National Library of Energy BETA

Sample records for a1 a9 a11

  1. A=11, 2012 evaluation

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    11 (2012KE01) (Revised Manuscript from 2012) An evaluation of A = 11 was published in Nuclear Physics A880 (2012) p. 88. The version here differs from the published version in that we have corrected a few errors discovered after the article went to press. PDF HTML A = 11 11He,11Li, 11Be, 11B, , 11C, , 11N, , 11O, , 11F, ,11Ne Adobe Reader Download Last modified: 23 April 2012

  2. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: A11 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    1 Categorical Exclusion Determinations: A11 Existing Regulations A11: Technical advice and assistance to organizations Technical advice and planning assistance to international, national, state, and local organizations. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD July 20, 2016 CX-100664 Categorical Exclusion Determination Physics-Based Interval Data Models to Automate and Scale Home Energy Performance Evaluations Award Number: DE-EE0007571 CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.1 Building Technologies Office Date:

  3. Energy Level Diagrams A=11

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    1 Available in the following years: (2012), (1990), (1985), (1980), (1975), (1968), (1959) A=11 Energy Level Diagrams from (2012KE01) PNG (Graphic Interchange Format): 11Li (26 KB) 11Be (66 KB) 11Li decay scheme (95 KB) 11B (147 KB) 11C (109 KB) 11N (25 KB) Isobar diagram (74 KB) PDF (Portable Document Format): 11Li (28 KB) 11Be (126 KB) 11Li decay scheme (185 KB) 11B (287 KB) 11C (185 KB) 11N (28 KB) Isobar diagram (245 KB) EPS (Encapsulated Postscript): 11Li (1807 KB) 11Be (2213 KB) 11Li decay

  4. Energy Level Diagrams A=9

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    9 Available in the following years: (2004), (1988), (1984), (1979), (1974), (1966), (1959) A=9 Energy Level Diagrams from (2004TI06) GIF (Graphic Interchange Format): 9Li (24 KB) 9Be (44 KB) 9B (36 KB) 9C (20 KB) Isobar diagram (36 KB) PDF (Portable Document Format): 9Li (36 KB) 9Be (60 KB) 9B (48 KB) 9C (28 KB) Isobar diagram (56 KB) EPS (Encapsulated Postscript): 9Li (1.7 MB) 9Be (1.7 MB) 9B (1.6 MB) 9C (1.7 MB) Isobar diagram (1.8 MB) A=9 Energy Level Diagrams from (1988AJ01) GIF (Graphic

  5. A=11-12, 1990 evaluation

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    1 - 12 (1990AJ01) (Revised Manuscript from 1990) An evaluation of A = 11 - 12 was published in Nuclear Physics A506 (1990), p. 1. This version differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press and changed reference key numbers to the NNDC/TUNL scheme. Introduction and overview tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Figures are now present in these pdf documents, and are also available elsewhere on this server (see below).

  6. A=11Li (1980AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    80AJ01) (See the Isobar Diagram for 11Li) 11Li has been observed in the bombardment of iridium by 24 GeV protons. Its mass excess is 40.94 ± 0.08 MeV (1975TH08). The cross section for its formation is ~ 50 μb (1976TH1A). 11Li is bound: Eb for break up into 9Li + 2n and 10Li + n are 158 ± 80 and 960 ± 250 keV, respectively [see (1979AJ01) for discussions of the masses of 9Li and 10Li]. The half-life of 11Li is 8.5 ± 0.2 msec (1974RO31): it decays to neutron unstable states of 11Be [Pn =

  7. A=9He (1974AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    4AJ01) (Not illustrated) 9He is predicted to be particle unstable: its calculated mass excess > 40.17 MeV (1970WA1G, 1972WA07), = 43.54 MeV (1972TH13). Particle instability with respect to 8He + n, 7He + 2n and 6He + 3n implies atomic mass excesses greater than 39.7, 42.25 and 41.812 MeV, respectively. See also (1968CE1A). 9He has not been observed in a pion experiment [9Be(π-, π+)9He] (1965GI10) nor in the spontaneous fission of 252Cf (1967CO1K

  8. A=9Li (66LA04)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    66LA04) (See Energy Level Diagrams for 9Li) GENERAL: See (GR64C). See also Table 9.1 [Table of Energy Levels] (in PDF or PS). Mass of 9Li: From the Q-value for 7Li(t, p)9Li: Q = -2.397 ± 0.020 MeV, the mass excess of 9Li is 24.965 ± 0.020 MeV (MI64E, MA65A). 1. 9Li(β-)9Be Qm = 13.615 9Li decays to the ground state (25 ± 15 %) and to the 2.43 MeV, neutron-unstable state of 9Be (75 ± 15 %). The β-endpoints are 13.5 ± 0.3 MeV and 11.0 ± 0.4 MeV; log ft = 5.5 ± 0.2 and 4.7 ± 0.2,

  9. Attachment A1

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    A1 CONTAINER STORAGE Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Hazardous Waste Permit October 2013 (This page intentionally blank) Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Hazardous Waste Permit October 2013 ...

  10. Appendix A-1

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    A-1 Table -1 This scale is created to provide a guide for the physician determination of ability to work for HRP certified persons with certain conditions and while taking certain ...

  11. Table A9. Total Primary Consumption of Energy for All Purposes by Census

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    A9. Total Primary Consumption of Energy for All Purposes by Census" " Region and Economic Characteristics of the Establishment, 1991" " (Estimates in Btu or Physical Units)" ,,,,,,,,"Coke" " "," ","Net","Residual","Distillate","Natural Gas(d)"," ","Coal","and Breeze"," ","RSE" " ","Total","Electricity(b)","Fuel

  12. A=11 Nuclides

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    A short list of corrections to mistakes found after the evaluation was published Elsevier Electronic Online: Elsevier (Nuclear Physics A) has made available PDF versions of A...

  13. Appendix A-1 Contract Performance Reports ARRA

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    A-1 Contract Performance Reports ARRA December 2011 CHPRC-2011-12, Rev. 0 Contract DE-AC06-08RL14788 Deliverable C.3.1.3.1 - 1 Format 1 - Work Breakdown Structure Format 3 -...

  14. A 1-Joule laser for a 16-fiber injection system

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Honig, J

    2004-04-06

    A 1-J laser was designed to launch light down 16, multi-mode fibers (400-{micro}m-core dia.). A diffractive-optic splitter was designed in collaboration with Digital Optics Corporation (DOC), and was delivered by DOC. Using this splitter, the energy injected into each fiber varied <1%. The spatial profile out of each fiber was such that there were no ''hot spots,'' a flyer could successfully be launched and a PETN pellet could be initiated. Preliminary designs of the system were driven by system efficiency where a pristine TEM{sub 00} laser beam would be required. The laser is a master oscillator, power amplifier (MOPA) consisting of a 4-mm-dia. Nd:YLF rod in the stable, q-switched oscillator and a 9.5-mm-dia. Nd:YLF rod in the double-passed amplifier. Using a TEM{sub 00} oscillator beam resulted in excellent transmission efficiencies through the fibers at lower energies but proved to be quite unreliable at higher energies, causing premature fiber damage, flyer plate rupture, stimulated Raman scattering (SRS), and stimulated Brillouin scattering (SBS). Upon further investigation, it was found that both temporal and spatial beam formatting of the laser were required to successfully initiate the PETN. Results from the single-mode experiments, including fiber damage, SRS and SBS losses, will be presented. In addition, results showing the improvement that can be obtained by proper laser beam formatting will also be presented.

  15. A9_ISO

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    November 2014 1 November 2014 Short-Term Energy Outlook (STEO) Highlights  North Sea Brent crude oil spot prices fell from $95/barrel (bbl) on October 1 to $84/bbl at the end of the month. The causes included weakening outlooks for global economic and oil demand growth, the return to the market of previously disrupted Libyan crude oil production, and continued growth in U.S. tight oil production. Brent crude oil spot prices averaged $87/bbl in October, the first month Brent prices have

  16. A=9 Nuclides

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    A short list of corrections to mistakes found after the evaluation was published Elsevier Electronic Online: Elsevier (Nuclear Physics A) has made available PDF versions of A...

  17. A = 9 General Tables

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    The General Table for 9Li is subdivided into the following categories: Shell Model Cluster Model Theoretical Ground State Properties Special States Other Model Calculations...

  18. Microsoft Word - 7A1.doc

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    6 Figure 1 Crystal structure of the 7A1 Fab' cocaine complex with the secondary structure of the antibody light (L) and heavy (H) chains colored in cyan. Substrate cocaine is also shown in spheres with yellow carbons, blue nitrogen, and red oxygens in the active site. High Resolution Snapshots for the Complete Reaction Cycle of a Cocaine Catalytic Antibody Xueyong Zhu 1 , Tobin J. Dickerson 2,3 , Claude J. Rogers 2,3 , Gunnar F. Kaufmann 2,3 , Jenny M. Mee 2,3 , Kathleen M. McKenzie 2,3 , Kim D.

  19. Decommissioning Project of Bohunice A1 NPP

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Stubna, M.; Pekar, A.; Moravek, J.; Spirko, M.

    2002-02-26

    The first (pilot) nuclear power plant A1 in the Slovak Republic, situated on Jaslovske Bohunice site (60 km from Bratislava) with the capacity of 143 MWel, was commissioned in 1972 and was running with interruptions till 1977. A KS 150 reactor (HWGCR) with natural uranium as fuel, D2O as moderator and gaseous CO2 as coolant was installed in the A1 plant. Outlet steam from primary reactor coolant system with the temperature of 410 C was led to 6 modules of steam generators and from there to turbine generators. Refueling was carried out on-line at plant full power. The first serious incident associated with refueling occurred in 1976 when a locking mechanism at a fuel assembly failed. The core was not damaged during that incident and following a reconstruction of the damaged technology channel, the plant continued in operation. However, serious problems were occurring with the integrity of steam generators (CO2 gas on primary side, water and steam on secondary side) when the plant had to be shut down frequently due to failures and subsequent repairs. The second serious accident occurred in 1977 when a fuel assembly was overheated with a subsequent release of D2O into gas cooling circuit due to a human failure in the course of replacement of a fuel assembly. Subsequent rapid increase in humidity of the primary system resulted in damages of fuel elements in the core and the primary system was contaminated by fission products. In-reactor structures had been damaged, too. Activity had penetrated also into certain parts of the secondary system via leaking steam generators. Radiation situation in the course of both events on the plant site and around it had been below the level of limits specified. Based on a technical and economical justification of the demanding character of equipment repairs for the restoration of plant operation, and also due to a decision made not to continue with further construction of gas cooled reactors in Czechoslovakia, a decision was made in

  20. CX-000703: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    03: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-000703: Categorical Exclusion Determination Maryland - Clean Energy Economic Development Initiative (CEEDI) CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, ...

  1. A 1-D dusty plasma photonic crystal

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Mitu, M. L.; Ticoş, C. M.; Toader, D.; Banu, N.; Scurtu, A.; Department of Physics, University of Bucharest, 077125 Bucharest

    2013-09-21

    It is demonstrated numerically that a 1-D plasma crystal made of micron size cylindrical dust particles can, in principle, work as a photonic crystal for terahertz waves. The dust rods are parallel to each other and arranged in a linear string forming a periodic structure of dielectric-plasma regions. The dispersion equation is found by solving the waves equation with the boundary conditions at the dust-plasma interface and taking into account the dielectric permittivity of the dust material and plasma. The wavelength of the electromagnetic waves is in the range of a few hundred microns, close to the interparticle separation distance. The band gaps of the 1-D plasma crystal are numerically found for different types of dust materials, separation distances between the dust rods and rod diameters. The distance between levitated dust rods forming a string in rf plasma is shown experimentally to vary over a relatively wide range, from 650 μm to about 1350 μm, depending on the rf power fed into the discharge.

  2. Data:B0c510db-7e64-4d8c-a9ae-f8521cbb8489 | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    d8c-a9ae-f8521cbb8489 No revision has been approved for this page. It is currently under review by our subject matter experts. Jump to: navigation, search Loading... 1. Basic...

