Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual eeo program" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

EEO Annual Training | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Annual Training | National Nuclear Security Administration Annual Training | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog EEO Annual Training Home > About Us > Our Operations > Management and Budget > Office of Civil Rights > EEO Annual Training EEO Annual Training OCR's mission: Promote and advocate Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action

2

EEO and Diversity Program  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

EEO and Diversity Program EEO and Diversity Program EEO and Diversity: Collaborating for Mission Success Solutions to Workplace Conflict: What Mediation Can Do for You! FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT MEDIATION On October 27, 2006, the EEO and Diversity Program sponsored a panel presentation on the mediation program for all Service Center complex employees. Also, a session was held for the Service Center Leadership Team on November 15, 2006. At the end of the panel presentations, audience members were able to ask questions about the mediation program. If you would like to review the DVD of the presentation, contact the EEO and Diversity Program Office at (505) 845-5517 or by email at EEODiversityOffice@doeal.gov * What kinds of issues can be mediated? * How does one prepare for mediation?

3

EEO Management Plan 20072010 September 2007 1  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

EEO Management Plan 2007­2010 September 2007 1 EEO Management Plan 2007-2010 Part 9A of the Anti-Discrimination Act (1977) and the Equal Opportunity for Women in the Workplace Act 1999, the EEO Management Plan awarded annually by EOWA) CDPS Cultural Diversity Priorities Statement HRS Human Resource Services ODU

Dunstan, Neil

4

Civil Rights EEO  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Components Services - Civil RightsEEO: Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR): Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) acknowledges that conflict is a natural product of people...

5

EEO Links | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Links | National Nuclear Security Administration Links | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog EEO Links Home > About Us > Our Operations > Management and Budget > Office of Civil Rights > EEO Links EEO Links DOE Office of Civil Rights (weblink) Department Of Justice Civil Rights Division (weblink) Department of Veterans Affairs (weblink)

6

EEO Complaints Information for Managers | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Information for Managers | National Nuclear Security Information for Managers | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog EEO Complaints Information for Managers Home > About Us > Our Operations > Management and Budget > Office of Civil Rights > EEO Complaints Information for Managers EEO Complaints Information for Managers

7

CANCER PROGRAM ANNUAL REPORT CANCER PROGRAM  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

CANCER PROGRAM ANNUAL REPORT CANCER PROGRAM 2010 ANNUAL REPORT WITH STATISTICAL DATA FROM 2009 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS MEDICAL CENTER #12;2 CANCER PROGRAM ANNUAL REPORT 2 #12;3 CANCER PROGRAM ANNUAL REPORT 3 UIMC CANCER PROGRAM CHANGING MULTIDISCIPLINARY CARE. FOR GOOD. #12;4 CANCER PROGRAM ANNUAL REPORT

Illinois at Chicago, University of

8

EEO Complaint Process EEO Complaint Process INFORMAL PROCESS...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Employment Opportunity: Collaborating For Mission Success EEO POLICY The Department of Energy (DOE) does not discriminate on the basis of age, color, race, disability (physical...

9

EEO Plans and Reports | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Plans and Reports | National Nuclear Security Administration Plans and Reports | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog EEO Plans and Reports Home > About Us > Our Operations > Management and Budget > Office of Civil Rights > EEO Plans and Reports EEO Plans and Reports FY 13 Disabled Veterans Affirmative Action Program Report (pdf, 668kb)

10

EEO Complaint Process EEO Complaint Process INFORMAL PROCESS-COUNSELING  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Complaint Process Complaint Process EEO Complaint Process INFORMAL PROCESS-COUNSELING National Nuclear Security Administration Office of Civil Rights Equal Employment Opportunity: Collaborating For Mission Success EEO POLICY The Department of Energy (DOE) does not discriminate on the basis of age, color, race, disability (physical or mental), national origin, reprisal, religion, sex (including sexual harassment), sexual orientation, genetic information or any other non-merit factor. DOE is committed to equal employment opportunity principles and practices in all management decisions and personnel practices. The Department is committed to providing equal employment opportunity; eliminating discrimination in employment; and maintaining an environment that

11

Director's Discretionary Research and Development Program, Annual...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Director's Discretionary Research and Development Program, Annual Report FY 2007 Director's Discretionary Research and Development Program, Annual Report FY 2007 Draft...

12

Technology Innovation Program 2010ANNUAL REPORT  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Technology Innovation Program 2010ANNUAL REPORT 2010ANNUAL REPORT Technology Innovation ProgramTechnology Innovation ProgramTechnology Innovation ProgramTechnology Innovation ProgramTechnology Innovation ProgramTechnology Innovation ProgramTechnology Innovation ProgramTechnology Innovation ProgramTechnology Innovation ProgramTechnology

13

2012 Annual Report Research Reactor Infrastructure Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The content of this report is the 2012 Annual Report for the Research Reactor Infrastructure Program.

Douglas Morrell

2012-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

14

1982 laser program annual report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This annual report covers the following eight sections: (1) laser program review, (2) laser systems and operation, (3) target design, (4) target fabrication, (5) fusion experiments program, (6) Zeus laser project, (7) laser research and development, and (8) energy applications. (MOW)

Hendricks, C.D.; Grow, G.R. (eds.)

1983-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

15

Geothermal Technologies Program Annual Peer Review Presentation...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Annual Peer Review Presentation By Doug Hollett Geothermal Technologies Program Annual Peer Review Presentation By Doug Hollett 2012 Peer Review presentation by Doug Hollett,...

16

EEO PRECOMPLAINT COUNSELING INTAKE FORM  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NATIONAL ORIGIN (SPECIFY) SEX ( ) FEMALE ( ) MALE DISABILITY ( ) MENTAL ( ) PHYSICAL AGE (SPECIFY DATE OF BIRTH) REPRISAL (List prior EEO activity, case number if known, and date of activity) GENETIC INFORMATION PREGNANCY SEXUAL ORIENTATION STATUS AS A PARENT - 2 - ISSUE(S) IN THE COMPLAINT (CHECK APPROPRIATE BOX/BOXES) NONSELECTION AWARDS RETIREMENT DETAIL TIME AND ATTENDANCE SUSPENSION REASSIGNMENT SEPARATION/TERMINATION DUTY HOURS REPRIMAND PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SEXUAL HARASSMENT ASSIGNMENT OF DUTIES WORK CONDITIONS OTHER (SPECIFY) PART 3. EVENT INFORMATION: PROVIDE A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF EACH ALLEGED DISCRIMINATORY INCIDENT, INCLUDING THE SPECIFIC DATE OF THE INCIDENT,

17

EEO PRECOMPLAINT COUNSELING INTAKE FORM  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NATIONAL ORIGIN (SPECIFY) NATIONAL ORIGIN (SPECIFY) SEX ( ) FEMALE ( ) MALE DISABILITY ( ) MENTAL ( ) PHYSICAL AGE (SPECIFY DATE OF BIRTH) REPRISAL (List prior EEO activity, case number if known, and date of activity) GENETIC INFORMATION PREGNANCY SEXUAL ORIENTATION STATUS AS A PARENT - 2 - ISSUE(S) IN THE COMPLAINT (CHECK APPROPRIATE BOX/BOXES) NONSELECTION AWARDS RETIREMENT DETAIL TIME AND ATTENDANCE SUSPENSION REASSIGNMENT SEPARATION/TERMINATION DUTY HOURS REPRIMAND PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SEXUAL HARASSMENT ASSIGNMENT OF DUTIES WORK CONDITIONS OTHER (SPECIFY) PART 3. EVENT INFORMATION: PROVIDE A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF EACH ALLEGED DISCRIMINATORY INCIDENT, INCLUDING THE SPECIFIC DATE OF THE INCIDENT,

18

CIEE 1993 annual conference: Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The California Institute for Energy efficiency`s third annual conference highlights the results of CIEE-sponsored multiyear research in three programs: Building Energy Efficiency, Air Quality Impacts of Energy Efficiency, and End-Use Resource Planning. Results from scoping studies, Director`s discretionary research, and exploratory research are also featured.

Not Available

1993-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

19

eeo  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

9%2A en Reasonable Accommodations http:nnsa.energy.govaboutusouroperationsmanagementandbudgetcivrightsaccommodations

20

Fermilab Legal Office - Ethics Program - Annual Reminders  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Resources Links Documents FRA Contract Modification No. M009 Modification No. M024 Ethics Program Ask the Ethicist Submit a Question Contact Us Annual Reminders Reporting Fraud...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual eeo program" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

4 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review Proceedings Available Online 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review Proceedings Available Online...

22

Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Overview: 2014 Annual Merit Review...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Overview: 2014 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Overview: 2014 Annual Merit Review and Peer...

23

Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Overview: 2012 Annual Merit Review...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Overview: 2012 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Overview: 2012 Annual Merit Review and Peer...

24

Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Overview: 2012 Annual Merit Review...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Program Overview: 2012 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Overview: 2012 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting...

25

Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Overview: 2011 Annual Merit Review...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Overview: 2011 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Overview: 2011 Annual Merit Review and Peer...

26

Environmental Planning and Ecology Program Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The annual program report provides detailed information about all aspects of the Sandia National Laboratories, California (SNL/CA) Environmental Planning and Ecology Program for a given calendar year. It functions as supporting documentation to the SNL/CA Environmental Management System Program Manual. The program report describes the activities undertaken during the past year, and activities planned in future years to implement the Planning and Ecology Program, one of six programs that supports environmental management at SNL/CA.

Larsen, Barbara L.

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

27

Director's Discretionary Research and Development Program, Annual Report FY 2007  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

Director's Discretionary Research and Development Program, Annual Report FY 2007 May 2007 Final Draft.

28

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Federal Facility Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports and Performance on AddThis.com... Requirements by Subject

29

Fuel Cell Technologies Program Overview: 2010 Annual Merit Review...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Overview: 2010 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting Fuel Cell Technologies Program Overview: 2010 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting Presentation by Richard...

30

Laser program annual report, 1979  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This volume provides a program overview, presenting highlights of the technical accomplishments of the elements of the program, as well as discussions of program resources and facilities. Also covered are the work of the Solid-State Laser program element, which includes systems operations, Nova, and research and development activities. (MOW)

Coleman, L.W.; Strack, J.R. (eds.)

1980-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

31

Methane Hydrate Program Annual Report to Congress  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

FY 2010 FY 2010 Methane Hydrate Program Annual Report to Congress September 2011 U.S. Department of ENERGY United States Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 Department of Energy | September 2011 FY 2010 Methane Hydrate Program Annual Report to Congress | Page 2 Message from the Secretary Section 968 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 requires the Department of Energy to submit to Congress an annual report on the results of methane hydrate research. I am pleased to submit the enclosed report entitled, U.S. Department of Energy FY 2010 Methane Hydrate Program Report to Congress. The report was prepared by the Department of Energy's Office of Fossil Energy and summarizes the progress being made in this important area of

32

Laser program annual report, 1980  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Volume 1 provides a Program Overview, presenting highlights of the technical accomplishments of the elements of the Program, a summary of activities carried out under the Glass Laser Experiments Lead Laboratory Program, as well as discussions of Program resources and facilities. Section 2, also in the first volume, covers the work on solid state Nd:glass lasers, including systems operations, Nova and Novette system development, and supporting research and development activities.

Coleman, L.W.; Krupke, W.F.; Strack, J.R. (eds.)

1981-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

33

Requested Amount: $7 million annually PROGRAM DESCRIPTION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Requested Amount: $7 million annually PROGRAM DESCRIPTION Goals are to increase the level of fire protection to the citizens of Texas and to decrease the level of losses (in lives and property) from wildfires, thereby enhancing the quality of life for Texans. The Texas Wildfire Protection Plan (TWPP

34

Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Presents Annual Merit Review Awards  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The USDOE's Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program presented its annual awards at the 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on June 17.

35

2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Progress Report...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Progress Report Posted 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Progress Report Posted November 10, 2014 - 5:25pm Addthis The...

36

2013 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review...  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

3 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report Posted 2013 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report...

37

2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

4 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report Posted 2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report...

38

NNSA's holds Stewardship Science Academic Programs Annual Review...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

NNSA's holds Stewardship Science Academic Programs Annual Review Symposium | National Nuclear Security Administration People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation...

39

FY 2014 Annual Progress Report- Electric Drive Technologies Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

FY 2014 Annual Progress Report for the Electric Drive Technologies Program of the Vehicle Technologies Office, DOE/EE-1163

40

2014 Annual Merit Review Results Report - Project and Program...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

Project and Program Statistical Calculations Overview 2014 Annual Merit Review Results Report - Project and Program Statistical Calculations Overview Merit review of DOE Vehicle...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual eeo program" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Laser Program annual report, 1985  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This volume presents the unclassified activities and accomplishments of the Inertial Confinement Fusion and Advanced Laser Development elements of the Laser Program at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory for the calendar year 1985. This report has been organized into major sections that correspond to our principal technical activities. Section 1 provides an overview. Section 2 comprises work in target theory, design, and code development. Target development and fabrication and the related topics in materials science are contained in Section 3. Section 4 presents work in experiments and diagnostics and includes developments in data acquisition and management capabilities. In Section 5 laser system (Nova) operation and maintenance are discussed. Activities related to supporting laser and optical technologies are described in Section 6. Basic laser research and development is reported in Section 7. Section 8 contains the results of studies in ICF applications where the work reported deals principally with the production of electric power with ICF. Finally, Section 9 is a comprehensive discussion of work to date on solid state lasers for average power applications. Individual sections, two through nine, have been cataloged separately.

Rufer, M.L.; Murphy, P.W. (eds.)

1986-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

42

Photovoltaic Program Branch annual report, FY 1989  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report summarizes the progress of the Photovoltaic (PV) Program Branch of the Solar Energy Research Institute (SERI) from October 1, 1988, through September 30, 1989. The branch is responsible for managing the subcontracted portion of SERI's PV Advanced Research and Development Project. In fiscal year (FY) 1989, this included nearly 50 subcontracts, with a total annualized funding of approximately $13.1 million. Approximately two-thirds of the subcontracts were with universities, at a total funding of nearly $4 million. The six technical sections of the report cover the main areas of the subcontracted program: Amorphous Silicon Research, Polycrystalline Thin Films, Crystalline Silicon Materials Research, High-Efficiency Concepts, New Ideas, and University Participation. Technical summaries of each of the subcontracted programs provide a discussion of approaches, major accomplishments in FY 1989, and future research directions. Each report will be cataloged individually.

Summers, K A [ed.

1990-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

43

Sandia National Laboratories, California Hazardous Materials Management Program annual report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The annual program report provides detailed information about all aspects of the Sandia National Laboratories, California (SNL/CA) Hazardous Materials Management Program. It functions as supporting documentation to the SNL/CA Environmental Management System Program Manual. This program annual report describes the activities undertaken during the calender past year, and activities planned in future years to implement the Hazardous Materials Management Program, one of six programs that supports environmental management at SNL/CA.

Brynildson, Mark E.

2011-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

44

2012 Former Worker Medical Screening Program Annual Report | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Information Center » Worker » Former Worker Program » 2012 Information Center » Worker » Former Worker Program » 2012 Former Worker Medical Screening Program Annual Report 2012 Former Worker Medical Screening Program Annual Report February 2013 The 2012 Annual Report presents a detailed overview of the accomplishments, progress, and future endeavors of the U.S. Department of Energy Former Worker Medical Screening Program. The report describes how the program is implemented, what organizations are involved in the medical screening efforts, and what the medical findings have been to date. 2012 Former Worker Medical Screening Program Annual Report More Documents & Publications Former Worker Program Medical Protocol Former Worker Medical Screening Program Brochure Former Worker Program Brochure DOE Technical Standards Program

45

2012 Annual Progress Report: DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program  

Fuel Cell Technologies Publication and Product Library (EERE)

The 2012 Annual Progress Report summarizes fiscal year 2012 activities and accomplishments by projects funded by the DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program.

46

Environmental research program: FY 1987, annual report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This multidisciplinary research program includes fundamental and applied research in physics, chemistry, engineering, and biology, as well as research on the development of advanced methods of measurement and analysis. The Program's Annual Report contains summaries of research performed during FY 1987 in the areas of atmospheric aerosols, flue gas chemistry, combustion, membrane bioenergetics, and analytical chemistry. The main research interests of the Atmospheric Aerosol Research group concern the chemical and physical processes that occur in haze, clouds, and fogs. For their studies, the group is developing novel analytical and research methods for characterizing aerosol species. Aerosol research is performed in the laboratory and in the field. Studies of smoke emissions from fires and their possible effects on climatic change, especially as related to nuclear winter, are an example of the collaboration between the Atmospheric Aerosol Research and Combustion Research Groups.

Not Available

1988-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

47

2013 Former Worker Medical Screening Program Annual Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

2013 Former Worker Medical Screening Program (FWP) Annual Report highlighting the accomplishments of this program, which provides critical services to those who served and sacrificed through their work in the Department and its predecessor agencies.

48

Former Worker Medical Screening Program 2012 Annual Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Published February 2013 Published February 2013 Pu Pu Publ b blis s ishe he hed d d Fe Fe Febr br brua ua u ry ry 2 201 013 3 FORMER WORKER MEDICAL SCREENING PROGRAM ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL REPORT 2 0 1 2 STC STONETURN CONSULTANTS 2012 Former Worker Medical Screening Program * i Table of Contents Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................................iii Foreword .................................................................................................................................................... v Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................

49

Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) 2004 Annual Plan  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Technical Capalbility Program Federal Technical Capalbility Program Fiscal Year (FY) 2004 Annual Plan November 20,2003 FTCP Annual Plan. FY 2004 INTRODUCTION The objective of the Federal Technical Capability Program (Program) is to recruit, deploy, develop, and retain Federal personnel with the necessary technical capabilities to safely accomplish the Department's missions and responsibilities. The current Program was formalized in 1998 through Department directives DOE P 426.1, Federal Technical Capability Program for Defense Nuclear Facilities, and DOE M 426. l-l, Federal Technical Capability Manual. The Federal Technical Capability Panel (FTCP) provides leadership in implementing the Program. The FTCP consists of senior technical safety managers representing nuclear facilities,

50

Buildings Energy Program annual report, FY 1991  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Buildings Energy Program at PNL conducts research and development (R&D) for DOE`s Office of Building Technologies (OBT). The OBT`s mission is to lead a national program supporting private and federal sector efforts to improve the energy efficiency of the nation`s buildings and to increase the use of renewable energy sources. Under an arrangement with DOE, Battelle staff also conduct research and development projects for other federal agencies and private clients. This annual report contains an account of the buildings-related research projects conducted at PNL during fiscal year (FY) 1991. A major focus of PNL`s energy projects is to improve the energy efficiency of commercial and residential buildings. Researchers who are developing solutions to energy-use problems view a building as an energy-using system. From this perspective, a desirable solution is not only one that is cost-effective and responsive to the needs of the occupants, but also one that optimizes the interaction among the energy components and systems that compose the whole.

Secrest, T.J.

1992-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

51

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting June 16, 2014...

52

NNSA Service Center EEO and Diversity Office FY 2009 Year-End...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

and Diversity Office uses a four color-coded system to measure EEO complaint activity: Green (successful); Bright Yellow (successful with a written extension); Pale Yellow...

53

Sandia National Laboratories California Environmental Monitoring Program Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The annual program report provides detailed information about all aspects of the SNL/CA Environmental Monitoring Program for a given calendar year. It functions as supporting documentation to the SNL/CA Environmental Management System Program Manual. The 2006 program report describes the activities undertaken during the past year, and activities planned in future years to implement the Environmental Monitoring Program, one of six programs that supports environmental management at SNL/CA.

Holland, Robert C.

2007-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

54

Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) 2005 Annual Plan  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Technical Capability Program Fiscal Year (FY) 2005 Annual Plan January 15, 2005 FTCP Annual Plan, FY 2005 INTRODUCTION The objective of the Federal Technical Capability Program (Program) is to recruit, deploy, develop, and retain Federal personnel with the necessary technical capabilities to safely accomplish the U.S. Department of Energy (also known as the "Department" or DOE) missions and responsibilities. The current Program was formalized in 1998 through Department directives DOE Policy 426.1, Federal Technical Capability Program for Defense Nuclear Facilities, and DOE Manual (M) 426.1-1A, Federal Technical Capability Manual. The Federal Technical Capability Panel (FTCP) provides leadership in implementing the

55

2009 Voluntary Protection Programs Participants' Association (VPPPA) Presentation: Conducting your Annual VPP Self Assessment  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

2009 Voluntary Protection Programs Participants' Association (VPPPA) Presentation: Conducting your Annual VPP Self Assessment

56

Hydrogen, Fuel Cells and Infrastructure Technologies Program: 2002 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The Department of Energys Hydrogen, Fuel Cells and Infrastructure Technologies programs 2002 annual progress report.

57

2013 Former Worker Medical Screening Program Annual Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The 2013 Annual Report presents a detailed overview of the accomplishments, progress, and future endeavors of the U.S. Department of Energy Former Worker Medical Screening Program. The report describes how the program is implemented, what organizations are involved in the medical screening efforts, and what the medical findings have been to date.

58

Nonproliferation Graduate Fellowship Program, Annual Report, Class of 2012  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This 32-pp annual report/brochure describes the accomplishments of the Class of 2012 of the Nonproliferation Graduate Fellowship Program (the last class of this program), which PNNL administers for the National Nuclear Security Administration. The time period covers Sept 2011 through June 2013.

McMakin, Andrea H.

2013-09-23T23:59:59.000Z

59

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Facility Annual Energy Reports  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Annual Energy Reports and Performance Annual Energy Reports and Performance Published Annual Reports Visit the FEMP Library to search for read FEMP Annual Reports to Congress on Federal Government Energy Management. For more information, contact Chris Tremper. The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) offers information and data sets illustrating Federal agencies' annual progress in meeting facility energy goals. Additional detail about each agency's performance can be found in their Strategic Sustainability Performance Plans on the Performance.Gov website. Federal Facility Efficiency Investment and Progress toward Sustainability Goals: Get an overview of Federal progress made in facility energy management and sustainability based on preliminary fiscal year (FY) 2012 reported findings. (For facility-level data reported under Section 432 of EISA, see EISA CTS Reports and Data.)

60

McGill Cancer NutritionRehabilitation Program Annual Report 2009 AAPPPPEENNDDIIXX II  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

McGill Cancer NutritionRehabilitation Program Annual Report 2009 AAPPPPEENNDDIIXX II CCLLIINNIICCAALL AACCTTIIVVIITTYY McGill Cancer NutritionRehabilitation Program Statistics for January;McGill Cancer NutritionRehabilitation Program Annual Report 2009 AAPPPPEENNDDIIXX IIII

Barthelat, Francois

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual eeo program" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Chemical and biological nonproliferation program. FY99 annual report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document is the first of what will become an annual report documenting the progress made by the Chemical and Biological Nonproliferation Program (CBNP). It is intended to be a summary of the program's activities that will be of interest to both policy and technical audiences. This report and the annual CBNP Summer Review Meeting are important vehicles for communication with the broader chemical and biological defense and nonproliferation communities. The Chemical and Biological Nonproliferation Program Strategic Plan is also available and provides additional detail on the program's context and goals. The body of the report consists of an overview of the program's philosophy, goals and recent progress in the major program areas. In addition, an appendix is provided with more detailed project summaries that will be of interest to the technical community.

NONE

2000-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

62

Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) 2003 Annual Plan  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Technical Capability Program FY 2003 Annual Plan Washington, D.C. 20585 September 2002 FTCP FY 2003 Annual Action Plan INTRODUCTION The U.S. Department of Energy's Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP) provides management direction to assist the Federal workforce in maintaining necessary technical competencies to safely operate its defense nuclear facilities. The Federal Technical Capability Panel (Panel) consists of senior technical safety managers representing nuclear facilities, and reports to the Deputy Secretary for workforce safety technical capabilities' matters. The Panel will continue to pursue progress in the following areas: 1. Continued development of senior management commitment and support for the technical intern

63

Introduction; DOE Hydrogen Program FY 2009 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

9 Annual Progress Report 9 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen Program The DOE Hydrogen Program (the Program) has conducted comprehensive and focused efforts to enable the widespread commercialization of fuel cells in diverse sectors of the economy. With emphasis on applications that will most effectively strengthen our nation's energy security and improve our stewardship of the environment, the Program engages in research, development, and demonstration (RD&D) of critical improvements in the technologies, as well as diverse activities to overcome economic and institutional obstacles to commercialization. The Program addresses the full range of barriers facing the development and deployment of fuel cell technologies by integrating basic and applied research, technology development and demonstration, and other supporting activities. In

64

Introduction, excerpt from 2007 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7 Annual Progress Report 7 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen Program The DOE Hydrogen Program is a comprehensive and focused effort launched in fiscal year (FY) 2004 to implement the President's Hydrogen Fuel Initiative. The Program addresses the full range of barriers facing the development and deployment of hydrogen and fuel cell technologies. The mission of the Program is to research, develop, and validate hydrogen production, storage, and fuel cell technologies and to overcome the non-technical barriers to the commercialization of these technologies-with the ultimate goals of reducing oil use and carbon emissions in the transportation sector and enabling clean, reliable energy for stationary and portable power generation. The Hydrogen Program is a coordinated effort that integrates basic and applied research,

65

Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) 2004 Annual Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Technical Capability Program Federal Technical Capability Program Annual Report to the Secretary of Energy for Fiscal Year 2004 2 Federal Technical Capability Program Annual Report to the Secretary of Energy for Fiscal Year 2004 Introduction The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is committed to ensuring that employees are trained and technically capable of performing their duties. In pursuit of this objective, the Secretary of Energy issued DOE Policy 426.1, Federal Technical Capability Policy for Defense Nuclear Facilities, to institutionalize the Federal Technical Capability Program (FTCP). This program specifically applies to those offices and organizations performing functions related to the safe operation of defense nuclear facilities, including the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA).

66

2007 Heavy Vehicle Systems Optimization Program Annual Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

HEAVY VEHiclE SYSTEMS HEAVY VEHiclE SYSTEMS OPTiMiZATiON PROGRAM V EH icl E T E c HNO l OG i ES P ROGRAM Less dependence on foreign oil today, and transition to a petroleum-free, emissions-free vehicle tomorrow. 2 0 0 7 a n n u a l p r o g r e s s r e p o r t U.S. Department of Energy Vehicle Technologies Program 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20585-0121 FY 2007 Annual Progress Report for Heavy Vehicle Systems Optimization Program Submitted to: U.S. Department of Energy Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Vehicle Technologies Program Advanced Vehicle Technology Analysis and Evaluation Lee Slezak, Technology Manager Heavy Vehicle Systems Optimization Program FY 2007 Annual Report CONTENTS I. AERODYNAMIC DRAG REDUCTION ........................................................................... 1

67

NREL photovoltaic program FY 1997 annual report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report summarizes the in-house and subcontracted research and development (R and D) activities under the NREL PV Program from October 1, 1996, through September 30, 1997 (FY 1997). The NREL PV Program is part of the US Department of Energy`s (DOE`s) National Photovoltaics Program, as described in the DOE National Photovoltaics Program Plan for 1996--2000. The FY 1997 budget authority for carrying out the NREL PV Program was $39.3 million in operating funds and $0.4 million in capital equipment funds. Subcontract activities represent a major part of the NREL PV Program, with $21.8 million (55% of PV funds) going to some 84 subcontractors. Cost sharing by industry added almost $8.8 million to the subcontract R and D activities with industry.

McConnell, R.D.; Hansen, A.; Smoller, S.

1998-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

68

NETL Publications: Carbon Storage Program Infrastructure Annual Review  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Carbon Storage Program Infrastructure Annual Review Meeting Carbon Storage Program Infrastructure Annual Review Meeting November 15-17, 2011 Table of Contents Disclaimer Presentations PRESENTATIONS Tuesday, November 15, 2011 Welcoming Remarks [PDF-2.18MB] Sean Plasynski, DOE/NETL Keynote Session 1 - Regulatory Issues Moderator: Traci Rodosta, DOE/NETL EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program: Geological Sequestration and Injection of Carbon Dioxide [PDF-604KB] Mark Defigueiredo, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Update on Implementation of EPA's Class VI GS Program [PDF-420KB] Bruce Kobelski, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency CCS on the OCS: Sub-Seabed Geologic CO2 Sequestration Authorities and Ongoing Actions Covering the Outer Continental Shelf [PDF-MB] Melissa Batum, , U. S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation, and Enforcement

69

Price-Anderson Nuclear Safety Enforcement Program. 1996 Annual report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This first annual report on DOE`s Price Anderson Amendments Act enforcement program covers the activities, accomplishments, and planning for calendar year 1996. It also includes the infrastructure development activities of 1995. It encompasses the activities of the headquarters` Office of Enforcement in the Office of Environment, Safety and Health (EH) and Investigation and the coordinators and technical advisors in DOE`s Field and Program Offices and other EH Offices. This report includes an overview of the enforcement program; noncompliances, investigations, and enforcement actions; summary of significant enforcement actions; examples where enforcement action was deferred; and changes and improvements to the program.

NONE

1996-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

70

Sandia National Laboratories, California Pollution Prevention Program annual report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The annual program report provides detailed information about all aspects of the SNL/CA Pollution Prevention Program for a given calendar year. It functions as supporting documentation to the SNL/CA Environmental Management System Program Manual. The program report describes the activities undertaken during the past year, and activities planned in future years to implement the Pollution Prevention Program, one of six programs that supports environmental management at SNL/CA. Pollution Prevention supports the goals and objectives to increase the procurement and use of environmentally friendly products and materials and minimize the generation of waste (nonhazardous, hazardous, radiological, wastewater). Through participation on the Interdisciplinary Team P2 provides guidance for integration of environmentally friendly purchasing and waste minimization requirements into projects during the planning phase. Table 7 presents SNL's corporate objectives and targets that support the elements of the Pollution Prevention program.

Harris, Janet S.

2011-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

71

SOLAR ENERGY PROGRAM: CHAPTER FROM THE ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT ANNUAL REPORT 1979  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

SOLAR ENERGY PROGRAM CHAPTER FROM THE ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT ANNUAL REPORT 1979 October 1980 TWO-WEEK LOAN

Authors, Various

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

72

Energy Analysis Program. 1992 Annual report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Program became deeply involved in establishing 4 Washington, D.C., project office diving the last few months of fiscal year 1942. This project office, which reports to the Energy & Environment Division, will receive the majority of its support from the Energy Analysis Program. We anticipate having two staff scientists and support personnel in offices within a few blocks of DOE. Our expectation is that this office will carry out a series of projects that are better managed closer to DOE. We also anticipate that our representation in Washington will improve and we hope to expand the Program, its activities, and impact, in police-relevant analyses. In spite of the growth that we have achieved, the Program continues to emphasize (1) energy efficiency of buildings, (2) appliance energy efficiency standards, (3) energy demand forecasting, (4) utility policy studies, especially integrated resource planning issues, and (5) international energy studies, with considerate emphasis on developing countries and economies in transition. These continuing interests are reflected in the articles that appear in this report.

Not Available

1993-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

73

Sandia National Laboratories, California Chemical Management Program annual report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The annual program report provides detailed information about all aspects of the Sandia National Laboratories, California (SNL/CA) Chemical Management Program. It functions as supporting documentation to the SNL/CA Environmental Management System Program Manual. This program annual report describes the activities undertaken during the calender past year, and activities planned in future years to implement the Chemical Management Program, one of six programs that supports environmental management at SNL/CA. SNL/CA is responsible for tracking chemicals (chemical and biological materials), providing Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) and for regulatory compliance reporting according to a variety of chemical regulations. The principal regulations for chemical tracking are the Emergency Planning Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) and the California Right-to-Know regulations. The regulations, the Hazard Communication/Lab Standard of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) are also key to the CM Program. The CM Program is also responsible for supporting chemical safety and information requirements for a variety of Integrated Enabling Services (IMS) programs primarily the Industrial Hygiene, Waste Management, Fire Protection, Air Quality, Emergency Management, Environmental Monitoring and Pollution Prevention programs. The principal program tool is the Chemical Information System (CIS). The system contains two key elements: the MSDS library and the chemical container-tracking database that is readily accessible to all Members of the Sandia Workforce. The primary goal of the CM Program is to ensure safe and effective chemical management at Sandia/CA. This is done by efficiently collecting and managing chemical information for our customers who include Line, regulators, DOE and ES and H programs to ensure compliance with regulations and to streamline customer business processes that require chemical information.

Brynildson, Mark E.

2012-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

74

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2008 Annual Progress Report -  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Education Education Printable Version 2008 Annual Progress Report IX. Education This section of the 2008 Progress Report for the DOE Hydrogen Program focuses on education. Each technical report is available as an individual Adobe Acrobat PDF. Download Adobe Reader. Education Sub-Program Overview, Christy Cooper, U.S. Department of Energy (PDF 181 KB) Hydrogen Knowledge and Opinions Assessment, Rick Schmoyer, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (PDF 257 KB) Hydrogen Safety: First Responder Education, Marylynn Placet, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PDF 270 KB) Hydrogen Education for Code Officials, Melanie Caton, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (PDF 261 KB) Increasing "H2IQ": A Public Information Program , Henry Gentenaar, The Media Network (PDF 70 KB)

75

Superconducting technology program: Sandia 1995 annual report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Sandia`s STP program is a thallium-based high-temperature superconductor (HTS) research and development program consisting of efforts in powder synthesis and process development, open-system thick film conductor development, wire and tape fabrication, and HTS motor design. The objective of this work is to develop high-temperature superconducting conductors (wire and tape) capable of meeting requirements for high-power electrical devices of interest to industry. The research efforts currently underway are: (1) process development and characterization of thallium-based high-temperature superconducting closed system wire and tape; (2) investigation of the synthesis and processing of thallium-based thick films using two-zone processing; and (3) cryogenic design of a 30K superconducting motor. This report outlines the research that has been performed during FY95 in each of these areas.

Roth, E.P. [Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (United States). Superconductivity Materials and Technology Dept.

1996-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

76

Superconducting technology program Sandia 1996 annual report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Sandia`s Superconductivity Technology Program is a thallium-based high-temperature superconductor (HTS) research and development program consisting of efforts in powder synthesis and process development, open-system thick film conductor development, wire and tape fabrication, and HTS motor design. The objective of this work is to develop high-temperature superconducting conductors (wire and tape) capable of meeting requirements for high-power electrical devices of interest to industry. The research efforts currently underway are: (1) Process development and characterization of thallium-based high-temperature superconducting closed system wire and tape, (2) Investigation of the synthesis and processing of thallium-based thick films using two-zone processing, and (3) Cryogenic design of a 30K superconducting motor. This report outlines the research that has been performed during FY96 in each of these areas.

Roth, E.P.

1997-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

77

Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) 2002 Annual Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

S. Department of Energy S. Department of Energy Federal Technical Capability Panel FY 2002 Annual Report to the Secretary of Energy on the Status of Federal Technical Capability Related to the Safe Operation of Defense Nuclear Facilities Washington, D.C. 20585 JUNE 1, 2001 to MAY 31, 2002 FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PANEL ANNUAL REPORT ON THE STATUS OF FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY RELATED TO THE SAFE OPERATIONS OF DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES This is the fourth Annual Report issued by the Federal Technical Capability Panel (FTCP). This report covers the period from June 1, 2001, to May 31, 2002, and summarizes the status of the federal technical capability program in the Department. It identifies accomplishments, issues, and recommendations as appropriate.

78

ANNUAL RADIOACTIVE WASTE TANK INSPECTION PROGRAM 2010  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Aqueous radioactive wastes from Savannah River Site (SRS) separations and vitrification processes are contained in large underground carbon steel tanks. Inspections made during 2010 to evaluate these vessels and other waste handling facilities along with evaluations based on data from previous inspections are the subject of this report. The 2010 inspection program revealed that the structural integrity and waste confinement capability of the Savannah River Site waste tanks were maintained. All inspections scheduled per SRR-LWE-2009-00138, HLW Tank Farm Inspection Plan for 2010, were completed. Ultrasonic measurements (UT) performed in 2010 met the requirements of C-ESG-00006, In-Service Inspection Program for High Level Waste Tanks, Rev. 3, and WSRC-TR-2002-00061, Rev.6. UT inspections were performed on Tanks 30, 31 and 32 and the findings are documented in SRNL-STI-2010-00533, Tank Inspection NDE Results for Fiscal Year 2010, Waste Tanks 30, 31 and 32. A total of 5824 photographs were made and 1087 visual and video inspections were performed during 2010. Ten new leaksites at Tank 5 were identified in 2010. The locations of these leaksites are documented in C-ESR-G-00003, SRS High Level Waste Tank Leaksite Information, Rev.5. Ten leaksites at Tank 5 were documented during tank wall/annulus cleaning activities. None of these new leaksites resulted in a release to the environment. The leaksites were documented during wall cleaning activities and the waste nodules associated with the leaksites were washed away. Previously documented leaksites were reactivated at Tank 12 during waste removal activities.

West, B.; Waltz, R.

2011-06-23T23:59:59.000Z

79

ANNUAL RADIOACTIVE WASTE TANK INSPECTION PROGRAM 2009  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Aqueous radioactive wastes from Savannah River Site (SRS) separations and vitrification processes are contained in large underground carbon steel tanks. Inspections made during 2009 to evaluate these vessels and other waste handling facilities along with evaluations based on data from previous inspections are the subject of this report. The 2009 inspection program revealed that the structural integrity and waste confinement capability of the Savannah River Site waste tanks were maintained. All inspections scheduled per LWO-LWE-2008-00423, HLW Tank Farm Inspection Plan for 2009, were completed. All Ultrasonic measurements (UT) performed in 2009 met the requirements of C-ESG-00006, In-Service Inspection Program for High Level Waste Tanks, Rev. 1, and WSRC-TR-2002-00061, Rev.4. UT inspections were performed on Tank 29 and the findings are documented in SRNL-STI-2009-00559, Tank Inspection NDE Results for Fiscal Year 2009, Waste Tank 29. Post chemical cleaning UT measurements were made in Tank 6 and the results are documented in SRNL-STI-2009-00560, Tank Inspection NDE Results Tank 6, Including Summary of Waste Removal Support Activities in Tanks 5 and 6. A total of 6669 photographs were made and 1276 visual and video inspections were performed during 2009. Twenty-Two new leaksites were identified in 2009. The locations of these leaksites are documented in C-ESR-G-00003, SRS High Level Waste Tank Leaksite Information, Rev.4. Fifteen leaksites at Tank 5 were documented during tank wall/annulus cleaning activities. Five leaksites at Tank 6 were documented during tank wall/annulus cleaning activities. Two new leaksites were identified at Tank 19 during waste removal activities. Previously documented leaksites were reactivated at Tanks 5 and 12 during waste removal activities. Also, a very small amount of additional leakage from a previously identified leaksite at Tank 14 was observed.

West, B.; Waltz, R.

2010-06-21T23:59:59.000Z

80

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2012 Annual Progress Report -  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Manufacturing R&D Manufacturing R&D Printable Version 2012 Annual Progress Report VI. Manufacturing R&D This section of the 2012 Annual Progress Report for the DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program focuses on manufacturing R&D. Manufacturing R&D Sub-Program Overview, Nancy Garland, U.S. Department of Energy Fuel Cell Membrane Electrode Assembly Manufacturing R&D, Michael Ulsh, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Manufacturing of Low-Cost, Durable Membrane Electrode Assemblies Engineered for Rapid Conditioning, Colin Busby, W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Adaptive Process Controls and Ultrasonics for High-Temperature PEM MEA Manufacture, Dan Walczyk, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Non-Contact Sensor Evaluation for Bipolar Plate Manufacturing Process Control and Smart Assembly of Fuel Cell Stacks, Eric Stanfield,

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual eeo program" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Annual Coded Wire Tag Program; Oregon Stock Assessment, 2001 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This annual report is in fulfillment of contract obligations with Bonneville Power Administration which is the funding source for the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife project 'Annual Stock Assessment - Coded Wire Tag Program (ODFW)'. Results for the 2001 contract period: Objective 1--Over 1 million juvenile salmon were coded-wire by this program (Table 1); Objective 2--ODFW recovered and processed over 40,000 snout collected from coded-wire tagged fish (Table 2); Objective 3--Survival data is summarized below; Objective 4--The last group of VIE tagged coho was released in 2001 and returning coho were samples at Sandy Hatchery. This sampling showed only 1 of 1,160 returning coho VIE marked as juveniles retained the VIE mark as adults.

Lewis, Mark; Mallette, Christine; Murray, William

2002-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

82

Biomass Thermochemical Conversion Program. 1983 Annual report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Highlights of progress achieved in the program of thermochemical conversion of biomass into clean fuels during 1983 are summarized. Gasification research projects include: production of a medium-Btu gas without using purified oxygen at Battelle-Columbus Laboratories; high pressure (up to 500 psia) steam-oxygen gasification of biomass in a fluidized bed reactor at IGT; producing synthesis gas via catalytic gasification at PNL; indirect reactor heating methods at the Univ. of Missouri-Rolla and Texas Tech Univ.; improving the reliability, performance, and acceptability of small air-blown gasifiers at Univ. of Florida-Gainesville, Rocky Creek Farm Gasogens, and Cal Recovery Systems. Liquefaction projects include: determination of individual sequential pyrolysis mechanisms at SERI; research at SERI on a unique entrained, ablative fast pyrolysis reactor for supplying the heat fluxes required for fast pyrolysis; work at BNL on rapid pyrolysis of biomass in an atmosphere of methane to increase the yields of olefin and BTX products; research at the Georgia Inst. of Tech. on an entrained rapid pyrolysis reactor to produce higher yields of pyrolysis oil; research on an advanced concept to liquefy very concentrated biomass slurries in an integrated extruder/static mixer reactor at the Univ. of Arizona; and research at PNL on the characterization and upgrading of direct liquefaction oils including research to lower oxygen content and viscosity of the product. Combustion projects include: research on a directly fired wood combustor/gas turbine system at Aerospace Research Corp.; adaptation of Stirling engine external combustion systems to biomass fuels at United Stirling, Inc.; and theoretical modeling and experimental verification of biomass combustion behavior at JPL to increase biomass combustion efficiency and examine the effects of additives on combustion rates. 26 figures, 1 table.

Schiefelbein, G.F.; Stevens, D.J.; Gerber, M.A.

1984-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

83

ADA/EEO Talking Notes Slide 1-Welcome to the New Employee Orientation session presented by the Office of Equal  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

ADA/EEO Talking Notes Slide 1-Welcome to the New Employee Orientation session presented by the Office of Equal Opportunity & Compliance or EOC. Slide2-This overview will cover EEO, ADA, Retaliation in the workplace. Please direct any of your questions regarding today's overview directly to EOC. Slide 3-The

Weston, Ken

84

Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) 2007 Annual Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0. Box 5400 0. Box 5400 Albuquerque, NM 87185 .JUL 1 4 2008 MEMORANDUM FOR: Distribution FROM: SUBJECT: aren L. Boardman, Chairperson, Federal Technical Capability Panel Approval of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Calendar Year 2007 Annual Report - 08-NA SC-005 This memorandum forwards DOE Calendar Year 2007 Annual Report, which has been approved for publication and distribution. Attachments cc w/attachments: FTCPAgents E. White, NNSA SC R. McMorland, HS-1.1 G Mortensen, INPO Distribution: Acting Deputy Secretary Administrator, National Nuclear Security Administration (NA-1) Under Secretary (US) Under Secretary for Science (US-4) Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management (EM-1) Deputy Administiator for Defense Programs, NNSA (NA-10) Director, Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology (NE-1)

85

Federal Technical Capabilities Program (FTCP) 2008 Annual Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

MEMORANDUM FOR: Distribution FROM: Karen L. Boardman, Chairperson, Federal Technical Capability Panel SUBJECT: Approval of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Calendar Year 2008 Annual Report - 09-NA SC-008 This memorandum forwards DOE Calendar Year 2008 Annual Report, which has been approved for publication and distribution. Attachments cc w/attachments: FTCP Agents E. White, NNSA SC R. McMorland, HS-1.1 G. Mortensen, INPO Distribution: Acting Deputy Secretary Administrator, National Nuclear Security Administration (NA-1) Under Secretary (US) Under Secretary for Science (US-4) Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management (EM-1) Deputy Administrator for Defense Programs, NNSA (NA-10) Director, Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology (NE-1)

86

Industrial Waste Reduction Program annual report, FY 1993  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Department of Energy`s Industrial Waste Reduction Program (IWRP) sponsors the development, demonstration, and deployment of technologies that offer a significant opportunity to reduce waste generation, improve productivity, and enhance environmental performance in US industry. The program emphasizes technology-driven solutions that are economically beneficial and environmentally sound. Its goal is to improve the energy efficiency and competitiveness of private industry by cost-effectively reducing waste. Industry, universities, national laboratories and other government agencies are working cooperatively to meet this goal. The IWRP emphasizes the timely commercialization of new technologies that can produce measurable energy, environmental, and economic benefits. All projects are substantially cost-shared with private companies to foster the commercialization process. The program is proud to claim four successfully commercialized technologies that have begun generating benefits. The current IWRP portfolio boasts 32 projects in progress. Funding for the IWRP has grown from $1.7 million in 1990 to $13 million in 1994. New companies join the program each year, reaping the benefits of working cooperatively with government. New technologies are expected to reach commercial success in fiscal year (FY) 1994, further increasing the benefits already accrued. Future Annual Reports will also include projects from the Waste Utilization and Conversion Program. Descriptions of the program`s 32 active projects are organized in this report according these elements. Each project description provides a brief background and the major accomplishments during FY 1993.

