National Library of Energy BETA

Sample records for air act waiver

  1. Status of Waivers Issued under the Recovery Act: Non-Availability Waivers

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This list includes Buy American waivers issued to Recovery Act funded projects administered by the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE).

  2. Clean Air Act

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    The primary law governing the Department of Energy (DOE) air pollution control activities is the Clean Air Act (CAA). This law defines the role of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and state, local and tribal air programs in protecting and improving the nation’s air quality and stratospheric ozone layer by regulating emissions from mobile and stationary sources.

  3. Statement from Secretary Bodman on Signing of the Jones Act Waiver |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy from Secretary Bodman on Signing of the Jones Act Waiver Statement from Secretary Bodman on Signing of the Jones Act Waiver September 26, 2005 - 10:52am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - Please find below a statement from Department of Energy Secretary Samuel W. Bodman on DHS Secretary Chertoff's decision to waive the Jones Act. This waiver will allow foreign as well as U.S. shipping vessels to transport petroleum and refined petroleum products (gasoline and diesel) until 12:01

  4. Clean Air Act, Section 309

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    CLEAN AIR ACT 309* 7609. Policy review (a) The Administrator shall review and comment in writing on the environmental impact of any matter relating to duties and ...

  5. Clean Air Act. Revision 5

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1994-02-15

    This Reference Book contains a current copy of the Clean Air Act, as amended, and those regulations that implement the statute and appear to be most relevant to DOE activities. The document is provided to DOE and contractor staff for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as legal guidance. This Reference Book has been completely revised and is current through February 15, 1994.

  6. Clean Air Act General Conformity Requirements and the National...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Clean Air Act General Conformity Requirements and the National Environmental Policy Act ... The second part provides greater detail on the Clean Air Act conformity requirements, the ...

  7. Clean Air Act | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: Clean Air ActLegal Abstract A primary goal of this chapter is to encourage or otherwise promote...

  8. Clear Air Act Amendments Overview and update

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Turner, W.C.; Frazier, R.S.

    1995-06-01

    The new Clean Air Act is rapidly establishing itself as the leading industry affecting environmental legislation of today and perhaps of all time. Numerous developments are occurring daily that can and will impact industry over the next few years. This paper summarizes the 1990 Amendments to the Clean Air Act and attempts to bring the reader {open_quotes}up to date{close_quotes}. The paper ends with some management suggestions as to what industry should be doing today.

  9. Preparing for the clean air act amendments

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Boomer, B.; Bensinger, D. Midwest Research Inst., Cary, NC )

    1993-09-09

    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and state air quality control agencies are in the midst of developing regulations and programs to meet the ambitious goals of the Clean Air Act Amendment (CAAA) of 1990. The CAAA--which call for stricter air quality standards, a greater number of pollutants and sources to be regulated, new operating permits, and more stringent enforcement of air quality violations--are expected to have a significant impact on virtually every facility in the country. An important deadline in the implementation of the CAAA is November 1993. That is when individual states must submit their proposed operating permit programs to the EPA, as mandated by Title 5 of the Amendments. The EPA then has one year after receiving a state program to accept or reject it. Once a state's program is accepted, all major sources of air pollution in that state have one year to apply for an operating air permit. Although the initial deadlines for business and industry are up to two years away, sufficient information is now available to take the first steps toward compliance with the new air quality regulations. Even while the details of the new rules are being hammered out, plant engineering can and should begin laying the groundwork for their own permit applications. Time and effort spent preparing now for the provisions of the CAAA will pay off in the long run.

  10. EPA Air Pollution and the Clean Air Act Webpage | Open Energy...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Air Pollution and the Clean Air Act Webpage Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Web Site: EPA Air Pollution and the Clean Air Act Webpage Abstract...

  11. Clean Air Act, Section 309 | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Act, Section 309 Clean Air Act, Section 309 The Administrator shall review and comment in ... Such written comment shall be made public at the conclusion of any such review. Clean Air ...

  12. Class Patent Waiver W(C)2011-013

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by AGREEMENT FOR COMMERCIALIZING TECHNOLOGY (ACT) CLASS WAIVER for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement N/A.

  13. Project Specific Waiver for Heartland Community College | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy Project Specific Waiver for Heartland Community College Project Specific Waiver for Heartland Community College il_signed (1.57 MB) More Documents & Publications EA-1807: Finding of No Significant Impact Status of Waivers Issued under the Recovery Act: Public Interest Waivers Project Specific Waiver for the Texas State Energy Office

  14. EPA's Section 309 Review: The Clean Air Act and NEPA

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This document discusses Section 309 of the Clean Air Act, which authorizes the Environmental Protection Agency to review certain proposed actions of other federal agencies in accordance with NEPA and make those reviews public.

  15. EPA's Section 309 Review: The Clean Air Act and NEPA

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    The Clean Air Act, a law to prevent pollution of a single environmental medium, contains an unusual provision. That provision is Section 309, which authorizes the Environmental Protection Agency ...

  16. Coal conversion and the Clean Air Act: help from DOE

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Frank, S.A.; Spiewak, S.A.

    1982-08-19

    While a large number of fuels conversions have occurred since the 1973-1974 oil embargo, there are still many opportunities for additional conversions. Many of the conversions which have occurred to date have been under federal order because of the legal benefits which accrue to them under the Clean Air Act. The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act changed the thrust of the federal program from a mandatory one to a voluntary one. A number of utilities have remained in the program or elected for certification under the new regulation because of the same Clean Air Act benefits. The DOE Office of Fuels Conversion, aside from being responsible for grants of Clean Air Act exemptions, possesses certain unique resources, including capabilities for engineering, finance, fuel supply, transportation, and environmental analysis. These capabilities are available to assist utilities seeking to convert to coal in numerous ways. In addition, assistance can be and is being provided to a state public service commission. 2 figures.

  17. Clean Air Act Title V: Knocking on your door

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Hosford, R.B. )

    1993-01-15

    The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 made several significant changes in the clean air program. One of the key elements of the Amendments was the inclusion of an operating permit program in Title V. The purpose of the program is to establish a central point for tracking all applicable air quality requirements for every source required to obtain a permit. This article provides a brief description of the most significant provisions. In addition, the subject of permit modification is discussed in some detail.

  18. Clean Air Act General Conformity Requirements and the National Environmental Policy Act Process (DOE, 2000)

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This DOE guidance has three parts. The first part discusses how to coordinate the conformity and NEPA processes. The second part provides greater detail on the Clean Air Act conformity requirements, the conformity review process, and the conformity determination process. The third part provides related references.

  19. NEPA and the Clean Air Act: Complementary approaches to maintaining air quality

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Miller, R.L.; McCold, L.N.

    1991-01-01

    The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 was established to prevent or eliminate damage to the environmental and biosphere from federal actions and stimulate the public health and welfare. An intertwined focus of NEPA has been to create and maintain conditions under which people and nature can exist in productive harmony. Meanwhile, the Clean Air Act (CAA) and amendments are the basis for regulating emission of air pollutants and otherwise maintaining or enhancing air quality to protect public health and welfare throughout the United States. Because the CAA is to comprehensive, a frequently asked question concerns the usefulness of NEPA from an air quality perspective: What can NEPA accomplish for federal actions that is not already accomplished by the CAA This paper contends that NEPA plays an important role in identifying and informing federal decision-makers of potential air quality impacts of federal actions. NEPA encompasses a broader scope and provides an independent analysis of CAA requirements for federal actions. NEPA ensures that spectrum of potential environmental effects is examined, rather than air quality alone. In some cases, NEPA analyses involve evaluating trade-offs of beneficial and adverse effects among different environmental media, such as air emissions vs solid waste. NEPA air quality analyses sometimes encompass potential concerns that are beyond those required for compliance with the CAA. Also, the environmental consequences of alternative actions are assessed to assist federal decision-makers in selecting a preferred alternative. Finally, proposed federal programs are evaluated under NEPA for their potential effects. 8 refs.

  20. EPA Plain English Guide to the Clean Air Act | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Plain English Guide to the Clean Air Act Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Web Site: EPA Plain English Guide to the Clean Air Act Author...

  1. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2005-049

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by AMERICAN AIR LIQUIDE for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC26-02NT41586.

  2. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2006-005

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This is a request by AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FG36-05GO85026

  3. CRS 25-7-100 et seq - Air Pollution and Prevention Control Act...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Prevention and Control Act. This statutory section sets forth requirements for Colorado's air quality control program. Published NA Year Signed or Took Effect 1980 Legal Citation...

  4. EPA-- Addressing Children's Health through Reviews Conducted Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act and Section 309 of the Clean Air Act

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Addressing Children's Health through Reviews Conducted Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act and Section 309 of the Clean Air Act

  5. Air toxics provisions of the Clean Air Act: Potential impacts on energy

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Hootman, H.A.; Vernet, J.E.

    1991-11-01

    This report provides an overview of the provisions of the Clean Air Act and its Amendments of 1990 that identify hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions and addresses their regulation by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). It defines the major energy sector sources of these HAPs that would be affected by the regulations. Attention is focused on regulations that would cover coke oven emissions; chromium emission from industrial cooling towers and the electroplating process; HAP emissions from tank vessels, asbestos-related activities, organic solvent use, and ethylene oxide sterilization; and emissions of air toxics from municipal waste combustors. The possible implications of Title III regulations for the coal, natural gas, petroleum, uranium, and electric utility industries are examined. The report discusses five major databases of HAP emissions: (1) TRI (EPA`s Toxic Release Inventory); (2) PISCES (Power Plant Integrated Systems: Chemical Emissions Studies developed by the Electric Power Research Institute); (3) 1985 Emissions Inventory on volatile organic compounds (used for the National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program); (4) Particulate Matter Species Manual (EPA); and (5) Toxics Emission Inventory (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). It also offers information on emission control technologies for municipal waste combustors.