  3. OSU-A9 inhibits angiogenesis in human umbilical vein endothelial cells via disrupting AktNF-?B and MAPK signaling pathways

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Omar, Hany A.; Arafa, El-Shaimaa A.; Salama, Samir A.; Arab, Hany H.; Wu, Chieh-Hsi; Weng, Jing-Ru

    2013-11-01

    Since the introduction of angiogenesis as a useful target for cancer therapy, few agents have been approved for clinical use due to the rapid development of resistance. This problem can be minimized by simultaneous targeting of multiple angiogenesis signaling pathways, a potential strategy in cancer management known as polypharmacology. The current study aimed at exploring the anti-angiogenic activity of OSU-A9, an indole-3-carbinol-derived pleotropic agent that targets mainly Aktnuclear factor-kappa B (NF-?B) signaling which regulates many key players of angiogenesis such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were used to study the in vitro anti-angiogenic effect of OSU-A9 on several key steps of angiogenesis. Results showed that OSU-A9 effectively inhibited cell proliferation and induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in HUVECs. Besides, OSU-A9 inhibited angiogenesis as evidenced by abrogation of migration/invasion and Matrigel tube formation in HUVECs and attenuation of the in vivo neovascularization in the chicken chorioallantoic membrane assay. Mechanistically, Western blot, RT-PCR and ELISA analyses showed the ability of OSU-A9 to inhibit MMP-2 production and VEGF expression induced by hypoxia or phorbol-12-myristyl-13-acetate. Furthermore, dual inhibition of AktNF-?B and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling, the key regulators of angiogenesis, was observed. Together, the current study highlights evidences for the promising anti-angiogenic activity of OSU-A9, at least in part through the inhibition of AktNF-?B and MAPK signaling and their consequent inhibition of VEGF and MMP-2. These findings support OSU-A9's clinical promise as a component of anticancer therapy. - Highlights: The antiangiogenic activity of OSU-A9 in HUVECs was explored. OSU-A9 inhibited HUVECs proliferation, migration, invasion and tube formation. OSU-A9 targeted signaling

  4. A11_ISO.PDF

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  5. TU-A-9A-10: Verification of Photoacoustic Computed Tomography Perfusion Imaging Using DCE-CT

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Roth, A; Krutulis, M; Verleker, A; Stantz, K

    2014-06-15

    Purpose: We propose to verify quantifiable perfusion information generated by a Photoacoustic Computed Tomography (PCT) scanner using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced CT (DCE-CT), and to investigate physicsbased models of acoustic properties of tissue and photon transport to improve quantification. These corrections first necessitate a skin identifying algorithms to reduce speed-of-sound blurring and empirical photon correction methods. Methods: Xenograft mice (n=5) of breast cancer was imaged using DCE-CT which was followed by DCE-PCT. To obtain CT perfusion data, each mouse was i.v. injected (0.2mL Isovue @0.5mL/min) and subsequent radio-opaque time curves fit to a 2-compartmental model on a voxel-wise basis. For DCE-PCT, different concentrations of ICG (250, 125, and 62.5 micro-Molar) were injected at the same rate, but also acquired at different sampling rates (3, 6, and 12 seconds). The time intensity curves from PCT were fit to a 1-compartmental model on a voxel by voxel basis. The images were coregistered (Oncentra) based on the structural similarities of the tumor vasculature after which we compared both the contrastenhanced dynamics and the vascular physiology. Results: Moderate to high doses of ICG impact the washin phase of the PCT contrast due to photon losses as a function of depth. A semi-automatic algorithm has been developed to identify the skin margin, and subsequent MC and empirical models of photon transport and variations in speed-of-sound are being evaluated. Conclusion: From our results we find that there is a need to apply photon and speed-of-sound corrections to our PCT data to improve the quantifiable image data at depth in the tumor for PCT. The dose and injection rate may help in reducing large systematic effects. Our project is partially funded by a NIH SBIR grant.

  6. File:FormA1.pdf | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    FormA1.pdf Jump to: navigation, search File File history File usage File:FormA1.pdf Size of this preview: 463 599 pixels. Other resolution: 464 600 pixels. Full resolution...

  7. A9R7296.tmp

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  8. A9R7298.tmp

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  9. A9_ISO.PDF

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  10. A9_iso.PDF

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  11. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: A1 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Categorical Exclusion Determinations: A1 Existing Regulations A1: Routine DOE business actions Routine actions necessary to support the normal conduct of DOE business limited to administrative, financial, and personnel actions. Previous Regulations Categorical Exclusion Determinations dated before November 14th, 2011 were issued under previous DOE NEPA regulations. See the Notice of Final Rulemaking (76 FR 63763, 10/13/2011) for information changes to this categorical exclusion. DOCUMENTS

  12. Consumer Refrigerators-Freezers (Appendix A1) | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Refrigerators-Freezers (Appendix A1) Consumer Refrigerators-Freezers (Appendix A1) The Department of Energy (DOE) develops standardized data templates for reporting the results of tests conducted in accordance with current DOE test procedures. Templates may be used by third-party laboratories under contract with DOE that conduct testing in support of ENERGY STAR® verification, DOE rulemakings, and enforcement of the federal energy conservation standards. Consumer Refrigerators-Freezers Appendix

  13. Evaluation of LLTR Series II tests A-1A and A-1B test results. [Large Leak Test Rig

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Shoopak, B F; Amos, J C; Norvell, T J

    1980-03-01

    The standard methodology, with minor modifications provides conservative yet realistic predictions of leaksite and other sodium system pressures in the LLTR Series II vessel and piping. The good agreement between predicted and measured pressures indicates that the TRANSWRAP/RELAP modeling developed from the Series I tests is applicable to larger scale units prototypical of the Clinch River steam generator design. Calculated sodium system pressures are sensitive to several modeling parameters including rupture disc modeling, acoustic velocity in the test vessel, and flow rate from the rupture tube. The acoustic velocity which produced best agreement with leaksite pressures was calculated based on the shroud diameter and shroud wall thickness. The corresponding rupture tube discharge coefficient was that of the standard design methodology developed from Series I testing. As found in Series I testing, the Series II data suggests that the leading edge of the flow in the relief line is two phase for a single, doubled-ended guillotine tube rupture. The steam generator shroud acts as if it is relatively transparent to the transmission of radial pressures to the vessel wall. Slightly lower sodium system maximum pressures measured during Test A-1b compared to Test A-1a are attributed to premature failure (failure at a lower pressure) of the rupture disc in contact with the sodium for test A-1b. The delay in failure of the second disc in Test A-1b, which was successfully modeled with TRANSWRAP, is attributed to the limited energy in the nitrogen injection.

  14. Liver X receptor alpha mediated genistein induction of human dehydroepiandrosterone sulfotransferase (hSULT2A1) in Hep G2 cells

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Chen, Yue; Zhang, Shunfen; Zhou, Tianyan; Huang, Chaoqun; McLaughlin, Alicia; Chen, Guangping

    2013-04-15

    Cytosolic sulfotransferases are one of the major families of phase II drug metabolizing enzymes. Sulfotransferase-catalyzed sulfonation regulates hormone activities, metabolizes drugs, detoxifies xenobiotics, and bioactivates carcinogens. Human dehydroepiandrosterone sulfotransferase (hSULT2A1) plays important biological roles by sulfating endogenous hydroxysteroids and exogenous xenobiotics. Genistein, mainly existing in soy food products, is a naturally occurring phytoestrogen with both chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic potential. Our previous studies have shown that genistein significantly induces hSULT2A1 in Hep G2 and Caco-2 cells. In this study, we investigated the roles of liver X receptor (LXRα) in the genistein induction of hSULT2A1. LXRs have been shown to induce expression of mouse Sult2a9 and hSULT2A1 gene. Our results demonstrate that LXRα mediates the genistein induction of hSULT2A1, supported by Western blot analysis results, hSULT2A1 promoter driven luciferase reporter gene assay results, and mRNA interference results. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay results demonstrate that genistein increase the recruitment of hLXRα binding to the hSULT2A1 promoter. These results suggest that hLXRα plays an important role in the hSULT2A1 gene regulation. The biological functions of phytoestrogens may partially relate to their induction activity toward hydroxysteroid SULT. - Highlights: ► Liver X receptor α mediated genistein induction of hSULT2A1 in Hep G2 cells. ► LXRα and RXRα dimerization further activated this induction. ► Western blot results agreed well with luciferase reporter gene assay results. ► LXRs gene silencing significantly decreased hSULT2A1 expression. ► ChIP analysis suggested that genistein enhances hLXRα binding to the hSULT2A1 promoter.

  15. Load partitioning between ferrite/martensite and dispersed nanoparticles of a 9Cr ferritic/martensitic (F/M) ODS steel at high temperatures

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Zhang, Guangming; Mo, Kun; Miao, Yinbin; Liu, Xiang; Almer, Jonathan; Zhou, Zhangjian; Stubbins, James F.

    2015-06-18

    In this study, a high-energy synchrotron radiation X-ray technique was used to investigate the tensile deformation processes of a 9Cr-ODS ferritic/martensitic (F/M) steel at different temperatures. Two minor phases within the 9Cr-ODS F/M steel matrix were identified as Y2Ti2O7 and TiN by the high-energy X-ray diffraction, and confirmed by the analysis using energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) of scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM). The lattice strains of the matrix and particles were measured through the entire tensile deformation process. During the tensile tests, the lattice strains of the ferrite/martensite and the particles (TiN and Y2Ti2O7) showed a strong temperature dependence, decreasing with increasing temperature. Analysis of the internal stress at three temperatures showed that the load partitioning between the ferrite/martensite and the particles (TiN and Y2Ti2O7) was initiated during sample yielding and reached to a peak during sample necking. At three studied temperatures, the internal stress of minor phases (Y2Ti2O7 and TiN) was about 2 times that of F/M matrix at yielding position, while the internal stress of Y2Ti2O7 and TiN reached about 4.5-6 times and 3-3.5 times that of the F/M matrix at necking position, respectively. It indicates that the strengthening of the matrix is due to minor phases (Y2Ti2O7 and TiN), especially Y2Ti2O7 particles. Although the internal stresses of all phases decreased with increasing temperature from RT to 600 degrees C, the ratio of internal stresses of each phase at necking position stayed in a stable range (internal stresses of Y2Ti2O7 and TiN were about 4.5-6 times and 3-3.5 times of that of F/M matrix, respectively). The difference between internal stress of the F/M matrix and the applied stress at 600 degrees C is slightly lower than those at RI and 300 degrees C, indicating that the nanoparticles still have good strengthening effect at 600 degrees C. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

  16. CX-012124: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Pressure Prediction and Hazard Avoidance Through Improved Seismic Imaging CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11 Date: 05/29/2014 Location(s): Massachusetts Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  17. CX-012161: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Pressure Prediction and Hazard Avoidance Through Improved Seismic Imaging CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11 Date: 05/29/2014 Location(s): Massachusetts Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  18. CX-008429: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Tennessee-City-Chattanooga CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 07/18/2012 Location(s): Tennessee Offices(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  19. CX-004504: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Beacon Power 20 Megawatt Flywheel Frequency Regulation PlantCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11Date: 11/19/2010Location(s): Tyngsboro, MassachusettsOffice(s): Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, National Energy Technology Laboratory

  20. CX-003272: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington-City-EverettCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B1.32, B5.1Date: 07/26/2010Location(s): Everett, WashingtonOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  1. CX-008447: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Shift for Good Community Program (Switch 4 Good) CX(s) Applied: A1, A8, A9, A11 Date: 06/21/2012 Location(s): Multiple Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  2. CX-004405: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    ArmorBelt Single Point Gas Lift System for Stripper WellsCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11Date: 11/08/2010Location(s): Hastings, MinnesotaOffice(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

  3. CX-005003: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington-City-VancouverCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B2.5, B5.1Date: 01/10/2011Location(s): Vancouver, WashingtonOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  4. CX-007074: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Washington-City-VancouverCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B2.5, B5.1Date: 01/10/2011Location(s): Vancouver, WashingtonOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  5. CX-002809: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Purchase of Dedicated Alternative Fuel VehiclesCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11Date: 06/22/2010Location(s): Diamond Bar, CaliforniaOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

  6. CX-002487: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Propane Powered Bus ProjectCX(s) Applied: A1, A7, A9, A11Date: 06/02/2010Location(s): Schaghticoke, New YorkOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

  7. CX-003649: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    California - City - RichmondCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B2.5, B5.1Date: 09/02/2010Location(s): Richmond, CaliforniaOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  8. CX-010481: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Differential Absorption Lidar (DIAL) for Spatial Mapping of Carbon Dioxide CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B3.6 Date: 05/29/2013 Location(s): Montana Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  9. CX-010705: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    National Laser Facility Program Funding Opportunity CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B3.6 Date: 02/08/2013 Location(s): CX: none Offices(s): NNSA-Headquarters

  10. CX-008955: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Smart Grid Data Access and Customer Engagement CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11 Date: 08/10/2012 Location(s): California, Colorado Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  11. CX-010792: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    CX-010792: Categorical Exclusion Determination Gulf of Mexico Miocene Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Site Characterization Mega Transect - Task 8 CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11 Date: 08142013 ...