Not Available

1994-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

87

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2006 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 6 Printable Version 2006 Annual Progress Report The 2006 Progress Report for the DOE Hydrogen Program summarizes the hydrogen and fuel cell R&D activities and accomplishments for FY 2006. Published in November 2006, the full document is very large; each technical report is available as an individual Adobe Acrobat PDF. Download Adobe Reader. Front Cover (PDF 226 KB) Table of Contents (PDF 346 KB) I. Introduction, JoAnn Milliken, Acting Program Manager, DOE Hydrogen Program (PDF 369 KB) II. Production Distributed Reforming Hydrogen from Coal Separations Biomass Reforming Biological Production Photoelectrochemical Nuclear Energy Electrolysis High-Temperature Thermochemical III. Delivery Pipelines Liquefaction Analysis Storage Tanks Cross-Cutting IV. Storage Metal Hydrides

88

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2006 Annual Progress Report -  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Education Education Printable Version 2006 Annual Progress Report IX. Education This section of the 2006 Progress Report for the DOE Hydrogen Program focuses on education. Each technical report is available as an individual Adobe Acrobat PDF. Download Adobe Reader. Education Sub-Program Overview, Christy Cooper, Education Team Lead, DOE Hydrogen Program (PDF 173 KB) Baseline Knowledge Assessment of Hydrogen and Fuel Cells, Tykey Truett, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (PDF 77 KB) Hydrogen/Alternative Energy Center, Ruth Borger, Lansing Community College (PDF 96 KB) Hydrogen Futures Park at University of Montana, Paul Williamson, University of Montana (PDF 158 KB) Hydrogen Technology and Energy Curriculum (HyTEC), Barbara Nagle, Univeristy of California, Berkeley (PDF 359 KB)

89

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2004 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 4 Printable Version 2004 Annual Progress Report The 2004 Progress Report for the DOE Hydrogen Program summarizes the hydrogen and fuel cell R&D and analysis activities and accomplishments for FY 2004. Published in November 2004, the full document is very large; each technical report is available as an individual Adobe Acrobat PDF. Download Adobe Reader. Front Cover (PDF 203 KB) Table of Contents (PDF 432 KB) I. Introduction (PDF 350 KB) II. Hydrogen Production and Delivery Distributed Production Technologies Separations Biomass Gasification/Pyrolysis Photobiological Production Photoelectrochemical Production Electrolysis High-Temperature Thermochemical Processes Hydrogen Delivery Analysis III. Hydrogen Storage Compressed/Liquid H2 Tanks Chemical Hydrides Metal Hydrides

90

Director's Discretionary Research and Development Program: Annual Report, Fiscal Year 2006  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Director's Discretionary Research and Development Program, Annual Report Fiscal Year 2006 is an annual management report that summarizes research projects funded by the DDRD program. The NREL DDRD program comprises projects that strengthen NREL's four technical competencies: Integrated Systems, Renewable Electricity, Renewable Fuels, and Strategic Analysis.

Not Available

2007-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

91

E-Print Network 3.0 - annual program review Sample Search Results  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Coordinator Faculty Department Head Review Program Outcomes IAB Faculty IAB Annual Mtg... Curriculum Reviews ... Source: Dratz, Edward A. - Department of Chemistry and...

92

2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Progress Report Posted  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Fuel Cell Technologies Office has posted the 2014 Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Progress Report.

93

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2004 Annual Progress Report -  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Education Education Printable Version 2004 Annual Progress Report VII. Education Each individual technical report is available as an individual Adobe Acrobat PDF for easier use. Download Adobe Reader. Education Sub-Program Review, Christy Cooper, DOE (PDF 283 KB) Determine Baseline Knowledge of Hydrogen and Fuel Cells, Tykey Truett , ORNL (PDF 262 KB) Fuel Cell Demonstration with On-site Generation of Hydrogen, Tim Turner, NC State University (PDF 212 KB) Washington State Fuel Cell Education and Demonstration Program, Mira Vowles, Central Washington Univ. (PDF 315 KB) Lansing Community College Alternative Energy Initiative, Ruth Borger, Lansing Community College (PDF 214 KB) Shared Technology Transfer Project, John Griffin, Nicholls State University (PDF 228 KB) Montana Hydrogen Futures Project, Paul Williamson, U. of Montana

94

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2008 Annual Merit Review Proceedings  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2008 Annual Merit Review Proceedings 2008 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Printable Version 2008 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Graphic of the White House with text that refers to the DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation, Washington, DC, June 9 - 13, 2008. Principal investigators presented the status and results of their hydrogen and fuel cell projects at the DOE Hydrogen Program's Annual Merit Review on June 9-13 in Arlington, Virginia. Links to their presentations and posters are provided below. Plenary Session Presentations Hydrogen Production and Delivery Presentations Production & Delivery Distributed BILI Production Electrolysis High-Temperature Thermochemical Hydrogen Delivery Nuclear Hydrogen Initiative Biomass Gasification Biological Photoelectrochemical Hydrogen From Coal

95

2004 Office of Fossil Energy Fuel Cell Program Annual Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Annual report of fuel cell projects sponsored by Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory.

NETL

2004-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

96

McGill Cancer NutritionRehabilitation Program Annual Report 2010 AAPPPPEENNDDIIXX II  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

McGill Cancer NutritionRehabilitation Program Annual Report 2010 Appendix-1 AAPPPPEENNDDIIXX II CCLLIINNIICCAALL AACCTTIIVVIITTYY MCGILL CANCER NUTRITIONREHABILITATION PROGRAM changes in team structure in 2010. ** No Social Worker on staff in 2010. #12;McGill Cancer Nutrition

Barthelat, Francois

97

Table of Contents; DOE Hydrogen Program FY 2008 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8 Annual Progress Report 8 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen Program Table of Contents I. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 II. Hydrogen Production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .17 II.0 Hydrogen Production Sub-Program Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .19 II.A Distributed Production from Bio-Derived Liquids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .23 II.A.1 H 2 Gen Innovations, Inc: Low-Cost Hydrogen Distributed Production System Development. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

98

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

FY 2012 Annual Progress Report FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program I. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-1 II. Hydrogen Production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .II-1 II.0 Hydrogen Production Sub-Program Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .II-3 II.A Distributed Biomass-Derived Liquids Production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-11 II.A.1 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory: Biomass-Derived Liquids Distributed (Aqueous Phase) Reforming . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

99

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2010 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

0 0 Printable Version 2010 Annual Progress Report The 2010 Progress Report for the DOE Hydrogen Program summarizes the hydrogen and fuel cell R&D activities and accomplishments for FY 2010. Published in February 2011, the full document is very large; each technical report is available as an individual Adobe Acrobat PDF. Front Cover Table of Contents I. Introduction, Sunita Satyapal, U.S. Department of Energy II. Hydrogen Production Distributed Bio-Derived Liquid Production Biomass Gasification Separations Hydrogen from Coal Electrolysis Hi-Temp Thermochemical Photoelectrochemical Biological Production Cross-Cutting/Production III. Hydrogen Delivery IV. Hydrogen Storage Metal Hydride Center of Excellence Chemical Hydrogen Storage Center of Excellence Hydrogen Sorption Center of Excellence

100

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2009 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

9 9 Printable Version 2009 Annual Progress Report The 2009 Progress Report for the DOE Hydrogen Program summarizes the hydrogen and fuel cell R&D activities and accomplishments for FY 2009. Published in November 2009, the full document is very large; each technical report is available as an individual Adobe Acrobat PDF. Download Adobe Reader. Front Cover (PDF 1.2 MB) Table of Contents (PDF 318 KB) I. Introduction, Sunita Satyapal, U.S. Department of Energy (PDF 1.5 MB) II. Hydrogen Production Distributed Production from Bio-Derived Liquids Biomass Gasification Separations Hydrogen from Coal Electrolysis Hi-Temp Thermochemical Nuclear Hydrogen Initiative Photoelectrochemical Biological Cross-Cutting/Production III. Hydrogen Delivery IV. Hydrogen Storage Metal Hydride Center of Excellence

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual eeo program" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2005 Annual Progress Report -  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Production Production Printable Version 2005 Annual Progress Report IV. Production This section of the 2005 Progress Report for the DOE Hydrogen Program focuses on production. Each technical report is available as an individual Adobe Acrobat PDF. Download Adobe Reader. Hydrogen Production Overview, Peter Devlin, Department of Energy (PDF 158 KB) A. Distributed Reforming Autothermal Cyclic Reforming Based Hydrogen Generating and Dispensing System, Ravi Kumar, GE Global Research (PDF 215 KB) Development of a Turnkey Hydrogen Fueling Station, David E. Guro, Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (PDF 209 KB) A Reversible Planar Solid Oxide Fuel-fed Electrolysis Cell and Solid Oxide Fuel Cell for Hydrogen and Electricity Production Operating on Natural Gas/Biogas, Greg Tao, Materials and Systems Research Inc. (PDF 336

102

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2008 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8 8 Printable Version 2008 Annual Progress Report The 2008 Progress Report for the DOE Hydrogen Program summarizes the hydrogen and fuel cell R&D activities and accomplishments for FY 2008. Published in November 2008, the full document is very large; each technical report is available as an individual Adobe Acrobat PDF. Download Adobe Reader. Front Cover (PDF 1.2 MB) Table of Contents (PDF 180 KB) I. Introduction, JoAnn Milliken, U.S. Department of Energy (PDF 980 KB) II. Hydrogen Production Distributed Production from Bio-Derived Liquids Electrolysis Separations Biomass Gasification Photoelectrochemical Biological Production Hydrogen From Coal Nuclear Hydrogen Initiative Hi-Temp Thermochemical Cross-Cutting Basic Energy Sciences III. Hydrogen Delivery IV. Hydrogen Storage

103

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2007 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7 7 Printable Version 2007 Annual Progress Report The 2007 Progress Report for the DOE Hydrogen Program summarizes the hydrogen and fuel cell R&D activities and accomplishments for FY 2007. Published in November 2007, the full document is very large; each technical report is available as an individual Adobe Acrobat PDF. Download Adobe Reader. Front Cover (PDF 711 KB) Table of Contents (PDF 236 KB) I. Introduction, JoAnn Milliken, U.S. Department of Energy (PDF 821 KB) II. Hydrogen Production Distributed Production from Natural Gas Distributed Production from Bio-Derived Liquids Electrolysis Separations Central Biomass Gasification Solar Hi-Temp Thermochemical Water Splitting Photoelectrochemical Biological Production Hydrogen from Coal Nuclear Hydrogen Initiative

104

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2005 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 5 Printable Version 2005 Annual Progress Report The 2005 Progress Report for the DOE Hydrogen Program summarizes the hydrogen and fuel cell R&D and analysis activities and accomplishments for FY 2005. Published in November 2005, the full document is very large; each technical report is available as an individual Adobe Acrobat PDF. Download Adobe Reader. Front Cover (PDF 127 KB) Table of Contents (PDF 401 KB) I. Introduction, Steve Chalk, Department of Energy (PDF 911 KB) II. Basic Research, Harriet Kung, Department of Energy (PDF 1.46 MB) III. Systems Analysis IV. Production Distributed Reforming Hydrogen from Coal Separations Biomass Reforming Biological Production Photoelectrochemical Hydrogen from Nuclear Energy Electrolysis High-temperature Thermochemical

105

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2011 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 1 Printable Version 2011 Annual Progress Report The 2011 Progress Report for the DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program summarizes the hydrogen and fuel cell R&D activities and accomplishments for FY 2011. Published in November 2011, the full document is very large; each technical report is available as an individual Adobe Acrobat PDF. Front Cover and Title Page Table of Contents I. Introduction, Sunita Satyapal, U.S. Department of Energy II. Hydrogen Production Distributed Bio-Derived Liquid Production Biomass Gasification Separations Hydrogen from Coal Electrolysis Hi-Temp Thermochemical Photoelectrochemical Biological Production Analysis Production Basic Energy Sciences III. Hydrogen Delivery IV. Hydrogen Storage Metal Hydride Chemical Hydrogen Storage Hydrogen Sorption

106

Hydrogen Program Contacts; DOE Hydrogen Program FY 2009 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7 7 FY 2009 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen Program Sunita Satyapal, DOE Hydrogen Program, Acting Program Manager Office of Hydrogen, Fuel Cells and Infrastructure Technologies DOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Phone: (202) 586-9811 E-mail: Sunita.Satyapal@ee.doe.gov Mark Ackiewicz, Hydrogen and Clean Coal Fuels Program Manager Office of Sequestration, Hydrogen, and Clean Coal Fuels U.S. Department of Energy Phone: (301) 903-3913 E-mail: Mark.Ackiewicz@hq.doe.gov Carl Sink, Program Manager Nuclear Hydrogen Initiative Office of Advanced Nuclear Research DOE Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology Phone: (301) 903-5131 E-mail: Carl.Sink@nuclear.energy.gov John Vetrano, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division Office of Basic Energy Sciences

107

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2009 Annual Merit Review Proceedings  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2009 Annual Merit Review Proceedings 2009 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Printable Version 2009 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Principal investigators presented the status and results of their hydrogen, fuel cell, and vehicle technologies projects at the 2009 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on May 18-22, 2009, in Arlington, Virginia. Links to their presentations and posters are provided below. Graphic of the Lincoln Memorial lit up at dusk with the text: Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting which was held in Arlington, Virginia, on May 18-22, 2009 From here, access presentations and posters from the AMR: Plenary Session Hydrogen Program Vehicle Technologies Program Hydrogen Program

108

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2006 Annual Merit Review Proceedings  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2006 Annual Merit Review Proceedings 2006 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Printable Version 2006 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Logo for the 2006 DOE Hydrogen Program Review, May 16-19, Washinton, D.C. The DOE Hydrogen Program held its Annual Merit Review May 16-19, 2006 in Arlington, Virginia. Principal investigators presented their project status and results in these oral and poster presentations. Plenary Session Presentations Hydrogen Production and Delivery Presentations Distributed Production Photoelectrochemical Production Electrolysis Nuclear Energy Initiative Hi-Temp Thermochemical Hydrogen Delivery Hydrogen from Coal Posters Distributed Production Separations Biomass Reforming Biological Production Photoelectrochemical Electrolysis Nuclear Energy Initiative Hi-Temp Thermochemical Hydrogen Delivery

109

INEEL Cultural Resource Management Program Annual Report - 2004  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

As a federal agency, the U.S. Department of Energy has been directed by Congress, the U.S. president, and the American public to provide leadership in the preservation of prehistoric, historic, and other cultural resources on the lands it administers. This mandate to preserve cultural resources in a spirit of stewardship for the future is outlined in various federal preservation laws, regulations, and guidelines such as the National Historic Preservation Act, the Archaeological Resources Protection Act, and the National Environmental Policy Act. The Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Site is located in southeastern Idaho, and is home to vast numbers and a wide variety of important cultural resources representing at least 13,000-year span of human occupation in the region. These resources are nonrenewable, bear valuable physical and intangible legacies, and yield important information about the past, present, and perhaps the future. There are special challenges associated with balancing the preservation of these resources with the management and ongoing operation of an active scientific laboratory, while also cleaning up the waste left by past programs and processes. The Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office has administrative responsibility for most of the Site, excluding lands and resources managed by the Naval Reactors Facility and (in 2004) Argonne National Laboratory-West. The Department of Energy is committed to a cultural resource program that accepts these challenges in a manner reflecting both the spirit and intent of the legislative requirements. This annual report is an overview of Cultural Resource Management Program activities conducted during Fiscal Year 2004 and is intended to be both informative to external stakeholders and to serve as a planning tool for future cultural resource management work to be conducted on the Site.

Clayton F. Marler

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

110

SNL/CA Environmental Planning and Ecology Program Annual Report 2007.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The annual program report provides detailed information about all aspects of the Sandia National Laboratories, California (SNL/CA) Environmental Planning and Ecology Program for a given calendar year. It functions as supporting documentation to the SNL/CA Environmental Management System Program Manual. The 2006 program report describes the activities undertaken during the past year, and activities planned in future years to implement the Planning and Ecology Program, one of six programs that supports environmental management at SNL/CA.

Larsen, Barbara L.

2007-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

111

SNL/CA Environmental Planning and Ecology Annual Program Report for Calendar Year 2005.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The annual program report provides detailed information about all aspects of the SNL/CA Environmental Planning and Ecology Program for a given calendar year. It functions as supporting documentation to the SNL/CA Environmental Management System Program Manual. The 2005 program report describes the activities undertaken during the past year, and activities planned in future years to implement the Planning and Ecology Program, one of six programs that supports environmental management at SNL/CA.

Larsen, Barbara L.

2005-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

112

Sandia National Laboratories, California Environmental Monitoring Program annual report for 2011.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The annual program report provides detailed information about all aspects of the SNL/California Environmental Monitoring Program. It functions as supporting documentation to the SNL/California Environmental Management System Program Manual. The 2010 program report describes the activities undertaken during the previous year, and activities planned in future years to implement the Environmental Monitoring Program, one of six programs that supports environmental management at SNL/California.

Holland, Robert C.

2011-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

113

Sandia National Laboratories, California pollution prevention annual program report for calendar year 2005.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The annual program report provides detailed information about all aspects of the SNL/CA Pollution Prevention Program for a given calendar year. It functions as supporting documentation to the ''SNL/CA Environmental Management System Program Manual''. The 2005 program report describes the activities undertaken during the past year, and activities planned in future years to implement the Pollution Prevention Program, one of six programs that supports environmental management at SNL/CA.

Farren, Laurie J. (Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA)

2005-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

114

Sandia National Laboratories California Environmental Monitoring Program Annual Report for Calendar Year 2005.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The annual program report provides detailed information about all aspects of the SNL/CA Environmental Monitoring Program for a given calendar year. It functions as supporting documentation to the SNL/CA Environmental Management System Program Manual. The 2005 Update program report describes the activities undertaken during the past year, and activities planned in future years to implement the Environmental Monitoring Program, one of six programs that supports environmental management at SNL/CA.

Holland, Robert C.

2006-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

115

Education Sub-Program Overview - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 3 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program IntroductIon The Education sub-program facilitates early market hydrogen and fuel cell deployments and supports future commercialization by providing technically accurate and objective information to key target audiences that can help transform the market (see Table 1). Table 1. Key Target Audiences for the Education Sub-Program target audience Rationale code officials Code officials must be familiar with hydrogen to facilitate the permitting process and local project approval. First Responders Firefighters, as well as law enforcement and emergency medical personnel, must know how to handle potential incidents; their understanding can also facilitate local project approval. Local communities/General Public

116

Hydrogen Program Contacts, excerpt from 2007 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 3 FY 2007 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen Program JoAnn Milliken, DOE Hydrogen Program Manager and Chief Engineer Office of Hydrogen, Fuel Cells and Infrastructure Technologies DOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Phone: (202) 586-2480 E-mail: JoAnn.Milliken@ee.doe.gov C. Lowell Miller, Director Office of Sequestration, Hydrogen and Clean Coal Fuels DOE Office of Fossil Energy Phone: (301) 903-9451 E-mail: Lowell.Miller@hq.doe.gov Carl Sink, Program Manager Nuclear Hydrogen Initiative Office of Advanced Nuclear Research DOE Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology Phone: (301) 903-5131 E-mail: Carl.Sink@nuclear.energy.gov Harriet Kung, Director, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division Office of Basic Energy Sciences DOE Office of Science

117

Herbaceous Energy Corps Program: Annual progress report for FY 1986  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report describes the activities and accomplishments of the Herbaceous Energy Crops Program (HECP) for the year ending September 30, 1986. HECP is devoted to research on the development of terrestrial, nonwoody plant species for use as energy feedstocks. HECP emphasizes lignocellulosic forage crops. In FY 1986 screening and selection trials continued on 25 species of perennial and annual grasses and legumes in five projects in the Southeast and the Midwest-Lake States regions. Research also continued on the development of winter rapeseed as a diesel-fuel substitute. Activities in FY 1986 included genetic crosses and selections to incorporate atrazine resistance, development of Canola-quality winter rapeseed for the Southeast, and development of dwarf varieties. Production practices for double-cropped winter rapeseed in the Southeast were also examined. Exploratory research efforts in FY 1986 included the physiology and biochemistry of hydrocarbon production in latex-bearing plants, the productivity of cattail stands under sustained harvesting, the development of tissue culture techniques for hard-to-culture sorghum genotypes, and the start of a study to measure sustained productivity of old-field successional vegetation. Environmental and economic analyses in FY 1986 included studies on the uses of wetlands and wet soils, the use of lignocellulosic crops as an alcohol feedstock, the potential of direct combustion of lignocellulosic crops, and existing oilseed extraction facilities. 6 refs., 12 figs., 15 tabs.

Cushman, J.H.; Turhollow, A.F.; Johnston, J.W.

1987-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

118

2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report Posted  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program has posted the 2014 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report, which summarizes the comments of expert peer reviewers at the 2014 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting (AMR) held June 1620, 2014, in Washington, D.C.

119

FY 2006 Annual Progress Report for Heavy Vehicle Systems Optimization Program  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Heavy veHicle SyStemS Heavy veHicle SyStemS OptimizatiOn prOgram U.S. Department of Energy FreedomCAR and Vehicle Technologies Program 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20585-0121 FY 2006 Annual Progress Report for Heavy Vehicle Systems Optimization Program Submitted to: U.S. Department of Energy Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy FreedomCAR and Vehicle Technologies Program Advanced Vehicle Technology Analysis and Evaluation Lee Slezak, Technology Manager Heavy Vehicle Systems Optimization Program FY 2006 Annual Report iii CONTENTS I. Aerodynamic Drag Reduction......................................................................................................... 1 A. DOE Project on Heavy Vehicle Aerodynamic Drag .................................................................. 1

120

High Temperature Materials Laboratory User Program: 19th Annual Report, October 1, 2005 - September 30, 2006  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Annual Report contains overview of the High Temperature Materials Laboratory User Program and includes selected highlights of user activities for FY2006. Report is submitted to individuals within sponsoring DOE agency and to other interested individuals.

Pasto, Arvid [ORNL

2007-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual eeo program" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

E-Print Network 3.0 - annual meeting program Sample Search Results  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

< 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 1 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS ACADEMIC SENATE VOLUME XXXVI, No. 1 Summary: on Special Academic Programs iv. Annual Report of the Committee on Undergraduate...

122

2014 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review Proceedings Available Online  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program has posted the 2014 Annual Merit Review Proceedings, which include presentations and posters on individual project status and results as well as overview presentations from the plenary session.

123

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2005 Annual Merit Review Proceedings  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2005 Annual Merit Review Proceedings 2005 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Printable Version 2005 Annual Merit Review Proceedings The US Department of Energy Hydrogen Program held its 2005 Annual Merit Review May 23-26, 2005, in Arlington, Virginia. Principal investigators presented their project status and results in these presentations and posters. Plenary Session Presentations Hydrogen Production and Delivery Presentations A. Distributed Production Technologies B. DOE Fossil Energy C. Separations D. Biomass Reforming E. Biological Production F. Photoelectrochemical Production G. Electrolysis H. DOE Nuclear Energy I. Hi-Temp Thermochemical J. Hydrogen Delivery Posters A. Distributed Production Technologies B. DOE Fossil Energy C. Separations D. Biomass Reforming E. Biological Production F. Photoelectrochemical Production

124

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2007 Annual Merit Review Proceedings  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2007 Annual Merit Review Proceedings 2007 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Printable Version 2007 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Logo for the 2007 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation, May 15-18, Washington, D.C. Principal investigators presented the status and results of their hydrogen and fuel cell projects at the DOE Hydrogen Program's Annual Merit Review on May 15-18, 2007 in Washington, D.C. Links to their presentations and posters are provided below. Plenary Session Presentations Hydrogen Production and Delivery Presentations Distributed Production Biological Production Separations Electrolysis Photoelectrochemical Production Hi-Temp Thermochemical Hydrogen Delivery Hydrogen from Coal Nuclear Hydrogen Initiative Posters Central Biomass Biological Production Compressed/Liquid Tanks

125

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2011 Annual Merit Review Proceedings  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2011 Annual Merit Review Proceedings 2011 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Printable Version 2011 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Principal investigators presented the status and results of their hydrogen and fuel cell projects at the 2011 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on May 9-13 in Washington, D.C. Links to their presentations and posters are provided below. Presentations and posters are grouped by topic and subtopic where applicable and appear in the order in which they were presented within those categories. See the 2011 AMR schedule for a full listing of oral presentation and poster presentation dates and times. Joint Plenary Session Plenary Session Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program

126

Long-Term Surveillance and Monitoring Program Annual Site Inspection and Monitoring Report  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Monitoring Program Monitoring Program Annual Site Inspection and Monitoring Report for Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Title I Disposal Sites Annual Report for the Period January 1,1998, Through December 31,1998 February 1999 This file contains inspection data for the Shiprock Site only. Long-Term Surveillance and Monitoring Program Annual Site inspection and Monitoring Report for Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Title I Disposal Sites 1998 Annual Report February 1999 Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Albuquerque Operations Office Grand Junction, Colorado Work Performed Under DOE Contract Number DE-AC13-966587335 Task Order Number MAC 99-06 Document Number SO0184 Contents Page 1.0 Introduction .......................................................... SHP-I

127

FY 2010 Annual Report Office of Fossil Energy Fuel Cell Program  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

FY 2010 Annual Report FY 2010 Annual Report Office of Fossil Energy Fuel Cell Program I. IntroductIon 2 Office of Fossil Energy Fuel Cell Program FY 2010 Annual Report 3 FY 2010 Annual Report Office of Fossil Energy Fuel Cell Program Competitive Innovation: Accelerating Technology Development The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Fossil Energy, through the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) and in collaboration with private industry, universities and national laboratories, has forged Government-industry partnerships under the Solid State Energy Conversion Alliance (SECA) to reduce the cost of solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs). This fuel cell technology shall form the basis for integrated gasification fuel cell (IGFC) systems utilizing coal for clean and efficient

128

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2008 Annual Merit Review Awards  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > 2008 Annual Merit Review Awards Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > 2008 Annual Merit Review Awards Printable Version 2008 Annual Merit Review Awards Each year, the Peer Review Panel at the Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting reviews the hydrogen and fuel cell projects funded by DOE's Hydrogen Program. After evaluating the merit of the 2008 hydrogen and fuel cell projects, the Peer Review Panel presented the following awards. DOE Hydrogen Program George Thomas, Sandia National Laboratory, retired This award recognizes George Thomas' past and continued technical excellence and outstanding dedication to the DOE Hydrogen Program in support of the President's Advanced Energy Initiative and the Hydrogen Fuel Initiative. Thomas' contributions to the Hydrogen Storage activity have

129

Annual Report: Unconventional Fossil Energy Resource Program (30 September 2013)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Yee Soong, Technical Coordinator, George Guthrie, Focus Area Lead, UFER Annual Report, NETL-TRS-UFER-2013, NETL Technical Report Series, U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, Pittsburgh, PA, 2013, p 14.

Soong, Yee; Guthrie, George

2014-03-11T23:59:59.000Z

130

A Unique Summer Experience at NNSA's Annual MSI Program | National...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

during its annual on-campus job fairs, instead being overshadowed by the plethora of petroleum, mechanical, and chemical engineering companies. As a result, my time spent at the...

131

Annual Coded Wire Tag Program; Oregon Stock Assessment, 2000 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This annual report is in fulfillment of contract obligations with Bonneville Power Administration which is the funding source for the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife's Annual Stock Assessment - Coded Wire Tag Program (ODFW) Project. Tule stock fall chinook were caught primarily in British Columbia and Washington ocean, and Columbia Basin fisheries. Up-river bright stock fall chinook contributed primarily to Alaska and British Columbia ocean commercial, Columbia Basin gillnet and freshwater sport fisheries. Contribution of Rogue stock fall chinook released in the lower Columbia River occurred primarily in Oregon ocean commercial, Columbia Basin gillnet and freshwater sport fisheries. Willamette stock spring chinook contributed primarily to Alaska and British Columbia ocean, and Columbia Basin sport fisheries. Willamette stock spring chinook released by CEDC contributed to similar ocean fisheries, but had much higher catch in Columbia Basin gillnet fisheries than the same stocks released in the Willamette Basin. Up-river stocks of spring chinook contributed almost exclusively to Columbia Basin fisheries. The up-river stocks of Columbia River summer steelhead contributed almost exclusively to the Columbia Basin gillnet and freshwater sport fisheries. Coho ocean fisheries from Washington to California were closed or very limited from 1994 through 1999 (1991 through 1996 broods). This has resulted in a lower percent of catch in Washington, Oregon and California ocean fisheries, and a higher percent of catch in Alaska and British Columbia ocean and Columbia Basin freshwater fisheries. Coho stocks released by ODFW below Bonneville Dam were caught mainly in Oregon, Washington, and British Columbia ocean, Columbia Gillnet and freshwater sport fisheries. Coho stocks released in the Klaskanine River and Youngs Bay area had similar ocean catch distributions, but a much higher percent catch in gillnet fisheries than the other coho releases. Ocean catch distribution of coho stocks released above Bonneville Dam was similar to the other coho groups. However, they had a higher percent catch in gillnet fisheries above Bonneville Dam than coho released below the dam. Survival rates of salmon and steelhead are influenced, not only by factors in the hatchery (disease, density, diet, size and time of release) but also by environmental factors in the river and ocean. These environmental factors are influenced by large scale oceanic and weather patterns such as El Nino. Changes in rearing conditions in the hatchery do impact survival, however, these can be offset by impacts caused by environmental factors. Coho salmon released in the Columbia River generally experience better survival rates when released later in the spring. However, for the 1990 brood year June releases of Columbia River coho had much lower survival than May releases, for all ODFW hatcheries. In general survival of ODFW Columbia River hatchery coho has declined to low levels in recent years. Preliminary results from the evaluation of Visual Implant Elastomer (VIE) tags showed tagging rate and pre-release tag retention improved from the first to second years of tagging. Tagging rate remained identical from 1999 to 2000 while pre-release tag retention dropped to 95%. Returning jack and adult salmon were sampled for CWT and VIE tags in the fall of 2000. Of 606 adults recovered at Sandy Fish Hatchery in 2000, only 1 or 0.2%, retained their VIE tag. Of 36 jacks recovered in 2000, 13 or 36.1% retained their VIE tag.

Lewis, Mark; Mallette, Christine; Murray, William

2002-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

132

Annual Coded Wire Tag Program; Oregon Missing Production Groups, 1998 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This annual report is in fulfillment of contract obligations with Bonneville Power Administration which is the funding source for the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife's Annual Coded Wire Tag Program - Oregon Missing Production Groups Project. Tule stock fall chinook were caught primarily in British Columbia and Washington ocean, and Columbia Basin fisheries. Up-river bright stock fall chinook contributed primarily to Alaska and British Columbia ocean commercial, Columbia Basin gillnet and other freshwater fisheries. Contribution of Rogue stock fall chinook released in the lower Columbia River occurred primarily in Oregon ocean commercial, Columbia Basin gillnet and other freshwater fisheries. Willamette stock spring chinook contributed primarily to Alaska and British Columbia ocean, and Columbia Basin fisheries. Willamette stock spring chinook released by CEDC contributed to similar ocean fisheries, but had much higher catch in Columbia Basin gillnet fisheries than the same stocks released in the Willamette Basin. Up-river stocks of spring chinook contributed almost exclusively to Columbia Basin fisheries. The up-river stocks of Columbia River summer steelhead contributed almost exclusively to the Columbia Basin gillnet and other freshwater fisheries. Coho ocean fisheries from Washington to California were closed or very limited from 1994 through 1998 (1991 through 1995 broods). This has resulted in a lower percent of catch in Washington, Oregon and California ocean fisheries, and a higher percent of catch in Alaska and British Columbia ocean and Columbia Basin freshwater fisheries. Coho stocks released by ODFW below Bonneville Dam were caught mainly in Oregon and Washington ocean, Columbia Gillnet and other freshwater fisheries. Coho stocks released in the Klaskanine River and Youngs Bay area had similar ocean catch distributions, but a much higher percent catch in gillnet fisheries than the other coho releases. Ocean catch distribution of coho stocks released above Bonneville Dam was similar to the other coho groups. However, they had a higher percent catch in gillnet fisheries above Bonneville Dam than coho released below the dam. Survival rates of salmon and steelhead are influenced, not only by factors in the hatchery (disease, density, diet, size and time of release) but also by environmental factors in the river and ocean. These environmental factors are influenced by large scale oceanic and weather patterns such as El Nino. Changes in rearing conditions in the hatchery do impact survival, however, these can be offset by impacts caused by environmental factors. Coho salmon released in the Columbia River generally experience better survival rates when released later in the spring. However, for the 1990 brood year June releases of Columbia River coho had much lower survival than May releases, for all ODFW hatcheries. In general survival of ODFW Columbia River hatchery coho has declined to low levels in recent years. Results from evaluation of photonic marking as a tool to mass mark juvenile salmonids were mixed (Appendix B). Logistical and safety concerns were documented. The mark was not retained through to adult return as no photonic marks were detected in any of the Sandy hatchery jack or adult coho recoveries. Data from coded-wire tag recoveries indicated there should have been approximately 6 jack and 318 adult coho recovered with photonic marks. Photonic marks were retained for the 5 months from marking to release. Photonic marking did not appear to effect in-hatchery survival or hatchery return rate. Because of the above results evaluation of photonic marking was discontinued in favor of evaluation of Visual Implant Elastomer tagging. Results in 1998 with Sandy hatchery coho demonstrated a marking rate of 17,000 fish per day for VIE tagging (Appendix C). Mark retention at releases was 98% for VIE tags. Although, this included re-marking 22% of the fish during the coded-wire tagging process (4 months after the VIE marks were applied).

Lewis, Mark A.; Mallette, Christine; Murray, William M.

1999-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

133

Annual Coded Wire Tag Program; Oregon Missing Production Groups, 1999 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This annual report is in fulfillment of contract obligations with Bonneville Power Administration which is the funding source for the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife's Annual Coded Wire Tag Program - Oregon Missing Production Groups Project. Tule stock fall chinook were caught primarily in British Columbia and Washington ocean, and Columbia Basin fisheries. Up-river bright stock fall chinook contributed primarily to Alaska and British Columbia ocean commercial, Columbia Basin gillnet and other freshwater fisheries. Contribution of Rogue stock fall chinook released in the lower Columbia River occurred primarily in Oregon ocean commercial, Columbia Basin gillnet and other freshwater fisheries. Willamette stock spring chinook contributed primarily to Alaska and British Columbia ocean, and Columbia Basin non-gillnet fisheries. Willamette stock spring chinook released by CEDC contributed to similar ocean fisheries, but had much higher catch in Columbia Basin gillnet fisheries than the same stocks released in the Willamette Basin. Up-river stocks of spring chinook contributed almost exclusively to Columbia Basin fisheries. The up-river stocks of Columbia River summer steelhead contributed almost exclusively to the Columbia Basin gillnet and other freshwater fisheries. Coho ocean fisheries from Washington to California were closed or very limited from 1994 through 1999 (1991 through 1996 broods). This has resulted in a lower percent of catch in Washington, Oregon and California ocean fisheries, and a higher percent of catch in Alaska and British Columbia ocean and Columbia Basin freshwater fisheries. Coho stocks released by ODFW below Bonneville Dam were caught mainly in Oregon, Washington, and British Columbia ocean, Columbia Gillnet and other freshwater fisheries. Coho stocks released in the Klaskanine River and Youngs Bay area had similar ocean catch distributions, but a much higher percent catch in gillnet fisheries than the other coho releases. Ocean catch distribution of coho stocks released above Bonneville Dam was similar to the other coho groups. However, they had a higher percent catch in gillnet fisheries above Bonneville Dam than coho released below the dam. Survival rates of salmon and steelhead are influenced, not only by factors in the hatchery (disease, density, diet, size and time of release) but also by environmental factors in the river and ocean. These environmental factors are influenced by large scale oceanic and weather patterns such as El Nino. Changes in rearing conditions in the hatchery do impact survival, however, these can be offset by impacts caused by environmental factors. Coho salmon released in the Columbia River generally experience better survival rates when released later in the spring. However, for the 1990 brood year June releases of Columbia River coho had much lower survival than May releases, for all ODFW hatcheries. In general survival of ODFW Columbia River hatchery coho has declined to low levels in recent years. Preliminary results from the evaluation of Visual Implant Elastomer (VIE) tagging showed an improvement in tagging rate and pre-release tag retention from the first (1998) to second (1999) year of tagging. For fish tagged in 1999 pre-release VIE tag retention was 99.4%. The first adult hatchery returns of VIE tagged coho for this study will be in 2000. Of 17 jacks recovered at Sandy hatchery in 1999 12 (70.6%) had retained there VIE tag.

Lewis, Mark A.; Mallette, Christine; Murray, William M.

2000-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

134

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2010 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document summarizes the comments provided by peer reviewers on hydrogen and fuel cell projects presented at the FY 2010 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting (AMR), held June 7-11, 2010 in Washington, D.C.

Not Available

2010-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

135

Hydrogen Technology Validation: DOE Hydrogen Program 2011 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This document summarizes the comments provided by peer reviewers on hydrogen and fuel cell projects presented at the FY 2011 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting (AMR), held May 913, 2011 in Arlington, VA.

136

FY13 Annual Progress Report for SECA Core Technology Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This progress report covers technical work performed during fiscal year 2013 at PNNL under Field Work Proposal (FWP) 40552. The report highlights and documents technical progress in tasks related to advanced cell and stack component materials development and computational design and simulation. Primary areas of emphasis for the materials development work were metallic interconnects and coatings, cathode and anode stability/degradation, glass seals, and advanced testing under realistic stack conditions: Metallic interconnects and coatings Effects of surface modifications to AISI 441 (prior to application of protective spinel coatings) on oxide scale growth and adhesion were evaluated as a function of temperature and time. Cathode stability/degradation Effects of cathode air humidity on performance and stability of SOFC cathodes were investigated by testing anode-supported cells as a function of time and temperature. In-situ high temperature XRD measurements were used to correlate changes in cathode lattice structure and composition with performance of anode-supported button cells. Anode stability/degradation Effects of high fuel steam content on Ni/YSZ anodes were investigated over a range of time and temperature. Vapor infiltration and particulate additions were evaluated as a potential means of improving tolerance of Ni/YSZ anodes to sulfur-bearing fuel species. Glass seals A candidate compliant glass-based seal materials were evaluated in terms of microstructural evolution and seal performance as a function of time and temperature. Stack fixture testing The SECA CTP stack test fixture was used for intermediate and long-term evaluation of candidate materials and processes. Primary areas of emphasis for the computational modeling work were coarse methodology, degradation of stack components, and electrochemical modeling: Coarse methodology Improvements were made to both the SOFC-MP and SOFC ROM simulation tools. Degradation of stack components Thermo-mechanical modeling and validation experiments were performed to understand/mitigate degradation of interconnects and seals during long-term stack operation. Electrochemical modeling 4 Modeling tools were developed to improve understanding of electrochemical performance degradation of SOFCs related to changes in electrode microstructure and chemical interactions with contaminants. During FY13, PNNL continued to work with NETL to increase the extent of interaction between the SECA Core Technology Program and the SECA Industry Teams. In addition to using established mechanisms of communication, such as the annual SECA Workshop, representatives from PNNL and NETL participated in telecons and/or face-to-face meetings with all three industry teams during FY13. During these meetings, PNNLs Core Technology Program work was presented in detail, after which feedback was solicited regarding current and future research topics. Results of PNNLs SECA CTP work were also distributed via topical reports for the industry teams, DOE reports, technical society presentations, and papers in peer-reviewed technical journals. 5

Stevenson, Jeffry W.; Koeppel, Brian J.

2014-01-31T23:59:59.000Z

137

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2012 Annual Merit Review Proceedings  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2012 Annual Merit Review Proceedings 2012 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Printable Version 2012 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Principal investigators presented the status and results of their hydrogen and fuel cell projects at the 2012 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on May 14-18 in Arlington, Virginia. Links to their presentations and posters are provided below. Presentations and posters are grouped by topic and subtopic where applicable and appear in the order in which they were presented within those categories. See the 2012 AMR schedule for a full listing of oral presentation and poster presentation dates and times. Plenary Session - Part I: Joint Plenary, Hydrogen and Fuel Cells

138

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2013 Annual Merit Review Proceedings  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2013 Annual Merit Review Proceedings 2013 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Printable Version 2013 Annual Merit Review Proceedings Principal investigators presented the status and results of their hydrogen and fuel cell projects at the 2013 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on May 13-17 in Arlington, Virginia. Links to their presentations and posters are provided below. Presentations and posters are grouped by topic and subtopic where applicable and appear in the order in which they were presented within those categories. See the 2013 AMR schedule for a full listing of oral presentation and poster presentation dates and times. Plenary Session - Part I: Joint Plenary, Hydrogen and Fuel Cells

139

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2010 Annual Merit Review Awards  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Annual Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > Awards Annual Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > Awards Printable Version 2010 Annual Merit Review Awards Each year, the Peer Review Panel at the Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting reviews the hydrogen and fuel cell projects funded by DOE's Hydrogen Program. After evaluating the merit of the 2010 hydrogen and fuel cell projects, the Peer Review Panel presented the following awards. DOE Hydrogen Program Team Awards (with special recognition for outstanding technical contributions): Production and Delivery Jamie Holladay, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) This award recognizes Jamie Holladay for his outstanding contributions to hydrogen production and delivery. He completed a two-year assignment in July, 2009, with the Department of Energy Fuel Cell Technologies (FCT)

140

Appliance Standards Program Schedule- CCE Overview and Update, presented at AHRI 2011 Annual Meeting, dated November 14, 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This document is the presentation for the Appliance Standards Program Schedule - CCE Overview and Update, presented at AHRI 2011 Annual Meeting on 11/14/ 2011

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual eeo program" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

FY 1999 annual work plan for infrastructure program WBS 6  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Fiscal Year (FY) 1999 DynCorp Annual Work Plan (AWP) relates DOE-RL work breakdown structure (WBS) to Cost Accounts and to Organizational Structure. Each Cost Account includes a workscope narrative and justification performance and service standards, goals, and deliverables. Basis of estimates are included within each Cost Account to demonstrate the relationship of budget to defined workscope. The FY 1999 AWP reflects the planning assumptions and initiatives that are included in the PHMC Strategic Plan for Infrastructure Optimization which was established in FY 1998. Development of the FY 1999 AWP was in accordance with a sequential series of events and efforts described in the Infrastructure Annual Work Planning and Budget Cycle which was developed and established in conjunction with the Strategic Plan. The Strategic Plan covers a rolling five year span of time and is updated at the start of each fiscal year as the beginning of the annual work planning and budget cycle for the following fiscal year. Accordingly the planning for the FY 1999 AWP began in January 1998. Also included in the annual work planning and budget cycle, and the basis for the budget in this AWP, is the development of a requirements-based budget.

