Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "7-year review fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

NEUP FY2011 R&D Review Processes | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FY2011 R&D Review Processes NEUP FY2011 R&D Review Processes NEUP FY2011 R&D Review Processes NEUP FY2011 R&D Review Processes For Web.pdf More Documents & Publications Meeting...

2

ACE Merit Review Report FY2004  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Merit Review and Peer Evaluation of FY 2004 DOE Advanced Combustion Engine R&D Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL May 18-20, 2004 Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy FreedomCAR and Vehicle Technologies Program December 2004 Bringing you a prosperous future where energy is clean, abundant, reliable, and affordable Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 December 13, 2004 Dear Colleague: This document summarizes the comments provided by the Review Panel for the FY 2004 Department of Energy (DOE) Advanced Combustion Engine R&D Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, the "ACE Review," held on May 18-20, 2004 at Argonne National Laboratory (ANL). The raw evaluations and comments of the panel were

3

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 DOE Energy Storage and Power Electronics Program (ESPE) PEER Review FY08 DOE Energy Storage and Power Electronics Program (ESPE) PEER Review John D. Boyes Sandia National...

4

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review FY07 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories Mission Mission Develop advanced electricity storage...

5

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 DOE Energy Storage 9 DOE Energy Storage PEER Review John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories Mission Develop advanced electricity storage and PE technologies, in partnership with industry, for modernizing and expanding the electric supply. This will improve the quality, reliability, flexibility and cost effectiveness of the existing system. Help create an energy storage industry Significant Events in FY09 Power Electronics Subprogram suffered a large budget cut in FY09 and was dropped as a separate program for FY10. ESSP will reabsorb power electronics development for energy storage applications back into program. Funding Due to a lengthy Congressional continuing resolution, FY09 funding was not received until April Power Electronics Sub-Program ESSP Program Highlights

6

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 DOE Energy Storage 8 DOE Energy Storage and Power Electronics Program (ESPE) PEER Review FY08 DOE Energy Storage and Power Electronics Program (ESPE) PEER Review John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories Sandia is a multi-program laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company, for the United States Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration, under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000 Mission Mission Develop advanced electricity storage and PE technologies, in partnership with industry, for modernizing and expanding the electric supply. This will improve the quality, reliability, flexibility and cost effectiveness of the existing system. Help create an energy storage industry Develop advanced power electronics for the grid of the future

7

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 DOE Energy Storage Program 7 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review FY07 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories Mission Mission Develop advanced electricity storage and PE technologies, in partnership with industry, for modernizing and expanding the electric supply. This will improve the quality, reliability, flexibility and cost effectiveness of the existing system. Help create an energy storage industry Make energy storage ubiquitous ESS Program Makeup ESS Program Makeup ESS Base Program - CEC/DOE Data Acquisition and Project Support - NYSERDA/DOE Data Acquisition and Project Support - BPA ETO based STATCOM Project - ETO Development Project - Boeing Superconducting Flywheel - ACONF Coast Guard Project - Iowa Stored Energy Project - Electrolyte Research

8

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 DOE Energy Storage Program 6 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER REVIEW John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories ESS Program Makeup ESS Base Program - CEC/DOE Data Acquisition and Project Support - NYSERDA/DOE Data Acquisition and Project Support - Boeing Superconducting Flywheel - ACONF Coast Guard Project - HybSim Hybrid Storage Model Development Congressionally-Directed Programs - University of Missouri-Rolla - Grid Modernization - Iowa Stored Energy Project - EEI - BiPolar Ni-MH Battery Development - Sprint - Storage for Telecommunications Apps. - Emerson - Network Power - Beacon Power - Frequency Regulation Plant Design - Mead Westvaco - Research on Lead-Carbon Asymmetric Super capacitors (FY05) ESS Program Makeup (cont.) ESS Program Makeup cont. SBIR - Aegis Technology - PII - Arkansas Power Electronic International -

9

NETL-RUA Annual Review FY2012 DOE/NETL-2012/1579 National Energy...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

NETL-RUA Annual Review FY2012 DOENETL-20121579 National Energy Technology Laboratory Office of Research and Development 2 NETL-RUA Disclaimer This document was prepared as an...

10

Review of the Oak Ridge Office FY 2012 Draft Schedules for Oversight Activitites  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ORO-2011-06-21 ORO-2011-06-21 Site: Oak Ridge Office Subject: Office of Enforcement and Oversight's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations Activity Report for the Review of the Oak Ridge Office FY 2012 Draft Schedules for Oversight Activities Dates of Activity : 06/21/2011 Report Preparer: Tim Mengers Activity Description/Purpose: The purpose of the visit was for the Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) site lead to gain operational awareness of the Oak Ridge Office (ORO)/Office of Environmental Management (EM) oversight activities and to review draft oversight schedules for the coming year. The HSS site lead met with EM managers to review next year's oversight schedules. The HSS site lead received a general listing of all EM oversight actions planned for FY 2012. EM is in the process of refining and prioritizing the reviews and

11

Microsoft PowerPoint - NEUP FY2011 R&D Review Processes For Web.pptx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

gy gy y g FY2011 Review Process FY2011 NEUP Review Process FY2011 NEUP Review Process RPA Proposals RPA 3 Pagers: Submission of three page RPA Proposals 3 page P R i RPA 3 Pagers: Submission of three page proposals by university respondents Relevancy Panels: Composed of two Federally selected reviewers representing technical areas Peer Review Panels: Composed of Federally Relevancy Panels Peer Review Panels Peer Review Panels: Composed of Federally selected University or Laboratory technical peers Recommendation Panels: Composed of Federal Directors and their selected advisors SSO Selection: Presentation of Recommendation Panels SSO Selection: Presentation of recommendations by NEUP to the SSO Invited: Proposals selected by the SSO to submit a full proposal N t I it d P l t l t d b th SSO SSO Selection

12

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 DOE Energy Storage PEER Review John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories Mission Develop advanced electricity storage and PE technologies, in partnership with industry, for...

13

FY06 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 DOE Energy Storage Program PEER REVIEW John D. Boyes Sandia National Laboratories ESS Program Makeup ESS Base Program - CECDOE Data Acquisition and Project Support - NYSERDADOE...

14

TFA Tanks Focus Area midyear review report FY 2000  

SciTech Connect

In accordance with EM's office of Science and Technology (OST), the TFA is committed to assessing the maturity of technology development projects and ensuring their readiness for implementation and subsequent deployment. The TFA conducts an annual Midyear Review to document the status of ongoing projects, reaffirm and document user commitment to selected projects, and to improve the effective deployment of technology by determining and documenting the readiness of selected projects to move ahead. Since 1995, OST has used a linear technology maturation model that spans through seven defined stages of maturity, from basic research to implementation. Application of this Stage/Gate model to technology development resulted in prescriptive and somewhat cumbersome review procedures, resulting in limited and inconsistent use. Subsequently, in February 2000, OST issued revised guidance in an effort to streamline the technology tracking and review process. While the new OST guidance reinforces peer review requirements and the use of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) for independent reviews, it also implements a simplified Gate model. The TFA is now responsible for providing auditable documentation for passing only three stages of technology maturity: ready for research (Gate 0); ready for development (Gate 2); ready for demonstration (Gate 5). The TFA Midyear Review is a key element in the overall review procedure, as the tracking evidence for all active projects is required to be available at this time. While the Midyear Report contains an overview of the status of all TFA reviews and projects, not all the reviews were conducted during the Midyear Review. The TFA used a phased approach to accomplish the Midyear Review requirements.

LR Roeder-Smith

2000-05-02T23:59:59.000Z

15

TFA Tanks Focus Area midyear review report FY 2000  

SciTech Connect

In accordance with EM's office of Science and Technology (OST), the TFA is committed to assessing the maturity of technology development projects and ensuring their readiness for implementation and subsequent deployment. The TFA conducts an annual Midyear Review to document the status of ongoing projects, reaffirm and document user commitment to selected projects, and to improve the effective deployment of technology by determining and documenting the readiness of selected projects to move ahead. Since 1995, OST has used a linear technology maturation model that spans through seven defined stages of maturity, from basic research to implementation. Application of this Stage/Gate model to technology development resulted in prescriptive and somewhat cumbersome review procedures, resulting in limited and inconsistent use. Subsequently, in February 2000, OST issued revised guidance in an effort to streamline the technology tracking and review process. While the new OST guidance reinforces peer review requirements and the use of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) for independent reviews, it also implements a simplified Gate model. The TFA is now responsible for providing auditable documentation for passing only three stages of technology maturity: ready for research (Gate 0); ready for development (Gate 2); ready for demonstration (Gate 5). The TFA Midyear Review is a key element in the overall review procedure, as the tracking evidence for all active projects is required to be available at this time. While the Midyear Report contains an overview of the status of all TFA reviews and projects, not all the reviews were conducted during the Midyear Review. The TFA used a phased approach to accomplish the Midyear Review requirements.

LR Roeder-Smith

2000-05-02T23:59:59.000Z

16

Idaho National Laboratory Integrated Safety Management System FY 2012 Effectiveness Review and Declaration Report  

SciTech Connect

Idaho National Laboratory (INL) performed an Annual Effectiveness Review of the Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS), per 48 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 970.5223 1, “Integration of Environment, Safety and Health into Work Planning and Execution.” The annual review assessed Integrated Safety Management (ISM) effectiveness, provided feedback to maintain system integrity, and identified target areas for focused improvements and assessments for fiscal year (FY) 2013. Results of the FY 2012 annual effectiveness review demonstrated that the INL’s ISMS program was significantly strengthened. Actions implemented by the INL demonstrate that the overall Integrated Safety Management System is sound and ensures safe and successful performance of work while protecting workers, the public, and environment. This report also provides several opportunities for improvement that will help further strengthen the ISM Program and the pursuit of safety excellence. Demonstrated leadership and commitment, continued surveillance, and dedicated resources have been instrumental in maturing a sound ISMS program. Based upon interviews with personnel, reviews of assurance activities, and analysis of ISMS process implementation, this effectiveness review concludes that ISM is institutionalized and is “Effective”.

Farren Hunt

2012-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

17

FY2002 ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS PEER REVIEW AGENDA  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS RESEARCH PROGRAM ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS RESEARCH PROGRAM ANNUAL PEER REVIEW November 2-3, 2006 Washington Marriott Hotel, Washington, DC (USA) AGENDA Thursday, November 2, 2004 7:45 AM Continental Breakfast 8:30 Welcome and Overview - Dr. Imre Gyuk, DOE 8:40 DOE Perspective - DOE 9:00 ESS Program Overview - John Boyes, Sandia National Laboratories 9:20 NAS Battery Performance at Charleston, WV - Ali Nourai, AEP Corp. (Funded in part by the Energy Storage Systems Program of the U.S. Department Of Energy (DOE/ESS) through Sandia National Laboratories (SNL). 9:40 Evaluation of the Kauai Island Utility Co-operative System for Energy storage Potential - Abbas Akhil, Sandia National Laboratories (Funded by the Kauai Island Utility Co-0p). 10:00 Iowa Stored Energy Plant - Bob Haug, Iowa Stored Energy Plant Agency

18

W-519 Sagebrush Mitigation Project FY-2004 Final Review and Status  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes activities conducted as mitigation for loss of sagebrush-steppe habitats due to Project W-519, the construction of the infrastructure for the Tank Waste Remediation System Vitrification Plant. The focus of this report is to provide a review and final status of mitigation actions performed through FY2004. Data collected since FY1999 have been included where appropriate. The Mitigation Action Plan (MAP) for Project W-519 prescribed three general actions to be performed as mitigation for the disturbance of approximately 40 ha (100 acres) of mature sagebrush-steppe habitat. These actions included: (1) transplanting approximately 130,000 sagebrush seedlings on the Fitzner-Eberhardt Arid Lands Ecology Reserve (ALE); (2) rectification of the new transmission line corridor via seeding with native grasses and sagebrush; and (3) research on native plant species with a goal of increasing species diversity in future mitigation or restoration actions. Nearly 130,000 Wyoming big sagebrush seedlings where planted on ALE during FY2000 and FY2001. About 39,000 of those seedlings were burned during the 24-Command Fire of June 2000. The surviving and subsequent replanting has resulted in about 91,000 seedlings that were planted across four general areas on ALE. A 50% survival rate at any monitoring period was defined as the performance standard in the MAP for this project. Data collected in 2004 indicate that of the over 5000 monitored plants, 51.1% are still alive, and of those the majority are thriving and blooming. These results support the potential for natural recruitment and the ultimate goal of wildlife habitat replacement. Thus, the basic performance standard for sagebrush survival within the habitat compensation planting has been met. Monitoring activities conducted in 2004 indicate considerable variation in seedling survival depending on the type of plant material, site conditions, and to a lesser extent, treatments performed at the time of planting. The principle findings include: (1) a clear indication that in most settings, bare-root seedling survival is considerably higher than tubling survival; (2) we can expect low plant survival at sites with a high cover of large native bunchgrasses--especially bluebunch wheatgrass; (3) mycorrhizal root treatments appeared to increase growth and survival at the Coppice Dune and 98-Burn Undisturbed sites, but appeared to have little effect at the 98-Burn Disturbed, 111-Road Sitanion, or Cold Creek sites; (4) use of a hydrogel dip at planting increases survival of bare-root plants compared to dipping roots in plain water; (5) reducing leaf area via clipping after planting did not increase survival of bare-root plants; (6) seedlings planted on a south-aspect hillside at the Lower Cold Creek planting area had higher survival than seedlings planted on the hilltop or northern-aspects although these survival rates were lower than the survival rate down on the flats at this same location. Rectification of the transmission line corridor occurred in early March 2001, with the broadcast seeding of Sandberg's bluegrass and sagebrush. Success criteria for this site-of-disturbance rectification required a grass establishment after four years with greater than 25% total canopy cover with 60% of the plant cover from planted species (DOE 1998). This planting met the total canopy criterion but failed the criterion of 60% relative coverage of planted species. Although the performance standard was not met, the planting is not necessarily a failure; the communities on the tower pads appear to be developing toward the desired end state. We feel that there are no reasonable mitigative actions that can be taken at this time that would significantly alter or speed up the plant community development on these sites. In fact, most options, such as overseeding, may cause damage to the currently establishing communities on those sites.

Durham, Robin E.; Sackschewsky, Michael R.

2004-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

19

ESS 2012 Peer Review - DOE-OE FY12 Electrical Energy Storage...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE-OE FY12 Electrical Energy Storage Demonstration Projects The Renaissance Hotel Washington, D.C. September 2012 Presented by Dan Borneo SAND Document 5312608 SAND2012-7453 C...

20

2010 Solar Program Peer Review Report: An Independent Evaluation of Program Activities for FY2009 and FY2010  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This document summarizes the recommendations and evaluations provided by an independent external panel of experts at the DOE Solar Energy Technologies Program's 2010 Program Review meeting, held on May 24?27, 2010, in Washington, D.C.

DOE Solar Energy Technologies Program

2010-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "7-year review fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

NETL-RUA Annual Review FY2012 DOE/NETL-2012/1579 National Energy Technology Laboratory  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Annual Review Annual Review FY2012 DOE/NETL-2012/1579 National Energy Technology Laboratory Office of Research and Development 2 NETL-RUA Disclaimer This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the U.S. Government. Neither the U.S. Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the U.S. Government or any agency thereof. The views

22

FY2010 ANNUAL REVIEW E-AREA LOW-LEVEL WASTE FACILITY PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT AND COMPOSITE ANALYSIS  

SciTech Connect

The E-Area Low-Level Waste Facility (ELLWF) consists of a number of disposal units described in the Performance Assessment (PA)(WSRC, 2008b) and Composite Analysis (CA)(WSRC, 1997; WSRC, 1999): Low-Activity Waste (LAW) Vault, Intermediate Level (IL) Vault, Trenches (Slit Trenches [STs], Engineered Trenches [ETs], and Component-in-Grout [CIG] Trenches), and Naval Reactor Component Disposal Areas (NRCDAs). This annual review evaluates the adequacy of the approved 2008 ELLWF PA along with the Special Analyses (SAs) approved since the PA was issued. The review also verifies that the Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 low-level waste (LLW) disposal operations were conducted within the bounds of the PA/SA baseline, the Savannah River Site (SRS) CA, and the Department of Energy (DOE) Disposal Authorization Statement (DAS). Important factors considered in this review include waste receipts, results from monitoring and research and development (R&D) programs, and the adequacy of controls derived from the PA/SA baseline. Sections 1.0 and 2.0 of this review are a summary of the adequacy of the PA/SA and CA, respectively. An evaluation of the FY2010 waste receipts and the resultant impact on the ELLWF is summarized in Section 3.1. The results of the monitoring program, R&D program, and other relevant factors are found in Section 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4, respectively. Section 4.0 contains the CA annual determination similarly organized. SRS low-level waste management is regulated under DOE Order 435.1 (DOE, 1999a) and is authorized under a DAS as a federal permit. The original DAS was issued by the DOE-Headquarters (DOE-HQ) on September 28, 1999 (DOE, 1999b) for the operation of the ELLWF and the Saltstone Disposal Facility (SDF). The 1999 DAS remains in effect for the regulation of the SDF. Those portions of that DAS applicable to the ELLWF were superseded by revision 1 of the DAS on July 15, 2008 (DOE, 2008b). The 2008 PA and DAS were officially implemented by the facility on October 31, 2008 and are the authorization documents for this FY2010 Annual Review. Department of Energy Headquarters approval of the 2008 DAS was subject to numerous conditions specified in the document. Two of those conditions are to update the ELLWF closure plan and monitoring plan to align with the conceptual model analyzed in the PA. Both of these conditions were met with the issuance of the PA Monitoring Plan (Millings, 2009a) and the Closure Plan (Phifer et al, 2009a). The PA Monitoring Plan was approved by DOE on July 22, 2009 and the Closure Plan was approved by DOE on May 21, 2009. Both will be updated as needed to remain consistent with the PA. The DAS also specifies that the maintenance plan include activities to resolve each of the secondary issues identified in the DOEHQ review of the 2008 PA that were not completely addressed either with supplemental material provided to the review team or in final revisions to the PA. These outstanding issues were originally documented in the 2008 update of the PA/CA Maintenance Plan (WSRC, 2008a) and in subsequent PA/CA Maintenance Plans (most recently SRNS, 2010a) as required and are actively being worked.

Butcher, T.; Swingle, R.; Crapse, K.; Millings, M.; Sink, D.

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

23

Annual Performance Report FY 2011 Annual Performance Plan FY 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Annual Performance Report FY 2011 Annual Performance Plan FY 2012 2 FY 2011 OIG Performance Results The OIG measures its performance against long-term and annual goals set forth in OIG planning documents. During this reporting period, the OIG successfully achieved its FY 2011 performance goals. The following are the specific results: Goal 1 Promote Presidential Reform Initiatives, Secretarial Mission Priorities, and Congress Objective 1: Conduct reviews seeking positive change in the Department relating to the implementation of Presidential Reform Initiatives, the Secretary's Mission Priorities, and the OIG-identified Management Challenges. Performance Measures: Accomplishments

24

NIST Appropriations Summary FY 2012 - FY 2014  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

*. Bookmark and Share. National Institute of Standards and Technology Appropriations Summary. FY 2012 - FY 2014 (Dollars in Table in Millions). ...

2013-04-26T23:59:59.000Z

25

Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2008 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Annual  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

FY 2008 DOE Vehicle FY 2008 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2008 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2008 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2008 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2008 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2008 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review on Digg Find More places to share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2008 DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Annual Merit Review on AddThis.com... Publications

26

Small Employer Quality Jobs 7-Year Cash Incentive (Oklahoma) | Department  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Employer Quality Jobs 7-Year Cash Incentive (Oklahoma) Employer Quality Jobs 7-Year Cash Incentive (Oklahoma) Small Employer Quality Jobs 7-Year Cash Incentive (Oklahoma) < Back Eligibility Agricultural Commercial Construction Fuel Distributor Industrial Installer/Contractor Investor-Owned Utility Municipal/Public Utility Nonprofit Retail Supplier Rural Electric Cooperative Systems Integrator Transportation Utility Savings Category Alternative Fuel Vehicles Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Buying & Making Electricity Home Weatherization Water Solar Wind Program Info State Oklahoma Program Type Grant Program Performance-Based Incentive Provider Oklahoma Department of Commerce This program provides incentive payments to a qualifying small employer (90 employees or less). The payments may reach as high as 5% of new taxable payroll and last for up to seven years. Annual salaries must meet at least

27

Microsoft Word - ASME FY08 Fuel Cell Peer Review Report_FINAL.doc  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Meeting Host Organization Technology & Management Services, Inc. Steven T. Ostheim (412) 386-6485 Review Panel AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS Minking K. Chyu, Chair, Peer Review Panel Richard Laudenat, Chair, Peer Review Executive Committee Michael Tinkleman, Director, Research ASME Center for Research and Technology Development (202) 785-7394 Meeting Facilitator and Final Report Ross Brindle, Energetics Incorporated (410) 953-6239 Work Done Under Prime Contract Number DE-AC26-05NT41816 (Subtask 305.01.02.3) FINAL REPORT 2008 STRATEGIC CENTER FOR COAL FUEL CELL PROGRAM PEER REVIEW MEETING Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania April 21-25, 2008 MEETING SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS REPORT José D. Figueroa NETL Project Manager and Meeting Coordinator

28

Annual Performance Assessment and Composite Analysis Review for the ICDF Landfill FY 2008  

SciTech Connect

This report addresses low-level waste disposal operations at the Idaho Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Disposal Facility (ICDF) landfill from the start of operations in Fiscal Year 2003 through Fiscal Year 2008. The ICDF was authorized in the Operable Unit 3-13 Record of Decision for disposal of waste from the Idaho National Laboratory Site CERCLA environmental restoration activities. The ICDF has been operating since 2003 in compliance with the CERCLA requirements and the waste acceptance criteria developed in the CERCLA process. In developing the Operable Unit 3-13 Record of Decision, U.S. Department of Energy Order (DOE) 435.1, 'Radioactive Waste Management', was identified as a 'to be considered' requirement for the ICDF. The annual review requirement under DOE Order 435.1 was determined to be an administrative requirement and, therefore, annual reviews were not prepared on an annual basis. However, the landfill has been operating for 5 years and, since the waste forms and inventories disposed of have changed from what was originally envisioned for the ICDF landfill, the ICDF project team has decided that this annual review is necessary to document the changes and provide a basis for any updates in analyses that may be necessary to continue to meet the substantive requirements of DOE Order 435.1. For facilities regulated under DOE Order 435.1-1, U.S. DOE Manual 435.1-1, 'Radioactive Waste Management', IV.P.(4)(c) stipulates that annual summaries of low-level waste disposal operations shall be prepared with respect to the conclusions and recommendations of the performance assessment and composite analysis. Important factors considered in this review include facility operations, waste receipts, and results from monitoring and research and development programs. There have been no significant changes in operations at the landfill in respect to the disposal geometry, the verification of waste characteristics, and the tracking of inventories against total limits that would affect the results and conclusions of the performance assessment. Waste receipts to date and projected waste receipts through Fiscal Year 2012 are both greater than the inventory assessed in the performance assessment and composite analysis. The waste forms disposed of to the landfill are different from the waste form (compacted soil) assessed in the performance assessment. The leak detection system and groundwater monitoring results indicate the landfill has not leaked. The results of the performance assessment/composite analysis are valid (i.e., there is still a reasonable expectation of meeting performance objectives) but the new information indicates less conservatism in the results than previously believed.

Karen Koslow Arthur Rood

2009-08-31T23:59:59.000Z

29

NREL Photovoltaic Program FY 1993  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report reviews the in-house and subcontracted research and development (R&D) activities under the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) Photovoltaic (PV) Program from October 1, 1992, through September 30, 1993 (fiscal year [FY] 1993). The NREL PV Program is part of the U.S. Department of Energy`s (DOE`s) National Photovoltaics Program, as described in the DOE Photovoltaics Program Plan, FY 1991 - FY 1995. The FY 1993 budget authority (BA) for carrying out the NREL PV Program was $40.1 million in operating funds and $0.9 million in capital equipment funds. An additional $4.8 million in capital equipment funds were made available for the new Solar Energy Research Facility (SERF) that will house the in-house PV laboratories beginning in FY 1994. Subcontract activities represent a major part of the NREL PV Program, with more than $23.7 million (nearly 59%) of the FY 1993 operating funds going to 70 subcontractors. In FY 1993, DOE assigned certain other PV subcontracting efforts to the DOE Golden Field Office (DOE/GO), and assigned responsibility for their technical support to the NREL PV Program. An example is the PV:BONUS (Building Opportunities in the U.S. for Photovoltaics) Project. These DOE/GO efforts are also reported in this document.

Not Available

1994-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

30

FY 1996 cost savings report  

SciTech Connect

Cost savings are an integral part of Hanford site operations. Congressional actions towards establishing a balanced budget have resulted in reductions to funding for all federal agencies, including the Department of Energy (DOE) Environmental Management (EM) cleanup mission. In September 1994 the DOE Richland Operations Office (RL) approved the FY 1995 multi-year baseline that included a cost estimate of $1.9 billion for FY 1996. However, Congress only appropriated $1.3 billion for that year. The shortfall of $600 million resulted in a significant challenge to accomplish the required workscope. Therefore, RL initiated an aggressive cost savings program to eliminate the shortfall by deleting workscope that was unnecessary and performing the remaining workscope more efficiently. RL initiated baseline planning actions (including deletions, deferrals, transfers, and additions) during the FY 1996 multi-year baseline development process to match workscope and anticipated funding and identified $205 million of workscope deletions. CFR (Contract Finance and Review Division) then reviewed over 200 cost baseline change requests during FY 1996 and documented an additional $95 million of FY 1996 cost savings. This included $73 million of workscope deletions and $22 million of efficiencies. Total savings as a result of FY 1996 initiatives, including baseline planning actions and current year initiatives, were $300 million.

Andrews-Smith, K.L.

1997-08-15T23:59:59.000Z

31

NIST Budget Legislation - FY 2010  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

NIST Budget Enacted Appropriations Legislation FY 2010. ... FY 2010 Appropriations. Appropriations, View Excerpt from Law. ...

2013-06-23T23:59:59.000Z

32

NIST Budget Legislation - FY 2009  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

NIST Budget Enacted Appropriations Legislation FY 2009. ... FY Omnibus Appropriations Act. Appropriations, View Excerpt from Law. ...

2013-06-23T23:59:59.000Z

33

ESS 2012 Peer Review - DOE-OE FY12 Electrical Energy Storage Demonstration Projects - Dan Borneo, SNL  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE-OE FY12 Electrical DOE-OE FY12 Electrical Energy Storage Demonstration Projects The Renaissance Hotel Washington, D.C. September 2012 Presented by Dan Borneo SAND Document 5312608 SAND2012-7453 C Acknowledgements I would like to thank the DOE's Office of Electricity and Dr. Imre Gyuk, Program Manager of the Electrical Energy Storage Program, for their support and funding of the Energy Storage Demonstration Projects. 2 EES Emerging Technology Demonstrations Presentation Outline  Project Overview  Problem Statement  Approach  Current Status  Path Forward - Next Steps  Geographical Representation of Projects  Summary Chart of Projects  Brief Descriptions of Individual Projects  Concluding Remarks 3 EES Demonstrations Project Overview  Problem Statement

34

FY 2007 State Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Department of Energy FY 2007 Congressional Budget Request February 2006 Office of Chief Financial Officer state tables preliminary Department of Energy FY 2007 Congressional Budget...

35

NIST FY 2011 Budget Request  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

NIST FY 2011 Budget Request. FY 2008 Enacted, ... 2010 enacted level. Back to News Release>>. Back to FY 2011 Budget in Brief>>.

2010-10-05T23:59:59.000Z

36

NIST Budget Legislation - FY 2006  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

NIST Budget Enacted Appropriations Legislation FY 2006. The following is ... FY 2006 Enacted Appropriations. Public Law Number, ...

2013-06-16T23:59:59.000Z

37

NIST Budget Legislation - FY 2008  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

NIST Budget Enacted Appropriations Legislation FY 2008. ... FY 2008 Omnibus Appropriations Act. Appropriations, View Excerpt from Law. ...

2013-06-23T23:59:59.000Z

38

NIST Budget Legislation - FY 2004  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

NIST Budget Enacted Appropriations Legislation FY 2004. ... FY 2004 Appropriations. Public Law Number, Appropriations, View Excerpt from Law. ...

2013-06-16T23:59:59.000Z

39

NIST Budget Legislation - FY 2012  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

*. Bookmark and Share. NIST Budget Enacted Appropriations Legislation FY 2012. The following ... Version. FY 2012 Appropriations. Public ...

2013-06-16T23:59:59.000Z

40

NIST Budget Legislation - FY 2001  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

NIST Budget Enacted Appropriations Legislation FY 2001. ... FY 2001 Appropriations. Public Law Number, Appropriations, View Excerpt from Law. ...

2013-06-23T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "7-year review fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

NIST Budget Legislation - FY 2013  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

NIST Budget Enacted Appropriations Legislation FY 2013. ... FY 2013 Appropriations. Public Law Number, View Excerpt from Law. ...

2013-05-28T23:59:59.000Z

42

NIST Budget Legislation - FY 2011  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

NIST Budget Enacted Appropriations Legislation FY 2011. ... FY 2011 Appropriations. Public Law Number, View Excerpt from Law. ...

2013-06-16T23:59:59.000Z

43

NIST Budget Legislation - FY 2003  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

NIST Budget Enacted Appropriations Legislation FY 2003. ... FY 2003 Appropriations. Public Law Number, Appropriations, View Excerpt from Law. ...

2013-06-23T23:59:59.000Z

44

NIST Budget Legislation - FY 2005  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

NIST Budget Enacted Appropriations Legislation FY 2005. ... FY 2005 Appropriations. Public Law Number, Appropriations, View Excerpt from Law. ...

2013-06-23T23:59:59.000Z

45

FY 2007 Secretary Rollout  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Budget Budget DOE: Energy, Science, and Security February 6, 2006 1 Guiding Principles * Advancing our National Security * Reducing Dependence on Foreign Oil * Increasing Economic Competitiveness through Scientific Discovery * Honoring our Commitments * Managing for Excellence Supporting our Nation's Highest Priorities 2 DOE Budget : FY 2006 and FY 2007 ($ in Billions) National Security $9.1 Energy and Environm ent $9.9 Science $3.6 Corporate M anagem ent $1.0 FY 2006 Appropriation $23.6 Billion FY 2007 Request $23.6 Billion FY 2007 request is level with FY 2006 In real terms, $0.5 billion below FY 2006 National Se curity $9.3 Ene rgy and Environm e nt $9.2 Science $4.1 Corporate M anage m ent $1.0 3 FY 2007 DOE Budget Breakout By Organization ($ in Millions) -$3 $983 $986 $1,002 Corporate Management/FERC

46

Office Inspector General DOE Annual Performance Report FY 2008, Annual  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Inspector General DOE Annual Performance Report FY 2008, Inspector General DOE Annual Performance Report FY 2008, Annual Performance Plan FY 2009 Office Inspector General DOE Annual Performance Report FY 2008, Annual Performance Plan FY 2009 During Fiscal Year (FY) 2008, we reviewed a variety of critical areas relevant to the Department's mission priorities. One of our goals, for example, was to examine possible programmatic improvements in Department operations relating to cyber security and contract management. Overall, our efforts resulted in the issuance of over 70 audit and inspection reports containing recommendations for enhancing Departmental operations, with likely savings of over $7 million. Further as a result of our investigative efforts, we obtained 20 criminal convictions, recovered $22.8 million in

47

FY 2008 Secretary Rollout  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Budget Budget Investing in Science and Energy Security February 5, 2007 1 The Focus * Investing in World-Class Science * Advancing Energy Security * Reducing Dependence on Foreign Sources of Energy * Promoting the Use of Clean Energy * Honoring our Commitments Supporting our Nation's Highest Priorities 2 DOE Budget : FY 2007 and FY 2008 ($ in Billions) National Security $9.3 Corporate Management $1.0 Science $4.1 Energy and Environment $9.2 FY 2007 Request $23.6 Billion FY 2008 Request $24.3 Billion FY 2008 request is $705 million above the FY 2007 request level. Energy and Environment $9.4 Science $4.4 National Security $9.4 Corporate Management $1.1 3 FY 2008 DOE Budget Breakout By Organization ($ in Millions) +$61 $1,041 $980 $967 Corporate Management/FERC +$705 $24,259 $23,554 $23,572 Total DOE

48

Annual Performance Report FY 2011 Annual Performance Plan FY...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Annual Performance Report FY 2011 Annual Performance Plan FY 2012 2 FY 2011 OIG Performance Results The OIG measures its performance against long-term and annual goals set forth...

49

FY 2007 Congressional Budget Request | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FY 2007 Congressional Budget Request FY 2007 Congressional Budget Request FY 2007 Budget Highlights FY 2007 Congressional Budget Request More Documents & Publications FY 2007...

50

Annual Performance Report FY 2005 Annual Performance Plan FY...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Performance Report FY 2005 Annual Performance Plan FY 2006 Iam pleased to present the Office of Inspector General's combined Fiscal Year 2005 Annual Performance Report and...

51

Annual Performance Report FY 2010 Annual Performance Plan FY...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Performance Report FY 2010 Annual Performance Plan FY 2011 I am pleased to submit the Office of Inspector General's combined Fiscal Year 2010 Annual Performance Report and...

