Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "administration livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Site Visit Report, Livermore Site Office - February 2011 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Site Visit Report, Livermore Site Office - February 2011 Site Visit Report, Livermore Site Office - February 2011 Site Visit Report, Livermore Site Office - February 2011 February 2011 Livermore Site Office Safety Basis Self-Assessment This site visit report documents the collective results of the Office of Health, Safety and Security's (HSS) assessment of National Nuclear Safety Administration (NNSA) Livermore Site Office (LSO) safety basis processes and discusses its scope, objective, results and conclusions. Appendix A provides lists of the documents, interviews, and observations and Appendix B includes the plan for the review. The assessment was sponsored by LSO as a self-assessment and conducted jointly by HSS and LSO staff. It was completed in late 2010 and included site visits from November 29 - December

2

Independent Activity Report, Livermore Site Office - January 2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Activity Report, Livermore Site Office - January 2011 Independent Activity Report, Livermore Site Office - January 2011 Independent Activity Report, Livermore Site Office - January 2011 January 2011 Livermore Site Office Facility Representative Program Assessment [ARPT-LSO-2011-001] This activity report documents the results of the Office of Health, Safety and Security's (HSS) review of and participation in the Livermore Site Office Self-Assessment of the Facility Representative (FR) Program. This self-assessment was led by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Livermore Site Office (LSO) and conducted by LSO staff, HSS staff, National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Office of the Chief of Defense Nuclear Safety (CDNS) staff, a peer from Los Alamos Site Office, and a FR subject matter expert from NNSA.

3

LIVERMORE SITE OFFICE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT PLAN For LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

LIVERMORE SITE OFFICE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT PLAN For LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY CONTRACT NO. DE-AC52-07NA27344 LSO_CMP_6-10-088 i CONTENTS Contents 1. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................. 3 2. PURPOSE .......................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Maintenance and Distribution ......................................................................................... 4 3. CONTRACT SUMMARY AND PRINCIPAL FEATURES............................................. 4 3.1 Contract Summary ...........................................................................................................

4

Site Visit Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - February 2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Site Visit Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - Site Visit Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - February 2011 Site Visit Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - February 2011 February 2011 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Safety Basis Assessment This site visit report documents the collective results of the review of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) safety basis processes and discusses its scope, objective, results and conclusions. Appendix A provides lists of the documents, interviews, and observations and Appendix B includes the plan for the review. This combined assessment was sponsored by the National Nuclear Safety Administration (NNSA) Livermore Site Office (LSO) and conducted jointly by staff from the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) and LSO. The review was conducted in late 2010 and included

5

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Lawrence Livermore Site Office |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore Site Lawrence Livermore Site Office Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Lawrence Livermore Site Office Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued by Lawrence Livermore Site Office. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD September 18, 2012 CX-010083: Categorical Exclusion Determination Radiography of Explosive Samples B321C CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/18/2012 Location(s): California Offices(s): Lawrence Livermore Site Office September 18, 2012 CX-009257: Categorical Exclusion Determination Radiography of Explosive Samples B321C CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/18/2012 Location(s): California Offices(s): Lawrence Livermore Site Office May 14, 2012 CX-008172: Categorical Exclusion Determination High-Pressure Crogenic Pump and Hydrogen Filling Station CX(s) Applied: B5.15 Date: 05/14/2012

6

Livermore Site Office Facility Representative Program Self-Assessment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ARPT-LSO-2011-001 ARPT-LSO-2011-001 Site: Livermore Site Office Subject: Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Activity Report for the Livermore Site Office Facility Representative Program Self-Assessment Dates of Activity 01/24/2011 - 01/28/2011 Report Preparer Robert Freeman Activity Description/Purpose: This activity report documents the results of the Office of Health, Safety and Security's (HSS) review of and participation in the Livermore Site Office Self-Assessment of the Facility Representative (FR) Program. This self-assessment was led by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Livermore Site Office (LSO) and conducted by LSO staff, HSS staff, National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Office of the Chief of Defense Nuclear Safety (CDNS) staff, a peer from Los Alamos Site

7

Lawrence Livermore Site Office Manager Joins EM's Senior Leadership Team  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore Site Office Manager Joins EM's Senior Lawrence Livermore Site Office Manager Joins EM's Senior Leadership Team Lawrence Livermore Site Office Manager Joins EM's Senior Leadership Team November 9, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis WASHINGTON, D.C. - EM Acting Assistant Secretary Dave Huizenga announced today that Alice Williams, manager of the DOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Lawrence Livermore Site Office has joined the EM senior leadership team. "I am very excited to have Alice join EM Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary Tracy Mustin and I as we continue work toward the achievement of the EM vision and the continuing evolution of an EM organization that is focused on delivery of mission success to meet the nation's needs in the 21st century," Huizenga said. In ensuing months, Williams will work closely with Huizenga and Mustin as

8

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory: Site Map  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Site Map Site Map About LLNL What we do How we do it Our Values Organization Management and Sponsors Publications History Organizations Global Security National Ignition Facility Operations Safety & Security Science & Technology Weapons & Complex Integration Visiting LLNL Maps & Directions Badging Discovery Center Site Tours Current Weather Protocol Office Where to stay Tri-Valley Visitors Bureau City of Livermore News News Center For Reporters Social Media & Multimedia Publication Science and Technology Review Lab Report News Releases Around the Lab Community Discovery Center Site Tours Community giving Corporate giving Environmental information Community Center Contacts Discover LLNL Newsletter Volunteer Opportunities Education Internships Postdocs K - 12 Outreach Site Tours School Tours

9

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site Lead Planning Activities...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Report Number: HIAR LLNL-2012-10-23 Site: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management...

10

Site Visit Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - March 2010 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Site Visit Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - March Site Visit Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - March 2010 Site Visit Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - March 2010 March 2010 Review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Identified Defective Department of Transportation Hazardous Material Packages This review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) identification, immediate actions, communications, documentation, evaluation, reporting and follow-up to the discovery of defective Department of Transportation (DOT) UN1A2 55- and 30-gallon open head single bolt closure steel drums intended for storage and transportation of hazardous waste and materials, conducted on January 26-29, 2010, was sponsored by the DOE Livermore Site Office (LSO) to support interface with

11

Site Visit Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - May 2010 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Site Visit Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - May Site Visit Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - May 2010 Site Visit Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - May 2010 May 2010 Review of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Fire Protection Design Review Process This review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Fire Protection Design Review Process, conducted on March 24 through April 2, 2010, was sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Livermore Site Office (LSO) and conducted jointly with LSO staff. Overall, the design review process was observed to be effective and the LLNL programs for performing these reviews were being implemented. Many aspects of the process are effective, and the personnel who implement it are knowledgeable and experienced. This review identified only one

12

Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Environmental Remediation at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site 300 Pit 7 Complex  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Environmental Remediation at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site 300 Pit 7 Complex January 2007 Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Livermore Site Office EA for the Proposed Environmental Remediation at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site 300 Pit 7 Complex i CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................1 1.1 Background ......................................................................................................................1 1.2 Purpose and Need for the Action .....................................................................................5

13

2010 Annual Planning Summary Livermore Site Office (LSO) | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

to be prepared in the next 24 months, and the planned cost and schedule for each NEPA review identified. 2010 Annual Planning Summary Livermore Site Office (LSO) More Documents...

14

Lawrence Livermore Site Office Safety Basis Self-Assessment Final February 11, 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Livermore Site Office Livermore Site Office Safety Basis Self-Assessment INTRODUCTION This site visit report documents the collective results of the Office of Health, Safety and Security's (HSS) assessment of National Nuclear Safety Administration (NNSA) Livermore Site Office (LSO) safety basis processes and discusses its scope, objective, results and conclusions. Appendix A provides lists of the documents, interviews, and observations and Appendix B includes the plan for the review. The assessment was sponsored by LSO as a self-assessment and conducted jointly by HSS and LSO staff. It was completed in late 2010 and included site visits from November 29 - December 3, 2010 and December 13-17, 2010. The assessment revealed that LSO has implemented appropriate plans, procedures, and

15

Lawrence Livermore Site Office Safety Basis Self-Assessment Final February 11, 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Livermore Site Office Livermore Site Office Safety Basis Self-Assessment INTRODUCTION This site visit report documents the collective results of the Office of Health, Safety and Security's (HSS) assessment of National Nuclear Safety Administration (NNSA) Livermore Site Office (LSO) safety basis processes and discusses its scope, objective, results and conclusions. Appendix A provides lists of the documents, interviews, and observations and Appendix B includes the plan for the review. The assessment was sponsored by LSO as a self-assessment and conducted jointly by HSS and LSO staff. It was completed in late 2010 and included site visits from November 29 - December 3, 2010 and December 13-17, 2010. The assessment revealed that LSO has implemented appropriate plans, procedures, and

16

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site Lead Planning Activities, October 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Report Number: HIAR LLNL-2012-10-23 Site: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for Site Lead Planning Activities at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Dates of Activity 10/23/2012 - 10/24/2012 Report Preparer: Robert Freeman Activity Description/Purpose: The purpose of this Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Independent Oversight activity was to maintain site operational awareness of key nuclear safety performance areas, monitor ongoing site oversight and planning activities for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) nuclear facilities, and identify and initiate coordination of future HSS oversight activities at the site, including planned HSS targeted reviews planned for Fiscal Year (FY) 2013.

17

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site Lead Planning Activities, October 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Report Number: HIAR LLNL-2012-10-23 Site: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for Site Lead Planning Activities at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Dates of Activity 10/23/2012 - 10/24/2012 Report Preparer: Robert Freeman Activity Description/Purpose: The purpose of this Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Independent Oversight activity was to maintain site operational awareness of key nuclear safety performance areas, monitor ongoing site oversight and planning activities for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) nuclear facilities, and identify and initiate coordination of future HSS oversight activities at the site, including planned HSS targeted reviews planned for Fiscal Year (FY) 2013.

18

Site safety plan for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory CERCLA investigations at site 300. Revision 2  

SciTech Connect

Various Department of Energy Orders incorporate by reference, health and safety regulations promulgated by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). One of the OSHA regulations, 29 CFR 1910.120, Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response, requires that site safety plans are written for activities such as those covered by work plans for Site 300 environmental investigations. Based upon available data, this Site Safety Plan (Plan) for environmental restoration has been prepared specifically for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site 300, located approximately 15 miles east of Livermore, California. As additional facts, monitoring data, or analytical data on hazards are provided, this Plan may need to be modified. It is the responsibility of the Environmental Restoration Program and Division (ERD) Site Safety Officer (SSO), with the assistance of Hazards Control, to evaluate data which may impact health and safety during these activities and to modify the Plan as appropriate. This Plan is not `cast-in-concrete.` The SSO shall have the authority, with the concurrence of Hazards Control, to institute any change to maintain health and safety protection for workers at Site 300.

Kilmer, J.

1997-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

19

Federal Facility Compliance Act: Conceptual Site Treatment Plan for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Department of Energy (DOE) is required by section 3021(b) of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), as amended by the Federal Facility Compliance Act (the Act), to prepare plans describing the development of treatment capacities and technologies for treating mixed waste. The Act requires site treatment plans (STPs or plans) to be developed for each site at which DOE generates or stores mixed waste and submitted to the State or EPA for approval, approval with modification, or disapproval. The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Conceptual Site Treatment Plan (CSTP) is the preliminary version of the plan required by the Act and is being provided to California, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and others for review. A list of the other DOE sites preparing CSTPs is included in Appendix 1.1 of this document. Please note that Appendix 1.1 appears as Appendix A, pages A-1 and A-2 in this document.

Not Available

1993-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

20

The Current and Historical Distribution of Special Status Amphibians at the Livermore Site and Site 300  

SciTech Connect

65 surveys were completed in 2002 to assess the current distribution of special status amphibians at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's (LLNL) Livermore Site and Site 300. Combined with historical information from previous years, the information presented herein illustrates the dynamic and probable risk that amphibian populations face at both sites. The Livermore Site is developed and in stark contrast to the mostly undeveloped Site 300. Yet both sites have significant issues threatening the long-term sustainability of their respective amphibian populations. Livermore Site amphibians are presented with a suite of challenges inherent of urban interfaces, most predictably the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana), while Site 300's erosion issues and periodic feral pig (Sus scrofa) infestations reduce and threaten populations. The long-term sustainability of LLNL's special status amphibians will require active management and resource commitment to maintain and restore amphibian habitat at both sites.

Hattem, M V; Paterson, L; Woollett, J

2008-08-20T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "administration livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Final Clean Closure Report Site 300 Surface Impoundments Closure Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore, California  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory operated two Class II surface impoundments that stored wastewater that was discharged from a number of buildings located on the Site 300 Facility (Site 300). The wastewater was the by-product of explosives processing. Reduction in the volume of water discharged from these buildings over the past several years significantly reduced the wastewater storage needs. In addition, the impoundments were constructed in 1984, and the high-density polyethylene (HDPE) geomembrane liners were nearing the end of their service life. The purpose of this project was to clean close the surface impoundments and provide new wastewater storage using above ground storage tanks at six locations. The tanks were installed and put into service prior to closure of the impoundments. This Clean Closure Report (Closure Report) complies with State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Section 21400 of the California Code of Regulations Title 27 (27 CCR section 21400). As required by these regulations and guidance, this Closure Report provides the following information: (1) a brief site description; (2) the regulatory requirements relevant to clean closure of the impoundments; (3) the closure procedures; and (4) the findings and documentation of clean closure.

Haskell, K

2006-02-14T23:59:59.000Z

22

Site Visit Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - February...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

the collective results of the review of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) safety basis processes and discusses its scope, objective, results and conclusions....

23

EA-1106: Explosive Waste Treatment Facility at Site 300, Lawrence Livermore  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

106: Explosive Waste Treatment Facility at Site 300, Lawrence 106: Explosive Waste Treatment Facility at Site 300, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, San Joaquin County, California EA-1106: Explosive Waste Treatment Facility at Site 300, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, San Joaquin County, California SUMMARY This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of the proposal to build, permit, and operate the Explosive Waste Treatment Facility to treat explosive waste at the U.S. Department of Energy's Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Experimental Test Site, Site 300. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD April 16, 1996 EA-1106: Finding of No Significant Impact Explosive Waste Treatment Facility at Site 300, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory April 16, 1996

24

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Main Site FFA Under CERCLA Section 120, November 1, 1988 Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (Main Site) Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (Main Site) Federal Facility Agreement Under CERCLA Section 120, November 1, 1988 State California Agreement Type Federal Facility Agreement Legal Driver(s) CERCLA Scope Summary Establish a procedural framework and schedule for developing, implementing, and monitoring appropriate response actions at the Site Parties DOE; USEPA; California Department of Health Services; California Regional Water Quality Control Board Date 11/1/1988 SCOPE * Establish a procedural framework and schedule for developing, implementing, and monitoring appropriate response actions at the Site. * Establish a basis for a determination that the DOE has completed remedial action and corrective measures to satisfaction. ESTABLISHING MILESTONES

25

Independent Oversight Review of Integrated Safety Management System Effectiveness at the Livermore Site Office, October 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Enforcement and Oversight Independent Oversight Review of Integrated Safety Management System Effectiveness at the Livermore Site Office October 2011 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ............................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Background ...................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Scope ................................................................................................................................................ 1

26

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - July  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - July 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - July 2013 July 2013 Review of Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent review of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Livermore Field Office (LFO) and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Site 200 preparedness for severe natural phenomena events (NPEs). The HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations performed this review to evaluate the processes for identifying emergency response capabilities and

27

Determination of effective acceleration for use in design at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory site  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

An rms-based effective acceleration study has been conducted for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The study used real time history records with epicentral distances, magnitudes and site conditions deemed appropriate for the LLNL Livermore site. Only those records having strong motion durations, T{sub D}{prime}, >3.0 seconds, and peak ground acceleration {ge} .4g were selected for determining the effective acceleration hazard curve used in design. These parameters are consistent with LLNL's use of broad-band Newmark-Hall Spectra for design, and the high peak instrumental accelerations corresponding to the return intervals of interest. Study results were used to modify the acceleration hazard curve for facility design/evaluation at LLNL.

Coats, D.W. Jr.

1991-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

28

Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Livermore National Laboratory Operational Drill at the B332 Plutonium Facility HIAR LLNL-2013-02-27 The Livermore Site Office (LSO) and Lawrence Livermore National Security,...

29

Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory- February 2009  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Inspection of Emergency Management at the Livermore Site Office and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

30

Energy conservation and management plan for plant facilities at the Livermore site  

SciTech Connect

An energy conservation and management plan for the Livermore site of the Lawrence Livermore Laboratory is presented. The plan defines the energy-conservation goals for the next 10 years and proposes the ways and means of attaining them. The main features contained in this plan are as follows: development of the criteria and underlying assumptions required for long range planning, including energy growth rates and the case for using the concept of the technical-fix energy growth rate, LLL energy outlook and fuel cost projections, and life-cycle-cost criteria; targets of the long-range plan include between 1975 and 1985, an annual energy usage growth equal to 5.8 percent of the 1975 energy consumption, 1985 and thereafter, zero energy growth, a change from the current dependence on natural gas to the use of other fuels for heating, and a doubling of the 30-day strategic oil storage capacity; and cost schedule for the next 10 years.

Ng, W.; Szybalski, S.; Kerr, W. H.; Meyer, H. J.

1976-03-15T23:59:59.000Z

31

Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplemental Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Summary Summary Prepared by: COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration TITLE: Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplemental Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0348 and DOE/EIS-0236-S3) CONTACT: For further information on this EIS, For general information on the DOE Call: 1-877-388-4930, or contact National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process, write or call: Thomas Grim Carol Borgstrom, Director Livermore Site Office Document Manager Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance NNSA (EH-42) 7000 East Avenue U.S. Department of Energy MS L-293 1000 Independence Avenue, SW

32

Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplemental Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

I I Chapters 1 through 12 Prepared by: COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration TITLE: Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplemental Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0348 and DOE/EIS-0236-S3) CONTACT: For further information on this EIS, For general information on the DOE Call: 1-877-388-4930, or contact National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process, write or call: Thomas Grim Carol Borgstrom, Director Livermore Site Office Document Manager Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance NNSA (EH-42) 7000 East Avenue U.S. Department of Energy

33

Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplemental Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

III III Appendix E through P Prepared by: COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration TITLE: Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplemental Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0348 and DOE/EIS-0236-S3) CONTACT: For further information on this EIS, For general information on the DOE Call: 1-877-388-4930, or contact National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process, write or call: Thomas Grim Carol Borgstrom, Director Livermore Site Office Document Manager Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance NNSA (EH-42) 7000 East Avenue U.S. Department of Energy

34

Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplemental Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

II II Appendix A through D Prepared by: COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration TITLE: Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplemental Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0348 and DOE/EIS-0236-S3) CONTACT: For further information on this EIS, For general information on the DOE Call: 1-877-388-4930, or contact National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process, write or call: Thomas Grim Carol Borgstrom, Director Livermore Site Office Document Manager Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance NNSA (EH-42) 7000 East Avenue U.S. Department of Energy

35

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

LLNL Home. Latest News Headlines. ... Operated by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, for the Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration

36

Technologies - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Nuclear & Radiological. ... Operated by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, for the Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration

37

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - Reports  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Review Reports 2013 Independent Oversight Review of the Fire Protection Program at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, September 2013 Independent Oversight Review of Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, July 2013 Activity Reports 2013 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Operational Drill at the B332 Plutonium Facility, February 2013 Activity Reports 2012 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site Lead Planning Activities, October 2012 Review Reports 2011 Review of Integrated Safety Management System Effectiveness at the Livermore Site Office, October 2011 Review of Integrated Safety Management System Effectiveness at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, September 2011

38

Fixed Monthly Living Expense Payments at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, INS-L-11-05  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Fixed Monthly Living Expense Fixed Monthly Living Expense Payments at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory INS-L-11-05 September 2011 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 September 21, 2011 MEMORANDUM FOR MANAGER, LIVERMORE SITE OFFICE FROM: Sandra D. Bruce Assistant Inspector General for Inspections SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Inspection Report on "Fixed Monthly Living Expense Payments at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory" BACKGROUND The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (Livermore) is a Department of Energy (Department) laboratory managed and operated by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, for the Department's National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). Livermore's mission is to ensure the safety and security of the nation through applied science and technology in key

39

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2013 September 2013 Review of the Fire Protection Program at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory This report documents the results of an independent oversight review of the fire protection program at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The review was performed June 10-21, 2013, by the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations, which is within the DOE Office of Health, Safety and Security. The review was one part of a targeted assessment of fire protection at nuclear facilities across the DOE complex, including National Nuclear Security Administration sites. The purpose of the Independent Oversight targeted assessment was to

40

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2013 September 2013 Review of the Fire Protection Program at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory This report documents the results of an independent oversight review of the fire protection program at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The review was performed June 10-21, 2013, by the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations, which is within the DOE Office of Health, Safety and Security. The review was one part of a targeted assessment of fire protection at nuclear facilities across the DOE complex, including National Nuclear Security Administration sites. The purpose of the Independent Oversight targeted assessment was to

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "administration livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Remedial investigation of the High-Explosives (HE) Process Area, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site 300  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report presents the results of a Remedial Investigation (RI) to define the extent of high explosives (HE) compounds and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) found in the soil, rocks, and ground water of the HE Process Area of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's (LLNL) Site 300 Facility. The report evaluates potential public health environmental risks associated with these compounds. Hydrogeologic information available before February 15, 1990, is included; however, chemical analyses and water-level data are reported through March 1990. This report is intended to assist the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)--Central Valley Region and the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in evaluating the extent of environmental contamination of the LLNL HE Process Area and ultimately in designing remedial actions. 90 refs., 20 figs., 7 tabs.

Crow, N.B.; Lamarre, A.L.

1990-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

42

Title I conceptual design for Pit 6 landfill closure at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site 300  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The objective of this design project is to evaluate and prepare design and construction documents for a closure cover cap for the Pit 6 Landfill located at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site 300. This submittal constitutes the Title I Design (Conceptual Design) for the closure cover of the Pit 6 Landfill. A Title I Design is generally 30 percent of the design effort. Title H Design takes the design to 100 percent complete. Comments and edits to this Title I Design will be addressed in the Title II design submittal. Contents of this report are as follows: project background; design issues and engineering approach; design drawings; calculation packages; construction specifications outline; and construction quality assurance plan outline.

MacDonnell, B.A.; Obenauf, K.S. [Golder Associates, Inc., Alameda, CA (United States)

1996-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

43

Correlation between predicted and observed levels of airborne tritium at Lawrence Livermore Laboratory site boundary  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

At the Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, a computer code based on the Gaussian plume model is used to estimate radiation doses from routine or accidental release of airborne radioactive material. Routine releases of tritium have been used as a test of the overall uncertainty associated with these estimates. The ration of concentration to release rate at distances from the two principal release points to each of six site boundary sampling locations has been calcuated using local meteorological data. The concentration of airborne tritiated water vapor is continuously measured at the six sampling stations as part of the Laboratory's environmental monitoring program. Comparison of predicted with observed annual tritiated water concentrations in 1978 showed an average ratio of 2.6 with a range of from 0.97 to 5.8.

Lindeken, C.L.; Silver, W.J.; Toy, A.J.; White, J.H.

1980-02-19T23:59:59.000Z

44

Inquiry into the De-Inventory of Special Nuclear Material at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, OAS-L-12-11  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Inquiry into the De-Inventory of Special Nuclear Material at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory OAS-L-12-11 September 2012 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 September 21, 2012 MEMORANDUM FOR THE MANAGER, LIVERMORE SITE OFFICE FROM: David Sedillo Director, Western Audits Division Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Special Report on "Inquiry into the De-Inventory of Special Nuclear Material at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory" BACKGROUND The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (Livermore) is a Department of Energy facility managed and operated by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC (LLNS), for the Department's National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). Livermore's mission is to

45

Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - March  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - March 2011 Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - March 2011 March 2011 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program Effectiveness Review [HIAR-LLNL-2011-03-25] The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and the Livermore Site Office (LSO) chartered a team to conduct an effectiveness review of the issues identified with the LLNL Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program (CBDPP). The team included members and observers from LLNL, LSO, the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), and the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The team's final report documents the results of the effectiveness review and the actions taken by LLNL to resolve and prevent recurrence of 44

46

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - July  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - July 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - July 2013 July 2013 Review of Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory The Office of Enforcement and Oversight (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an independent review of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Livermore Field Office (LFO) and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Site 200 preparedness for severe natural phenomena events (NPEs). The HSS Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations performed this review to evaluate the processes for identifying emergency response capabilities and maintaining them in a state of readiness in case of a severe NPE. This

47

Results of Surveys for Special Status Reptiles at the Site 300 Facilities of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of this report is to present the results of a live-trapping and visual surveys for special status reptiles at the Site 300 Facilities of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). The survey was conducted under the authority of the Federal recovery permit of Swaim Biological Consulting (PRT-815537) and a Memorandum of Understanding issued from the California Department of Fish and Game. Site 300 is located between Livermore and Tracy just north of Tesla road (Alameda County) and Corral Hollow Road (San Joaquin County) and straddles the Alameda and San Joaquin County line (Figures 1 and 2). It encompasses portions of the USGS 7.5 minute Midway and Tracy quadrangles (Figure 2). Focused surveys were conducted for four special status reptiles including the Alameda whipsnake (Masticophis lateralis euryxanthus), the San Joaquin Whipsnake (Masticophis Hagellum ruddock), the silvery legless lizard (Anniella pulchra pulchra), and the California horned lizard (Phrynosoma coronanum frontale).

Woollett, J J

2008-09-18T23:59:59.000Z

48

Technologies - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

LLNL Home. Latest News Headlines. ... Operated by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, for the Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration

49

Print - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

... or in home healthcare settings. ... Operated by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, for the Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration

50

Final Revised Environmental Assessment for The Proposed Construction and Operation of a Biosafety Level 3 Facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

R R Final Revised Environmental Assessment for The Proposed Construction and Operation of a Biosafety Level 3 Facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California Issued: December 2002 Revised: January 2008 Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Livermore Site Office This page intentionally left blank. FINAL Revised EA for the Proposed Construction and Operation of a Biosafety Level 3 Facility at LLNL ii FORWARD The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) of the Department of Energy (DOE) has responsibility for national programs to reduce and counter threats from weapons of mass destruction including nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons (bioweapons). NNSA's bioscience work at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) in support of these

51

Site map | National Nuclear Security Administration  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

map | National Nuclear Security Administration map | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > Site map Site map Front page Front page of National Nuclear Security Administration NNSA Site Navigation Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Stockpile Stewardship Program Quarterly Experiments Dismantlement and Disposition Weapons NPT Compliance

52

Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - October 2012 Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - October 2012 October 2012 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site Lead Planning Activities [HIAR LLNL-2012-10-23] The purpose of this Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Independent Oversight activity was to maintain site operational awareness of key nuclear safety performance areas, monitor ongoing site oversight and planning activities for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) nuclear facilities, and identify and initiate coordination of future HSS oversight activities at the site, including planned HSS targeted reviews planned for Fiscal Year (FY) 2013. Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -

53

Savannah River Site | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Site | National Nuclear Security Administration Site | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > About Us > Our Locations > Savannah River Site Savannah River Site http://www.srs.gov/general/srs-home.html Field Office: Located south of Aiken, South Carolina, the Savannah River Field Office (SRFO) is responsible for the NNSA Defense Program missions at

54

Site Information | National Nuclear Security Administration  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Information | National Nuclear Security Administration Information | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Site Information Home > About Us > Our Programs > Defense Programs > Military Academic Collaborations > Site Information Site Information The NNSA's nuclear security enterprise spans eight sites, including three national laboratories, with more than six decades of cutting-edge nuclear

55

Savannah River Site | National Nuclear Security Administration  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Site | National Nuclear Security Administration Site | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > About Us > Our Locations > Savannah River Site Savannah River Site http://www.srs.gov/general/srs-home.html Field Office: Located south of Aiken, South Carolina, the Savannah River Field Office (SRFO) is responsible for the NNSA Defense Program missions at

56

Site Information | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Information | National Nuclear Security Administration Information | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Site Information Home > About Us > Our Programs > Defense Programs > Military Academic Collaborations > Site Information Site Information The NNSA's nuclear security enterprise spans eight sites, including three national laboratories, with more than six decades of cutting-edge nuclear

57

National Nuclear Security Administration Pantex Site Office  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

DCARTER at 3:47 pm, Jan 11, 2008 DCARTER at 3:47 pm, Jan 11, 2008 c Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Pantex Site Office P. 0. Box 30030 Amarillo, TX 791 20 MhdWswQAtwbWM JAN 3 2008 MEMORANDUM FOR: Dennis Huddleston, EP&O, B&W Pantex LLC FROM: & Site Engineering Programs SUBJECT: Interagency Agreement (LQG) for the Pantex Superfund Site (Pantex or Pantex Site) Please reference the attached Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) letter dated December 1 1,2007, subject as above. Subject letter was informally transmitted to B&W Pantex's Regulatory Compliance Department on December 19,2007, to expedite any subsequent requirements by the Pantex Site. The enclosed IAG identifies specific review and response times for each of the participating agencies

58

National Nuclear Security Administration Pantex Site Office  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

M M m I Nudeor hriiy Adminisbnabn JAN - 7 2009 MEMORANDUM FOR: W. R. Mairson, Environment, Safety, & Health, B&W Pantex FROM: Johnnie F. Guelker, Assistant Manager for Environmental & Site Engineering Programs SUBJECT: Notice of Approval of an On-Site Sewage Facility Please reference the attached Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) letter dated December 16,2008, subject as above. Attached letter notifies the Pantex Site Office that the On-Site Sewage Facility (OSSF) has satisfied the design, construction, and installation requirements of the TCEQ and pursuant to Title 30, Texas Administrative Code (TAC). TCEQ has approved the OSSF constructed under TCEQ ID No.: 033- 0245 and the final inspection occurred on December 16,2008.

59

2012 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Livermore  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6.W~~l 6.W~~l #II VA. 'lf,fi:'¥Ylj Nsffonal Nuclear Security Admfnfat111tlon Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Livermore Site Office PO Box 808, L-293 7000 East Avenue Livermore, California 94551-0808 !JAN 18 2013 3250 COR-M0-1/17/2013-490077 MEMORANDUM FOR KAREN L. BOARDMAN CHAIRPERSON FEDERAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PANEL FROM: v KIMBERLY DAVIS LEBAK "/'JJ. f /ti/ MANAGER ~ ..--r; tV[ SUBJECT: REFRENCE: Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for the Livermore Field Office 2012, Revision I Memorandum (K. Boardman/Distribution), Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for Calendar Year 2012, dated October 24, 2012 Please see the attached revised Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report for the Livermore

60

Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - March  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

March 2011 March 2011 Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - March 2011 March 2011 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program Effectiveness Review [HIAR-LLNL-2011-03-25] The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and the Livermore Site Office (LSO) chartered a team to conduct an effectiveness review of the issues identified with the LLNL Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program (CBDPP). The team included members and observers from LLNL, LSO, the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), and the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS). The team's final report documents the results of the effectiveness review and the actions taken by LLNL to resolve and prevent recurrence of 44

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "administration livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

TECHNICAL EVALUATION OF SOIL REMEDIATION ALTERNATIVES AT THE BUILDING 812 OPERABLE UNIT, LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY SITE 300  

SciTech Connect

The Department of Energy Livermore Site Office requested a technical review of remedial alternatives proposed for the Building 812 Operable Unit, Site 300 at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The team visited the site and reviewed the alternatives proposed for soil remediation in the draft RI/FS and made the following observations and recommendations. Based on the current information available for the site, the team did not identify a single technology that would be cost effective and/or ecologically sound to remediate DU contamination at Building 812 to current remedial goals. Soil washing is not a viable alternative and should not be considered at the site unless final remediation levels can be negotiated to significantly higher levels. This recommendation is based on the results of soil washing treatability studies at Fernald and Ashtabula that suggest that the technology would only be effective to address final remediation levels higher than 50 pCi/g. The technical review team identified four areas of technical uncertainty that should be resolved before the final selection of a preferred remedial strategy is made. Areas of significant technical uncertainty that should be addressed include: (1) Better delineation of the spatial distribution of surface contamination and the vertical distribution of subsurface contamination in the area of the firing table and associated alluvial deposits; (2) Chemical and physical characterization of residual depleted uranium (DU) at the site; (3) Determination of actual contaminant concentrations in air particulates to support risk modeling; and (4) More realistic estimation of cost for remedial alternatives, including soil washing, that were derived primarily from vendor estimates. Instead of conducting the planned soil washing treatability study, the team recommends that the site consider a new phased approach that combines additional characterization approaches and technologies to address the technical uncertainty in the remedial decision making. The site should redo the risk calculations as the future use scenario has changed for the site. As a result, the existing model is based on very conservative assumptions that result in calculation of unreasonably low cleanup goals. Specifically, the review team proposes that LLNL consider: (1) Revising the industrial worker scenario to a reasonable maximum exposure (RME) for a site worker that performs a weekly walk down of the area for two hours for 25 years (or an alternative RME if the exposure scenario changes); (2) Revising the ESSI of 2 mg U per kg soil for the deer mouse to account for less than 0.05 of the total ingested uranium being adsorbed by the gut; (3) Revising bioaccumulation factors (BAFs) for vegetation and invertebrates that are based on 100 mg of soluble uranium per kg of soil, as the uranium concentration in the slope soil does not average 100 mg/kg and it is not all in a soluble form; and (4) Measuring actual contaminant concentrations in air particulates at the site and using the actual values to support risk calculations. The team recommends that the site continue a phased approach during remediation. The activities should focus on elimination of the principal threats to groundwater by excavating (1) source material from the firing table and alluvial deposits, and (2) soil hotspots from the surrounding slopes with concentrations of U-235 and U-238 that pose unacceptable risk. This phased approach allows the remediation path to be driven by the results of each phase. This reduces the possibility of costly 'surprises', such as failure of soil treatment, and reduces the impact of remediation on endangered habitat. Treatment of the excavated material with physical separation equipment may result in a decreased volume of soil for disposal if the DU is concentrated in the fine-grained fraction, which can then be disposed of in an offsite facility at a considerable cost savings. Based on existing data and a decision to implement the recommended phased approach, the cost of characterization, excavation and physical

Eddy-Dilek, C.; Miles, D.; Abitz, R.