Donley, C.D.

1998-08-27T23:59:59.000Z

142

EEOC FORM  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Opportunity Commission FEDERAL AGENCY ANNUAL EEO PROGRAM STATUS REPORT U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration For period covering October 1, 2011, to...

143

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2012 Annual Merit Review Awards  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > Awards Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > Awards Printable Version 2012 Annual Merit Review Awards Each year, at the Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, the Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program presents "Program Awards" for contributions to the overall efforts of the Program, and "Sub-Program Awards" to recognize achievements in specific areas. This year, the Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Office and the Vehicle Technologies Office also presented a joint "Special Recognition Award." Special Recognition Award from the DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and the Vehicle Technologies Office Judi Abraham, Conference Management Associates, Inc. As a special tribute, the DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Office recognize Ms. Judi Abraham for her exceptional

144

AICD -- Advanced Industrial Concepts Division Biological and Chemical Technologies Research Program. 1993 Annual summary report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The annual summary report presents the fiscal year (FY) 1993 research activities and accomplishments for the United States Department of Energy (DOE) Biological and Chemical Technologies Research (BCTR) Program of the Advanced Industrial Concepts Division (AICD). This AICD program resides within the Office of Industrial Technologies (OIT) of the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EE). The annual summary report for 1993 (ASR 93) contains the following: A program description (including BCTR program mission statement, historical background, relevance, goals and objectives), program structure and organization, selected technical and programmatic highlights for 1993, detailed descriptions of individual projects, a listing of program output, including a bibliography of published work, patents, and awards arising from work supported by BCTR.

Petersen, G.; Bair, K.; Ross, J. [eds.

1994-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

145

2011 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Office Annual...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Office Plenary Session Program Analysis Ward Analyst Technology Integration Smith and Bezanson Vehicle & Systems Simulation & Testing Slezak Materials Schutte Materials...

146

FY2002 Annual Progress Report for the Light Vehicle Propulsioin & Ancillary Subsystems Program  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

& Vehicle Technologies & Vehicle Technologies 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20585-0121 FY 2002 Annual Progress Report for the Light Vehicle Propulsion & Ancillary Subsystems Program Submitted to: U.S. Department of Energy Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Office of FreedomCAR & Vehicle Technologies Vehicle Systems Team Robert Kost, Team Leader January 2003 Light Vehicle Propulsion & Ancillary Subsystems Program FY 2002 Annual Progress Report CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 1 II. TECHNOLOGY REQUIREMENTS DEFINITION....................................... 3 A. Simulation Model Development ..................................................................... 3 1. Improvement, Validation and Application of Advanced

147

2009 Annual Progress Report: DOE Hydrogen Program, November 2009 (Book)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report summarizes the hydrogen and fuel cell R&D activities and accomplishments of the DOE Hydrogen Program for FY2009. It covers the program areas of hydrogen production and delivery; fuel cells; manufacturing; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; education; and systems analysis.

Not Available

2009-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

148

Price-Anderson Nuclear Safety Enforcement Program. 1997 annual report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report summarizes activities in the Department of Energy's Price-Anderson Amendments Act (PAAA) Enforcement Program in calendar year 1997 and highlights improvements planned for 1998. The DOE Enforcement Program involves the Office of Enforcement and Investigation in the DOE Headquarters Office of Environment, Safety and Health, as well as numerous PAAA Coordinators and technical advisors in DOE Field and Program Offices. The DOE Enforcement Program issued 13 Notices of Violation (NOV`s) in 1997 for cases involving significant or potentially significant nuclear safety violations. Six of these included civil penalties totaling $440,000. Highlights of these actions include: (1) Brookhaven National Laboratory Radiological Control Violations / Associated Universities, Inc.; (2) Bioassay Program Violations at Mound / EG and G, Inc.; (3) Savannah River Crane Operator Uptake / Westinghouse Savannah River Company; (4) Waste Calciner Worker Uptake / Lockheed-Martin Idaho Technologies Company; and (5) Reactor Scram and Records Destruction at Sandia / Sandia Corporation (Lockheed-Martin).

NONE

1998-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

149

Index of Primary Contacts, excerpt from 2007 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

99 99 FY 2007 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen Program XIII. Index of Primary Contacts A Aardahl, Chris . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 492 Aaron, Tim. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Abu-Omar, Mahdi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 767 Aceves, Salvador . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 302, 605, 1075 Acquaviva, Jim. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 Adams, Thad . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114 Adrianowycz, Orest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 722 Adzic, Radoslav . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 751 Ahluwalia, Rajesh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 611, 675 Ahmed, S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 Ahn, Channing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

150

Primary Contacts Index, DOE Hydrogen Program FY 2010 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

9 9 FY 2010 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen Program A Abken, Anke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179 Abruna, Hector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1072 Aceves, Salvador . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 282, 341, 615, 1363 Adams, Thad . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 293 Adzic, Radoslav . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 841, 1092 Ahluwalia, Rajesh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 566, 661 Ahmed, Shabbir . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34, 1209 Allendorf, Mark . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 423 Anton, Don . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 413, 514 Arif, Muhammad . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 686 Atanasoski, Radoslav . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 825 Ayers, Katherine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 B Balachandran, Balu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 Balbuena, Perla . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1099 Barclay, John . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

151

Unconventional gas recovery program. Semi-annual report for the period ending September 30, 1979  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document is the third semi-annual report describing the technical progress of the US DOE projects directed at gas recovery from unconventional sources. Currently the program includes Methane Recovery from Coalbeds Project, Eastern Gas Shales Project, Western Gas Sands Project, and Geopressured Aquifers Project.

Manilla, R.D. (ed.)

1980-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

152

FY2010 AnnuAl RepoRt eDA university Center program  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

..................................................................................................... 15 3.1.3. Economic Assessment Process.S. Department of Commerce Economic Development Administration EDA Grant No. 05-66-05033 #12;2 Abstract ThiS ANNUAl REPoRT of ThE ECoNomiC DEvEloPmENT ADmiNiSTRATioN-UNivERSiTy CENTER (EDA-UC) PRoGRAm PRovi

Vaswani, Namrata

153

Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting 2007 Hydrogen Program Annual Review  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Hydrogen Storage Systems Analysis Working Group Meeting 2007 Hydrogen Program Annual Review Crystal Laboratory and Elvin Yuzugullu Sentech, Inc. June 28, 2007 #12;SUMMARY REPORT Hydrogen Storage of hydrogen storage materials and processes for information exchange and to update the researchers on related

154

Safety, Codes & Standards Sub-Program Overview - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program IntroductIon The Safety, Codes and Standards sub-program supports research and development (R&D) to provide an experimentally validated fundamental understanding of the relevant physics, critical data, and safety information needed to define the requirements for technically sound and defensible codes and standards. This information is used to help facilitate and enable the widespread deployment and commercialization of hydrogen and fuel cell technologies. In Fiscal Year (FY) 2012, the sub-program continued to identify and evaluate safety

155

Technology Validation Sub-Program Overview - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program IntroductIon The Technology Validation sub-program demonstrates, tests, and validates hydrogen and fuel cell technologies and uses the results to provide feedback to the Program's research and development (R&D) activities. This year, the sub-program concluded the National Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Learning Demonstration, the principal emphasis of the sub-program over the past decade, which encompassed the co- development and integration of hydrogen infrastructure with hydrogen fuel cell-powered vehicles, allowing industry to assess progress toward technology readiness. In addition, the Technology Validation sub-program completed a project on combined hydrogen, heat, and power (tri-generation or CHHP). Continuing efforts

156

Yucca Mountain biological resources monitoring program; Annual report FY92  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The US Department of Energy (DOE) is required by the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (as amended in 1987) to study and characterize Yucca Mountain as a potential site for a geologic repository for high-level nuclear waste. During site characterization, the DOE will conduct a variety of geotechnical, geochemical, geological, and hydrological studies to determine the suitability of Yucca Mountain as a potential repository. To ensure that site characterization activities (SCA) do not adversely affect the environment at Yucca Mountain, an environmental program has been implemented to monitor and mitigate potential impacts and ensure activities comply with applicable environmental regulations. This report describes the activities and accomplishments of EG&G Energy Measurements, Inc. (EG&G/EM) during fiscal year 1992 (FY92) for six program areas within the Terrestrial Ecosystem component of the YMP environmental program. The six program areas are Site Characterization Effects, Desert Tortoises, Habitat Reclamation, Monitoring and Mitigation, Radiological Monitoring, and Biological Support.

NONE

1993-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

157

Yucca Mountain Biological Resources Monitoring Program; Annual report, FY91  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The US Department of Energy (DOE) is required by the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (as amended in 1987) to study and characterize Yucca Mountain as a possible site for a geologic repository for high-level nuclear waste. During site characterization, the DOE will conduct a variety of geotechnical, geochemical, geological, and hydrological studies to determine the suitability of Yucca Mountain as a repository. To ensure that site characterization activities (SCA) do not adversely affect the Yucca Mountain area, an environmental program has been implemented to monitor and mitigate potential impacts and to ensure that activities comply with applicable environmental regulations. This report describes the activities and accomplishments during fiscal year 1991 (FY91) for six program areas within the Terrestrial Ecosystem component of the YMP environmental program. The six program areas are Site Characterization Activities Effects, Desert Tortoises, Habitat Reclamation, Monitoring and Mitigation, Radiological Monitoring, and Biological Support.

NONE

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

158

Grande Ronde Basin Supplementation Program; Lostine River, 2001 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Northwest Power Planning Council (NPPC) identified supplementation as a high priority to achieve its goal of increasing runs of anadromous fish in the Columbia Basin. Supplementation activities in the Lostine River and associated monitoring and evaluation conducted by the Nez Perce Tribe relate directly to the needs addressed in the Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program (NPPC 1994). Measure 7.4L.1 of the Program mandates that appropriate research accompany any proposed supplementation. In addition, measure 7.3B.2 of the Program stresses the need for evaluating supplementation projects to assess their ability to increase production. Finally, Section 7.4D.3 encourages the study of hatchery rearing and release strategies to improve survival and adaptation of cultured fish. In 1997, Oregon Department of Fisheries and Wildlife (ODFW) requested a modification of Permit 1011 to allow the take of adult spring chinook salmon. In 1998, the Nez Perce Tribe also requested a permit specific to activities on Lostine River. The permit was issued in 2000. A special condition in the permits required the development of a long term management plan for the spring chinook salmon of the Grande Ronde Basin. The Nez Perce Tribe, ODFW, and the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR) completed a formal long range plan entitled ''Grande Ronde Basin Endemic Spring Chinook Salmon Supplementation Program''. The program proposes to increase the survival of spring chinook salmon in the Grand Ronde Basin through hatchery intervention. Adult salmon from the Lostine River, Catherine Creek, and the Upper Grande Ronde River are used for a conventional supplementation program in the basin. The Nez Perce program currently operates under the ESA Section 10 Permit 1149.

Onjukka, Sam T. (Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Portland, OR); Harbeck, Jim (Nez Perce Tribe, Department of Fisheries Resource Management, Enterprise, OR)

2003-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

159

Grande Ronde Basin Supplementation Program; Lostine River, 2000 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Northwest Power Planning Council (NPPC) identified supplementation as a high priority to achieve its goal of increasing runs of anadromous fish in the Columbia Basin. Supplementation activities in the Lostine River and associated monitoring and evaluation conducted by the Nez Perce Tribe relate directly to the needs addressed in the Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program (NPPC 1994). Measure 7.4L.1 of the Program mandates that appropriate research accompany any proposed supplementation. In addition, measure 7.3B.2 of the Program stresses the need for evaluating supplementation projects to assess their ability to increase production. Finally, Section 7.4D.3 encourages the study of hatchery rearing and release strategies to improve survival and adaptation of cultured fish. In 1997, Oregon Department of Fisheries and Wildlife (ODFW) requested a modification of Permit 1011 to allow the take of adult spring chinook salmon. In 1998, the Nez Perce Tribe also requested a permit specific to activities on Lostine River. The permit was issued in 2000. A special condition in the permits required the development of a long term management plan for the spring chinook salmon of the Grande Ronde Basin. The Nez Perce Tribe, ODFW, and the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR) completed a formal long range plan entitled ''Grande Ronde Basin Endemic Spring Chinook Salmon Supplementation Program''. The program proposes to increase the survival of spring chinook salmon in the Grand Ronde Basin through hatchery intervention. Adult salmon from the Lostine River, Catherine Creek, and the Upper Grande Ronde River are used for a conventional supplementation program in the basin. The Nez Perce program currently operates under the ESA Section 10 Permit 1149.

Onjukka, Sam T. (Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Portland, OR); Harbeck, Jim (Nez Perce Tribe, Department of Fisheries Resource Management, Enterprise, OR)

2003-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

160

Lake Roosevelt Fisheries Monitoring Program; 1988-1989 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In the Northwest Power Planning Council's 1987 Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program (NPPC 1987), the Council directed the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) to construct two kokanee salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) hatcheries as partial mitigation for the loss of anadromous salmon and steelhead incurred by construction of Grand Coulee Dam [Section 903 (g)(l)(C)]. The hatcheries will produce kokanee salmon for outplanting into Lake Roosevelt as well as rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) for the Lake Roosevelt net-pen program. In section 903 (g)(l)(E), the Council also directed BPA to fund a monitoring program to evaluate the effectiveness of the kokanee hatcheries. The monitoring program included the following components: (1) a year-round, reservoir-wide, creel survey to determine angler use, catch rates and composition, and growth and condition of fish; (2) assessment of kokanee, rainbow, and walleye (Stizostedion vitreum) feeding habits and densities of their preferred prey, and; (3) a mark and recapture study designed to assess the effectiveness of different locations where hatchery-raised kokanee and net pen reared rainbow trout are released. The above measures were adopted by the Council based on a management plan, developed by the Upper Columbia United Tribes Fisheries Center, Spokane Indian Tribe, Colville Confederated Tribes, Washington Department of Wildlife, and National Park Service, that examined the feasibility of restoring and enhancing Lake Roosevelt fisheries (Scholz et al. 1986). In July 1988, BPA entered into a contract with the Spokane Indian Tribe to initiate the monitoring program. The projected duration of the monitoring program is through 1995. This report contains the results of the monitoring program from August 1988 to December 1989.

Peone, Tim L.; Scholz, Allan T.; Griffith, James R.

1990-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual eeo program" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Bioremediation Education Science and Technology (BEST) Program Annual Report 1999  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Bioremediation, Education, Science and Technology (BEST) partnership provides a sustainable and contemporary approach to developing new bioremedial technologies for US Department of Defense (DoD) priority contaminants while increasing the representation of underrepresented minorities and women in an exciting new biotechnical field. This comprehensive and innovative bioremediation education program provides under-represented groups with a cross-disciplinary bioremediation cirruculum and financial support, coupled with relevant training experiences at advanced research laboratories and field sites. These programs are designed to provide a stream of highly trained minority and women professionals to meet national environmental needs.

Hazen, Terry C.

2000-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

162

Biological Systems for Hydrogen Photoproduction - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 3 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Maria L. Ghirardi (Primary Contact), Paul W. King, Kathleen Ratcliff and David Mulder National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) 1617 Cole Blvd. Golden, CO 80401 Phone: (303) 384-6312 Email: maria.ghirardi@nrel.gov DOE Manager Eric Miller Phone: (202) 287-5829 Email: Eric.Miller@hq.doe.gov Subcontractors: * Dr. Sergey Kosourov, Institute of Basic Biological Problems, RAS, Pushchino, Russia * Dr. Eric Johnson, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD Project Start Date: October 1, 2000 Project End Date: Project continuation and direction determined annually by DOE Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Primary Objectives

163

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2011 Annual Merit Review Awards  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > Awards Merit Review & Peer Evaluation > Awards Printable Version 2011 Annual Merit Review Awards Each year, the Peer Review Panel at the Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting reviews the hydrogen and fuel cell projects funded by DOE's Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program. After evaluating the merit of the 2011 hydrogen and fuel cell projects, the Peer Review Panel presented the following awards. DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Team Awards (with special recognition for outstanding technical contributions): Production Tom Jaramillo, Stanford University This award recognizes Tom Jaramillo for the invaluable contributions he has made to the program in the field of photoelectrochemical (PEC) hydrogen production. Dr. Jaramillo has been an instrumental driving force in EERE's

164

Federal Alternative Motor Fuels Programs Fifth Annual Report to Congress - 1996  

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center [Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)]

Abstract Abstract This annual report to Congress presents the current status of the U.S. Department of Energy's alterna- tive fuel vehicle demonstration and performance tracking programs being conducted across the country in accordance with the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6374, et seq.). These programs, which comprise the most compre- hensive data collection effort ever undertaken on alternative transporta- tion fuels and alternative fuel vehi- cles, are beginning their sixth year. This report summarizes tests and results from the fifth year. Even though present interest in electric vehicles is quite high, they are not currently included in these vehicle demonstration and performance tracking programs, and the annual report does not include information on them.

165

Integral Fast Reactor Program annual progress report, FY 1991  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report summarizes highlights of the technical progress made in the Integral Fast Reactor (IFR) Program in FY 1991. Technical accomplishments are presented in the following areas of the IFR technology development activities: (1) metal fuel performance, (2) pyroprocess development, (3) safety experiments and analyses, (4) core design development, (5) fuel cycle demonstration, and (6) LMR technology R&D.

Not Available

1992-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

166

Integral Fast Reactor Program annual progress report, FY 1991  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report summarizes highlights of the technical progress made in the Integral Fast Reactor (IFR) Program in FY 1991. Technical accomplishments are presented in the following areas of the IFR technology development activities: (1) metal fuel performance, (2) pyroprocess development, (3) safety experiments and analyses, (4) core design development, (5) fuel cycle demonstration, and (6) LMR technology R D.

Not Available

1992-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

167

Hydrothermal Injection Research Program. Annual progress report, FY 1983  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The test program was initiated at the Raft River Geothermal Field in southern Idaho in September of 1982. A series of eight short-term injection and backflow tests followed by a long-term injection test were conducted on one well in the field. Tracers were added during injection and monitored during backflow of the well. The test program was successful, resulting in a unique data set which shows promise as a means to improve understanding of the reservoir characteristics. In December of 1982 an RFP was issued to obtain an industrial partner to obtain follow-on data on the injection/backflow technique in a second field and to study any alternate advanced concepts for injection testing which the industrial community might recommend. Republic Geothermal, Inc. and the East Mesa Geothermal Field were selected for the second test series. Two wells were utilized for testing, and a series of ten tests were conducted in July and August of 1983 aimed principally at further evaluation of the injection/backflow technique. This test program was also successfully completed. This report describes in detail the analysis conducted on the Raft River data, the supporting work at EG and G Idaho and at ESL/UURI, and gives an overview of the objectives and test program at East Mesa.

Blackett, R.E.; Kolesar, P.T.; Capuano, R.G.; Sill, W.R.; Allman, D.W.; Hull, L.C.; Large, R.M.; Miller, J.D.; Skiba, P.A.; Downs, W.F.; Koslow, K.N.; McAtee, R.E.; Russell, B.F.

1983-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

168

94-1 R&D Program Annual Operating Plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The 94-1 R&D Program focuses on developing the technical basis for stabilizing and safely storing plutonium-bearing materials. To address these issues, we have in place a material identification and stabilization project, a surveillance and monitoring project, and a management team.

Mason, Richard E.; Dominguez, Pamela D.

2003-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

169

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2009 Annual Progress Report - Hydrogen  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Hydrogen Delivery Hydrogen Delivery Printable Version 2009 Annual Progress Report III. Hydrogen Delivery This section of the 2009 Progress Report for the DOE Hydrogen Program focuses on hydrogen delivery. Each technical report is available as an individual Adobe Acrobat PDF. Download Adobe Reader. Hydrogen Delivery Program Element Introduction, Monterey Gardiner, U.S. Department of Energy (PDF 67 KB ) Hydrogen Delivery Infrastructure Analysis (PDF 267 KB), Marianne Mintz, Argonne National Laboratory H2A Delivery Components Module (PDF 315 KB), Olga Sozinova, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Hydrogen Regional Infrastructure Program in Pennsylvania (PDF 1.3 MB), Eileen Schmura, Concurrent Technologies Corporation Oil-Free Centrifugal Hydrogen Compression Technology Demonstration

170

Proceedings of the Advanced Turbine Systems annual program review meeting  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Goals of the 8-year program are to develop cleaner, more efficient, and less expensive gas turbine systems for utility and industrial electric power generation, cogeneration, and mechanical drive units. During this Nov. 9-11, 1994, meeting, presentations on energy policy issues were delivered by representatives of regulatory, industry, and research institutions; program overviews and technical reviews were given by contractors; and ongoing and proposed future projects sponsored by university and industry were presented and displayed at the poster session. Panel discussions on distributed power and Advanced Gas Systems Research education provided a forum for interactive dialog and exchange of ideas. Exhibitors included US DOE, Solar Turbines, Westinghouse, Allison Engine Co., and GE.

NONE

1994-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

171

Fifth parabolic dish solar thermal power program annual review: proceedings  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The primary objective of the Review was to present the results of activities within the Parabolic Dish Technology and Module/Systems Development element of the Department of Energy's Solar Thermal Energy Systems Program. The Review consisted of nine technical sessions covering overall Project and Program aspects, Stirling and Brayton module development, concentrator and engine/receiver development, and associated hardware and test results to date; distributed systems operating experience; international dish development activities; and non-DOE-sponsored domestic dish activities. A panel discussion concerning business views of solar electric generation was held. These Proceedings contain the texts of presentations made at the Review, as submitted by their authors at the beginning of the Review; therefore, they may vary slightly from the actual presentations in the technical sessions.

None

1984-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

172

Applied Science Division annual report, Environmental Research Program FY 1983  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The primary concern of the Environmental Research Program is the understanding of pollutant formation, transport, and transformation and the impacts of pollutants on the environment. These impacts include global, regional, and local effects on the atmosphere and hydrosphere, and on certain aspects of human health. This multidisciplinary research program includes fundamental and applied research in physics, chemistry, engineering, and biology, as well as research on the development of advanced methods of measurement and analysis. During FY 1983, research concentrated on atmospheric physics and chemistry, applied physics and laser spectroscopy, combustion theory and phenomena, environmental effects of oil shale processing, freshwater ecology and acid precipitation, trace element analysis for the investigation of present and historical environmental impacts, and a continuing survey of instrumentation for environmental monitoring.

Cairns, E.J.; Novakov, T.

1984-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

173

Lower Granite Dam Smolt Monitoring Program; 1997 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The 1997 fish collection season at Lower Granite was characterized by high spring flows, extensive spill, cool spring and early summer water temperatures and comparatively low numbers of fish, particularly yearling chinook. The Fish Passage Center's Smolt Monitoring Program is designed to provide a consistent, real-time database of fish passage and document the migrational characteristics of the many stocks of salmon and steelhead in the Columbia Basin.

Verhey, Peter; Witalis, Shirley; Morrill, Charles (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA)

1998-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

174

Lake Roosevelt Fisheries Monitoring Program; 1990 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

As partial mitigation for the loss of anadromous salmon and steelhead incurred by construction of Grand Coulee Dam, the Northwest Power Planning Council directed Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) to construct two kokanee salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) hatcheries on Lake Roosevelt (NPPC 1987 [Section 903 (g)(l)(C)]). The hatcheries are to produce 8 million kokanee salmon fry or 3.2 million adults for outplanting into Lake Roosevelt as well as 500,000 rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) for the Lake Roosevelt net-pen programs. In section 903 (g)(l)(E), the Council also directed BPA to fund a monitoring program to evaluate the effectiveness of the kokanee hatcheries. The monitoring program included the following components: (1) conduction of a year-round creel census survey to determine angler pressure, catch rates and composition, growth and condition of fish caught by anglers, and economic value of the fishery. Comparisons will be made before and after hatcheries are on-line to determine hatchery effectiveness; (2) conduct an assessment of kokanee, rainbow trout, and walleye feeding habits, growth rates, and densities of their preferred prey at different locations in the reservoir and how reservoir operations affect population dynamics of preferred prey organisms. This information will be used to determine kokanee and rainbow trout stocking locations, stocking densities and stocking times; (3) conduct a mark-recapture study designed to assess effectiveness of various release times and locations for hatchery-raised kokanee and net-pen raised rainbow so fish-loss over Grand Coulee Dam will be minimized, homing to egg collection sites will be improved and angler harvest will be increased. The above measures were adopted by the Council based on a management plan developed by Upper Columbia United Tribes Fisheries Center, Spokane Indian Tribe, Colville Confederated Tribes, Washington Department of Wildlife, and the National Park Service. This plan examined the feasibility of restoring and enhancing Lake Roosevelt fisheries (Scholz et al. 1986). In July 1988, BPA entered into a contract with the Spokane Indian Tribe to initiate the monitoring program and continue research through 1995. This report contains the results of the monitoring program from January to December 1990.

Griffith, Janelle R.; Scholz, Allan T. (Eastern Washington University, Upper Columbia United Tribes Fisheries Research Center, Cheney, WA)

1991-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

175

Annual report of the Surface Air Sampling Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Tropospheric concentrations of radioactive debris from nuclear weapons tests continued to decrease during the period from 1983 to 1985. For the first time since this measurement program was begun, no clear springtime peak was discernible in the concentrations of /sup 90/Sr, /sup 137/Cs, and /sup 239,240/Pu in the surface air of the Northern Hemisphere. The data for quality assurance samples measured as part of the program indicate that the low ambient concentrations during this period introduced significant uncertainties into the fission product data for routine monthly samples. Meteorological factors probably produce the large observed week to week variations in the concentrations of /sup 7/Be and /sup 210/Pb at sites that are sampled on a weekly basis. Four such factors are responsible for much of the seasonal variation of /sup 7/Be concentrations. These are variations in the rate of exchange of air between the stratosphere and the troposphere, of vertical transport within the troposphere, of horizontal mixing between high- and mid-latitudes, and of washout by rainfall.

Freely, H.W.; Larsen, R.J.; Sanderson, C.G.

1988-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

176

Proceedings of the 2002 U.S. DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Annual Program/Lab R&D Review, May 6-10, 2002, Golden, Colorado.  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Proceedings of the US DOE Hydrogen Program, the Fuel Cells for Transportation Program, and the Fuels for Fuel Cells Program inaugural combined Annual Program/Lab R&D Review held May 6-10, 2002 in Golden, Colorado.

177

U.S. Department of Energy EEO COUNSELOR'S REPORT 1. COMPLAINANT'S/AGENT'S FULL NAME:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2 2 (11-83) U.S. Department of Energy EEO COUNSELOR'S REPORT 1. COMPLAINANT'S/AGENT'S FULL NAME: 4. COMPLAINANT'S/AGENT'S/AGENCY/OFFICE NAME: 2. COMPLAINANT'S HOME ADDRESS: 5. COMPLAINANT'S OFFICE ADDRESS: 3. OFFICE COMPLAINANT BELIEVES DISCRIMINATED AGAINST HIM/HER: 6. TITLE AND GRADE OF COMPLAINANT: 7. BASIS OF DISCRIMINATION ALLEGED: (Check and specify) 8. ISSUES ALLEGED: Street Address, RD, or P.O. Box: City, State, Zip Code: Phone Number (Include Area Code): Street Address, RD, or P.O. Box: City, State, Zip Code: Phone Number (Include Area Code): Race Color Religion Age Sex Handicap (Physical or Mental) National Origin Reprisal Assignment of Duties Examination/Test Work Conditions Harrassment Reprisal Pay including Overtime Conversion to Fulltime/CC Reinstatement Awards

178

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2012 Annual Progress Report - Hydrogen  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Hydrogen Production Hydrogen Production Printable Version 2012 Annual Progress Report II. Hydrogen Production This section of the 2012 Annual Progress Report for the DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program focuses on hydrogen production. Hydrogen Production Sub-Program Overview, Sara Dillich, U.S. Department of Energy A. Distributed Bio-Derived Liquid Production Biomass-Derived Liquids Distributed (Aqueous Phase) Reforming, David King, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Distributed Bio-Oil Reforming, Stefan Czernik, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Back to Top B. Biomass Gasification One Step Biomass Gas Reforming-Shift Separation Membrane Reactor, Mike Roberts, Gas Technology Institute Back to Top C. Separations Development of Hydrogen Selective Membranes/Modules as Reactors/Separators for Distributed Hydrogen Production, Paul Liu, Media

179

2005 Annual Progress Report for the Advanced Power Electronics and Electric Machinery Program  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Technologies, EE-2G Technologies, EE-2G 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20585-0121 FY 2005 Annual Progress Report for the Advanced Power Electronics and Electric Machinery Program Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy FreedomCAR and Vehicle Technologies Vehicle Systems Team Susan A. Rogers, Technology Development Manager November 2005 ii Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations ................................................................................................................. iv Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................ 1 1. Technical Support............................................................................................................................. 3

180

Primary Contacts Index; DOE Hydrogen Program FY 2009 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 3 FY 2009 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen Program XIII. Primary Contacts Index A Aceves, Salvador . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 336, 771, 1257 Adams, Thad . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95, 358 Adrianowycz, Orest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1108 Ahluwalia, Rajesh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 714, 919 Ahmed, Shabbir . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49, 1274 Ahn, Channing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 487, 625 Allendorf, Mark . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 498 Anton, Donald . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 483, 675, 720 Arif, Muhammad . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 952 Autrey, Tom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 528, 846 B Bain, Richard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 Balachandran, U . (Balu) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 Baldwin, Don . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 350 Barclay, John . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 327 Barton, Tom . . . .

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual eeo program" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Annual report of the Surface Air Sampling Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Tropospheric concentrations of radioactive debris from nuclear weapons tests are currently at or below the lower limits of detection of our analytical systems. Following the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear reactor in the USSR on April 26, 1986, fission products were detected at all sampling sites located in the Northern Hemisphere. Short-term variations in the concentrations of {sup 7}Be and {sup 210}Pb at sites in which weekly air filter samples are analyzed probably result from variations in meteorological factors. The data from quality assurance samples indicate that the reliability of the air filter measurements are acceptable. The gross gamma-ray activity and the monthly mean surface air concentrations of {sup 7}Be, {sup 95}Zr, {sup 137}CS, {sup 144}Ce and {sup 210}Pb at sampling sites in the Surface Air Sampling Program during 1985 through 1988 are presented. The weekly mean surface air concentrations of {sup 7}Be, {sup 137}Cs, {sup 144}Ce and {sup 210}Pb are also presented for 11 sites. 2 refs., 1 fig., 27 tabs.

Larsen, R.J.; Sanderson, C.G.

1990-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

182

Third annual Walker Branch Watershed research symposium. Program and abstracts  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The methods and concepts of watershed research, originally applied in an experimental or monitoring mode to relatively small catchments, are increasingly being used at larger scales and for specific applied problems. Research at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, the Tennessee Valley Authority, the US Forest Service, and other agencies and institutions participating in this symposium reflects research over a broad range of spatial scales that is being integrated through large-scale experiments along with computer modeling and graphical interfaces. These research projects address the basic atmospheric, geophysical, biogeochemical, and biological processes that regulate the responses of forested ecosystems to natural environmental variation and anthropogenic stresses. Regional and global issues addressed by presentations include emissions of carbon dioxide, methane, and other hydrocarbons; deposition of sulfate, nitrate, and mercury; land-use changes; biological diversity; droughts; and water quality. The reports presented in this symposium illustrate a wide range of methods and approaches and focus more on concepts and techniques than on a specific physical site. Sites and projects that have contributed research results to this symposium include Walker Branch Watershed (DOE), the Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory and LTER site (USFS and NSF), Great Smoky Mountains National Park (research funded by NPS, TVA, and EPRI), Imnavait Creek, Alaska (DOE), the TVA-Norris Whole-tree Facility (TVA and EPRI), and DOE`s Biomass Program.

Not Available

1992-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

183

Proceedings of the 2011 ACM annual international conference on Special interest group on the ada programming language  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Welcome to the 2011 Annual International Conference of the Association for Computing Machinery's (ACM's) Special Interest Group on the Ada Programming Language (SIGAda), being held in Denver, Colorado, in the heart of the western United States. We offer ...

Ricky E. Sward; Jeff Boleng; Michael Feldman; Dan Eilers; Jean-Pierre Rosen; Frank Singhoff; Julien DeLange; Mark Gardinier; Karl Nyberg

2011-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

184

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2010 Annual Progress Report - Systems  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Systems Analysis Systems Analysis Printable Version 2010 Annual Progress Report VII. Systems Analysis This section of the 2010 Progress Report for the DOE Hydrogen Program focuses on systems analysis. Each technical report is available as an individual Adobe Acrobat PDF. Systems Analysis Sub-Program Overview, Fred Joseck, DOE Scenario Evaluation, Regionalization and Analysis (SERA) Model, Brian Bush, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Analysis of Energy Infrastructures and Potential Impacts from an Emergent Hydrogen Fueling Infrastructure, David Reichmuth, Sandia National Laboratories Agent-Based Model of the Transition to Hydrogen-Based Personal Transportation: Consumer Adoption and Infrastructure Development Including Combined Hydrogen, Heat, and Power, Matthew Mahalik, Argonne National

185

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2008 Annual Progress Report - Delivery  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Delivery Delivery Printable Version 2008 Annual Progress Report III. Delivery This section of the 2008 Progress Report for the DOE Hydrogen Program focuses on delivery. Each technical report is available as an individual Adobe Acrobat PDF. Download Adobe Reader. Hydrogen Delivery Sub-Program Overview, Rick Farmer, U.S. Department of Energy (PDF 218 KB) Hydrogen Delivery Infrastructure Options Analysis, TP Chen, Nexant, Inc. (PDF 242 KB) Hydrogen Delivery Infrastructure Analysis, Marrianne Mintz, Argonne National Laboratory (PDF 324 KB) Hydrogen Embrittlement of Pipelines: Fundamentals, Experiments, Modeling, Petros Sofronis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign (PDF 686 KB) Materials Solutions for Hydrogen Delivery in Steel Pipeline, Subodh Das, Secat, Inc. (PDF 691 KB)

186

Electric and Hybrid Vehicles Program. Sixteenth annual report to Congress for fiscal year 1992  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report describes the progress achieved in developing electric and hybrid vehicle technologies, beginning with highlights of recent accomplishments in FY 1992. Detailed descriptions are provided of program activities during FY 1992 in the areas of battery, fuel cell, and propulsion system development, and testing and evaluation of new technology in fleet site operations and in laboratories. This Annual Report also contains a status report on incentives and use of foreign components, as well as a list of publications resulting from the DOE program.

Not Available

1993-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

187

Annual Report of the Integrated Status and Effectiveness Monitoring Program: Fiscal Year 2008  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document was created as an annual report detailing the accomplishments of the Integrated Status and Effectiveness Monitoring Program (ISEMP) in the Upper Columbia Basin in fiscal year 2008. The report consists of sub-chapters that reflect the various components of the program. Chapter 1 presents a report on programmatic coordination and accomplishments, and Chapters 2 through 4 provide a review of how ISEMP has progressed during the 2008 fiscal year in each of the pilot project subbasins: the John Day (Chapter 2), Wenatchee/Entiat (Chapter 3) and Salmon River (Chapter 4). Chapter 5 presents a report on the data management accomplishments in 2008.

Terraqua, Inc. (Wauconda, WA)

2009-07-20T23:59:59.000Z

188

Annual  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

19 19 th Annual Triple "E" Seminar Presented by U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory and Spectroscopy Society of Pittsburgh Thursday, January 20, 2011 8:00 a.m. Registration & Breakfast 8:30 a.m. Opening Remarks/Welcome Michael Nowak, Senior Management & Technical Advisor National Energy Technology Laboratory 8:35 a.m. Overview of Energy Issues Michael Nowak, Senior Management & Technical Advisor National Energy Technology Laboratory 8:45 a.m. Introduction of Presenters McMahan Gray National Energy Technology Laboratory 8:50 a.m. Jane Konrad, Pgh Regional Center for Science Teachers "Green - What Does it Mean" 9:45 a.m. Break 10:00 a.m. John Varine, Spectroscopy Society of Pittsburgh

189

Hydrogen Delivery Sub-Program Overview - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program IntroductIon The Hydrogen Delivery sub-program supports research and development (R&D) of technologies that enable low-cost, efficient, and safe delivery of hydrogen to the end-user in order to achieve a threshold cost of $2-$4 per gallon gasoline equivalent (gge) of hydrogen (produced, delivered, and dispensed), which represents the cost at which hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs) are projected to become competitive on a cost- per-mile basis with competing vehicles (gasoline-powered hybrid-electric vehicles) in 2020. 1 The Hydrogen Delivery sub-program addresses all hydrogen distribution activities from the point of production to the point

190

Market Transformation Activities - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 3 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program IntroductIon The Market Transformation sub-program is conducting activities to help promote and implement commercial and pre-commercial hydrogen and fuel cell systems in real-world operating environments and to provide feedback to research programs, U.S. industry manufacturers, and potential technology users. One of the sub-program's goals is to achieve sufficient manufacturing volumes in emerging commercial applications that will enable cost reductions through economies of scale, which will help address the current high cost of fuel cells (currently the capital and installation costs of fuel cells are from five to six times higher than

191

Technical Assistance to Developers - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 3 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program T. Rockward and R.L. Borup (Primary Contacts), F. Garzon, R. Mukundan, and D. Spernjak Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) P.O. Box 1663 Los Alamos, NM 87545 Phone: (505) 667-9587 and (505) 667-2823 Emails: trock@lanl.gov, borup@lanl.gov DOE Manager HQ: Nancy Garland Phone: (202) 586-5673 Email: Nancy.Garland@ee.doe.gov Project Start Date: October 2003 Project End Date: Project continuation and direction determined annually by DOE Objectives Support technically, as directed by DOE, fuel cell * component and system developers Assess fuel cell materials and components and give * feedback to developers Assist the DOE Durability Working Group with the * development of various new material durability testing

192

Composite Technology for Hydrogen Pipelines - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7 7 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Barton Smith (Primary Contact), Barbara J. Frame and Lawrence M. Anovitz Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) P. O. Box 2008 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Phone: (865) 574-2196 Email: smithdb@ornl.gov DOE Manager HQ: Sara Dillich Phone: (202) 586-7925 Email: Sara.Dillich@ee.doe.gov Start Date: January 2005 Project End Date: Project continuation and direction determined annually by DOE Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Complete high-pressure cyclic fatigue tests to verify that * a combination of H 2 environment and stress does not adversely affect composite pipeline integrity and service life. Identify the requisite data, provide data, and contribute * to the codification of hydrogen composite pipelines, in

193

Characterization of Fuel Cell Materials - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2 2 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Karren L. More Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) 1 Bethel Valley Rd. Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6064 Phone: (865) 574-7788 Email: morekl1@ornl.gov DOE Manager HQ: Donna Ho Phone: (202) 586-8000 Email: Donna.Ho@ee.doe.gov Contributors: * David Cullen (ORNL) * Miaofang Chi (ORNL) * Kelly Perry (ORNL) Project Start Date: Fiscal Year (FY) Year 1999 Project End Date: Project continuation and direction determined annually by DOE Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Develop and/or apply novel preparation, imaging, and * analytical methods to characterize fuel cell materials and architectures in the as-processed (fresh) state, during

194

Component Standard Research and Development - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8 8 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Robert Burgess (Primary Contact), William Buttner, Matthew Post, Carl Rivkin, Chad Blake National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) 15013 Denver West Parkway Golden, CO 80401 Phone: (303) 275-3823 Email: robert.burgess@nrel.gov DOE Manager HQ: Antonio Ruiz Phone: (202) 586-0729 Email: Antonio.Ruiz@ee.doe.gov Subcontractor: SAE International, Troy, MI Project Start Date: Fiscal Year (FY) 2008 Project End Date: Project continuation and direction determined annually by DOE Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Support development of new codes and standards * required for commercialization of hydrogen technologies. Create code language that is based on the latest scientific *

195

Hydrogen Embrittlement of Structural Steels - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

9 9 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Daniel Dedrick (Primary Contact), Brian Somerday Sandia National Laboratories P.O. Box 969 Livermore, CA 94550 Phone: (925) 294-1552 Email: dededri@sandia.gov DOE Manager HQ: Erika Sutherland Phone: (202) 586-3152 Email: Erika.Sutherland@ee.doe.gov Project Start Date: January, 2007 Project End Date: Project continuation and direction determined annually by DOE Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Determine the threshold level of oxygen impurity * concentration required to mitigate accelerated fatigue crack growth of X52 steel in hydrogen at gas pressures up to 3,000 psi (21 MPa) Measure the fatigue crack growth (da/dN vs. * ∆K) relationship at constant H 2 gas pressure in X65 pipeline

196

Hydrogen Delivery Infrastructure Analysis - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 3 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Amgad Elgowainy (Primary Contact), Marianne Mintz and Krishna Reddi Argonne National Laboratory 9700 South Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439 Phone: (630) 252-3074 Email: aelgowainy@anl.gov DOE Manager HQ: Erika Sutherland Phone: (202) 586-3152 Email: Erika.Sutherland@ee.doe.gov Project Start Date: October 2007 Project End Date: Project continuation and direction determined annually by DOE Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Identify cost drivers of current technologies for hydrogen * delivery to early market applications of fuel cells Evaluate role of high-pressure tube-trailers in reducing * hydrogen delivery cost Identify and evaluate benefits of synergies between *

197

Aluminum Hydride - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 1 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Jason Graetz (Primary Contact), James Wegrzyn Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) Building 815 Upton, NY 11973 Phone: (631) 344-3242 Email: graetz@bnl.gov DOE Manager HQ: Ned Stetson Phone: (202) 586-9995 Email: Ned.Stetson@ee.doe.gov Project Start Date: October 1, 2011 Project End Date: Project continuation and direction determined annually by DOE Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Develop onboard vehicle storage systems using aluminum hydride that meets all of DOE's targets for proton exchange membrane fuel cell vehicles. Produce aluminum hydride material with a hydrogen * storage capacity greater than 9.7% gravimetric (kg-H 2 /kg) and 0.13 kg-H 2 /L volumetric. Develop practical and economical processes for *

198

Hydrogen Materials and Components Compatibility - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2 2 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Aaron Harris (Primary Contact), Brian Somerday, Chris San Marchi Sandia National Laboratories P.O. Box 969 Livermore, CA 94551-0969 Phone: (925) 294-4530 Email: apharri@sandia.gov DOE Manager HQ: Antonio Ruiz Phone: (202) 586-0729 Email: Antonio.Ruiz@ee.doe.gov Project Start Date: October, 2003 Project End Date: Project continuation and direction determined annually by DOE Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Complete Canadian Standards Association (CSA) Test * Method for Evaluating Material Compatibility for Compressed Hydrogen Applications - Phase I - Metals (CHMC1) document Issue Sandia report reflecting updated content from * Technical Reference website

199

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2006 Annual Progress Report - Fuel  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Fuel Cells Fuel Cells Printable Version 2006 Annual Progress Report V. Fuel Cells This section of the 2006 Progress Report for the DOE Hydrogen Program focuses on fuel cells. Each technical report is available as an individual Adobe Acrobat PDF. Download Adobe Reader. Fuel Cells Sub-Program Overview, Valri Lightner, Fuel Cell Team Lead, DOE Hydrogen Program (PDF 169 KB) A. Membrane Electrode Assemblies (MEAs) Integrated Manufacturing for Advanced Membrane Electrode Assemblies, Emory DeCastro, PEMEAS U.S.A., E-TEK Division (PDF 251 KB) Advanced MEAs for Enhanced Operating Conditions, Mark Debe, 3M (PDF 892 KB) Electrocatalyst Supports and Electrode Structures, Mahlon Wilson, Los Alamos National Laboratory (PDF 1.46 MB) Back to Top B. Membranes and MEAs Poly(p-Phenylene Sulfonic Acid)s with Frozen-in Free Volume for Use

200

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2006 Annual Progress Report - Storage  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Storage Storage Printable Version 2006 Annual Progress Report IV. Storage This section of the 2006 Progress Report for the DOE Hydrogen Program focuses on storage. Each technical report is available as an individual Adobe Acrobat PDF. Download Adobe Reader. Hydrogen Storage Sub-Program Overview, Sunita Satyapal, Storage Team Lead, DOE Hydrogen Program (PDF 298 KB) A. Metal Hydrides High Density Hydrogen Storage System Demonstration Using NaAlH4 Based Complex Compound Hydrides, Dan Mosher, United Technologies Research Center (PDF 763 KB) Discovery of Novel Complex Metal Hydrides for Hydrogen Storage through Molecular Modeling and Combinatorial Methods, David Lesch, UOP LLC (PDF 780 KB) Complex Hydride Compounds with Enhanced Hydrogen Storage Capacity, Dan Mosher, United Technologies Research Center (PDF 678 KB)

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual eeo program" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

FY2001 Annual Progress Report for the Vehicle Propulsion & Ancillary Subsystems Program  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

PROPULSION & PROPULSION & ANCILLARY SUBSYSTEMS 2 0 0 1 A N N UA L P R O G R E S S R E P O R T U.S. Department of Energy Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Office of Transportation Technologies A C K N O W L E D G E M E N T We would like to express our sincere appreciation to Argonne National Laboratory and Computer Systems Management, Inc., for their artistic and technical contributions in preparing and publishing this report. In addition, we would like to thank all our program participants for their contributions to the programs and all the authors who prepared the project abstracts that comprise this report. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Advanced Automotive Technologies 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20585-0121 FY 2001 Annual Progress Report for the Vehicle Propulsion & Ancillary Subsystems Program

202

Proceedings of the Third Annual Information Meeting DOE Low-Level Waste-Management Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Third Annual Participants Information Meeting of the Low-Level Waste Management Program was held in New Orleans, Louisiana, November 4-6, 1981 The specific purpose was to bring together appropriate representatives of industry, USNRC, program management, participating field offices, and contractors to: (1) exchange information and analyze program needs, and (2) involve participants in planning, developing and implementing technology for low-level waste management. One hundred seven registrants participated in the meeting. Presentation and workshop findings are included in these proceedings under the following headings: low-level waste activities; waste treatment; shallow land burial; remedial action; greater confinement; ORNL reports; panel workshops; and summary. Forty-six papers have been abstracted and indexed for the data base.

