Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "acquisition compliance project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY Project Information Project Title:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Dig d~ch from 24-51-5TX-1 0 to 24-AX-10 and reinstall electrical wire Dig d~ch from 24-51-5TX-1 0 to 24-AX-10 and reinstall electrical wire Date: 12120/2010 DOE Coda: Contractor Coda: Project Lead: Marcus Bruckner Project Overview 1 Dig ditch from 24-51-8TX-1 0 to 24-AX-10 and remove and replace electrical wire {N 2.7o') 1. Brief project desalptlon Pnclude anything that oould impact the 2. 24-51-5TX-10 and 24-AX-10 (SW r.tN 10TOWNSHIP 38 NORTH RANGE 78WEST) environment] 2. Leg allocation 3. 1 day 3. Duration of the project 4. Major equipment to be used 4. Backhoe The table below is to be completed by the Project Leed and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and contact the Technical Assurance Department.

2

Report: EM Acquisition and Project Management  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ACQUISITION AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT September 25, 2008 Submitted by the EMAB Acquisition and Project Management Subcommittee Background: In Fiscal Year (FY) 2008, EMAB was tasked to...

3

Development of Electronic Acquisition Model for Project ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... have independent decision support models to ... An agent-based communication environment called Electronic Acquisition Model for Project ...

2003-03-14T23:59:59.000Z

4

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY Project Information Project Title:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

New power Line for new generator at ten sleep New power Line for new generator at ten sleep Dat e: 12114/10 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Mike Preston Project Overview 1. Brief project description (include Extend 3 phase power line from (existing) pole 99 to the Ten Sleep location for a new generator. The anything that could impact the transformer bank at the WDF will be dismantled, the line extended overhead, across 5 new power poles, to environment) the Ten Sleep Battery and the bank will be reassembled there. The new guy anchor at pole 99 will be located outside Palustrine wetlands. The line will be 34.5/19.920 KV, approximately 1,200 feet in length. 2. Legal location Ground disturbance will be minimal and have very little potential to affect the environment. 3. Duration of the project

5

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY Project Information Project Title:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reclamation of Pits and Boxes Reclamation of Pits and Boxes Date: Nov. 11 , 2010 DOE Code: 6740.010.00000 Contractor Code: 8067-451 Project Lead: Anthony Bowler Project Overview 1. Brief project description [include anything that Reclamation of Q!!]y the following Pits and Boxes : 1. T-2-11 could impact the environment) 2. B-1-10 Pit 2. Legal location 3. B-1-3 Pit 3. Duration of the project 4. T .Q-3 Concrete Sump Box 4. Major equipment to be used 5. B-2-10 Skim Box 6. B-1-14 Skim Box 7. 66-1-StX-14 Pit 8. T-5-10 Pit 9. WDFSkim Box 10. WDFUpperPit 11 . WDFLowerPit 12. B-1-3 Skim Box 13. T-3-3 Skim Box 14. T-1-20 Pit 15. T-2-34 Pit (A) 16. T-2-34 Pit (B) 17. B-1 -10 Skim Box 18. Carwash Skim Box 19. 5~1-SX-3-Madison Water Valve Box from 57-WX-3 20. T-5-3 Pit

6

Report: Acquisition, Project Management, and Quality Assurance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Acquisition, Project Management, and Quality Assurance Acquisition, Project Management, and Quality Assurance September 30, 2009 Submitted by the EMAB Acquisition and Project Management Subcommittee Background For FY 2009 EMAB was tasked to review the management and delivery of EM's Construction Projects and confirm whether or not the program is headed in the right direction or needs to make some adjustments in order to improve efficiency. EMAB reviewed and discussed the topics of Acquisition and Project Management during its public meetings. The Acquisition and Project Management subcommittee, comprised of Mr. G. Brian Estes, Dr. Lawrence Papay, and Mr. David Swindle, engaged in teleconferences on August 7 and September 4 with EM senior personnel. Findings and Observations Deputy Assistant Secretary Jack Surash provided an update on EM acquisition initiatives, and he

7

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY Project Information Project Title: Liner Drilling Date:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Liner Drilling Date: Liner Drilling Date: 4-5-10 DOE Code: 71092 Cont ractor Code: 8067-766 Project Lead: Frank Ingham Project Overview Nothing out of the ordinary for drilling an existing location 1. What are the environmental impacts? NE SW Sec 21 , T39N, R78W (45-3-X-21 well) 2. What is the legal location? 3. What is the duration of the project? Approximately a week 4 . What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig, drilling rig, Drilling Rig etc.)? Will Drill out of 9 5/8 caslng with liner drillng assembly. After drilling approximately 750 to 1000 ft, will test liner hanging assembly set and retrieve multiple times. The table b elow is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialis t and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey a

8

Project review for the acquisition executive  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A set of view graphs for briefing the acquisition executive for the Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project are presented.

NONE

1986-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

9

Ecological Compliance Assessment Project: 1994 Summary report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Ecological Compliance Assessment Project (ECAP) began full operation on March 1, 1994. The project is designed around a baseline environmental data concept that includes intensive biological field surveys of key areas of the Hanford Site where the majority of Site activities occur. These surveys are conducted at biologically appropriate times of year to ensure that the data gathered are current and accurate. The data are entered into the ECAP database, which serves as a reference for the evaluation of review requests coming in to the project. This methodology provided the basis for over 90 percent of the review requests received. Field surveys conducted under ECAP are performed to document occurrence information for species of concern and to obtain habitat descriptions. There are over 200 species of concern on the Hanford Site, including plants, birds, mammals, reptiles, amphibians, fish, and invertebrates. In addition, Washington State has designated mature sagebrush-steppe habitat as a Priority Habitat meriting special protective measures. Of the projects reviewed, 17 resulted or will result in impacts to species or habitats of concern on the Hanford Site. The greatest impact has been on big sagebrush habitat. Most of the impact has been or will be within the 600 Area of the Site.

Brandt, C.A.

1994-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

10

Report: Small Business, Acquisition, and Project Management  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SMALL BUSINESS, ACQUISITION, AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT SMALL BUSINESS, ACQUISITION, AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT Background In FY 2007 EMAB was tasked to dialogue with the Office of Acquisition and Project Management (EM-50) on the topic of Small Business and provide advice and recommendations drawn from EMAB members' experience in commercial industry. Additionally, EMAB continued to review and discuss the topics of Acquisition and Project Management during its public meetings and in exchanges with EM senior personnel. Discussion In FY 2006, EM's small business prime contract goal of $208 million was exceeded by well over $100 million. The FY 2007 goal was $198 million, and once again, the program was poised to exceed that mark. Statistically, EM's execution of its small business acquisition strategy is commendable; however, EMAB has a number of

11

Project Title: DOE Code: Project Lead: NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE Code: DOE Code: Project Lead: NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY # 258 Project lnfonnation Rewire electrical to pole at 77SHX10 Mike Preston Date: 11-19-09 Contractor Code: Project Overview No~ rea has been previously disturbed. The trenching will be th,ugh pre-existing right of way for the 1. What are the environmental ~ ~=~d ~ impacts? 2. What is the legal location? Repair a~ replacement of electrical lines to the Pole next to well at 77S~1 0. This will require trenching 3. What is the duration of the project? across the road a~ to the pole. Removing old lines and replacement of lines. 4. What major equipment will be used if any (wor1< over rig, drilling rig, 1 day etc.)? Back hole The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA

12

Idaho Spent Fuel Facility (ISFF) Project, Appropriate Acquisition...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Idaho Spent Fuel Facility (ISFF) Project, Appropriate Acquisition Strategy Lessons Learned Report, NNSA, Feb 2010 Idaho Spent Fuel Facility (ISFF) Project, Appropriate Acquisition...

13

National Ignition Facility project acquisition plan  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this National Ignition Facility Acquisition Plan is to describe the overall procurement strategy planned for the National Ignition Facility (NIF) Project. The scope of the plan describes the procurement activities and acquisition strategy for the following phases of the NIF Project, each of which receives either plant and capital equipment (PACE) or other project cost (OPC) funds: Title 1 and 2 design and Title 3 engineering (PACE); Optics manufacturing facilitization and pilot production (OPC); Convention facility construction (PACE); Procurement, installation, and acceptance testing of equipment (PACE); and Start-up (OPC). Activities that are part of the base Inertial Confinement Fusion (ICF) Program are not included in this plan. The University of California (UC), operating Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and Los Alamos National Laboratory, and Lockheed-Martin, which operates Sandia National Laboratory (SNL) and the University of Rochester Laboratory for Laser Energetics (UR-LLE), will conduct the acquisition of needed products and services in support of their assigned responsibilities within the NIF Project structure in accordance with their prime contracts with the Department of Energy (DOE). LLNL, designated as the lead Laboratory, will have responsibility for all procurements required for construction, installation, activation, and startup of the NIF.

Callaghan, R.W.

1996-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

14

Report on Acquisition and Project Management Continuous Improvement |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

on Acquisition and Project Management Continuous Improvement on Acquisition and Project Management Continuous Improvement Report on Acquisition and Project Management Continuous Improvement EM senior management has committed to extensive management reforms and has completed several robust improvements in contract and project management. Additional improvement initiatives are continuing and this document outlines the consolidated plan of these initiatives in a top-down framework of EM vision, goals, strategies, performance metrics, and specific improvement actions completed or being undertaken. Report on Acquisition and Project Management Continuous Improvement More Documents & Publications Microsoft Word - EERE PSRP 7 23 2010 Testimony Before the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development

15

Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This Order provides project management direction for the acquisition of capital assets that are delivered on schedule, within budget, and capable of meeting mission performance and environmental...

16

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY J.-1{p Project Information Project Title:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

}:- }:- J.-1{p Project Information Project Title: Flowline leak @ 68-66-SX-34 Date: 1/26/2010 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Jeff Jones Project Overview 011..- 1. What are the environmental Elimination of the flowline@ 68-66- SX-34. Dig up and locate leak. Take p ntaminated soil to land fann and impacts? record in log book. The duration of this project will be approx. 4-days. The equipment to be used is as follows backhoe, and welder. We will be eliminating the flowline and pumping to a tank set on location.So we don't 2. What is the legal location? have any leaks in the Mure. 3. What is the duration of the project? 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig, drilling rig, etc.)? The table below Is to be completed by the Project Lead and nwlewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA

17

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY Project Information Project Title: Express Stack Tools  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Express Stack Tools Express Stack Tools Date: 11/16/2010 DOE Code: 6730.020.81023 Contractor Code: 8067-971 Project Lead: Brian Black Project Overview 1) This project will test open and cased Hole logging tools in multiple wells. The tools to be testied include: 1. Brief project description [include anything that could impact the natural gamma, borehole temperature, compensated neutron, compensated density with PE, dual environment] induction/short guard, neutron prompt gamma, and acoustic televiewer tool. Radioactive sources will be run in the well as part of the toolstring. 2. Legal location 3. Duration of the project 2) 48-X-28 well location, SE %, SW %, Tsp 39N Rng 78W, Section 28; 45::3-X-21 well location, NE %, SW 4. Major equipment to be used %, Tsp 39N, Rng 78W, Section 21; 46-TpX-10 well location, NE %, SW Y.., Tsp38N, Rng 78W, Section 10.

18

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY Project Information Project Title: Casing Drilling Test  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Casing Drilling Test Casing Drilling Test Date: 5-17-201 1 DOE Code: 6730-020-72000 Contractor Code: 8067-806 Project Lead: Marl< Duletsky Project Overview 1, Brief project description ~nclude The existing 13-1-SX-23 location and entry road will be reworlproject 4. Major equipment to be used

19

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Acquisition and Project Management  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Surash Surash Deputy Assistant Secretary for Acquisition and Project Management Office of Environmental Management United States Department of Energy Contract Management by the Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management Before the Subcommittee on Financial and Contracting Oversight Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs United States Senate June 27, 2013 Good morning, Madam Chairman, Ranking Member Johnson, and Members of the Subcommittee. Thank you for this opportunity to provide you an overview of the Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (EM) acquisitions and of contract and project management reforms that EM is implementing. I am Jack Surash, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Acquisition and Project Management (APM) in

20

Status Report: EM Acquisition and Project Management Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Report: Acquisition and Project Report: Acquisition and Project Management Review August 15, 2006 Submitted by: Mr. James Ajello and Mr. Dennis Ferrigno Background: The Environmental Management Advisory Board is in the process of providing Jack Surash, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Acquisition and Project Management (EM-50), records of past EMAB recommendations and commentary. Mr. Ajello and Mr. Ferrigno believe that the records will be helpful to Mr. Surash and his staff. EMAB has identified the following actionable items: Provide Mr. Surash with EMAB committee files for review Have Mr. Ferrigno contact Mr. Surash to arrange a meeting for discussion of said materials Have Mr. Ajello and Mr. Ferrigno meet with Mr. Surash periodically to discuss project management and contract issues, as per request of EM-1.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "acquisition compliance project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Acquisition and Project Management  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Surash Surash Deputy Assistant Secretary for Acquisition and Project Management Office of Environmental Management United States Department of Energy On Department of Energy's Major System Construction Projects Before the Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development Committee on Appropriations United States House of Representatives March 20, 2013 Good morning, Mr. Chairman, Ranking Member Kaptur, and Members of the Subcommittee. Thank you for having me here today to provide you an update on the Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (EM) major system construction projects and the progress in implementing contract and project management reforms.

22

Microsoft PowerPoint - Surash.AcquisitionProjectMgmt.042909  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Management Advisory Board J. E. Surash, P. E. Deputy Assistant Secretary Acquisition and Project Management April 29, 2009 2 Agenda Update on FY09 Plan for Acquisition & Contracting Small Business Activities Project Management Areas of Focus 3 Process Contact Handled Transuranic Debris and Soils Waste Process Remote Handled Transuranic Debris and Soils Waste Process Remote Handled Transuranic Sludge Waste Ship Transuranic Waste to Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Transuranic Waste Processing Center Oak Ridge, Tennessee Apr-May-Jun 2009 Jun 16, 2008 Apr 2, 2008 Award Industry Proposal Due Request for Proposals Estimated Value 3-year base, 2-year option: $150M-$200M (Small Business Set- Aside) Scope of Work 4 Waste Processing of Transuranic And Special Requirements Wastes

23

Report: EMAB Acquisition and Project Management Subcommittee Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

SECOND INTERIM REPORT TO THE SECOND INTERIM REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD Removal of EM Projects from the GAO High Risk List: Strategies for Improving the Effectiveness of Project and Contract Management in the Office of Environmental Management Submitted by the EMAB Acquisition and Project Management Subcommittee June 23, 2011 Background: On March 31, 2010, Dr. Inés Triay, Assistant Secretary for the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Environmental Management (EM), tasked the Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB or Board) to provide observations and recommendations regarding EM's updated strategy for reducing project and contract risks, and removing EM projects from the Government Accountability Office's (GAO) High Risk List. In response to this charge, members

24

Final Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance at the Slick Rock, Colorado, UMTRA Project Site  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

58 58 Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance at the Slick Rock, Colorado, UMTRA Project Sites Final February 2003 Prepared by U.S. Department of Energy Grand Junction Office Grand Junction, Colorado Work Performed Under DOE Contract No. DE-AC13-02GJ79491 DOE Grand Junction Office EA of Ground Water Compliance at the Slick Rock Sites February 2003 Final Page iii Contents Page Acronyms and Abbreviations...........................................................................................................v Executive Summary...................................................................................................................... vii 1.0 Introduction.............................................................................................................................1

25

Mission Need Statement: Calcine Disposition Project Major Systems Acquisition Project  

SciTech Connect

This document identifies the need to establish the Calcine Disposition Project to determine and implement the final disposition of calcine including characterization, retrieval, treatment (if necessary), packaging, loading, onsite interim storage pending shipment to a repository or interim storage facility, and disposition of related facilities.

J. T. Beck

2007-04-26T23:59:59.000Z

26

Table 3a. Imported Refiner Acquisition Cost of Crude Oil, Projected...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

a. Imported Refiner Acquisition Cost of Crude Oil, Projected vs. Actual" "Projected Price in Constant Dollars" " (constant dollars per barrel in ""dollar year"" specific to each...

27

Ground Water Compliance Action Plan for the Old Rifle, Colorado, UMTRA Project Site  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

GJO-2000-177-TAR GJO-2000-177-TAR MAC-GWRFL 1.9 Ground Water Compliance Action Plan for the Old Rifle, Colorado, UMTRA Project Site December 2001 Work Performed Under DOE Contract No. DE-AC13-96GJ87335 for the U.S. Department of Energy Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. GJO-2000-177-TAR MAC-GWRFL 1.9 Ground Water Compliance Action Plan for the Old Rifle, Colorado, UMTRA Project Site December 2001 Prepared by U.S. Department of Energy Grand Junction Office Grand Junction, Colorado Project Number UGW-511-0017-12-000 Document Number U0066302 Work Performed under DOE Contract No. DE-AC13-96GJ87335 Document Number U0066302 Contents DOE/Grand Junction Office Ground Water Compliance Action Plan for Old Rifle, Colorado

28

Project W-519 TWRS privatization phase 1 infrastructure year 2000 compliance assessment project plan  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This assessment describes the potential Year 2000 (Y2K) problems and describes the methods for achieving Y2K Compliance for Project W-519, Tank Waste Remediation System Privatization Phase I Infrastructure Support. The purpose of this assessment is to give an overview of the project. This assessment will describe the methods, protocols, and practices to assure that equipment and systems do not have Y2K problems. This document will not be updated and any dates contained in this document are estimates and may change. The scope of project W-519 is to provide utilities and infrastructure to support construction and operation of the private contractor's facility to treat, immobilize, and dispose of tank waste. The private contractor's facility will be located on east side of 200E-area and north of Route 4s (near the defunct grout vaults). The utilities include potable and process water, construction and operational electrical power systems, and liquid effluent disposal transfer lines to the existing effluent treatment facility (ETF) and the liquid effluent retention facility (LERF).

BUSSELL, J.H.

1999-08-25T23:59:59.000Z

29

FEDERAL FACILITY COMPLIANCE AGREEMENT (FFCA) STACK ISOLATION PROJECT FUNCTIONS & REQUIREMENTS  

SciTech Connect

This document delineates the functions and requirements for the FFCA Stack Isolation Project for the 244-A, 244-BX, 244-5, and 244-TX DCRTs. The isolation of each ventilation system and stack includes the electrical, instrumentation, and mechanical isolation of the ventilation system and the installation of primary and annulus breather filters to provide passive ventilation to meet the FFCA requirements.

TRANBARGER, R.K.

2003-12-16T23:59:59.000Z

30

DOE G 413.3-13, U.S. Department of Energy Acquisition Strategy Guide for Capital Assets Projects  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

This Guide serves as a tool for federal project directors developing a project acquisition strategy document. No cancellation.

2008-07-22T23:59:59.000Z

31

Final Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance at the Slick Rock, Colorado, UMTRA Project Site  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Impact Impact Ground Water Compliance at the Slick Rock, Colorado, UMTRA Project Sites AGENCY: U.S. DEP.4RTMENT OF ENERGY ACTIOK: FL&-DING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMP-ACT (FONSI) SU$IM$RY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) plans to implement ground lvater compliance strategies for two Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTR.4) Project sites near Slick Rock. Colorado. The purpose of the strategies is to comply with U.S. En\.ironmental Protection .Qency (EP.Aj ground n'ater standards defined in Title 40 Codr ~fF~d~w/ iieplutio?r.s (CFR) Part 192. and in so doing. protect human health and the en\.ironment. Ground water at the Slick Rock sites is contaminated with residual radioactive materials from hisTorica acti\,ities, associated with the processin of uranium ore, The planned action (~formeri>,.

32

Table 3b. Imported Refiner Acquisition Cost of Crude Oil, Projected...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

b. Imported Refiner Acquisition Cost of Crude Oil, Projected vs. Actual" "Projected Price in Nominal Dollars" " (nominal dollars per barrel)" ,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,20...

33

FEDERAL ACQUISITION CERTIFICATION FOR PROGRAM AND PROJECT MANAGERS (FAC-P/PM)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CERTIFICATION FOR PROGRAM AND PROJECT CERTIFICATION FOR PROGRAM AND PROJECT MANAGERS (FAC-P/PM) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Purpose. The Federal Acquisition Certification for Program and Project Managers (FAC-P/PM) establishes general training and experience requirements for program and project managers in civilian agencies. The FAC- P/PM focuses on essential competencies needed for program and project managers; the program does not include functional or technical competencies, such as those for information technology, or agency- specific competencies. 2. Background. The quality and effectiveness of the federal acquisition process depend on the development of a capable and competent workforce. The Services Acquisition Reform Act of 2003 (SARA, P.L. 108-136) expanded the definition of acquisition to include functions performed by program and project managers.

34

Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance at the Naturita, Colorado, UMTRA Project Site  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Environmental Assessment addresses the environmental effects of a proposed action and the no action alternative to comply with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ground water standards at the Naturita, Colorado, Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action Project site. In 1998, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) completed surface cleanup at the site and encapsulated the tailings in a disposal cell 15 miles northwest near the former town of Uravan, Colorado. Ground water contaminants of potential concern at the Naturita site are uranium and vanadium. Uranium concentrations exceed the maximum concentration limit (MCL) of 0.044 milligram per liter (mg/L). Vanadium has no MCL; however, vanadium concentrations exceed the EPA Region III residential risk-based concentration of 0.33 mg/L (EPA 2002). The proposed compliance strategy for uranium and vanadium at the Naturita site is no further remediation in conjunction with the application of alternate concentration limits. Institutional controls with ground water and surface water monitoring will be implemented for these constituents as part of the compliance strategy. This compliance strategy will be protective of human health and the environment. The proposed monitoring program will begin upon regulatory concurrence with the Ground Water Compliance Action Plan (DOE 2002a). Monitoring will consist of verifying that institutional controls remain in place, collecting ground water samples to verify that concentrations of uranium and vanadium are decreasing, and collecting surface water samples to verify that contaminant concentrations do not exceed a regulatory limit or risk-based concentration. If these criteria are not met, DOE would reevaluate the proposed action and determine the need for further National Environmental Policy Act documentation. No comments were received from the public during the public comment period. Two public meetings were held during this period. Minutes of these meetings are included as Attachment 1.

N /A

2003-04-23T23:59:59.000Z

35

OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Chapter 1 - Acquisition Regulations System OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides Microsoft Word - FedComplianceCritChecklist.doc...

36

Acquisition Strategy for the Idaho National Laboratory Remote-Handled Low-Level Waste Disposition Project  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document describes the design-build acquisition strategy that will be applied to the Remote Handled LLW Disposal Project. The design-build delivery method will be tailored, as appropriate, to integrate the requirements of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 413.3B, 'Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets,' with the DOE budget formulation process and the safety requirements of DOE-STD-1189, 'Integration of Safety into the Design Process.'

David Duncan

2011-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

37

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY Project Information Project TitJe: Geothermal Technologies Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Project Information Project TitJe: Geothermal Technologies Program Date: 12-11-()9 DOE Code: 6730.020.61041 Contractor Code: Project Lead: Project Overview This NEPA is for the laying of a 2,975 foot, 8" welded plastic water line from Little Teapot Creek near in the 1. What are the environmental impacts? intersection with Teapot Creek to the North Waterflood Facility (NWF) building. The entire project area is within Section 21 T39N R78W (map attached) and will not impact any wet land areas but will cross one 2. What is the legal location? intermittent stream. The stream is presently dry. The project will include the clearing of vegetation from a 12 3. What is the duration of the project? foot wide construction corridor along the route, digging a 5 foot deep trench, welding and placing the plastic

38

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY Project Information Project Title: South Compost Facility #2 Da  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

South Compost Facility #2 Da South Compost Facility #2 Da te: 1-6-10 DOE Code: 6730.020.0000 Contracto r Code: 8067-788 Project Lead: Anthony Bowler Project Ove rview The purpose of the project is to build an additional compos ling facility at RMOTC to allow for 1. Bnef project description [include anything that increased soil remediation capabilities. The project will involve removing the top soil and placing could impact the environment] it adjacent to the operational area ,in a "signed" pile for reclamation . Additional scraping of the 2. Legal location area (6"-8'1 will generate material which will be used to erect a 2' berm around the location to 3. Duration of the project control runon/runoff. A perimeter fence and a locking gate will be installed around the facility's

39

Office of Acquisition and Project Management Certifications Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

16 semester hours of undergraduate work with emphasis in business Record here: 16 semester hours of undergraduate work with emphasis in business Record here: Experience: Document 1 year of Purchasing experience ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ TRAINING Course Number Course Name How did you take it? Date Completed Number of CLPs CON 100 Shaping Smart Business Arrangements Chhhhh hh hhhh h MM/DD/YYYY Digit < 40 CON 237 Simplified Acquisition Procedures Chhhhh hh hhhh h

40

Program & Project Management For The Acquisition Of Capital Assets  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Root Cause Analysis Corrective Action Plan Root Cause Analysis Corrective Action Plan ISSUE #3: Strengthen Risk Management November 4, 2009 Paul Bosco, PE, PMP, LEED-AP Director, Office of Engineering and Construction Management (OECM) U. S. Department of Energy Office of Management Office of Engineering and Construction Management 2 * Some Background - GAO High-Risk List - Root Cause Analysis and Corrective Action Plan - Issue Number THREE * Things We Have Done: Risk Mitigation Efforts to Date * Things to Consider Presentation Outline Office of Management Office of Engineering and Construction Management 3 Why are we on "The List"? * Since 1990, DOE's record of: - Inadequate Management - Inadequate Oversight - Failure to Hold Contractors Accountable - Non-Compliance with Departmental Policies GAO High Risk List

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "acquisition compliance project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY Project Information Project Title: T-1-21 Restoration  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1-21 Restoration 1-21 Restoration Date: 12-22-2010 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead : Bernard Winfree Project Overview 1. What are the environmental The existing building will be removed from the site. A backhoe will be used to dig up the manifold piping, impacts? after all possible fluids have been sucked out of the piping. We will then cut off the pipes at the lowest 2. What is the legal location? possible point At this time a com posit soil sample will be taken of the area. When the samples come back under the established limits, we will backfill the hole with the existing materials and recontour the site to 3. What is the duration of the project? perexisting conditions. Reseeding will be initiated when the proper seed mix is established. This is an

42

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY Project Information Project Title: T-2-33  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2-33 2-33 Date: 12-22-2010 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Bernard Winfree Project Overview 1. What are the environmental The existing manifold building will be moved off site. A backhoe will be used to dig up the manifold piping, impacts? after all possible fluids have been sucked out. Wells 88-ax-28, 17 -stx-27 and 18-stx-27 will be tied directly into the tank The remaining pipes will be cut off at the lowest point. At this time, a compos it sample of the 2. What is the legal location? surrounding soil soil will be taken . Any contaiminated soils will be hauled to the compost facility. When the 3. What is the duration of the project? samples come back under the established limits, the hole will be backfilled with native materials and the site

43

Program & Project Management For The Acquisition Of Capital Assets  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

February 3, 2011 February 3, 2011 Operational Organization Chart (FY 11) Office of Engineering & Construction Management POLICY - GUIDANCE -OVERSIGHT Pete Check Deputy Director Les Novitsky - Management Analyst (on detail) Rosalyn Matthews - Program Support Specialist EIR Program Analyst (IBM) - Monica Morris Robert Raines Director for Project Management Systems & Assessments Peter O'Konski Director for Facilities Management & Professional Development Paul Bosco Director Real Estate Tom Geronikos - Realty Spec Mark Price - Realty Spec David Steinau - Realty Spec Project Management James Fountain - Prog Analyst John Makepeace - Prog Analyst Cynthia Seiter - Prog Analyst Project Mgt Assessment Mike Peek - Gen Engr Tom Bruder- Gen Engr Brian Huizenga - Gen Engr Rick Elliott -- Gen Engr

44

Program & Project Management For The Acquisition Of Capital Assets  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2009 2009 Office of Management Office of Engineering and Construction Management Operational Organization Chart (FY 09) Office of Engineering & Construction Management POLICY - GUIDANCE -OVERSIGHT Pete Check Deputy Director Les Novitsky - Management Analyst Rosalyn Matthews - Program Support Specialist EIR Program Analyst (NISC) - Monica Morris Pete Check Deputy Director Les Novitsky - Management Analyst Rosalyn Matthews - Program Support Specialist EIR Program Analyst (NISC) - Monica Morris Robert Raines Director for Project Management Systems & Assessments Robert Raines Director for Project Management Systems & Assessments Peter O'Konski Director for Facilities Management & Professional Development Peter O'Konski Director for Facilities Management & Professional Development

45

EA-1406: Ground Water Compliance at the New Rifle, Colorado, UMTRA Project Site, Rifle, Colorado  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This EA evaluates the environmental impacts for the proposed compliance strategy of natural flushing combined with institutional controls and continued monitoring for the New Rifle uranium mill...

46

Optimized image acquisition for breast tomosynthesis in projection and reconstruction space  

SciTech Connect

Breast tomosynthesis has been an exciting new development in the field of breast imaging. While the diagnostic improvement via tomosynthesis is notable, the full potential of tomosynthesis has not yet been realized. This may be attributed to the dependency of the diagnostic quality of tomosynthesis on multiple variables, each of which needs to be optimized. Those include dose, number of angular projections, and the total angular span of those projections. In this study, the authors investigated the effects of these acquisition parameters on the overall diagnostic image quality of breast tomosynthesis in both the projection and reconstruction space. Five mastectomy specimens were imaged using a prototype tomosynthesis system. 25 angular projections of each specimen were acquired at 6.2 times typical single-view clinical dose level. Images at lower dose levels were then simulated using a noise modification routine. Each projection image was supplemented with 84 simulated 3 mm 3D lesions embedded at the center of 84 nonoverlapping ROIs. The projection images were then reconstructed using a filtered backprojection algorithm at different combinations of acquisition parameters to investigate which of the many possible combinations maximizes the performance. Performance was evaluated in terms of a Laguerre-Gauss channelized Hotelling observer model-based measure of lesion detectability. The analysis was also performed without reconstruction by combining the model results from projection images using Bayesian decision fusion algorithm. The effect of acquisition parameters on projection images and reconstructed slices were then compared to derive an optimization rule for tomosynthesis. The results indicated that projection images yield comparable but higher performance than reconstructed images. Both modes, however, offered similar trends: Performance improved with an increase in the total acquisition dose level and the angular span. Using a constant dose level and angular span, the performance rolled off beyond a certain number of projections, indicating that simply increasing the number of projections in tomosynthesis may not necessarily improve its performance. The best performance for both projection images and tomosynthesis slices was obtained for 15-17 projections spanning an angular arc of {approx}45 deg. - the maximum tested in our study, and for an acquisition dose equal to single-view mammography. The optimization framework developed in this framework is applicable to other reconstruction techniques and other multiprojection systems.

Chawla, Amarpreet S.; Lo, Joseph Y.; Baker, Jay A.; Samei, Ehsan [Department of Radiology and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27705 (United States); Department of Radiology, Department of Medical Physics, and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Duke University Durham, North Carolina 27705 (United States); Department of Radiology, Duke Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Duke University Durham, North Carolina 27705 (United States); Department of Radiology, Department of Medical Physics, and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Duke University Durham, North Carolina 27705 (United States)

2009-11-15T23:59:59.000Z

47

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

n tal Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope oc:c:urs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and contact the Technical...

48

Colville Confederated Tribes' Performance Project Wildlife Mitigation Acquisitions, Annual Report 2006.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Colville Confederated Tribes Wildlife Mitigation Project is protecting lands as partial mitigation for hydropower's share of the wildlife losses resulting from Chief Joseph and Grand Coulee Dams. The Mitigation Project protects and manages 54,606 acres for the biological requirements of managed wildlife species that are important to the Colville Tribes. With the inclusion of 2006 acquisitions, the Colville Tribes have acquired approximately 32,018 habitat units (HUs) towards a total 35,819 HUs lost from original inundation due to hydropower development. This annual report for 2006 briefly describes that four priority land acquisitions that were considered for enrollment into the Colville Tribes Mitigation Project during the 2006 contract period.

Whitney, Richard; Berger, Matthew; Tonasket, Patrick

2006-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

49

Response ¬タモ Acquisition and Project Management (11/1/2010)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Washin Washin gton, DC 2058 5 November 1, 2010 MEMORANDUM FOR JAMES AJELLO CHAIRMAN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD I /0 FROM: INES R. TRIAY ~ .%~ ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR a ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SUBJECT: Office of Environmental Management Response to the Report Submitted by the Acquisition and Project Management Subcommittee of the Environmental Management Advisory Board On September 15, 2010, the Office of Environmental Management (EM) received the "Report to the Environmental Management Advisory Board, Removal ofEM Projects from the GAO High Risk List: Strategies for Improving the Effectiveness ofProject and Contract Management in the Office of Environmental Management" from the Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB). The report provided observations and recommendations regarding EM's updated

50

Table 3a. Imported Refiner Acquisition Cost of Crude Oil, Projected vs. Actual  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

a. Imported Refiner Acquisition Cost of Crude Oil, Projected vs. Actual a. Imported Refiner Acquisition Cost of Crude Oil, Projected vs. Actual Projected Price in Constant Dollars (constant dollars per barrel in "dollar year" specific to each AEO) AEO Dollar Year 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 AEO 1994 1992 16.69 16.43 16.99 17.66 18.28 19.06 19.89 20.72 21.65 22.61 23.51 24.29 24.90 25.60 26.30 27.00 27.64 28.16 AEO 1995 1993 14.90 16.41 16.90 17.45 18.00 18.53 19.13 19.65 20.16 20.63 21.08 21.50 21.98 22.44 22.94 23.50 24.12 AEO 1996 1994 16.81 16.98 17.37 17.98 18.61 19.27 19.92 20.47 20.97 21.41 21.86 22.25 22.61 22.97 23.34 23.70 24.08

51

Table 3b. Imported Refiner Acquisition Cost of Crude Oil, Projected vs. Actual  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

b. Imported Refiner Acquisition Cost of Crude Oil, Projected vs. Actual b. Imported Refiner Acquisition Cost of Crude Oil, Projected vs. Actual Projected Price in Nominal Dollars (nominal dollars per barrel) 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 AEO 1994 17.06 17.21 18.24 19.43 20.64 22.12 23.76 25.52 27.51 29.67 31.86 34.00 36.05 38.36 40.78 43.29 45.88 48.37 AEO 1995 15.24 17.27 18.23 19.26 20.39 21.59 22.97 24.33 25.79 27.27 28.82 30.38 32.14 33.89 35.85 37.97 40.28 AEO 1996 17.16 17.74 18.59 19.72 20.97 22.34 23.81 25.26 26.72 28.22 29.87 31.51 33.13 34.82 36.61 38.48 40.48

52

DOE/EA-1312: Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance at the Grand Junction UMTRA Project Site (Climax Uranium Millsite) (September 1999)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Rev. 0 Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance at the Grand Junction UMTRA Project Site (Climax Uranium Millsite) Final September 1999 Prepared by U.S. Department of Energy Grand Junction Office Grand Junction, Colorado Work Performed Under DOE Contract No. DE-AC13-96GJ87335 for the U.S. Department of Energy EA of Ground Water Compliance at the Grand Junction UMTRA Project Site DOE Grand Junction Office Page ii Final September 1999 Contents Executive Summary.........................................................................................................................v 1.0 Introduction...............................................................................................................................1 1.1 Grand Junction UMTRA Project Site Location and Description.........................................1

53

Compliance Monitoring of Underwater Blasting for Rock Removal at Warrior Point, Columbia River Channel Improvement Project, 2009/2010  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Portland District (USACE) conducted the 20-year Columbia River Channel Improvement Project (CRCIP) to deepen the navigation channel between Portland, Oregon, and the Pacific Ocean to allow transit of fully loaded Panamax ships (100 ft wide, 600 to 700 ft long, and draft 45 to 50 ft). In the vicinity of Warrior Point, between river miles (RM) 87 and 88 near St. Helens, Oregon, the USACE conducted underwater blasting and dredging to remove 300,000 yd3 of a basalt rock formation to reach a depth of 44 ft in the Columbia River navigation channel. The purpose of this report is to document methods and results of the compliance monitoring study for the blasting project at Warrior Point in the Columbia River.