52

FY 2013 Volume 5  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 5 DOE/CF-0075 Volume 5 Environmental Management Department of Energy FY 2013 Congressional Budget Request February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 5 DOE/CF-0075 Volume 5 Environmental Management Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Department of Energy FY 2013 Congressional Budget Request Environmental Management Page 1 FY 2013 Congressional Budget Volume 5 Table of Contents Page Appropriation Account Summary ............................................................................................................................................ 3 Appropriation Language .......................................................................................................................................................... 5

53

FY 2013 Budget Highlights  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 Department of Energy FY 2013 Congressional Budget Request Budget Highlights g g g February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer DOE/CF-0077 Department of Energy FY 2013 Congressional Budget Request Budget Highlights g g g February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Table of Contents LETTER FROM THE SECRETARY ...................................................................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY FY 2013 PROGRAM OFFICE HIGHLIGHTS............................................................................................................ 9

54

FY 2012 Volume 4  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 Volume 4 Department of Energy FY 2012 Congressional Budget Request Science Science February 2011 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 4 DOE/CF-0060 Volume 4 Department of Energy FY 2012 Congressional Budget Request Science Science February 2011 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 4 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Department of Energy/ Science FY 2012 Congressional Budget Volume 4 Table of Contents Page Appropriation Account Summary .............................................................................................................3 Appropriation Language ...........................................................................................................................5 Overview ...................................................................................................................................................7

55

FY 2011 Volume 4  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 DOE/CF-0050 Volume 4 Science Department of Energy FY 2011 Congressional Budget Request February 2010 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 4 DOE/CF-0050 Volume 4 Science Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Department of Energy FY 2011 Congressional Budget Request Department of Energy/ Science FY 2011 Congressional Budget Volume 4 Table of Contents Page Appropriation Account Summary.............................................................................................................3 Appropriation Language ...........................................................................................................................5 Overview...................................................................................................................................................7

56

FY 2011 Volume 5  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 5 DOE/CF-0051 Volume 5 Environmental Management Department of Energy FY 2011 Congressional Budget Request February 2010 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 5 DOE/CF-0051 Volume 5 Environmental Management Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Department of Energy FY 2011 Congressional Budget Request Department of Energy/ Environmental Management FY 2011 Congressional Budget Volume 5 Table of Contents Page Appropriation Account Summary.............................................................................................................3 Appropriation Language ...........................................................................................................................5 Overview...................................................................................................................................................7

57

FY 2012 Budget Highlights  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Department of Energy FY 2012 Congressional Budget Request Budget Highlights g g g February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer DOE/CF-0064 Department of Energy FY 2012 Congressional Budget Request Budget Highlights g g g February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY FY 2012 PROGRAM OFFICE HIGHLIGHTS .......................................................................................................... 7 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY BUDGET BY ORGANIZATION .......................................................................................................................... 15

58

FY 2012 LDRD Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The total FY 2012 LDRD Program cost at the national laboratories was $578.9 million in 1,738 projects.

59

FY 2013 LDRD Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The total FY 2013 LDRD Program cost at the national laboratories was $568.6 million in 1,742 projects.

60

FY 2011 LDRD Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The total FY 2011 LDRD Program cost at the national laboratories was $581 million, which represents approximately 4.7 percent of total cost base at these laboratories.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "7-year review fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

FY 2010 LDRD Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The total FY 2010 LDRD program cost at the national laboratories was $541 million, which represents approximately 4.6 percent of total cost base at these laboratories.

62

FY 2010 Reports  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Environmental Management Monthly Reports - FY 2010 The Department of Energy Nevada Field Office Environmental Management Program creates monthly reports for the NSSAB. These...

63

FY 2007 Reports  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Environmental Management Monthly Reports - FY 2007 The Department of Energy Nevada Field Office Environmental Management Program creates monthly reports for the NSSAB. These...

64

FY 2011 Reports  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Environmental Management Monthly Reports - FY 2011 The Department of Energy Nevada Field Office Environmental Management Program creates monthly reports for the NSSAB. These...

65

FY 2013 Volume 3  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 DOECF-0073 Volume 3 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Department of Energy FY 2013 Congressional Budget Request Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electricity Delivery...

66

FTCP FY09 Operational Plan GOAL 2 Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Programs Reviewed for FTCP on Monthly Call: March 2009 - Mid-Level Recruitment Programs White Paper Posted on FTCP Website: June 2009 5 August 25, 2009 FTCP FY09 OPSPLAN GOAL 2...

67

FY 2012 Volume 5  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Volume 5 Department of Energy FY 2012 Congressional Budget Request Environmental Management February 2011 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 5 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Environmental Management FY 2011 Congressional Budget Volume 5 Table of Contents Page Appropriation Account Summary .............................................................................................................3

68

FY 2010 Volume 4  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 DOE/CF-038 Volume 4 Science May 2009 Office of Chief Financial Officer FY 2010 Congressional Budget Request Volume 4 DOE/CF-038 Volume 4 Science Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Department of Energy/ Science FY 2010 Congressional Budget Volume 4 Table of Contents Page Appropriation Account Summary.............................................................................................................3 Appropriation Language ...........................................................................................................................5 Overview...................................................................................................................................................7 Funding by Site .......................................................................................................................................21

69

FY 2011 Budget Highlights  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE/CF-0046 Budget Highlights Department of Energy FY 2011 Congressional Budget Request February 2010 Office of Chief Financial Officer DOE/CF-0046 Budget Highlights Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Department of Energy FY 2011 Congressional Budget Request Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................... 1 PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS........................................................................................................................ 5 BUDGET BY ORGANIZATION .............................................................................................................. 13 BUDGET BY APPROPRIATION............................................................................................................

70

FY 2012 Volume 7  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Volume 7 Department of Energy FY 2012 Congressional Budget Request Nuclear Energy D f N l W t Di l Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal Nuclear Waste Disposal February 2011 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 7 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Department of Energy/ Volume 7 FY 2012 Congressional Budget Volume 7 Table of Contents Page Appropriation Account Summary ........................................................................................................... 3

71

Fossil Energy FY 2009 Budget  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Fossil Energy's FY 2009 budget, including request, House and Senate marks, and Omnibus appropriation.

72

LANL FY11 activities(u)  

SciTech Connect

Briefings presenting W78 programmatic activities for FY11 and the status and plan for associated Hydro 3617, is included wherewith in support of the NNSA W78 Program Review Meetings scheduled for January 11 thru 13, 2011, at the Savannah River Plant, SC.

Aragon, Ezekiel D [Los Alamos National Laboratory

2011-01-06T23:59:59.000Z

73

FY 2010 Laboratory Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Laboratory Tables Laboratory Tables Preliminary May 2009 Office of Chief Financial Officer FY 2010 Congressional Budget Request Laboratory Tables Preliminary The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, use of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Laboratory / Facility Index FY 2010 Congressional Budget Page 1 of 3 (Dollars In Thousands) 2:08:56PM Department Of Energy 5/4/2009 Page Number FY 2008 Appropriation FY 2009 Appropriation FY 2010 Request Laboratory Table 1 1 $1,200

74

Fy 2009 Laboratory Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Laboratory Tables Laboratory Tables Preliminary February 2008 Office of Chief Financial Officer Department of Energy FY 2009 Congressional Budget Request Laboratory Tables Preliminary The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, use of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Laboratory / Facility Index FY 2009 Congressional Budget Page 1 of 3 (Dollars In Thousands) 8:59:25AM Department Of Energy 1/30/2008 Page Number FY 2007 Appropriation FY 2008 Appropriation FY 2009

75

FY 2006 Statistical Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Statistical Table by Appropriation Statistical Table by Appropriation (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 Comparable Comparable Request to FY 2006 vs. FY 2005 Approp Approp Congress Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy supply Operation and maintenance................................................. 787,941 909,903 862,499 -47,404 -5.2% Construction......................................................................... 6,956 22,416 40,175 17,759 +79.2% Total, Energy supply................................................................ 794,897 932,319 902,674 -29,645 -3.2% Non-Defense site acceleration completion............................. 167,272 157,316 172,400 15,084 +9.6%

76

FY 2009 State Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

State Tables State Tables Preliminary February 2008 Office of Chief Financial Officer Department of Energy FY 2009 Congressional Budget Request State Tables Preliminary The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, use of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. Printed with soy ink on recycled paper State Index Page Number FY 2009 Congressional Budget 1/30/2008 Department Of Energy (Dollars In Thousands) 9:01:45AM Page 1 of 2 FY 2007 Appropriation FY 2008 Appropriation FY 2009 Request State Table 1 1 $27,588

77

FY 2007 Laboratory Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Laboratory tables Laboratory tables preliminary Department of Energy FY 2007 Congressional Budget Request February 2006 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Office of Chief Financial Officer Laboratory tables preliminary The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, uses of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. Laboratory / Facility Index FY 2007 Congressional Budget Page 1 of 3 (Dollars In Thousands) 12:10:40PM Department Of Energy 1/31/2006 Page Number FY 2005 Appropriation FY 2006 Appropriation FY 2007

78

FY 2010 State Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

State Tables State Tables Preliminary May 2009 Office of Chief Financial Officer FY 2010 Congressional Budget Request State Tables Preliminary The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, use of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. Printed with soy ink on recycled paper State Index Page Number FY 2010 Congressional Budget 5/4/2009 Department Of Energy (Dollars In Thousands) 2:13:22PM Page 1 of 2 FY 2008 Appropriation FY 2009 Appropriation FY 2010 Request State Table 1 1 $46,946 $48,781 $38,844 Alabama 2 $6,569

79

FY 2008 Laboratory Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Laboratory Table Laboratory Table Preliminary Department of Energy FY 2008 Congressional Budget Request February 2007 Office of Chief Financial Officer Laboratory Table Preliminary Printed with soy ink on recycled paper The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, uses of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. Laboratory / Facility Index FY 2008 Congressional Budget Page 1 of 3 (Dollars In Thousands) 6:51:02AM Department Of Energy 2/1/2007 Page Number FY 2006 Appropriation FY 2007 Request FY 2008 Request

80

FY 2006 State Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

State Tables State Tables Preliminary Department of Energy FY 2006 Congressional Budget Request Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO February 2005 State Tables Preliminary Printed with soy ink on recycled paper The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, uses of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. State Index Page Number FY 2006 Congressional Budget 1/27/2005 Department Of Energy (Dollars In Thousands) 3:32:58PM Page 1 of 2 FY 2004 Comp/Approp FY 2005 Comp/Approp FY 2006 Request State Table

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "7-year review fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

FY 2008 State Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

State Table State Table Preliminary Department of Energy FY 2008 Congressional Budget Request February 2007 Office of Chief Financial Officer State Table Preliminary Printed with soy ink on recycled paper The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, uses of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. State Index Page Number FY 2008 Congressional Budget 2/1/2007 Department Of Energy (Dollars In Thousands) 6:53:08AM Page 1 of 2 FY 2006 Appropriation FY 2007 Request FY 2008 Request State Table 1 1 $28,332 $30,341

82

FY 2005 Laboratory Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Congressional Budget Congressional Budget Request Laboratory Tables Preliminary Department of Energy FY 2005 Congressional Budget Request Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO February 2004 Laboratory Tables Preliminary Department of Energy Department of Energy FY 2005 Congressional Budget FY 2005 Congressional Budget Request Request Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO February 2004 Laboratory Tables Laboratory Tables Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Preliminary Preliminary The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropria ted as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress.

83

FY 2013 Volume 4  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 DOE/CF-0074 Volume 4 Science Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy Department of Energy FY 2013 Congressional Budget Request February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 4 DOE/CF-0074 Volume 4 Science Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Department of Energy FY 2013 Congressional Budget Request Science Advanced Research Projects Agency- Energy Science Advanced Research Projects Agency- Energy Department of Energy/Science/ Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy FY 2013 Congressional Budget Volume 4 Table of Contents Page Appropriation Account Summary ............................................................................................................................................ 3

84

FY 2011 Volume 1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 DOE/CF-0047 Volume 1 National Nuclear Security Administration Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Department of Energy FY 2011 Congressional Budget Request February 2010 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 1 DOE/CF-0047 Volume 1 National Nuclear Security Administration Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Department of Energy FY 2011 Congressional Budget Request Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Department of Energy/ National Nuclear Security Administration FY 2011 Congressional Budget

85

FY 2013 Statistical Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Statistical Table by Appropriation Statistical Table by Appropriation (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Current Enacted Congressional Approp. Approp. * Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy efficiency and renewable energy........................................ 1,771,721 1,809,638 2,337,000 +527,362 +29.1% Electricity delivery and energy reliability......................................... 138,170 139,103 143,015 +3,912 +2.8% Nuclear energy................................................................................ 717,817 765,391 770,445 +5,054 +0.7% Fossil energy programs Clean coal technology.................................................................. -16,500 -- --

86

FY 2009 Statistical Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Statistical Table by Appropriation Statistical Table by Appropriation (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Current Current Congressional Op. Plan Approp. Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy efficiency and renewable energy.......................... -- 1,722,407 1,255,393 -467,014 -27.1% Electricity delivery and energy reliability........................... -- 138,556 134,000 -4,556 -3.3% Nuclear energy................................................................. -- 961,665 853,644 -108,021 -11.2% Legacy management........................................................ -- 33,872 -- -33,872 -100.0% Energy supply and conservation Operation and maintenance..........................................

87

FY 2013 Volume I  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 DOE/CF-0071 Volume 1 National Nuclear Security Administration Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Department of Energy FY 2013 Congressional Budget Request February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 1 DOE/CF-0071 Volume 1 National Nuclear Security Administration Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Department of Energy FY 2013 Congressional Budget Request Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Department of Energy/ National Nuclear Security Administration Page 1 FY 2013 Congressional Budget

88

FY 2008 Meetings  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Fiscal Year 2008 Meetings Fiscal Year 2008 Meetings Meetings, Minutes and Handouts Date Type Time Location Agenda Handouts Minutes Nov 6, 2007 EMPIRE Committee 2:30 - 3:45 p.m. 821 E. Amargosa Farm Road Amargosa Valley, NV 89020 Fact Sheet Review n/a Minutes Nov 6, 2007 Budget Committee 4 - 5 p.m. 821 E. Amargosa Farm Road Amargosa Valley, NV 89020 FY 2008 Budget Update Handouts Minutes Nov 6, 2007 Full Board Meeting 6 p.m. 821 E. Amargosa Farm Road Amargosa Valley, NV 89020 Agenda Handouts Minutes Nov 27, 2007 Transportation/Waste Committee 3 p.m. Conference call Transportation Routes n/a Minutes Jan 10, 2008 EMPIRE Committee 3:15 - 4:15 Bob Ruud Community Center 150 Hwy 160, Pahrump, NV n/a n/a Minutes Jan 10, 2008 Outreach Ad Hoc Committee 4:30 - 5:30 Bob Ruud Community Center 150 Hwy 160, Pahrump, NV n/a n/a Minutes

89

Innovations in Measurement Science: FY 2014 Projects  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

*. Bookmark and Share. Innovations in Measurement Science: FY 2014 Projects. Purpose: Innovations in Measurement Science: FY 2014 Projects. ...

2013-09-16T23:59:59.000Z

90

FY 2006 Laboratory Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Laboratory Tables Laboratory Tables Preliminary Department of Energy FY 2006 Congressional Budget Request Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO February 2005 Laboratory Tables Preliminary Printed with soy ink on recycled paper The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, uses of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. Laboratory / Facility Index FY 2006 Congressional Budget Page 1 of 3 (Dollars In Thousands) 3:43:16PM Department Of Energy 1/27/2005 Page Number FY 2004 Comp/Approp FY 2005 Comp/Approp

91

FY 2011 State Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

State Tables State Tables Department of Energy FY 2011 Congressional Budget Request DOE/CF-0054 March 2010 Office of Chief Financial Officer State Tables Printed with soy ink on recycled paper The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, use of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. Department of Energy FY 2011 Congressional Budget Request DOE/CF-0054 State Index Page Number FY 2011 Congressional Budget 1/29/2010 Department Of Energy (Dollars In Thousands) 6:34:40AM Page 1 of 2 FY 2009 Appropriation

92

FY 2010 Statistical Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Statistical Table by Appropriation Statistical Table by Appropriation (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2009 FY 2010 Current Current Current Congressional Approp. Approp. Recovery Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy efficiency and renewable energy....................................... 1,704,112 2,178,540 16,800,000 2,318,602 +140,062 +6.4% Electricity delivery and energy reliability........................................ 136,170 137,000 4,500,000 208,008 +71,008 +51.8% Nuclear energy.............................................................................. 960,903 792,000 -- 761,274 -30,726 -3.9% Legacy management..................................................................... 33,872 -- -- --

93

FY 2012 Statistical Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2Statistical Table by Appropriation 2Statistical Table by Appropriation (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 Current Congressional Annualized Congressional Approp. Request CR Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy efficiency and renewable energy....................................... 2,216,392 2,355,473 2,242,500 3,200,053 +983,661 +44.4% Electricity delivery and energy reliability........................................ 168,484 185,930 171,982 237,717 +69,233 +41.1% Nuclear energy............................................................................. 774,578 824,052 786,637 754,028 -20,550 -2.7% Fossil energy programs Fossil energy research and development................................... 659,770 586,583 672,383 452,975

94

FY 2007 Volume 5  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 5 DOE/CF-006 Volume 5 Environmental management Department of Energy FY 2007 Congressional Budget Request February 2006 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 5 DOE/CF-006 Volume 5 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Environmental management Department of Energy/ Environmental Management FY 2007 Congressional Budget Volume 5 Table of Contents Page Appropriation Account Summary .........................................................................................................3 Overview................................................................................................................................................5 Defense Environmental Cleanup Appropriation Cleanup .................................................................107 Carlsbad

95

FY 2009 Volume 4  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 DOE/CF-027 Volume 4 Science February 2008 Office of Chief Financial Officer Department of Energy FY 2009 Congressional Budget Request Volume 4 DOE/CF-027 Volume 4 Science Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Department of Energy/ Science FY 2009 Congressional Budget Volume 4 Table of Contents Page Appropriation Account Summary.............................................................................................................3 Appropriation Language ...........................................................................................................................5 Overview...................................................................................................................................................7 Funding by Site

96

FY 2008 Volume 5  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 5 DOE/CF-018 Volume 5 Environmental Management Department of Energy FY 2008 Congressional Budget Request February 2007 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 5 DOE/CF-018 Volume 5 Environmental Management Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Department of Energy/ Environmental Management FY 2008 Congressional Budget Volume 5 Table of Contents Page Appropriation Account Summary.............................................................................................................3 Strategic Overview....................................................................................................................................5 Overview...................................................................................................................................................7

97

Fossil Energy FY 2012 Budget | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 Budget Fossil Energy FY 2012 Budget Fossil Energy's FY 2012 budget, including House and Senate marks. Fossil Energy FY 2012 Budget More Documents & Publications FY 2014 Budget...

98

Office Inspector General DOE Annual Performance Report FY 2008...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Inspector General DOE Annual Performance Report FY 2008, Annual Performance Plan FY 2009 Office Inspector General DOE Annual Performance Report FY 2008, Annual Performance Plan FY...

99

DOE/IG Annual Performance Report FY 2008, Annual Performance...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Performance Report FY 2008, Annual Performance Plan FY 2009 More Documents & Publications Office Inspector General DOE Annual Performance Report FY 2008, Annual Performance Plan FY...

100

RMR CRSP Capital Investment Plan FY12-FY21 Detail  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Plan FY12-FY21 Detail Yellow Highlight New Project to list W Total Western Only Costs Red Text Change from previous version O Total Trust and Joint Participation...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "7-year review fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

EM Five-Year Plan (FY2008 - FY2012)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) is not included in DOE-EM Five Year Plan FY 2008 - FY 2012. LBNL site is expected to be transferred to National Nuclear Security...

102

Budget Planning Meeting FY 2007 Status of ITER Negotiations  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

March 22-24 · CDs-2-4 are more dependent upon the reviews by the ITER Organization (to be formed-level discussion on ITER held in DOE HQ, Washington, DC · Requested a comprehensive briefing on ITER #12;FY2006 Agreement per H.R. 610 Form ITER Organization Begin funding for personnel FY2006 Pres Request of $49.5M

103

NIST Budget Legislation - FY 2007  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... appropriated amounts to STRS, CRF, and TA appropriations for FY ... The Industrial Technology Services (ITS) account appropriation was referenced ...

2013-06-23T23:59:59.000Z

104

FY 1994 Annual Work Plan  

SciTech Connect

This is the third Office of Inspector General (OIG)Annual Work Plan. Its purpose is to summarize work completed in Fiscal Year (FY) 1993, identify ongoing projects from previous fiscal years which the OIG intends to continue into FY 1994, and announce planned projects which the OIG intends to begin in FY 19994.

Not Available

1993-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

105

Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Annual Performance Results and FY 2010  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Annual Performance Results and FY Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Annual Performance Results and FY 2010 Annual Performance Plan Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Annual Performance Results and FY 2010 Annual Performance Plan Subject: Office of Inspector General's combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Annual Performance Results and FY 2010 Annual Performance Plan This report presents the goals, objectives, and strategies for measuring the OIG's FY 2009 actual performance and FY 2010 planned activities. Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Annual Performance Results and FY 2010 Annual Performance Plan More Documents & Publications U.S. Departmetn of Energy, Office of Inspector General, Annaul Peformance Report FY 2009, Annual Performance Plan Fy 2010 Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 Annual Performance Results and FY 2012

106

FY 2004 House Report 108-221, FY 2004 CJS Appropriations ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

*. Bookmark and Share. Taken from FY 2004 House Report 108-221. FY 2004 CJS Appropriations Bill. SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. ...

2010-10-05T23:59:59.000Z

107

FY 2012 Laboratory Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 5 Department of Energy FY 2012 Congressional Budget Request Laboratory Tables y Preliminary February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer DOE/CF-0065 Department of Energy FY 2012 Congressional Budget Request Laboratory Tables P li i Preliminary h b d i d i hi d h l l f b d h i f h The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, use of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Laboratory / Facility Index FY 2012 Congressional Budget

108

FY 2008 Statistical Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Statistical Table by Appropriation Statistical Table by Appropriation (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 Current Congressional Congressional Approp. Request Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy supply and conservation Operation and maintenance........................................... 1,781,242 1,917,331 2,187,943 +270,612 +14.1% Construction.................................................................... 31,155 6,030 -- -6,030 -100.0% Total, Energy supply and conservation............................. 1,812,397 1,923,361 2,187,943 +264,582 +13.8% Fossil energy programs Clean coal technology.................................................... -20,000 -- -58,000 -58,000 N/A Fossil energy research and development......................

109

FY 2013 Laboratory Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 8 Department of Energy FY 2013 Congressional Budget Request Laboratory Tables y Preliminary February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer DOE/CF-0078 Department of Energy FY 2013 Congressional Budget Request Laboratory Tables P li i Preliminary h b d i d i hi d h l l f b d h i f h The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, use of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Laboratory / Facility Index FY 2013 Congressional Budget

110

FY 2011 Laboratory Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Laboratory Tables Laboratory Tables Department of Energy FY 2011 Congressional Budget Request DOE/CF-0055 March 2010 Office of Chief Financial Officer Laboratory Tables Printed with soy ink on recycled paper The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, use of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. Department of Energy FY 2011 Congressional Budget Request DOE/CF-0055 Laboratory / Facility Index FY 2011 Congressional Budget Page 1 of 3 (Dollars In Thousands) 6:24:57AM Department Of Energy 1/29/2010 Page

111

FY 2013 Volume 2  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Volume 2 f Department of Energy FY 2013 Congressional B d R Budget Request Other Defense Activities Departmental Administration Inspector General Working Capital F nd Working Capital Fund Safeguards and Security Crosscut Pensions February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 2 DOE/CF-0072 Volume 2 f Department of Energy FY 2013 Congressional B d R Budget Request Other Defense Activities Departmental Administration Inspector General Working Capital F nd Working Capital Fund Safeguards and Security Crosscut Pensions February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 2 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Department of Energy/ Volume 2 FY 2013 Congressional Budget Volume 2 Table of Contents Page Appropriation Account Summary .............................................................................................................3

112

FY 2007 Statistical Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Statistical Table by Appropriation Statistical Table by Appropriation (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Current Current Congressional Approp. Approp. Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy supply and conservation Operation and maintenance............................................ 1,779,399 1,791,372 1,917,331 +125,959 +7.0% Construction................................................................... 22,416 21,255 6,030 -15,225 -71.6% Total, Energy supply and conservation.............................. 1,801,815 1,812,627 1,923,361 +110,734 +6.1% Fossil energy programs Clean coal technology..................................................... -160,000 -20,000 -- +20,000 +100.0% Fossil energy research and development.......................

113

FY 2005 Volume 7  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 8 Volume 7 Interior & Related Agencies Interior & Related Agencies Fossil Energy Research & Development Fossil Energy Research & Development Naval Petroleum & Oil Shale Reserves Naval Petroleum & Oil Shale Reserves Elk Hills School Lands Fund Elk Hills School Lands Fund Energy Conservation Energy Conservation Economic Regulation Economic Regulation Strategic Petroleum Reserve Strategic Petroleum Reserve Energy Information Administration Energy Information Administration Clean Coal Technology Clean Coal Technology February 2004 Volume 7 Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO Department of Energy Department of Energy FY 2005 Congressional Budget FY 2005 Congressional Budget Request Request Interior & Related Agencies Interior & Related Agencies

114

FY 2012 Volume 3  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 Volume 3 Department of Energy FY 2012 Congressional Budget Request Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Energy Transformation Acceleration Fund Energy Transformation Acceleration Fund Fossil Energy Research and Development Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves Strategic Petroleum Reserve Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve Ultra-Deepwater Unconventional Natural Gas February 2011 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 3 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Department of Energy/ Volume 3 FY 2012 Congressional Budget Volume 3 Table of Contents Page Appropriation Account Summary .............................................................................................................3

115

FY 2005 Volume 1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Volume 1 February 2004 Volume 1 National Nuclear Security Administration National Nuclear Security Administration Office of the Administrator Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Naval Reactors Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO Department of Energy Department of Energy FY 2005 Congressional Budget FY 2005 Congressional Budget Request Request DOE/ME-0032 Volume 1 February 2004 Volume 1 Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO Printed with soy ink on recycled paper National Nuclear Security Administration National Nuclear Security Administration Office of the Administrator Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation

116

FY 2009 Volume 1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 DOE/CF-024 Volume 1 National Nuclear Security Administration Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors February 2008 Office of Chief Financial Officer Department of Energy FY 2009 Congressional Budget Request Volume 1 DOE/CF-024 Volume 1 National Nuclear Security Administration Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Department of Energy/ National Nuclear Security Administration FY 2009 Congressional Budget Volume 1 Table of Contents

117

FY 2005 Volume 6  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 Volume 6 Power Marketing Administrations Power Marketing Administrations Southeastern Power Administration Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration February 2004 Volume 6 Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO Department of Energy Department of Energy FY 2005 Congressional Budget FY 2005 Congressional Budget Request Request DOE/ME-0037 Volume 6 Power Marketing Administrations Power Marketing Administrations Southeastern Power Administration Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Area Power Administration

118

FY 2010 Volume 3  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 DOE/CF-037 Volume 3 Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Energy Transformation Acceleration Fund Nuclear Energy May 2009 Office of Chief Financial Officer FY 2010 Congressional Budget Request Volume 3 DOE/CF-037 Volume 3 Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Energy Transformation Acceleration Fund Nuclear Energy Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Energy Transformation Acceleration Fund Nuclear Energy Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Energy Transformation Acceleration Fund Nuclear Energy Department of Energy/ Volume 3 FY 2010 Congressional Budget

119

FY 2012 Volume 2  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 8 Volume 2 f Department of Energy FY 2012 Congressional B d R Budget Request Other Defense Activities Other Defense Activities Departmental Administration Inspector General Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program Title 17 Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Program Better Building Pilot Loan Guarantee Initiative for Universities Schools and Hospitals Universities, Schools, and Hospitals Working Capital Fund Energy Information Administration Safeguards and Security Crosscut February 2011 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 2 g y Pensions Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Department of Energy/ Volume 2 FY 2012 Congressional Budget Volume 2 Table of Contents Page Appropriation Account Summary .............................................................................................................3

120

FY 2011 Volume 2  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 DOE/CF-0048 Volume 2 Other Defense Activities Departmental Administration Inspector General Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program Title 17 Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Program Working Capital Fund Energy Information Administration Safeguards and Security Crosscut Domestic Utility Fee Pensions Department of Energy FY 2011 Congressional Budget Request February 2010 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 2 DOE/CF-0048 Volume 2 Other Defense Activities Departmental Administration Inspector General Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program Title 17 Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Program Working Capital Fund Energy Information Administration Safeguards and Security Crosscut Domestic Utility Fee Pensions Department of Energy FY 2011 Congressional

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "7-year review fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

FY 2005 Volume 3  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 Volume 3 February 2004 Volume 3 Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO Energy Supply Energy Supply Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electric Transmission and Distribution Electric Transmission and Distribution Nuclear Energy Nuclear Energy Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Environment, Safety & Health Environment, Safety & Health Future Liabilities Future Liabilities Legacy Management Legacy Management Department of Energy Department of Energy FY 2005 Congressional Budget FY 2005 Congressional Budget Request Request DOE/ME-0034 Volume 3 Energy Supply Energy Supply Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electric Transmission and Distribution

122

FY 2007 Volume 1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Chief Financial Officer Chief Financial Officer Volume 1 DOE/CF-002 Volume 1 National Nuclear Security Administration Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Department of Energy FY 2007 Congressional Budget Request February 2006 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 1 DOE/CF-002 Volume 1 National Nuclear Security Administration Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Department of Energy/ National Nuclear Security Administration FY 2007 Congressional Budget

123

FY 2010 Volume 5  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 5 DOE/CF-039 Volume 5 Environmental Management Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal Nuclear Waste Disposal May 2009 Office of Chief Financial Officer FY 2010 Congressional Budget Request Volume 5 DOE/CF-039 Volume 5 Environmental Management Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal Nuclear Waste Disposal Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Environmental Management Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal Nuclear Waste Disposal Environmental Management Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal Nuclear Waste Disposal Department of Energy FY 2010Congressional Budget Environmental Management/ Defense Nuclear Waste/Nuclear Waste Disposal Volume 5 Table of Contents Page Appropriation Account Summary.............................................................................................................3

124

FY 2009 Summary Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

of Performance and financial information FY 2009 DOE/CF-0045 The Reports Consolidation Act of 2000 authorizes Federal agencies, with the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) concurrence, to consolidate various reports in order to provide performance, financial and related information in a more meaningful and useful format. In accordance with the Act, the Department of Energy (Department or DOE), has produced a consolidated Performance and Accountability Report (PAR) in previous years. For fiscal year (FY) 2009, the Department has chosen to produce an alternative report to the consolidated PAR and will produce an Agency Financial Report, an Annual Performance Report and a Summary of Performance and Financial

125

FY 2013 Volume 6  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 Volume 6 Department of Energy FY 2013 Congressional Budget Request Power Marketing Administrations Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 6 DOE/CF-0076 Volume 6 Department of Energy FY 2013 Congressional Budget Request Power Marketing Administrations Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 6 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Area Power Administration

126

FY 2007 Volume 4  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 DOE/CF-005 Volume 4 Science Nuclear waste disposal Defense nuclear waste disposal Departmental administration Inspector general Working capital fund Department of Energy FY 2007 Congressional Budget Request February 2006 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 4 DOE/CF-005 Volume 4 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Science Nuclear waste disposal Defense nuclear waste disposal Departmental administration Inspector general Working capital fund Science Nuclear Waste Disposal Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal Departmental Administration Inspector General Working Capital Fund Science Nuclear Waste Disposal Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal Departmental Administration Inspector General Working Capital Fund Department of Energy FY 2007 Congressional Budget Volume 4 Table of Contents

127

FY 2008 Volume 1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 DOE/CF-014 Volume 1 National Nuclear Security Administration Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Department of Energy FY 2008 Congressional Budget Request February 2007 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 1 DOE/CF-014 Volume 1 National Nuclear Security Administration Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Department of Energy/ National Nuclear Security Administration FY 2008 Congressional Budget Volume 1 Table of Contents

128

FY 2005 Volume 5  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 Volume 5 Environmental Management Environmental Management Defense Site Acceleration Completion Defense Site Acceleration Completion Defense Environmental Services Defense Environmental Services Non Non - - Defense Site Acceleration Completion Defense Site Acceleration Completion Non Non - - Defense Environmental Services Defense Environmental Services Uranium Enrichment Decontamination Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning Fund and Decommissioning Fund February 2004 Volume 5 Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO Department of Energy Department of Energy FY 2005 Congressional Budget FY 2005 Congressional Budget Request Request Environmental Management Environmental Management Defense Site Acceleration Completion Defense Site Acceleration Completion

129

FY 2010 Volume 1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 DOE/CF-035 Volume 1 National Nuclear Security Administration Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors May 2009 Office of Chief Financial Officer FY 2010 Congressional Budget Request Volume 1 DOE/CF-035 Volume 1 National Nuclear Security Administration Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Department of Energy/ National Nuclear Security Administration FY 2010 Congressional Budget Volume 1 Table of Contents Page Appropriation Account Summary.............................................................................................................3

130

FY 2006 Summary Table by Appropriation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Appropriation Account Summary Appropriation Account Summary (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 Comparable Comparable Request to FY 2006 vs. FY 2005 Approp Approp Congress Energy And Water Development Energy Programs Energy supply....................................................................... Non-Defense site acceleration completion........................... Uranium enrichment D&D fund............................................ Non-Defense environmental services................................... Science................................................................................. Nuclear waste disposal......................................................... Departmental administration.................................................