Large, D.E.; Lowrie, R.S.; Stratton, L.E.; Jacobs, D.G. (comps.)

1981-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

203

Project Listings by State, DOE Hydrogen Program FY 2010 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7 7 FY 2010 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen Program Alabama V.B.2 CFD Research Corp.: Water Transport in PEM Fuel Cells: Advanced Modeling, Material Selection, Testing, and Design Optimization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .711 V.B.2 ESI US R&D: Water Transport in PEM Fuel Cells: Advanced Modeling, Material Selection, Testing, and Design Optimization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .711 Alaska VIII.9 Tanadgusix Foundation: TDX Foundation Hydrogen Project/PEV Project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1288 VIII.9 TDX Power: TDX Foundation Hydrogen Project/PEV Project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1288 VIII.9 Alaska Center for Energy and Power: TDX Foundation Hydrogen Project/PEV Project . . . . . . . . . 1288

204

Project Listings by Organization, excerpt from 2007 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

25 25 FY 2007 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen Program XVI. Project Listings by Organization 3M V.E.1 Novel Approach to Non-Precious Metal Catalysts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .820 V.E.4 Advanced Cathode Catalysts and Supports for PEM Fuel Cells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .833 V.L.2 Adaptive Stack With Subdivided Cells for Improved Stability, Reliability, and Durability Under Automotive Load Cycle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .874 V.M.2 Membranes and MEA's for Dry, Hot Operating Conditions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .885 V.M.3 New Polyelectrolyte Materials for High Temperature Fuel Cells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

205

Project Listings by State; DOE Hydrogen Program FY 2008 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 5 FY 2008 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen Program Alabama IV.B.1i University of Alabama: Main Group Element and Organic Chemistry for Hydrogen Storage and Activation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .592 V.H.1 CFD Research Corporation: Water Transport in PEM Fuel Cells: Advanced Modeling, Material Selection, Testing, and Design Optimization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1033 V.H.1 ESI US R&D: Water Transport in PEM Fuel Cells: Advanced Modeling, Material Selection, Testing, and Design Optimization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1033 Alaska II.C.3 University of Alaska: Development of a Novel Efficient Solid-Oxide Hybrid for Co-Generation of Hydrogen and Electricity Using Nearby Resources for Local Application .

206

National Codes and Standards Coordination - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8 8 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Carl Rivkin, (Primary Contact), Chad Blake, Robert Burgess, William Buttner, and Matthew Post National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, CO 80401 Phone: (303) 275-3839 Email: carl.rivkin@nrel.gov DOE Manager Antonio Ruiz Phone: (202) 586-0729 Email: Antonio.Ruiz@ee.doe.gov Subcontractors: * CSA, Standards, Cleveland, OH * FP2 Fire Protection Engineering, Golden, CO * GWS Solutions, Tolland, CT * Kelvin Hecht, Avon, CT * MorEvents, Englewood, CO * SAE International (SAE), Warrendale, PA

207

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

XVII-1 XVII-1 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Alabama V.F.5 CFD Research Corporation: Water Transport in PEM Fuel Cells: Advanced Modeling, Material Selection, Testing, and Design Optimization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-226 V.F.5 ESI US R&D: Water Transport in PEM Fuel Cells: Advanced Modeling, Material Selection, Testing, and Design Optimization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-226 Arizona VI.3 Arizona State University: Adaptive Process Controls and Ultrasonics for High-Temperature PEM MEA Manufacture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VI-17 Arkansas XII.4 FedEx Freight: Fuel Cell-Powered Lift Truck FedEx Freight Fleet Deployment .

208

Project Listings by Organization, DOE Hydrogen Program FY 2010 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

33 33 FY 2010 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen Program 3M Company V.D.2 Membranes and MEAs for Dry, Hot Operating Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .748 V.D.7 Novel Approaches to Immobilized Heteropoly Acid (HPA) Systems for High Temperature, Low Relative Humidity Polymer-Type Membranes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .772 V.E.1 Advanced Cathode Catalysts and Supports for PEM Fuel Cells. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .790 V.E.6 Durable Catalysts for Fuel Cell Protection during Transient Conditions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .825 V.E.8 Nanosegregated Cathode Alloy Catalysts with Ultra-Low Platinum Loading. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .835

209

Projects Listings by State, excerpt from 2007 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7 7 FY 2007 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen Program XV. Project Listings by State Alabama II.I.7 Production and Storage of Hydrogen from Coal Using C1 Chemistry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .207 IV.B.5k Main Group Element and Organic Chemistry for Hydrogen Storage and Activation . . . . . . . . . . . . . 514 V.D.21 Nanostructured Catalysts for Fuel Cells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .803 V.M.2 Membranes and MEA's for Dry, Hot Operating Conditions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .885 V.R.2 Water Transport in PEM Fuel Cells: Advanced Modeling, Material Selection, Testing, and Design Optimization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1042

210

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

XV-1 XV-1 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program A Aceves, Salvador. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .III.11 Adzic, Radoslav . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V.D.6 Ahluwalia, Rajesh. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV.E.1, V.A.4 Ainscough, Chris . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V.A.8 Anton, Don . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .IV.D.1 Arif, Muhammad . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V.A.6 Atanasoski, Radoslav . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V.D.3 Autrey, Tom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .IV.H.16 Ayers, Katherine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II.D.2, II.D.5 B Baxter-Clemmons, Shannon. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IX.1, X.4

211

Project Listings by Organization; DOE Hydrogen Program FY 2008 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7 7 FY 2008 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen Program 3M Company V.C.1 Advanced Cathode Catalysts and Supports for PEM Fuel Cells. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .861 V.G.5 Membranes and MEAs for Dry, Hot Operating Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .962 V.G.8 Novel Approaches to Immobilized Heteropoly Acid (HPA) Systems for High Temperature, Low Relative Humidity Polymer-Type Membranes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 978 A Mountain Top, LLC X.8 HyDRA: Hydrogen Demand and Resource Analysis Tool . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1275 Addison Bain VIII.6 Hydrogen Safety Panel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1202

212

Grande Ronde Basin Chinook Salmon Captive Brood and Conventional Supplementation Program, 2000 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Endangered Species Permit Number 1011 (formerly Permit No. 973) authorizes ODFW to take listed spring chinook salmon juveniles from Catherine Creek (CC), Lostine River (LR) and Grande Ronde River (GR) for research and enhancement purposes. Modification 2 of this permit authorizes ODFW to take adults for spawning and the production and release of smolts for the Captive and Conventional broodstock programs. This report satisfies the requirement that an annual report be submitted. Herein we report on activities conducted and provide cursory data analyses for the Grande Ronde spring chinook salmon Captive and Conventional broodstock projects from 1 January-31 December 2000.

Carmichael, Richard W. (Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, La Grande, OR)

2003-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

213

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2007 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2007 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 14-18, 2007, in Washington, D.C. The projects evaluated support the Department of Energy and President Bush's Hydrogen Initiative. The results of this merit review and peer evaluation are major inputs used by DOE to make funding decisions. Project areas include hydrogen production and delivery; hydrogen storage; fuel cells; technology validation; safety, codes and standards; education; and systems analysis.

Milliken, J.

2007-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

214

Project Listings by Organization; DOE Hydrogen Program FY 2009 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 3 FY 2009 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen Program 3M Company V.D.11 Novel Approaches to Immobilized Heteropoly Acid (HPA) Systems for High Temperature, Low Relative Humidity Polymer-Type Membranes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1034 V.D.13 Membranes and MEAs for Dry, Hot Operating Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1042 V.E.1 Advanced Cathode Catalysts and Supports for PEM Fuel Cells. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1065 A Mountaintop LLC VII.1 HyDRA: Hydrogen Demand and Resource Analysis Tool . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1267 Acumentrics Corporation V.I.5 Development of a Low Cost 3-10 kW Tubular SOFC Power System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1141 Addison Bain IX.7 Hydrogen Safety Panel

215

Microsoft Word - FY 2011 MD-715 Report.docx  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

1 1 DOE NNSA December 14, 2011 i National Nuclear Security Administration U.S. Department of Energy ANNUAL EEO PROGRAM STATUS REPORT EEO PLAN TO ATTAIN THE ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF A MODEL EEO PROGRAM Table of Contents Page FORM 715-01 Part A Department or Agency Identifying Information......................1 FORM 715-01 Part B Total Employment....................................................................1 FORM 715-01 Part C Agency Official(s) Responsible for oversight of EEO Program(s)................................................................................................................1 FORM 715-01 Part D List of Subordinate Components Covered in this Report ........3 FORM 715-01 Part E Executive Summary.................................................................4

216

EEOC FORM  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Management Directive-715 Fiscal Year 2012 DOE NNSA February 4, 2013 i National Nuclear Security Administration U.S. Department of Energy ANNUAL EEO PROGRAM STATUS REPORT EEO PLAN TO ATTAIN THE ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF A MODEL EEO PROGRAM Table of Contents Page FORM 715-01 Part A Department or Agency Identifying Information......................1 FORM 715-01 Part B Total Employment....................................................................1 FORM 715-01 Part C Agency Official(s) Responsible for oversight of EEO Program(s)................................................................................................................1

217

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

ANALYSIS ANALYSIS FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report | 465 2013 - Systems Analysis Summary of Annual Merit Review of the Systems Analysis Program Summary of Reviewer Comments on the Systems Analysis Program: The reviewers considered the Systems Analysis program to be an essential component of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program's (the Program's) mission. The projects were considered to be appropriately diverse and focused on addressing technical barriers and meeting targets. In general, the reviewers noted that the Systems Analysis program is well managed and demonstrated the ability to address immediate analytical needs and overall objectives and plans, especially to implement the new initiative, H

218

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2009 Annual Progress Report - Hydrogen  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Hydrogen Storage Hydrogen Storage Printable Version 2009 Annual Progress Report IV. Hydrogen Storage This section of the 2009 Progress Report for the DOE Hydrogen Program focuses on hydrogen storage. Each technical report is available as an individual Adobe Acrobat PDF. Download Adobe Reader. Hydrogen Storage Program Element Introduction, Sara Dillich, U.S. Department of Energy (PDF 489 KB) A. Metal Hydride Center of Excellence Metal Hydride Center of Excellence Metal Hydride Center of Excellence (PDF 243 KB), Lennie Klebanoff, Sandia National Laboratories Thermodynamically Tuned Nanophase Materials for Reversible Hydrogen Storage: Structure and Kinetics of Nanoparticle and Model System Materials (PDF 324 KB), Bruce Clemens, Stanford University Development of Metal Hydrides at Sandia National Laboratories (PDF

219

FY2007 Annual Progress Report for the Advanced Power Electronics and Electric Machinery Program  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Power electronics And Power electronics And electric MAchinery ProgrAM v ehicle t echnologies Progr AM Less dependence on foreign oil today, and transition to a petroleum-free, emissions-free vehicle tomorrow. 2 0 0 7 a n n u a l p r o g r e s s r e p o r t U.S. Department of Energy Office of Vehicle Technologies, EE-2G 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20585-0121 FY 2007 Annual Progress Report for the Advanced Power Electronics and Electric Machinery Program Submitted to: Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Office of Vehicle Technologies Vehicle Systems Team Susan A. Rogers, Technology Development Manager December 2007 Power Electronics and Electric Machines FY 2007 Progress Report Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations ................................................................................................................ v

220

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2005 Annual Progress Report - Delivery  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Delivery Delivery Printable Version 2005 Annual Progress Report V. Delivery This section of the 2005 Progress Report for the DOE Hydrogen Program focuses on delivery. Each technical report is available as an individual Adobe Acrobat PDF. Download Adobe Reader. Hydrogen Delivery Sub-program Overview, Mark Paster, Department of Energy (PDF 159 KB) A. Pipelines Hydrogen Permeability and Integrity of Hydrogen Transfer Pipelines, Zhili Feng, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (PDF 596 KB) New Materials for Hydrogen Pipelines, Barton Smith, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (PDF 562 KB) Materials Solutions for Hydrogen Delivery in Pipelines, Subodh K. Das, SECAT Inc (PDF 248 KB) Evaluation of Natural Gas Pipeline Materials for Hydrogen/Mixed Hydrogen-natural Gas Service, Thad M. Adams, Savannah River National

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual eeo program" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2011 Annual Progress Report - Hydrogen  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Hydrogen Production Hydrogen Production Printable Version 2011 Annual Progress Report II. Hydrogen Production This section of the 2011 Progress Report for the DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program focuses on hydrogen production. Each technical report is available as an individual Adobe Acrobat PDF. Hydrogen Production Sub-Program Overview, Sara Dillich, DOE A. Distributed Bio-Derived Liquid Production Biomass-Derived Liquids Distributed (Aqueous Phase) Reforming, David King, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Distributed Bio-Oil Reforming, Stefan Czernik, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Distributed Reforming of Renewable Liquids Using Oxygen Transport Membranes (OTMs), Balu Balachandran, Argonne National Laboratory Back to Top B. Biomass Gasification A Novel Slurry-Based Biomass Reforming Process, Sean Emerson, United

222

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2007 Annual Progress Report - Delivery  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Delivery Delivery Printable Version 2007 Annual Progress Report III. Delivery This section of the 2007 Progress Report for the DOE Hydrogen Program focuses on delivery. Each technical report is available as an individual Adobe Acrobat PDF. Download Adobe Reader. Hydrogen Delivery Sub-Program Overview, Mark Paster, U.S. Department of Energy (PDF 182 KB) A. Analysis Hydrogen Delivery Infrastructure Options Analysis, Tan-Ping Chen, Nexant, Inc. (PDF 620 KB) B. Liquefaction Innovative Hydrogen Liquefaction Cycle, Martin A. Shimko, Gas Equipment Engineering Corp. (PDF 514 KB) C. Carriers Reversible Liquid Carriers for an Integrated Production, Storage and Delivery of Hydrogen, Guido P. Pez, Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. (PDF 528 KB) D. Storage Inexpensive Delivery of Compressed Hydrogen with Advanced Vessel

223

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2010 Annual Progress Report - Hydrogen  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Hydrogen Storage Hydrogen Storage Printable Version 2010 Annual Progress Report IV. Hydrogen Storage This section of the 2010 Progress Report for the DOE Hydrogen Program focuses on hydrogen storage. Each technical report is available as an individual Adobe Acrobat PDF. Hydrogen Storage Sub-Program Overview, Ned Stetson, DOE A. Metal Hydride Center of Excellence Metal Hydride Center of Excellence Five-Year Review of Metal Hydride Center of Excellence, Lennie Klebanoff, Sandia National Laboratories Fundamental Studies of Advanced High-Capacity, Reversible Metal Hydrides, Craig Jensen, University of Hawaii Lightweight Metal Hydrides for Hydrogen Storage, J.-C. Zhao, Ohio State University Development of Metal Hydrides at Sandia National Laboratories, Lennie Klebanoff, Sandia National Laboratories

224

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2005 Annual Progress Report - Storage  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Storage Storage Printable Version 2005 Annual Progress Report VI. Storage This section of the 2005 Progress Report for the DOE Hydrogen Program focuses on storage. Each technical report is available as an individual Adobe Acrobat PDF. Download Adobe Reader. Hydrogen Storage Sub-program Overview, Sunita Satyapal, Department of Energy (PDF 244 KB) A. Metal Hydrides Catalytically Enhanced Hydrogen Storage Systems, Craig M. Jensen, University of Hawaii (PDF 441 KB) High Density Hydrogen Storage System Demonstration using NaAlH4 Based Complex Compound Hydrides, Donald L. Anton, United Technologies Research Center (PDF 633 KB) Discovery of Novel Complex Metal Hydrides for Hydrogen Storage through Molecular Modeling and Combinatorial Methods, David A. Lesch, UOP LLC (PDF 308 KB)

225

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2007 Annual Progress Report - Hydrogen  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Hydrogen Production Hydrogen Production Printable Version 2007 Annual Progress Report II. Hydrogen Production This section of the 2007 Progress Report for the DOE Hydrogen Program focuses on hydrogen production. Each technical report is available as an individual Adobe Acrobat PDF. Download Adobe Reader. Hydrogen Production Sub-Program Overview, Mark Paster, Roxanne Garland, Arlene Anderson, U.S. Department of Energy (PDF 242 KB) A. Distributed Production from Natural Gas Low Cost Hydrogen Production Platform, Tim Aaron, Praxair, Inc. (PDF 399 KB) Low-Cost Hydrogen Distributed Production System Development, Franklin D. Lomax, H2Gen Innovations, Inc. (PDF 309 KB) Integrated Hydrogen Production, Purification and Compression System, Satish Tamhankar, The BOC Group, Inc. (PDF 123 KB)

226

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2009 Annual Progress Report - Fuel  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Fuel Cells Fuel Cells Printable Version 2009 Annual Progress Report V. Fuel Cells This section of the 2009 Progress Report for the DOE Hydrogen Program focuses on fuel cells. Each technical report is available as an individual Adobe Acrobat PDF. Download Adobe Reader. Fuel Cells Program Element Introduction, Dimitrios Papageorgopoulos, U.S. Department of Energy (PDF 262 KB) A. Analysis/Characterization Fuel Cell Systems Analysis (PDF 560 KB), Rajesh Ahluwalia, Argonne National Laboratory Mass Production Cost Estimation for Direct H2 PEM Fuel Cell System for Automotive Applications (PDF 1.4 MB), Brian James, Directed Technologies, Inc. Cost Analyses of Fuel Cell Stack/Systems (PDF 724 KB), Jayanti Sinha , TIAX LLC Fuel Cell Testing at Argonne National Laboratory (PDF 458 KB), Ira

227

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2009 Annual Progress Report - Systems  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Systems Analysis Systems Analysis Printable Version 2009 Annual Progress Report VII. Systems Analysis This section of the 2009 Progress Report for the DOE Hydrogen Program focuses on systems analysis. Each technical report is available as an individual Adobe Acrobat PDF. Download Adobe Reader. Systems Analysis Program Element Introduction, Fred Joseck, U.S. Department of Energy (PDF 411 KB) HyDRA: Hydrogen Demand and Resource Analysis Tool (PDF 243 KB), Johanna Levene, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Water Needs and Constraints for Hydrogen Pathways (PDF 99 KB), A.J. Simon, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Cost Implications of Hydrogen Quality Requirements (PDF 817 KB), Shabbir Ahmed, Argonne National Laboratory Macro-System Model (PDF 384 KB), Mark Ruth, National Renewable

228

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2007 Annual Progress Report - Hydrogen  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Hydrogen Storage Hydrogen Storage Printable Version 2007 Annual Progress Report IV. Hydrogen Storage This section of the 2007 Progress Report for the DOE Hydrogen Program focuses on hydrogen storage. Each technical report is available as an individual Adobe Acrobat PDF. Download Adobe Reader. Hydrogen Storage Sub-Program Overview, Sunita Satyapal, U.S. Department of Energy (PDF 729 KB) A. Metal Hydrides-Independent Projects Complex Hydride Compounds with Enhanced Hydrogen Storage Capacity, Daniel A. Mosher, United Technologies Research Center (PDF 475 KB) Discovery of Novel Complex Metal Hydrides for Hydrogen Storage through Molecular Modeling and Combinatorial Methods, David A. Lesch, UOP LLC (PDF 529 KB) High Density Hydrogen Storage System Demonstration Using NaAlH4 Complex Compound Hydrides, Daniel A. Mosher, United Technologies Research

229

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2008 Annual Progress Report - Fuel  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Fuel Cells Fuel Cells Printable Version 2008 Annual Progress Report V. Fuel Cells This section of the 2008 Progress Report for the DOE Hydrogen Program focuses on fuel cells. Each technical report is available as an individual Adobe Acrobat PDF. Download Adobe Reader. Fuel Cells Sub-Program Overview, Nancy Garland, U.S. Department of Energy (PDF 204 KB) A. Analysis/Characterization Fuel Cell Systems Analysis, Rajesh Ahluwalia, Argonne National Laboratory (PDF 375 KB) Mass Production Cost Estimation for Direct H2 PEM Fuel Cell System for Automotive Applications, Brian James, Directed Technologies, Inc. (PDF 1.0 MB) Cost Analyses of Fuel Cell Stack/Systems, Jayanti Sinha, TIAX LLC (PDF 437 KB) Microstructural Characterization Of PEM Fuel Cell MEAs, Karren More, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (PDF 414 KB)

230

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2010 Annual Progress Report - Hydrogen  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Hydrogen Delivery Hydrogen Delivery Printable Version 2010 Annual Progress Report III. Hydrogen Delivery This section of the 2010 Progress Report for the DOE Hydrogen Program focuses on hydrogen delivery. Each technical report is available as an individual Adobe Acrobat PDF. Hydrogen Delivery Sub-Program Overview, Sara Dillich, DOE Hydrogen Delivery Infrastructure Analysis, Marianne Mintz, Argonne National Laboratory H2A Delivery Analysis and H2A Delivery Components Model, Olga Sozinova, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Oil-Free Centrifugal Hydrogen Compression Technology Demonstration, Hooshang Heshmat Development of a Centrifugal Hydrogen Pipeline Gas Compressor, Francis Di Bella, Concepts NREC Advanced Hydrogen Liquefaction Process, Joseph Schwartz, Praxair, Inc. Active Magnetic Regenerative Liquefier, John Barclay, Prometheus

231

Proceedings of the fourth annual participants' information meeting, DOE Low-Level Waste Management Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Fourth Annual Participants' Information Meeting of the Department of Energy Low-Level Waste Management Program was held in Denver, Colorado, August 31 to September 2, 1982. The purpose of the meeting was to report and evaluate technology development funded by the program and to examine mechanisms for technology transfer. The meeting consisted of an introductory plenary session, followed by two concurrent overview sessions and then six concurrent technical sessions. There were two group meetings to review the findings of the technical sessions. The meeting concluded with a plenary summary session in which the major findings of the meeting were addressed. All papers have been abstracted and indexed for the Energy Data Base.

Large, D.E.: Mezga, L.J.; Stratton, L.E.; Rose, R.R. (comps.)

1982-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

232

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2009 Annual Progress Report - Hydrogen  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Hydrogen Production Hydrogen Production Printable Version 2009 Annual Progress Report II. Hydrogen Production This section of the 2009 Progress Report for the DOE Hydrogen Program focuses on hydrogen production. Each technical report is available as an individual Adobe Acrobat PDF. Download Adobe Reader. Hydrogen Production Sub-Program Overview, Richard Farmer, U.S. Department of Energy (PDF 76 KB) A. Distributed Production from Bio-Derived Liquids Low-Cost Hydrogen Distributed Production System Development (PDF 246 KB), Frank Lomax, H2Gen Innovations, Inc. Distributed Hydrogen Production from Biomass Reforming (PDF 485 KB), Yong Wang, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Hydrogen Generation from Biomass-Derived Carbohydrates via the Aqueous-Phase Reforming (APR) Process (PDF 234 KB), Greg Keenan, Virent

233

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2005 Annual Progress Report - Fuel  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Fuel Cells Fuel Cells Printable Version 2005 Annual Progress Report VII. Fuel Cells This section of the 2005 Progress Report for the DOE Hydrogen Program focuses on fuel cells. Each technical report is available as an individual Adobe Acrobat PDF. Download Adobe Reader. Fuel Cells Sub-program Overview, Valri Lightner, Department of Energy (PDF 198 KB) A. Membrane Electrode Assemblies (MEA) Integrated Manufacturing for Advanced Membrane Electrode Assemblies, Emory S. De Castro, De Nora N.A., E-TEK Division (PDF 292 KB) Advanced MEAs for Enhanced Operating Conditions, Mark K. Debe, 3M Company (PDF 459 KB) Development of High-temperature Membranes and Improved Cathode Catalysts, Lesia Protsailo, UTC Fuel Cells (PDF 642 KB) Electrocatalyst Supports and Electrode Structures, Eric Brosha, Los

234

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2008 Annual Progress Report - Hydrogen  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Hydrogen Production Hydrogen Production Printable Version 2008 Annual Progress Report II. Hydrogen Production This section of the 2008 Progress Report for the DOE Hydrogen Program focuses on hydrogen production. Each technical report is available as an individual Adobe Acrobat PDF. Download Adobe Reader. Hydrogen Production Sub-Program Overview, Richard Farmer, U.S. Department of Energy (PDF 319 KB) A. Distributed Production from Bio-Derived Liquids Low-Cost Hydrogen Distributed Production System Development, Frank Lomax, H2Gen Innovations, Inc. (PDF 298 KB) Distributed Hydrogen Production from Biomass Reforming, David King, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PDF 372 KB) Analysis of Ethanol Reforming System Configurations, Brian James, Directed Technologies, Inc. (PDF 515 KB)

235

Umatilla River Subbasin Fish Habitat Improvement Program, 2004-2005 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This annual report is in fulfillment of contractual obligations with Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), which is the funding source for the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife's (ODFW), Umatilla River Subbasin Fish Habitat Improvement Program (Program). The Program works cooperatively with private landowners to develop long-term restoration, under which, passive and active Habitat Improvement Projects are conducted. Historically, projects have included livestock exclusion fencing (passive restoration) to protect riparian habitats, along with the installation of instream structures (active restoration) to address erosion and improve fish habitat. In recent years, the focus of active restoration has shifted to bioengineering treatments and, more recently, to channel re-design and reconstruction aimed at improving fish habitat, by restoring stable channel function. This report provides a summary of Program activities for the 2004 calendar year (January 1 through December 31, 2004), within each of the four main project phases, including: (1) Implementation--Pre-Work, (2) Implementation--On Site Development, (3) Operation and Maintenance, and (4) Monitoring and Evaluation. This report also summarizes Program Administrative, Interagency Coordination, and Public Education activities.

St. Hilaire, Danny R. (Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Pendleton, OR)

2006-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

236

ORNL Superconducting Technology Program for electric power systems: Annual report for FY 1997  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Superconducting Technology Program is conducted as part of a national effort by the US Department of Energy`s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy to develop the science and technology base needed by US industry for commercial development of electric power applications of high temperature superconductivity. The two major elements of this program are wire development and applications development. This document describes the major research and developments activities for this program together with related accomplishments. The technical progress reported was summarized from recent open literature publications, presentations, and information prepared for the FY 1997 Annual Program Review held July 21--23, 1997. This ORNL program is highly leveraged by the staff and other resources of US industry and universities. In fact, nearly three-fourths of the ORNL effort is devoted to cooperative projects with private companies. Interlaboratory teams are also in place on a number of industry-driven projects. Patent disclosures, working group meetings, staff exchanges, and joint publications and presentations ensure that there is technology transfer with US industry. Working together, the collaborative teams are making rapid progress in solving the scientific and technical issues necessary for the commercialization of long lengths of practical high temperature superconductor wire and wire-using systems.

Koncinski, W.S.; O`Hara, L.M. [eds.; Hawsey, R.A.; Murphy, A.W. [comps.

1998-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

237

ORNL Superconducting Technology Program for electric power systems. Annual report for FY 1995  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Superconducting Technology Program is conducted as part of a national effort by the U.S. Department of Energy`s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy to develop the science and technology base needed by U.S. industry for commercial development of electric power applications of high-temperature superconductivity. The two major elements of this program are wire development and systems development. This document describes the major research and development activities for this program together with related accomplishments. The technical progress reported was summarized from information prepared for the FY 1995 Annual Program Review held August 1-2, 1995. This ORNL program is highly leveraged by the staff and other resources of U.S. industry and universities. In fact, nearly three-fourths of the ORNL effort is devoted to cooperative projects with private companies. Interlaboratory teams are also in place on a number of industry-driven projects. Patent disclosures, working group meetings, staff exchanges, and joint publications and presentations ensure that there is technology transfer with U.S. industry. Working together, the collaborative teams are making rapid progress in solving the scientific and technical issues necessary for the commercialization of long lengths of practical high-temperature superconductor wire and wire-using systems.

Hawsey, R.A. [comp.; Turner, J.W. [ed.

1996-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

238

ORNL Superconducting Technology Program for electric power systems. Annual report for FY 1996  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Superconducting Technology Program is conducted as part of a national effort by the US Department of Energy`s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy to develop the science and technology base needed by US industry for commercial development of electric power applications of high temperature superconductivity. The two major elements of this program are wire development and applications development. This document describes the major research and development activities for this program together with related accomplishments. The technical progress reported was summarized from recent open literature publications, presentations, and information prepared for the FY 1996 Annual Program Review held July 31 and August 1, 1996. This ORNL program is highly leveraged by the staff and other resources of US industry and universities. In fact, nearly three-fourths of the ORNL effort is devoted to cooperative projects with private companies. Interlaboratory teams are also in place on a number of industry-driven projects. Patent disclosures, working group meetings, staff exchanges, and joint publications and presentations ensure that there is technology transfer with US industry. Working together, the collaborative teams are making rapid progress in solving the scientific and technical issues necessary for the commercialization of long lengths of practical high temperature superconductor wire and wire-using systems.

Koncinski, W.S. [ed.; Hawsey, R.A. [comp.

1997-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

239

ORNL Superconducting Technology Program for Electric Power Systems, Annual Report for FY 1998  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Superconducting Technology Program is conducted as part of a national effort by the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy to develop the science and technology base needed by U.S. industry for commercial development of electric power applications of high temperature superconductivity. The two major elements of this program are wire development and applications development. This document describes the major research and development activities for this program together with related accomplishments. The technical progress reported was summarized from recent open literature publications, presentations, and information prepared for the FY 1998 Annual Program Review held July 20-22, 1998. Aspects of ORNL's work that were presented at the Applied Superconductivity Conference (September 1998) are included in this report, as well. This ORNL program is highly leveraged by the staff and other resources of U.S. industry and universities. In fact, nearly three-fourths of the ORNL effort is devoted to cooperative projects. Patent disclosures, working group meetings, staff exchanges, and joint publications and presentations ensure that there is technology transfer with U.S. industry. Working together, the collaborative teams are making rapid progress in solving the scientific and technical issues necessary for the commercialization of long lengths of practical high temperature superconductor wire and wire-using systems.

Hawsey, R.A.; Murphy, A.W.

1999-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

240

ORNL superconducting technology program for electric power systems. Annual report for FY 1993  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Superconducting Technology Program is conducted as part of a national effort by the US Department of Energy`s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy to develop the technology base needed by US industry for commercial development of electric power applications of high-temperature superconductivity. The two major elements of this program are conductor development and applications development. This document describes the major research and development activities for this program together with related accomplishments. The technical progress reported was summarized from information prepared for the FY 1993 Annual Program Review held July 28--29, 1993. This ORNL program is highly leveraged by the staff and other resources of US industry and universities. In fact, nearly three-fourths of the ORNL effort is devoted to industrial competitiveness projects with private companies. Interlaboratory teams are also in place on a number of industry-driven projects. Patent disclosures, working group meetings, staff exchanges, and joint publications and presentations ensure that there is technology transfer to US industry. Working together, the collaborative teams are making rapid progress in solving the scientific and technical issues necessary for the commercialization of long lengths of practical high-temperature superconductor wire and wire products.

Hawsey, R.A. [comp.

1994-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual eeo program" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Proceedings of the Efficient Separations and Processing Cross-Cutting Program Annual Technical Exchange Meeting  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document contains summaries of technology development presented at the 1995 Efficient Separations and Processing Cross-Cutting Program (ESP) Annual Technical Exchange Meeting. The ESP is sponsored by the US Department of Energy`s Office of Environmental Management (EM), Office of Technology Development. The meeting is held annually to promote a free exchange of ideas among technology developers, potential users (for example, EM focus areas), and other interested parties within EM. During this meeting, developers of ESP-funded technologies describe the problems and needs addressed by their technologies; the technical approach, accomplishments, and resolution of issues; the strategy and schedule for commercialization; and evolving potential applications. Presenters are asked to address the following areas: Target waste management problem, waste stream, or data need; scientific background and technical approach; technical accomplishments and resolution of technical issues; schedule and strategy for commercializing and implementing the technology or acquiring needed data; potential alternate applications of the technology or data, including outside of DOE/EM. The meeting is not a program review of the individual tasks or subtasks; but instead focuses on the technical aspects and implementation of ESP-sponsored technology or data. The meeting is also attended by members of the ESP Technical Review Team, who have the opportunity at that time to review the ESP as a whole.

NONE

1995-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

242

Employee Assistance Program  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Resources Resources AAP/ EEO Working at LBNL Benefits Lab Information International Researchers & Scholars Office Visitors and Affiliates Contact Us forward Berkeley Lab Staff/ Guests Only forward HR Staff Only forward HR A-Z Benefits at Berkeley Lab Search the HR website: Search UC At Your Service My Accounts image (At Your Service Web Site) UPAY 850 Benefits Change form Benefits Forms and Publications Benefits Orientations Benefit Plan Contacts Calendar of Events: July | August COBRA Information Disability Leave of Absence/FMLA Employee Assistance Programs Employee Self Service Family Member Eligibility Verification UC Retirement Savings Program (Fidelity) Health Care Facilitator Program Employee Discounts and Programs Making Benefit Changes Payroll Information Postdoc Benefits

243

Development of Hydrogen Education Programs for Government Officials - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7 7 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Shannon Baxter-Clemmons South Carolina Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Alliance (SCHFCA) P.O. Box 12302 Columbia, SC 29211 Phone: (803) 545-0189 Email: baxterclemmons@schydrogen.org DOE Manager GO: Gregory Kleen Phone: (720) 356-1672 Email: Gregory.Kleen@go.doe.gov Technical Advisor Kim Cierpik Phone: (720) 356-1266 Email: kim.cierpik@go.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-FG36-08GO18113 Subcontractors: * Greenway Energy, Aiken, SC * Advanced Technology International, Charleston, SC Project Start Date: October 1, 2008 Project End Date: January 31, 2013 Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Further develop relationships with government *

244

ARM - Annual Reports  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Annual Reports Program Fact Sheets Campaign Backgrounders Education and Outreach Posters Brochures Research Highlights Summaries Annual Reports For proper viewing, the ARM...

245

2006 TEPP Annual Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Emergency Emergency Preparedness Program 2006 Annual Report US Department of Energy - Offi ce of Environmental Management Transportation Emergency Preparedness Program 2006 Annual Report 2 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary.......................................................................................................................4 I. Transportation Emergency Preparedness Program Purpose.......................................6

246

Corrugated Membrane Fuel Cell Structures - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

0 0 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Stephen Grot Ion Power Incorporated 720 Governor Lea Rd New Castle, DE 19720-5501 Phone: (302) 832 9550 Email: s.grot@ion-power.com DOE Managers HQ: Donna Ho Phone: (202) 586-8000 Email: Donna.Ho@ee.doe.gov GO: Reginald Tyler Phone: (720) 356-1805 Email: Reginald.Tyler@go.doe.gov Technical Advisor Thomas Benjamin Phone: (630) 252-1632 Email: benjamin@anl.gov Subcontractors: * Graftech International Holdings Inc., Parma, OH * General Motors Corporation, Flint, MI Contract Number: DE-EE0000462 Project Start Date: September 1, 2010 Project End Date: February 28, 2014 Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives

247

Electrochemical Reversible Formation of Alane - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 5 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Ragaiy Zidan 1 (Primary Contact), Douglas A. Knight 1 , Scott Greenway 2 1 Savannah River National Laboratory 999-2W Room 121 Savannah River Site Aiken, SC 29808 Phone: (803) 646-8876 Email: ragaiy.zidan@srnl.doe.gov 2 Greenway Energy DOE Manager HQ: Ned Stetson Phone: (202) 586-9995 Email: Ned.Stetson@ee.doe.gov Project Start Date: October 1, 2006 Project End Date: October 1, 2012 Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Identify means for achieving energy efficiency * improvements of over 50%. Perform electrochemical production of alane and alane * adducts in a pressurized electrochemical cell and demonstrate production of α-alane. Demonstrate the formation of alane and the regeneration *

248

Hawaii Hydrogen Power Park - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

0 0 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Richard (Rick) E. Rocheleau (Primary Contact), Mitch Ewan Hawaii Natural Energy Institute School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology University of Hawaii at Manoa 1680 East-West Road, POST 109 Honolulu, HI 96822 Phone: (808) 956-8346 Email: rochelea@hawaii.edu DOE Managers HQ: Jason Marcinkoski Phone: (202) 586-7466 Email: Jason.Marcinkoski@ee.doe.gov GO: Reginald Tyler Phone: (720) 356-1805; Email: Reginald.Tyler@go.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-FC51-02R021399 A008 Project Start Date: June 29, 2009 Project End Date: December 31, 2014 Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Island of Hawaii (Big Island) Install hydrogen fueling station infrastructure at Hawaii * Volcanoes (HAVO) National Park on the Big Island of

249

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2004 Annual Progress Report - Hydrogen  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Hydrogen Production and Delivery Hydrogen Production and Delivery Printable Version 2004 Annual Progress Report II. Hydrogen Production and Delivery Each individual technical report is available as an individual Adobe Acrobat PDF for easier use. Download Adobe Reader. Production and Delivery Sub-Program Review, Pete Devlin, DOE (PDF 220 KB) A. Distributed Production Technologies Ceramic Membrane Reactor Systems for Converting Natural Gas to Hydrogen and Synthesis Gas (ITM Syngas), Christopher Chen, Air Products (PDF 316 KB) Integrated Ceramic Membrane System for Hydrogen Production, Joseph Schwartz, Praxair (PDF 421 KB) Low Cost Hydrogen Production Platform, Tim Aaron, Praxair (PDF 500 KB) Autothermal Cyclic Reforming Based Hydrogen Generating and Dispensing System, Ravi Kumar, GE Energy (PDF 511 KB)

250

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2004 Annual Progress Report - Fuel  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Fuel Cells Fuel Cells Printable Version 2004 Annual Progress Report IV. Fuel Cells Each individual technical report is available as an individual Adobe Acrobat PDF for easier use. Download Adobe Reader. Fuel Cells Sub-Program Review, Patrick Davis, DOE (PDF 265 KB) A. MEAs and Catalysts Integrated Manufacturing for Advanced Membrane Electrode Assemblies, Emory DeCastro, De Nora (PDF 486 KB) Development of High-Temperature Membranes and Improved Cathode Catalysts Jeremy Meyers, UTC (PDF 595 KB) Advanced MEAs for Enhanced Operating Conditions, Amenable to High Volume Manufacture, Mark Debe, 3M (PDF 372 KB) Back to Top B. Membranes and MEAs High Temperature Polymer Membranes for Fuel Cells, Tom Zawodzinski, Case West Res. University (PDF 356 KB) Electrodes for Hydrogen-Air PEM Fuel Cells, Francisco Uribe, LANL

251

Hydrogen Refueling Infrastructure Cost Analysis - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

9 9 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Marc W. Melaina (Primary Contact), Michael Penev and Darlene Steward National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) 15013 Denver West Parkway Golden, CO 80401 Phone: (303) 275-3836 Email: Marc.Melaina@nrel.gov DOE Manager HQ: Fred Joseck Phone: (202) 586-7932 Email: Fred.Joseck@hq.doe.gov Subcontractor: IDC Energy Insights, Framingham, MA Project Start Date: October 1, 2010 Project End Date: September 28, 2012 Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Identify the capacity (kg/day) and capital costs * associated with "Early Commercial" hydrogen stations (defined below) Identify cost metrics for larger numbers of stations and * larger capacities Technical Barriers This project addresses the following technical barriers

252

California Hydrogen Infrastructure Project - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 6 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Edward C. Heydorn Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. 7201 Hamilton Boulevard Allentown, PA 18195 Phone: (610) 481-7099 Email: heydorec@airproducts.com DOE Managers HQ: Jason Marcinkoski Phone: (202) 586-7466 Email: Jason.Marcinkoski@ee.doe.gov GO: Jim Alkire Phone: (720) 356-1426 Email: James.Alkire@go.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-FC36-05GO85026 Working Partners/Subcontractors: * University of California Irvine (UCI), Irvine, CA * National Fuel Cell Research Center (NFCRC), Irvine, CA Project Start Date: August 1, 2005 Project End Date: December 31, 2011 Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Demonstrate a cost-effective infrastructure model in

253

Photoelectrochemical Materials: Theory and Modeling - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8 8 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Muhammad N. Huda (Primary Contact), Yanfa Yan*, Todd Deutsch*, Mowafak M. Al-Jassim* and A. John A. Turner* Department of Physics University of Texas at Arlington Arlington, TX 76019 Phone: (817) 272-1097 Email: huda@uta.edu *National Renewable Energy Laboratory DOE Manager HQ: Eric L. Miller Phone: (202) 287-5892 Email: Eric.Miller@ee.doe.gov Subcontractor: University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX Project Start Date: September 2009 Project End Date: August 2012 Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives For FY 2012, the main goal of this project was to improve materials efficiency by understanding and hence tuning the following by theoretical/computational modeling

254

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2010 Annual Progress Report - Fuel  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Printable Version 2010 Annual Progress Report XI. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) This section of the 2010 Progress Report for the DOE Hydrogen Program focuses on the fuel cell technologies America Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). Each technical report is available as an individual Adobe Acrobat PDF. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Activitites, Sara Dillich, DOE Commercialization Effort for 1 W Consumer Electronics Power Pack, Charles Carlstrom, MTI Micro Fuel Cells, Inc. Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Diesel Auxiliary Power Unit Demonstration, Steven Shaffer, Delphi Automotive Systems, LLC Highly Efficient, 5 kW CHP Fuel Cells Demonstrating Durability and Economic Value in Residential and Light Commercial Applications, John

255

State and Local Government Partnership - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 6 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Joel M. Rinebold Connecticut Center for Advanced Technology (CCAT), Inc. 222 Pitkin Street, Suite 101 East Hartford, CT 06108 Phone: (860) 291-8832 Email: Jrinebold@ccat.us DOE Managers HQ: Connie Bezanson Phone: (202) 586-8055 Email: Connie.Bezanson@ee.doe.gov GO: Gregory Kleen Phone: (720) 356-1672 Email: Gregory.Kleen@go.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-FC36-08GO18116 / 003 Project Start Date: September 1, 2008 Project End Date: December 31, 2011 Project Objectives Foster strong relationships among federal, state, and * local government officials, industry, and appropriate stakeholders. Serve as a conduit between the DOE and state and local *