  12. CX-000113: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mashantucket Pequot Tribe Energy Efficiency and Conservation StrategyCX(s) Applied: A9, A1, A11Date: 12/07/2009Location(s): ConnecticutOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  13. CX-004417: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Nevada-City-Carson CityCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B5.1Date: 11/09/2010Location(s): Carson City, NevadaOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  14. CX-004629: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Seneca Nation of New York Energy Efficiency and Conservation StrategiesCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11Date: 10/26/2009Location(s): New YorkOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  15. CX-013873: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Milford Site for Frontier Observatory for Geothermal Energy (FORGE) CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11Date: 07/01/2015 Location(s): UtahOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  16. CX-013409: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Alstom Grid Commercial Microgrid Design Development. and Testing for PIDC and PWD Systems CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11Date: 02/02/2015 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  17. CX-013408: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Alstom Grid Commercial Microgrid Design Development. and Testing for PIDC and PWD Systems CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11Date: 02/02/2015 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  18. CX-014427: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Deployment of Microgrid Technologies in Alaska CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11Date: 12/02/2015 Location(s): AlaskaOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  19. CX-013849: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Frontier Observatory for Research in Geothermal Energy - Fallon, NV (Phase One) CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11Date: 06/23/2015 Location(s): New MexicoOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  20. CX-013874: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Snake River Plain Field Laboratory for Enhanced Geothermal Systems Development CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11Date: 07/01/2015 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  1. CX-013744: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Ceramic Matrix Composite Advanced Transition for 65% Combined Cycle Efficiency CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11Date: 03/19/2015 Location(s): FloridaOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  2. CX-013468: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Ceramic Matrix Composite Advanced Transition for 65% Combined Cycle Efficiency CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11Date: 03/19/2015 Location(s): FloridaOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  3. CX-006121: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    University Energy Education Curriculum Project (UEECP)CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11Date: 06/29/2011Location(s): Richmond, KentuckyOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

  4. CX-012154: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    System-Cost Optimized Smart EVSE for Residential Application (New Tasks 101 and 102) CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11 Date: 05/12/2014 Location(s): Michigan Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  5. CX-011802: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    South Louisiana EOR/Sequestration Research and Development Project CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B3.6 Date: 01/28/2014 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  6. CX-012262: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Reconciling Unconventional Gas Emission Estimates (SUMMARY) CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B3.1 Date: 07/02/2014 Location(s): Colorado, California Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  7. CX-014243: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Rockville Centre SCADA, RTU & Relay Project CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B1.7Date: 09/10/2015 Location(s): New YorkOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  8. CX-004484: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Whitelist Antivirus ProjectCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B1.7Date: 11/18/2010Location(s): Pullman, WashingtonOffice(s): Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, National Energy Technology Laboratory

  9. CX-003739: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    National Electric Sector Cybersecurity OrganizationCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11Date: 09/17/2010Location(s): Clackamas, OregonOffice(s): Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, National Energy Technology Laboratory

  10. CX-008275: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Clean Cities - Implementation Initiatives to Advance Alternative Fuel Markets CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11 Date: 05/10/2012 Location(s): CX: none Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  11. CX-007041: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Texas-City-Grand PrairieCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B5.1Date: 03/30/2010Location(s): Grand Prairie, TexasOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  12. CX-013400: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    High Temperature Ceramic Matrix Composite Nozzles for 65% Efficiency - Phase I CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11Date: 02/13/2015 Location(s): New YorkOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  13. CX-012286: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Marine Vibrator Prototype Demonstration Test CX(s) Applied: A1, A8, A9, A11, B3.11 Date: 06/12/2014 Location(s): CX: none Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  14. CX-005277: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Minnesota-County-RamseyCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B2.5, B5.1Date: 02/17/2011Location(s): Ramsey County, MinnesotaOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  15. CX-002554: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    California-City-HemetCX(s) Applied: B1.32, A1, A9, A11, B5.1Date: 05/17/2010Location(s): Hemet, CaliforniaOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  16. CX-011803: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    South Louisiana EOR/Sequestration Research and Development Project CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B3.6 Date: 01/28/2014 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  17. CX-005519: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Mississippi-City-JacksonCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B5.1Date: 03/23/2011Location(s): Jackson, MississippiOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  18. CX-009174: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Missouri-County-Christian CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 09/17/2012 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  19. CX-005252: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Florida-City-SarasotaCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B1.32, B5.1Date: 02/09/2011Location(s): Sarasota, FloridaOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  20. CX-013846: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Frontier Observatory for Research in Geothermal Energy - Newberry Volcano, OR (Phase One) CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11Date: 06/24/2015 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  1. CX-010792: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Gulf of Mexico Miocene Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Site Characterization Mega Transect - Task 8 CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11 Date: 08/14/2013 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  2. CX-000114: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mashantucket Pequot Tribe Technical Consulting ServicesCX(s) Applied: A9, A1, A11Date: 12/07/2009Location(s): ConnecticutOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  3. CX-008956: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Demonstrating Innovation in Customer Empowerment through Open Data Access - Phase I CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11 Date: 08/10/2012 Location(s): CX: none Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  4. CX-011811: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Extension and dissemination of the Open Modeling Framework and GridLAB-D CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11 Date: 01/22/2014 Location(s): Virginia Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  5. CX-005267: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Indiana-City-HammondCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B5.1Date: 02/14/2011Location(s): Hammond, IndianaOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  6. CX-008896: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Colorado-County-Douglas CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B1.32, B5.1 Date: 07/31/2012 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  7. CX-012125: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Pressure Prediction and Hazard Avoidance Through Improved Seismic Imaging CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11 Date: 05/29/2014 Location(s): Oklahoma Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  8. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: NNSA-Headquarters | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    February 8, 2013 CX-010705: Categorical Exclusion Determination National Laser Facility Program Funding Opportunity CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B3.6 Date: 02082013 Location(s): ...

  9. CX-000075: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Tanana Chiefs Conference Residential and Commercial Building Energy AuditsCX(s) Applied: B5.1, A1, A11, A9Date: 11/12/2009Location(s): AlaskaOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  10. CX-008416: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Colorado-County-Arapahoe CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 07/18/2012 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  11. CX-013844: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Frontier Observatory for Research in Geothermal Energy - Coso, CA (Phase One) CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11Date: 06/25/2015 Location(s): New MexicoOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  12. CX-003512: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Resort Communities Retrofit ProgramCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B5.1Date: 07/09/2010Location(s): Eagle, ColoradoOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office

  13. CX-014068: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Southeast Offshore Storage Research Assessment CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11Date: 07/24/2015 Location(s): GeorgiaOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  14. CX-000130: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Sun'aq Tribe of Kodiak Energy Efficiency and Conservation StrategyCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11Date: 12/16/2009Location(s): AlaskaOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  15. CX-008903: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Virginia-County-Albemarle CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 08/23/2012 Location(s): Virginia Offices(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  16. CX-014232: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Coal Syngas Combustor Development for High-Pressure, Oxy-Fuel Supercritical… CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11Date: 09/15/2015 Location(s): North CarolinaOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  17. CX-004627: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Seneca Nation of New York Energy AuditsCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B5.1Date: 10/26/2009Location(s): New YorkOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  18. CX-011056: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Support for the NETL's Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11 Date: 09/04/2013 Location(s): CX: none Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  19. CX-012440: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Coal Syngas Combustor Development for High-Pressure, Oxy-Fuel SCO2 Cycles CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11Date: 41878 Location(s): North CarolinaOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  20. CX-003260: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Michigan-City-WarrenCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B2.5, B5.1Date: 07/19/2010Location(s): Warren, MichiganOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  1. CX-008188: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    California City-Moreno Valley CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 04/12/2012 Location(s): California Offices(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  2. CX-012421: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Development of Low-Leakage Shaft End Seals for Utility-Scale SCO2 Turbo Expanders CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11Date: 41880 Location(s): TexasOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  3. A=11Be (2012KE01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    0.8. The data related to states involved in neutron emission have ambiguous interpretation connected with uncertainty in placement of neutron decay branches; the observed...

  4. A=11C (59AJ76)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    3. 9Be(3He, n)11C Qm 7.565 See (PO52B, KU53A, MO54B). 4. 10B(p, )11C Qm 8.700 For Ep 0.7 to 3 MeV, the main capture radiation is to the ground state. Weaker radiations, ...

  5. A=11C (2012KE01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2012KE01) (See Table Prev. Table 11.38 preview 11.38 (in PDF or PS), Table Prev. Table 11.39 preview 11.39 (in PDF or PS) and Energy Level Diagram for 11C and Isobar Diagram) ...

  6. A = 11B (68AJ02)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    68AJ02) (See Energy Level Diagrams for 11B) GENERAL: See Table 11.3 [Table of Energy Levels] (in PDF or PS). Shell model:(KU56, KU57A, BI60, TA60L, BA61D, BA61N, KO61L, KU61E, TR61, UM61, AM64, NE64C, CO65I, FA65A, FA65C, HA66F, MA66S, CO67M, FA67A, KU68A). Collective model:(BR59M, CL61D, CL62G, MA64HH, NE65E, EL66B, MI66J, RI67J, GO68). Ground state properties:(BE62L, BE63T, LI64H, LI64I, ST64, HU65C, RI66F, WI66E, BA67E, RH67A, SH67C, BA68B). Other:(SE63G, OL64A, TH64A, WI66F, BA67HH, PO67G).

  7. A11_1975iso.PDF

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  8. A=11B (2012KE01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2012KE01) (See Table Prev. Table 11.18 preview 11.18 (in PDF or PS), Table Prev. Table 11.19 preview 11.19 (in PDF or PS) and Energy Level Diagram for 11B and Isobar Diagram) μ = +2.6886489 (10) nm (1989RA17), Q = 40.65 ± 0.26 mb (1970NE05), B(E2; 3/2- → 1/2-) = 2.6 ± 0.4 e2 ⋅ fm4 (1980FE07). 1. 4He(7Li, α0) Eb = 8.6641 A 13.7 MeV 7Li beam impinged on a thick 4He gas filled chamber and the spectrum of elastically scattered α particles, measured in a position sensitive ΔE-E Si

  9. A=11Be (1980AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    80AJ01) (See Energy Level Diagrams for 11Be) GENERAL: See also (1975AJ02) and Table 11.1 [Table of Energy Levels] (in PDF or PS). Model calculations: (1974TA1E, 1975MI12, 1976IR1B, 1977SE1D, 1978BO31, 1979BE1H). Special reactions: (1975FE1A, 1976OS04, 1977AR06, 1977YA1B). Muon capture (See also reaction 2.): (1978DE15). Pion reactions: (1975CO06, 1976CO1M, 1977DO06, 1977GE1D). Ground state of 11Be: (1975BE31, 1978BO31). 1. 11Be(β-)11B Qm = 11.508 The decay proceeds to 11B*(0, 2.12, 5.02, 6.79,

  10. A=11Be (1985AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    85AJ01) (See Energy Level Diagrams for 11Be) GENERAL: See also (1980AJ01) and Table 11.3 [Table of Energy Levels] (in PDF or PS). Model calculations:(1981RA06, 1981SE06, 1983MI1E, 1984VA06). Electromagnetic transitions:(1980MI1G). Complex reactions involving 11Be:(1979BO22, 1980WI1L, 1983EN04, 1983WI1A, 1984GR08, 1984HI1A). Hypernuclei:(1979BU1C, 1982IK1A, 1982KA1D, 1982KO11, 1983FE07, 1983KO1D, 1983MI1E). Other topics:(1981SE06, 1982NG01). Ground-state properties of 11Be:(1981AV02, 1982NG01,

  11. A=11Be (1990AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    90AJ01) (See Energy Level Diagrams for 11Be) GENERAL: See also (1985AJ01) and Table 11.2 [Table of Energy Levels] (in PDF or PS). Model calculations:(1984MI1H, 1984VA06, 1986WI04). Electromagnetic transitions:(1984MI1H, 1984VA06, 1987HO1L). Complex reactions involving 11Be:(1985BO1A, 1986AV1B, 1987TR05, 1987WA09, 1988BA53, 1988RU01, 1988TA1N, 1988TR03, 1989SA10). Muon and neutrino capture and reactions:(1984KO24). Hypernuclei:(1985IK1A, 1986ME1F). Other topics:(1984MI1H, 1985AN28, 1986AN07).