131

FY 2010 Budget Highlights  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE/CF-042 DOE/CF-042 Budget Highlights May 2009 Office of Chief Financial Officer FY 2010 Congressional Budget Request DOE/CF-042 Budget Highlights Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................... 1 PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS........................................................................................................................ 5 BUDGET BY ORGANIZATION .............................................................................................................. 14 BUDGET BY APPROPRIATION............................................................................................................ 15 DETAILS BY PROGRAM

132

FY 2009 Budget Highlights  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE/CF-031 DOE/CF-031 Budget Highlights February 2008 Office of Chief Financial Officer Department of Energy FY 2009 Congressional Budget Request DOE/CF-031 Budget Highlights Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................... 1 BUDGET BY ORGANIZATION .............................................................................................................. 21 BUDGET BY APPROPRIATION............................................................................................................ 22 SECTION 1. ENERGY SECURITY.......................................................................................................

133

FY 2007 Budget Highlights  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE/CF-009 DOE/CF-009 Budget highlights Department of Energy FY 2007 Congressional Budget Request February 2006 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Budget highlights Office of Chief Financial Officer DOE/CF-009 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................1 BUDGET BY ORGANIZATION ..............................................................................................................17 BUDGET BY APPROPRIATION ............................................................................................................18 SECTION 1. DEFENSE STRATEGIC GOAL........................................................................................19

134

FY 2006 Budget Highlights  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE/ME-0053 DOE/ME-0053 Budget Highlights Department of Energy FY 2006 Congressional Budget Request Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO February 2005 DOE/ME-0053 Budget Highlights Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Table of Contents INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................ 1 BUDGET BY ORGANIZATION...................................................................................................... 15 BUDGET BY APPROPRIATION.................................................................................................... 16 FUNDING BY GOALS .................................................................................................................. 17 SECTION 1. DEFENSE STRATEGIC GOAL.................................................................................

135

FY 2012 Volume 6  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Volume 6 Department of Energy FY 2012 Congressional Budget Request Power Marketing Administrations Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration February 2011 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 6 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration

136

FY14.xlsx  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

4 Q1 Revision 1 Approved SNS FY 2014 Q2-4 Planning Only, Revised 09052013 Revised 952013 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4...

137

A SEARCH FOR CONCENTRIC CIRCLES IN THE 7 YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE TEMPERATURE SKY MAPS  

SciTech Connect

In this Letter, we search for concentric circles with low variance in cosmic microwave background sky maps. The detection of such circles would hint at new physics beyond the current cosmological concordance model, which states that the universe is isotropic and homogeneous, and filled with Gaussian fluctuations. We first describe a set of methods designed to detect such circles, based on matched filters and {chi}{sup 2} statistics, and then apply these methods to the best current publicly available data, the 7 year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) temperature sky maps. We compare the observations with an ensemble of 1000 Gaussian {Lambda}CDM simulations. Based on these tests, we conclude that the WMAP sky maps are fully compatible with the Gaussian and isotropic hypothesis as measured by low-variance ring statistics.

Wehus, I. K. [Department of Physics, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1048 Blindern, N-0316 Oslo (Norway); Eriksen, H. K., E-mail: i.k.wehus@fys.uio.no [Institute of Theoretical Astrophysics, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1029 Blindern, N-0315 Oslo (Norway)

2011-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

138

FY 2008 & FY 2009 Annual Uncosted Balances Report | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Uncosted Balances Reports » FY 2008 & FY 2009 Uncosted Balances Reports » FY 2008 & FY 2009 Annual Uncosted Balances Report FY 2008 & FY 2009 Annual Uncosted Balances Report This report presents a combined presentation and analysis of the Department's uncosted balances for FY 2008 and FY 2009. In FY 2009, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) provided the Department an additional $36.7 billion of funding. The FY 2009 uncosted balances associated with Recovery Act funding are separately presented but are not included in the additional analysis of uncosted balances in this report. FY 2008-2009 Report on Uncosted Balances More Documents & Publications FY 2010 Annual Uncosted Balances Report FY 2011 Annual Uncosted Balances Report FY 2012 Annual Uncosted Balances

139

Tanks focus area multiyear program plan - FY96-FY98  

SciTech Connect

The Tanks Focus Area (TFA) Multiyear Program Plan (MYPP) presents the recommended TFA technical program. The recommendation covers a 3-year funding outlook (FY96-FY98), with an emphasis on FY96 and FY97. In addition to defining the recommended program, this document also describes the processes used to develop the program, the implementation strategy for the program, the references used to write this report, data on the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) tank site baselines, details on baseline assumptions and the technical elements, and a glossary.

NONE

1995-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

140

Technology Administration Appropriation Summary FY 2005 ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... rescissions enacted in PL 108-447, FY 2005 Consolidated Appropriations Act (TA ... (c) The President signed the FY 2006 appropriation (HR 2862 ...

2010-10-05T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "7-year review fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

FY 2007 Congressional Budget Request  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

state tables preliminary Department of Energy FY 2007 Congressional Budget Request February 2006 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Office of Chief Financial Officer state...

142

FY 2008 Volume 3  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 DOE/CF-016 Volume 3 Energy Supply and Conservation Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Nuclear Energy Legacy Management Department of Energy FY 2008 Congressional Budget Request February 2007 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 3 DOE/CF-016 Volume 3 Energy Supply and Conservation Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Nuclear Energy Legacy Management Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Energy Supply Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Nuclear Energy Legacy Management Energy Supply Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Nuclear Energy Legacy Management Department of Energy/ Energy Supply and Conservation FY 2008 Congressional Budget

143

FY 2008 Volume 2  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 DOE/CF-015 Volume 2 Other Defense Activities Health, Safety and Security Legacy Management Nuclear Energy Defense-Related Administrative Support Hearings and Appeals Safeguards and Security Crosscut Department of Energy FY 2008 Congressional Budget Request February 2007 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 2 DOE/CF-015 Volume 2 Other Defense Activities Health, Safety and Security Legacy Management Nuclear Energy Defense-Related Administrative Support Hearings and Appeals Safeguards and Security Crosscut Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Other Defense Activities Safeguards and Security Crosscut Other Defense Activities Safeguards and Security Crosscut Department of Energy/ Other Defense Activities FY 2008 Congressional Budget Volume 2 Table of Contents Page

144

FY 2006 Volume 1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

National Nuclear Security Administration National Nuclear Security Administration Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO Volume 1 February 2005 DOE/ME-0046 Volume 1 Department of Energy FY 2006 Congressional Budget Request National Nuclear Security Administration Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO Volume 1 February 2005 DOE/ME-0046 Volume 1 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Office of the Administrator Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Naval Reactors Department of Energy/ National Nuclear Security Administration FY 2006 Congressional Budget

145

FY 2005 State Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office of Management, Budget Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO February 2004 State Tables State Tables Preliminary Preliminary Department of Energy Department of Energy FY 2005 Congressional Budget FY 2005 Congressional Budget Request Request Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO February 2004 State Tables State Tables Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Preliminary Preliminary The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, uses of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. State Index Page Number

146

FY 2012 State Table  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 Department of Energy FY 2012 Congressional Budget Request State Tables P li i Preliminary February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer DOE/CF-0066 Department of Energy FY 2012 Congressional Budget Request State Tables P li i Preliminary The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, use of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer Printed with soy ink on recycled

147

FY06 AR  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

ACCOMPLISHMENTS ACCOMPLISHMENTS NETL Accomplishments FY 2006 2 NETL Accomplishments FY 2006 3 MESSAGE FROM THE DIRECTOR For 200 years, America's energy demands have grown at a remarkable rate. As we have moved from an agricultural society, through industrial expansion, and into the current technological era, our society's transformation has depended on reliable, affordable energy supplies. Energy reliance is not limited to the United States. The worldwide need for on-demand electricity, modern transportation, and industrial power is driving a steep rise in global energy consumption. By 2030, we will collectively consume nearly double the energy we use today. In this climate, U.S. energy security is critical. It demands our extracting the maximum available energy from

148

DETECTION OF NEW POINT SOURCES IN WMAP 7 YEAR DATA USING INTERNAL TEMPLATES AND NEEDLETS  

SciTech Connect

We have developed a new needlet-based method to detect point sources in cosmic microwave background (CMB) maps and have applied it to the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) 7 year data. We use both the individual frequency channels as well as internal templates, the latter being the difference between pairs of frequency channels and hence having the advantage that the CMB component is eliminated. Using the area of the sky outside the Kq85 galactic mask, we detect a total of 2102 point sources at the 5{sigma} level in either the frequency maps or the internal templates. Of these, 1116 are detected either at 5{sigma} directly in the frequency channels or at 5{sigma} in the internal templates and {>=}3{sigma} at the corresponding position in the frequency channels. Of the 1116 sources, 603 are detections that have not been reported so far in WMAP data. We have made a catalog of these sources available with position and flux estimated in the WMAP channels where they are seen. In total, we identified 1029 of the 1116 sources with counterparts at 5 GHz and 69 at other frequencies.

Scodeller, Sandro; Hansen, Frode K. [Institute of Theoretical Astrophysics, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1029 Blindern, N-0315 Oslo (Norway); Marinucci, Domenico, E-mail: sandro.scodeller@astro.uio.no, E-mail: frodekh@astro.uio.no, E-mail: marinucc@mat.uniroma2.it [Dipartimento di Matematica, Universita di Roma 'Tor Vergata', Via della Ricerca Scientifica 1, I-00133 Roma (Italy)

2012-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

149

Accelerator/Experiment Operations - FY01 through FY03  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

230 230 January 2004 Accelerator/Experiment Operations - FY 2001 Through FY 2003 J. Conrad, D. Denisov, S. Holmes, M. Lindgren, W. Louis, R. Roser Edited by J. Appel This Technical Memorandum (TM) summarizes the accelerator and experiment operations for the period FY 2001 through FY 2003. The plan is to have an annual TM to gather such information in one place. In this case, the information concerns the startup of Run II at the Tevatron Collider and the beginning of the MiniBooNE neutrino experiment. While the focus is on the FY 2003 efforts, this document includes summaries of the earlier years where available for completeness. Each section was prepared by the relevant authors, and was somewhat edited for uniformity for inclusion in this summary.

150

FIMS Data Validation Schedule FY 2010_090729.xls | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FIMS Data Validation Schedule FY 2010090729.xls FIMS Data Validation Schedule FY 2010090729.xls FIMS Data Validation Schedule FY 2010090729.xls More Documents & Publications...

151

Technical Standards, FY 2000 - February 02, 2001 | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FY 2000 - February 02, 2001 Technical Standards, FY 2000 - February 02, 2001 February 02, 2001 FY 2000: Annual Report; Replaced by 2003 The use of voluntary consensus standards...

152

FY 2013 Budget Request Office of Environmental Management | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FY 2013 Budget Request Office of Environmental Management FY 2013 Budget Request Office of Environmental Management The FY 2013 budget will support major cleanup accomplishments in...

153

FY 2014 Environmental Management Budget Request to Congress ...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FY 2014 Environmental Management Budget Request to Congress FY 2014 Environmental Management Budget Request to Congress Department of Energy - Environmental Management FY 2014...

154

DOE FY 2012 Budget Overview presentation | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DOE FY 2012 Budget Overview presentation DOE FY 2012 Budget Overview presentation fy12budgetrollout02-14-11finalfordistribution-110214100000-phpapp01.pptx More Documents &...

155

Fossil Energy FY 2011 Budget | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 Budget Fossil Energy FY 2011 Budget Fossil Energy's FY 2011 budget request, House and Senate marks, and final appropriation. Fossil Energy FY 2011...

156

Fossil Energy FY 2013 Budget | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 Budget Fossil Energy FY 2013 Budget Fossil Energy's FY 2013 Budget, including House and Senate marks. Fossil Energy FY 2013...

157

Fossil Energy FY 2010 Budget | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 Budget Fossil Energy FY 2010 Budget Fossil Energy's FY 2010 budget, including request, House and Senate marks, and final appropriation. Fossil Energy FY 2010...

158

Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Annual Performance Results and...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Year (FY) 2009 Annual Performance Results and FY 2010 Annual Performance Plan Subject: Office of Inspector General's combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Annual Performance Results...

159

Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2007 Annual Performance Results and...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Year (FY) 2007 Annual Performance Results and FY 2008 Annual Performance Plan Subject: Office of Inspector General's combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2007 Annual Performance Results...

160

Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 Annual Performance Results and...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Year (FY) 2011 Annual Performance Results and FY 2012 Annual Performance Plan Subject: Office of Inspector General's combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 Annual Performance Results...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "7-year review fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Innovations in Measurement Science: FY13 Projects  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

*. Bookmark and Share. Innovations in Measurement Science: FY13 Projects. Purpose: The NIST Innovations in Measurement ...

2012-09-28T23:59:59.000Z

162

FY 2014 NIST Budget Request Emphasizes Advanced ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

FY 2014 NIST Budget Request Emphasizes Advanced Manufacturing, Cybersecurity. From NIST Tech Beat: April 17, 2013. ...

2013-04-17T23:59:59.000Z

163

Performance Period Total Fee Paid FY2008  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 FY2010 0 FY2011 0 FY2012 12,862 FY2013 0 Cumulative Fee Paid 12,862 1,111,678 URS Energy & Construction, Inc. DE-AT30-08CC60014SP16 Contractor: Contract Number: Minimum...

164

FY 2012 Highlighted Sustainable Targets and Initiatives  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Joint Environmental Management System (EMS) GoalsFY 2012 Highlighted Sustainable Targets and Initiatives

165

FY 2006 Commerce Appropriations, TA Appropriations  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

*. Bookmark and Share. “Taken from FY 2006 Commerce Appropriations …”. MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR SCIENCE ...

2010-10-05T23:59:59.000Z

166

Waste Package Materials Performance Peer Review | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Report on Dual-Purpose Canister Disposal Alternatives (FY13) A Review of Stress Corrosion CrackingFatigue Modeling for Light Water Reactor Cooling System Components Working...

167

FY 2007 Congressional Budget Request  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

state tables state tables preliminary Department of Energy FY 2007 Congressional Budget Request February 2006 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Office of Chief Financial Officer state tables preliminary The numbers depicted in this document represent the gross level of DOE budget authority for the years displayed. The figures include both the discretionary and mandatory funding in the budget. They do not consider revenues/receipts, uses of prior year balances, deferrals, rescissions, or other adjustments appropriated as offsets to the DOE appropriations by the Congress. State Index Page Number FY 2007 Congressional Budget 1/31/2006 Department Of Energy (Dollars In Thousands) 12:09:13PM Page 1 of 2 FY 2005 Appropriation FY 2006 Appropriation FY 2007 Request State Table 1 1 $32,439

168

FY 2011 OCIO Congressional Budget  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Departmental Administration/ Departmental Administration/ Chief Information Officer/ FY 2011 Congressional Budget Chief Information Officer Funding Profile by Subprogram (dollars in thousands) FY 2009 Current Appropriati on FY 2009 Current Recovery Act Appropriatio n FY 2010 Current Appropriation FY 2011 Request Chief Information Officer Cyber Security 34,512 0 33,365 35,872 Corporate Management Information Program 27,250 0 9,403 8,933 Energy Information Technology Services 0 0 22,149 21,120 Program Direction 53,738 5,700 38,146 36,238 Total, Chief Information Officer 115,500 5,700 103,063 102,163 Public Law Authorizations: Public Law 103-62: 'Government Performance Results Act of 1993' Public Law 104-106: 'Clinger-Cohen Act of 1996'

169

Photovoltaics program plan, FY 1991--FY 1995  

SciTech Connect

This program plan describes the goals and philosophy of DOE National Photovoltaics Program and its major research and development activities for fiscal years (FY) 1991 through 1995. The plan represents a consensus among researchers and manufacturers, as well as current and potential users of photovoltaics (PV). It defines the activites that we believe are necessary to continue the rapid progress toward acceptance of photovoltaics as a serious candidate for cost-competitive electric power generation by the utility, transportation, buildings, and industrial sectors. A succesful National Photovoltaics Program will help achieve many of our national priorities. The mission of the National Photovoltaics Program is to help US industry to develop photovoltaic technology for large-scale generation of economically competitive electric power in the United States, making PV a significant part of our national energy mix. To fully achieve this, we must continue to work toward the long-term goals established in our previous program plan: reducing the price of delivered electricity to 5 to 6 cents per kilowatt-hour (kWh), increasing lifetimes to 30 years, and increasing module efficiencies to 15% for flat-plate and 25% for concentrator technologies. If progress continues at its current pace, we expect that the PV industry will have installed at least 1000 megawatts (MW) of capacity in the United States and 500 MW internationally by the year 2000.

1991-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

170

Exploratory Research and Development Fund, FY 1990  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Exploratory R D Fund FY 1990 report is compiled from annual reports submitted by principal investigators following the close of the fiscal year. This report describes the projects supported and summarizes their accomplishments. It constitutes a part of an Exploratory R D Fund (ERF) planning and documentation process that includes an annual planning cycle, projection selection, implementation, and review. The research areas covered in this report are: Accelerator and fusion research; applied science; cell and molecular biology; chemical biodynamics; chemical sciences; earth sciences; engineering; information and computing sciences; materials sciences; nuclear science; physics and research medicine and radiation biophysics.

Not Available

1992-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

171

Natural System Evaluation and Tool Development FY11 Progress Report |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Natural System Evaluation and Tool Development FY11 Progress Report Natural System Evaluation and Tool Development FY11 Progress Report Natural System Evaluation and Tool Development FY11 Progress Report The report describes selected aspects of progress for four major tasks: (1) development of a detailed R&D plan for natural system evaluation and tool development; (2) in-depth analsis of key attributes and new concepts identified in the R&D plan; (3) preliminary demonstration of new modeling and experimental tools; and (4) conceptual design of a databse for natural system evaluation. This includes discussions related to: 1) discrete fracture network simulation; 2) spatial heterogeneity in Kd; 3) literature review of radionuclide interactions with clay/clay minerals; 4) behavior of aqueous Pu(IV) and intrinsic Pu(IV) nanocolloids; 5) mechanical response of clay,

172

FY 2010 Volume 6  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 DOE/CF-040 Volume 6 Power Marketing Administrations Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration May 2009 Office of Chief Financial Officer FY 2010 Congressional Budget Request Volume 6 DOE/CF-040 Volume 6 Power Marketing Administrations Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration Department of Energy/

173

FY 2008 Volume 4  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 DOE/CF-017 Volume 4 Science Nuclear Waste Disposal Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal Departmental Administration Inspector General Loan Guarantee Program Working Capital Fund Department of Energy FY 2008 Congressional Budget Request February 2007 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 4 DOE/CF-017 Volume 4 Science Nuclear Waste Disposal Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal Departmental Administration Inspector General Loan Guarantee Program Working Capital Fund Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Science Nuclear Waste Disposal Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal Departmental Administration Inspector General Loan Guarantee Program Working Capital Fund Science Nuclear Waste Disposal Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal Departmental Administration Inspector General Loan Guarantee Program Working Capital Fund

174

FY 2009 Volume 3  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 DOE/CF-026 Volume 3 Energy Supply and Conservation Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Nuclear Energy Legacy Management February 2008 Office of Chief Financial Officer Department of Energy FY 2009 Congressional Budget Request Volume 3 DOE/CF-026 Volume 3 Energy Supply and Conservation Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Nuclear Energy Legacy Management Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Energy Supply and Conservation Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Nuclear Energy Legacy Management Energy Supply and Conservation Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Nuclear Energy Legacy Management

175

FY 2007 Volume 3  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 DOE/CF-004 Volume 3 Energy supply and Conservation Energy efficiency and renewable energy Electricity delivery and energy reliability Nuclear energy Environment, safety and health Legacy management Department of Energy FY 2007 Congressional Budget Request February 2006 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 3 DOE/CF-004 Volume 3 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Energy supply and Conservation Energy efficiency and renewable energy Electricity delivery and energy reliability Nuclear energy Environment, safety and health Legacy management Energy Supply Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability Nuclear Energy Environment, Safety and Health Legacy Management Energy Supply Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability

176

FY 2007 Volume 6  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 DOE/CF-007 Volume 6 Power marketing administrations Southeastern power administration Southwestern power administration Western power administration Bonneville power administration Department of Energy FY 2007 Congressional Budget Request February 2006 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 6 DOE/CF-007 Volume 6 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Power marketing administrations Southeastern power administration Southwestern power administration Western power administration Bonneville power administration Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration Department of Energy/

177

FY 2006 Volume 5  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 5 February 2005 DOE/ME-0050 Volume 5 Environmental Management Defense Site Acceleration Completion Defense Environmental Services Non-Defense Site Acceleration Completion Non-Defense Environmental Services Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning Fund Department of Energy FY 2006 Congressional Budget Request Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO Volume 5 February 2005 DOE/ME-0050 Volume 5 Environmental Management Defense Site Acceleration Completion Defense Environmental Services Non-Defense Site Acceleration Completion Non-Defense Environmental Services Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning Fund Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Defense Site Acceleration Completion Defense Environmental Services Non-Defense Site Acceleration Completion

178

FY 2009 Volume 2  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 DOE/CF-025 Volume 2 Other Defense Activities Departmental Administration Inspector General Loan Guarantee Program Working Capital Fund Energy Information Administration Safeguards and Security Crosscut February 2008 Office of Chief Financial Officer Department of Energy FY 2009 Congressional Budget Request Volume 2 DOE/CF-025 Volume 2 Other Defense Activities Departmental Administration Inspector General Loan Guarantee Program Working Capital Fund Energy Information Administration Safeguards and Security Crosscut Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Other Defense Activities Departmental Administration Inspector General Loan Guarantee Program Working Capital Fund Energy Information Administration Safeguards and Security Crosscut Other Defense Activities Departmental Administration

179

FY 2007 Volume 2  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 DOE/CF-003 Volume 2 Other defense activities Security & Safety Performance assurance Environment, safety & health Legacy management Nuclear energy Defense related administrative support Hearings and appeals Safeguards & security crosscut Department of Energy FY 2007 Congressional Budget Request February 2006 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 2 DOE/CF-003 Volume 2 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Other defense activities Security & Safety Performance assurance Environment, safety & health Legacy management Nuclear energy Defense related administrative support Hearings and appeals Safeguards & security crosscut Other Defense Activities Safeguards and Security Crosscut Other Defense Activities Safeguards and Security Crosscut Department of Energy/

180

FY 2006 Volume 2  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 February 2005 DOE/ME-0047 Volume 2 Other Defense Activities Security & Performance Assurance Environment, Safety & Health Legacy Management Nuclear Energy Defense Related Administrative Support Office of Hearings & Appeals Safeguards & Security Crosscut Department of Energy FY 2006 Congressional Budget Request Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO Volume 2 February 2005 DOE/ME-0047 Volume 2 Other Defense Activities Security & Performance Assurance Environment, Safety & Health Legacy Management Nuclear Energy Defense Related Administrative Support Office of Hearings & Appeals Safeguards & Security Crosscut Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Other Defense Activities Safeguards and Security Crosscut Other Defense Activities Safeguards and Security Crosscut

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "7-year review fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

FY 2006 Volume 6  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 February 2005 DOE/ME-0051 Volume 6 Power Marketing Administrations Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration Department of Energy FY 2006 Congressional Budget Request Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO Volume 6 February 2005 DOE/ME-0051 Volume 6 Power Marketing Administrations Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Power Administration

182

FY 2009 Volume 6  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 DOE/CF-029 Volume 6 Power Marketing Administrations Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration February 2008 Office of Chief Financial Officer Department of Energy FY 2009 Congressional Budget Request Volume 6 DOE/CF-029 Volume 6 Power Marketing Administrations Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Area Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration

183

FY 2006 Volume 4  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Science Science Nuclear Waste Disposal Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal Departmental Administration Inspector General Working Capital Fund Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO Volume 4 February 2005 DOE/ME-0049 Volume 4 Department of Energy FY 2006 Congressional Budget Request Science Nuclear Waste Disposal Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal Departmental Administration Inspector General Working Capital Fund Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO Volume 4 February 2005 DOE/ME-0049 Volume 4 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Science Nuclear Waste Disposal Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal Departmental Administration Inspector General Working Capital Fund Science Nuclear Waste Disposal Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal Departmental Administration Inspector General Working Capital Fund

184

FY 2008 Volume 6  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 DOE/CF-019 Volume 6 Power Marketing Administrations Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration Department of Energy FY 2008 Congressional Budget Request February 2007 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 6 DOE/CF-019 Volume 6 Power Marketing Administrations Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration Western Power Administration Bonneville Power Administration Department of Energy/

185

FY 2010 Volume 2  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 DOE/CF-036 Volume 2 Other Defense Activities Departmental Administration Inspector General Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program Title 17 Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Program Working Capital Fund Energy Information Administration Safeguards and Security Crosscut May 2009 Office of Chief Financial Officer FY 2010 Congressional Budget Request Volume 2 DOE/CF-036 Volume 2 Other Defense Activities Departmental Administration Inspector General Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program Title 17 Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Program Working Capital Fund Energy Information Administration Safeguards and Security Crosscut Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Other Defense Activities Departmental Administration Inspector General Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program

186

FY 2006 Volume 7  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 February 2005 DOE/ME-0052 Volume 7 Interior & Related Agencies Fossil Energy Research & Development Naval Petroleum & Oil Shale Reserves Elk Hills School Lands Fund Energy Conservation Economic Regulation Strategic Petroleum Reserve Energy Information Administration Clean Coal Technology Department of Energy FY 2006 Congressional Budget Request Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO Volume 7 February 2005 DOE/ME-0052 Volume 7 Interior & Related Agencies Fossil Energy Research & Development Naval Petroleum & Oil Shale Reserves Elk Hills School Lands Fund Energy Conservation Economic Regulation Strategic Petroleum Reserve Energy Information Administration Clean Coal Technology Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Fossil Energy Research and Development

187

ALCATOR C-MOD FY03-FY04 WORK PROPOSAL  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

(Draft) (Draft) ALCATOR C-MOD FY03-FY04 WORK PROPOSAL March 2002 Submitted to: Office of Fusion Energy Sciences Office of Energy Research U.S. Department of Energy Germantown, MD 20874 Plasma Science and Fusion Center Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02139 ALCATOR C-MOD FY03-04 WORK PROPOSAL Table of Contents 1. Introduction.......................................................................................... 1 2. Alcator C-Mod Research Areas ............................................................11 2.1 Advanced Tokamak Thrust ............................................................11 2.2 Burning Plasma Experiment Support..............................................25 2.3 Transport

188

Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 Annual Performance Results and FY 2012 Annual Performance Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This report presents the goals, objectives, and strategies for measuring the OIG’s FY 2011 actual performance and FY 2012 planned activities.

189

Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2006 Annual Performance Results and FY 2007 Annual Performance Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This report presents the goals, objectives, and strategies for measuring the OIG’s FY 2006 actual performance and FY 2007 planned activities.

190

Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2007 Annual Performance Results and FY 2008 Annual Performance Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This report presents the goals, objectives, and strategies for measuring the OIG’s FY 2007 actual performance and FY 2008 planned activities.

191

Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Annual Performance Results and FY 2010 Annual Performance Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This report presents the goals, objectives, and strategies for measuring the OIG’s FY 2009 actual performance and FY 2010 planned activities.

192

Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 Annual Performance Results and FY 2011 Annual Performance Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This report presents the goals, objectives, and strategies for measuring the OIG’s FY 2010 actual performance and FY 2011 planned activities.

193

FY 2012 Budget Rollout Overview | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FY 2012 Budget Rollout Overview FY 2012 Budget Rollout Overview fy12-budget-rollout-02-14-11-final-distribution.pdf More Documents & Publications DOE FY 2012 Budget Overview...

194

Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies FY 2014 Budget Request Rollout...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

and Vehicle Technologies) in key areas. *Funds for the SBIRSTTR programs for FY 2013 and FY 2014 will be subtracted at later date. Note: The FY 2012 and FY 2013 numbers...

195

Accelerator/Experiment Operations - FY01 through FY03  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

88-DO 88-DO October 2004 Accelerator/Experiment Operations - FY 2004 C. Bromberg, J. Conrad, D. Denisov, S. Holmes, W. Louis, A. Meyer, C. Moore, R. Raja, E. Ramberg, R. Roser Edited by J. Appel This Technical Memorandum (TM) summarizes the accelerator and experiment operations for FY 2004. It is one of a series of annual publications intended to gather information in one place. In this case, the information concerns the FY 2004 Run II at the Tevatron Collider, the MiniBooNE neutrino experiment, and SY 120 activities. Each section was prepared by the relevant authors, and was somewhat edited for uniformity for inclusion in this summary. Collider (Steve Holmes) FY 2004 began with the accelerator complex in the middle of an annual, scheduled

196

Annual Report FY2012 University of Rhode Island  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

2006 5 4 New category (as of FY2006): US Dept. of Defense excluding funds from Army, Navy and Air Force. 1 5 6 New category (as of FY2006): University funds other than URI. 2 1 FY2007 FY2008 1 FY2009 1 FY DEVELOPMENT OF NEW ELECTROLYTE SYSTEMS LITHIUM ION BATTERY S $674,769 $674,769 LUCHT, BRETT INVESTIGATION

Rhode Island, University of

197

FY11 Joint Research Target: Status and Planning on  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

FY11 Joint Research Target: Status and Planning on Alcator C-Mod Jerry Hughes Including slides from: (1) ECC Meeting on FY2010 and FY2011 Joint Research Milestones, April 12, 2010 (2) Alcator C-Mod FY10 capability for the H-mode pedestal is the subject of the FY11 JRT Statement of the FY2011 FES Joint Theory

Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

198

USDA Section 9006 Program: Status and Energy Benefits of Grant Awards in FY 2003-2005  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

At the request of the U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Development, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory reviewed projects awarded in the Section 9006 Program: Renewable Energy Systems and Energy Efficiency Improvements Program. This report quantifies federal and private investment, outlines project status based on recent field updates, and calculates the effects on energy and emissions of energy efficiency and renewable energy projects awarded grants in FY 2003, FY 2004, and FY 2005. An overview of the program challenges and modifications in the first three years of operation is also included.

Walters, T.; Savage, S.; Brown, J.

2006-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

199

NNSA FY14 BUDGET REQUEST  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

in FY14 to directly support these programs. The W76-1 LEP, now in Phase 6.6 full production, is meeting all operational requirements for Navy deployments. The B61-12 LEP...

200

NNSA FY14 BUDGET REQUEST  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

FY14 BUDGET REQUEST FY14 BUDGET REQUEST We're keeping the American people safe. President Obama has laid out the most ambitious view of nuclear security in decades. Our nonproliferation, counterterrorism, and modern-day nuclear deterrent programs keep the American people safe every day. The President remains committed to a safe, secure, and reliable nuclear deterrent, and his FY14 budget provides $7.9 billion for NNSA's weapons activities. o Our Life Extension Programs (LEPs) are moving forward to ensure the aging American nuclear weapons deterrent remains safe, secure, and effective. $1 billion is requested in FY14 to directly support these programs. The W76-1 LEP, now in Phase 6.6 full

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "7-year review fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

FY 2010 Volume 7  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 DOE/CF-041 Volume 7 Fossil Energy Research and Development Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves Strategic Petroleum Reserve Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve Clean Coal Technology Ultra-Deepwater Unconventional Natural Gas May 2009 Office of Chief Financial Officer FY 2010 Congressional Budget Request Volume 7 DOE/CF-041 Volume 7 Fossil Energy Research and Development Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves Strategic Petroleum Reserve Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve Clean Coal Technology Ultra-Deepwater Unconventional Natural Gas Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Fossil Energy Research and Development Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves Strategic Petroleum Reserve Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve Clean Coal Technology Ultra-Deepwater Unconventional Natural Gas

202

FY 2006 Volume 3  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Supply Energy Supply Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electric Transmission and Distribution Nuclear Energy Environment, Safety & Health Legacy Management Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO Volume 3 February 2005 DOE/ME-0048 Volume 3 Department of Energy FY 2006 Congressional Budget Request Energy Supply Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electric Transmission and Distribution Nuclear Energy Environment, Safety & Health Legacy Management Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation/CFO Volume 3 February 2005 DOE/ME-0048 Volume 3 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Energy Supply Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Electric Transmission and Distribution Nuclear Energy Environment, Safety and Health Legacy Management Energy Supply Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

203

FY 2007 Volume 7  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 DOE/CF-008 Volume 7 Fossil energy and other Fossil energy research and development Naval petroleum & oil shale reserves Elk hills school lands fund Strategic petroleum reserve Clean coal technology Energy information administration Department of Energy FY 2007 Congressional Budget Request February 2006 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 7 DOE/CF-008 Volume 7 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Fossil energy and other Fossil energy research and development Naval petroleum & oil shale reserves Elk hills school lands fund Strategic petroleum reserve Clean coal technology Energy information administration Fossil Energy Research and Development Naval Petroleum & Oil Shale Reserves Elk Hills School Lands Fund Strategic Petroleum Reserve Clean Coal Technology

204

FY 2008 Volume 7  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 DOE/CF-020 Volume 7 Fossil Energy and Other Fossil Energy Research and Development Naval Petroleum & Oil Shale Reserves Elk Hills School Lands Fund Strategic Petroleum Reserve Clean Coal Technology Ultra-Deepwater Unconventional Natural Gas Energy Information Administration Department of Energy FY 2008 Congressional Budget Request February 2007 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 7 DOE/CF-020 Volume 7 Fossil Energy and Other Fossil Energy Research and Development Naval Petroleum & Oil Shale Reserves Elk Hills School Lands Fund Strategic Petroleum Reserve Clean Coal Technology Ultra-Deepwater Unconventional Natural Gas Energy Information Administration Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Fossil Energy Research and Development Naval Petroleum & Oil Shale Reserves

205

FY 2006 funded projects  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

4 4 Brookhaven National Laboratory FY 2006 LDRD PROJECTS LDRD Project Project Title P.I. Dept/Bldg. 03-104 Hydrogen Atom Transfer from Carbon to Metal - Relevance of a Novel Reaction to Catalyzed Hydrocarbon Conversions M. Bullock CHEM/555A 04-011 Femtosecond Photoinitiated Nanoparticle Surface Chemistry N. Camillone CHEM/555 04-013 Chirped Pulse Amplification at the DUV-FEL L.H. Yu NSLS/725C 04-025 Overcoming Coherent Instabilities at Medium- Energy Storage Rings J.-M. Wang NSLS/725C 04-033 Layered Cobaltates with High Thermoelectric Power Qiang Li MSD/480 04-038 Complex Thin Films and Nanomaterial Properties J. Misewich MSD/480 04-041 Lattice QCD relevant for RHIC and AGS P. Petreczky PHYS/510A 04-043 Very Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation

206

Operating plan FY 1998  

SciTech Connect

This document is the first edition of Argonne`s new Operating Plan. The Operating Plan complements the strategic planning in the Laboratory`s Institutional Plan by focusing on activities that are being pursued in the immediate fiscal year, FY 1998. It reflects planning that has been done to date, and it will serve in the future as a resource and a benchmark for understanding the Laboratory`s performance. The heart of the Institutional Plan is the set of major research initiatives that the Laboratory is proposing to implement in future years. In contrast, this Operating Plan focuses on Argonne`s ongoing R&D programs, along with cost-saving measures and other improvements being implemented in Laboratory support operations.