256

Acronyms and Abbreviations; DOE Hydrogen Program FY 2008 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

9 9 FY 2008 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen Program °C Degrees Celsius °F Degrees Fahrenheit 1-D, 1D One-dimensional 1Q First quarter of the fiscal year 2-D, 2D Two-dimensional 2-FPTf 2, fluoropyridinium triflate 2DSM Dimensionally stable membrane with 2-dimensional laser-drilled hole support 2Q Second quarter of the fiscal year 3-D, 3D Three-dimensional 3DSM Dimensionally stable membrane with 3-dimensional porous support 3Q Third quarter of the fiscal year 4Q Fourth quarter of the fiscal year 8YSZ 8 mol% yttria-stabilized zirconia α-AlH 3 Alpha polymorph of aluminum hydride A Amps Å Angstrom AAO Anodic aluminum oxide AB Ammonia borane, NH 3 BH 3 ABI Automated ball indentation, Agent-based investment ABH 2 Ammonium borohydride, NH 4 BH 4 ABM Agent-based modeling ABMS Agent-based modeling and simulation

257

Photoelectrochemical Hydrogen Production - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

9 9 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Arun Madan MVSystems, Incorporated (MVS) 500 Corporate Circle, Suite L Golden, CO 80401 Phone: (303) 271-9907 Email: ArunMadan@aol.com or amadan@mvsystemsinc.com DOE Managers HQ: Eric Miller Phone: (202) 287-5829 Email: Eric.Miller@ee.doe.gov GO: David Peterson Phone: (720) 356-1747 Email: David.Peterson@go.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-FC36-07GO17105, A00 Subcontractor: University of Hawaii at Manoa (UH), Honolulu, HI Project Start Date: September 1, 2007 Project End Date: December 31, 2012 Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Work closely with the DOE Working Group on * Photoelectrochemical (PEC) Hydrogen Production for optimizing PEC materials and devices. Develop new PEC film materials compatible with high- *

258

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program: 2004 Annual Progress Report - Hydrogen  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Hydrogen Storage Hydrogen Storage Printable Version 2004 Annual Progress Report III. Hydrogen Storage Each individual technical report is available as an individual Adobe Acrobat PDF for easier use. Download Adobe Reader. Hydrogen Storage Sub-Program Review, JoAnn Milliken, DOE (PDF 227 KB) A. Compressed/Liquid H2 Tanks Low-Cost, High-Efficiency, High-Pressure Hydrogen Storage, Jui Ko, Quantum (PDF 373 KB) Optimum Utilization of Available Space in a Vehicle through Conformable Hydrogen Tanks, Salvador Aceves, LLNL (PDF 614 KB) Next Generation Physical Hydrogen Storage, Andrew Weisberg, LLNL (PDF 1 MB) Back to Top B. Chemical Hydrides Low-Cost, Off-Board Regeneration of Sodium Borohydride, Ying Wu, Millennium Cell (PDF 420 KB) Hydrogen Storage: Radiolysis for Borate Regeneration, Bruce Wilding,

259

Distributed Bio-Oil Reforming - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 5 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Stefan Czernik (Primary Contact), Richard French, Michael Penev National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) 15013 Denver West Parkway Golden, CO 80401 Phone: (303) 384-6135 Email: Stefan.Czernik@nrel.gov DOE Manager Sara Dillich Phone: (202) 586-1623 Email: Sara.Dillich@ee.doe.gov Subcontractor: University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN Project Start Date: October 1, 2004 Project End Date: September 30, 2012 Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives By 2012, develop and demonstrate distributed reforming * technology for producing hydrogen from bio-oil at $4.10/ kilogram (kg) purified hydrogen. Demonstrate integrated performance at bench scale * including bio-oil vaporization, partial-oxidation (POX)

260

Landfill Gas-to-Hydrogen - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

20 20 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Shannon Baxter-Clemmons (Primary Contact), Russ Keller 1 South Carolina Hydrogen Fuel Cell Alliance P.O. Box 12302 Columbia, SC 29211 Phone: (803) 727-2897 Emails: baxterclemmons@schydrogen.org; russ.keller@ati.org DOE Managers HQ: Pete Devlin Phone: (202) 586-4905 Email: Peter.Devlin@ee.doe.gov GO: Gregory Kleen Phone: (720) 356-1672 Email: Gregory.Kleen@go.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-FG36-08GO18113 Subcontractor: 1 Advanced Technology International, Charleston, SC Project Start Date: March 1, 2011 Project End Date: January 31, 2013 Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Validate that a financially viable business case * exists for a full-scale deployment of commercially

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual eeo program" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Accelerated Testing Validation - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

0 0 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Rangachary Mukundan 1 (Primary Contact), Rod Borup 1 , John Davey 1 , Roger Lujan 1 , Dennis Torraco 1 , David Langlois 1 , Fernando Garzon 1 , Dusan Spernjak 1 , Joe Fairweather 1 , Sivagaminathan Balasubramanian 2 , Adam Weber 2 , Mike Brady 3 , Karren More 3 , Greg James 4 , Dana Ayotte 4 , and Steve Grot 5 1 Los Alamos National Laboratory MS D429, P.O. Box 1663 Los Alamos, NM 87545 Phone: (505) 665-8523 Email: Mukundan@lanl.gov DOE Manager HQ: Nancy Garland Phone: (202) 586-5673 Email: Nancy.Garland@ee.doe.gov Subcontractors: 2 Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, Berkeley, CA 3 Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge TN 4 Ballard Power Systems, Burnaby, BC V5J 5J8 Canada 5 Ion Power, New Castle, DE Project Start Date: Oct 2009

262

Acronyms, Abbreviations and Definitions, DOE Hydrogen Program FY 2010 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

81 81 FY 2010 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen Program °C Degrees Celsius °F Degrees Fahrenheit α-AlH 3 Alpha polymorph of aluminum hydride Δ Change, delta ΔG Gibbs free energy of reaction ΔH Enthalpy of reaction, enthalpy of hydrogenation ΔH° f standard heat of formation ΔK Stress intensity factor ΔP Pressure drop, pressure change ~ Approximately ≈ Equals approximately > Greater than ≥ Greater than or equal to < Less than ≤ Less than or equal to @ At # Number % Percent ® Registered trademark µA Micro ampere(s) µA/cm 2 Micro ampere(s) per square centimeter μc-Si Microcrystalline silicon µg Microgram(s) µm Micrometer(s); micron(s) µM Micromolar µmol Micromole(s) µΩ-cm 2 Micro-ohm(s)-square centimeter µV Micro volt(s)

263

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

XVIII-1 XVIII-1 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 3M Company II.D.5 Low-Cost Large-Scale PEM Electrolysis for Renewable Energy Storage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-46 V.D.1 Advanced Cathode Catalysts and Supports for PEM Fuel Cells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-84 V.D.3 Durable Catalysts for Fuel Cell Protection during Transient Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-100 V.D.5 Nanosegregated Cathode Catalysts with Ultra-Low Platinum Loading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-111 V.F.2 Fuel Cell Fundamentals at Low and Subzero Temperatures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-211 Acumentrics Corporation V.J.2 Development of a Low-Cost 3-10 kW Tubular SOFC Power System .

264

Resource Analysis for Hydrogen Production - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 3 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Marc W. Melaina (Primary Contact), Michael Penev and Donna Heimiller National Renewable Energy Laboratory 15013 Denver West Parkway Golden, CO 80401 Phone: (303) 275-3836 Email: Marc.Melaina@nrel.gov DOE Manager HQ: Fred Joseck Phone: (202) 586-7932 Email: Fred.Joseck@hq.doe.gov Project Start Date: October 1, 2009 Project End Date: September 28, 2012 Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Understand the hydrogen production requirements for a * future demand scenario Estimate low-carbon energy resources required to meet * the future scenario demand Compare resource requirements to current consumption * and projected future consumption Determine resource availability geographically and on a *

265

Acronyms, Abbreviations and Definitions; DOE Hydrogen Program FY 2009 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

23 23 FY 2009 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen Program °C Degrees Celsius °F Degrees Fahrenheit D Change, delta ~ Approximately ≈ Equals approximately > Greater than ≥ Greater than or equal to " Inch(s) ≤ Less than or equal to < Less than # Number % Percent ® Registered trademark $ U.S. Dollars 1-D, 1D One-dimensional 2-D, 2D Two-dimensional 2-FPTf 2, fluoropyridinium triflate 3-D, 3D Three-dimensional 1Q First quarter of the fiscal year 2Q Second quarter of the fiscal year 3Q Third quarter of the fiscal year 4Q Fourth quarter of the fiscal year 6F Hexafluorinated (biphenol A) sulfonated poly(arylene ether sulfone) 6FCN-x HexaFluoro bisphenol A based disulfonated polybenzonitirle (H+ form) (x denotes degree of sulfonation) 6FK Partially fluorinated

266

Transport in PEMFC Stacks - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

0 0 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Cortney Mittelsteadt (Primary Contact), Hui Xu, Junqing Ma (GES); John Van Zee, Sirivatch Shimpalee, Visarn Lilavivat (USC); James E. McGrath Myoungbae Lee, Nobuo Hara, Kwan-Soo Lee, Chnng Hyun (VT); Don Conners, Guy Ebbrell (Ballard); Kevin Russell (Tech Etch) Giner Electrochemical Systems, LLC 89 Rumford Ave. Newton, MA 02466 Phone: (781) 529-0529 Email: cmittelsteadt@ginerinc.com DOE Managers HQ: Donna Ho Phone: (202) 586-8000 Email: Donna.Ho@ee.doe.gov GO: Gregory Kleen Phone: (720) 356-1672 Email: Gregory.Kleen@go.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-EE0000471 Subcontractors: * Tech-Etch, Plymouth, MA * Ballard Material Products, Inc., Lowell, MA

267

Semi-annual report of the Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Management, Quality Assessment Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report presents the results from the analysis of the 43rd set of environmental quality assessment samples (QAP XLIII) that were received on or before December 1, 1995. This Quality Assessment Program (QAP) is designed to test the quality of the environmental measurements being reported to the Department of Energy by its contractors. Since 1976, real or synthetic environmental samples that have been prepared and thoroughly analyzed at the Environmental Measurements Laboratory (EML) have been distributed at first quarterly and then semi-annually to these contractors. Their results, which are returned to EML within 90 days, are compiled with EML`s results and are reported back to the participating contractors 30 days later. A summary of the reported results is available to the participants 2 days after the reporting deadline via a modem-telephone connection to the EML computer.

Sanderson, C.G.; Greenlaw, P.

1996-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

268

Semi-annual report of the Department of Energy Quality Assessment Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report presents the results from the analysis of the 35th set of environmental quality assessment samples (QAP XXXV) that were received on or before December 5, 1991. This Quality Assessment Program (QAP) is designed to test the quality of the environmental measurements being reported to the Department of Energy by its contractors. Since 1976, real or synthetic environmental samples that have been prepared and thoroughly analyzed at the Environmental Measurements Laboratory (EML) have been distributed at first quarterly and then semi-annually to these contractors. Their results, which are returned to EML within 90 days, are compiled with EML`s results and are reported back to the participating contractors 30 days later. A summary of the reported results is available to the participants 3 days after the reporting deadline via a modem-telephone connection to the EML computer.

Sanderson, C.G.; Scarpitta, S.C.

1992-01-02T23:59:59.000Z

269

Semi-annual report of the Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Management, Quality Assessment Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report presents the results from the analysis of the 42st set of environmental quality assessment samples (QAP XLII) that were received on or before June 1, 1995. This Quality Assessment Program (QAP) is designed to test the quality of the environmental measurements being reported to the Department of Energy by its contractors. Since 1976, real or synthetic environmental samples that have been prepared and thoroughly analyzed at the Environmental Measurements Laboratory (EML) have been distributed at first quarterly and then semi-annually to these contractors. Their results, which are returned to EML within 90 days, are compiled with EML`s results and are reported back to the participating contractors 30 days later. A summary of the reported results is available to the participants 2 days after the reporting deadline via a modem-telephone connection to the EML computer.

Sanderson, C.G.; Greenlaw, P.; Pan, V.

1995-07-03T23:59:59.000Z

270

Semi-annual report of the Department of Energy Quality Assessment Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report presents the results from the analysis of the 35th set of environmental quality assessment samples (QAP XXXV) that were received on or before December 5, 1991. This Quality Assessment Program (QAP) is designed to test the quality of the environmental measurements being reported to the Department of Energy by its contractors. Since 1976, real or synthetic environmental samples that have been prepared and thoroughly analyzed at the Environmental Measurements Laboratory (EML) have been distributed at first quarterly and then semi-annually to these contractors. Their results, which are returned to EML within 90 days, are compiled with EML's results and are reported back to the participating contractors 30 days later. A summary of the reported results is available to the participants 3 days after the reporting deadline via a modem-telephone connection to the EML computer.

Sanderson, C.G.; Scarpitta, S.C.

1992-01-02T23:59:59.000Z

271

SUPRI heavy oil research program. Fourteenth annual report, October 1, 1989--September 30, 1990  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The 14th Annual Report of the SUPRI Heavy Oil Research Program includes discussion of the following topics: (1) A Study of End Effects in Displacement Experiments; (2) Cat Scan Status Report; (3) Modifying In-situ Combustion with Metallic Additives; (4) Kinetics of Combustion; (5) Study of Residual Oil Saturation for Steam Injection and Fuel Concentration for In-Situ Combustion; (6) Analysis of Transient Foam Flow in 1-D Porous Media with Computed Tomography; (7) Steam-Foam Studies in the Presence of Residual Oil; (8) Microvisualization of Foam Flow in a Porous Medium; (9) Three- Dimensional Laboratory Steam Injection Model; (10) Saturation Evaluation Following Water Flooding; (11) Numerical Simulation of Well-to-Well Tracer Flow Test with Nonunity Mobility Ratio.

Aziz, K.; Ramey, H.J. Jr.; Castanier, L.M.

1991-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

272

Florida Hydrogen Initiative (FHI) - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

3 3 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program David L. Block, Director Emeritus Florida Solar Energy Center/University of Central Florida 1679 Clearlake Road Cocoa, FL 32922 Phone: (321) 638-1001 Email: block@fsec.ucf.edu DOE Managers HQ: Jason Marcinkoski Phone: (202) 586-7466 Email: Jason.Marcinkoski@ee.doe.gov GO: Greg Kleen Phone: (720) 356-1672 Email: Greg.Kleen@go.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-FC36-04GO14225 Subcontractors: * EnerFuels, Inc., West Palm Beach, FL * Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL * Florida Solar Energy Center, Cocoa, FL * SRT Group, Inc., Miami, FL * Electrolytic Technologies Corporation, Miami, FL

273

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

VALIDATION VALIDATION 380 | FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report 2013 - Technology Validation Summary of Annual Merit Review of the Technology Validation Program Summary of Reviewer Comments on the Technology Validation Program: In general, the reviewers believed the program area was adequately covered. The role of the Technology Validation program within the structure of the Fuel Cell Technologies Office was clearly identified. Progress relating to projects was clearly presented and plans were identified for addressing issues and challenges. The partnership with the National Renewable Energy Laboratory's (NREL's) data collection/analysis team was seen as key to the success

274

Rice Alliance Annual Corporate Underwriter Program 2011 2012 Academic Year July 1, 2011 to June 30, 2012  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Rice Alliance Annual Corporate Underwriter Program 2011 ­ 2012 Academic Year · July 1, 2011 to June Underwriter · Contribution: $ 5,000 UNDERWRITER BENEFITS: · Recognition at all Rice Alliance events throughout the year as an underwriter Over 26,000 individuals have attended Rice Alliance events Recognition

275

Snake River Sockeye Salmon Captive Broodstock Program; Hatchery Element, 1997 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

On November 20, 1991, the National Marine Fisheries Service listed Snake River sockeye salmon Oncorhynchus nerka as endangered under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. In 1991, the Idaho Department of Fish and Game, the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, and the National Marine Fisheries Service initiated efforts to conserve and rebuild populations in Idaho. Initial steps to recover sockeye salmon included the establishment of a captive broodstock program at the Idaho Department of Fish and Game Eagle Fish Hatchery. Sockeye salmon broodstock and culture responsibilities are shared with the National Marine Fisheries Service at two locations adjacent to Puget Sound in Washington State. Activities conducted by the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes and the National Marine Fisheries Service are reported under separate cover. Idaho Department of Fish and Game monitoring and evaluation activities of captive broodstock program fish releases (annual report to the Bonneville Power Administration for the research element of the program) are also reported under separate cover. Captive broodstock program activities conducted between January 1, 1997 and December 31, 1997 are presented in this report. One hundred twenty-six female sockeye salmon from one captive broodstock group were spawned at the Eagle Fish Hatchery in 1997. Successful spawn pairings produced approximately 148,781 eyed-eggs with a cumulative mean survival to eyed-egg rate of 57.3%. Approximately 361,600 sockeye salmon were released to Sawtooth basin waters in 1997. Reintroduction strategies included eyed-eggs (brood year 1997), presmolts (brood year 1996), and prespawn adults for volitional spawning (brood year 1994). Release locations included Redfish Lake, Alturas Lake, and Pettit Lake. During this reporting period, four broodstocks and two unique production groups were in culture at the Eagle Fish Hatchery. Two of the four broodstocks were incorporated into the 1997 spawning design, and one broodstock was terminated following the completion of spawning.

Kline, Paul A.; Heindel, Jeff A.; Willard, Catherine (Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Boise, ID)

2003-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

276

Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Overview: 2011 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation by Sunita Satyapal at the 2011 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting on May 9, 2011.

277

Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Overview: 2014 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation by Sunita Satyapal at the 2014 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting plenary session on June 16, 2014.

278

Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Overview: 2013 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation by Sunita Satyapal at the 2013 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting plenary session on May 13, 2013.

279

Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Overview: 2012 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Presentation by Sunita Satyapal at the 2012 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting plenary session on May 14, 2012.

280

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory National Environmental Policy Act Compliance Program -- FY 2010 Annual Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

During fiscal year (FY) 2010, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) Environmental Protection and Regulatory Programs Division (before March 1, 2011 known as the Environmental Management Services Department) staff performed a number of activities as part of PNNLs National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance program. These activities helped to verify U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Pacific Northwest Site Office (PNSO) and Richland Operations Office (RL) compliance with NEPA requirements and streamline the NEPA process for federal activities conducted at PNNL. Self-assessments were performed to address NEPA compliance and cultural and biological resource protection. The NEPA self-assessments focused on implementation within the PNNL Energy and Environment Directorate and routine maintenance activities conducted during the previous calendar year. The cultural and biological resource self-assessments were conducted in accordance with the PNSO Cultural and Biological Resources Management Plan, which specifies annual monitoring of important resources to assess and document the status of the resources and the associated protective mechanisms in place to protect sensitive resources.

Weeks, Regan S.

2011-04-20T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual eeo program" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Grande Ronde Basin Chinook Salmon Captive Brood and Conventional Supplementation Programs, 2002 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Endangered Species Permit Number 1011 (formerly Permit No. 973) authorizes ODFW to take listed spring chinook salmon juveniles from Catherine Creek (CC), Lostine River (LR) and Grande Ronde River (GR) for research and enhancement purposes. Modification 2 of this permit authorizes ODFW to take adults for spawning and the production and release of smolts for the Captive and Conventional broodstock programs. This report satisfies the requirement that an annual report be submitted. Herein we report on activities conducted and provide cursory data analyses for the Grande Ronde spring chinook salmon Captive and Conventional broodstock projects from 1 January-31 December 2002. The Grande Ronde Basin Spring Chinook Salmon Captive Broodstock Project is designed to rapidly increase numbers of salmon in stocks that are in imminent danger of extirpation. Parr are captured in Catherine Creek, upper Grande Ronde River and Lostine River and reared to adulthood in captivity. Upon maturation, they are spawned (within stocks) and their progeny reared to smoltification before being released into the natal stream of their parents. This program is co-managed by ODFW, National Marine Fisheries Service, the Nez Perce Tribe and Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation.

Carmichael, Richard W. (Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, La Grande, OR)

2003-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

282

Fuel cells for transportation program: FY1997 national laboratory annual report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Department of Energy (DOE) Fuel Cells for Transportation Program is structured to effectively implement the research and development (R and D) required for highly efficient, low or zero emission fuel cell power systems to be a viable replacement for the internal combustion engine in automobiles. The Program is part of the Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicles (PNGV), a government-industry initiative aimed at development of an 80 mile-per-gallon vehicle. This Annual Report summarizes the technical accomplishments of the laboratories during 1997. Participants include: Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). During 1997, the laboratory R and D included one project on solid oxide fuel cells; this project has since been terminated to focus Department resources on PEM fuel cells. The technical component of this report is divided into five key areas: fuel cell stack research and development; fuel processing; fuel cell modeling, testing, and evaluation; direct methanol PEM fuel cells; and solid oxide fuel cells.

NONE

1997-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

283

Snake River Sockeye Salmon Captive Broodstock Program; Hatchery Element, 2001 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

On November 20, 1991, the National Marine Fisheries Service listed Snake River sockeye salmon Oncorhynchus nerka as endangered under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. In 1991, the Idaho Department of Fish and Game, the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, and the National Marine Fisheries Service initiated efforts to conserve and rebuild populations in Idaho. Initial steps to recover sockeye salmon included the establishment of a captive broodstock program at the Idaho Department of Fish and Game Eagle Fish Hatchery. Sockeye salmon broodstock and culture responsibilities are shared with the National Marine Fisheries Service at two locations adjacent to Puget Sound in Washington State. Activities conducted by the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes and the National Marine Fisheries Service are reported under separate cover. Idaho Department of Fish and Game monitoring and evaluation activities of captive broodstock program fish releases (annual report to the Bonneville Power Administration for the research element of the program) are also reported separately. Captive broodstock program activities conducted between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2001 for the hatchery element of the program are presented in this report. In 2001, 26 anadromous sockeye salmon returned to the Sawtooth Basin. Twenty-three of these adults were captured at adult weirs located on the upper Salmon River and on Redfish Lake Creek. Three of the anadromous sockeye salmon that returned were observed below the Sawtooth Fish Hatchery weir and allowed to migrate upstream volitionally (following the dismantling of the weir on October 12, 2001). Nine anadromous adults were incorporated into the captive broodstock program spawning design in 2001. The remaining adults were released to Redfish Lake for natural spawning. Based on their marks, returning adult sockeye salmon originated from a variety of release options. Two sockeye salmon females from the anadromous group and 152 females from the brood year 1998 captive broodstock group were spawned at the Eagle Hatchery in 2001. Spawn pairings produced approximately 118,121 eyed-eggs with egg survival to eyed stage of development averaging 42.0%. Presmolts (106,166), smolts (13,915), and adults (79) were planted or released into Stanley Basin waters in 2001. Supplementation strategies involved releases to Redfish Lake, Redfish Lake Creek, Alturas Lake, and Pettit Lake. During this reporting period, five broodstocks and two unique production groups were in culture at Idaho Department of Fish and Game facilities (Eagle Fish Hatchery and Sawtooth Fish Hatchery). Two of the five broodstocks were incorporated into the 2001 spawning design, and one broodstock was terminated following the completion of spawning.

Kline, Paul A.; Willard, Catherine; Baker, Dan J. (Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Boise, ID)

2003-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

284

Theory of Hydrogen Storage in Complex Hydrides - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

53 53 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Christopher Wolverton Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Northwestern University 2220 Campus Drive, Room 2036 Evanston, IL 60208-3108 Phone: (734) 678-6319 Email: c-wolverton@northwestern.edu Vidvuds Ozolins Department of Materials Science & Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles DOE Program Officer: James Davenport Program Manager Theoretical Condensed Matter Physics Office of Basic Energy Sciences Email: James.Davenport@science.doe.gov Phone: (301) 903-0035 Objectives Using first-principles methods, determine the atomic- level processes that are rate limiting in hydrogen storage

285

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

SAFETY, CODES AND STANDARDS SAFETY, CODES AND STANDARDS 402 | FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report 2013 - Safety, Codes and Standards Summary of Annual Merit Review of the Safety, Codes and Standards Program Summary of Reviewer Comments on the Safety, Codes and Standards Program: The Safety, Codes and Standards program supports research and development (R&D) that provides the critical information needed to define requirements and close gaps in safety, codes, and standards to enable the safe use and handling of hydrogen and fuel cell technologies. The program also conducts safety activities focused on promoting safety practices among U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) projects and the development of information resources and best practices. Reviewers recognized that the program continues to provide strong support in the following

286

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

TRANSFORMATION TRANSFORMATION 442 | FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report 2013 - Market Transformation Summary of Annual Merit Review of the Market Transformation Program Summary of Reviewer Comments on the Market Transformation Program: The purpose of the Market Transformation program is to spur market growth for domestically produced hydrogen and fuel cell systems. By supporting increased sales in key early markets, this program helps to identify and overcome non-technical barriers to commercial deployment and to reduce the life cycle costs of fuel cell power by helping to achieve economies of scale. The current focus of the Market Transformation program is to build on past successes in lift truck and emergency backup power applications (part of the U.S. Department of Energy's [DOE's]

287

First annual report on the Biological Monitoring and Abatement Program at Oak Ridge National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

As a condition of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit issued to Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) on April 1, 1986, a Biological Monitoring and Abatement Program (BMAP) was developed for White Oak Creek (WOC); selected tributaries of WOC, including Fifth Creek, First Creek, Melton Branch, and Northwest Tributary; and the Clinch River. BMAP consists of seven major tasks that address both radiological and nonradiological contaminants in the aquatic and terrestrial environs on-site and the aquatic environs off-site. These tasks are (1) toxicity monitoring; (2) bioaccumulation monitoring of nonradiological contaminants in aquatic biota; (3) biological indicator studies; (4) instream ecological monitoring; (5) assessment of contaminants in the terrestrial environment; (6) radioecology of WOC and White Oak Lake (WOL); and (7) contaminant transport, distribution, and fate in the WOC embayment-Clinch River-Watts Bar Reservoir system. This document, the first of a series of annual reports presenting the results of BMAP, describes studies that were conducted from March through December 1986.

Loar, J.M. (ed.); Adams, S.M.; Blaylock, B.G.; Boston, H.L.; Frank, M.L.; Garten, C.T.; Houston, M.A.; Kimmel, B.L.; Ryon, M.G.; Smith, J.G.; Southworth, G.R.; Stewart, A.J.; Walton, B.T.; Berry, J.B.; Talmage, S.S. (Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States)); Amano, H. (JAERI, Tokai Res., Establishment, Ibari-Ken (Japan)); Jimenez, B.D. (School of Pharmacy, Univ. of Puerto Rico (San Juan)); Kitchings, J.T.

1992-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

288

The advanced manufacturing science and technology program. FY 95 Annual Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This is the Fiscal Year 1995 Annual Report for the Advanced Manufacturing Science and Technology (AMST) sector of Los Alamos Tactical Goal 6, Industrial Partnering. During this past fiscal year, the AMST project leader formed a committee whose members represented the divisions and program offices with a manufacturing interest to examine the Laboratory`s expertise and needs in manufacturing. From a list of about two hundred interest areas, the committee selected nineteen of the most pressing needs for weapon manufacturing. Based upon Los Alamos mission requirements and the needs of the weapon manufacturing (Advanced Design and Production Technologies (ADaPT)) program plan and the other tactical goals, the committee selected four of the nineteen areas for strategic planning and possible industrial partnering. The areas selected were Casting Technology, Constitutive Modeling, Non-Destructive Testing and Evaluation, and Polymer Aging and Lifetime Prediction. For each area, the AMST committee formed a team to write a roadmap and serve as a partnering technical consultant. To date, the roadmaps have been completed for each of the four areas. The Casting Technology and Polymer Aging teams are negotiating with specific potential partners now, at the close of the fiscal year. For each focus area we have created a list of existing collaborations and other ongoing partnering activities. In early Fiscal Year 1996, we will continue to develop partnerships in these four areas. Los Alamos National Laboratory instituted the tactical goals for industrial partnering to focus our institutional resources on partnerships that enhance core competencies and capabilities required to meet our national security mission of reducing the nuclear danger. The second industry sector targeted by Tactical Goal 6 was the chemical industry. Tactical Goal 6 is championed by the Industrial Partnership Office.

Hill, J. [comp.

1996-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

289

FY2008 Annual Progress Report for the Advanced Power Electronics and Electric Machinery Program  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

AnnuAl Progress rePort for AnnuAl Progress rePort for the AdvAnced Power electronics And electric MAchinery technology AreA annual progress report 2008 V e h i c l e T e c h n o l o g i e s P r o g r a m U.S. Department of Energy FreedomCAR and Vehicle Technologies, EE-2G 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W.

290

E-Print Network 3.0 - annual session program Sample Search Results  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

,000.00 annually. Introduction of a new fund in the amount of ... Source: Saskatchewan, University of - Department of Physics and Engineering Physics, Plasma Physics...

291

Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) Hydrogen Program New Projects Awarded in FY 2007, excerpt from 2007 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7 7 FY 2007 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen Program The Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program provides small businesses with opportunities to participate in DOE research activities by exploring new and innovative approaches to achieve R&D objectives. The funds set aside for SBIR projects are used to support an annual competition for Phase I awards of up to $100,000 each for about nine months to explore the feasibility of innovative concepts. Phase II is the principal research or R&D effort, and these awards are up to $750,000 over a two-year period. Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) projects include substantial (at least 30%) cooperative research collaboration between the small business and a non-profit research institution. For more information about

292

Hydrogen Emergency Response Training for First Responders - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

52 52 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Monte R. Elmore Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) 902 Battelle Blvd. Richland, WA 99352 Phone: (509) 372-6158 Email: monte.elmore@pnnl.gov DOE Manager HQ: Antonio Ruiz Phone: (202) 586-0729 Email: Antonio.Ruiz@ee.doe.gov Subcontractors: * Jennifer Hamilton, California Fuel Cell Partnership (CaFCP), Sacramento, CA * Hanford Fire Department, Richland, WA * Hazardous Materials Management and Emergency

293

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program, 2013 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report (Book)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The fiscal year (FY) 2013 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting (AMR), in conjunction with DOE's Vehicle Technologies Office AMR, was held from May 13-16, 2013, at the Crystal City Marriott and Crystal Gateway Marriott in Arlington, Virginia. This report is a summary of comments by AMR peer reviewers about the hydrogen and fuel cell projects funded by DOE's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE).

Not Available

2013-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

294

Lower Granite Dam Smolt Monitoring Program, 2005-2006 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The 2005 fish collection season at Lower Granite Dam (LGR) was characterized by average water temperatures, below average flows, above average spill, low levels of debris and the record number of smolts collected compared to the previous five years. With the continued release of unclipped supplementation chinook and steelhead above LGR, we cannot accurately distinguish wild chinook, steelhead, and sockeye/kokanee in the sample. For the purposes of this report we will designate fish as clipped and unclipped. This season a total of 13,030,967 juvenile salmonids were collected at LGR. Of these, 12,099,019 were transported to release sites below Bonneville Dam, 12,032,623 by barge and 66,396 by truck. An additional 898,235 fish were bypassed to the river due to over-capacity of the raceways, barges or trucks and for research purposes. This was the first season of summer spill at LGR. Spill was initiated at 12:01am June 20 as directed by the ruling set forth by Judge James Redden of the United States District Court (Order CV 01-640-RE). In addition, the Lower Granite project also conducted a summer spill test alternating spill and spill patterns between spill to the gas cap without the removable spillway weir (RSW) and spill with up to 20 kcfs utilizing the RSW. Because of the forecast low flow this year, most hatchery reared subyearling fall chinook were released up to three weeks early. With the unexpected high flows in late May and early June, more than 90% of the subyearling chinook were collected prior to the initiation of the court ordered summer spill program. Collection number fluctuations reflect river flow and project operations for any given year. For example, low flow years (2001, 2004 and 2005) result in higher collection numbers. Court ordered spill throughout the summer migration will directly affect collection of fall subyearling chinook collection numbers. The editors of this report urge the reader to use caution when comparing fish collection numbers between years, considering both annual river flows and annual project operations, because both affect fish migration and collection.

Mensik, Fred; Rapp, Shawn; Ross, Doug (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA)

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

295

Lower Granite Dam Smolt Monitoring Program, Annual Report 2005-2006.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The 2005 fish collection season at Lower Granite Dam (LGR) was characterized by average water temperatures, below average flows, above average spill, low levels of debris and the record number of smolts collected compared to the previous five years. With the continued release of unclipped supplementation chinook and steelhead above LGR, we cannot accurately distinguish wild chinook, steelhead, and sockeye/kokanee in the sample. For the purposes of this report we will designate fish as clipped and unclipped. This season a total of 13,030,967 juvenile salmonids were collected at LGR. Of these, 12,099,019 were transported to release sites below Bonneville Dam, 12,032,623 by barge and 66,396 by truck. An additional 898,235 fish were bypassed to the river due to over-capacity of the raceways, barges or trucks and for research purposes. This was the first season of summer spill at LGR. Spill was initiated at 12:01am June 20 as directed by the ruling set forth by Judge James Redden of the United States District Court (Order CV 01-640-RE). In addition, the Lower Granite project also conducted a summer spill test alternating spill and spill patterns between spill to the gas cap without the removable spillway weir (RSW) and spill with up to 20 kcfs utilizing the RSW. Because of the forecast low flow this year, most hatchery reared subyearling fall chinook were released up to three weeks early. With the unexpected high flows in late May and early June, more than 90% of the subyearling chinook were collected prior to the initiation of the court ordered summer spill program. Collection number fluctuations reflect river flow and project operations for any given year. For example, low flow years (2001, 2004 and 2005) result in higher collection numbers. Court ordered spill throughout the summer migration will directly affect collection of fall subyearling chinook collection numbers. The editors of this report urge the reader to use caution when comparing fish collection numbers between years, considering both annual river flows and annual project operations, because both affect fish migration and collection.

Menski, Fred

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

296

Using HyPro to Evaluate Competing Hydrogen Pathways, excerpt from 2007 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

89 89 FY 2007 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen Program Objectives Develop understanding of how a hydrogen production infrastructure for H 2 fuel cell (FC)/ internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles might develop in the U.S. Quantify production methods under consistent cost and state-of-technology assumptions. Analyze infrastructure development under dynamic conditions over time. Determine factors that will drive infrastructure development. Define role of externalities such as policy and technology advancement. Develop a computational model to aid in the analysis. Technical Barriers This project addresses the following technical barriers from the Systems Analysis section of the Hydrogen, Fuel Cells and Infrastructure Technologies Program Multi-Year Research, Development and

297

Ammonia-Borane under High Pressure - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 4 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Jiuhua Chen (Primary Contact), Shah Najiba, Yongzhou Sun, Jennifer Girard, Vadym Drozd Center for the Study of Matters at Extreme Conditions Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering Florida International University 11200 SW 8 th Street Miami, FL 33199 Phone: (305) 348-3140 Email: chenj@fiu.edu DOE Program Officer: Dr. Lane Wilson Phone: (301) 903-5877 Email: Lane.Wilson@science.doe.gov Subcontractor: Wendy Mao, Stanford University Objectives Understand pressure influence on the structure, phase * stability, dehydrogenation of ammonia borane and its

298

Appliance Standards Program Schedule - CCE Overview and Update, presented at AHRI 2011 Annual Meeting, dated November 14, 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

November 14, 2011 November 14, 2011 AHRI Annual Meeting 2011 2 | Building Technologies Program & General Counsel's Office of Enforcement eere.energy.gov Agenda Enforcement Happenings 1 Certification Follow-Up 4 5 Rulemaking Schedules How to Submit Questions 6 2 Rulemaking Updates 3 Enforcement Overview 3 | Building Technologies Program & General Counsel's Office of Enforcement eere.energy.gov Product Stage Scheduled Issuance Fans, Blowers, and Fume Hoods Request for Information Issued Commercial/Industrial Pumps Coverage Determination Issued Walk-in Coolers and Freezers NOPR Fall/Winter 2011 Commercial Ice Makers Preliminary Analysis Winter 2011

299

Appliance Standards Program Schedule - CCE Overview and Update, presented at AHRI 2011 Annual Meeting, dated November 14, 2011  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

November 14, 2011 November 14, 2011 AHRI Annual Meeting 2011 2 | Building Technologies Program & General Counsel's Office of Enforcement eere.energy.gov Agenda Enforcement Happenings 1 Certification Follow-Up 4 5 Rulemaking Schedules How to Submit Questions 6 2 Rulemaking Updates 3 Enforcement Overview 3 | Building Technologies Program & General Counsel's Office of Enforcement eere.energy.gov Product Stage Scheduled Issuance Fans, Blowers, and Fume Hoods Request for Information Issued Commercial/Industrial Pumps Coverage Determination Issued Walk-in Coolers and Freezers NOPR Fall/Winter 2011 Commercial Ice Makers Preliminary Analysis Winter 2011

300

Ammonia-Borane: a Promising Material for Hydrogen Storage - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

0 0 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Larry G. Sneddon (Primary Contact), Martin Bluhm, Dan Himmelberger, William Ewing, Laif Alden, Emily Berkeley, Chang Won Yoon and Allegra Marchione University of Pennsylvania Department of Chemistry 231 S. 34 th Street Philadelphia, PA 19104-6323 Phone: (215) 898-8632 Email: lsneddon@sas.upenn.edu DOE Program Officer: Larry Rahn Phone: (301) 903-2508 Email: Larry.Rahn@science.doe.gov Subcontractors: R. Tom Baker, Richard Burchell, Felix Gaertner, Hassan Kalviri, Morgane Le Fur, Larena Menant, Giovanni Rachiero Matthew Rankin, Johannes Thomas,

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual eeo program" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Computational studies of hydrogen interactions with storage materials - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 6 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Chris G. Van de Walle (Primary Contact), Lars Ismer, Anindya Roy, and Anderson Janotti Materials Department, University of California Santa Barbara, CA 93106-5050 Phone: (805) 893-7144 Email: vandewalle@mrl.ucsb.edu DOE Program Officer: James Davenport Phone: (301) 903-0035 Email: James.Davenport@science.doe.gov Objectives Building on our accumulated knowledge of hydrogen interactions with semiconductors and insulators we have been conducting computational studies with the goal of developing new insights for hydrogen interactions with hydrogen storage materials. Using state-of-the-art density functional calculations, our research addresses the energetics

302

Impact of DOE Program Goals on Hydrogen Vehicles: Market Prospect, Costs, and Benefits - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

9 9 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Zhenhong Lin (Primary Contact), David Greene, Jing Dong Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) National Transportation Research Center 2360 Cherahala Boulevard Knoxville, TN 37932 Phone: (865) 946-1308 Email: linz@ornl.gov DOE Manager HQ: Fred Joseck Phone: (202) 586-7932 Email: Fred.Joseck@hq.doe.gov Project Start Date: October 2011 Project End Date: September 2012 Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Project market penetrations of hydrogen vehicles under * varied assumptions on processes of achieving the DOE program goals for fuel cells, hydrogen storage, batteries, motors, and hydrogen supply. Estimate social benefits and public costs under different *

303

St. Louis Airport Site. Annual site environmental report, calendar year 1985. Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

During 1985, the environmental monitoring program was continued at the St. Louis Airport Site (SLAPS) in St. Louis County, Missouri. The ditches north and south of the site have been designated for cleanup as part of the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). The monitoring program at the SLAPS measures radon gas concentrations in air; external gamma radiation dose rates; and uranium, thorium, and radium concentrations in surface water, groundwater, and sediment. Potential radiation doses to the public are also calculated. Because the site is not controlled or regulated by the DOE, the DOE Derived Concentration Guides (DCGs) are not applicable to SLAPS, but are included only as a basis for comparison. The DOE DCGs and the DOE radiation protection standard have been revised. (Appendix B). During 1985, annual average radon levels in air at the SLAPS were below the DCG for uncontrolled areas. External gamma monitoring in 1985 showed measured annual gamma dose rates ranging from 3 to 2087 mrem/y, with the highest value occurring in an area known to be contaminated. The calculated maximum dose at the site boundary, assuming limited occupancy, would be 6 mrem/y. Average annual concentrations of /sup 230/Th, /sup 226/Ra, and total uranium in surface waters remained below the DOE DCG. The on-site groundwater measurements showed that average annual concentrations of /sup 230/Th, /sup 226/Ra and total uranium were within the DOE DCGs. Although there are no DCGs for sediments, all concentrations of total uraniu, /sup 230/Th, and /sup 226/Ra were below the FUSRAP Guidelines.

Not Available

1986-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

304

Snake River Sockeye Salmon Captive Broodstock Program; Hatchery Element, 2004 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

On November 20, 1991, the National Marine Fisheries Service listed Snake River sockeye salmon Oncorhynchus nerka as endangered under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. In 1991, the Idaho Department of Fish and Game, the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, and the National Marine Fisheries Service initiated efforts to conserve and rebuild populations in Idaho. Initial steps to recover sockeye salmon included the establishment of a captive broodstock program at the Idaho Department of Fish and Game Eagle Fish Hatchery. Sockeye salmon broodstock and culture responsibilities are shared with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration at two locations adjacent to Puget Sound in Washington State. Activities conducted by the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration are reported under separate cover. Idaho Department of Fish and Game monitoring and evaluation activities of captive broodstock program fish releases (annual report to the Bonneville Power Administration for the research element of the program) are also reported separately. Captive broodstock program activities conducted between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2004 for the hatchery element of the program are presented in this report. In 2004, twenty-seven anadromous sockeye salmon returned to the Sawtooth Valley. Traps on Redfish Lake Creek and the upper Salmon River at the Sawtooth Fish Hatchery intercepted one and four adults, respectively. Additionally, one adult sockeye salmon was collected at the East Fork Salmon River weir, 18 were seined from below the Sawtooth Fish Hatchery weir, one adult sockeye salmon was observed below the Sawtooth Fish Hatchery weir but not captured, and two adult sockeye salmon were observed in Little Redfish Lake but not captured. Fish were captured/collected between July 24 and September 14, 2004. The captured/collected adult sockeye salmon (12 females and 12 males) originated from a variety of release strategies and were transferred to Eagle Fish Hatchery on September 14, 2004 and later incorporated into hatchery spawn matrices. Nine anadromous females, 102 captive females from brood year 2001, and one captive female from brood year 2000 broodstock groups were spawned at the Eagle Hatchery in 2004. Spawn pairings produced approximately 140,823 eyed-eggs with egg survival to eyed stage of development averaging 72.8%. Eyed-eggs (49,134), presmolts (130,716), smolts (96), and adults (241) were planted or released into Sawtooth Valley waters in 2004. Reintroduction strategies involved releases to Redfish Lake, Alturas Lake, and Pettit Lake. During this reporting period, five broodstocks and five unique production groups were in culture at Idaho Department of Fish and Game (Eagle Fish Hatchery and Sawtooth Fish Hatchery) and Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (Oxbow Fish Hatchery) facilities. Two of the five broodstocks were incorporated into the 2004 spawning design.

Baker, Dan J.; Heindel, Jeff A.; Redding, Jeremy (Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Boise, ID)

2006-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

305

Endangered species and cultural resources program, Naval Petroleum Reserves in California: Annual report FY95  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In FY95, EG and G Energy Measurements, Inc. (EG and G/EM) continued to support efforts to protect endangered species and cultural resources at the Naval Petroleum Reserves in California (NPRC). These efforts are conducted to ensure NPRC compliance with regulations regarding the protection of listed species and cultural resources on Federal properties. Population monitoring activities are conducted annually for San Joaquin kit foxes, giant kangaroo rats, blunt-nosed leopard lizards, and Hoover`s wooly-star. To mitigate impacts of oil field activities on listed species, 674 preactivity surveys covering approximately 211 hectares (521 acres) were conducted in FY95. EG and G/EM also assisted with mitigating effects from third-party projects, primarily by conducting biological and cultural resource consultations with regulatory agencies. EG and G/EM has conducted an applied habitat reclamation program at NPRC since 1985. In FY95, an evaluation of revegetation rates on reclaimed and non-reclaimed disturbed lands was completed, and the results will be used to direct future habitat reclamation efforts at NPRC. In FY95, reclamation success was monitored on 50 sites reclaimed in 1985. An investigation of factors influencing the distribution and abundance of kit foxes at NPRC was initiated in FY94. Factors being examined include habitat disturbance, topography, grazing, coyote abundance, lagomorph abundance, and shrub density. This investigation continued in FY95 and a manuscript on this topic will be completed in FY96. Also, Eg and G/EM completed collection of field data to evaluate the effects of a well blow-out on plant and animal populations. A final report will be prepared in FY96. Finally, EG and G/EM completed a life table analysis on San Joaquin kit foxes at NPRC.