Carlson, Thomas J.; Johnson, Gary E.; Woodley, Christa M.; Skalski, J. R.; Seaburg, Adam

2011-05-10T23:59:59.000Z

55

Compliance Agreements | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Compliance » Compliance Compliance » Compliance Agreements Compliance Agreements This photo shows the Savannah River Site’s Heavy Water Components Test Reactor during decommissioning. This photo shows the Savannah River Site's Heavy Water Components Test Reactor during decommissioning. Compliance agreements illustrate and help support the development of effective compliance approaches and strategies, and can assist in promoting greater cooperation, coordination, and consistency with other EM offices, Departmental organizations, and State agencies. Please click the site or location name to view a listing of the associated agreements and summaries. Idaho Oak Ridge Paducah Portsmouth Richland/Office of River Protection Savannah River Closure Sites NNSA Sites West Valley Demonstration Project

56

EA-1406: Ground Water Compliance at the New Rifle, Colorado,...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6: Ground Water Compliance at the New Rifle, Colorado, UMTRA Project Site, Rifle, Colorado EA-1406: Ground Water Compliance at the New Rifle, Colorado, UMTRA Project Site, Rifle,...

57

Office of Enforcement - Compliance Orders  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Enforcement Preliminary Notice of Violation and Compliance Order isued to Fluor Daniel Hanford, Inc., relating to events at the Spent Nuclear Fuels Project, K-Basins and other...

58

NEPA Compliance Officer  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Compliance Officer Compliance Officer Award #: EE 000 0784 Recipient: County of Escambia ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) MC Blanchard Judicial Center B5.1 Historic Preservation Clause and Old Courthouse Block Waste Stream Clause Office Complex EEIP Road Prison Geothermal Earth Coupled HVAC Upgrade A9, All Allowable Activities: Information gathering, data collection, reporting, and preliminary design. Prohibited Activities: Implementation of final design, construction, and operation tasks for this project should be conditioned pending further NEPA review. Landfill Gas Extraction and Control System A9, All Allowable Activities: Information gathering,

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "acquisition compliance project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 8 Project lnfonnation Project Title: New Drilling Location in Section 29 Date: 12-10-2009 DOE Code: 6730.020.78002 Contractor Code: 8067-371 Project Lead: Mark Duletsky Project Overview The project will involve excavating 3-4 backhoe pits to a depth of about 8 feet to observe soil characteristics 1. What are the environmental impacts? in the vicinity of our planned reserve pit excavation area. 2. What is the legal location? NE 1/4, SE 1/4, Sec. 29. T39N. R78W. Natrona County, Wyoming 3. What is the duration of the project? 4. What major equipment will be used 1 day if any (work over rig, drilling rig, etc.)? Backhoe The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and

62

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Project l nfonnation Project Title: Reclamation ofT-2-14 Date: 11/2412009 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Jeff Jones Project Overview We will be removing old piping from the treater@ T-2-14. We will also remove the berm and grade and 1. What are the environmental impacts? reclamate location. The duration of this project will be approx. 2 days. Equipment that will be used is as follows backhoe. dumptruck, blade,and a tiller so we can seed with native grasses. 2. What is the legal location? 3. What is the duration of the project? 4. What major equipment will be used if any (woO< over rig, drilling rig, etc.)? The table below Is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and

63

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Project lnfonnation Project Title: Restoration of 77 -13-SX-3 Date: 2-8-1 0 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Jeff Jones Project Overview We will be restoring 77-SX-3 per procedure. 1. What are the environmental impacts? The duration of this project will be 3-4 days. 2. What is the leg al location? 3. What is the duration of the project? The equipment to be used will be Backhoe, welder, tiller dump truck. 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig , drilling rig , We will take oil contaminated dirt to the Eastside landfarm and backfill with d ean fill dirt from sec. 20. etc.)? The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and

64

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 Project lnfonnation Project Title: C-EAG. Maintenance I grading of existing roads Date: 8/4/2011 and road drainages (barrow ditches): ex 81.3 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Michael J. Taylor [NCO] Project Overview 1. Brief project description [include C-EA 6. Maintenance I grading of existing roads and road drai nages anything that could impact the (barrow ditches) : ex 81.3 environment] Existing roads defined as per May 2010 Aerial Photos. (Changing out culverts, grading I modifying embankments, etc., that has potential to impact wetlands, requires a NCS.) The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and

65

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 Project lnfonnation Project Title: Replace electrical line from well to power pole Date: 3/10/2010 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Mike Preston Project Overview No impact to the environment. 1. What are the environmental impacts? Dig up old electrical line from pumping unit on 61-S-34 to power pole east of well , {approximately 75 feet 2. What is the legal location? from unit) and replace with new line. 3. What is the duration of the project? 4. What major equipment will be used 1 day if any (work over rig , drilling rig , etc.)? Electrician, ditch witch and operator for equipment The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and

66

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Project lnfonnation Project Title: e-EA5. Reclamation of well sites Date: 8/4/2011 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Michael J. Taylor [NCO] Project Overview e-EA 5. Reclamation of wellsites : ex 81.3 and ex 86.1 1. Brief project description [include anything that could impact the Small-scale, short-term cleanup actions including excavation and environment] consolidation of contaminated soils, removal of underground piping, removal of rig anchors or T-bars, drainage control , transport and backfilling of clean soil I fill dirt, and reseeding . The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and

67

System verification and validation plan for SY-101 hydrogen mitigation test project data acquisition and control system (DACS-1). Revision 1  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This document outlines the system verification and validation plan for the SY-101 Data Acquisition and Control System (DACS), covering the operation and maintenance phase of the project life cycle

Ermi, A.M.; Gauck, G.J.; Smith, S.O.

1995-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

68

This Guide is designed to provide assistance to the community regarding the direct charging of costs to sponsored projects while maintaining compliance with the Federal cost principles (2 CFR Part 220, OMB  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

charging of costs to sponsored projects while maintaining compliance with the Federal cost principles (2. Typical costs charged directly to a sponsored project include: 1. compensation of employees incurred for the sponsored project. Costs of materials from stock/services rendered by specialized

69

Computing compliance  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Inquisitive semantics (cf. Groenendijk, 2008) provides a formal framework for reasoning about information exchange. The central logical notion that the semantics gives rise to is compliance. This paper presents an algorithm that computes the set of compliant ...

Ivano Ciardelli; Irma Cornelisse; Jeroen Groenendijk; Floris Roelofsen

2009-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

70

Acquisition Guidance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Guidance Acquisition Letters DOE Acquisition Regulations (DEAR) DOE Directives Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) Federal Register Financial Assistance Guide Headquarters Office...

71

DOE NEPA Compliance Officers  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEPA Compliance Officers NEPA Compliance Officers NEPA Compliance Officers are listed first for Program Offices, then Power Marketing Administrations, then Field Offices. Please send updates to yardena.mansoor@hq.doe.gov Oct 04, 2013 Forrestal (FORS) Addresses: Germantown (GTN) Addresses: 1000 Independence Ave SW 1000 Independence Ave SW Washington, DC 20585 Washington, DC 20585-1290 . Use for U.S. Postal Service mail. 19901 Germantown Road Germantown, MD 20874-1290 Use for EXPRESS DELIVERY (e.g. Federal Express, UPS). NAME, OFFICE, E-MAIL FAX ADDRESS PHONE william.bierbower@hq.doe.gov Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy 202-287-6585 FORS AR-1 20585 ARPA-E William Bierbower lori.gray@go.doe.gov Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office 720-356-1568 720-356-1350 Department of Energy

72

DOE Order Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The goal of this Guide is to provide the Department of Energy's federal project directors (FPDs) with the knowledge, methodologies and tools needed to meet Order 413.3A's requirement that they plan...

73

Code Compliance Technical Meeting: Building Technologies Office  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Compliance Compliance Technical Meeting: Building Technologies Office Department of Energy Washington, DC APRIL 2013 1 Welcome Welcome to The Building Technologies Office's Code Compliance Technical Meeting and to Washington, DC. On behalf of the Department of Energy Building Technology Office (BTO), we would like to thank you for attending, for your participation. The goal of this meeting is to review and discuss ongoing projects and existing activities that improve compliance with model energy codes. DOE

74

Work plan for upgrade of SY-101 Hydrogen Mitigation Test Project Data Acquisition and Control System (DACS-1)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The purpose of this effort is to upgrade the existing DACS-1 used for control and data acquisition in support of the hydrogen mitigation program for tank 101-SY. The planned upgrades will enhance the system capabilities to support additional mitigation projects and improve the system operability by implementing changes identified during operation of the system to date. Once the upgrades have been implemented, the DACS-1 system should operate as it did prior to the upgrade, but with greatly increased speed and capability. No retraining of Test Engineers will be required; the upgrade is designed to be transparent to those who operate it, with only a noticeable increase in the speed of the system. This work plan defines the tasks required for implementing the upgrade. It identifies deliverables, responsible organizations and individuals, interfaces, and schedule. This upgrade effort employs system engineering principles wherever applicable.

Truitt, R.W.

1994-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

75

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

~ ~ -o ~ ~ -o Project lnfonnation Project Title: Replace Down Guy Rod 24~3 Date: 11/30/09 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Mike Preston Project Overview Replace Down Guy Rod Emergency The pole was ready to Break Wire 5' above the ground 1. What are the environmental impacts? 24-SHX-3 2. What is the legal location? 3. What is the duration of the project? 5 hr 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig, drilling rig, etc,)? Back hole The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTe If Change of Scope oe~. Project Lead must sutlmft a new NEPA ColT pll~ Sunley and c ontact the T echnical Assurance Department. Impacts If YES, then complete below

76

MISSION ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICER HANDBOOK and Guide to Life-of-Project Environmental Compliance for all USAID Staff  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Contract Number EPP-I-00-03-00013-00, Task Order No. 11. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of IRG and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. NOTE: The terminology used in this Handbook is consistent with the ADS. While terms such as, strategic objective and strategic objective team may no longer be in use, we use these terms herein pending update of ADS 204 and other USAID guidance. About this Handbook Dear MEO, The purpose of this Handbook is to provide you with guidance and the resources you need to be as effective as possible in helping your Mission attain and maintain full compliance with USAIDs Environmental Procedures and to mainstream environmentally sound design and management (ESDM). We know that your MEO role is just one of several important and competing responsibilities, and we hope that this Handbook makes your MEO role more fulfilling and easier. This Handbook provides you with: A basic orientation to USAIDs Environmental Procedures and the MEO position. Recommendations for coordinating with other USAID staff and partners. An orientation to, and recommendations for, implementing the MEOs core role: ensuring that

unknown authors

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

77

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Project Information Project Title: Survey Centralizer Design Date: 2-10-2010 DOE Code: 6730.020.71091 Contractor Code: 8067-762 Project Lead: Frank Ingham Project Overview 1. What are the environmental No environmental impacts. impacts? Run a logging tool through existing wells at : 2. What is the /ega/location? 67-LBT-3, SW SE sec 3, T38N , R78W 86-1 -X-10 , NE SE Sec 10, T38N , R78W 3. What is the duration of the project? 22-2-X-10H , NW NW Sec 10, T38N , R78W 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig , drilling rig, 4 Days etc.)? Stinger truck or crane . The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE: If Change of Scope occurs, Project Lead must submit a new NEPA Compliance Survey and

78

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

81 81 Project lnfonnation Project Title: CBM Gas Separator Date: 2-23-2010 DOE Code: 6720-020-51131 Contractor Code: Project Lead: Mark Duletsky Project Overview None anticipated, uses producing well on pre-existing location. 1. What are the environmental impacts? 48-2-X-28 Location, 447' FSL. 2495 FWL, SE, SW, Sec. 28, T39N, R78W, Natrona County. Wyoming USA 2. Wnat is the legal location? 3. What is the duration of the project? 5days 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig, drilling rig, Forkfift. winch truck. water truck etc.)? The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Special ist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NO'TE: H Change of Scope occurs, Proj ect Lead m u st $ubmlt a new NEPA Compllance Suntey and

79

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 Project lnfonnation Project Title: NODA 2. Reclamation of decommissioned Date: 8/4/2011 batteries, test satellites, and facilities DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Michael J. Taylor [NCO] Project Overview NODA 2. Reclamation of decommissioned batteries, test satellites, and 1. Brief project description [include facilities : anything that could impact the environment] ex 81 .3 and ex 86.1 Small-scale, short-term cleanup actions including excavation or consolidation of contaminated soils, removal of equipment and underground piping , drainage control, and reseeding. NOD req uired to ensure compliance with Reclamation Procedures. The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA

80

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 8 Project lnfonnation Project Title: Change out down guy on power pole Date: 2-8-10 DOE Code : Contractor Code: Project Lead: Mike Preston Project Overview 1 What are the environmental No impact to the environment impacts? Power pole east of B-1 -33 2. What is the legal location? 3. What is the duration of the project? 3Hr 4. What major equipment will be used if any (worl< over rig, drilling rig, Backhoe and operator for equ1 pment etc.)? The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE; If Chiing

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "acquisition compliance project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Chapter 34 - Major Systems Acquisition Policy Flash 2013-40 Acquisition Guide Chapter 43.3 - Maintaining Alignment of Project Management with Contract Management of Non-Management...

82

System design description for SY-101 hydrogen mitigation test project data acquisition and control system (DACS-1)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This document describes the hardware subsystems of the data acquisition and control system (DACS) used in mitigation tests conducted on waste tank SY-101 at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation. The system was designed and implemented by Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) and supplied to Westinghouse Hanford Company (WHC). The mitigation testing uses a pump immersed in the waste tank, directed at certain angles and operated at different speeds and time durations. The SY-101 tank has experienced recurrent periodic gas releases of hydrogen, nitrous oxide, ammonia, and (recently discovered) methane. The hydrogen gas represents a danger, as some of the releases are in amounts above the lower flammability limit (LFL). These large gas releases must be mitigated. Several instruments have been added to the tank to monitor the gas compositions, the tank level, the tank temperature, and other parameters. A mixer pump has been developed to stir the tank waste to cause the gases to be released at a slow rate. It is the function of the DACS to monitor those instruments and to control the mixer pump in a safe manner. During FY93 and FY94 the mixer pump was installed with associated testing operations support equipment and a mitigation test project plan was implemented. These activities successfully demonstrated the mixer pump`s ability to mitigate the SY-101 tank hydrogen gas hazard.

Truitt, R.W. [Westinghouse Hanford Co., Richland, WA (United States); Pounds, T.S.; Smith, S.O. [EG and G Energy Measurements, Inc., Las Vegas, NV (United States)

1994-08-24T23:59:59.000Z

83

Policy Flash 2013-30 Acquisition Letter on Acquisition Planning  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 Acquisition Letter on Acquisition Planning 0 Acquisition Letter on Acquisition Planning Considerations for Management and Operating Contracts Policy Flash 2013-30 Acquisition Letter on Acquisition Planning Considerations for Management and Operating Contracts Attached is Policy Flash 2013-30 Acquisition Letter on Acquisition Planning Considerations for Management and Operating Contracts Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Jason Taylor of the Contract and Financial Assistance Policy Division, Office of Policy, Office of Acquisition and Project Management at (202) 287-1560 or at jason.taylor@hq.doe.gov. Policy Flash_MO Acq Planning AL.pdf AL_ 2013-03 Acq Planning_MO.pdf More Documents & Publications Attachment FY2011-09(3) Policy Flash 2013-78 Acquisition Guide Chapter 7.3 Acquisition Planning in

84

Accuracy assessment of solar system performance projection based on short-term data acquisition as compared to seasonal results from the National Solar Data Network  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Considerable interest has been placed on the assessment of solar thermal performance based on data acquired during short-term monitoring periods of up to two weeks time. This paper utilizes the measured long-term performance data available from the National Solar Data Network (NSDN) to assess the accuracy of projected thermal performance factors which are based on short-term data acquisition. 7 refs.

Kendall, P.W.

1981-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

85

System Design Description for the SY-101 Hydrogen Mitigation Test Project Data Acquisition and Control System (DACS-1)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document describes the hardware and software of the computer subsystems for the Data Acquisition and Control System (DACS) used in mitigation tests conducted on waste tank 241-SY-101 at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation.

ERMI, A.M.

2000-01-24T23:59:59.000Z

86

DOE NEPA Compliance Officers  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

NEPA Compliance Officers are listed first for Program Offices, then Power Marketing Administrations, then Field Offices.

87

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

. NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY Project lnfonnation Project Title: Reclamation of Pits and Boxes Date: Nov. 3, 2010 DOE Code: 6740.010.00000 Contractor Code: 8067-451 Project Lead: Anthony Bowler Project Overview Reclamation of QD.]y the following Pits and Boxes : 1. Brief project description [include 1. B-2-1 0 Skim Box anything that could impact the 2. B-1-14 Skim Box environment 3. Near66-1-STX-14 Pit 2. Legal location 4. T-5-10 Skim Box 3. Duration of the project 5. WDFUpperPit 6. WDFLowerPit 4. Major equipment to be used 7. WDFSkimBox 8. B-1-3 Pit 9. B-1 -3 Skim Box 10. T-2-34 Pit 11 . B-1-10 Pit 12. B-1 -10 Skim Box 13. SE of SG3 & Welding Shop Skim Box 14. 58.Q4-1-SX-3 Skim Box 15. Near Tank 126 Skim Box 16. 77-1-SX-3 NW of Well Pit 17. T-5-3 Pit

88

Computer system design description for SY-101 hydrogen mitigation test project data acquisition and control system (DACS-1). Revision 1  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This document provides descriptions of components and tasks that are involved in the computer system for the data acquisition and control of the mitigation tests conducted on waste tank SY-101 at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation. The system was designed and implemented by Los alamos National Laboratory and supplied to Westinghouse Hanford Company. The computers (both personal computers and specialized data-taking computers) and the software programs of the system will hereafter collectively be referred to as the DACS (Data Acquisition and Control System).

Truitt, R.W. [Westinghouse Hanford Co., Richland, WA (United States)

1994-08-24T23:59:59.000Z

89

7.0 - Integrated Acquisition Planning Process  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 (August 2006) 0 (August 2006) 1 INTEGRATING ACQUISITION PLANNING PROCESSES - AN OVERVIEW REFERENCES 1. FAR Part 7 Acquisition Planning 2. FAR Part 34 Major System Acquisition 3. Acquisition Letter 2005-08R, Small Business Programs 4. Acquisition Guide Chapter 7.1, Acquisition Planning 5. Acquisition Guide Chapter 42.5, Contract Management Planning 6. DOE O 580.1 Department of Energy Property Management Program 7. DOE O 413.3 Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets Guiding Principles n Acquisition planning benefits from integrating independent planning processes and a team approach that includes appropriate representation

90

Environmental Compliance Management System  

SciTech Connect

Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) is developing the Environmental Compliance Management System (ECMS) as a comprehensive, cost-effective tool to ensure (1) that the Laboratory complies with all applicable federal and state environmental laws and regulations, (2) that environmental issues and concerns are recognized and considered in the early phases of projects; and (3) that Laboratory personnel conduct Laboratory operations in the most environmentally acceptable manner. The ECMS is an expert computer system which is designed to allow project engineers to perform an environmental evaluation of their projects. The system includes a Master Program which collects basic project information, provide utility functions, and access the environmental expert modules, environmental expert system modules for each federal and state environmental law which allows the user to obtain specific information on how an individual law may affect his project; and site-specific databases which contain information necessary for effective management of the site under environmental regulations. The ECMS will have the capability to complete and print many of the necessary environmental forms required by federal and state agencies, including the Department of Energy.

Brownson, L.W.; Krsul, T.; Peralta, R.A. [Argonne National Lab., Idaho Falls, ID (United States); Knudson, D.A.; Rosignolo, C.L. [Argonne National Lab., IL (United States)

1992-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

91

Environmental Compliance Management System  

SciTech Connect

Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) is developing the Environmental Compliance Management System (ECMS) as a comprehensive, cost-effective tool to ensure (1) that the Laboratory complies with all applicable federal and state environmental laws and regulations, (2) that environmental issues and concerns are recognized and considered in the early phases of projects; and (3) that Laboratory personnel conduct Laboratory operations in the most environmentally acceptable manner. The ECMS is an expert computer system which is designed to allow project engineers to perform an environmental evaluation of their projects. The system includes a Master Program which collects basic project information, provide utility functions, and access the environmental expert modules, environmental expert system modules for each federal and state environmental law which allows the user to obtain specific information on how an individual law may affect his project; and site-specific databases which contain information necessary for effective management of the site under environmental regulations. The ECMS will have the capability to complete and print many of the necessary environmental forms required by federal and state agencies, including the Department of Energy.

Brownson, L.W.; Krsul, T.; Peralta, R.A. (Argonne National Lab., Idaho Falls, ID (United States)); Knudson, D.A.; Rosignolo, C.L. (Argonne National Lab., IL (United States))

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

92

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY # 350 8 Revised 8/2/10 mjt Attachment 1 Written by Dan Smallwood Production Enhancement Project-5 T-2-34 to T-1-33 MIT all wells in this area to determine which are producing wells. There are 15 wells shut in this area because of no tank or shipping line. According to the old test sheet these wells make 24bbls oil and 120bbls of water. Two of these wells have leaks in the flow lines that will be fixed. One is 33-S-34 which could be run to 34-AX-34, about 400' .6 bbl/pd and the other is 35 shx 34 which could be run to 35-AX-34 which is about 200'.5bbl/pd. 42-AX-34 could be ran to 32-AX-34 and then to 33-SX-34 to 34-AX-34. There are two manifolds at T-2-34, one with 10 wells and the other with 12. None of the flow lines have valves or checks in the lines. I propose we flush, disconnect, and plug all wells that

93

System Design Description for the SY-101 Hydrogen Mitigation Test Project Data Acquisition and Control System (DACS-1)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document describes the hardware and software of the computer subsystems for the Data Acquisition and Control System (DACS) used in mitigation tests conducted on waste tank 241-SY-101 at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, The original system was designed and implemented by LANL, supplied to WHC, and turned over to LMHC for operation. In 1999, the hardware and software were upgraded to provide a state-of-the-art, Year-2000 compliant system.

ERMI, A.M.

1999-08-25T23:59:59.000Z

94

Compliance Order on Consent  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Laws » Laws » Compliance Order on Consent Compliance Order on Consent The Compliance Order on Consent provides the requirements for environmental cleanup of hazardous constituents for LANL. Contact Environmental Communication & Public Involvement P.O. Box 1663 MS M996 Los Alamos, NM 87545 (505) 667-0216 Email What is the Compliance Order on Consent? The Compliance Order on Consent between the State of New Mexico Environment Department and the United States Department of Energy and Los Alamos National Laboratory provides for specified compliance requirements for all of the solid waste management units, areas of concern, canyons, and watershed aggregates included in the Order. Compliance Order on Consent documents LANL documents submitted under the Compliance Order on Consent are

95

Alabama Compliance Implementation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Alabama Alabama Compliance Implementation and Evaluation (CIE) Guide BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM COMPLIANCE IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION (CIE) GUIDE 2 This Guide is designed to assist state and local code jurisdictions in achieving statewide compliance with the 2009 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) for residential buildings and ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2007 for commercial buildings. COMPLIANCE IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION (CIE) GUIDE 3 Alabama WHAT'S INSIDE CIE Guide Overview-Flow Diagram ........................................................................................................................... 5 PART 1: Guide Overview .................................................................................................................................................

96

Acquisition Resources | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Acquisition » Acquisition Acquisition » Acquisition Resources Acquisition Resources Doing Business with DOE/EM Doing Business with DOE/EM EM Procurement Offices Doing Business with EM Consolidated Business Center Guide for Submission of Unsolicated Proposals Federal Business Opportunities Small Business Opportunities EM Major Procurements as of 10/01/13 EM Utility Contracts EM Partnering Initiative: Journey to Excellence Metric No. 3.5 Project Management Resources DOE Office of Environmental Management Project & Contract Management Improvement Timeline Project Management Approach Using Earned Value Management Root Cause Analysis and Corrective Actions Plan DOE Order 413.3B DOE Directives OMB Capital Programming Guide OECM Project Management Career Development Program OECM Project Management Policy and Guidance per Office of Management

97

ACQUISITION LETTER  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy No. 2001-03 Department of Energy No. 2001-03 Acquisition Regulation Date May 25, 2001 ACQUISITION LETTER This Acquisition Letter is issued under the authority of the Procurement Executives of DOE and NNSA. Subject: COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH WHISTLEBLOWER ACTIONS References: DEAR 931.205-47(h) DEAR 952.216-7, Alt II DEAR 970.3102-05-47(h) DEAR 970.5232-2, Payments and Advances When Does this Acquisition Letter Expire? This Acquisition Letter will expire when this guidance is distributed as an Acquisition Guide section or otherwise superseded. Whom Do You Contact for More Information? Contact Terry Sheppard of the Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy at (202) 586-8193 or terry.sheppard@hq.doe.gov Visit our website at www.pr.doe.gov for information on Acquisition Letters and other policy

98

USGS and Engineering and Environmental Division joint compliance monitoring report for Sacramento, CA Municipal Utility District's SMUDGEO No. 1 Geothermal project. Appendix D to final decision  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The laws, ordinances, standards, and conditions for designing, constructing, and operating the power plant and related facilities are referenced. In addition, actions, verifications, submittals, and approvals required by the USGS, BLM, and CEC are specified to assure that the facilities are designed, constructed, and operated in compliance with air and water quality, public health and safety, environmental and such other laws, ordinances, and standards specified. (MHR)

Not Available

1981-03-25T23:59:59.000Z

99

Chapter 34 - Major Systems Acquisition | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

quisitionofMajorSystems0.pdf More Documents & Publications OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides Policy Flash 2013-40 Acquisition Guide Chapter 43.3 - Maintaining Alignment of Project...

100

Acquisition Strategy RM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Acquisition Strategy Review Module Acquisition Strategy Review Module March 2010 CD-0 O 0 OFFICE OF C CD-1 F ENVIRO Standard R Acquisi Rev Critical Decis CD-2 M ONMENTAL Review Plan ition Stra view Module sion (CD) Ap CD March 2010 L MANAGE n (SRP) ategy e pplicability D-3 EMENT CD-4 Post Ope eration Standard Review Plan, 2 nd Edition, March 2010 i FOREWORD The Standard Review Plan (SRP) 1 provides a consistent, predictable corporate review framework to ensure that issues and risks that could challenge the success of Office of Environmental Management (EM) projects are identified early and addressed proactively. The internal EM project review process encompasses key milestones established by DOE O 413.3A, Change 1, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets,

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "acquisition compliance project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Work plan for transition of SY-101 hydrogen mitigation test project data acquisition and control system (DACS-1)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The purpose of this effort is to transfer operating and maintenance responsibility for the 241-SY-101 data acquisition and control system (DACS-1) from Los Alamos National Laboratory to Westinghouse Hanford Company. This work plan defines the tasks required for a successful turnover. It identifies DACS-1 transition, deliverables, responsible organizations and individuals, interfaces, cost, and schedule. The transition plan will discuss all required hardware, software, documentation, maintenance, operations, and training for use at Hanford Waste Tank 241-SY-101. The transfer of responsibilities for DACS-1 to WHC is contingent on final approval of applicable Acceptance for Beneficial Use documentation by Waste Tank Operations. The DACS-1 was designed to provide data monitoring, display, and storage for Tank 241-SY-101. The DACS-1 also provides alarm and control of all the hydrogen mitigation testing systems, as well as ancillary systems and equipment (HVAC, UPS, etc.) required to achieve safe and reliable operation of the testing systems in the tank.

McClees, J.; Truitt, R.W.

1994-10-12T23:59:59.000Z

102

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Project_!.!!formatlon Doll!r Reseed~ ~u.pment and Ol.mp lludts The table below Ia to be completed by the Project Lead and ,.vi-ed by the Envwonmental Spec1ull.r ao\d the DOll NEPA Compliance Officer. NOTE, If Ch *r :,r· ol .ir.Uf · OC" '" , PtOj

103

Environmental Compliance Guide  

SciTech Connect

Volume II supplements Vol. I in providing procedures, relative timing, and details to assist in achieving compliance with Federal environmental requirements. (PSB)

None

1981-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

104

Acquisition Workforce Information | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Certifications and Professional Certifications and Professional Development » Acquisition Workforce Information Acquisition Workforce Information The Department of Energy (DOE) Acquisition Workforce consists of a broad range of professional and technical personnel including: Contract Specialists/Contracting Officers, Contracting Officer's Technical Representatives, Financial Assistance Personnel, Technical Project Officers, Personal Property Managers, Real Estate Contracting Officers, Federal Project Directors/Program Managers, as well as personnel who perform acquisition-related activities and functions within DOE. DOE's goal is to continue to develop and maintain a highly professional, well-trained Acquisition Workforce. DOE requires Acquisition Workforce members to meet a variety of Federal and DOE established certifications

105

Acquisition Guide  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

_____Chapter 15.4-4 (July 2010) _____Chapter 15.4-4 (July 2010) GENERAL GUIDE FOR TECHNICAL ANALYSIS OF COST PROPOSALS FOR ACQUISITION CONTRACTS Acquisition Guide _____________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________Chapter 15.4-4 (July 2010) TABLE OF CONTENT CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION KEY CONCEPTS ........................................................................................1 LIST OF ACRONYMS...............................................................................1 RELATIONSHIP OF TECHNICAL ANALYSIS TO COST ANALYSIS ..................................2 RESPONSIBILITIES IN EVALUATING CONTRACTOR PROPOSALS ..................................2

106

ACQUISITION LETTER  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

No. 2009-04 No. 2009-04 Acquisition Regulation Date 02/12/09 ACQUISITION LETTER This Acquisition Letter is issued under the authority of the DOE and NNSA Procurement Executives. Subject: Management of Excess Weapons Inventories and Selective Sensitive Equipment. References: 41 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 109-1, Department of Energy (DOE) Federal Property Management Regulations 48 CFR 52.245-1, Government Property DOE Guide 580.1-1, DOE Personal Property Management Guide DOE Order 580.1-1, DOE Personal Property Management, Contractor Requirements Document (CRD), Attachment 2, as set forth in the DOE O 580.1 Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation 970.5245-1, Property Federal Acquisition Regulation Part 45, Government Property

107

ACQUISITION PLANNING  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Chapter 7.1 (May 2012 second revision) Chapter 7.1 (May 2012 second revision) 2 ACQUISITION PLANNING REFERENCES 1. FAR 4.803(a)(1) Contents of Contract Files 2. FAR 5.405(a) Exchange of Acquisition Information 3. FAR Part 7 Acquisition Planning 4. FAR Part 8 Required Sources of Supply 5. FAR Part 10 Market Research 6. FAR 11.402 Factors to Consider in Establishing Schedules 7. FAR 15.201(c) Exchanges with Industry Before Receipt of Proposals 8. FAR Subpart 16.1 Selecting Contract Types 9. FAR 16.504(c) Indefinite-Quantity Contracts - Multiple Award Preference 10. FAR 17.5 Interagency Acquisitions 11. FAR Subpart 17.6 Management and Operating Contracts 12. FAR Part 19 Small Business Programs Guiding Principles  Sound acquisition planning ensures that the contracting process is

108

ACQUISITION PLANNING  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

-Chapter 7.1 (May 2012) -Chapter 7.1 (May 2012) 2 ACQUISITION PLANNING REFERENCES 1. FAR 4.803(a)(1) Contents of Contract Files 2. FAR 5.405(a) Exchange of Acquisition Information 3. FAR Part 7 Acquisition Planning 4. FAR Part 8 Required Sources of Supply 5. FAR Part 10 Market Research 6. FAR 11.402 Factors to Consider in Establishing Schedules 7. FAR 15.201(c) Exchanges with Industry Before Receipt of Proposals 8. FAR Subpart 16.1 Selecting Contract Types 9. FAR 16.504(c) Indefinite-Quantity Contracts - Multiple Award Preference 10. FAR 17.5 Interagency Acquisitions 11. FAR Subpart 17.6 Management and Operating Contracts 12. FAR Part 19 Small Business Programs Guiding Principles  Sound acquisition planning ensures that the contracting process is

109

Canister storage building compliance assessment DOE Order 6430.1A, General Design Criteria  

SciTech Connect

This document presents the Project's position on compliance with DOE Order 6430.1A ''General Design Criteria.'' No non-compliances are shown. The compliance statements have been reviewed and approved by DOE. Open items are scheduled to be closed prior to project completion.

BLACK, D.M.