1997-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

207

Fourth Quarter FY 2009  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

December 2009 1 December 2009 1 Fourth Quarter FY 2009 December 1, 2009; Issue No. 61 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT National Environmental Policy Act LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS N E P A (continued on page 8) DOE Begins Online Posting of Categorical Exclusion Determinations The Department of Energy (DOE) is now posting most of its categorical exclusion (CX) determinations on the web under a policy that went into effect November 2, 2009. In establishing the policy, Deputy Secretary Daniel B. Poneman referred to President Obama's commitment to "creating an unprecedented level of openness in Government," including by posting information online. "Such openness is especially important when the information relates to the Department's

208

FY 2009 Volume 7  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 DOE/CF-030 Volume 7 Fossil Energy Research and Development Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves Strategic Petroleum Reserve Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve Clean Coal Technology Ultra-Deepwater Unconventional Natural Gas February 2008 Office of Chief Financial Officer Department of Energy FY 2009 Congressional Budget Request Volume 7 DOE/CF-030 Volume 7 Fossil Energy Research and Development Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves Strategic Petroleum Reserve Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve Clean Coal Technology Ultra-Deepwater Unconventional Natural Gas Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Fossil Energy Research and Development Naval Petroleum & Oil Shale Reserves Strategic Petroleum Reserve Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve Clean Coal Technology Ultra-Deepwater Unconventional Natural Gas

209

DOE Hydrogen Program: 2009 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes comments from the Peer Review Panel at the FY 2009 DOE Hydrogen Program Annual Merit Review, held on May 18 -22, 2009, in Arlington, Virginia.

Satyapal, S.

2009-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

210

CRSP South Capital Investment Plan FY12-FY21 Detail  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

9/2011 9/2011 CRSP South Capital Investment Plan FY12-FY21 Detail Yellow Highlight = New Project to list W Total = Western Only Costs Red Text = Change from previous version O Total = Trust and Joint Participation Costs Blue Text = will be removed from list FY Total = Sum of W Total and O Total Green Highlight = Annual Equipment Replacement Programs MPS Split = Multiple Power System Cost Split. Fund PROJECT PROJECT Power Sys TOTAL W Total W PD W Non-PD O Total FY TOTAL W Total W PD W Non-PD O Total FY TOTAL Transmission Lines Environmental Support for Lands, Access Roads, and ROW's CRSPVMF 450 110 10 100 110 110 10 100 110 Lidar Closeout at Pinnacle Peak and Rogers CRSPVMF 15 15 15 15 Pinnacle Peak-Rogers ROW Agreement CRSPVMF 6,100 6,100 100 6,000 6,100 T-Line SubTotal 6,565 125 25 100 125 6,210 110

211

FY 2008 Summary Federal Tech Transfer  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Summary Report on Federal Laboratory Technology Transfer FY2008. For Immediate Release: April 30, 2010. Contact: Cathleen ...

2013-06-26T23:59:59.000Z

212

Tanks Focus Area Site Needs Assessment - FY 2001  

SciTech Connect

The TFA uses a systematic process for developing its annual program that draws from the tanks science and technology development needs expressed by the five DOE tank waste sites. TFA's annual program development process is iterative and involves the following steps: Collection of site needs; Needs analysis; Development of technical responses and initial prioritization; Refinement of the program for the next fiscal year; Formulation of the Corporate Review Budget (CRB); Preparation of Program Execution Guidance (PEG) for the next FY Revision of the Multiyear Program Plan (MYPP). This document describes the outcomes of the first phase of this process, from collection of site needs to the initial prioritization of technical activities. The TFA received site needs in October - December 2000. A total of 170 site needs were received, an increase of 30 over the previous year. The needs were analyzed and integrated, where appropriate. Sixty-six distinct technical responses were drafted and prioritized. In addition, seven strategic tasks were approved to compete for available funding in FY 2002 and FY 2003. Draft technical responses were prepared and provided to the TFA Site Representatives and the TFA User Steering Group (USG) for their review and comment. These responses were discussed at a March 15, 2001, meeting where the TFA Management Team established the priority listing in preparation for input to the DOE Office of Science and Technology (OST) budget process. At the time of publication of this document, the TFA continues to finalize technical responses as directed by the TFA Management Team and clarify the intended work scopes for FY 2002 and FY 2003.

Allen, Robert W.; Josephson, Gary B.; Westsik, Joseph H.; Nickola, Cheryl L.

2001-04-30T23:59:59.000Z

213

2005 Electric Distribution Peer Review - Agenda and Presentations...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Fact Sheets Meetings & Events Electric Distribution R&D FY05 Annual Program and Peer Review Meeting April 19 & 20, 2005 Georgia Tech Conference Center Atlanta, Georgia Agenda...

214

Photovoltaic Subcontract Program, FY 1990  

SciTech Connect

This report summarizes the progress of the subcontracted photovoltaic (PV) research and development (R D) performed under the Photovoltaics Program at the Solar Energy Research Institute (SERI). The SERI subcontracted PV research and development represents most of the subcontracted R D that is funded by the US Department of Energy (DOE) National Photovoltaics Program. This report covers fiscal year (FY) 1990: October 1, 1989 through September 30, 1990. During FY 1990, the SERI PV program started to implement a new DOE subcontract initiative, entitled the Photovoltaic Manufacturing Technology (PVMaT) Project.'' Excluding (PVMaT) because it was in a start-up phase, in FY 1990 there were 54 subcontracts with a total annualized funding of approximately $11.9 million. Approximately two-thirds of those subcontracts were with universities, at a total funding of over $3.3 million. Cost sharing by industry added another $4.3 million to that $11.9 million of SERI PV subcontracted R D. The six technical sections of this report cover the previously ongoing areas of the subcontracted program: the Amorphous Silicon Research Project, Polycrystalline Thin Films, Crystalline Silicon Materials Research, High-Efficiency Concepts, the New Ideas Program, and the University Participation Program. Technical summaries of each of the subcontracted programs discuss approaches, major accomplishments in FY 1990, and future research directions. Another section introduces the PVMaT project and reports the progress since its inception in FY 1990. Highlights of technology transfer activities are also reported.

Summers, K.A. (ed.)

1991-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

215

Photovoltaic Subcontract Program, FY 1990  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes the progress of the subcontracted photovoltaic (PV) research and development (R D) performed under the Photovoltaics Program at the Solar Energy Research Institute (SERI). The SERI subcontracted PV research and development represents most of the subcontracted R D that is funded by the US Department of Energy (DOE) National Photovoltaics Program. This report covers fiscal year (FY) 1990: October 1, 1989 through September 30, 1990. During FY 1990, the SERI PV program started to implement a new DOE subcontract initiative, entitled the Photovoltaic Manufacturing Technology (PVMaT) Project.'' Excluding (PVMaT) because it was in a start-up phase, in FY 1990 there were 54 subcontracts with a total annualized funding of approximately $11.9 million. Approximately two-thirds of those subcontracts were with universities, at a total funding of over $3.3 million. Cost sharing by industry added another $4.3 million to that $11.9 million of SERI PV subcontracted R D. The six technical sections of this report cover the previously ongoing areas of the subcontracted program: the Amorphous Silicon Research Project, Polycrystalline Thin Films, Crystalline Silicon Materials Research, High-Efficiency Concepts, the New Ideas Program, and the University Participation Program. Technical summaries of each of the subcontracted programs discuss approaches, major accomplishments in FY 1990, and future research directions. Another section introduces the PVMaT project and reports the progress since its inception in FY 1990. Highlights of technology transfer activities are also reported.

Summers, K.A. (ed.)

1991-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

216

FY 2012 Control Table by Appropriation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FY 2012 Summary Control Table by Appropriation (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 Current Congressional Annualized Congressional Approp. Request CR Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy efficiency and renewable energy....................................... 2,216,392 2,355,473 2,242,500 3,200,053 +983,661 +44.4% Electricity delivery and energy reliability........................................ 168,484 185,930 171,982 237,717 +69,233 +41.1% Nuclear energy............................................................................. 774,578 824,052 786,637 754,028

217

FY 2006 Control Table by Organization  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Organization Organization (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 Comparable Comparable Request to FY 2006 vs. FY 2005 Approp Approp Congress Discretionary Summary By Organization National Security Weapons........................................................................................ 6,447,159 6,583,350 6,630,133 +46,783 +0.7% Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation................................................... 1,367,709 1,422,103 1,637,239 +215,136 +15.1% Naval Reactors............................................................................... 761,872 801,437 786,000 -15,437 -1.9% Office of the Administrator.............................................................. 352,949 357,051 343,869 -13,182 -3.7% Other Defense Activities................................................................. -446 -- -- -- --

218

FY11 OE public summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

The FY 2011 Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE) budget request is $185.9 million, $14.0 million more than the FY 2010 Appropriation, which reflects increased investments in research and development, particularly in energy storage, advanced grid modeling and power electronics. The FY 2011 request supports the efforts of the Research and Development program; the Permitting, Siting, and Analysis program; and the Infrastructure Security and Energy Restoration program to modernize the electric grid, enhance security and reliability of the energy infrastructure, and facilitate recovery from disruptions to the energy supply. The proposed budget provides a balanced and diverse portfolio of activities, including: Research and Development ($144.3 million)

219

OPT Annual Report, FY 2012  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OPT Annual Report, FY 2012 OPT Annual Report, FY 2012 i Executive Summary The Office of Environmental Management (EM) was established to mitigate the risks and hazards posed by the legacy of nuclear weapons production and research. The most ambitious and far ranging of these missions is dealing with the environmental legacy of the Cold War. Many problems posed by its operations are unique, and include the transportation of unprecedented amounts of contaminated waste, water, and soil, and a vast number of contaminated structures during remediation of the contaminated sites. Since Fiscal Year (FY) 2004, EM has completed over 150,000 shipments of radioactive material and waste. The mission of the Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Packaging and Transportation (OPT) positioned

220

RTBF Program Review for FY 2003  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Doug Dearolph, Manager Doug Dearolph, Manager National Nuclear Security Administration Savannah River Site Office August 9, 2011 | pg. 2 GROUND RULES Only the Source Evaluation Board (SEB) has the authority to change or clarify the Request for Proposal (RFP). Any information presented during the site tours that differs or may be viewed as a change to the RFP will not be considered an amendment to the final RFP. Questions on this presentation should be for clarification of the material presented. Any questions that are deferred should be provided to the SEB website. Questions on this afternoon's tours that cannot be answered on the spot must be written on index cards for collection at the end of the visit. Defense Programs (DP) at the Savannah River Site Savannah River Site

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "7-year review fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Performance Period Total Fee Paid FY2001  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

01 01 $4,547,400 FY2002 $4,871,000 FY2003 $6,177,902 FY2004 $8,743,007 FY2005 $13,134,189 FY2006 $7,489,704 FY2007 $9,090,924 FY2008 $10,045,072 FY2009 $12,504,247 FY2010 $17,590,414 FY2011 $17,558,710 FY2012 $14,528,770 Cumulative Fee Paid $126,281,339 Cost Plus Award Fee DE-AC29-01AL66444 Washington TRU Solutions LLC Contractor: Contract Number: Contract Type: $8,743,007 Contract Period: $1,813,482,000 Fee Information Maximum Fee $131,691,744 Total Estimated Contract Cost: $4,547,400 $4,871,000 $6,177,902 October 2000 - September 2012 Minimum Fee $0 Fee Available EM Contractor Fee Site: Carlsbad Field Office - Carlsbad, NM Contract Name: Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Operations March 2013 $13,196,690 $9,262,042 $10,064,940 $14,828,770 $12,348,558 $12,204,247 $17,590,414 $17,856,774

222

Institutional Plan FY 2003 - 2007  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Fiscal Year (FY) 2003-2007 Institutional Plan describes the strategic directions and key issues that Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory management must address with the Department of Energy (DOE) in charting its future as a multiprogram national laboratory. The Plan provides an overview of the Laboratory's mission, strategic plan, initiatives, and the resources required to fulfill its role in support of national needs in fundamental science and technology, energy resources, and environmental quality. The Plan facilitates the Department of Energy's ongoing efforts to strengthen the Integrated Laboratory System. Preparation and review of the Institutional Plan is one element of the Department of Energy's strategic management planning activities, implemented through an annual planning process. The Plan supports the President's Management Agenda and the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993. The Plan complements the current performance-based contract between the Department of Energy and the Regents of the University of California, and summarizes Best Management Practices for a potential future results-based contract as a basis for achieving DOE goals and the Laboratory's scientific and operations objectives. It identifies technical and administrative directions in the context of national energy policy and research needs and the Department of Energy's program planning initiatives. Preparation of the Plan is coordinated by the Planning and Strategic Development Office from information contributed by Berkeley Lab's scientific and support divisions and DOE comments on prior years' plans. The Laboratory Mission section identifies the specific strengths of Berkeley Lab that contribute to the mission in general and the Integrated Laboratory System in particular. The Laboratory Strategic Plan section identifies the existing activities in support of DOE Office of Science and other sponsors; support for DOE goals; and the Laboratory Scientific Vision and operations goals. The Initiatives section describes some of the specific new research programs representing major long-term opportunities for the Department of Energy and Berkeley Lab. The Operations Strategic Planning section describes our strategic thinking in the areas of human resources; site and cyber security; workforce diversity; communications and trust; integrated safety management; and technology transfer activities. The Infrastructure Strategic Planning section describes Berkeley Lab's facilities planning process and our site and facility needs. The Summary of Major Issues section provides context for discussions at the Institutional Planning On-Site Review. The Resource Projections are estimates of required budgetary authority for Berkeley Lab's research programs.

Chartock, Michael; Hansen, Todd

2003-01-27T23:59:59.000Z

223

Institutional Plan FY 2003 - 2007  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Disclaimer Disclaimer While this document is believed to contain correct information, the United States Government nor any agency thereof makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that it would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by its trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. INSTITUTIONAL PLAN FY 2003 - 2007 INSTITUTIONAL PLAN FY 2003 - 2007 1 Table of Contents Page 1 Introduction

224

FY 2012 Service Contract Inventory Analysis Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Service Contract Inventory Service Contract Inventory Analysis Plan Department of Energy Office of Acquisition and Project Management Strategic Programs Division (MA-622) December 2012 Department of Energy FY 2012 Service Contract Inventory Plan for Analysis The Department of Energy (DOE) approach will be performed in accordance with the criteria set out in Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010, (Pub. L. No. 111-117, § 743 (2009)) and Appendix D of the November 5, 2010 OMB Memorandum on Service Contract Inventories, and will ultimately identify contracts for a more in-depth review. DOE will develop the basic inventory in accordance with OMB guidance using FPDS-NG data to address a number of the inventory requirements consistent with the Consolidated Appropriations Act. APM will

225

FY 2011 Service Contract Inventory Analysis Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 Service Contract Inventory Analysis 1 Service Contract Inventory Analysis Plan Department of Energy Office of Procurement & Assistance Management Strategic Programs Division (MA-622) December 2011 Department of Energy FY 2011 Service Contract Inventory Plan for Analysis The Department of Energy (DOE) approach will be performed in accordance with the criteria set out in Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010, (Pub. L. No. 111-117, § 743 (2009)) and Appendix D of the November 5, 2010 OMB Memorandum on Service Contract Inventories, and will ultimately identify contracts for a more in-depth review. DOE will develop the basic inventory in accordance with OMB guidance using FPDS-NG data to address a number of the inventory requirements consistent with the Consolidated Appropriations Act and collect

226

Policy Flashes - FY 2002 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Policy Flashes - FY 2002 The following is a list of Policy Flashes issued by the Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy. To obtain any Policy Flash listed below please contact Office of Policy at DOE_OAPM@hq.doe.gov or on (202) 287-1330. 2002-42 Federal Acquisition Circular 2001-10 2002-42 Attachment Federal Acquisition Circular 2001-10 2002-41 Revisions and Additions to the Department of Energy (DOE) Acquisition Guide - Chapter 7, Acquisition Planning, and Chapter 71, Headquarters Review of Contract and Financial Assistance Actions 2002-40 Extension of Price-Anderson Act - 1) Awarded Contracts, 2) Proposed Awards, and 3) Reinstatement of Acquisition Letter (AL) 2002-04 2002-39 Financial Assistance Letter (FAL) 2002-03, Implementation of DOE's Industry Interactive Procurement System (IIPS)

227

C-Mod FY2007 Campaign Statistics  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

07 Campaign Statistics 07 Campaign Statistics presented by R. Granetz Alcator C-Mod quarterly review 20 September 2007 C-Mod FY07 run statistics * Budgeted for 60 research days * We completed 98% of the planned research days of operation at the end of August (~ 59 run days). * ~ 1500 plasma discharges * 52 different miniproposals received run time C-Mod 2007 run utilization (in run days) Topic/Group Run Days Original Allocation Pre-Physics* ----------- ------------ -------------------- ------------- LH 13.41 9 2.06 H-mode Scenarios 6.73 6 0 MHD 2.00 6 0 Divertor/Edge 5.28 6 0 Transport 10.94 10 0

228

FY 2008 Annual Performance Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Focuses on detailed performance information including performance targets associated with the Department’s budget activities. The report discusses individual and summary performance measure results through narrative descriptions with references to supporting documentation, a concise statement on highlevel program challenges and benefits, and the status of all FY 2007 unmet measures.

229

LDRD FY 2014 Program Plan  

SciTech Connect

As required by DOE Order 413.2B the FY 2014 Program Plan is written to communicate ares of investment and approximate amounts being requested for the upcoming fiscal year. The program plan also includes brief highlights of current or previous LDRD projects that have an opportunity to impact our Nation's current and future energy challenges.

Anita Gianotto; Dena Tomchak

2013-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

230

NEET Awards for FY2012 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NEET Awards for FY2012 NEET Awards for FY2012 List of Nuclear Energy Enabling Technologies Awards for Fiscal Year 2012 NEET Awards for FY2012 More Documents & Publications NEET...

231

FY 2010 EMS Goals and Initiatives | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 EMS Goals and Initiatives FY 2010 EMS Goals and Initiatives Joint Environmental Management System (EMS) FY 2010 EMS Goals and Initiatives FY 2010 EMS Goals and Initiatives More...

232

FY 2011 EMS Goals and Initiatives | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 EMS Goals and Initiatives FY 2011 EMS Goals and Initiatives Joint Environmental Management System (EMS) FY 2011 EMS Goals and Initiatives FY 2011 EMS Goals and Initiatives More...

233

Attachment FY2011-46(4) OPAM | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4) OPAM Attachment FY2011-46(4) OPAM Types of Compliance Requirements Chart Attachment FY2011-46(4) OPAM More Documents & Publications FLASH2011-46-OPAM Attachment FY2011-80 OPAM...

234

Attachment FY2011-83 OPAM | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Attachment FY2011-83 OPAM Attachment FY2011-83 OPAM Federal Supply Schedules Attachment FY2011-83 OPAM More Documents & Publications Chapter 8 - Required Sources of Supplies and...

235

Microsoft PowerPoint - FY 2012 AOP MEETING.pptx  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

FY 2012 Purchase Power * Next Steps 1 FY2011 Hydrology Update FY2011 Hydrology Update Forecast For The Remainder of WY 2011 WY 2011 WY 2010 WY 2011 WY 2010 Lake Powell (maf) %...

236

Attachment FY2011-77 OPAM | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Other Agencies You are here Home Attachment FY2011-77 OPAM Attachment FY2011-77 OPAM Data Quality Plan Attachment FY2011-77 OPAM More Documents & Publications Flash2011-77...

237

Attachment FY2011-15 OPAM | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Agencies You are here Home Attachment FY2011-15 OPAM Attachment FY2011-15 OPAM FAR Dollar Threshold Changes Attachment FY2011-15 OPAM More Documents & Publications Flash2011-15...

238

EM Five-Year Plan (FY 2008 - FY 2012) | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EM Five-Year Plan (FY 2008 - FY 2012) EM Five-Year Plan (FY 2008 - FY 2012) EM Five-Year Plan (FY 2008 - FY 2012) The purpose of the EM Five Year Plan is to describe EM's planned strategies, funding and accomplishments over the next five years. This plan summarizes EM progress to date, presents EM performance measures, discusses assumptions and the EM decision-making process, and provides estimated EM funding over the FY 2008-2012 time period. Following this summary are sections that provide detailed information on each site including planned accomplishments at the target funding scenario. EM's five year planning targets are significantly different from the funding targets that appeared in the FY 2007-2011 Five Year Plan. Site planning allocations that formed the basis for the planned accomplishments

239

Environmental Solutions FY05: PNNL Contributions to Bechtel Hanford, Inc.  

SciTech Connect

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory provided support to Bechtel Hanford, Inc., for their work to safely demolish nuclear facilities and clean up waste sites near the Columbia River. During FY05, PNNL screened a variety of technologies to solve difficult problems. The danger of lung-scarring beryllium becoming airborne during the demolition of a nuclear fuel rod fabrication plant was addressed. For Bechtel Hanford, PNNL researchers extensively screened technologies and supported field testing of selected options. Assisted by the Laboratory's information, Bechtel Hanford staff razed the 76,000-square-feet facility near the Columbia River with no release of airborne beryllium. Removing large tanks and other equipment containing highly radioactive material from the 107-N facility continued to present challenges. The facility housed the filtration equipment for N Reactor's fuel storage basin. In FY05, PNNL identified and reviewed retrieval technologies. This work built on the evaluation criteria PNNL staff developed in FY04. In support of Bechtel Hanford's work to remediate and close the 618-7 burial ground, PNNL researchers evaluated remote technologies to characterize the waste drums as they are retrieved. One objective is to identify any drums containing Zircaloy, a zirconium alloy that can catch on fire when exposed to certain conditions. To assist in safely retrieving, treating, and disposing of spent nuclear fuel decladding waste in the 116-C-3 tank, PNNL identified and reviewed waste characterization, retrieval, and treatment technologies. This information was used by Bechtel Hanford staff as part of their engineering study of the situation.

Truex, Michael J.; Manke, Kristin L.

2005-12-15T23:59:59.000Z

240

SG Review Draft  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3/2010 3/2010 1 National Academy of Engineering - BMED December 2008 www.oe.energy.gov U.S. Department of Energy - 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 OE Peer Review Smart Grid R&D November 2-4, 2010 Eric Lightner Merrill Smith Dan Ton December 2008 Presentation Outline  OE Program Overview  Smart Grid Program Goals and Strategies  OE Programs Addressing Smart Grid Development - Recovery Act Programs - Smart Grid R&D Base Program  International Coordination 2 December 2008 (Dollars in Thousands) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2010 Appropriation to FY 2011 Request Appropriation Request House Mark Senate Mark Research and Development Clean Energy Transmission and Reliability 37,373 35,000 34,000 35,000 -2,373 +6% Smart Grid Research and Development* 31,541 39,293 34,872 39,293

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "7-year review fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Post Competition Accountability Report: Second Quarter, FY 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Post Competition Accountability Quarterly Report: High Performing Organization Proposal 2012Fiscal Years (FY) 2012–2016: Reporting Period: Second Quarter, FY 2013

242

Small Business Award Winners - FY 2011 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Small Business Award Winners - FY 2011 Small Business Award Winners - FY 2011 Each year, the Energy Department celebrates small business advocates who have advanced the role of...

243

Electric Markets Technical Assistance Program: FY1999 Grant Descriptio...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FY1999 Grant Descriptions and Contact Information Electric Markets Technical Assistance Program: FY1999 Grant Descriptions and Contact Information Public Benefits and Distributed...

244

Office of Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability FY 2012 Budget...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Office of Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability FY 2012 Budget Request Presentation Office of Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability FY 2012 Budget Request Presentation...

245

FY 2014 Budget Request Summary Table | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Summary Table FY 2014 Budget Request Summary Table Summary Table by Appropriations Summary Table by Organization More Documents & Publications FY 2014 Budget Justification Details...

246

FY 2007 Congressional Budget Request | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Laboratory Tables for the Department of Energy's 2007 Congressional budget. FY 2007 Congressional Budget Request More Documents & Publications Department of Energy FY 2007 Budget...

247

Post Competition Accountability Report: First Quarter, FY2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Post Competition Accountability Quarterly Report: High Performing Organization Proposal 2012Fiscal Years (FY) 2012 – 2016: Reporting Period: First Quarter, FY2013

248

FY 2007 FAIR ACT INVENTORY REASON CODES | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

07 FAIR ACT INVENTORY REASON CODES FY 2007 FAIR ACT INVENTORY REASON CODES FY 2007 FAIR ACT INVENTORY REASON CODES More Documents & Publications OFFICE OF PROCUREMENT &...

249

SNS Run Schedule for FY 2012 | ORNL Neutron Sciences  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Home Facilities SNS SNS Operating Status FY 2012 Run Schedule SNS Run Schedule for FY 2012 (Oct. 2011-Sep. 2012) Printable version Excel version SNS Run Schedule...

250

Post Competition Accountability Report: Third Quarter, FY 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Post Competition Accountability Quarterly Report: High Performing Organization Proposal 2012Fiscal Years (FY) 2012–2016: Reporting Period: Third Quarter, FY 2013

251

Attachment FY2011-75 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Attachment FY2011-75 Multiple-Award Contracts and Governmentwide Acquisition Contracts Including Delivery Orders and Task Orders Attachment FY2011-75 More Documents & Publications...

252

Attachment FY2011-75 OPAM | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OPAM Attachment FY2011-75 OPAM Federal Supply Schedules Attachment FY2011-75 OPAM More Documents & Publications Chapter 8 - Required Sources of Supplies and Services Attachment...

253

Office of Legacy Management FY 2010 Consolidated Energy Data...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Other Agencies You are here Home Office of Legacy Management FY 2010 Consolidated Energy Data Report (CEDR) Office of Legacy Management FY 2010 Consolidated Energy Data...

254

Office of Legacy Management FY 2009 Energy Management Data Report...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Administration Other Agencies You are here Home Office of Legacy Management FY 2009 Energy Management Data Report Office of Legacy Management FY 2009 Energy Management Data...

255

FY 2011 OIG Recovery Act Plan Overview | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FY 2011 OIG Recovery Act Plan Overview FY 2011 OIG Recovery Act Plan Overview The primary objective of the Office of Inspector General's oversight strategy involves the...

256

Activities and Accomplishments in MY 2005/FY 2006  

SciTech Connect

From vehicle acquisition and credit trading to exemptions and outreach activity, the Annual Report summarizes the State & Alternative Fuel Provider Activity's accomplishments during FY 2004/FY 2005.

Not Available

2006-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

257

FY 1974 program plan for geothermal project  

SciTech Connect

The Program Plan specifies the basic plan for the utilization of FY-74 funds allocated by the AEC Division of Applied Technology and contributions from other participants for the development of geothermal energy in southern Idaho. Funding priorities are dictated by the Construction Data Package submission deadline and the October 1, 1974, site selection. Tasks not funded during FY-74 will be pursued during FY-75. (auth)

1974-02-05T23:59:59.000Z

258

Electronics Engineering Research. Final report, FY 1979  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Accomplishments in Electronics Engineering Research (EER) during FY79 spanned a broad range of technologies, from high-speed microelectronics to digital image enhancement; from underground probing with electromagnetic waves to detecting neutrons with a small solid-state device; and from computer systems to aid engineers, to software tools to aid programmers. This report describes the overall EER program and its objectives, summarizes progress made in FY79, and outlines plans for FY80.

Weissenberger, S. (ed.)

1980-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

259

Exploratory research and development FY90  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In general, the Exploratory Research and Development (ER D) Program supports research projects considered too basic or long-range to be funded by other Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) programs. This Program is managed for the Laboratory Director by a special assistant who chairs the LLNL's IR D Review Committee. Membership in the Review Committee comprises senior LLNL scientists, engineers, and managers whose areas of expertise span the range of scientific disciplines pursued at the Laboratory. The research supported by the Program falls into three categories: Exploratory Research in the Disciplines, Director's Initiatives, and Laboratory-Wide Competition. The first two, Exploratory Research and Director's Initiatives, promote pioneering work in the various scientific disciplines and programmatic areas. Laboratory departments and divisions propose and manage projects in the Exploratory Research category. The Laboratory Director, with the advice of the Review Committee, selects several larger projects to fund as Director's Initiative. These projects, which are proposed and managed by the responsible associate director, are intended to enhance the scope of existing programs or establish new technical directions and programs for the Laboratory. All FY90 projects are described in detail in this report. Other publications on ER D projects are included in the Publications List at the back of this report.

Struble, G.L.; Middleton, C.; Baldwin, G.; Cherniak, J.; Clements, W.; Donohue, M.L.; Francke, A.; Kirvel, R.D.; MacGregor, P.; Shaw, G. (eds.)

1990-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

260

FY 2009 LDRD Report to Congress  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

LDRD Report to Congress LDRD Report to Congress Department of Energy Department of Energy FY 2009 Laboratory Directed Research and Development at the DOE National Laboratories Report to Congress April 2010 FY 2009 LDRD Report to Congress Department of Energy Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Table 1. LDRD, PDRD and SDRD Breakdown 1 1. Introduction 2 1.1 Background 2 1.2 Purpose of the Report 2 2. FY 2009 LDRD Program 3 2.1 Financial Information 3 2.1.1 LDRD Funding Mechanism 3 2.1.2 FY 2009 Expenditures 3 Table 2. Laboratory Costs and LDRD Costs 4

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "7-year review fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

NREL Photovoltaic Program FY 1994 bibliography  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report lists all published documents of the Photovoltaic Program for FY 1994. Documents include conference papers, journal articles, book chapters, patents, etc.

Not Available

1994-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

262

EM Quality Assurance Assessment Schedule FY 2010  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Attached for planning and coordination purposes is the updated Quality Assurance (QA) assessment schedule for the remainder of fiscal year (FY) 2010.

263

NREL Photovoltaic Program FY 1993 bibliography  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report lists all published documents of the Photovoltaic Program for FY 1993. Documents include conference papers, journal articles, book chapters, etc.

Pohle, L. [ed.

1994-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

264

The FY 2005 Budget Request  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 Budget Request 5 Budget Request Building on a Record of Success February 2, 2004 David Garman Assistant Secretary Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Building on a Record of Success Meeting Presidential Priorities Citizen Centered Affordable Energy Energy Security Climate Change Building on a Record of Success FY 2005 Budget Request * Supports Presidential commitment to strengthen energy security and enhance energy choices for all Americans while protecting the environment * Maintains FY 2004 request levels in budget constrained year * Builds upon and sustains a record of success * Research & Development (R&D) * Deployment * Management Building on a Record of Success Still EERE's Request Is ^ Priority Driven 1. Dramatically reduce or even end dependence on foreign oil

265

Photovoltaic Subcontract Program, FY 1991  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes the fiscal year (FY) 1991 (October 1, 1990, through September 30, 1991) progress of the subcontracted photovoltaic (PV) research and development (R D) performed under the Photovoltaic Advanced Research and Development Project at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) -- formerly the Solar Energy Research Institute (SERI). The mission of the national PV program is to develop PV technology for large-scale generation of economically competitive electric power in the United States. The technical sections of the report cover the main areas of the subcontract program: the Amorphous Silicon Research Project, Polycrystalline Thin Films, Crystalline Silicon Materials Research, High-Efficiency Concepts, the New Ideas Program, the University Participation Program, and the Photovoltaic Manufacturing Technology (PVMaT) project. Technical summaries of each of the subcontracted programs provide a discussion of approaches, major accomplishments in FY 1991, and future research directions.

Not Available

1992-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

266

Nevada Test Site-Directed Research and Development: FY 2006 Report  

SciTech Connect

The Nevada Test Site–Directed Research and Development (SDRD) program completed its fifth successful year of research and development activities in FY 2006. Forty new projects were selected for funding this year, and ten FY 2005 projects were brought to conclusion. The total funds expended by the SDRD program were $6 million, for an average per-project cost of $120 thousand. Beginning in May, 2006 programmatic burden rates were applied to SDRD project costs. An external audit conducted in September 2006 verified that appropriate accounting practices were applied to the SDRD program. Highlights for the year included: the filing of 27 invention disclosures for intellectual property generated by FY 2006 projects; programmatic adoption of four FY 2005 SDRD-developed technologies; participation in the tri-Lab Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) and SDRD program review that was broadly attended by NTS, NNSA, LDRD, and U.S. Department of Homeland Security representatives; peer reviews of all FY 2006 projects; and the successful completion of 50 R&D projects, as presented in this report.