NONE

1996-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

306

EPAct Alternative Fuel Transportation Program: State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleet Compliance Annual Report (Brochure)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This annual report summarizes the compliance results of state and alternative fuel provider fleets covered by the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPAct) for model year 2008/fiscal year 2009.

Not Available

2010-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

307

2013 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report Posted  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The report summarizes the comments of expert peer reviewers at the 2013 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, which was held May 1317, 2013, in Arlington, Virginia.

308

Fluid Phase Chemical Hydrogen Storage Materials - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8 8 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Benjamin L. Davis (Primary Contact), Tessui Nakagawa, Biswajit Paik, and Troy A. Semelsberger Materials Physics and Applications, Materials Chemistry Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), MS J514 P.O. Box 1663 Los Alamos, NM 87545 Phone: (505) 500-2463 Email: bldavis@lanl.gov DOE Manager Grace Ordaz Phone: (202) 586-8350 Email: Grace.Ordaz@hq.doe.gov Partner Tom Baker, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Project Start Date: October 1, 2010 Project End Date: Project continuation and direction determined annually by DOE Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Develop fluid, pumpable ammonia-borane (AB)-based fuels with high-H 2 content. Technical Barriers

309

Lifecycle Verification of Polymeric Storage Tank Liners - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7 7 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Barton Smith (Primary Contact) and Lawrence M. Anovitz Oak Ridge National Laboratory P.O. Box 2008 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Phone: (865) 574-2196 Email: smithdb@ornl.gov DOE Manager HQ: Ned Stetson Phone: (202) 586-9995 Email: Ned.Stetson@ee.doe.gov Start Date: June 2008 Projected End Date: Project continuation and direction determined annually by DOE Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Continue temperature cycling and permeation * measurements on tank liner polymers, and use permeation data to assess ability of tank liners to retain a steady-state hydrogen discharge rate that does not exceed 110% of the 75 normal cubic centimeters per minute (Ncc)/min permeation requirement of SAE International

310

Fermentation and Electrohydrogenic Approaches to Hydrogen Production - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8 8 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Pin-Ching Maness (Primary Contact), Katherine Chou, and Lauren Magnusson National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) 15013 Denver West Parkway Golden, CO 80401 Phone: (303) 384-6114 Email: pinching.maness@nrel.gov DOE Manager HQ: Eric Miller Phone: (202) 287-5829 Email: Eric.Miller@hq.doe.gov Subcontractor: Bruce Logan, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA Start Date: October 1, 2004 Projected End Date: Project continuation and direction determined annually by DOE Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Optimize sequencing fed-batch parameters in converting * cellulose to hydrogen by the cellulolytic bacterium Clostridium thermocellum; aimed at lowering feedstock cost. Improve plasmid stability in * C. thermocellum; aimed

311

Stationery and Emerging Market Fuel Cell System Cost Analysis - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 1 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Kathya Mahadevan (Primary Contact), VinceContini, Matt Goshe, and Fritz Eubanks Battelle 505 King Avenue Columbus, OH 43201 Phone: (614) 424-3197 Email: mahadevank@battelle.org DOE Managers HQ: Jason Marcinkoski Phone: (202) 586-7466 Email: Jason.Marcinkoski@ee.doe.gov GO: Reg Tyler Phone: (720) 356-1805 Email: Reginald.Tyler@go.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-EE0005250/001 Project Start Date: September 30, 2011 Project End Date: Project continuation and direction determined annually by DOE Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives To assist the DOE in developing fuel cell systems for stationary and emerging markets by developing independent cost models and costs estimates for manufacture and

312

Next Generation H2 Station Analysis - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 6 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Sam Sprik (Primary Contact), Keith Wipke, Todd Ramsden, Chris Ainscough, Jen Kurtz National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) 15013 Denver West Parkway Golden, CO 80401-3305 Phone: (303) 275-4431 Email: sam.sprik@nrel.gov DOE Manager HQ: Jason Marcinkoski Phone: (202) 586-7466 Email: Jason.Marcinkoski@ee.doe.gov Project Start Date: October 1, 2011 Project End Date: Project continuation and direction determined annually by DOE Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Collect data from state-of-the-art hydrogen (H2) fueling * facilities, such as those funded by the California Air Resources Board (CARB), to enrich the analyses and composite data products (CDPs) on H2 fueling originally established by the Learning Demonstration project.

313

Renewable Electrolysis Integrated Systems Development and Testing - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

9 9 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Kevin Harrison National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) 15013 Denver West Parkway Golden, CO 80401 Phone: (303) 384-7091 Email: Kevin.Harrison@nrel.gov DOE Manager HQ: Eric Miller Phone: (202) 287-5829 Email: Eric.Miller@hq.doe.gov Contributors: Chris Ainscough and Michael Peters Subcontractor: Marc Mann, Spectrum Automation Controls, Arvada, CO Project Start Date: October 1, 2003 Project End Date: Project continuation and direction determined annually by DOE Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Validate stack and system efficiency and contributing * sub-system performance of DOE-awarded advanced electrolysis systems Collaborate with industry to optimize and demonstrate *

314

Lake Roosevelt Fisheries Evaluation Program; Limnological and Fisheries Monitoring, Annual Report 2000.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A slightly dryer than normal year yielded flows in Lake Roosevelt that were essentially equal to the past ten year average. Annual mean inflow and outflow were 3,160.3 m3/s and 3,063.4 m3/s respectively. Mean reservoir elevation was 387.2 m above sea level at the Grand Coulee Dam forebay. The forebay elevation was below the mean elevation for a total of 168 days. During the first half of the 2000 forebay elevation changed at a rate of 0.121 m/d and during the last half changed at a rate of 0.208 m/d. The higher rate of elevation change earlier in the year is due to the drawdown to accommodate spring runoff. Mean annual water retention time was 40 days. Annual mean total dissolved gas was 108%. Total dissolved gas was greatest at upriver locations (110% = US/Canada Border annual mean) and decreased moving toward Grand Coulee Dam (106% = Grand Coulee Dam Forebay annual mean). Total dissolved gas was greatest in May (122% reservoir wide monthly mean). Gas bubble trauma was observed in 16 fish primarily largescale suckers and was low in severity. Reservoir wide mean temperatures were greatest in August (19.5 C) and lowest in January (5.5 C). The Spokane River and Sanpoil River Arms experienced higher temperatures than the mainstem reservoir. Brief stratification was observed at the Sanpoil River shore location in July. Warm water temperatures in the Spokane Arm contributed to low dissolved oxygen concentrations in August (2.6 mg/L at 33 m). However, decomposition of summer algal biomass was likely the main cause of depressed dissolved oxygen concentrations. Otherwise, dissolved oxygen profiles were relatively uniform throughout the water column across other sampling locations. Annual mean Secchi depth throughout the reservoir was 5.7 m. Nutrient concentrations were generally low, however, annual mean total phosphorus (0.016 mg/L) was in the mesotrophic range. Annual mean total nitrogen was in the meso-oligotrophic range. Total nitrogen to total phosphorus ratios were large (31:1 annual mean) likely indicating phosphorus limitations to phytoplankton.

Lee, Chuck; Scofield, Ben; Pavlik, Deanne

2003-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

315

Solar Energy Program: Chapter from the Energy and Environmental Division Annual Report 1980  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

SOLAR ENERGY PROGRAM PERSONNEL Small Particle SuspensionsStrategies for Active Solar Energy Systems M. Warren, S.ENVIRONMENT DIVISION I SOLAR ENERGY PROGRAM Chapter from t h

Energy and Environment Division

1981-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

316

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2012 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report: May 14-18, 2012, Arlington, VA  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document summarizes the comments provided by peer reviewers on hydrogen and fuel cell projects presented at the fiscal year (FY) 2012 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program and Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting (AMR), held May 14-18, 2012, in Arlington, VA.

Not Available

2012-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

317

V1FY 2013 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Jean St-Pierre (Primary Contact), Yunfeng Zhai,  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

V­1FY 2013 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Jean St-Pierre (Primary applications, 80-kWe (net) integrated transportation fuel cell power systems operating on direct hydrogen-Pierre ­ Hawaii Natural Energy InstituteV.E Fuel Cells / Impurities V­2DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2013

318

Fuel Cell Combined Heat and Power Industrial Demonstration - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

0 0 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Kriston P. Brooks (Primary Contact), Siva P. Pilli, Dale A. King Pacific Northwest National Laboratory P.O. Box 999 Richland, WA 99352 Phone: (509) 372-4343 Email: kriston.brooks@pnnl.gov DOE Manager HQ: Peter Devlin Phone: (202) 586-4905 Email: Peter.Devlin@ee.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-AC05-76RL01830 Subcontractor: ClearEdge Power, Portland, OR Project Start Date: May 2010 Project End Date: September 2012

319

Development of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies for Renewable Energy Applications, excerpt from 2007 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

65 65 FY 2007 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen Program Objectives This project will address selected key manufacturability issues needing solution in two hydrogen technology areas: storage and the production of components. NCMS will evaluate, identify, and develop manufacturing technologies vital to affordable hydrogen-powered systems. NCMS will leverage manufacturing technologies from other industrial sectors and work with its extensive industrial membership to do feasibility projects on those technologies identified as key to reducing production cost by rendering a system component or subcomponent of the targeted hydrogen-powered systems producible in volume. Technical Barriers This project addresses the following technical barriers from the Manufacturing R&D section of the

320

Advanced Materials and Concepts for Portable Power Fuel Cells - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

0 0 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report P. Zelenay (Primary Contact), H. Chung, C.M. Johnston, Y.S. Kim, Q. Li, D. Langlois, D. Spernjak, P. Turner, G. Wu Materials Physics and Applications Division Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) Los Alamos, NM 87545 Phone: (505) 667-0197 Email: zelenay@lanl.gov DOE Manager HQ: Nancy Garland Phone: (202) 586-5673 Email: Nancy.Garland@ee.doe.gov Subcontractors: * R.R. Adzic (PI), S. Bliznakov, M. Li, P. Liu, K. Sasaki, M.-P. Zhou Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY * Y. Yan (PI), S. Alia, J. Zheng University of Delaware, Newark, DE

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual eeo program" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Extended, Continuous Pt Nanostructures in Thick, Dispersed Electrodes - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7 7 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Bryan Pivovar (Primary Contact), Shyam Kocha, KC Neyerlin, Jason Zack, Shaun Alia, Arrelaine Dameron, Tim Olson, Svitlana Pylypenko, Justin Bult, Brian Larsen, Jeremy Leong, Niccolo Aieta, Guido Bender National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) 15013 Denver West Parkway Golden, CO 80401 Phone: (303) 275-3809 Email: Bryan.Pivovar@nrel.gov DOE Manager HQ: Kathi Epping Martin Phone: (202) 586-7425 Email: Kathi.Epping@ee.doe.gov Subcontractors: * Kelly Perry, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN * Rod Borup, Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM * Yushan Yan, University of Delaware, Newark, DE

322

Fuel Cell Fundamentals at Low and Subzero Temperatures - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

11 11 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Adam Z. Weber Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) 1 Cyclotron Rd, MS 70-108B Berkeley, CA 94720 Phone: (510) 486-6308 Email: azweber@lbl.gov DOE Manager HQ: Donna Ho Phone: (202) 586-8000 Email: Donna.Ho@ee.doe.gov Subcontractors: * Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM * United Technologies Research Center, East Hartford, CT * 3M Company, St Paul, MN * The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA Project Start Date: September 21, 2009 Project End Date: September 30, 2013

323

High Performance, Low Cost Hydrogen Generation from Renewable Energy - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 5 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Dr. Katherine Ayers (Primary Contact), Andy Roemer Proton Energy Systems d/b/a Proton OnSite 10 Technology Drive Wallingford, CT 06492 Phone: (203) 678-2190 Email: kayers@protononsite.com DOE Managers HQ: Erika Sutherland Phone: (202) 586-3152 Email: Erika.Sutherland@ee.doe.gov GO: Dave Peterson Phone: (720) 356-1747 Email: David.Peterson@go.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-EE000276 Subcontractors: * Entegris, Inc., Chaska, MN * The Electrochemical Engine Center at Penn State, University Park, PA * Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN Project Start Date: September 1, 2009

324

Sustainable Hydrogen Fueling Station, California State University, Los Angeles - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8 8 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report David Blekhman California State University Los Angeles Los Angeles, CA 90032 Phone: (323) 343-4569 Email: blekhman@calstatela.edu DOE Managers HQ: Jason Marcinkoski Phone: (202) 586-7466 Email: Jason.Marcinkoski@ee.doe.gov GO: Gregory Kleen Phone: (720) 356-1672 Email: Gregory.Kleen@go.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-EE0000443 Subcontractors: * General Physics Corporation, Elkridge, MD * Weaver Construction, Anaheim, CA Project Start Date: January, 2009 Project End Date: December, 2012 *Congressionally directed project Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Procure core equipment for the California State *

325

Nanosegregated Cathode Catalysts with Ultra-Low Platinum Loading - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 1 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Nenad M. Markovic (Primary Contact) and Vojislav R. Stamenkovic Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) Argonne, IL 60439 Phone: (630) 252-5181 Email: nmmarkovic@anl.gov DOE Manager HQ: Nancy Garland Phone: (202) 586-5673 Email: Nancy.Garland@ee.doe.gov Subcontractors: * Karren More, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN * Charles Hays, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA * Shuoheng Sun, Brown University, Providence, RI * Guofeng Wang, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA * Radoslav Atanasoski, 3M Company, Saint Paul, MN

326

PEM Electrolyzer Incorporating an Advanced Low-Cost Membrane - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 1 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Monjid Hamdan (Primary Contact), Tim Norman Giner, Inc. (Formerly Giner Electrochemical Systems, LLC.) 89 Rumford Ave. Newton, MA 02466 Phone: (781) 529-0526 Email: mhamdan@ginerinc.com DOE Managers HQ: Erika Sutherland Phone: (202) 586-3152 Email: Erika.Sutherland@ee.doe.gov GO: David Peterson Phone: (720) 356-1747 Email: David.Peterson@go.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-FG36-08GO18065 Subcontractors: * Virginia Polytechnic Institute and University, Blacksburg, VA * Parker Hannifin Ltd domnick hunter Division, Hemel Hempstead, United Kingdom Project Start Date: May 1, 2008

327

Hydrogen Storage in Metal-Organic Frameworks - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

7 7 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Jeffrey Long (Primary Contact), Martin Head-Gordon Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 1 Cyclotron Road Berkeley, CA 95720 Phone: (510) 642-0860 Email: jrlong@berkeley.edu DOE Managers HQ: Ned Stetson Phone: (202) 586-9995 Email: Ned.Stetson@ee.doe.gov GO: Jesse Adams Phone: (720) 356-1421 Email: Jesse.Adams@go.doe.gov Subcontractors: * National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD (Craig Brown) * General Motors Corporation, Warren, MI (Anne Dailly) Project Start Date: April 1, 2012 Project End Date: March 31, 2015 Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives

328

Energy Storage in Clathrate Hydrogen Material - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

9 9 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Carolyn A. Koh (Primary Contact), Amadeu K. Sum, R. Gary Grim, Matthew R. Walsh, Prasad B. Kerkar Center for Hydrate Research Colorado School of Mines 1600 Illinois Street Golden, CO 80401 Phone: (303) 273-3237 Email: ckoh@mines.edu DOE Program Officer: Bonnie Gersten Phone: (303) 903-0002 Email: Bonnie.Gersten@science.doe.gov Objectives The current project aims to probe key questions surrounding the metastability of hydrates relating to synthesis, structure, and composition. The questions on metastability are crucial in all energy applications of clathrate hydrates including energy storage, energy transportation, and energy recovery. Specifically, this project

329

U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2013 Annual Merit Review (AMR) and Peer Evaluation Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

AND DELIVERY AND DELIVERY FY 2013 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report | 7 2013 - Hydrogen Production and Delivery Summary of Annual Merit Review of the Hydrogen Production and Delivery Program Summary of Reviewer Comments on the Hydrogen Production and Delivery Program: This review session evaluated hydrogen production and delivery research and development (R&D) activities in the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Fuel Cell Technologies Office (FCTO) in the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. The hydrogen production projects reviewed represented a diverse portfolio of technologies to produce hydrogen from renewable energy sources. Production project sub-categories included water electrolysis, solar-driven thermochemical cycles, photoelectrochemical (PEC) direct water splitting, and biological hydrogen

330

Durable Catalysts for Fuel Cell Protection during Transient Conditions - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

0 0 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Radoslav T. Atanasoski (Primary Contact), George D. Vernstrom, Gregory M. Haugen, Jimmy Wong, Theresa M. Watschke, Ljiljana L. Atanasoska, Amy E. Hester Fuel Cell Components Program, 3M Company 3M Center, Building 201-2N-05 St. Paul, MN 55144-1000 Phone: (651) 733-9441 Email: rtatanasoski@mmm.com Timothy C. Crowtz, Jessie E. Harlow, Robbie J. Sanderson, David A. Stevens, Jeff R. Dahn Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada David A. Cullen, Karren L. More, Shawn Reeves Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN Deborah J. Myers, Xiaoping Wang, Ramachandran Subbaraman, Vojislav R. Stamenkovic, Nenad M. Markovic Argonne National Laboratory, LeMont, IL Sumit Kundu, Wendy Lee AFCC Automotive Fuel Cell Cooperation, Burnaby,

331

Complex Hydrides - A New Frontier for Future Energy Applications - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 5 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Vitalij K. Pecharsky, 1 Marek Pruski, 2 L. Scott Chumbley, 3 Duane D. Johnson, 4 Takeshi Kobayashi 5 1 FWP Leader: Ames Laboratory, 253 Spedding Hall, Ames, IA 50011, Email: vitkp@ameslab.gov, Phone: (515) 294-8220 2 PI: Ames Laboratory, 230 Spedding Hall, Ames, IA 50011, Email: mpruski@iastate.edu, Phone: (515) 294-2017 3 PI: Ames Laboratory, 214 Wilhelm Hall, Ames, IA 50011, Email: chumbley@iastate.edu, Tel.: 515-2947903; 4 PI: Ames Laboratory, 311 TASF, Ames, IA 50011, Email: ddj@ameslab.gov, Phone: (515) 2949649 5 Ames Laboratory, 229 Spedding Hall, Ames, IA 50011, Email: takeshi@iastate.edu, Phone: (515)-294-6823 DOE Program Officer: Dr. Refik Kortan

332

Novel Molecular Materials for Hydrogen Storage Applications - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 6 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Maddury Somayazulu (Primary Contact), Timothy Strobel, Robert Potter, Raja Chellappa, Viktor Struzhkin, Russell J Hemley Geophysical Laboratory Carnegie Institution of Washington 5251 Broad Branch Rd NW Washington, D.C. 20015 Phone: (202) 478-8911 Email: zulu@gl.ciw.edu DOE Program Manager: Dr. P. Thiyagarajan Phone: (301) 903-9706 Email: P.Thiyagarajan@science.doe.gov Objectives Discover, identify and characterize novel hydrogen-rich * compounds that can be used for hydrogen storage or as agents for rehydrogenation of hydrogen storage materials at high pressures. Investigate high pressure routes to rehydrogenating * ammonia borane and polymeric complexes of ammonia borane. Investigate interaction of hydrogen with metallo-organic *

333

Semi-annual report of the Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management, Quality Assessment Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Quality Assessment Program (QAP) is designed to test the quality of the environmental measurements being reported to the Department of Energy by its contractors. Since 1976. real or synthetic environmental samples that have been prepared and thoroughly analyzed at the Environmental Measurements Laboratory (EML) have been distributed at first quarterly and then semi-annually to these contractors. Their results, which are returned to EML within 90 days, are compiled with EML`s results and are reported back to the participating contractors 30 days later. A summary of the reported results is available to the participants 3 days after the reporting deadline via a modem-telephone connection to the EML computer. This is the 42nd report of this program.

Sanderson, C.G.; Klusek, C.S.

1993-01-04T23:59:59.000Z

334

Semi-annual report of the Department of Energy, Operational Safety, Health and Environment Division, Quality Assessment Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report presents the results from the analysis of the 32nd set of environmental quality assessment samples (QAP XXXII) that were received on or before June 5, 1990. This Quality Assessment Program (QAP) is designed to test the quality of the environmental measurements being reported to the Department of Energy by its contractors. Since 1976, real or synthetic environmental samples that have been prepared and thoroughly analyzed at the Environmental Measurements Laboratory (EML) have been distributed at first quarterly and then semi-annually to these contractors. Their results, which are returned to EML within 90 days, are compiled with EML's results and are reported back to the participating contractors 30 days later. A summary of the reported results is available to the participants 3 days after the reporting deadline via a modem-telephone connection to the EML computer. This is the 39th report of this program.

Sanderson, C.G.; Scarpitta, S.C.

1990-07-02T23:59:59.000Z

335

Semi-annual report of the Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management, Quality Assessment Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Quality Assessment Program (QAP) is designed to test the quality of the environmental measurements being reported to the Department of Energy by its contractors. Since 1976. real or synthetic environmental samples that have been prepared and thoroughly analyzed at the Environmental Measurements Laboratory (EML) have been distributed at first quarterly and then semi-annually to these contractors. Their results, which are returned to EML within 90 days, are compiled with EML's results and are reported back to the participating contractors 30 days later. A summary of the reported results is available to the participants 3 days after the reporting deadline via a modem-telephone connection to the EML computer. This is the 42nd report of this program.

Sanderson, C.G.; Klusek, C.S.

1993-01-04T23:59:59.000Z

336

Environmental hazards assessment program. Annual report, July 1, 1994--June 30, 1995  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report describes activities and reports on progress for the third year of the DOE grant to support the Environmental Hazards Assessment Program (EHAP). It reports progress against grant objectives and the Program Implementation Plan published at the end of the first year of the grant. As the program has evolved, more projects have been funded and many existing projects have become more complex. Thus, to accomplish better the objectives over the years and retain a solid focus on the total mission, we have reorganized the grant effort from three to five majoe elements: Public and professional outreach; Clinical programs; Science programs; Information systems; and, Program management.

NONE

1995-07-31T23:59:59.000Z

337

SOLAR ENERGY PROGRAM: CHAPTER FROM THE ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT ANNUAL REPORT 1979  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

U,S,/ Israel and U.S. /Mexico solar programs. The SOLERASMexico," Proceedings of the International Conference on Solar

Authors, Various

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

338

Geothermal Technology Development Program annual progress report, October 1982-September 1983  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The program emphasizes research in rock penetration mechanics, fluid technology, borehold mechanics, diagnostics technology, and permeability enhancement.

Kelsey, J.R. (ed.)

1984-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

339

DOE (Department of Energy)-Nuclear Energy Standards Program annual assessment, FY 1990  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

To meet the objectives of the programs funded by the Department of Energy (DOE)-Nuclear Energy (NE) Technology Support Programs, the Performance Assurance Project Office (PAPO) administers a nuclear standards program and related activities and fosters the development and application of standards. This standards program is carried out in accordance with the principles in DOE Order 1300.2, Department of Energy Standards Program, December 18, 1980. The purposes of this effort, as set forth in three subtasks, are to (1) manage the NE Standards Program, (2) manage the development and maintenance of NE standards, and (3) operate an NE Standards Information Program. This report assesses the Performance Assurance Project Office (PAPO) activities in terms of the objectives of the Department of Energy-Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE) funded programs. To meet these objectives, PAPO administers a nuclear standards program and related activities and fosters the development and application of standards. This task is carried out in accordance with the principles set forth in DOE Order 1300.2, Department of Energy Standards Program, December 18, 1980, and DOE memorandum, Implementation of DOE Orders on Quality Assurance, Standards, and Unusual Occurrence Reporting for Nuclear Energy Programs, March 3, 1982, and with guidance from the DOE-NE Technology Support Programs. 1 tab. (JF)

Williams, D.L. Jr.

1990-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

340

Exploratory Technology Research Program for Electrochemical Energy Storage. Annual report, 1992  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report summarizes the progress made by the Exploratory Technology Research (ETR) Program for Electrochemical Energy Storage during calendar year 1992. The primary objective of the ETR Program, which is sponsored by the US Department of Energy (DOE) and managed by Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory (LBL), is to identify electrochemical technologies that can satisfy stringent performance, durability and economic requirements for electric vehicles (EVs). The ultimate goal is to transfer the most-promising electrochemical technologies to the private sector or to another DOE program (e.g., SNL`s Electric Vehicle Advanced Battery Systems Development Program, EVABS) for further development and scale-up. Besides LBL, which has overall responsibility for the ETR Program, LANL and BNL have participated in the ETR Program by providing key research support in several of the program elements. The ETR Program consists of three major elements: Exploratory Research; Applied Science Research; and Air Systems Research. The objectives and the specific battery and electrochemical systems addressed by each program element are discussed in the following sections, which also include technical summaries that relate to the individual programs. Financial information that relates to the various programs and a description of the management activities for the ETR Program are described in the Executive Summary.

Kinoshita, K. [ed.

1993-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual eeo program" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Annual report to the President and the Congress on the State Energy Conservation Program for calendar year 1989  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Department is required by Section 365(c) of Title 3, Part C, of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA), 42 U.S.C. 6321-6327, as amended by Title 4, Part B of the Energy Conservation and Production Act (ECPA), to report annually to the President and the Congress on the operation of the State Energy Conservation Program. The report is to include an estimate of the energy conservation achieved, and the degree of state participation and achievement as well as a description of innovative conservation programs undertaken by individual states. Together the EPCA and the ECPA constitute the State Energy Conservation Program (SECP) which has provided the states (any one of the 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the Territories and possessions of the United States) with funding to help establish and maintain their capability to plan, design, implement and coordinate a variety of programs and initiatives designed to promote energy conservation and efficiency at state and local levels. All states have operational programs funded under EPCA (no monies have been appropriated under ECPA since FY 1981). In addition, the majority of states have augmented the SECP with oil overcharge funding they have received over the past several years. Each state is required to provide a twenty-percent match for the Federal funds received, and its Base Plan must include the following program measures: (1) mandatory lighting efficiency standards for state public buildings; (2) programs to promote the availability and use of carpool, vanpool, and public transportation; (3) mandatory standards and policies relating to energy efficiency to govern the state procurement practices; (4) mandatory thermal efficiency standards and insulation requirements for new and renovated buildings; and (5) a traffic law or regulation, which permits the operator of a motor vehicle to turn right at a red stop light after stopping. 6 tabs.

Not Available

1990-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

342

2005 TEPP Annual Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Transportation Emergency Transportation Emergency Preparedness Program 2005 Annual Report Special thanks to participants in the Haralson County, Georgia and Leigh Valley International Airport, Pennsylvania exercises who are featured on the front cover of this report. Transportation Emergency Preparedness Program 2005 Annual Report Table of Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................1 I. Transportation Emergency Preparedness Program Purpose ......................3 II. Training ............................................................................................................3 III. TEPP Central Operations .................................................................................5

343

2004 TEPP Annual Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Transportation Transportation Transportation Emergency Preparedness Program 2004 Annual Report United States Department of Energy Transportation Emergency Preparedness Program (TEPP) 2004 Annual Report Table of Contents Executive Summary..................................................................................... 1 I. Transportation Emergency Preparedness Program Purpose ...... 3 II. Training.............................................................................................. 3 III. Outreach and Conferences ............................................................... 5 IV. Go-Kits ............................................................................................... 5 V. TEPP Exercise and Tabletop Activities ..........................................

344

Fossil Energy Program Annual Progress Report for April 1, 2002, Through March 31, 2003  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The mission of the Fossil Energy Program is to conduct research and development that contribute to the advancement of fossil energy technologies. The Oak Ridge National Laboratory Fossil Energy Program research and development activities, performed for the Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Fossil Energy, cover the areas of coal, clean coal technology, gas, petroleum, and support to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Projects on the ORNL Fossil Energy Program are supported by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Fossil Energy, the DOE National Energy Technology Laboratory, the DOE Fossil Energy Clean Coal Technology Program, the DOE National Petroleum Technology Office, and the DOE Fossil Energy Office of Strategic Petroleum Reserve. The ORNL Fossil Energy Program shares with DOE Oak Ridge Operations technical management responsibility for all activities on the DOE Fossil Energy Advanced Research Materials Program. The Advanced Research Materials Program includes research at other DOE and government laboratories, at universities, and at industrial organizations.

Judkins, RR

2003-06-19T23:59:59.000Z

345

ORNLs Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program FY 2013 Annual Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) program at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) reports its status to the US Department of Energy (DOE) in March of each year. The program operates under the authority of DOE Order 413.2B, Laboratory Directed Research and Development (April 19, 2006), which establishes DOEs requirements for the program while providing the Laboratory Director broad flexibility for program implementation. LDRD funds are obtained through a charge to all Laboratory programs. This report includes summaries of all ORNL LDRD research activities supported during FY 2013. The associated FY 2013 ORNL LDRD Self-Assessment (ORNL/PPA-2014/2) provides financial data and an internal evaluation of the programs management process.

NA, NA [ORNL

2014-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

346

ORNLs Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program FY 2010 Annual Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) program at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) reports its status to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) in March of each year. The program operates under the authority of DOE Order 413.2B, Laboratory Directed Research and Development (April 19, 2006), which establishes DOEs requirements for the program while providing the Laboratory Director broad flexibility for program implementation. LDRD funds are obtained through a charge to all Laboratory programs. This report includes summaries of all ORNL LDRD research activities supported during FY 2010. The associated FY 2010 ORNL LDRD Self-Assessment (ORNL/PPA-2011/2) provides financial data and an internal evaluation of the programs management process.

NA, NA [ORNL

2011-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

347

ORNLs Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program FY 2011 Annual Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) program at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) reports its status to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) in March of each year. The program operates under the authority of DOE Order 413.2B, Laboratory Directed Research and Development (April 19, 2006), which establishes DOEs requirements for the program while providing the Laboratory Director broad flexibility for program implementation. LDRD funds are obtained through a charge to all Laboratory programs. This report includes summaries of all ORNL LDRD research activities supported during FY 2011. The associated FY 2011 ORNL LDRD Self-Assessment (ORNL/PPA-2012/2) provides financial data and an internal evaluation of the programs management process.

NA, NA [ORNL

2012-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

348

ORNLs Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program FY 2009 Annual Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) program at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) reports its status to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) in March of each year. The program operates under the authority of DOE Order 413.2B, Laboratory Directed Research and Development (April 19, 2006), which establishes DOEs requirements for the program while providing the Laboratory Director broad flexibility for program implementation. LDRD funds are obtained through a charge to all Laboratory programs. This report includes summaries all ORNL LDRD research activities supported during FY 2009. The associated FY 2009 ORNL LDRD Self-Assessment (ORNL/PPA-2010/2) provides financial data and an internal evaluation of the programs management process.

NA, NA [ORNL

2010-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

349

ORNLs Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program FY 2012 Annual Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) program at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) reports its status to the US Department of Energy (DOE) in March of each year. The program operates under the authority of DOE Order 413.2B, Laboratory Directed Research and Development (April 19, 2006), which establishes DOEs requirements for the program while providing the Laboratory Director broad flexibility for program implementation. LDRD funds are obtained through a charge to all Laboratory programs. This report includes summaries of all ORNL LDRD research activities supported during FY 2012. The associated FY 2012 ORNL LDRD Self-Assessment (ORNL/PPA-2012/2) provides financial data and an internal evaluation of the programs management process.

NA, NA [ORNL

2013-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

350

Exploratory Technology Research Program for electrochemical energy storage: Annual report for 1993  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy`s Office of Propulsion Systems provides support for an Electrochemical Energy Storage Program, that includes research and development (R&D) on advanced rechargeable batteries and fuel cells. A major goal of this program is to develop electrochemical power sources suitable for application in electric vehicles (EVs). The program centers on advanced systems that offer the potential for high performance and low life-cycle costs, both of which are necessary to permit significant penetration into commercial markets. The DOE Electrochemical Energy Storage Program is divided into two projects: the Electric Vehicle Advanced Battery Systems (EVABS) Development Program and the Exploratory Technology Research (ETR) Program. The EVABS Program management responsibility has been assigned to Sandia National Laboratories (SNL); Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory (LBL) is responsible for management of the ETR Program. The EVABS and ETR Programs include an integrated matrix of R&D efforts designed to advance progress on selected candidate electrochemical systems. The United States Advanced Battery Consortium (USABC), a tripartite undertaking between DOE, the U.S. automobile manufacturers and the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), was formed in 1991 to accelerate the development of advanced batteries for consumer EVs. The role of the FIR Program is to perform supporting research on the advanced battery systems under development by the USABC and EVABS Program, and to evaluate new systems with potentially superior performance, durability and/or cost characteristics. The specific goal of the ETR Program is to identify the most promising electrochemical technologies and transfer them to the USABC, the battery industry and/or the EVABS Program for further development and scale-up. This report summarizes the research, financial and management activities relevant to the ETR Program in CY 1993.

Kinoshita, K. [ed.

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

351

Exploratory Technology Research Program for electrochemical energy storage. Annual report for 1991  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The US Department of Energy`s Office of Propulsion Systems provides support for an electrochemical energy storage program, that includes research and development (R&D) on advanced rechargeable batteries and fuel cells. A major goal of this program is to develop electrochemical power sources suitable for application in electric vehicles. The program centers on advanced systems that offer the potential for high performance and low life-cycle costs. The DOE Electrochemical Energy Storage Program is divided into two projects: the Electric Vehicle Advanced Battery Systems Development (EVABS) Program and the Exploratory Technology Research (ETR) Program. The EVABS Program management responsibility has been assigned to Sandia National Laboratory, and the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory is responsible for management of the ETR Program. The EVABS and ETR Programs include an integrated matrix of R&D efforts designed to advance progress on several candidate electrochemical systems. The United States Advanced Battery Consortium (USABC), a tripartite undertaking between DOE, the US automobile manufacturers and the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), was formed in 1991 to accelerate the development of advanced batteries for consumer EVs. The role of the ETR Program is to perform supporting research on the advanced battery systems under development by the USABC and EVABS Program, and to evaluate new systems with potentially superior performance, durability and/or cost characteristics. The specific goal of the ETR Program is to identify the most promising electrochemical technologies and transfer them to the USABC, the battery industry and/or the EVABS Program for further development and scaleup. This report summarizes the research, financial and management activities relevant to the ETR Program in CY 1991.

Kinoshita, K. [ed.

1992-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

352

Annual Reports | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Services » Annual Reports Services » Annual Reports Annual Reports Annual Reports December 28, 2012 Southeastern Power Administration 2012 Annual Report This report reflects our agency's programs,accomplishments, operational, and financial activities for the 12-month period beginning October 1, 2011, and ending September 30, 2012. December 31, 2011 Southeastern Power Administration 2011 Annual Report This report reflects our agency's programs, accomplishments, operational, and financial activities for the 12-month period beginning October 1, 2010, and ending September 31, 2011. December 27, 2010 Southeastern Power Administration 2010 Annual Report This report reflects our agency's programs, accomplishments, operational, and financial activities for the 12-month period beginning October 1, 2009,

353

Exploratory Technology Research Program for electrochemical energy storage. Annual report fr 1994  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The US Department of Energy`s Office of Propulsion Systems provides support for an Electrochemical Energy Storage Program, that includes research and development (R&D) on advanced rechargeable batteries and fuel cells. A major goal of this program is to develop electrochemical power sources suitable for application in electric vehicles (EVs). The program centers on advanced systems that offer the potential for high performance and low life-cycle costs, both of which are necessary to permit significant penetration into commercial markets. The DOE Electrochemical Energy Storage Program is divided into two projects: the Electric Vehicle Advanced Battery Systems (EVABS) Development Program and the Exploratory Technology Research (ETR) Program. The general R&D areas addressed by the program include identification of new electrochemical couples for advanced batteries, determination of technical feasibility of the new couples, improvements in battery components and materials, establishment of engineering principles applicable to electrochemical energy storage and conversion, and the development of air-system (fuel cell, metal/air) technology for transportation applications. Major emphasis is given to applied research which will lead to superior performance and lower life-cycle costs. The ETR Program is divided into three major program elements: Exploratory Research, Applied Science Research, and Air Systems Research. Highlights of each program element are summarized according to the appropriate battery system or electrochemical research area.

Kinoshita, K. [ed.

1995-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

354

Geothermal Technology Development Program. Annual progress report, October 1983-September 1984  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report describes the status of ongoing Research and Development (R and D) within the Geothermal Technology Development Program. The work reported is sponsored by the Department of Energy/Geothermal Hydropower Technology Division (DOE/GHTD), with program management provided by Sandia National Laboratories. The program emphasizes research in rock penetration mechanics, fluid technology, borehole mechanics, diagnostics technology, and permeability enhancement. 102 figs., 16 tabs.

Kelsey, J.R. (ed.)

1985-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

355

Geothermal Energy R&D Program: Annual Progress Report for Fiscal Year 1989  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This is an internal DOE Geothermal Program planning and control document. Many of these reports were issued only in draft form.

None

1990-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

356

Geothermal Energy R&D Program Annual Progress Report for Fiscal Year 1989 Draft  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This is an internal DOE Geothermal Program planning and control document. Many of these reports were issued only in draft form. (DJE -2005)

None

1990-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

357

E-Print Network 3.0 - annual program progress Sample Search Results  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

meeting. This form will be shared with your committee members, signed by your... advisor, examined by the program director, and placed in your file. Students who fail ......

358

Geothermal Energy R&D Program: Annual Progress Report for Fiscal Year 1991  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This is an internal DOE Geothermal Program planning and control document. Many of these reports were issued only in draft form.

None

1992-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

359

Gas-Cooled Fast Reactor Program. Annual progress report for period ending December 31, 1979  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Information on the GCFR reactor is presented concerning the Core Flow Test Loop; shielding and physics; pressure vessel and closure studies; and irradiation program.

Gat, U.; Kasten, P.R.

1980-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

360

ENERGY ANALYSIS PROGRAM. CHAPTER FROM THE ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT DIVISION ANNUAL REPORT 1980  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

J. Leone, Marine Biomass Energy Project, (New Orleans, La. :assessed, including biomass energy systems in Hawaii; marineoutlined a program of biomass energy use in Hawaii and have

Authors, Various

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual eeo program" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

E-Print Network 3.0 - assessment program annual Sample Search...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Data in Your Program Review... Creativity: Student Writing Showcase Judith Chitwood Creativity: Dance ... Source: Kostic, Milivoje M. - Department of Mechanical Engineering,...

362

NREL Photovoltaic Program. FY 1994 annual report, October 1, 1993--September 30, 1994  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report summarizes the in-house and subcontracted research and development activities under the National renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) Photovoltaics (PV) program for fiscal year 1994. Research is organized under the following areas; PV program management; crystalline silicon and advanced devices; thin-film PV technologies; PV manufacturing; PV module and system performance and engineering; and PV applications and markets.

NONE

1995-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

363

Advanced turbine systems program conceptual design and product development. Annual report, August 1994--July 1995  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Objective of the ATS program is to develop ultra-high efficiency, environmentally superior, and cost-competitive gas turbine systems for base-load application in utility, independent power producer, and industrial markets. This report discusses the major accomplishments achieved during the second year of the ATS Phase 2 program, particularly the design and test of critical components.

NONE

1994-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

364

Taxi-out Prediction using Approximate Dynamic Programming Submitted to the TRB 2008 Annual Meeting  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

is to accurately predict taxi-out time at major airports, in the presence of weather and other departure Performance Metrics (ASPM) database on Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County International Airport (DTW to congestion), weather, and air traffic management programs such as the ground delay program (GDP). GDP is said

365

Niagara Falls Storage Site, Annual site environmental report, Lewiston, New York, Calendar year 1986: Surplus Facilities Management Program (SFMP)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

During 1986, the environmental monitoring program was continued at the Niagara Falls Storage Site (NFSS), a US Department of Energy (DOE) surplus facility located in Niagara County, New York, presently used for the interim storage of radioactive residues and contaminated soils and rubble. The monitoring program is being conducted by Bechtel National, Inc. The monitoring program at the NFSS measures radon gas concentrations in air; external gamma radiation levels; and uranium and radium concentrations in surface water, groundwater, and sediment. To verify that the site is in compliance with the DOE radiation protection standard and to assess its potential effect on public health, the radiation dose was calculated for the maximally exposed individual. Based on the conservative scenario described in the report, this individual would receive an annual external exposure approximately equivalent to 6% of the DOE radiation protection standard of 100 mrem/yr. By comparison, the incremental dose received from living in a brick house versus a wooden house is 10 mrem/yr above background. The cumulative dose to the population within an 80-km (50-mi) radius of the NFSS that would result from radioactive materials present at the site would be indistinguishable from the dose that the same population would receive from naturally occurring radioactive sources. Results of the 1986 monitoring show that the NFSS is in compliance with the DOE radiation protection standard. 14 refs., 11 figs., 14 tabs.

Not Available

1987-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

366

Alternative Fuel Cell Membranes for Energy Independence - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

0 0 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Robson F. Storey (Primary Contact), Daniel A. Savin, Derek L. Patton The University of Southern Mississippi 118 College Drive #5050 Hattiesburg, MS 30406 Phone: (601) 266-4879 Email: Robson.Storey@usm.edu DOE Managers HQ: Dimitrios Papageorgopoulos Phone: (202) 586-5463 Email: Dimitrios.Papageorgopoulos@ee.doe.gov GO: David Peterson Phone: (720) 356-1747 Email: David.Peterson@go.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-FG36-08GO88106 Project Start Date: August 1, 2009 Project End Date: May 31, 2012 *Congressionally directed project Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Synthesize novel, low-cost hydrocarbon fuel cell * membrane polymers with high-temperature performance and long-term chemical/mechanical durability.