1999-08-12T23:59:59.000Z

110

ACQUISITION PLANNING  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

January 2011) January 2011) 2 ACQUISITION PLANNING REFERENCES 1. FAR 4.803(a)(1) Contents of Contract Files 2. FAR 5.405(a) Exchange of Acquisition Information 3. FAR Part 7 Acquisition Planning 4. FAR Part 8 Required Sources of Supply 5. FAR Part 10 Market Research 6. FAR 11.402 Factors to Consider in Establishing Schedules 7. FAR 15.201(c) Exchanges with Industry Before Receipt of Proposals 8. FAR Subpart 16.1 Selecting Contract Types 9. FAR 16.504(c) Indefinite-Quantity Contracts - Multiple Award Preference 10. FAR Subpart 17.6 Management and Operating Contracts 11. FAR Part 19 Small Business Programs 12. FAR 25.802(a)(2) Other International Agreements and Coordination Guiding Principles  Sound acquisition planning ensures that the contracting process is

111

Acquisition Guide  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3.2 (November 2009) 3.2 (November 2009) PURCHASE ORDERS GUIDING PRINCIPLES J Purchase Orders should normally be issued on a fixed-price basis. J Modifications of Purchase Orders may be used for unpriced orders and for administrative matters on priced orders. J Purchase orders cannot exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. This section discusses the Department of Energy's (DOE) use of purchase orders as described in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 13.302 and the Department of Energy's Acquisition Regulation (DEAR) Section 91 3.304. Only contracting officers acting within the scope of their authority are empowered to execute purchase orders on behalf of DOE. Authority A. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 13.302. B. DEAR 913.307 Background When shouldpurchase orders be used? Due to the administrative cost of preparing and handling

112

ACQUISITION PLANNING  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OCTOBER 2010) OCTOBER 2010) 2 ACQUISITION PLANNING REFERENCES 1. FAR 4.803(a)(1) Contents of Contract Files 2. FAR 5.405(a) Exchange of Acquisition Information 3. FAR Part 7 Acquisition Planning 4. FAR Part 8 Required Sources of Supply 5. FAR Part 10 Market Research 6. FAR 11.402 Factors to Consider in Establishing Schedules 7. FAR 15.201(c) Exchanges with Industry Before Receipt of Proposals 8. FAR Subpart 16.1 Selecting Contract Types 9. FAR 16.504(c) Indefinite-Quantity Contracts - Multiple Award Preference 10. FAR Subpart 17.6 Management and Operating Contracts 11. FAR Part 19 Small Business Programs 12. FAR 25.802(a)(2) Other International Agreements and Coordination Guiding Principles  Sound acquisition planning ensures that the contracting process is

113

ACQUISITION PLANNING  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7.1 (May 2010) 7.1 (May 2010) 1 ACQUISITION PLANNING REFERENCES 1. FAR 4.803(a)(1) Contents of Contract Files 2. FAR 5.405(a) Exchange of Acquisition Information 3. FAR Part 7 Acquisition Planning 4. FAR Part 8 Required Sources of Supply 5. FAR Part 10 Market Research 6. FAR 11.402 Factors to Consider in Establishing Schedules 7. FAR 15.201(c) Exchanges with Industry Before Receipt of Proposals 8. FAR Subpart 16.1 Selecting Contract Types 9. FAR 16.504(c) Indefinite-Quantity Contracts - Multiple Award Preference 10. FAR Subpart 17.6 Management and Operating Contracts 11. FAR Part 19 Small Business Programs 12. FAR 25.802(a)(2) Other International Agreements and Coordination 13. FAR 34.004 Acquisition Strategy Guiding Principles

114

ACQUISITION LETTER  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ACQUISITION LETTER ACQUISITION LETTER AUTHORITY This Acquisition Letter (AL) is issued by the Procurement Executive pursuant to a delegation from the Secretary and under the authority of the Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation (DEAR) subsection 901.301-70. CONTENTS CITATION TITLE DEAR Part 933 Protests, Disputes, and Appeals I. Purpose. This AL establishes policy and provides guidance for the use of alternative dispute resolution techniques in connection with disputes that arise under the Contract Disputes Act (CDA) of 1978, 41 U.S.C. sections 601-613. This AL revision deletes references to "district court" which were incorrectly cited in paragraph four of the Policy section. II. Background. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) refers to a range of procedures

115

Acquisition Guide  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Chapter 15.4-4 (December 2010) Chapter 15.4-4 (December 2010) GENERAL GUIDE FOR TECHNICAL ANALYSIS OF COST PROPOSALS FOR ACQUISITION CONTRACTS Acquisition Guide _____________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________Chapter 15.4-4 (November 2010) TABLE OF CONTENT CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION KEY CONCEPTS ........................................................................................1 LIST OF ACRONYMS...............................................................................1 RELATIONSHIP OF TECHNICAL ANALYSIS TO COST ANALYSIS ..................................2 RESPONSIBILITIES IN EVALUATING CONTRACTOR PROPOSALS ..................................2 CHAPTER 2 - PREPARING TO EVALUATE A PROPOSAL

116

ACQUISITION PLANNING  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

--Chapter 7.1 (JUNE 2010) --Chapter 7.1 (JUNE 2010) 2 ACQUISITION PLANNING REFERENCES 1. FAR 4.803(a)(1) Contents of Contract Files 2. FAR 5.405(a) Exchange of Acquisition Information 3. FAR Part 7 Acquisition Planning 4. FAR Part 8 Required Sources of Supply 5. FAR Part 10 Market Research 6. FAR 11.402 Factors to Consider in Establishing Schedules 7. FAR 15.201(c) Exchanges with Industry Before Receipt of Proposals 8. FAR Subpart 16.1 Selecting Contract Types 9. FAR 16.504(c) Indefinite-Quantity Contracts - Multiple Award Preference 10. FAR Subpart 17.6 Management and Operating Contracts 11. FAR Part 19 Small Business Programs 12. FAR 25.802(a)(2) Other International Agreements and Coordination Guiding Principles

117

ACQUISITION PLANNING  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

PLANNING PLANNING REFERENCES 1. FAR 4.803(a)(1) Contents of Contract Files 2. FAR 5.405(a) Exchange of Acquisition Information 3. FAR Part 6 Competition Requirements 4. FAR Part 7 Acquisition Planning 5. FAR Part 8 Required Sources of Supply 6. FAR Part 9 Contractor Qualifications 7. FAR Part 10 Market Research 8. FAR Part 11 Describing Agency Needs 9. FAR 15.201(c) Exchanges with Industry Before Receipt of Proposals 10. FAR Subpart 16.1 Selecting Contract Types 11. FAR 16.504(c) Indefinite-Quantity Contracts - Multiple Award Preference 12. FAR 17 Special Contracting Methods 13. FAR Part 19 Small Business Programs 14. FAR 25.802(a)(2) Other International Agreements and Coordination 15. FAR 34.004 Acquisition Strategy

118

Acquisition News  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

acquisition-news Office of Environmental Management acquisition-news Office of Environmental Management 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 202-586-7709 en Contract Awarded for Environmental Technical Services http://energy.gov/em/articles/contract-awarded-environmental-technical-services Contract Awarded for Environmental Technical Services

119

II. GENERAL COMPLIANCE SUPPLEMENT INTRODUCTION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Rather than repeat these compliance requirements, audit objectives, and suggested audit procedures for each program, they are provided once in this part. For each program in this Compliance Supplement (this Supplement), the program-specific compliance guidance section (Part III of this guidance) contains additional information about the compliance requirements that arise from laws and regulations applicable to each program, including the requirements specific to each program that should be tested using the guidance in this part. Compliance Requirements, Audit Objectives, and Suggested Audit Procedures At the end of this General Compliance Supplement is a matrix that outlines the compliance requirements, including special tests and provisions, that are applicable to programs performed under

120

Coach Compliance Form  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Coach Compliance Form Coach Compliance Form My team is participating in the Department of Energy's Lithium-Ion Battery Car Competition as part of the National Science Bowl ® . I have reviewed the following documents with the participating students: o Safety Hazards of Batteries o Material Safety Data Sheet - Lithium Polymer Battery o Electric Battery Car Competition Rules ______________________________ ______________ Coach Signature Date Name of School: ____________________________________________ Name of Coach (Please Print): ________________________________ Coach's Email Address: ______________________________________ Please sign this form and either mail, fax or e-mail a pdf to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory: National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "acquisition compliance project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

324 Building Compliance Project: Selection and evaluation of alternatives for the removal of solid remote-handled mixed wastes from the 324 Building  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Six alternatives for the interim storage of remote-handled mixed wastes from the 324 Building on the Hanford Site have been identified and evaluated. The alternatives focus on the interim storage facility and include use of existing facilities in the 200 Area, the construction of new facilities, and the vitrification of the wastes within the 324 Building to remove the majority of the wastes from under RCRA regulations. The six alternatives are summarized in Table S.1, which identifies the primary facilities to be utilized, the anticipated schedule for removal of the wastes, the costs of the transfer from 324 Building to the interim storage facility (including any capital costs), and an initial risk comparison of the alternatives. A recently negotiated Tri-Party Agreement (TPA) change requires the last of the mixed wastes to be removed by May 1999. The ability to use an existing facility reduces the costs since it eliminates the need for new capital construction. The basic regulatory approvals for the storage of mixed wastes are in place for the PUREX facility, but the Form HI permit will need some minor modifications since the 324 Building wastes have some additional characteristic waste codes and the current permit limits storage of wastes to those from the facility itself. Regulatory reviews have indicated that it will be best to use the tunnels to store the wastes. The PUREX alternatives will only provide storage for about 65% of the wastes. This results from the current schedule of the B-Cell Clean Out Project, which projects that dispersible debris will continue to be collected in small quantities until the year 2000. The remaining fraction of the wastes will then be stored in another facility. Central Waste Complex (CWC) is currently proposed for that residual waste storage; however, other options may also be available.

Ross, W.A.; Bierschbach, M.C.; Dukelow, J.S. Jr. [and others

1995-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

122

Acquisition Guide Chapter 42.5  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Chapter 42.5 Chapter 42.5 (February 2012) 1 CONTRACT MANAGEMENT PLANNING Applicability: This section is applicable to the contracting activities of the Department of Energy (DOE). References:  FAR 46.4, "Government Contract Quality Assurance"  FAR 42, Contract Administration and Auditing Services  FAR 43, Contract Modifications  DEAR 970.1100-1, "Performance-based Contracting"  DOE Acquisition Guide, Chapter 7.1, "Acquisition Planning"  DOE Acquisition Guide, Chapter 37, "Service Contracting"  DOE Acquisition Guide Chapter 43.2, "Change Order Template"  DOE O 413.3B, "Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets"

123

2004 WIPP Compliance Recertification Application  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2004 WIPP Compliance Recertification Application DOEWIPP 04-3231 March 2004 Content of the CRA As required by Title 40 CFR, Parts 191 and 194, the 2004 Compliance Recertification...

124

Acquisition Strategy RM | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Acquisition Strategy RM Acquisition Strategy RM Acquisition Strategy RM The Acquisition Strategy (AS) Review Module (RM) is a tool that assists Department of Energy (DOE) federal project review teams in evaluating the adequacy of the AS prior to approval of CD-1. The key elements and Lines of Inquiry's (LOIs) identified in this Module were specifically developed to be generic in nature to ensure that they were applicable to as many DOE projects as possible. Therefore, it is essential that the review team use these key elements and LOIs only as a starting point, and that more detailed project specific elements and LOIs be developed to ensure that the project is adequately evaluated. Acquisition Strategy RM More Documents & Publications Conceptual Safety Design RM Checkout, Testing, and Commissioning Plan RM

125

Acquisition Strategy RM | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Acquisition Strategy RM Acquisition Strategy RM Acquisition Strategy RM The Acquisition Strategy (AS) Review Module (RM) is a tool that assists Department of Energy (DOE) federal project review teams in evaluating the adequacy of the AS prior to approval of CD-1. The key elements and Lines of Inquiry's (LOIs) identified in this Module were specifically developed to be generic in nature to ensure that they were applicable to as many DOE projects as possible. Therefore, it is essential that the review team use these key elements and LOIs only as a starting point, and that more detailed project specific elements and LOIs be developed to ensure that the project is adequately evaluated. Acquisition Strategy RM More Documents & Publications Conceptual Safety Design RM Checkout, Testing, and Commissioning Plan RM

126

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE (EC)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE (EC) OBJECTIVE EC.1: LANL has established and implemented an Environmental Compliance program to ensure safe accomplishment of work and operations within the requirements of the BIO, TSRs, SER, and regulatory permits for WCRR Facility activities. Sufficient numbers of qualified personnel, as well as adequate facilities and equipment, are available to support WCRRF operations. (CRs 1, 4, 6, 7, 9) CRITERIA 1. WCRRF has implemented the requirements for hazardous materials and waste management programs, as described in the WCRRF BIO and TSRs (WCRRF TSRs 5.6.9 and 5.10.2). 2. Environmental permits required for WCRR operations have been met. Processes are in place to ensure that these requirements are maintained. Environmental regulations include Resource

127

Residential Building Code Compliance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6 6 Residential Building Code Compliance: Recent Findings and Implications Energy use in residential buildings in the U.S. is significant-about 20% of primary energy use. While several approaches reduce energy use such as appliance standards and utility programs, enforcing state building energy codes is one of the most promising. However, one of the challenges is to understand the rate of compliance within the building community. Utility companies typically use these codes as the baseline for providing incentives to builders participating in utility-sponsored residential new construction (RNC) programs. However, because builders may construct homes that fail to meet energy codes, energy use in the actual baseline is higher than would be expected if all buildings complied with the code. Also,

128

Checking Security Policy Compliance  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Ensuring compliance of organizations to federal regulations is a growing concern. This paper presents a framework and methods to verify whether an implemented low-level security policy is compliant to a high-level security policy. Our compliance checking framework is based on organizational and security metadata to support refinement of high-level concepts to implementation specific instances. Our work uses the results of refinement calculus to express valid refinement patterns and their properties. Intuitively, a low-level security policy is compliant to a high-level security policy if there is a valid refinement path from the high-level security policy to the low-level security policy. Our model is capable of detecting violations of security policies, failures to meet obligations, and capability and modal conflicts.

Gowadia, Vaibhav; Kudo, Michiharu

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

129

17.3 - Acquisition, Use and Disposal of Real Property  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of Real Estate References DEAR 917.74 - Acquisition, Use, and Disposal of Real Estate DOE Directives DOE Order 413.3B, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of...

130

Microsoft Word - FedComplianceCritChecklist.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Balanced Scorecard Balanced Scorecard Federal Compliance Review Criteria Acquisition & Financial Assistance Self-Assessment Checklist Revised: May 2008 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Contract Management Office of Procurement & Assistance Management INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE OF THE CHECKLIST The Procurement Executive of the Department of Energy (DOE) is responsible for establishing an effective acquisition and financial assistance management system which ensures that quality goods and services are obtained at reasonable prices, in a timely fashion, and in accordance with the statutory and regulatory requirements and the programmatic needs of the agency. To assist in the accomplishment of this responsibility, the Procurement Executive has established the

131

Office of Acquisition Management (OAM) | National Nuclear Security  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of Acquisition Management (OAM) | National Nuclear Security of Acquisition Management (OAM) | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Office of Acquisition Management (OAM) Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Office of Acquisition Management (OAM) Office of Acquisition Management (OAM) Office of Acquisition Management (OAM)

132

Office of Acquisition Management (OAM) | National Nuclear Security  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

of Acquisition Management (OAM) | National Nuclear Security of Acquisition Management (OAM) | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Office of Acquisition Management (OAM) Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > Office of Acquisition Management (OAM) Office of Acquisition Management (OAM) Office of Acquisition Management (OAM)

133

Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program 2007 Report  

SciTech Connect

In accordance with U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Order 450.1, 'Environmental Protection Program', the Office of the Assistant Manager for Environmental Management of the DOE, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) requires ecological monitoring and biological compliance support for activities and programs conducted at the Nevada Test Site (NTS). National Security Technologies, LLC (NSTec), Ecological Services has implemented the Ecological Monitoring and Compliance (EMAC) Program to provide this support. EMAC is designed to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations, delineate and define NTS ecosystems, and provide ecological information that can be used to predict and evaluate the potential impacts of proposed projects and programs on those ecosystems. This report summarizes the EMAC activities conducted by NSTec during calendar year 2007. Monitoring tasks during 2007 included eight program areas: (a) biological surveys, (b) desert tortoise compliance, (c) ecosystem mapping and data management, (d) sensitive plant monitoring, (e) sensitive and protected/regulated animal monitoring, (f) habitat monitoring, (g) habitat restoration monitoring, and (h) biological monitoring at the Nonproliferation Test and Evaluation Complex (NPTEC). The following sections of this report describe work performed under these eight areas.

Dennis Hansen, David Anderson, Derek Hall, Paul Greger, W. Kent Ostler

2008-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

134

Learning & Development Policy/Compliance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Learning & Development Policy/Compliance Learning & Development Policy/Compliance Learning & Development Policy/Compliance Searching for information on Department and Federal training policy and guidelines? The following websites can be of help: DOE Learning & Development Training Policies and Guidelines On the DOE Directives page you will find the following information: DOE O360.1b Federal Employee Training Order DOE M360.1-1B Federal Employee Training Manual DOE O361.1B Acquisition Career Management Program Office of Personnel Management Federal Government Training Policies and Guidelines Training and Development Policy Training Policy Handbook Training, however, is a program, not just a set of authorities, and works within a context that includes Federal procurement authorities, personnel

135

Scaling Restoration Projects for 316(b) Compliance  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report examines fish stocking as a restoration approach for offsetting impingement mortality and entrainment at power plant cooling water intake structures. It will provide information to industry, resource agencies, and non-governmental organizations involved in the 316(b) regulatory process.

2006-07-11T23:59:59.000Z

136

Compliance Certification Application  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

40 CFR Part 191 40 CFR Part 191 Compliance Certification Application for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Appendix PIC United States Department of Energy Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Carlsbad Area Office Carlsbad, New Mexico Passive Institutional Controls Conceptual Design Report PASSIVE INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT REVISION 0 MAY 14, 1996 1 C PASSIVE INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS DESIGN REPORT REVISION 0 PASSIVE INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT MAY 1 4 . 1 9 9 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 A . Purpose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 B . Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 C . Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 I1 . SITE DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 I11 . DESIGN REQUIREMENTS/CRITERIA . . . . . . . . . . 17 IV . MESSAGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

137

Christina Bigelow Compliance Counsel  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Christina Bigelow Christina Bigelow Compliance Counsel Direct Dial: 317-249-5132 E-mail: cbigelow@misoenergy.org November 6, 2013 Mr. Stan Kaplan Mr. William Booth U.S. Energy Information Administration 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 VIA EMAIL RE: Form EIA-930 Hourly and Daily Balancing Authority Operations Report Revisions Dear Mssrs. Booth and Kaplan: On behalf of the Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc 1 . ("MISO"), I want to extend our appreciation for your time and consideration of the input of the Independent System Operators and Regional Transmission Organizations ("ISOs/RTOs") regarding the proposal to collect additional Balancing Authority ("BA") operations information from all "Balancing

138

Acquisition Certifications Program Handbook  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Department of Energy (DOE) Acquisition Career Management Program (ACMP) was established to provide a formal, structured approach to certification of DOEs acquisition workforce.

139

Compliance Evaluation | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

as the Saltstone PA, is acceptable. Compliance Evaluation More Documents & Publications DOE Order 435.1 Performance Assessment Savannah River Site 2009 Performance Assessment for...

140

Motor Vehicle Parts Compliance Requirements  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... The OVSC compliance testing program is a strong incentive for manufacturers of motor vehicles and items of motor vehicle equipment to ...

2012-09-24T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "acquisition compliance project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

FAQS Reference Guide Environmental Compliance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This reference guide addresses the competency statements in the June 2011 edition of DOE-STD-1156-2011, Environmental Compliance Functional Area Qualification Standard.

142

(SSS)Project Dashboard 2013-07-25.xlsx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7252013 Office of Management Office of Acquisition and Project Management Program Contractor Project Number Project Title Original Project Budget Project Budget Monthly Overall...

143

Environmental Compliance 2-1 2. Environmental Compliance  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

operate under leasing arrangements at the ETTP under the DOE Rein- dustrialization Program. LesseesEnvironmental Compliance 2-1 2. Environmental Compliance It is DOE-ORO and National Nuclear, executive orders, DOE orders (as incorporated into the op- erating contracts), and best management practices

Pennycook, Steve

144

Environmental Compliance 2-1 2. Environmental Compliance  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

at the ETTP under the DOE Rein- dustrialization Program. Lessees are accountable for complying with all facilities at the ETTP site have been leased to private entities over the past several years through the DOEEnvironmental Compliance 2-1 2. Environmental Compliance It is DOE-ORO and NNSA policy to conduct

Pennycook, Steve

145

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Project Information Project Title: Restoration "F T-3-3 Date: 1212/2009 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Jeff Jones Project Overview 1. What are the environmental The environmental impacts will be minimal since this is already disturbed land. The legal is T-3-3. We will be impacts? digging down 5ft. and cutting off pipe and capping them. We will then blade the area and till it The 2. What is the legal location? equipment to used is as follows: backhoe, blade, cutting torch,and a tiller. The duration of this project will be approx. 2 days. 3. What is the duration of the project? 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig, drilling rig, etc.)? The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Speciali.st and the DOE NEPA

146

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

-$ )_Jp ~ R -$ )_Jp ~ R tW" I Project lnfonnation Project Title: New Drilling Location in Section 29 Date: 12-10-2009 DOE Code: 6730.020.78002 Contractor Code: 8067-371 Project Lead: Mar1< Duletsky Project Overview The project will involve excavating ~ backhoe pits to a depth of about 8 feet to observe soil characteristics 1. What are the environmental impacts? in the vicinity of our planned reserve pit excavation area. 2. What is the legal location? NE 1/4, SE 1/4, Sec. 29, T39N, R78W, Natrona County, Wyoming 3. What is the duration of the project? 4. What major equipment will be used 1 day if any (worn over rig, drilling rig, etc.)? Backhoe The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the E. nvironmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA

147

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 Project lnfonnation Project Title: Geothennal Technologies Program Date: 12-11-09 DOE Code: 6730.020.61041 Contractor Code: Project Lead: Lyle Johnson Project Overview This NEPA is for the laying of a 350 foot. 8" welded plastic water line from the lower cooling pond at the 1. What are the environmental Tensleep battery to a location between the 5,000 bbl tank and the top pond at the Tensleep battery. The impacts? entire project area is within Section 10 T39N R78VV (map attached) and will not impact any wet land areas. 2. What is the legal location? The project will include the clearing of sparse vegetation from a 12 foot wide construction corridor along the 3. What is the duration of the project? route, digging a 5 foot deep trench. welding and placing the plastic line and covering and compacting the

148

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 Project lnfonnation Project Title: Openhole Logging Well Date: 2-8-2010 DOE Code: 6730-020-51135 Contractor Code: TBD Project Lead: Brian Black Project Overview This project will use the drilling rig and associated equipment to drill a well to 5400 feet that will be 1. What are the environmental impacts? designated for Openhole logging. The environmental impads include possible spills on location of drilling fluids or downhole fluids, minor excavation may be necessary in a pre-existing lined pit, and some earthwork to prepare the location for the drilling rig. 2. What is the legal location? This project will take place on the 61-2-TpX-10 well location (189' FNL, 1895' FEL Section 15,TWP38N, RNG78W). 3. What is the duration of the projed? This project is expected have a duration of 4 weeks (2 weeks of moving the rig, and 2 weeks of drilling,

149

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

od~ od~ Project Information Project Title: South Composting Facility Pit Date: 1/10/2011 DOE Code: 6730.020.0000 Contractor Code: 8067-788 Project Lead: Tony Bowler Project Overview The purpose of the project is to build a working reserve pit for storage of produced fluids during RMOTC reclamation work. The pit will be approximately 30' wide by 1 00' long by 12' deep. The pit will be lined with 1. Brief project description [include 20 mil polyprolene and bermed to allow 2' of freeboard to address the potential for offsite migration. The pit anything that could impact the will be covered with Nylon mesh to prevent wildlife incursion. A perimeter fence and a locking gate will be environment) installed to deter wildlife and unauthorized human access. The project will involve removing 6" -8" of top soil

150

DOE standard compliance demonstration program: An office building example  

SciTech Connect

The US Department of Energy (DOE) issued interim new building energy standards (10 CFR 435 1989) to achieve maximum energy efficiency in the designs of new buildings. DOE then entered into a project to demonstrate and assess the impact of these standards on the design community. One area of focus was a test to see how a less conventional design-focused building would meet the standards` requirements -- DOE wanted to demonstrate that compliance with energy standards does not mean compromising the architectural intent of a building. This study, which was initiated at Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL), illustrated the process by which compliance with the standards can be proven for a highly {open_quotes}design-oriented{close_quotes} office building. The study also assessed the impact of the whole building simulation compliance alternatives on design. This report documents the compliance requirements, gives a description of the sample building chosen for the study, provides general guidance for the compliance process, documents the method of compliance that was undertaken for the sample building, presents the results of the study, and provides a recommendation on how the compliance requirements could be improved to reflect more realistic use types.

Bailey, S.A.; Keller, J.M.; Wrench, L.E.; Williams, C.J.

1993-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

151

Acquisition Plan Strategy and Guidance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 01 ACQUISITION PLAN STRATEGY AND GUIDANCE NOTE: The process provided below is not intended to replace an agency's acquisition planning requirements. INSTRUCTIONS 1. Work with your DOE Federal Finance Specialist to determine whether a "pay from savings" project is feasible. a. Determine if appropriated dollars are available to offset some of the costs. b. Consider alternative finance options: Energy Savings Performance Contract (ESPC), Utility Energy Service Contract (UESC), Power Purchase Agreement (PPA), or Enhanced Use Lease (EUL) Scott Wolf 6848 Cooper Point Road NW Olympia, WA 98502 Phone: 360-866-9163 Fax: 360-866-9683 scott.wolf@ee.doe.gov Serving Montana, Wyoming, Utah, Colorado, Nebraska, New Mexico,

152

Fleet Compliance Results for MY 2010/FY 2011, EPAct Alternative Fuel Transportation Program: State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleet Compliance Annual Report (Brochure)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This annual report summarizes the compliance results of state and alternative fuel provider fleets covered by the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPAct) for model year 2010/fiscal year 2011. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) regulates covered state and alternative fuel provider (SFP) fleets under the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPAct), as amended. For model year (MY) 2010, the compliance rate for the 2911 covered SFP fleets was 100%. Fleets used either Standard Compliance or Alternative Compliance. The 279 fleets that used Standard Compliance exceeded their aggregate MY 2010 acquisition requirements by 61%. The 12 covered fleets that complied using Alternative Compliance exceeded their aggregate MY 2010 petroleum-use-reduction requirements by 89%. Overall, DOE saw modest decreases from MY 2009 in biodiesel fuel use credits earned and in the number of light-duty vehicles (LDVs) acquired. Compared to years before MY 2009, these rates were far lower. Because covered fleets acquired fewer new vehicles overall in MY 2010, the requirement for alternative fuel vehicles (AFVs), which is proportional to new acquisitions, also dropped.

Not Available

2012-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

153

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

28 28 Project Information Project Title: New B-1-3 Pit and Box Construction Date: 51 2612011 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Maintenance Department Project Overview This is a project for the construction of a new pit and box at the B-1-3 facility. Topsoil will be removed from 1. Brief project description [include the specified area and placed in a pile off to the side of the construction area. The pile will be identified as anything that could impact the topsoil, using a sign. After the topsoil has been removed the new pit and box will be dug out. Cement environment] retaining walls and a floor will be poured for the box. The new pit will be lined with 12 mm thickness pit liner The area around the new pit and box will be fenced to prevent animals and people from entering the area.

154

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

~ ~ ' Project Information Project Title: Restoration of 51-63-SX-1 0 Date: 12/28/2009 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Jeff Jones Project Overview 1. What are the environmental impacts? The Location of this project is 51-63-SX-1 0. The duration is going to be approx. 3-days. Before we do 2. What is the legal location? any digging and welding we will be flushing the flowline . We will be digging down approx. 5ft. cutting the wellhead off and welding a legal plate to it. We will then do the same with the flowline. Once this is done 3. What is the duration of the project? we will be tilling and seeding location with native grasses. The machinery to be used is as follows: 4. What major equipment will be used if backhoe, Blade, Welder, Ford tractor, Seeder.

155

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 Project Information Project Title: Repair flowline at 83-AX-4 Date: 2-17-2010 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Bernard Winfrey Project Overview 1. What are the environmental Repair a flowline leak and test the line at 83-AX-4. Dug up pipeline, will backfill with clean fi ll dirt. Oil impacts? contaminated soil will be hauled to the east side landfarm and clean dirt will be brought in from section 20. 2. What is the legal location? 83-AX-4, N43 17'40.5" w. 10612'46.0" 3. What is the duration of the project? Approximately 2 days 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig, drilling rig, Backhoe with operator and one to three workers. etc.)? The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA

156

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 8 Project lnfonnation Project Title : NODA 1. Planned repair of flow lines Dat e : 8/41201 DOE Code : Contrac t o r Code: Project Lead: Michael J. Taylor [NCO] Project Ov erview NODA 1. Planned repair of flow lines : CX 8 5.4 1. Bnef project description [include anything that could impact the Note : For all 85.4 : Repair of pipeline sections falls under USACE environmenl] Nationwide Permit Number 12, Utility Line Activity. Non-emergency repairs that do NOT include reportable releases I spills. NOD required to ensure activities remain within existing right-of-ways (25' from centerline] and to determine if further analysis may be needed. The table below is to be completed by the Project Lea d a nd review ed by the Environmental Specialist a nd the DOE NEPA

157

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

;l,[p~ ;l,[p~ Project Information Project Title: Restoration of 54-TPX-1 0 Date: DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Jeff Jones Project Overview 1. What are the environmental We will be restoring 54-TPX-10. The work to be done will be to dig 5ft below surface cut casing and impacts? install a marker. We will do the same with the flowline. Any contaminated soil will be replaced with clean fill dirt. The contaminated soil will be transferrred to the lanclfarm. The base will be moved to section 14. 2. What is the legal location? We will then blade, till and reseed with native grasses. The equipment to be used will be as follows: 3. What is the duration of the project? Backhoe, Blade, Shovels, Torch, Welder, And Tiller. This project will also require a hotwork permit for the

158

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

:;J/7 :;J/7 Project Information Project Title: B-1-3 Heat Trace Date: 10/14/09 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Mike Preston Project Overview Routine maintenance activities for the buildings at B-1-3 using existing electrical rights-of-way, to repair and replace electrical lines from the electrical box to the existing buildings. This is a routine 1. What are the environmental Maintenance activities, to preserve the electrical function in the buildings at B-1-3. impacts? 2. What is the legal location? 1 Day 3. What is the duration of the project? 4. What major equipment will be used Ditch witch I Backhoe if any (work over rig, drilling rig, etc.)? The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA

159

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 Project Information Project Title: e-EA 1. Maintaining and Replacing Infrastructure Date: 6/6/2011 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Michael J. Taylor [NCO] Project Overview e-EA 1. Maintaining and Replacing Infrastructure: 1. Brief project description [include Approved in the October 2008 Sitewide Environmental Assessment (SWEA) anything that could impact the [Section 3.1.1, Page 11 , Line 3] and Finding of No Significant Impact environment] (FONSI ). ex 81.22 and ex 85.2 2. Legal location 3. Duration of the project To include moving I minor upgrading I installing buildings, storage tanks, 4. Major equipment to be used pumps, pumping units, etc. Contact Technical Assurance to include tank moves in the Spill Prevention Countermeasures and Control (SPCC) Plan.

160

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 Project lnfonnat ion Project Title: Geothermal Technologies Program - ORMAT Generator Date: 10-22-09 DOE Code: 6730.020.61041 Contractor Code: 8067-731 Project Lead: Lyle Johnson Project Overview 1. What are the environmental This NEPA is for the existing ORMAT geothermal processing unit that was used for testing during CRADA impacts? No 2007-083. The Original project consisted of the installation and 1 year testing of the binary geothermal power unit at the Tensleep battery using the hot produced water source as the heat medium. The unit is 2. What is the legal location? connected to the field electrical system for dissipation of the produced energy that is metered and monitored 3. What is the duration of the project? for reliability and quality. It is planned for the unit to remain in place so that an additional approximately 2.5

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "acquisition compliance project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Project lnfonnation Project Title: C-EA 3. Dirt work in the specified areas that have been previously and substantially disturbed Date: 617/2011 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Michael J. Taylor [NCO] Project Overview 1 . Brief project description [include anything that could impact the environment] 2. Legallocation 3. Duration of the project 4. Major equipment to be used C-EA 3. Dirt work in the specified areas that have been previously and substantially disturbed: ex 81.3 Includes previously-bladed areas immediately within "only" the following facilities as defined by the May 2010 Aerial Photos: B-1-3 B-1-1 0 B-2-10 T-1-11 B-1-20 T-2-34 T-5-3 South Terminal Car Wash (SG2) SG4 ESS&H Bldg. Lower Production Office and Shop Bldg

162

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

67 67 Project lnfonnation Project Title: Restoration of 63-S-11 Date: 1212112009 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Jeff Jones Project Overview The environmental impacts will be minimal since this is an already disturbed area. The loc. is 63-S-11 . The 1. What are the environmental impacts? duration of this project will be approx. 4 days. We will flush the flowline and cut it off below surface and cap it. We will also do the same with the wellhead and then weld a location marker on it. The final stage will be to Ull 2. What is the legal location? and seed with native foilage.The equipment to be used is as follows backhoe, Blade, Welder. tiller. and 3. What is the duration of the project? seeder. 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig, drilling rig,

163

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Project lnfonnation Project Title: Glori Oil-Biotechnology EOR Date: 2-4-10 DOE Code: 6730-020-51132 Contrac tor Code: 8067-757 Project Lead: Mark Duletsky Project Overview This is a proposal to place a water line from the water haul tank to 21-1 6-sx-2. The waterline will be buried 1. What are the environmental impacts? following an existing right of way to the road and then tum and be place in the roadway to the 21 16 sx-2 location. 2. What is the legal location? 3. What is the duration of the project? There will be a minor amount of surface disturbance involed in the project during trenching operations for the 4. What major equipment will be used pipeline. The area will be reclaimed after the pipeline is completed. if any (work over rig, drilling rig,

164

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

lnfonnat lnfonnat lon Project Title: Geothennal Technologies Program I Date : II0/20/09 DOE Code: 6730.020.61 041 I Contractor Code: lso67-73t Project Lead: Lyle Johnson TillS NEPA is for the laying of a 2.975 foot. 8" welded plastic wata ltnc from Lillie Teall<'!(~ Project Overview 1. 'Mlat are the environmental ncar in the Intersection with Teapot Creek to the North Waterllood Facility (NW F) building. The impacts? entire project area is within Section 21 T39N R 78W (map attached) and will not impact any wet 2. 'Mlat is the legal location? land areas but will cross one in tcnnittcnt stream. The stream is presently dry. The project will 3. 'Mlat is the duration of the project? include the clearing of vegetation from a 12 foot wide construction corridor along the route, digging

165

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Project Information Project Title: Restoration ofT -6-3 Date: 11/10/2009 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Proje ct Le ad: Jeff Jones Project Overview The environmental impact will be minimal. The location is T -6-3. The duration of this project is approx. two 1. What are the environmental impacts? weeks. We will be removing the treater and building. Taking the building to 25X14. Taking the treater to the scrap yard to cut up for scrap.Aiso we will remove the manifold building and take that to 25X14 also. The 2. What is the legal location? piping that goes along with this will be flushed and capped.Then we will blade and level location till and 3. What is the duration of the project? seed with native species of plants and grasses. The equipment used in this project will be as follows:

166

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

D D Project lnfonnation Project Title: Emergency flowline repair 78-sx-34 & 68-66-sx-34 Date: 12-29-09 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: RickM. Project Overview We dug up the line where the oil was coming out of the ground and had to put 2 clamps on to seal the leak. 1. What are the environmental impacts? The contaminated dirt was hauled to the land farm and after the line was tested we backfilled the hole. this job took 5 hrs. to complete and required a backhoe and two hands. this leak was 100 yards south of well No. 2. What is the legal location? 68-66-sx-34. 3. What is the duration of the project? 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig, drilling rig, etc.)? The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA

167

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

rr rr ;J. 95 Project lnfonnation Project Title: Well Coring-Schlumberger Carbon Services Date: 3/18/10 DOE Code: 6730.020.81016 Contractor Code: 8067-708 Project Lead: Vicki Stamp Project Overview 1 What are the environmental Description: We will use a combination of commercial wellbore logging and coring impacts? tools to analyze two existing RMOTC wells. Overview: 1. Environmental impacts are 2. What is the legal location? minimal. This is routine downhole well work . 2. Wells 43-TPX-10 and 46-TPX-10 3. What is the duration of the project? have been selected . 3. Anticipate approximately 1 month for well preparation and 4. What major equipment will be used project execution. 4. Workover rig , boom truck , pressure truck , dozer/grader and if any (work over rig

168

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 Project lnfonnation Project Title: Restoration 72-12-SX-1 0 Date: 2/26/2010 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Jeff Jones Project Overview We will be restoring 71-12-SX1 0. This will include digging 5ft down and cutting well head off and placing 1. What are the environmental impacts? OHM. We will haul contaminated soils to the Eastside landfarm and record in log book. We will replace all dirt hauled off with clean fill from sec.20. 2. What is the legal location? 71-12 SX10 3. What is the duration of the project? Approximately 3-4 days 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig , drilling rig , Backhoe with operator, welder, tiller and one worker. etc.)? The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA

169

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 'f>lf,M/9-~ ~of- Project lnfq,gnation Project Title: WhisperGenARelocation from 58-MX-10 ~o 65-S-10 ·~ I Date: 3/16/2010 DOE Code: -#Z'l?. Contractor Code: Project Lead: Everett Walker /41f-t#J ST _,J.tl Project Overview The Environmental Specialist and the Field Coordinator visited location and discussed the plan to remove 1. What are the environmental impacts? the WhisperGen unit, concrete pad, gas supply umbilical, and power conduit from the current location and move to higher visibility area with dry gas supply to supply power to 65-S-1 0. an existing well. There were 2 previous NEPAs # 211 on 5/27/09 and #240 on 10/01/09 2. What is the legal location? 58-MX-10 3. What is the duration of the project? Construction Two days/ Project Duration 6 months

170

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Project Information Project Title: C-EA 2. Work on existing well location (within 125' Date: 6/6/2011 from well bore) DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Michael J. Taylor [NCO] Project Overview C-EA 2. Work on existing well location (within 125' from well bore): 1. Brief project description [include P&A of wells was approved in the October 2008 Sitewide Environmental anything that could impact the Assessment (SWEA) [Section 3.1 .1 , Page 11 , Line 1 ]and Finding of No environment] 2. Legal location Significant Impact (FONSI). CX 85.12 3. Duration of the project Includes well workovers, P&A of wells, and associated dirt work, to include 4. Major equipment to be used repair of anchors I piping I flowlines and construction of temporary workover

171

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 Project lnfonnation Project Title: EOR Steam Generator Date: 3-28-2011 DOE Code: 6730-020-51145 Contractor Code: 8067-797 Project Lead: Mark Duletsky Project Overview 1. Brief project description [indude The project will involve pulling and re-running the existing production equipment on up to 4 wells in the field. anything that could impact the When the equipment is re-run into the well, it will have 1.66" steel tubing banded onto it that will transmit environment] heated, very humid, air downhole. The heated, humid, air will be produced using Madison water from the field. The third party contractor equipment contains a Reverse Osmosis water filter system. The system will use approximately 11 gallons of water per day. A 300 to 500 gallon plastic water storage tank will be

172

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lf~ Lf~ Project Information Project Title: B-1-28 Test site reclamation . Date: 11-12-09 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Rick Mclaughllin Project Overview 1. What are the environmental We will Dig up and cap or remove all the old shipping lines that are present. Then backfill and dean up the impacts? immediate area around the old test site. When it is all cleaned up we will seed the location. No building will be moved. Impact to the environment should be very slight, as all lines present are not in use. Any oil that 2. What is the legal location? might be present will be vac trucked out of the pipes. The site is located at N43 19.182 W196 13.158. 3. What is the duration of the project? The total time of this project should take apx. 4 days to complete. And will require the use of a backhoe,

173

Evaluation of Resource Acquisition Approaches : Final Report.  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Over the last few years, Bonneville has been addressing this need and has developed numerous ways of acquiring resources. Four of these Approaches, the Competitive Acquisition, Billing Credits, and Targeted Acquisition Programs, and the Cowlitz Falls Hydroelectric Project, were the subject of this evaluation project. Each Approach is currently in different stages of a process, and Bonneville felt it was an appropriate time that an evaluation be conducted. The purpose of this evaluation is to analyze the various Approaches` processes, to learn what`s working and what`s not, and to offer recommendations as to how Bonneville might improve their resources acquisition efforts. The evaluation was conducted with no preconceived biases.