  12. A=11Be (59AJ76)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    59AJ76) (Not illustrated) GENERAL: Mass of 11Be: From the decay energy, 11Be(β-)11B, and using the Wapstra mass (WA55C) for 11B, the mass excess of 11Be, M - A = 23.39 ± 0.15 MeV (WI59). The binding energies of a neutron, deuteron and triton in 11Be are, respectively, 0.54, 18.4 and 15.76 MeV. 1. 11Be(β-)11B Qm = 11.48 The decay proceeds to 11Bg.s. and to several excited states. For the ground-state transition, Eβ(max) = 11.48 ± 0.15 MeV; τ1/2 = 13.57 ± 0.15 sec, log ft = 6.77 (AL58E,

  13. A=11Be (68AJ02)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    68AJ02) (See Energy Level Diagrams for 11Be) GENERAL: See Table 11.1 [Table of Energy Levels] (in PDF or PS). Mass of 11Be: The Q-value of the 9Be(t, p)11Be reaction is given as Q = -1.164 ± 0.015 MeV by (PU62) (based on 12C(t, p)14C*). This value has been adjusted by (RY65) to -1.170 MeV, leading to M - A for 11Be = 20.181 ± 0.015 MeV (relative to 12C) (MA65A). See (TA60D, TA60L, DO61, RO66S, DE67P). The ground state of 11Be has even parity (AL64I). 1. 11Be(β-)11B Qm = 11.513 The decay

  14. A=11C (1980AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    80AJ01) (See Energy Level Diagrams for 11C) GENERAL: See also (1975AJ02) and Table 11.19 [Table of Energy Levels] (in PDF or PS). Special levels: (1976IR1B). Astrophysical questions: (1976VI1A, 1977SC1D, 1977SI1D, 1978BU1B). Special reactions: (1975HU14, 1976BE1K, 1976BU16, 1976DI01, 1976HE1H, 1976LE1F, 1976SM07, 1977AR06, 1977AS03, 1977SC1G, 1978DI1A, 1978GE1C, 1978HE1C, 1979KA07, 1979VI05). Muon and neutrino capture and reactions: (1975DO1F, 1976DO1G). Pion capture and reactions (See also

  15. A=11C (1985AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    5AJ01) (See Energy Level Diagrams for 11C) GENERAL: See also (1980AJ01) and Table 11.17 [Table of Energy Levels] (in PDF or PS). Model calculations:(1981RA06, 1983SH38). Special states:(1981RA06). Complex reactions involving 11C:(1979BO22, 1980GR10, 1980WI1K, 1980WI1L, 1981MO20, 1982GE05, 1982LY1A, 1982RA31, 1983FR1A, 1983OL1A, 1983WI1A, 1984GR08, 1984HI1A). Electromagnetic transitions:(1978KR19). Applied work:(1979DE1H, 1982BO1N, 1982HI1H, 1982KA1R, 1982ME1C, 1982NE1D, 1982PI1H, 1982YA1C,

  16. A=11C (1990AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    90AJ01) (See Energy Level Diagrams for 11C) GENERAL: See also (1985AJ01) and Table 11.16 [Table of Energy Levels] (PDF or PS) here. Model calculations: (1988WO04) Special states: (1985SH24, 1986AN07, 1988KW02) Astrophysical Questions: (1987RA1D) Complex reactions involving 11C:(1981AS04, 1985AR09, 1985HI1C, 1985MO08, 1986AV1B, 1986AV07, 1986BA3G, 1986HA1B, 1986HI1D, 1986UT01, 1987AR19, 1987BA38, 1987DE37, 1987NA01, 1987RI03, 1987SN01, 1987ST01, 1987YA16, 1988CA06, 1988KI05, 1988KI06, 1988SA19,

  17. A=11F (1975AJ02)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    75AJ02) (Not illustrated) This nucleus has not been observed: see (1974IR04

  18. A=11F (1980AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    0AJ01) (Not illustrated) These nuclei have not been observed: see (1975BE31, 1976IR1B

  19. A=11F (1985AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    5AJ01) (Not illustrated) These nuclei have not been observed: see (1980AJ01) and (1982NG01, 1983ANZQ

  20. A=11F (1990AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    90AJ01) (Not illustrated) These nuclei have not been observed: see (1980AJ01, 1985AJ01) and (1986AN07, 1987SA15

  1. A=11F (2012KE01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2012KE01) (Not illustrated) These nuclei have not been observed: see (1980AJ01, 1985AJ01

  2. A=11He (1975AJ02)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    75AJ02) (Not illustrated) This nucleus has not been observed: see (1974IR04

  3. A=11He (1980AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    0AJ01) (Not illustrated) 11He has not been observed: see (1976IR1B; theor.

  4. A=11He (1985AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    5AJ01) (Not illustrated) 11He has not been observed: see (1980AJ01) and (1983ANZQ

  5. A=11He (1990AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    1990AJ01) (Not illustrated) 11He has not been reported: see (1980AJ01). The ground state of 11He is predicted to have

  6. A=11He (2012KE01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2012KE01) (Not illustrated) 11He has not been reported: see (1980AJ01). The ground state of 11He is predicted to have Jπ = 1/2+ (1993PO11). Also see

  7. A=11Li (1985AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    5AJ01) (See the Isobar Diagram for 11Li) GENERAL: The mass excess of 11Li is 40.94 ± 0.08 MeV (1975TH08). [(A.H. Wapstra, private communication) suggests 40.91 ± 0.11 MeV.] Using the value reported by (1975TH08) 11Li is bound with respect to 9Li + 2n by 156 ± 80 keV and with respect to 10Li + n by 966 ± 260 keV [see (1984AJ01) for the masses of 9Li and 10Li]. Systematics suggest Jπ = 1/2- for 11Lig.s.. See also (1979AZ03, 1980AZ01, 1980BO31, 1981BO1X, 1982BO1Y, 1982OG02), (1981HA2C),

  8. A=11Li (68AJ02)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    68AJ02) (See the Isobar Diagram for 11Li) 11Li has been identified in the 5.3 GeV proton bombardment of uranium. It is particle stable (PO66H). See also (GA66C, CO67A

  9. A=11N (1975AJ02)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    75AJ02) (See the Isobar Diagram for 11N) The 14N(3He, 6He)11N reaction has been studied at E(3He) = 70 MeV (1974BE20). A 6He group is observed which corresponds to a state in 11N with an atomic mass excess of 25.23 ± 0.10 MeV and Γ = 740 ± 100 keV. The cross section for forming this state is 0.5 μb/sr at 10°. The observed state is interpreted as being the Jπ = 1/2- mirror of 11Be*(0.32) because of its width; the 1/2+ mirror of 11Beg.s. would be expected to be much broader (1974BE20). The

  10. A=11N (1980AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    0AJ01) (See the Isobar Diagram for 11N) The 14N(3He, 6He)11N reaction has been studied at E(3He) = 70 MeV. A 6He group is observed which corresponds to a state in 11N with an atomic mass excess of 25.23 ± 0.10 MeV and Γ = 740 ± 100 keV. The cross section for forming this state is 0.5 μb/sr at 10°. The observed state is interpreted as being the Jπ = 1/2- mirror of 11Be*(0.32) because of its width; the 1/2+ mirror of 11Beg.s. would be expected to be much broader (1974BE20). The 11N state is

  11. A=11N (1985AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    85AJ01) (See the Isobar Diagram for 11N) The 14N(3He, 6He)11N reaction has been studied at E(3He) = 70 MeV. A 6He group is observed which corresponds to a state in 11N with an atomic mass excess of 25.23 ± 0.10 MeV and Γ = 740 ± 100 keV. The cross section for forming this state is 0.5 μb/sr at 10°. The observed state is interpreted as being the Jπ=1/2- mirror of 11Be*(0.32) because of its width; the 1/2+ mirror of 11Beg.s. would be expected to be much broader (1974BE20). The 11N state is

  12. A=11N (1990AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    90AJ01) (See the Isobar Diagram for 11N) The 14N(3He, 6He)11N reaction has been studied at E(3He) = 70 MeV. A 6He group is observed which corresponds to a state in 11N with an atomic mass excess of 25.23 ± 0.10 MeV and Γ = 740 ± 100 keV. The cross section for forming this state is 0.5 μb/sr at 10°. The observed state is interpreted as being the Jπ = 1/2- mirror of 11Be*(0.32) because of its width; the 1/2+ mirror 11Beg.s. would be expected to be much broader (1974BE20). This 11N state is

  13. A=11N (2012KE01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2012KE01) (See Table Prev. Table 11.45 preview 11.45 (in PDF or PS) and Energy Level Diagram for 11N and Isobar Diagram ) Experimental evidence supporting states in 11N have produced a generally consistent picture of the 11N structure. However, sizeable inconsistencies persist amongst measured values for the ground state energy (mass excess) and the widths of states. There are essentially three high resolution measurements of the 11N ground state mass. They do not have overlap in their

  14. A=11N (68AJ02)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    68AJ02) (Not illustrated) See (GO60P, KE66C

  15. A=11Ne (1980AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    0AJ01) (Not illustrated) These nuclei have not been observed: see (1975BE31, 1976IR1B

  16. A=11Ne (1985AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    5AJ01) (Not illustrated) These nuclei have not been observed: see (1980AJ01) and (1982NG01, 1983ANZQ

  17. A=11Ne (1990AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    90AJ01) (Not illustrated) These nuclei have not been observed: see (1980AJ01, 1985AJ01) and (1986AN07, 1987SA15

  18. A=11Ne (2012KE01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2012KE01) (Not illustrated) These nuclei have not been observed: see (1980AJ01, 1985AJ01

  19. A=11O (1975AJ02)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    75AJ02) (Not illustrated) This nucleus has not been observed: see (1972WA07, 1974IR04

  20. A=11O (1980AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    80AJ01) (Not illustrated) These nuclei have not been observed: see (1975BE31, 1976IR1B; theor.

  1. A=11O (2012KE01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2012KE01) (Not illustrated) These nuclei have not been observed: see (1980AJ01, 1985AJ01

  2. A=11B (59AJ76)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    10-15 sec, assuming J 52. On the same assumption, the intensity ratio of quadrupole to dipole transitions is 0.2 (RA58A). A mean life of 1.5 x 10-15 sec is calculated by...

  3. A=11B (1990AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    a broad maximum at E 5.1 MeV (max 40 mb) is observed (1984OL05). For the earlier work see Table 11.7 (in PDF or PS) in (1980AJ01) and Table 11.7 (in PDF or PS) in...

  4. A=11Li (1975AJ02)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    by GeV protons. Its mass excess is 40.9 0.1 MeV (1973KL1C). 11Li is bound: Eb for breakup into 9Li + 2n and 10Li + n are 0.2 and 0.3 MeV, respectively see (1974AJ01) for a...

  5. A=11Li (2012KE01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    E(11Li) 246 MeVA, analysis of a complete three-body kinematical measurement of 11Li breakup on a 12C target indicates the reaction mechanism is 11Li inelastic scattering to...

  6. A=11Li (1990AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    increase in matter radii with increasing A and do not support the idea of a neutron halo in 11Li (1988POZS; prelim.). See, however, (1988TA1A). Fragmentation cross sections of...

  7. A=11B (1975AJ02)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    1970CO1H, 1971BA2Y, 1971NO02, 1972LE1L, 1973HA49, 1973KU03, 1973SA30, 1974ME19). Cluster and collective models: (1969BA1J, 1970BA1Q, 1971NO02, 1972LE1L, 1973KU03). Special...