2009-08-14T23:59:59.000Z

62

Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplemental Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SW/SPEIS Chapter 4 - Description of the Existing Environment SW/SPEIS Chapter 4 - Description of the Existing Environment March 2005 4.9-9 TABLE 4.9.3-1.-Federal and California Species with Protected or Sensitive Status Known to Occur at the Livermore Site and Site 300 in 2001 and 2002 Site Status Common Name Livermore Site Site 300 Federal Status Code State Status Code Plants Big tarplant a - X - CNPS List 1 B Hogwallow starfish - X - CNPS List 4 Large-flowered fiddleneck - X FE (CH) CNPS List 1 B Round-leaved filaree - X - CNPS List 2 Stinkbells - X - CNPS List 4 Diamond-petaled poppy - X FSC CNPS List 1 B Gypsum rock jasmine - X - CNPS List 4 Gypsum loving larkspur - X - CNPS List 4 Invertebrates Valley elderberry longhorn beetle - X FT - California linderiella fairy shrimp - X FSC - Amphibians

63

National Nuclear Security Administration Pantex Site Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Pantex Site Office Pantex Site Office P. 0. Box 30036 Amarillo, TX 79120 JAN 1 2 2011 MEMORANDUM FOR: KENNETH W. POWERS ASSOCIATE ADMINISTRATOR FOR STEVEN C. ERHART MANAGER FROM: SUBJECT: Submission of Annual National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Planning Summaries for Fiscal Year 20 1 1 Please reference your memorandum dated December 17,2010, subject as above. Attached are the Pantex Site Ofice (PXSO) Annual NEPA Planning Summaries. All PXSO NEPA documentation expected in the near future or already under development is listed in these forms. This information is being disseminated through the Pantex Website at www.pantex.com and will be made available to the public in area Department of Energy Information Repositories. The PXSO does not anticipate preparing any Environmental Assessments within the next 12 months or

64

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

racks "Green" supercomputer reduces energy footprint by 75% "Green" supercomputer reduces energy footprint by 75% Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National...

65

National Nuclear Security Administration Pantex Site Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEP A Compliance Officer Rationale NEP A Compliance Officer Rationale Pantex Site Office Proj. No.: MWO-ll-004-C NEPA ID No.: PXP-ll-0001 Parking Lot South of Bullding 16-35 Application of DOE NEPA Procedure: Categorical Exclusion B1.15, Applicable to Facility Operations (10 CFR Part 1021, Subpart 0, Appendix B), applies to this proposal. Therefore, neither an Environmental Assessment nor an Environmental Impact Statement is necessary for the activity described in NEPA Review Form (NRF) PXP-II-000l, which is hereby incorporated by reference. Rationale: The U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration, proposes to construct a permanent parking lot south of Building 16-35 on the Pantex Plant. The parking lot would be approximately 220 feet in length and 170 feet wide. Four metal culverts,

66

National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

93-851 8 93-851 8 JAM 1 4 2010 Scott Blake Harris, General Counsel, DOEiHQ (GC-1) FORS NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION NEVADA SITE OFFICE (NNSA/NSO) NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPA) ANNUAL PLANNING SUMMARY Pursuant to DOE Order 451. IB, NEPA Compliance Program, NNSA/NSO is pleased to provide the enclosed Annual NEPA Planning Summary. The document provides a brief description of ongoing and planned NEPA actions for calendar year 201 0. If there are any questions regarding this summary, please contact our NEPA Compliance Officer, Linda M. Cohn, at (702) 295-0077. s r4/(&~1/:~d Stephen A. Mellington Enclosure: As stated cc wtencl. via e-mail: C. M. Borgstrom, DOEiHQ (GC-54) FORS B. A. Costner, DOEiHQ (GC-54) FORS M. E. Martin, NNSAIHQ (NA-56) FORS

67

WCI | Cutting-Edge Facilities | Site 300 Experimental Test Site  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Site 300 Site Access Contained Firing Facility (CFF) Continuously Operating Reference Station (CORS) What is Site 300? Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's Site 300 is an experimental test site operated by the Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, for the Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration. It is situated on 7,000 acres in rural foothills approximately six miles southwest of downtown Tracy and 15 miles southeast of Livermore. Site 300 was established in 1955 as a non-nuclear explosives test facility to support Livermore Laboratory's national security mission. The site gets its name from the early days of Lawrence Livermore, when the main laboratory was called Site 200 and the test facility was Site 300 (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory was Site 100). Today, work at Site 300

68

Site map | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure...

69

Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

October 2012 October 2012 Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - October 2012 October 2012 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site Lead Planning Activities [HIAR LLNL-2012-10-23] The purpose of this Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Independent Oversight activity was to maintain site operational awareness of key nuclear safety performance areas, monitor ongoing site oversight and planning activities for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) nuclear facilities, and identify and initiate coordination of future HSS oversight activities at the site, including planned HSS targeted reviews planned for Fiscal Year (FY) 2013. Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - October 2012 More Documents & Publications

70

Former Worker Medical Screening Program - Lawrence Livermore...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Livermore National Laboratory Former Workers Former Worker Medical Screening Program (FWP) Project Name: Worker Health Protection Program Covered DOE Site: LLNL...

71

Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

October 2012 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site Lead Planning Activities HIAR LLNL-2012-10-23 The purpose of this Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Independent...

72

Lawrence Livermore National Laborotory Safety Basis Assessment Final February 11, 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Safety Basis Assessment INTRODUCTION This site visit report documents the collective results of the review of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) safety basis processes and discusses its scope, objective, results and conclusions. Appendix A provides lists of the documents, interviews, and observations and Appendix B includes the plan for the review. This combined assessment was sponsored by the National Nuclear Safety Administration (NNSA) Livermore Site Office (LSO) and conducted jointly by staff from the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) and LSO. The review was conducted in late 2010 and included site visits from November 29 - December 3, 2010 and December 13-17, 2010. Overall, the LLNL programs

73

Lawrence Livermore National Laborotory Safety Basis Assessment Final February 11, 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Safety Basis Assessment INTRODUCTION This site visit report documents the collective results of the review of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) safety basis processes and discusses its scope, objective, results and conclusions. Appendix A provides lists of the documents, interviews, and observations and Appendix B includes the plan for the review. This combined assessment was sponsored by the National Nuclear Safety Administration (NNSA) Livermore Site Office (LSO) and conducted jointly by staff from the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) and LSO. The review was conducted in late 2010 and included site visits from November 29 - December 3, 2010 and December 13-17, 2010. Overall, the LLNL programs

74

Arizona Web Sites - Energy Information Administration  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Arizona Web Sites . Other Links : Arizona Electricity Profile: Arizona Energy Profile: Arizona Restructuring: Last Updated: April 2007 . Sites:

75

Texas Web Sites - Energy Information Administration  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Texas Web Sites Other Links : Texas Electricity Profile: Texas Energy Profile: Texas Restructuring: Last Updated: April 2007 . Sites: Links ...

76

National Nuclear Security Administration LOS ALAMOS SITE OFFICE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

LOS ALAMOS SITE OFFICE National Nuclear Security Administration CONTRACT MANAGEMENT PLAN For LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY CONTRACT NO. DE-AC52-06NA25396 Los Alamos...

77

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratorys (LLNL) primary mission is research and development in support of national security. As a...

78

Site Manager Livermore Site Office  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Year-End Diversity Reports MD-715 DVAAP FEORP 9-Point Plan Special Emphasis Program Training and Education (Program Devel- opment...

79

Wisconsin Web Sites - Energy Information Administration  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Wisconsin Web Sites . Other Links : Wisconsin Electricity Profile: Wisconsin Energy Profile: Wisconsin Restructuring: Last Updated: April 2007 .

80

Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - June 2005 Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - June 2005 June 2005 Inspection of Emergency Management at the Livermore Site Office and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory The Secretary of Energy's Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance (OA), within the Office of Security and Safety Performance Assurance, conducted an inspection of the emergency management program at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) site in June 2005. The inspection was performed by the OA Office of Emergency Management Oversight. This 2005 OA inspection determined that LLNL has completed program development work or has established an appropriate framework for nearly all

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "administration livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Site Information | National Nuclear Security Administration  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

nonproliferation, bio threats, global climate modeling and other critical problems. NTS Nevada National Security Site (NNSS), near Las Vegas, Nev., is where the U.S....

82

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL):Livermore Lab Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Livermore Lab Report News Center Around the Lab Contacts For Reporters Livermore Lab Report News Archive News Releases Social Media & Multi Media Livermore Lab Report A weekly...

83

Federal Register Notice: National Nuclear Security Administration Site-Wide  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Register Notice: National Nuclear Security Administration Register Notice: National Nuclear Security Administration Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Sandia National Laboratories, New Mexico (SNL/NM) Federal Register Notice: National Nuclear Security Administration Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Sandia National Laboratories, New Mexico (SNL/NM) Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 156 / Friday, August 12, 2011 / Notices. National Nuclear Security Administration Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Sandia National Laboratories, New Mexico (SNL/NM). NNSA.SWEIS_.SNL_.NM_.pdf More Documents & Publications EIS-0466: Re-opening of Public Scoping Period and Announcement of Additional Public Scoping Meetings EIS-0466: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0281: Notice of Intent to Prepare a Site-Wide Environmental Impact

84

Review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Health Services...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

and Health Administration SQUIRM Super Quality Improvement and Risk Management 1 OFFICE OF OVERSIGHT REVIEW OF THE LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORIES HEALTH SERVICES...

85

Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - February 2009 Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - February 2009 February 2009 Inspection of Emergency Management at the Livermore Site Office and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight inspected the emergency management program at DOE's Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) in October/November 2008. The inspection was performed by Independent Oversight's Office of Emergency Management Oversight. This 2008 inspection found that overall, the LLNL emergency management program is, with a few exceptions, well defined and better implemented in most areas than observed during previous inspections, but some implementation weaknesses remain that diminish the ability of the program

86

Ten-Year Site Plans (TYSP) | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

The TYSPs are not binding plans of action. Current Final TYSPs, FY2013-2022: Kansas City Plant TYSP Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory TYSP Los Alamos National Laboratory...

87

Bonneville Power Administration Site Environmental Report, 1991.  

SciTech Connect

In 1991, in order to provide BPA`s management with environmental information for decision making, and to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, BPA completed 15 environmental impact evaluations and decision documents, with many more in progress. BPA received the results of two US Department of Energy (DOE) environmental management audits, which noted areas for improvement in our operations. We completed Action Plans in response to each DOE report. We received one administrative complaint from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) concerning a 1990 spill in Arlington, Oregon, caused by a BPA subcontractor. BPA responded promptly to EPA`s findings and concerns. There were 32 new spill/release incidents, most involving failure of Polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) capacitors. Cleanup of these spills/releases has proceeded satisfactorily. BPA continued vigorous efforts to clean up substations contaminated with residuals of oil and PCB from past spills. BPA took several actions to improve our environmental performance with respect to water quality. The BPA environmental team developed a long-term schedule for environmental appraisals and audits, identifying facilities and projects that will receive audits through 1996.

United States. Bonneville Power Administration.

1992-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

88

Bonneville Power Administration 1991 site environmental report  

SciTech Connect

In 1991, in order to provide BPA's management with environmental information for decision making, and to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, BPA completed 15 environmental impact evaluations and decision documents, with many more in progress. BPA received the results of two US Department of Energy (DOE) environmental management audits, which noted areas for improvement in our operations. We completed Action Plans in response to each DOE report. We received one administrative complaint from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) concerning a 1990 spill in Arlington, Oregon, caused by a BPA subcontractor. BPA responded promptly to EPA's findings and concerns. There were 32 new spill/release incidents, most involving failure of Polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) capacitors. Cleanup of these spills/releases has proceeded satisfactorily. BPA continued vigorous efforts to clean up substations contaminated with residuals of oil and PCB from past spills. BPA took several actions to improve our environmental performance with respect to water quality. The BPA environmental team developed a long-term schedule for environmental appraisals and audits, identifying facilities and projects that will receive audits through 1996.

Not Available

1992-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

89

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Experimental Test Site (Site 300) Salinity Evaluation and Minimization Plan for Cooling Towers and Mechanical Equipment Discharges  

SciTech Connect

This document was created to comply with the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB) Waste Discharge Requirement (Order No. 98-148). This order established new requirements to assess the effect of and effort required to reduce salts in process water discharged to the subsurface. This includes the review of technical, operational, and management options available to reduce total dissolved solids (TDS) concentrations in cooling tower and mechanical equipment water discharges at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's (LLNL's) Experimental Test Site (Site 300) facility. It was observed that for the six cooling towers currently in operation, the total volume of groundwater used as make up water is about 27 gallons per minute and the discharge to the subsurface via percolation pits is 13 gallons per minute. The extracted groundwater has a TDS concentration of 700 mg/L. The cooling tower discharge concentrations range from 700 to 1,400 mg/L. There is also a small volume of mechanical equipment effluent being discharged to percolation pits, with a TDS range from 400 to 3,300 mg/L. The cooling towers and mechanical equipment are maintained and operated in a satisfactory manner. No major leaks were identified. Currently, there are no re-use options being employed. Several approaches known to reduce the blow down flow rate and/or TDS concentration being discharged to the percolation pits and septic systems were reviewed for technical feasibility and cost efficiency. These options range from efforts as simple as eliminating leaks to implementing advanced and innovative treatment methods. The various options considered, and their anticipated effect on water consumption, discharge volumes, and reduced concentrations are listed and compared in this report. Based on the assessment, it was recommended that there is enough variability in equipment usage, chemistry, flow rate, and discharge configurations that each discharge location at Site 300 should be considered separately when deciding on an approach for reducing the salt discharge to the subsurface. The smaller units may justify moderate changes to equipment, and may benefit from increased cleaning frequencies, more accurate and suitable chemical treatment, and sources of make up water and discharge re-use. The larger cooling towers would be more suitable for automated systems where they don't already exist, re-circulation and treatment of blow down water, and enhanced chemical dosing strategies. It may be more technically feasible and cost efficient for the smaller cooling towers to be replaced by closed loop dry coolers or hybrid towers. There are several potential steps that could be taken at each location to reduce the TDS concentration and/or water use. These include: sump water filtration, minimization of drift, accurate chemical dosing, and use of scale and corrosion coupons for chemical calibration. The implementation of some of these options could be achieved by a step-wise approach taken at two representative facilities. Once viable prototype systems have been proven in the field, systematic implementation should proceed for the remaining systems, with cost, desired reduction, and general feasibility taken into consideration for such systems.

Daily III, W D

2010-02-24T23:59:59.000Z

90

National Nuclear Security Administration Pantex Site Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

JAN 2 7 2012 JAN 2 7 2012 MEMORANDUM FOR: TIMOTHY G. LYNCH ACTING GENERAL COUNSEL FROM: STEVEN C. ERHART MANAGER SUBJECT: Submission of Annual National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Planning Summaries for Fiscal Year 2012 Attached are the Pantex Site Office (PXSO) Annual NEPA Planning Summaries. All PXSO NEPA documentation expected in the near future or already under development is listed in these forms. This information is being disseminated through the Pantex Website at www.pantex.com and will be made available to the public in area Department of Energy Information Repositories. PXSO does not anticipate preparing any Environmental Assessments within the next 12 months or any Environmental Impact Statements within the next 24 months. We have begun preparing a new

91

National Nuclear Security Administration Pantex Site Office  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

JAN 22 2010 MEMORANDUM FOR: J. Brian Bidwell, Prime Contract Manager, Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Pantex, LLC / / / FROM: Seb M. Klein, Contracting Officer, Pantex Site Offic ~ SUBJECT: Contract No. DE-AC04-00AL66620, Contract Modification No. M193 to B& W Pantex Contract Enclosed for your retention is an executed copy of the subject modification. This modification revises Part II, Section I - Contract Clauses, Part III Section J, Appendix A - Definitions, Part I - Compensation System, Part II - Benefits Program, Part IV Miscellaneous Human Resources Programs, incorporates Reimbursement Authorizations Thirty (30) Thirty One (31 ) Thirty Two (32), previously approved by a Contracting Officer, replace Appendix E - "List of Applicable Directives," with as of

92

DOE Selects Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC to Manage its  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC to Manage its Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC to Manage its Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory DOE Selects Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC to Manage its Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory May 8, 2007 - 12:45pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC (LLNS) has been selected to be the management and operating contractor for DOE's National Nuclear Security Administration's (NNSA) Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California. "Livermore National Laboratory is a critical part of our nuclear weapons complex and has been for the last 55 years," Secretary Bodman said. "For the first time since the beginning of the laboratory a new contractor is

93

Supplement Analysis of the 2005 Site-Wide EIS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Livermore Site Office Livermore, California SUPPLEMENT ANALYSIS of the 2005 Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement For Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Volume I: Main Report AUGUST 2011 DOE/EIS-0348-SA-03 i CONTENTS NOTATION.............................................................................................................................. v SUMMARY...........................................................................................................................S-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Purpose and Need............................................................................................

94

Welcome to the Livermore Field Office | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Livermore Field Office | National Nuclear Security Livermore Field Office | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog The National Nuclear Security Administration Welcome to the Livermore Field Office Home > Field Offices > Welcome to the Livermore Field Office Welcome to the Livermore Field Office The NNSA Livermore Field Office (LFO) is located at the Lawrence Livermore

95

Workforce Statistics - Livermore Field Office | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Livermore Field Office | National Nuclear Security Livermore Field Office | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Workforce Statistics - Livermore Field Office Home > About Us > Our Operations > Management and Budget > Office of Civil Rights > Workforce Statistics > Workforce Statistics - Livermore Field Office Workforce Statistics - Livermore Field Office

96

Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Livermore Field  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Livermore Livermore Field Office Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Livermore Field Office The purpose of the Livermore Field Office (LFO) Teclmical Qualification Program (TQP) is to ensure that federal teclmical personnel with safety oversight responsibilities at defense nuclear facilities at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory possess competence commensurate with responsibilities. LFO is committed to ensuring it has the necessary teclmical capabilities to provide the kind of management, direction, and guidance essential to safe operation ofDOE's defense nuclear facilities. LFO TQP Self-Assessment, May 2013 More Documents & Publications Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Nevada Site Office Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Sandia Site Office

97

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

LLNL Home. Latest News Headlines. LLNL, Intel, Cray produce big data machine. November 4, 2013. ... Operated by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, ...

98

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Livermore researchers have pioneered the formulation and application of silica aerogels, an extremely lightweight glassy material with ideal mechanical characteristics for...

99

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Operational Drill at the...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

HSS Independent Activity Report - Rev. 0 Report Number: HIAR LLNL-2013-02-27 Site: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's...

100

Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

February 2013 February 2013 Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - February 2013 February 2013 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Operational Drill at the B332 Plutonium Facility [HIAR LLNL-2013-02-27] The Livermore Site Office (LSO) and Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC (LLNS) requested personnel from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations (HS-45) to observe an operational drill at the Plutonium Facility in Building 332 (B332). LSO and LLNS desired HS-45's participation to help determine the maturity of the operational drill program by providing independent expertise in the matter at a time when HS-45 personnel were already on site conducting an emergency management review. LLNS administered this operational drill using the DOE guidance for

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "administration livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Revised Livermore seismic hazard estimates for sixty-nine nuclear power plant sites east of the Rocky Mountains. Final report, July 1993--March 1994  

SciTech Connect

The draft version of this report presented updated Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) probabilistic seismic hazard analysis estimates for 69 nuclear power plant sites in the region of the United States east of the Rocky Mountains. LLNL performed a re-elicitation of seismicity and ground motion experts to improve their estimates of uncertainty in seismicity parameters and ground motion models. Using these revised inputs, LLNL updated the seismic hazard estimates documented in NUREG/CR-5250 (1989). These updated hazard estimates will be used in future NRC actions. The draft was issued for public comment in October 1993. By the end of the public comment period, February 28, 1994, comments had been received from two nuclear industry companies. The comments from these companies neither contested nor suggested amendments to the technical data conveyed in the report. Rather, they both suggest changes in the Individual Plant External Event Examination (IPEEE) program scope. This report is not the forum for discussion of the IPEEE program. Possible modification to the scope of the IPEEE will be examined in its own setting. Therefore, there are no technical differences between the draft report and this final report. Any information as to modifications to the IPEEE program will be provided to the public via an NRC general communication.

Sobel, P.

1994-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

102

Print - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Industrial Partnerships Office P.O. Box 808, L-795 Livermore, CA 94551 Phone: (925) 422-6416 Fax: (925) 423-8988 Operated by Lawrence Livermore ...

103

LVOC - Livermore Valley Open Campus  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Livermore Livermore National Laboratory researchers used meteorological observations and wind farm data in conjunction with high-performance computing to help industry partners...

104

Search - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Industrial Partnerships Office P.O. Box 808, L-795 Livermore, CA 94551 Phone: (925) 422-6416 Fax: (925) 423-8988 Operated by Lawrence Livermore ...

105

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

team are using Livermore's 6.2-meter-long, two-stage, light-gas gun to conduct their shock experiments on organic liquids. They are focusing initially on cometary impacts. For...

106

Livermore Field Office Public Affairs | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Livermore Field Office Public Affairs | National Nuclear Security Livermore Field Office Public Affairs | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Livermore Field Office Public Affairs Home > Field Offices > Welcome to the Livermore Field Office > Livermore Field Office Public Affairs Livermore Field Office Public Affairs The LFO Office of Public Affairs is the primary point of contact between

107

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Kimberly S. Budil  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

. Steven E. Koonin Under Secretary for Nuclear Security/NNSA Administrator Thomas P. D'Agostino Asst Livermore National Laboratory Historically, most HEDS research has been sponsored by NNSA NNSA's HEDP) Motivated and encouraged by National Academy/workshop reports: Federal response SC/NNSA: Joint Program

Shyy, Wei

108

Sandia National Laboratories: Locations: Livermore, California  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Livermore, California Livermore, California Livermore, California administration building For more than 50 years, the California campus of Sandia National Laboratories has delivered essential science and technology to resolve the nation's most challenging security issues. Many of these challenges - like energy resources, transportation, immigration, ports, and more - surfaced early in the state of California, providing Sandia/California with a special opportunity to participate in the first wave of solutions to important national problems. For example, Sandia's scientists are breaking new ground in energy research and are helping to accelerate the development of next-generation biofuels so that we can reduce our nation's dependence on foreign oil and mitigate the effects of global climate change.

109

Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - June 2, 2005 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June June 2, 2005 Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - June 2, 2005 June 2, 2005 Enforcement Letter Issued to Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory for Quality Assurance Deficiencies related to Weapon Activities, June 2, 2005 This letter is to inform you of the Department of Energy's (DOE) concern regarding several quality assurance-related deficiencies involving actions by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) personnel. These deficiencies were associated with a cracked explosive event that occurred at the Pantex site in January 2004. The timing of this letter is intended to coincide with a DOE enforcement action stemming from this event. Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - June 2, 2005 More Documents & Publications

110

Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - June 2, 2005 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

June June 2, 2005 Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - June 2, 2005 June 2, 2005 Enforcement Letter Issued to Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory for Quality Assurance Deficiencies related to Weapon Activities, June 2, 2005 This letter is to inform you of the Department of Energy's (DOE) concern regarding several quality assurance-related deficiencies involving actions by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) personnel. These deficiencies were associated with a cracked explosive event that occurred at the Pantex site in January 2004. The timing of this letter is intended to coincide with a DOE enforcement action stemming from this event. Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - June 2, 2005 More Documents & Publications

111

Print - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Industrial Partnerships Office P.O. Box 808, L-795 Livermore, CA 94551 Phone: (925) 422-6416 Fax: (925) 423-8988 Operated by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC ...

112

Technologies - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Industrial Partnerships Office P.O. Box 808, L-795 Livermore, CA 94551 Phone: (925) 422-6416 Fax: (925) 423-8988 Operated by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC ...

113

Search - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Industrial Partnerships Office P.O. Box 808, L-795 Livermore, CA 94551 Phone: (925) 422-6416 Fax: (925) 423-8988 Operated by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC ...

114

Application - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Search & Browse Software: Licensing Instructions: Patents: Application. Industrial Partnerships Office P.O. Box 808, L-795 Livermore, CA 94551 ...

115

Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Laborat... Laborat... file:///I|/Data%20Migration%20Task/EIS-0157-FEIS-03-1992/05eis0157_f.html[6/27/2011 9:57:50 AM] APPENDIX F ECOLOGY AND BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT This appendix contains two major sections. Section F.1 is a discussion of the ecological characteristics at the LLNL Livermore site, LLNL Site 300, and SNL, Livermore (referred to collectively as the study sites); and presents information and data on the flora and fauna in the upland areas (see Appendix G for a detailed analysis of wetlands at the study sites). This section focuses on the biological features of LLNL Site 300 because this 7000-acre site is largely undeveloped and represents the most biologically diverse area under study. In contrast, the LLNL Livermore site and SNL, Livermore are developed areas that provide only marginal wildlife habitat because of the high degree of human activity and the few

116

Lab Spotlight: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Designing Biocompatible Microelectronics Pioneering work with polymer-based microfabrication methods at Lawrence Livermore National...

117

FY 2012 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PEP | National Nuclear  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

PEP | National Nuclear PEP | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2012 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PEP Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Performance Evaluations > FY 2012 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PEP FY 2012 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PEP

118

Director of the National Ignition Facility, Lawrence Livermore National  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Director of the National Ignition Facility, Lawrence Livermore National Director of the National Ignition Facility, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > About Us > Who We Are > In The Spotlight > Edward Moses Director of the National Ignition Facility, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

119

Retired lab physicist and computational pioneer, Lawrence Livermore  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Retired lab physicist and computational pioneer, Lawrence Livermore Retired lab physicist and computational pioneer, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > About Us > Who We Are > In The Spotlight > Berni Alder Retired lab physicist and computational pioneer, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

120

Associate director for Physical and Life Sciences, Lawrence Livermore  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Associate director for Physical and Life Sciences, Lawrence Livermore Associate director for Physical and Life Sciences, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > About Us > Who We Are > In The Spotlight > William Goldstein Associate director for Physical and Life Sciences, Lawrence Livermore

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "administration livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

LVOC - Livermore Valley Open Campus  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

LVOC - Livermore Valley Open Campus LVOC - Livermore Valley Open Campus ↓ Case Studies | ↓ About LVOC Get to market faster Making the impossible possible Lawrence Livermore and Sandia National Laboratories are home to some of the world's most unique state-of-the art facilities and resources. For decades, we have been using our combined capabilities, including a workforce of over 7000 employees to solve complex problems for the nation. Visit the science and technology epicenter - the Livermore Valley Open Campus - just east of San Francisco in the Tri-Valley's innovation ecosystem to find out what problems we can solve for you. LVOC Flyer We Keep Industry on the Cutting Edge of Innovative Technology About the Livermore Valley Open Campus LVOC Rendering Open for Business: The Livermore Valley Open Campus is located at the

122

Safety Basis Requirements for Nonnuclear Facilities at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site-Specific Work Smart Standard Revision 3 December 2006  

SciTech Connect

This standard establishes requirements that, when coupled with Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's (LLNL's) Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS) methods and other Work Smart Standards for assuring worker safety, assure that the impacts of nonnuclear operations authorized in LLNL facilities are well understood and controlled in a manner that protects the health of workers, the public, and the environment. All LLNL facilities shall be classified based on potential for adverse impact of operations to the health of co-located (i.e., nearby) workers and the public in accordance with this standard, Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 830, Subpart B, and Department of Energy Order (DOE O) 420.2A.

Beach, D; Brereton, S; Failor, R; Hildum, J; Ingram, C; Spagnolo, S; van Warmerdam, C

2007-06-07T23:59:59.000Z

123

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

March/April 2008 March/April 2008 4 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Extending the Search for Extending the Search for A new imager will allow astrophysicists to study the atmospheres of distant planets. T HE discovery of other solar systems beyond ours has been the stuff of science fiction for decades. Great excitement greeted the positive identification of the first planet outside our solar system in 1995. Since then, scientists have identified approximately 250 extrasolar planets (exoplanets), but they have had no way to study the majority of these planets or their

124

Leadership | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Leadership | National Nuclear Security Administration Leadership | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Leadership Home > Field Offices > Welcome to the Livermore Field Office > Leadership Leadership Kimberly D. Lebak, Manager Kim Lebak became the Livermore Site Manager in January, 2012 for the National Nuclear Security Administration of the U.S. Department of Energy.

125

UC Regents Visit Lawrence Livermore  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of a regional-scale earthquake simulation at TSF and were briefed on the Lab's response to the Fukushima Daiichi power plant disaster in Japan. Livermore Mayor John...

126

Search - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Giving animals in need a HOME. November 14, 2013. LLNL, Intel, Cray produce big data machine. ... Operated by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, ...

127

Technologies - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Information & Communication. Industrial Partnerships Office P.O. Box 808, L-795 Livermore, CA 94551 Phone: (925) 422-6416 Fax: (925) 423-8988

128

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL):  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

IPO Fact Sheet Strategic Diversity Program Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) works with other national laboratories to coordinate and integrate programmatic...

129

Environmental Survey preliminary report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California  

SciTech Connect

This report presents the preliminary findings from the first phase of the Environmental Survey of the Department of Energy (DOE) Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), conducted December 1 through 19, 1986. The Survey is being conducted by an interdisciplinary team of environmental specialists, led and managed by the Office of Environment, Safety and Health's Office of Environmental Audit. Individual team components are being supplied by a private contractor. The objective of the Survey is to identify environmental problems and areas of environmental risk associated with LLNL. The Survey covers all environmental media all areas of environmental regulation. It is being performed in accordance with the DOE Environmental Survey Manual. This phase of the Survey involves the review of existing site environmental data, observations of the operations performed at LLNL, and interviews with site personnel. A Sampling and Analysis Plan was developed to assist in further assessing certain of the environmental problems identified during performance of on-site activities. The Sampling and Analysis Plan will be executed by a DOE National Laboratory. When completed, the results will be incorporated into the LLNL Environmental Survey Interim Report. The Interim Report will reflect the final determinations of the LLNL Survey. 70 refs., 58 figs., 52 tabs.,

Not Available

1987-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

130

Sandia National Laboratories: Locations: Livermore, California: Visiting  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

California California Livermore, California administration building Our location and hours of operation Sandia/California is located at 7011 East Avenue in Livermore, Calif., a suburban community about 45 miles east of San Francisco. Positioned at the eastern edge of the San Francisco Bay Area, Sandia is within easy commuting distance of many affordable housing communities in San Joaquin County and the Central Valley. The official hours of operation at Sandia/California are from 7:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. PST, Monday through Friday. General inquiries can be made by calling (925) 294-3000. See our contacts page for additional information. Getting here All three major airports in the San Francisco Bay Area provide access to Sandia/California. Oakland International Airport is the closest airport to

131

FY 2009 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2009 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Performance Evaluations > FY 2009 Lawrence Livermore National Security,

132

Southwestern Power Administration annual site environmental report CY 1997  

SciTech Connect

This report provides a synopsis of Southwestern Power Administration`s (Southwestern`s) effectiveness in managing its operations in an environmentally responsible manner. In CY 1997, the Office of Environmental, Safety, and Health was reorganized and incorporated into the Division of Acquisition and Property. The Division of Acquisition, Property, and Environmental Management maintains responsibility for development, oversight, and implementation of environmental programs. Senior Management at Southwestern has taken actions to increase environmental awareness throughout the organization. During CY 1997, (Southwestern) was not involved in any known programs or activities that had adverse impacts on the environment. The 1997 Environmental Appraisal, a portion of Southwestern`s Self-Assessment and Appraisal Program, indicated approximately 90% compliance with Southwestern`s written environmental programs. Southwestern continued to function throughout CY 1997 in an operations and maintenance posture with minor substation projects.

NONE

1998-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

133

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2011 Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2011 September 2011 Review of Integrated Safety Management System Effectiveness at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory The purpose of this review was to assess the effectiveness of the integrated safety management system (ISMS) established and implemented by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2011 More Documents & Publications Independent Oversight Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Management at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Technical Appendices, Volume II, December 2004 Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory,

134

Livermore Biomass Facility | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

| Sign Up Search Page Edit with form History Facebook icon Twitter icon Livermore Biomass Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Livermore Biomass Facility Facility...

135

Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

February 2013 Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - February 2013 February 2013 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Operational Drill at the B332...

136

Environmental Assessment for The Proposed Construction and Operation of a Biosafety Level 3 Facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA (DOE/EA-1442) (12/02)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environmental Assessment for The Proposed Construction and Operation of a Biosafety Level 3 Facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California December 2002 Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Oakland Operations Office EA for the Proposed Construction and Operation of a Biosafety Level 3 Facility at LLNL ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), has responsibility for national programs to reduce and counter threats from weapons of mass destruction including nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons (bioweapons). NNSA's bioscience work at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) in support of these missions requires work with infectious agents, including those historically used for bioweapons.

137

Technologies - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Harmonic Air Motor; Two Stage Engine Technology; Industrial Partnerships Office P.O. Box 808, L-795 Livermore, CA 94551 Phone: (925) 422-6416 Fax: (925) 423-8988

138

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory: Phonebook  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Phonebook Phonebook Address and Phone Numbers Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 7000 East Ave., Livermore, CA 94550-9234( For deliveries, enter off of Greenville Road) P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA 94551-0808 (Mail) Main Operator (925) 422-1100 Fax (925) 422-1370, Fax verification (925) 422-1100 Employment Verification Hot Line (925) 422-9348 Public Affairs (925) 422-4599 Search for individuals by last name or full name. Use * for a wildcard. Phonebook: Warning: This Electronic Phonebook is provided solely for official use by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory community. Using information obtained from this Phonebook to contact individuals for purposes other than official Laboratory business is forbidden. If you have any questions, please contact Public Affairs at (925) 422-4599.