367

Validation of an Integrated Hydrogen Energy Station - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8 8 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Edward C. Heydorn Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. 7201 Hamilton Blvd Allentown, PA 18195 Phone: (610) 481-7099 Email: heydorec@airproducts.com DOE Managers HQ: Jason Marcinkoski Phone: (202) 586-7466 Email: Jason.Marcinkoski@ee.doe.gov GO: Jim Alkire Phone: (720) 356-1426 Email: James.Alkire@go.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-FC36-01GO11087 Subcontractor: FuelCell Energy, Danbury, CT Project Start Date: September 30, 2001 Project End Date: December 31, 2011 Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Demonstrate the technical and economic viability of a hydrogen energy station using a high-temperature fuel cell designed to produce power and hydrogen. Complete a technical assessment and economic analysis *

368

Development of a Centrifugal Hydrogen Pipeline Gas Compressor - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 5 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Francis A. Di Bella, P.E. Concepts ETI, Inc., d.b.a. Concepts NREC 285 Billerica Road, Suite 102 Chelmsford, MA 01824-4174 Phone: (781) 937-4718 Email: fdibella@conceptsnrec.com DOE Managers HQ: Erika Sutherland Phone: (202) 586-3152 Email: Erika.Sutherland@ee.doe.gov GO: Katie Randolph Phone: (720) 356-1759 Email: Katie.Randolph@go.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-FG36-08GO18059 Subcontractors: Texas A&M University, College Station, TX HyGen Industries, Eureka, CA Project Start Date: June 1, 2008 Project End Date: May, 2013 Overall Project Objectives Develop and demonstrate an advanced centrifugal * compressor system for high-pressure hydrogen pipeline transport to support DOE's strategic hydrogen

369

Accelerating Acceptance of Fuel Cell Backup Power Systems - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 4 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report James Petrecky Plug Power 968 Albany Shaker Road Latham, NY 12110 Phone: (518) 782-7700 ext: 1799 Email: james_petrecky@plugpower.com DOE Managers HQ: Jason Marcinkoski Phone: (202) 586-7466 Email: Jason.Marcinkoski@ee.doe.gov GO: Reg Tyler Phone: (720) 356-1805 Email: Reginald.Tyler@go.doe.gov Subcontractor: IdaTech LLC, Bend, OR Project Start Date: October 1, 2009 Project End Date: September 15, 2013 Objectives Quantify the performance of 20 low-temperature fuel * cell systems at two locations Optimize the maintenance of the systems and data * collection practices The project is intended to increase distributed power * generation, improve reliability and efficiency of

370

Component Testing for Industrial Trucks and Early Market Applications - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 5 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Aaron Harris (Primary Contact), Brian Somerday, Chris San Marchi Sandia National Laboratories P.O. Box 969 Livermore, CA 94551-0969 Phone: (925) 294-4530 Email: apharri@sandia.gov DOE Manager HQ: Antonio Ruiz Phone: (202) 586-0729 Email: Antonio.Ruiz@ee.doe.gov Project Start Date: January 2010 Project End Date: May 2011 (carryover from Fiscal Year [FY] 2011 extended objectives into FY 2012) Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives (1) Provide technical basis for the development of standards defining the use of steel (Type 1) storage pressure vessels for gaseous hydrogen: Compare fracture mechanics based design approach - for fatigue assessment of pressure vessels for

371

Highly Dispersed Alloy Catalyst for Durability - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

95 95 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Vivek S. Murthi (Primary Contact), Elise Izzo, Wu Bi, Sandra Guerrero and Lesia Protsailo UTC Power Corporation 195 Governor's Highway South Windsor, CT 06042 Phone: (860) 727-2126 Email: vivek.srinivasamurthi@utcpower.com DOE Managers HQ: Kathi Epping Martin Phone: (202) 586-7425 Email: Kathi.Epping@ee.doe.gov GO: Reginald Tyler Phone: (720) 356-1805 Email: Reginald.Tyler@go.doe.gov Technical Advisor Thomas Benjamin Phone: (630) 252-1632 Email: Benjamin@anl.gov Contract Number: DE-FG36-07GO17019 Subcontractors: * Johnson-Matthey Fuel Cells, Sonning Commons, UK * Texas A&M University, College Station, TX

372

Analysis of Durability of MEAs in Automotive PEMFC Applications - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 1 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Randal L. Perry E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company Chestnut Run Plaza, 701/209 4417 Lancaster Pike Wilmington, DE 19805 Phone: (302) 999-6545 Email: randal.l.perry @usa.dupont.com DOE Managers HQ: Kathi Epping Martin Phone: (202) 586-7425 Email: Kathi.Epping@ee.doe.gov GO: David Peterson Phone: (720) 356-1747 Email: David.Peterson@go.doe.gov Technical Advisor Thomas Benjamin Phone: (630) 252-1632 Email: Benjamin@anl.gov Contract Number: DE-EE0003772 Subcontractors: * Nissan Technical Center North America, Farmington Hills, MI * Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT), Chicago, IL Project Start Date: September 1, 2010

373

Stationary Fuel Cell System Cost Analysis - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Brian D. James (Primary Contact), Andrew B. Spisak, Whitney G. Colella Strategic Analysis, Inc. 4075 Wilson Blvd. Suite 200 Arlington, VA 22203 Phone: (703) 778-7114 Email: bjames@sainc.com DOE Managers HQ: Jason Marcinkoski Phone: (202) 586-7466 Email: Jason.Marcinkoski@ee.doe.gov GO: Gregory Kleen Phone: (720) 356-1672 Email: Gregory.Kleen@go.doe.gov Technical Advisor Bryan Pivovar Phone: (303) 275-3809 Email: bryan.pivovar@nrel.gov Sub-Contract Number No: AGB-0-40628-01 under Prime Contract No. DE-AC36-08G028308 Project Start Date: July 8, 2010 Project End Date: September 7, 2012 Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Perform Design for Manufacturing and Assembly * (DFMA ® ) cost analysis for low-temperature (LT)

374

System Level Analysis of Hydrogen Storage Options - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 4 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Rajesh K. Ahluwalia (Primary Contact), T. Q. Hua, J-K Peng, Hee Seok Roh, and Romesh Kumar Argonne National Laboratory 9700 South Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439 Phone: (630) 252-5979 Email: walia@anl.gov DOE Manager HQ: Grace Ordaz Phone: (202) 586-8350 Email: Grace.Ordaz@ee.doe.gov Start Date: October 1, 2004 Projected End Date: September 30, 2014 Objective The overall objective of this effort is to support DOE with independent system level analyses of various H 2 storage approaches, to help to assess and down-select options, and to determine the feasibility of meeting DOE targets. Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Model various developmental hydrogen storage systems. * Provide results to Hydrogen Storage Engineering Center *

375

Hydrogen Storage Cost Analysis, Preliminary Results - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2 2 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Brian D. James (Primary Contact), Andrew B. Spisak, Whitney G. Colella Strategic Analysis, Inc. 4075 Wilson Blvd. Suite 200 Arlington, VA 22203 Phone: (703) 778-7114 E-mail: bjames@sainc.com DOE Managers HQ: Grace Ordaz Phone: (202) 586-8350 Email: Grace.Ordaz@ee.doe.gov GO: Katie Randolph Phone: (720) 356-1759 Email: Katie.Randolph@go.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-EE0005253 Project Start Date: September 30, 2012 Project End Date: September 29, 2016 Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Develop cost models of carbon fiber hydrogen storage * pressure vessels. Explore the sensitivity of pressure vessel cost to design * parameters including hydrogen storage quantity, storage

376

Lightweight Metal Hydrides for Hydrogen Storage - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Ji-Cheng Zhao (Primary Contact), Xuenian Chen, Sheldon G. Shore The Ohio State University, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, 286 Watts Hall, 2041 College Road Columbus, OH 43210 Phone: (614) 292-9462 Email: zhao.199@osu.edu DOE Managers HQ: Ned Stetson Phone: (202) 586-9995 Email: Ned.Stetson@ee.doe.gov GO: Katie Randolph Phone: (720) 356-1759 Email: Katie.Randolph@go.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-FC3605GO15062 Project Start Date: January 1, 2005 Project End Date: August 31, 2011 (No-cost extension to December 31, 2012) Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Develop a high-capacity lightweight hydride for * reversible vehicular hydrogen storage, capable of meeting or exceeding the 2010 DOE FreedomCAR

377

Development of Kilowatt-Scale Coal Fuel Cell Technology - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 5 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Steven S.C. Chuang (Primary Contact), Tritti Siengchum, Jelvehnaz Mirzababaei, Azadeh Rismanchian, and Seyed Ali Modjtahedi The University of Akron 302 Buchtel Common Akron, OH 44310-3906 Phone: (330) 972-6993 Email: schuang@uakron.edu DOE Managers HQ: Dimitrios Papageorgopoulos Phone: (202) 586-5463 Email: Dimitrios.Papageorgopoulos@ee.doe.gov GO: Reg Tyler Phone: (720) 356-1805 Email: Reginald.Tyler@go.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-FC36-08GO0881114 Project Start Date: June 1, 2008 Project End Date: May 31, 2012 *Congressionally directed project Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives To develop a kilowatt-scale coal-based solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) technology. The outcome of this research effort

378

Oil-Free Centrifugal Hydrogen Compression Technology Demonstration - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

0 0 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Hooshang Heshmat Mohawk Innovative Technology, Inc. (MiTi) 1037 Watervliet Shaker Road Albany, NY 12205 Phone: (518) 862-4290 Email: HHeshmat@miti.cc DOE Managers HQ: Erika Sutherland Phone: (202) 586-3152 Email: Erika.Sutherland@ee.doe.gov GO: Katie Randolph Phone: (720) 356-1759 Email: Katie.Randolph@go.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-FG36-08GO18060 Subcontractor: Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd, Compressor Corporation, Hiroshima, Japan Project Start Date: September 25, 2008 Project End Date: May 30, 2013 Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Design a reliable and cost-effective centrifugal compressor for hydrogen pipeline transport and delivery: Eliminate sources of oil/lubricant contamination * Increase efficiency by using high rotational speeds *

379

Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Material Handling Equipment Demonstration - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 5 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Todd Ramsden National Renewable Energy Laboratory 15013 Denver West Parkway Golden, CO 80401 Phone: (303) 275-3704 Email: todd.ramsden@nrel.gov DOE Manager HQ: Peter Devlin Phone: (202) 586-4905 Email: Peter.Devlin@ee.doe.gov Subcontractor: Oorja Protonics, Inc., Fremont, CA Project Start Date: June 1, 2010 Project End Date: March 31, 2013 Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Operate and maintain fuel-cell-powered material * handling equipment (MHE) using direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) technology. Compile operational data of DMFCs and validate their * performance under real-world operating conditions. Provide an independent technology assessment that * focuses on DMFC system performance, operation, and

380

Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Diesel Auxiliary Power Unit Demonstration - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

9 9 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Dan Hennessy (Primary Contact), Jim Banna Delphi Automotive Systems, LLC 300 University Drive m/c 480-300-385 Auburn Hills, MI 48326 Phone: (248) 732-0656 Email: daniel.t.hennessy@delphi.com DOE Managers HQ: Dimitrios Papageorgopoulos Phone: (202) 586-5463 Email: Dimitrios.Papageorgopoulos@ee.doe.gov GO: David Peterson Phone: (720) 356-1747 Email: David.Peterson@go.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-EE0000478 Subcontractors: * Electricore, Inc., Valencia, CA * PACCAR, Inc., Bellevue, WA * TDA Research, Inc., Wheat Ridge, CO Project Start Date: August 1, 2009 Project End Date: April 30, 2013 Objectives

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual eeo program" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

HGMS: Glasses and Nanocomposites for Hydrogen Storage - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8 8 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Kris Lipinska (Primary Contact), Oliver Hemmers Harry Reid Center, University of Nevada Las Vegas (UNLV) 4505 Maryland Parkway, Box 454009 Las Vegas, NV 89154-4009 Phones: (702) 895-4450, (702) 895-3742 Emails: kristina.lipinska@unlv.edu, oliver.hemmers@unlv.edu DOE Managers HQ: Grace Ordaz Phone: (202) 586-8350 Email: Grace.Ordaz@ee.doe.gov GO: Jesse Adams Phone: (720) 356-1421 Email: Jesse.Adams@go.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-EE0000269 Project Start Date: November 25, 2009 Project End Date: October 31, 2012 *Congressionally directed project Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Fabricate glasses and nanocrystalline composites: * improve materials composition by introducing functional dopants Demonstrate controlled nucleation of nanocrystals

382

Characterization of Materials for Photoelectrochemical (PEC) Hydrogen Production - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 4 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Clemens Heske Department of Chemistry University of Nevada, Las Vegas 4505 S. Maryland Parkway Las Vegas, NV 89154-4003 Phone: (702) 895-2694 Email: heske@unlv.nevada.edu DOE Manager HQ: Eric Miller Phone: (202) 287-5829 Email: Eric.Miller@hq.doe.gov Project Start Date: November 4, 2011 Project End Date: September 30, 2012 Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Enhance the understanding of PEC materials and interfaces and promote break-through discoveries by: Utilizing and developing cutting-edge soft X-ray and * electron spectroscopy characterization. Determining electronic and chemical structures of PEC * candidate materials. Addressing materials performance, materials lifetime, * and capital costs through close collaboration with the

383

Hydrogen Storage by Novel CBN Heterocycle Materials - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 4 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Shih-Yuan Liu University of Oregon Department of Chemistry 1253 University of Oregon Eugene, OR 97403-1253 Phone: (541) 346-5573 Email: lsy@uoregon.edu DOE Managers HQ: Grace Ordaz Phone: (202) 586-8350 Email: Grace.Ordaz@ee.doe.gov GO: Katie Randolph Phone: (720) 356-1759 Email: Katie.Randolph@go.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-FG36-08GO18143 Project Start Date: September 1, 2008 Project End Date: September 30, 2012 Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives The objective of this project is to develop novel boron- nitrogen heterocycles as liquid-phase hydrogen storage materials with storage capacities and thermodynamic properties that have the potential to lead to rechargeable systems capable of meeting DOE targets. We seek to:

384

Hydrogen Fuel Quality Research and Development - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2 2 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Tommy Rockward (Primary Contact), C. Quesada, K. Rau, E. Brosha, F. Garzon, R. Mukundan, and C. Padró Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) P.O. Box 1663 Los Alamos, NM 87545 Phone: (505) 667-9587 Email: trock@lanl.gov DOE Manager HQ: Antonio Ruiz Phone: (202) 586-0729 Email: Antonio.Ruiz@ee.doe.gov Project Start Date: October 1, 2011 Project End Date: September 30, 2015 Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Determine the allowable levels of hydrogen fuel * contaminants in support of the development of science- based international standards for hydrogen fuel quality (International Organization for Standardization [ISO] TC197 WG-12). Validate the ASTM International test method for * determining low levels of non-hydrogen constituents.

385

Hydrogen by Wire - Home Fueling System - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 6 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Luke T. Dalton Proton Energy Systems 10 Technology Drive Wallingford, CT 06492 Phone: (203) 678-2128 Email: ldalton@protonenergy.com DOE Manager HQ: Eric L. Miller Phone: (202) 287-5829 Email: Eric.Miller@hq.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-SC0001149 Project Start Date: August 15, 2010 Project End Date: August 14, 2012 Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Develop enabling technologies for 350-bar hydrogen * home fueling Design key electrolysis cell stack and system components * Fabricate, inspect and assemble prototype components * Demonstrate prototype 350-bar hydrogen generation * Demonstrate prototype 350-bar home fueling technologies * Technical Barriers This project addresses the following technical barriers

386

Air-Cooled Stack Freeze Tolerance - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 6 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Dave Hancock Plug Power Inc. 968 Albany Shaker Rd Latham, NY 12110 Phone: (518) 782-7700 Email: david_hancock@plugpower.com DOE Managers HQ: Donna Ho Phone: (202) 586-8000 Email: Donna.Ho@ee.doe.gov GO: Reginald Tyler Phone: (720) 356-1805 Email: Reginald.Tyler@go.doe.gov Technical Advisor Walt Podolski Phone: (630) 252-7558 Email: podolski@anl.gov Contract Number: DE-EE0000473 Subcontractor: Ballard Power Systems, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada Project Start Date: June 1, 2009 Project End Date: November 15, 2011 Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Advance the state of the art in technology for air-cooled * proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell stacks and related GenDrive(tm) material handling application fuel

387

Hydrogen Storage Engineering Center of Excellence - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 4 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Donald L. Anton (Primary Contact), Theodore Motyka, Bruce Hardy and David Tamburello Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) Bldg. 999-2W Aiken, SC 29808 Phone: (803) 507-8551 Email: DONALD.ANTON@SRNL.DOE.GOV DOE Managers HQ: Ned Stetson Phone: (202) 586-9995 Email: Ned.Stetson@ee.doe.gov GO: Jesse Adams Phone: (720) 356-1421 Email: Jesse.Adams@go.doe.gov Technical Advisor Robert Bowman Phone: 818-354-7941 Email: rcbjr1967@gmail.com Subcontractors: * Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) * United Technologies Research Center (UTRC) * General Motors Corp (GM) * Ford Motor Corp. (FMC)

388

Development of Improved Composite Pressure Vessels for Hydrogen Storage - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

0 0 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Norman Newhouse (Primary Contact), Jon Knudsen, John Makinson Lincoln Composites, Inc. 5117 NW 40 th Street Lincoln, NE 68524 Phone: (402) 470-5035 Email: nnewhouse@lincolncomposites.com DOE Managers HQ: Ned Stetson Phone: (202) 586-9995 Email: Ned.Stetson@ee.doe.gov GO: Jesse Adams Phone: (720) 356-1421 Email: Jesse.Adams@go.doe.gov Contract Number: DE-FC36-09GO19004 Project Start Date: February 1, 2009 Project End Date: June 30, 2014 Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Improve the performance characteristics, including * weight, volumetric efficiency, and cost, of composite pressure vessels used to contain hydrogen in adsorbants. Evaluate design, materials, or manufacturing process *

389

Semi-annual report of the Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management, Quality Assessment Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report presents the results from the analysis of the 36th set of environmental quality assessment samples (QAP 36) that were received on or before January 2, 1992. This Quality Assessment Program (QAP) is designed to test the quality of the environmental measurements being reported to the Department of Energy by its contractors. Since 1976, real or synthetic environmental samples that have been prepared and thoroughly analyzed at the Environmental Measurements Laboratory (EML) have been distributed at first quarterly and then semi-annually to these contractors. Their results, which are returned to EML within 90 days, are complied with EML`s results and are reported back to the participating contractors 30 days later. A summary of the reported results is available to the participants 3 days after the reporting deadline via a modem-telephone connection to the EML computer.

Sanderson, C.G.; Scarpitta, S.C.

1992-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

390

Semi-annual report of the Department of Energy, Operational Safety, Health and Environment Division: Quality assessment program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report presents the results from the analysis of the 27th set of environmental quality assessment samples (QAP XXVII) that were received on or before December 3, 1987. This Quality Assessment Program (QAP) is designed to test the Quality of the environmental measurements being reported to the Department of Energy by its contractors. Since 1976, real or synthetic environmental samples that have been prepared and thoroughly analyzed at the Environmental Measurements Laboratory (EML) have been distributed, at first Quarterly and then semi-annually to these contractors. Their results, which are returned to EML within 90 days, are compiled with EML's results and are reported back to the participation contractors 30 days later. A summary of the reported results is available to the participants 3 days after the reporting deadline via a modem-telephone connection to the EML computer.

Sanderson, C.G.; Feiner, M.S.

1988-01-04T23:59:59.000Z

391

Semi-annual report of the Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management, Quality Assessment Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report presents the results from the analysis of the 36th set of environmental quality assessment samples (QAP 36) that were received on or before January 2, 1992. This Quality Assessment Program (QAP) is designed to test the quality of the environmental measurements being reported to the Department of Energy by its contractors. Since 1976, real or synthetic environmental samples that have been prepared and thoroughly analyzed at the Environmental Measurements Laboratory (EML) have been distributed at first quarterly and then semi-annually to these contractors. Their results, which are returned to EML within 90 days, are complied with EML's results and are reported back to the participating contractors 30 days later. A summary of the reported results is available to the participants 3 days after the reporting deadline via a modem-telephone connection to the EML computer.

Sanderson, C.G.; Scarpitta, S.C.

1992-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

392

Semi-annual report of the Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management, Quality Assessment Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Quality Assessment Program (QAP) is designed to test the quality of the environmental measurements being reported to the Department of Energy by its contractors. Since 1976, real or synthetic environmental samples that have been prepared and thoroughly analyzed at the Environmental Measurements Laboratory (EML) have been distributed at first quarterly and then semi-annually to these contractors. Their results, which are returned to EML within 90 days, are compiled with EML`s results and are reported back to the participating contractors 30 days later. A summary of the reported results is available to the participants 3 days after the reporting deadline via a modem-telephone connection to the EML computer. This report presents the results from the analysis of the 38th set of environmental quality assessment samples (QAP XXXVIII) that were received on or before June 2, 1993.

Sanderson, C.G.; Klusek, C.S.

1993-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

393

Effects of Technology Cost Parameters on Hydrogen Pathway Succession - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

5 5 FY 2012 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Mark F. Ruth* (Primary Contact), Victor Diakov*, Brian James † , Julie Perez ‡ , Andrew Spisak † *National Renewable Energy Laboratory 15013 Denver West Pkwy. Golden, CO 80401 Phone: (303) 817-6160 Email: Mark.Ruth@nrel.gov and Victor.Diakov@nrel.gov † Strategic Analysis, Inc. ‡ New West Technologies DOE Manager HQ: Fred Joseck Phone: (202) 586-7932 Email: Fred.Joseck@ee.doe.gov Subcontractor: Strategic Analysis, Inc., Arlington, VA Project Start Date: February 1, 2009 Project End Date: October 31, 2011 Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Develop a macro-system model (MSM): * Aimed at performing rapid cross-cutting analysis - Utilizing and linking other models - Improving consistency between models -

394

Chemical Hydride Rate Modeling, Validation, and System Demonstration - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 6 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Troy A. Semelsberger (Primary Contact), Biswajit Paik, Tessui Nakagawa, Ben Davis, and Jose I. Tafoya Los Alamos National Laboratory MS J579, P.O. Box 1663 Los Alamos, NM 87545 Phone: (505) 665-4766 Email: troy@lanl.gov DOE Managers HQ: Ned Stetson Phone: (202) 586-9995 Email: Ned.Stetson@ee.doe.gov GO: Jesse Adams Phone: (720) 356-1421 Email: Jesse.Adams@go.doe.gov Project Start Date: February 2009 Project End Date: February 2014 Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Investigate reaction characteristics of various fluid-phase * ammonia-borane (AB)-ionic liquid (IL) compositions Identify and quantify hydrogen impurities and develop *

395

Office of Civil Rights, NNSA, NA 1.2, Albuquerque Complex  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

managers, supervisors, and employees Discrimination complaints program management Alternative Dispute Resolution Program (Mediation) EEO Counselor Program ...

396

Report on the Predation Index, Predator Control Fisheries, and Program Evaluation for the Columbia River Basin Experimental Northern Pikeminnow Management Program, 2008 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report presents results for year seventeen in the basin-wide Experimental Northern Pikeminnow Management Program to harvest northern pikeminnow1 (Ptychocheilus oregonensis) in the Columbia and Snake Rivers. This program was started in an effort to reduce predation by northern pikeminnow on juvenile salmonids during their emigration from natal streams to the ocean. Earlier work in the Columbia River Basin suggested predation by northern pikeminnow on juvenile salmonids might account for most of the 10-20% mortality juvenile salmonids experience in each of eight Columbia River and Snake River reservoirs. Modeling simulations based on work in John Day Reservoir from 1982 through 1988 indicated that, if predator-size northern pikeminnow were exploited at a 10-20% rate, the resulting restructuring of their population could reduce their predation on juvenile salmonids by 50%. To test this hypothesis, we implemented a sport-reward angling fishery and a commercial longline fishery in the John Day Pool in 1990. We also conducted an angling fishery in areas inaccessible to the public at four dams on the mainstem Columbia River and at Ice Harbor Dam on the Snake River. Based on the success of these limited efforts, we implemented three test fisheries on a system-wide scale in 1991 - a tribal longline fishery above Bonneville Dam, a sport-reward fishery, and a dam-angling fishery. Low catch of target fish and high cost of implementation resulted in discontinuation of the tribal longline fishery. However, the sport-reward and dam-angling fisheries were continued in 1992 and 1993. In 1992, we investigated the feasibility of implementing a commercial longline fishery in the Columbia River below Bonneville Dam and found that implementation of this fishery was also infeasible. Estimates of combined annual exploitation rates resulting from the sport-reward and dam-angling fisheries remained at the low end of our target range of 10-20%. This suggested the need for additional effective harvest techniques. During 1991 and 1992, we developed and tested a modified (small-sized) Merwin trapnet. We found this floating trapnet to be very effective in catching northern pikeminnow at specific sites. Consequently, in 1993 we examined a system-wide fishery using floating trapnets, but found this fishery to be ineffective at harvesting large numbers of northern pikeminnow on a system-wide scale. In 1994, we investigated the use of trap nets and gillnets at specific locations where concentrations of northern pikeminnow were known or suspected to occur during the spring season (i.e., March through early June). In addition, we initiated a concerted effort to increase public participation in the sport-reward fishery through a series of promotional and incentive activities. In 1995, 1996, and 1997, promotional activities and incentives were further improved based on the favorable response in 1994. Results of these efforts are subjects of this annual report. Evaluation of the success of test fisheries in achieving our target goal of a 10-20% annual exploitation rate on northern pikeminnow is presented in Report C of this report. Overall program success in terms of altering the size and age composition of the northern pikeminnow population and in terms of potential reductions in loss of juvenile salmonids to northern pikeminnow predation is also discussed in Report C. Program cooperators include the Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission (PSMFC), Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW), and Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), and the U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Animal Damage Unit as a contractor to test Dam Angling. The PSMFC was responsible for coordination and administration of the program; PSMFC subcontracted various tasks and activities to ODFW and WDFW based on the expertise each brought to the tasks involved in implementing the program and dam angling to the USDA.

Porter, Russell [Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission].

2009-09-10T23:59:59.000Z

397

Annual review of cultural resource investigations by the Savannah River Archaeological Research Program. Fiscal year 1994  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Savannah River Archaeological Research Program (SRARP) of the South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of South Carolina, manages archaeological resources on the Savannah River Site (SRS). An ongoing research program provides the theoretical, methodological, and empirical basis for assessing site significance within the compliance process specified by law. The SRARP maintains an active public education program for disseminating knowledge about prehistory and history, and for enhancing awareness of historic preservation. This report summarizes the management, research, and public education activities of the SRARP during Fiscal Year 1994.

NONE

1994-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

398

DOE Energy in Indian Country Conference and Annual Tribal Energy Program Review  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

The 2012 DOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Tribal Energy Program Review in Denver, Colorado, will provide an overview of the wide range of renewable energy and energy efficiency...

399

Solar Energy Program: Chapter from the Energy and Environmental Division Annual Report 1980  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

SOLAR ENERGY PROGRAM PERSONNEL Small Particle SuspensionsStrategies for Active Solar Energy Systems M. Warren, S.R a d i a t i o n , " Solar Energy, v o l . 4, no. 3 , 1960,

Energy and Environment Division

1981-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

400

ENERGY EFFICIENT BUILDINGS PROGRAM Chapter from the Energy and Environment Division Annual Report 1980  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

air heat exchanger. A research program to investigate the pollutant controlair-cleaning systems appear to be required to control the levels of indoor-generated pollutants, including radon, Strategies to control

Authors, Various

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual eeo program" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Los Alamos National Laboratory Science Education Program. Annual progress report, October 1, 1995--September 30, 1996  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The National Teacher Enhancement program (NTEP) is a three-year, multi-laboratory effort funded by the National Science Foundation and the Department of Energy to improve elementary school science programs. The Los Alamos National Laboratory targets teachers in northern New Mexico. FY96, the third year of the program, involved 11 teams of elementary school teachers (grades 4-6) in a three-week summer session, four two-day workshops during the school year and an on-going planning and implementation process. The teams included twenty-one teachers from 11 schools. Participants earned a possible six semester hours of graduate credit for the summer institute and two hours for the academic year workshops from the University of New Mexico. The Laboratory expertise in the earth and environmental science provided the tie between the Laboratory initiatives and program content, and allowed for the design of real world problems.

Gill, D.H.

1997-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

402

ENERGY EFFICIENT BUILDINGS PROGRAM. CHAPTER FROM ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT DIVISION ANNUAL REPORT 1978  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

four phases: In 1975 an energy audit and monitoring programKennewick, WA Conduct an energy audit and identify energyeach school were based on an energy audit and computer model

Sonderegger, R. C.

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

403

ENERGY ANALYSIS PROGRAM. CHAPTER FROM THE ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT DIVISION ANNUAL REPORT 1978  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Regulatory policy must be set for solar finance programs bythe individual solar technologies. For policy purposes, anpolicy guidelines be developed for utility participation in the marketing, manufacture and financing of solar

Various, Various,

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

404

Annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Report for the Fort St. Vrain Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report presents the results of the 2001 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program conducted in accordance with 10 CFR 72.44 for the Fort St. Vrain Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation. A description of the facility and the monitoring program is provided. The results of monitoring the predominant radiation exposure pathway, direct and scattered radiation exposure, indicate the facility operation has not contributed to any increase in the estimated maximum potential dose commitment to the general public.

Hall, Gregory Graham; Newkirk, Jay Ronald; Borst, Frederick Jon

2002-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

405

Annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Report for the Fort St. Vrain Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report presents the results of the 2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program conducted in accordance with 10 CFR 72.44 for the Fort St. Vrain Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation. A description of the facility and the monitoring program is provided. The results of monitoring the predominant radiation exposure pathway, direct and scattered radiation exposure, indicate the facility operation has not contributed to any increase in the estimated maximum potential dose commitment to the general public.

Jay R. Newkirk; Frederick J. Borst; Gregory G. Hall

2003-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

406

2010 Annual Plan | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

2010 Annual Plan Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural Gas and Other Petroleum Resources Research and Development Program 2009 Annual Plan Ultra-Deepwater and...

407

2009 Annual Plan | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

2009 Annual Plan Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural Gas and Other Petroleum Resources Research and Development Program 2010 Annual Plan Ultra-Deepwater and...

408

2013 Annual Plan | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Annual Plan 2013 Annual Plan Ultra-Deepwater and Uncoventional Natural Gas and Other Petroleum Resources Research and Development Program Report to Congress, June 2013 Section...

409

Safety System Oversight Annual Award Process  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

November 13, 2014 1 SAFETY SYSTEM OVERSIGHT ANNUAL AWARD PROGRAM OBJECTIVE The Safety System Oversight (SSO) Annual Award is a special award designed to recognize superior or...

410

Electric and Magnetic Fields Research and Public Information Dissemination Program annual report for fiscal year 1996  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Electric and Magnetic Fields (EMF) Research and Public Information Dissemination (RAPID) Program was authorized by the Energy Policy Act of 1992 as a near-term effort to expand and accelerate the research needed to address the EMF issue. As required by this legislation, the EMF Interagency Committee, the National EMF Advisory Committee (NEMFAC), and the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) are providing valued input and advice for the direction of this program. With this input and advice, the Department of Energy (DOE) and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) have developed and are implementing five-year program plans. Multi-year health effects research projects and related EMF measurement and exposure assessment projects are underway using funds appropriated in fiscal years 1994, 1995, and 1996 together with voluntary non-Federal contributions. The results of these research projects, along with the results of other EMF research, will be used as input to the hazard evaluation effort, which is the focus of the EMF RAPID Program. A coordinated interagency program is underway to communicate needed information on the EMF issue in a clear manner to the public and other decision makers.

NONE

1997-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

411

ORNL Superconducting Technology Program for Electric Energy Systems. Annual report for FY 1992  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Superconducting Technology Program is conducted as part of a national effort by the US Department of Energy`s (DOE`s) Office of Conservation and Renewable Energy to develop the technology base needed by US industry for commercial development of electric power applications of high-temperature superconductivity. The two major elements of this program are wire development and systems development. This document describes the major research and development activities for this program together with related accomplishments. The technical progress reported was summarized from information prepared for the FY 1992 Peer Review of Projects, conducted by DOE`s Office of Program Analysis, Office of Energy Research. This ORNL program is highly leveraged by the staff and other resources of US industry and universities. Interlaboratory teams are also in place on a number of industry-driven projects. Patent disclosures, working group meetings, staff exchanges, and joint publications and presentations ensure that there is technology transfer to US industry. Working together, the collaborative teams are making tremendous progress in solving the scientific and technical issues necessary for the commercialization of long lengths of practical high-temperature superconductor wire and wire products.

Hawsey, R.A. [comp.

1993-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

412

Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site Ecological Monitoring Program 1995 annual report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Ecological Monitoring Program (ECMP) was established at the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site (Site) in September 1992. At that time, EcMP staff developed a Program Plan that was peer-reviewed by scientists from western universities before submittal to DOE RFFO in January 1993. The intent of the program is to measure several quantitative variables at different ecological scales in order to characterize the Rocky Flats ecosystem. This information is necessary to document ecological conditions at the Site in impacted and nonimpacted areas to determine if Site practices have had ecological impacts, either positive or negative. This information can be used by managers interested in future use scenarios and CERCLA activities. Others interested in impact analysis may also find the information useful. In addition, these measurements are entered into a database which will serve as a long-term information repository that will document long-term trends and potential future changes to the Site, both natural and anthropogenic.

NONE

1995-05-31T23:59:59.000Z

413

Environmental Hazards Assessment Program annual report, July 1, 1993--June 30, 1994  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

On June 23, 1992, the US Department of Energy (DOE) signed Assistance Instrument Number DE-FG01-92EW50625 with the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) to support the Environmental Hazards Assessment Program (EHAP). The objectives of the EHAP program stated in the proposal to DOE are to: (1) Develop a holistic, national basis for risk assessment, risk management, and risk communication which recognizes the direct impact of environmental hazards on the health and well-being of all. (2) Develop a pool of talented scientists and experts in cleanup activities, especially in human health aspects; and (3) Identify needs and develop programs addressing the critical shortage of well-educated, highly-skilled technical and scientific personnel to address the health oriented aspects of environmental restoration and waste management. This report describes activities and reports on progress for the second year of the grant.

Not Available

1994-08-17T23:59:59.000Z

414

LABORATORY ROYALTY USE PROGRAM ANNUAL REPORT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Brookhaven National Laboratory was established in 1947 on the site of the former Army Camp Upton. Brookhaven is a multidisciplinary Laboratory that carries out basic and applied research in the physical, biomedical and environmental sciences, and in selected energy technologies. Associated Universities, Inc. managed the Laboratory, under contract with the US Department of Energy until April 30, 1998. On March 1, 1998, Brookhaven Science Associates LLC (BSA) was awarded a contract by the US Department of Energy to manage the Laboratory. Brookhaven Science Associates has taken responsibility for all aspects of the existing Royalty Use Program from the prior contractor, AUI. This report is limited to FY 1998 activities of the Royalty Use Program that were funded by royalty income from prior fiscal years. Any FY 1998 royalty income allocated in FY 1998 shall be reported in the FY 1999 Royalty Use Program Report.

OGEKA,G.J.; FOX,K.J.

1999-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

415

Snake River Sockeye Salmon Captive Broodstock Program : Hatchery Element : Annual Progress Report, 2000.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

On November 20, 1991, the National Marine Fisheries Service listed Snake River sockeye salmon Oncorhynchus nerka as endangered under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. In 1991, the Idaho Department of Fish and Game, the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, and the National Marine Fisheries Service initiated efforts to conserve and rebuild populations in Idaho. Initial steps to recover sockeye salmon included the establishment of a captive broodstock program at the Idaho Department of Fish and Game Eagle Fish Hatchery. Sockeye salmon broodstock and culture responsibilities are shared with the National Marine Fisheries Service at two locations adjacent to Puget Sound in Washington State. Activities conducted by the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes and the National Marine Fisheries Service are reported under separate cover. Idaho Department of Fish and Game monitoring and evaluation activities of captive broodstock program fish releases are also reported under separate cover. Captive broodstock program activities conducted between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2000 are presented in this report.

Kline, Paul A.; Willard, Catherine

2001-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

416

Community Radiation Monitoring Program. Annual report, October 1, 1991--September 30, 1992  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Community Radiation Monitoring Program (CRMP) is a cooperative effort between the US Department of Energy (DOE); the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); the Desert Research Institute (DRI), a division of the University and Community College System of Nevada and the Nuclear Engineering Laboratory of the University of Utah (UNEL). The twelfth year of the program began in the fall of 1991, and the work continues as an integral part of the DOE-sponsored long-term offsite radiological monitoring effort that has been conducted by EPA and its predecessors since the inception of nuclear testing at the Nevada Test Site (NTS). The program began as an outgrowth of activities that occurred during the Three Mile Island incident in 1979. The local interest and public participation that took place there were thought to be transferrable to the situation at the NTS, so, with adaptations, that methodology was implemented for this program. The CRMP began by enhancing and centralizing environmental monitoring and sampling equipment at 15 communities in the existing EPA monitoring network, and has since expanded to 19 locations in Nevada, Utah and California. The primary objectives of this program are still to increase the understanding by the people who live in the area surrounding the NTS of the activities for which DOE is responsible, to enhance the performance of radiological sampling and monitoring, and to inform all concerned of the results of these efforts. One of the primary methods used to improve the communication link with people in the potentially impacted area has been the hiring and training of local citizens as station managers and program representatives in those selected communities in the offsite area. These managers, active science teachers wherever possible, have succeeded, through their training, experience, community standing, and effort, in becoming a very visible, able and valuable asset in this link.

Cooper, E.N.

1993-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

417

Lake Roosevelt Fisheries Evaluation Program, Part A; Fisheries Creel Survey and Population Status Analysis, 1998 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Lake Roosevelt Fisheries Evaluation Program is the result of a merger between two projects, the Lake Roosevelt Monitoring Program (BPA No. 8806300) and the Lake Roosevelt Data Collection Project (BPA No. 9404300). These projects were merged in 1996 to continue work historically completed under the separate projects, and is now referred to as the Lake Roosevelt Fisheries Evaluation Program. Creel and angler surveys estimated that anglers made 196,775 trips to Lake Roosevelt during 1998, with an economic value of $8.0 million dollars, based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI). In 1998 it was estimated that 9,980 kokanee salmon, 226,809 rainbow trout, 119,346 walleye, and over 14,000 smallmouth bass and other species were harvested. Creel data indicates that hatchery reared rainbow trout contribute substantially to the Lake Roosevelt fishery. The contribution of kokanee salmon to the creel has not met the expectations of fishery managers to date, and is limited by entrainment from the reservoir, predation, and possible fish culture obstacles. The 1998 Lake Roosevelt Fisheries Creel and Population Analysis Annual Report includes analyses of the relative abundance of fish species, and reservoir habitat relationships (1990-1998). Fisheries surveys (1990-1998) indicate that walleye and burbot populations appear to be increasing, while yellow perch, a preferred walleye prey species, and other prey species are decreasing in abundance. The long term decreasing abundance of yellow perch and other prey species are suspected to be the result of the lack of suitable multiple reservoir elevation spawning and rearing refugia for spring spawning reservoir prey species, resulting from seasonal spring-early summer reservoir elevation manipulations, and walleye predation. Reservoir water management is both directly, and indirectly influencing the success of mitigation hatchery production of kokanee salmon and rainbow trout. Tag return data suggested excessive entrainment occurred in 1997, with 97 percent of tag recoveries from rainbow trout coming from below Grand Coulee Dam. High water years appear to have substantial entrainment impacts on salmonids. The 1998 salmonid harvest has improved from the previous two years, due to the relatively water friendly year of 1998, from the harvest observed in the 1996-1997 high water years, which were particularly detrimental to the reservoir salmonid fisheries. Impacts from those water years are still evident in the reservoir fish populations. Analysis of historical relative species abundance, tagging data and hydroacoustical studies, indicate that hydro-operations have a substantial influence on the annual standing crop of reservoir salmonid populations due to entrainment losses, and limited prey species recruitment, due to reservoir elevation level fluctuation, and corresponding reproductive success.

Spotts, Jim; Shields, John; Underwood, Keith

2002-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

418

Geothermal Energy R&D Program Annual Progress Report Fiscal Year 1993  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In this report, the DOE Geothermal Program activities were split between Core Research and Industrial Development. The technical areas covered are: Exploration Technology, Drilling Technology, Reservoir Technology (including Hot Dry Rock Research and The Geyser Cooperation), and Conversion Technology (power plants, materials, and direct use/direct heat). Work to design the Lake County effluent pipeline to help recharge The Geysers shows up here for the first time. This Progress Report is another of the documents that are reasonable starting points in understanding many of the details of the DOE Geothermal Program. (DJE 2005)

None

1994-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

419

Nye County Nuclear Waste Repository Project Office independent scientific investigations program annual report, May 1997--April 1998  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This annual summary report, prepared by the Nye County Nuclear Waste Repository Project Office (NWRPO), summarizes the activities that were performed during the period from May 1, 1997 to April 30, 1998. These activities were conducted in support of the Independent Scientific Investigation Program (ISIP) of Nye County at the Yucca Mountain Site (YMS). The Nye County NWRPO is responsible for protecting the health and safety of the Nye County residents. NWRPO`s on-site representative is responsible for designing and implementing the Independent Scientific Investigation Program (ISIP). Major objectives of the ISIP include: Investigating key issues related to conceptual design and performance of the repository that can have major impact on human health, safety, and the environment; identifying areas not being addressed adequately by the Department of Energy (DOE). Nye County has identified several key scientific issues of concern that may affect repository design and performance which were not being adequately addressed by DOE. Nye County has been conducting its own independent study to evaluate the significance of these issues. This report summarizes the results of monitoring from two boreholes and the Exploratory Studies Facility (ESF) tunnel that have been instrumented by Nye County since March and April of 1995. The preliminary data and interpretations presented in this report do not constitute and should not be considered as the official position of Nye County. The ISIP presently includes borehole and tunnel instrumentation, monitoring, data analysis, and numerical modeling activities to address the concerns of Nye County.

NONE

1998-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

420

Solar Hydrogen Production with a Metal Oxide-Based Thermochemical Cycle - DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

0 0 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program FY 2012 Annual Progress Report Anthony McDaniel (Primary Contact), Ivan Ermanoski Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) MS9052 PO Box 969 Livermore, CA 94550 Phone: (925) 294-1440 Email: amcdani@sandia.gov DOE Manager HQ: Sara Dillich Phone: (202) 586-7925 Email: Sara.Dillich@ee.doe.gov Subcontractors: * Nathan Siegel, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA. * Alan Weimer, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO. Project Start Date: October 1, 2008 Project End Date: Project continuation and direction determined annually by DOE Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Objectives Discover and characterize suitable materials for two- *

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual eeo program" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

United States Transuranium and Uranium Registries: A human tissue research program. USTUR annual report for October 1, 1997 through January 31, 1999  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The United States Transuranium and Uranium Registries (USTUR) are a human tissue research program studying the deposition, biokinetics and dosimetry of the actinide elements in humans with the primary goals of providing data fundamental to the verification, refinement, or future development of radiation protection standards for these and other radionuclides, and of determining possible bioeffects on both a macro and subcellular level attributable to exposure to the actinides. This annual report covers October 1, 1997, through January 31, 1999; the reporting period has been extended so that future annual reports will coincide with the period covered by the grant itself.

Ehrhart, Susan M. (ed.); Filipy, Ronald E. (ed.)

1999-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

422

Research on Captive Broodstock Programs for Pacific Salmon, 2001-2002 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In the 2000 Federal Columbia River Power System (FCRPS) Biological Opinion, NMFS identified six populations of steelhead and several salmon populations that had dropped to critically low levels and continue to decline. Following thorough risk-benefit analyses, captive propagation programs for some or all of the steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) populations may be required to reduce the risk of extinction, and more programs may be required in the future. Thus, captive propagation programs designed to maintain or rebuild steelhead populations require intensive and rigorous scientific evaluation, much like the other objectives of BPA Project 1993-056-00 currently underway for chinook (O. tshawytscha) and sockeye salmon (O. nerka). Pacific salmon reared to the adult stage in captivity exhibit poor reproductive performance when released to spawn naturally. Poor fin quality and swimming performance, incomplete development of secondary sex characteristics, changes in maturation timing, and other factors may contribute to reduced spawning success. Improving natural reproductive performance is critical for the success of captive broodstock programs in which adult-release is a primary reintroduction strategy for maintaining ESA-listed populations.

Berejikian, Barry A.; Tezak, E.P. (National Marine Fisheries Service); Endicott, Rick (Long Live the Kings, Seattle, WA)

2002-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

423

Fiscal Year 2007 Annual Report Integrated Ocean Drilling Program U.S. Implementing Organization  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

upon the earlier successes of the Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) and the Ocean Drilling Program (ODP Preparing for IODP Phase 2 SODV project 5 Expedition planning 8 Operational support 11 Engineering unsuitable for either the riserless or riser vessel, such as near the shoreline in shallow-water areas

424

94-1 R&D program annual operating plan: Fiscal Year 2003  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The 94-1 R&D Program focuses on developing the technical basis for stabilizing and safely storing plutonium-bearing materials. To address these issues, we have in place a material identification and stabilization project, a surveillance and monitoring project, and a management team.

Mason, Richard E.; Dominguez, Pamela D.