  8. A=11B (1985AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    PDF or PS). Shell and deformed models:(1981BO1Y, 1981RA06, 1982BO01, 1983VA31, 1984VA06). Cluster model:(1979NI06, 1980FU1G, 1983SH38). Special states:(1979NI06, 1980RI06,...

  9. A=11B (1980AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    of Energy Levels (in PDF or PS). Shell model: (1977BO07, 1977JA14, 1977TE01, 1978BO31). Cluster, collective and rotational models: (1976BR26, 1977BO07, 1977NI1A, 1977OK1C,...

  10. A=11C (68AJ02)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    cross sections vary from 20 to 160 mb and tend to increase with increasing Q. For the groups that do not show the broad resonance, the cross sections are all below 5 mb and...

  11. A=11C (1975AJ02)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    of Energy Levels (in PDF or PS). Shell model: (1972LE1L, 1973HA49, 1973SA30, 1974ME19). Cluster and collective model: (1972LE1L). Special levels: (1969HA1G, 1969HA1F, 1972MS01,...

  12. A=11Be (1975AJ02)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Special reactions: (1969AR13, 1971AR02, 1972VO06, 1973BA81, 1973KO1D, 1973WI15). Muon capture (See also reaction 2.): (1967DE1E, 1968DE20, 1969BE41, 1970VA24, 1971BE57,...

  13. Superfund Record of Decision (EPA Region 1): Fort Devens-Sudbury Training Annex (areas of contamination A4, A7, and A9), Middlesex County, MA, September 30, 1997

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1998-01-01

    The US Army Sudbury Annex (the Annex) is a National Priorities List (NPL) site under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA). This Record of Decision addresses past releases of contaminants to all media at area of contamination (AOC) A4-Waste Dump, and past releases to groundwater at AOC A7-Old Gravel Pit Landfill and AOC A9-Petroleum, Oil, and Lubricant (POL) Burn Area.

  14. A9R729A.tmp

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  15. A9R729C.tmp

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  16. A9R729E.tmp

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  17. A9R72A0.tmp

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  18. A9R72A2.tmp

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  19. A9R72A4.tmp

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  20. A9R72A6.tmp

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  1. A9R72A8.tmp

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  2. A9R72AA.tmp

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  3. A9R72AC.tmp

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  4. A9R72AE.tmp

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  5. A9R72B0.tmp

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  6. A9RB1B5.tmp

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    Real Gross State Product (Billion $2009) New England ................ 858 869 863 867 869 874 878 883 888 892 896 901 864 876 894 Middle Atlantic .............. 2,399 2,435 2,450 2,455 2,459 2,473 2,487 2,499 2,507 2,519 2,531 2,542 2,435 2,479 2,525 E. N. Central ................. 2,236 2,250 2,269 2,277 2,278 2,288 2,298 2,309 2,322 2,333 2,344 2,353 2,258 2,293 2,338 W. N. Central ................ 1,048 1,055 1,057 1,058 1,060 1,066 1,072 1,078 1,084 1,090 1,096 1,102 1,054 1,069 1,093 S.

  7. A=9Be (1984AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Energy Levels (in PDF or PS). Shell model: (1978AR1H, 1979LA06, 1981BO1Y, 1982OR03). Cluster and -particle models: (1978AR1H, 1978RE1A, 1979CH1D, 1979FO16, 1979LU1A, 1979OK02,...

  8. A=9Be (1979AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    PDF or PS). Shell model: (1975KU27, 1975SC1K, 1977CA08, 1977JA14, 1978BO31). and cluster models: (1974CH19, 1974GR42, 1974PA1B, 1975AB1E, 1975CH28, 1975KR1D, 1975RO1B,...

  9. A=9Be (66LA04)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    excited state is 4 times less (HO61G: see also (JA57)). Angular distributions for both groups show maxima in the forward hemisphere. It is suggested that the large cross section...

  10. A=9B (1974AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    4AJ01) (See Energy Level Diagrams for 9B) GENERAL: See also (1966LA04) and Table 9.9 [Table of Energy Levels] (in PDF or PS). Model calculations: (1966BA26, 1966EL08, 1967ST1C, 1971CO28, 1972LE1L, 1973HA49). Special levels: (1966BA26, 1966EL08, 1967BA59, 1967ST1C, 1969HA1G, 1970TO1E, 1971CO28, 1971LI30, 1972BE1E). Astrophysical questions: (1970BA1M). Other topics: (1967CA17, 1967CH1H, 1970SA05, 1972AN05, 1972HA57, 1972CA37, 1972LE1L, 1972PN1A, 1973JU2A). Ground state properties: (1966BA26,

  11. A=9B (1979AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    9AJ01) (See Energy Level Diagrams for 9B) GENERAL: See also (1974AJ01) and Table 9.9 [Table of Energy Levels] (in PDF or PS). Model calculations: (1977HO1F, 1977OK01, 1978HO1E). Special levels: (1974IR04, 1975WI1E, 1976IR1B, 1978HO1E). Astrophysical questions: (1977SI1D). Pion reactions: (1974KA07). Other topics: (1974HA1C, 1974IR04, 1976IR1B). Ground state properties: (1975BE31, 1977OK01). 1. (a) 6Li(3He, n)8B Qm = -1.975 Eb = 16.603 (b) 6Li(3He, p)8Be Qm = 16.7878 (c) 6Li(3He, d)7Be Qm = 0.113

  12. A=9B (1984AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    4AJ01) (See Energy Level Diagrams for 9B) GENERAL: See also (1979AJ01) and Table 9.9 [Table of Energy Levels] (in PDF or PS). Model calculations: (1978AR1H, 1979LA06, 1979MA1J, 1981KO1Q). Special states: (1981KO1Q). Reactions involving pions: (1978WA1B, 1979AL1J, 1982EL07, 1982HI02, 1983HU02). Hypernuclei: (1978PO1A, 1978SO1A, 1979MA1L, 1981WA1J, 1982KO11). Other topics: (1979BE1H, 1979LA06, 1982NG01). Ground state of 9B: (1982NG01). 1. (a) 6Li(3He, γ)9B Qm = 16.601 (b) 6Li(3He, n)8B Qm =

  13. A=9B (1988AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    8AJ01) (See Energy Level Diagrams for 9B) GENERAL: See also (1984AJ01) and Table 9.9 [Table of Energy Levels] (in PDF or PS). Model calculations: (1983SH38, 1987VOZU). Special states: (1983AU1B, 1983FE07, 1983GO28, 1984KO40, 1985PO18, 1985PO19, 1985SH24, 1986AN07, 1987BA54, 1987VOZU). Complex reactions involving 9B: (1985PO18, 1985PO19, 1987AR19, 1987PO03). Reactions involving pions: (1985PN01). Hypernuclei: (1982KA1D, 1983KO1D, 1983SH38, 1983SH1E, 1984ZH1B, 1985AH1A, 1985PN01, 1986DA1B,

  14. A=9B (2004TI06)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2004TI06) (See Energy Level Diagrams for 9B) GENERAL: References to articles on general properties of 9B published since the previous review (1988AJ01) are grouped into categories and listed, along with brief descriptions of each item, in the General Tables for 9B located on our website at (www.tunl.duke.edu/nucldata/General_Tables/9b.shtml). See also Table Prev. Table 9.13 preview 9.13 [Table of Energy Levels] (in PDF or PS). The low-lying levels of 9B have mainly [441] spatial symmetry and

  15. A=9B (59AJ76)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    59AJ76) (See the Energy Level Diagram for 9B) GENERAL: See also Table 9.4 [Table of Energy Levels] (in PDF or PS). 1. 6Li(3He, p)8Be Qm = 16.786 Eb = 16.598 The excitation functions for protons leading to the ground and 2.9-MeV excited states of 8Be have been measured for E(3He) = 0.9 to 5.1 MeV (θ = 0° and 150°, lab.). Resonances are observed at E(3He) = 1.6 MeV (Γ = 0.25 MeV, 9B* = 17.6 MeV) and 3.0 MeV (Γ = 1.5 MeV, 9B* = 18.6 MeV) (SC56F). However, J.W. Butler (private communication)

  16. A=9B (66LA04)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    66LA04) (See Energy Level Diagrams for 9B) GENERAL: See (BA59N, PH60A, SP60, TA60L, BA62G, IN62, GR64C, RE64A, ST64). See also Table 9.10 [Table of Energy Levels] (in PDF or PS). 1. (a) 6Li(3He, p)8Be Qm = 16.787 Eb = 16.601 (b) 6Li(3He, n)8B Qm = -1.975 The excitation functions for protons leading to the ground and 2.9 MeV states of 8Be (p0 and p1) have been measured for E(3He) = 0.9 to 17 MeV. Resonances are reported at E(3He) = 1.6 MeV (Γ = 0.25 MeV) and E(3He) = 3.0 MeV (Γ = 1.5 MeV)

  17. A=9Be (1974AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    4AJ01) (See Energy Level Diagrams for 9Be) GENERAL: See also (1966LA04) and Table 9.2 [Table of Energy Levels] (in PDF or PS). Shell model: (1961KO1A, 1965CO25, 1965GR18, 1965VO1A, 1966AD06, 1966BA26, 1966HA18, 1966MA1P, 1966WI1E, 1967CO32, 1967ST1C, 1968GO01, 1969BO1V, 1969BO19, 1969BO33, 1969GU03, 1969VA1C, 1970CO1H, 1971CO28, 1971GR02, 1971NO02, 1972LE1L, 1973HA49, 1973KU03). Aplha and cluster models: (1965NE1B, 1966HI1A, 1967TA1C, 1968KU1B, 1969BA1J, 1969NE1C, 1970BA1Q, 1971LE1N, 1971NO02,

  18. A=9Be (1988AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    1988AJ01) (See Energy Level Diagrams for 9Be) GENERAL: See also (1984AJ01) and Table 9.2 [Table of Energy Levels] (in PDF or PS). Shell model: (1983VA31, 1984VA06, 1984ZW1A, 1985AN16, 1987KI1C, 1988OR1C, 1988WO04). Cluster and α-particle models: (1981PL1A, 1982DZ1A, 1983JA09, 1983MI1E, 1983SH38, 1985HA1P, 1985KW02, 1986CR1B, 1987VOZU). Special states: (1981PL1A, 1983AU1B, 1983GO28, 1983MI08, 1983VA31, 1984BA49, 1984KO40, 1984VA06, 1984WO09, 1984ZW1A, 1985GO1A, 1985HA1J, 1985PO19, 1985SH24,

  19. A=9Be (2004TI06)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2004TI06) (See Energy Level Diagrams for 9Be) GENERAL: References to articles on general properties of 9Be published since the previous review (1988AJ01) are grouped into categories and listed, along with brief descriptions of each item, in the General Tables for 9Be located on our website at (www.tunl.duke.edu/nucldata/General_Tables/9be.shtml). See also Table Prev. Table 9.2 preview 9.2 [Table of Energy Levels] (in PDF or PS). μ = -1.1778 ± 0.0009 μN: see (1978LEZA); Q = 52.88 ± 0.38 mb:

  20. A=9Be (59AJ76)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    59AJ76) (See the Energy Level Diagram for 9Be) GENERAL: See also Table 9.1 [Table of Energy Levels] (in PDF or PS). Theory: See (DA55D, FR55H, BL56A, DE56, KU56, BA57, PA57A, KU58B). 1. (a) 6Li(t, d)7Li Qm = 0.994 Eb = 17.687 (b) 6Li(t, p)8Li Qm = 0.803 (c) 6Li(t, n)8Be Qm = 16.021 (d) 6Li(t, α)5He Qm = 15.158 (e) 6Li(t, n)4He + 4He Qm = 16.115 The differential cross section at 90° for reaction (a) rises steeply from 8.8 mb/sr at Et = 0.72 MeV to 19 mb at 0.90 MeV, and then more slowly to 21

  1. A=9C (1974AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    4AJ01) (See the Isobar Diagram for 9C) GENERAL: See also (1966LA04) and Table 9.12 [Table of Energy Levels] (in PDF or PS). Model calculations: (1966BA26). Other topics: (1966BA26, 1966MC1C, 1972AN05, 1972CA37, 1973LA19). Ground state properties, including theoretical mass predictions: (1965GO1D, 1966BA26, 1966GO1B, 1966KE16, 1969GA1P, 1969JA1M, 1972CE1A, 1973HA77). Mass of 9C: From the threshold energy of 7Be(3He, n)9C (1971MO01) the atomic mass excess of 9C is 28.908 ± 0.004 MeV. This value