139

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | July 2011 Aerial View Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | July 2011 Aerial View Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's (LLNL) primary mission is research and development in support of national security. As a nuclear weapons design laboratory, LLNL has responsibilities in nuclear stockpile stewardship. LLNL also applies its expertise to prevent the spread and use of weapons of mass destruction and strengthen homeland security. Other areas include advanced defense technologies, energy, environment, biosciences, and basic science. Enforcement July 22, 2013 Enforcement Letter, NEL-2013-03 Issued to Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC related to Programmatic

140

Enforcement Documents - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Enforcement Documents - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory July 22, 2013 Enforcement Letter, NEL-2013-03 Issued to Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC related to Programmatic Deficiencies in the Software Quality Assurance Program at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory February 23, 2006 Preliminary Notice of Violation, University of California - EA-2006-01 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to the University of California related to Radiological Uptakes, a Radioactive Material Spill, and Radiological Protection Program, Quality Assurance, and Safety Basis Deficiencies at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory June 2, 2005 Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - June 2, 2005

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "administration livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Links | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Home > Field Offices > Welcome to the NNSA Production Office > Links Home > Field Offices > Welcome to the NNSA Production Office > Links Links NNSA HQ National Nuclear Security Administration Advanced Simulation & Computing NNSA Graduate Program NNSA Small Business Program Office of Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Field Offices NNSA Albuquerque Complex Kansas City Field Office Livermore Field Office Los Alamos Field Office Naval Reactors Idaho Branch Office Nevada Field Office Sandia Field Office DOE Oak Ridge Sites Oak Ridge Office Oak Ridge National Laboratory UCOR Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board American Museum of Science and Energy City of Oak Ridge Plants Laboratories Bechtel Nevada Bettis Laboratory Kansas City Plant Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

142

FY 2012 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

PER Summary | National PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2012 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Performance Evaluations > FY 2012 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, ...

143

Livermore Field Office Technical Qualification Program Self Assessment Report, May 31, 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Livermore Field Office Technical Qualification Program Self Assessment Report May 31, 2013 Assessment Team Richard crowe:NNSA NA-SH-80, Team Leader Dan Schwendenman, NNSA NA-SH-50 Carol lngn;:NNSA LFO Facility Operations Approved By: Phll ' F~nt .r/:;,/;.J ~I Date Date Date~/ NNSA Livermore Field Office TQP Self Assessment (NNSA LSO TQP SA) Report Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................. 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 3 Scope and Methodology ...................................................................................................... 3

144

Concerns with Consulting Contract Administration at Various Department Sites, IG-0889  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Inspection Report Inspection Report Concerns with Consulting Contract Administration at Various Department Sites DOE/IG-0889 June 2013 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits & Inspections Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 June 7, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY OF ENERGY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Inspection Report on "Concerns with Consulting Contract Administration at Various Department Sites" INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE The mission of the Department of Energy (Department) is to ensure America's national security and prosperity by addressing its energy, environmental, and nuclear weapons challenges through

145

National Nuclear Security Administration  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Walsh, Office of the Under Secretary, S-3 Maurice Daugherty, EM 3.1 Steve Taylor, Kansas City Site Office Camille Yuan-Soo Hoo, Livermore Site Office Ed Wilmot, Los Alamos Site...

146

2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Lawrence Livermore National...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Lawrence Livermore National...

147

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION I National Nuclear Security Administration/Kansas City Site Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Nuclear Security Administration/Kansas City Site Office National Nuclear Security Administration/Kansas City Site Office A. Description of Proposed Action: (lor 2 sentences: include title, general activities, location, timeframc) Kirtland Operations - Project 1769 - Relocate NC-135 Site Operations: transfer existing operations from the NC-135 site on Kirtland Air force Base (KAFB) to leased and other Federal property. No buildings designed for occupancy are being relocated. Transfer will consist of tenant improvements to the new leased properties and transfer through the relocation of existing equipment and office personnel. November 2012 thru April 2014. B. Number and Title of the Categorical Exclusion Being Applied: (See text in 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D.) B 1.24 - Property Transfer B 1.31 - Installation or relocation of machinery and equipment

148

Final closure plan for the high-explosives open burn treatment facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Experimental Test Site 300  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document addresses the interim status closure of the HE Open Bum Treatment Facility, as detailed by Title 22, Division 4.5, Chapter 15, Article 7 of the Califonia Code of Regulations (CCR) and by Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 265, Subpart G, ``Closure and Post Closure.`` The Closure Plan (Chapter 1) and the Post- Closure Plan (Chapter 2) address the concept of long-term hazard elimination. The Closure Plan provides for capping and grading the HE Open Bum Treatment Facility and revegetating the immediate area in accordance with applicable requirements. The Closure Plan also reflects careful consideration of site location and topography, geologic and hydrologic factors, climate, cover characteristics, type and amount of wastes, and the potential for contaminant migration. The Post-Closure Plan is designed to allow LLNL to monitor the movement, if any, of pollutants from the treatment area. In addition, quarterly inspections will ensure that all surfaces of the closed facility, including the cover and diversion ditches, remain in good repair, thus precluding the potential for contaminant migration.

Mathews, S.

1997-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

149

Expanding Your Horizons Conference, Lawrence Livermore National...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Lab Expanding Your Horizons Conference, Lawrence Livermore National Lab August 1, 2013 2:45PM EDT to August 31, 2013 3:45PM EDT University of the...

150

Lawrence Livermore announces voluntary separation program  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

| NR-13-05-02 Lawrence Livermore announces voluntary separation program Lynda L Seaver, LLNL, (925) 423-3103, seaver1@llnl.gov Printer-friendly Lawrence Livermore National...

151

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Former Production Workers...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Laboratory, Former Production Workers Screening Projects Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Former Production Workers Screening Projects Project Name: Worker Health Protection...

152

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL): News Releases...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Trek: Into Darkness" (5162013) Renewable energy demonstration project (5142013) LLNL announces voluntary separation program (582013) RFI released for Livermore Valley...

153

Technical Safety Appraisal of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect

This report documents the results of the Technical Safety Appraisal (TSA) of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) (including the Site 300 area), Livermore, California, conducted from February 26 to April 5, 1990. The purpose of the assessment was to provide the Secretary of Energy with the status of Environment, Safety and Health (ES H) Programs at LLNL. LLNL is operated by the University of California for the Department of Energy (DOE), and is a multi-program, mission-oriented institution engaged in fundamental and applied research programs that require a multidisciplinary approach. 1 fig.

1990-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

154

Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - May 2007 Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - May 2007 May 2007 Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Programs at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), conducted an inspection of environment, safety, and health (ES&H) programs at the DOE Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) during January and February 2007. The inspection was performed by Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations. LSO's oversight has matured, and operational awareness and assessments have improved in gathering data and identifying deficiencies. LSO

155

UMKC Web Site Starter Kit The Web Site Starter Kit is a tool for UMKC academic units, administrative offices and affiliate organizations planning  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

1 UMKC Web Site Starter Kit The Web Site Starter Kit is a tool for UMKC academic units, administrative offices and affiliate organizations planning to redesign an existing Web site or develop a new one Web site. They are based not only on research into design and content best practices; they are also

Zeng, Yong - Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Missouri

156

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Environmental Report 2010  

SciTech Connect

The purposes of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Environmental Report 2010 are to record Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's (LLNL's) compliance with environmental standards and requirements, describe LLNL's environmental protection and remediation programs, and present the results of environmental monitoring at the two LLNL sites - the Livermore site and Site 300. The report is prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) by LLNL's Environmental Protection Department. Submittal of the report satisfies requirements under DOE Order 231.1A, Environmental Safety and Health Reporting, and DOE Order 5400.5, Radiation Protection of the Public and Environment. The report is distributed electronically and is available at https://saer.llnl.gov/, the website for the LLNL annual environmental report. Previous LLNL annual environmental reports beginning in 1994 are also on the website. Some references in the electronic report text are underlined, which indicates that they are clickable links. Clicking on one of these links will open the related document, data workbook, or website that it refers to. The report begins with an executive summary, which provides the purpose of the report and an overview of LLNL's compliance and monitoring results. The first three chapters provide background information: Chapter 1 is an overview of the location, meteorology, and hydrogeology of the two LLNL sites; Chapter 2 is a summary of LLNL's compliance with environmental regulations; and Chapter 3 is a description of LLNL's environmental programs with an emphasis on the Environmental Management System including pollution prevention. The majority of the report covers LLNL's environmental monitoring programs and monitoring data for 2010: effluent and ambient air (Chapter 4); waters, including wastewater, storm water runoff, surface water, rain, and groundwater (Chapter 5); and terrestrial, including soil, sediment, vegetation, foodstuff, ambient radiation, and special status wildlife and plants (Chapter 6). Complete monitoring data, which are summarized in the body of the report, are provided in Appendix A. The remaining three chapters discuss the radiological impact on the public from LLNL operations (Chapter 7), LLNL's groundwater remediation program (Chapter 8), and quality assurance for the environmental monitoring programs (Chapter 9). The report uses System International units, consistent with the federal Metric Conversion Act of 1975 and Executive Order 12770, Metric Usage in Federal Government Programs (1991). For ease of comparison to environmental reports issued prior to 1991, dose values and many radiological measurements are given in both metric and U.S. customary units. A conversion table is provided in the glossary.

Jones, H E; Bertoldo, N A; Campbell, C G; Cerruti, S J; Coty, J D; Dibley, V R; Doman, J L; Grayson, A R; MacQueen, D H; Wegrecki, A M; Armstrong, D H; Brigdon, S L; Heidecker, K R; Hollister, R K; Khan, H N; Lee, G S; Nelson, J C; Paterson, L E; Salvo, V J; Schwartz, W W; Terusaki, S H; Wilson, K R; Woods, J M; Yimbo, P O; Gallegos, G M; Terrill, A A; Revelli, M A; Rosene, C A; Blake, R G; Woollett, J S; Kumamoto, G

2011-09-14T23:59:59.000Z

157

Livermore Contract Announcement | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Livermore Contract Announcement Livermore Contract Announcement Livermore Contract Announcement May 8, 2007 - 12:45pm Addthis Remarks as Prepared for Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman Good afternoon. Thank you all for coming and welcome to the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory employees who are watching this on our Webcast. I know my remarks are of special importance to you. The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory opened in 1952 using the "team science" approach pioneered by Ernest O. Lawrence. Livermore was - and is - a place where "new ideas" are dominant. Few would have predicted back then how deeply the work conducted at Lawrence Livermore would influence the course of history. And yet it has. Today is the 123rd anniversary of President Harry S Truman's birth. The first Cold War president, Truman's decisive

158

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 2007 Annual Report  

SciTech Connect

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's many outstanding accomplishments in 2007 are a tribute to a dedicated staff, which is shaping the Laboratory's future as we go through a period of transition and transformation. The achievements highlighted in this annual report illustrate our focus on the important problems that affect our nation's security and global stability, our application of breakthrough science and technology to tackle those problems, and our commitment to safe, secure, and efficient operations. In May 2007, the Department of Energy (DOE) awarded Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC (LLNS), a new public-private partnership, the contract to manage and operate the Laboratory starting in October. Since its inception in 1952, the Laboratory had been managed by the University of California (UC) for the DOE's National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) and predecessor organizations. UC is one of the parent organizations that make up LLNS, and UC's presence in the new management entity will help us carry forward our strong tradition of multidisciplinary science and technology. 'Team science' applied to big problems was pioneered by the Laboratory's co-founder and namesake, Ernest O. Lawrence, and has been our hallmark ever since. Transition began fully a year before DOE's announcement. More than 1,600 activities had to be carried out to transition the Laboratory from management by a not-for-profit to a private entity. People, property, and procedures as well as contracts, formal agreements, and liabilities had to be transferred to LLNS. The pre-transition and transition teams did a superb job, and I thank them for their hard work. Transformation is an ongoing process at Livermore. We continually reinvent ourselves as we seek breakthroughs that impact emerging national needs. An example is our development in the late 1990s of a portable instrument that could rapidly detect DNA signatures, research that started with a view toward the potential threat of terrorist use of biological weapons. As featured in our annual report, activities in this area have grown to many important projects contributing to homeland security and disease prevention and control. At times transformation happens in large steps. Such was the case when nuclear testing stopped in the early 1990s. As one of the nation's nuclear weapon design laboratories, Livermore embarked on the Stockpile Stewardship Program. The objectives are to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the nation's nuclear weapons stockpile and to develop a science-based, thorough understanding of the performance of nuclear weapons. The ultimate goal is to sustain confidence in an aging stockpile without nuclear testing. Now is another time of major change for the Laboratory as the nation is resizing its nuclear deterrent and NNSA begins taking steps to transform the nuclear weapons complex to meet 21st-century national security needs. As you will notice in the opening commentary to each section of this report, the Laboratory's senior management team is a mixture of new and familiar faces. LLNS drew the best talent from its parent organizations--Bechtel National, UC, Babcock & Wilcox, the Washington Group Division of URS, and Battelle--to lead the Laboratory. We are honored to take on the responsibility and see a future with great opportunities for Livermore to apply its exceptional science and technology to important national problems. We will work with NNSA to build on the successful Stockpile Stewardship Program and transform the nation's nuclear weapons complex to become smaller, safer, more secure, and more cost effective. Our annual report highlights progress in many relevant areas. Laboratory scientists are using astonishing computational capabilities--including BlueGene/L, the world's fastest supercomputer with a revolutionary architecture and over 200,000 processors--to gain key insights about performance of aging nuclear weapons. What we learn will help us sustain the stockpile without nuclear testing. Preparations are underway to start experiments at

Chrzanowski, P; Walter, K

2008-04-25T23:59:59.000Z

159

Oversight Reports - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Oversight Reports - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory October 2, 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - September 2013 Review of the Fire Protection Program at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory July 19, 2013 Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - July 2013 Review of Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory April 12, 2013 Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - February 2013 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Operational Drill at the B332 Plutonium Facility [HIAR LLNL-2013-02-27] December 18, 2012 Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -

160

Administration  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This document has been funded by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under Contract 68-W6-0014. It has been subject to administrative review by all agencies participating in the Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable, and has been approved for publication. Any mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. TABLE OF CONTENTS

Technologies Roundtable

1998-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "administration livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Specific Administrative Controls Review at the Hanford Site with EM at DOE-RL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations Activity Report on its Participation in a Review of Selected Aspects of Nuclear Safety at the Hanford Site Plutonium Finishing Plant, November 29 - December 3, 2010 The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security, participated in the Office of Environmental Management Office of Standards and Quality Assurance, EM-23, review of Specific Administrative Controls (SAC) at the Hanford Site. The EM-23 review included selected programs at the Hanford Site that are under the auspices of the DOE Richland Operations Office. During the review, Independent Oversight personnel reviewed a few of the SACs applicable to the Plutonium Finishing Plant.

162

REMOVAL OF THE GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION WATERTOWN, MASSACHUSETTS, PROPERTY FROM THE SITE DECOMMISSIONING MANAGEMENT PLAN  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

To inform the Commission that the staff plans to remove the General Services Administration (GSA) Watertown, MA property from the Site Decommissioning Management Plan (SDMP) as it meets the radiological criteria for unrestricted use in 10 CFR 20.1402. BACKGROUND: The GSA property is located in Watertown, Middlesex County, MA, approximately 13 kilometers (8 miles) west of Boston. It was a parcel of the former Watertown Arsenal used by the U.S. Army for depleted uranium (DU) munition operations authorized under Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) License No. SUB-238. From 1955-1966, an area northeast of the Arsenal site (now identified as the GSA property) was designated for stabilization of DU scrap from Arsenal activities. Operations involved igniting DU fragments at a specific site location (burn pit) to reduce volume, packaging the material in waste containers, and preparing shipments for offsite disposal. Contamination of soil resulted from spillage of the DU fragments and burned

William D. Travers

2003-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

163

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > M & O Support Department > Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory DE-AC52-07NA27344 Operated by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC BASIC Contract (Official) Modifications (Official) Funding Mods Available Upon Request Conformed Contract (Unofficial) LLNL Sec A (SF33) (pdf, 91KB) See Modifications Section under Conformed Contract Link LLNS Conformed Contract (weblink) LLNL Sec B-H (pdf, 306KB) LLNL Sec I pdf 687KB LLNL Sec J Appx A (pdf, 67KB) LLNL Sec J Appx B (pdf, 191KB) LLNL Sec J Appx C (pdf, 11KB) LLNL Sec J Appx D (pdf, 18KB)

164

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Livermore National Laboratory Livermore National Laboratory (Redirected from Lawrence Livermore National Lab) Jump to: navigation, search Logo: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Name Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Address 7000 East Ave. Place Livermore, California Zip 94550-9234 Number of employees 5001-10,000 Year founded 1952 Notes LLNL-WEB-422768 Coordinates 37.6798282°, -121.7107786° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":37.6798282,"lon":-121.7107786,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

165

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION I National Nuclear Security Administration/Kansas City Site Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

I I National Nuclear Security Administration/Kansas City Site Office A. Description of Proposed Action: (lor 2 sentences; include title, general activities, location, timeframe) Kansas City Plant -Routine Operating and Administrative Activities (ROAA) - NCR KCPIO·07: NEPA action levels for planned changes as defined in the FY2011 Health Safety & Environment Management System Description and Worker Safety & Health Program document, Section 7,0 Work Planning and Control, signed 9/212010. October 2010 thru September 201 1. B. Number and Title of the Categorical Exclusion Being Applied: (See text in 10 CPR 1021, Subpart D.) Multiple, which could include but not limited to: A7-A9, All, B1.3, B1.23, B1.3l as listed in Table 3.b of the document

166

Sandia National Laboratories: Locations: Livermore, California...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

in the cities, on the beaches, and in the mountains. Top 15 hometowns of SandiaCalifornia employees Livermore (34%) Tracy (8%) Pleasanton (5%) Dublin (4%) Oakland (3%)...

167

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory opens High Performance...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

06302011 | NR-11-06-08 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory opens High Performance Computing Innovation Center for collaboration with industry Donald B Johnston, LLNL,...

168

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL): Business Opportunities  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

IPO Fact Sheet Strategic Diversity Program Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) spends approximately 650,000,000 annually through procurements to a diverse group of...

169

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

a review of nuclear safety programs at the DOE Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) from October through November 2009. The review was performed by the HSS Office of...

170

Lawrence Livermore announces new strategic national security...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Livermore announces new strategic national security assignments Lynda L Seaver, LLNL, (925) 423-3103, seaver1@llnl.gov Printer-friendly Bruce Goodwin Photos by Julie...

171

Outline of UCRL-Livermore Rover Program  

SciTech Connect

This report describes the development plan, and problems which would be addressed, for the nuclear rocket engine design/UCRL-Livermore ROVER.

York, H.F.

1995-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

172

Harmonic Air Motor - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Current Weather. Protocol Office. Where to stay. Tri-Valley Visitors Bureau. City of Livermore. Community. Our Community. Discovery Center. ... such ...

173

Technologies - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

home \\ technologies. Technologies: Ready-to-Sign Licenses: Software: Patents: Technologies ... for the Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration

174

Creating the laboratory`s future; A strategy for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect

``Creating The Laboratory`s Future`` describes Livermore`s roles and responsibilities as a Department of Energy (DOE) national laboratory and sets the foundation for decisions about the Laboratory`s programs and operations. It summarizes Livermore`s near-term strategy, which builds on recent Lab achievements and world events affecting their future. It also discusses their programmatic and operational emphases and highlights program areas that the authors believe can grow through application of Lab science and technology. Creating the Laboratory`s Future reflects their very strong focus on national security, important changes in the character of their national security work, major efforts are under way to overhaul their administrative and operational systems, and the continuing challenge of achieving national consensus on the role of the government in energy, environment, and the biosciences.

NONE

1997-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

175

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review, Lawrence Livermore National Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - December 2009 Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - December 2009 December 2009 Review of Nuclear Safety at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), performed a review of nuclear safety programs at the DOE Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) from October through November 2009. The review was performed by the HSS Office of Independent Oversight's Office of Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Evaluations. LLNL has made significant progress in establishing and implementing comprehensive programs to effectively manage nuclear safety. LLNL has devoted considerable management attention and resources to enhance nuclear

176

Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Volume I - December 2004 Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Volume I - December 2004 December 2004 Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Management at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance (OA), within the Office of Security and Safety Performance Assurance (SSA), conducted an inspection of environment, safety, and health (ES&H) at the DOE Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) during October and November 2004. The inspection was performed by the OA Office of Environment, Safety and Health Evaluations. LSO and LLNL have established ISM systems that are conceptually sound but

177

Sandia/California named winner of "Environmental Spirit" Award by Livermore  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

RELEASES RELEASES FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE January 31, 2008 Sandia/California named winner of "Environmental Spirit" Award by Livermore Chamber of Commerce LIVERMORE, Calif. -Sandia National Laboratories' Livermore, Calif., site has been selected by the Livermore Chamber of Commerce as recipient of its inaugural Environmental Spirit Award. The award was presented to Sandia for its environmental programs and ongoing commitment to protecting the environment, wildlife, and numerous species on the laboratory's 400-acre site, says Dale Kaye Chamber president and CEO. "Sandia has not only shown tremendous sensitivity to the land they occupy, but also a dedicated commitment to its community," says Kaye. "This is an organization that helps to protect our world and we are

178

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Operational Drill at the B332 Plutonium Facility  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

HSS Independent Activity Report - Rev. 0 Report Number: HIAR LLNL-2013-02-27 Site: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Operational Drill at the B332 Plutonium Facility Date of Activity: 02/27/2013 Report Preparer: Thomas Rogers Activity Description/Purpose: The Livermore Site Office (LSO) and Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC (LLNS) requested personnel from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations (HS-45) to observe an operational drill at the Plutonium Facility in Building 332 (B332). LSO and LLNS desired HS-45's participation to help

179

EIS-0426: Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Operation of the Department of Energy / National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada National Security Site and Off-Site Locations in the State of Nevada  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This Site-Wide EIS evaluates the potential environmental impacts of proposed alternatives for continued management and operation of the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) (formerly known as the Nevada Test Site) and other U.S. Department of Energy/National Nuclear Security Administration (DOE/NNSA)-managed sites in Nevada.

180

Search - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Giving animals in need a HOME. November 14, 2013. LLNL, Intel, Cray produce big data machine. ... for the Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "administration livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Technologies - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Giving animals in need a HOME. November 14, 2013. LLNL, Intel, Cray produce big data machine. ... for the Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration

182

Secretary Chu, NNSA Administrator Congratulate New Los Alamos...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of the National Nuclear Security Administration's Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). McMillan, who started his career as an experimental physicist at Lawrence Livermore...

183

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION' National Nuclear Security Administration/Kansas City Site Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DETERMINATION' DETERMINATION' National Nuclear Security Administration/Kansas City Site Office A. Description of Proposed Action: (lor 2 sentences; include title, general activities, location, timeframe) Kansas City Plant - Project 1712 Repair OF002 CIPP Liner Near AICO Inlet: repair Outfall No. 002 using an open cut replacement of the southern section, a slip lining of the northern section, and a manhole placed at the intersection of those sections. October 2010 thru April 201 1. B. Number and Title of the Categorical Exclusion Being Applied: (See text in 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D.) B6.1 Small scale, short term cleanup actions under RCRA, Atomic Energy Act, or other authorities C. Regulatory Requirements in 10CFR 1021.410 (b): (See full text in regulation.) (1) The proposed action fits within a class of actions that is listed in Appendix A or B to Subpart D.

184

RECORD OF CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION! National Nuclear Security Administration/Kansas City Site Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DETERMINATION! DETERMINATION! National Nuclear Security Administration/Kansas City Site Office A. Description of Proposed Action: (lor 2 sentences; include title, general activities, location, timeframe) Kansas City Plant - Project 1615 - Building 16 PCB Decontamination: Areas within Building 16 that exhibit PCB contamination above the 10 ug/l00cm2 exposure threshold, as defined by the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) (40 CFR Part 761), would be addressed under this project. February 2014 thru September 2014. B. Number and Title of the Categorical Exclusion Being Applied: (See text in 10 CFR 1021, Subpart D.) B 1.17 - Removal of polychlorinated biphenyl-containing items from buildings, other above ground locations. C. Regulatory Requirements in 10 CFR 1021.410 (b): (See full text in regulation.)

185

It's only natural: Lawrence Livermore helps find link to  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 1 For immediate release: 03/04/2013 | NR-13-03-01 It's only natural: Lawrence Livermore helps find link to arsenic-contaminated groundwater Anne M Stark, LLNL, (925) 422-9799, stark8@llnl.gov Printer-friendly Hand pump at a community well of a sampling site in Bangladesh. Human activities are not the primary cause of arsenic found in groundwater in Bangladesh. Instead, a team of researchers from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Barnard College, Columbia University, University of Dhaka, Desert Research Institute and University of Tennessee found that the arsenic in groundwater in the region is part of a natural process that predates any recent human activity, such as intensive pumping. The results appear in the March 4 edition of the Proceedings of the

186

Sandia National Laboratories: Locations: Livermore, California...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

81,000, the city of Livermore maintains a local personality. Whether you are a sports fan, wine connoisseur, or outdoor enthusiast, you will have plenty to see and do. Pavilion...

187

Science on Saturday @ Lawrence Livermore Lab  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Science on Saturday. Science on Saturday (SOS) is a series of science lectures for middle and high school students. Each topic highlights cutting-edge science occurring at the Lawrence Livermore...

188

Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

at the U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) in June 2002. The inspection was performed as a joint effort by the OA Office of...

189

CES-21 board meets at Lawrence Livermore  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1613ces 04162013 CES-21 board meets at Lawrence Livermore James A Bono, LLNL, (925) 422-9919, bono4@llnl.gov Printer-friendly LLNL's Computation Associate Director Dona Crawford...

190

Independent Oversight Review, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory- July 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Review of Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

191

Independent Oversight Inspection, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory- May 2007  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health Programs at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

192

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-2000-12 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-2000-12 September 27, 2000 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to the University of California related to Authorization Basis Issues at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, (EA-2000-12) This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) investigation of the facts and circumstances concerning Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) maintenance and adherence to documents, which form the Authorization Basis (AB) for the Laboratory's nuclear facilities. Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-2000-12 More Documents & Publications Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - November 5,

193

Review of the Lawrence Livermore Nationa Laboratory Identiified Defective Department of Transportation Hazardous Material Packages  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 5 Site Visit Report - Review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Identified Defective Department of Transportation Hazardous Material Packages This site visit report documents the results of Office of Health, Safety and Security's review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) identification, immediate actions, communications, documentation, evaluation, reporting and follow-up to the discovery of defective Department of Transportation (DOT) UN1A2 55- and 30-gallon open head single bolt closure steel drums intended for storage and transportation of hazardous waste and materials. This review, conducted on January 26-29, 2010, was sponsored by the DOE Livermore Site Office (LSO) to support interface with the lab and this report is intended to support follow-up

194

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

National Laboratory National Laboratory Jump to: navigation, search Logo: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Name Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Address 7000 East Ave. Place Livermore, California Zip 94550-9234 Number of employees 5001-10,000 Year founded 1952 Notes LLNL-WEB-422768 Coordinates 37.6798282°, -121.7107786° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":37.6798282,"lon":-121.7107786,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

195

Record simulations conducted on Lawrence Livermore supercomputer  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5 5 For immediate release: 03/19/2013 | NR-13-03-05 Record simulations conducted on Lawrence Livermore supercomputer Breanna Bishop, LLNL, (925) 423-9802, bishop33@llnl.gov Printer-friendly OSIRIS simulation on Sequoia of the interaction of a fast-ignition-scale laser with a dense DT plasma. The laser field is shown in green, the blue arrows illustrate the magnetic field lines at the plasma interface and the red/yellow spheres are the laser-accelerated electrons that will heat and ignite the fuel. High Resolution Image LIVERMORE, Calif. -- Researchers at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory have performed record simulations using all 1,572,864 cores of Sequoia, the largest supercomputer in the world. Sequoia, based on IBM BlueGene/Q architecture, is the first machine to exceed one million computational

196

Researcher, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | National Nuclear  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Bruce Macintosh Bruce Macintosh Researcher, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Bruce Macintosh Bruce Macintosh Role: Researcher, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Award: AAAS Newcomb Cleveland Prize Profile: A Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory researcher's paper published in November 2008 is co-winner of this year's American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Newcomb Cleveland Prize. The Paper is one of two outstanding papers published in Science from June 1, 2008 through May 31, 2009. Bruce Macintosh of the Physics and Life Science Directorate was one of the lead authors of the paper titled, "Direct Imaging of Multiple Planets orbiting the Star HR 8799," which appeared in the Nov. 28, 2008 edition of Science. Christian Marois, a former LLNL postdoc now at NRC Herzberg

197

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-2003-04 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-2003-04 September 3, 2003 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to the University of California related to an Extremity Radiological Overexposure at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, (EA-2003-04) This letter refers to the recent investigation by the Department of Energy's Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) of the June 2002 extremity radiological overexposure event. Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-2003-04 More Documents & Publications Preliminary Notice of Violation, University of California - EA-2006-01 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -

198

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Federal Facility Compliance Order, February 24, 1997 Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Facility Compliance Act Order for Lawrence Federal Facility Compliance Act Order for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Compliance Order HWCA 96/97-5002 State California Agreement Type Federal Facility Agreement Legal Driver(s) FFCAct Scope Summary Require compliance by the DOE with a Site Treatment Plan for the treatment of mixed waste at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Parties DOE; State of California Environmental Protection Agency (Department of Toxic Substances Control) Date 2/24/1997 SCOPE * Require compliance by the DOE with a Site Treatment Plan for the treatment of mixed waste at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. * Address LDR requirements pertaining to storage and treatment of covered waste at LLNL. ESTABLISHING MILESTONES * The Compliance Plan Volume of the STP provides overall schedules for achieving

199

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites

Phonebook | Phonebook | Site Map | Contact Us Search LLNL Go KEY RESEARCH Ensuring the safety, reliability, and security of the U.S. nuclear stockpile and applying science and technology to anticipate, innovate and deliver solutions to global security needs. Weapons Program High Explosives Application Facility Site 300 Global Security Energy and Environmental Security Defense Intelligence Nonproliferation Advancing energy security in the United States through the discovery, development, production and deployment of cost-effective, sustainable systems while protecting the environment. Energy Technologies Carbon Capture and Storage Climate and Carbon U.S. Energy Flow Charts Hydrogen Fuel Geothermal Wind Forecasting Underground Coal Gasification Vehicle Aerodynamics Turning scientific and technological concepts into reality, whether

200

Contact Us | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

sent to the following: LSOPUBLICAFFAIRS@nnsa.doe.gov Mailing Address U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Livermore Field Office P.O. Box 808, L-293...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "administration livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory December 13, 2004  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

John Lindl Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory December 13, 2004 The NIF Ignition Program Presentation to Fusion Power Associates Meeting #12;NIF-0202-0XXXXppt 15/GHM/tr Outline · Ignition Introduction 104 105 500 50 5 0.5 Capsule energy (KJ) NIF Relaxed pressure and stability requirements

202

Search process for Lawrence Livermore director, LLNS president...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6.13search 11262013 Search process for Lawrence Livermore director, LLNS president gets under way Lynda L Seaver, LLNL, (925) 423-3103, seaver1@llnl.gov LIVERMORE, Calif. - The...

203

Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory- June 2, 2005  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Enforcement Letter Issued to Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory for Quality Assurance Deficiencies related to Weapon Activities, June 2, 2005

204

Independent Activity Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory- March 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program Effectiveness Review [HIAR-LLNL-2011-03-25

205

Evaluation of HotSpot, Lawerence Livermore National Laboratory...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Nasstrom accepting the revised Hotspot More Documents & Publications Excessing of Computers Used for Unclassified Controlled Information at Lawrence Livermore National...

206

Evaluation of Cavity Collapse and Surface Crater Formation for Selected Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Tests - 2011  

SciTech Connect

This report evaluates collapse evolution for selected Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) underground nuclear tests at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS, formerly called the Nevada Test Site). The work is being done at the request of National Security Technologies, LLC (NSTec) and supports the Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration for the Nevada Site Office Borehole Management Program (BMP). The primary objective of this program is to close (plug) weapons program legacy boreholes that are deemed no longer useful. Safety decisions must be made before a crater area, or potential crater area, can be reentered for any work. Our statements on cavity collapse and crater formation are input into their safety decisions. The BMP is an on-going program to address hundreds of boreholes at the NTS. Each year NSTec establishes a list of holes to be addressed. They request the assistance of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Los Alamos National Laboratory Containment Programs to provide information related to the evolution of collapse history and make statements on completeness of collapse as relates to surface crater stability. These statements do not include the effects of erosion that may modify the collapse craters over time. They also do not address possible radiation dangers that may be present. Subject matter experts from the LLNL Containment Program who had been active in weapons testing activities performed these evaluations. Information used included drilling and hole construction, emplacement and stemming, timing and sequence of the selected test and nearby tests, geology, yield, depth of burial, collapse times, surface crater sizes, cavity and crater volume estimations, ground motion, and radiological release information. Both classified and unclassified data were reviewed. Various amounts of information are available for these tests, depending on their age and other associated activities. Lack of data can hamper evaluations and introduce uncertainty. We make no attempt to quantify this uncertainty. The following unclassified summary statements describe collapse evolution and crater stability in response to a recent request to review 3 LLNL test locations in areas 2 and 12: Kennebec in U2af, Cumberland in U2e, and Yuba in U12b.10.