  6. Air toxics provisions of the Clean Air Act: Potential impacts on energy

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Hootman, H.A.; Vernet, J.E.

    1991-11-01

    This report provides an overview of the provisions of the Clean Air Act and its Amendments of 1990 that identify hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions and addresses their regulation by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). It defines the major energy sector sources of these HAPs that would be affected by the regulations. Attention is focused on regulations that would cover coke oven emissions; chromium emission from industrial cooling towers and the electroplating process; HAP emissions from tank vessels, asbestos-related activities, organic solvent use, and ethylene oxide sterilization; and emissions of air toxics from municipal waste combustors. The possible implications of Title III regulations for the coal, natural gas, petroleum, uranium, and electric utility industries are examined. The report discusses five major databases of HAP emissions: (1) TRI (EPA's Toxic Release Inventory); (2) PISCES (Power Plant Integrated Systems: Chemical Emissions Studies developed by the Electric Power Research Institute); (3) 1985 Emissions Inventory on volatile organic compounds (used for the National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program); (4) Particulate Matter Species Manual (EPA); and (5) Toxics Emission Inventory (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). It also offers information on emission control technologies for municipal waste combustors.

  7. Analysis of S. 1844, the Clear Skies Act of 2003; S. 843, the Clean Air Planning Act of 2003; and S. 366, the Clean Power Act of 2003

    Reports and Publications (EIA)

    2004-01-01

    Senator James M. Inhofe requested that the Energy Information Administration (EIA) undertake analysis of S.843, the Clean Air Planning Act of 2003, introduced by Senator Thomas Carper; S.366, the Clean Power Act of 2003, introduced by Senator James Jeffords; and S.1844, the Clear Skies Act of 2003, introduced by Senator James M. Inhofe. The EIA received this request on March 19, 2004. This Service Report responds to his request.

  8. FY 2013 Conference Waiver - Emergency Management Issues Special Interest

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Group | Department of Energy Conference Waiver - Emergency Management Issues Special Interest Group FY 2013 Conference Waiver - Emergency Management Issues Special Interest Group FY 2013 Conference Waiver - Emergency Management Issues Special Interest Group.pdf (37.35 KB) More Documents & Publications Implementation of Division F, Title I, Title II, and Title III and Division G, Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013, Pub. L. No.113-6 Acquisition Letters No. AL

  9. Analysis of S. 485, the Clear Skies Act of 2003, and S. 843, the Clean Air Planning Act of 2003

    Reports and Publications (EIA)

    2003-01-01

    On July 30, 2003, Senator James M. Inhofe requested the Energy Information Administration to undertake analyses of S.843, The Clean Air Planning Act of 2003, introduced by Senator Thomas Carper, and S.485, Clear Skies Act of 2003. Senator Inhofe also asked the Energy Information Administration (EIA) to analyze S. 485 without the mercury provisions and S. 843 without the mercury and carbon dioxide provisions. This service report responds to both requests.

  10. 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. - Clean Air Act | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    is the statutory text of the Clean Air Act. Published NA Year Signed or Took Effect 1977 Legal Citation 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. DOI Not Provided Check for DOI availability:...

  11. EPA's Section 309 Review: The Clean Air Act and NEPA (EPA, 1999)

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This document discusses Section 309 of the Clean Air Act, which authorizes the Environmental Protection Agency to review certain proposed actions of other federal agencies in accordance with NEPA and make those reviews public.

  12. Patent Waivers Overview

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    A patent waiver refers to the government’s waiver of rights in an invention arising from DOE-funded research so that private entities may expedite commercialization, quickly bringing their technologies from lab to market.

  13. Trials and tribulations implementing the Clean Air Act Title V in fourteen air districts

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Moore, C.

    1998-12-31

    Santa Fe pacific Pipeline Partners, L.P. (SFPP) is a refined petroleum pipeline operating in six states in the western United States. Sixteen terminals are subject to the Title V permit to operate requirements. There are many obstacles to overcome, not only when preparing applications for Title V operating permits, but in the implementation phase of the project as well. Each Air District has its own set of rules and regulations that must be adhered to in preparing the application. For example, some districts required the insignificant sources to be documented and included in compliance plans and some do not. The format required for the application varies from stringent forms that must be completed to no forms at all. In preparing the Title V application for SFPP, the author quickly realized if this confusion was transferred to the implementation phase, compliance would be a failure. Therefore, early on the environmental manager instituted a training program. Beginning with a pilot program in one district the author began training managers and supervisors. This program quickly was expanded to include senior vice presidents and technicians. This training session was a one hour of general overview to visually describe how the Title V process would affect the facilities. As a result of this training, virtually every employee became familiar with how the Title V program was affecting the facilities. Engineering and Customer Service is instructed to notify the manager of any and every new project so it could undergo a review to determine if it affected a Title V facility. The field acts as a check of the system. Any change or modification at any facility is immediately under scrutiny for Title V implications. Another obstacle to overcome is to help the facility deal with something that is new and basically a different way of operating.

  14. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2005-007

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC36-04GO13030.

  15. Memorandum of Decision: Withdrawal of LED Lighting Waiver | Department...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    LED Lighting Waiver Memorandum of Decision: Withdrawal of LED Lighting Waiver novemberdecisionwithdraw More Documents & Publications Nationwide Nonavailability Waiver: November...

  16. The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990: Hazardous Air Pollutant Requirements and the DOE Clean Coal Technology Program

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Moskowitz, P.D.; DePhillips, M.; Fthenakis, V.M.; Hemenway, A.

    1991-12-31

    The purpose of the US Department of Energy -- Office of Fossil Energy (DOE FE) Clean Coal Technology Program (CCTP) is to provide the US energy marketplace with advanced, efficient, and environmentally sound coal-based technologies. The design, construction, and operation of Clean Coal Technology Demonstration Projects (CCTDP) will generate data needed to make informed, confident decisions on the commercial readiness of these technologies. These data also will provide information needed to ensure a proactive response by DOE and its industrial partners to the establishment of new regulations or a reactive response to existing regulations promulgated by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The objectives of this paper are to: (1) Present a preliminary examination of the potential implications of the Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA) -- Title 3 Hazardous Air Pollutant requirements to the commercialization of CCTDP; and (2) help define options available to DOE and its industrial partners to respond to this newly enacted Legislation.

  17. The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990: Hazardous Air Pollutant Requirements and the DOE Clean Coal Technology Program

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Moskowitz, P.D.; DePhillips, M.; Fthenakis, V.M. ); Hemenway, A. )

    1991-01-01

    The purpose of the US Department of Energy -- Office of Fossil Energy (DOE FE) Clean Coal Technology Program (CCTP) is to provide the US energy marketplace with advanced, efficient, and environmentally sound coal-based technologies. The design, construction, and operation of Clean Coal Technology Demonstration Projects (CCTDP) will generate data needed to make informed, confident decisions on the commercial readiness of these technologies. These data also will provide information needed to ensure a proactive response by DOE and its industrial partners to the establishment of new regulations or a reactive response to existing regulations promulgated by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The objectives of this paper are to: (1) Present a preliminary examination of the potential implications of the Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA) -- Title 3 Hazardous Air Pollutant requirements to the commercialization of CCTDP; and (2) help define options available to DOE and its industrial partners to respond to this newly enacted Legislation.

  18. Unreasonable Cost Waivers | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Unreasonable Cost Waivers Unreasonable Cost Waivers unreasonablecost10-03-2012.pdf cnmidecision.pdf eaglepassdecision.pdf...

  19. Interaction between Titles 2 and 3 of the Clean Air Act as amended, 1990

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Szpunar, C.B.

    1996-02-01

    This report examines Some issues that would I affect the refining industry if the requirements for hazardous air pollutants set out in Title III of the Clean Air Act Amendments were to impede the market entrance of oxygenated fuels, as me; required by Title II. It describes the mandate for reformulated gasoline; considers gasoline characteristics in light of component shifts in refining; examines the supply of, demand for, and cost of various feedstocks and blendstocks; and identifies the emissions and atmospheric impacts that might result from the production and use of reformulated gasoline. Attention is focused on methanol and MTBE, two potential blendstocks that are also hazardous air pollutants, and on maximum achievable control technology standards, which might be applied to the stationary sources that produce them.

  20. Fee Waiver and Reduction Criteria | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Fee Waiver and Reduction Criteria Integrated Support Center (ISC) ISC Home About Services Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Privacy Act Advisory Exemptions How to Submit a FOIA Request Fee Waiver and Reduction Criteria Electronic Reading Room ISC Conventional Reading Rooms Reference Links Privacy Act NEPA Documents Contact Information Integrated Support Center Roxanne Purucker U.S. Department of Energy 9800 S. Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439 P: (630) 252-2110 Kenneth Tarcza U.S. Department of

  1. Clean Air Act L76(C) conformity determinations and the Department of Defense. Master`s thesis

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Fall, S.M.

    1995-09-30

    The modern Clean Air Act is the product of nearly a dozen separate Acts of Congress over the course of the last 40 years. This thesis will explore the concept of general conformity, the guidance DOD has created to assist the services in implementing general conformity, and recent conformity litigation that is likely to affect DOD`s activities now and in the future.