  2. A=9C (1979AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    9AJ01) (See the Isobar Diagram for 9C) GENERAL: See also (1974AJ01) and Table 9.12 [Table of Energy Levels] (in PDF or PS). Model calculations: (1974IR04, 1976IR1B). Pion reactions: (1974KA07, 1976HE1G, 1978SE1D). Other topics: (1974IR04, 1975BE56, 1976IR1B, 1977CE05). Ground state properties: (1975BE31). Mass of 9C: The atomic mass excess of 9C is 28912 ± 3 keV (1975KA18) based on the Q-value of the 12C(3He, 6He)9C reaction (1971TR03) and the threshold energy of the 7Be(3He, n)9C reaction

  3. A=9C (1984AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    4AJ01) (See the Isobar Diagram for 9C) GENERAL: (See also (1979AJ01) for other references in this category and for some reactions on which no new work has been done.) and Table 9.12 [Table of Energy Levels] (in PDF or PS) here. Model calculations: (1979LA06). Complex reactions involving 9C: (1981MO20). Reactions involing pions: (1979AS01, 1979NA1E, 1980BU15, 1983HU02). Other topics: (1979BE1H, 1979LA06, 1982NG01). Mass of 9C: The recent Q0 value for the 12C(3He, 6He)9C reaction (see reaction 3)

  4. A=9C (1988AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    8AJ01) (See the Isobar Diagram for 9C) GENERAL: See also (1984AJ01) and Table 9.11 [Table of Energy Levels] (in PDF or PS) here. Model calculations: (1983AU1B). Complex reactions involving 9C: (1983FR1A, 1983OL1A, 1986HA1B, 1987SN01). Reactions involving pions: (1983AS1B, 1984BR22, 1985PN01). Other topics: (1982KA1D, 1985AN28, 1986AN07). Ground state of 9C: (1983ANZQ, 1983AU1B, 1985AN28, 1987SA15). 1. 9C(β+)9B Qm = 16.498 The half-life of 9C is 126.5 ± 0.9 msec: see (1974AJ01). The decay is

  5. A=9C (2004TI06)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2004TI06) (See Energy Level Diagrams for 9C) GENERAL: References to articles on general properties of 9C published since the previous review (1988AJ01) are grouped into categories and listed, along with brief descriptions of each item, in the General Tables for 9C located on our website at (www.tunl.duke.edu/nucldata/General_Tables/9c.shtml). See also Table Prev. Table 9.16 preview 9.16 [Table of Energy Levels] (in PDF or PS). Ground state properties: μ = -1.3914 ± 0.0005 μN (1996MA38). See

  6. A=9C (59AJ76)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    59AJ76) (Not illustrated) Comparison with the mass of 9Li leads to an estimated mass excess of 32.3 ± 2 MeV (55AJ61). Analysis of a single star attributed to β-decay of 9C and subsequent breakup into p + 2α yields Q > 15.4 MeV, mass excess > 30.2 MeV (SW56A). Stability against 8B + p requires a mass excess < 32.9 MeV. Two reactions leading to 9C which have not been reported are 7Be(3He, n)9C (Qm = -7) and 12C(γ, 3n)9C (Qm = -54

  7. A=9C (66LA04)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    66LA04) (See the Isobar Diagram for 9C) GENERAL: See (55AJ61, SW56A, GR64C, WI64E, JA65C, WO65). Mass of 9C: The atomic mass excess of 9C is 28.99 ± 0.07 MeV: see 12C(3He, 6He)9C (CE65). 1. 9C(β+)9B → 8Be + p Qm = 16.76 Two groups of delayed protons are observed, indicating a component of the β+ decay to a level of 9B at 12.05 ± 0.2 MeV with Γ = 800 ± 100 keV which then decays to p + 8Be(0) and 8Be*(2.9). The half-life is 127 ± 3 msec. The allowed character of the decay suggests Jπ =

  8. A=9He (1979AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    9AJ01) (Not illustrated) 9He has not been observed: see (1974AJ01). It is predicted to be particle unstable. Particle instability with respect to 8He + n, 7He + 2n and 6He + 3n implies atomic mass excesses greater than 39.667, 42.253 and 41.808 MeV, respectively. The calculated mass excess of 9He is 43.49 MeV based on the modified form of the mass equation (1975JE02). See also (1974TH01) and (1974IR04, 1975BE31, 1976IR1B; theor.

  9. A=9He (1984AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    4AJ01) (Not illustrated) 9He has been observed in the 9Be(π-, π+)9He reaction at Eπ- = 194 MeV; the atomic mass excess is 40.81 ± 0.12 MeV. 9He is then unstable with respect to decay into 8He + n by 1.14 MeV (1981SE1B, 1980NA1D, 1980SE1C, 1980SE1F). See also (1979AJ01) and (1982PO1C; hypernuclei) and (1982NG01; theor

  10. A=9He (1988AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    8AJ01) (See the Isobar Diagram for 9He) 9He has been observed in the 9Be(14C, 14O) reaction at E(14C) = 158 MeV (1987BEYI) and in the 9Be(π-, π+) reaction at Eπ- = 180 and 194 MeV (1987SE05): the atomic mass excesses are 41.5 ± 1.0 MeV and 40.80 ± 0.10 MeV, respectively. We adopt the latter value. 9He is then unstable with respect to decay into 8He + n by 1.13 MeV. (1987SE05) also report the population of excited states of 9He at 1.2, 3.8 and 7.0 MeV, while (1987BEYI) suggest an excited

  11. A=9He (2004TI06)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2004TI06) (See the Isobar Diagram for 9He) GENERAL: References to articles on general properties of 9He published since the previous review (1988AJ01) are grouped into categories and listed, along with brief descriptions of each item, in the General Tables for 9He located on our website at (www.tunl.duke.edu/nucldata/General_Tables/9he.shtml). Mass of 9He: Although the value adopted in the 2003 Atomic Mass Evaluation (2003AU02) for the 9He ground state is 40.939 ± 0.029 MeV based on the results

  12. A=9Li (1974AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    4AJ01) (See Energy Level Diagrams for 9Li) GENERAL: See also Table 9.1 [Table of Energy Levels] (in PDF or PS). Model calculations: (1966BA26). Special reactions: (1965DO13, 1966GA15, 1966KL1C, 1967AU1B, 1967CA1J, 1967HA10, 1968DO1C, 1972VO06, 1973KO1D, 1973MU12, 1973WI15). Other topics: (1972CA37, 1972PN1A, 1973JU2A). Ground state properties: (1966BA26, , 1969JA1M). Mass of 9Li: From the Q-value of 18O(7Li, 16O)9Li, the atomic mass excess of 9Li is 24.9654 ± 0.005 MeV (1969NE1E; prelim.

  13. A=9Li (1979AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    9AJ01) (See Energy Level Diagrams for 9Li) GENERAL: See also (1974AJ01) and Table 9.1 [Table of Energy Levels] (in PDF or PS). Model calculations: (1974IR04, 1976IR1B, 1977JA14). Special reactions: (1975AB1D, 1975ZE01, 1976AL1F, 1976BE67, 1976BU16, 1977YA1B). Pion and kaon reactions (See also reaction 3.): (1973CA1C, 1976TR1A, 1977BA1Q, 1977DO06, 1977SH1C). Other topics: (1970KA1A, 1973TO16, 1974IR04, 1975BE56, 1976IR1B). Ground state properties: (1975BE31). μ = 3.4359 ± 0.0010 nm (1976CO1L;

  14. A=9Li (1984AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    4AJ01) (See Energy Level Diagrams for 9Li) GENERAL: See also (1979AJ01) and Table 9.1 [Table of Energy Levels] (in PDF or PS). Model calculations: (1979LA06). Complex reactions involving 9Li: (1978DU1B, 1979AL22, 1979BO22, 1979JA1C, 1980BO31, 1980WI1L, 1981BO1X, 1981MO20, 1982BO1Y). Muon and neutrino capture and reactions: (1980MU1B). Reactions involving pions and other mesons (See also reaction 3.): (1978FU09, 1979BO21, 1979PE1C, 1979WI1E, 1980NI03, 1980ST15, 1981YA1A). Hypernuclei: (1978DA1A,

  15. A=9Li (1988AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    8AJ01) (See Energy Level Diagrams for 9Li) GENERAL: See also (1984AJ01) and Table 9.1 [Table of Energy Levels] (in PDF or PS). Model calculations: (1983KU17, 1984CH24, 1984VA06). Special states: (1983KU17, 1984VA06). Electromagnetic interactions: (1983KU17). Astrophysical questions: (1987MA2C). Complex reactions involving 9Li: (1983OL1A, 1983WI1A, 1984GR08, 1985JA1B, 1985MA02, 1985MO17, 1986CS1A, 1986HA1B, 1986SA30, 1986WE1C, 1987BA38, 1987CH26, 1987JA06, 1987KO1Z, 1987SH1K, 1987TAZU, 1987WA09,

  16. A=9Li (2004TI06)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2004TI06) (See Energy Level Diagrams for 9Li) GENERAL: References to articles on general properties of 9Li published since the previous review (1988AJ01) are grouped into categories and listed, along with brief descriptions of each item, in the General Tables for 9Li located on our website at (www.tunl.duke.edu/nucldata/General_Tables/9li.shtml). See also Table Prev. Table 9.1 preview 9.1 [Table of Energy Levels] (in PDF or PS). Ground state properties: μ = 3.4391 ± 0.0006 μN (1983CO11). See

  17. A=9Li (59AJ76)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    59AJ76) (Not illustrated) Mass of 9Li: From the threshold for 9Be(d, 2p)9Li, Ed = 19 ± 1 MeV (GA51C), the mass excess of 9Li is determined as M - A = 28.1 ± 1 MeV. 1. 9Li(β-)9Be* --> 8Be + n Qm = 12.4 9Li decays to excited states of 9Be which decay by neutron emission. The mean of the reported half-lives is 0.169 ± 0.003 sec (GA51C, HO52B). See also (SH52, FR53A, BE55D, FL56, TA58B). 2. 9Be(d, 2p)9Li Qm = -15.5 The threshold is 19 ± 1 MeV (GA51C). 3. 11B(γ, 2p)9Li Qm = -31.4 See (SH52,

  18. A=9N (1979AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    79AJ01) (Not illustrated) Not observed: see (1974IR04, 1975BE31, 1976IR1B

  19. A=9N (1984AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    4AJ01) (Not illustrated) Not observed: see (1979AJ01). See also (1982NG01

  20. A=9N (1988AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    8AJ01) (Not illustrated) Not observed: see (1984AJ01) and (1983ANZQ, 1986AN40

  1. A=9N (2004TI06)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2004TI06) (Not illustrated) Not observed: see (1988AJ01). Mass excesses of 46.56 and 46.40 MeV have been estimated from two different mass formulae (2000PO32). 9N would then be proton unbound by ~ 4 MeV. However, mass formulae neither take into account the fact that the last occupied orbit(s) may change near the drip lines nor the fact that an extended low-l orbit leads to a lowered Coulomb energy. The suggested s-wave ground-state of 9He and a Coulomb energy estimated from the 11N ground state

  2. A=9n (1984AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    4AJ01) (Not illustrated) Not observed: see (1977DE08

  3. A=9n (1988AJ01)

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    8AJ01) (Not illustrated) Not observed: see (1979AJ01) and (1983BE55; theor.

  4. SNOiioaroad A9U3N3

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    1997 Household Characteristics RSE Column Factor: Total Four Most Populated States RSE Row Factors New York California Texas Florida 0.4 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.4 Total .............................................................. 101.5 6.8 11.5 7.0 5.9 NF 1997 Household Income Category Less than $5,000 ......................................... 3.8 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.1 16.2 $5,000 to $9,999 ......................................... 9.6 0.9 1.1 0.6 0.7 14.2 $10,000 to $14,999

  5. Wave-Energy/-Device Modeling: Developing A 1:17 Scaled Model

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    ... News & Events, Renewable Energy, Research & Capabilities, Systems Analysis, Water PowerWave-Energy-Device Modeling: Developing A 1:17 Scaled Model Wave-Energy-Device Modeling: ...