Pawloski, G A

2011-02-28T23:59:59.000Z

207

DOE/EIS-0157-SA-01; Supplement Analysis for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Analysis Analysis S-1 March 1999 Findings ♦ This supplement analysis evaluated a set of new and modified projects and proposals and other new information and concluded that no supplementation of the 1992 EIS/EIR for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and Sandia National Laboratories (SNL), Livermore, is needed. Either the projected impacts are within the bounds of the 1992 EIS/EIR, the impacts were anticipated by mitigation measures established in the 1992 EIS/EIR, or the incremental differences in impacts are not significant. ♦ While proposed increases in administrative limits for radioactive materials at LLNL might slightly increase radiological releases during accidents, the resulting consequences are expected to remain essentially the same as described in the 1992

208

The Livermore Phantom History and Supplementation  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In vivo monitoring facilities determine the absence or presence of internally entrained radionuclides. To be of greatest utility, the detection systems must detect and quantify the nuclides of interest at levels of interest. Phantoms have been developed to improve measurements at in vivo monitoring facilities. Since the 1970s, the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL, or simply "Livermore") phantom continues to be a well-used tool at lung monitoring facilities, especially for the detection of low-energy emissions from transuranics. The history of its development from need, through design development and current availability, is summarized. The authors have taken the LLNL phantom one step further by scanning the phantom surface and announce the availability of the scan files on the internet.

Snyder, Sandra F.; Traub, Richard J.

2010-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

209

Consent Order, Lawrence Livermore National National Security, LLC -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National National Security, LLC - Lawrence Livermore National National Security, LLC - WCO-2010-01 Consent Order, Lawrence Livermore National National Security, LLC - WCO-2010-01 October 29, 2010 Consent Order issued to Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC for deficiencies associated with the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program This letter refers to the Office of Health, Safety and Security, Office of Enforcement investigation into deficiencies associated with the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program (CBDPP) and related work planning and control processes. The results of the investigation were provided to Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC (LLNS) in an Investigation Report dated July 7, 2009. An

210

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's Use of Time and Materials Subcontracts  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore National Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's Use of Time and Materials Subcontracts OAS-M-13-06 August 2013 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 August 8, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR THE MANAGER, LIVERMORE FIELD OFFICE FROM: George W. Collard Assistant Inspector General for Audits Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's Use of Time and Materials Subcontracts" BACKGROUND The mission of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (Livermore) is to strengthen the United States' security through development and application of science and technology to enhance the Nation's defense, reduce the global threat from terrorism and weapons of mass destruction, and respond to scientific issues of national importance. Livermore is operated by Lawrence

211

Geothermal programs at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has a number of geothermal programs supported through two offices in the Department of Energy: the Office of Renewable Technologies, Geothermal Technologies Division, and the Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Engineering, Mathematics and Geosciences. Within these programs, we are carrying out research in injection monitoring, optical instrumentation for geothermal wells, seismic imaging methods, geophysical and drilling investigations of young volcanic systems in California, and fundamental studies of the rock and mineral properties.

Kasameyer, P.W.; Younker, L.W.

1987-07-10T23:59:59.000Z

212

Allocation of Direct and Indirect Costs … Cost Accounting Standard 418 … at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, OAS-L-13-07  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Allocation of Direct and Indirect Allocation of Direct and Indirect Costs - Cost Accounting Standard 418 - at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory OAS-L-13-07 April 2013 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 April 11, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR THE MANAGER, LIVERMORE SITE OFFICE FROM: Rickey R. Hass Deputy Inspector General for Audits and Inspections Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on the "Allocation of Direct and Indirect Costs - Cost Accounting Standard 418 - at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory" BACKGROUND The attached report presents the results of the audit of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's (Livermore) Allocation of Direct and Indirect Costs - Cost Accounting Standard 418, conducted to address the performance audit objective described below. The Office of

213

Evaluation of Cavity Collapse and Surface Crater Formation for Selected Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Underground Nuclear Tests - 2010  

SciTech Connect

This report evaluates collapse evolution for selected Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) underground nuclear tests at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS, formerly called the Nevada Test Site). The work is being done at the request of Navarro-Interra LLC, and supports environmental restoration efforts by the Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration for the Nevada Site Office. Safety decisions must be made before a surface crater area, or potential surface crater area, can be reentered for any work. Our statements on cavity collapse and surface crater formation are input into their safety decisions. These statements do not include the effects of erosion that may modify the surface collapse craters over time. They also do not address possible radiation dangers that may be present. Subject matter experts from the LLNL Containment Program who had been active in weapons testing activities performed these evaluations. Information used included drilling and hole construction, emplacement and stemming, timing and sequence of the selected test and nearby tests, geology, yield, depth of burial, collapse times, surface crater sizes, cavity and crater volume estimations, and ground motion. Both classified and unclassified data were reviewed. Various amounts of information are available for these tests, depending on their age and other associated activities. Lack of data can hamper evaluations and introduce uncertainty. We make no attempt to quantify this uncertainty.

Pawloski, G A

2011-01-03T23:59:59.000Z

214

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Federal Facility Agreement, June 29, 1992 Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Site 300) Site 300) Agreement Name Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Federal Facility Agreement Under CERCLA Section 120, June 29, 1992 State California Agreement Type Federal Facility Agreement Legal Driver(s) CERCLA Scope Summary Establish a procedural framework and schedule for developing, implementing, and monitoring appropriate response actions at the Site Parties DOE; USEPA; California Department of Toxic Substances Control; Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board Date 6/29/1992 SCOPE * Establish a procedural framework and schedule for developing, implementing, and monitoring appropriate response actions at the Site. * Identify operable units (OUs) which are appropriate at the Site prior to the implementation of final remedial action(s).

215

EPA Notice of Availability of the Site-wide Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Stockpile Stewardship and Management, Implementation (DOE/EIS-0348/DOE/EIS-0236-S3)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

08 08 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 82 / Friday, April 29, 2005 / Notices beneficial uses of dredged materials (i.e., wetlands restoration in Dorchester County, MD). EPA expressed environmental concerns over the remaining three alternatives (i.e., the proposed multiple new Confined Disposal Facilities in the Patapsco River, the Poplar Island Environmental Restoration Project expansion and the Large Island Restoration Middle Bay). EPA recommended that continued use of Open Water Placement in Virginia include the already designated NorfolkOcean Disposal Site given its available capacity. Rating EC1 EIS No. 20050053, ERP No. D-CGD- E03013-00, Compass Port and Deepwater Port License Application, To Construct a Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Receiving, Storage and

216

Administration site issues, contact Dr. Everet Beckner at (202) 586-2179. Enclosure  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Dear Mr. Chainnan: Enclosed is Revision 2 ofthe Department ofEnergy's Implementation Plan for stabilization ofthe nuclear materials identified in Recommendation 2000-1. The primary purpose ofthis revision is to incorporate the revised plans and schedule for stabilizing nuclear materials at the Savannah River Site and the Los Alamos National Laboratory. This revision also updates the current status of, and changes to, other site commitments from the previous revision ofJanuary 2001. We continue to closely track progress on all stabilization commitments and are pleased to be able to continue to show measurable progress at several sites. We will keep you and your staffinfonned ofour progress in meeting the commitments in this plan. In particular, the commitment at Rocky Flats to complete repackaging ofall remaining low-risk residues was completed on May 1, 2002. This was a significant accomplishment, as you have acknowledged in your May 22, 2002, letter. Ifyou have any questions, please contact Mr. Paul Golan for Environmental Management site issues, at (202) 586-7709 and for National Nuclear Security

Unf S -; r; Ii C. J Y Boafw; The Honorable; John T. Conway

2002-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

217

DOE Site HSPD-12 Card Issuance Performance Measures 10-8-10...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

& NR Sub-Total Service Center (Includes NNSA Site Office Populations) Y-12 Site Kansas City Plant Honeywell Kirtland Pantex Plant Nevada Test Site Lawrence Livermore National...

218

Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC, - May 15,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Security LLC, - May Security LLC, - May 15, 2008 Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC, - May 15, 2008 May 15, 2008 Enforcement Letter issued to Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC related to the Protection of Classified Information at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory In our recent dialogue via televideo with your Deputy, safeguards and security director, and other key managers of your staff, we discussed our reasons for sending this enforcement letter to Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC; the purpose of this letter; and our concerns about the protection of classified information at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). Accordingly, this is not a formal enforcement action and imposes no requirements. Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC- May 15, 2008

219

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0-12 0-12 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-2000-12 September 27, 2000 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to the University of California related to Authorization Basis Issues at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, (EA-2000-12) This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) investigation of the facts and circumstances concerning Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) maintenance and adherence to documents, which form the Authorization Basis (AB) for the Laboratory's nuclear facilities. Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-2000-12 More Documents & Publications Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - November 5, 1999 Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - August 22,

220

FY 2010 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2010 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "administration livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

FY 2011 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2011 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project...

222

FY 2008 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2008 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project...

223

FY 2009 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2009 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project...

224

Livermore and Russian scientists propose new names for elements...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

was named after Flerov - Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear Reactions (FLNR). Livermorium (atomic symbol Lv) was chosen to honor Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and...

225

Lawrence Livermore teams with industry to advance energy technologies...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

release: 03192012 | NR-12-03-01 Lawrence Livermore teams with industry to advance energy technologies using high performance computing Donald B Johnston , LLNL, (925)...

226

Independent Oversight Review of the Lawrence Livermore National...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

- March 2001 March 2001 Review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Health Services Department The Office of Environment, Safety, and Health (ES&H) Oversight...

227

Lawrence Livermore research highlighted at AAAS annual meeting  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Lawrence Livermore research highlighted at AAAS annual meeting Breanna Bishop, LLNL, (925) 423-9802, bishop33@llnl.gov Printer-friendly Mike Dunne, Debbie Callahan and...

228

Lawrence Livermore increases contracts awarded to small businesses...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

standing in front of the NIF diagnostics that she works on. Photos by Julie KorhummelLLNL Lawrence Livermore increases contracts awarded to small businesses for third straight...

229

GAO-04-986R Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory: Further Improvements Needed to Strengthen Controls Over the Purchase Card Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6R LLNL Purchase Card Controls 6R LLNL Purchase Card Controls United States Government Accountability Office Washington, DC 20548 August 6, 2004 Congressional Requesters Subject: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory: Further Improvements Needed to Strengthen Controls Over the Purchase Card Program The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) located in Livermore, California is a government-owned, contractor-operated national laboratory of the Department of Energy's (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). 1 The University of California manages the lab under a cost-reimbursable contract with NNSA. The university is paid a management fee to operate the lab and is reimbursed for all allowable costs charged to the contract. During the fall of 2002, the Federal Bureau of Investigation began investigating two

230

Lawrence Livermore charitable campaign raises $3.3 million for local  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

charitable campaign raises $3.3 million for local charitable campaign raises $3.3 million for local organizations | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > NNSA Blog > Lawrence Livermore charitable campaign raises $3.3 million ... Lawrence Livermore charitable campaign raises $3.3 million for local organizations Posted By Office of Public Affairs

231

Livermore scientists assist in solving riddle of black hole spin | National  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

scientists assist in solving riddle of black hole spin | National scientists assist in solving riddle of black hole spin | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > NNSA Blog > Livermore scientists assist in solving riddle of ... Livermore scientists assist in solving riddle of black hole spin Posted By Office of Public Affairs NNSA Blog

232

Livermore scientists assist in solving riddle of black hole spin | National  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

scientists assist in solving riddle of black hole spin | National scientists assist in solving riddle of black hole spin | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > NNSA Blog > Livermore scientists assist in solving riddle of ... Livermore scientists assist in solving riddle of black hole spin Posted By Office of Public Affairs NNSA Blog

233

Livermore scientist, engineers train to be inspectors for test ban treaty  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

scientist, engineers train to be inspectors for test ban treaty scientist, engineers train to be inspectors for test ban treaty organization | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > NNSA Blog > Livermore scientist, engineers train to be inspectors ... Livermore scientist, engineers train to be inspectors for test ban treaty organization

234

EIS-0348: Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

: Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement : Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0348: Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Supplement Stockpile Stewardship and Management The continued operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) is critical to National Nuclear Security Administration's Stockpile Stewardship Program and to preventing the spread and use of nuclear weapons worldwide. LLNL maintains core competencies in activities associated with research, development, design, and surveillance of nuclear weapons, as well as the assessment and certification of their safety and reliability. In response to the end of the Cold War and changes in the world's political regimes, the emphasis on the U.S. nuclear weapons program has shifted from

235

Development of a Novel Depleted Uranium Treatment Process at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A three-stage process was developed at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory to treat potentially pyrophoric depleted uranium metal wastes. The three-stage process includes waste sorting/rinsing, acid dissolution of the waste metal with a hydrochloric and phosphoric acid solution, and solidification of the neutralized residuals from the second stage with clay. The final product is a solid waste form that can be transported to and disposed of at a permitted low-level radioactive waste disposal site.

Gates-Anderson, D; Bowers, J; Laue, C; Fitch, T

2007-01-22T23:59:59.000Z

236

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-98-01 March 9, 1998 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to University of California related to the Unplanned Personnel Contaminations and Radioactive Material Intakes at the Hazardous Waste Management Facilities at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, (EA-98-01) This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances surrounding the unplanned personnel contaminations/intakes at [a building] of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's (LLNL) Hazardous Waste Management Facilities on July 2, 1997. Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-98-01 More Documents & Publications Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -

237

Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Livermore Field  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Livermore Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Livermore Field Office Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Livermore Field Office The purpose of the Livermore Field Office (LFO) Teclmical Qualification Program (TQP) is to ensure that federal teclmical personnel with safety oversight responsibilities at defense nuclear facilities at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory possess competence commensurate with responsibilities. LFO is committed to ensuring it has the necessary teclmical capabilities to provide the kind of management, direction, and guidance essential to safe operation ofDOE's defense nuclear facilities. LFO TQP Self-Assessment, May 2013 More Documents & Publications Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Pacific Northwest

238

Lawrence Livermore to build advanced laser system in Czech Republic  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

9-06 9-06 For immediate release: 09/17/2013 | NR-13-09-06 High Resolution Image The High Repetition-Rate Advanced Petawatt Laser System, or HAPLS, will be designed, developed, assembled and tested at Lawrence Livermore. It will be transferred to the ELI Beamlines facility in 2016, where it will be commissioned for use by the international scientific community. Lawrence Livermore to build advanced laser system in Czech Republic Breanna Bishop, LLNL, (925) 423-9802, bishop33@llnl.gov High Resolution Image Artist renderings of the ELI Beamlines facility, currently under construction in the Czech Republic. High Resolution Image A CAD image of the ELI-HAPLS laser. LIVERMORE, Calif. - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), through Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC (LLNS), has been awarded more than

239

Independent Oversight Review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Review of the Lawrence Livermore National Review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - March 2001 Independent Oversight Review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - March 2001 March 2001 Review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Health Services Department The Office of Environment, Safety, and Health (ES&H) Oversight (EH-2) in conjunction with the Accreditation Association of Ambulatory Health Care (AAAHC) reviewed the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Health Services Department on March 19-21, 2001. The purpose of the review was twofold. First, EH-2 performed a review of selected activities to identify positive attributes, issues, and opportunities for improvement. Second, the AAAHC surveyed the medical program for accreditation. This report documents

240

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory: Social Media  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Social Media Social Media By staying on the cutting edge of Web communication, the News Center at LLNL reaches out to the media and the public through a variety of social media and multimedia Websites: Flickr An image- and video-hosting Website. Visit now and view the LLNL photostream in a variety of formats. Twitter A microblogging service. Sign up today and get short, tiimely messages about the Livermore Lab. Facebook A social-networking Website with more than 500 million active users. Enlist now to become a "friend" of LLNL. RSS A Web-feed service that sends content to subscribers automatically. Enroll at once to get the latest LLNL headlines. Utube A video-sharing Website. Navigate here to immediately watch the latest in cutting-edge science and technology at the Laboratory.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "administration livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory: News Center Distribution  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

News > News > News Center > Receive News Releases Receive News Releases Journalists: To receive information about activities at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, please complete the form below. The form may also be used to submit changes in your contact information or to remove yourself from the list. If you have any questions, please contact Media Relations at (925) 422-4599 or send an e-mail message to Kirsten Sprott. Type of Request: New Addition to News Media List Change Information Delete Information Your Name Title E-Mail Address Preferred E-Mail Address Direct Business Phone Number (with area code) Business Fax Number (with area code) News Organization Street Address City State Country Zip Code f815eee8931dfda40651bfb5302ac9a7 1389471929 Type of News Services You Use:

242

Livermore Regional Air Quality model (LIRAQ-1)  

SciTech Connect

The Livermore Regional Air Quality (LIRAQ) model is an Eulerian grid model developed for use in assessing the regional air quality of a region with temporally and spatially varying meteorology in complex terrain. The first implementation of this approach is embodied in the LIRAQ-1 model and is intended for use with either simple chemical systems or relatively inert pollutants. The basic model formulation is based on the conservation of mass equation integrated vertically from the surface to the base of an inversion layer, thereby creating a single layer model with a grid structure established in the two horizontal dimensions. Surface pollutant concentrations are related to vertical average concentrations using a logarithmic profile. Atmospheric transport, inversion height, source emissions, and topography are all prescribed. Data for the San Francisco Bay Area obtained during 1973 have been used in validation studies. (auth)

MacCracken, M.C.; Grant, K.E.

1975-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

243

Dr. Yuan Ping Lawrence Livermore National Lab  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Creating, diagnosing and Creating, diagnosing and controlling high-energy- density matter with lasers Dr. Yuan Ping Lawrence Livermore National Lab Tuesday, Oct 22, 2013 - 3:00PM MBG AUDITORIUM Refreshments at 2:45PM The PrinceTon Plasma Physics laboraTory is a U.s. DeParTmenT of energy faciliTy Since their invention in 1960's, lasers with power spanning from Kilo- Watt to PetaWatt have been widely used in almost every branch of sci- ence, leading to numerous discoveries and novel techniques. At present, lasers are capable of creating extreme states of matter in a laboratory, at conditions resembling those most extreme in the Universe: they heat matter up to the temperatures inside stars, they create electric field and

244

DOECGF 2009 Site Report: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Data group provides data analysis and visualization support to its customers. This consists primarily of the development and support of VisIt, a data analysis and visualization tool. Support ranges from answering questions about the tool, providing classes on how to use the tool, and performing data analysis and visualization for customers. The Information Management and Graphics Group supports and develops tools that enhance our ability to access, display, and understand large, complex data sets. Activities include applying visualization software for terascale data exploration; running video production labs on two networks; supporting graphics libraries and tools for end users; maintaining PowerWalls and assorted other displays; and developing software for searching, managing, and browsing scientific data. Researchers in the Center for Applied Scientific Computing (CASC) work on various projects including the development of visualization techniques for terascale data exploration that are funded by the ASC program, among others. The researchers also have LDRD projects and collaborations with other lab researchers, academia, and industry.

Brugger, E; Springmeyer, R R

2009-04-17T23:59:59.000Z

245

Lawrence Livermore Site Office Safety Basis Self-Assessment Final...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

are anticipated, so this authority is not currently needed. The LSO Integrated Safety Management System Description and Environment, Safety and Health Functions,...

246

Lawrence Livermore Site Office Safety Basis Self-Assessment Final...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

(for facility modifications or at LSO's direction), and potential inadequacy of the safety analysis (PISA) submittals. The process for DSA and TSR reviews is detailed and...

247

Site Visit Report - Review of the Lawrence Livermore National...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Utility Service Division. In addition, various LLNL management policies, department manuals, and procedures were reviewed. A diagram depicting the flowdown of these requirements...

248

Site Visit Report - Review of the Lawrence Livermore National...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

from the work control program (Superblock Work Control Manual, LLNL-AR-409585). A process flow chart within this manual described the change control process and key steps when...

249

J.G. Tobin and S.-W. Yu Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Differentiation of 5f and 6d Components Differentiation of 5f and 6d Components in the Unoccupied Electronic Structure of UO 2 J.G. Tobin and S.-W. Yu Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA Summary: One of the crucial questions of all actinide electronic structure determinations is the issue of 5f versus 6d character and the distribution of these components across the density of states. Here, two break-though experiments will be discussed, which have allowed the direct determination of the U5f and U6d contributions to the unoccupied density of states (UDOS) in Uranium Dioxide (UO 2 ). [1] First, a combined soft X-ray Absorption and Bremstrahlung Isochromat Spectroscopy (XAS and BIS, respectively) study of UO 2 will be discussed. [2] Second, a novel Resonant Inverse Photoelectron and X-ray Emission Spectroscopy (RIPES and

250

Nuclear Materials Management U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In light of the changing Defense Complex mission, the high cost to storing and protecting nuclear materials, and in consideration of scarcity of resources, it is imperative that the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) owned nuclear materials are managed effectively. The U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Strategic Action Plan outlines the strategy for continuing to meet Americas nuclear security goals, meeting the overall mission challenges of DOE and NNSA as well as giving focus to local missions. The mission of the NNSA/NSO Nuclear Materials Management (NMM) Program is to ensure that nuclear material inventories are accurately assessed and reported, future material needs are adequately planned, and that existing Nevada Test Site (NTS) inventories are efficiently utilized, staged, or dispositioned. The NNSA/NSO understands that the NTS has unique characteristics to serve and benefit the nation with innovative solutions to the complex problems involving Special Nuclear Materials, hazardous materials, and multi-agency, integrated operations. The NNSA/NSO is defining infrastructure requirements for known future missions, developing footprint consolidation strategic action plans, and continuing in the path of facility modernization and improvements. The NNSA/NSO is striving for the NTS to be acknowledged as an ideal location towards mission expansion and growth. The NTS has the capability of providing isolated, large scale construction and development locations for nuclear power or alternate energy source facilities, expanded nuclear material storage sites, and for new development in green technology.

Jesse Schrieber

2008-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

251

Nuclear Materials Management U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO)  

SciTech Connect

In light of the changing Defense Complex mission, the high cost to storing and protecting nuclear materials, and in consideration of scarcity of resources, it is imperative that the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) owned nuclear materials are managed effectively. The U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Strategic Action Plan outlines the strategy for continuing to meet Americas nuclear security goals, meeting the overall mission challenges of DOE and NNSA as well as giving focus to local missions. The mission of the NNSA/NSO Nuclear Materials Management (NMM) Program is to ensure that nuclear material inventories are accurately assessed and reported, future material needs are adequately planned, and that existing Nevada Test Site (NTS) inventories are efficiently utilized, staged, or dispositioned. The NNSA/NSO understands that the NTS has unique characteristics to serve and benefit the nation with innovative solutions to the complex problems involving Special Nuclear Materials, hazardous materials, and multi-agency, integrated operations. The NNSA/NSO is defining infrastructure requirements for known future missions, developing footprint consolidation strategic action plans, and continuing in the path of facility modernization improvements. The NNSA/NSO is striving for the NTS to be acknowledged as an ideal location towards mission expansion and growth. The NTS has the capability of providing isolated, large scale construction and development locations for nuclear power or alternate energy source facilities, expanded nuclear material storage sites, and for new development in green technology.

Jesse Schreiber

2008-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

252

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Surface Water Protection: A Watershed Approach  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This surface water protection plan (plan) provides an overview of the management efforts implemented at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) that support a watershed approach to protect surface water. This plan fulfills a requirement in the Department of Energy (DOE) Order 450.1A to demonstrate a watershed approach for surface water protection that protects the environment and public health. This plan describes the use of a watershed approach within which the Laboratory's current surface water management and protections efforts have been structured and coordinated. With more than 800 million acres of land in the U.S. under federal management and stewardship, a unified approach across agencies provides enhanced resource protection and cost-effectiveness. The DOE adopted, along with other federal agencies, the Unified Federal Policy for a Watershed Approach to Federal Land and Resource Management (UFP) with a goal to protect water quality and aquatic ecosystems on federal lands. This policy intends to prevent and/or reduce water pollution from federal activities while fostering a cost-effective watershed approach to federal land and resource management. The UFP also intends to enhance the implementation of existing laws (e.g., the Clean Water Act [CWA] and National Environmental Policy Act [NEPA]) and regulations. In addition, this provides an opportunity for the federal government to serve as a model for water quality stewardship using a watershed approach for federal land and resource activities that potentially impact surface water and its uses. As a federal land manager, the Laboratory is responsible for a small but important part of those 800 million acres of land. Diverse land uses are required to support the Laboratory's mission and provide an appropriate work environment for its staff. The Laboratory comprises two sites: its main site in Livermore, California, and the Experimental Test Site (Site 300), near Tracy, California. The main site is largely developed yet its surface water system encompasses two arroyos, an engineered detention basin (Lake Haussmann), storm channels, and wetlands. Conversely, the more rural Site 300 includes approximately 7,000 acres of largely undeveloped land with many natural tributaries, riparian habitats, and wetland areas. These wetlands include vernal pools, perennial seeps, and emergent wetlands. The watersheds within which the Laboratory's sites lie provide local and community ecological functions and services which require protection. These functions and services include water supply, flood attenuation, groundwater recharge, water quality improvement, wildlife and aquatic habitats, erosion control, and (downstream) recreational opportunities. The Laboratory employs a watershed approach to protect these surface water systems. The intent of this approach, presented in this document, is to provide an integrated effort to eliminate or minimize any adverse environmental impacts of the Laboratory's operations and enhance the attributes of these surface water systems, as possible and when reasonable, to protect their value to the community and watershed. The Laboratory's watershed approach to surface water protection will use the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Watershed Framework and guiding principles of geographic focus, scientifically based management and partnerships1 as a foundation. While the Laboratory's unique site characteristics result in objectives and priorities that may differ from other industrial sites, these underlying guiding principles provide a structure for surface water protection to ensure the Laboratory's role in environmental stewardship and as a community partner in watershed protection. The approach includes pollution prevention, continual environmental improvement, and supporting, as possible, community objectives (e.g., protection of the San Francisco Bay watershed).

Coty, J

2009-03-16T23:59:59.000Z

253

Assessment of Eligibility to National Register of Historic Places Building 431 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) proposes to demolish the original sections of Building 431 at its main site in Livermore, California. As this action will constitute an undertaking within the regulatory constraints of the National Historic Preservation Act, LLNL arranged for an assessment of the building's historic significance. This report provides a brief history of the magnetic fusion energy research activities housed in Building 431 and a historic assessment of the building. The final recommendation of the report is that, although Building 431 housed some significant breakthroughs in accelerator technology and magnetic mirror plasma confinement, it lacks integrity for the periods of significance of those developments. It is, therefore, not eligible to the National Register of Historic Places.

Sullivan, M A; Ullrich, R A

2003-05-07T23:59:59.000Z

254

Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - November 5,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

November 5, 1999 Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - November 5, 1999 November 5, 1999 Issued to Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory related to Authorization Basis Issues This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning issues related to the maintenance and adherence to documents which form the authorization basis for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) operated nuclear facilities. Specifically, three Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) reports were submitted over a four-day period and are summarized below: On July 30, 1999, it was reported that two cabinets contained about [specified amount] of [ ] solvents in violation of the building Safety Analysis Documentation;

255

Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - November 5,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

November 5, 1999 Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - November 5, 1999 November 5, 1999 Issued to Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory related to Authorization Basis Issues This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances concerning issues related to the maintenance and adherence to documents which form the authorization basis for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) operated nuclear facilities. Specifically, three Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) reports were submitted over a four-day period and are summarized below: On July 30, 1999, it was reported that two cabinets contained about [specified amount] of [ ] solvents in violation of the building Safety Analysis Documentation;

256

Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - August 22,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

August August 22, 1996 Enforcement Letter, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - August 22, 1996 August 22, 1996 Issued to the University of California related to Radiological Worker Training Deficiencies at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's (LLNL) report of a potential noncompliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 835 (Occupational Radiation Protection). This potential noncompliance involved the failure to complete required radiological worker retraining for 49 percent of LLNL's approximately 700 radiological workers. The training issue was initially identified on May 6, 1996, by LLNL during a routine review of the Chemistry and Materials Science deficiency

257

Microsoft Word - Functional Analysis for Selected Sites - March...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Lab (LANL), Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), and the Nevada Test site (NTS). The culmination of the entire effort would then be published in a full revision to...

258

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3-04 3-04 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-2003-04 September 3, 2003 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to the University of California related to an Extremity Radiological Overexposure at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, (EA-2003-04) This letter refers to the recent investigation by the Department of Energy's Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) of the June 2002 extremity radiological overexposure event. Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-2003-04 More Documents & Publications Preliminary Notice of Violation, University of California - EA-2006-01 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-98-06 Independent Oversight Inspection of Environment, Safety, and Health

259

Four Lawrence Livermore researchers named 2013 APS Fellows  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6 6 For immediate release: 12/23/2013 | NR-13-12-06 Four Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory scientists have been selected as 2013 fellows of the American Physical Society (APS). They include, from left: Charles Cerjan, Ian Thompson, Eric Schwegler and Marilyn Schneider. Four Lawrence Livermore researchers named 2013 APS Fellows Breanna Bishop, LLNL, (925) 423-9802, bishop33@llnl.gov LIVERMORE, Calif. - Four Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory scientists have been selected as 2013 fellows of the American Physical Society (APS). Physicist Charles Cerjan was cited by the Division of Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics for "seminal contributions to time-dependent Schrodinger equation propagation algorithms and their application to particle scattering and intense field dynamics, the development of laser-produced

260

Cold cases heat up through Lawrence Livermore approach to identifying  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

10-03 10-03 For immediate release: 10/10/2012 | NR-12-10-03 Cold cases heat up through Lawrence Livermore approach to identifying remains Anne M Stark, LLNL, (925) 422-9799, stark8@llnl.gov Printer-friendly Bruce Buchholz loads a sample in the accelerator. High Resolution Image LIVERMORE, Calif. -- In an effort to identify the thousands of John/Jane Doe cold cases in the United States, a Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory researcher and a team of international collaborators have found a multidisciplinary approach to identifying the remains of missing persons. Using "bomb pulse" radiocarbon analysis developed at Lawrence Livermore, combined with recently developed anthropological analysis and forensic DNA techniques, the researchers were able to identify the remains of a missing

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "administration livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Boralex Beaver Livermore Falls Biomass Facility | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Livermore Falls Biomass Facility Livermore Falls Biomass Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Boralex Beaver Livermore Falls Biomass Facility Facility Boralex Beaver Livermore Falls Sector Biomass Location Androscoggin County, Maine Coordinates 44.1912416°, -70.1707037° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":44.1912416,"lon":-70.1707037,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

262

Lawrence Livermore National Security Enforcement Letter (NEL-2013-03)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Penrose C. Albright Penrose C. Albright Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 July 22, 2013 President and Laboratory Director Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 7000 East Avenue Livermore, California 94550 NEL-2013-03 Dear Dr. Albright: The Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Enforcement and Oversight has evaluated the facts and circumstances surrounding programmatic deficiencies identified in the Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC (LLNS) software quality assurance (SQA) program. LLNS reported these deficiencies on January 16, 2013, in Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS) report NTS--LSO-LLNL-LLNL- 2013-0001, LLNL Software Quality Assurance Program Does Not Meet DOE 0 414.1 D Standards and Procedures Requirements.

263

Lawrence Livermore Laboratory PERFORMANCE TEST OF A BLADELESS...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Lawrence Livermore Laboratory PERFORMANCE TEST OF A BLADELESS TURBINE FOR GF.OTHF.RMAT. APPLICATIONS R. Steidel and H. Weiss March 24, 1976 I j UCID-17068 This is an informal...

264

Lawrence Livermore charitable campaign raises $3.3 million for...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Lawrence Livermore raises 3.3 million for local organizations Posted on December 12, 2013 at 3:00 pm ET Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version Facebook Twitter...

265

Lawrence Livermore engineering team makes breakthrough in solar...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Allan Chang and Mihail Bora. Lawrence Livermore engineering team makes breakthrough in solar energy research Kenneth K Ma, LLNL, (925)-423-7602, ma28@llnl.gov High Resolution...

266

Livermore Scientists Team with Russia to Discover Element 118  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

"Synthesis of the isotopes of elements 118 and 116" (Abstract) "Synthesis of the isotopes of elements 118 and 116" (Abstract) Physical Review C, October 9, 2006 Livermore Scientists Team With Russia To Discover Elements 113 and 115 LLNL News Release, February. 2, 2004 "Present at the Creation" Science & Technology Review, January/February 2002 Island of Stability NOVA Science Now, September 2006 Social Media Logos Follow LLNL on YouTube Subscribe to LLNL's RSS feed Follow LLNL on Facebook Follow LLNL on Twitter Follow LLNL on Flickr Contact: Anne M. Stark Phone: (925) 422-9799 E-mail: stark8l@llnl.gov FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE October 16, 2006 NR-06-10-03 Livermore scientists team with Russia to discover element 118 LIVERMORE, Calif. - Scientists from the Chemistry, Materials and Life Sciences Directorate at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, in

267

Researcher, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | National...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Christian Marois, a former LLNL postdoc now at NRC Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics in Canada was the other lead author. Learn more about these publications off site link ....

268

Administrator - Energy Information Administration  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

www.eia.gov Adam Sieminski Administrator Biography Adam Sieminski was sworn in on June 4, 2012, as the eighth administrator of the U.S. Energy Information ...