O`Neill, Maura L.; Mortimer, Tom; Palermini, Debbi; Nelson, Kari

1991-09-12T23:59:59.000Z

174

Acquisition News | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Acquisition News Acquisition News Acquisition News RSS April 29, 2011 DOE Awards Contract for Decontamination & Decommissioning Project for the East Tennessee Technology Park Oak Ridge, Tenn. - As part of its ongoing commitment to cleaning up the legacy of the Cold War at sites across the weapons complex, the U.S. Department of Energy has awarded a contract for the remaining environmental cleanup at the East Tennessee Technology Park (ETTP) to URS | CH2M Oak Ridge, LLC. previous 1 2 next Waste Management Nuclear Materials & Waste Tank Waste and Waste Processing Waste Disposition Packaging and Transportation Site & Facility Restoration Deactivation & Decommissioning (D&D) Facility Engineering Soil & Groundwater Sustainability Program Management Safety Security Quality Assurance

175

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 8 Project lnfonnation Project Title: Restoration of 62-42 SX 10 DOE Code: Project Lead: Jeff Jones Project Overview We will be restoring this location 62-42 SX-1 0. What are the environmental Date: 2/25/2010 Contractor Code: impacts? We will be removing all oil contaminated soil from location to the landfarm and recording it in the book. W e 2. What is the legal location? will then back fill with clean fill dirt from sec.20. We will remove well head and place a dry hole marker. 3. What is the duration of the project? Flush flowline and remove it. Then we will till the location and plant with native grasses. 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig, drilling rig , 3-4 days etc.)? The equipment to be used will be a backhoe, tiller, dumptruck, and welder.

176

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 Project lnfonnation Project Title: C-EA 7. Cleanup of "non-reportable" spills of crude Date: 8/4/2011 oil &/or produced water DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Michael J. Taylor [NCO] Project Overview C-EA 7. Cleanup of "non-reportable" spills of crude oil &/or produced 1. Brief project description [include water : ex 85.4 and ex 85.6 anything that could impact the environment] Note : For all 85.4 : Repair of pipeline sections falls under USACE Nationwide Perm it Number 12, Utility Line Activity. For RMOTC's NEPA purposes, non-reportable spills of crude oil &/or produced water are less than one barrel that is NOT environmentally significant. Events that are environmentally significant include those that

177

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 Project Informat ion Project Title: Date: 10-26-2009 DOE Code: Contractor Code : 8067.742 Project Lead: Mike Curtis Project Overview To stimulate the Shannon Reservoir using a down-hole seismic source set in well 68-68-Sx-11 . The source 1. What are the environmental will be powered by a self-contained. electric driven. surface, hydraulic unit Production data will be logged at the 8 surrounding wells. impacts? 2. What is the legal location? Environmental Impact - There will be no environmental impact on the surface or subsurface. 3. What is the duration of the project? Location- Tool will be installed in 68-68-Sx-1 1. Production will be logged at the 8 surrounding production wells 4. What major equipment will be used Duration - 3 months if any (wori< over rig. drilling rig.

178

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 Project Information Project Title: Restoration of 73 SX 1 OH DOE Code: Project Lead: Jeff Jones Project Overview We will be restoring this location 73 SX 10H. What are the environmental Date: 3/3/2010 Contractor Code: impacts? We will be removing all oil contaminated soil from location to the landfarm and recording it in the book. We 2. What is the legal location? will then back fill with clean fill dirt from sec.20. We will remove well head and place a dry hole marker. 3. What is the duration of the project? Flush flowline and remove it.Then we will till the location and plant with native grasses. 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig , drilling rig, 3-4 days etc.)? The equipment to be used will be a backhoe, tiller, dumptruck, and welder.

179

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

283 283 Project Information Project Title: Restoration of61 -36-SX-10 DOE Code: Project Lead: Jeff Jones Project Ove rview We will be restoring this location 61 -36-SX-10. What are the environmental Da te: 2-9-2010 Cont rac tor Code: impacts? We will be removing all oil contaminated soil from location to the landfarm and recording it in the book. We 2. What is the legal location? will then back fill with clean fill dirt from sec.20. We will remove well head and place a dry hole marlproject? Flush flowline and remove it. Then we will till the location and plant with native grasses. 4. What major equipment will be used if any (worl< over rig, drilling rig, 3-4 days etc.)? The equipment to be used will be a backhoe, tiller, dumptruck. and welder.

180

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 Project Information Project Title: Colvert replacement near 81-66-sx-15 Date: 10-19-09 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Bone -Wes Reisland Project Overview 1. What are the environmental We have a drainage problem with this colvert near 81-66-SX15 , and have tried to blast it out with a water impacts? from a fire hose to no avail. We think that it is colapsed in the middle. The environmental impact should be very small from digging the colvert out and replacing it. The job should take no longer than one day and will 2. What is the legal location? require two men a backhoe and picker truck to complete. The colvert will be replaced. Any contaminated 3. What is the duration of the project? soils will be replaced with fresh soil. The area for equipment will be restricted to the road and the imediant

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "acquisition compliance project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Binary Power Unit Test Binary Power Unit Test Date: 3-29-2010 DOE Code: 6730.020.61045 Contractor Code: 8067-768 Project Lead: Lyle Johnson Project Overview 1 What are the environmental The purpose of the project is to do confirmation testing of the binary power unit at several different impacts? temperatures and rates. This test will be conducted in a location covered in the Site Wide EA It will uses infrastructure installed for another project consisting of a hot-water source and a cooling water source. The 2. What is the legal location? hot water is from well 17 -WX-21 , a Madison well adjacent to the siting location. The cooling water will be 3. What is the duration of the project? pumped from Little Teapot Creek through an existing line and then returned to Teapot Creek. There should

182

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 Project lnfonnation Project ntle: TerrVlci RSS Ill Dat e: 11-18-09 DOE Code: 6730.020.71088 Contractor Code: 8067-746 Project Lead : Frank Ingham Project Overview Nill. We reentering an existing well with the rig currently in place on an existing pad and an existing pit. We 1. What are the environmental impacts? will drill one or more directionally drilled laterals. The well will be plugged back when finished or left for a subsequent partner. 2. What is the legal location? 3. What is the duration of the project? The well is the 45-3-X-21 , API#49-025-23507, 2315" FSL & 2323" FWLof Sec 21 , T39N, R7fNV 4. What major equipment will be used If any (work over rig, drilling rig, The test is scheduled to last for approx 4 days. etc.)?

183

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 Project lnfonnation Project Title: Water haul permit location Date: 2-4-10 DOE Code: 6730-02()-51132 Contractor Code: 8067-757 Project Lead: Mark Duletsky Project Overview 1. What are the environmental This is a proposal to move the Water Haul line from the current location to the opposite side of the road. This impacts? action is for environmental and safety considerations. During the rainy season the area adjacent to the loading area becomes extremely muddy. The vehicles using the loading are become loaded down and 2. What is the legal location? cause ruts into the bank of the little teapot creek and on the graded areas. Moving the loading station to a 3. What is the duration of the project? higher position will eliminate the concerns. A pump will be used to draw water from the creek to a 400 bbl

184

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Project Information Project Title: 17 -AX-11 Restoration Date: DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Jim Bell Project Overview The environmental impacts should be minimal . Using Best Management Practies for erosion prevention; 1. What are the environmental impacts? we will dig out all unused pipeing and electrical wire and get rid of the concrete pad on the location. this will require the use of a backhoe, blade ,dozer and farm tractor. Containeated siol will be trensferred to the 2. What is the legal location? landfarm and clean fill dirt will be used for replacement. We will restore the location back to the origanal 3. What is the duration of the project? contour and reseed it. This should take around 4 days to complete. 4. What major equipment will be used

185

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Project lnfonnation Project Title: RMOTC process improvement Old pipe yard clean up. Date: 11-03-09 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Terry Sullivan Project Overview 1. What are the environmental We will dig out the pipe racks that are cemented into the ground, and haul them out. Then remove the impacts? weeds that have taken over the area. Then we will blade the location and have it ready if we ever decide to 2. What is the legal location? make farther improvements. I expect this to take aproximatly one week with two to three hands working on it. The impact to the envoronment should be minimal as this area has already been disturbed. The work will 3. What is the duration of the project? require the use of a backhoe and a blade as well as the cherry picker. This location is located just north of

186

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

t~Lf§ t~Lf§ Project lnfonnation Project Title: T-2-11 Skim box reclamation Date: 10-S-09 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Terry Sullivan Project Overview We will dig around the cement box and cap or remove any pipes that are in the ground in the area. All of the 1. What are the environmental impacts? area we will be disturbing has already been dug up before ,so the impact to the invironment will be kept to a minimum. We will remove the cemant containment that is aproximatly six foot on all sides and take it to the 2. What is the legal location? cement pile behind the shop, or crush it and use it as backfill on location, at the descretion of the 3. What is the duration of the project? environmental dept. And backfill the hole with soil from the land farm that has been tested by the

187

Sustainable Acquisition Coding System | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Acquisition Coding System Sustainable Acquisition Coding System Sustainable Acquisition Coding System Sustainable Acquisition Coding System More Documents & Publications Policy...

188

Oil Mist Compliance  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report summarizes activities at the KCP related to evaluating and modifying machine tools in order to be in compliance with Section 23 of DOE 10 CFR 851, Worker Safety and Health Program. Section 851.23 (a) states that Contractors must comply with the following safety and health standards that are applicable to the hazards in their covered workplace, and subsection 9 contains the following applicable standard: American Congress of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH), Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices, (2005) (incorporated by reference, see 851.27) when the ACGIH Threshold Limit Values are lower (more protective) than permissible exposure limits in 29 CFR 1910. In the 2005 ACGIH Threshold Limit Value book a Notice of Change was issued for exposure to mineral oil mist used in metalworking fluids (MWFs). The effects of planning for the new facility and which machine tools would be making the transition to the new facility affected which machine tools were modified.

Lazarus, Lloyd

2009-02-02T23:59:59.000Z

189

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Project Information Project Title: WhisperGen Relocation to 65-S-1 0 j.,.. I~ 6 T -9-?t. / I f I ii?J { Date: 3116/2010 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Everett Walker r - - Project Overview ~ E £ N c. 5 ,;;g: z II(_ 5/ Z?fo 9 )cl- I'J c. '5 :::JT Z""'O ( ID 1 1 1 tJ 'I)! Jo~ What are the environmental The Environmental Specialist and the Field Coordinator visited location and discussed the o owing activity. 1. The unit will be within 120' radius of65-S10 wellhead location. The WhisperGen unit gas supply and power impacts? line to 65-S-1 0 will be buried. A six foot by six foot concrete pad. moved from the test's previous location, will be placed on the ground as a base for the unit. 2. What is the legal location? 65-S-10

190

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Project Information Project Title: T-6-10 abandoment and storage relocation Date: 912812009 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Jeff Jones Project Overview We will be reclaiming this loc. we will dig down approx. 4ft. cut off pipes and cap them. And haul of dirt from the berms . We will then blade loc. . The worX to be done is to reclaim this location. In preparation for this 1. What are the environmental worX we will need to remove the old shipping building and a old set of tank stairs. These will be placed in storage in section 14. Upon reading SOP: EN.8000.01 reviewed on July 23rd 2009 I believe this falls under impacts? 2. What is the legal location? NEPA exclusion ex 81 .3 and CX 85.3. Which reads: When moving portable buildings to another disturbed

191

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Range Management Survey Date: Range Management Survey Date: 12/6/10 DOE Code: 6730.020.0000 Contractor 8067-788 Code: Project Lead: I Anthony Bowler Project Overview We will use a backhoe to get samples for our range management survey. At each site. one or 1. Brief project descnptlon [include anything that two holes will be excavated, and the samples will be taken from 0-1' and 1-2' deep. After could 1mpad the environment] excavating and the samples taken. the remaining soli Will be replaced and tamped back into 2. Legal location place. 3. Duratfon of tile project See attached NPR-3 Maps for preliminary locations : N~ area well 6-A-2\ NVV SW Section 21 . 4. Major equipment to be used f Township 39N, Range 78E) Middle area well 48-1 -Sh (SE SW 34 Township 39N, Range 4 WU-LSIT£5

192

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Cementing Swivel Test Cementing Swivel Test Da te: 6-23-2010 DOE Code: 6730-020-71094 Contractor Code: 8067-779 Project Lead: Mark Duletsky Project Overview 1. Brief project description [include The test will check the longevity of BJ Services cementing head elements. The test will be conducted on an anything that could impact the existing location, using an existing well in a recirculating flowline. The test will consist of tying cementing environment) head into mud system, rotating and circulating mud until 100 hours have elapsed or element failure. Potential exists for drilling mud leak from flowline. 2. Legal location 3. Duration of the project 45-3-X-21 , NE Y. SW Y. Section 21 Township 39 North Range 78 West 4. Major equipment to be used 5days Drilling rig , forklift, winch truck, water truck

193

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 8 Project lnfonnation Project Title: Weir Box for Tensleep discharge Date: 1 1-12.{)9 DOE Code: Project Lead: Dan Smallwood Project Overview 1 What are the environmental impacts? 2 . What is the legal location? 3. What 1 s the duration of the projed? 4 . What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig, drilling rig, etc.)? Contractor Code: The primary functions of the bio-treatment facility consist of oil-water separation, cooling, blending, and biological treatment of produced waters. The original facility was designed to treat an average of 50,000 barrels of produced water per day. RMOTC will install at the Tensleep cooling ponds outflow an open channel flow meter suitable for fixed-site monitoring with sensors to measure levels. The flow meter shall contain conversions tor

194

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Any contaiminated soil will be hauled to the 3. What is the duration of the project? compost facilities. When the site has tested as dean, the hole will be backfilled with dean...

195

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Log Deep Well Log Deep Well Date: 1/1212010 DOE Code: 6730.020.81019 Contractor Code: I 8067-756 Project Lead: Brian Black Project Overview This project will test prototype logg1 n_g tools 1 n a previously drilled deep well. The should not be any neglible 1. What are the environmental impacts? impacts to the environment. The tools will be lowered up and down a wellbore Via wireline cable and truck. 2. What is the legal location? This test will take place on the drilling rig at 45-3-X-21 3. What is the duration of the project? 4, What major equipment will be used The project will last for 3-4 days. if any (work over rig, drilling rig, etc.)? The drilling ng will be used as a overflead crane to lift the sheave pulley that the cable will run across. The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA

196

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 5 Project lnfonnation Project Title: Repair flowline 100 feet North of 71-3-SX-3 Date: 2-16-2010 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Rick Mclaughlin Project Overview Emergency Repair tor a "owline leak north of 71-3-SX-3. Dug up pipeline, repaired line and backfilled with 1. What are the environmental impacts? clean fill dirt. Oil contaminated soH was hauled to the east side landfarm and dean dirt was brought in from section 20. 2 What 1s the legal location? 3. What is the duration of the project? North of 71-3-SX-3. N43 1 7'53 6~ W. 10611'49.3" 4. What major equipment will be used Approximately 4 hours if any (work over rig, drilling rig, etc.)? Backhoe with operator and one wor1Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA

197

Regulatory Compliance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Regulatory Compliance Regulatory Compliance Regulatory Compliance This photo shows the inside the K West Basin facility, where workers are retrieving highly radioactive sludge material under 17 feet of water. This photo shows the inside the K West Basin facility, where workers are retrieving highly radioactive sludge material under 17 feet of water. The Department of Energy is not a regulatory agency; however it does self-regulate its own radioactive waste. DOE is also affected by a variety of statutes, legislation, regulations, directives and guidance. Many of the current compliance-related actions revolve around waste and material disposition. These include National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Environmental Impact Statements and Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) Records of Decision. Links, below,

198

FPD + Acquisition Workforce News Acquiring Minds Want to Know  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FPD + Acquisition Workforce News FPD + Acquisition Workforce News Acquiring Minds Want to Know Office of Acquisition and Project Management OCTOBER 2012 DOE/NNSA Workshop 2 PARS II Reports 3 Recently Certified FPDs 3 PMCDP Schedule 4 Construction Industry Institute 5 Newsletter Name Change 5 PMCDP Curriculum Change 6 FPD Questions of the Month 6 Observations from the Road . . . Management Reserve vs. Contingency Karen Urschel, EVP, Humphreys & Associates The Project Assessment & Reporting System (PARS II)/Earned Value Management Systems (EVMS) Road Show, sponsored by DOE's Office of Acquisition and Project Management (APM), has been visiting our sites across the country. One of the most

199

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1" .J(p(p 1" .J(p(p Project lnfonnation Project Title: Geothermal Technologies Program Da te: 12/8/09 DOE Code: 6730.020.61041 Contractor Code: 8067-731 Project Lead: Lyle Johnson Project Overview This wor1< will consist of the laying of two pipelines to complete the construction of a low temperature 1. What are the environmental impacts? geothermal testing facility at the t>M/F building in Section 21 . The first line will.re a 250 feet long. 6 inch steel line from well17 WX 21 to the building. This line will provide hot Madison water to the facility. The 2. What is the legal location? second line will be a 250 feet long 1 0 inch steel line to return the cooling water and excess Madison to the 3. What is the duration of the project? Teapot Creek drainage. This line will terminate on a cement slab * a stone pile or a combination of botn to

200

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Project Information Project T itle: Repair flowline 77 -S-1 0 Date: 3111/2010 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Wes Riesland Project Overview The flowline leak at 77 -s-1 0 surfaced on the location but we had to follow the line off the location to find the 1. What are the environmental impacts? hole in the pipe. This took us up the hill going south aproximatily 120 feet from the well head. We were able 2. What is the legal location? to successfully clamp the leak. 3. What is the duration of the projed? This flowline runs from the well 77 -s-1 0 to the B-2-1 0 manifold. 4. What major equipment will be used Approximately 6 hours to complete if any (worn over rig. drilling rig. etc.)? backhoe and opperator and one hand The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environmental Specialist and the DOE NEPA

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "acquisition compliance project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 Project lnfonnation Project Title: WisperGen Sterling Generator Date: 09-30-09 DOE Code: Contractor Code: Project Lead: Joe Rochelle Project Overview The produong well for the test W ill be 58-S-1 0 located m the SWSE SectiOn 1 0-T38N-R78W The well 1. What are the environmental impacts? was dnl ed an 1994 to a depth ot2184'to test the 10brara and Steele shale The weU was plugged back and completed 1 n the Shannon format1on from 360' to 464'. The well has 7" cas.ng set at 530' The 2. What is the legal location? well1s produced w1th a Nat1 onal 25 pump1 ng unrt The pump1ng un1 t currently has a 3 horsepower 3. What is the duration of the project? motor The motor w111 be replaced w1 th a 1.5 horsepower; motor w1th the followmg mforma!lon 1160 4. What major equipment will be used

202

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

WS' ~S5 WS' ~S5 Project Informa tion Proje ct Title: ESP ShuttleS Date: 11-23-09 DOE Code: 71086 Contrac tor Code : 8067-737 Project Lead: fr~V.. Project Ove rview We will be circulatlng water from a cased hole with a plug on bottom. to surface tanks, and back downhole. 1. What are the environmental impacts? A closed system. Frac Master tanks, a generator. esp power equipment and surface plumbing will be in place temporarily. There will be daily traffic for a 2 week period during testing. 2. What is the legaf location? 3. What is the duration of the project? Weii56-LX(MX)-1 0 in the SW SE of sec 10, T38N, R78W 4. What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig, drilling ng., 2Weeks etc.)? Work over rig, smeal,generator, forklift. The table below is to be completed by the Project Lead and reviewed by the Environme

203

Acquisition, Use, and Disposal of Real Estate  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Chapter 17.3 (March 2011) Chapter 17.3 (March 2011) 1 Acquisition, Use, and Disposal of Real Estate References DEAR 917.74 - Acquisition, Use, and Disposal of Real Estate DOE Directives DOE Order 413.3B, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets, or current version DOE Order 430.1B, Real Property Asset Management, or current version Overview This section provides internal Departmental information and DOE and NNSA points of contact for issues dealing with real estate acquisition, use, and disposal for cost reimbursement and fixed price contracts when in performance of the contract, the contractor will acquire or proposes to acquire use of real property. Background DEAR Subpart 917.74 - Acquisition, Use, and Disposal of Real Estate provides the policy and

204

Acquisition Management Division  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Welcome to the NIST Acquisitions information page. MISSION. The ... 6335. Information Technology Team Leader (301) 975-6324. ...

2012-07-06T23:59:59.000Z

205

Risk Analysis & Security Rule Compliance Activities  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Risk Analysis & Security Rule Compliance Activities Marissa Gordon- Nguyen, JD, MPH Health Information Privacy Specialist ...

2010-05-13T23:59:59.000Z

206

Technical Consumer Products - Compliance Test Laboratory  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Technical Consumer Products - Compliance Test Laboratory. NVLAP Lab Code: 200571-0. Address and Contact Information: ...

2013-09-20T23:59:59.000Z

207

Reasons for ERP Acquisition  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Abstract: Numerous reasons for Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system acquisitions in organizations have been proposed in the prior research. In this paper these different reasons for ERP system acquisitions are synthesized and categorized into technological and business reasons. Further, the prevalence of the different reasons is explored with an empirical data concerning the ERP acquisition in 41 Finnish companies. 1.

Petri Hallikainen; Sanna Laukkanen; Sami Sarpola

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

208

Data Acquisition Interpretation  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Data Acquisition Inversion Interpretation Discussion Virgin River DCIP Report Justin Granek1 1 Report #12;Data Acquisition Inversion Interpretation Discussion Outline 1 Data Acquisition Location Survey Specications 2 Inversion Data Errors DCIP2D DCIP3D 3 Interpretation Correlations Snowbird Tectonic

Oldenburg, Douglas W.

209

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 Project Informa t ion Proj ect Title: Restoration South of 54-TPX-1 0 Date : 2-8-1 0 DOE Code : Contractor Code: Project Lead: Jeff Jones Project Ove rview We will be digging contaminated soil out of the ground just to the south of 54-TPX-10. We will be taking all 1. What are the enwonmental 1 mpacts? contaminated soil to the land farm and entering the tot. ats in the log. We will backfill with clean fill dirt from Sec.20. 2. What is the legal location? 3. What is the duration of the project? The dura~Jon should be no longer than 4-6 days T 4 What major equipment will be used if any (work over rig, drilling rig, The equipment to be used is as follows Backhoe. dump truck. Tiller. etc.)? Aller all contaminated soil is removed and fresh fill has been placed we will t\11 the area and seed with native

210

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

lnfonnatlon lnfonnatlon Project Title: Advanced Formation Evaluation Tools Date: 12-6-2010 DOE Code: 6730.020.51144 Contractor 8067-795 Code: Proj ect Lead: Frank Ingham Project Overview DrillS 1/2" hole through Tenslee12 with an Lggging Whi~ Drilling (LWD). Wor1< will consist of 1. Brief project description [include anything that could impact the environment) re~ated drilling and lggging , more drilling and going bi!ck !o lgg th!il ~!Qn, my!!jQie times, Will change out LWD assemb~ ang re~a! mutti12le tim!il:i, Wor1< is on an existing hole utilizing 2. Legal location !ilxi§ting ~ui12ment. Kicks, fires and fliud release are all ootential environmental hazards. 3. Duration of the project Standard Ol2!i!rating 12radices will be utilized to monitQr drilling o~rations. l2!0Q wor1< will be

211

OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides Acquisition Guides OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides More Documents & Publications Acquisition, Use, and Disposal of Real...

212

OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides Acquisition Guides OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides More Documents & Publications Chapter 1 - Acquisition Regulations...

213

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE (EC)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

LOS ALAMOS SITE OFFICE (LASO) LOS ALAMOS SITE OFFICE (LASO) OBJECTIVE LASO.1: Los Alamos Site Office (LASO) programs that provide oversight for WCRR, such as, Project Management, Facility Representative (FR), Authorization Basis (AB), Safety System Oversight (SSO), Safety Subject Matter Experts (SME), Occurrence Reporting, Contractor Assessment (CA), Issues Management, and Quality Assurance (QA) are adequate. (CR 18) CRITERIA 1. Required LASO management, oversight, and assessment programs important to nuclear safety activities specific to WCRR operations such as facility readiness and authorization, program management, nuclear safety, fire protection, emergency management, radiological protection, occupational safety and industrial hygiene, quality assurance, occurrence

214

Department of Energy Acquisition System - A Guide for Executives |  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Department of Energy Acquisition System - A Guide for Executives Department of Energy Acquisition System - A Guide for Executives Department of Energy Acquisition System - A Guide for Executives The principal purposes of the Department's acquisition system are to: Deliver on a timely basis the best value product or service to the customer by, for example, Maximizing the use of commercial products and services. Using contractors who have a track record of successful past performance or who demonstrate a current superior ability to perform. Promoting competition. Maintain the public's trust by conducting business with integrity, fairness, openness, and compliance with statutory and regulatory requirements. Minimize administrative operating costs Fulfill public policy objectsives, such as Providing opportunities for small and small disadvantaged business.

215

Secretarial Memorandum on Integrating Project Management with NEPA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Secretarial Memorandum on Integrating Project Management with NEPA Secretarial Memorandum on Integrating Project Management with NEPA Compliance to Improve Decision Making Secretarial Memorandum on Integrating Project Management with NEPA Compliance to Improve Decision Making June 12, 2012 - 4:14pm Addthis Declaring that "Compliance with [NEPA] is a pre-requisite to successful implementation of DOE programs and projects," the Secretary has signed a memorandum on "Improved Decision Making through the Integration of Program and Project Management with National Environmental Policy Act Compliance." The memo urges better use of existing tools and guidance, and highlights principles for strengthening NEPA compliance - for example, through Field and Headquarters teamwork, realistic schedules, and performance

216

OFFICE OF NEPA POLICY AND COMPLIANCE - STAFF DIRECTORY | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OFFICE OF NEPA POLICY AND COMPLIANCE - STAFF DIRECTORY OFFICE OF NEPA POLICY AND COMPLIANCE - STAFF DIRECTORY OFFICE OF NEPA POLICY AND COMPLIANCE - STAFF DIRECTORY Carol Borgstrom, Director 202-586-4600 Carol.Borgstrom@hq.doe.gov Lettie Wormley, Secretary 202-586-4610 Lettie.Wormley@hq.doe.gov Eastern Energy and Waste Management Unit Contact Program/Responsibility Special Projects or Topics Brian Costner Brian.Costner@hq.doe.gov 202-586-9924 Unit Leader Yardena Mansoor Yardena.Mansoor@hq.doe.gov 202-586-9326 Office of Environmental Management * Oak Ridge Office * Savannah River Operations Office Office of Fossil Energy * Strategic Reserves * Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability * Champlain Hudson Power Express Western Area Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration

217

EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Alternative Compliance for  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Alternative Compliance for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets to someone by E-mail Share EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Alternative Compliance for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets on Facebook Tweet about EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Alternative Compliance for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets on Twitter Bookmark EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Alternative Compliance for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets on Google Bookmark EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Alternative Compliance for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets on Delicious Rank EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Alternative Compliance for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets on Digg Find More places to share EPAct Transportation Regulatory

218

Compliance status report for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant  

SciTech Connect

The US Department of Energy (DOE) is responsible for the disposition of transuranic (TRU) waste generated through national defense-related activities. Approximately 53,700 m{sup 2} of these wastes have been generated and are currently stored at government defense installations across the country. The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), located in southeastern New Mexico, has been sited and constructed to meet the criteria established by the scientific and regulatory community for the safe, long-term disposal of TRU and TRU-mixed wastes. This Compliance Status Report (CSR) provides an assessment of the progress of the WIPP Program toward compliance with long-term disposal regulations, set forth in Title 40 CFR 191 (EPA, 1993a), Subparts B and C, and Title 40 CFR {section}268.6 (EPA, 1993b), in order to focus on-going and future experimental and engineering activities. The CSR attempts to identify issues associated with the performance of the WIPP as a long-term repository and to focus on the resolution of these issues. This report will serve as a tool to focus project resources on the areas necessary to ensure complete, accurate, and timely submittal of the compliance application. This document is not intended to constitute a statement of compliance or a demonstration of compliance.

Not Available

1994-03-31T23:59:59.000Z

219

Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance NEPA Requirements and Guidance - Search Index Quickly search through 100+ NEPA requirements and guidance documents to find information on NEPA topics. Read more DOE NEPA Projects Currently Open for Public Comment Find how to comment on DOE NEPA documents in an area of interest. Read more NEPA Success Stories from Lessons Learned Quarterly Reports This compilation describes DOE NEPA reviews that resulted in better planning, enhanced public participation, and protection of sensitive environmental resources. Read more Latest Documents & Notices January 10, 2014 EIS-0488: FERC Draft Environmental Impact Statement Cameron Pipeline Expansion Project and Cameron LNG Liquefaction Project, Cameron Parish, Louisiana January 10, 2014

220

Integrated Project Team RM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Integrated Project Team (IPT) is an essential element of the Departments acquisition process and will be utilized during all phases of a project life cycle. The IPT is a team of professionals...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "acquisition compliance project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Acquisition Conflict Resolution  

Acquisition Conflict Resolution At the option of the Supplier, a concern may be brought to the Ombuds Office or may be taken to the Internal Conflict Resolution Process

222

Acquisition & Financial Assistance Self-Assessment Checklist  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

& Financial Assistance & Financial Assistance Self-Assessment Checklist Revised: October 20 10 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Contract Management Office of Procurement & Assistance Management COMPLIANCE REVIEW CRITERIA CHECKl.IST(s) 1 . Construction 2. Contract Completion and Closeout 3. Evaluation and Source Selection 4. Federal Supply Schedule File Review 5. Financial Assistance/Grant File Review 6. Funds Out Interagency Agreements 7. General Contract File Review 8. Government-wide Acquisition Contracts (GWACs) 9. Information Technology Procurements 10. M&O Contract File Review 1 1 . Multiple Award Contracts 12. Options 13. Pre-Award Cost Authorizations, Letter Contracts, and Ratifications 14. Service Contracting 15. Simplified Acquisition File Review

223

Walnut Capital Acquisitions | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Acquisitions Acquisitions Jump to: navigation, search Name Walnut Capital Acquisitions Place Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Zip 15232 Product Walnut Capital Acquisitions is the project development arm of Walnut Capital, one of Pittsburgh's largest and fastest growing real estate management, development and brokerage companies. Coordinates 40.438335°, -79.997459° Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"googlemaps3","type":"ROADMAP","zoom":14,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"geoservice":"google","maxzoom":false,"width":"600px","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","visitedicon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"wmsoverlay":"","layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"kml":[],"gkml":[],"fusiontables":[],"resizable":false,"tilt":0,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":[],"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":[{"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":40.438335,"lon":-79.997459,"alt":0,"address":"","icon":"","group":"","inlineLabel":"","visitedicon":""}]}

224

Project  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Exploring the Standard Model Exploring the Standard Model       You've heard a lot about the Standard Model and the pieces are hopefully beginning to fall into place. However, even a thorough understanding of the Standard Model is not the end of the story but the beginning. By exploring the structure and details of the Standard Model we encounter new questions. Why do the most fundamental particles have the particular masses we observe? Why aren't they all symmetric? How is the mass of a particle related to the masses of its constituents? Is there any other way of organizing the Standard Model? The activities in this project will elucidate but not answer our questions. The Standard Model tells us how particles behave but not necessarily why they do so. The conversation is only beginning. . . .

225

BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM Iowa Compliance Implementation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Iowa Iowa Compliance Implementation and Evaluation (CIE) Guide COMPLIANCE IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION (CIE) GUIDE 2 This Guide is designed to assist state and local code jurisdictions in achieving statewide compliance with the 2009 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) for residential buildings and ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2007 for commercial buildings. COMPLIANCE IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION (CIE) GUIDE 3 Iowa WHAT'S INSIDE CIE Guide Overview-Flow Diagram ........................................................................................................................... 5 PART 1: Guide Overview .................................................................................................................................................

226

certification, compliance and enforcement regulations for Commercial...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

needs to be redone. certification, compliance and enforcement regulations for Commercial Refrigeration Equipment (CRE) More Documents & Publications Regulatory Burden RFI...

227

Acquisition, Insolvency and Managers in UK Small Companies  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

?rm, management human capital, involuntary insolvency, acquisition target, competing risks model, MCMC, Bayesian analysis 2 1 Introduction Insolvency and acquisition serve an important common purpose in the market selection process by moving assets... and medium-sized enterprises in Member States are projected to experience ownership transfers through acquisition between 2000 and 2010 (EC (2002), Allinson, Braidford, Houston, Robson, and Stone (2007)). Given that managers dier in their ability to discern...

Isachenkova, N; Weeks, Melvyn

228

Federal Acquisition Regulation Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-62 Summary of Rules  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 Summary of Rules 2 Summary of Rules Item Subject FAR Case I. Updates to Contract Reporting and Central 2010-014 Contractor Registration II. Interagency Acquisitions: Compliance by Nondefense 2012-010 Agencies with Defense Procurement Requirements. III. Free Trade Agreement-Panama 2012-027 Item I-- Updates to Contract Reporting and Central Contractor Registration (FAR Case 2010-014) This final rule amends the FAR to limit the use of generic substitutes instead of Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) numbers, and update the policies and procedures associated with reporting in the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS). Additionally, this final rule changes the clauses requiring contractor registration in the Central Contractor

229

Tools for NEPA compliance: Baseline reports and compliance guides  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Environmental baseline documents and NEPA compliance guides should be carried in every NEPA implementation ``tool kit``. These two indispensable tools can play a major role in avoiding repeated violations of NEPA requirements that have occurred over the past 26 years. This paper describes these tools, discusses their contents, and explains how they are used to prepare better NEPA documents more cost-effectively. Focus is on experience at Sandia Laboratories (NM).

Wolff, T.A. [Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (United States); Hansen, R.P. [Hansen Environmental Consultants, Englewood, CO (United States)

1994-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

230

Alternative Financing - New Acquisition Guide Subchapter | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Alternative Financing - New Acquisition Guide Subchapter Alternative Financing - New Acquisition Guide Subchapter policy flash Alternative Financing - New Acquisition Guide...

231

OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides Acquisition Guides OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides More Documents & Publications Chapter 31 - Contract Cost Principles...

232

OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides Acquisition Guides OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides More Documents & Publications Chapter 26 - Other Socioeconomic...