  6. Table A1. Refiner/Reseller Motor Gasoline Prices by Grade, PAD...

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    Information Administration Petroleum Marketing Annual 1995 Table A1. RefinerReseller Motor Gasoline Prices by Grade, PAD District and State, 1984-Present (Cents per Gallon...

  7. Table A1. Refiner/Reseller Motor Gasoline Prices by Grade, PAD...

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    AdministrationPetroleum Marketing Annual 1999 401 Table A1. RefinerReseller Motor Gasoline Prices by Grade, PAD District and State, 1984-Present (Cents per Gallon...

  8. ,"Table 3A.1. January Monthly Peak Hour Demand, by North American...

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    A.1. January Monthly Peak Hour Demand, by North American Electric Reliability Corporation ... February Monthly Peak Hour Demand, by North American Electric Reliability Corporation ...

  9. Axial resonances a$$_{1}$$(1260), b$$_{1}$$(1235) and their decays from the lattice

    DOE Public Access Gateway for Energy & Science Beta (PAGES Beta)

    Lang, C. B.; Leskovec, Luka; Mohler, Daniel; Prelovsek, Sasa

    2014-04-28

    The light axial-vector resonancesmore » $a_1(1260)$ and $b_1(1235)$ are explored in Nf=2 lattice QCD by simulating the corresponding scattering channels $$\\rho\\pi$$ and $$\\omega\\pi$$. Interpolating fields $$\\bar{q} q$$ and $$\\rho\\pi$$ or $$\\omega\\pi$$ are used to extract the s-wave phase shifts for the first time. The $$\\rho$$ and $$\\omega$$ are treated as stable and we argue that this is justified in the considered energy range and for our parameters $$m_\\pi\\simeq 266~$$MeV and $$L\\simeq 2~$$fm. We neglect other channels that would be open when using physical masses in continuum. Assuming a resonance interpretation a Breit-Wigner fit to the phase shift gives the $a_1(1260)$ resonance mass $$m_{a1}^{res}=1.435(53)(^{+0}_{-109})$$ GeV compared to $$m_{a1}^{exp}=1.230(40)$$ GeV. The $a_1$ width $$\\Gamma_{a1}(s)=g^2 p/s$$ is parametrized in terms of the coupling and we obtain $$g_{a_1\\rho\\pi}=1.71(39)$$ GeV compared to $$g_{a_1\\rho\\pi}^{exp}=1.35(30)$$ GeV derived from $$\\Gamma_{a1}^{exp}=425(175)$$ MeV. In the $b_1$ channel, we find energy levels related to $$\\pi(0)\\omega(0)$$ and $b_1(1235)$, and the lowest level is found at $$E_1 \\gtrsim m_\\omega+m_\\pi$$ but is within uncertainty also compatible with an attractive interaction. Lastly, assuming the coupling $$g_{b_1\\omega\\pi}$$ extracted from the experimental width we estimate $$m_{b_1}^{res}=1.414(36)(^{+0}_{-83})$$.« less

  10. A 1.3-Å Structure of Zinc-bound N-terminal Domain of Calmodulin...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Ion-binding Step Citation Details In-Document Search Title: A 1.3- Structure of Zinc-bound N-terminal Domain of Calmodulin Elucidates Potential Early Ion-binding Step Authors: ...

  11. Induction of cytochromes P450 1A1 and 1A2 by tanshinones in human...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    human HepG2 hepatoma cell line Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Induction of cytochromes P450 1A1 and 1A2 by tanshinones in human HepG2 hepatoma cell line Diterpenoid ...

  12. File:FormA1-R.pdf | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    link to this file. Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgwindex.php?titleFile:FormA1-R.pdf&oldid532769" Feedback Contact needs updating Image needs updating Reference...

  13. Refrigerators and Refrigerator-Freezers (Appendix A1 after May 2, 2011) |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy Refrigerators and Refrigerator-Freezers (Appendix A1 after May 2, 2011) Refrigerators and Refrigerator-Freezers (Appendix A1 after May 2, 2011) The Department of Energy (DOE) develops standardized data templates for reporting the results of tests conducted in accordance with current DOE test procedures. Templates may be used by third-party laboratories under contract with DOE that conduct testing in support of ENERGY STAR® verification, DOE rulemakings, and enforcement

  14. Table A1. Refiner/Reseller Motor Gasoline Prices by Grade, PAD...

    U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

    71.6 92.3 78.2 101.8 83.6 87.5 74.7 See footnotes at end of table. A1. RefinerReseller Motor Gasoline Prices by Grade, PAD District, and State, 1984-Present 452 Energy Information...

  15. Higgs Coupling Measurements at a 1 TeV Linear Collider

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Barklow, T

    2003-12-18

    Methods for extracting Higgs boson signals at a 1 TeV center-of-mass energy e{sup +}e{sup -} linear collider are described. In addition, estimates are given for the accuracy with which branching fractions can be measured for Higgs boson decays to b{bar b} WW, gg, and {gamma}{gamma}.

  16. CX-009363: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Development and Test of a 1,000 Level 3C Fiber Optic Borehole Seismic Receiver Array Applied to Carbon Sequestration CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B3.6 Date: 09/19/2012 Location(s): Multiple Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  17. Predicting the future could win a $1,000 California or Illinois scholarship

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Predicting The Future Could Win California Or Illinois Scholarship Community Connections: Your link to news and opportunities from Los Alamos National Laboratory Latest Issue: September 1, 2016 all issues All Issues » submit Predicting the future could win a $1,000 California or Illinois scholarship To qualify, students need to post the answer to this question on their blog or website: "Where do you see the Internet in 10 years?" September 1, 2012 dummy image Read our archives

  18. Neutron dosimetry and damage calculations for the ATR-A1 irradiation

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Greenwood, L.R.; Ratner, R.T.

    1998-09-01

    Neutron fluence measurements and radiation damage calculations are reported for the collaborative US/Japan ATR-A1 irradiation in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL). The maximum total neutron fluence at midplane was 9.4 {times} 10{sup 21} n/cm{sup 2} (5.5 {times} 10{sup 21} n/cm{sup 2} above 0.1 MeV), resulting in about 4.6 dpa in vanadium.

  19. Active site proton delivery and the lyase activity of human CYP17A1

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Khatri, Yogan; Gregory, Michael C.; Grinkova, Yelena V.; Denisov, Ilia G.; Sligar, Stephen G.

    2014-01-03

    Highlights: The disruption of PREG/PROG hydroxylation activity by T306A showed the participation of Cpd I. T306A supports the involvement of a nucleophilic peroxo-anion during lyase activity. The presence of cytochrome b{sub 5} augments CC lyase activity. ?5-Steroids are preferred substrates for CYP17 catalysis. -- Abstract: Cytochrome P450 CYP17A1 catalyzes a series of reactions that lie at the intersection of corticoid and androgen biosynthesis and thus occupies an essential role in steroid hormone metabolism. This multifunctional enzyme catalyzes the 17?-hydroxylation of ?4- and ?5-steroids progesterone and pregnenolone to form the corresponding 17?-hydroxy products through its hydroxylase activity, and a subsequent 17,20-carboncarbon scission of pregnene-side chain produce the androgens androstenedione (AD) and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA). While the former hydroxylation reaction is believed to proceed through a conventional Compound I rebound mechanism, it has been suggested that the latter carbon cleavage is initiated by an iron-peroxy intermediate. We report on the role of Thr306 in CYP17 catalysis. Thr306 is a member of the conserved acid/alcohol pair thought to be essential for the efficient delivery of protons required for hydroperoxoanion heterolysis and formation of Compound I in the cytochromes P450. Wild type and T306A CYP17A1 self-assembled in Nanodiscs were used to quantitate turnover and coupling efficiencies of CYP17s physiological ?4- and ?5-substrates. We observed that T306A co-incorporated in Nanodiscs with its redox partner cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase, coupled NADPH only by 0.9% and 0.7% compared to the wild type (97% and 22%) during the conversion of pregnenolone and progesterone, respectively, to the corresponding 17-OH products. Despite increased oxidation of pyridine nucleotide, hydroxylase activity was drastically diminished in the T306A mutant, suggesting a high degree of uncoupling in which reducing equivalents and protons

  20. Measurement of velocity deficit at the downstream of a 1:10 axial hydrokinetic turbine model

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Gunawan, Budi; Neary, Vincent S; Hill, Craig; Chamorro, Leonardo

    2012-01-01

    Wake recovery constrains the downstream spacing and density of turbines that can be deployed in turbine farms and limits the amount of energy that can be produced at a hydrokinetic energy site. This study investigates the wake recovery at the downstream of a 1:10 axial flow turbine model using a pulse-to-pulse coherent Acoustic Doppler Profiler (ADP). In addition, turbine inflow and outflow velocities were measured for calculating the thrust on the turbine. The result shows that the depth-averaged longitudinal velocity recovers to 97% of the inflow velocity at 35 turbine diameter (D) downstream of the turbine.

  1. Overview of Remote Handling Equipment Used for the NPP A1 Decommissioning - 12141

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kravarik, K.; Medved, J.; Pekar, A.; Stubna, M.; Michal, V.; Vargovcik, L.

    2012-07-01

    The first Czechoslovak NPP A1 was in operation from 1972 to 1977 and it was finally shutdown due to an accident (level 4 according to the INES). The presence of radioactive, toxic or hazardous materials limits personnel access to facilities and therefore it is necessary to use remote handling technologies for some most difficult characterization, retrieval, decontamination and dismantling tasks. The history of remote handling technologies utilization started in nineties when the spent nuclear fuel, including those fuel assemblies damaged during the accident, was prepared for the transport to Russia. Subsequent significant development of remote handling equipment continued during implementation of the NPP A1 decommissioning project - Stage I and ongoing Stage II. Company VUJE, Inc. is the general contractor for both mentioned stages of the decommissioning project. Various remote handling manipulators and robotics arms were developed and used. It includes remotely controlled vehicle manipulator MT-15 used for characterisation tasks in hostile and radioactive environment, special robust manipulator DENAR-41 used for the decontamination of underground storage tanks and multi-purposes robotics arms MT-80 and MT-80A developed for variety of decontamination and dismantling tasks. The heavy water evaporator facility dismantling is the current task performed remotely by robotics arm MT-80. The heavy water evaporator is located inside the main production building in the room No. 220 where loose surface contamination varies from 10 Bq/cm{sup 2} to 1x10{sup 3} Bq/cm{sup 2}, dose rate is up to 1.5 mGy/h and the feeding pipeline contained liquid RAW with high tritium content. Presented manipulators have been designed for broad range of decommissioning tasks. They are used for recognition, sampling, waste retrieval from large underground tanks, decontamination and dismantling of technological equipments. Each of the mentioned fields claims specific requirements on design of

  2. Test of a 1.8 Tesla, 400 Hz Dipole for a Muon Synchrotron

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Summers, D.J.; Cremaldi, L.M.; Hart, T.L.; Perera, L.P.; Reep, M.; Witte, H.; Hansen, S.; Lopes, M.L.; Reidy Jr., J.; /Oxford High School

    2012-05-01

    A 1.8 T dipole magnet using thin grain oriented silicon steel laminations has been constructed as a prototype for a muon synchrotron ramping at 400 Hz. Following the practice in large 3 phase transformers and our own Opera-2d simulations, joints are mitred to take advantage of the magnetic properties of the steel which are much better in the direction in which the steel was rolled. Measurements with a Hysteresigraph 5500 and Epstein frame show a high magnetic permeability which minimizes stored energy in the yoke allowing the magnet to ramp quickly with modest voltage. Coercivity is low which minimizes hysteresis losses. A power supply with a fast Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistor (IGBT) switch and a capacitor was constructed. Coils are wound with 12 gauge copper wire. Thin wire and laminations minimize eddy current losses. The magnetic field was measured with a peak sensing Hall probe.

  3. Laser photodetachment diagnostics of a 1/3-size negative hydrogen ion source for NBI

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Geng, S.; Tsumori, K.; Nakano, H.; Kisaki, M.; Ikeda, K.; Takeiri, Y.; Osakabe, M.; Nagaoka, K.; Kaneko, O.