269

Lawrence Livermore and Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute scientists set a  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6 6 For immediate release: 04/30/2013 | NR-13-04-06 Lawrence Livermore and Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute scientists set a new simulation speed record on the Sequoia supercomputer Donald B Johnston, LLNL, (925) 423-4902, johnston19@llnl.gov Printer-friendly Lawrence Livermore scientists, from left, David Jefferson and Peter Barnes. Photo by Laura Schulz and Meg Epperly/LLNL High Resolution Image Computer scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute have set a high performance computing speed record that opens the way to the scientific exploration of complex planetary-scale systems. In a paper to be published in May, the joint team will announce a record-breaking simulation speed of 504 billion events per second on LLNL's

270

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory -  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - EA-98-06 July 28, 1998 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to the University of California related to Criticality Safety and the Quality Assurance Program at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, July 28, 1998 (EA-98-06) This letter refers to the Department of Energy's (DOE) evaluation of the facts and circumstances surrounding a series of criticality safety infractions occurring between May and December 1997 in [a building] at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). [The building] is the central repository used to process and store [radioactive material]. During the period May 20 through July 15, 1997, Certified [Radioactive Material] Handlers violated criticality safety procedures for mass limits and form

271

California utilities partner with Lawrence Livermore to improve state's  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2-12-04 2-12-04 For immediate release: 12/20/2012 | NR-12-12-04 California utilities partner with Lawrence Livermore to improve state's energy grid Lynda L Seaver, LLNL, (925) 423-3103, seaver1@llnl.gov Printer-friendly California utilities will use the advanced technologies and expertise of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory to improve the efficiency, security and safety of the state's utility systems under an agreement approved today by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). The CPUC approved funding of a five-year research and development agreement between Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Southern California Edison Company and San Diego Gas and Electric Company, and Lawrence Livermore (LLNL) that will provide the utilities with access to LLNL technological

272

Energy Innovations from Livermore Lab to Power Hawaiian Nonprofit |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Innovations from Livermore Lab to Power Hawaiian Nonprofit Innovations from Livermore Lab to Power Hawaiian Nonprofit Energy Innovations from Livermore Lab to Power Hawaiian Nonprofit February 28, 2011 - 11:31am Addthis Mike Gleason (second from left), president and CEO of The Arc of Hilo. Also shown, from left: Annemarie Meike, Mark Sueksdorf, Marjorie Gonzalez and Larry Ferderber | Photo Courtesy of LLNL Mike Gleason (second from left), president and CEO of The Arc of Hilo. Also shown, from left: Annemarie Meike, Mark Sueksdorf, Marjorie Gonzalez and Larry Ferderber | Photo Courtesy of LLNL April Saylor April Saylor Former Digital Outreach Strategist, Office of Public Affairs What are the key facts? LLNL technologies will reduce the plant's electrical bills by 50 percent and provide sustainable and energy efficient solutions for the

273

Digitizing the Administrative Records of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management (Em) and Office of Legacy Management (LM) Ohio Sites  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

As former weapons sites close and are transitioned to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM), continued public involvement is essential for the successful turnover of long-term surveillance and maintenance (LTS and M) activities. During the environmental remediation process, public participation was a key factor in cleanup completion. The same level of commitment to encourage active public participation is true for the LTS and M activities at the LM sites, such as the Miamisburg Closure Project and the Fernald Closure Project. Community members participate in the transition and the decision-making processes for LTS and M as they did for the selection of response actions under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) cleanup process. [1] A key part of the post-closure activities for the Ohio Sites transitioning to LM from the DOE Office of Environmental Management (EM) is the preservation of site history and stakeholder involvement in the LTS and M activities that will continue during post-closure. In meeting the regulatory requirements of providing the CERCLA Administrative Record Reading Room for public access and to ensure that appropriate records are retrievable and available for all stakeholders, a decision was made to digitize the Miamisburg Closure Project and the Fernald Closure Project Administrative Records. This decision was, in part, based on the information and lessons learned from the digitization of the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site (RFETS) CERCLA Administrative Records (AR). The Ohio Sites effort was expanded to include the Living History Project from the Fernald Closure Project. In most cases, the CERCLA AR maintained by EM closure sites and transitioned to LM will provide adequate baselines for identifying and capturing the information required by LM for post-closure stewardship of the sites. The AR established under Section 113(k) [2] of CERCLA serves two primary purposes. First, the record contains those documents that form the basis for selection of a response action and comply with Section 113(j) [3]; judicial review of any issue concerning the adequacy of any response action is limited to the record. Second, Section 113(k) [2] requires that the AR act as a vehicle for public participation in selecting a response action. The AR is the body of documents that 'forms the basis' for the selection of a particular response action at a site and contains historic information that has future study value by scholars, historians, regulators, and other stakeholders. (authors)

Powell, J. [U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management, Cincinnati, Ohio (United States); Williams, K.; Walpole, S. [S.M. Stoller Corporation, Miamisburg, Ohio (United States); McKinney, R. [Source One Management, Inc., Denver, Colorado (United States)

2007-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

274

Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Summary-1992.html[6/24/2011 3:44:58 PM] Summary-1992.html[6/24/2011 3:44:58 PM] EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the Regents of the University of California (UC) propose the continued operation, including near-term (within 5 to 10 years) proposed projects, of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). In addition, DOE proposes the continued operation, including near-term proposed projects, of Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore (SNL, Livermore). Continued operation plus proposed projects at the two Laboratories is needed so that the research and development missions established by Congress and the President can continue to be supported. As provided and encouraged by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), DOE and UC have prepared this document as a joint Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and

275

Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2-1992/01eis0157_a.html[6/27/2011 9:53:34 AM] 2-1992/01eis0157_a.html[6/27/2011 9:53:34 AM] APPENDIX A DESCRIPTION OF MAJOR PROGRAMS AND FACILITIES Appendix A describes the programs, infrastructures, facilities, and future plans of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and the Sandia National Laboratories at Livermore (SNL, Livermore). It provides information on existing activities and facilities, as well as information on those activities anticipated to occur or facilities to be constructed over the next 5 to 10 years. The purpose of this appendix is to: present information that can be used to evaluate the proposed action and other EIS/EIR alternatives, identify activities that are part of the proposed action, distinguish proposed action activities from no action alternative activities, and

276

Review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Health Services Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environment, Safety, and Health Environment, Safety, and Health Oversight Review of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Health Services Department March 2001 Office of Environment, Safety and Health i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACRONYMS................................................................................................................. iii 1.0 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................. 1 2.0 RESULTS .............................................................................................................. 2 3.0 CONCLUSIONS.................................................................................................... 4 APPENDIX A.................................................................................................................

277

Industrial ecology at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory summary statement  

SciTech Connect

At Livermore our hope and our intention is to make important contributions to global sustainability by basing both our scientific and technological research and our business practices on the principles of industrial ecology. Current efforts in the following fields are documented: global security, global ecology, energy for transportation, fusion energy, materials sciences, environmental technology, and bioscience.

Gilmartin, T.J.

1996-06-04T23:59:59.000Z

278

Independent Oversight Inspection of Emergency Management at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - Volume II  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance Office of the Secretary of Energy July 2002 Volume II INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT INSPECTION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AT THE LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY Volume II July 2002 i INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT INSPECTION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AT THE LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY Volume II Table of Contents Acronyms ......................................................................................................................................... iii 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................1 2.0 Results .......................................................................................................................................3

279

Supplement analysis for continued operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore. Volume 2: Comment response document  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The US Department of Energy (DOE), prepared a draft Supplement Analysis (SA) for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore (SNL-L), in accordance with DOE`s requirements for implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (10 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] Part 1021.314). It considers whether the Final Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore (1992 EIS/EIR) should be supplement3ed, whether a new environmental impact statement (EIS) should be prepared, or no further NEPA documentation is required. The SA examines the current project and program plans and proposals for LLNL and SNL-L, operations to identify new or modified projects or operations or new information for the period from 1998 to 2002 that was not considered in the 1992 EIS/EIR. When such changes, modifications, and information are identified, they are examined to determine whether they could be considered substantial or significant in reference to the 1992 proposed action and the 1993 Record of Decision (ROD). DOE released the draft SA to the public to obtain stakeholder comments and to consider those comments in the preparation of the final SA. DOE distributed copies of the draft SA to those who were known to have an interest in LLNL or SNL-L activities in addition to those who requested a copy. In response to comments received, DOE prepared this Comment Response Document.

NONE

1999-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

280

Secretary of Energy Advisory Board Lawrence Livermore Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Livermore Laboratory Lawrence Livermore Laboratory October 12, 2011 Agenda Open Plenary Meeting Session 9:30 AM-9:45 AM Welcome and Overview Secretary Steven Chu and Dr. William Perry 9:45 AM-10:00 AM Director's Perspective George Miller, LLNL Director 10:00 AM-10:40 AM LLNL Progress Towards Ignition and Weapons Physics Experiments on NIF Bruce Goodwin and Ed Moses 10:40 AM-11:00 AM LLNL Strategy for Improvements in Cyber Security Jim Brase 11:00 AM-11:20 AM LLNL Computational Advances in Applied Energy Julio Friedman 11:20 AM-12:00 PM DOE in the Innovation Chain Secretary Chu 12:00 PM-1:30 PM Lunch Break 1:30 PM-1:45 PM Subcommittee Updates 1:45 PM-2:30 PM Blue Ribbon Commission Update

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "administration livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Alan Alda awards Lawrence Livermore engineer for making science  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 1 For immediate release: 06/04/2013 | NR-13-06-01 From left: Steve Maguire, who won in the video category of the 2013 Flame Challenge, Alan Alda and Nick Williams, who won in the written category. Alan Alda awards Lawrence Livermore engineer for making science understandable Linda A Lucchetti, LLNL, (925) 422-5815, lucchetti1@llnl.gov Students from Candlewood Middle School in Dix Hills N.Y. join Alan Alda in presenting the Flame Challege Award to Nick Williams at the World Science Festival. What is time? How would you explain it to a 5th grader? Nick Williams, a retired engineer and science presenter from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory not only has done a fine job of conveying the concept of time to 11 year olds, he's being recognized for it. Williams

282

Public Affairs Office: Livermore Lab Physicist Dates Lifetime of Solar  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Dating the Solar System: Where Were You When the Solar System Was Being Formed? Dating the Solar System: Where Were You When the Solar System Was Being Formed? Chemistry & Materials Science Directorate, LLNL Chronology of the early Solar System from chondrule-bearing calcium-aluminium-rich inclusions Nature, April 21, 2005 Building Planets at PSI: The Origin of the Solar System Planetary Science Institute Social Media Logos Follow LLNL on YouTube Subscribe to LLNL's RSS feed Follow LLNL on Facebook Follow LLNL on Twitter Follow LLNL on Flickr Contact: Anne M. Stark Phone: (925) 422-9799 E-mail: stark8@llnl.gov FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE April 20, 2005 NR-05-04-02 Livermore Lab physicist dates lifetime of solar nebula at two million years LIVERMORE, Calif. - The oxygen and magnesium content of some of the oldest objects in the universe are giving clues to the lifetime of the

283

Laser fusion experiment yields record energy at Lawrence Livermore's  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

4 4 For immediate release: 08/26/2013 | NR-13-08-04 High Resolution Image All NIF experiments are controlled and orchestrated by the integrated computer control system in the facility's control room. It consists of 950 front-end processors attached to about 60,000 control points, including mirrors, lenses, motors, sensors, cameras, amplifiers, capacitors and diagnostic instruments. Laser fusion experiment yields record energy at Lawrence Livermore's National Ignition Facility Breanna Bishop, LLNL, (925) 423-9802, bishop33@llnl.gov High Resolution Image The preamplifiers of the National Ignition Facility are the first step in increasing the energy of laser beams as they make their way toward the target chamber. LIVERMORE, Calif. -- In the early morning hours of Aug.13, Lawrence

284

Smashing science: Livermore scientists discover how explosives respond to  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3 3 For immediate release: 12/12/2013 | NR-13-12-03 High Resolution Image A schematic representation of the shock experiment. The resulting energy release pushed the shock front to the left. Image by Liam Krauss/LLNL. Smashing science: Livermore scientists discover how explosives respond to shockwaves Anne M Stark, LLNL, (925) 422-9799, stark8@llnl.gov Watch Video A laser pulse impinging on an aluminum ablation layer (which is coated on a glass substrate to the right), which generates a rapidly expanding plasma. This small explosion pushes the ablator to the left and drives a shock wave in the sample. The experiment simultaneously measures the speed of the shock wave in the sample, and the speed of the ablator expansion, which allows Livermore researchers to estimate the pressure and density of the

285

The Computation Directorate at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Computation Directorate at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has four major areas of work: (1) Programmatic Support -- Programs are areas which receive funding to develop solutions to problems or advance basic science in their areas (Stockpile Stewardship, Homeland Security, the Human Genome project). Computer scientists are 'matrixed' to these programs to provide computer science support. (2) Livermore Computer Center (LCC) -- Development, support and advanced planning for the large, massively parallel computers, networks and storage facilities used throughout the laboratory. (3) Research -- Computer scientists research advanced solutions for programmatic work and for external contracts and research new HPC hardware solutions. (4) Infrastructure -- Support for thousands of desktop computers and numerous LANs, labwide unclassified networks, computer security, computer-use policy.

Cook, L

2006-09-07T23:59:59.000Z

286

Livermore team successfully leads important test of a conventional warhead  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

102813_dod 102813_dod 10/28/2013 Livermore team successfully leads important test of a conventional warhead for the DoD Anne M Stark, LLNL, (925) 422-9799, stark8@llnl.gov LLNL served as technical lead and integrator on an important test to assess a new conventional warhead designed by the Lab. Dave Hare, Livermore's program manager of the test, called it an "unequivocal success." Below is the press release from the Department of Defense Defense Department successfully conducts warhead sled test The Defense Department announced recently the successful testing of an advanced conventional precision effects warhead, a critical part of a national effort to establish a conventional prompt strike capability. This capability will contribute to the country's ability to defend its interests

287

Industrial ecology at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory summary statement  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This statement summarizes Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory`s committment to making important scientific, technological, and business contributions to global sustainability. The quest has many aspects, some socio-political or economic and some technological, and some in which the soft and hard sciences become indistinguishable, as in visionary national strategies, like Holland`s, and futuristic regional and city development plans, like those of Kagoshima and Chattanooga.

Gilmartin, T.J.

1996-05-21T23:59:59.000Z

288

LINCS: Livermore's network architecture. [Octopus computing network  

SciTech Connect

Octopus, a local computing network that has been evolving at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory for over fifteen years, is currently undergoing a major revision. The primary purpose of the revision is to consolidate and redefine the variety of conventions and formats, which have grown up over the years, into a single standard family of protocols, the Livermore Interactive Network Communication Standard (LINCS). This standard treats the entire network as a single distributed operating system such that access to a computing resource is obtained in a single way, whether that resource is local (on the same computer as the accessing process) or remote (on another computer). LINCS encompasses not only communication but also such issues as the relationship of customer to server processes and the structure, naming, and protection of resources. The discussion includes: an overview of the Livermore user community and computing hardware, the functions and structure of each of the seven layers of LINCS protocol, the reasons why we have designed our own protocols and why we are dissatisfied by the directions that current protocol standards are taking.

Fletcher, J.G.

1982-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

289

Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1-1992/01eis0157_rg.html[6/24/2011 4:00:49 PM] 1-1992/01eis0157_rg.html[6/24/2011 4:00:49 PM] READER'S GUIDE The Final EIS/EIR is organized to assist the reader's understanding of the complex operations at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore. Organization of Documents The EIS/EIR is divided into five volumes and two companion reports: Volume I. This volume contains the Final EIS/EIR, which in part relies on the detailed information in the appendices, and comprehensively discusses the proposed action, the alternatives, and the existing conditions and impacts of the proposed action and the alternatives. Volume II. This volume contains the Final EIS/EIR technical appendices which provide technical support for the analyses in Volume I and also provide additional information and references. Appendix E was originally identified in

290

CERCLA - Site Selector  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

(LEHR) Fernald Preserve Monticello Site Mound Site - Miamisburg Closure Project Rocky Flats Site Weldon Spring Search the Administrative Record The White House USA.gov E-Gov...

291

CERCLA - Site Selector  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Monticello Site Mound Site - Miamisburg Closure Project Rocky Flats Site Weldon Spring Search the Administrative Record The White House USA.gov E-Gov Information Quality FOIA...

292

October 2013 | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

3 | National Nuclear Security Administration 3 | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > October 2013 October 2013 NNSA Blog Livermore's biosciences celebrates 50th anniversary Posted By Office of Public Affairs Over the last 50 years, scientists from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's Biosciences and Biotechnology Division have been instrumental

293

Top 10 Things You Didn't Know About Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 Things You Didn't Know About Lawrence Livermore National 0 Things You Didn't Know About Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Top 10 Things You Didn't Know About Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory December 6, 2013 - 6:18pm Addthis The photo above is of a cryogenically cooled target in the National Ignition Facility as "seen" by the laser through the hohlraum's laser entrance hole. | Photo courtesy of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The photo above is of a cryogenically cooled target in the National Ignition Facility as "seen" by the laser through the hohlraum's laser entrance hole. | Photo courtesy of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Ben Dotson Ben Dotson Project Coordinator for Digital Reform, Office of Public Affairs What are the key facts? Founded in 1952, Lawrence Livermore National Lab is one of the

294

A Cure for the Valentine's Blues? Livermore Supercomputer Seeks to Mend  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

A Cure for the Valentine's Blues? Livermore Supercomputer Seeks to A Cure for the Valentine's Blues? Livermore Supercomputer Seeks to Mend Broken Hearts A Cure for the Valentine's Blues? Livermore Supercomputer Seeks to Mend Broken Hearts February 14, 2013 - 9:56am Addthis The Cardioid code developed by a team of Livermore and IBM scientists divides the heart into a large number of manageable pieces, or subdomains. The development team used two approaches, called Voronoi (left) and grid (right), to break the enormous computing challenge into much smaller individual tasks. | Photo from the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory The Cardioid code developed by a team of Livermore and IBM scientists divides the heart into a large number of manageable pieces, or subdomains. The development team used two approaches, called Voronoi (left) and grid

295

Top 10 Things You Didn't Know About Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Top 10 Things You Didn't Know About Lawrence Livermore National Top 10 Things You Didn't Know About Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Top 10 Things You Didn't Know About Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory December 6, 2013 - 6:18pm Addthis The photo above is of a cryogenically cooled target in the National Ignition Facility as "seen" by the laser through the hohlraum's laser entrance hole. | Photo courtesy of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The photo above is of a cryogenically cooled target in the National Ignition Facility as "seen" by the laser through the hohlraum's laser entrance hole. | Photo courtesy of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Ben Dotson Ben Dotson Project Coordinator for Digital Reform, Office of Public Affairs What are the key facts? Founded in 1952, Lawrence Livermore National Lab is one of the

296

Lawrence Livermore Laser Fusion Program: a status report  

SciTech Connect

The Laser Fusion Program at the Lawrence Livermore Laboratory is presently emerging from a three-year period of intensive development of the tools required for significant DT implosion experiments of continuously increasing scale. These diverse tools include target design codes, sophisticated target fabrication techniques, radically new diagnostics instrumentation, high peak- power-high brightness laser technology, and fully integrated laser-target- diagnostic irradiation facilities. These tools have recently led to the successful production of neutrons from compressed DT-containing targets together with a wealth of correlating plasma physics data. The current status of major program activities at LLL will be reviewed and major future milestones will be projected. (auth)

Krupke, W.F.

1975-04-15T23:59:59.000Z

297

Preliminary Notice of Violation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory- EA-2000-12  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to the University of California related to Authorization Basis Issues at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, (EA-2000-12)

298

Sandia National Laboratories: Visiting the Livermore Valley Open Campus  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Visiting the LVOC Visiting the LVOC LVOC Home Partnership Opportunities Featured Programs Working at the LVOC Are you a member of the research, business, or academic community who would like to learn more about current and future opportunities at the Livermore Valley Open Campus? We're actively seeking companies, research organizations, universities, and other laboratories with interests in energy, computing, homeland security, and other laboratory mission areas. Request a visit Contact us to explore collaborative opportunities and to discuss a potential visit to the LVOC. We look forward to hearing from you! Map and directions Directions to the LVOC Screen reader users: click here for plain HTML Go to Google Maps Home 37.679620,-121.697112 Loading... Map Sat Ter Did you mean a different:

299

Site Map - Energy Innovation Portal  

Energy Innovation Portal. Home. Site Map; ... Solar Thermal; Startup America; ... National Aeronautics and Space Administration;

300

Related Sites | Y-12 National Security Complex  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Related Sites Related Sites Related Sites Links to the following sources of information are provided as resources. Listings are obtained from government, industry and trade organizations and from other resources. B&W Corporate B&W Corporate The Babcock & Wilcox Company is a leading international provider of energy products and services. B&W Lawrence Livermore Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory helps reduce and counter threats to national and global security through the advancement and application of science and technology. B&W Pantex Located in Amarillo, Texas, the Pantex Plant supports stockpile stewardship, nonproliferation, and safeguards and security. Government System for Award Management The System for Award Management (SAM) (formerly Central Contractor

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "administration livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

National Nuclear Security Administration  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

AI~W~~l AI~W~~l 11Vl'~~4 National Nuclear Security Administration Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office P.O. Box 98518 Las Vegas, NV 89193-8518 JAN! 8 2013 Gregory H. Woods, General Counsel, DOE/HQ (GC-1) FORS NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION NEVADA SITE OFFICE (NNSA/NSO) NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPA) ANNUAL SUMMARY In accordance with DOE Order 451.1B, National Environmental Policy Act Compliance Program, NNSA/NSO is submitting the enclosed Annual NEP A Planning Summary. The document provides a brief description of ongoing and planned NEP A actions for calendar year 2013. This summary provides information for completion of the Site- Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Nevada National Security Site and Off-Site Locations in the State of Nevada.

302

Livermore installs big data machine | National Nuclear Security...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

installs big data machine | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response...

303

Laser System for Livermore's Mono Energetic Gamma-Ray Source  

SciTech Connect

A Mono-energetic Gamma-ray (MEGa-ray) source, based on Compton scattering of a high-intensity laser beam off a highly relativistic electron beam, requires highly specialized laser systems. To minimize the bandwidth of the {gamma}-ray beam, the scattering laser must have minimal bandwidth, but also match the electron beam depth of focus in length. This requires a {approx}1 J, 10 ps, fourier-transform-limited laser system. Also required is a high-brightness electron beam, best provided by a photoinjector. This electron source requires a second laser system with stringent requirements on the beam including flat transverse and longitudinal profiles and fast rise times. Furthermore, these systems must be synchronized to each other with ps-scale accuracy. Using a novel hyper-dispersion compressor configuration and advanced fiber amplifiers and diode-pumped Nd:YAG amplifiers, we have designed laser systems that meet these challenges for the X-band photoinjector and Compton-scattering source being built at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.

Gibson, D; Albert, F; Bayramian, A; Marsh, R; Messerly, M; Ebbers, C; Hartemann, F

2011-03-14T23:59:59.000Z

304

Nonlinear RR Lyrae models with new Livermore opacities  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A.N. Cox recently showed that a 20% opacity decrease in the 20,000--30,000 K region as indicated by the new Livermore OPAL opacities reconciles the discrepancy between pulsation and evolution masses of double-mode RR Lyrae variables. Nonlinear hydrodynamic calculations were performed for RR Lyrae models of mass 0l75 M{circle_dot}, 51 L{circle_dot}, and Z=0.0001 including this opacity decrease. The Stellingwerf periodic relaxation method was used to converge the models to a limit cycle, and the Floquet matrix eigenvalues calculated to search for a tendency of the fundamental mode to grow from the full-amplitude overtone solution, and the overtone mode to grow from the full-amplitude fundamental solution, thereby predicting double-mode behavior. Models of T{sup eff} < 7000 K with the opacity decrease have positive fundamental-mode growth rates in the overtone solution, in contrast to earlier results by Hodson and Cox, and models with T{sub eff} < 7000 have positive 1st overtone growth rates in the fundamental-mode behavior was not found.

Guzik, J.A.; Cox, A.N.

1992-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

305

Nonlinear RR Lyrae models with new Livermore opacities  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A.N. Cox recently showed that a 20% opacity decrease in the 20,000--30,000 K region as indicated by the new Livermore OPAL opacities reconciles the discrepancy between pulsation and evolution masses of double-mode RR Lyrae variables. Nonlinear hydrodynamic calculations were performed for RR Lyrae models of mass 0l75 M{circle dot}, 51 L{circle dot}, and Z=0.0001 including this opacity decrease. The Stellingwerf periodic relaxation method was used to converge the models to a limit cycle, and the Floquet matrix eigenvalues calculated to search for a tendency of the fundamental mode to grow from the full-amplitude overtone solution, and the overtone mode to grow from the full-amplitude fundamental solution, thereby predicting double-mode behavior. Models of T{sup eff} < 7000 K with the opacity decrease have positive fundamental-mode growth rates in the overtone solution, in contrast to earlier results by Hodson and Cox, and models with T{sub eff} < 7000 have positive 1st overtone growth rates in the fundamental-mode behavior was not found.

Guzik, J.A.; Cox, A.N.

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

306

Research collaboration opportunities at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) is a major research facility within the Department of Energy (DOE) complex. LLNL`s traditional mission is in Defense Programs, including a significant effort in non-proliferation and arms control. In terms of disciplinary areas, over 50% of our present research efforts are in the fields of large-scale computing, high energy-density physics, energy and environmental sciences, engineering, materials research, manufacturing, and biotechnology. The present decade presents new challenges to LLNL. Many factors have influenced us in modifying our research approach. The main driver is the realization that many scientific problems in our mission areas can best be solved by collaborative teams of experts. At LLNL we excel in physical sciences, but we need the expertise of many others, beyond our established areas of expertise. For example, to find an acceptable solution to reduce earthquake damage requires contributions from engineering, soil mechanics, hydrology, materials sciences, Geosciences, computer modeling, economics, law, and political science. In the pursuit of our mission goals, we are soliciting increased research collaborations with university faculty and students. The scientific and national security challenges facing us and our nation today are unprecedented. Pooling talents from universities, other research organizations, and the national laboratories will be an important approach to finding viable solutions.

Budwine, C.M.

1996-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

307

Progress in inertial confinement fusion at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect

The goals of the Inertial Fusion Program at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory are to study matter under extreme conditions of temperature and pressure and to produce fusion energy from inertially confined fusion fuel. With the conclusion of recent multi-kilojoule 0.53 ..mu..m experiments on Novette, we have demonstrated vastly improved plasma conditions compared to those previously obtained at LLNL with similar energies at 1.06 ..mu..m and elsewhere with 10 ..mu..m radiation. The lower preheat environment obtainable with short wavelength light has led to 3X improvements in the compression of targets on Novette compared to similar targets on Shiva with 1.06 ..mu..m. Subsequent experiments on Nova with short wavelength light will begin in 1985. They are expected to demonstrate the necessary compression conditions required for high gain fusion to occur when irradiated with a multi-megajoule driver. These recent results, together with improved calculations, and innovations in driver and reactor technology, indicate that high gain inertial fusion will occur and is a viable candidate for fusion power production in the future.

Holzrichter, J.F.

1984-08-06T23:59:59.000Z

308

Evaluation of HotSpot, Lawerence Livermore National Laboratory - June 11,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Evaluation of HotSpot, Lawerence Livermore National Laboratory - Evaluation of HotSpot, Lawerence Livermore National Laboratory - June 11, 2010 Evaluation of HotSpot, Lawerence Livermore National Laboratory - June 11, 2010 June 11, 2010 Letter from Andy Lawrence to John Nasstrom accepting the revised Hotspot In your letter dated April 16, 2010, you summarized the work done by the Lawerence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) to meet the Department of Energy's (DOE) recommendations from the 2007, Software Evaluation of HotSpot, and DOE, Safety Software Toolbox Recommendation, for inclusion of V2.07 in the DOE Safety Software Central Registry. Based on this work, you futher requested that HotSpot be included in the DOE Central Registry. Letter from Andy Lawrence to John Nasstrom accepting the revised Hotspot More Documents & Publications

309

Recent laser-plasma interaction experiments at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Recent Livermore experiments are aimed at investigating laser-plasma interaction issues which are relevant to ablatively driven fusion processes. We report the data obtained from using longer pulses and shorter laser wavelengths.

Lee, P.H.Y.

1980-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

310

Minutes of the 7th Meeting of the Livermore Vulnerability Committee  

SciTech Connect

This memorandum provides the minutes of the 7th meeting of the Livermore Vulnerability Committee. The Laboratory commitments in the Tapestry experiment, with particular reference to those experiments proposed in the Polaris MK 2 and the Minuteman MK 2 programs.

Germain, L.

1965-05-26T23:59:59.000Z

311

Routine environmental audit of the Sandia National Laboratories, California, Livermore, California  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report documents the results of the Routine Environmental Audit of the Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, California (SNL/CA). During this audit the activities the Audit Team conducted included reviews of internal documents and reports from preview audits and assessments; interviews with US Department of Energy (DOE), State of California regulators, and contractor personnel; and inspections and observations of selected facilities and operations. The onsite portion of the audit was conducted from February 22 through March 4, 1994, by the DOE Office of Environmental Audit (EH-24), located within the Office of Environment, Safety, and Health (EH). The audit evaluated the status of programs to ensure compliance with Federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations; compliance with DOE Orders, guidance, and directives; and conformance with accepted industry practices and standards of performance. The audit also evaluated the status and adequacy of the management systems developed to address environmental requirements. The audit`s functional scope was comprehensive and included all areas of environmental management and a programmatic evaluation of NEPA and inactive waste sites.

Not Available

1994-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

312

Related Links | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Livermore Field Office > Related Links Related Links NNSA FOIA DOENNSA Telephone Directory U.S. Department of Energy Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Printer-friendly...

313

Western Area Power Administration  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

v*Zy- i , . v*Zy- i , . r ,v * -i S # Af [, (e- . - o -A tl }r- 0 v-" l^~4~S J l ^-)^ I^U^ck iM clti ^ Administration Follow-up to Nov. 25, 2008 Transition Meeting Undeveloped Transmission Right-of-Way Western has very little undeveloped transmission right-of-way. There is a 7-mile right- of-way between Folsom, CA and Roseville, CA where Western acquired a 250' wide right-of-way but is only using half of it. Another line could be built parallel to Western's line to relieve congestion in the Sacramento area. In addition, Western has rights-of- way for many transmission lines that could be rebuilt to increase transmission capacity. For example, Western's Tracy-Livermore 230-kV line is a single circuit line but the existing towers could support a double circuit line. These rights-of-way would have to

314

Exploring Viral Genomics at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This summer I had the privilege of working at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under the Nonproliferation, Homeland and International Security Directorate in the Chemical and Biological Countermeasures Division. I worked exclusively on the Viral Identification and Characterization Initiative (VICI) project focusing on the development of multiplexed polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays. The goal of VICI is to combine several disciplines such as molecular biology, microfluidics, and bioinformatics in order to detect viruses and identify them in order to effectively and quickly counter infectious disease, natural or engineered. The difficulty in such a countermeasure is that little is known about viral diversity due to the ever changing nature of these organisms. In response, VICI is developing a new microfluidic bioanalytical platform to detect known and unknown viruses by analyzing every virus in a sample by isolating them into picoliter sized droplets on a microchip and individually analyzing them. The sample will be injected into a channel of oil to form droplets that will contain viral nucleic acids that will be amplified using PCR. The multiplexed PCR assay will produce a series of amplicons for a particular virus genome that provides an identifying signature. A device will then detect whether or not DNA is present in the droplet and will sort the empty droplets from the rest. From this point, the amplified DNA is released from the droplets and analyzed using capillary gel electrophoresis in order to read out the series of amplicons and thereby determine the identity of each virus. The following figure depicts the microfluidic process. For the abovementioned microfluidic process to work, a method for detecting amplification of target viral nucleic acids that does not interfere with the multiplexed biochemical reaction is required for downstream sorting and analysis. In this report, the successful development of a multiplexed PCR assay using SYBR Green I as a fluorescent dye to detect amplification of viral DNA that can later be integrated into microfluidic PCR system for sorting and analysis is shown.

Kilpatrick, K; Hiddessen, A

2007-08-22T23:59:59.000Z

315

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL): Visiting the Lab  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

for bringing restricted and controlled items onto the site. The public is invited to tour the Discovery Center, located just outside the Laboratory's gates off Greenville Road;...

316

Audit of Renovation and New Construction Projects at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, WR-B-97-06  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

THE SECRETARY THE SECRETARY FROM: John C. Layton Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Report on "Audit of Renovation and New Construction Projects at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory" BACKGROUND: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory must periodically renovate existing facilities or build new ones to accomplish its missions or to provide infrastructure to support its missions. The objective of the audit was to determine if Livermore's proposed renovation and new construction projects met mission needs while minimizing the cost to the Government. DISCUSSION: In pursuing three projects, estimated to cost over $78 million, Livermore had not demonstrated that it had selected the

317

DOE Site List  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Links Links Central Internet Database CID Photo Banner DOE Site List Site Geo Site Code State Operations Office1 DOE Programs Generating Streams at Site DOE Programs Managing Facilities Associated Data2 Acid/Pueblo Canyons ACPC NM Oak Ridge Waste/Media, Facilities Airport Substation CA Western Area Power Administration Facilities Akron Hill Communication Site CO Western Area Power Administration Facilities Akron Substation CO Western Area Power Administration Facilities AL Complex NM Albuquerque DP Facilities Alba Craft ALCL OH Oak Ridge Facilities Albany Research Center AMRC OR Oak Ridge Facilities Alcova Switchyard WY Western Area Power Administration Facilities Aliquippa Forge ALFO PA Oak Ridge Facilities

318

Gina Pearson Assistant Administrator  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Gina Pearson Gina Pearson Assistant Administrator for Communications Duties Gina Pearson is the Assistant Administrator (AA) for Communications, and in this capacity provides leadership and direction to conduct the U.S. Energy Information Administration's comprehensive communications program for diverse external customer groups and agency employees. The AA for Communications is responsible for Agency communications policies and standards, the www.eia.gov website, press and media rela- tions, marketing and outreach services, energy education and literacy efforts, and the Agency's employee intranet site. Biography Since 2006, Gina Pearson has played a leadership role in the U.S. Energy Information Administration's (EIA) strategy and operations for commu- nicating information and data to Federal, State and local agencies; the

319

Lawrence Livermore and Cool Earth Solar receive $1.7 million for renewable  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3 3 For immediate release: 05/14/2013 | NR-13-05-03 Lawrence Livermore and Cool Earth Solar receive $1.7 million for renewable energy demonstration project Anne M Stark, LLNL, (925) 422-9799, stark8@llnl.gov Printer-friendly The concentrator photovoltaic (CPV) system in the field. Photo courtesy of Cool Earth Inc. High Resolution Image The California Energy Commission (CEC) has awarded $1.7 million to a partnership between Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Cool Earth Solar Inc. (CES) to conduct a community-scale renewable energy integration demonstration project at the Livermore Valley Open Campus. CES is the prime awardee and is contributing an additional $1 million in matching funds to the CEC amount, while LLNL will provide advanced R&D support for the effort.