233

OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides Acquisition Guides OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides More Documents & Publications PolFlash10-31attach2.pdf OPAM Policy...

234

NPT Compliance | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Compliance | National Nuclear Security Administration Compliance | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog NPT Compliance Home > Our Mission > Managing the Stockpile > NPT Compliance NPT Compliance Maintaining the safety, security and effectiveness of the nuclear deterrent without nuclear testing - especially at lower numbers - requires

235

ACQUISITION CERTIFICATION - FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE LEVEL I APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ACQUISITION CERTIFICATION - FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE ACQUISITION CERTIFICATION - FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE LEVEL I APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION TECHNICAL PROJECT OFFICER LEVEL I PART A - EMPLOYEE INFORMATION Name (Last, First, Middle initial)_____________________________________________ Email Address____________________________________________________________ Phone __________________________________________________________________ Agency Name____________________________________________________________ Agency Address__________________________________________________________ Title, Series, Grade________________________________________________________ Education: Please specify degree and major: a. Degree: Associates: __; Bachelors __; Masters: __; Doctorate: __

236

Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance NEPA Requirements and Guidance - Search Index Quickly search through 100+ NEPA requirements and guidance documents to find information on NEPA topics. Read more DOE NEPA Projects Currently Open for Public Comment Find how to comment on DOE NEPA documents in an area of interest. Read more NEPA Success Stories from Lessons Learned Quarterly Reports This compilation describes DOE NEPA reviews that resulted in better planning, enhanced public participation, and protection of sensitive environmental resources. Read more Latest Documents & Notices January 17, 2014 EIS-0488: EPA Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Impact Statement Cameron Liquefaction Project, Cameron Parish, Louisiana January 15, 2014 EIS-0460: Record of Decision

237

Federal Energy Management Program: EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports and Data EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports and Data EISA 432 Overview EISA requires Federal agencies to identify "covered facilities" that constitute at least 75% of their total facility energy use as subject to the requirements of the statute. Each Federal agency must designate an energy manager responsible for implementing the requirements at each covered facility. Comprehensive energy and water evaluations are to be performed at each covered facility every four years to identify potential energy and water efficiency and conservation measures. EISA requires agencies to report progress toward these requirements in CTS, along with: Estimated cost and savings for projects implemented in covered facilities Measured savings for implemented projects

238

300 Area TEDF NPDES Permit Compliance Monitoring Plan  

SciTech Connect

This monitoring plan describes the activities and methods that will be employed at the 300 Area Treated Effluent Disposal Facility (TEDF) in order to ensure compliance with the National Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. Included in this document are a brief description of the project, the specifics of the sampling effort, including the physical location and frequency of sampling, the support required for sampling, and the Quality Assurance (QA) protocols to be followed in the sampling procedures.

Loll, C.M.

1994-10-13T23:59:59.000Z

239

Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program 2006 Report  

SciTech Connect

The Ecological Monitoring and Compliance program (EMAC), funded through the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO), monitors the ecosystem of the Nevada Test Site (NTS) and ensures compliance with laws and regulations pertaining to NTS biota. This report summarizes the program's activities conducted by National Security Technologies LLC (NSTec) during the Calendar Year 2006. Program activities included: (a) biological surveys at proposed construction sites, (b) desert tortoise compliance, (c) ecosystem mapping and data management, (d) sensitive plant species monitoring, (e) sensitive and protected/regulated animal monitoring, (f) habitat monitoring, (g) habitat restoration monitoring, and (h) monitoring of the Nonproliferation Test and Evaluation Complex (NPTEC). Sensitive and protected/regulated species of the NTS include 44 plants, 1 mollusk, 2 reptiles, over 250 birds, and 26 mammals protected, managed, or considered sensitive as per state or federal regulations and natural resource agencies and organizations. The threatened desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) is the only species on the NTS protected under the Endangered Species Act. Biological surveys for the presence of sensitive and protected/regulated species and important biological resources on which they depend were conducted for 34 projects. A total of 342.1 hectares (ha) (845.37 acres [ac]) was surveyed for these projects. Sensitive and protected/regulated species and important biological resources found included: 2 inactive tortoise burrows, 2 western burrowing owls (Athene cunicularia hypugaea), several horses (Equus caballus), 2 active predator burrows, mature Joshua trees (Yucca brevifolia), yuccas and cacti; and also 1 bird nest (2 eggs), 1 barn owl (Tyto alba) and 2 great-horned owls (Bubo virginianus). NSTec provided a written summary report of all survey findings and mitigation recommendations, where applicable. All flagged burrows were avoided during construction activities. Twenty one of the 34 projects had sites within the distribution range of the threatened desert tortoise. NNSA/NSO must comply with the terms and conditions of a permit (called a Biological Opinion) from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) when conducting work in tortoise habitat. No tortoises were found in or displaced from project areas. No desert tortoises were accidentally injured or killed, nor were any captured or displaced from project sites. One desert tortoise was accidentally killed along a paved road. One site specific re-vegetation plan was submitted this year as required by the desert tortoise habitat re-vegetation plan approved in 2004. This year a total of 1.89 ha (4.69 ac) of tortoise habitat was disturbed. Re-vegetation of habitat at the Bren Tower burn was completed in the spring of 2006. In the summer of 2006, NSTec scientists prepared a Biological Assessment of the security activities that were being conducted at the Device Assembly Facility (DAF). NNSA requested a Biological Opinion from FWS in late 2006. Ecosystem mapping and data management in 2006 focused primarily on two tasks: (a) converting hardcopies of about 17 reports (EMAC annual reports and selected topical reports from 1996 to 2003) into electronic versions (Portable Document Format [PDF] files) to facilitate electronic document exchange, rapid retrieval, duplication, and printing, and (b) conducting an annual vegetation survey to determine wildland fire hazards on the NTS. Copies of the PDF documents were sent to DOE's Office of Scientific and Technical Information website in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and the DOE National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) Public Reading Facility.

David C. Anderson; Paul D. Greger; Derek B. Hall; Dennis J. Hansen; William K. Ostler

2007-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

240

Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program 2006 Report  

SciTech Connect

The Ecological Monitoring and Compliance program (EMAC), funded through the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO), monitors the ecosystem of the Nevada Test Site (NTS) and ensures compliance with laws and regulations pertaining to NTS biota. This report summarizes the program's activities conducted by National Security Technologies LLC (NSTec) during the Calendar Year 2006. Program activities included: (a) biological surveys at proposed construction sites, (b) desert tortoise compliance, (c) ecosystem mapping and data management, (d) sensitive plant species monitoring, (e) sensitive and protected/regulated animal monitoring, (f) habitat monitoring, (g) habitat restoration monitoring, and (h) monitoring of the Nonproliferation Test and Evaluation Complex (NPTEC). Sensitive and protected/regulated species of the NTS include 44 plants, 1 mollusk, 2 reptiles, over 250 birds, and 26 mammals protected, managed, or considered sensitive as per state or federal regulations and natural resource agencies and organizations. The threatened desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) is the only species on the NTS protected under the Endangered Species Act. Biological surveys for the presence of sensitive and protected/regulated species and important biological resources on which they depend were conducted for 34 projects. A total of 342.1 hectares (ha) (845.37 acres [ac]) was surveyed for these projects. Sensitive and protected/regulated species and important biological resources found included: 2 inactive tortoise burrows, 2 western burrowing owls (Athene cunicularia hypugaea), several horses (Equus caballus), 2 active predator burrows, mature Joshua trees (Yucca brevifolia), yuccas and cacti; and also 1 bird nest (2 eggs), 1 barn owl (Tyto alba) and 2 great-horned owls (Bubo virginianus). NSTec provided a written summary report of all survey findings and mitigation recommendations, where applicable. All flagged burrows were avoided during construction activities. Twenty one of the 34 projects had sites within the distribution range of the threatened desert tortoise. NNSA/NSO must comply with the terms and conditions of a permit (called a Biological Opinion) from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) when conducting work in tortoise habitat. No tortoises were found in or displaced from project areas. No desert tortoises were accidentally injured or killed, nor were any captured or displaced from project sites. One desert tortoise was accidentally killed along a paved road. One site specific revegetation plan was submitted this year as required by the desert tortoise habitat revegetation plan approved in 2004. This year a total of 1.89 ha (4.69 ac) of tortoise habitat was disturbed. Revegetation of habitat at the Bren Tower burn was completed in the spring of 2006. In the summer of 2006, NSTec scientists prepared a Biological Assessment of the security activities that were being conducted at the Device Assembly Facility (DAF). NNSA requested a Biological Opinion from FWS in late 2006. Ecosystem mapping and data management in 2006 focused primarily on two tasks: (a) converting hardcopies of about 17 reports (EMAC annual reports and selected topical reports from 1996 to 2003) into electronic versions (Portable Document Format [PDF] files) to facilitate electronic document exchange, rapid retrieval, duplication, and printing, and (b) conducting an annual vegetation survey to determine wildland fire hazards on the NTS.

David C. Anderson; Paul D. Greger; Derek B. Hall; Dennis J. Hansen; William K. Ostler

2007-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "acquisition compliance project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Project Management | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Management Management Project Management Project Directors are responsible for the planning, programming, budgeting and acquisition of capital assets. One of the principal outcomes in exercising this responsibility is the delivery of projects on schedule, within budget, with the required performance capability, and compliant with quality, environmental, safety and health standards. These web pages identify the DOE requirements related to the acquisition of capital assets and present a common framework for implementing the requirements. Our intent is not to impose additional requirements, but rather place existing requirements in the proper context. The target audience for these pages includes Federal Project Directors, Program Managers, Acquisition Executives, and others involved in the DOE capital asset acquisition

242

Acquisition and Project Management | National Nuclear Security...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press...

243

Acquisition and Project Management Continuous Improvement Presentation...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Continuous Improvement presentation More Documents & Publications 2012 Congressional Nuclear Cleanup Caucus Briefings Energy Storage & Power Electronics 2008 Peer Review -...

244

Office of Acquisition and Project Management  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

support on D&D activities, sustainabilityenergy management, and real property asset management across the EM complex. The office manages the transfer of excess contaminated...

245

Acquisition and the Environment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The information provide on these pages are meant to be resource and tool for the DOE acquisition community. Please share suggestions for its further development and improvement. Provide your...

246

OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

17.3 (February 2004) 17.3 (February 2004) Acquisition, Use, and Disposal of Real Estate [Reference: DEAR 917.74, 970.5244-1] Overview This section provides internal Departmental information and a DOE point of contact for issues dealing with real estate acquisition, use, and disposal. Background DEAR 917.74 provides the policy and procedures to be followed in the acquisition, use, and disposal of real estate. In accordance with DEAR clause 970.5244-1, Management and Operating contractors also follow the DEAR 917.74 coverage when they acquire real property. Occasionally in the performance of cost type contracts, the performer will be required to acquire an interest in real estate. Real estate interests include purchases, leases, easements, permits, and licenses. In accordance with the current Secretarial delegation of authority for acquisition,

247

Data acquisition system  

DOE Patents (OSTI)

A data acquisition circuit for a particle detection system that allows for time tagging of particles detected by the system. The particle detection system screens out background noise and discriminate between hits from scattered and unscattered particles. The detection system can also be adapted to detect a wide variety of particle types. The detection system utilizes a particle detection pixel array, each pixel containing a back-biased PIN diode, and a data acquisition pixel array. Each pixel in the particle detection pixel array is in electrical contact with a pixel in the data acquisition pixel array. In response to a particle hit, the affected PIN diodes generate a current, which is detected by the corresponding data acquisition pixels. This current is integrated to produce a voltage across a capacitor, the voltage being related to the amount of energy deposited in the pixel by the particle. The current is also used to trigger a read of the pixel hit by the particle.

Shapiro, Stephen L. (14228 Amherst Ct., Los Altos Hills, CA 94022); Mani, Sudhindra (1618 17th St., Sacramento, CA 95814); Atlas, Eugene L. (440 De Anza Ct., Oceanside, CA 92057); Cords, Dieter H. W. (526 Cuesta Real, La Honda, CA 94020); Holbrook, Britt (4540 Varsity Ct., Sacramento, CA 95841)

1997-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

248

Federal Requirements and Acquisition Guidance for Low Standby Power  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Requirements and Acquisition Guidance for Low Standby Power Federal Requirements and Acquisition Guidance for Low Standby Power Products Federal Requirements and Acquisition Guidance for Low Standby Power Products Updated July 2013 Federal agencies must purchase products with a standby power level of 1 watt or less. Standby power is the power consumed by a product when in the lowest power consuming mode. This typically occurs when the product is switched off or not performing its primary purpose. These additional resources can also help Federal agencies meet low standby power purchasing requirements: Low Standby Product List Measuring Standby Power Frequently Asked Questions Meeting Low Standby Power Requirements Table 1 outlines specific standby power requirements and compliance resources by product category. Federal purchases must meet these low

249

Policy Flash 2013-78 Acquisition Guide Chapter 7.3 Acquisition Planning in the M&O Environment  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Jason Taylor of the Contract and Financial Assistance Policy Division, Office of Policy, Office of Acquisition and Project Management at...

250

OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

33 - Protests, Disputes and Appeals Chapter 1 - Acquisition Regulations System OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides...

251

OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

26 - Other Socioeconomic Programs OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides Chapter 34 - Major Systems Acquisition...

252

Formal hardware specification languages for protocol compliance verification  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The advent of the system-on-chip and intellectual property hardware design paradigms makes protocol compliance verification increasingly important to the success of a project. One of the central tools in any verification project is the modeling language, ... Keywords: Esterel, Heterogeneous Hardware Logic, Hierarchical Annotated Action Diagrams, Java, Lava, Live Sequence Charts, Message Sequence Charts, Objective VHDL, OpenVera, Property Specification Language, SpecC, Specification and Description Language, Statecharts, SystemC, SystemVerilog, The Unified Modeling Language, e, hardware monitors, timing diagrams

Annette Bunker; Ganesh Gopalakrishnan; Sally A. Mckee

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

253

Smartgrid supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system security issues and counter measures.  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

??This project discusses security issues, countermeasures and research issues in the Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition (SCADA) system. SCADA system is used in power sector (more)

Sunku Ravindranath, Raksha

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

254

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE QUALIFICATION STANDARD REFERENCE GUIDE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environmental Environmental Compliance Qualification Standard Reference Guide DECEMBER 2011 Table of Contents i LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................... iii ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................ iv PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE ........................................................................................................................................... 1

255

Compliance Certification Enforcement | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Compliance Certification Enforcement Compliance Certification Enforcement Compliance Certification Enforcement DOE enforces the energy and water conservation regulations established by the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Appliance Standards Program to ensure that residential, commercial and industrial equipment deliver the energy and cost savings required by law. To ensure that all covered products comply with the energy and water conservation standards, the enforcement office reviews manufacturers' compliance with certification requirements. Products covered under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975, as amended, are required annually to ''certify by means of a certification report that each basic model(s) meets the applicable energy conservation standard." This program

256

Definition: Compliance Monitor | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

compliance of responsible entities with reliability standards.1 Related Terms sustainability References Glossary of Terms Used in Reliability Standards An LikeLike...

257

BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM Nevada Compliance Implementation  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

key routes through the Guide Route Number 1: The Guide provides the state agency or organization that is responsible for statewide compliance certification a set of action sheets...

258

Acquisition | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Acquisition Acquisition Acquisition In 2009, DOE competitively awarded Ameresco Federal Solutions, Inc. a fixed-price renewable Energy Savings Performance Contract (ESPC) to finance, design, construct, operate, maintain and fuel a new biomass facility at SRS for 20-years. Under ESPCs, private companies finance, install, and maintain new energy and water-efficient equipment in federal facilities, with no up-front funding or extra costs incurred by the government or taxpayers. In 2009, DOE competitively awarded Ameresco Federal Solutions, Inc. a fixed-price renewable Energy Savings Performance Contract (ESPC) to finance, design, construct, operate, maintain and fuel a new biomass facility at SRS for 20-years. Under ESPCs, private companies finance, install, and maintain new energy and water-efficient equipment in federal

259

Acquisition Guide P  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

P P h a p t e r 5.1 (September 2004) Release of Information: Congressional Notification and Long-range Acquisition Estimates [Reference: FAR 5.41 Overview This section discusses the procedures for providing Congressional notice of certain contract and financial assistance actions, and the release of long-range acquisition estimates. Background The Headquarters Office of Congressional and Intergovernmental Affairs notifies members of Congress of DOE activities likely to have an effect on their constituents. These activities include certain contract and financial assistance actions. FAR 5.404-1 identifies the requirements for the release of long-range acquisition planning estimates. Congressional Notification Contracting activities complete and submit form DOE F 4220.10, Congressional GrantIContract

260

VERITAS Data Acquisition  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

VERITAS employs a multi-stage data acquisition chain that extends from the VME readout of custom 500 MS/s flash ADC electronics to the construction of telescope events and ultimately the compilation of information from each telescope into array level data. These systems provide access to the programming of the channel level triggers and the FADCs. They also ensure the proper synchronization of event information across the array and provide the first level of data quality monitoring. Additionally, the data acquisition includes features to handle the readout of special trigger types and to monitor channel scaler rates. In this paper we describe the software and hardware components of the systems and the protocols used to communicate between the VME, telescope, and array levels. We also discuss the performance of the data acquisition for array operations.

VERITAS Collaboration; E. Hays

2007-10-11T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "acquisition compliance project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Part II, General Compliance Supplement  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

A. ACTIVITIES ALLOWED OR UNALLOWED Compliance Requirements The specific requirements for activities allowed or unallowed are unique to each DOE Federal award or program and are found in the laws, regulations, and the provisions of contract or grant agreements pertaining to the program. In addition, ARRA has established a cross-cutting unallowable activity for all ARRA-funded awards. Pursuant to Section 1604 of ARRA, none of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available in ARRA may be used by any State or local government, or any private entity, for any casino or other gambling establishment, aquarium, zoo, golf course, or swimming pool. Source of Governing Requirements The requirements for activities allowed or unallowed are contained in program legislation or, as

262

South Valley Compliance Agreement Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

South Valley South Valley Agreement Name South Valley Superfund Site Interagency Agreement State New Mexico Agreement Type Compliance Agreement Legal Driver(s) CERCLA Scope Summary Interagency Agreement with the U.S. Air Force for payment of costs associated with the remediation of two operable units (the facility and San Jose 6) at the South Valley Superfund Site. Parties DOE; U.S. Air Force Date 9/26/1990 SCOPE * Set forth the actions required of the USAF and DOE to fulfill their respective responsibilities pursuant to the Settlement Agreement between DOE, USAF, and General Electric Company (8/29/1990). * Establish mechanism by which DOE will transfer, to a fund managed by the USAF, its share of the costs set forth in the Settlement Agreement. * Set forth each party's responsibilities and respective share of costs.

263

II. GENERAL COMPLIANCE SUPPLEMENT INTRODUCTION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

A. ACTIVITIES ALLOWED OR UNALLOWED Compliance Requirements The specific requirements for activities allowed or unallowed are unique to each DOE Federal award or program and are found in the laws, regulations, and the provisions of contract or grant agreements pertaining to the program. In addition, ARRA has established a cross-cutting unallowable activity for all ARRA-funded awards. Pursuant to Section 1604 of ARRA, none of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available in ARRA may be used by any State or local government, or any private entity, for any casino or other gambling establishment, aquarium, zoo, golf course, or swimming pool. Source of Governing Requirements The requirements for activities allowed or unallowed are contained in program legislation or, as

264

Project 296  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

McDermott Technology McDermott Technology Alliance, OH www.mcdermott.com CONTACTS Bruce W. Lani Project Manager National Energy Technology Laboratory 412-386-5819 bruce.lani@netl.doe.gov Thomas J. Feeley, III Technology Manager National Energy Technology Laboratory 412-386-6134 thomas.feeley@netl.doe.gov Hamid Farzan Babcock & Wilcox Company 330-860-6628 HFarzan@babcock.com WEBSITE http://www.netl.doe.gov NO X CONTROL FOR UTILITY BOILER OTR COMPLIANCE Background Enacted regulations pertaining to the NO X SIP Call and potential future regulations in proposed legislation such as the President's Clear Skies Act or EPA's Clean Air Interstate Rule require power producers to seek the most cost effective methods to achieve compliance. In order to address present and anticipated NO X emissions control legislation targeting the current fleet of U.S. coal-fired boilers, the Department

265

Environmental Compliance Audit& Assessment Program Manual  

SciTech Connect

This document describes the elements, schedule, roles, and responsibilities of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) Environmental Compliance Audit & Assessment Program (ECAAP). The ECAAP has been developed to meet the requirements of DOE Order 450.1A,1 and Executive Order 13423.2 These referenced Orders stipulate that government agencies must develop environmental compliance audit programs to monitor and improve compliance with environmental regulations. As stated specifically in the DOE Order, as a part of a DOE facility's Environmental Management System (EMS), 'An environmental compliance audit and review program that identifies compliance deficiencies and root causes of non-compliance' shall be developed and implemented. The ECAAP has also been developed to satisfy LBNL's institutional technical assurance assessment requirements promulgated in the Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) Self-Assessment Program (LBNL/PUB-5344) and described by the ES&H Technical Assurance Program (TAP) Manual (LBNL/PUB-913E). The ES&H TAP Manual provides the framework for systematic reviews of ES&H programs with the intent to provide assurance that these programs comply with their guiding regulations, are effective, and are properly implemented. As required by the DOE and Executive Orders and by LBNL's TAP, the goal of the ECAAP is to identify environmental regulatory compliance deficiencies and to determine their respective causes. The ECAAP then provides a means of correcting any deficiencies identified, and leads to continually improving environmental compliance performance.

Thorson, Patrick; Baskin, David; Borglin, Ned; Fox, Robert; Wahl, Linnea; Hatayama, Howard; Pauer, Ronald

2009-03-13T23:59:59.000Z

266

Federal Acquisition Regulation; Federal Acquisition Circular  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC) 2005-40 Federal Register /Vol. 75, No. 55 /Tuesday, March 23, 2010 /page 14059 A summary for the FAR rule follows. Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) (FAR case 2008-027) Effective Date: April 22, 2010. This final rule amends the FAR to implement section 872 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009. Section 872 requires the establishment of a data system, Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), containing specific information on the integrity and performance of covered Federal agency contractors and grantees. FAPIIS is available for use in award decisions at www.ppirs.gov. Government input to FAPIIS is accomplished at www.cpars.csd.disa.mil.

267

Federal Acquisition Regulation; Federal Acquisition Circular  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2005-37; Introduction Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC) 2005-37 List of Rules in FAC 2005-37 Item Subject I. Registry of Disaster Response Contractors II. Limiting Length of Noncompetitive Contracts in "Unusual and Compelling Urgency" Circumstances III. GAO Access to Contractor Employees IV. Use of Commercial Services Item Authority V. Limitations on Pass-Through Charges VI. Award Fee Language Revision VII. National Response Framework VIII. Technical Amendments SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Summaries for each FAR rule follow. Item I-Registry of Disaster Response Contractors (FAR Case 2008-035) This interim rule amends the FAR at parts 2, 4, 7, 10, 13, 18, 26, and 52 to implement the Registry of Disaster Response Contractors provision, section 697 of the Department of

268

EA-1155: Ground-water Compliance Activities at the Uranium Mill Tailings  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5: Ground-water Compliance Activities at the Uranium Mill 5: Ground-water Compliance Activities at the Uranium Mill Tailings Site, Spook, Wyoming EA-1155: Ground-water Compliance Activities at the Uranium Mill Tailings Site, Spook, Wyoming SUMMARY This EA evaluates the environmental impacts for the proposal to comply with the Environmental Protection Agency's ground-water standards set forth in 40 CFR 192 at the Spook, Wyoming Uranium Mill Tailings Site by using the selected alternative stated in the Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for the Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action Ground Water Project. PUBLIC COMMENT OPPORTUNITIES None available at this time. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD March 1, 1997 EA-1155: Final Environmental Assessment Ground-water Compliance Activities at the Uranium Mill Tailings Site,

269

Project Title:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Repair flowline 61-66-SX-3 Repair flowline 61-66-SX-3 DOE Code: Project Lead: Wes Riesland NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY # 291 Project Information Date: 3/1 1/2010 Contractor Code: Project Overview In order to repair this line it was decided to trench a line aproximately 100 feet and tie it into the line at 71-3- 1. What are the environmental sx-3. This will get us out of the old flow line which has been repaired 5-6 times. this will mitigate the chances impacts? of having spills in the future. 2. What is the legal location? This flowline runs from the well77-s-1 0 to the B-2-10 manifold.+ "/-,~?X3 3. What is the duration of the project? Approximately 10 hours(1 day) to complete 4. What major equipment will be used backhoe and operator and one hand if any (work over rig. drilling rig.

270

Federal Acquisition Regulation; Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-47; Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7; Summary 7; Summary This document summarizes the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) rules agreed to by the Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense Acquisition Regulations Council (Councils) in this Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC) 2005-47. All were effective December 13, 2010 except Items II, HUB Zone, and VI, Pass Through, which will be effective January 12, 2011. List of Rules in FAC 2005-47 Item Subject FAR case Analyst ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- I..................................... Notification of Employee 2010-006 McFadden.

271

Chapter 18 - Emergency Acquisitions | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 - Emergency Acquisitions Chapter 18 - Emergency Acquisitions 18.0EmergencyAcquisitions0.pdf More Documents & Publications Acqguide18pt0 March 2011 final Microsoft Word -...

272

Acquisition Guide | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

12 - Acquisition of Commercial Items (RESERVED) Chapter 13 - Simplified Acquisition Procedures 13.1 -DOE Policy and Operating Procedures for the Use of the GSA SmartPay2 Purchase...

273

Using EnergyPlus for California Title-24 compliance calculations  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Using EnergyPlus for California Title-24 compliance calculations Title Using EnergyPlus for California Title-24 compliance calculations Publication Type Conference Paper LBNL...

274

DOE Acquisition Workforce News Acquiring Minds Want to Know  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Workforce News Workforce News Acquiring Minds Want to Know Office of Acquisition and Project Management SEPTEMBER 2012 Procurement Management Review Program 2 DOE/NNSA Acquisition Workshop 3 Recently Certified FPDs 3 PMCDP Course Schedule 4 Questions of the Month 5 Continuing Education Hours Name Change 5 Causal Connection between Design Maturity and Project Cost Rick Elliott, PE, CCE, CFM, CEM Design maturity is one of the principal criteria that the Office of Acquisition and Project Management considers when evaluating the readiness of a project to receive Critical Decision (CD) 2, Approve Performance Baseline, and CD-3, Approve Start of Construction or Execution. An "immature" design is simply one that has not been fully

275

Data acquisition for PLT  

SciTech Connect

DA/PLT, the data acquisition system for the Princeton Large Torus (PLT) fusion research device, consists of a PDP-10 host computer, five satellite PDP- 11s connected to the host by a special high-speed interface, miscellaneous other minicomputers and commercially supplied instruments, and much PPPL produced hardware. The software consists of the standard PDP-10 monitor with local modifications and the special systems and applications programs to customize the DA/PLT for the specific job of supporting data acquisition, analysis, display, and archiving, with concurrent off-line analysis, program development, and, in the background, general batch and timesharing. Some details of the over-all architecture are presented, along with a status report of the different PLT experiments being supported. (auth)

Thompson, P.A.

1975-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

276

ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 Recipien, ..ounty of Westmoreland, PA ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Energy Efficiency & Conservation Programs for Buildings & Facilities All County Building Energy Audits A9 Energy Efficiency Retrofits B5.1 Waste Stream, Engineering, and Historical Preservation clauses. Energy Efficiency & Conservation Strategy A9, All, B5.1 Allowable: Any administrative actions/audits associated with this activity Prohibited: Any implantation of projects/construction activities without NEPA approval from DOE Renewable Energy Technologies on Government Buildings B5.1 Allowable: Any administrative actions/audits

277

Sustainable Acquisition | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Acquisition Acquisition Sustainable Acquisition Mission The team establishes a national approach to expand purchases of environmentally sound goods and services, including biobased products in accordance with Executive Order (EO) 13423, Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and Transportation Management, and (EO) 13514, Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance, and DOE Order 436.1, Departmental Sustainability, as approved by LM. The team advocates the implementation of a "green" procurement process. Scope The team has established a process to evaluate the procurement of goods and services for LM using the acquisition of environmentally preferable products and services, including the acquisition of biobased, environmentally preferable, energy-efficient, water-efficient, and

278

SIGNATURE OF THIS CO U A RECORD OF THIS DEC SION. NEPA Compliance Officer Signature:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

THIS THIS CO U A RECORD OF THIS DEC SION. NEPA Compliance Officer Signature: .PA Compliance Officer Page 1 of 1 PINC-5.F2. t1.01A11) U.S. DEPARMENT OF ENERGY FERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERI\ ITNATION RECIPIENT:The University of Texas at Austin STATE: TX PROJECT Techno-economic Modeling of the Integration of 20% Wind and Large-scale energy storage in ERCOT TITLE : by 2030 Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number DE-PS36-09G099009 DE -EE0001 385 GF0-1 0-026 0 Based on my review of the information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451.IA), I have made the following determination: CX, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A9 Information gathering (including, but not limited to, literature surveys, inventories, audits), data analysis (including

279

SIGNATURE OF THIS MEMORAND TES A RECORD OF THIS DECISION. NEPA Compliance Officer Signature:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

MEMORAND MEMORAND TES A RECORD OF THIS DECISION. NEPA Compliance Officer Signature: EPA Compliance Officer Date: (93 Page 1 of 2 INIC*EF2a U.S. DEPARTI\ LENT OF ENERGY F.ERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NFPA DETERI\ 11-NATION RECIPIENT:Tennessee Tech University STATE: TN PROJECT TITLE : Recovery Act: Multi-level Energy Storage and Controls for Large-scale Wind Energy Integration Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number DE-PS36-09G099009 DE-EE0001 383 GF0-10-010 0 Based on my review of the information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451.IA), I have made the following determination: CX, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A9 Information gathering (including, but not limited to, literature surveys, inventories, audits), data analysis (including

280

Contacts for Acquisition | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

for Acquisition CIO Leadership Organization Contact Us Acquisition Administration Cyber Security E-Gov Enterprise Architecture Geospatial Science Program Information...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "acquisition compliance project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Performance Based Service Acquisition Toolkit | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Services Performance Based Service Acquisition Toolkit Performance Based Service Acquisition Toolkit Aviation Management Green Leases Executive Secretariat Energy Reduction at...

282

OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Chapter 1 - Acquisition Regulations System Microsoft Word - AcqGuide7pt1.doc Chapter 18 - Emergency Acquisitions...

283

OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ACQUISITION LETTER DEAR Part 933 Microsoft Word - ACQUISITION LETTER.doc Chapter 33 - Protests, Disputes and Appeals...

284

Environmental Compliance Performance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Compliance » Environmental Compliance » Environmental Compliance Performance Environmental Compliance Performance Most Office of Environmental Management (EM) cleanup is being performed under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) through Federal Facility Agreements as well as under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) through various consent orders, agreements, and decrees with states. These agreements and orders identify milestones associated with cleanup actions and dates by which those milestones are to be met. DOE has approximately 40 agreements and orders in place with its State and Federal regulators dealing with EM's cleanup mission. Major enforceable milestones are those which have fixed, mandatory due dates and, in EM's view, represent cleanup progress. EM's senior

285

RECIPIENT:NREL U.S. DEPART~IENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DEPART~IENT OF ENERGY DEPART~IENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETEillIINATION PROJECT TITLE: CREED Buildling Lease; NREL Tracking No. 10-018 Page 1 of2 STATE: CO Funding Opportunity Announc:~mtnt Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number em Number NREl10.018 G01D337 Based on my review of the information concerning the propoStd action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451.11\), I han made the following detennination: ex, EA, [IS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: A7 Transfer, lease, disposition, or acquisition of interests in personal property (e.g., equipment and materials) or real property (e.g .. permanent structures and land). if property use is to remain unchanged; i.e., the type and

286

RECIPIENT:NREL U.S. DEPARTUENT OF ENER GY EERE PROJECT M ANAGEMENT CENT  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DEPARTUENT OF ENER DEPARTUENT OF ENER GY EERE PROJECT M ANAGEMENT CENT ER NEPA DETERl\IINATION PROJECT TITLE: NREL Bus Service to Off-Site Parking lot; NREL Tracking No. 10-016 Page 1 of2 STATE: CO FUnding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurcmtntlnstrumtnt Number NEPA Control Number CIO Number NREl-10-016 G01 0337 Based on my review orlhe information concerning the proposed action, as N[PA Compliance Offi<:er (authoriud under DOE Order 4Sl.IA), I have made the following determination: ex, EA, [IS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: DOE/EA· 1440-5·1 .7 Final Supplement to Final Site-Wide Environmental Assessment of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory's (NREL) South Table Mountain Complex (May 2008) Transfer, lease, disposition , or acquisition of interests in personal property (e.g., equipment and materials) or

287

Compliance Assurance Monitoring (CAM) Implementation Study  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Many power producers are required to include a Compliance Assurance Monitoring (CAM) Plan in their first Title V permit renewal application. In developing the CAM plan, sources must provide a reasonable assurance of compliance with the applicable emission limit(s) for each affected unit. Currently, only particulate mass emissions are of concern to power producers. Therefore, CAM plans must be based on measurable parameters that can be related to particulate emissions in a reliable manner. Since the regul...

2003-10-16T23:59:59.000Z

288

Hallmark Project  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Project Project Commercialization of the Secure SCADA Communications Protocol, a cryptographic security solution for device-to-device communication Increased connectivity and automation in the control systems that manage the nation's energy infrastructure have improved system functionality, but left systems more vulnerable to cyber attack. Intruders could severely disrupt control system operation by sending fabricated information or commands to control system devices. To ensure message integrity, supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) systems require a method to validate device-to- device communication and verify that information has come from a trusted source and not been altered in transit. The Secure SCADA Communications Protocol (SSCP) provides message

289

Managing license compliance in free and open source software development  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

License compliance in Free and Open Source Software development is a significant issue today and organizations using free and open source software are predominately focusing on this issue. The non-compliance to licenses in free and open source software ... Keywords: Compatibility analysis, Compliance management, Free and open source software, License compliance, Rights expression languages

G. R. Gangadharan; Vincenzo D'Andrea; Stefano Paoli; Michael Weiss

2012-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

290

Business Models for Code Compliance | Building Energy Codes Program  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Compliance Compliance Site Map Printable Version Development Adoption Compliance Basics Compliance Evaluation Software & Web Tools Regulations Resource Center Business Models for Code Compliance The U.S. Department of Energy is coordinating strategies and activities with companies, individuals, and government entities to demonstrate, quantify, and monetize energy code compliance and coordinate deployment at the local, state, and regional levels. Consumer Assurance through Code Compliance Energy efficiency measures in the buildings sector, if properly realized and captured, provide a tremendous opportunity to reduce energy consumption and expenditures. Yet currently there is a lack of assurance that buildings as designed realize the levels of energy efficiency established in the

291

ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

12 Recipient: County of Hidalgo, Texas 12 Recipient: County of Hidalgo, Texas ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Categorical Exclusion Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Activity 1 - Sunset Park 85.1 Waste St ream Clause Efficient Ught Project **This NEPA determination applies to the LED light project only. Activity 2 - Hidalgo County, 85.1 Waste Stream Clause Pct 2 Multipurpose Building Historic Preservation Clause Renewable Energy Engineering Clause Component Activity 3 - Solar Power 85.1 Waste Stream Clause Retrofit of Multi-Purpose Historic Preservation Clause Facilities Engineering Clause Activity 4 - Energy Efficiency 85.1 Waste Stream Clause and Conservation Through Historic Preservation Clause

292

Taking compliance patterns and quality management system (QMS) framework approach to ensure medical billing compliance  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The United States Office of Inspector General (OIG) has issued a number of compliance guidelines including third-party medical billing guidelines for healthcare companies in the United States to reduce errors and fraud in the field of medical billing. ... Keywords: ISO 9001, OIG, common audit framework, medical billing compliance patterns, quality management system (QMS)

Syeda Uzma Gardazi, Arshad Ali Shahid

2013-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

293

A PROPOSED FRAMEWORK FOR PLANNING DEACTIVATION AND DECOMMISSIONING ENGINEERING AND DESIGN ACTIVITIES TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF DOE ORDER 413.3A, PROGRAM AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT FOR THE ACQUISITION OF CAPITAL ASSETS  

SciTech Connect

This paper provides guidance in applying the requirements of DOE O 413.3A to Deactivation and Decommissioning (D&D) projects. A list of 41 engineering and design activities relevant to D&D projects was generated. For several activities in this list, examples of the level of development and/or types of deliverables that might be expected at the completion of the conceptual, preliminary and final project design phases described in the Order are provided.