  2. Implications of the Clean Air Act acid rain title on industrial boilers

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Maibodi, M. )

    1991-11-01

    This paper discusses the impacts of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments related to acid rain controls, as they apply to industrial boilers. Emphasis is placed on explaining the Title IV provisions of the Amendments that permit nonutility sources to participate in the SO{sub 2} allowance system. The allowance system, as it pertains to industrial boiler operators, is described, and the opportunities for operators to trade and/or sell SO{sub 2} emission credits is discussed. The paper also reviews flue gas desulfurization system technologies available for industrial boiler operators who may choose to participate in the system. Furnace sorbent injection, advanced silicate process, lime spray drying, dry sorbent injection, and limestone scrubbing are described, including statements of their SO{sub 2} removing capability, commercial status, and costs. Capital costs, levelized costs and cost-effectiveness are presented for these technologies.

  3. Clean Air Act Title IV: Lessons learned from Phase I; getting ready for Phase II

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Miller, M.J.

    1997-12-31

    The 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments have required significant reductions in SO{sub 2} and NO{sub x} emissions from fossil fuel-fired power plants in the US. This paper examines some of the key technical lessons learned in Phase I following retrofit of low NO{sub x} systems, FGD systems, and continuous emissions monitors. Some of the key problems encountered have been waterwall wastage as a result of low NO{sub x} burner retrofits; high LOI (carbon) ash as a result of low NO{sub x} operation; high O&M costs associated with CEMs; and the heat rate discrepancy which has arisen between CEMs and conventional heat rate calculations. As Phase II approaches, EPRI and the electric utility industry are investigating improvements in FGD systems (e.g., clear liquor scrubbing), advances in NO{sub x} control technologies, more robust CEM systems, and tools to help in the technology decision-making process.

  4. Current Test Procedure Waivers | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Current Test Procedure Waivers Current Test Procedure Waivers The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) regulations for covered products permit a person to seek a waiver, or an interim waiver, from the test procedure requirements for covered appliances and commercial equipment if certain criteria are satisfied. Regulations applicable to test procedure waivers for appliances can be found at 10 CFR 430.27; those applicable to test procedure waivers for commercial equipment are at 10 CFR 431.401. This

  5. Effects of the 1990 Clean Air Act amendments on distributions of visual impairment

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Shannon, J.D.; Camp, J.; Trexler, E.C. Jr.

    1996-02-01

    The Acid Rain Provisions (Title IV) of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments (1990 CAAA) focus on emission policies designed to reduce the amount of deposition of acidifying pollutants, particularly in the Northeast. The primary strategy is a significant reduction in SO{sub 2} emissions, with lesser reductions scheduled for NO{sub {times}} emissions. However, lessening of acid deposition is not the only important benefit of the emission control strategy. Decreasing SO{sup {minus}} and NO {sup {minus}} emissions will decrease atmospheric concentrations of sulfate and nitrate particles, which account for much of the visibility reduction associated with regional haze. Although one can get a qualitative sense of how visibility might improve by examining historical large-scale trends in regional emission totals and regional visibility, quantification of the expected improvement requires model simulations. One must model the spatial and temporal patterns of emissions reductions; the relevant pollutant transport, transformation, and removal processes in the atmosphere; and the changes in particulate loading. For this initial examination of the visibility improvement at Shenandoah National Park associated the the Phase I and Phase II SO{sub 2} emission reductions, we have linked emission trend projections taken from ongoing analysis of the 1990 CAAA at Argonne National Laboratory, regional transport modeling with the Advanced Statistical Trajectory Regional Air Pollution (ASTRAP) model and visual impairment modeling with the Visibility Assessment Scoping Model (VASM).

  6. Assessing the potential visibility benefits of Clean Air Act Title IV emission reductions

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Trexler, E.C. Jr.; Shannon, J.D.

    1995-06-01

    Assessments are made of the benefits of the 1990 Clean Air Act Title IV (COVE), Phase 2, SO2 and NOX reduction provisions, to the visibility in typical eastern and western Class 1 areas. Probable bands of visibility impairment distribution curves are developed for Shenandoah National Park, Smoky Mountain National Park and the Grand Canyon National Park, based on the existing emissions, ``Base Case``, and for the COVE emission reductions, ``CAAA Case``. Emission projections for 2010 are developed with improved versions of the National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program emission projection models. Source-receptor transfer matrices created with the Advanced Statistical Trajectory Regional Air Pollution (ASTRAP) model are used with existing emission inventories and with the emission projections to calculate atmospheric concentrations of sulfate and nitrate at the receptors of interest for existing and projected emission scenarios. The Visibility Assessment Scoping Model (VASM) is then used to develop distributions of visibility impairment. VASM combines statistics of observed concentrations of particulate species and relative humidity with ASTRAP calculations of the relative changes in atmospheric sulfate and nitrate particulate concentrations in a Monte Carlo approach to produce expected distributions of hourly particulate concentrations and RH. Light extinction relationships developed in theoretical and field studies are then used to calculate the resulting distribution of visibility impairment. Successive Monte Carlo studies are carried out to develop sets of visibility impairment distributions with and without the COVE emission reductions to gain insight into the detectability of expected visibility improvements.

  7. Nationwide Categorical Waiver | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Memorandum of Decision: Withdrawal of Waiver for Fluorescent Electronic Ballasts Capable of Dimming (Expired) Nationwide Limited Public Interest Waiver for LED Lighting and HVAC ...

  8. State reactions to Title IV of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Miller, D.A.

    1995-12-01

    The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 represents a bold step in application of environmental regulation. By setting up a national free market in sulfur dioxide emission allowances, Congress has adopted the position that environmental protection and good economics are not necessarily in opposition. In fact, by carefully crafting legislation these two goals may work in aide of each other. Title IV is intended to achieve a significant reduction in the incidence of acid rain at minimal cost for the nation as a whole. On the other hand, states have traditionally had the greater responsibility for direct regulation of electric utility operations. A national free market in pollution is not welcomed by many state regulatory agencies. Some states are concerned about losing in-state markets for coal; others are unwilling to {open_quotes}import{close_quotes} pollution through the purchase of allowances. A number of states have reacted by passing regulations which limit utilities` choices in developing compliance plans. The Illinois Coal Act, for example, specifically requires two of the largest Illinois coal-fired power plants to install scrubbers and prohibits any plant from reducing its use of Illinois-mined coal by more than 10 percent per year. In December of 1993 the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois ruled, in the case of Alliance for Clean Coal v. Craig, that the Illinois Coal Act violates the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution and permanently enjoined the Illinois Commerce Commission from enforcing it. The state appealed that decision but in January of 1995 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit upheld the District Court`s opinion. This paper will show that the argument that should be of particular interest from an economics perspective. Finally, the paper will attempt to draw conclusions regarding how state regulators may legitimately integrate the trading of emission allowances into their current regulatory schemes.

  9. U.S. Department of Energy - American Recovery & Reinvestment Act |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy U.S. Department of Energy - American Recovery & Reinvestment Act U.S. Department of Energy - American Recovery & Reinvestment Act Waivers Issued by DOE under the Buy American Provisions This list includes all waivers that have been issued for the Buy American Recovery Act provisions under projects funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 and administered by the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE). All waivers are

  10. Effects of Title IV of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 on Electric Utilities: An Update, The

    Reports and Publications (EIA)

    1997-01-01

    Describes the strategies used to comply with the Acid Rain Program in 1995, the effect of compliance on SO2 emissions levels, the cost of compliance, and the effects of the program on coal supply and demand. It updates and expands the EIA report, Electric Utility Phase I Acid Rain Compliance Strategies for the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990.

  11. The 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments and the Great Lakes economy: Challenges and opportunities

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Hanson, D.; Molburg, J.; Pandola, G.; Taxon, T.; Lurie, G.; Fisher, R.; Boyd, G. ); Fox, J. )

    1991-01-01

    This paper deals with the market for SO{sub 2} emission allowances over time and electric utility compliance choices. For currently high emitting plants ( > 2.5 lb SO{sub 2}/MMBtu), the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA) provide for about twice as many SO{sub 2} allowances to be issued per year in Phase 1 (1995--1999) than in Phase 2. Also, considering the scrubber incentives in Phase 1, there is likely to be substantial emission banking for use in Phase 2. Allowance prices are expected to increase over time at a rate less than the return on alternative investments, so utilities which are risk neutral or other potential speculators in the allowance market are not expected to bank allowances. The allowances will be banked by risk averse utilities or the utilities may buy forward contracts for SO{sub 2} allowances. However, speculators may play an important role by selling forward contracts for SO{sub 2} allowances to the risk averse utilities. The Argonne Utility Simulation Model (ARGUS) is being revised to incorporate the provisions of the CAAA acid rain title and to simulate SO{sub 2} allowance prices, compliance choices, capacity expansion, system dispatch, fuel use, and emissions. The revised model (ARGUS2) incorporates unit-level performance data and can incorporate unit-specific compliance decisions when these are known. The model has been designed for convenience in analyzing alternatives scenarios (demand growth rates, technology mix, economic parameters, etc). 1 ref., 5 figs.

  12. Accident prevention and Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 with particular reference to anhydrous hydrogen fluoride

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kaiser, G.D. (Science Applications International Corp., McLean, VA (United States))

    1993-07-01

    The sections of the Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA) of 1990 that refer to accident prevention are to be found in Title III. Two significant requirements of the CAAA in this respect relate to the responsibilities of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), which has promulgated a new Process Safety Management (PSM) standard and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which at the time of writing, is developing Risk Management Program (RMP) regulations. The focus of this paper is on how the requirements of the CAAA may affect the reasons for performing a Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) or may affect the results of QRA. In order to limit the discussion, this paper focuses on HF. First, the CAAA requires that the EPA assess the hazards associated with HF; the EPA's current draft report is discussed. Second, a generic assessment of the risks associated with the use of HF is given, with emphasis on alkylation units in refineries. The principal contributors to risk are listed. Finally, an assessment of OSHA's PSM standard 29 CFR 1910.119, the related requirements of state laws such as California's Risk Management and Prevention Program and the potential requirement of EPA's Risk Management Program are given, including an assessment of how these requirements may influence quantitative estimates of risk. 13 refs., 1 fig.