Wil Lewis, editor

2007-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

267

CAES Annual Report FY 2011  

SciTech Connect

The Center for Advanced Energy Studies was created to lead research programs important to the nation, attract students and faculty to the Idaho universities and act as a catalyst for technology-based economic development. CAES is striving to meet those goals by continuing to develop its infrastructure and equipment capabilities, expand its research portfolio and bolster Idaho's energy workforce. This Annual Report details the progress CAES made in FY 2011 toward fulfilling its research, education and economic development missions.

Kortny Rolston

2011-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

268

CAES Annual Report FY 2011  

SciTech Connect

The Center for Advanced Energy Studies was created to lead research programs important to the nation, attract students and faculty to the Idaho universities and act as a catalyst for technology-based economic development. CAES is striving to meet those goals by continuing to develop its infrastructure and equipment capabilities, expand its research portfolio and bolster Idaho's energy workforce. This Annual Report details the progress CAES made in FY 2011 toward fulfilling its research, education and economic development missions.

Kortny Rolston

2011-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

269

Ethanol annual report FY 1990  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes the research progress and accomplishments of the US Department of Energy (DOE) Ethanol from Biomass Program, field managed by the Solar Energy Research Institute, during FY 1990. The report includes an overview of the entire program and summaries of individual research projects. These projects are grouped into the following subject areas: technoeconomic analysis; pretreatment; cellulose conversion; xylose fermentation; and lignin conversion. Individual papers have been indexed separately for inclusion on the data base.

Texeira, R.H.; Goodman, B.J. (eds.)

1991-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

270

Projects Not Reviewed: U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Systems for High Temperature, Low Relative Humidity Polymer-Type Membranes Andrew Herring Colorado School of Mines 640 | FY 2012 Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Report...

271

FY 1995 cost savings report  

SciTech Connect

Fiscal Year (FY) 1995 challenged us to dramatically reduce costs at Hanford. We began the year with an 8 percent reduction in our Environmental Management budget but at the same time were tasked with accomplishing additional workscope. This resulted in a Productivity Challenge whereby we took on more work at the beginning of the year than we had funding to complete. During the year, the Productivity Challenge actually grew to 23 percent because of recissions, Congressional budget reductions, and DOE Headquarters actions. We successfully met our FY 1995 Productivity Challenge through an aggressive cost reduction program that identified and eliminated unnecessary workscope and found ways to be more efficient. We reduced the size of the workforce, cut overhead expenses, eliminated paperwork, cancelled construction of new facilities, and reengineered our processes. We are proving we can get the job done better and for less money at Hanford. DOE`s drive to do it ``better, faster, cheaper`` has led us to look for more and larger partnerships with the private sector. The biggest will be privatization of Hanford`s Tank Waste Remediation System, which will turn liquid tank waste into glass logs for eventual disposal. We will also save millions of dollars and avoid the cost of replacing aging steam plants by contracting Hanford`s energy needs to a private company. Other privatization successes include the Hanford Mail Service, a spinoff of advanced technical training, low level mixed waste thermal treatment, and transfer of the Hanford Museums of Science and history to a private non-profit organization. Despite the rough roads and uncertainty we faced in FY 1995, less than 3 percent of our work fell behind schedule, while the work that was performed was completed with an 8.6 percent cost under-run. We not only met the FY 1995 productivity challenge, we also met our FY 1995-1998 savings commitments and accelerated some critical cleanup milestones. The challenges continue. Budgets remain on the decline, even while the expectations increase. Yet we are confident in our ability to keep our commitments and goals by identifying new efficiencies in the Hanford cleanup program. We will also pursue new contracting arrangements that will allow us to foster greater competition and use more commercial practices while maintaining our commitment to the safety and health of the public, our workers, and the environment.

Andrews-Smith, K.L., Westinghouse Hanford

1996-06-21T23:59:59.000Z

272

FY 2014 Budget Request for the Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Table showing the FY 2012 Current Appropriation, the FY 2013 Annualized Continuing Resolution, and the FY 2014 Congressional Request for the Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability.

273

FY 2013 Budget Request for the Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Table showing the FY 2011 Current Appropriation, the FY 2012 Enacted Appropriation, and the FY 2013 Congressional Request for the Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability.

274

Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program FY 2007  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Report on Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program FY 2007

Hansen, Todd C; editor, Todd C Hansen,

2008-03-12T23:59:59.000Z

275

House Report 109-272 FY 2006 Conference Report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

“Taken from House Report 109-272 FY 2006 Conference Report”… SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. TECHNOLOGY ADMINISTRATION. ...

2010-10-05T23:59:59.000Z

276

President's FY 2014 Budget Request for NIST Supports ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

President's FY 2014 Budget Request for NIST Supports Research in Advanced Manufacturing, Cybersecurity. For Immediate ...

2013-04-10T23:59:59.000Z

277

Transportation Treasury FY 2006 Appropriations 3.1 Percent ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

*. Bookmark and Share. “Taken from FY 2006 Transportation, Treasury.Appropriations Act… House Conference Report ...

2010-10-05T23:59:59.000Z

278

ITS RESCISSION Taken from the FY 2008 Omnibus ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

*. Bookmark and Share. ITS RESCISSION Taken from the FY 2008 Omnibus Appropriations bill… NATIONAL INSTITUTE ...

2010-10-05T23:59:59.000Z

279

FY 2006 Control Table by Appropriation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Appropriation Appropriation (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 Comparable Comparable Request to FY 2006 vs. FY 2005 Approp Approp Congress Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy supply.......................................................................... 794,897 932,319 902,674 -29,645 -3.2% Non-Defense site acceleration completion............................... 167,272 157,316 172,400 15,084 +9.6% Uranium enrichment D&D fund................................................ 414,027 495,015 591,498 96,483 +19.5% Non-Defense environmental services...................................... 307,795 288,966 177,534 -111,432 -38.6% Science.................................................................................... 3,536,373 3,599,546 3,462,718 -136,828 -3.8%

280

FY 2006 Summary Table by Organization  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Budget by Organization Budget by Organization (discretionary dollars in thousands) FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 Comparable Comparable Request to FY 2006 vs. FY 2005 Approp Approp Congress Discretionary Summary By Organization National Security Weapons............................................................... 6,447,159 6,583,350 6,630,133 +46,783 +0.7% Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation.......................... 1,367,709 1,422,103 1,637,239 +215,136 +15.1% Naval Reactors...................................................... 761,872 801,437 786,000 -15,437 -1.9% Office of the Administrator..................................... 352,949 357,051 343,869 -13,182 -3.7% Other Defense Activities......................................... -446 -- -- -- -- Total, National Nuclear Security Administration......... 8,929,243 9,163,941 9,397,241 +233,300 +2.5%

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "7-year review fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

FY 1996 Congressional budget request: Budget highlights  

SciTech Connect

The FY 1996 budget presentation is organized by the Department`s major business lines. An accompanying chart displays the request for new budget authority. The report compares the budget request for FY 1996 with the appropriated FY 1995 funding levels displayed on a comparable basis. The FY 1996 budget represents the first year of a five year plan in which the Department will reduce its spending by $15.8 billion in budget authority and by $14.1 billion in outlays. FY 1996 is a transition year as the Department embarks on its multiyear effort to do more with less. The Budget Highlights are presented by business line; however, the fifth business line, Economic Productivity, which is described in the Policy Overview section, cuts across multiple organizational missions, funding levels and activities and is therefore included in the discussion of the other four business lines.

Not Available

1995-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

282

FY 2015 | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Funding Opportunity Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) » FY 2015 Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) SBIR/STTR Home About Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) FY 2006-2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Applicant and Awardee Resources Commercialization Assistance Other Resources Awards SBIR/STTR Highlights Reporting Fraud Contact Information Small Business Innovation Research and Small Business Technology Transfer U.S. Department of Energy SC-29/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-5707 F: (301) 903-5488 E: sbir-sttr@science.doe.gov More Information » Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) FY 2015 Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Fiscal Year: FY06-12, FY13, FY14, FY15 Phase I

283

Transmission and distribution technologies: Program overview, FY 1993--FY 1994  

SciTech Connect

Electricity is the lifeblood of our Nation`s economy and a critical contributor to our standard of living. For decades, increases in the gross domestic product (GDP) have been accompanied by increases in electricity use. This overview provides the reader with an introduction to the US Department of Energy`s (DOE`s) T&D Technologies Program. It shows how the program is meeting the challenges being imposed on the T&D infrastructure by the changing electric power industry and how the Nation will benefit from its efforts. The overview describes the program`s ongoing projects and discusses the new projects being initiated in fiscal year (FY) 1995.

1995-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

284

Alternative Electrochemical Salt Waste Forms, Summary of FY2010 Results  

SciTech Connect

In FY2009, PNNL performed scoping studies to qualify two waste form candidates, tellurite (TeO2-based) glasses and halide minerals, for the electrochemical waste stream for further investigation. Both candidates showed promise with acceptable PCT release rates and effective incorporation of the 10% fission product waste stream. Both candidates received reprisal for FY2010 and were further investigated. At the beginning of FY2010, an in-depth literature review kicked off the tellurite glasses study. The review was aimed at ascertaining the state-of-the-art for chemical durability testing and mixed chloride incorporation for tellurite glasses. The literature review led the authors to 4 unique binary and 1 unique ternary systems for further investigation which include TeO2 plus the following: PbO, Al2O3-B2O3, WO3, P2O5, and ZnO. Each system was studied with and without a mixed chloride simulated electrochemical waste stream and the literature review provided the starting points for the baseline compositions as well as starting points for melting temperature, compatible crucible types, etc. The most promising glasses in each system were scaled up in production and were analyzed with the Product Consistency Test, a chemical durability test. Baseline and PCT glasses were analyzed to determine their state, i.e., amorphous, crystalline, phase separated, had undissolved material within the bulk, etc. Conclusions were made as well as the proposed direction for FY2011 plans. Sodalite was successfully synthesized by the sol-gel method. The vast majority of the dried sol-gel consisted of sodalite with small amounts of alumino-silicates and unreacted salt. Upon firing the powders made by sol-gel, the primary phase observed was sodalite with the addition of varying amounts of nepheline, carnegieite, lithium silicate, and lanthanide oxide. The amount of sodalite, nepheline, and carnegieite as well as the bulk density of the fired pellets varied with firing temperature, sol-gel process chemistry, and the amount of glass sintering aid added to the batch. As the firing temperature was increased from 850 C to 950 C, chloride volatility increased, the fraction of sodalite decreased, and the fractions nepheline and carnegieite increased. This indicates that the sodalite structure is not stable and begins to convert to nepheline and carnegieite under these conditions at 950 C. Density has opposite relationship with relation to firing temperature. The addition of a NBS-1, a glass sintering aid, had a positive effect on bulk density and increased the stability of the sodalite structure in a minimal way.

Riley, Brian J.; Rieck, Bennett T.; Crum, Jarrod V.; Matyas, Josef; McCloy, John S.; Sundaram, S. K.; Vienna, John D.

2010-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

285

FY 2012 Agency Financial Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

in order to provide performance, financial in order to provide performance, financial and related information in a more meaningful and useful format. The Department of Energy (Department or DOE), has chosen an alternative reporting to the consolidated Performance and Accountability Report and instead, produces an Agency Financial Report, an Annual Performance Report and a Summary of Performance and Financial Information, pursuant to the OMB Circular A-136. This reporting approach simplifies and streamlines the performance presentations while utilizing the Internet for providing and leveraging additional performance information. The Department's fiscal year (FY) 2012 reporting includes the following three components and will be available at the website below, as each component

286

FY 91 Annual Research Plan  

SciTech Connect

In line with the Federal Oil Research Program to maximize the economic producibility of the domestic oil resource, the National Institute for Petroleum and Energy Research (NIPER) presents this FY91 Annual Research Plan. NIPER is organized into two research departments -- Energy Production Research (EPR) and Fuels Research (FR). Projects in EPR deal with various aspects of enhanced oil recovery and include reservoir characterization, chemical flooding, gas injection, steam injection, microbial enhanced oil recovery, and the environmental concerns related to these processes. Projects in FR consider the impact of heavy oil and alternative fuels on the processing and end-use of fuels. Projects are briefly described.

Not Available

1990-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

287

Fossil Energy FY 2013 Budget-in-Brief | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FY 2013 Budget-in-Brief Fossil Energy FY 2013 Budget-in-Brief A brief synopsis of Fossil Energy's budget request for FY 2013. Fossil Energy FY 2013 Budget-in-Brief More Documents &...

288

Quarterly SSP Experiment Summary-FY13-4Q final ...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Quarter FY13Q1 FY13Q2 FY13Q3 FY13Q4 Dual Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test (DARHT) facility LANL Integrated or Focused non- nuclear weapons experiments DARHT captures high...

289

Environmental Systems Research and Analysis FY 2000 Annual Report  

SciTech Connect

The Environmental Systems Research (ESR) Program, a part of the Environmental Systems Research and Analysis (ESRA) Program, was implemented to enhance and augment the technical capabilities of the INEEL. Strengthening the Technical capabilities of the INEEL will provide the technical base to serve effectively as the Environmental Management Laboratory for the Office of Environmental Management (EM). This is a progress report for the third year of the ESR Program (FY 2000). A report of activities is presented for the five ESR research investment areas: (1) Transport Aspects of Selective Mass Transport Agents, (2) Chemistry of Environmental Surfaces, (3) Materials Dynamics, (4) Characterization Science, and (5) Computational Simulation of Mechanical and Chemical Systems. In addition to the five technical areas, the report describes activities in the Science and Technology Foundations element of the program, e.g., interfaces between ESR and the EM Science Program (EMSP) and the EM Focus Areas. The five research areas are subdivided into 18 research projects. FY 2000 research in these 18 projects has resulted in more than 50 technical papers that are in print, in press, in review, or in preparation. Additionally, more than 100 presentations were made at professional society meetings nationally and internationally. Work supported by this program was in part responsible for one of our researchers, Dr. Mason Harrup, receiving the Department of Energy’s “Bright Light” and “Energy at 23” awards. Significant accomplishments were achieved. Non-Destructive Assay hardware and software was deployed at the INEEL, enhancing the quality and efficiency of TRU waste characterization for shipment. The advanced tensiometer has been employed at numerous sites around the complex to determine hydrologic gradients in variably saturated vadose zones. An ion trap, secondary ion mass spectrometer (IT-SIMS) was designed and fabricated to deploy at the INEEL site to measure the chemical speciation of radionuclides and toxic metals on the surfaces of environmentally significant minerals. The FY 2001 program will have a significantly different structure and research content. This report presents the final summary of projects coming to an end in FY 2000 and is a bridge to the FY 2001 program.

David L. Miller; Castle, Peter Myer; Steven J. Piet

2001-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

290

FY 2005 Summary Table by Appropriation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OMB Scoring) OMB Scoring) FY 2003 Comparable Approp FY 2004 Comparable Approp FY 2005 Congress Request Energy and Water Development Energy Programs Energy supply.............................................................. 730,215 788,620 835,266 +46,646 +5.9% Non-Defense site acceleration completion.................... 156,129 162,411 151,850 -10,561 -6.5% Uranium enrichment D&D fund.................................... 320,563 414,027 500,200 +86,173 +20.8% Non-Defense environmental services........................... 161,852 306,439 291,296 -15,143 -4.9% Science....................................................................... 3,322,244 3,500,169

291

FY 2010 Service Contract Inventory Analysis  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 Service Contract Inventory Analysis 0 Service Contract Inventory Analysis Department of Energy Office of Procurement & Assistance Management Strategic Programs Division (MA-622) January 2012 (REVISED) FY2010 Service Contract Inventory Analysis Department of Energy Contents Page Section 1: Background 1 Section 2: Analysis and Findings 3 Section 3: Next Steps 5 FY2010 Service Contract Inventory Analysis Department of Energy 1 Section 1: Background Section 743 of Division C of the FY 2010 Consolidated Appropriations Act, P.L. 111-117, requires civilian agencies to prepare an annual inventory of their service contracts. The Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) November 5, 2010 and December 19, 2012 Memorandums entitled, "Service Contract

292

FY 2013 Control Table by Appropriation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Summary Control Table by Appropriation Summary Control Table by Appropriation (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Current Enacted Congressional Approp. Approp. * Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy efficiency and renewable energy......................................... 1,771,721 1,809,638 2,337,000 +527,362 +29.1% Electricity delivery and energy reliability.......................................... 138,170 139,103 143,015 +3,912 +2.8% Nuclear energy................................................................................ 717,817 765,391 770,445 +5,054 +0.7% Fossil energy programs Clean coal technology..................................................................

293

FY 2009 Control Table by Appropriation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Control Table by Appropriation Control Table by Appropriation (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Current Current Congressional Op. Plan Approp. Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy efficiency and renewable energy.......................... -- 1,722,407 1,255,393 -467,014 -27.1% Electricity delivery and energy reliability........................... -- 138,556 134,000 -4,556 -3.3% Nuclear energy.................................................................. -- 961,665 853,644 -108,021 -11.2% Legacy management........................................................ -- 33,872 -- -33,872 -100.0% Energy supply and Conservation...................................... 2,145,149 -- -- -- -- Fossil energy programs

294

PADS FY 2010 Annual Reports  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

A00 - SMALL BUSINESS 1,890 1,921,241,548 A00 - SMALL BUSINESS 1,890 1,921,241,548 B22 - LARGE BUSINESS 979 2,388,060,659 C0F - FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 478 388,669,688 C0L - LOCAL GOVT/MUNICIPALITY 2 125,000 C3N - NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION 24 282,357,286 C4N - SHELTERED WORKSHOP 1 831,263 E1N - FOREIGN CONTRACTOR 1 -16,921,324 I0E - EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION 9 4,970,555 8 UNIQUE VALUES 3,384 4,969,334,675 Geographic Distribution of FY 2010 Obligations to Non-Facilities Management Awards STATE NUMBER OF AWARDS FY 2010 OBLIGATIONS ALABAMA (AL) 12 2,445,191 ALASKA (AK) 5 3,073,629 ARIZONA (AZ) 96 8,732,671 ARKANSAS (AR) 17 3,142,515 CALIFORNIA (CA) 174 102,574,020 COLORADO (CO) 233 155,184,318 CONNECTICUT (CT) 24 3,663,352 DELAWARE (DE) 3 136,752 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (DC) 770 524,559,400

295

FY 2013 | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

13 13 Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) SBIR/STTR Home About Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) FY 2006-2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Applicant and Awardee Resources Commercialization Assistance Other Resources Awards SBIR/STTR Highlights Reporting Fraud Contact Information Small Business Innovation Research and Small Business Technology Transfer U.S. Department of Energy SC-29/Germantown Building 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 P: (301) 903-5707 F: (301) 903-5488 E: sbir-sttr@science.doe.gov More Information » Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) FY 2013 Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page Fiscal Year: FY06-12, FY13, FY14, FY15 Phase I Release 1 FOA CLOSED Release 2 FOA CLOSED Topics Issued Monday, July 16, 2012 Monday, October 29, 2012

296

ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT - FY 2013 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT - FY 2013 ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT - FY 2013 ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT - FY 2013 October 1, 2013 - 2:09pm Addthis ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT - FY 2013 ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT - FY 2013 ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT - FY 2013 ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT - FY 2013 ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT - FY 2013 ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT - FY 2013 In 2013 the program operated above the 6 year average and 6 year high, and participation increased by adding 13 new program locations. Southeastern Power Administration and its partners conducted 32 training events which directly impacted 855 trainees, and our outreach efforts promoted energy efficiency and renewable energy to an estimated 3505

297

ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT - FY 2013 | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT - FY 2013 ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT - FY 2013 ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT - FY 2013 October 1, 2013 - 2:09pm Addthis ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT - FY 2013 ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT - FY 2013 ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT - FY 2013 ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT - FY 2013 ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT - FY 2013 ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT - FY 2013 In 2013 the program operated above the 6 year average and 6 year high, and participation increased by adding 13 new program locations. Southeastern Power Administration and its partners conducted 32 training events which directly impacted 855 trainees, and our outreach efforts promoted energy efficiency and renewable energy to an estimated 3505

298

Biofuels Program Plan, FY 1992--FY 1996. Executive summary  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This five-year program plan describes the goals and philosophy of the US Department of Energy`s (DOE) Biofuels Systems Division (BSD) program and the BSD`s major research and development (R&D) activities for fiscal years (FY) 1992 through 1996. The plan represents a consensus among government and university researchers, fuel and automotive manufacturers, and current and potential users of alternative fuels and fuel additives produced from biomass. It defines the activities that are necessary to produce versatile, domestic, economical, renewable liquid fuels from biomass feedstocks. The BSD program focuses on the production of alternative liquid fuels for transportation-fuels such as ethanol, methanol, biodiesel, and fuel additives for reformulated gasoline. These fuels can be produced from many plant materials and from a significant portion of the wastes generated by municipalities and industry. Together these raw materials and wastes, or feedstocks, are called biomass.

Not Available

1993-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

299

FY 2011 Budget Justification | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Budget » FY 2011 Budget Justification Budget » FY 2011 Budget Justification FY 2011 Budget Justification The following documents reflect the FY 2011 Department of Energy's Budget Request to Congress: Summary Budget Documents Budget Highlights - A high-level narrative summarization of the Department's budget request Summary Table - A short summarization of the request by appropriation account and by first tier organization Control Tables - A longer summarization of the request at the decision unit level available in order by appropriation account or in first tier organization order Statistical Table - Shows the budget request at the level at which Congress controls our spending and is more detailed than the Control table Laboratory Table - Summarizes funding by decision unit and by the laboratories at which DOE does work

300

FY 2005 Budget Justification | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Budget » FY 2005 Budget Justification Budget » FY 2005 Budget Justification FY 2005 Budget Justification The following documents reflect the FY 2005 Department of Energy's Budget Request to Congress: Summary Budget Documents Budget Highlights - A high-level narrative summarization of the Department's budget request Summary Table - A short summarization of the request by appropriation account and by first tier organization Control Tables - A longer summarization of the request at the decision unit level available in order by appropriation account or in first tier organization order Statistical Table - Shows the budget request at the level at which Congress controls our spending and is more detailed than the Control table Laboratory Table - Summarizes funding by decision unit and by the laboratories at which DOE does work

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "7-year review fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

FY 2014 Budget Justification | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Budget » FY 2014 Budget Justification Budget » FY 2014 Budget Justification FY 2014 Budget Justification 2014 Funding History with link to the spreadsheet The following documents reflect the FY 2014 Department of Energy's Budget Request to Congress: Summary Budget Documents Budget Highlights - A high-level narrative summarization of the Department's budget request Summary Table - A short summarization of the request by appropriation account and by first tier organization Control Tables - A longer summarization of the request at the decision unit level available in order by appropriation account or in first tier organization order Statistical Table - Shows the budget request at the level at which Congress controls our spending and is more detailed than the Control table Laboratory Table - Summarizes funding by decision unit and by the

302

FY 2010 Budget Justification | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Budget » FY 2010 Budget Justification Budget » FY 2010 Budget Justification FY 2010 Budget Justification The following documents reflect the FY 2010 Department of Energy's Budget Request to Congress: Summary Budget Documents Budget Highlights - A high-level narrative summarization of the Department's budget request Summary Table - A short summarization of the request by appropriation account and by first tier organization Control Tables - A longer summarization of the request at the decision unit level available in order by appropriation account or in first tier organization order Statistical Table - Shows the budget request at the level at which Congress controls our spending and is more detailed than the Control table Laboratory Table - Summarizes funding by decision unit and by the laboratories at which DOE does work

303

FY 2010 Control Table by Appropriation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Control Table by Appropriation Control Table by Appropriation (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2009 FY 2010 Current Current Current Congressional Approp. Approp. Recovery Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy efficiency and renewable energy.......................................... 1,704,112 2,178,540 16,800,000 2,318,602 +140,062 +6.4% Electricity delivery and energy reliability............................................ 136,170 137,000 4,500,000 208,008 +71,008 +51.8% Nuclear energy................................................................................... 960,903 792,000 -- 761,274 -30,726 -3.9% Legacy management.......................................................................... 33,872 -- -- --

304

Policy Flashes FY 2012 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FY 2012 FY 2012 Policy Flashes FY 2012 Archive of Policy Flashes issued in FY 2012. Number Topic 2012-70 Department of Energy Federal Acquisition Regulation Clause Usage Guide 2012-69 DEAR Contract Clause Matrix 2012-68 Political Activity 2012-67 Acquisition Savings Reporting Guidance 2012-66 Attachment to Policy Flash on New Procedures for Submitting Clause or Template Changes 2012-65 Federal Acquisition Circular 61 2012-64 Contract Clause Matrix 2012-63 Update Department of Energy Acquisition Guide Chapter 22.1 Labor Standards 2012-62 Class Deviation DEAR 950.7006/AL 2012-10, Implementation of the Price-Anderson Act of 2005 2012-61 DOE COR Toolkit Recission 2012-60 Acquisition Guide Chapter 13.1, Purchase Card Policy and Operating Procedures 2012-59 Section 311 Revised Template August 2012

305

FY 2012 Control Table by Organization  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 Summary Control Table by Organization 2 Summary Control Table by Organization (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 Current Congressional Annualized Congressional Approp. Request CR Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Organization Department Of Energy By Organization National Nuclear Security Administration Weapons Activities * ............................................................................. 6,386,371 7,008,835 7,008,835 7,629,716 +620,881 +8.9% Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation * ...................................................... 2,131,382 2,687,167 2,136,709 2,549,492 -137,675 -5.1% Naval Reactors * ................................................................................... 945,133 1,070,486 945,133 1,153,662 +83,176 +7.8% Office of the Administrator * ................................................................. 410,754 448,267 410,754 450,060

306

FY 2008 LDRD Report to Congress  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 Report to Congress 8 Report to Congress Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) at the DOE National Laboratories (Report also available at http://www.mbe.doe.gov/cf1-2/ldrd.htm) March 2009 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 1. Introduction 5 1.1 Background 5 1.2 Purpose of the Report 5 2. FY 2008 LDRD Program 7 2.1 Financial Information 7 2.1.1 LDRD Funding Mechanism 7 2.1.2 FY 2008 Expenditures 7 2.1.3 FY 2008 LDRD Allocation Percentages 8 2.2 Workforce Development 9 2.3 LDRD and the Work for Others (WFO) Program 11 3. FY 2008 PDRD and SDRD Programs 13 3.1 Plant Directed Research and Development Programs 13 3.2 Site Directed Research and Development Program 13

307

FY 2009 Budget Justification | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Budget » FY 2009 Budget Justification Budget » FY 2009 Budget Justification FY 2009 Budget Justification The following documents reflect the FY 2009 Department of Energy's Budget Request to Congress: Summary Budget Documents Budget Highlights - A high-level narrative summarization of the Department's budget request Summary Table - A short summarization of the request by appropriation account and by first tier organization Control Tables - A longer summarization of the request at the decision unit level available in order by appropriation account or in first tier organization order Statistical Table - Shows the budget request at the level at which Congress controls our spending and is more detailed than the Control table Laboratory Table - Summarizes funding by decision unit and by the laboratories at which DOE does work

308

FY 2011 Statistical Table by Appropriation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Statistical Table by Appropriation Statistical Table by Appropriation (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2009 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 Current Current Current Congressional Approp. Recovery Approp. Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy efficiency and renewable energy........................................... 2,156,865 16,771,907 2,242,500 2,355,473 +112,973 +5.0% Electricity delivery and energy reliability............................................. 134,629 4,495,712 171,982 185,930 +13,948 +8.1% Nuclear energy................................................................................... 791,444 0 786,637 824,052 +37,415 +4.8% Fossil energy programs Clean coal technology..................................................................... 0 0 0 0

309

FY 2006 Budget Justification | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Budget » FY 2006 Budget Justification Budget » FY 2006 Budget Justification FY 2006 Budget Justification The following documents reflect the FY 2006 Department of Energy's Budget Request to Congress: Summary Budget Documents Budget Highlights - A high-level narrative summarization of the Department's budget request Summary Table - A short summarization of the request by appropriation account and by first tier organization Control Tables - A longer summarization of the request at the decision unit level available in order by appropriation account or in first tier organization order Statistical Table - Shows the budget request at the level at which Congress controls our spending and is more detailed than the Control table Laboratory Table - Summarizes funding by decision unit and by the laboratories at which DOE does work

310

FY 2013 Budget Justification | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Budget » FY 2013 Budget Justification Budget » FY 2013 Budget Justification FY 2013 Budget Justification The following documents reflect the FY 2013 Department of Energy's Budget Request to Congress: Summary Budget Documents Budget Highlights - A high-level narrative summarization of the Department's budget request Summary Table - A short summarization of the request by appropriation account and by first tier organization Control Tables - A longer summarization of the request at the decision unit level available in order by appropriation account or in first tier organization order Statistical Table - Shows the budget request at the level at which Congress controls our spending and is more detailed than the Control table Laboratory Table - Summarizes funding by decision unit and by the laboratories at which DOE does work

311

FY 2011 Control Table by Appropriation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Summary Control Table by Appropriation Summary Control Table by Appropriation (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2009 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 Current Current Current Congressional Approp. Recovery Approp. Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy efficiency and renewable energy........................................... 2,156,865 16,771,907 2,242,500 2,355,473 +112,973 +5.0% Electricity delivery and energy reliability............................................. 134,629 4,495,712 171,982 185,930 +13,948 +8.1% Nuclear energy................................................................................... 791,444 0 786,637 824,052 +37,415 +4.8% Fossil energy programs Clean coal technology..................................................................... 0 0 0 0

312

FY 2008 Budget Justification | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Budget » FY 2008 Budget Justification Budget » FY 2008 Budget Justification FY 2008 Budget Justification The following documents reflect the FY 2008 Department of Energy's Budget Request to Congress: Summary Budget Documents Budget Highlights - A high-level narrative summarization of the Department's budget request Summary Table - A short summarization of the request by appropriation account and by first tier organization Control Tables - A longer summarization of the request at the decision unit level available in order by appropriation account or in first tier organization order Statistical Table - Shows the budget request at the level at which Congress controls our spending and is more detailed than the Control table Laboratory Table - Summarizes funding by decision unit and by the laboratories at which DOE does work

313

Policy Flashes FY 2013 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Flashes FY 2013 Flashes FY 2013 Policy Flashes FY 2013 The following is a list of Policy Flashes issued by the Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy. These files are in PDF (Portable Document Files) format. To read PDF files you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available at no charge from Adobe (http://www.adobe.com/). If you have any questions concerning this list, please contact the Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy on (202) 287-1330. If a Policy Flash and/or attachment is in a different format than Adobe Acrobat, the format type will be noted after the number of the Flash. View the archive of Policy Flashes for FY 2012. Number Topic 2013-79 Professional and Consultant service costs (FAR 31.205-33) 2013-78 Acquisition Guide Chapter 7.3 Acquisition Planning in the M&O Enviroment

314

FY 2007 Budget Justification | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Budget » FY 2007 Budget Justification Budget » FY 2007 Budget Justification FY 2007 Budget Justification The following documents reflect the FY 2007 Department of Energy's Budget Request to Congress: Summary Budget Documents Budget Highlights - A high-level narrative summarization of the Department's budget request Summary Table - A short summarization of the request by appropriation account and by first tier organization Control Tables - A longer summarization of the request at the decision unit level available in order by appropriation account or in first tier organization order Statistical Table - Shows the budget request at the level at which Congress controls our spending and is more detailed than the Control table Laboratory Table - Summarizes funding by decision unit and by the laboratories at which DOE does work

315

FY 2005 Budget Justification | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Budget » FY 2005 Budget Justification Budget » FY 2005 Budget Justification FY 2005 Budget Justification The following documents reflect the FY 2005 Department of Energy's Budget Request to Congress: Summary Budget Documents Budget Highlights - A high-level narrative summarization of the Department's budget request Summary Table - A short summarization of the request by appropriation account and by first tier organization Control Tables - A longer summarization of the request at the decision unit level available in order by appropriation account or in first tier organization order Statistical Table - Shows the budget request at the level at which Congress controls our spending and is more detailed than the Control table Laboratory Table - Summarizes funding by decision unit and by the laboratories at which DOE does work

316

FY 2007 LDRD Report to Congress  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 Report to Congress 7 Report to Congress Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) at the DOE National Laboratories (Report also available at http://www.mbe.doe.gov/cf1-2/ldrd.htm) December 2007 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 1. Introduction 4 1.1 Background 4 1.2 Purpose of the Report 4 2. FY 2007 LDRD Program 6 2.1 Financial Information 6 2.1.1 LDRD Funding Mechanism 6 2.1.2 FY 2007 Expenditures 6 2.1.3 FY 2007 LDRD Allocation Percentages 7 2.2 Workforce Development 8 2.3 LDRD and the Work for Others (WFO) Program 10 3. FY 2007 PDRD and SDRD Programs 12 3.1 Plant Directed Research and Development Programs 12 3.2 Site Directed Research and Development Program 12

317

FY 2012 Budget Justification | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Budget » FY 2012 Budget Justification Budget » FY 2012 Budget Justification FY 2012 Budget Justification The following documents reflect the FY 2012 Department of Energy's Budget Request to Congress: Summary Budget Documents Budget Highlights - A high-level narrative summarization of the Department's budget request Summary Table - A short summarization of the request by appropriation account and by first tier organization Control Tables - A longer summarization of the request at the decision unit level available in order by appropriation account or in first tier organization order Statistical Table - Shows the budget request at the level at which Congress controls our spending and is more detailed than the Control table Laboratory Table - Summarizes funding by decision unit and by the laboratories at which DOE does work

318

FY14 Integrated Training Management Process  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

(TNA) For FY14 Complete By Send email to TPOCs confirming TNA point-of-contact March 27 Train designated LDTSTNA Team March 28 Annual TNA kick-offSend directional email (TNA...