2003-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

425

Grande Ronde Endemic Spring Chinook Salmon Supplementation Program : Facility Operation and Maintenance Facilities, Annual Report 2003.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Anadromous salmonid stocks have declined in both the Grande Ronde River Basin (Lower Snake River Compensation Plan (LSRCP) Status Review Symposium 1998) and in the entire Snake River Basin (Nehlsen et al. 1991), many to the point of extinction. The Grande Ronde River Basin historically supported large populations of fall and spring chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), sockeye (O. nerka), and coho (O. kisutch) salmon and steelhead trout (O. mykiss) (Nehlsen et al. 1991). The decline of chinook salmon and steelhead populations and extirpation of coho and sockeye salmon in the Grande Ronde River Basin was, in part, a result of construction and operation of hydroelectric facilities, over fishing, and loss and degradation of critical spawning and rearing habitat in the Columbia and Snake River basins (Nehlsen et al. 1991). Hatcheries were built in Oregon, Washington and Idaho under the Lower Snake River Compensation Plan (LSRCP) to compensate for losses of anadromous salmonids due to the construction and operation of the lower four Snake River dams. Lookingglass Hatchery (LGH) on Lookingglass Creek, a tributary of the Grande Ronde River, was completed under LSRCP in 1982 and has served as the main incubation and rearing site for chinook salmon programs for Grande Ronde and Imnaha rivers in Oregon. Despite these hatchery programs, natural spring chinook populations continued to decline resulting in the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) listing Snake River spring/summer chinook salmon as ''threatened'' under the federal Endangered Species Act (1973) on 22 April 1992. Continuing poor escapement levels and declining population trends indicated that Grande Ronde River basin spring chinook salmon were in imminent danger of extinction. These continuing trends led fisheries co-managers in the basin to initiate the Grande Ronde Endemic Spring Chinook Salmon Supplementation Program (GRESCSSP) in order to prevent extinction and preserve options for use of endemic fish stocks in future artificial propagation programs. The GRESCSSP was implemented in three Grande Ronde River basin tributaries; the Lostine and upper Grande Ronde rivers and Catherine Creek. The GRESCSSP employs two broodstock strategies utilizing captive and conventional brood sources. The captive brood program began in 1995, with the collection of parr from the three tributary areas. The conventional broodstock component of the program began in 1997 with the collection of natural adults returning to these tributary areas. Although LGH was available as the primary production facility for spring chinook programs in the Grande Ronde Basin, there were never any adult or juvenile satellite facilities developed in the tributary areas that were to be supplemented. An essential part of the GRESCSSP was the construction of adult traps and juvenile acclimation facilities in these tributary areas. Weirs were installed in 1997 for the collection of adult broodstock for the conventional component of the program. Juvenile facilities were built in 2000 for acclimation of the smolts produced by the captive and conventional broodstock programs and as release sites within the natural production areas of their natal streams. The Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR) operate both the juvenile acclimation and adult trapping facilities located on Catherine Creek and the upper Grande Ronde River under this project. The Nez Perce Tribe (NPT) operate the facilities on the Lostine River under a sister project. Hatcheries were also built in Oregon, Washington and Idaho under the LSRCP to compensate for losses of summer steelhead due to the construction and operation of the lowest four Snake River dams. Despite these harvest-driven hatchery programs, natural summer steelhead populations continued to decline as evidenced by declining counts at Lower Granite Dam since 1995 (Columbia River Data Access in Real Time, DART) and low steelhead redd counts on index streams in the Grande Ronde Basin. Because of low escapement the Snake River summer steelhead were listed as threat

McLean, Michael L.; Seeger, Ryan; Hewitt, Laurie (Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, Department of Natural Resources, Pendleton, OR)

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

426

Snake River Sockeye Salmon Captive Broodstock Program; Research Element, 2002 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

On November 20, 1991, the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration listed Snake River sockeye salmon Oncorhynchus nerka as endangered under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. In 1991, the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes and Idaho Department of Fish and Game initiated the Snake River Sockeye Salmon Sawtooth Valley Project to conserve and rebuild populations in Idaho. Restoration efforts are focusing on Redfish, Pettit, and Alturas lakes within the Sawtooth Valley. The first release of hatchery-produced juvenile sockeye salmon from the captive broodstock program occurred in 1994. The first anadromous adult returns from the captive broodstock program were recorded in 1999 when six jacks and one jill were captured at IDFG's Sawtooth Fish Hatchery. In 2002, progeny from the captive broodstock program were released using four strategies: age-0 presmolts were released to Alturas, Pettit, and Redfish lakes in August and to Pettit and Redfish lakes in October, age-1 smolts were released to Redfish Lake Creek in May, eyed-eggs were planted in Pettit Lake in December, and hatchery-produced and anadromous adult sockeye salmon were released to Redfish Lake for volitional spawning in September. Oncorhynchus nerka population monitoring was conducted on Redfish, Alturas, and Pettit lakes using a midwater trawl in September 2002. Age-0, age-1, and age-2 O. nerka were captured in Redfish Lake, and population abundance was estimated at 50,204 fish. Age-0, age-1, age-2, and age-3 kokanee were captured in Alturas Lake, and population abundance was estimated at 24,374 fish. Age-2 and age-3 O. nerka were captured in Pettit Lake, and population abundance was estimated at 18,328 fish. The ultimate goal of the Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG) captive broodstock development and evaluation efforts is to recover sockeye salmon runs in Idaho waters. Recovery is defined as reestablishing sockeye salmon runs and providing for utilization of sockeye salmon and kokanee resources by anglers. The immediate project goal is to maintain this unique sockeye salmon population through captive broodstock technology and avoid species extinction. The project objectives are: (1) Develop captive broodstocks from Redfish Lake anadromous sockeye salmon. (2) Determine the contribution hatchery-produced sockeye salmon make toward avoiding population extinction and increasing population abundance. (3) Describe O. nerka population characteristics for Sawtooth Valley lakes in relation to carrying capacity and broodstock program supplementation efforts. (4) Refine our ability to discern the origin of wild and broodstock sockeye salmon to provide maximum effectiveness in their utilization within the broodstock program. (5) Transfer technology through participation in the technical oversight committee process, providing written activity reports and participation in essential program management and planning activities.

Willard, Catherine; Hebdon, J. Lance; Castillo, Jason (Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Boise, ID)

2004-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

427

Industrial Energy-Efficiency Improvement Program. Annual report to the Congress and the President 1979  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The industrial energy efficiency improvement program to accelerate market penetration of new and emerging industrial technologies and practices which will improve energy efficiency; encourage substitution of more plentiful domestic fuels; and enhance recovery of energy and materials from industrial waste streams is described. The role of research, development, and demonstration; technology implementation; the reporting program; and progress are covered. Specific reports from the chemicals and allied products; primary metals; petroleum and coal products; stone, clay, and glass, paper and allied products; food and kindred products; fabricated metals; transportation equipment; machinery (except electrical); textile mill products; rubber and miscellaneous plastics; electrical and electronic equipment; lumber and wood; and tobacco products are discussed. Additional data from voluntary submissions, a summary on progress in the utilization of recovered materials, and an analysis of industrial fuel mix are briefly presented. (MCW)

Not Available

1980-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

428

Fossil Energy Program annual progress report for April 1993 through March 1994  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report covers progress made during the period April 1, 1993, through March 31, 1994, for research and development projects that contribute to the advancement of various fossil energy technologies. Projects on the Fossil Energy Program are supported by the DOE Office of Fossil Energy, the DOE Morgantown Energy Technology Center, the DOE Pittsburgh Energy Technology Center, the DOE Fossil Energy Clean Coal Technology Program, the DOE Bartlesville Project Office, the DOE Fossil Energy Office of Petroleum Reserves, and the US Agency for International Development. The five areas of research covered in this report are: Materials research and development; Environmental analysis and support; Bioprocessing; Coal combustion; and Fossil fuels supplies modeling and research. Selected papers have been processed separately for inclusion on the data base.

Judkins, R.R.

1994-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

429

ENERGY EFFICIENT BUILDINGS PROGRAM Chapter from the Energy and Environment Division Annual Report 1980  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The aim of the Energy Efficient Buildings Program is to conduct theoretical and experimental research on various aspects of building technology that will permit such gains in energy efficiency without decreasing occupants' comfort or adversely affecting indoor air quality. To accomplish this goal, we have developed five major research groups. The foci of these groups are: Energy Performance of Buildings; Building Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality; Building Energy Analysis; Energy Efficient Windows and Lighting; and Building Energy Data, Analysis and Demonstration.

Authors, Various

1981-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

430

Nevada Test Site 2000 Annual Data Report: Groundwater Monitoring Program Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Site  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report is a compilation of the calendar year 2000 groundwater sampling results from the Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Site (RWMS). Contamination indicator data are presented in control chart and tabular form with investigation levels (IL) indicated. Gross water chemistry data are presented in graphical and tabular form. Other information in the report includes, the Cumulative Chronology for Area 5 RWMS Groundwater Monitoring Program, a brief description of the site hydrogeology, and the groundwater sampling procedure.

Y. E.Townsend

2001-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

431

Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program. Annual report to the Department of Energy, December 1997  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

New ideas and opportunities fostering the advancement of technology are occurring at an ever increasing rate. It, therefore, seems appropriate that a vehicle be available which fosters the development of new ideas and technologies, promotes the early exploration and exploitation of creative and innovative concepts, and develops new fundable R and D projects and programs if BNL is to carry out its primary mission and support the basic Department of Energy activities. At Brookhaven National Laboratory one such method is through its Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program. This discretionary research and development tool is critical in maintaining the scientific excellence and vitality of the Laboratory. Additionally, it is a means to stimulate the scientific community, fostering new science and technology ideas, which is the major factor in achieving and maintaining staff excellence and a means to address national needs within the overall mission of the DOE and BNL. The Project Summaries with their accomplishments described in this report reflect the above. Aside from leading to new fundable or promising programs and producing especially noteworthy research, they have resulted in numerous publications in various professional and scientific journals and presentations at meetings and forums.

Ogeka, G.J.; Searing, J.M.

1997-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

432

Argonne National Laboratory: Laboratory Directed Research and Development FY 1993 program activities. Annual report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purposes of Argonne`s Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Program are to encourage the development of novel concepts, enhance the Laboratory`s R&D capabilities, and further the development of its strategic initiatives. Projects are selected from proposals for creative and innovative R&D studies which are not yet eligible for timely support through normal programmatic channels. Among the aims of the projects supported by the Program are establishment of engineering ``proof-of-principle`` assessment of design feasibility for prospective facilities; development of an instrumental prototype, method, or system; or discovery in fundamental science. Several of these projects are closely associated with major strategic thrusts of the Laboratory as described in Argonne`s Five Year Institutional Plan, although the scientific implications of the achieved results extend well beyond Laboratory plans and objectives. The projects supported by the Program are distributed across the major programmatic areas at Argonne as indicated in the Laboratory LDRD Plan for FY 1993.

none,

1993-12-23T23:59:59.000Z

433

Development of a Systemwide Predator Control Program, Section I : Northern Squawfish Management Program Implementation, 1994 annual report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The authors report the results from the forth year of a basinwide program to harvest northern squawfish (Ptychocheilus oregonensis) in an effort to reduce mortality due to northern squawfish predation on juvenile salmonids during their emigration from natal streams to the ocean. Earlier work in the Columbia River Basin suggested predation by northern squawfish on juvenile salmonids may account for most of the 10--20% mortality juvenile salmonids experience in each of eight Columbia and Snake River reservoirs. Modeling simulations based on work in John Day Reservoir from 1982 through 1988 indicated it is not necessary to eradicate northern squawfish to substantially reduce predation-caused mortality of juvenile salmonids. Instead, if northern squawfish were exploited at a 10--20% rate, reductions in numbers of larger, older fish resulting in restructuring of their population could reduce their predation on juvenile salmonids by 50% or more. Consequently, the authors designed and tested a sport-reward angling fishery and a commercial longline fishery in the John Day pool in 1990. They also conducted an angling fishery in areas inaccessible to the public at four dams on the mainstem Columbia River and at Ice Harbor Dam on the Snake River. Based on the success of these limited efforts, they implemented three test fisheries on a multi-pool, or systemwide, scale in 1991--a tribal longline fishery above Bonneville Dam, a sport-reward fishery, and a dam-angling fishery.

Willis, Charles F. (S.P. Cramer and Associates, Inc., Gresham, OR); Young, Franklin R. (Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority, Portland, OR)

1995-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

434

Lake Roosevelt Fisheries Evaluation Program : Limnological and Fisheries Monitoring Annual Report 1999.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Grand Coulee Dam was constructed in 1939 without a fish ladder, which eliminated steelhead (Onchorhynchus mykiss), chinook salmon (O. twshwastica), coho salmon (O. kisutch) and sockeye salmon (O. nerka) from returning to approximately 1,835 km (1,140 miles) of natal streams and tributaries found in the upper Columbia River Drainage in the United States and Canada. The Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act of 1980 gave the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), the authority and responsibility to use its legal and financial resources, 'to protect, mitigate, and enhance fish and wildlife to the extent affected by the development and operation of any hydroelectric project of the Columbia River and its tributaries. This is to be done in a manner consistent with the program adopted by the Northwest Power Planning Council (NWPPC), and the purposes of the Act' (NWPPC, 1987). With the phrase 'protect, mitigate and enhance', Congress signaled its intent that the NWPPC's fish and wildlife program should do more than avoid future hydroelectric damage to the basin's fish and wildlife. The program must also counter past damage, work toward rebuilding those fish and wildlife populations that have been harmed by the hydropower system, protect the Columbia Basin's fish and wildlife resources, and mitigate for harm caused by decades of hydroelectric development and operations. By law, this program is limited to measures that deal with impacts created by the development, operation and management of hydroelectric facilities on the Columbia River and its tributaries. However, off-site enhancement projects are used to address the effects of the hydropower system on fish and wildlife (NWPPC 1987). Resident game fish populations have been established in Franklin D. Roosevelt Lake, the reservoir behind Grand Coulee Dam, since the extirpation of anadromous fish species. The resident game fish populations are now responsible for attracting a large percentage of the recreational visits to the region. An increase in popularity has placed Lake Roosevelt fifth amongst the most visited State and Federal parks in Washington. Increased use of the reservoir prompted amplified efforts to enhance the Native American subsistence fishery and the resident sport fishery in 1984 with hatchery supplementation of rainbow trout (O. mykiss) and kokanee salmon (O. nerka). This was followed by the formation of the Spokane Tribal Lake Roosevelt Monitoring Project (LRMP) in 1988 and later by formation of the Lake Roosevelt Data Collection Project in 1991. The Lake Roosevelt Data Collection Project began in July 1991 as part of the BPA, Bureau of Reclamation, and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers System Operation Review process. This process sought to develop an operational scenario for the federal Columbia River hydropower system to maximize the in-reservoir fisheries with minimal impacts to all other stakeholders in the management of the Columbia River. The Lake Roosevelt Monitoring/Data Collection Program (LRMP) is the result of a merger between the Lake Roosevelt Monitoring Program (BPA No. 8806300) and the Lake Roosevelt Data Collection Project (BPA No. 9404300). These projects were merged in 1996 forming the Lake Roosevelt Monitoring Program (LRMP), which continues the work historically completed under the separate projects. The LRMP has two main goals. The first is to develop a biological model for Lake Roosevelt that will predict in-reservoir biological responses to a range of water management operational scenarios, and to develop fisheries and reservoir management strategies accordingly. The model will allow identification of lake operations that minimize impacts on lake biota while addressing the needs of other interests (e.g. flood control, hydropower generation, irrigation, and downstream resident and anadromous fisheries). Major components of the model will include: (1) quantification of entrainment and other impacts to phytoplankton, zooplankton and fish caused by reservoir drawdowns and low water retention times; (2) quantification

McLellan, Holly; Lee, Chuck; Scofield, Ben; Pavlik, Deanne

1999-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

435

Snake River Sockeye Salmon Captive Broodstock Program Hatchery Element : Project Progress Report 2007 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Numbers of Snake River sockeye salmon Oncorhynchus nerka have declined dramatically in recent years. In Idaho, only the lakes of the upper Salmon River (Sawtooth Valley) remain as potential sources of production (Figure 1). Historically, five Sawtooth Valley lakes (Redfish, Alturas, Pettit, Stanley, and Yellowbelly) supported sockeye salmon (Bjornn et al. 1968; Chapman et al. 1990). Currently, only Redfish Lake receives a remnant anadromous run. On April 2, 1990, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Fisheries Service (NOAA - formerly National Marine Fisheries Service) received a petition from the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes (SBT) to list Snake River sockeye salmon as endangered under the United States Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973. On November 20, 1991, NOAA declared Snake River sockeye salmon endangered. In 1991, the SBT, along with the Idaho Department of Fish & Game (IDFG), initiated the Snake River Sockeye Salmon Sawtooth Valley Project (Sawtooth Valley Project) with funding from the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). The goal of this program is to conserve genetic resources and to rebuild Snake River sockeye salmon populations in Idaho. Coordination of this effort is carried out under the guidance of the Stanley Basin Sockeye Technical Oversight Committee (SBSTOC), a team of biologists representing the agencies involved in the recovery and management of Snake River sockeye salmon. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Fisheries Service ESA Permit Nos. 1120, 1124, and 1481 authorize IDFG to conduct scientific research on listed Snake River sockeye salmon. Initial steps to recover the species involved the establishment of captive broodstocks at the Eagle Fish Hatchery in Idaho and at NOAA facilities in Washington State (for a review, see Flagg 1993; Johnson 1993; Flagg and McAuley 1994; Kline 1994; Johnson and Pravecek 1995; Kline and Younk 1995; Flagg et al. 1996; Johnson and Pravecek 1996; Kline and Lamansky 1997; Pravecek and Johnson 1997; Pravecek and Kline 1998; Kline and Heindel 1999; Hebdon et al. 2000; Flagg et al. 2001; Kline and Willard 2001; Frost et al. 2002; Hebdon et al. 2002; Hebdon et al. 2003; Kline et al. 2003a; Kline et al. 2003b; Willard et al. 2003a; Willard et al. 2003b; Baker et al. 2004; Baker et al. 2005; Willard et al. 2005; Baker et al. 2006; Plaster et al. 2006; Baker et al. 2007). The immediate goal of the program is to utilize captive broodstock technology to conserve the population's unique genetics. Long-term goals include increasing the number of individuals in the population to address delisting criteria and to provide sport and treaty harvest opportunity. (1) Develop captive broodstocks from Redfish Lake sockeye salmon, culture broodstocks and produce progeny for reintroduction. (2) Determine the contribution hatchery-produced sockeye salmon make toward avoiding population extinction and increasing population abundance. (3) Describe O. nerka population characteristics for Sawtooth Valley lakes in relation to carrying capacity and broodstock program reintroduction efforts. (4) Utilize genetic analysis to discern the origin of wild and broodstock sockeye salmon to provide maximum effectiveness in their utilization within the broodstock program. (5) Transfer technology through participation in the technical oversight committee process, provide written activity reports, and participate in essential program management and planning activities. Idaho Department of Fish and Game's participation in the Snake River Sockeye Salmon Captive Broodstock Program includes two areas of effort: (1) sockeye salmon captive broodstock culture, and (2) sockeye salmon research and evaluations. Although objectives and tasks from both components overlap and contribute to achieving the same goals, work directly related to sockeye salmon captive broodstock research and enhancement will appear under a separate cover. Research and enhancement activities associated with Snake River sockeye salmon are permitted under NOAA permit numbers 1120, 1124, and 1481. This report details fish

Baker, Dan J.; Heindel, Jeff A.; Green, Daniel G.; Kline, Paul A.

2008-12-17T23:59:59.000Z

436

EM-54 Technology Development In Situ Remediation Integrated Program. Annual report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Department of Energy (DOE) established the Office of Technology Development (EM-50) as an element of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management (EM) in November 1989. EM manages remediation of all DOE sites as well as wastes from current operations. The goal of the EM program is to minimize risks to human health, safety and the environment, and to bring all DOE sites into compliance with Federal, state, and local regulations by 2019. EM-50 is charged with developing new technologies that are safer, more effective and less expensive than current methods. The In Situ Remediation Integrated Program (the subject of this report) is part of EM-541, the Environmental Restoration Research and Development Division of EM-54. The In Situ Remediation Integrated Program (ISR IP) was instituted out of recognition that in situ remediation could fulfill three important criteria: Significant cost reduction of cleanup by eliminating or minimizing excavation, transportation, and disposal of wastes; reduced health impacts on workers and the public by minimizing exposure to wastes during excavation and processing; and remediation of inaccessible sites, including: deep subsurfaces; in, under, and around buildings. Buried waste, contaminated soils and groundwater, and containerized wastes are all candidates for in situ remediation. Contaminants include radioactive wastes, volatile and non-volatile organics, heavy metals, nitrates, and explosive materials. The ISR IP tends to facilitate development of in situ remediation technologies for hazardous, radioactive, and mixed wastes in soils, groundwater, and storage tanks. Near-term focus is on containment of the wastes, with treatment receiving greater effort in future years.

Not Available

1993-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

437

Geothermal Energy R&D Program Annual Progress Report for Fiscal Year 1992  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Geothermal budget actual amounts are shown for FY 1989 -1992, broken down by about 15 categories. Here, the main Program categories are: Exploration Technology, Drilling Technology, Reservoir Technology, Conversion Technology (power plants and materials), Industry-Coupled Drilling, Drilling Applications, Reservoir Engineering Applications, Direct Heat, Geopressured Wells Operation, and Hot Dry Rock Research. Here the title--Industry-Coupled Drilling--covered case studies of the Coso, CA, and Dixie Valley, NV, fields, and the Long Valley Exploratory Well (which had started as a magma energy exploration project, but reported here as a hydrothermal prospect evaluation well). (DJE 2005)

None

1993-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

438

Snake River Sockeye Salmon Captive Broodstock Program; Hatchery Element, 1999 Annual Report.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

On November 20, 1991, the National Marine Fisheries Service listed Snake River sockeye salmon Oncorhynchus nerka as endangered under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. In 1991, the Idaho Department of Fish and Game, the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, and the National Marine Fisheries Service initiated efforts to conserve and rebuild populations in Idaho. Initial steps to recover sockeye salmon included the establishment of a captive broodstock program at the Idaho Department of Fish and Game Eagle Fish Hatchery. Sockeye salmon broodstock and culture responsibilities are shared with the National Marine Fisheries Service at two locations adjacent to Puget Sound in Washington State. Activities conducted by the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes and the National Marine Fisheries Service are reported under separate cover. Idaho Department of Fish and Game monitoring and evaluation activities of captive broodstock program fish releases are also reported under separate cover. Captive broodstock program activities conducted between January 1, 1999 and December 31, 1999 are presented in this report. In 1999, seven anadromous sockeye salmon returned to the Sawtooth Valley and were captured at the adult weir located on the upper Salmon River. Four anadromous adults were incorporated in the captive broodstock program spawning design for year 1999. The remaining three adults were released to Redfish Lake for natural spawning. All seven adults were adipose and left ventral fin-clipped, indicating hatchery origin. One sockeye salmon female from the anadromous group and 81 females from the captive broodstock group were spawned at the Eagle Fish Hatchery in 1999. Spawn pairings produced approximately 63,147 eyed-eggs with egg survival to eyed-stage of development averaging 38.97%. Eyed-eggs (20,311), presmolts (40,271), smolts (9,718), and adults (21) were planted or released into Sawtooth Valley waters in 1999. Supplementation strategies involved releases to Redfish Lake, Redfish Lake Creek, upper Salmon River (below the Sawtooth Fish Hatchery weir), Alturas Lake, and Pettit Lake. During this reporting period, four broodstocks and three production groups were in culture at the Eagle Fish Hatchery. Two of the four broodstocks were incorporated into the 1999 spawning design and one broodstock was terminated following the completion of spawning.

Baker, Dan J,; Heindel, Jeff A.; Kline, Paul A. (Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Boise, ID)

2005-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

439

Annual review of cultural resource investigations by the Savannah River Archaeological Research Program. Fiscal year 1995  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Savannah River Archaeological Research Program (SRARP) continued through FY95 with the United States Department of Energy to fulfill a threefold mission of cultural resource management, research, and public education at the Savannah River Site. Over 2,300 acres of land on the SRS came under cultural resources review in FY95. This activity entailed 30 field surveys, resulting in the recording of 86 new sites. Twenty-two existing sites within survey tract boundaries were revisited to update site file records. Research conducted by SRARP was reported in 11 papers and monographs published during FY95. SRARP staff also presented research results in 18 papers at professional meetings. Field research included several testing programs, excavations, and remote sensing at area sites, as well as data collection abroad. Seven grants were acquired by SRARP staff to support off-site research. In the area of heritage education, the SRARP expanded its activities in FY95 with a full schedule of classroom education, public outreach, and on-site tours. Volunteer excavations at the Tinker Creek site were continued with the Augusta Archaeological Society and other avocational groups, and other off-site excavations provided a variety of opportunities for field experience. Some 80 presentations, displays and tours were provided for schools, historical societies, civic groups, and environmental and historical awareness day celebrations. Additionally, SRARP staff taught four anthropology courses at area colleges.

Brooks, M.J.; Brooks, R.D.; Sassaman, K.E.; Crass, D.C. [and others] [and others

1995-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

440

SETEC/Semiconductor Manufacturing Technologies Program: 1999 Annual and Final Report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report summarizes the results of work conducted by the Semiconductor Manufacturing Technologies Program at Sandia National Laboratories (Sandia) during 1999. This work was performed by one working group: the Semiconductor Equipment Technology Center (SETEC). The group's projects included Numerical/Experimental Characterization of the Growth of Single-Crystal Calcium Fluoride (CaF{sub 2}); The Use of High-Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy (HRTEM) Imaging for Certifying Critical-Dimension Reference Materials Fabricated with Silicon Micromachining; Assembly Test Chip for Flip Chip on Board; Plasma Mechanism Validation: Modeling and Experimentation; and Model-Based Reduction of Contamination in Gate-Quality Nitride Reactor. During 1999, all projects focused on meeting customer needs in a timely manner and ensuring that projects were aligned with the goals of the National Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors sponsored by the Semiconductor Industry Association and with Sandia's defense mission. This report also provides a short history of the Sandia/SEMATECH relationship and a brief on all projects completed during the seven years of the program.

MCBRAYER,JOHN D.

2000-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "annual eeo program" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Argonne National Laboratory Annual Report of Laboratory Directed Research and Development program activities FY 2011.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

As a national laboratory Argonne concentrates on scientific and technological challenges that can only be addressed through a sustained, interdisciplinary focus at a national scale. Argonne's eight major initiatives, as enumerated in its strategic plan, are Hard X-ray Sciences, Leadership Computing, Materials and Molecular Design and Discovery, Energy Storage, Alternative Energy and Efficiency, Nuclear Energy, Biological and Environmental Systems, and National Security. The purposes of Argonne's Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Program are to encourage the development of novel technical concepts, enhance the Laboratory's research and development (R and D) capabilities, and pursue its strategic goals. projects are selected from proposals for creative and innovative R and D studies that require advance exploration before they are considered to be sufficiently developed to obtain support through normal programmatic channels. Among the aims of the projects supported by the LDRD Program are the following: establishment of engineering proof of principle, assessment of design feasibility for prospective facilities, development of instrumentation or computational methods or systems, and discoveries in fundamental science and exploratory development.

(Office of The Director)

2012-04-25T23:59:59.000Z

442

ARM - Program Fact Sheets  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Annual Reports Program Fact Sheets Campaign Backgrounders Education and Outreach Posters Brochures Research Highlights Summaries Program Fact Sheets Please contact...

443

Solar Energy Program: Chapter from the Energy and EnvironmentalDivision Annual Report 1980  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Solar energy has become a major alternative for supplying a substantial fraction of the nation's future energy needs. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) supports activities ranging from the demonstration of existing technology to research on future possibilities. At Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory (LBL), projects are in progress that span a wide range of activities, with the emphasis on research to extend the scientific basis for solar energy applications, and on preliminary development of new approaches to solar energy conversion. To assess various solar applications, it is important to quantify the solar resource. Special instruments have been developed and are now in use to measure both direct solar radiation and circum-solar radiation, i.e., the radiation from near the sun resulting from the scattering of sunlight by small particles in the atmosphere. These measurements serve to predict the performance of solar designs that use focusing collectors employing mirrors or lenses to concentrate the sunlight. Efforts have continued at a low level to assist DOE in demonstrating existing solar technology by providing the San Francisco Operations Office (SAN) with technical support for its management of commercial-building solar demonstration projects. Also, a hot water and space-heating system has been installed on an LBL building as part of the DOE facilities Solar Demonstration Program. LBL continues to provide support for the DOE Appropriate Energy Technology grants program. Evaluations are made of the program's effectiveness by, for example, estimating the resulting potential energy savings. LBL also documents innovative features and improvements in economic feasibility as compared to existing conventional systems or applications. In the near future, we expect that LBL research will have a substantial impact in the areas of solar heating and cooling. Conventional and new types of high-performance absorption air conditioners are being developed that are air-cooled and suitable for use with flat plate or higher-temperature collectors. Operation of the controls test facility and computer modeling of collector loop and building load dynamics are yielding quantitative evaluations of the performance of different control strategies for active solar-heating systems. Research is continuing on ''passive'' approaches to solar heating and cooling, where careful considerations of architectural design, construction materials, and the environment are used to moderate a building's interior climate. Computer models of passive concepts are being developed and incorporated into building energy analysis computer programs which are in the public domain. The resulting passive analysis capabilities are used in systems studies leading to design tools and in the design of commercial buildings on a case study basis. The investigation of specific passive cooling methods is an ongoing project; for example, a process is being studied in which heat-storage material would be cooled by radiation to the night sky, and would then provide ''coolness'' to the building. Laboratory personnel involved in the solar cooling, controls, and passive projects are also providing technical support to the Active Heating and Cooling Division and the Passive and Hybrid Division of DOE in developing program plans, evaluating proposals, and making technical reviews of projects at other institutions and in industry. Low-grade heat is a widespread energy resource that could make a significant contribution to energy needs if economical methods can be developed for converting it to useful work. Investigations continued this year on the feasibility of using the ''shape-memory'' alloy, Nitinol, as a basis for constructing heat engines that could operate from energy sources, such as solar-heated water, industrial waste heat, geothermal brines, and ocean thermal gradients. Several projects are investigating longer-term possibilities for utilizing solar energy. One project involves the development of a new type of solar thermal receiver that would be placed at the focus of a central

Energy and Environment Division

1981-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

444

South Fork Flathead Watershed Westslope Cutthroat Trout Conservation Program, Annual Report 2002.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In 1999, Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks (MFWP) began a program aimed at conserving the genetically pure populations of westslope cutthroat trout in the South Fork Flathead River drainage. The objective of this program is to eliminate all of the exotic and hybrid trout that threaten the genetically pure westslope cutthroat populations in the South Fork Flathead. The exotic and hybrid trout populations occur in several headwater lakes and their outflow streams. In 2001 MFWP released a draft environmental assessment, pursuant to the Montana Environmental Policy Act (MEPA), that addressed the use of motorized equipment to deliver personnel and materials to some of these lakes in the Bob Marshall and Great Bear Wildernesses (Grisak 2001). After a 30-day public comment period, MFWP determined that the complexity of issues was too great and warranted a more detailed analysis. These issues included transportation options for personnel, equipment and materials, the use of motorized equipment in wilderness, fish removal methods, fish stocking, and the status and distribution of amphibian populations in the project area. Because the program also involves the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) and Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), the environmental analysis needs to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). In October 2001, pursuant to NEPA, MFWP, along with the USFS and BPA initiated an environmental assessment to address these issues. In June 2002, the three agencies determined that the scope of these issues warranted an Environmental Impact Statement. This specialist report describes the logistical, technical and biological issues associated with this project and provides an analysis of options for fish removal, transportation and fish stocking. It further analyzes issues and concerns associated with amphibian populations and creating new domesticated stocks of westslope cutthroat trout. Finally, this document provides a description of each lake, the best method of fish removal that would achieve the goals of the project, logistics for carrying out the fish removal, and the immediate management direction for each lake following fish removal. The USFS is preparing a specialist report detailing land management issues that relate to National Forest, designated Hiking Areas, and Wilderness. Information from these two documents will be used by BPA to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.

Grisak, Grant; Marotz, Brian

2003-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

445

Semi-annual report of the Department of Energy, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Environment, Quality Assessment Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report presents the results from the analysis of the 33rd set of environmental quality assessment samples (QAP 33) that were received on or before December 4, 1990. This Quality Assessment Program (QAP) is designed to test the quality of the environmental measurements being reported to the Department of Energy by its contractors. Since 1976, real or synthetic environmental samples that have been prepared and thoroughly analyzed at the Environmental Measurements Laboratory (EML) have been distributed at first quarterly and then semi-annually to these contractors. Their results, which are returned to EML within 90 days, are compiled with EML's results and are reported back to the participating contractors 30 days later. A summary of the reported results is available to the participants 3 days after the reporting deadline via a modem-telephone connection to the EML computer. The data for the different kinds of samples are given in the following units: air filters in Bq/filter; soil in Bq kg{sup {minus}1}; tissue in Bq kg{sup {minus}1}; vegetation in Bq kg{sup {minus}1}; and water in Bq L{sup {minus}1}. The values for elemental uranium are reported in {mu}g/filter, g, or mL. The EML value' listed in the tables to which the contractors' results are compared is the mean of replicate demonstrations for each nuclide. The EML uncertainty is the standard error of the mean. All other uncertainties are as reported by the participants.

Sanderson, C.G.; Scarpitta, S.C.

1991-01-02T23:59:59.000Z

446

Semi-annual report of the Department of Energy, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Environment, Quality Assessment Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report presents the results from the analysis of the 34th set of environmental quality assessment samples (QAP 34) that were received on or before June 10, 1991. This Quality Assessment Program (QAP) is designed to test the quality of the environmental measurements being reported to the Department of Energy by its contractors. Since 1976, real or synthetic environmental samples that have been prepared and thoroughly analyzed at the Environmental Measurements Laboratory (EML) have been distributed at first quarterly and then semi-annually to these contractors. Their results, which are returned to EML within 90 days, are compiled with EML's results and are reported back to the participating contractors 30 days later. A summary of the reported results is available to the participants 3 days after the reporting deadline via a modem-telephone connection to the EML computer. The EML value'' listed in the tables to which the contractors' results are compared is the mean of replicate determination for each nuclide. The EML uncertainty is the standard error of the mean. All other uncertainties are as reported by the participants.

Sanderson, C.G.; Scarpitta, S.C.

1991-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

447

Niagara falls storage site: Annual site environmental report, Lewiston, New York, Calendar Year 1988: Surplus Facilities Management Program (SFMP)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The monitoring program at the Niagara Falls Storage Site (NFSS) measures radon concentrations in air; external gamma radiation levels; and uranium and radium concentrations in surface water, groundwater, and sediment. To verify that the site is in compliance with the DOE radiation protection standard and to assess its potential effect on public health, the radiation dose was calculated for a hypothetical maximally exposed individual. Based on the conservative scenario described in this report, this hypothetical individual receives an annual external exposure approximately equivalent to 6 percent of the DOE radiation protection standard of 100 mrem/yr. This exposure is less than a person receives during two round-trip flights from New York to Los Angeles (because of the greater amounts of cosmic radiation at higher altitudes). The cumulative dose to the population within an 80-km (50-mi) radius of the NFSS that results from radioactive materials present at the site is indistinguishable from the dose that the same population receives from naturally occurring radioactive sources. Results of the 1988 monitoring show that the NFSS is in compliance with applicable DOE radiation protection standards. 17 refs., 31 figs., 20 tabs.

Not Available

1989-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

448

Environmental Hazards Assessment Program. Volume 4: Annual report, July 1, 1993--June 30, 1994  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Medical University of South Carolina`s (MUSC) vision is to become the premier national resource for medical information and for environmental/health risk assessment. A key component to the success of the many missions of the Environmental Hazards Assessment Program (EHAP) is timely access to large volumes of data. The significant growth in the number of environmental/health information systems that has occurred over the past few years has made data access challenging. This study documents the results of the needs assessment effort conducted to determine the information access and processing requirements of EHAP. The following topics are addressed in this report: immunological consequences of beryllium exposure; assessment of genetic risks to environmental diseases; low dose-rate radiation health effects; environmental risk perception in defined populations; information support and access systems; and environmental medicine and risk communication: curriculum and a professional support network-Department of Family Medicine.

Not Available

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

449

Hot Dry Rock Geothermal Energy Development Program Annual Report Fiscal Year 1988  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The complete list of HDR objectives is provided in Reference 10, and is tabulated below in Tables 1 and 2 for the reader's convenience. The primary, level 1, objective for HDR is ''to improve the technology to the point where electricity could be produced commercially from a substantial number of known HDR resource sites in a cost range of 5 to 8 cents/kWh by 1997''. A critically important milestone in attaining this cost target is the level II objective: ''Evaluate the performance of the Fenton Hill Phase II reservoir''. To appreciate the significance of this objective, a brief background is helpful. During the past 14 years the US DOE has invested $123 million to develop the technology required to make Hot Dry Rock geothermal energy commercially useful. The Governments of Japan and the Federal Republic of Germany have contributed an additional $32 million to the US program. The initial objectives of the program were met by the successful development and long-term operation of a heat-extraction loop in hydraulically-fractured hot dry rock. This Phase I reservoir produced pressurized hot water at temperatures and flow rates suitable for many commercial uses such as space heating and food processing. It operated for more than a year with no major problems or detectable environmental effect. With this accomplished and the technical feasibility of HDR energy systems demonstrated, the program undertook the more difficult task of developing a larger, deeper, hotter reservoir, called ''Phase II'', capable of supporting pilot-plant-scale operation of a commercial electricity-generating power plant. As described earlier in ''History of Research'', such a system was created and operated successfully in a preliminary 30-day flow test. However, to justify capital investment in HDR geothermal technology, industry now requires assurance that the reservoir can be operated for a long time without major problems or a significant decrease in the rate and quality of energy production. Industrial advisors to the HDR Program have concluded that, while a longer testing period would certainly be desirable, a successful and well-documented flow test of this high-temperature, Phase II reservoir lasting at least one year should convince industry that HDR geothermal energy merits their investment in its commercial development. This test is called the Long Term Flow Test (LTFT), and its completion will be a major milestone in attaining the Level 1 objective. However, before the LTFT could be initiated, well EE-2 had to be repaired, as also briefly described in the ''History of Research''. During this repair operation, superb progress was made toward satisfying the next most critically important Level II objective: Improve the Performance of HDR Drilling and Completion Technology. During the repair of EE-2, Los Alamos sidetracked by drilling out of the damaged well at 2.96 km (9700 ft), and then completed drilling a new-wellbore (EE-2A) to a total depth of 3.78 km (12,360 ft). As a consequence of this drilling experience, Los Alamos believes that if the original wells were redrilled today their combined cost would be only $8 million rather than the $18.8 million actually spent (a 60% cost saving). Further details, particularly of the completion of the well, can be found in the major section, ACCOMPLISHMENTS, but it can be seen that the second, Level II objective is already nearing attainment.

Dash, Zora V.; Murphy, Hugh D.; Smith, Morton C.

1988-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

450

Advanced turbine systems program conceptual design and product development. Annual report, August 1994--July 1995  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report summarizes the tasks completed under this project during the period from August 1, 1994 through July 31, 1994. The objective of the study is to provide the conceptual design and product development plan for an ultra high efficiency, environmentally superior and cost-competitive industrial gas turbine system to be commercialized by the year 2000. The tasks completed include a market study for the advanced turbine system; definition of an optimized recuperated gas turbine as the prime mover meeting the requirements of the market study and whose characteristics were, in turn, used for forecasting the total advanced turbine system (ATS) future demand; development of a program plan for bringing the ATS to a state of readiness for field test; and demonstration of the primary surface recuperator ability to provide the high thermal effectiveness and low pressure loss required to support the proposed ATS cycle.

NONE

1995-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

451

Waste tank safety program annual status report for FY 1993, Task 5: Toxicology and epidemiology  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A toxicology team independently reviewed analytical data and provided advice concerning potential health effects associated with exposure to tank-vapor constituents at the Hanford site. Most of the emphasis was directed toward Tank 241-C-103, but a preliminary assessment was also made of the toxicologic implication of the cyanide levels in the headspace of Tank 241-C-108. The objectives of this program are to (1) review procedures used for sampling vapors from various tanks, (2) identify constituents in tank-vapor samples that could be related to symptoms reported by waste-tank workers, (3) evaluate the toxicologic implications of those constituents by comparison to established toxicologic data bases, (4) provide advice for additional analytical efforts, and (5) support other activities as requested by the project manager and the cognizant Westinghouse Hanford Company Tank Vapor Issues Safety Resolution Manager.

Mahlum, D.D.; Young, J.Y.

1993-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

452

Waste Tank Safety Program. Annual status report for FY 1993, Task 3: Organic chemistry  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This task supports the tank-vapor project, mainly by providing organic analytical support and by analyzing Tank 241-C-103 (Tank C-103) vapor-space samples, collected via SUMMA{trademark} canisters, by gas chromatography (GC) and GC/mass spectrometry (MS). In the absence of receiving tank-vapor samples, we have focused our efforts toward validating the normal paraffin hydrocarbon (NPH) sampling and analysis methods and preparing the SUMMA{trademark} laboratory. All required milestones were met, including a report on the update of phase I sampling and analysis on August 15, 1993. This update described the work involved in preparing to analyze phase I samples (Appendix A). This report describes the analytical support provided by Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL){sup (a)} to the Hanford Tank Safety Vapor Program.

Lucke, R.B.; Clauss, T.T.W.; Hoheimer, R.; Goheen, S.C.

1994-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

453

Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products and Commercial and Industrial Equipment-- AHRI Annual Meeting CCE Overview and Update Presenation, dated April 13, 2011  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

AHRI Annual Meeting AHRI Annual Meeting CCE Overview and Update April 13, 2011 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Agenda Certified Ratings Basic Model Explanation Certification 2 | Building Technologies Program & General Counsel's Office of Enforcement eere.energy.gov Enforcement Overview AEDM/ARM Requirements DOE's New Initiatives How to Submit Questions Basic Model Explanation * May contain multiple models/model numbers. * Is manufactured by a single manufacturer, although it may be distributed under different brand names. * Is made up of models that contain the same primary energy source (i.e., electric, gas). 3 | Building Technologies Program & General Counsel's Office of Enforcement eere.energy.gov A Basic Model * Is made up of models that have essentially identical electrical, physical and functional characteristics that affect

454

Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products and Commercial and Industrial Equipment-- AHRI Annual Meeting CCE Overview and Update Presenation, dated April 13, 2011  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

AHRI Annual Meeting AHRI Annual Meeting CCE Overview and Update April 13, 2011 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Agenda Certified Ratings Basic Model Explanation Certification 2 | Building Technologies Program & General Counsel's Office of Enforcement eere.energy.gov Enforcement Overview AEDM/ARM Requirements DOE's New Initiatives How to Submit Questions Basic Model Explanation * May contain multiple models/model numbers. * Is manufactured by a single manufacturer, although it may be distributed under different brand names. * Is made up of models that contain the same primary energy source (i.e., electric, gas). 3 | Building Technologies Program & General Counsel's Office of Enforcement eere.energy.gov A Basic Model * Is made up of models that have essentially identical electrical, physical and functional characteristics that affect

455

Annual Reports  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Occupational Radiation Exposure Occupational Radiation Exposure Home Welcome What's New Register Dose History Request Data File Submittal REMS Data Selection HSS Logo Annual Reports User Survey on the Annual Report Please take the time to complete a survey on the Annual Report. Your input is important to us! The 2012 Annual Report View or print the annual report in PDF format The 2011 Annual Report View or print the annual report in PDF format The 2010 Annual Report View or print the annual report in PDF format The 2009 Annual Report View or print the annual report in PDF format The 2008 Annual Report View or print the annual report in PDF format The 2007 Annual Report View or print the annual report in PDF format The 2006 Annual Report View or print the annual report in PDF format The 2005 Annual Report

456

Vehicle Technologies Office: 2008 Advanced Vehicle Technology Analysis and Evaluation Activities and Heavy Vehicle Systems Optimization Program Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

20098 Annual Progress Report describing accomplishments in: modeling and simulation; integration and validation; laboratory testing and benchmarking; operational and fleet testing; thermal management; friction and wear; and aerodynamics.

457

Vehicle Technologies Office: 2009 Advanced Vehicle Technology Analysis and Evaluation Activities and Heavy Vehicle Systems Optimization Program Annual Progress Report  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

2009 annual progress report describing accomplishments in: modeling and simulation; integration and validation; laboratory testing and benchmarking; operational and fleet testing; thermal management; friction and wear; and aerodynamics.