320

6th US-Russian Pu Science Workshop Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

US-Russian Pu Science Workshop US-Russian Pu Science Workshop Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory University of California, Livermore, California July 14 and 15, 2006 Local Chairs: Michael Fluss, James Tobin, Adam Schwartz LLNL, Livermore, USA Alexander V. Petrovtsev, RFNC * VNIITF, Snezhinsk, Russia Boris A. Nadykto, RFNC * VNIIEF, Sarov, Russia Lidia F. Timofeeva, VNIINM, Moscow, Russia Siegfried S. Hecker, (Luis Morales POC) LANL, Los Alamos, USA Valentin E. Arkhipov, IMP, Ural Branch of RAS, Yekaterinburg, Russia This is a satellite meeting of the "Pu Futures-The Science 2006 International Conference", 9-13 July 2006, Asilomar Conference, Grounds, Pacific Grove Ca. The workshop is hosted by LLNL, under the aegis of the United States/Russian Federation Scientific and Technical Collaboration pursuant

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "administration livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Lawrence Livermore, Intel, Cray produce big data machine to serve as  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 1 For immediate release: 11/04/2013 | NR-13-11-01 High Resolution Image Catalyst is a unique high performance computing (HPC) cluster that will serve research scientists and provide a proving ground for new HPC and Big Data technologies and architectures. It was recently installed at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Lawrence Livermore, Intel, Cray produce big data machine to serve as catalyst for next-generation HPC clusters Donald B Johnston, LLNL, (925) 423-4902, johnston19@llnl.gov Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in partnership with Intel and Cray, today announced a unique high performance computing (HPC) cluster that will serve research scientists at all three institutions and provide a proving ground for new HPC and Big Data technologies and architectures.

322

Southwestern Power Administration  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

About this site About this site This Web site is the official Web site of the Southwestern Power Administration. It is part of a Federal computer system used to accomplish Federal functions and is monitored for security purposes to ensure it remains available to all users and to protect information in the system. By accessing this Web site, you are expressly consenting to these monitoring activities. Accessibility Southwestern is committed to providing the most up-to-date, relevant information to its stakeholders and to members of the general public, including those with disabilities and/or limited English proficiency. If you are unable to access information about Southwestern due to the presentation of information in this Web site, or if you have any questions, concerns, or comments you would like to share with us, please contact

323

Nevada National Security Site Radiological Control Manual  

SciTech Connect

This document supersedes DOE/NV/25946--801, 'Nevada Test Site Radiological Control Manual,' Revision 1 issued in February 2010. Brief Description of Revision: A complete revision to reflect a recent change in name for the NTS; changes in name for some tenant organizations; and to update references to current DOE policies, orders, and guidance documents. Article 237.2 was deleted. Appendix 3B was updated. Article 411.2 was modified. Article 422 was re-written to reflect the wording of DOE O 458.1. Article 431.6.d was modified. The glossary was updated. This manual contains the radiological control requirements to be used for all radiological activities conducted by programs under the purview of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO). Compliance with these requirements will ensure compliance with Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 835, 'Occupational Radiation Protection.' Programs covered by this manual are located at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS); Nellis Air Force Base and North Las Vegas, Nevada; Santa Barbara and Livermore, California; and Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland. In addition, fieldwork by NNSA/NSO at other locations is covered by this manual. Current activities at NNSS include operating low-level radioactive and mixed waste disposal facilities for United States defense-generated waste, assembly and execution of subcritical experiments, assembly/disassembly of special experiments, the storage and use of special nuclear materials, performing criticality experiments, emergency responder training, surface cleanup and site characterization of contaminated land areas, environmental activity by the University system, and nonnuclear test operations, such as controlled spills of hazardous materials at the Hazardous Materials Spill Center. Currently, the major potential for occupational radiation exposure is associated with the burial of low-level radioactive waste and the handling of radioactive sources. Remediation of contaminated land areas may also result in radiological exposures.

Radiological Control Managers Council

2012-03-26T23:59:59.000Z

324

Field Offices | National Nuclear Security Administration  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Offices | National Nuclear Security Administration Offices | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Field Offices Home > Field Offices Field Offices Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr Learn More Welcome to the Sandia Field Office Welcome to the Kansas City Field Office Welcome to the Livermore Field Office

325

April 2013 | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

3 | National Nuclear Security Administration 3 | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > April 2013 April 2013 NNSA Blog New simulation speed record set on Sequoia Posted By Office of Public Affairs New simulation speed record set on Sequoia Computer scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) have set a high performance

326

In The Spotlight | National Nuclear Security Administration  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

In The Spotlight | National Nuclear Security Administration In The Spotlight | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog In The Spotlight Home > About Us > Who We Are > In The Spotlight In The Spotlight Berni Alder, 2009 National Medal of Science Winner Berni Alder Role: Retired lab physicist and computational pioneer, Lawrence Livermore

327

Site Characterization Awards | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technology Centers Field Sites Power Marketing Administration Other Agencies You are here Home Site Characterization Awards Site Characterization Awards A description of...

328

Independent Oversight Review of the Fire Protection Program at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, September 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Fire Protection Program at Fire Protection Program at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory May 2011 February 2013 September 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U. S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose .................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................. 1 3.0 Scope ....................................................................................................................................................... 2

329

Independent Oversight Review of the Fire Protection Program at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, September 2013  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Fire Protection Program at Fire Protection Program at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory May 2011 February 2013 September 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U. S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose .................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................. 1 3.0 Scope ....................................................................................................................................................... 2

330

Review of Integrated Safety Management System Effectiveness at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, September 2011  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Oversight Review of Oversight Review of Integrated Safety Management System Effectiveness at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory September 2011 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................... 1 4.0 Summary of Results ............................................................................................................... 1

331

Review of Integrated Safety Management System Effectiveness at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, September 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Oversight Review of Oversight Review of Integrated Safety Management System Effectiveness at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory September 2011 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 Scope ...................................................................................................................................... 1 4.0 Summary of Results ............................................................................................................... 1

332

Electromechanical battery research and development at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The concepts undergirding a funded program to develop a modular electromechanical battery (EMB) at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory are described. Example parameters for EMBs for electric and hybrid-electric vehicles are given, and the importance of the high energy recovery efficiency of EMBs in increasing vehicle range in urban driving is shown.

Post, R.F.; Baldwin, D.E.; Bender, D.A.; Fowler, T.K.

1993-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

333

Federal Register Notice: National Nuclear Security Administration...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Register Notice: National Nuclear Security Administration Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for Sandia National Laboratories, New Mexico (SNLNM) Federal Register Notice:...

334

Site environmental report for 1996  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

To help verify effective protection of public safety and preservation of the environment, Sandia National Laboratories (SNL)/California maintains an extensive, ongoing environmental monitoring program. This program monitors all significant airborne and liquid effluents and the environment at the SNL/California site perimeter. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) performs off-site environmental monitoring for both sites. These monitoring efforts ensure that emission controls are effective in preventing contamination of the environment. As part of SNL/California`s Environmental Monitoring Program, an environmental surveillance system measures the possible presence of radioactive and hazardous materials in ambient air, surface water, groundwater, sewage, soil, vegetation, and locally produced food-stuffs. The program also includes an extensive environmental dosimetry program, which measures external radiation levels around the Livermore site and nearby vicinity. Each year, the results of the Environmental Monitoring Program are published in this report, the Site Environmental Report. This executive summary focuses on impacts to the environment and estimated radiation doses to the public from site emissions. Chapter 3, {open_quotes}Compliance Summary,{close_quotes} reviews the site`s various environmental protection activities and compliance status, with applicable environmental regulations. The effluent monitoring and environmental surveillance results for 1996 show that SNL/California operations had no harmful effects on the environment or the public. 37 figs., 12 tabs.

Holland, R.C.

1997-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

335

Report of exploratory trenching for the Decontamination and Waste Treatment Facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Three exploratory trenches, totaling about 1,300 ft in length were excavated and logged across the site of a proposed Decontamination and Waste Treatment Facility (DWTF), to assess whether or not active Greenville fault zone, located about 4100 ft to the northeast, pass through or within 200 ft of the site. The layout of the trenches (12-16 ft deep) was designed to provide continuous coverage across the DWTF site and an area within 200 ft northeast and southwest of the site. Deposits exposed in the trench walls are primarily of clay, and are typical of weakly cemented silty sand to sandy silt with the alluvial deposits in the area. Several stream channels were encountered that appear to have an approximated east-west orintation. The channel deposits consist of well-sorted, medium to coarse-grained sand and gravel. A well-developed surface soil is laterally continuous across all three trenches. The soil reportedly formed during late Pleistocene time (about 35,000 to 40,000 yr before present) based on soil stratigraphic analyses. A moderately to well-developed buried soil is laterally continuous in all three trenches, except locally where it has been removed by channelling. This buried soil apparently formed about 100,000 yr before present. At least one older, discontinuous soil is present below the 100,000-yr-old soil in some locations. The age of the older soil is unknown. At several locations, two discontinuous buried soils were observed between the surface soil and the 100,000-yr-old soil. Various overlapping stratigraphic units could be traced across the trenches providing a continuous datum of at least 100,000 yr to assess the presence or absence of faulting. The continuity of stratigraphic units in all the trenches demonstrated that no active faults pass through or within 200 ft of the proposed DWTF site.

Dresen, M.D.; Weiss, R.B.

1985-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

336

Awards | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

tsf tsf award The Terascale Simulation Facility (TSF) Project at Lawrence Livermore National Lab has recently won the DOE Secretary's Project Management Award of Achievement....

337

Underground Test Area Fiscal Year 2012 Annual Quality Assurance Report Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

This report is mandated by the Underground Test Area (UGTA) Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) and identifies the UGTA quality assurance (QA) activities for fiscal year (FY) 2012. All UGTA organizationsU.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO); Desert Research Institute (DRI); Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL); Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL); Navarro-Intera, LLC (N-I); National Security Technologies, LLC (NSTec); and the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)conducted QA activities in FY 2012. The activities included conducting assessments, identifying findings and completing corrective actions, evaluating laboratory performance, revising the QAPP, and publishing documents. In addition, processes and procedures were developed to address deficiencies identified in the FY 2011 QAPP gap analysis.

Farnham, Irene; Marutzky, Sam

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

338

Evaluation of Cavity Collapse and Surface Crater Formation for Selected Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Underground Nuclear Tests - 2011, Part 2  

SciTech Connect

This report evaluates collapse evolution for selected Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) underground nuclear tests at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS, formerly called the Nevada Test Site). The work is being done to support several different programs that desire access to the ground surface above expended underground nuclear tests. The programs include: the Borehole Management Program, the Environmental Restoration Program, and the National Center for Nuclear Security Gas-Migration Experiment. Safety decisions must be made before a crater area, or potential crater area, can be reentered for any work. Evaluation of cavity collapse and crater formation is input into the safety decisions. Subject matter experts from the LLNL Containment Program who participated in weapons testing activities perform these evaluations. Information used included drilling and hole construction, emplacement and stemming, timing and sequence of the selected test and nearby tests, geology, yield, depth of burial, collapse times, surface crater sizes, cavity and crater volume estimations, ground motion, and radiological release information. Both classified and unclassified data were reviewed. The evaluations do not include the effects of erosion that may modify the collapse craters over time. They also do not address possible radiation dangers that may be present. Various amounts of information are available for these tests, depending on their age and other associated activities. Lack of data can hamper evaluations and introduce uncertainty. We make no attempt to quantify this uncertainty. Evaluation of Cavity Collapse and Surface Crater Formation for Selected Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Underground Nuclear Tests - 2011 was published on March 2, 2011. This report, considered Part 2 of work undertaken in calendar year 2011, compiles evaluations requested after the March report. The following unclassified summary statements describe collapse evolution and crater stability in response to a recent request to review 6 LLNL test locations in Yucca Flat, Rainier Mesa, and Pahute Mesa. They include: Baneberry in U8d; Clearwater in U12q; Wineskin in U12r, Buteo in U20a and Duryea in nearby U20a1; and Barnwell in U20az.

Pawloski, G A

2012-01-30T23:59:59.000Z

339

SUBJECT: National Nuclear Security Administration  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Nuclear Security Administration Sandia Site Ofce P. 0. Box 5400 Albuquerque, NM 87185 JAN O=P= ONP= Annual National Environmental Policy Act Planning Sumary 2013 Attached is: the Annual National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Planning Summary for the National Nuclear Security Administation, Sandia Site Ofce (SSO). Currently, there are two environmental assessments planned and one environmental impact statement in progess for the

340

History & Reflections of Engineering at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect

I thought it was important to relate how this project began. Jens Mahler, Mechanical Engineering Deputy Associate Director, recalls that during a discussion between him and Wally Decker, Wally suggested that he document the significant events and the organization of the Mechanical Engineering Department since 1952, i.e., write a history of Mechanical Engineering. Jens agreed that Wally should begin this effort. Upon learning of this, Dave Pehrson, Deputy Associate Director for Engineering, suggested that the History be expanded to include Electronics Engineering and that it be called A History of Engineering. Dave asked me to join Wally on this effort and, unfortunately, Wally died shortly after I started. In the first part of this History, I have attempted to capture the important contributions that Engineering has made to the Programs, since Engineering's primary mission is to provide ''support to the Laboratory Programs.'' In the later parts you will find views discussing the development and application of Engineering's technology base. While Engineering's direct programmatic support had first priority, Engineering had other responsibilities as well. Some of these were to hire and train a competent technical and leadership staff, to anticipate and develop engineering technologies for future use by the Programs, to provide support to institutional activities, to be the vehicle for internal technology transfer, to provide for the movement of personnel between Programs, to groom individuals to assume programmatic and institutional leadership positions, and to develop, operate, and maintain facilities. Engineering developed the reputation as ''the flywheel of the Laboratory.'' It was also known as willing to provide people for tasks broader than just primarily technical roles, such as membership on salary review committees, and members and chairs of the student policy committees and safety groups. This History is not a compilation of facts only but a reflection by many individuals of what they viewed as important contributions during their careers at the Laboratory. I thank them all for taking the time to write their inputs to this document. Finally, I want to acknowledge all the former and current members of Engineering: engineers, associates, coordinators, drafters and designers, technicians, administrators and clerical, who in their own way made Engineering what it is. For after all is said and done, Engineering's primary assets were and are its people.

Lafranchi, E

2002-04-18T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "administration livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Emergency Response Capability Baseline Needs Assessment Requirement Document  

SciTech Connect

This revision of the LLNL Fire Protection Baseline Needs Assessment (BNA) was prepared by John A. Sharry, LLNL Fire Marshal and LLNL Division Leader for Fire Protection and reviewed by Martin Gresho, Sandia/CA Fire Marshal. The document follows and expands upon the format and contents of the DOE Model Fire Protection Baseline Capabilities Assessment document contained on the DOE Fire Protection Web Site, but only address emergency response. The original LLNL BNA was created on April 23, 1997 as a means of collecting all requirements concerning emergency response capabilities at LLNL (including response to emergencies at Sandia/CA) into one BNA document. The original BNA documented the basis for emergency response, emergency personnel staffing, and emergency response equipment over the years. The BNA has been updated and reissued five times since in 1998, 1999, 2000, 2002, and 2004. A significant format change was performed in the 2004 update of the BNA in that it was 'zero based.' Starting with the requirement documents, the 2004 BNA evaluated the requirements, and determined minimum needs without regard to previous evaluations. This 2010 update maintains the same basic format and requirements as the 2004 BNA. In this 2010 BNA, as in the previous BNA, the document has been intentionally divided into two separate documents - the needs assessment (1) and the compliance assessment (2). The needs assessment will be referred to as the BNA and the compliance assessment will be referred to as the BNA Compliance Assessment. The primary driver for separation is that the needs assessment identifies the detailed applicable regulations (primarily NFPA Standards) for emergency response capabilities based on the hazards present at LLNL and Sandia/CA and the geographical location of the facilities. The needs assessment also identifies areas where the modification of the requirements in the applicable NFPA standards is appropriate, due to the improved fire protection provided, the remote location and low population density of some the facilities. As such, the needs assessment contains equivalencies to the applicable requirements. The compliance assessment contains no such equivalencies and simply assesses the existing emergency response resources to the requirements of the BNA and can be updated as compliance changes independent of the BNA update schedule. There are numerous NFPA codes and standards and other requirements and guidance documents that address the subject of emergency response. These requirements documents are not always well coordinated and may contain duplicative or conflicting requirements or even coverage gaps. Left unaddressed, this regulatory situation results in frequent interpretation of requirements documents. Different interpretations can then lead to inconsistent implementation. This BNA addresses this situation by compiling applicable requirements from all identified sources (see Section 5) and analyzing them collectively to address conflict and overlap as applicable to the hazards presented by the LLNL and Sandia/CA sites (see Section 7). The BNA also generates requirements when needed to fill any identified gaps in regulatory coverage. Finally, the BNA produces a customized simple set of requirements, appropriate for the DOE protection goals, such as those defined in DOE O 420.1B, the hazard level, the population density, the topography, and the site layout at LLNL and Sandia/CA that will be used as the baseline requirements set - the 'baseline needs' - for emergency response at LLNL and Sandia/CA. A template approach is utilized to accomplish this evaluation for each of the nine topical areas that comprise the baseline needs for emergency response. The basis for conclusions reached in determining the baseline needs for each of the topical areas is presented in Sections 7.1 through 7.9. This BNA identifies only mandatory requirements and establishes the minimum performance criteria. The minimum performance criteria may not be the level of performance desired Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory or Sandia/CA

Sharry, J A

2009-12-30T23:59:59.000Z

342

Lawrence Livermore wins six R&D Awards for science, technological  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6-08 6-08 For immediate release: 06/20/2012 | NR-12-06-08 Lawrence Livermore wins six R&D Awards for science, technological innovation Lynda L Seaver, LLNL, (925) 423-3103, seaver1@llnl.gov Printer-friendly Natalia Zaitseva, an LLNL materials scientist, leads a team of Livermore researchers that has developed the first plastic material capable of efficiently distinguishing neutrons from gamma rays, something not thought possible for the past five decades or so. See video. Photo by Jacqueline McBride High Resolution Image The vertical cross-section of the "snowflake" region of an experimental tokamak TCV in Switzerland. The left panel shows broad spreading of the exhaust plasma, and the right shows the snowflake-shaped magnetic field lines (six branches, counting the two directed upward) near the magnetic

343

From Pilot to Practice - Streamlining Procurement and Engineering at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

16.33> BACKGROUND Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL, http://www.llnl.gov) is a research and development facility owned by the U.S. Department of Energy and managed by the University of California. It was founded in 1952 as a sister lab of the Los Alamos National Laboratory and is located in Livermore, California. Organization The Lab has about 8,000 employees and an annual budget of $1 billion. Its programs include biology and biotechnology; defense and nuclear technologies; energy programs; environmental programs; laser programs; and non-proliferation, arms control and International security. The programs are supported by more general scientific and engineering directorates chemistry and material science; computation; engineering; and physics, and space technology (Figure 1). Director's Office Research Programs Biology and Biotechnology Research Defense and Nuclear Technologies Energy Programs Laser Programs Non-

Judith Gebauer; Frank Frber

2000-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

344

Review of Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, July 2013  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Independent Oversight Review of Independent Oversight Review of Preparedness for Severe Natural Phenomena Events at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory May 2011 July 2013 Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Office of Enforcement and Oversight Office of Health, Safety and Security U.S. Department of Energy Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose................................................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Scope................................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Background ......................................................................................................................................... 2

345

A Collaborative Effort to Address the Distribution of Plutonium-Contaminated Sludge in Livermore, California  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

For over a half-century, the U.S. Department of Energy nuclear weapons laboratory in Livermore, California has worked with plutonium in the course of its mission to research and develop nuclear weapons. Plutonium releases via the Laboratorys sewer system resulted in the contamination of sewage sludge that was distributed and used widely as soil conditioner in parks, landscaping around public buildings, and in home lawns and gardens. The amount of sludge distributed and the concentration of the radioactivity in the sludge are uncertain. In 1999, research was undertaken to investigate the historic distribution of sewage sludge (1958-1976) in Livermore. Navigating the uncertainties surrounding the sludge distribution more than forty years after it began presented an enormous ethical challenge. Community members who received the sludge at no cost were not told that the sludge they received may have been contaminated with plutonium, and the log-book that had recorded the names and addresses of sludge recipients had disappeared. The half-life of weapons-grade plutonium is about 24,000 years. Therefore, former, current, and future Livermore residents are at potential increased risk of cancer and other health impacts from their largely unrecognized and therefore unavoidable

Patrice Sutton; A Jacqueline Cabasso; A Tracy Barreau; B Marylia Kelley C

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

346

Environmental recordkeeping: The administrative record  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document provides information on an environmental records management system. It includes information on environmental recordkeeping; environmental regulations with emphasis on the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA); and the administrative record including a case study of the Hanford Site's administrative record system. This paper will focus on the following objectives: (1) Identify resources that can be used as reference tools; (2) understand the reasons for developing and maintaining an administrative record; and, (3) evaluate an existing system and identify means of complying with the regulations. 15 refs., 2 figs.

Sprouse, B.S.

1991-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

347

National Nuclear Security Administration  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites

National Nuclear Security Administration National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog US, UK, France Discuss Stockpile Stewardship, Arms Control and Nonproliferation and Visit the Nevada National Security Site Learn More NNSA DOE removes all remaining HEU from Hungary Learn More DOE removes all remaining HEU from Hungary Tiffany A. Blanchard-Case receives 2013 Linton Brooks Medal

348

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3: 3: PROCUREMENT, SUPPLY, AND GRANT RECORDS July 2008 Revision 2 Procurement and supply records document the acquisition of goods and non-personal services, controlling the volume of stock on hand, reporting procurement needs, and related supply matters which are part of daily procurement operations. The basic procurement files reflect a considerable range of procedure, from simple, small purchases to complicated prime contractor and subcontractor operations. Any records created prior to 1895 must first be offered to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) for appraisal before applying the disposal instructions. Frequently copies of procurement papers become integral parts of other files, such as project files of various types or general subject files pertaining to program operations;

349

Individualized Site Training | National Nuclear Security Administratio...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Individualized Site Training | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response...

350

Radiation Emergency Assistance Center / Training Site | National...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Radiation Emergency Assistance Center Training Site | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear...

351

National Nuclear Security Administration Pantex Site Office  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

SUBJECT: Permit Application Flexible Permit Number: 84802 Please reference the attached Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Flexible Air Quality Permit dated May 5 , 2009....

352

National Nuclear Security Administration Pantex Site Office  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

benefit operations under this Contract. Add paragraph B.2.m below: m. Wellness Program. Costs of a Wellness Program to promote employee health and fitness are allowable. This...

353

Site Support Contractor Solicitation - Support Administrative...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

List PDF-85KB 3.0 Additional Information (i.e., Operating Environment, Operating Manuals) 4.0 Government Furnished Property PDF-34KB 5.0 Solicitation & Accompanying...

354

National Nuclear Security Administration Pantex Site Office  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

96206) and the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 ("AEA"), 42 U.S.C. 201 1 et. seq, applicable DOE Orders governing classified and national security information, and applicable...

355

National Nuclear Security Administration Pantex Site Office  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

cc wattachment (via email): A. Wilson, EC, PXSO D. Huddleston, Projects, B&W T. Biggs, Projects, B&W J. Flowers, RCD, B&W RCDWOD, Records, B&W EC:FYlO:036;e212344 By...

356

Management and Administration | National Nuclear Security Administration  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Management and Administration | National Nuclear Security Administration Management and Administration | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Management and Administration Home > About Us > Our Programs > Powering the Nuclear Navy > Management and Administration Management and Administration NNSA's Naval Reactors is committed to excellence and dedicated to meeting

357

TECHNOLOGY ADMINISTRATION  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

This report originated in the authors participation in a multi-country study of national innovation systems and their impact on new technology development, sponsored by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Our task was to look at the U.S. national innovation systems impact on the commercial development of Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) fuel cells for residential power applications. Early drivers of PEM fuel cell innovation were the aerospace and defense programs, in particular the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), which used fuel cells on its spacecraft. In the early 1990s, deregulation hit the electric utility industry, which made utilities and entrepreneurs see the potential in generating electricity from distributed power. Throughout the 1990s, the Department of Energy funded a significant portion of civilian fuel cell research, while the Department of Defense and NASA funded more esoteric military and space applications. In 1998, the Department of Commerces Advanced Technology Program (ATP) awarded the first of 25 fuel cell projects, as prospects for adoption and commercialization of fuel cell technologies improved.

John M. Nail; Gary Anderson; Gerald Ceasar; Christopher J. Hansen; John M. Nail; Gerald Ceasar; Christopher J. Hansen; Carlos M. Gutierrez; Hratch G. Samerjian; Acting Director; Marc G. Stanley; Director Abstract

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

358

Livermore energy policy model and projections of energy futures for the Gas Research Institute  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Energy and Resource Planning Group at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) was asked by the Gas Research Institute to evaluate ten of their research projects relative to proposed funding levels for 1982. These energy technology projects included gas from unconventional and synthetic sources as well as utilization technologies. The primary tool used in the evaluation was the LLNL Energy Policy Model (EPM). The report gives background information about the study, the basic assumptions used in the study, and some conclusions, and presents selected supporting results from the EPM runs.

Castleton, R.

1981-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

359

14 MeV neutron work at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect

The 14 MeV neutron work at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) covers two main areas of interest to this Symposium: (1) measurements and calculations of differential cross sections; and (2) integral measurements of the neutron and gamma emission spectra. In both areas a large number of materials have been studied, spanning a wide mass range (6 < A < 239), of interest to fusion and hybrid reactors. In this presentation a brief description of the experimental techniques and calculational analysis is given for each of the above areas and the measured and calculated cross sections are discussed. 28 refs., 7 figs., 3 tabs.

Hansen, L.F.

1985-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

360

Southwestern Power Administration  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Disability Employment Disability Employment Duty Locations Equal Employment New Employee Orientation Reasonable Accommodation Student Employment Opportunities Pathways Skip Navigation Links USAJOBS Veteran Employment Opportunities Feds Hire Vets Current Vacancy Announcements There are currently no employment vacancies. Please check here regularly for career opportunities at Southwestern Power Administration. Apply At USAJOBS USAJobs is the official job site of the US Federal Government. Please visit this site to see all job vacancies within Southwestern, the Department of Energy, and the Federal Government. Please pay close attention to the closing date in the "Open Period" section as well as the information in the "Who May Be Considered" section on the first page of each announcement to determine if you are

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "administration livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Southwestern Power Administration  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Student Employment Opportunities Student Employment Opportunities There are currently no student employment vacancies. Please check here regularly for career opportunities at Southwestern Power Administration. Learn more about the type of work engineers perform at Southwestern: Electric Power Marketing Engineering and Planning Reliability Compliance and Transmission Policy Resources and Rates Apply At USAJOBS USAJobs is the official job site of the US Federal Government. Please visit this site to see all job vacancies within Southwestern, the Department of Energy, and the Federal Government. Please pay close attention to the closing date in the "Open Period" section as well as the information in the "Who May Be Considered" section on the first page of each announcement to determine if you are

362

NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

NNSA Policy Letter: NAP-5 NNSA Policy Letter: NAP-5 (DOE P 450.3) Date: October 16, 2002 TITLE: Policy Letter for Standards Management I. OBJECTIVE: Establish NNSA expectations for Standards Management Programs used to select and maintain applicable standards for work performed at NNSA Headquarters and field sites. II. APPLICABILITY: NNSA federal staff and NNSA management and operating contractors, and other prime contractors as determined by NNSA Headquarters and/or field site management, shall use a defined formal process to tailor environment, safety, and health; project management; safeguards and security; quality assurance; business; and administrative standards and, as determined by NNSA management, other standards used to perform federal and contractor work. Here, the term standard encompasses federal,

363

Electromagnetic Imaging of CO2 Sequestration at an Enhanced Oil Recovery Site  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Electromagnetic Imaging of CO Electromagnetic Imaging of CO 2 Sequestration at an Enhanced Oil Recovery Site Barry Kirkendall (Kirkendall1@llnl.gov ; 925-423-1513) Jeff Roberts (Roberts17@llnl.gov ; 925-422-7108) Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 7000 East Avenue Livermore, CA 94550 1.1 Introduction Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) is currently involved in a long term study using time-lapse multiple frequency electromagnetic (EM) characterization at a waterflood enhanced oil recovery (EOR) site in California operated by Chevron Heavy Oil Division in Lost Hills, California (Figure 1). The petroleum industry's interest and the successful imaging results from this project suggest that this technique be extended to monitor CO 2 sequestration at an EOR site also operated by Chevron. The impetus for this study is

364

Site Map  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Home » Site Map Home » Site Map Site Map Home About Overview NERSC Mission Contact us Staff Center Leadership Sudip Dosanjh Select Publications Jeff Broughton Katie Antypas John Shalf Francesca Verdier Center Administration James Craw Norma Early Jeff Grounds Betsy MacGowan Zaida McCunney Lynn Rippe Suzanne Stevenson David Tooker Center Communications Jon Bashor Linda Vu Margie Wylie Kathy Kincade Advanced Technologies Group Nicholas Wright Brian Austin Research Projects Matthew Cordery Christopher Daley Analytics Group Peter Nugent David Camp Hank Childs Harinarayan Krishnan Burlen Loring Joerg Meyer Prabhat Oliver Ruebel Daniela Ushizima Gunther Weber Yushu Yao Computational Systems Group Jay Srinivasan James Botts Scott Burrow Tina Butler Nick Cardo Tina Declerck Ilya Malinov David Paul Larry Pezzaglia Iwona Sakrejda

365

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Emergency Response Capability 2009 Baseline Needs Assessment Performance Assessment  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document was prepared by John A. Sharry, LLNL Fire Marshal and Division Leader for Fire Protection and was reviewed by Sandia/CA Fire Marshal, Martin Gresho. This document is the second of a two-part analysis of Emergency Response Capabilities of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The first part, 2009 Baseline Needs Assessment Requirements Document established the minimum performance criteria necessary to meet mandatory requirements. This second part analyses the performance of Lawrence Livermore Laboratory Emergency Management Department to the contents of the Requirements Document. The document was prepared based on an extensive review of information contained in the 2004 BNA, a review of Emergency Planning Hazards Assessments, a review of building construction, occupancy, fire protection features, dispatch records, LLNL alarm system records, fire department training records, and fire department policies and procedures. On October 1, 2007, LLNL contracted with the Alameda County Fire Department to provide emergency response services. The level of service called for in that contract is the same level of service as was provided by the LLNL Fire Department prior to that date. This Compliance Assessment will evaluate fire department services beginning October 1, 2008 as provided by the Alameda County Fire Department.

Sharry, J A

2009-12-30T23:59:59.000Z

366

Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Richland Operations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Richland Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Richland Operations Office - December 2010 Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Richland Operations Office - December 2010 December 2010 Specific Administrative Controls Review with the Office of Environmental Management at DOE-Richland Operations Office The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security, participated in the Office of Environmental Management Office of Standards and Quality Assurance, EM-23, review of Specific Administrative Controls (SAC) at the Hanford Site. The EM-23 review included selected programs at the Hanford Site that are under the auspices of the DOE Richland Operations Office. Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Richland Operations

367

Livermore Lab's giant laser system will bring star power to Earth  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

In the 50 years since the laser was first demonstrated in Malibu, California, on May 16, 1960, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) has been a world leader in laser technology and the home for many of the world's most advanced laser systems. That tradition continues today at LLNL's National Ignition Facility (NIF), the world's most energetic laser system. NIF's completion in March 2009 not only marked the dawn of a new era of scientific research - it could also prove to be the next big step in the quest for a sustainable, carbon-free energy source for the world. NIF consists of 192 laser beams that will focus up to 1.8 million joules of energy on a bb-sized target filled with isotopes of hydrogen - forcing the hydrogen nuclei to collide and fuse in a controlled thermonuclear reaction similar to what happens in the sun and the stars. More energy will be produced by this 'ignition' reaction than the amount of laser energy required to start it. This is the long-sought goal of 'energy gain' that has eluded fusion researchers for more than half a century. Success will be a scientific breakthrough - the first demonstration of fusion ignition in a laboratory setting, duplicating on Earth the processes that power the stars. This impending success could not be achieved without the valuable partnerships forged with other national and international laboratories, private industry and universities. One of the most crucial has been between LLNL and the community in which it resides. Over 155 businesses in the local Tri-Valley area have contributed to the NIF, from industrial technology and engineering firms to tool manufacturing, electrical, storage and supply companies. More than $2.3B has been spent locally between contracts with nearby merchants and employee salaries. The Tri-Valley community has enabled the Laboratory to complete a complex and far-reaching project that will have national and global impact in the future. The first experiments were conducted on NIF last summer and fall, successfully delivering a world-record level of ultraviolet laser energy - more than 1.2 million joules - to a target. The experiments also demonstrated the target drive and target capsule conditions required to achieve fusion ignition. When ignition experiments begin later this year, NIF's lasers will create temperatures and pressures in the hydrogen target that exist only in the cores of stars and giant planets and inside thermonuclear weapons. As a key component of the National Nuclear Security Administration's Stockpile Stewardship Program, NIF will offer the means for sustaining a safe, secure and reliable U.S. nuclear deterrent without nuclear testing. NIF is uniquely capable of providing the experimental data needed to develop and validate computer models that will enable scientists to assess the continuing viability of the nation's nuclear stockpile. Along with this vital national security mission, success at NIF also offers the possibility of groundbreaking scientific discoveries in a wide variety of disciplines ranging from hydrodynamics to astrophysics. As a unique facility in the world that can create the conditions that exist in supernovas and in the cores of giant planets, NIF will help unlock the secrets of the cosmos and inspire the next generation of scientists. It is NIF's third mission, energy security that has been generating the most excitement in the news media and the international scientific community. The reasons are obvious: global energy demand, driven by population growth and the aspirations of the developing world, already is straining the planet's existing energy resources. Global need for electricity is expected to double from its current level of about two trillion watts (TW) to four TW by 2030 and could reach eight to ten TW by the end of the century. As many as 10,000 new billion-watt power plants will have to be built to keep up with this demand. Meeting this pressing need will require a sustainable carbon-free energy technology that can supply base load electricity to the world. Successful ignition experim

Moses, E

2010-04-08T23:59:59.000Z

368

NIF Target Chamber Dedicated | National Nuclear Security Administration  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

NIF Target Chamber Dedicated | National Nuclear Security Administration NIF Target Chamber Dedicated | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > About Us > Our History > NNSA Timeline > NIF Target Chamber Dedicated NIF Target Chamber Dedicated June 11, 1999 Livermore, CA NIF Target Chamber Dedicated Secretary Richardson dedicates the National Ignition Facility target

369

Secretary Chu, NNSA Administrator Congratulate New Los Alamos National  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Congratulate New Los Alamos Congratulate New Los Alamos National Laboratory Director Charles F. McMillan Secretary Chu, NNSA Administrator Congratulate New Los Alamos National Laboratory Director Charles F. McMillan May 26, 2011 - 12:00am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC -- U.S. Department of Energy Secretary Steven Chu today congratulated Dr. Charles F. McMillan on his appointment as the new director of the National Nuclear Security Administration's Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). McMillan, who started his career as an experimental physicist at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in 1983, was chosen after a rigorous, nationwide selection process that attracted more than 150 applicants. Beginning next month, McMillan will serve as the tenth LANL director and as the President of the Los Alamos National Security, LLC, the management and

370

Photon Sciences | User Administration  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Administration Postal Address User Administration Office Brookhaven National Laboratory 75 Brookhaven Avenue, Bldg. 725B Upton, NY 11973-5000 USA Office Hours Monday through...

371

Site environmental report for 1992  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) is committed to conducting its operations in an environmentally safe and sound manner. It is mandatory that activities at SNL/California comply with all applicable environmental statutes, regulations, and standards. Moreover, SNL/California continuously strives to reduce risks to employees, the public, and the environment to the lowest levels reasonably possible. To help verify effective protection of public safety and preservation of the environment, SNL/California maintains an extensive, ongoing environmental monitoring program. This program, conducted in conjunction with Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, monitors all significant airborne and liquid effluents and the general environment in the area. This monitoring effort ensures that emission controls are effective in preventing contamination of the environment. As part of the Environmental Monitoring Program, an ambient environmental surveillance system measures the possible presence of radioactive and hazardous materials in ambient air, surface water, groundwater, sewage, soil, vegetation, and locally-produced food stuffs. The program also includes an extensive environmental dosimetry program, which measures external radiation levels around the Livermore site and nearby vicinity. This executive summary focuses on impacts to the environment and estimated radiation doses to the public from site emissions.

Gordon, K.W. [ed.; Brekke, D.D. [Sandia National Labs., Livermore, CA (United States); Holland, R.C. [Science Applications International Corp., San Diego, CA (United States)

1993-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

372

Livermore, Los Alamos Team for Artificial Retina Project to Help Restore Vision for Many  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

9 9 6 www.federallabs.org Livermore, Los Alamos Team for Artificial Retina Project to Help Restore Vision for Many signals in the eye that the brain uses to create a visual image. As a core member of the team, Los Alamos National Laboratory is developing and applying techniques for the functional imaging of physiological and prosthetic stimulation in neural tissue to characterize information encoding and processing by the retina and to validate the efficacy of electrical stimulation. Coupled experimental studies and computer simulations are being used to investigate the biophysical and physiological properties of retinal neuronal tissue. In clinical trials, patients with vision loss were able to successfully identify objects, increase mobility, and

373

Reducing the solid waste stream: reuse and recycling at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In Fiscal Year (FY) 1996 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) increased its solid waste diversion by 365 percent over FY 1992 in five solid waste categories - paper, cardboard, wood, metals, and miscellaneous. (LLNL`s fiscal year is from October 1 to September 30.) LLNL reused/ recycled 6,387 tons of waste, including 340 tons of paper, 455 tons of scrap wood, 1,509 tons of metals, and 3,830 tons of asphalt and concrete (Table1). An additional 63 tons was diverted from landfills by donating excess food, selling toner cartridges for reconditioning, using rechargeable batteries, redirecting surplus equipment to other government agencies and schools, and comporting plant clippings. LLNL also successfully expanded its demonstration program to recycle and reuse construction and demolition debris as part of its facility-wide, comprehensive solid waste reduction programs.

Wilson, K. L.

1997-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

374

Lawrence Livermore pulsed sphere benchmark analysis of MCNP{trademark} ENDF/B-VI  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Twenty-eight Lawrence Livermore pulsed sphere experiments were modeled using MCNP for the purpose of bench- marking the new MCNP ENDF/B-VI data library. The twenty-eight pulsed sphere experiments contain thirty-four of the 124 isotopic or elemental evaluations contained in the new ENDF/B-VI set. The ENDF/B-VI results are compared to experimental neutron time-of-flight data, the results obtained from using ENDF/B-V, and against an additional data set, the MCNP Recommended Library, which includes Los Alamos group T-2 evaluations. The results show that ENDF/B-VI results give better or comparable results in comparison to experiment to ENDF/B-V in many cases, and do not deviate grossly in the other cases.

Court, J.D.; Brockhoff, R.C.; Hendricks, J.S.

1994-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

375

Systems Studies Department FY 78 activity report. Volume 2. Systems analysis. [Sandia Laboratories, Livermore  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Systems Studies Department at Sandia Laboratories Livermore (SLL) has two primary responsibilities: to provide computational and mathematical services and to perform systems analysis studies. This document (Volume 2) describes the FY Systems Analysis highlights. The description is an unclassified overview of activities and is not complete or exhaustive. The objective of the systems analysis activities is to evaluate the relative value of alternative concepts and systems. SLL systems analysis activities reflect Sandia Laboratory programs and in 1978 consisted of study efforts in three areas: national security: evaluations of strategic, theater, and navy nuclear weapons issues; energy technology: particularly in support of Sandia's solar thermal programs; and nuclear fuel cycle physical security: a special project conducted for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Highlights of these activities are described in the following sections. 7 figures. (RWR)

Gold, T.S.

1979-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

376

2011 Annual Planning Summary for Bonneville Power Administration...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Annual Planning Summary for National Nuclear Security Administration Service Center (NNSA-SC) Energy.gov Careers & Internships Guidance & Requirements Contact Us About This Site...

377

Security Administration Production Office,  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

JUNE/JULY 2013 JUNE/JULY 2013 inside this issue ... Reaching the summit - Big hitters talk economic development Page 3 Saving yesterday's knowledge today Page 5 What's a fellow to do? Page 6 ... and other Y-12 news On June 3 newly appointed Secretary of Energy Ernest Moniz (right) made Oak Ridge the site of his first official visit since being sworn in as head of the U.S. Department of Energy. Secretary Moniz met earlier in the day with national lab directors at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, then came to Y-12 for tours and a meeting with the National Nuclear Security Administration Production Office, B&W Y-12 and ORNL employees. He was joined by Rep. Chuck Fleischmann. The Secretary described Oak Ridge as a place where DOE's chief missions of nuclear security, environmental

378

University Partnerships | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

have had a close relationship with the Department of Energy's Defense Programs national laboratories. In fact, Los Alamos and Lawrence Livermore have been operated for...

379

Pollux | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Pollux | National Nuclear Security Administration Pollux | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > Media Room > Video Gallery > Pollux Pollux Pollux The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) announced that Pollux, a subcritical experiment, was successfully conducted at its Nevada National Security Site (NNSS). This video is of the vessel containing the Pollux experiment.

380

Microsoft Word - LLNLControlledSubstancesFinal Report Cover 02032011 ws  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Management of Controlled Management of Controlled Substances at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory INS-O-11-01 February 2011 Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 February 10, 2011 MEMORANDUM FOR THE MANAGER, LIVERMORE SITE OFFICE FROM: Sandra D. Bruce Assistant Inspector General for Inspections Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Inspection Report on "Management of Controlled Substances at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory" BACKGROUND As part of its national defense mission, the Department of Energy's (Department) Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (Livermore) actively engages in scientific, engineering, and environmental research activities. Livermore is managed and operated under contract by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, for the National Nuclear Security Administration

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "administration livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

National Nuclear Security Administration IUA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

IUA IUA '1.L'\I~~ Pantex Site Office IIV1'~~4j P. O. Box 30030 Amarillo, TX 79120 National Nuclear Security Administration NEPA Compliance Officer Rationale Pantex Site Office Proj. No.: EXP-IO-OlS-C NEPA ID No.: PXP-IO-OOOI Uninterruptable Power Supply (UPS)/Generator Replacement Application of DOE NEPA Procedure: Categorical Exclusions B 1.3 and B 1.23, Applicable to Facility Operations (10 CFR Part 1021 , Subpart D, Appendix B), apply to the proposed activity described below. Rationale: The U.S . Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), proposes to demolish Building 12-20, which is 225 square feet (sf) in size, along with a small concrete pad of approximately 32 sf. The building currently houses an inoperable

382

INSPECTION ON THE MANAGEMENT OF EXCESS PERSONAL PROPERTY AT LAWRENCE...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Technology Centers Field Sites Power Marketing Administration Other Agencies You are here Home INSPECTION ON THE MANAGEMENT OF EXCESS PERSONAL PROPERTY AT LAWRENCE LIVERMORE...

383

HSS Message, December 2009  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

- 1009 Lawrence Livermore National * Laboratory - 1009 DOE Nevada Site Office - 1009 * National Nuclear Security * Administration (NNSA) Fleet Managers Meeting, Albuquerque, NM...

384

Livermore's 2004 R&D 100 Awards: Magnetically Levitated Train Takes Flight  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

the 1960s, transportation industry planners have sought an energy-efficient design for a train that can glide through air at speeds up to 500 kilometers per hour. This type of train, called a magnetically levitated (maglev) train, is thought to be a viable solution to meet the nation's growing need for intercity and urban transportation networks. However, despite some promising developments, unresolved concerns with the operation and safety of maglev trains has prevented the transition from demonstration model to commercial development. Inductrack, a maglev system originally conceived by Livermore physicist Richard Post, is designed to address these issues. Post's work on Inductrack began with funding from Livermore's Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program, and in 2003, the technology was licensed to General Atomics (GA) in San Diego for train and transit system applications. This year, members of the Livermore-GA team received an R&D 100 Award for Inductrack's development. Inductrack uses permanent magnets to produce the magnetic fields that levitate the train and provides economic and operational advantages over other maglev systems. It can be adapted to both high-speed and urban-speed environments. In the event of a power failure, the train slows gradually until it comes to rest on its auxiliary wheels. The maintenance requirements for Inductrack are also lower than they are for other systems, plus it has a short turning radius and is designed for quiet operation. Previous designs for maglev systems did not offer the energy efficiency or safety protections that are in the Inductrack design. Electromagnetic systems (EMS) use powered electromagnets to levitate the train. However, these systems are based on magnetic attraction rather than repulsion and thus are inherently unstable. In EMS trains, the levitation gap--the separation between the magnet pole faces and the iron rail--is only about 10 millimeters and, during operation, must be maintained to within {+-}1 millimeter. Position sensors and electronic feedback systems are required to control the magnetic current and to compensate for the inherent instability. This requirement, plus the onboard source of emergency power required to ensure operational safety during a sudden power loss, increases the complexity of EMS trains. In contrast, in electrodynamic systems (EDS), large superconducting magnet coils mounted on the sides of the train generate high-intensity magnetic field poles. Interaction of the current between the coils and the track levitates the train. At operating speeds (above a liftoff speed of about 100 kilometers per hour), the magnetic levitation force balances the weight of the car at a stable position. EDS trains do not require the feedback control systems that EMS trains use to stabilize levitation. However, the superconducting magnetic coils must be kept at temperatures of only 5 kelvins, so costly electrically powered cryogenic equipment is required. Also, passengers, especially those with pacemakers, must be shielded from the high magnetic fields generated by the superconductors.

Hazi, A

2005-09-20T23:59:59.000Z

385

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 16:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 16: ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT RECORDS June 2007 Revision 1 This schedule covers those administrative management activities not covered by other Administrative Schedules. Included are disposable records created in the course of organizational planning, development, and simplification of procedures; records management activities; and administration of management improvement programs. See ADM 1 (items 12 and 13) for the disposition of case files on individuals involved in incentive award and similar types of management improvement programs. The organizational locations and titles of administrative management units vary. They may be scattered at numerous levels or locations, or may be centralized. For the purposes

386

Administrative | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Services » Employee Services » Administrative Services » Employee Services » Administrative Administrative The Office of Management provides many of the administrative services that keep the Department of Energy operational. These functions are primarily provided by the Office of Administration, MA-40, the Office of Administrative Management and Support, MA-42. Administrative Management Services Conferencing and Special Events Copier Services Document Imaging Graphics Mail and Distribution Photography Printing For a listing of office contacts please use the About Us menu, the Contact Us section, available directly through this link. We welcome your comments or questions regarding these services. Please feel free to provide feedback to the Office of Administration's Customer Mailbox at: MA-40Customervoice@hq.doe.gov.

387

Energy Information Administration  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Energy Information Administration - EIA - Official Energy Statistics from the U.S. Government ... storage, imports and exports, production, prices, sales.

388

National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure...

389

Glossary - Energy Information Administration  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

U.S. Energy Information Administration ... (e.g., water vapor, carbon dioxide, helium, hydrogen sulfide, and nitrogen) ... Storage Withdrawals: ...

390

CSRC - Systems Administration  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... The intended audience is composed of Windows 2000 Systems Administrators and technical Windows 2000 Professional users working in ...

391

Administrative Committee Members  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Volunteer Training Module. March 2013. 1. Your Professional Partner for Career Advancement. Administrative Committee. Members. Online Training Module.

392

Glossary - Energy Information Administration  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Energy Information Administration 137 Energy Policy Act Transportation Study: Interim Report on Natural Gas Flows and Rates Glossary Affiliated ...

393

Lawrence Livermore: News and Public Affairs: News and Media: NR-04-02-01  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Social Media Logos Follow LLNL on YouTube Subscribe to LLNL's RSS feed Follow LLNL on Facebook Follow LLNL on Twitter Follow LLNL on Flickr Social Media Logos Follow LLNL on YouTube Subscribe to LLNL's RSS feed Follow LLNL on Facebook Follow LLNL on Twitter Follow LLNL on Flickr Contact: Anne M. Stark Phone:(925) 422-9799 E-mail: stark8@llnl.gov FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Date: February 2, 2004 NR-04-02-01 Livermore Scientists Team With Russia To Discover Elements 113 and 115 A calcium-48 ion is accelerated to a high velocity in a cyclotron and directed at an americium-243 target. (300 dpi) One of the numerous americium-243 target atoms with a nucleus of protons and neutrons surrounded by an electron cloud. (300 dpi) An accelerated calcium-48 ion and an americium-243 target atom just before they collide. (300 dpi) The moment of collision between an accelerated calcium-48 ion and an americium-243 target atom.

394

Initial ultraviolet-B intensity data at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect

A measurement of UV-B reaching the ground has been established at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The instrument is the same as those operated by the National Institute for Water and Atmospheric Research in their network in New Zealand. The wavelength response of the radiometer is similar to the response of human skin to UV-B. Intensity data are collected by averaging meter readings over 10 minutes from 6:00 am to 6:00 pm Pacific Standard Time, then converting to effective UV-B intensity normalized at 310 nm. This report checks the intensities obtained at LLNL from November 1992 to July 1993 against the expected results: Increased solar zenith angle, whether from the daily cycle or from the yearly cycle in solar position, should decrease UV-B intensity at the ground due to increased optical path; and, intervening cloud cover should decrease ground UV-B intensity. Three additional findings are reported here: Maximum UV-B intensity on cloudless days does not always follow a smooth curve, but instead varies either high or low to some extent; Morning UV-B intensities are less than those in the afternoon at comparable solar zenith angles at certain times of year; LLNL wintertime daily-averaged UV-B intensities are somewhat higher than those observed at Auckland, New Zealand in their winter of 1992.

Patten, K.O. Jr.; Wuebbles, D.J. [Lawrence Livermore National Lab., CA (United States); Smith, G.J. [New Zealand Inst. for Industrial Research and Development, Lower Hutt (New Zealand)

1993-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

395

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory underground coal gasification data base. [US DOE-supported field tests; data  

SciTech Connect

The Department of Energy has sponsored a number of field projects to determine the feasibility of converting the nation's vast coal reserves into a clean efficient energy source via underground coal gasification (UCG). Due to these tests, a significant data base of process information has developed covering a range of coal seams (flat subbituminous, deep flat bituminous and steeply dipping subbituminous) and processing techniques. A summary of all DOE-sponsored tests to data is shown. The development of UCG on a commercial scale requires involvement from both the public and private sectors. However, without detailed process information, accurate assessments of the commercial viability of UCG cannot be determined. To help overcome this problem the DOE has directed the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) to develop a UCG data base containing raw and reduced process data from all DOE-sponsored field tests. It is our intent to make the data base available upon request to interested parties, to help them assess the true potential of UCG.

Cena, R. J.; Thorsness, C. B.

1981-08-21T23:59:59.000Z

396

Screening Program Reduced Melanoma Mortality at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 1984-1996  

SciTech Connect

Worldwide incidence of cutaneous malignant melanoma has increased substantially, and no screening program has yet demonstrated reduction in mortality. We evaluated the education, self examination and targeted screening campaign at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) from its beginning in July 1984 through 1996. The thickness and crude incidence of melanoma from the years before the campaign were compared to those obtained during the 13 years of screening. Melanoma mortality during the 13-year period was based on a National Death Index search. Expected yearly deaths from melanoma among LLNL employees were calculated by using California mortality data matched by age, sex, and race/ethnicity and adjusted to exclude deaths from melanoma diagnosed before the program began or before employment at LLNL. After the program began, crude incidence of melanoma thicker than 0.75 mm decreased from 18 to 4 cases per 100,000 person-years (p = 0.02), while melanoma less than 0.75mm remained stable and in situ melanoma increased substantially. No eligible melanoma deaths occurred among LLNL employees during the screening period compared with a calculated 3.39 expected deaths (p = 0.034). Education, self examination and selective screening for melanoma at LLNL significantly decreased incidence of melanoma thicker than 0.75 mm and reduced the melanoma-related mortality rate to zero. This significant decrease in mortality rate persisted for at least 3 yr after employees retired or otherwise left the laboratory.

Schneider, MD, J S; II, PhD, D; MD, PhD, M

2006-10-12T23:59:59.000Z

397

Summary Report of Summer 2009 NGSI Human Capital Development Efforts at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect

In 2009, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) engaged in several activities to support NA-24's Next Generation Safeguards Initiative (NGSI). This report outlines LLNL's efforts to support Human Capital Development (HCD), one of five key components of NGSI managed by Dunbar Lockwood in the Office of International Regimes and Agreements (NA-243). There were five main LLNL summer safeguards HCD efforts sponsored by NGSI: (1) A joint Monterey Institute of International Studies/Center for Nonproliferation Studies-LLNL International Safeguards Policy and Information Analysis Course; (2) A Summer Safeguards Policy Internship Program at LLNL; (3) A Training in Environmental Sample Analysis for IAEA Safeguards Internship; (4) Safeguards Technology Internships; and (5) A joint LLNL-INL Summer Safeguards Lecture Series. In this report, we provide an overview of these five initiatives, an analysis of lessons learned, an update on the NGSI FY09 post-doc, and an update on students who participated in previous NGSI-sponsored LLNL safeguards HCD efforts.

Dougan, A; Dreicer, M; Essner, J; Gaffney, A; Reed, J; Williams, R

2009-11-16T23:59:59.000Z

398

Physical and chemical sensor technologies developed at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The increasing emphasis on envirorunental issues, waste reduction, and improved efficiency for industrial processes has mandated the development of new chemical and physical sensors for field or in-plant use. The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) has developed a number of technologies for sensing physical and chemical properties. Table 1 gives some examples of several sensors. that have been developed recently for environmental, industrial, commercial or government applications. Physical sensors of pressure, temperature, acceleration, acoustic vibration spectra, and ionizing radiation have been developed. Sensors developed at LLNL for chemical species include inorganic solvents, heavy metal ions`, and gaseous atoms and compounds. Primary sensing technologies we have employed have been based on optical fibers, semiconductor optical or radiation detectors, electrochemical activity, micromachined electromechanical (MEMs) structures, or chemical separation technologies. The complexities of these sensor systems range from single detectors to more advanced micro-instruments on-a-chip. For many of the sensors we have developed the necessary intelligent electronic support systems for both local and remote sensing applications. Each of these sensor technologies are briefly described in the remaining sections of this paper.

Balch, J.W.; Ciarlo, D.; Folta, J.; Glass, R.; Hagans, K.; Milanovich, F.; Sheem, S.

1993-08-10T23:59:59.000Z

399

Estimating The Reliability of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Flash X-ray (FXR) Machine  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

At Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), our flash X-ray accelerator (FXR) is used on multi-million dollar hydrodynamic experiments. Because of the importance of the radiographs, FXR must be ultra-reliable. Flash linear accelerators that can generate a 3 kA beam at 18 MeV are very complex. They have thousands, if not millions, of critical components that could prevent the machine from performing correctly. For the last five years, we have quantified and are tracking component failures. From this data, we have determined that the reliability of the high-voltage gas-switches that initiate the pulses, which drive the accelerator cells, dominates the statistics. The failure mode is a single-switch pre-fire that reduces the energy of the beam and degrades the X-ray spot-size. The unfortunate result is a lower resolution radiograph. FXR is a production machine that allows only a modest number of pulses for testing. Therefore, reliability switch testing that requires thousands of shots is performed on our test stand. Study of representative switches has produced pre-fire statistical information and probability distribution curves. This information is applied to FXR to develop test procedures and determine individual switch reliability using a minimal number of accelerator pulses.

Ong, M M; Kihara, R; Zentler, J M; Kreitzer, B R; DeHope, W J

2007-06-27T23:59:59.000Z

400

Investigating Sources of Toxicity in Stormwater: Algae Mortality in Runoff Upstream of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect

A source evaluation case study is presented for observations of algae toxicity in an intermittent stream passing through the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory near Livermore, California. A five-step procedure is discussed to determine the cause of water toxicity problems and to determine appropriate environmental management practices. Using this approach, an upstream electrical transfer station was identified as the probable source of herbicides causing the toxicity. In addition, an analytical solution for solute transport in overland flow was used to estimate the application level of 40 Kg/ha. Finally, this source investigation demonstrates that pesticides can impact stream water quality regardless of application within levels suggested on manufacturer labels. Environmental managers need to ensure that pesticides that could harm aquatic organisms (including algae) not be used within close proximity to streams or storm drainages and that application timing should be considered for environmental protection.

Campbell, C G; Folks, K; Mathews, S; Martinelli, R

2003-10-06T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "administration livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Energy Secretary to Visit Georgia Nuclear Reactor Site and Tennessee...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Nuclear Reactor Site and Tennessee Laboratory to Highlight Administration Support for Nuclear Energy Energy Secretary to Visit Georgia Nuclear Reactor Site and Tennessee...

402

Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics (IGPP), Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL): Quinquennial report, November 14-15, 1996  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Quinquennial Review Report of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) branch of the Institute for Geophysics and Planetary Physics (IGPP) provides an overview of IGPP-LLNL, its mission, and research highlights of current scientific activities. This report also presents an overview of the University Collaborative Research Program (UCRP), a summary of the UCRP Fiscal Year 1997 proposal process and the project selection list, a funding summary for 1993-1996, seminars presented, and scientific publications. 2 figs., 3 tabs.

Tweed, J.

1996-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

403

Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore Environmental Protection Implementation Plan for the period November 9, 1991--November 9, 1992  

SciTech Connect

Sandia National Laboratories, as part of the DOE complex, is committed to full compliance with all applicable environmental laws and regulations. This Environmental Protection Implementation Plan (EPIP) is intended to ensure that the environmental program objectives of DOE Order 5400.1 are achieved at SNL, Livermore. The EPIP will serve as an aid to management and staff to implement these new programs in a timely manner. 23 refs., 4 figs., 1 tab.

Not Available

1991-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

404

Serving the Nation for Fifty Years: 1952 - 2002 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [LLNL], Fifty Years of Accomplishments  

DOE R&D Accomplishments (OSTI)

For 50 years, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has been making history and making a difference. The outstanding efforts by a dedicated work force have led to many remarkable accomplishments. Creative individuals and interdisciplinary teams at the Laboratory have sought breakthrough advances to strengthen national security and to help meet other enduring national needs. The Laboratory's rich history includes many interwoven stories -- from the first nuclear test failure to accomplishments meeting today's challenges. Many stories are tied to Livermore's national security mission, which has evolved to include ensuring the safety, security, and reliability of the nation's nuclear weapons without conducting nuclear tests and preventing the proliferation and use of weapons of mass destruction. Throughout its history and in its wide range of research activities, Livermore has achieved breakthroughs in applied and basic science, remarkable feats of engineering, and extraordinary advances in experimental and computational capabilities. From the many stories to tell, one has been selected for each year of the Laboratory's history. Together, these stories give a sense of the Laboratory -- its lasting focus on important missions, dedication to scientific and technical excellence, and drive to made the world more secure and a better place to live.

2002-00-00T23:59:59.000Z

405

Distribution: Sonya Baskerville, Liaison, Bonneville Power Administration  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

11, 2013 11, 2013 Distribution: Sonya Baskerville, Liaison, Bonneville Power Administration Karen Boardman, Health Safety and Security, Director, National Training Center Wayne Elias, Fossil Energy, Director, FE-42 Gordon Fox, Office of Science, Director, SC-31.2 Mark Gilbertson, Environmental Management, DAS, Site Restoration Larry Harp, Division of Engineering and Planning, South Western Power Administration Joshua Hill, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Acting Director, Logistics Mgmt. Div. Doug Hooker, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Director, GO-OMA Mary McCune, Nuclear Energy, Director, Office of Facilities Management Peter O'Konski, Office of Management, Director, Office of Administration Jessica Schwersenska, Naval Reactors Laboratory Field Office, Analyst

406

Media Room | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Media Room | National Nuclear Security Administration Media Room | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog The National Nuclear Security Administration Media Room Home > Media Room Media Room NNSA's Office of Congressional, Intergovernmental, and Public Affairs regularly updates the web site with current press releases, newsletters,

407

Southwestern Power Administration One West...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of the United States Department of Energy Southwestern Power Administration Strategic Plan March 2013 Administrator's Message The Southwestern Power Administration powers the...

408

Low-Level Plutonium Bioassay Measurements at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Plutonium-239 ({sup 239}Pu) and plutonium-240 ({sup 240}Pu) are important alpha emitting radionuclides contained in radioactive debris from nuclear weapons testing. {sup 239}Pu and {sup 240}Pu are long-lived radionuclides with half-lives of 24,400 years and 6580 years, respectively. Concerns over human exposure to plutonium stem from knowledge about the persistence of plutonium isotopes in the environment and the high relative effectiveness of alpha-radiation to cause potential harm to cells once incorporated into the human body. In vitro bioassay tests have been developed to assess uptakes of plutonium based on measured urinary excretion patterns and modeled metabolic behaviors of the absorbed radionuclides. Systemic plutonium absorbed by the deep lung or from the gastrointestinal tract after ingestion is either excreted or distributed to other organs, primarily to the liver and skeleton, where it is retained for biological half-times of around 20 and 50 years, respectively. Dose assessment and atoll rehabilitation programs in the Marshall Islands have historically given special consideration to residual concentrations of plutonium in the environment even though the predicted dose from inhalation and/or ingestion of plutonium accounts for less than 5% of the annual effective dose from exposure to fallout contamination. Scientists from the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) have developed a state-of-the-art bioassay test to assess urinary excretion rates of plutonium from Marshallese populations. This new heavy-isotope measurement system is based on Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS). The AMS system at LLNL far exceeds the standard measurement requirements established under the latest United States Department of Energy (DOE) regulation, 10CFR 835, for occupational monitoring of plutonium, and offers several advantages over classical as well as competing new technologies for low-level detection and measurement of plutonium isotopes. The United States National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has independently verified the accuracy and precision of the AMS detection system for low-level bioassay measurements of plutonium isotopes through participation in an intercomparison exercise whereby performance evaluation samples were prepared in a synthetic urine matrix and submitted to participating laboratories for blind analysis. The results of the analyses were then sent to the NIST to independently evaluate the performance of laboratory participants. At LLNL, the AMS measurements of {sup 239}Pu and {sup 240}Pu met ANSI 13.30 criteria for both precision and accuracy at all sample test levels. Livermore scientists continue to test the performance of the Marshall Islands Plutonium Urinalysis Program by routine blind analysis of externally prepared quality control test samples, and through the rigorous implementation of standardized methods and procedures. Although not addressed directly in the report, AMS measurements show that the urinary excretion of plutonium by selected Marshallese populations fall into a low and reproducible range. Moreover, there appears to be no evidence of small incremental intakes of plutonium associated with resettlement activities - past or present. The improved quality, reliability and detection sensitivity of AMS for low-level plutonium isotope measurements will enable DOE to develop high-quality, baseline urinary excretion data for Marshallese populations, and accurately assess and track potential uptakes of plutonium. associated with resettlement activities and/or from long-term changes in plutonium exposure conditions in the Marshall Islands.

Hamilton, T; Brown, T; Hickman, D; Marchetti, A; Williams, R; Kehl, S

2007-06-18T23:59:59.000Z

409

Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 1996 Annual Report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics (IGPP) is a Multicampus Research Unit of the University of California (UC). IGPP was founded in 1946 at UC Los Angeles with a charter to further research in the earth and planetary sciences and in related fields. The Institute now has branches at UC campuses in Los Angeles, San Diego, and Riverside, and at Los Alamos and Lawrence Livermore national laboratories. The University-wide IGPP has played an important role in establishing interdisciplinary research in the earth and planetary sciences. For example, IGPP was instrumental in founding the fields of physical oceanography and space physics, which at the time fell between the cracks of established university departments. Because of its multicampus orientation, IGPP has sponsored important interinstitutional consortia in the earth and planetary sciences. Each of the five branches has a somewhat different intellectual emphasis as a result of the interplay between strengths of campus departments and Laboratory programs. The IGPP branch at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) was approved by the Regents of the University of California in 1982. IGPP-LLNL emphasizes research in seismology, geochemistry, cosmochemistry, and astrophysics. It provides a venue for studying the fundamental aspects of these fields, thereby complementing LLNL programs that pursue applications of these disciplines in national security and energy research. IGPP-LLNL is directed by Charles Alcock and was originally organized into three centers: Geosciences, stressing seismology; High-Pressure Physics, stressing experiments using the two-stage light-gas gun at LLNL; and Astrophysics, stressing theoretical and computational astrophysics. In 1994, the activities of the Center for High-Pressure Physics were merged with those of the Center for Geosciences. The Center for Geosciences, headed by Frederick Ryerson, focuses on research in geophysics and geochemistry. The Astrophysics Research Center, headed by Charles Alcock, provides a home for theoretical and observational astrophysics and serves as an interface with the Physics and Space Technology Department's Laboratory for Experimental Astrophysics and with other astrophysics efforts at LLNL. The IGPP branch at LLNL (as well as the branch at Los Alamos) also facilitates scientific collaborations between researchers at the UC campuses and those at the national laboratories in areas related to earth science, planetary science, and astrophysics. It does this by sponsoring the University Collaborative Research Program (UCRP), which provides funds to UC campus scientists for joint research projects with LLNL. The goals of the UCRP are to enrich research opportunities for UC campus scientists by making available to them some of LLNL's unique facilities and expertise, and to broaden the scientific program at LLNL through collaborative or interdisciplinary work with UC campus researchers. UCRP funds (provided jointly by the Regents of the University of California and by the Director of LLNL) are awarded annually on the basis of brief proposals, which are reviewed by a committee of scientists from UC campuses, LLNL programs, and external universities and research organizations. Typical annual funding for a collaborative research project ranges from $5,000 to $25,000. Funds are used for a variety of purposes, including salary support for visiting graduate students, postdoctoral fellows, and faculty; released-time salaries for LLNL scientists; and costs for experimental facilities. Although the permanent LLNL staff assigned to IGPP is relatively small (presently about five full-time equivalents), IGPP's research centers have become vital research organizations. This growth has been possible because of IGPP support for a substantial group of resident postdoctoral fellows; because of the 20 or more UCRP projects funded each year; and because IGPP hosts a variety of visitors, guests, and faculty members (from both UC and other institutions) on sabbatical leave. To focus attention on areas of topical interest i

Ryerson, F. J., Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics

1998-03-23T23:59:59.000Z

410

Energy Efficiency Program Administration Powerpoint Presentation...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Program Administration Powerpoint Presentation Energy Efficiency Program Administration Powerpoint Presentation Energy Efficiency Program Administration Powerpoint Presentation...

411

Chemistry Department Administration  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Administration Administration A. Harris, Chair (631) 344-4301 alexh@bnl.gov G. Hall, Deputy Chair (631) 344-4376 gehall@bnl.gov S. McAlary, Deputy BES Manager (631) 344-4305 mcalary2@bnl.gov J. Petterson, Senior Administrative Assistant (631) 344-4302 jpetter@bnl.gov Administrative Support Includes budgeting, procurement activities, foreign/domestic travel, seminars and general administrative concerns. Guest Appointments and Personnel matters should be referred to the Department's Senior Administrative Assistant. L. Sallustio (631) 344-4303 lsallust@bnl.gov Building and Stockroom Maintain the Chemistry Department stockroom and provide technical and building support to the staff. Information on the BNL Chemical Management Inventory system is available through the stockroom. Click here to view

412

National Nuclear Security Administration  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Nuclear Security Administration National Nuclear Security Administration Ofice of Secure Transportation mKlK= Box RQMM= ^luquerqueI= kj= UTNUR= ;JAN 03 213 MEMORANDUM FOR GREGORY eK= WOODS GENERAL COUNSEL DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY FROM: SUBJECT: JEFFREY P. HARREL ASSIST ANT DEPU FOR SECURE 2013 ANNUAL PLANNING SUMMARY In response to your memorandum of December TI= 2012, the following information is provided for the National Nuclear Security Administration Ofice of Secure

413

Articles - Energy Information Administration  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

163 U.S. Energy Information Administration/Petroleum Marketing Monthly February 2012 Articles Feature articles on energy-related subjects are ...