  13. A review of the accidental release analysis procedure for the Clean Air Act Section 112(r)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Sung, H.M.; Liles, R. [Trinity Consultants, Inc., Dallas, TX (United States)

    1995-12-31

    As a result of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendment, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is in the process of developing a chemical accident prevention program, which is covered under Section 112(r)(7). The EPA finalized the threshold quantities for the compounds listed in the 112(r)(7)(A) in January 1994. The proposed risk management program (RMP), 112(r)(7)(B), received over 1,000 comments from industries and the general public. The RMP rule proposed by the EPA is fundamentally based on the Process Safety Management (PSM) standard implemented by the Occupational Safety Health Administration (OSHA). The PSM was promulgated in May 1992. Many of the facilities subject to the OSHA PSM standard have developed certain programs to comply with the rule. The major difference between the EPA RMP and the OSHA PSM is the off-site hazard risk assessment (consequence analysis) required by EPA. As a result of this additional requirement, most of the comments received by the EPA for the proposed RMP rule concern the worst case release scenario defined for the hazard risk assessment, which may have a significant impact on the operations and future planning for all the facilities subject to this rule. This paper reviews major concerns involved in the consequence analysis of accidental releases. Several well-established models are reviewed in terms of their applicability for different release scenarios.

  14. Closing_Language_Patent_Waiver_Grant_Cases.pdf | Department of...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    ClosingLanguagePatentWaiverGrantCases.pdf More Documents & Publications Identified Patent Waiver W(I)2009-004 Identified Patent Waiver W(I)2010-004 Advance Patent Waiver...

  15. NSRCC(A)WAIVER.pdf | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    NSRCC(A)WAIVER.pdf NSRCC(A)WAIVER.pdf (428.57 KB) More Documents & Publications Class Patent Waiver W(C)2008-004 NSRC_MOU.pdf Class_Waiver_NPUA-2.pdf

  16. State air pollution permit program under subchapter 5 of the Clean Air Act as of August 8, 1995. Master`s thesis

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Smith, J.M.

    1995-05-01

    The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 imposed the requirement for a comprehensive set of state air pollution permit programs on a nationwide basis for the first time. Prior to the passage of this law, there were about thirty-five state permit programs, and they were not subject to Federal supervision. During the debate in the House of Representives it was stated that the purpose of the permit program was to clarify and make more enforceable a source`s pollution control requirements. In addition, the Congress wanted to encourage public involvement in the process so that interested citizens will be able to review and help enforce a source`s obligations under the Act.

  17. Interactions between energy efficiency and emission trading under the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Hillsman, E.L.; Alvic, D.R.

    1994-08-01

    The 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments affect electric utilities in numerous ways. The feature that probably has received the greatest attention is the provision to let utilities trade emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO{sub 2}), while at the same time requiring them to reduce S0{sub 2} emissions in 2000 by an aggregate 43%. The emission trading system was welcomed by many as a way of reducing the cost of reducing emissions, by providing greater flexibility than past approaches. This report examines some of the potential interactions between trading emissions and increasing end-use energy efficiency. The analysis focuses on emission trading in the second phase of the trading program, which begins in 2000. The aggregate effects, calculated by an emission compliance and trading model, turn out to be rather small. Aggressive improvement of end-use efficiency by all utilities might reduce allowance prices by $22/ton (1990 dollars), which is small compared to the reduction that has occurred in the estimates of future allowance prices and when compared to the roughly $400/ton price we estimate as a base case. However, the changes in the allowance market that result are large enough to affect some compliance decisions. If utilities in only a few states improve end-use efficiency aggressively, their actions may not have a large effect on the price of an allowance, but they could alter the demand for allowances and thereby the compliance decisions of utilities in other states. The analysis shows how improving electricity end-use efficiency in some states can cause smaller emission reductions in other states, relative to what would have happened without the improvements. Such a result, while not surprising given the theory behind the emission trading system, is upsetting to people who view emissions, environmental protection, and energy efficiency in moral rather than strictly economic terms.

  18. Accidental release prevention requirement: Risk management programs under Clean Air Act section 112(r)(7)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Hahn, J. [Integrated Waste Services Association, Fairfield, NJ (United States)

    1997-12-01

    The Occupational Safety and Health Administration promulgates and enforces regulations that govern the health and safety of workers. OSHA rules often are considered to govern what happens {open_quotes}inside the fence line,{close_quotes} or within the physical boundaries of the facility. In some ways, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency takes over where OSHA leaves off. The U.S. EPA is responsible for environmental programs {open_quotes}outside the fence line.{close_quotes} The concept is as simple as drawing a line, or is it? Anyone developing and implementing compliance programs, whether for OSHA or EPA, will tell you nothing is that simple. EPA`s recent promulgation of rules pertaining to risk management programs is a case in point. A new EPA rule is intended to compliment OSHA requirements under the Process Safety Management (PSM) rule. Under the OSHA rule, plant operators developed programs that ensure safe measures are in use when handling certain chemicals. During the past three years, waste-to-energy facilities faced difficult decisions when complying with the PSM requirements. Earlier this year, the US EPA promulgated its 112(r)(7) rule that is intended to `complement` OSHA`s PSM requirements. This is not always the case. Unfortunately, these new Clean Air Act requirements do not always complement, but may instead confuse plant operators. For example, EPA`s 112(r) rule may force plant operators to change, once again, their decisions on the use of selected chemicals. The US EPA estimates that approximately 66,000 facilities, including the 114 waste-to-energy facilities nationwide, may be affected by the list and risk management planning rules. The facilities include chemical and many other manufacturers, cold storage facilities with ammonia refrigeration systems, public water treatment systems, wholesalers and distributors of these chemicals, propane retailers, utilities, and federal facilities.

  19. Allowance trading under the Clean Air Act: Who should regulate, and when?

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Lock, R.

    1993-07-01

    The goal of this paper is to explore how compliance with the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA), especially Title IV and emission trading under it, will affect the current relationship between state and federal regulation. It is difficult, with the limited experience we have had under Title IV, to be definitive about or to be a very strong advocate of too many policy positions. What may be most helpful at this point is to identify where the difficult issues in state/federal relations might arise; and then to explore ways in which tensions might be either avoided or resolved. One anticipated conclusion is that a traditional regulatory mindset could be very destructive if applied to this new area of oversight without due sensitivity to what Congress is trying to achieve in Title IV. That concern pervaded the early legislative debates; and it persists today. Title IV presents some unique challenges to state regulators and will require some creative solutions and fresh thinking if the goals of Congress are to be realized and the full benefits that allowance trading can offer are to be reaped by electricity consumers. In the ultimate analysis, Title IV amounts to a massive internalization of the external costs imposed on society by acid rain deposition. (This places in serious question the notion of additional externality {open_quotes}adders{close_quotes} for sulfur dioxide (SO{sub 2}) and nitrous oxide (NO{sub x}) at the state level for utility supply planning purposes.) The whole point of Title IV is to give those directly charged with compliance, namely power producers, the maximum flexibility to pursue least-cost compliance solutions. Perhaps the biggest single factor in how well they do this will be how state regulators respond to their compliance and allowance trading initiatives.

  20. A COMPARISON OF DOSE RESULTS FROM THE CLEAN AIR ACT ASSESSMENT...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    EPA-approved computer software packages, including CAP88-PC, are used by Department of Energy sites to demonstrate compliance with the radionuclide air emission standard under the ...

  1. Overview of the effect of Title III of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments on the natural gas industry

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Child, C.J.

    1995-12-31

    The regulation of hazardous air pollutants by Title III of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 has a potential wide-ranging impact for the natural gas industry. Title III includes a list of 189 hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) which are targeted for reduction. Under Title III, HAP emissions from major sources will be reduced by the implementation of maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standards. If the source is defined as a major source, it must also comply with Title V (operating permit) and Title VII (enhanced monitoring) requirements. This presentation will review Title III`s effect on the natural gas industry by discussing the regulatory requirements and schedules associated with MACT as well as the control technology options available for affected sources.

  2. Title III List of Lists: Consolidated list of chemicals subject to the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) and Section 112(r) of the Clean Air Act, as amended. Title III of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986, and Title III of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1996-12-01

    This consolidated chemical list includes chemicals subject to reporting requirements under Title III of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA), also known as the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) and chemicals listed under Section 112(r) of Title III of the Clean Air Act (CAA) Amendments of 1990. This consolidated list has been prepared to help firms handling chemicals determine whether they need to submit reports under sections 302, 304, or 314 or SARA Title III (EPCRA) and, for a specific chemical, what reports may need to be submitted. It also will also help firms determine whether they will be subject to accident prevention regulations under CAA section 112(r).

  3. Nationwide Limited Public Interest Waiver for LED and HVAC Units |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy Limited Public Interest Waiver for LED and HVAC Units Nationwide Limited Public Interest Waiver for LED and HVAC Units eere_nationwide_public_interest_waiver (55.98 KB) More Documents & Publications Nationwide Nonavailability Waiver: February 11, 2010 (Please note, the waiver for LED traffic signals has been withdrawn effective December 1, 2010) Nationwide Nonavailability Waiver: November 5, 2010 Amended Nationwide Nonavailability Waiver: November 5

  4. Petition for Advance Waiver of Patent Rights | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Advance Waiver of Patent Rights Petition for Advance Waiver of Patent Rights This the DOE form to petition for advance waiver of DOE patent rights under regulation 10 C.F.R. PART 784. Advance Waiver Petition 07-27-2016 (39.09 KB) More Documents & Publications Petition for Advance Waiver of Patent Rights Under 10 CFR Part 784 Format-PetForAdvanceWaivers.pdf Petition for Identified Waiver of Patent Rights

  5. Petition for Identified Waiver of Patent Rights | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Identified Waiver of Patent Rights Petition for Identified Waiver of Patent Rights This the DOE form to petition for an identified waiver of DOE patent rights under regulation 10 C.F.R. PART 784. Identified Waiver Petition (24.59 KB) More Documents & Publications Petition for Advance Waiver of Patent Rights Under 10 CFR Part 784 Identified Patent Waiver W(I)2009-001 Identified Patent Waiver W(I)2008-005

  6. Enforcement Policy on the Application of Waivers and on the Waiver Process

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    | Department of Energy Policy on the Application of Waivers and on the Waiver Process Enforcement Policy on the Application of Waivers and on the Waiver Process December 23, 2010 In response to questions from manufacturers, on November 30, 2010, the Department of Energy sought views on the implementation of recently granted waivers establishing an alternative test procedure for large-capacity clothes washers. After reviewing the comments, relevant provisions of the Energy Policy and

  7. Advanced Patent Waivers | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    ... April 10, 2013 Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2013-013 This is a request by BABCOCK & WILCOX mPOWER for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-NE0000583. ...

  8. Identified Patent Waivers | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    W(I)2012-014 This is a request by CERAMATEC, INC. for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FE0000408. November 25, 2013 Identified Patent Waiver W(...

  9. Title III list of lists: Consolidated list of chemicals subject to the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) and section 112(r) of the Clean Air Act, as amended. Title III of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986, and Title III of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1994-06-01

    The consolidated chemical list includes chemicals subject to reporting requirements under Title III of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA), also known as the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA), and chemicals listed under section 112(r) of Title III the Clean Air Act (CAA) Amendments of 1990. This consolidated list has been prepared to help firms handling chemicals determine whether they need to submit reports under sections 302, 304, or 313 of SARA Title III (EPCRA) and, for a specific chemical, what reports may need to be submitted. Separate lists are also provided of Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) waste streams and unlisted hazardous wastes, and of radionuclides reportable under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA). These lists should be used as reference tool, not as a definitive source of compliance information. The chemicals on the consolidated list are ordered by Chemical Abstract Service (CAS) registry number. Categories of chemicals, which do not have CAS registry numbers, but which are cited under CERCLA, EPCRA section 313, and the CAA, are placed at the end of the list. More than one chemical name may be listed for one CAS number, because the same chemical may appear on different lists under different names.

  10. Federal operating permits program under Title V of the Clean Air Act. Final report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1996-08-01

    ;Table of Contents: Introduction; Transition Between Parts 70 and 71; Title V Obligations and Applicability; Synthetic Minors, Potential to Emit, and Transition Policy; Permit Application Step and Content; Flexible Permit Approaches; Hazardous Air Pollution Program Requirements for Title V; Information Sources; Appendix A. EPA Memoranda; and Appendix B. Seminar Overhead Transparencies.

  11. Alternative compliance strategy for title 3 of the 1990 Clean Air Act amendments. Master`s thesis

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Brothers, H.S.

    1995-11-01

    This dissertation presents the development of an alternate compliance strategy (ACS) incorporating pollution prevention and flexibility to replace traditional end-of-pipe control strategy. The ACS was based on the Hazardous Organic National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (HON) rule which is the first major Title 3 regulation promulgated under the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA). The ACS is defined by converting language in the HON rule into a performance based standard permitting regulated facilities to design compliance programs to meet the required hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emission reduction. Three evaluation methods are developed to compare the ACS to the compliance methods in the HON rule. The methods include a qualitative Evaluation Matrix, an economic analysis, and a Risk Reduction Measurement Model. An example facility was characterized using information from engineering references and a Dow Chemical ethylene oxide, ethylene glycol plant. The ACS and the reference control technology (RCT) compliance programs were applied to the example facility and the ACS reduced HAP emissions to a greater extent. The three evaluation methods were used to compare the compliance programs developed for the example facility and all three demonstrated the ACS to be a favorable compliance alternative. The ACS should be incorporated into the HON rule and other similar 1990 CAAA regulations as an alternative method of compliance. The ACS provides a major step in the progression of moving regulations from the traditional end-of-pipe treatment philosophy to pollution prevention performance based standards. (AN).

  12. {open_quotes}Methods for the determination of the Clean Air Act Title III metallic HAPS in coal

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Snider, J.

    1995-08-01

    The Clean Air Act was amended in 1990 and additional requirements were added to Title III {open_quotes}Air Toxics.{close_quotes} Title III identified one hundred eighty-nine hazardous air pollutants (HAPS) and Congress directed the EPA to study the effects of emissions of these HAPS on public health and the environment. EPA is to report to Congress in the fall of 1995 concerning their findings and make recommendations regarding fossil fuel fired combustion units. The outcome of the EPA recommendations will be of great interest to coal producers and users. Of the one hundred eighty-nine listed HAPS, eleven are trace metals found in coal. The producers and users may be required to analyze coal for these HAPS, to determine if selective mining and/or beneficiation can lower their occurrence, to determine their fate in the combustion process, etc. Indeed many coal companies have begun to study their reserves to aid the EPA investigation. Currently there are no EPA promulgated test methodologies for these elements in coal. Moreover, the American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) does not provide standards for the analyses of all of the eleven HAPS either. In view of this lack of standardized analytical protocols the commercial laboratory is left with finding the best methods for meeting these analytical needs. This paper describes how Standard Laboratories, Inc. as a whole and particularly its Environmental Laboratory Division has met this need.

  13. ClassWaiver-PUA.pdf | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    ClassWaiver-PUA.pdf ClassWaiver-PUA.pdf More Documents & Publications ClassWaiverNPUA-2.pdf EXHIBIT A: CRADA, WFO, PUA and NPUA Comparison Table, with suggested...

  14. Compliance with the Clean Air Act Amendments: Challenge of the 90's

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Odegard, G.J.; Van, H. )

    1993-01-01

    With its 17,593 miles of pipeline, El Paso Natural Gas Company is one of the country's largest interstate natural gas transmission companies. To keep the gas continually moving through the pipeline, it is compressed back to high pressures at 73 stations comprising 1,210,120 horsepower located along the pipeline route. These compressor stations, which operate 24 hours a day every day, house 316 reciprocating engines and 92 gas turbines. As fuel, these engines and turbines burn natural gas. Natural gas combustion releases emissions of nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide with small amounts of particulates, sulfur dioxide and volatile organic compounds. This presentation will describe how one large energy company plans to comply with these new requirements over the next several years. El Paso has developed an extensive Air Program designed to obtain all needed operating permits by the November 1995 deadline. Work is underway to quantify and document emissions at every operating facility. Emissions tests will measure NOx, CO, oxygen, CO[sub 2], water, stack temperature, stack velocity and fuel flow rate. Data generated by the Emissions Inventory System will be used not only for permit applications, but to develop alternative emission reduction strategies at facilities located in nonattainment areas. Dispersion modeling will be performed to analyze compliance with PSD increments and National Ambient Air Quality Standards.

  15. (Expired) Nationwide Limited Public Interest Waiver for LED Lighting...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    (Expired) Nationwide Limited Public Interest Waiver for LED Lighting and HVAC Units: February 11, 2010 (Expired) Nationwide Limited Public Interest Waiver for LED Lighting and HVAC ...

  16. MemoAdvisoryAssistanceContractWaiver.pdf | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    MemoAdvisoryAssistanceContractWaiver.pdf More Documents & Publications ClosingLanguagePatentWaiverGrantCases.pdf UnSecMemoProjectManagementExpectationsFinancialAssistance23...

  17. Class Patent Waiver W(C)2011-009

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by WFO Class Waiver for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement N/A.

  18. DOE Issues Enforcement Guidance on Large-Capacity Clothes Washer Waivers and the Waiver Process

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Today, the Department of Energy issued enforcement guidance on the application of recently granted waivers for large-capacity clothes washers and announced steps to improve the waiver process – and...

  19. The effects of Title IV of the Clean Air Act amendments of 1990 on electric utilities: An update

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1997-03-01

    This report presents data and analyses related to Phase I implementation of the Clean Air Act Amendment by electric utilities. It describes the strategies used to comply with the Acid Rain Program in 1995, the effect of compliance on sulfur dioxide emissions levels, the cost of compliance, and the effects of the program on coal supply and demand. The first year of Phase I demonstrated that the market-based sulfur dioxide emissions control system could achieve significant reductions in emissions at lower than expected costs. Some utilities reduced aggregate emissions below legal requirements due to economic incentives; other utilities purchased additional allowances to avoid noncompliance. More than half of the utilities switched to or blended with lower sulfur coal, due to price reductions in the coal market which were partially due to the allowance trading program. 21 figs., 20 tabs.

  20. Pollution prevention incentives and disincentives created by the Clean Air Act

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Webb, C.F.; Wolffe, G.S.

    1998-12-31

    Environmental laws and regulations have not always been implemented in a manner which allows the consideration of pollution prevention alternatives as a means of achieving progress toward air quality goals. Recently EPA has been making strides to re-interpret laws and regulations to be more flexible and encourage pollution prevention projects which do not involve end-of-the-pipe controls. For instance when conducting control technology evaluations such as Best Available Control Technology (BACT) and Lowest Achievable Emission Rate (LAER), facilities can and should take into consideration P2 options which accomplish the same emission reduction goals as traditional end-of-the-pipe controls. There are also new emissions trading provisions building on those allowed in the acid rain and offset trading programs which promise to make P2 projects much more cost effective. Several traditional command and control programs of the CAA also promote P2 projects. For instance emission reductions realized through P2 projects show managers a direct cost savings due to reductions in Title V Facility annual emissions fees and possibly a direct cost benefit through sale of emission credits. Furthermore, the CAA encourages P2 indirectly through the detailed understanding of processes gained from emissions inventories and Risk Management Plans. However, many CAA prescriptive programs create disincentives for industry to select pollution prevention alternatives. This paper will discuss incentives and disincentives for using P2 alternatives to comply with the CAA and discuss some of the recent changes designed to encourage P2.

  1. Stratospheric ozone protection: The Montreal Protocol and Title VI of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Babst, C.R. III

    1993-08-01

    The stratospheric ozone layer protects the surface of the Earth from harmful ultraviolet (UV-B) radiation, which has been causally linked to skin cancer and cataracts, suppression of the human immune system, damage to crops and aquatic organisms, the formation of ground-level zone and the rapid weathering of outdoor plastics. In recent years, scientists have observed a significant deterioration of the ozone layer, particularly over the poles, but increasingly over populated regions as well. This deterioration has been attributed to the atmospheric release of certain man-made halocarbons, including chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), halons, methyl chloroform and carbon tetrachloride. Once used extensively as propellants for aerosol sprays (but generally banned for such purposes since 1978), CFCs are widely used today as refrigerants, foams and solvents. All of these chlorinated (CFC, methyl chloroform and carbon tetrachloride) and brominated (halon) compounds are classified for regulatory purposes as Class I substances because of their significant ozone-depleting potential. Hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), developed as alternatives to CFCs and halons for many different applications, have been classified for regulatory purposes as Class II substances because of their relatively less destructive impact on stratospheric ozone. This paper describes the following regulations to reduce destruction of the ozone layer: the Montreal Protocol; Title VI of the Clean air Act Amendments of 1990; Accelerated Phase-out schedules developed by the countries which signed the Montreal Protocol; Use restrictions; Recycling and Emission reduction requirements; Servicing of motor vehicle air conditions; ban on nonessential products; labeling requirements; safe alternatives. 6 refs.

  2. Major sources to waivers - lessons learned and $ saved at two U.S. Navy facilities

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Klitsch, M.

    1997-12-31

    Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock Division (NSWCCD) manages 17 US Navy research and development (R and D) facilities across the country. These include two facilities in Maryland -- one in Annapolis and the other in West Bethesda which is better known as Carderock. NO{sub x} is the only air emission which exceeds a threshold limit at both properties. The potential to emit NO{sub x} is 72 tpy for Annapolis and 51 tpy for Carderock. The facilities are in different counties but each county has a trigger limit for NO{sub x} of 25 tpy making both facilities major sources. In preparation for the Title V permit applications to the state of Maryland, Carderock budgeted $150,000 in fiscal year 1996 to have a contractor conduct air emission inventories and prepare the Title V permits for both Carderock and Annapolis. However, the Carderock Air Program Manager did not pursue a contractor to perform the work but personally conducted the air emission inventory for both Annapolis and Carderock. Noticing a large difference between the potential-to-emit and the actual emissions of NO{sub x}, the Air Program Manager began negotiations with the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) to waive the requirement for the Title V permit application. MDE responded in December 1996 that if the facility`s actual emissions would not exceed 50% of any of the threshold limits during any 12 month period, then a letter of understanding stating such should be submitted to MDE. This letter of understanding would be recognized by the US EPA and MDE and would act as a waiver to the Title V permit applicability up to July 31, 1998. Carderock and Annapolis meet this requirement and letters of understanding were drafted and sent to MDE in January 1997.

  3. Separation Programs Releases and Waivers | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Separation Programs Releases and Waivers Separation Programs Releases and Waivers Attachment 7 - Separation Programs Releases and Waivers (138.06 KB) More Documents & Publications Self-Select Voluntary Separation Plan Template Workforce Restructuring Policy Involuntary Separation Program General Release and Waiver

  4. Involuntary Separation Program General Release and Waiver | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy Program General Release and Waiver Involuntary Separation Program General Release and Waiver Attachment 9 - Involuntary Separation Program General Release and Waiver (31.07 KB) More Documents & Publications Separation Programs Releases and Waivers Workforce Restructuring Policy AFGE Local 928

  5. Human health benefits of ambient sulfate aerosol reductions under Title IV of the 1990 Clean Air Act amendments

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Chestnut, L.G.; Watkins, A.M.

    1997-12-31

    The Acid Rain Provisions (Title IV) of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 call for about a 10 million ton reduction in annual SO{sub 2} emissions in the United States by the year 2010. Although the provisions apply nationwide, most of the reduction will take place in the eastern half of the United States, where use of high sulfur coal for electricity generation is most common. One potentially large benefit of Title IV is the expected reduction in adverse human health effects associated with exposure to ambient sulfate aerosols, a secondary pollutant formed in the atmosphere when SO{sub 2} is present. Sulfate aerosols are a significant constituent of fine particulate (PM{sub 2.5}). This paper combines available epidemiologic evidence of health effects associated with sulfate aerosols and economic estimates of willingness to pay for reductions in risks or incidence of health effects with available estimates of the difference between expected ambient sulfate concentrations in the eastern United States and southeastern Canada with and without Title IV to estimate the expected health benefits of Title IV. The results suggest a mean annual benefit in the eastern United States of $10.6 billion (in 1994 dollars) in 1997 and $40.0 billion in 2010, with an additional $1 billion benefit each year in Ontario and Quebec provinces.

  6. Patent Waivers Approved Before 2003 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Patent Waivers Approved Before 2003 Patent Waivers Approved Before 2003 This document lists all approved DOE patent waivers by class for 2002 and before. If you wish to obtain a copy of any of the patent waivers listed on this document please contact the Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Technology Transfer & Intellectual Property at GC-62@hq.doe.gov or (202)-586-2813. Pre-2003 Patent Waivers Information Sheet (217.83 KB) More Documents & Publications

  7. Class Patent Waivers | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    July 8, 2013 Class Patent Waiver W(C)2012-007 This is a request by SOLID-STATE LIGHTING ... March 1, 2013 Class Patent Waiver W(C)2012-006 This is a request by LBNL DESIGN FORWARD ...

  8. III. Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    82 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 241 / Friday, December 14, 2012 / Rules and Regulations technical errors in § 447.400(a) and § 447.405 listed on page 66701. One correction ensures consistency between two sentences in the same paragraph and the other restores text inadvertently omitted from the final rule that had been included in the May 11, 2012 notice of proposed rulemaking (77 FR 27671) on pages 26789-90. Thus, we are correcting page 66701 to reflect the correct information. III. Waiver

  9. Test Procedure Waivers | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Appliance & Equipment Standards » Rulemakings & Notices » Test Procedure Waivers Test Procedure Waivers Products covered by standards change as manufacturers add new features to their products and update designs in order to compete for consumers. Innovation and product development occasionally causes products to change in ways that either (1) make the results of a test procedure unrepresentative of actual energy use or efficiency, or (2) make it impossible to test in accordance with

  10. Involuntary Separation Program General Release and Waiver

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Involuntary Separation Program General Release and Waiver This Involuntary Separation Program General Release and Waiver ("Release") is entered into by and between ______________________ ("Employee") and _________ ("Employer") in connection with the Employer's determination that the Employee is being laid off from employment by ________. IN EXCHANGE FOR THE PROMISES SET FORTH BELOW, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Valuable Consideration: In exchange for Employee

  11. Class_Waiver_NPUA-2.pdf | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    NPUA-2.pdf ClassWaiverNPUA-2.pdf ClassWaiverNPUA-2.pdf More Documents & Publications EXHIBIT A: CRADA, WFO, PUA and NPUA Comparison Table, with suggested changes...

  12. STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS CLASS WAIVER OF THE GOVERNMENT'S

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    AT DESIGNATED NON-PROPRIETARY USER FACILITIES: DOE WAIVER NO. W(C)-2008-003. This Class Waiver is intended to provide for the disposition of intellectual property rights and...

  13. Waiver of Preferential Right to Lease Highway Right of Way |...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    Waiver of Preferential Right to Lease Highway Right of Way Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Reference: Waiver of Preferential Right to Lease...

  14. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Federal Energy Management Program Technical Assistance Project 224 Altus Air Force Base Solar Technologies

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Russo, Bryan J.

    2010-09-30

    The principal goal of this project was to evaluate altus Air Force Base for building integrated silicon or thin film module photovoltaic opportunities. This report documents PNNL's efforts and documents study conclusions.

  15. Evaluation of vost and semivost methods for halogenated compounds in the Clean Air Act amendments title III. Validation study at fossil fuel plant

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Jackson, M.D.; Knoll, J.E.; Midgett, M.R.; McGaughey, J.F.; Bursey, J.T.

    1993-01-01

    The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA), Title III, present a need for stationary source sampling and analytical methods for the list of 189 toxic air pollutants. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has used VOST and SemiVOST sampling and analytical methods for a wide variety of volatile and semivolatile organic compounds in the past, but these methodologies have been completely validated for only a few of the organic compounds. The applicability of VOST and SemiVOST techniques to the halogenated organic compounds listed in Title III of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 has been evaluated under laboratory conditions for chromatographic separation, mass spectrometric response, sorbent recovery and analytical method detection limit. Dynamic spiking techniques for the sampling trains (both gaseous and liquid dynamic spiking) were also evaluated in the laboratory. In the study, the VOST and SemiVOST methods were evaluated in the field at a fossil fuel power plant. The source was selected to provide actual stationary source emissions with the compounds of interest present in trace amounts or not present. The paper presents the results of the field validation of the VOST and SemiVOST sampling and analytical methods.

  16. Impending impacts of Title III and Title V of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 on the coal industry

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kerch, R.L.

    1994-12-31

    The coal industry has already begun to feel the affects of the acid deposition title, particularly in Illinois. Two challenges to the producers and sellers of coal; i.e., (1) Title III, Hazardous Air Pollutants and what is in store for customers, and (2) Title V, Operating Permits, which may affect production facilities are discussed. The utilities are temporarily exempted from Title III. The Great Waters report suggests that mercury will be regulated, and it looks like risk assessments will be based on coal analysis rather than on actual emission measurements. Stack sampling is difficult, expensive and slow. Coal cleaning is important in reducing trace elements. Electrostatic precipitators also remove trace elements. ESPs are less effective for mercury and selenium because they are emitted in the gas phase. FGD can remove hazardous air pollutants, but it is not well documented.

  17. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2002-023 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    2-023 Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2002-023 Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2002-023 (1.52 MB) More Documents & Publications Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2006-028 WA05056IBMWATSONRESEARCH...

  18. Class_Waiver_W_C-2003-001.pdf | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ClassWaiverWC-2003-001.pdf ClassWaiverWC-2003-001.pdf (194.4 KB) More Documents & Publications ClassWaiverWC-2004-005.pdf WC2003001CLASSWAIVEROFPATENTRIGHTSFORTEC...

  19. Class_Waiver_W_C-2002-003.pdf | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    ClassWaiverWC-2002-003.pdf ClassWaiverWC-2002-003.pdf PDF icon ClassWaiverWC-2002-003.pdf More Documents & Publications WC2002003CLASSWAIVEROFTHEGOVERNMENTSUSAND...

  20. Analysis of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990: A forecast of the electric utility industry response to Title IV, Acid Deposition Control

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Molburg, J.C.; Fox, J.A.; Pandola, G.; Cilek, C.M.

    1991-10-01

    The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 incorporate, for the first time, provisions aimed specifically at the control of acid rain. These provisions restrict emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO[sub 2]) and oxides of nitrogen (NO[sub x]) from electric power generating stations. The restrictions on SO[sub 2] take the form of an overall cap on the aggregate emissions from major generating plants, allowing substantial flexibility in the industry's response to those restrictions. This report discusses one response scenario through the year 2030 that was examined through a simulation of the utility industry based on assumptions consistent with characterizations used in the National Energy Strategy reference case. It also makes projections of emissions that would result from the use of existing and new capacity and of the associated additional costs of meeting demand subject to the emission limitations imposed by the Clean Air Act. Fuel-use effects, including coal-market shifts, consistent with the response scenario are also described. These results, while dependent on specific assumptions for this scenario, provide insight into the general character of the likely utility industry response to Title IV.

  1. Analysis of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990: A forecast of the electric utility industry response to Title IV, Acid Deposition Control

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Molburg, J.C.; Fox, J.A.; Pandola, G.; Cilek, C.M.

    1991-10-01

    The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 incorporate, for the first time, provisions aimed specifically at the control of acid rain. These provisions restrict emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO{sub 2}) and oxides of nitrogen (NO{sub x}) from electric power generating stations. The restrictions on SO{sub 2} take the form of an overall cap on the aggregate emissions from major generating plants, allowing substantial flexibility in the industry`s response to those restrictions. This report discusses one response scenario through the year 2030 that was examined through a simulation of the utility industry based on assumptions consistent with characterizations used in the National Energy Strategy reference case. It also makes projections of emissions that would result from the use of existing and new capacity and of the associated additional costs of meeting demand subject to the emission limitations imposed by the Clean Air Act. Fuel-use effects, including coal-market shifts, consistent with the response scenario are also described. These results, while dependent on specific assumptions for this scenario, provide insight into the general character of the likely utility industry response to Title IV.

  2. Criminal provisions of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 and their interface with the United States sentencing guidelines. Master's thesis

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Bowen, W.P.

    1991-09-30

    The growing severity of our societal response to environmental misconduct is reflected, in part, by the criminalization of environmental wrongs by both state and Federal governments. Indeed, the recently enacted Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 continue this trend, giving the Environmental Protection Agency, via the Department of Justice, significant new criminal enforcement tools. The importance attached to law enforcement of environmental laws is a relatively recent phenomenon and took a significant upswing in 1982 when the department of Justice created what is today the Environmental Crimes Section in what is now the Environment and Natural Resources Division, which section has grown steadily and now has over 25 attorneys who prosecute or assist in the prosecution of environmental crimes in the U.S.

  3. Examination of utility Phase 1 compliance choices and state reactions to Title IV of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Bailey, K.A.; Elliott, T.J.; Carlson, L.J.; South, D.W.

    1993-11-01

    Title IV (acid rain) of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 is imposing new limitations on the emission of sulfur dioxide (SO{sub 2}) and nitrogen oxides (N{sub x}) from electric power plants. The act requires utilities to develop compliance plans to reduce these emissions, and indications are that these plans will dramatically alter traditional operating procedures. A key provision of the SO{sub 2} control program deaned in Title IV is the creation of a system of emission allowances, with utilities having the option of complying by adjusting system emissions and allowance holdings. A compilation of SO{sub 2} compliance activities by the 110 utility plants affected by Phase I is summarized in this report. These compliance plans are presented in a tabular form, correlated with age, capacity, and power pool data. A large number of the Phase I units (46%) have chosen to blend or switch to lower sulfur coals. This choice primarily is in response to (1) prices of low-sulfur coal and (2) the need to maintain SO{sub 2} control flexibility because of uncertain future environmental regulations (e.g., air toxics, carbon dioxide) and compliance prices. The report also discusses the responses of state legislatures and public utility commissions to the compliance requirements in Title IV. Most states have taken negligible action regarding the regulatory treatment of allowances and compliance activities. To protect mine employment, states producing high-sulfur coal have enacted regulations encouraging continued use of that coal, but for the most part, this response has had little effect on utility compliance choices.

  4. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2011-026

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by US SYNTHETIC CORPORATION for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0003633.

  5. Class Patent Waiver W(C)2010-005

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by REGIONAL INNOVATIVE CLUSTER INITIATIVE for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement E-RIC FOA

  6. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2008-015

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by BP SOLAR LTD. for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC36-GO17049

  7. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-021

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by USEC, INC. for a DOE Advance patent waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-NE0000488.

  8. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-024

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by SIEMENS ENERGY, INC. for a DOE Advance patent waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0005493.

  9. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2011-029

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This is a request by W. R. GRACE COMPANY for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FOA-0000324.

  10. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2013-007

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This is a request by CA TCHLIGHT ENERGY, LLC for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0005974.

  11. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2007-015

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC26-07NT43055

  12. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2008-005

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORPORATION for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC26-07NT43243

  13. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2008-043

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORPORATION for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC26-07NT43240

  14. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2005-027

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC07-05ID14636.

  15. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2011-046

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by ALSTOM GRID INC. for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-OE0000551.

  16. IIdentified Patent Waiver W(I)2008-003

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by NORMANN, RANDY A. for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-AC04-94AL85000

  17. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2008-033

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This is a request by Whitefox Technologies, Limited for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC26-07NT43090

  18. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2011-040

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by SYPRIS ELECTRONICS for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-OE0000543.

  19. Class Patent Waiver W(C)2009-016

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This is a request by GEOTHERMAL TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FOA-00000109

  20. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2011-058

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0005143.

  1. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2010-048

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by ROBERT BOSCH, LLC for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC26-07NT43274

  2. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2009-063

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by CREE, INC for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC26-08NT01577

  3. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2011-025

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by CREE, INC. for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0003246.

  4. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2006-026

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by CREE, INC for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC26-06NT42932

  5. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2009-056

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by CREE, INC. for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0000412

  6. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2005-006

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by ABENGOA BIOENERGY CORPORATION for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC36-03GO13142.

  7. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2013-027

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This is a request by ELECTRICORE INC. for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0005968

  8. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2011-018

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by ESOLAR for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0003595.

  9. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2008-012

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by DUPONT for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC36-07GOI7056

  10. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2009-024

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by SOUTHERN COMPANY SERVICES INC. for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-NT0000749

  11. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2008-011

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by DSM lnnovation, Inc. for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-PS36-06GO97034

  12. Title: Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2011-041

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by GENERAL MOTOR for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-AC36-08GO28308.

  13. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2009-069

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by ENVIRON INTERNATIOAL CORPORATION for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0000069

  14. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2011-031

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by PARKER HANNIFIN CORPORATION for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FE0005508.

  15. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2008-044

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This is a request by ALSTOM POWER, INC. for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC26-07NT43095

  16. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-032

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by EATON CORPORATION for a DOE Advance patent waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0005665.

  17. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2010-052

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This is a request by A123 SYSTEMS, INC. for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE003513

  18. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2011-038

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This is a request by A123 SYSTEMS, INC. for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0001187.

  19. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-007

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by NAVISTAR for a DOE Advance patent waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0003303.

  20. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2008-013

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by SANYO ELECTRIC COMPANY for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC36-07GO17050

  1. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2013-014

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This is a request by W.R GRACE AND CO for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE- EE0005991.

  2. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2009-001

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by GE GLOBAL RESEARCHH CENTER for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC36-GO18085

  3. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2005-014

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by IBM for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement W-7405-ENG-48.

  4. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2011-053

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by VOLVO TECHNOLOGY OF AMERICA, INC. for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0004125.

  5. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2011-023

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by SCHWEITZER ENGINEERING LAB INC. for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-OE0000537.

  6. Identified Patent Waiver W(I)2011-006

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORY for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-AC04-95AL85000.

  7. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2008-031

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by Novozymes North America for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC26-07NT43084

  8. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2005-016

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This is a request by BAKER HUGHES INTERNATIONAL for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC26-05NT15488.

  9. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2011-021

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This is a request by CUMMINS, INC. for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0004125.

  10. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2010-054

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by UNITED TECHNOLOGIE for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-NT003894

  11. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2006-027

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC26-06NT42864

  12. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-009

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by AE SOLAR for a DOE Advance patent waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0005340.

  13. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-005

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by PHILIPS LUMILEDS LIGHTING, LLC for a DOE Advance patent waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0005099.

  14. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2004-084

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by MILLENNIUM INORGANIC CHEMICAL for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC36-04GO14153.

  15. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2006-014

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This is a request by PPG INDUSTRIES, INC for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC36-04GO14044

  16. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2008-028

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This is a request by INEOS USA LLC for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FG36-04GO14315

  17. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2006-018

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-AC36-04GO116034

  18. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2010-003

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by GENERAL ELECTRICC GLOBAL RESEARCH for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FE0000784

  19. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2008-032

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by CUMMINS, INC. for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC26-07NT43279

  20. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-018

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by GE ENERGY for a DOE Advance patent waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FE0007859.

  1. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2010-030

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by RED ACQUISITION, LLC for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0003364

  2. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2009-059

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by PPG INDUSTRIES for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0000167

  3. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2008-036

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by LIGNOL INNOVATIONS, LTD. for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC36-08GO18047

  4. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2005-011

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC36-05GO15042.

  5. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2009-020

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by PRAXAIR, INC. for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-NT0005341

  6. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2007-002

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This is a request by HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC26-06NT42947

  7. Identified Patent Waiver W(I)2008-004

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by RUSSO, A. J. for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement AT(29-1)-789

  8. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2013-003

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0006108.

  9. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2010-062

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by PARKER HANNIFIN CORPORATION for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0000296

  10. Class Patent Waiver W(C)2012-001

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This is a request by ARPA ENERGY for a DOE Class patent waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FOA-0000474.

  11. Class Patent Waiver W(C)2010-006

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This is a request by ARPA ENERGY for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FOA-0000065

  12. Class Patent Waiver W(C)2009-008

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by ARPA ENERGY for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FOA0000065

  13. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2011-069

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by NAVISTAR for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0003303.

  14. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2005-038

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by PHILLIPS ELECTRONIC for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC26-05NT42342.

  15. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2009-021

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This is a request by PHILIPS LUMILEDS for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC26-08NT01583

  16. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2011-072

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by GE GLOBAL RESEARCHH CENTER for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0005344.

  17. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2010-065

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by DRESSER WAUKESHA for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0004016

  18. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2006-034

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by ENERGY CONVERSION DEVICES, INC. for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement UNKNOWN

  19. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2011-013

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by UNITED TECHNOLOGIES RESEARCH CENTER for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0003953.

  20. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2008-008

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by PPG INDUSTRIES, INC for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FG36-93CH10554

  1. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2010-053

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by PPG INDUSTRIESS, INC. for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0003586

  2. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2010-032

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by PPG INDUSTRIES for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0003209

  3. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2011-005

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This is a request by UNITED TECHNOLOGIES RESEARCH CENTER for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0003954.

  4. Class Patent Waiver W(C)2009-005

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by PHOTOVOLTAIC SUPPLY CHAIN for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-PS36-09GO99003

  5. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2009-062

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC. for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0000141

  6. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2011-011

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by OSRAM SYLVANIA PRODUCTS, INC for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0001361.

  7. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-004

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by GENERAL ELECTRIC GLOBAL REARCH for a DOE Advance patent waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FO0007514.

  8. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2009-036

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC26-08NT01579

  9. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2009-060

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by PARKER HANNIFIN CORPORATION for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0000412

  10. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2007-020

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by GENERAL ELECTRIC for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC26-06NT42950

  11. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2010-049

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by PRAXAIR, INC for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC26-07NT43088

  12. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2010-057

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0003840

  13. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2007-014

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by DONALDSON COMPANY for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC26-06NT42861

  14. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2011-014

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by UNITED TECHNOLOGIES RESEARCH CENTER for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0003955.

  15. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2008-021

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by CARGILL, INC. for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC36-07GO17055

  16. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-030

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by SRI INTERNATIONAL for a DOE Advance patent waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FE0000896.

  17. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2009-048

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This is a request by GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC26-08NT0005310

  18. Class Patent Waiver W(C)2008-008

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by University of Chicago for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-AC02-06CH11357

  19. Identified Patent Waiver W(I)2008-011

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by ELTRON RESEARCH, INC. for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC26-05NT42469

  20. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2008-002

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by FORD MOTOR COMPANY for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC26-07NT43276

  1. Class Patent Waiver W(C)2009-021

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by ENERGY INNOVATIONS HUBS FUEL FROM SUNLIGHT for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FOA-0000214

  2. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2005-036

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by POVAIR CORPORATION for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC36-02AL67627.

  3. Identified Patent Waiver W(I)2011-005

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This is a request by MICHAEL BROCKWELL for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-AC52-06NA25396.

  4. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2010-018

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by BOEING COMPANY for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FG36-08GO18055

  5. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2011-030

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by EATON CORPORATION for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0003911.

  6. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2011-061

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by ABENGOA SOLAR INC. for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC36-08GO18037.

  7. Identified Patent Waiver W(I)2010-003

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This is a request by UOP, INC. for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FG26-04NT42121

  8. Identified Patent Waiver W(I)2010-005

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This is a request by UOP, INC. for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FG26-04NT42121

  9. Identified Patent Waiver W(I)2010-006

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This is a request by UOP, INC. for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FG26-04NT42121

  10. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2010-021

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by PHILIPS LUMILEDS for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0003249

  11. Class Patent Waiver W(C)2009-017

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by GEOTHERMAL TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FOA-0000116

  12. Identified Patent Waiver W(I)2010-008

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by BENEQ OY for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-AC36-08GO28308

  13. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2008-027

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This is a request by ALCOA, INC. for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC36-08GO180278

  14. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2010-020

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This is a request by HALOTECHNICS, INC. for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC36-08GO18144

  15. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2010-023

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This is a request by FORD MOTOR COMPANY for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0000020

  16. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2010-035

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by GE GLOBAL RESEARCH for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0003251

  17. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2011-049

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0003916.

  18. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-016

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by LINDE, INC. for a DOE Advance patent waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FE0007453.

  19. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2009-054

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by UNITED TECHNOLOGIES RESEARCH for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-PS36-08GO98010

  20. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2009-010

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORP for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FG36-08GO18184

  1. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2009-044

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by FORD MOTOR COMPANY for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC36-09GO19002

  2. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2008-046

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by EATON CORPORATION for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FG36-08GO18131

  3. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2013-013

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This is a request by BABCOCK & WILCOX mPOWER for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-NE0000583.

  4. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2010-034

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This is a request by LUMINATION, LLC for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0003232

  5. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2005-061

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by CATERPILLAR for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC26-05NT42412.

  6. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2005-052

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by CATERPILLAR, INC for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC26-05NT42423.

  7. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2011-036

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by HONEYWELL LABORATORIES for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-OE0000544.

  8. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2006-019

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by NALCO CHEMICAL CORPORATION for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC26-06FT42721

  9. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2011-003

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by PPG INDUSTRIES, INC. for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0003170.

  10. Identified Patent Waiver W(I)2010-007

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-AC04-94AL85000

  11. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2009-050

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by GED INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0000167

  12. Class Patent Waiver W(C)2009-004

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This is a request by SMART GRID DEMONSTRATIONS for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FOA-0000036

  13. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2011-012

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by CAMBRIOS TECHNOLOGIES CORP. for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0003254.

  14. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2010-029

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by OSRAM SYLVANI for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0003241

  15. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2011-002

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0003838.

  16. Class Patent Waiver W(C)2011-012

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by SOLID STATE LIGHTING PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT ROUND 8 for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FOA-0000563.

  17. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2010-036

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by GE GLOBAL RESEARCH for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0003251

  18. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2010-047

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0003331

  19. Class Patent Waiver W(C)2009-007

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by HIGH PENETRATION SOLAR DEPLOYMENT for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FOA-0000085

  20. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2008-022

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by ABENGOA BIOENERGY BIOMASS OF KANSAS, LLC for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC3607017028

  1. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2011-070

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by CASCADE ENGINEERING INC. for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0005440.

  2. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-010

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by 3M COMPANY for a DOE Advance patent waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0002980.

  3. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-019

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by GE ENERGY for a DOE Advance patent waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FE0007902.

  4. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2012-025

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by EATON CORPORATION for a DOE Advance patent waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-OE0000592.

  5. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2009-051

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by CATERPILLAR, INC. for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement De-FC26-02AL67974

  6. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2008-035

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by POET RESEARCH, INC. for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-FC36-08GO88033

  7. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2009-007

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-AC02-05CH11231

  8. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2009-006

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-AC02-05CH11231

  9. Identified Patent Waiver W(I)2011-004

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by LASER APPARATUS for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-AC04-04AL85000.

  10. Advance Patent Waiver W(A)2010-005

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request by PPG INDUSTRIES for a DOE waiver of domestic and foreign patent rights under agreement DE-EE0001361