Santos, J; John Gladden, J

2007-11-06T23:59:59.000Z

294

MEMORANDUM FOR CHIEF ACQUISITION OFFICERS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

November 28, 2007 November 28, 2007 MEMORANDUM FOR CHIEF ACQUISITION OFFICERS SENIOR PROCUREMENT EXECUTIVES FROM: Paul A. Denett Administrator SUBJECT: Appropriate Use of Brand Name or Equal Purchase Descriptions The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued policy memorandums in April 2005 and April 2006, implementing brand name posting requirements for acquisitions (including simplified acquisitions and sole source procurements) over $25,000. The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) was revised in September 2006 to incorporate this new policy. However, we are concerned that agencies are not preparing and posting the brand name justification or documentation in accordance with the new FAR requirements. Complaints have also been

295

Self-scrubbing coal{sup TM}: An integrated approach to clean air. A proposed Clean Coal Technology Demonstration Project  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This environmental assessment (EA) was prepared by the U.S.Department of Energy (DOE), with compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, Council on Environmental Quality (CE) regulations for implementating NEPA (40 CFR 1500-1508) and DOE regulations for compliance with NEPA (10 CFR 1021), to evaluate the potential environmental impacts associated with a proposed demonstration project to be cost-shared by DOE and Custom Coals International (CCI) under the Clean Coal Technology (CCT) Demonstration Program of DOE`s Office of Fossil Energy. CCI is a Pennsylvania general partnership located in Pittsburgh, PA engaged in the commercialization of advanced coal cleaning technologies. The proposed federal action is for DOE to provide, through a cooperative agreement with CCI, cost-shared funding support for the land acquisition, design, construction and demonstration of an advanced coal cleaning technology project, {open_quotes}Self-Scrubbing Coal: An Integrated Approach to Clean Air.{close_quotes} The proposed demonstration project would take place on the site of the presently inactive Laurel Coal Preparation Plant in Shade Township, Somerset County, PA. A newly constructed, advanced design, coal preparation plant would replace the existing facility. The cleaned coal produced from this new facility would be fired in full-scale test burns at coal-fired electric utilities in Indiana, Ohio and PA as part of this project.

Not Available

1994-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

296

H-35 DOE-H-__ Compliance With Internet Protocol Version 6 (Ipv6) In Acquiring Information  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

as appropriate. Consider using in solicitations involving M&O as appropriate. Consider using in solicitations involving M&O contracts, management of major facilities, and any acquisition which could involve the direct or indirect purchase of Information Technology equipment that uses Internet Protocol (IP) technology. DOE-H-__ COMPLIANCE WITH INTERNET PROTOCOL VERSION 6 (IPV6) IN ACQUIRING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (JULY 2011) This contract involves the acquisition of Information Technology (IT) that uses Internet Protocol (IP) technology. The Contractor agrees that (1) all deliverables that involve IT that uses IP (products, services, software, etc.) comply with IPv6 standards and interoperate with both IPv6 and IPv4 systems and products; and (2) it has IPv6 technical support for fielded product management, development and

297

Policy Flash 2013-25 Acquisition Certifications Program Handbook 3rd  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Policy Flash 2013-25 Acquisition Certifications Program Handbook Policy Flash 2013-25 Acquisition Certifications Program Handbook 3rd Edition released Policy Flash 2013-25 Acquisition Certifications Program Handbook 3rd Edition released Attached is Policy Flash 2013-25 Acquisition Certifications Program Handbook 3rd Edition released The Handbook is available online at the following website: http://energy.gov/management/downloads/acquisition-certifications-program-handbook Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Linda Ott of the Office of Acquisition and Project Management, Professional Development Division, at (202) 287-5310 or at linda.ott@hq.doe.gov. Policy Flash 2013_25 AMCP Handbook 3rd Edition Released.pdf More Documents & Publications Policy Flash 2013-54 Acquisition Certification Program Handbook 4th Edition

298

OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Chapter 15.4-2 (January 2007) Chapter 15.4-2 (January 2007) 1 Weighted Guidelines [References: FAR 15.4, DEAR 915.4] Overview This section provides guidance for applying the Department's structured approach in determining profit/fee. Background The FAR requires consideration of certain factors (described in 15.404-4 as "profit- analysis factors" or "common factors") in developing a structured profit/fee approach. DOE's structured approach for determining profit/fee objectives is used in those acquisitions when the contracting officer is required to perform a cost analysis. This system provides a comprehensive approach for determining a fair profit or fee. It ensures consistent consideration of the relative value of the factors and provides a basis for

299

Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program 2011 Report  

SciTech Connect

The Ecological Monitoring and Compliance (EMAC) Program, funded through the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office, monitors the ecosystem of the Nevada National Security Site and ensures compliance with laws and regulations pertaining to NNSS biota. This report summarizes the program's activities conducted by National Security Technologies, LLC, during calendar year 2011. Program activities included (a) biological surveys at proposed construction sites, (b) desert tortoise compliance, (c) ecosystem monitoring, (d) sensitive plant species monitoring, (e) sensitive and protected/regulated animal monitoring, (f) habitat restoration monitoring, and (g) monitoring of the Nonproliferation Test and Evaluation Complex. During 2011, all applicable laws, regulations, and permit requirements were met, enabling EMAC to achieve its intended goals and objectives.

Hansen, D. J., Anderson, D. C., Hall, D. B., Greger, P. D., Ostler, W. K.

2012-06-13T23:59:59.000Z

300

Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program 2008 Report  

SciTech Connect

The Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program, funded through the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO), monitors the ecosystem of the Nevada Test Site (NTS) and ensures compliance with laws and regulations pertaining to NTS biota. This report summarizes the programs activities conducted by National Security Technologies, LLC (NSTec), during calendar year 2008. Program activities included (a) biological surveys at proposed construction sites, (b) desert tortoise compliance, (c) ecosystem mapping and data management, (d) sensitive plant species monitoring, (e) sensitive and protected/regulated animal monitoring, (f) habitat monitoring, (g) habitat restoration monitoring, and (h) monitoring of the Nonproliferation Test and Evaluation Complex (NPTEC).

Dennis J. Hansen, David C. Anderson, Derek B. Hall, Paul D. Greger, W. Kent Ostler

2009-04-30T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "acquisition compliance project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program 2010 Report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Ecological Monitoring and Compliance (EMAC) Program, funded through the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO), monitors the ecosystem of the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) and ensures compliance with laws and regulations pertaining to NNSS biota. This report summarizes the programs activities conducted by National Security Technologies, LLC (NSTec), during calendar year 2010. Program activities included (a) biological surveys at proposed construction sites, (b) desert tortoise compliance, (c) ecosystem monitoring, (d) sensitive plant species monitoring, (e) sensitive and protected/regulated animal monitoring, (f) habitat restoration monitoring, and (g) monitoring of the Nonproliferation Test and Evaluation Complex (NPTEC). During 2010, all applicable laws, regulations, and permit requirements were met, enabling EMAC to achieve its intended goals and objectives.

Hansen, D.J.; Anderson, D.C.; Hall, D.B.; Greger, P.D.; Ostler, W.K.

2011-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

302

Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program 2012 Report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program (EMAC), funded through the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office (NNSA/NFO, formerly Nevada Site Office), monitors the ecosystem of the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) and ensures compliance with laws and regulations pertaining to NNSS biota. This report summarizes the programs activities conducted by National Security Technologies, LLC (NSTec), during calendar year 2012. Program activities included (a) biological surveys at proposed construction sites, (b) desert tortoise compliance, (c) ecosystem monitoring, (d) sensitive plant species monitoring, (e) sensitive and protected/regulated animal monitoring, (f) habitat restoration monitoring, and (g) monitoring of the Nonproliferation Test and Evaluation Complex (NPTEC). During 2012, all applicable laws, regulations, and permit requirements were met, enabling EMAC to achieve its intended goals and objectives.

Hall, Derek B.; Anderson, David C.; Greger, Paul D.; Ostler, W. Kent; Hansen, Dennis J.

2013-07-03T23:59:59.000Z

303

Tailor-Made Projects I N S I D E T H I S I S S U E P R O J E  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Tailor-Made Projects Tailor-Made Projects I N S I D E T H I S I S S U E : P R O J E C T M A N A G E M E N T C A R E E R D E V E L O P M E N T P R O G R A M Pathways to Project Success D E C E M B E R 2 0 1 1 Brian Kong, PE, PMP, CCE, LEED AP Your project is unique and is tailor-made to ensure its success. While the end product may be the same, the acquisition process can be tailored to effectively and efficiently manage the multi- tude of factors that you and your project team face. Some compliance factors cannot be ig- nored or changed, but the requirements within DOE Order 413.3B can be tailored. Properly tai- lored and initiated early on, the path to the end product may be a better fit for your project. Documenting the tailoring strategy and obtaining the Acquisition Executive's approval prior to

304

Appropriate Acquisition Strategy PMLL Identifier: PMLL-2011-NNSS-RFS-388 (Source: User Submitted)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Appropriate Acquisition Strategy Appropriate Acquisition Strategy PMLL Identifier: PMLL-2011-NNSS-RFS-388 (Source: User Submitted) Validator: Kevin Thornton, NNSA/NSO Date: 2/14/2011 Contact: Robert Platoni/702-295-0815 Statement: The selection of an acquisition strategy that is appropriate for current market conditions, funding constraints, and project scope can result in more competitive bidding and lower bid prices. Discussion: The scope of this project was to construct two new fire stations to replace existing outdated facilities. The project was originally planned as two separate projects to be constructed in two different fiscal years using a design/bid/build acquisition strategy. The funding profile was appropriate for this type of strategy. In FY2004, Congress directed that the two projects be

305

Policy Flash 2013-40 Acquisition Guide Chapter 43.3 - Maintaining  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 Acquisition Guide Chapter 43.3 - Maintaining 0 Acquisition Guide Chapter 43.3 - Maintaining Alignment of Project Management with Contract Management of Non-Management and Operating (M&O) Cost Reimburstment Contracts Policy Flash 2013-40 Acquisition Guide Chapter 43.3 - Maintaining Alignment of Project Management with Contract Management of Non-Management and Operating (M&O) Cost Reimburstment Contracts Attached is Policy Flash 2013-40 Acquisition Guide Chapter 43.3 - Maintaining Alignment of Project Management with Contract Management of Non-Management and Operating (M&O) Cost Reimbursement Contracts for Capital Asset Projects, Environmental Remediation, Decontamination and Decommissioning, Facility Operations, and Other Major Projects Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Barbara Binney

306

EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Compliance Methods for State  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Compliance Methods for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets to someone by E-mail Share EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Compliance Methods for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets on Facebook Tweet about EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Compliance Methods for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets on Twitter Bookmark EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Compliance Methods for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets on Google Bookmark EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Compliance Methods for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets on Delicious Rank EPAct Transportation Regulatory Activities: Compliance Methods for State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleets on Digg Find More places to share EPAct Transportation Regulatory

307

Project Title  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Carbon Storage R&D Project Review Meeting Carbon Storage R&D Project Review Meeting Developing the Technologies and Building the Infrastructure for CO 2 Storage August 21-23, 2012 2 Acknowledgments Dave Harris, Kentucky Geological Survey Dave Barnes, Western Michigan University John Rupp, Indiana Geological Survey Scott Marsteller, Schlumberger Carbon Services John McBride, Brigham Young University * Project is funded by the U.S. Department of Energy through the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) and by a cost share agreement with the Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity, Office of Coal Development through the Illinois Clean Coal Institute * ConocoPhillips: in-kind match * Western Kentucky Carbon Storage Foundation: matching funding * SeisRes 2020, Houston: VSP acquisition and processing

308

Independent Oversight Review, West Valley Demonstration Project  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Independent Oversight Review, West Valley Demonstration Project Independent Oversight Review, West Valley Demonstration Project Transportation - September 2000 Independent Oversight Review, West Valley Demonstration Project Transportation - September 2000 September 2000 Transportation Emergency Management Review of the West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP) and National Transportation Program (NTP)/Transportation Compliance Evaluation/Assistance Program (TCEAP) The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Emergency Management Oversight, within the Secretary of Energy's Office of Independent Oversight and Performance Assurance, conducted a transportation emergency management review of the West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP) and National Transportation Program (NTP)/Transportation Compliance Evaluation/Assistance Program (TCEAP) in September 2000.

309

Rocky Flats Compliance Program; Technology summary  

SciTech Connect

The Department of Energy (DOE) established the Office of Technology Development (EM-50) (OTD) as an element of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management (EM) in November 1989. The primary objective of the Office of Technology Development, Rocky Flats Compliance Program (RFCP), is to develop altemative treatment technologies for mixed low-level waste (wastes containing both hazardous and radioactive components) to use in bringing the Rocky Flats Plant (RFP) into compliance with Federal and state regulations and agreements. Approximately 48,000 cubic feet of untreated low-level mixed waste, for which treatment has not been specified, are stored at the RFP. The cleanup of the Rocky Flats site is driven by agreements between DOE, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Colorado Department of Health (CDH). Under these agreements, a Comprehensive Treatment and Management Plan (CTMP) was drafted to outline the mechanisms by which RFP will achieve compliance with the regulations and agreements. This document describes DOE`s strategy to treat low-level mixed waste to meet Land Disposal Restrictions and sets specific milestones related to the regulatory aspects of technology development. These milestones detail schedules for the development of technologies to treat all of the mixed wastes at the RFP. Under the Federal Facilities Compliance Act (FFCA), the CTMP has been incorporated into Rocky Flats Plant Conceptual Site Treatment Plan (CSTP). The CSTP will become the Rocky Flats Plant site Treatment Plan in 1995 and will supersede the CTMP.

NONE

1994-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

310

Trigger and data acquisition  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Past LEP experiments generate data at 0.5 MByte/s from particle detectors with over a quarter of a million readout channels. The process of reading out the electronic channels, treating them, and storing the date produced by each collision for further analysis by the physicists is called "Data Acquisition". Not all beam crossings produce interesting physics "events", picking the interesting ones is the task of the "Trigger" system. In order to make sure that the data is collected in good conditions the experiment's operation has to be constantly verified. In all, at LEP experiments over 100 000 parameters were monitored, controlled, and synchronized by the "Monotoring and control" system. In the future, LHC experiments will produce as much data in a single day as a LEP detector did in a full year's running with a raw data rate of 10 - 100 MBytes/s and will have to cope with some 800 million proton-proton collisions a second of these collisions only one in 100 million million is interesting for new particle se...

CERN. Geneva

2001-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

311

Microsoft Word - ACQUISITION LETTER.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

IV. Effective Date. This Acquisition Letter is effective 30 days from the date of issue. V. Expiration Date. This Acquisition Letter remains in effect until canceled or...

312

OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Microsoft Word - AL2006-07.doc Policy Flash 2013-54 Acquisition Certification Program Handbook 4th Edition Acquisition Certifications Program Handbook...

313

OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

17 - Special Contracting Methods Acquisition Letter 2009-03 Acquisition Planning-Extending A Management and Operating Contract Without Full and Open Competition and Site and...

314

Acquisition Workforce Information | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Acquisition Career Management Program (ACMP) Acquisition Career Management Program Handbook Applications for ACMP Certification FAC-C, Purchasing, CFA and Property...

315

Federal Energy Management Program: EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

EISA Compliance EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports and Data to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports and Data on Facebook Tweet about Federal Energy Management Program: EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports and Data on Twitter Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports and Data on Google Bookmark Federal Energy Management Program: EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports and Data on Delicious Rank Federal Energy Management Program: EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports and Data on Digg Find More places to share Federal Energy Management Program: EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports and Data on AddThis.com... Requirements by Subject Requirements by Regulation Notices & Rules

316

A static compliance-checking framework for business process models  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Regulatory compliance of business operations is a critical problem for enterprises. As enterprises increasingly use business process management systems to automate their business processes, technologies to automatically check the compliance of process ...

Y. Liu; S. Mller; K. Xu

2007-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

317

Recipient: County of McHenry, IL ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

21 21 Recipient: County of McHenry, IL ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Project #1: Daylighting B5.1 None Project #2: Occupancy Sensors B5.1 None Project #3: Administration Building - LED Parking Lot Lighting B5.1 Waste Stream Clause Project #4: Annex A - Replace Hot Water Boiler B5.1 Waste Stream Clause *boiler replacements cannot result in a net increase in air emissions. Project #5: Annex A - Window Film B5.1 None Project #6: Department of Transportation Building - Skylights B5.1 Historic Preservation Clause Waste Stream Clause Project #7: Department of Transportation Building - HID to T8 Fluorescent with Occupancy Sensors

318

Microsoft Word - Similkameen_Acquisition_CX .docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Dave Roberts Dave Roberts Project Manager - KEWU-4 Proposed Action: Provision of funds to the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) to purchase two parcels of land from the Trust for Public Land in Okanogan County, Washington. Fish and Wildlife Project No.: 2007-232-00 Categorical Exclusion Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021): B1.25 Transfer of land/habitat preservation wildlife management. Location: The two parcels are located in Township 40 North, Range 25 East, Sections 17 and 21 of the Nighthawk 7.5' USGS quadrangle map, in Okanogan County, Washington (northwest of the town of Oroville). Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to fund the acquisition of two parcels of

319

Alternative Compliance Program: 10 CFR Part 490 (Presentation)  

SciTech Connect

Presentation explains the Alternative Compliance option under the U.S. Department of Energy's State and Alternative Fuel Provider program.

Sears, T.

2008-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

320

Support of Industry Compliance with the EU Directive on ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Support of Industry Compliance with the EU Directive on Restriction of Certain Hazardous Substances (RoHS). Summary: ...

2013-07-23T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "acquisition compliance project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

068 068 Re ent: City of Reno, NV ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Reno Interior Energy Efficiency Retrofits; Reno Exterior Energy Efficiency Retrofits; Reno Solar Onsite Renewable Energy; Reno Wind Onsite Renewable Energy 83.1, B5.1 Waste Stream, Historical Preservation, and Engineering Clauses Wind Turbines Only: Allowable: Any administrative actions/audits associated with this activity. Prohibited: Any implementation of projects/construction activity without NEPA approval from DOE Design and Size of the wind turbines needs to be supplied to DOE for NEPA Analysis. Additional Comments: Design and Size of the wind turbines needs to be supplied to DOE for NEPA

322

ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0847 0847 Recipient: City of .viadison, WI ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) LED Street Lights B2.5 B5.1 Waste Stream Clause *Replacement of existing fixtures to EE lighting. Anaerobic Food Waste Digester - Pilot Study A9 All C12 *This NEPA determination is limited to conducting the waste stream study, feasibility study and preliminary engineering for an Anaerobic Food Waste Digester facility only. *Recipient needs to provide technical and site specific information for this activity. *Allowable: Any administrative actions associated with this activity. Prohibited: Any implementation of projects/construction activities without

323

Directory of certificates of compliance for radioactive materials packages  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this directory is to make available a convenient source of information on packagings approved by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. To assist in identifying packaging, an index by Model Number and corresponding Certificate of Compliance Number is included at the front of Volumes 1 and 2. An alphabetical listing by user name is included in the back of Volume 3 for approved Quality Assurance programs. The reports include a listing of all users of each package design and approved Quality Assurance programs prior to the publication date of the directory. Comments to make future revisions of this directory more useful are invited and should be directed to the Spent Fuel Project Office, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

NONE

1997-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

324

U.S. DEPARThIENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERMINATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Page 1 of2 Page 1 of2 RECIPIENT: Dept. of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Div of Energy and Climate STATE: DE Climate PROJECT TITLE: Replacing Traditional Electric Meters with Smart Electric Meters - City of Newark, DE Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number DE-FOA-OOOOOS2 DE-EEOOOO342 GFo.oooo342-OO1 Based on my review orlhe information cODceming the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (nthorized under DOE Order 4St.IA), I have made the (ollowing determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUM BER: Description: 61.7 Electronic equipment Acquisition, installation, operation, modification, and removal of electricity transmission control and monitonng devices for grid demand and response. communication systems. data processing equipment.

325

U.S. DEPARTII'lENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DEPARTII'lENT OF ENERGY DEPARTII'lENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERMINATION RECIPIENT:Greenville County PROJECf TITLE: Sidewalks to School Page 1 of2 STATE: SC Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number cm Number DEJOA_OOOOO13 EEOOOO947 GFO-OOOO947-005 0 Based on my reyiew ofthe information concerning tht- proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authom.ed under DOE Order451 .IA), I have made the following determination: CX, EA, [IS APPENDI X AND NUMBER: Description: 81.13 Pathw ays, short access roads, and rail Jines Construction. acquIsition. and relocation. consistent with applicable right-of-way conditions and approved land use or IransportatJoo Improvement plans, of pedestrian walkways and trails, bICycle paths. small outdoor frtness areas, and short

326

RECIPIENT:Whole Energy u.s. DEPARTlIIENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Whole Energy Whole Energy u.s. DEPARTlIIENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETElaIINATION PROJECf TITLE : SEp· Biodiesel Refueling Infrastructure Page 1 of2 STATE: WA Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procure ment Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CIO Number qFO-OOOoI'f!- O~1 0 Based on my review of the information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DO .. : Order4SI .IA), I have made the following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 81.7 ACQuisition, installation, operation, and removal of oommunication systems, data processing equipment, and similar electronic equipment. A9 Information gathering (including, but nollimiled to, literature surveys, inventories, audits). data analysis (including

327

U.S. DEPARTlVIENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERlVIINATION  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

State of Washington STATE: WA State of Washington STATE: WA PROJECT TITLE: SEP ARRA - GEN-X Energy Group, Inc. Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number DE-FOA-0000052 EE0000139 GFO-0000139-033 EE139 Based on my review of the information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 4Sl.IA), I have made the following determination: CX, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: B1.7 Acquisition, installation, operation, and removal of communication systems, data processing equipment, and similar electronic equipment. B5.1 Actions to conserve energy, demonstrate potential energy conservation, and promote energy-efficiency that do not increase the indoor concentrations of potentially harmful substances

328

RECIPJENT:NREL u.s. DEPARThIENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT ~ANAGEMENT CENTER  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

RECIPJENT:NREL RECIPJENT:NREL u.s. DEPARThIENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT ~ANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERMINATION PROJEL, TITLE: Shuttle Service to South Golden Road RTD Bus Slops Page 1 of2 STATE: CO Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number eln Number NREL·11-010 G010337 Based on my review oftbe information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451.1A), I have made the following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: DOElEA· 1440-S-1 Final Supplement to Final Site-Wide Environmental Assessment of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory's (NREL) South Table Mountain Complex (May 2008) A7 Transfer, lease, disposition, or acquisition of interests in personal property (e.g., equipment and materials) or

329

U.S. DEP.-\RTl\ IENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

\RTl\ \RTl\ IENT OF ENERGY EERE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CENTER NEPA DETERlIlINATION REC)PIENT:Oregon Department of Energy Page 1 of2 STATE: OR PROJECf TITLE: Oregon Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant - Formula-EEC8G: video conferencing funding Opportunity Announcement Number ProcuTC'ment Instrument Number NEPA Control Number CID Number DE-FOA-013 DE-EE0000926 EEO Based on my review oftbe information (ooerr-ning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451.1A), I have made the following determination: ex, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 81.7 Acquisition, installation, operation, and removal of communication systems, data processing equipment, and similar electronic equipment 85.1 Actions to conserve energy. demonstrate potential energy conservation, and promote energy-efficiency that do not

330

Compliance plan for PG and E geysers unit 16  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

A plan is described to establish a monitoring system to assure that the geothermal power plant is constructed and operated in compliance with air and water quality, public health and safety, and other applicable regulations, guidelines, and conditions of the California Energy Commission. The plan is divided into: a Power Plant Compliance Plan and a Transmission Line Compliance Plan. (MHR)

Not Available

1981-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

331

Acquisition Letters | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Acquisition Letters Acquisition Letters Acquisition Letters The following is a list of active Department of Energy Acquisition Letters. These files are in PDF (Portable Document Files), MS Excel, or htm (hypertext markup) format. To read PDF files you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader which is available at no charge from Adobe (http://www.adobe.com/). If you have any questions concerning this list, please contact the Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy on (202) 287-1330. NOTE: Copies of rescinded or cancelled AL's are available by calling the Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy at (202) 287-1330. ASSISTANCE ON USING THESE FILES: You may: (1) download these files to your local machine by clicking on the file name and choosing SAVE TO DISK, OR (2) you can configure Adobe Acrobat Reader to automatically open, which

332

Computational models of language acquisition  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Child language acquisition, one of Nature's most fascinating phenomena, is to a large extent still a puzzle. Experimental evidence seems to support the view that early language is highly formulaic, consisting for the most part of frozen items with ...

Shuly Wintner

2010-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

333

Policy Flash 2013-57 New Strategic Sourcing Acquisition Guide Chapter 7.2  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Mike Larson of the Office of Acquisition and Project Management, Strategic Programs Division at (202) 287-1426 or at Michael.Larson@hq...

334

Policy Flash 2013-63 Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC) 2005-67  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Barbara Binney, of the Office of Acquisition and Project Management Policy at (202) 287-1340 or at Barbara.Binney@hq.doe.gov.

335

DOE O 415.1 Admin Chg 1, Information Technology Project Management  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The Order provides program and project management direction for the acquisition and management of IT projects, investments, and initiatives. Cancels DOE G ...

2012-12-03T23:59:59.000Z

336

PROJECT TITLE:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Baltimore Baltimore PROJECT TITLE: EECBG - GHG Scrubbing System Page 1 of2 STATE: MD Funding Opportunity Announcement Number Procurement Instrument Number NEPA Control Number em Number DE-EE0000738 GFO-0000738-002 0 Based all my review of the information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451.1A), I have made the following determination: CX, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: All Technical advice and planning assistance to international, national, state, and local organizations. 85.1 Actions to conserve energy, demonstrate potential energy conservation, and promote energy-efficiency that do not increase the indoor concentrations of potentially harmful substances. These actions may involve financial and technical

337

MONTICELLO PROJECTS  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

09 09 January 2010 Doc. No. S06172 Page 1 1.3 Peripheral Properties (Private and City-Owned) * No land use or supplemental standards compliance issues were observed or reported by LTSM on-site staff. Monticello National Priorities List Sites Federal Facilities Agreement (FFA) Quarterly Report: October 1-December 31, 2009 This report summarizes project status and activities implemented October through December 2009, and provides a schedule of near-term activities for the Monticello Mill Tailings Site (MMTS) and the Monticello Vicinity Properties (MVP) sites. This report also includes disposal cell and Pond 4 leachate collection data, quarterly site inspection reports, site meteorological data, and a performance summary for the ex situ groundwater treatment system.

338

Project 298  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Reaction Engineering Reaction Engineering International Salt Lake City, UT www.reaction-eng.com CONTACTS Bruce W. Lani Project Manager National Energy Technology Laboratory 412-386-5819 bruce.lani@netl.doe.gov Thomas J. Feeley, III Technology Manager National Energy Technology Laboratory 412-386-6134 thomas.feeley@netl.doe.gov Michael Bockelie Reaction Engineering International 801-364-69255 bockelie@reaction-eng.com WEBSITE http://www.netl.doe.gov NO X CONTROL OPTIONS AND INTEGRATION FOR U.S. COAL FIRED BOILERS (RICH REAGENT INJECTION) Background Enacted regulations pertaining to the NO X SIP Call and potential future regulations in proposed legislation such as the President's Clear Skies Act or EPA's Clean Air Interstate Rule require power producers to seek the most cost effective methods to achieve compliance. In order to address present and

339

PROJECT TITLE:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Richmond Richmond PROJECT TITLE: EECBG - Solar Compactors and Recycling Units Page 1 of2 STATE: VA Funding Opportunity Announcement Number DE-FOA-0000013 Procurement Instrument Number DE-EE0000878 NEPA Control Number cm Number GFO-0000878-003 0 Based on my review of the information concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (authorized under DOE Order 451.1A), I have made the following determination: CX, EA, EIS APPENDIX AND NUMBER: Description: 85.1 Actions to conserve energy, demonstrate potential energy conservation, and promote energy-efficiency that do not increase the indoor concentrations of potentially harmful substances. These actions may involve financial and technical assistance to individuals (such as builders, owners, consultants, designers), organizations (such as utilities), and state

340

Policy Flash 2013-68 Acquisition Guide 42.101 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 Acquisition Guide 42.101 8 Acquisition Guide 42.101 Policy Flash 2013-68 Acquisition Guide 42.101 Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Michael Righi of the Contract and Financial Assistance Policy Division, Office of Policy, Office Acquisition and Project Management at (202) 287-1337 or at Michael.Righi@hq.doe.gov POLICY_FLASH_for Acquisition Guiide Chapter on Audit Requirements for non MO contracts.pdf ninth version of Audit Guide Chapter of April 2013--incorporating field comments -FINAL.pdf More Documents & Publications Chapter 42 - Contract Administration 2014-02 Acquistion Letter 2014-01: Management and Operating Contractors' Audit Coverage of Cost-Reimbursement Subcontracts Attached is Policy Flash 2013-44 Acquisition Guide- Allowability of Incurred Costs

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "acquisition compliance project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Policy Flash 2013-68 Acquisition Guide 42.101 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Policy Flash 2013-68 Acquisition Guide 42.101 Policy Flash 2013-68 Acquisition Guide 42.101 Policy Flash 2013-68 Acquisition Guide 42.101 Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Michael Righi of the Contract and Financial Assistance Policy Division, Office of Policy, Office Acquisition and Project Management at (202) 287-1337 or at Michael.Righi@hq.doe.gov POLICY_FLASH_for Acquisition Guiide Chapter on Audit Requirements for non MO contracts.pdf ninth version of Audit Guide Chapter of April 2013--incorporating field comments -FINAL.pdf More Documents & Publications Chapter 42 - Contract Administration Attached is Policy Flash 2013-44 Acquisition Guide- Allowability of Incurred Costs 2014-02 Acquistion Letter 2014-01: Management and Operating Contractors' Audit Coverage of Cost-Reimbursement Subcontracts

342

Revised Acquisition Guide Chapter 42.5, Contract Management Planning  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2-24 2-24 Date: February 21, 2012 To: Procurement Directors From: Director Contract and Financial Assistance Policy Division Office of Policy Office of Procurement and Assistance Management Subject: Revised Acquisition Guide Chapter 42.5, Contract Management Planning Summary: The Department of Energy (DOE) has been on GAO's High Risk List for the past several years as a result of inadequate contract and project management. Accordingly, the improvement of contract administration is a critical issue for DOE. The Acquisition Guide chapter on Contract Management Planning has been completely revised to address this matter.

343

FAQS Job Task Analyses - Environmental Compliance FAQS  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environmental Compliance Functional Area Qualification Standard Environmental Compliance Functional Area Qualification Standard DOE-STD-1156-2011 Step 1 Identify and evaluate tasks - Develop a comprehensive list of tasks that define the job. o A great starting point is the list of Duties and Responsibilities from the FAQS. o Give careful thought to additional tasks that could be considered. o Don't worry about deleting tasks at this point - that is a part of the process further down. - List the tasks (and their sources, e.g., Duties and Responsibilities #1) in the chart below. - Discuss each task as a group and come to a consensus pertaining to Importance and Frequency of the task (i.e., each team member can consent to the assigned value, even if they don't exactly agree with it). - When all values have been assigned, consider as a group deleting tasks

344

RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL PACKAGING TORQUE REQUIREMENTS COMPLIANCE  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Shipping containers used to transport radioactive material (RAM) in commerce employ a variety of closure mechanisms. Often, these closure mechanisms require a specific amount of torque be applied to a bolt, nut or other threaded fastener. It is important that the required preload is achieved so that the package testing and analysis is not invalidated for the purpose of protecting the public. Torque compliance is a means of ensuring closure preload, is a major factor in accomplishing the package functions of confinement/containment, sub-criticality, and shielding. This paper will address the importance of applying proper torque to package closures, discuss torque value nomenclature, and present one methodology to ensure torque compliance is achieved.

Watkins, R.; Leduc, D.

2011-03-24T23:59:59.000Z

345

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2010 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2010 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2010 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2011 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2010

346

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2011 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2011 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2013 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third

347

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2011 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2011 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2010 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011

348

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2013 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2013 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2013 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2011 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2010

349

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2012

350

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012

351

Monitoring, Verification and Reporting: Improving Compliance Within Energy  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Monitoring, Verification and Reporting: Improving Compliance Within Energy Monitoring, Verification and Reporting: Improving Compliance Within Energy Efficient Programs Jump to: navigation, search Tool Summary Name: Monitoring, Verification and Reporting: Improving Compliance Within Energy Efficient Programs Agency/Company /Organization: International Energy Agency Sector: Energy Focus Area: Energy Efficiency Topics: GHG inventory, Policies/deployment programs Resource Type: Guide/manual Website: www.iea.org/papers/pathways/monitoring.pdf Monitoring, Verification and Reporting: Improving Compliance Within Energy Efficient Programs Screenshot References: Monitoring, Verification and Reporting: Improving Compliance Within Energy Efficient Programs[1] This document includes: A brief overview of MVE in the context of S&L programmes.

352

FAQS Qualification Card - Environment Compliance | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Environment Compliance Environment Compliance FAQS Qualification Card - Environment Compliance A key element for the Department's Technical Qualification Programs is a set of common Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQS) and associated Job Task Analyses (JTA). These standards are developed for various functional areas of responsibility in the Department, including oversight of safety management programs identified as hazard controls in Documented Safety Analyses (DSA). For each functional area, the FAQS identify the minimum technical competencies and supporting knowledge and skills for a typical qualified individual working in the area. FAQC-EnvironmentalCompliance.docx Description Environment Compliance Qualification Card More Documents & Publications FAQS Qualification Card - Safeguards and Security General Technical Base

353

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2012 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2012 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2011 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012

354

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2009 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

09 09 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2009 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2009 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2010 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2010 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2010

355

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2011 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First

356

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2010 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2010 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2010 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2010 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2009

357

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2011 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2011 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2010 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2011

358

OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 - Acquisition Regulations System SEBMonthlyStatusReportingRequirement.pdf Chapter 15 - Contracting by Negotiation...

359

Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site Waste Compliance Order, August 21, 1997 Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7-08-21-02 7-08-21-02 State Colorado Agreement Type Consent Order Legal Driver(s) RCRA Scope Summary Establish compliance requirements and schedules for the implementation of a "Waste Chemical Project Plan" Parties DOE; Kaiser-Hill Company, LLC; Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Date 8/21/1997 SCOPE * Establish compliance requirements and schedules for the implementation of a "Waste Chemical Project Plan" (the "Waste Chemical Plan") at RFETS. * Resolve violations of the Colorado Hazardous Waste Act and the Colorado Hazardous Waste Regulations. ESTABLISHING MILESTONES * Activities in the Waste Chemical Plan shall be completed by no later than December 31, 1999, except as to Excluded Chemicals (discussed in Paragraph 22 of this Order

360

Recipient: County of Horry, SC ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 8 Recipient: County of Horry, SC ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Project Activity #1 - City of Conway- New Photovoltaic Generating system at Public Works Complex B5.1 Historical Preservation Clause Waste Stream Clause Engineering Clause Project Activity #2 - Horry County Building & Facilities B5.1 Historical Preservation Clause Waste Stream Clause Engineering Clause Additional Comments: Based on my review of information conveyed to me and in my possession (or attached) concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (as authorized under DOE Order 451.18), I have determined that the proposed action fits within the specified class of actions, other applicable

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "acquisition compliance project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Recipient: City of Riverside ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Award #: EE 000 0872 Award #: EE 000 0872 Recipient: City of Riverside ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Project 1-Government Facility Retrofits A9, All, B5.1 Waste Stream Clause Historic Preservation Clause Engineering Clause **boiler replacement cannot result in a net increase in air emissions. Project 2 - Foreclosed Home - Green Rehab Program A9, All, B5.1 Waste Stream Clause Historic Preservation Clause Engineering Clause Project 3-PC Power Management Software Rebate Program A9, All, B5.1 None. Project 4-Specific Plan Updates A9, All None. Project 6-Solar Trash Compactor Technologies B5.1 Waste Stream clause Project 7-PV electric vehicle

362

Compliance with Energy Codes | Building Energy Codes Program  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Compliance with Energy Codes Compliance with Energy Codes Energy code compliance must be achieved to realize the considerable benefits inherent in energy codes. BECP supports successful compliance by making no-cost compliance tools, REScheck(tm) and COMcheck(tm), and other resources widely available to everyone. BECP has also developed several resources to help states uniformly assess the rate of compliance with their energy codes for residential and commercial buildings. It is important to note that regardless of the level of enforcement, as a law the building owner/developer is ultimately responsible to comply with the energy code. Compliance will be increased if the adopting agency prepares the building construction community to comply with the energy code and provides resources to code officials to enforce it.

363

Contacts for IT Project Management | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

IT Project Management CIO Leadership Organization Contact Us Acquisition Administration Cyber Security E-Gov Enterprise Architecture Geospatial Science Program Information...

364

Case History of a Clean Water Act Compliance Agreement at the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site near Golden, Colorado  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A major Clean Water Act (CWA) Federal Facilities Compliance Agreement was signed on March 25, 1991 by the US Department of Energy, Rocky Flats Field Office (DOE, RFFO) and the Water Enforcement Division of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region VIII. The agreement revised the Rocky Flats Plant`s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and arose from pemittee-requested changes in effluent monitoring points and permit violations, most notably the February 22, 1989 Chromic Acid Incident. The Rocky Flats Plant, now called the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site (Site) near Golden Colorado was operated at that time by Rockwell International Corporation, who later plead guilty to six misdemeanor and felony counts of the CWA (the aforementioned NPDES permit violations) and paid a $4 million fine on March 26, 1992. The Compliance Agreement, hereafter referred to as the NPDES FFCA, called for three separate remedial action plans and contained a schedule for their submittal to the EPA. The compliance plans focussed on: (1) Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP) performance upgrades, (2) source control and surface water protection, and (3) characterization of the impacts from past sludge disposal practices. Projects that implemented the compliance plans were initiated soon after submittal to the EPA and are forecast to complete in 1997 at a total cost of over $35 million. This paper presents a case history of NPDES FFCA compliance projects and highlights the successes, failures, and lessons learned.

Thompson, J.S.

1995-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

365

DOE FPD + Acquisition Workforce News Acquiring Minds Want to Know  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

MARCH 2013 MARCH 2013 Got COR Experience? 2 PARS II Helpful Hints 3 Did You Know? PARS II Has a New "On Hold" Project Designation 5 Questions of the Month 6 Recently Certified FPD 7 Independent Government Cost Estimate and Independent Cost Estimate - The Same or Different? Ron Cone, MA-621, Field Assistance & Oversight Division Rick Elliott, PE, CCE, MA-631, Project Assessments Division A DOE project may require either an independent government cost estimate or an independent cost estimate based on events that occur during the project or at certain stages of project development. Sometimes, both are required. DOE Order 413.3B, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets, provides the following definitions:

366

Acquisition Savings Reporting Process Template  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Savings Reporting Process Savings Reporting Process Reporting Template 083112 FINAL 1 of 7 As of August 28, 2012 ` Process 1 STEP 1 - Select Savings Type You must first determine if the savings is through a Strategic Sourcing process or an Other Acquisition Savings process. If it is Strategic Sourcing, it must satisfy the 8 step definition. If it does not satisfy the eight steps, then it is an Other Acquisition Savings process. 2 STEP 2 - Select Savings Methodology (In Order of Preference) Regardless if it is Strategic Sourcing or an Other Acquisition Savings process, the next step is to determine the savings methodology that will be used to calculate the savings. You must select only one methodology. a. Transactions are not reported as savings in multiple categories.

367

Acquisition News | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Acquisition News Acquisition News Acquisition News RSS July 12, 2013 Contract Awarded for Environmental Technical Services Cincinnati - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) awarded a contract for Environmental Technical Services to Restoration Services Inc. of Oak Ridge, Tennessee, for support services at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant located near Piketon, OH. March 7, 2013 Department of Justice: CH2M Hill Hanford Group Inc. Admits Criminal Conduct, Parent Company Agrees to Cooperate in Ongoing Investigation and Pay $18.5 Million to Resolve Civil and Criminal Allegations The Justice Department, in conjunction with the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Washington, announced today that Colorado-based CH2M Hill Hanford Group Inc. (CHG) and its parent company, CH2M Hill

368

Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program Fiscal Year 2001  

SciTech Connect

The Ecological Monitoring and Compliance program, funded through the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Operations Office, monitors the ecosystem of the Nevada Test Site (NTS) and ensures compliance with laws and regulations pertaining to NTS biota. This report summarizes the program's activities conducted by Bechtel Nevada during fiscal year 2001. Program activities included: (1) biological surveys at proposed construction sites, (2) desert tortoise compliance, (3) ecosystem mapping and data management, (4) sensitive species and unique habitat monitoring, and (5) biological monitoring at the HAZMAT Spill Center. Biological surveys for the presence of sensitive species were conducted for 23 NTS projects. Eleven sites were in desert tortoise habitat. These projects have the potential to disturb a total of 588 acres, where 568 acres of disturbance would be off-road driving. No tortoises were found in or displaced from project areas, and no tortoise s were accidentally injured or killed at project areas. One tortoise was crushed by a vehicle on a paved road. A topical report describing the classification of habitat types on the NTS was completed and distributed. The report is the culmination of three years of field vegetation mapping and the analysis of vegetation data from over 1,500 ecological landform units. Compilation of historical wildlife data was initiated. A long-term monitoring plan for important plant species that occur on the NTS was completed. Site-wide monitoring was conducted for the western burrowing owl, bat species of concern, wild horses, and raptor nests. Sixty-nine of 77 known owl burrows were monitored. As in previous years, some owls were present year round on the NTS. An overall decrease in active owl burrows was observed within all three ecoregions (Mojave Desert, Transition, Great Basin Desert) from October through January. An increase in active owl burrows was observed from mid March to early April. A total of 55 juvenile owls was detected from 11 breeding pairs. Pellet analysis of burrowing owls was completed which identified key prey species. A total of 272 bats, representing 10 bat species were captured in mist-nets at water sources in the Great Basin Desert ecoregion. Bats were detected with the Anabat II call-recording system at water sources and selected tunnel and mine entrances. Thirty-seven adult horses and 11 foals were counted this year. Two of the eleven foals observed last year survived to yearlings. Seven active raptor nests were found and monitored this year. These included two Great-horned Owl nests, three Barn Owl nests, and two Red-tailed Hawk nests. Selected wetlands and man-made water sources were monitored for physical parameters and wildlife use. No dead animals were observed this year in any plastic-lined sump. The chemical spill test plans for four experiments at the HAZMAT Spill Center were reviewed for their potential to impact biota downwind of spills on Frenchman Lake playa.

C. A. Wills

2001-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

369

SunShot Initiative: Customer Acquisition  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Customer Acquisition to someone Customer Acquisition to someone by E-mail Share SunShot Initiative: Customer Acquisition on Facebook Tweet about SunShot Initiative: Customer Acquisition on Twitter Bookmark SunShot Initiative: Customer Acquisition on Google Bookmark SunShot Initiative: Customer Acquisition on Delicious Rank SunShot Initiative: Customer Acquisition on Digg Find More places to share SunShot Initiative: Customer Acquisition on AddThis.com... Concentrating Solar Power Photovoltaics Systems Integration Balance of Systems Reducing Non-Hardware Costs Lowering Barriers Fostering Growth Customer Acquisition Photo of a woman, man, and child looking at a silver box on the outside of a home. The cost of acquiring customers and designing systems to fit their homes represents approximately 45% of all balance of systems costs in the U.S.

370

Different Kind of"Deal": Selling Wind as Environmental Compliance; Preprint  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Supplemental Environmental Projects (SEPs), an environmental regulatory mechanism available at both State and Federal levels, show promise as a marketing venue for wind developers. SEPs are an alternative available to defendants who have been assessed penalties for environmental non-compliance, allowing them to offset a significant amount of penalties by investing in environmentally beneficial projects. In 1999, the dollar value of Federal SEPs negotiated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) totaled$277 million. In addition, cumulative state enforcement actions may be settled with SEPs. Aside from some compressed natural gas projects, no clean energy projects have been undertaken with the funds. Wind and other clean energy developers can play a unique role in introducing wind energy projects into the SEP negotiating process.

Tombari, C.; Sinclair, K.

2003-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

371

The Washington State Experience Energy Code Compliance  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Washington State Experience Washington State Experience Residential Energy Code Compliance Gary Nordeen Senior Building Science Specialist April 4, 2013 WSU Energy Program Provides energy services, products, education and information for: * Businesses * Utilities ̶ public and private * Governments ̶ state and local * Tribes * Federal agencies * Manufacturing plants * Educational facilities * National laboratories WSU Energy Program Building Science Team * Residential energy code technical assistance * Voluntary programs, Northwest ENERGYSTAR Homes * Research and development, Building America * Community-based upgrade programs * Industry training and certifications ̶ HERS, BPI, ENERGY STAR, PTCS Staff provides building science expertise for: WSU Energy Program

372

Environmental Compliance Functional Area Qualification Standard  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

56-2011 56-2011 June 2011 DOE STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; further dissemination unlimited. (Unclassified Unlimited) DOE-STD-1156-2011 ii This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/ DOE-STD-1156-2011 iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENT v PURPOSE 1 APPLICABILITY 1 IMPLEMENTATION 2 EVALUATION REQUIREMENTS 3 INITIAL QUALIFICATION AND TRAINING 5

373

WICF Certification, Compliance and Enforcement webinar  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

WICF Testing, Certification, WICF Testing, Certification, Compliance, and Enforcement Overview August 30, 2011 2 | Building Technologies Program & General Counsel's Office of Enforcement eere.energy.gov Agenda 2 Certified Ratings 3 1 Testing Basic Model Enforcement 4 5 Manufacturer How to Submit Questions 6 3 | Building Technologies Program & General Counsel's Office of Enforcement eere.energy.gov Manufacturer Explanation A Manufacturer of a WICF * Is a domestic manufacturer or an importer. * Produces a component of a walk-in cooler or walk-in freezer that affects energy consumption, including, but not limited to, refrigeration, doors, lights, windows, or walls.

374

Security Implications and Considerations for Serial to Internet Protocol-Based Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition Migration  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This technical update report describes the requirements, risks, benefits, vulnerabilities, and potential compliance issues with North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) critical infrastructure protection (CIP) standards that utilities might face when migrating their supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) systems from serial-based communications to communications based on the Internet protocol (IP) suite. The report is based on a survey of several utilities that have taken ...

2012-09-20T23:59:59.000Z

375

Recipient: Lounty of Salt Lake ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 Recipient: Lounty of Salt Lake ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Development of Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy All, B5.1 Allowable: Any administrative actions/audits associated with this activity Prohibited: Any implementation of projects/construction activities without NEPA approval from DOE Energy Efficiency Grants to Nonprofits A9, B5.1 Allowable: Any administrative actions/audits associated with this activity Prohibited: Any implementation of projects/construction activities without NEPA approval from DOE Home Performance Energy Star B5.1 Upgrade Planning & Zoning Ordinances for Wind, Solar,

376

Los Alamos National Laboratory Compliance Order, October 4, 1995 Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Facility Compliance Order Federal Facility Compliance Order State New Mexico Agreement Type Compliance Agreement Legal Driver(s) New Mexico Hazardous Waste Act (NMHWA)/ FFCAct /RCRA Scope Summary Require compliance with a Site Treatment Plan for the treatment of mixed waste at Los Alamos National Lab. Parties DOE; University of California; New Mexico Environment Department Date 10/04/1995 SCOPE * Require compliance with a Site Treatment Plan for the treatment of mixed waste at Los Alamos National Lab. * Bring the Los Alamos National Lab into compliance with the requirements for the storage and treatment of mixed waste under RCRA and the NMHWA. * Establish that DOE and the University of California have both joint and several liability for meeting the conditions of the agreement.

377

Project information  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Project Information Amistad Project (Texas) Collbran Project (Colorado) Colorado River Storage Project Dolores Project (Colorado) Falcon Project (Texas) Provo River Project (Utah)...

378

"Annual NEPA Planning Summary Status of Ongoing NEPA Compliance Activities - Environmental Impact Statements"  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Status of Ongoing NEPA Compliance Activities - Environmental Impact Statements" "Bonneville Power Administration Annual NEPA Planning Summary Status of Ongoing NEPA Compliance Activities Environmental Impact Statements" "application/vnd.ms-excel" "#","*Title, Location","Estimated Cost","Estimated Schedule (**NEPA Milestones)",,"Description" ,"I-5 Corridor Reinforcement Project Cowlitz and Clark Counties, WA and Multnomah County, OR",5000000,"Determination Date:","application/vnd.ms-excel"," Construct about 70 miles of new 500-kV line between a new proposed substation near Castle Rock, WA and an exsting BPA substation in Troutdale, OR"

379

Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program Fiscal Year 1999 Report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Ecological and Compliance program, funded through the U. S. Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office, monitors the ecosystem of the Nevada Test Site (NTS) and ensures compliance with laws and regulations pertaining to NTS biota. This report summarizes the program's activities conducted by Bechtel Nevada during fiscal year 1999. Program activities included: (1) biological surveys at proposed construction sites (2) desert tortoise compliance (3) ecosystem mapping (4) sensitive species and unique habitat monitoring and (5) biological monitoring at the HAZMAT Spill Center.

Cathy A. Wills

1999-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

380

Microsoft Word - West Swan_Acquisition_CX_10212010.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

21, 2010 21, 2010 REPLY TO ATTN OF: Bruce Hollen KEC-4 SUBJECT: Environmental Clearance Memorandum Cecilia Brown Project Manager - KEWM-4 Proposed Action: Funding the acquisition by the State of Montana of habitat in the West Swan Valley. Fish and Wildlife Project No.: 2008-800-00, Contract # BPA-45235 Categorical Exclusion Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021) B1.25 Transfer, lease, disposition or acquisition of interests in uncontaminated land for habitat preservation or wildlife management, and only associated buildings that support these purposes. Uncontaminated means that there would be no potential for release of substances at a level, or in a form, that would pose a threat to public health or the environment.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "acquisition compliance project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2009 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Fourth Quarter Fourth Quarter FY2009 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2009 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2009 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2010 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2010

382

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Fourth Quarter Fourth Quarter FY2011 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012

383

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

First Quarter First Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012

384

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Second Quarter Second Quarter FY2011 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2011 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2011 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2010

385

Lighting Development, Adoption, and Compliance Guide BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM I  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Lighting Development, Adoption, and Compliance Guide BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM I Lighting Development, Adoption, and Compliance Guide BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM I Lighting BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM Development, Adoption, and Compliance Guide Lighting BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM September 2012 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 | PNNL-SA-90653 Development, Adoption, and Compliance Guide 3.3 Exterior Lighting Controls ...........................................................................24 3.3.1 Dusk to Dawn Controls ...............................................................................25 3.3.2 Lighting Power Reduction Controls ........................................................25 3.3.3 Parking Garage Controls ............................................................................26

386

ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3 Recipient. aunty of Montgomery, MD ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific...

387

APPENDIX J: STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH DOE SEISMICITY PROTOCOL  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

compliance with the "Protocol for Induced Seismicity Associated with Enhanced Geothermal Systems". Calpine Corporation and other Geysers geothermal operators have long been...

388

State and Alternative Fuel Provider Fleet Compliance Methods (Revised) (Brochure)  

SciTech Connect

Fact sheet describes the difference between Standard and Alternative Compliance requirements for state and alternative fuel provider fleets covered under the Energy Policy Acts of 1992 and 2005.

Not Available

2009-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

389

Compliance and Enforcement Basics | Building Energy Codes Program  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

& Offices Consumer Information Building Energy Codes Search Search Search Help Building Energy Codes Program Home News Events About DOE EERE BTO BECP Compliance Site...

390

Appliance Standards Update and Review of Certification, Compliance...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and Review of Certification, Compliance and Enforcement Powerpoint Presentation for ASHRAE Conference, January 31, 2011 Appliance Standards Update and Review of Certification,...

391

Environmental Protection- Industrial Compliance (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The Industrial Compliance Section develops and administers Certificates of Approval for the Construction and/or Operation of various industrial facilities. Industries with air emissions and/or...

392

Department of Energy Subpoenas Compliance Data from AeroSys,...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sites Power Marketing Administration Other Agencies You are here Home Department of Energy Subpoenas Compliance Data from AeroSys, Inc. Department of Energy Subpoenas...

393

Animal Agriculture Compliance Act (Iowa) | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Compliance Act (Iowa) Policy Type Environmental Regulations Affected Technologies BiomassBiogas Active Policy Yes Implementing Sector StateProvince Program Administrator...

394

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Second Quarter Second Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012

395

Guidelines for Obtaining Compliance Assurance Monitoring (CAM) Permits  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Compliance Assurance Monitoring (CAM) is a relatively new regulation that will affect virtually every coal-fired plant in the United States by the end of 2010.

2005-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

396

Policy Flash 2013-54 Acquisition Certification Program Handbook...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Policy Flash 2013-54 Acquisition Certification Program Handbook 4th Edition Policy Flash 2013-54 Acquisition Certification Program Handbook 4th Edition Acquisition Certifications...

397

Federal Acquisition Circulars 17, 18 and 20 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Acquisition Circulars 17, 18 and 20 Federal Acquisition Circulars 17, 18 and 20 Policy Flash 2007-61 Federal Acquisition Circulars 17, 18 and 20 More Documents & Publications...

398

Microsoft Word - ACQUISITION LETTER.doc | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Microsoft Word - ACQUISITION LETTER.doc More Documents & Publications ACQUISITION LETTER DEAR Part 933 OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides Chapter 33 - Protests, Disputes and Appeals...

399

Test Acquisition Guide | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Test Acquisition Guide Test Acquisition Guide Test Acquisition Guide Regulatory requirements for the acquisition process are set forth in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and are supplemented in the Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation (DEAR). FAR 1.301 provides for the issuance of additional internal agency guidance, including designations and delegations of authority, assignments of responsibilities, work-flow procedures, and internal reporting requirements. The DOE Acquisition Guide serves this purpose by identifying relevant internal standard operating procedures to be followed by both procurement and program personnel who are involved in various aspects of the acquisition process. The Guide also is intended to be a repository of best practices found throughout the agency

400

Policy Flash 2013-42 Acquisition Guide Chapter 19.1- Summary of Small  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 Acquisition Guide Chapter 19.1- Summary of 2 Acquisition Guide Chapter 19.1- Summary of Small Business Administration and Department of Energy Partnership Policy Flash 2013-42 Acquisition Guide Chapter 19.1- Summary of Small Business Administration and Department of Energy Partnership Attached is Policy Flash 2013-42 Acquisition Guide Chapter 19.1 - Summary of Small Business Administration and Department of Energy Partnership Agreement Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Jason Taylor of the Contract and Financial Assistance Policy Division, Office of Policy, Office of Acquisition and Project Management at (202) 287-1560 or at jason.taylor@hq.doe.gov. Policy Flash 2013-42.pdf Department of Energy Partnership Agreement.pdf AG19 1.pdf More Documents & Publications Attachment FY2011-55 OPAM

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "acquisition compliance project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Policy Flash 2013-39 Acquisition Guide, Chapter 42.15, Contractor  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 Acquisition Guide, Chapter 42.15, Contractor 9 Acquisition Guide, Chapter 42.15, Contractor Performance Information Policy Flash 2013-39 Acquisition Guide, Chapter 42.15, Contractor Performance Information Attached is Policy Flash 2013-39 Acquisition Guide, Chapter 42.15, Contractor Performance Information Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Barbara Binney, of the Office of Acquisition and Project Management Policy at (202) 287-1340 or at Barbara.Binney@hq.doe.gov. Policy Flash AG chapter 4215.pdf AcqGuide42pt15 March 2013.pdf AcqGuide42pt15 attachment March 2013 ratings and narratives.pdf More Documents & Publications Policy Flash 2013-70 Acqusition Guides 42.15 Contractor Performance Infromation and 42.16 reporting Other Contractor Performance into Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Infromation Systems (FAPIIS)

402

Policy Flash 2013-24 Fee Determinations: Requirement to Obtain Acquisition  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 Fee Determinations: Requirement to Obtain 4 Fee Determinations: Requirement to Obtain Acquisition Executive's Input Policy Flash 2013-24 Fee Determinations: Requirement to Obtain Acquisition Executive's Input Attached is Policy Flash 2013-24 Fee Determinations: Requirement to Obtain Acquisition Executive's Input. Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Michael Righi of the Contract and Financial Assistance Policy Division, Office of Policy, Office Acquisition and Project Management at (202) 287-1337 or at Michael.Righi@hq.doe.gov. POLICY_FLASH_2013-24 disseminating the Dep Sec's memo of Jan 28 2013 on Fee Determ and AEs.pdf Fee Determinations - Requirement to Obtain Acquisition Executive's Input.pdf More Documents & Publications Policy Flash: 2013-52 Contractor Legal Management Requirements: Final Rule

403

Policy Flash 2013-24 Fee Determinations: Requirement to Obtain Acquisition  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 Fee Determinations: Requirement to Obtain 4 Fee Determinations: Requirement to Obtain Acquisition Executive's Input Policy Flash 2013-24 Fee Determinations: Requirement to Obtain Acquisition Executive's Input Attached is Policy Flash 2013-24 Fee Determinations: Requirement to Obtain Acquisition Executive's Input. Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Michael Righi of the Contract and Financial Assistance Policy Division, Office of Policy, Office Acquisition and Project Management at (202) 287-1337 or at Michael.Righi@hq.doe.gov. POLICY_FLASH_2013-24 disseminating the Dep Sec's memo of Jan 28 2013 on Fee Determ and AEs.pdf Fee Determinations - Requirement to Obtain Acquisition Executive's Input.pdf More Documents & Publications Policy Flash: 2013-52 Contractor Legal Management Requirements: Final Rule

404

Acquisition Career Management Program Handbook, Partial Revision...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Acquisition Career Management Program Handbook, Partial Revision of Chapter 11, Contracting Officer's Representative SUMMARY: The...

405

Securing Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Acquisition (SCADA) and Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Linkage of Security and Safety in SCADA and Industrial Control Systems ...

2013-04-09T23:59:59.000Z

406

OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Chapter 1 - Acquisition Regulations System Policy Flash 2012-8 BSCProgramDescriptionDocumentJan2005.doc&0;...

407

Recipient. Uty of San Jose ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

81 81 Recipient. Uty of San Jose ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) LED Streetlights A9, All, B5.1 Waste Stream clause Municipal Energy Efficiency Retrofits A9, All, B5.1 Waste Stream clause Historic Preservation clause Engineering clause Municipal Solar Program A9, All Administration, outreach, technical advice, and outreach should be CX'd; implementation of projects under this activity should be conditioned pending further NEPA review. Additional Comments: Based on my review of information conveyed to me and in my possession (or attached) concerning the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (as authorized under DOE Order 451.1B), I have

408

Project 363  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

water sources may help to minimize effects on surface-water ecosystems caused by thermal discharge of cooling water and power plant water intakes to insure compliance with...

409

Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program Fiscal Year 2000 Report  

SciTech Connect

The Ecological Monitoring and Compliance program, funded through the U.S. Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office, monitors the ecosystem of he Nevada Test Site (NTS) and ensures compliance with laws and regulations pertaining to NTS biota. This report summarizes the program's activities conducted by Bechtel Nevada during fiscal year 2000. Program activities included: (1) biological surveys at proposed construction sites, (2) desert tortoise compliance,(3) ecosystem mapping, (4) sensitive species and unique habitat monitoring, and (5) biological monitoring at the HAZMAT Spill Center. Biological surveys for the presence of sensitive species were conducted for 24 NTS projects. Seventeen sites were in desert tortoise habitat, and six acres of tortoise habitat were documented as being disturbed this year. No tortoises were found in or displaced from project areas, and no tortoises were accidentally injured or killed. A topical report describing the classification of habitat types o n the NTS was completed. The report is the culmination of three years of field vegetation mapping and the analysis of vegetation data from over 1,500 ecological landform units. A long-term monitoring plan for important plant species that occur on the NTS was completed. Sitewide inventories were conducted for the western burrowing owl, bat species of concern, wild horses, raptor nests, and mule deer. Fifty-nine of 69 known owl burrows were monitored. Forty-four of the known burrows are in disturbed habitat. As in previous years, some owls were present year round on the NTS. An overall decrease in active owl burrows was observed within all three ecoregions (Mojave Desert, Transition, Great Basin Desert) from October through January. An increase in active owl burrows was observed from mid-March to early April. A total of 45 juvenile owls was detected from eight breeding pairs. One nest burrow was detected in the Mojave Desert,one in the Great Basin Desert, and six in the Transition ecoregion. Seventy bats, representing four bat species of concern, were captured in mist-nets at water sources in the Great Basin Desert ecoregion. Bats were detected with the Anabat II call-recording system at selected tunnel and mine entrances verifying that some NTS mines and tunnels are used as bat roosts. Thirty-seven adult horses and 11 foals were counted this year. Four of the five foals observed last year have survived to yearlings. A monitoring plan for NTS horses was completed. Six active red-tailed hawk nests and 10 nestling red-tailed hawks were detected this year. Two spotlighting surveys for mule deer were conducted, each over three consecutive nights in October 1999 and August 2000. The mean sighting rate in October was 1.2 deer/10 kilometers (km) and 1.6 deer/10 km in August. Selected wetlands and man-made water sources were monitored for physical parameters and wildlife use. No dead animals were observed this year in any plastic-lined sump. Pahute Mesa Pond was confirmed to have vegetation,hydrology, and soil indicators that qualify the site as a jurisdictional wetland. The chemical spill test plan for one experiment at the HAZMAT Spill Center was reviewed for its potential to impact biota downwind of spills on Frenchman Lake playa.

Wills, C.A.

2000-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

410

EOTA Support Services Contract Acquisition  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Emergency Operations Training Academy (EOTA) Support Services Contract Emergency Operations Training Academy (EOTA) Support Services Contract Acquisition Welcome to the EOTA Support Services Contract Acquisition page. The U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration, EOTA requires support services to implement a comprehensive professional training development program to NNSA HQs and site office personnel. EOTA's training center located in Albuquerque, NM develop, coordinates, delivers, and certifies related emergency operations/management training at other NNSA site Offices located through out the country. EOTA ensures the effective and efficient training of emergency operations personnel throughout the DOE who are or may become involved in the planning, preparedness, and response of vital national resources. The EOTA provides

411

Microsoft Word - LowerJocko_Acquisition_CX_final_081310.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6, 2010 6, 2010 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Environmental Clearance Memorandum Cecilia Brown Project Manager - KEWM-4 Proposed Action: Provision of funds to Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes (CSKT) for purchase of the Lower Jocko River Property Fish and Wildlife Project No.: 2002-003-00, Contract # BPA-44646 Categorical Exclusion Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021): B1.25 Transfer, lease, disposition or acquisition of interests in uncontaminated land for habitat preservation or wildlife

412

Preliminary Project Execution Plan for the Remote-Handled Low-Level Waste Disposal Project  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This preliminary project execution plan (PEP) defines U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) project objectives, roles and responsibilities of project participants, project organization, and controls to effectively manage acquisition of capital funds for construction of a proposed remote-handled low-level waste (LLW) disposal facility at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL). The plan addresses the policies, requirements, and critical decision (CD) responsibilities identified in DOE Order 413.3B, 'Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets.' This plan is intended to be a 'living document' that will be periodically updated as the project progresses through the CD process to construction and turnover for operation.

David Duncan

2011-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

413

NEPA COMPLIANCE SURVEY NEPA Review Routing Form  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEPA Review Routing Form NEPA Review Routing Form A ::opy of Compliance Surveys for rev.ew. Revised 812/1 0 mjt Originator: Technical Assurance Department - Enylronmental Group D ocument Name: ~a'5 ll:?f\ " B-rr . J(j Bur I e.d ~ (ec-tr ; rJL{ u ~ Documont Numbor: 3 a 5 Date or Routing: ~ I~ I a() II Namo Roviowod Signature Date (~~ Thaf I CUt 1 -f CJ./ W./11 ~ A /rt ...... "" . A-~ r;;;;I £1 "3 7i7 .-J;_~~· ~~ / ' I" - 4 ' . # / . - . 1 ?9 '1' l p /=-- Z-4-11 ,_, y~ -- - - - - - - - - ~ L- ·~~ ,....... ,_ ,.,.. ....... , "'t _,.., , ....... '" / / /1 /7/1....., ,..I\. / / I F r-Q V C. .L> I \ I I ..... Forwarded Forwarded To Date i-t l.tlbrub ~ r:H:.. ~rrr

414

STATE OF CALIFORNIA CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE, PRESCRIPTIVE HVAC ALTERATIONS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

STATE OF CALIFORNIA CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE, PRESCRIPTIVE HVAC ALTERATIONS CEC-MECH-1C-ALT-HVAC (Revised 07/10) CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE MECH-1C-ALT-HVAC Prescriptive HVAC Steps" column below. Note: After installation of HVAC units and/or ducts, the Installation

415

National Environmental Policy Act compliance guide. Volume II (reference book)  

SciTech Connect

This document (Volume II of the National Environmental Policy Act Compliance Guide) contains current copies of regulations and guidance from the Council on Environmental Quality, the Department of Energy, the Department of State, and the Environmental Protection Agency, related to compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA).

NONE

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

416

Ecological Monitoring and Compliance Program Fiscal Year 2003 Report  

SciTech Connect

The Ecological Monitoring and Compliance program, funded through the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office, monitors the ecosystem of the Nevada Test Site and ensures compliance with laws and regulations pertaining to Nevada Test Site biota. This report summarizes the program's activities conducted by Bechtel Nevada during fiscal year 2003.

Bechtel Nevada

2003-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

417

Compliance Verification Paths for Residential and Commercial Energy Codes  

SciTech Connect

This report looks at different ways to verify energy code compliance and to ensure that the energy efficiency goals of an adopted document are achieved. Conformity assessment is the body of work that ensures compliance, including activities that can ensure residential and commercial buildings satisfy energy codes and standards. This report identifies and discusses conformity-assessment activities and provides guidance for conducting assessments.

Conover, David R.; Makela, Eric J.; Fannin, Jerica D.; Sullivan, Robin S.

2011-10-10T23:59:59.000Z

418

Preliminary Comments on Compliance Plan and Request for Clarification or,  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Comments on Compliance Plan and Request for Comments on Compliance Plan and Request for Clarification or, in the Alternative, Rehearing of the District of Columbia Public Service Commission Preliminary Comments on Compliance Plan and Request for Clarification or, in the Alternative, Rehearing of the District of Columbia Public Service Commission Docket No. EO-05-01: Pursuant to Order No. 202-05-3, issued by the Department of Energy ("DOE") in the above-captioned docket on December 20, 2005 ("December 20 Order"), and Section 313 of the Federal Power Act ("FPA"), 16 U.S.C. § 8251, the District of Columbia Public Service Commission ("DCPSC") hereby submits its preliminary comments on the compliance plan ("Compliance Plan") proposed by MiranT Potomac River,

419

Compliance Order, Los Alamos National Security, LLC - July 12, 2007 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Compliance Order, Los Alamos National Security, LLC - July 12, 2007 Compliance Order, Los Alamos National Security, LLC - July 12, 2007 Compliance Order, Los Alamos National Security, LLC - July 12, 2007 July 12, 2007 Issued to Los Alamos National Security, LLC related to the Unauthorized Reproduction and Removal of Classified Matter from the Los Alamos National Laboratory The Compliance Order directs LANS to implement specific corrective actions to remediate both the laboratory management deficiencies that contributed to the thumb drive security incident at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) discovered in October 2006 and, more broadly, longstanding deficiencies in the classified information and cyber security programs at LANL. Violation of the Compliance Order would subject LANS to issuance of a notice of violation and assessment of civil penalties up to S100,000 per

420

Compliance Order, Los Alamos National Security, LLC - July 12, 2007 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Compliance Order, Los Alamos National Security, LLC - July 12, 2007 Compliance Order, Los Alamos National Security, LLC - July 12, 2007 Compliance Order, Los Alamos National Security, LLC - July 12, 2007 July 12, 2007 Issued to Los Alamos National Security, LLC related to the Unauthorized Reproduction and Removal of Classified Matter from the Los Alamos National Laboratory The Compliance Order directs LANS to implement specific corrective actions to remediate both the laboratory management deficiencies that contributed to the thumb drive security incident at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) discovered in October 2006 and, more broadly, longstanding deficiencies in the classified information and cyber security programs at LANL. Violation of the Compliance Order would subject LANS to issuance of a notice of violation and assessment of civil penalties up to S100,000 per

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "acquisition compliance project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Oak Ridge Reservation Compliance Order, September 26, 1995  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reservation Compliance Order, September 26, 1995 Page 1 of 5 Reservation Compliance Order, September 26, 1995 Page 1 of 5 EM Home | Regulatory Compliance | Environmental Compliance Agreements Oak Ridge Reservation Compliance Order, September 26, 1995 STATE OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION IN THE MATTER OF: ) ) ) DIVISION OF SOLID WASTE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ) MANAGEMENT ENERGY ) ) CASE NO. 95-0514 RESPONDENT ) Commissioner's Order NOW COMES Don Dills, Commissioner of the Department of Environment and Conservation, and states that: Table of Contents Parties Jurisdiction Facts Order Reservation of Rights Notice of Rights Parties I. Don Dills is the duly appointed Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation ("the Department"). II. The United States Department of Energy ("DOE")is a department, agency and instrumentality of the

422

EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports and Data | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports and Data EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports and Data EISA Compliance Tracking System Reports and Data October 8, 2013 - 2:06pm Addthis The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) provides links to reports and data illustrating Federal progress in meeting the requirements outlined in Section 432 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA) (42 U.S.C. 8253(f)) available through the EISA 432 Compliance Tracking System (CTS). EISA 432 CTS Data Levels Top-tier agency aggregates, representing all reported data subject to the EISA 432 requirements Facility-level detailed data that excludes information for facilities that have requested exemption from public disclosure for national-security purposes. Access Data Federal Government Compliance Overview: View key CTS metrics and aggregates

423

NSLS-II Project Schedule  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

NSLS-II Project Schedule NSLS-II Project Schedule Major Milestone Event Major Milestone Event Preliminary Schedule CD-0 (approve Mission Need) 4th quarter, FY2005 CD-1 (approve Alternative Selection and Cost Range) 4th quarter, FY2007 CD-2 (approve Performance Baseline) 1st quarter, FY2008 CD-3 (approve Start of Construction) 2nd quarter, FY2009 CD-4 (approve Start of Operations) FY2015 Critical Decisions The five Critical Decisions are major milestones approved by the Secretarial Acquisition Executive or Acquisition Executive that establish the mission need, recommended alternative, Acquisition Strategy, the Performance Baseline, and other essential elements required to ensure that the project meets applicable mission, design, security, and safety requirements. Each Critical Decision marks an increase in commitment of

424

Project Execution Plan RM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Project Execution Plan (PEP) Review Module Project Execution Plan (PEP) Review Module March 2010 CD-0 O 0 OFFICE OF P C CD-1 F ENVIRO Standard R Project E Rev Critical Decis CD-2 M ONMENTAL Review Plan Execution view Module sion (CD) Ap CD March 2010 L MANAGE n (SRP) n Plan e pplicability D-3 EMENT CD-4 Post Ope eration Standard Review Plan, 2 nd Edition, March 2010 i FOREWORD The Standard Review Plan (SRP) 1 provides a consistent, predictable corporate review framework to ensure that issues and risks that could challenge the success of Office of Environmental Management (EM) projects are identified early and addressed proactively. The internal EM project review process encompasses key milestones established by DOE O 413.3A, Change 1, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets, DOE-STD-1189-2008,

425

3-D seismic acquisition gains momentum in transition zone  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The hydrocarbon-rich Gulf of Mexico continues to be an active seismic data acquisition arena, with seismic crews working at a rapid-fire pace to acquire 3-D databases on a regional scale. Lately, however, many contractors are looking shoreward to what will be the next active site for data acquisition and exploratory drilling--the coastal transition zone, which extends roughly five miles either side of the coastline. Diverse terrain causes acquisition efforts to shift frequently between land, water and marsh. Each environment carries its own unique acquisition requirements, which means a wide variety of equipment must be constantly available. Need for multiple permits from multiple sources lends itself to a formidable permitting maze, and environmental problems are prevailing in this sensitive wetlands area. With this in mind, Fairfield and Seismic Exchange, Inc., have teamed in a joint venture to produce the world`s largest non-exclusive 3-D seismic transition zone program. The project will build on Fairfield`s massive shallow water effort, which is nearly complete.

Lawrence, M.A. [Fairfield Industries Inc., Houston, TX (United States)

1996-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

426

Compliance, HQ GILMAD J&ILL STUDY  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

r-tin E. Biles, Director, DivFsi_on of Safety, Standards and r-tin E. Biles, Director, DivFsi_on of Safety, Standards and Compliance, HQ GILMAD J&ILL STUDY The enclosed report ccntains the result of a survey of desisated areas of Gilman E%ll on the University of Californ-ia at Berkeley Cnrr,pls . The survey ~2s conducted by re~rcsentatives of the Lzwrence Lahorator?es. The third floor and b? veyed. c.sOzsnt floor areas were sur- prior Selection of areas for srlrvey was based on the history of use associated with the I~lanhattan Project and/or early Atomic Energy Coaik5sion activities. IThilc the ;.esults of the survey show the presence of low levels of restdual activity in the two areas surveyed, it is clear that these levels represent r?o health hazard. Key fi~diugs are as follow : 1. Entire survey was free of removable contaxiilation.

427

Forrest Ranch Acquisition, Annual Report 2001-2002.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Through their John Day Basin Office, the Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon (Tribes) acquired the Forrest Ranch during July of 2002. The property consists of two parcels located in the John Day subbasin within the Columbia basin. The mainstem parcel consists of 3,503 acres and is located 1/2 mile to the east of Prairie City, Oregon on the mainstem of the John Day River. The middle fork parcel consists of 820 acres and is located one mile to the west of the town of Austin, OR on the middle fork John Day River. The Forrest Ranch Project is under a memorandum of agreement with the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) to provide an annual written report generally describing the real property interests of the project and management activities undertaken or in progress. The Forrest Ranch acquisition was funded by BPA as part of their program to protect, mitigate, and enhance fish and wildlife habitat affected by the operation of their hydroelectric facilities on the Columbia River and its tributaries. Following lengthy negotiations with the BPA and property owner, the Tribes were able to conclude the acquisition of the Forrest Ranch in July of 2002. The intent of the acquisition project was to partially mitigate fish and wildlife impacts for the John Day Dam on the Columbia River as outlined in the Northwest Power Planning Council's Wildlife Program (NPPC 1994, section 11.1, section 7.6). While the Tribes hold fee-title to the property, the BPA has assured a level of program funding through a memorandum of agreement and annual statement of work. As early as 1997, the Tribes identified this property as a priority for restoration in the John Day basin. In 2000, the Tribes arranged an agreement with the landowner to seek funds for the acquisition of both the Middle Fork and upper Mainstem John Day River holdings of Mr. John Forrest. This property had been a priority of not only the Tribes, but of many other basin natural resource agencies. The contract period was the first year of the program with December 2001 through July 2nd 2002 being previous to acquisition of the property. The majority of the activities conducted under the contract period were spent on O&M and pre acquisition activities.

Smith, Brent

2003-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

428

Office of Acquisition and Project Management Certifications Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

one year property experience. Please specify month and year of one year property experience. Please specify month and year of entry into the property field: ________/____ Document one year of related experience: Training requirements: Send all certificates for applicable courses below to the SACM IND 100 CONTRACT PROPERTY ADMINISTRATION AND DISPOSITION FUNDAMENTALS (Y/N) Actual course; _____Date completed or Date Fulfillment Approved or Other ____________________________________ Course Title and Number of Training Hours ____________________________________; ____________ Course Provider Date Complete IND 103 CONTRACT PROPERTY SYSTEMS ANALYSIS FUNDAMENTALS (Y/N) Actual course; _____Date completed or Date Fulfillment Approved or Other ____________________________________ Course Title and Number of Training Hours

429

Office of Acquisition and Project Management Certifications Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Desired) 64 semester hours of undergraduate work with emphasis in business Record here: Desired) 64 semester hours of undergraduate work with emphasis in business Record here: Experience: Document an additional 2 years of Purchasing experience (5 years cumulative) ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ TRAINING Course Number Course Name How did you take it? Date Completed Number of CLPs Performance-Based Contracting - Minimum of 16 hours Chhhhh hh hhhh h MM/DD/YYYY Digit < 40

430

Office of Acquisition and Project Management Certifications Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 years property experience. Please specify month and year of 3 years property experience. Please specify month and year of entry into the property field: ________/____ Please document related experience here: Training requirements: Send all certificates for applicable courses below to the SACM IND 200 INTERMEDIATE CONTRACT PROPERTY ADMINISTRATION AND DISPOSITION (Y/N) Actual course; _____Date completed or Date Fulfillment Approved OR ____________________________________ Course Title and Number of Training Hours ____________________________________; ____________ Course Provider Date Complete DEMILITARIZATION COURSE ____________________________________ Course Title and Number of Training Hours ____________________________________; ____________ Course Provider Date Complete PERSONAL PROPERTY AND NONPROLIFERATION COURSE

431

Idaho Spent Fuel Facility (ISFF) Project, Appropriate Acquisition...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Strategy Lessons Learned Report Feb 2011.pdf More Documents & Publications Highly Enriched Uranium Materials Facility, Major Design Changes Late...Lessons Learned Report, NNSA,...

432

Office of Acquisition and Project Management Certifications Program  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

(Desired) 32 semester hours of undergraduate work with emphasis in business. Record here (Desired) 32 semester hours of undergraduate work with emphasis in business. Record here Experience: Document an additional 2 years of Purchasing experience ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ TRAINING Course Number Course Name How did you take it? Date Completed Number of CLPs CON 110 or FCN 110 Mission Support Planning Chhhhh hh hhhh h MM/DD/YYYY Digit < 40 CON 111 or FCN 111 Mission Strategy

433

Energy, Product, and Economic Implications of Environmental Compliance Options- A Southern California Case Study  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Industrial plants that are faced with regulated emissions constraints may also have a complex array of compliance options from which to choose. Technology options may include a number of pollution control alternatives: retrofits with more efficient equipment, fuel switching and/or process change to electrotechnologies, or advanced gas-fueled technologies. In some cases, a plant may be able to purchase emissions reduction credits (ERCs) in lieu of changing equipment, as would be the case in Southern California if the proposed RECLAIM regulations are adopted. In such cases, ERCs could also be sold by plants that achieve emissions reductions, offsetting the costs of their technology investments. This paper explores an exhaustive list of compliance options for a single industry, describing how to collect data and compare options in terms of costs, commercial availability, and impacts on energy use, emissions, plant throughput or productivity, product quality control, and other characteristics relevant to selecting an option to implement. We discuss how the options are assembled into an array of coping strategies for environmental compliance. This work is part of an ongoing project to develop a database of regulations and technology options. (A major Southern California industry, in terms of energy use and emissions, will be selected in October and the work completed in December, in preparation for a broadened scope to the entire industrial sector.)

Kyricopoulos, P. F.; Dennison, W. J.

1994-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

434

EA-1155: Ground-water Compliance Activities at the Uranium Mill...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5: Ground-water Compliance Activities at the Uranium Mill Tailings Site, Spook, Wyoming EA-1155: Ground-water Compliance Activities at the Uranium Mill Tailings Site, Spook,...

435

Part IV, Matrix of Compliance Requirements  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Davis Bacon Act Davis Bacon Act Eligibility Equipment and Real Property Management Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Period of Availability of Federal Funds Procurement/ Suspension/ Debarment Program Income Real Property Acquisition/ Relocation Reporting Subrecipient Monitoring NEPA National Historic Preservation Act Special Tests and Provisions 81.036 Inventions and Innovations Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 81.049 Office of Science Financial Assistance Program Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 81.079 Regional Biomass Energy Programs Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 81.086 Conservation Research and Development Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 81.087 Renewable Energy Research and Development Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 81.089 Fossil Energy Research and

436

Recipient: County of Kitsap, WA ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

it: EE 000 0853 it: EE 000 0853 Recipient: County of Kitsap, WA ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Kitsap Built Green Projects B5.1 Waste Stream, Engineering, and Historic Preservation clauses. Kitsap County Building Retrofits and Energy Efficiency Upgrades (Green Jobs Initiative) B5.1 except geothermal Waste Stream, Engineering, and Historic Preservation clauses. Prohibited: Any implementation of geothermal projects/construction activities without NEPA approval from DOE. Geothermal projects are to be provided to DOE for analysis. Energy Efficiency Implementation and Strategy A9, All, B5.1 None Energy Services Corps A9, All, B5.1

437

Recipient: City of Arlingtou, Texas ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

959 959 Recipient: City of Arlingtou, Texas ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) Emission Reduction Goal & Climate Action Plan A9, All, B5.1 City Hall Public Space (1st Floor) EE Project B5.1 Waste stream, engineering and historical preservation clauses. City Facility Services Building EE Project B5.1 Waste stream, engineering and historical preservation clauses. Convention Center LED Lighting Upgrade B5.1 Waste stream clause Internal Facilities Lighting Upgrades B5.1 Waste stream, engineering and historical preservation clauses. City Tower EE Project B5.1 Waste stream, engineering and historical preservation clauses.

438

Microsoft Word - MissionCreek_Kingston_Acquisition_CX_final.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

purchase purchase of the Mission Creek Property. Fish and Wildlife Project No.: 2002-003-00, Contract # BPA-44646 Categorical Exclusion Applied (from Subpart D, 10 C.F.R. Part 1021): B1.25 Transfer, lease, disposition or acquisition of interests in uncontaminated land for habitat preservation or wildlife management, and only associated buildings that support these purposes. Uncontaminated means that there would be no potential for release of substances at a level, or in a form, that would pose a threat to public health or the environment. Location: Township 19 North, Range 21 West, Section 33 of the Dixon Quad, in Lake County, Montana Proposed by: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and CSKT Description of the Proposed Action: BPA proposes to fund the acquisition of 12 acres of property

439

Deep Trek Re-configurable Processor for Data Acquisition (RPDA)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report summarizes technical progress achieved during the cooperative research agreement between Honeywell and U.S. Department of Energy to develop a high-temperature Re-configurable Processor for Data Acquisition (RPDA). The RPDA development has incorporated multiple high-temperature (225C) electronic components within a compact co-fired ceramic Multi-Chip-Module (MCM) package. This assembly is suitable for use in down-hole oil and gas applications. The RPDA module is programmable to support a wide range of functionality. Specifically this project has demonstrated functional integrity of the RPDA package and internal components, as well as functional integrity of the RPDA configured to operate as a Multi-Channel Data Acquisition Controller. This report reviews the design considerations, electrical hardware design, MCM package design, considerations for manufacturing assembly, test and screening, and results from prototype assembly and characterization testing.

Bruce Ohme; Michael Johnson

2009-06-30T23:59:59.000Z

440

SO2 Compliance and Allowance Trading: Developments and Outlook  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report takes a sharp look at specific questions about SO2 compliance under Title IV of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments. With several years of Phase I compliance behind us, what do we know about the allowance market and compliance costs? What factors will be in play between the present with its low allowance prices and the 2000-2005 period when uncertain fossil generation growth, drawdown of the allowance bank, and the prospect of major new environmental legislation could lead to very different fut...

1997-05-05T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "acquisition compliance project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Biennial Environmental Compliance Report  

SciTech Connect

This Biennial Environmental Compliance Report (BECR) documents environmental regulatory compliance at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), a facility designed and authorized for the safe disposal of transuranic (TRU) radioactive waste, for the reporting period of April 1, 2002, to March 31, 2004. As required by the WIPP Land Withdrawal Act (LWA) (Public Law [Pub. L.] 102-579, as amended by Pub. L. 104-201), the BECR documents U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) compliance with applicable environmental protection laws and regulations implemented by agencies of the federal government and the state of New Mexico.

Washington Regulatory and Environmental Services (WRES)

2004-10-25T23:59:59.000Z

442

Interaction of Compliance and Voluntary Renewable Energy Markets  

SciTech Connect

In recent years, both compliance and voluntary markets have emerged to help support the development of renewable energy resources. Both of these markets are growing rapidly and today about half of U.S. states have RPS policies in place, with a number of these policies adopted in the last several years. In addition, many states have recently increased the stringency of their RPS policies. This paper examines key market interaction issues between compliance and voluntary renewable energy markets. It provides an overview of both the compliance and voluntary markets, addressing each market's history, purpose, size, scope, and benefits while addressing issues, including double counting.

Bird, L.; Lokey, E.

2007-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

443

ECOLOGICAL MONITORING AND COMPLIANCE PROGRAM CALENDAR YEAR 2005 REPORT  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Ecological Monitoring and Compliance program (EMAC), funded through the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO), monitors the ecosystem of the Nevada Test Site (NTS) and ensures compliance with laws and regulations pertaining to NTS biota. This report summarizes the programs activities conducted by Bechtel Nevada (BN) during the Calendar Year 2005. Program activities included: (1) biological surveys at proposed construction sites, (2) desert tortoise compliance, (3) ecosystem mapping and data management, (4) sensitive and protected/regulated species and unique habitat monitoring, (5) habitat restoration monitoring, and (6) biological monitoring at the Non-Proliferation Test and Evaluation Complex (NPTEC).

BECHTEL NEVADA ECOLOGICAL SERVICES

2006-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

444

Non-Compliance Tracking and Trending at LLNL  

SciTech Connect

The Criticality Safety Section at LLNL has a formal set of procedures to guide the administrative and technical work of the section. Two of these procedures, ''Response to a Criticality Safety Infraction'' and ''CSG Criticality Safety Non-Compliance and Audit Tracking System,'' provide combined guidance for response, tracking, and trending for procedural non-compliances. Combined with a database, this system provides a framework to systematically respond to, document, track and trend criticality safety non-compliances, as well as audit findings.

Huang, S T; Pearson, J S

2001-08-22T23:59:59.000Z

445

Recipient: City of San Antonio, Texas ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

970 970 Recipient: City of San Antonio, Texas ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANTS NEPA COMPLIANCE FORM Activities Determination/ Categorical Exclusion Reviewer's Specific Instructions and Rationale (Restrictions and Allowable Activity) City Lights B5.1 Waste Stream, and Historical Preservation clauses Community Green Retrofit Program B2.5, B5.1 Engineering, waste stream, and historical preservation clauses. Municipal Facility Retrofit Program B5.1 Engineering, waste stream, and historical preservation clauses. Allowable: Any administrative action/audits associated with this activity. Prohibited: Any implementation of projects/construction activities without approval from DOE. Transportation Enhancement Initiative B5.1 Engineering, waste stream, and historical preservation clauses.

446

A Complex Multitasked Data Acquisition and Control System for Measuring  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Complex Multitasked Data Acquisition and Control System for Measuring Complex Multitasked Data Acquisition and Control System for Measuring Window Thermal Efficiency, or How TSX+ Saved Our Project When It Outgrew RT-11 Title A Complex Multitasked Data Acquisition and Control System for Measuring Window Thermal Efficiency, or How TSX+ Saved Our Project When It Outgrew RT-11 Publication Type Conference Paper LBNL Report Number LBL-30613 Year of Publication 1991 Authors Yazdanian, Mehry, J. Randy Michelson, and Guy O. Kelley Conference Name U.S. DECUS Spring 1991 Symposium, May 6-10, 1991 Date Published 05/1991 Conference Location Atlanta, GA Other Numbers Mo-282 Abstract The Mobile Window Thermal Test facility (MoWiTT) predicts the energy efficiency of windows by continuously measuring the net heat transfer into and out of two room-sized calorimeters. The system consists of a data acquisition/control unit which communicates through a General Purpose Interface bus (GPIB IEEE-488) with an LSI-11/23 computer. We wrote the software in FORTRAN 77 and run it under TSX+ using detached jobs, the message facility, and shared run time systems to execute nine 64KB jobs which simultaneously take data and store it on disk. We arbitrate the access to a single scanner on the GPIB by running a SERVER task which acts as a virtual machine to serialize the requests. We can control and monitor the system remotely and run a number of interactive jobs without interfering with the data collection tasks. We cover a description of the hardware; the software requirements, including the libraries to control the data collection and drive the hardware; the system architecture, including a block diagram; design considerations to meet real-world requirements; and the problems we discovered along the way and the solutions we found either to correct or to bypass them.

447

Directory of Certificates of Compliance for radioactive materials packages: Certificates of Compliance. Volume 2, Revision 18  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of this directory is to make available a convenient source of information on packagings which have been approved by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. To assist in identifying packaging, an index by Model Number and corresponding Certificate of Compliance Number is included at the front of Volumes 1 and 2. An alphabetical listing by user name is included in the back of Volume 3 of approved QA programs. The reports include a listing of all users of each package design and approved QA programs prior to the publication date.

NONE

1995-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

448

A framework and methodology for enhancing operational requirements development : United States Coast Guard cutter project case study  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Within any major United States Coast Guard cutter acquisition project, developing the operational requirements in the early phases of acquisition is difficult as the complexity of the system is not easily understood until ...

Schofield, Douglas M. (Douglas MacLean)

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

449

Federal Acquisition Regulation Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-61  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Summary of Rules in FAC 2005-61 Item Subject FAR Case I. United States--Korea Free Trade Agreement. 2012-004 II. Delete Outdated FAR Reference to the 2012-026 DoD Industrial Preparedness Program. III. NAICS and Size Standards 2012-021 IV. Bid Protest and Appeal Authorities. 2012-008 V. Technical Amendments. Item I--United States-Korea Free Trade Agreement (FAR Case 2012-004) This final rule adopts without change the interim rule published in the Federal Register on March 7, 2012 (77 FR 13952), to implement the United States-Korea Free Trade Agreement. The Republic of Korea is already party to the World Trade Organization Government Procurement Agreement (WTO GPA). The Korea Free Trade Agreement now covers acquisition of supplies and services between $100,000 and the current WTO GPA threshold of

450

Federal Acquisition Regulations Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-51 Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Regulations Regulations Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-51 Summary Federal Register April 1, 2011 76FR 18304 I Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB) Program (Interim Rule). II Clarification of Standard Form 26--Award/Contract. Item I--Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB) Program (FAR Case 2010-015) (Interim) This interim rule amends the FAR to add subpart 19.15, Women-Owned Small Business Program, which will assist Federal agencies in achieving the 5 percent statutory goal for contracting with women-owned small business (WOSB) concerns. Agencies may restrict competition to economically disadvantaged women-owned small business (EDWOSB) concerns for contracts assigned a North American Industry Classification Systems (NAICS) code in an industry in which the Small Business Administration has

451

Planning, Budget, and Acquisition | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Planning, Budget, and Acquisition Planning, Budget, and Acquisition Planning, Budget, and Acquisition The Office of Legacy Management's (LM) Planning, Budget, and Acquisition (PBA) Team performs the following management functions: Plans, develops, and implements improvements in efficiencies of business processes and identifies opportunities for reengineering or restructuring. Plans, develops, and implements strategic planning efforts, which include analyzing the organization's annual and long-term goals and the best approach for achieving those goals. Plans, develops, and implements budget formulation processes to include identifying future spending priorities and assessing the effectiveness of programs. Plans, develops, and implements processes for budget execution, including day-to-day obligations for agency expenditures, invoices, billing

452

Miscellaneous States Shale Gas Proved Reserves Acquisitions ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Available; W Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 812013 Next Release Date: 812014 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Acquisitions...

453

SPR Acquisition Procedures - Final Rulemaking | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Director of Operatons and Readiness, Strategic Petroleum Reserve, (202) 586-4691 SPR Crude Oil Acquisition Procedures - Final Rulemaking More Documents & Publications Price...

454

Small Business Issues for Environmental Restoration Acquisitions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Small Business Issues for Environmental Restoration Acquisitions The Department of Energys best practices to reduce and eliminate barriers to small businesses entering into prime contracts for...

455

IMPLEMENTATION OF DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ACQUISITION REGULATION...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

References Workplace Substance Abuse Programs at DOE Sites 10 CFR 707 http:www.hss.enerw.aovlHealthSafetvWSHPrule85 lrule707.html Department of Energy Acquisition...

456

Federal Energy Management Program: Model Acquisition Language...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Language for Energy-Efficient Product Contracts to someone by E-mail Share Federal Energy Management Program: Model Acquisition Language for Energy-Efficient Product...

457

OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 - Cost Accounting Standards Administration OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides GAO-04-539 Department of Energy: Certain Postretirement Benefits for Contractor Employees Are Unfunded...

458

BCDA - Beamline Controls and Data Acquisition Software  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

BCDA Data Acquisition: CCD Support Data Visualization: tools used at the APS beamlines Java Channel Access: JCA Unsupported Distribution MEDM Replacement: MEDM has been the main...

459

Site Acquisition Description/ Category Contracting Office Solicitation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

is based on publicly available information available published on the DOE Acquisition Forecast (http:hqlnc.doe.govForecast) and other public sources. An actual date is provided...

460

Major DOE Acquisition Planning rev1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Improving DOE's Acquisition Forecasting and Lead-Time Information John R. Bashista, Deputy Director Office of Procurement and Assistance Management April 6, 2007 Briefing to the...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "acquisition compliance project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Evaluating Commercial Buildings for Statewide Compliance | Building Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Commercial Buildings for Statewide Compliance Commercial Buildings for Statewide Compliance The materials for this course may be used for in-person training courses, and are intended to provide the tools and specific training necessary to evaluate statewide commercial compliance with ASHRAE Standard 90.1. The course also provides useful training for the commercial provisions of the International Energy Conservation Code and general commercial field inspection for energy code compliance. The recommended background for taking this class is significant experience with plan review and/or inspection of commercial energy code provisions. Presenters: Course materials originally published by the DOE Building Energy Codes Program, July 16, 2010. Course Type: Training Materials Video In-person Downloads: Presentation Slides

462

Building Energy Codes COMPLIANCE TOOLKIT BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

COMPLIANCE TOOLKIT COMPLIANCE TOOLKIT BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM Building Energy Codes ACE LEARNING SERIES III Building Energy Codes COMPLIANCE TOOLKIT Prepared by: Building Energy Codes Program (BECP) The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Building Energy Codes Program (BECP) is an information resource on energy codes and standards for buildings. They work with other government agencies, state and local jurisdictions, organizations that develop model codes and standards, and building industry to promote codes that will provide for energy and environmental benefits and help foster adoption of, compliance with, and enforcement of those codes. September 2012 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 PNNL-SA-90466 LEARNING SERIES OVERVIEW Building Energy Codes

463

Evaluating Residential Buildings for Statewide Compliance | Building Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Residential Buildings for Statewide Compliance Residential Buildings for Statewide Compliance The materials for this course may be used for in-person training courses, and are intended to provide the tools and specific training necessary to evaluate residential compliance with the 2009 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC). The course also provides useful training in general residential field inspection for energy code compliance. The recommended background for taking this course is significant experience and/or certification on the IECC in a plan review or inspection capacity. Presenters: Course materials originally published by the DOE Building Energy Codes Program, July 16, 2010. Course Type: Training Materials Video In-person Downloads: Presentation Slides Presentation Slides Presentation Slides and Windows Media Videos

464

Tax compliance in a simulated heterogeneous multi-agent society  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

We consider an individualised approach to agent behaviour in an application to the classical economic problem of tax compliance. Most economic theories consider homogeneous representative agent utilitarian approaches to explain the decision of complying ...

Luis Antunes; Joo Balsa; Paulo Urbano; Luis Moniz; Catarina Roseta-Palma

2005-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

465

Fleet Compliance Results for MY 2011/FY 2012 (Brochure)  

SciTech Connect

This annual report summarizes the compliance results of state and alternative fuel provider fleets covered by the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPAct) for model year 2011/fiscal year 2012.

Not Available

2013-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

466

DOE/EA-1268: Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 Rev. 0 Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance at the Tuba City Uranium Mill Tailings Site December 1998 Prepared by U.S. Department of Energy Grand Junction Office...

467

Burbank Water and Power SBX1 2 Compliance Plan  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

and verifying compliance with the RPS. Keywords: Biodiesel, biogas, biomass, biomethane, certificates ........................................................................................................................................ 24 2. Biogas (including pipeline biomethane with the reduction of solid waste and treatment benefits created by the use of biomass or biogas fuels. In addition

468

Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance | Department of Energy  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Transfer and Procurement Energy Policy ARPA-E Laws & Legal Resources Open Government SmartGrid Information The mission of the Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance is to assure...

469

Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program environmental compliance assessment checklists  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of the Environmental Compliance Assessment Program is to assess the compliance of Formerly Utilized Site Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) sites with applicable environmental regulations and Department of Energy (DOE) Orders. The mission is to identify, assess, and decontaminate sites utilized during the 1940s, 1950s, and 1960s to process and store uranium and thorium ores in support of the Manhattan Engineer District and the Atomic Energy Commission. To conduct the FUSRAP environmental compliance assessment, checklists were developed that outline audit procedures to determine the compliance status of the site. The checklists are divided in four groups to correspond to these regulatory areas: Hazardous Waste Management, PCB Management, Air Emissions, and Water Discharges.

Levine, M.B.; Sigmon, C.F.

1989-09-29T23:59:59.000Z

470

Submitting Environmental Impact Statements | Compliance and Enforcement | US EPA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Submitting Environmental Impact Statements | Compliance and Enforcement | US EPA Submitting Environmental Impact Statements | Compliance and Enforcement | US EPA Jump to main content. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Recent Additions | Contact Us Search: All EPA Compliance and Enforcement q You are here: EPA Home q Compliance and Enforcement q National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) q Submitting Environmental Impact Statements Submitting Environmental Impact Statements q Amended EIS Filing System Guidelines (January 2011) q Where to Submit (or "File") an EIS q Filing an EIS--Draft, Final and Supplemental q EIS Filing Procedure for Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP) Events q Notice in the Federal Register q Time Periods Amended EIS Filing System Guidelines (January 2011)

471

Knowledge discovery in corporate email : the compliance bot meets Enron  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

I propose the creation of a real-time compliance "bot" - software to momentarily pause each employee's email at the moment of sending and to electronically assess whether that email is likely to create liability or ...

Waterman, K. Krasnow

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

472

Eder Acquisition 2007 Habitat Evaluation Procedures Report.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

A habitat evaluation procedures (HEP) analysis was conducted on the Eder acquisition in July 2007 to determine how many protection habitat units to credit Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) for providing funds to acquire the project site as partial mitigation for habitat losses associated with construction of Grand Coulee and Chief Joseph Dams. Baseline HEP surveys generated 3,857.64 habitat units or 1.16 HUs per acre. HEP surveys also served to document general habitat conditions. Survey results indicated that the herbaceous plant community lacked forbs species, which may be due to both livestock grazing and the late timing of the surveys. Moreover, the herbaceous plant community lacked structure based on lower than expected visual obstruction readings (VOR); likely a direct result of livestock impacts. In addition, introduced herbaceous vegetation including cultivated pasture grasses, e.g. crested wheatgrass and/or invader species such as cheatgrass and mustard, were present on most areas surveyed. The shrub element within the shrubsteppe cover type was generally a mosaic of moderate to dense shrubby areas interspersed with open grassland communities while the 'steppe' component was almost entirely devoid of shrubs. Riparian shrub and forest areas were somewhat stressed by livestock. Moreover, shrub and tree communities along the lower reaches of Nine Mile Creek suffered from lack of water due to the previous landowners 'piping' water out of the stream channel.

Ashley, Paul R.

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

473

PPPL Project Management System Page 1 of 111 PPPL Project Management System Description Rev-01  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

413.3A to DOE O 413.3B. Added new requirement of DOE 413.3B to perform monthly cost performance guides and procedures. For projects covered by DOE Order 413.3B, the DOE Acquisition Executive. For smaller projects/experiments and GPP projects that are not covered by DOE Order 413.3B, the overall

Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

474

2008 Nonresidential Compliance Forms July 2010 Appendix A  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

)4 NA7.5.8 MECH-10A - Hydronic System Variable Flow Control §125(a)7 & §144(j), §144(j)1 §144(j)5 Certificate of Compliance Envelope Mechanical Lighting Outdoor Lighting Sign Lighting Refrigerated Warehouse-INST 10-103(a)3A Refrigerated Warehouse RWH-INST 10-103(a)3A #12;2008 Nonresidential Compliance Forms July

475

Poneman Joins EM Contract and Project Management Workshop | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Poneman Joins EM Contract and Project Management Workshop Poneman Joins EM Contract and Project Management Workshop Poneman Joins EM Contract and Project Management Workshop June 7, 2013 - 12:00pm Addthis Deputy Secretary Daniel Poneman talks to participants in EM's Contract and Project Management Workshop this week. Deputy Secretary Daniel Poneman talks to participants in EM's Contract and Project Management Workshop this week. EM Deputy Assistant Secretary for Acquisition and Project Management Jack Surash discusses EM's current contract performance. EM Deputy Assistant Secretary for Acquisition and Project Management Jack Surash discusses EM's current contract performance. Deputy Secretary Daniel Poneman talks to participants in EM's Contract and Project Management Workshop this week. EM Deputy Assistant Secretary for Acquisition and Project Management Jack Surash discusses EM's current contract performance.

476

Policy Flash 2013-64 Acquisition Letter 10 and Class Deviation for  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Policy Flash 2013-64 Acquisition Letter 10 and Class Deviation for Policy Flash 2013-64 Acquisition Letter 10 and Class Deviation for Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers Policy Flash 2013-64 Acquisition Letter 10 and Class Deviation for Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Jason Taylor of the Contract and Financial Assistance Policy Division, Office of Policy, Office of Acquisition and Project Management at (202) 287-1560 or at jason.taylor@hq.doe.gov. Policy Flash_Nondisplacement.pdf SIGNED_classdeviation970.5244-1.pdf AL nondisplacement of qualified workers.pdf More Documents & Publications Policy Flash 2013-79 Professional and Consultant service cost (FAR 31.205-33) Policy Flash 2013-41 Contracts Periods of Performance Exceeding 5 Years Policy Flashes FY 2013

477

US Department of Energy Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action ground water Project. Revision 1, Version 1: Final project plan  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The scope of the Project is to develop and implement a ground water compliance strategy for all 24 UMTRA processing sites. The compliance strategy for the processing sites must satisfy requirements of the proposed EPA ground water cleanup standards in 40 CFR Part 192, Subparts B and C (1988). This scope of work will entail the following activities, on a site-specific basis: Development of a compliance strategy based upon modification of the UMTRA Surface Project remedial action plans (RAP) or development of Ground Water Project RAPs with NRC and state or tribal concurrence on the RAP; implementation of the RAP to include establishment of institutional controls, where appropriate; institution of long-term verification monitoring for transfer to a separate DOE program on or before the Project end date; and preparation of completion reports and final licensing on those sites that will be completed prior to the Project end date.

Not Available

1993-12-21T23:59:59.000Z

478

University Location Project Description  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Location Project Description Location Project Description Boise State University Boise, Idaho Boise State University has undertaken a study of the structural setting and geothermal potential at Neal Hot Springs that will integrate geology, geochemistry, and geophysics to analyze the site on the western Snake River plain. Boise State will determine if Neal Hot Springs sustains the necessary rock dilation and conduit pathways for hydrothermal fluid flow and successful geothermal development. The result will be new data acquisition, including a deep geophysical survey and fault surface data. Colorado School of Mines Golden, Colorado Colorado School of Mines will conduct an investigation near Homedale, Idaho, an area that straddles volcanic rock and unconsolidated sediments.

479

Report: Removal of EM Projects from the GAO High Risk List  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

staff. This will provide flexibility during project executions (resource analysis curve). Even if the acquisition delivery is adequately staffed, the need for on-call...

480

U.S. Department of Energy Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action Ground Water Project: Project plan  

SciTech Connect

The scope of the Project is to develop and implement a ground water compliance strategy for all 24 UMTRA Project processing sites. The compliance strategy for the processing sites must satisfy the proposed EPA ground water cleanup standards in 40 CFR Part 192, Subparts B and C (1987). This scope of work will entail the following activities on a site-specific basis: Develop a compliance strategy based on modification of the UMTRA Surface Project RAPs or develop Ground Water Project RAPs with NRC concurrence on the RAP and full participation of the affected states and tribes. Implement the RAP to include institutional controls, where appropriate, as an interim measure until compliance with the standards is achieved. Institute long-term verification monitoring for transfer to a separate long-term surveillance program on or before the Project end date. Prepare certification or confirmation reports and modify the long-term surveillance plan (LTSP), where needed, on those sites completed prior to the Project end date.

Not Available

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "acquisition compliance project" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

Alternative Compliance: Guidelines for Preparing and Submitting a Waiver Request Application and Other Documentation Requirements (Book)  

SciTech Connect

This document is designed to assist covered fleets interested in taking advantage of more flexible compliance options and to facilitate the transition from Standard Compliance to Alternative Compliance. It is designed to help fleets better understand the Alternative Compliance option and successfully complete the waiver application process.

Sears, T.

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

482

A conceptual model and IS framework for the design and adoption of environmental compliance management systems  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Environmental concerns have led to a significant increase in the number and scope of compliance imperatives governing electrical, electronics, and IT products across global regulatory environments. This is, of course, in addition to general compliance ... Keywords: Enterprise systems, Environment, Environmental compliance management systems, Governance, IS framework, IT, Risk and compliance

Tom Butler; Damien Mcgovern

2012-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

483

Alternative Compliance: Guidelines for Preparing and Submitting a Waiver Request Application and Other Documentation Requirements  

SciTech Connect

This document is designed to assist covered fleets interested in taking advantage of more flexible compliance options and to facilitate the transition from Standard Compliance to Alternative Compliance. It is designed to help fleets better understand the Alternative Compliance option and successfully complete the waiver application process.

Not Available

2013-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

484

Alternative Compliance: Guidelines for Preparing and Submitting a Waiver Request Application and Other Documentation Requirements (Book)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This document is designed to assist covered fleets interested in taking advantage of more flexible compliance options and to facilitate the transition from Standard Compliance to Alternative Compliance. It is designed to help fleets better understand the Alternative Compliance option and successfully complete the waiver application process.

Not Available

2010-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

485

Check-Testing of Manufacturer Self Reported Labeling Data & Compliance with MEPS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

trends in compliance rates, energy-savings ratings and performance variations between appliance markets.

Zhou, Nan

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

486

The LiveWire Project  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Enova and Pacific Telesis planned field trials of a high-speed, hybrid fiber/coax two-way communication link to test how new products and services could be delivered to residential customers. Pacific Telesis' acquisition by SBC Communications ended the project before the trials began. This report discusses design and implementation of a system prototype built to serve one house.

1998-10-20T23:59:59.000Z

487

Supporting acquisition decisions through effective experimental design  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Weapon acquisition is a very expensive process, especially in today's cost reduction environment. Techniques must be used to conduct operational te