414

Energy Information Administration  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Presented at the 2012 International Field Directors and Technologies Conference in Orlando, FL as The Effect of Reporting Mode on Administrative Records: Are We ...

415

Southwestern Power Administration  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

7 ANNUAL REPORT 7 ANNUAL REPORT Southwestern Power Administration Letter to the Secretary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 About Southwestern. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Accomplishments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Supplementary Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

416

Abbreviations - Energy Information Administration  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Bcf Billion cubic feet DOE U.S. Department of Energy EIA Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy FERC

417

Energy Information Administration (EIA)  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Petroleum prices, supply and demand information from the Energy Information Administration - EIA - Official Energy Statistics from the U.S. Government

418

Glossary - Energy Information Administration  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

that are tariff based and corporately aligned with companies that own distribution facilities are also ... U.S. Energy Information Administration ...

419

Glossary - Energy Information Administration  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

U.S. Energy Information Administration/Electric Power Monthly June 2012 167 Glossary Anthracite: ... the electric department at tariff or other specified rates

420

Energy Information Administration  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

2010 EIA-64A Annual Report of the Origin of Natural Gas Liquids Production 1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Energy Information Administration Washington, DC 20585

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "administration livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

valdez - Energy Information Administration  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Sources: Petroleum supply data were derived from the Energy Information Administration, Weekly Petroleum Reporting System; crude oil and motor gasoline spot price ...

422

Section Administration and Resources  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Section Information, Membership, Newsletters and Awards Section Administration and Resources Awards Program aocs award Awards baldwin fats global inform job listings member membership network oils ...

423

Southwestern Power Administration  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

FOIAPrivacy Act Submit a FOIA Request DOE FOIA Requester Service Center Electronic Reading Room FOIA Links Power Marketing Administrations' FOIA Links Bonneville Power...

424

Energy Information Administration  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Annual Report of the Origin of Natural Gas Liquids Production 1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Energy Information Administration Washington, DC 20585 Form Approved OMB Number:...

425

Outlook - Energy Information Administration  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

An order form is enclosed for your convenience. Send order form and payment to: ... U.S. Department of Energy Energy Information Administration

426

RFS - Energy Information Administration  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Technical Conference September 28, 2004 Elizabeth Campbell Energy Information Administration (EIA) Elizabeth.Campbell@eia.doe.gov. www.eia.gov ...

427

Energy Information Administration  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

This report was prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of ...

428

EIA - Energy Information Administration  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

EIA Energy Information Administration Office of Oil and Gas November 17, 1997 http://www.eia.doe.gov NYM EX Future Prices vs Henry Hub Spot Prices

429

Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Office of River  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office of Office of River Protection - December 2010 Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Office of River Protection - December 2010 December 2010 Specific Administrative Controls Review with the Office of Environmental Management at the Office of River Protection The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Independent Oversight, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security, participated in an Office of Environmental Management Office of Standards and Quality Assurance, EM-23, review of Specific Administrative Controls (SAC). The EM-23 review included selected Office of River Protection programs at the Hanford Site. Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Office of River Protection - December 2010 More Documents & Publications Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Richland Operations

430

Impact of Recent Constraints on Intellectual Freedom on Science and Technology at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect

The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) was created in 1952 to meet the nation's need for an expanded nuclear weapons research and development (R&D) capability. LLNL quickly grew to become a full-fledged nuclear weapons design laboratory with a broad range of technical capabilities similar to those of our sister laboratory--Los Alamos--with which we shared mission responsibilities. By its very nature, nuclear weapons R&D requires some of the most advanced science and technology (S&T). Accordingly, there is an obvious need for careful attention to ensure that appropriate security measures exist to deal with the sensitive aspects of nuclear weapons development. The trade-off between advancing S&T at the Laboratory and the need for security is a complex issue that has always been with us, As Edward Teller noted in a recent commentary in a May, 1999 editorial in the New York Times: ''The reaction of President Harry Truman to the leaking of information is well known. He imposed no additional measures for security. Instead, we have clear knowledge that the disclosures by (Klaus) Fuchs caused Truman to call for accelerated work on all aspects of nuclear weapons. The right prescription for safety is not reaction to dangers that are arising, but rather action leading to more knowledge and, one hopes, toward positive interaction between nations.'' To explore the issue of intellectual freedom at a national security laboratory such as LLNL, one must understand the type of activities we pursue and how our research portfolio has evolved since the Laboratory was established. Our mission affects the workforce skills, capabilities, and security measures that the Laboratory requires. The national security needs of the US have evolved, along with the S&T community in which the Laboratory resides and to which it contributes. These factors give rise to a greater need for the Laboratory to interact with universities, industry, and other national laboratories. Intellectual freedom at the Laboratory and constraints on it can be understood only within the context of our mission, our necessary interactions with other entities; and our need for an exceptional multidisciplinary workforce.

Wadsworth, J

2000-11-12T23:59:59.000Z

431

Final Progress Report for the NASA Inductrack Model Rocket Launcher at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Inductrack magnetic levitation system, developed at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, was studied for its possible use for launching rockets. Under NASA sponsorship, a small model system was constructed at the Laboratory to pursue key technical aspects of this proposed application. The Inductrack is a passive magnetic levitation system employing special arrays of high-field permanent magnets (Halbach arrays) on the levitating cradle, moving above a ''track'' consisting of a close-packed array of shorted coils with which are interleaved with special drive coils. Halbach arrays produce a strong spatially periodic magnetic field on the front surface of the arrays, while canceling the field on their back surface. Relative motion between the Halbach arrays and the track coils induces currents in those coils. These currents levitate the cradle by interacting with the horizontal component of the magnetic field. Pulsed currents in the drive coils, synchronized with the motion of the carrier, interact with the vertical component of the magnetic field to provide acceleration forces. Motional stability, including resistance to both vertical and lateral aerodynamic forces, is provided by having Halbach arrays that interact with both the upper and the lower sides of the track coils. At present, a 7.8 meter track composed of drive and levitation coils has been built and the electronic drive circuitry performs as designed. A 9 kg cradle that carries the Halbach array of permanent magnets has been built. A mechanical launcher is nearly complete which will provide an initial cradle velocity of 9 m/s into the electronic drive section. We have found that the drag forces from the levitation coils were higher than in our original design. However, measurements of drag force at velocities less than 1 m/s are exactly as predicted by theory. Provided here are recommended design changes to improve the track's performance so that a final velocity of 40 m/s can be achieved with the existing track. This project was designed and built as part of a Phase II contract that started in Feb. 1999 and ended in Sep. 2000 at a cost of $600K. A detailed budget on how this funding was spent is also included here.

Tung, L S; Post, R F; Martinez-Frias, J

2001-06-27T23:59:59.000Z

432

Modular authorization and administration  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In large organizations the administration of access privileges (such as the assignment of access rights to a user in a particular role) is handled cooperatively through distributed administrators in various different capacities. A quorum may be necessary, ... Keywords: Modularity, Petri-Nets, composability, work-flow

Horst F. Wedde; Mario Lischka

2004-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

433

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 23:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 23: ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 23: RECORDS COMMON TO MOST OFFICES June 2007 Revision 1 This schedule provides for the disposal of certain records common to most offices. It covers administrative subject files; facilitative records such as suspense files, tracking and control records, calendars, and indexes; and documents of transitory value. This schedule does not apply to any materials determined to be non-record or to materials such as calendars or work schedules claimed as personal. Office Administrative Files described under item 1 are records retained by an originating office as its record of initiation of an action, request, or response to requests for information. This item may be applied only to separate administrative files containing such records as copies of

434

Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Bonneville Power Administration |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

July 30, 2012 July 30, 2012 CX-008891: Categorical Exclusion Determination Pilot Butte-La Pine No. 1 Wood Pole Replacement Project CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 07/30/2012 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration July 30, 2012 CX-008890: Categorical Exclusion Determination Bonneville Power Administration/Washington Department of Natural Resources Access Road Improvements CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 07/30/2012 Location(s): Washington, Washington, Washington, Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration July 27, 2012 CX-008676: Categorical Exclusion Determination Four AT&T Wireless Communication Site Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B1.7, B1.19 Date: 07/27/2012 Location(s): Washington, Washington, Washington, Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

435

Social Media | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

to boost American industr... 8 weeks 5 days ago NNSANews: Alan Alda awards @LivermoreLab engineer for making science understandable - BLOG: http:t.coamtt2cHRjc 8 weeks 6...

436

Southwestern Power Administration  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Privacy Notice For statistical purposes only, Southwestern collects the following data: IP addresses of users who visit our Web site Dates of average Web site activity Most viewed...

437

Recommendations and Justifications for Modifications for Use Restrictions Established under the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

This document is part of an effort to re-evaluate all FFACO URs against the current RBCA criteria (referred to in this document as the Industrial Sites [IS] RBCA process) as defined in the Industrial Sites Project Establishment of Final Action Levels (NNSA/NSO, 2006c). Based on this evaluation, the URs were sorted into the following categories: 1. Where sufficient information exists to determine that the current UR is consistent with the RCBA criteria 2. Where sufficient information exists to determine that the current UR may be removed or downgraded based on RCBA criteria. 3. Where sufficient information does not exist to evaluate the current UR against the RCBA criteria. After reviewing all the existing FFACO URs, the 49 URs addressed in this document have sufficient information to determine that these current URs may be removed or downgraded based on RCBA criteria. This document presents recommendations on modifications to existing URs that will be consistent with the RCBA criteria.

Lynn Kidman

2008-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

438

Microsoft Word - LLNL 2011 SA_8_1.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Nuclear Security Administration National Nuclear Security Administration Livermore Site Office Livermore, California SUPPLEMENT ANALYSIS of the 2005 Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement For Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Volume I: Main Report AUGUST 2011 DOE/EIS-0348-SA-03 i CONTENTS NOTATION.............................................................................................................................. v SUMMARY...........................................................................................................................S-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Purpose and Need............................................................................................

439

Microsoft Word - LLNL 2011 CRD_8_1.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Nuclear Security Administration National Nuclear Security Administration Livermore Site Office Livermore, California SUPPLEMENT ANALYSIS of the 2005 Final Site-wide Environmental Impact Statement For Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory VOLUME II: Comment Response Document AUGUST 2011 DOE/EIS-0348-SA-03 ii (This page intentionally left blank.) iii Contents NOTATIONS..................................................................................................................... iv Acronyms and Abbreviations ........................................................................................ iv Units of Measure............................................................................................................ vi 1.0 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................

440

Recommendations and Justifications for Modifications for Use Restrictions Established under the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order with ROTC 1, Revision No. 0  

SciTech Connect

Many Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) Use Restrictions (URs) have been established at various corrective action sites (CASs) as part of FFACO corrective actions (FFACO, 1996; as amended January 2007). Since the signing of the FFACO in 1996, practices and procedures relating to the implementation of risk-based corrective action (RBCA) have evolved. This document is part of an effort to re-evaluate all FFACO URs against the current RBCA criteria (referred to in this document as the Industrial Sites [IS] RBCA process) as defined in the Industrial Sites Project Establishment of Final Action Levels (NNSA/NSO, 2006c). Based on this evaluation, the URs were sorted into the following categories: 1. Where sufficient information exists to determine that the current UR is consistent with the RCBA criteria 2. Where sufficient information exists to determine that the current UR may be removed or downgraded based on RCBA criteria. 3. Where sufficient information does not exist to evaluate the current UR against the RCBA criteria. After reviewing all the existing FFACO URs, the 49 URs addressed in this document have sufficient information to determine that these current URs may be removed or downgraded based on RCBA criteria. This document presents recommendations on modifications to existing URs that will be consistent with the RCBA criteria.

Lynn Kidman

2008-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "administration livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 11:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 11: ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 11: SPACE AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS June 2007 Revision 1 This schedule provides for the disposal of all copies, wherever located in the Department, of records relating to space and maintenance, except as indicated below. Records documenting these functions pertain to the acquisition, allocation, utilization, and release of space and include related correspondence and reports submitted to the General Services Administration (or equivalent agency with similar Government-wide responsibilities) as directed by law and regulation (41 CFR 101-17); correspondence and forms relating to the compilation of directory service listings; identification credentials and related accountable records; requests for building and equipment services;

442

Impact of the January-February 1980 earthquake sequence on various structures at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect

On January 24, 1980, California's Livermore Valley was rocked by a moderate earthquake that caused some damage to the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). The earthquake, which measured 5.5 on the Richter scale and was centered about 20 km (12 mi) northwest of the Laboratory, produced estimated peak horizontal ground acceleration at LLNL of between 0.15 and 0.3 g. The earthquake was part of a sequence that included two sharp aftershocks (magnitudes 5.2 and 4.2) within 1.5 minutes of the initial event. A second earthquake (magnitude 5.8) struck on January 26, and several lesser earthquakes occurred during the next few weeks. This paper describes the damage impact of the January 24 earthquake, including: background information on LLNL, discussion of pre-earthquake seismic safety philosophy, and description of the impact of the January 24 earthquake, including a description of the seismic setting of the Laboratory, a discussion of the ground motion, and a summary of damage. This paper also describes a data gathering and reduction effort at LLNL in the aftermath of the January earthquakes.

Murray, R.C.; Nelson, T.A.; Coats, D.W.; Ng, D.S.; Weaver, H.J.

1981-02-04T23:59:59.000Z

443

Terahop and Lawrence Livermore National LaboratoryStructural Fire RF Testing  

SciTech Connect

The Georgia Public Safety Training Center's Live Fire Training Facility in Forsyth, GA is a three story structure constructed of rebar-reinforced concrete wall and floors. All the door and window coverings on the building are constructed of thick, plate metal to withstand the high temperatures generated inside the building during training exercises. All of the building's walls and floors are 1-foot thick, and regular concrete columns run up along the inside of the wall increasing the thickness to 20-inches in those locations. A center concrete staircase divides the structure in half. For typical exercises, fires are started in the back right corner of the building on the first floor and in the front right corner on the second floor as shown in Figure 2. Due to the high heat generated during these exercises, measured at 300 F on the floor and 700 F near the ceilings, there were limited locations at which equipment could be placed that did not incorporate heat shielding, such as the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's UWB system. However, upon inspection of the building, two preferable locations were identified in which equipment could be placed that would be protected from the temperature extremes generated by the fires. These locations are identified in Figure 2 as the tested TX locations. These were preferred locations because, while they protected the hardware from temperature extremes, they also force the RF transmission path through the building to cross very near the fire locations and anticipated plasma generation regions. Both of the locations listed in Figure 2 were tested by the UWB equipment and found to be suitable deployment locations to establish a solid RF link for data collection. The transmission location on the first floor was ultimately chosen for use during the actual exercises because it was accessible to the data collection team during the exercises. This allowed them to remove the hardware once the testing was complete without having to wait for the entire day of exercises to complete. Unfortunately, RF transmission directly through the central location of the fire on the first floor was not possible, so the transmission path had to be shifted approximately 6-feet off the side of the fire's center. The corner where the fire was located on the first floor was re-enforced with a mixture of concrete and metal fibers for heat resistance. This material was highly reflective, permitting very little RF energy to pass through it. This phenomenon was also observed and verified by Terahop's testing, discussed in the next section. An image of these re-enforced walls and a close up of the actual wall material containing the metal fibers can bee seen in Figure 3.

Haugen, P; Pratt, G

2007-02-26T23:59:59.000Z

444

EIA Energy Information Administration  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

as of August 15, with Consuming East region storage facilities holding 1,217 Bcf. The Energy Information Administration has revised downward its estimate of working gas in storage...

445

EIA Energy Information Administration  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

East to 1,443 Bcf - 9 Bcf more than last year at this time according to AGA data. The Energy Information Administration (EIA) estimates that the working gas level at the end of...

446

EIA Energy Information Administration  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

by almost 20 Bcf the weekly average of about 74.1 Bcf during May last year, using the Energy Information Administration&20;s (EIA) reported total net injections in May 1996 of 328...

447

Adam Sieminski Administrator Biography  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Adam Sieminski Adam Sieminski Administrator Biography Adam Sieminski was sworn in on June 4, 2012, as the eighth administrator of the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). From March 2012 to May 2012, while awaiting confirmation as EIA administrator, Mr. Siemin- ski served as senior director for energy and environment on the staff of the National Security Council. From 2005 until March 2012, he was the chief energy economist for Deutsche Bank, working with the Bank's global research and trading units. Drawing on extensive industry, government, and academic sources, Mr. Sieminski forecasted energy market trends and wrote on a variety of topics involving energy economics, climate change, geopoli- tics, and commodity prices. From 1998 to 2005, he served as the director and energy strategist for

448

Energy Information Administration  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Annual Report of the Origin of Natural Gas Liquids Production 1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Energy Information Administration Washington, DC 20585 Form Approved XXXX XXXX OMB No....

449

Table - Energy Information Administration  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

September 2013 U.S. Energy Information 9/27/2013 9:52:45 AM Administration | Natural Gas Monthly 9 Created on: Table 4. U.S. natural gas imports ...

450

Southwestern Power Administration  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Contact Us U.S. Department of Energy Southwestern Power Administration Gore Maintenance Office Mailing Address: P.O. Box 728 Gore, OK 74435-0728 Delivery Address: 14165 East 143rd...

451

National Nuclear Security Administration  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Nuclear Security Administration FY 2011 - FY 2015 Budget Outlook Managing the NNSA 4.0% Science, Technology & Engineering 14.5% Stockpile Support 17.9% Preventing the Spread of...

452

1994 Site Development Plan: A plan with vision  

SciTech Connect

The 1994 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site Development Plan has been developed during a period of great change and uncertainty. Our goal is to make possible the best use of the Laboratory`s resources to meet shifting national priorities in the post-Cold War world. Site Planning is an important component of the overall Laboratory strategic planning process. This plan focuses on opportunities for the Laboratory as well as on key site development issues including facility construction, redevelopment and reuse, site accessibility, and security. A major challenge is to achieve sufficient stability in the site planning and execution so that the processes of construction can occur efficiently while at the same time providing sufficient flexibility in site facilities so that a range of changing national needs can be accommodated. We are closely coupled to the DOE strategic planning process to meet this challenge.

1994-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

453

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 2: PAYROLL AND PAY ADMINISTRATION...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

More Documents & Publications ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 2: PAYROLL AND PAY ADMINISTRATION RECORDS-Revision 2 Financial Management Handbook Handbook on Overseas Assignments...

454

Human factoring administrative procedures  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In nonnuclear business, administrative procedures bring to mind such mundane topics as filing correspondence and scheduling vacation time. In the nuclear industry, on the other hand, administrative procedures play a vital role in assuring the safe operation of a facility. For some time now, industry focus has been on improving technical procedures. Significant efforts are under way to produce technical procedure requires that a validated technical, regulatory, and administrative basis be developed and that the technical process be established for each procedure. Producing usable technical procedures requires that procedure presentation be engineered to the same human factors principles used in control room design. The vital safety role of administrative procedures requires that they be just as sound, just a rigorously formulated, and documented as technical procedures. Procedure programs at the Tennessee Valley Authority and at Boston Edison's Pilgrim Station demonstrate that human factors engineering techniques can be applied effectively to technical procedures. With a few modifications, those same techniques can be used to produce more effective administrative procedures. Efforts are under way at the US Department of Energy Nuclear Weapons Complex and at some utilities (Boston Edison, for instance) to apply human factors engineering to administrative procedures: The techniques being adapted include the following.

Grider, D.A.; Sturdivant, M.H.

1991-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

455

Contact Information | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Information | National Nuclear Security Administration Information | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Contact Information Home > About Us > Our Programs > Defense Programs > Military Academic Collaborations > Contact Information Contact Information At each of NNSA's eight sites, leading-edge research and development is

456

Historical Doses from Tritiated Water and Tritiated Hydrogen Gas Released to the Atmosphere from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). Part 6. Summary  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Throughout fifty-three years of operations, an estimated 792,000 Ci (29,300 TBq) of tritium have been released to the atmosphere at the Livermore site of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL); about 75% was tritium gas (HT) primarily from the accidental releases of 1965 and 1970. Routine emissions contributed slightly more than 100,000 Ci (3,700 TBq) HT and about 75,000 Ci (2,800 TBq) tritiated water vapor (HTO) to the total. A Tritium Dose Reconstruction was undertaken to estimate both the annual doses to the public for each year of LLNL operations and the doses from the few accidental releases. Some of the dose calculations were new, and the others could be compared with those calculated by LLNL. Annual doses (means and 95% confidence intervals) to the potentially most exposed member of the public were calculated for all years using the same model and the same assumptions. Predicted tritium concentrations in air were compared with observed mean annual concentrations at one location from 1973 onwards. Doses predicted from annual emissions were compared with those reported in the past by LLNL. The highest annual mean dose predicted from routine emissions was 34 {micro}Sv (3.4 mrem) in 1957; its upper confidence limit, based on very conservative assumptions about the speciation of the release, was 370 {micro}Sv (37 mrem). The upper confidence limits for most annual doses were well below the current regulatory limit of 100 {micro}Sv (10 mrem) for dose to the public from release to the atmosphere; the few doses that exceeded this were well below the regulatory limits of the time. Lacking the hourly meteorological data needed to calculate doses from historical accidental releases, ingestion/inhalation dose ratios were derived from a time-dependent accident consequence model that accounts for the complex behavior of tritium in the environment. Ratios were modified to account for only those foods growing at the time of the releases. The highest dose from an accidental release was calculated for a release of about 1,500 Ci HTO that occurred in October 1954. The likely dose for this release was probably less than 360 {micro}Sv (36 mrem), but, because of many unknowns (e.g., release-specific meteorological and accidental conditions) and conservative assumptions, the uncertainty was very high. As a result, the upper confidence limit on the predictions, considered a dose that could not have been exceeded, was estimated to be 2 mSv (200 mrem). The next highest dose, from the 1970 accidental release of about 290,000 Ci (10,700 TBq) HT when wind speed and wind direction were known, was one-third as great. Doses from LLNL accidental releases were well below regulatory reporting limits. All doses, from both routine and accidental releases, were far below the level (3.6 mSv [360 mrem] per year) at which adverse health effects have been documented in the literature.

Peterson, S

2007-09-05T23:59:59.000Z

457

Southwestern Power Administration  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Annual Site Environmental Report Annual Environmental Management System Progress Report Competing Uses Brochure Environmental Policy Statement NEPA Categorical Exclusion...

458

National Nuclear Security Administration Overview | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Nuclear Security Administration Overview National Nuclear Security Administration Overview National Nuclear Security Administration Overview More Documents & Publications National...

459

ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

.' :h I : .' :h I : ' ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20545 October 24, 1975 :~.. ,. Memo to Piles' CARNEGIE-MELLON S~C&RCCYCLOTRON On October 23, 1975, W. J. McCool (HQOS), E. K. Loop (HQ-OS), R. E. Allen (HQ-OS), J. Pingel (CH), B. 3. Davis (CH), R. Drucker (CR-BAO) and I met at Germantown to discuss the clean-up of radio- activity at the Saxonburg accelerator site. After discussion, we concluded acceptable criteria would include removal of all material necessary to reduce the residual surface activity to a maximum ofO.04 mR/hr above ambient background. Since ambient backgrounds is 0.03 to 0.05 &/hr, the above 0.04 mR/hr criterion will essentially be the 0.08 mR/hr (induced +background) case discussed previously.

460

Regulations For State Administration Of The National Pollutant Discharge  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

For State Administration Of The National Pollutant For State Administration Of The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (Arkansas) Regulations For State Administration Of The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (Arkansas) < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Construction Fed. Government Fuel Distributor General Public/Consumer Industrial Installer/Contractor Institutional Investor-Owned Utility Local Government Low-Income Residential Multi-Family Residential Municipal/Public Utility Nonprofit Residential Retail Supplier Rural Electric Cooperative Schools State/Provincial Govt Systems Integrator Transportation Tribal Government Utility Program Info State Arkansas Program Type Siting and Permitting Provider Department of Environmental Quality The Regulations For State Administration Of The National Pollutant

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "administration livermore site" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Drilling operations at the Nevada Test Site  

SciTech Connect

The Nevada Operations Office (NV) is responsible for supporting the nuclear test programs of the Los Alamos and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories. This support includes the drilling of test holes for nuclear device testing a the Nevada Test Site (NTS). The purpose of this audit was to assess the effectiveness of the Department of Energy's management of test hole inventories at the NTS. Our audit disclosed that NV accumulated a large inventory of unused test holes and approved drilling additional holes for which neither laboratory (Los Alamos nor Livermore) had identified a need. The overdrilling of test holes occurred because NV did not comply with good inventory practices that would have had NV's approving official question the need for, and the timing of, the laboratories' drilling requests. Instead, NV gave perfunctory approval to the laboratories' work orders for drilling test holes, and emphasized keeping two drill rig crews busy and satisfying the laboratories' demands for dedicated drilling personnel. Although NV did not agree that overdrilling had occurred, it has cut back its drilling activities and estimated that this will save abut $7.6 million annually. NV agreed with the recommendations in the report and has taken corrective actions.

1990-05-29T23:59:59.000Z

462

National Nuclear Security Administration  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Nuclear Security Administration Finding of No Significant Impact for the Construction and Operation of a New Office Building and Related Structures within TA-3 at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico U. S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Los Alamos Area Office 528 35th Street Los Alamos, N M 8 7 5 4 4 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY. NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECUIRTY ADMINISTRATION FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT INIPACT Construction and Operation of a New Office Building and Related Structures withinTA-3 at Los Alarnos National Laboratory, Los Alamos. New Mexico FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The Environmental Assessment (EA) for Construction and Operation of a New Office Building and Related Structures within TA-3 at L os Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico (DOE/EA- 7 375)

463

Energy Information Administration  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Marks 25th Anniversary of 1973 Oil Embargo Marks 25th Anniversary of 1973 Oil Embargo Jay Hakes, Administrator, Energy Information Administration (EIA) September 3, 1998 Click here to start Table of Contents Energy Information Administration Some Views of 1973 Major Disruptions of World Oil Supply Imported Oil as a Percent of Total U. S. Consumption Percent of OPEC and Persian Gulf World Oil Production U. S. Retail Price of Gasoline U. S. Total Petroleum Consumption U. S. Per Capita Use of Petroleum U. S. Government Owned Crude Oil Stocks Cost of Finding Oil and Gas Reserves U. S. MPG Ratings for New Vehicles U. S. Average Horsepower of a New Vehicle Share of U. S. Electricity Generated By Petroleum Futures And Options Markets Changed Energy Marketing U. S. Total Energy Consumption U. S. Per Capita Use of Energy

464

Western Area Power Administration  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Loveland Area Projects November 29-30, 2011 2 Agenda * Overview of Western Area Power Administration * Post-1989 Loveland Area Projects (LAP) Marketing Plan * Energy Planning and Management Program * Development of the 2025 PMI Proposal * 2025 PMI Proposal * 2025 PMI Comment Period & Proposal Information * Questions 3 Overview of Western Area Power Administration (Western) * One of four power marketing administrations within the Department of Energy * Mission: Market and deliver reliable, renewable, cost-based Federal hydroelectric power and related services within a 15-state region of the central and western U.S. * Vision: Provide premier power marketing and transmission services Rocky Mountain Region (RMR) is one of five regional offices 4 Rocky Mountain Region

465

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

22 Federal Register 22 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 29 / Friday, February 11, 2011 / Rules and Regulations SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 13 CFR Parts 121 and 124 RIN 3245-AF53 Small Business Size Regulations; 8(a) Business Development/Small Disadvantaged Business Status Determinations AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: This rule makes changes to the regulations governing the section 8(a) Business Development (8(a) BD) program, the U.S. Small Business Administration's (SBA or Agency) size regulations, and the regulations affecting Small Disadvantaged Businesses (SDBs). It is the first comprehensive revision to the 8(a) BD program in more than ten years. Some of the changes involve technical issues such as changing the term ''SIC code'' to

466

Federal Railroad Administration  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Update Du Update Du Jour Department Of Energy Transportation External Coordination Working Group Meeting Albuquerque, New Mexico April 21-23, 2004 Presented by Kevin R. Blackwell Radioactive Materials Program Manager Federal Railroad Administration Federal Railroad Administration Dedicated Train Study- Report to Congress FRA' s Research & Development Office (as lead on the study) received a draft final report from the Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (VNTSC) in late November, 2003. Editorial corrections were made and a final draft dated February, 2004 was provided to FRA. Final Draft Report FRA has been reviewed and been sent to FRA Administrator for clearance and forwarding to DOT OST. FRA has already "Officially Coordinated" and briefed DOT OST and

467

Independent Oversight Review, Nevada Site Office - October 2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Nevada Site Office - October 2011 Nevada Site Office - October 2011 Independent Oversight Review, Nevada Site Office - October 2011 October 2011 Review of Nevada Site Office Criticality Safety Assessments at the Criticality Experiments Facility and Training Assembly for Criticality Safety and Appraisal of the Criticality Experiments Facility Startup Plan The purpose of this independent review by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Safety and Emergency Management (Independent Oversight), within the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS), was to shadow the Nevada Site Office (NSO) line oversight activities conducted August 29 - September 2, 2011, to determine the level of compliance of Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) with American National Standards Institute and American Nuclear

468

National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Federal Equal Opportunity Recruitment Program Plan Certification - Fiscal Year 2009 Please type or print clearly and return this sheet with original signature to: Ms. Carmen Andujar, Manager Recruiting, Examining and Assessment Group Center for Talent and Capacity Policy Strategic Human Resources Policy Attn: FY 2009 FEORP Report U.S. Office of Personnel Management 1900 E Street, NW, Room 6547 Washington, D.C. 20415-9800 A. Name and Address of Agency National Nuclear Security Administration Office of Diversity and Outreach 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 B. Name and Title of Designated FEORP Official (include address, if different from above,

469

National Nuclear Security Administration  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

i. i. Message from the Administrator President Obama has reshaped our national security priorities making enterprise infrastructure modernization with integrated Information Technology (IT) capabilities a key strategic initiative. Our IT infrastructure must ensure that our workforce can access appropriate information in a secure, reliable, and cost-effective manner. Effective information sharing throughout the government enhances the national security of the United States (US). For the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), effective information sharing helps strengthen our nuclear security mission; builds collaborative networks within NNSA as well as with the Department of Energy (DOE), Department of Defense (DoD), and other national security

470

Dear Secretary/ Administrator:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office of Management and Budget Dear Secretary/ Administrator: Executive Office of the President Council on Environmental Quality Consistent with the President's focus on sound stewardship of our natural resources, we are committed to improving environmental governance through constructive and timely approaches to addressing challenges that arise over the use, conservation, and restoration of the environment, natural resources, and public lands. To achieve better governance, the Administration calls for department and agency commitment to the goals identified in the Memorandum on Environmental Collaboration and Conflict Resolution, and the goals identified in related policy guidance. This approach supports other transparency and good government initiatives including the Memorandum on Transparency and Open Government (January 21,

471

Federal Railroad Administration  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE TRANSPORTATION EXTERNAL WORKING GROUP MEETING Pueblo, CO. September 20, 2005 Presented by Kevin R. Blackwell Radioactive Materials/Hazardous Materials Specialist Federal Railroad Administration - HQ Hazmat Division, Washington, DC. Federal Railroad Administration Dedicated Train Study - Report to Congress November 2003 - FRA' s Ofc. Of Research & Development (RDV), as lead on the Dedicated Train Study (DTS), received draft final report from the Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (VNTSC), the contractor conducting the study. February, 2004 - FRA completed review of DFR and submitted editorial corrections back to VNTSC. Final draft of the DTS with editorial corrections received from VNTSC in February, 2004. March to September 2004 -

472

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 22:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 22: ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 22: AUDIT/INVESTIGATIVE RECORDS June 2007 Revision 1 Section I of this schedule covers records associated with investigations other than those performed by the Office of the Inspector General (OIG). Types of investigations may include: routine and significant internal program investigations, specific purpose investigations, audits, inspections, appraisals, and management reviews. Investigations may be described or referred to as audits, appraisals, surveillance, self-assessments, management assessments, or evaluations. Investigations may be conducted by DOE or by its contractors. Section II covers records created by the Department's OIG investigations. OIG investigations serve to prevent or reduce waste and fraud in Departmental programs,

473

National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Federal Equal Opportunity Recruitment Program Plan Certification - Fiscal Year 2011 Please type or print clearly and return this sheet with original signature to: Ms. Carmen Andujar, Manager Recruiting, Examining and Assessment Group Center for Talent and Capacity Policy Strategic Human Resources Policy Attn: FY 2011 FEORP Report U.S. Office of Personnel Management 1900 E Street, NW, Room 6547 Washington, D.C. 20415-9800 A. Name and Address of Agency National Nuclear Security Administration 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 B. Name and Title of Designated FEORP Official (include address, if different from above,

474

Computer hardware fault administration  

DOE Patents (OSTI)

Computer hardware fault administration carried out in a parallel computer, where the parallel computer includes a plurality of compute nodes. The compute nodes are coupled for data communications by at least two independent data communications networks, where each data communications network includes data communications links connected to the compute nodes. Typical embodiments carry out hardware fault administration by identifying a location of a defective link in the first data communications network of the parallel computer and routing communications data around the defective link through the second data communications network of the parallel computer.

Archer, Charles J. (Rochester, MN); Megerian,