319

FY 2011 Control Table by Organization  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 Summary Control Table by Organization 1 Summary Control Table by Organization (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2009 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 Current Current Current Congressional Approp. Recovery Approp. Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Organization National Security Weapons................................................................................................. 6,410,000 0 6,384,431 7,008,835 +624,404 +9.8% Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation........................................................... 1,545,071 0 2,136,709 2,687,167 +550,458 +25.8% Naval Reactors........................................................................................ 828,054 0 945,133 1,070,486 +125,353 +13.3% Office of the Administrator....................................................................... 439,190 0 410,754 448,267

320

FY 2006 LDRD Report to Congress  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Project ID FY Total Project Name Planning for a New Neutrino Experiment at a Nuclear Reactor PANL2005-160 116700 Femtosecond Pulses of Coherent Synchrotron Radiation from an...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "7-year review fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for Automotive  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5 Progress Report 5 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials on Digg Find More places to share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials on AddThis.com...

322

FY 2011 Annual Performance Report | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Performance Reports » FY 2011 Annual Performance Performance Reports » FY 2011 Annual Performance Report FY 2011 Annual Performance Report DOE's FY 2011 Annual Performance Report (APR) presents the performance results for fiscal year 2011 that contributed to the achievement of goals identified in the President's fiscal year 2011 budget. The performance measures in this report were initially outlined in the Department's FY 2011 Congressional Budget Request. After final congressional budget negotiations, some performance targets were revised to reflect changes in funding levels in enacted appropriations. DOE's FY 2011 Summary Report provides highlights of key financial and performance information that demonstrates DOE's accountability to ensure America's security and prosperity by addressing its energy,

323

Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for Advanced  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5 Progress Report 5 Progress Report for Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies on Digg Find More places to share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies on

324

Electric Markets Technical Assistance Program: FY1999 Grant Descriptions  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FY1999 Grant FY1999 Grant Descriptions and Contact Information Electric Markets Technical Assistance Program: FY1999 Grant Descriptions and Contact Information Public Benefits and Distributed Generation Outreach Project The National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) will hold collaborative workshops with key stakeholders to build consensus on effective policy options for emerging competitive distributed generation markets. FY1999 Grant Descriptions and Contact Information More Documents & Publications Electric Restructuring Outreach Activities and Information Dissemination to State Public Utility Regulators Electric Markets Technical Assistance Program: FY2001 Grant Descriptions and Contact Information Electric Markets Technical Assistance Program: FY2003 Grant Descriptions

325

Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2006 Progress Report for Advanced  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6 Progress Report 6 Progress Report for Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2006 Progress Report for Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2006 Progress Report for Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2006 Progress Report for Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2006 Progress Report for Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2006 Progress Report for Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies on Digg Find More places to share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2006 Progress Report for Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies on

326

Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2003 Progress Report for Automotive  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3 Progress Report 3 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2003 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2003 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2003 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2003 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2003 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials on Digg Find More places to share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2003 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials on AddThis.com...

327

Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2006 Progress Report for Automotive  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

6 Progress Report 6 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2006 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2006 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2006 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2006 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2006 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials on Digg Find More places to share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2006 Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials on AddThis.com...

328

Idaho National Laboratory Directed Research and Development FY-2009  

SciTech Connect

The FY 2009 Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Annual Report is a compendium of the diverse research performed to develop and ensure the INL's technical capabilities can support the future DOE missions and national research priorities. LDRD is essential to the INL - it provides a means for the laboratory to pursue novel scientific and engineering research in areas that are deemed too basic or risky for programmatic investments. This research enhances technical capabilities at the laboratory, providing scientific and engineering staff with opportunities for skill building and partnership development. Established by Congress in 1991, LDRD proves its benefit each year through new programs, intellectual property, patents, copyrights, publications, national and international awards, and new hires from the universities and industry, which helps refresh the scientific and engineering workforce. The benefits of INL's LDRD research are many as shown in the tables below. Last year, 91 faculty members from various universities contributed to LDRD research, along with 7 post docs and 64 students. Of the total invention disclosures submitted in FY 2009, 7 are attributable to LDRD research. Sixty three refereed journal articles were accepted or published, and 93 invited presentations were attributable to LDRD research conducted in FY 2009. The LDRD Program is administered in accordance with requirements set in DOE Order 413.2B, accompanying contractor requirements, and other DOE and federal requirements invoked through the INL contract. The LDRD Program is implemented in accordance with the annual INL LDRD Program Plan, which is approved by the DOE, Nuclear Energy Program Secretarial Office. This plan outlines the method the laboratory uses to develop its research portfolio, including peer and management reviews, and the use of other INL management systems to ensure quality, financial, safety, security and environmental requirements and risks are appropriately handled. The LDRD Program is assessed annually for both output and process efficiency to ensure the investment is providing expected returns on technical capability enhancement. The call for proposals and project selection process for the INL LDRD program begins typically in April, with preliminary budget allocations, and submittal of the technical requests for preproposals. A call for preproposals is made at this time as well, and the preparation of full proposals follows in June and closes in July. The technical and management review follows this, and the portfolio is submitted for DOE-ID concurrence in early September. Project initiation is in early October. The technical review process is independent of, and in addition to the management review. These review processes are very stringent and comprehensive, ensuring technical viability and suitable technical risk are encompassed within each project that is selected for funding. Each proposal is reviewed by two or three anonymous technical peers, and the reviews are consolidated into a cohesive commentary of the overall research based on criteria published in the call for proposals. A grade is assigned to the technical review and the review comments and grade are released back to the principal investigators and the managers interested in funding the proposals. Management criteria are published in the call for proposals, and management comments and selection results are available for principal investigator and other interested management as appropriate. The DOE Idaho Operations Office performs a final review and concurs on each project prior to project authorization, and on major scope/budget changes should they occur during the project's implementation. This report begins with several research highlights that exemplify the diversity of scientific and engineering research performed at the INL in FY 2009. Progress summaries for all projects are organized into sections reflecting the major areas of research focus at the INL. These sections begin with the DOE-NE Nuclear Science and Technology mission support area,

Not Available

2010-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

329

Idaho National Laboratory Directed Research and Development FY-2009  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The FY 2009 Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Annual Report is a compendium of the diverse research performed to develop and ensure the INL's technical capabilities can support the future DOE missions and national research priorities. LDRD is essential to the INL - it provides a means for the laboratory to pursue novel scientific and engineering research in areas that are deemed too basic or risky for programmatic investments. This research enhances technical capabilities at the laboratory, providing scientific and engineering staff with opportunities for skill building and partnership development. Established by Congress in 1991, LDRD proves its benefit each year through new programs, intellectual property, patents, copyrights, publications, national and international awards, and new hires from the universities and industry, which helps refresh the scientific and engineering workforce. The benefits of INL's LDRD research are many as shown in the tables below. Last year, 91 faculty members from various universities contributed to LDRD research, along with 7 post docs and 64 students. Of the total invention disclosures submitted in FY 2009, 7 are attributable to LDRD research. Sixty three refereed journal articles were accepted or published, and 93 invited presentations were attributable to LDRD research conducted in FY 2009. The LDRD Program is administered in accordance with requirements set in DOE Order 413.2B, accompanying contractor requirements, and other DOE and federal requirements invoked through the INL contract. The LDRD Program is implemented in accordance with the annual INL LDRD Program Plan, which is approved by the DOE, Nuclear Energy Program Secretarial Office. This plan outlines the method the laboratory uses to develop its research portfolio, including peer and management reviews, and the use of other INL management systems to ensure quality, financial, safety, security and environmental requirements and risks are appropriately handled. The LDRD Program is assessed annually for both output and process efficiency to ensure the investment is providing expected returns on technical capability enhancement. The call for proposals and project selection process for the INL LDRD program begins typically in April, with preliminary budget allocations, and submittal of the technical requests for preproposals. A call for preproposals is made at this time as well, and the preparation of full proposals follows in June and closes in July. The technical and management review follows this, and the portfolio is submitted for DOE-ID concurrence in early September. Project initiation is in early October. The technical review process is independent of, and in addition to the management review. These review processes are very stringent and comprehensive, ensuring technical viability and suitable technical risk are encompassed within each project that is selected for funding. Each proposal is reviewed by two or three anonymous technical peers, and the reviews are consolidated into a cohesive commentary of the overall research based on criteria published in the call for proposals. A grade is assigned to the technical review and the review comments and grade are released back to the principal investigators and the managers interested in funding the proposals. Management criteria are published in the call for proposals, and management comments and selection results are available for principal investigator and other interested management as appropriate. The DOE Idaho Operations Office performs a final review and concurs on each project prior to project authorization, and on major scope/budget changes should they occur during the project's implementation. This report begins with several research highlights that exemplify the diversity of scientific and engineering research performed at the INL in FY 2009. Progress summaries for all projects are organized into sections reflecting the major areas of research focus at the INL. These sections begin with the DOE-NE Nuclear Science and Technology mission support area,

Not Available

2010-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

330

Summary of Sandia research on metal tritides : FY 2007.  

SciTech Connect

Sandia National Laboratories has cradle to grave responsibility for all neutron generators in the US nuclear weapons stockpile. As such, much research effort is exerted to develop a comprehensive understanding of all the major components of a neutron generator. One of the key components is the tritium containing target. The target is a thin metal tritide film. Sandia's research into metal tritides began in the early 1960's with a collaboration with the Denver Research Institute (DRI) and continues to this day with a major in house research effort. This document is an attempt to briefly summarize what is known about the aging of erbium tritide and to review the major publications conducted at Sandia in FY 07. First, a review of our knowledge of helium in erbium tritide will be presented. Second, executive summaries of the six major SAND reports regarding neutron tube targets published in FY07 by Department 2735, the Applied Science and Technology Maturation Department, and research partners are presented.

Browning, James Frederick (Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN); Kammler, Daniel R.; Snow, Clark Sheldon; Ferrizz, Robert Matthew; Rodriguez, Mark Andrew; Wixom, Ryan R.; Espada, Loren I.

2008-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

331

Geosciences projects FY 1985 listing  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report, which updates the previous working group publication issued in February 1982, contains independent sections: (A) Summary Outline of DOE Geoscience and Related Studies, and (B) Crosscut of DOE Geoscience and Geoscience Related Studies. The FY 1985 funding levels for geoscience and related activities in each of the 11 programs within DOE are presented. The 11 programs fall under six DOE organizations: Energy Research Conservation and Renewable Energy; Fossil Energy; Defense Programs; Environmental, Safety, and Health; and Civilian radioactive Waste. From time to time, there is particular need for special interprogrammatic coordination within certain topical areas. section B of the report is intended to fill this need for a topical categorization of the Department's geoscience and related activities. These topical areas in Solid Earth Geosciences, Atmospheric Geosciences, Ocean Geosciences, Space and Solar/Terrestrial Geosciences, and Hydrological Geosciences are presented in this report.

Not Available

1986-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

332

Geosciences projects FY 1985 listing  

SciTech Connect

This report, which updates the previous working group publication issued in February 1982, contains independent sections: (A) Summary Outline of DOE Geoscience and Related Studies, and (B) Crosscut of DOE Geoscience and Geoscience Related Studies. The FY 1985 funding levels for geoscience and related activities in each of the 11 programs within DOE are presented. The 11 programs fall under six DOE organizations: Energy Research Conservation and Renewable Energy; Fossil Energy; Defense Programs; Environmental, Safety, and Health; and Civilian radioactive Waste. From time to time, there is particular need for special interprogrammatic coordination within certain topical areas. section B of the report is intended to fill this need for a topical categorization of the Department's geoscience and related activities. These topical areas in Solid Earth Geosciences, Atmospheric Geosciences, Ocean Geosciences, Space and Solar/Terrestrial Geosciences, and Hydrological Geosciences are presented in this report.

1986-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

333

FY08 VPP Program Evaluation  

SciTech Connect

The Voluntary Protection Program (VPP) is a recognized third-party certification of worker safety and health program excellence, based on industry best practices that focus on management leadership and employee involvement, as well as other safety and health program elements. This Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) VPP Program Evaluation is the FY-2008 report of the PNNL VPP Steering Committee regarding the status of VPP at PNNL. It is an update of the previous annual report dated January, 2007 and was completed in January 2008. An annual evaluation of the status of VPP is required of all sites that participate in the DOE-VPP. This report provides a detailed summary of the PNNL VPP Steering Committee’s evaluation of program performance and documents both strengths and improvement opportunities related to the various aspects of the VPP model.

Dossett, Sharon D.

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

334

Rotor testing in FY 1981  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The results and observation are summarized of flywheel spin tests conducted in the Oak Ridge Flywheel Evaluation Laboratory for the Mechanical Energy Storage Technology project at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). Two types of tests are discussed. The first is an ultimate speed test similar to those performed in FY 1980. It includes ultimate speed evaluations for a tapered, quasi-isotropic, graphite composite flywheel built by LLNL, a constant thickness disk with an SMC core and circumferentially wound graphite restraining ring built by Owens-Corning Fiberglas and Lord Kinematic Corporation, and a constant thickness disk with an S-glass, ..cap alpha..-ply layup core and circumferentially wound graphite ring built by General Electric. The second type of test is a cyclic fatigue test. A matching General Electric flywheel was used as the first test unit. Test results as well as general observations and conclusions are presented.

Steele, R.S. Jr.; Babelay, E.F. Jr.

1981-07-13T23:59:59.000Z

335

The FY 2006 Budget Request  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 Budget Request 6 Budget Request David Garman Assistant Secretary Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy February 7, 2005 FY 2006 Budget Request * Supports Presidential commitment to strengthen energy security and enhance energy choices for all Americans while protecting the environment * Builds upon and sustains a record of success ƒ Research & Development (R&D) ƒ Deployment ƒ Management * Continues trend of budget requests in the $1.2 billion range 2 Budget Request is Priority Driven 1. Dramatically reduce or even end dependence on foreign oil 2. Reduce the burden of energy prices on the disadvantaged 3. Increase the viability and deployment of renewable energy technologies 4. Increase the reliability and efficiency of electricity generation and use

336

ASCOT FY-1980 progress report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

An overview of the accomplishments of the DOE Atmospheric Studies in Complex Terrain (ASCOT) program during FY-1980 is presented. Fiscal Year 1980 was the second in a three to four year ASCOT study being conducted in The Geysers area of Northern California to achieve the following objectives: to augment the present knowledge of the physical mechanisms involved in the development, perpetuation, and breakup of nocturnal drainage flows; to develop an integrated measurement and modeling methodology to perform air quality impact assessment and control strategies for energy development in areas subject to drainage flows; and to provide the developed methodology with special applications to the H/sub 2/S emissions associated with The Geysers geothermal development. This year the focus of the work was on the major areas of reducing, analyzing and modeling data taken during the July 1979 field experiment within the Anderson Creek Valley at The Geysers and planning and executing a major field experiment in September 1980.

Dickerson, M.H.; Gudiksen, P.H.

1980-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

337

FY 1996 annual work plan  

SciTech Connect

In April 1994, the Department of Energy (DOE) Strategic Plan was issued. This Plan presents the Department`s strategic outlook in response to a changing world. It discusses the Department`s unique capabilities; its mission, vision, and core values; and key customer and stakeholder considerations. The DOE Strategic Plan lists business strategies and critical success factors which are intended to aid the Department in accomplishing its mission and reaching its vision of itself in the future. The Office of Inspector General (OIG) has an important role in carrying out the goals and objectives of the Secretary`s Strategic Plan. The ultimate goal of the OIG is to facilitate positive change by assisting its customers, responsible Government officials, in taking actions to improve programs and operations. The Inspector General annually issues his own Strategic Plan that contains program guidance for the next fiscal year. As part of its responsibility in carrying out the OIG mission, the Office of the Deputy Inspector General for Audit Services (Office of Audit Services) publishes an Annual Work Plan that sets forth audits that are planned for the next fiscal year. Selection of these audits is based on the overall budget of the Department, analyses of trends in Departmental operations, guidance contained in the agency`s strategic plans, statutory requirements, and the expressed needs and audit suggestions of Departmental program managers and OIG managers and staff. This work plan includes audits that are carried over from FY 1995 and audits scheduled to start during FY 1996. Audits included in the plan will be performed by OIG staff.

1995-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

338

FY  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of any other process for weather modification undertaken by the U.S. Department of Energy, or any of its constituents. Finalized 002 032808 032808 Direct Copies of...

339

FY11 Level-2 Milestone 3953: TLCC2 contract awarded  

SciTech Connect

This report documents completion of FY11 L2 milestone No.3953-TLCC2 contract award. This milestone was scheduled for completion on 3/31/11 and was completed on 4/14/11. There is a separate milestone (3856), due at the end of the fiscal year, concerned with installation of the first LLNL SU and early user access. Efforts related to this tri-lab L2 milestone started early in 2010 with the development of tri-lab requirements for the second ASC capacity system procurement. The SOW was then developed along with necessary RFP paperwork and sent to HQ/DOE for their review prior to being released. There was significant delay in getting this step completed which led to this milestone being put at risk for several months. However, once the RFP was approved and released we were able to get the procurement back on track with aggressive proposal response and review timelines.

Carnes, B

2011-09-12T23:59:59.000Z

340

Attachment FY2011-3(3) | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3) Attachment FY2011-3(3) Stripes Template for Interagency Agreement Attachment FY2011-3(3) More Documents & Publications AttachmentFlash2011-3(7).pdf ATTACHMENTFLASH2011-31AL2011-...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "7-year review fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Microsoft Word - FY08AnnualReport.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 8 Annual Procurement and Financial Assistance Report for FY 2008 Page 2 of 40 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction................................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Summary..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Highlights of Fiscal Year 2008 ................................................................................................................................................................... 5 FY 2008 Obligations to Facilities Management Contracts.........................................................................................................................

342

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: FY 2004 Financial Awards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

FY 2004 Financial FY 2004 Financial Awards to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: FY 2004 Financial Awards on Facebook Tweet about Fuel Cell Technologies Office: FY 2004 Financial Awards on Twitter Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: FY 2004 Financial Awards on Google Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: FY 2004 Financial Awards on Delicious Rank Fuel Cell Technologies Office: FY 2004 Financial Awards on Digg Find More places to share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: FY 2004 Financial Awards on AddThis.com... Current Opportunities Past Opportunities Recovery Act Selected Awards Requests for Information Related Opportunities Quick Links Hydrogen Production Hydrogen Delivery Hydrogen Storage Fuel Cells Technology Validation Manufacturing Codes & Standards Education

343

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: FY 2003 Financial Awards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Share this resource Send a link to Fuel Cell Technologies Office: FY 2003 Financial Awards to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: FY 2003 Financial Awards on...

344

Highlights of the FY 2011 Congressional Budget Request for OE  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The FY 2011 Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE) budget request is $185.9 million, $14.0 million more than the FY 2010 Appropriation, which reflects increased investments in...

345

Activities and Accomplishments in MY 2005/FY 2006  

SciTech Connect

From vehicle acquisition and credit trading to exemptions and outreach activity, the Annual Report summarizes the State & Alternative Fuel Provider Activity's accomplishments during FY 2004/FY 2005.

2006-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

346

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy FY 2014 Budget...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy FY 2014 Budget Rollout Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy FY 2014 Budget Rollout U.S. Department of Energy's Office...

347

Microsoft Word - FY09AnnualReportv1.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 9 Annual Procurement and Financial Assistance Report for FY 2009 Page 2 of 42 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction................................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Summary..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Highlights of Fiscal Year 2009 ................................................................................................................................................................... 5 FY 2009 Obligations to Facilities Management Contracts.........................................................................................................................

348

Attachment FY2011-31 OPAM | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 OPAM Attachment FY2011-31 OPAM attachment 3 flow chart of new 17.5 FAR Team update based on FAC2005-47 Dec 13, 2010 Attachment FY2011-31 OPAM More Documents & Publications...

349

EMSL Quarterly Highlights Report: 4th Quarter, FY08  

SciTech Connect

This report outlines the science highlights, publications, and other happenings at EMSL in 4th quarter of FY08.

Showalter, Mary Ann

2008-11-24T23:59:59.000Z

350

House Conference Report 108-401… FY 2004 Appropriations ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Taken from House Conference Report 108-401… FY 2004 Appropriations bill…Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2004. REPORT LANGUAGE. ...

2010-10-05T23:59:59.000Z

351

House Conference Report 108-401… FY 2004 Appropriations ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Taken from House Conference Report 108-401… FY 2004 Appropriations bill…Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2004. ...

2010-10-05T23:59:59.000Z

352

1st FY 2001 Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

“Taken from PL 107-38 1st FY 2001 Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act…”. An Act. Making emergency supplemental ...

2010-10-05T23:59:59.000Z

353

NIST Conference Report 108-792 FY 2005 Omnibus ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

“Taken from NIST Conference Report 108-792 FY 2005 Omnibus Appropriations Commerce, Justice, and State Appropriations…”. ...

2010-10-05T23:59:59.000Z

354

Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program FY 2007  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Chemical Sciences Division LDRD FY2007 Annual Report LB07006 Conversion of Glycerol and Aromatic Compounds from Biomass

editor, Todd C Hansen,

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

355

EMSL Quarterly Highlights Report: FY09, 3rd Quarter  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report outlines the science and publications that occurred at EMSL during the 3rd quarter of FY09.

Showalter, Mary Ann; Kathmann, Loel E.; Manke, Kristin L.; Wiley, Julie G.

2009-07-17T23:59:59.000Z

356

Microsoft Word - FY07AnnualReport.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 Annual Report (revised) - 1 - Created on 01/11/2008 7 Annual Report (revised) - 1 - Created on 01/11/2008 PROCUREMENT AND ASSISTANCE DATA SYSTEM (PADS) FISCAL YEAR 2007 ANNUAL REPORTS FY 2007 Obligations to Facilities Management Contracts......................................................................................................................... 2 FY 2007 Non-Facilities Management Awards and Obligations................................................................................................................. 4 FY 2007 Obligations to Non-Facilities Management Awards by Organization Type ............................................................................... 5 Geographic Distribution of FY 2007 Obligations to Non-Facilities Management Awards .......................................................................

357

Tanks Focus Area Site Needs Assessment FY 2000  

SciTech Connect

This document summarizes the Tanks Focus Area (TFA's) process of collecting, analyzing, and responding to high-level radioactive tank waste science and technology needs developed from across the DOE complex in FY 2000. The document also summarizes each science and technology need, and provides an initial prioritization of TFA's projected work scope for FY 2001 and FY 2002.

Allen, Robert W.

2000-03-10T23:59:59.000Z

358

Nevada Test Site-Directed Research and Development, FY 2007 Report  

SciTech Connect

The Nevada Test Site-Directed Research and Development (SDRD) program completed a very successful year of research and development activities in FY 2007. Twenty-nine new projects were selected for funding this year, and eight projects started in FY 2006 were brought to conclusion. The total funds expended by the SDRD program were $5.67 million, for an average per-project cost of $153 thousand. An external audit conducted in September 2007 verified that appropriate accounting practices were applied to the SDRD program. Highlights for the year included: programmatic adoption of 8 SDRD-developed technologies; the filing of 9 invention disclosures for innovation evolving from SDRD projects; participation in the tri-Lab Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) and SDRD Symposium that was broadly attended by Nevada Test Site (NTS), National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), LDRD, U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) representatives; peer reviews of all FY 2007 projects; and the successful completion of 37 R&D projects, as presented in this report. In response to a company-wide call, authors throughout the NTS complex submitted 182 proposals for FY 2007 SDRD projects. The SDRD program has seen a dramatic increase in the yearly total of submitted proposals--from 69 in FY 2002 to 182 this year--while the number of projects funded has actually decreased from a program high of 57 in FY 2004. The overall effect of this trend has helped ensure an increasingly competitive program that benefited from a broader set of innovative ideas, making project selection both challenging and rewarding. Proposals were evaluated for technical merit, including such factors as innovation, probability of success, potential benefit, and mission applicability. Authors and reviewers benefited from the use of a shortfalls list entitled the 'NTS Technology Needs Assessment' that was compiled from NTS, National Weapons Laboratory (NWL), and NNSA sources. This tool continues to be of considerable value in aligning the SDRD program with mission priorities, and was expanded in FY 2007 to include technology development needs from the DHS and other agencies with missions closely aligned to that of the NTS.

Wil Lewis, editor

2008-02-20T23:59:59.000Z

359

Review  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

review of the Phase I DP for the West Valley Demonstration Project, Rev. I (Reference 1). DOE submitted responses to the other 38 of the 44 RAIs to NRC on August 13, 2009 (Reference 3). Enclosed are 20 paper copies of the RAI response package along with 20 compact disks. Each compact disk contains an electronic copy of the six RAI responses and two calculationQ t Dr. Keith 1. McConnell-3- September 16, 2009 For Further Information Please note that DOE's RAI responses and the proposed decommissioning approach are based on the preferred alternative in the Revised Draft Environmental Impact Statement for

unknown authors

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

360

FTCP FY 2011 Operational Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

N N N o o v v e e m m b b e e r r 2 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 U U . . S S . . D D E E P P A A R R T T M M E E N N T T O O F F E E N N E E R R G G Y Y F F E E D D E E R R A A L L T T E E C C H H N N I I C C A A L L C C A A P P A A B B I I L L I I T T Y Y P P R R O O G G R R A A M M F F Y Y 2 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 O O P P E E R R A A T T I I O O N N A A L L P P L L A A N N Federal Technical Capability Program FY 2011 Operational Plan November 2010 1 The objective of the Federal Technical Capability Program is to recruit, deploy, develop, and retain Federal personnel with the necessary technical capabilities to safely accomplish the Department's missions and responsibilities. The Department has identified guiding principles to accomplish that objective and identified four general functions of the Federal Technical Capability Program. The guiding principles are: ï‚· Federal personnel possess the experience, knowledge, skills, and abilities that are

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "7-year review fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

FY 2008 Annual Performance Report  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Hyd Hyd rog en Tan k Res earc h, LLN L PH EN IX Ex pe rim en t, BN L Fu el Ce ll Re sea rch , AN L Ca rb on Se qu es tra tio n Re se ar ch , PN NL Hi gh Ex pl os iv es Ap pl ic at io ns Fa ci lit y, LL NL Com put er Sim ulat ion The ater , LAN L Al ga e Re se ar ch , NR EL Ad va nc ed Bio fue ls Re se arc h, LB NL T ra in in g Nuc lear Mat eria ls Sto rag e, SRS C o a l G a s if ic a ti o n R e s e a rc h , P N N L Cli ma te Mo de lin g, OR NL AnnuAl PerformAnce rePort fY 2008 Table of Contents Introduction....................................................................................................................................1 Performance Summary Scorecard..................................................................................................2 Department Performance ...............................................................................................................4

362

FTCP FY 2009 Operational Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

N N o o v v e e m m b b e e r r 2 2 0 0 0 0 8 8 U U . . S S . . D D E E P P A A R R T T M M E E N N T T O O F F E E N N E E R R G G Y Y F F E E D D E E R R A A L L T T E E C C H H N N I I C C A A L L C C A A P P A A B B I I L L I I T T Y Y P P R R O O G G R R A A M M F F Y Y 2 2 0 0 0 0 9 9 O O P P E E R R A A T T I I O O N N A A L L P P L L A A N N Federal Technical Capability Program FY 2009 Operational Plan November 2008 1 The objective of the Federal Technical Capability Program is to recruit, deploy, develop, and retain Federal personnel with the necessary technical capabilities to safely accomplish the Department's missions and responsibilities. The Department has identified guiding principles to accomplish that objective and identified four general functions of the Federal Technical Capability Program. The guiding principles are: * Federal personnel possess the experience, knowledge, skills, and abilities that are

363

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2010 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2010 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2010 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2011 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2010

364

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2011 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2011 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2010 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011

365

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2013 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 3 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2013 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2013 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2011 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2010

366

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2009 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Fourth Quarter Fourth Quarter FY2009 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2009 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2009 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2010 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2010

367

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Fourth Quarter Fourth Quarter FY2011 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012

368

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

First Quarter First Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012

369

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2012

370

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Second Quarter Second Quarter FY2011 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2011 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2011 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2010

371

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012

372

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 2 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2012 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2012 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2011 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012

373

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2009 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

09 09 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2009 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2009 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2010 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2010 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2010

374

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2010 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

0 0 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2010 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2010 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2010 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2009

375

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2011 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2011 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2010 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2011

376

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Second Quarter Second Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Second Quarter FY2012 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012

377

FY 2013 Control Table by Organization  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 Summary Control Table by Organization 3 Summary Control Table by Organization (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Current Enacted Congressional Approp. Approp. * Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Organization Department Of Energy By Organization National Nuclear Security Administration Weapons Activities.............................................................................. 6,865,775 7,214,120 7,577,341 +363,221 +5.0% Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation........................................................ 2,281,371 2,295,880 2,458,631 +162,751 +7.1% Naval Reactors.................................................................................... 985,526 1,080,000 1,088,635 +8,635 +0.8% Office of the Administrator................................................................... 393,293 410,000 411,279

378

FY 2007 Control Table by Organization  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Control Table by Organization Control Table by Organization (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Current Current Congressional Approp. Approp. Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Organization National Security Weapons................................................................................. 6,625,542 6,369,597 6,407,889 +38,292 +0.6% Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation.......................................... 1,507,966 1,614,839 1,726,213 +111,374 +6.9% Naval Reactors........................................................................ 801,437 781,605 795,133 +13,528 +1.7% Office of the Administrator...................................................... 363,350 338,450 386,576 +48,126 +14.2% Total, National Nuclear Security Administration........................ 9,298,295 9,104,491

379

FY 2009 Control Table by Organization  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 Control Table by Organization 9 Control Table by Organization (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Current Current Congressional Op. Plan Approp. Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Organization National Security Weapons................................................................................. 6,258,583 6,297,466 6,618,079 +320,613 +5.1% Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation........................................... 1,824,202 1,335,996 1,247,048 -88,948 -6.7% Naval Reactors....................................................................... 781,800 774,686 828,054 +53,368 +6.9% Office of the Administrator...................................................... 358,291 402,137 404,081 +1,944 +0.5% Total, National Nuclear Security Administration.......................

380

FY 2011 LDRD Report to Congress  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FY 2011 Report to Congress FY 2011 Report to Congress Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) at the DOE National Laboratories For additional information on the Department's Laboratory Directed Research and Development program, please see the Office of Science website: http://science.energy.gov/lpe/laboratory-directed-research-and-development/ or the National Nuclear Security Administration website: http://tri-lab.lanl.gov/ Formally, this Report responds to the Conference Report (H.R. Rep. No. 106-988 (Conf. Rep.)) accompanying the Fiscal Year (FY) 2001 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, which requested the DOE Chief Financial Officer "develop and execute a financial accounting report of LDRD expenditures by laboratory and weapons production plant." It also responds to the National Defense

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "7-year review fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

FY 2008 Control Table by Appriopriation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Control Table by Appropriation Control Table by Appropriation (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 Current Congressional Congressional Approp. Request Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy supply and Conservation..................................... 1,812,397 1,923,361 2,187,943 +264,582 +13.8% Fossil energy programs Clean coal technology................................................... -20,000 -- -58,000 -58,000 N/A Fossil energy research and development..................... 580,669 469,686 566,801 +97,115 +20.7% Naval petroleum and oil shale reserves........................ 21,285 18,810 17,301 -1,509 -8.0% Elk Hills school lands fund............................................

382

FY 2009 Performance Goals Artificial Retina Project  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

FY 2009 Performance Goals FY 2009 Performance Goals 2009 Annual Goal: Advance blind patient sight. FY09: Complete in vitro/benchtop development of implantable 200+ electrode prototype. 2009 Annual Goal Met: The bench-top development of an implantable 200+ electrode prototype has been completed. All the components of the 200+ electrode prototype have been integrated and characterized. Performance Goal/Annual Target Quarter Quarter Goal Quarterly Results: Yes or No? 1st Quarter Build electronics module for implantable active A-200+ system Goal Met. The electronics module for an implantable active A-200+ system was assembled and tested. It is a key component required to fabricate the active A-200+ prototype system. 2nd Quarter Complete fabrication of active A - 200+ Prototype system

383

FY 2007 Control Table by Appropriation  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Control Table by Appropriation Control Table by Appropriation (dollars in thousands - OMB Scoring) FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Current Current Congressional Approp. Approp. Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Energy supply and Conservation......................................... 1,801,815 1,812,627 1,923,361 +110,734 +6.1% Fossil energy programs Clean coal technology....................................................... -160,000 -20,000 -- +20,000 +100.0% Fossil energy research and development........................ 560,852 592,014 469,686 -122,328 -20.7% Naval petroleum and oil shale reserves........................... 17,750 21,285 18,810 -2,475 -11.6% Elk Hills school lands fund................................................

384

Annual Performance Report FY 2004 Annual Performance Plan FY...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reports Calendar Year Reports Recovery Act Peer Reviews DOE Directives Performance Strategic Plan Testimony Financial Statements Semiannual Reports Work Plan Mission About Us...

385

Argonne National Laboratory institutional plan FY 2002 - FY 2007.  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The national laboratory system provides a unique resource for addressing the national needs inherent in the mission of the Department of Energy. Argonne, which grew out of Enrico Fermi's pioneering work on the development of nuclear power, was the first national laboratory and, in many ways, has set the standard for those that followed. As the Laboratory's new director, I am pleased to present the Argonne National Laboratory Institutional Plan for FY 2002 through FY 2007 on behalf of the extraordinary group of scientists, engineers, technicians, administrators, and others who are responsible for the Laboratory's distinguished record of achievement. Like our sister DOE laboratories, Argonne uses a multifaceted approach to advance U.S. R and D priorities. First, we assemble interdisciplinary teams of scientists and engineers to address complex problems. For example, our initiative in Functional Genomics will bring together biologists, computer scientists, environmental scientists, and staff of the Advanced Photon Source to develop complete maps of cellular function. Second, we cultivate specific core competencies in science and technology; this Institutional Plan discusses the many ways in which our core competencies support DOE's four mission areas. Third, we serve the scientific community by designing, building, and operating world-class user facilities, such as the Advanced Photon Source, the Intense Pulsed Neutron Source, and the Argonne Tandem-Linac Accelerator System. This Plan summarizes the visions, missions, and strategic plans for the Laboratory's existing major user facilities, and it explains our approach to the planned Rare Isotope Accelerator. Fourth, we help develop the next generation of scientists and engineers through educational programs, many of which involve bright young people in research. This Plan summarizes our vision, objectives, and strategies in the education area, and it gives statistics on student and faculty participation. Finally, we collaborate with other national laboratories, academia, and industry, both on scientific and engineering research and on the construction of major research facilities, such as the Spallation Neutron Source. This Plan describes some of the important collaborations currently under way. For more than 55 years, the University of Chicago has, as a public service, managed and operated Argonne under contract to the federal government. As a result, the Laboratory's research environment and performance have maintained a high standard of intellectual excellence and integrity, and the site--despite its age--is among the best maintained in the DOE complex. Currently, the University and Laboratory are strengthening their mutual ties at all levels, from student research and individual-investigator collaborations to joint appointments and strategic alliances. The Laboratory has also benefited greatly from its excellent relations with the state of Illinois, whose taxpayers have generously supported many scientific programs and facilities at Argonne. Because Argonne is a publicly funded institution operating under a performance-based contract, it is incumbent on us to conduct all our work and operate all our facilities cost-effectively and with distinction, while we maintain exemplary relations with the public (especially neighbors near the Illinois and Idaho sites); give the highest priority to the safety and health of our personnel and others on and near our site; protect the environment; and effectively implement security, counterintelligence, and export control measures. Our performance and plans in these areas are also discussed in this Plan.

Beggs, S. D.

2001-11-29T23:59:59.000Z

386

The PNNL Lab Homes Experimental Plan, FY12?FY15  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The PNNL lab homes (http://labhomes.pnnl.gov/ ) are two manufactured homes recently installed immediately south of the 6th Street Warehouse on the PNNL Richland, WA campus that will serve as a project test bed for DOE, PNNL and its research partners who aim to achieve highly energy efficient and grid-responsive homes. The PNNL Lab Homes project is the first of its kind in the Pacific Northwest region. The Energy & Environment Directorate at PNNL, working with multiple sponsors, will use the identical 1,500 square-foot homes for experiments focused on reducing energy use and peak demand. Research and demonstration primarily will focus on retrofit technologies, and the homes will offer a unique, side-by-side ability to test and compare new ideas and approaches that are applicable to site-built as well as manufactured homes. The test plan has the following objectives: • To define a retrofit solution packages for moderate to cold climates that can be cost effectively deployed in the Pacific NW to save 50% of the energy needs of a typical home while enhancing the comfort and indoor air quality. The retrofit strategies would also lower the peak demands on the grid. • To leverage the unique opportunity in the lab homes to reach out to researchers, industry, and other interested parties in the building science community to collaborate on new smart and efficient solutions for residential retrofits. • To increase PNNL’s visibility in the area of buildings energy efficiency based on the communication strategy and presentation of the unique and impactful data generated in the lab homes. This document describes the proposed test plan for the lab homes to achieve these goals, through FY15. The subsequent sections will provide a brief description of each proposed experiment, summarize the timing of the experiment (including any experiments that may be run in parallel, and propose potential contributors and collaborators. For those experiments with funding information available, it is provided.

Widder, Sarah H.; Parker, Graham B.; Baechler, Michael C.

2012-05-30T23:59:59.000Z

387

2012 CERTS Transmission Reliability R&D Internal Program Review...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FY12 DOE - CERTS Transmission Reliability R&D Internal Program Review June 12-13, 2012 LBNL Project Office 901 D St., SW Washington DC Nancy Lewis' cell: 510.918.3155 Revised...

388

Internal Program Review  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Synchrophasor Initiative (NASPI) and Synchrophasor Initiative (NASPI) and Advanced Applications Research & Development (AARD) Internal Program Review 27-28 June 2013 Washington, DC Joe Eto Lawrence Berkeley National Lab DOE/OE Transmission Reliability Program 2 Management Review Topics  Project objective  Major technical accomplishments that will be completed this year  Deliverables and schedule for activities to be completed under FY13 funding  Risk factors affecting timely completion of planned activities as well as movement through RD&D cycle  Early thoughts on follow-on work that should be considered for funding in FY14 3 Management Review Issues  RD&D stage of the project: - Theoretical study-proof of concept - Modeling/simulation-using real data?

389

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: FY 2009 Financial Awards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Financial Opportunities Financial Opportunities Printable Version Share this resource Send a link to Fuel Cell Technologies Office: FY 2009 Financial Awards to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: FY 2009 Financial Awards on Facebook Tweet about Fuel Cell Technologies Office: FY 2009 Financial Awards on Twitter Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: FY 2009 Financial Awards on Google Bookmark Fuel Cell Technologies Office: FY 2009 Financial Awards on Delicious Rank Fuel Cell Technologies Office: FY 2009 Financial Awards on Digg Find More places to share Fuel Cell Technologies Office: FY 2009 Financial Awards on AddThis.com... Current Opportunities Past Opportunities Recovery Act Selected Awards Requests for Information Related Opportunities Quick Links Hydrogen Production

390

Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability FY 2010 Budget |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FY 2010 FY 2010 Budget Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability FY 2010 Budget The FY 2010 Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE) budget request is $208.0 million, $71.0 million more than the FY 2009 Appropriation. This increase reflects increased investments in research and development, particularly in energy storage, smart grid technologies, and cyber security areas. OE will also establish one of the Department's multi-disciplinary Energy Innovation Hubs (Hubs) that specifically focuses on Grid Materials, Devices, and Systems. The FY 2010 budget proposes a budget structure change to better align with the Department's priorities to establish a clean, secure energy future. Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability FY 2010 Budget

391

FY 2014 Budget Request Now Available | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FY 2014 Budget Request Now Available FY 2014 Budget Request Now Available FY 2014 Budget Request Now Available April 10, 2013 - 5:20pm Addthis The Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability's (OE) FY 2014 budget request represents an increased investment in the continued commitment to help keep America's energy flowing, promote economic prosperity, and move the nation closer to a cleaner and more secure energy future. Highlights of OE's FY2014 budget request, and Assistant Secretary Patricia Hoffman's presentation on the budget request are also available online. For more information, click here. The entire FY 2014 budget request for the Department of Energy is also available online. For highlights of the Department's FY 2014 budget request, read the press release. Addthis Related Articles

392

FY2006SmallBusinessReport.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT TO THE SECRETARY SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2006 Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION Page 3 II. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE) MISSION Page 3 III. OFFICE of SMALL and DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS UTILIZATION (OSDBU) Page 3 IV. LAWS & REGULATIONS Page 3 V. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY BUSINESS MODEL Page 4 A. Facility Management Contractors (FMC) B. Non-FMCs VI. SMALL BUSINESS GOALS Page 5 A. Government Statutory Goals B. FY 2006 DOE Negotiated Goals VII. PRIME CONTRACT SMALL BUSINESS ACHIEVEMENTS Page 7 A. 8(a) and Small & Disadvantaged Business (SDB) B. Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB) C. HUBZone Small Business

393

Budget highlights. FY 1979 budget to Congress  

SciTech Connect

The DOE budget for FY 1979 is described for the following mission areas: energy supply (research and technology development), energy supply (production, demonstration, and distribution), conservation, regulation, emergency preparedness, energy information, environment, basic sciences, atomic energy defense activities, and policy and management. This budget totals $12.6 billion in budget authority and $10 billion in outlays. These figures are a 22% increase in budget authority and 14% increase in outlays over the FY 1978 funding of DOE's constituent agencies. Increases center primarily on the conservation, emergency preparedness, regulation, and energy information missions. The first part of the report is descriptive; the second half consists in statistical information. (RWR)

1978-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

394

Sales of Fossil Fuels Produced from Federal and Indian Lands, FY 2003 through FY 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Sales of Fossil Fuels Produced Sales of Fossil Fuels Produced from Federal and Indian Lands, FY 2003 through FY 2011 March 2012 Independent Statistics & Analysis www.eia.gov U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 U.S. Energy Information Administration | Sales of Fossil Fuels Produced on Federal and Indian Lands, FY 2003 through FY 2011 i This report was prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy. By law, EIA's data, analyses, and forecasts are independent of approval by any other officer or employee of the United States Government. The views in this report therefore should not be construed as representing those of the Department of Energy or

395

Sales of Fossil Fuels Produced from Federal and Indian Lands, FY 2003 through FY 2012  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

2 2 May 2013 Independent Statistics & Analysis www.eia.gov U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 U.S. Energy Information Administration | Sales of Fossil Fuels Produced on Federal and Indian Lands, FY 2003 through FY 2012 ii This report was prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy. By law, EIA's data, analyses, and forecasts are independent of approval by any other officer or employee of the United States Government. The views in this report therefore should not be construed as representing those of the Department of Energy or other federal agencies. May 2013 U.S. Energy Information Administration | Sales of Fossil Fuels Produced on Federal and Indian Lands, FY 2003 through FY 2012 1

396

Sales of Fossil Fuels Produced from Federal and Indian Lands, FY 2003 through FY 2011  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1 1 March 2012 Independent Statistics & Analysis www.eia.gov U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 U.S. Energy Information Administration | Sales of Fossil Fuels Produced on Federal and Indian Lands, FY 2003 through FY 2011 i This report was prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy. By law, EIA's data, analyses, and forecasts are independent of approval by any other officer or employee of the United States Government. The views in this report therefore should not be construed as representing those of the Department of Energy or other Federal agencies. March 2012 U.S. Energy Information Administration | Sales of Fossil Fuels Produced on Federal and Indian Lands, FY 2003 through FY 2011 1

397

FY 2008 & FY 2009 Proposed Loan Guarantee Solicitation Implementation Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FY 2008 Implementation Plan FY 2008 Implementation Plan Loan Guarantee Program Title XVII, Energy Policy Act of 2005 Prepared pursuant to the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008 Loan Guarantee Program Office Office of the Chief Financial Officer U.S. Department of Energy April 2008 This Loan Guarantee Program Implementation Plan for FY 2008 is being submitted by the U.S. Department of Energy ("DOE") to the Congressional Appropriations Committees, pursuant to the requirements of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008, Pub. L. No. 110-161 (2007) ("FY 2008 Appropriations Act"). That Act requires DOE to submit to the Congressional Appropriations Committees, at least 45 days prior to "execution of a new solicitation" under the loan guarantee program authorized by Title

398

FY 1999 Saltcake Dissolution Workshop  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

During the FY 1998 Saltcake Dissolution Workshop, participants identified nine tasks to be performed prior to the FY 1999 workshop. Discussions during the workshop indicated that significant progress was made in each area. The workshop focused on the strengths and weaknesses of the Environmental Simulation Program (ESP). In addition, the ESP predictions for the Tank SY-101 remediation and the ESP validation efforts were evaluated. Finally, the need for a broader user base was identified. At the request of the Tank Waste Remediation System (TWRS), the ESP model was successfully utilized to predict the effects of Hanford tank farm operations such as waste transfers and water dilutions. The ESP model was originally developed to predict the compositions of solutions from off gas scrubbers. Therefore, the original database for the ESP model was designed for use with solutions with low ionic strengths. However, the Hanford tanks contain waste with very high ionic strengths. TWRS and Tank Focus Area (TFA) staff members have measured the solubilities of key components at high ionic strengths. The results from these studies were used to develop the Hanford database for the ESP model so the model could more accurately predict the compositions of Hanford waste streams with high ionic streams. The OLI Corporation, which developed the ESP model, has now incorporated most of the Hanford database into its standard ESP database. Another deficiency of the ESP model involves the lack of detailed documentation. Most new users of the ESP model normally encounter several obstacles. Therefore, TWRS management has proposed the development of an ESP user guide based on the experiences of TWRS and TFA researchers. The objective of the user guide is to make the ESP model more user friendly for the Hanford process engineers. The saltcake dissolution experiments at Hanford and the SOLGAS calculations at Oak Ridge are critically in the validation of the ESP model. Due to the high costs associated with the experiments with actual waste, the TWRS would prefer to use the ESP model to predict the effects of most tank farm operations. A comparison of the SOLGAS and ESP calculations indicated that the models were not in good agreement at most of the hydroxide concentration. The SOLGAS model uses the Gibbs free energy of formation to determine the solubilities of the chemical constituents while the ESP uses the KFIT subroutine. The agreement between the ESP and SOLGAS predictions improved when the ESP calculations were based on thermodynamic functions. TPA researchers will contact OLI Corporation to determine the experimental results needed to improve the fit. In addition, a high ionic strength model, which was developed by Moonis Ally of Oak Ridge National Laboratory, will be used to validate the ESP model. One of the new points of emphasis involves the need for the TPA researchers to work with a wider range of users at the Hanford site. Most of the previous TFA and users interactions involved the engineering group, which is responsible for the initial remediation of Tank SY-101. A list of other potential users in the areas of process engineering, tank farm operations, and retrieval was developed. Meetings between the TFA researchers and these potential customers will be held over the next several months.

Beahm, E.C.

2001-02-12T23:59:59.000Z

399

FTCP FY 2010 Operational Plan  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

D D D e e c c e e m m b b e e r r 2 2 0 0 0 0 9 9 ( (R Re ev vi is se ed d A Ap pr ri il l 2 20 01 10 0) ) U U . . S S . . D D E E P P A A R R T T M M E E N N T T O O F F E E N N E E R R G G Y Y F F E E D D E E R R A A L L T T E E C C H H N N I I C C A A L L C C A A P P A A B B I I L L I I T T Y Y P P R R O O G G R R A A M M F F Y Y 2 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 O O P P E E R R A A T T I I O O N N A A L L P P L L A A N N Federal Technical Capability Program FY 2010 Operational Plan December 2009 (Rev 1, April 2010) 1 The objective of the Federal Technical Capability Program is to recruit, deploy, develop, and retain Federal personnel with the necessary technical capabilities to safely accomplish the Department's missions and responsibilities. The Department has identified guiding principles to accomplish that objective and identified four general functions of the Federal Technical Capability Program. The guiding principles are:

400

EMSL Quarterly Highlights Report 2nd Quarter FY08  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Quarterly Highlights Report: 2 Quarterly Highlights Report: 2 nd Quarter, FY08 1 The W.R. Wiley Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory (EMSL) is a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) national scientific user facility located at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) in Richland, Washington. EMSL is operated by PNNL for the DOE Office of Biological and Environmental Research. At one location, EMSL offers a comprehensive array of leading-edge resources and expertise. Access to the instrumentation and expertise is obtained on a peer-reviewed proposal basis. Users are participants on accepted proposals. Staff members work with users to expedite access. The EMSL Quarterly Highlights Report documents research and activities of EMSL staff and users. Research Highlights Atmospheric Aerosol Chemistry

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "7-year review fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Twenty-Five Year Site Plan FY2013 - FY2037  

SciTech Connect

Los Alamos National Laboratory (the Laboratory) is the nation's premier national security science laboratory. Its mission is to develop and apply science and technology to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the United States (U.S.) nuclear stockpile; reduce the threat of weapons of mass destruction, proliferation, and terrorism; and solve national problems in defense, energy, and the environment. The fiscal year (FY) 2013-2037 Twenty-Five Year Site Plan (TYSP) is a vital component for planning to meet the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) commitment to ensure the U.S. has a safe, secure, and reliable nuclear deterrent. The Laboratory also uses the TYSP as an integrated planning tool to guide development of an efficient and responsive infrastructure that effectively supports the Laboratory's missions and workforce. Emphasizing the Laboratory's core capabilities, this TYSP reflects the Laboratory's role as a prominent contributor to NNSA missions through its programs and campaigns. The Laboratory is aligned with Nuclear Security Enterprise (NSE) modernization activities outlined in the NNSA Strategic Plan (May 2011) which include: (1) ensuring laboratory plutonium space effectively supports pit manufacturing and enterprise-wide special nuclear materials consolidation; (2) constructing the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Replacement Nuclear Facility (CMRR-NF); (3) establishing shared user facilities to more cost effectively manage high-value, experimental, computational and production capabilities; and (4) modernizing enduring facilities while reducing the excess facility footprint. Th is TYSP is viewed by the Laboratory as a vital planning tool to develop an effi cient and responsive infrastructure. Long range facility and infrastructure development planning are critical to assure sustainment and modernization. Out-year re-investment is essential for sustaining existing facilities, and will be re-evaluated on an annual basis. At the same time, major modernization projects will require new line-item funding. This document is, in essence, a roadmap that defines a path forward for the Laboratory to modernize, streamline, consolidate, and sustain its infrastructure to meet its national security mission.

Jones, William H. [Los Alamos National Laboratory

2012-07-12T23:59:59.000Z

402

Twenty-Five Year Site Plan FY2013 - FY2037  

SciTech Connect

Los Alamos National Laboratory (the Laboratory) is the nation's premier national security science laboratory. Its mission is to develop and apply science and technology to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the United States (U.S.) nuclear stockpile; reduce the threat of weapons of mass destruction, proliferation, and terrorism; and solve national problems in defense, energy, and the environment. The fiscal year (FY) 2013-2037 Twenty-Five Year Site Plan (TYSP) is a vital component for planning to meet the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) commitment to ensure the U.S. has a safe, secure, and reliable nuclear deterrent. The Laboratory also uses the TYSP as an integrated planning tool to guide development of an efficient and responsive infrastructure that effectively supports the Laboratory's missions and workforce. Emphasizing the Laboratory's core capabilities, this TYSP reflects the Laboratory's role as a prominent contributor to NNSA missions through its programs and campaigns. The Laboratory is aligned with Nuclear Security Enterprise (NSE) modernization activities outlined in the NNSA Strategic Plan (May 2011) which include: (1) ensuring laboratory plutonium space effectively supports pit manufacturing and enterprise-wide special nuclear materials consolidation; (2) constructing the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Replacement Nuclear Facility (CMRR-NF); (3) establishing shared user facilities to more cost effectively manage high-value, experimental, computational and production capabilities; and (4) modernizing enduring facilities while reducing the excess facility footprint. Th is TYSP is viewed by the Laboratory as a vital planning tool to develop an effi cient and responsive infrastructure. Long range facility and infrastructure development planning are critical to assure sustainment and modernization. Out-year re-investment is essential for sustaining existing facilities, and will be re-evaluated on an annual basis. At the same time, major modernization projects will require new line-item funding. This document is, in essence, a roadmap that defines a path forward for the Laboratory to modernize, streamline, consolidate, and sustain its infrastructure to meet its national security mission.

Jones, William H. [Los Alamos National Laboratory

2012-07-12T23:59:59.000Z

403

FY 2004 LDRD Report to Congress  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 Report to Congress 4 Report to Congress Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) at the DOE National Laboratories December 2004 Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 1. Introduction....................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Background............................................................................................ 2 1.2 Purpose of the Report............................................................................. 2 2. FY 2004 LDRD Program ............................................................. 4 2.1 Financial Information ........................................................ 4 2.1.1 LDRD Funding Mechanism ................................................. 4

404

SERI Biomass Program. FY 1983 annual report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes the progress and research accomplishments of the SERI Biomass Program during FY 1983. The SERI Biomass Program consists of three elements: Aquatic Species, Anaerobic Digestion, and Photo/Biological Hydrogen. Each element has been indexed separately. 2 references, 44 figures, 22 tables.

Corder, R.E.; Hill, A.M.; Lindsey, H.; Lowenstein, M.Z.; McIntosh, R.P.

1984-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

405

Advanced Energy Projects: FY 1993, Research summaries  

SciTech Connect

AEP has been supporting research on novel materials for energy technology, renewable and biodegradable materials, new uses for scientific discoveries, alternate pathways to energy efficiency, alternative energy sources, innovative approaches to waste treatment and reduction, etc. The summaries are grouped according to projects active in FY 1993, Phase I SBIR projects, and Phase II SBIR projects. Investigator and institutional indexes are included.

Not Available

1993-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

406

Transmutation Fuels Campaign FY-09 Accomplishments Report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report summarizes the fiscal year 2009 (FY-08) accomplishments for the Transmutation Fuels Campaign (TFC). The emphasis is on the accomplishments and relevance of the work. Detailed description of the methods used to achieve the highlighted results and the associated support tasks are not included in this report.

Lori Braase

2009-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

407

Institutional research and development, FY 1987  

SciTech Connect

The Institutional Research and Development program at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory fosters exploratory work to advance science and technology, disciplinary research to develop innovative solutions to problems in various scientific fields, and long-term interdisciplinary research in support of defense and energy missions. This annual report describes research funded under this program for FY87. (DWL)

Struble, G.L.; Lawler, G.M.; Crawford, R.B.; Kirvel, R.D.; Peck, T.M.; Prono, J.K.; Strack, B.S. (eds.)

1987-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

408

FY 2007 Report on Uncosted Balances  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Report on Uncosted Balances Report on Uncosted Balances For Fiscal Year Ended September 30,2007 August 2008 Prepared by: Office of the Chief Financial Officer TABLE OF CONTENTS Purpose.. . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . .. . .. . . . . . . . , . . , . , , . . . . , Executive Summary ... . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . .... .. .... .... .. Threshold Analysis - Approach and Background ................... . .... .. Composition of FY 2007 Year-End Uncosted Obligations ..... .. . . . . . Explanation of Significant Threshold Variances ... ... .. . . . . . .. . .. .. . . . . . List of Acronyms.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

409

FY 2012 Summary Table by Organization  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 5 Department of Energy Budget by Organization (discretionary dollars in thousands) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 Current Cong. Annualized Cong. Approp. Request CR Request $ % National Security Weapons Activities* 6,386,371 7,008,835 7,008,835 7,629,716 +620,881 +8.9% Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation* 2,131,382 2,687,167 2,136,709 2,549,492 -137,675 -5.1% Naval Reactors* 945,133 1,070,486 945,133 1,153,662 +83,176 +7.8% Office of the Administrator* 410,754 448,267 410,754 450,060 +1,793 +0.4% Total, National Nuclear Security Administration* 9,873,640 11,214,755 10,501,431 11,782,930 +568,175 +5.1% Energy and Environment Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 2,216,392 2,355,473 2,242,500 3,200,053 +983,661 +44.4% Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability 168,484 185,930 171,982 237,717 +69,233 +41.1%

410

FY 2008 CONTRACTOR PURCHASING BALANCED SCORECARD RESULTS DEPARTMENTAL AVERAGES BY FISCAL YEAR  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 CONTRACTOR PURCHASING BALANCED SCORECARD RESULTS 8 CONTRACTOR PURCHASING BALANCED SCORECARD RESULTS DEPARTMENTAL AVERAGES BY FISCAL YEAR FY 2008 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 National Taraets Customer Perspective Objective: Customer Satisfaction 93 9 3 Core Measure: Customer Satisfaction Rating Internal Business Perspective Objective: Effective Internal Controls 95 93 Core Measure: assessment of degree to which purchasing systems are in compliance Objective: Effective Supplier Management 8 3 8 1 Core Measure: % Delivery on-time, including Just-in-Time Objective: Use of Effective Competition 7 1 74 Core Measure: % of total dollars obligated on actions over $100,000 that were competed N/A - locally set 84 N/A - locally set 2 FY 2008 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY2006 FY 2007 FY2008 National Tarpets

411

FY 2009 CONTRACTOR PURCHASING BALANCED SCORECARD RESULTS DEPARTMENTAL AVERAGES BY FISCAL YEAR  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

9 CONTRACTOR PURCHASING BALANCED SCORECARD RESULTS 9 CONTRACTOR PURCHASING BALANCED SCORECARD RESULTS DEPARTMENTAL AVERAGES BY FISCAL YEAR FY 2009 FY2005 FY2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 National Tarpets Customer Perspective Objective: Customer Satisfaction Core Measure: Customer Satisfaction Rating Internal Business Perspective Objective: Effective Internal Controls 93 94 Core Measure: assessment of degree to which purchasing systems are in compliance Objective: Effective Supplier Management 8 1 83 Core Measure: % Delivery on-time, including Just-in-Time Objective: Use of Effective Competition 74 69 Core Measure: % of total dollars obligated on actions over $100,000 that were competed 97 97 N/A - locally set 84 8 6 84 67 74 N/A - locally set 2 FY 2009 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY2009 National Targets

412

FY 2010 Annual Report Office of Fossil Energy Fuel Cell Program  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

FY 2010 Annual Report Office of Fossil Energy Fuel Cell Program I. IntroductIon 2 Office of Fossil Energy Fuel Cell Program FY 2010 Annual Report 3 FY 2010 Annual Report Office of...

413

Wind and Water Power Technologies FY'14 Budget At-a-Glance |...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Wind and Water Power Technologies FY'14 Budget At-a-Glance Wind and Water Power Technologies FY'14 Budget At-a-Glance Wind and Water Power Technologies FY'14 Budget At-a-Glance, a...

414

Solar Energy Technologies FY'14 Budget At-a-Glance | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Technologies FY'14 Budget At-a-Glance Solar Energy Technologies FY'14 Budget At-a-Glance Solar Energy Technologies FY'14 Budget At-a-Glance, a publication of the U.S....

415

Safety Schedule FY2013.xls  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

29 Jan 2013 31 Jan 2013 SAF-135V HPI Event Investigation Y-12 29 Jan 2013 31 Jan 2013 SAF-135V HPI Event Investigation Y-12 4 Feb 2013 6 Feb 2013 SAF-290 Readiness Review Member Training NSO 5 Feb 2013 7 Feb 2013 SAF-385 Assessment Techniques LASO 7 Feb 2013 7 Feb 2013 SAF-291 Readiness Review Leader Training NSO 11 Feb 2013 15 Feb 2013 SAF-230 Accident Investigation Pantex 25 Feb 2013 27 Feb 2013 SAF-290 Readiness Review Member Training Y-12 28 Feb 2013 28 Feb 2013 SAF-291 Readiness Review Leader Training Y-12 5 Mar 2013 5 Mar 2013 SAF-720 Hazard Identification Y-12 6 Mar 2013 6 Mar 2013 SAF-725 Hazard Categorization Y-12 12 Mar 2013 15 Mar 2013 SAF-786 Unreviewed Safety Questions Livermore 18 Mar 2013 22 Mar 2013 SAF-220 Senior Technical Safety Managers Overview NSO

416

Microsoft PowerPoint - 00_agenda_02_ops_in_fy13.pptx  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

12 Q3, August 13, 2012 12 Q3, August 13, 2012 Jim Irby: Facility status and plans Earl Marmar: Discussion of possible operations in FY13 Anne White: FY2012 Joint Research Target Steve Wukitch: Field-aligned ICRF antenna, results and plans Ron Parker: Lower Hybrid RF results and plans Geoff Olynyk: Recent disruption mitigation studies Dennis Whyte: RFQ accelerator for in-situ surface analysis, status and plans DoE Quarterly Review 08/13/2012 Facilities Outline * Status - C-Mod - ICRF Systems - LH Systems - Outer Divertor - Diagnostics * ARRA Upgrades * Plans and Schedule C-Mod Status * 13.5 weeks thus far out of 18 weeks of planned research operation * 1940 plasma discharges * Plasma operations in support of - New Field-Aligned antenna - LH current drive and wave physics - ICRF physics

417

N Reactor standby program plan; Part 5: Safety and environment FY-90 update  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

N Reactor was shutdown by order of DOE in January 1987 to permit implementation of a series of hardware and software safety enhancements. These upgrades were designed to enhance the safe operation of N Reactor and provide comparability to commercial nuclear industry standards and requirements. The enhancements were identified by a series of external independent reviews and were managed under the N Reactor Safety Enhancement Program. In February 1988, DOE directed that N Reactor would be placed in standby. Additional guidance in FY-88 directed that the reactor would be placed in a dry layup status based on preceding Westinghouse Hanford Studies directed at defining a cost effective layup method which would preserve the ability to subsequently restart and operate N Reactor if required. The FY-88 directives also stipulated that the ability to restart N Reactor in a 2--3 year period from date of notification be preserved. 7 figs., 8 tabs.

NONE

1989-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

418

Frequently Asked Questions for DOE FY 2011 For-Profit Audit Guidance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

for DOE FY 2011 For-Profit Audit Guidance for DOE FY 2011 For-Profit Audit Guidance June 2012 Questions Relating to Subrecipient Audit Requirements: Question # 1: We wanted to confirm our understanding based on a review of the Policy Flash 2012-39. If a for-profit subrecipient has expended DOE funding from a local University (i.e. funding not received directly from DOE), our understanding is that the subrecipient would not be subject to the DOE For-Profit audit requirement (DOE Audit Guide). Response # 1: This is correct. Subrecipients are not required to have 10 CFR 600.316 audits. That is, only direct awards from DOE are subject to the DOE Audit Guide and it does not apply to subawards. Question # 2: Consider the following example: XYZ For-Profit Entity has three DOE awards with

419

Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2003 Progress Report for Heavy Vehicle  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3 Progress Report 3 Progress Report for Heavy Vehicle Propulsion Materials Program to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2003 Progress Report for Heavy Vehicle Propulsion Materials Program on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2003 Progress Report for Heavy Vehicle Propulsion Materials Program on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2003 Progress Report for Heavy Vehicle Propulsion Materials Program on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2003 Progress Report for Heavy Vehicle Propulsion Materials Program on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2003 Progress Report for Heavy Vehicle Propulsion Materials Program on Digg Find More places to share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2003 Progress Report for Heavy Vehicle Propulsion Materials Program on

420

Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004 Progress Report for Advanced  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

4 Progress Report 4 Progress Report for Advanced Combustion Engine Research and Development to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004 Progress Report for Advanced Combustion Engine Research and Development on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004 Progress Report for Advanced Combustion Engine Research and Development on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004 Progress Report for Advanced Combustion Engine Research and Development on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004 Progress Report for Advanced Combustion Engine Research and Development on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004 Progress Report for Advanced Combustion Engine Research and Development on Digg Find More places to share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "7-year review fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004 Progress Report for High Strength  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

4 Progress Report 4 Progress Report for High Strength Weight Reduction Materials to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004 Progress Report for High Strength Weight Reduction Materials on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004 Progress Report for High Strength Weight Reduction Materials on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004 Progress Report for High Strength Weight Reduction Materials on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004 Progress Report for High Strength Weight Reduction Materials on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004 Progress Report for High Strength Weight Reduction Materials on Digg Find More places to share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004 Progress Report for High Strength Weight Reduction Materials on

422

Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004 Progress Report for Heavy Vehicle  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

4 Progress Report 4 Progress Report for Heavy Vehicle Propulsion Materials Program to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004 Progress Report for Heavy Vehicle Propulsion Materials Program on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004 Progress Report for Heavy Vehicle Propulsion Materials Program on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004 Progress Report for Heavy Vehicle Propulsion Materials Program on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004 Progress Report for Heavy Vehicle Propulsion Materials Program on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004 Progress Report for Heavy Vehicle Propulsion Materials Program on Digg Find More places to share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2004 Progress Report for Heavy Vehicle Propulsion Materials Program on

423

NNSA FY 2013 Budget Request | National Nuclear Security Administration  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

FY 2013 Budget Request | National Nuclear Security Administration FY 2013 Budget Request | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > Media Room > Video Gallery > NNSA FY 2013 Budget Request NNSA FY 2013 Budget Request NNSA FY 2013 Budget Request FY 2013 Budget Request Seeks $11.5 Billion to Achieve President Obama's Nuclear Security Objectives, Shape Future of Nuclear Security

424

Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for High Strength  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5 Progress Report 5 Progress Report for High Strength Weight Reduction Materials to someone by E-mail Share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for High Strength Weight Reduction Materials on Facebook Tweet about Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for High Strength Weight Reduction Materials on Twitter Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for High Strength Weight Reduction Materials on Google Bookmark Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for High Strength Weight Reduction Materials on Delicious Rank Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for High Strength Weight Reduction Materials on Digg Find More places to share Vehicle Technologies Office: FY 2005 Progress Report for High Strength Weight Reduction Materials on

425

FY 2011 Annual Performance Report | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Annual Performance Reports » FY 2011 Annual Performance Annual Performance Reports » FY 2011 Annual Performance Report FY 2011 Annual Performance Report DOE's FY 2011 Annual Performance Report (APR) presents the performance results for fiscal year 2011 that contributed to the achievement of goals identified in the President's fiscal year 2011 budget. The performance measures in this report were initially outlined in the Department's FY 2011 Congressional Budget Request. After final congressional budget negotiations, some performance targets were revised to reflect changes in funding levels in enacted appropriations. DOE's FY 2011 Summary Report provides highlights of key financial and performance information that demonstrates DOE's accountability to ensure America's security and prosperity by addressing its energy,

426

Secretary Chu Congratulates FY 2011 Small Business Award Winners |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Secretary Chu Congratulates FY 2011 Small Business Award Winners Secretary Chu Congratulates FY 2011 Small Business Award Winners Secretary Chu Congratulates FY 2011 Small Business Award Winners June 29, 2012 - 2:57pm Addthis Secretary Chu presents the FY 2011 Small Business Award Winners at an award ceremony yesterday at the Energy Department headquarters in Washington, DC. | Energy Department photo. Secretary Chu presents the FY 2011 Small Business Award Winners at an award ceremony yesterday at the Energy Department headquarters in Washington, DC. | Energy Department photo. Dot Harris Dot Harris The Honorable Dot Harris, Director, Office of Economic Impact and Diversity "You are limited only by your imagination, by your courage" Secretary Steven Chu The Energy Department had the pleasure of publicly recognizing the FY 2011

427

FY 2012 Budget Control Table for the Office of Electricity Delivery...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FY 2012 Budget Control Table for the Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability FY 2012 Budget Control Table for the Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy...

428

FY 2013 Environmental Management Budget Request to Congress  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 5 DOE/CF-0075 Volume 5 Environmental Management Department of Energy FY 2013 Congressional Budget Request February 2012 Office of Chief Financial Officer Volume 5 DOE/CF-0075 Volume 5 Environmental Management Printed with soy ink on recycled paper Department of Energy FY 2013 Congressional Budget Request Environmental Management Page 1 FY 2013 Congressional Budget Volume 5 Table of Contents Page Appropriation Account Summary ............................................................................................................................................ 3 Appropriation Language .......................................................................................................................................................... 5

429

Annual Report FY2012 University of Rhode Island  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

(CSMNS) AS NOVEL NAN $433,605 $433,605 NARAYANAN, RADHA SURFACE EXTINCTION SPECTROSCOPY AS NOVEL METHOD 127 31 15 23 6 78 46 5 1 3 4 3 4 New category (as of FY2006): US Dept. of Defense excluding funds from Army, Navy and Air Force. New category (as of FY2006): University funds other than URI. FY2007 660 14 5

Rhode Island, University of

430

Attachment FY2011-30 OPAM | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Waiver of Mandatory Use of the Stratetic Integrated Procurement Enterprise System (STRIPES) for Certain Purchase Card Transactions Attachment FY2011-30 OPAM More Documents &...

431

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2011 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2011 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2013 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third

432

Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 1 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011 The information in the scorecard represents preliminary data and is provided for the public interest. While EM makes every effort to ensure the scorecard's timeliness and completeness, the dynamic nature of cleanup actions and modifications to agreements are such that the scorecard may not be completely accurate. Consequently, this scorecard is not used as a notification to regulatory agencies of attained or missed milestones. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2011 More Documents & Publications Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Fourth Quarter FY2012 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - Third Quarter FY2011 Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard - First

433

Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Internal Controls Evaluations Guidance  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

FY 2012 Internal Controls guidance required to be implemented by Departmental elements to meet the requirements of the Federal Managers' Financial Integrity ...

2012-01-13T23:59:59.000Z

434

Electric Markets Technical Assistance Program: FY2002 Grant Descriptio...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 Grant Descriptions and Contact Information Electric Markets Technical Assistance Program: FY2002 Grant Descriptions and Contact Information Grant descriptions and contact...

435

Electric Markets Technical Assistance Program: FY2001 Grant Descriptio...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1 Grant Descriptions and Contact Information Electric Markets Technical Assistance Program: FY2001 Grant Descriptions and Contact Information Grant descriptions and contact...

436

Electric Markets Technical Assistance Program: FY2003 Grant Descriptio...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 Grant Descriptions and Contact Information Electric Markets Technical Assistance Program: FY2003 Grant Descriptions and Contact Information Grant descriptions and contact...

437

FY 2006 University of California (LLNL), PER Summary | National...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2006 University of California (LLNL), PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project...

438

FY 2014 Budget Request for the Office of Electricity Delivery...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Budget Request for the Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability FY 2014 Budget Request for the Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Table showing the...

439

FY 2013 Budget Request for the Office of Electricity Delivery...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3 Budget Request for the Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability FY 2013 Budget Request for the Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Table showing...

440

FY2012 EERE Congressional Budget Request | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Year 2012 budget request from the Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy fy2012eerecongressionalbudgetrequest.pdf More Documents &...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "7-year review fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Fuel Cell Technologies Office: FY 2008 Financial Awards  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Financial Opportunities Printable Version Share this resource Send a link to Fuel Cell Technologies Office: FY 2008 Financial Awards to someone by E-mail Share Fuel Cell...

442

ARPA-E FY2010 Annual Report Highlights Transformational Projects...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

are enabling batteries for transportation -- beyond lithium-ion -- that could make electric cars cheaper and go much farther distances than today's batteries. The FY2010...

443

FY 1993 | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Scientific and Technical Information Honors & Awards Jobs Contact Us You are here: SC Home About Organization Support Offices Budget Home FY 1993 Budget...

444

FY 2014 | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Scientific and Technical Information Honors & Awards Jobs Contact Us You are here: SC Home About Organization Support Offices Budget Home FY 2014 Budget...

445

FY 2007 | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Scientific and Technical Information Honors & Awards Jobs Contact Us You are here: SC Home About Organization Support Offices Budget Home FY 2007 Budget...

446

FY 2011 | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Scientific and Technical Information Honors & Awards Jobs Contact Us You are here: SC Home About Organization Support Offices Budget Home FY 2011 Budget...

447

FY 2008 | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Scientific and Technical Information Honors & Awards Jobs Contact Us You are here: SC Home About Organization Support Offices Budget Home FY 2008 Budget...

448

Geothermal Technologies FY14 Budget At-a-Glance  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Geothermal Technologies FY14 Budget At-a-Glance, a publication of the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.

449

FY 2008 National Security Technologies, LLC, PER Summary | National...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2008 National Security Technologies, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and...

450

FY 2010 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2010 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project...

451

FY 2006 National Security Technologies, LLC, PER Summary | National...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2006 National Security Technologies, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and...

452

FY 2012 National Security Technologies, LLC, PER Summary | National...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2012 National Security Technologies, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and...

453

FY 2011 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2011 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project...

454

FY 2011 Los Alamos National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2011 Los Alamos National Security, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project...

455

FY 2008 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2008 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project...

456

FY 2010 National Security Technologies, LLC, PER Summary | National...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2010 National Security Technologies, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and...

457

FY 2012 Los Alamos National Security, LLC, PEP | National Nuclear...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2012 Los Alamos National Security, LLC, PEP Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management >...

458

FY 2009 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2009 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project...

459

FY 2008 Los Alamos National Security, LLC, PER Summary | National...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2008 Los Alamos National Security, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project...

460

Wind Powering America FY08 Activities Summary (Book)  

SciTech Connect

The Wind Powering America FY08 Activities Summary reflects the accomplishments of state Wind Working Groups, WPA programs at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and partner organizations.

Not Available

2009-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "7-year review fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Introduction, DOE Hydrogen Program FY 2010 Annual Progress Report  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Hydrogen Production The FY 2010 Hydrogen Production activities continued to focus on developing technologies that enable the long-term viability of hydrogen as an energy...

462

Hydrogen Program Contacts; DOE Hydrogen Program FY 2008 Annual...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 FY 2008 Annual Progress Report DOE Hydrogen Program JoAnn Milliken, DOE Hydrogen Program Manager and Chief Engineer Office of Hydrogen, Fuel Cells and Infrastructure Technologies...

463

FY 2006 University of California (LANL), PER Summary | National...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

the main content Facebook Flickr RSS Twitter YouTube FY 2006 University of California (LANL), PER Summary | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the...

464

Attachment FY2011-28 OPAM | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

FY2011-28 OPAM More Documents & Publications Chapter 19 - Small Business Programs OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides Guidance of the Department of Energy Subcontracting Program...

465

FY 2014 Funding History Detail Spreadsheet | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Balances Reports Budget Environmental & ES&H Liabilities Financial Management Handbook LDR&D Annual Reports Testimony DOEFundingHistory.xlsx Description FY 2014 Funding...

466

Activities and Accomplishments in MY 2004/FY 2005  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

From vehicle acquisition and credit trading to exemptions and outreach activity, the Annual Report summarizes the State & Alternative Fuel Provider Activity's accomplishments during MY 2004/FY 2005.

Not Available

2005-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

467

NNSA FY 2013 Budget Request | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

FY 2013 Budget Request | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response...

468

Wind Powering America: FY09 Activities Summary (Book)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Wind Powering America FY09 Activities Summary reflects the accomplishments of state Wind Working Groups, WPA programs at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and partner organizations.

Not Available

2010-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

469

For-Profit Audit Guidance (FY 2010) | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Compliance Supplement Part III, Program-Specific Compliance Supplements Part IV, Matrix of Compliance Requirements More Documents & Publications Attachment FY2011-46(1) OPAM...

470

FY 2010 Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Pantex, LLC, PER...  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog FY 2010 Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Pantex, LLC, PER Summary Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and...

471

Combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Annual Performance Results and...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2012 Annual Performance Results and FYs 2013 and 2014 Annual Performance Plan Subject: Office of Inspector General's combined Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Annual Performance Results...

472

FY 2005 Progress Report for Fuels Technologies  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Annual Progress Report Progress rePort for fuels technologies Less dependence on foreign oil, and eventual transition to an emissions-free, petroleum-free vehicle F r e e d o m C A r A n d V e h i C l e T e C h n o l o g i e s P r o g r A m U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20585-0121 FY 2005 Progress Report for Fuels Technologies Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Office of FreedomCAR and Vehicle Technologies Approved by Stephen Goguen January 2006 Fuels Technologies FY 2005 Progress Report Contents I Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 II Fuels and Lubricants to Enable High Efficiency Engine Operation while Meeting 2007 - 2010 Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15

473

FY 2008 Summary Table by Organization  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 FY 2007 FY 2008 Current Congressional Congressional Approp. Request Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Organization National Security Weapons......................................................................... 6,355,297 6,407,889 6,511,312 +103,423 +1.6% Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation.................................... 1,619,179 1,726,213 1,672,646 -53,567 -3.1% Naval Reactors................................................................ 781,605 795,133 808,219 +13,086 +1.6% Office of the Administrator............................................... 354,223 386,576 394,656 +8,080 +2.1% Total, National Nuclear Security Administration.................. 9,110,304 9,315,811 9,386,833 +71,022 +0.8% Energy and Environment Energy Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy....................

474

FY 2007 Summary Table by Organization  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 5 FY 2006 FY 2007 Current Current Congressional Approp. Approp. Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Organization National Security Weapons................................................................................ 6,625,542 6,369,597 6,407,889 +38,292 +0.6% Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation.......................................... 1,507,966 1,614,839 1,726,213 +111,374 +6.9% Naval Reactors....................................................................... 801,437 781,605 795,133 +13,528 +1.7% Office of the Administrator...................................................... 363,350 338,450 386,576 +48,126 +14.2% Total, National Nuclear Security Administration...................... 9,298,295 9,104,491 9,315,811 +211,320 +2.3% Energy, Science and Environment

475

FY2012 EERE Congressional Budget Request  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy eere.energy.gov The Parker Ranch installation in Hawaii The FY 2012 Budget Request February 2011 Henry Kelly Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for EERE 2 | Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy eere.energy.gov "This is our generation's Sputnik moment. We'll invest in ... clean energy technology - an investment that will strengthen our security, protect our planet, and create countless new jobs for our people. Maintaining our leadership in research and technology is crucial to America's success." President Obama State of the Union January 25, 2011 Clean Innovative Energy Solutions Securing America's Future 3 | Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy eere.energy.gov EERE Budget Trend EERE Budget Trend FY 2003 -

476

FY 2009 Summary Table by Organization  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7 7 FY 2008 FY 2009 Current Current Congressional Op. Plan Approp. Request $ % Discretionary Summary By Organization National Security Weapons................................................................................. 6,258,583 6,297,466 6,618,079 +320,613 +5.1% Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation........................................... 1,824,202 1,335,996 1,247,048 -88,948 -6.7% Naval Reactors....................................................................... 781,800 774,686 828,054 +53,368 +6.9% Office of the Administrator...................................................... 358,291 402,137 404,081 +1,944 +0.5% Total, National Nuclear Security Administration....................... 9,222,876 8,810,285 9,097,262 +286,977 +3.3% Energy and Environment

477

National Energy Technology Laboratory Accomplishments FY 2004  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

NETL Accomplishments FY 2004 NETL Accomplishments FY 2004 2 MESSAGE FROM THE DIRECTOR It is my pleasure to present the National Energy Technology Laboratory's (NETL's) Accomplishments Report for fiscal year 2004. The report responds to the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 by describing how NETL has spent taxpayer funds. It emphasizes the results of NETL's activities-not the activities themselves. It demonstrates that NETL has upheld the trust of the American taxpayer and has wisely used taxpayer funds to achieve meaningful results that benefit the country. This laboratory has been evolving for nearly 100 years. What was once a small experimental laboratory near downtown Pittsburgh, is now a major research laboratory with facilities in four states-Alaska, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, and

478

Photovoltaic Subcontract Program. Annual report, FY 1992  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes the fiscal year (FY) 1992 progress of the subcontracted photovoltaic (PV) research and development (R&D) performed under the Photovoltaic Advanced Research and Development Project at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)-formerly the Solar Energy Research Institute (SERI). The mission of the national PV program is to develop PV technology for large-scale generation of economically competitive electric power in the United States. The technical sections of the report cover the main areas of the subcontract program: the Crystalline Materials and Advanced Concepts project, the Polycrystalline Thin Films project, Amorphous Silicon Research project, the Photovoltaic Manufacturing Technology (PVMaT) project, PV Module and System Performance and Engineering project, and the PV Analysis and Applications Development project. Technical summaries of each of the subcontracted programs provide a discussion of approaches, major accomplishments in FY 1992, and future research directions.

Not Available

1993-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

479

Photovoltaic Program Branch annual report, FY 1989  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes the progress of the Photovoltaic (PV) Program Branch of the Solar Energy Research Institute (SERI) from October 1, 1988, through September 30, 1989. The branch is responsible for managing the subcontracted portion of SERI's PV Advanced Research and Development Project. In fiscal year (FY) 1989, this included nearly 50 subcontracts, with a total annualized funding of approximately $13.1 million. Approximately two-thirds of the subcontracts were with universities, at a total funding of nearly $4 million. The six technical sections of the report cover the main areas of the subcontracted program: Amorphous Silicon Research, Polycrystalline Thin Films, Crystalline Silicon Materials Research, High-Efficiency Concepts, New Ideas, and University Participation. Technical summaries of each of the subcontracted programs provide a discussion of approaches, major accomplishments in FY 1989, and future research directions. Each report will be cataloged individually.

Summers, K A [ed.

1990-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

480

NREL photovoltaic program FY 1997 annual report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes the in-house and subcontracted research and development (R and D) activities under the NREL PV Program from October 1, 1996, through September 30, 1997 (FY 1997). The NREL PV Program is part of the US Department of Energy`s (DOE`s) National Photovoltaics Program, as described in the DOE National Photovoltaics Program Plan for 1996--2000. The FY 1997 budget authority for carrying out the NREL PV Program was $39.3 million in operating funds and $0.4 million in capital equipment funds. Subcontract activities represent a major part of the NREL PV Program, with $21.8 million (55% of PV funds) going to some 84 subcontractors. Cost sharing by industry added almost $8.8 million to the subcontract R and D activities with industry.

McConnell, R.D.; Hansen, A.; Smoller, S.

1998-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "7-year review fy" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

NEPA Lessons Learned Second Quarter FY 2006  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 1 6 1 (continued on page 4) Second Quarter FY 2006 June 1, 2006; Issue No. 47 National Environmental Policy Act U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QUARTERLY REPORT LESSONS LEARNED LEARNED LESSONS N E P A Quality + Leadership = NEPA Success NEPA 35 Earns Special Award from NAEP; see page 3 DOE's NEPA Compliance Offi cers discussed quality assurance during the interactive meeting of more than

482

Hanford personnel dosimeter supporting studies FY-1981  

SciTech Connect

This report examined specific functional components of the routine external personnel dosimeter program at Hanford. Components studied included: dosimeter readout; dosimeter calibration; dosimeter field response; dose calibration algorithm; dosimeter design; and TLD chip acceptance procedures. Additional information is also presented regarding the dosimeter response to light- and medium-filtered x-rays, high energy photons and neutrons. This study was conducted to clarify certain data obtained during the FY-1980 studies.

Not Available

1982-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

483

NREL Photovoltaic Program FY 1996 Annual Report  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This report summarizes the in-house and subcontract research and development (R&D) activities under the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) Photovoltaics (PV) Program from October 1, 1995 through September 30, 1996 (fiscal year [FY] 1996). The NREL PV Program is part of the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) National Photovoltaics Program, as described in the DOE Photovoltaics Program Plan, FY 1991 - FY 1995. The mission of the DOE National Photovoltaics Program is to: "Work in partnership with U.S. industry to develop and deploy photovoltaic technology for generating economically competitive electric power, making photovoltaics an important contributor to the nation's and the world's energy use and environmental improvement. The two primary goals of the national program are to (1) maintain the U.S. PV industry's world leadership in research and technology development and (2) help the U.S. industry remain a major, profitable force in the world market. The NREL PV Program provides leadership and support to the national program toward achieving its mission and goals.

Not Available

1997-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

484

Theoretical Division annual report, FY 1975. [LASL  

SciTech Connect

This report presents an overview of the activities in the Theoretical Division and a summary of research highlights during FY 1975. It is intended to inform a wide audience about the theoretical work of the LASL and, therefore, contains introductory material which places recent advances in a broader context. The report is organized into two special interest reports: reactor safety research and the Advanced Research Committee, and 11 reports from the T-Division group leaders on the work of their respective groups. Main interests and responsibilities are outlined including the relationship of the group's work to the work of other T-Division groups and other divisions at the Laboratory. The description of research highlights for FY 1975 explains in a fairly simple, straightforward manner the major recent advances and their significance. Each group report is followed by a publication list for FY 1975 (330 references) and a list of talks given outside the Laboratory (140 references). 29 figures. (auth)

Carruthers, P.A.

1976-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

485

NREL Photovoltaic Program FY 1996 Annual Report  

SciTech Connect

This report summarizes the in-house and subcontract research and development (R&D) activities under the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) Photovoltaics (PV) Program from October 1, 1995 through September 30, 1996 (fiscal year [FY] 1996). The NREL PV Program is part of the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) National Photovoltaics Program, as described in the DOE Photovoltaics Program Plan, FY 1991 - FY 1995. The mission of the DOE National Photovoltaics Program is to: "Work in partnership with U.S. industry to develop and deploy photovoltaic technology for generating economically competitive electric power, making photovoltaics an important contributor to the nation's and the world's energy use and environmental improvement. The two primary goals of the national program are to (1) maintain the U.S. PV industry's world leadership in research and technology development and (2) help the U.S. industry remain a major, profitable force in the world market. The NREL PV Program provides leadership and support to the national program toward achieving its mission and goals.

1997-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

486

Omega Group Publications FY2007 Forward 1  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Omega Group Publications FY2007 Forward 1 Omega Group Publications FY2007 Forward 1 Omega Group Publications from FY2007 to May, 2010 1. M. Begel, A. Patwa, M. Pleier, S. Protopopescu, S. Snyder, et al. (D0 Collaboration), Search for Higgs boson production in dilepton and missing energy final states with 5.4 fb-1 of p-pbar collisions at sqrt(s) =1.96 TeV. Submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett. e-Print: arXiv:1001.4481 [hep-ex] (2010). http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1001/1001.4481v3.pdf 2. M. Begel , A. Patwa, M. Pleier, S. Protopopescu, S. Snyder, et al. (D0 Collaboration), Measurement of Z/gamma*+jet+X angular distributions in p anti-p collisions at s**(1/2) = 1.96.TeV. Phys. Lett. B682 (2010) 370-380. http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0907/0907.4286v2.pdf 3. M. Begel, A. Patwa, M. Pleier, S. Protopopescu, S. Snyder, et al. (D0

487

2012 SG Peer Review - Dramatic Residential Demand Reduction in the Desert Southwest - Robert Boehm, Univ. of Nevada, Las Vegas  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

S S t G id P 2012 Smart Grid Program Peer Review Meeting "D ti D d R d ti "Dramatic Demand Reduction in the Desert Southwest" Robert F Boehm Robert F. Boehm Center for Energy Research University of Nevada Las Vegas June 8, 2012 "Dramatic Demand Reduction in the Desert Southwest" in the Desert Southwest Objective Decrease the peak electrical demand by 65% over code-built houses in a new development of 185 homes. Life-cycle Funding ($K) FY08 - FY13 (now FY15) Technical Scope 1. Build energy conserving residences. 2. Include PV on the residences. FY08 - FY13 (now FY15) $6948k 3. Develop a demand control system that gives the customer options and that is enhanced by an artificial intelligence supplemental system. Instantaneous December 2008 power pricing information will be available

488

Abiotic Degradation Rates for Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform: Progress in FY 2010  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report documents the progress made through FY 2010 on a project initiated in FY 2006 to help address uncertainties related to the rates of hydrolysis in groundwater at the Hanford Site for carbon tetrachloride (CT) and chloroform (CF). The study also explores the possible effects of contact with minerals and sediment (i.e., heterogeneous hydrolysis) on these rates. The research was initiated to decrease the uncertainties in abiotic degradation rates of CT and chloroform CF associated with temperature and possible heterogeneous effects. After 2 years of data collection, the first evidence for heterogeneous effects was identified for hydrolysis of CT, and preliminary evidence for the effects of different mineral types on CF hydrolysis rates also was reported. The CT data showed no difference among mineral types, whereas significant differences were seen in the CF results, perhaps due to the fact that CF hydrolyzes by both neutral and base-catalyzed mechanisms whereas CT follows only the neutral hydrolysis path. In this report, we review the project objectives, organization, and technical approaches taken, update the status and results of the hydrolysis-rate experiments after 4 years of experimentation (i.e., through FY 2010), and provide a brief discussion of how these results add to scientific understanding of the behavior of the CT/CF plume at the Hanford Site.

Amonette, James E.; Jeffers, Peter M.; Qafoku, Odeta; Russell, Colleen K.; Humphrys, Daniel R.; Wietsma, Thomas W.; Truex, Michael J.

2010-12-08T23:59:59.000Z

489

Separations and Waste Forms Research and Development: FY 2012 Accomplishments Report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report contains FY 2012 accomplishments for the Separations and Waste Form Research and Development Project.

Not Listed

2013-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

490

FY 2010 DOE Agency Financial Report | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Agency Financial Reports » FY 2010 DOE Agency Financial Agency Financial Reports » FY 2010 DOE Agency Financial Report FY 2010 DOE Agency Financial Report The Department's efforts brought it closer to its goals of: expanding the frontiers of science (science, discovery and innovation) creating clean energy jobs (economic prosperity) curbing the carbon pollution that threatens our planet (clean, secure energy) reducing nuclear dangers (national security) FY 2010 was the second year of implementing the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Recovery Act). The Department contributed to the Administration's goal of stimulating the U.S. economy through ramping up its activities in energy-related areas of spending, project performance, and job creation. FY 2010 DOE Agency Financial Report More Documents & Publications

491

FY 2012 DOE Agency Financial Report | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reports » Agency Financial Reports » FY 2012 DOE Agency Financial Reports » Agency Financial Reports » FY 2012 DOE Agency Financial Report FY 2012 DOE Agency Financial Report Notable accomplishments in FY 2012 include: the first electric grid-connected tidal energy project off the coast of Maine a new approach to sea water desalination that could lower the costs of water purification new insights into the molecular structure of a hydrogen fuel cell that could aid in achieving the goal of producing electricity for transportation new advances in engineering inedible plant biomass into biofuels In the national security area, we met a major milestone of eliminating 450 metric tons of highly enriched Russian uranium taken from nuclear weapons and the dismantlement of the last remaining B53 nuclear bomb. FY 2012 Agency Financial Report

492

A review of the FY 1999 Administration Request for the ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... lifelines -- electric power, water, sewage, oil and gas ... making repairs, and in rapid recovery for businesses ... a step forward for enhanced public safety ...

2010-10-05T23:59:59.000Z

493

Program development fund: FY 1987  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

It is the objective of the Fund to encourage innovative research to maintain the Laboratory's position at the forefront of science. Funds are used to explore new ideas and concepts that may potentially develop into new directions of research for the Laboratory and that are consistent with the major needs, overall goals, and mission of the Laboratory and the DOE. The types of projects eligible for support from PDF include: work in forefront areas of science and technology for the primary purpose of enriching Laboratory research and development capabilities; advanced study of new hypotheses, new experimental concepts, or innovative approaches to energy problems; experiments directed toward ''proof of principle'' or early determination of the utility of a new concept; and conception, design analyses, and development of experimental devices, instruments, or components. This report is a review of these research programs.

Not Available

1989-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

494

Argonne National Laboratory institutional plan FY 2001--FY 2006.  

SciTech Connect

This Institutional Plan describes what Argonne management regards as the optimal future development of Laboratory activities. The document outlines the development of both research programs and support operations in the context of the nation's R and D priorities, the missions of the Department of Energy (DOE) and Argonne, and expected resource constraints. The Draft Institutional Plan is the product of many discussions between DOE and Argonne program managers, and it also reflects programmatic priorities developed during Argonne's summer strategic planning process. That process serves additionally to identify new areas of strategic value to DOE and Argonne, to which Laboratory Directed Research and Development funds may be applied. The Draft Plan is provided to the Department before Argonne's On-Site Review. Issuance of the final Institutional Plan in the fall, after further comment and discussion, marks the culmination of the Laboratory's annual planning cycle. Chapter II of this Institutional Plan describes Argonne's missions and roles within the DOE laboratory system, its underlying core competencies in science and technology, and six broad planning objectives whose achievement is considered critical to the future of the Laboratory. Chapter III presents the Laboratory's ''Science and Technology Strategic Plan,'' which summarizes key features of the external environment, presents Argonne's vision, and describes how Argonne's strategic goals and objectives support DOE's four business lines. The balance of Chapter III comprises strategic plans for 23 areas of science and technology at Argonne, grouped according to the four DOE business lines. The Laboratory's 14 major initiatives, presented in Chapter IV, propose important advances in key areas of fundamental science and technology development. The ''Operations and Infrastructure Strategic Plan'' in Chapter V includes strategic plans for human resources; environmental protection, safety, and health; site and facilities; security, export control, and counterintelligence; information management; communications, outreach, and community affairs; performance-based management; and productivity improvement and overhead cost reduction. Finally, Chapter VI provides resource projections that are a reasonable baseline for planning the Laboratory's future.

Beggs, S.D.

2000-12-07T23:59:59.000Z

495

Exploratory Research and Development Fund, FY 1990. Report on Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Exploratory R&D Fund FY 1990 report is compiled from annual reports submitted by principal investigators following the close of the fiscal year. This report describes the projects supported and summarizes their accomplishments. It constitutes a part of an Exploratory R&D Fund (ERF) planning and documentation process that includes an annual planning cycle, projection selection, implementation, and review. The research areas covered in this report are: Accelerator and fusion research; applied science; cell and molecular biology; chemical biodynamics; chemical sciences; earth sciences; engineering; information and computing sciences; materials sciences; nuclear science; physics and research medicine and radiation biophysics.

Not Available

1992-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

496

Laboratory Directed Research and Development FY2008 Annual Report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Program, authorized by Congress in 1991 and administered by the Institutional Science and Technology Office at Lawrence Livermore, is our primary means for pursuing innovative, long-term, high-risk, and potentially high-payoff research that supports the full spectrum of national security interests encompassed by the missions of the Laboratory, the Department of Energy, and National Nuclear Security Administration. The accomplishments described in this annual report demonstrate the strong alignment of the LDRD portfolio with these missions and contribute to the Laboratory's success in meeting its goals. The LDRD budget of $91.5 million for fiscal year 2008 sponsored 176 projects. These projects were selected through an extensive peer-review process to ensure the highest scientific quality and mission relevance. Each year, the number of deserving proposals far exceeds the funding available, making the selection a tough one indeed. Our ongoing investments in LDRD have reaped long-term rewards for the Laboratory and the nation. Many Laboratory programs trace their roots to research thrusts that began several years ago under LDRD sponsorship. In addition, many LDRD projects contribute to more than one mission area, leveraging the Laboratory's multidisciplinary team approach to science and technology. Safeguarding the nation from terrorist activity and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction will be an enduring mission of this Laboratory, for which LDRD will continue to play a vital role. The LDRD Program is a success story. Our projects continue to win national recognition for excellence through prestigious awards, papers published in peer-reviewed journals, and patents granted. With its reputation for sponsoring innovative projects, the LDRD Program is also a major vehicle for attracting and retaining the best and the brightest technical staff and for establishing collaborations with universities, industry, and other scientific and research institutions. By keeping the Laboratory at the forefront of science and technology, the LDRD Program enables us to meet our mission challenges, especially those of our ever-evolving national security mission. The Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) annual report for fiscal year 2008 (FY08) provides a summary of LDRD-funded projects for the fiscal year and consists of two parts: A broad description of the LDRD Program, the LDRD portfolio-management process, program statistics for the year, and highlights of accomplishments for the year. A summary of each project, submitted by the principal investigator. Project summaries include the scope, motivation, goals, relevance to Department of Energy (DOE)/National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) mission areas, the technical progress achieved in FY08, and a list of publications that resulted from the research in FY08. Summaries are organized in sections by research category (in alphabetical order). Within each research category, the projects are listed in order of their LDRD project category: Strategic Initiative (SI), Exploratory Research (ER), Laboratory-Wide Competition (LW), and Feasibility Study (FS). Within each project category, the individual project summaries appear in order of their project tracking code, a unique identifier that consists of three elements. The first is the fiscal year the project began, the second represents the project category, and the third identifies the serial number of the proposal for that fiscal year.

Kammeraad, J E; Jackson, K J; Sketchley, J A; Kotta, P R

2009-03-24T23:59:59.000Z

497

APS Long Range Operations Schedule FY2009  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

09) 09) Alternate Formats: iCal | Excel | PDF APS Long Range Operation Schedule (FY2009) 2008-3 2009-1 2009-2 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

498

ARM - Selected Science Team Proposals - FY 1995  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

5 5 Science Research Themes Research Highlights Journal Articles Collaborations Atmospheric System Research (ASR) ARM Science Team Meetings User Meetings Annual Meetings of the Atmospheric System Research (ASR) Science Team and Fall Working Groups Accomplishments Read about the 20 years of accomplishments (PDF, 696KB) from the ARM Program and user facility. Performance Metrics ASR Metrics 2009 2008 2007 2006 Selected Science Team Proposals - FY 1995 Dr. R. Nelson Byrne, SAIC: "Evolution of a New GCM-Capable Stochastic Cloud/Radiation Parameterization Using ARM Data - Phase II" Dr. Steven J. Ghan, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory: "Parameterization of Convective Cloud Coverage in GCMs" Dr. George Golitsyn, Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of

499

Advanced energy projects; FY 1995 research summaries  

SciTech Connect

The AEP Division supports projects to explore novel energy-related concepts which are typically at an early stage of scientific development, and high-risk, exploratory concepts. Topical areas presently receiving support are: novel materials for energy technology, renewable and biodegradable materials, exploring uses of new scientific discoveries, alternate pathways to energy efficiency, alternative energy sources, and innovative approaches to waste treatment and reduction. There were 46 research projects during FY 1995; ten were initiated during that fiscal year. The summaries are separated into grant and laboratory programs, and small business innovation research programs.

NONE

1995-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

500

Argonne National Laboratory institutional plan FY 2001--FY 2006.  

SciTech Connect

This Institutional Plan describes what Argonne management regards as the optimal future development of Laboratory activities. The document outlines the development of both research programs and support operations in the context of the nation's R and D priorities, the missions of the Department of Energy (DOE) and Argonne, and expected resource constraints. The Draft Institutional Plan is the product of many discussions between DOE and Argonne program managers, and it also reflects programmatic priorities developed during Argonne's summer strategic planning process. That process serves additionally to identify new areas of strategic value to DOE and Argonne, to which Laboratory Directed Research and Development funds may be applied. The Draft Plan is provided to the Department before Argonne's On-Site Review. Issuance of the final Institutional Plan in the fall, after further comment and discussion, marks the culmination of the Laboratory's annual planning cycle. Chapter II of this Institutional Plan describes Argonne's missions and roles within the DOE laboratory system, its underlying core competencies in science and technology, and six broad planning objectives whose achievement is considered critical to the future of the Laboratory. Chapter III presents the Laboratory's ''Science and Technology Strategic Plan,'' which summarizes key features of the external environment, presents Argonne's vision, and describes how Argonne's strategic goals and objectives support DOE's four business lines. The balance of Chapter III comprises strategic plans for 23 areas of science and technology at Argonne, grouped according to the four DOE business lines. The Laboratory's 14 major initiatives, presented in Chapter IV, propose important advances in key areas of fundamental science and technology development. The ''Operations and Infrastructure Strategic Plan'' in Chapter V includes strategic plans for human resources; environmental protection, safety, and health; site and facilities; security, export control, and counterintelligence; information management; communications, outreach, and community affairs; performance-based management; and productivity improvement and overhead cost reduction. Finally, Chapter VI provides resource projections that are a reasonable baseline for planning the Laboratory's future.

Beggs, S.D.

2000-12-07T23:59:59.000Z