    2015-04-08

    To investigate the flows of charged particles in front of the plasma grid (PG) in a negative hydrogen ion source, the information of the local densities of electrons and negative hydrogen ions (H-) are necessary. For this purpose, the laser photodetachment is applied for pure hydrogen plasmas and Cs-seeded plasma in a 1/3-size negative hydrogen ion source in NIFS-NBI test stand. The H- density obtained by photodetachment is calibrated by the results from cavity ring-down (CRD). The pressure dependence and PG bias dependence of the local H- density are presented and discussed. The results show that H- density increases significantly by seeding Cs into the plasma. In Cs-seeded plasma, relativity exists between the H- ion density and plasma potential.

  4. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-DNA adducts and the CYP1A1 restriction fragment length polymorphism

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Shields, P.G.; Bowman, E.D.; Weston, A.; Harris, C.C.; Sugimura, H.; Caporaso, N.E.; Petruzzelli, S.F. ); Trump, B.F. )

    1992-11-01

    Human cancer risk assessment at a genetic level involves the investigation of carcinogen metabolism and DNA adduct formation. Wide interindividual differences in metabolism result in different DNA adduct levels. For this and other reasons, many laboratories have considered DNA adducts to be a measure of the biologically effective dose of a carcinogen. Techniques for studying DNA adducts using chemically specific assays are becoming available. A modification of the [sup 32]P-postlabeling assay for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon DNA adducts described here provides potential improvements in quantification. DNA adducts, however, reflect only recent exposure to carcinogens; in contrast, genetic testing for metabolic capacity indicates the extent to which carcinogens can be activated and exert genotoxic effects. Such studies may reflect both separate and integrated risk factors together with DNA adduct levels. A recently described restriction fragment length polymorphism for the CYP1A1, which codes for the cytochrome P450 enzyme primarily responsible for the metabolic activation of carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, has been found to be associated with lung cancer risk in a Japanese population. In a subset of individuals enrolled in a US lung cancer case-control study, no association with lung cancer was found. 17 refs., 3 figs.

  5. Daymet: Daily Surface Weather Data on a 1-km Grid for North America, Version 2.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Thornton, Peter E; Thornton, Michele M; Mayer, Benjamin W; Wilhelmi, Nate; Wei, Yaxing; Devarakonda, Ranjeet; Cook, Robert B

    2014-01-01

    More information: http://daymet.ornl.gov Presenter: Ranjeet Devarakonda Environmental Sciences Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Daymet: Daily Surface Weather Data and Climatological Summaries provides gridded estimates of daily weather parameters for North America, including daily continuous surfaces of minimum and maximum temperature, precipitation occurrence and amount, humidity, shortwave radiation, snow water equivalent, and day length. The current data product (Version 2) covers the period January 1, 1980 to December 31, 2013 [1]. The prior product (Version 1) only covered from 1980-2008. Data are available on a daily time step at a 1-km x 1-km spatial resolution in Lambert Conformal Conic projection with a spatial extent that covers the conterminous United States, Mexico, and Southern Canada as meteorological station density allows. Daymet data can be downloaded from 1) the ORNL Distributed Active Archive Center (DAAC) search and order tools (http://daac.ornl.gov/cgi-bin/cart/add2cart.pl?add=1219) or directly from the DAAC FTP site (http://daac.ornl.gov/cgi-bin/dsviewer.pl?ds_id=1219) and 2) the Single Pixel Tool [2] and THREDDS (Thematic Real-time Environmental Data Services) Data Server [3]. The Single Pixel Data Extraction Tool allows users to enter a single geographic point by latitude and longitude in decimal degrees. A routine is executed that translates the (lon, lat) coordinates into projected Daymet (x,y) coordinates. These coordinates are used to access the Daymet database of daily-interpolated surface weather variables. Daily data from the nearest 1 km x 1 km Daymet grid cell are extracted from the database and formatted as a table with one column for each Daymet variable and one row for each day. All daily data for selected years are returned as a single (long) table, formatted for display in the browser window. At the top of this table is a link to the same data in a simple comma-separated text format, suitable for import into a

  6. Experimental results from pressure testing a 1:6-scale nuclear power plant containment

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Horschel, D.S.

    1992-01-01

    This report discusses the testing of a 1:6-scale, reinforced-concrete containment building at Sandia National Laboratories, in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The scale-model, Light Water Reactor (LWR) containment building was designed and built to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) code by United Engineers and Constructors, Inc., and was instrumented with over 1200 transducers to prepare for the test. The containment model was tested to failure to determine its response to static internal overpressurization. As part of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission`s program on containment integrity, the test results will be used to assess the capability of analytical methods to predict the performance of containments under severe-accident loads. The scaled dimensions of the cylindrical wall and hemispherical dome were typical of a full-size containment. Other typical features included in the heavily reinforced model were equipment hatches, personnel air locks, several small piping penetrations, and a ihin steel liner that was attached to the concrete by headed studs. In addition to the transducers attached to the model, an acoustic detection system and several video and still cameras were used during testing to gather data and to aid in the conduct of the test. The model and its instrumentation are briefly discussed, and is followed by the testing procedures and measured response of the containment model. A summary discussion is included to aid in understanding the significance of the test as it applies to real world reinforced concrete containment structures. The data gathered during SIT and overpressure testing are included as an appendix.

  7. An early look of comet C/2013 A1 (Siding Spring): Breathtaker or nightmare?

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Ye, Quan-Zhi; Hui, Man-To

    2014-06-01

    The dynamically new comet, C/2013 A1 (Siding Spring), is to make a close approach to Mars on 2014 October 19 at 18:30 UT at a distance of 40 1 Martian radii. Such an extremely rare event offers a precious opportunity for the spacecrafts on Mars to closely study a dynamically new comet itself as well as the planet-comet interaction. Meanwhile, the high-speed meteoroids released from C/Siding Spring also pose a threat to physically damage the spacecrafts. Here we present our observations and modeling results of C/Siding Spring to characterize the comet and assess the risk posed to the spacecrafts on Mars. We find that the optical tail of C/Siding Spring is dominated by larger particles at the time of the observation. Synchrone simulation suggests that the comet was already active in late 2012 when it was more than 7 AU from the Sun. By parameterizing the dust activity with a semi-analytic model, we find that the ejection speed of C/Siding Spring is comparable to comets such as the target of the Rosetta mission, 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. Under a nominal situation, the simulated dust cone will miss the planet by about 20 Martian radii. At the extreme ends of uncertainties, the simulated dust cone will engulf Mars, but the meteoric influx at Mars is still comparable to the nominal sporadic influx, seemly indicating that an intense and enduring meteoroid bombardment due to C/Siding Spring is unlikely. Further simulation also suggests that gravitational disruption of the dust tail may be significant enough to be observable at Earth.

  8. MNK1 expression increases during cellular senescence and modulates the subcellular localization of hnRNP A1

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Ziaei, Samira; The Graduate School and University Center of CUNY, New York, NY ; Shimada, Naoko; Kucharavy, Herman; Hubbard, Karen; The Graduate School and University Center of CUNY, New York, NY

    2012-03-10

    Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 (hnRNP A1) is an RNA-binding protein that modulates splice site usage, polyadenylation, and cleavage efficiency. This protein has also been implicated in mRNA stability and transport from the nucleus. We have previously demonstrated that hnRNP A1 had diminished protein levels and showed cytoplasmic accumulation in senescent human diploid fibroblasts. Furthermore, we have shown that inhibition of p38 MAPK, a key regulator of cellular senescence, elevated hnRNP A1 protein levels and inhibited hnRNP A1 cytoplasmic localization. In this study, we have explored the possible involvement of MNK1, one of the downstream effector of p38 MAPK, in the regulation of hnRNP A1. We have demonstrated that pharmacological inhibition of MNK1 by CGP 57380 decreased the phosphorylation levels of hnRNP A1 in young and senescent fibroblast cells and blocked the cytoplasmic accumulation of hnRNP A1 in senescent cells. In addition, MNK1 formed a complex with hnRNP A1 in vivo. The expression levels of MNK1, phospho-MNK1, and phospho-eIF4E proteins were found to be elevated in senescent cells. These data suggest that MNK1 regulates the phosphorylation and the subcellular distribution of hnRNP A1 and that MNK1 may play a role in the induction of senescence. -- Highlights: Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer MNK1 and not MAPKAPK2 phosphorylates hnRNP A1. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer MNK1 has elevated levels in senescent cells, this has not been reported previously. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer MNK1 activity induces cytoplasmic accumulation of hnRNP A1 in senescent cells. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer Altered cytoplasmic localization of hnRNP A1 may alter gene expression patterns. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer Our studies may increase our understanding of RNA metabolism during cellular aging.

  9. CX-009929: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    South Louisiana Enhanced Oil Recovery/Sequestration Research and Development Project CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B3.1, B3.6 Date: 03/26/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  10. CX-005707: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Florida-City-LargoCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B1.32, B2.5, B5.1Date: 04/19/2011Location(s): Largo, FloridaOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  11. CX-002087: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Oregon-City-GreshamCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B2.5, B3.6, B5.1Date: 04/22/2010Location(s): Gresham, OregonOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  12. CX-001684: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Oklahoma State Energy Program (SEP) American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) - ManagementCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11Date: 04/08/2010Location(s): OklahomaOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office

  13. CX-003048: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Training Program Development for Commercial Building Equipment TechniciansCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11Date: 07/19/2010Location(s): College Station, TexasOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

  14. CX-003046: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Development of Total Energy, Environment and Asset Management (TE2AM) CurriculumCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11Date: 07/19/2010Location(s): Madison, WisconsinOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

  15. CX-003043: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Development of a Training Program for Commercial Building TechniciansCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11Date: 07/19/2010Location(s): Des Plaines, IllinoisOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

  16. CX-006019: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program - Michigan-City-WarrenCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B2.5, B5.1Date: 06/01/2011Location(s): Warren, MichiganOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  17. CX-002084: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Oklahoma-City-EdmondCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B1.32, B2.5, B5.1Date: 04/23/2010Location(s): Edmond, OklahomaOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  18. CX-006102: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    California-City-San BernardinoCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B2.5, B3.6, B5.1Date: 03/26/2010Location(s): San Bernardino, CaliforniaOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  19. CX-003319: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Recovery Act - National Aeronautics and Space Administration Solar Electric Propulsion Technology Application Readiness (NSTAR) Automated Meter Reading (AMR) -Based Dynamic PricingCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B2.2, B5.1Date: 07/30/2010Location(s): Newton, MassachusettsOffice(s): Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, National Energy Technology Laboratory

  20. CX-002011: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Illinois - City - Town of CiceroCX(s) Applied: B1.32, B2.5, A1, A9, A11, B5.1Date: 04/27/2010Location(s): Cicero, IllinoisOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  1. CX-006103: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    California-City-San ClementeCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B1.32, B5.1Date: 03/05/2010Location(s): San Clemente, CaliforniaOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  2. CX-010300: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    A 1,000 Level Drill Pipe Deployed Fiber Optic 3C Receiver Array for Deep Boreholes CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.6 Date: 04/30/2013 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  3. CX-003538: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Green Fuels DepotCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B3.6, B5.1Date: 08/26/2010Location(s): Naperville, IllinoisOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

  4. CX-001807: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Conversion of High Mileage State VehiclesCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B5.1Date: 04/19/2010Location(s): Oklahoma City, OklahomaOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

  5. CX-004229: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Kansas-City-Overland ParkCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B1.32, B2.5, B5.1Date: 10/13/2010Location(s): Overland Park, KansasOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  6. CX-002226: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Town of Cary's Listing of Positions and Installations CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B2.5, B5.1Date: 05/06/2010Location(s): Cary, North CarolinaOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  7. CX-004362: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Wisconsin-City-West AllisCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B1.32, B2.5, B5.1Date: 11/01/2010Location(s): West Allis, WisconsinOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  8. CX-004789: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Wisconsin-City-West AllisCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B1.32, B2.5, B5.1Date: 12/20/2010Location(s): West Allis, WisconsinOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  9. CX-002070: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    New York-City-AlbanyCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B1.32, B5.1Date: 04/13/2010Location(s): Albany, New YorkOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  10. CX-003776: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    New York-City-GreeceCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B2.5, B5.1Date: 09/09/2010Location(s): Greece, New YorkOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy