National Library of Energy BETA

Sample records for 5 comment responses

  1. CRA Comments & Responses

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    CRA Comments & Responses Home CRA - 2004 Final Recertification Decision CRA Comments & Responses CCA - 1996 CRA CARDs & TSDs CCA CARDs & TSDs Regulatory Tools Completeness Determination-Related Correspondence All EPA & DOE correspondence related to the determination of completeness and the CRA are provided below. Letter Transmitting EPA's CRA Completeness Determination (9/29/05) Notification of Completeness Determination EPA Letter # Subject 1 CRA Comments (5/20/04)

  2. CRA Comments & Responses

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    (51105) 11 Response to CRA Comments (92005) Enclosure 1 - Computer Code VerificationTesting (92005) Inventory and Performance Assessment Reports DOE - Performance...

  3. EEI Comments in response to DOE regulatory review RFI, 76 Fed. Reg. 75798 (Dec. 5, 2011)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is submitting these comments in response to request for information (RFI) issued by the Department of Energy (DOE). In the RFI, DOE is asking for information on...

  4. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Comments and Responses to the Tentative Agreement Regarding The Fast Flux Test Facility (Agreement Major Milestone Series M-81-00) August 1999 2 COMMENTS AND RESPONSES TO THE TENTATIVE AGREEMENT REGARDING THE FAST FLUX TEST FACILITY COMMENTS AND RESPONSES 1. Introduction In January 1997 the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) changed the status of the Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF) from deactivation to standby pending a decision, to be made by December 1998 on whether or not the facility will be

  5. Comment and Response Management System

    Energy Science and Technology Software Center (OSTI)

    1998-06-09

    CRMS is a Web-based client/server application that helps manage, track, and report on institutional responses to public comments on published documents such as environmental impact statements.

  6. BPA Response to Customer Comments-EBBA

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Integration Team Responses to Customer Comments Received on BPA's Proposed Enhanced BPA Balancing Authority (EBBA) - 61212 Table of Contents 1. Market-based Mechanisms...

  7. NCPA No. 2: IX comments and responses to Draft JES

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1980-01-01

    Comments received from twenty-six separate entities are included. Following each letter or set of comments are staff responses. Sections of the draft environmental statement which have been revised in response to these comments are noted. (PCS)

  8. Comment Listing Response to Draft REEE Solicitation FINAL | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy Comment Listing Response to Draft REEE Solicitation FINAL Comment Listing Response to Draft REEE Solicitation FINAL Comment ListingResponse_REEE Solicitation_final.pdf (566.28 KB) More Documents & Publications Draft Advanced Fossil Energy Projects Solicitation Public Comments Draft Advanced Nuclear Energy Solicitation Public Meeting Presentation DOE-LPO_Email-Update_001_Through_11

  9. The EIS Comment-Response Process (DOE, 2004)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This DOE guidance presents a series of recommendations to lead those involved in the preparation and review of a final EIS. The guidance addresses both the substance and the mechanics of the comment-response process and provides advice on tracking and categorizing comments, considering comments and preparing responses, and presenting responses and corresponding changes in a final EIS.

  10. Appendix A: Comments and Responses on the Draft Revised FONSI

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Appendix A: Comments and Responses on the Draft Revised FONSI Comments and Responses on the Draft Revised FONSI Comment Number EA Section Commenter Comment Response 1 General J Moore Curious if the streams in the area of the bannister complex have been examined for pollutants and if any clean up of those are included in these plans? I have a particular interest in Dyke Branch as my property backs up to it. Can you provide recent water quality results? The Draft Revised FONSI was drafted to

  11. The EIS Comment-Response Process | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    and review of a final EIS. The guidance addresses both the substance and the mechanics of the comment-response process and provides advice on tracking and categorizing ...

  12. QER- Comment of Energy Innovation 5

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Hello, Please accept these papers as comments into the QER record for the public meeting on finance and market incentives. Thank you, Hallie

  13. DOE Responses to DOE Challenge Home (formerly Builders Challenge) National Program Requirements Public Comments

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    - Responses to Draft Specification Comments 1 Updated 4/9/2012 DOE Responses to DOE Challenge Home (formerly Builders Challenge) National Program Requirements Public Comments DOE received comments on the draft DOE Challenge Home specifications and requirements from December 15, 2011 through January 31, 2012. This document summarizes the comments received, DOE's responses, and the resulting policy change, if any. All comments were reviewed. Similar comments were grouped together in the responses.

  14. Response to Comments Regarding EPAct 2005 Section 242: October 2014

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This document contains the response to comments that were received in regards to a revised draft of the EPAct 2005 Section 242 "Hydroelectric Incentive Program" Application Guidance that was released on October 20, 2014.

  15. EPAct Section 242 Comments and DOE Responses

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    On July 2, 2014 in the Federal Register, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published and requested comment on draft guidance for implementing Section 242 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct...

  16. Telephone Flat Geothermal Development Project Environmental Impact Statement Environmental Impact Report. Final: Comments and Responses to Comments

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1999-02-01

    This document is the Comments and Responses to Comments volume of the Final Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report prepared for the proposed Telephone Flat Geothermal Development Project (Final EIS/EIR). This volume of the Final EIS/EIR provides copies of the written comments received on the Draft EIS/EIR and the leady agency responses to those comments in conformance with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

  17. Comments received in response to the DOE-QTR Request For Information |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy Comments received in response to the DOE-QTR Request For Information Comments received in response to the DOE-QTR Request For Information All public comments received by the Department in response to the DOE-QTR RFI published in the Federal Register on March 14, 2011 Comments received in response to the DOE-QTR Request For Information (13.25 MB) More Documents & Publications Comments received in response to the DOE-QTR Request For Information Comments received in

  18. Comments of Saton Technology Corporation in response to Smart Grid RFI |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy Saton Technology Corporation in response to Smart Grid RFI Comments of Saton Technology Corporation in response to Smart Grid RFI Satcon Technology Corporation Request for Information Response for: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation for US Department of Energy. Saton Technology Corporation (154.5 KB) More Documents & Publications Lana'ai Hawaii: An Inside Look at the World's Most Advanced Renewable Energy MicroGrid Systems

  19. Microsoft Word - response public comments letters1.doc

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Ken Niles Oregon Office of Energy 625 Marion Street, NE Suite 1 Salem, Oregon 97301-3742 Dear Mr. Niles: COMMENTS ON THE ENGINEERING EVALUATION/COST ANALYSIS (EE/CA) FOR DISPOSITION OF MIXED WASTE FROM THE 183-H SOLAR EVAPORATION BASINS (DOE/RL-2002-63) Thank you for your April 15, 2003, letter submitting the Oregon Office of Energy's comments on the Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis (EE/CA) for Disposition of Mixed Waste from the 183-H Solar Evaporation Basins (DOE/RL-2002-63). Responses to

  20. Rheem Comments | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Rheem Comments Rheem Comments These comments are submitted by Rheem Manufacturing Company in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) notice appearing in the December 5, 2011 Federal Register requesting information on existing regulations that should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed. DOE Comments - Regulatory Burden RFI (377.96 KB) More Documents & Publications DOE Comments Regulatory Burden RFI Fourth RFI Comment on Regulatory Review Reducing Regulatory Burden EO

  1. Microsoft Word - AppendixH_CommentResponse.doc

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    NFSS Vicinity Property Report October 2010 Doc. No. S06246 Page H-1 Responsiveness Summary The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) released the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program Niagara Falls Storage Site Vicinity Properties, New York: Review of Radiological Conditions at Six Vicinity Properties and Two Drainage Ditches on April 23, 2010, for public comment. Report availability was announced through a message to stakeholders sent on behalf of DOE by USACE. The announcement provided a

  2. Responses to Public Comments on Draft Vitrification Melter Evaluation

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    available for public and state review and comment and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) consultation review. The public comments on the Draft WIR Evaluation were submitted to...

  3. Columbia River System Operation Review : Final Environmental Impact Statement, Appendix T (Second Continued Volume): Comments & Responses.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Columbia River System Operation Review

    1995-11-01

    This is Appendix T (second continued volume) giving public comments and responses to the final environmental impact statement for the Columbia River System.

  4. Central Plateau Cleanup Final Comments and Responses Document on Proposed Changes to Central Plateau Cleanup Page 1

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    and Responses on Proposed TPA Changes to Central Plateau Cleanup Final Comments and Responses Document on Proposed Changes to Central Plateau Cleanup Page 1 Comments and Responses to the Tentative Agreement on Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order Implementing Changes to Central Plateau Cleanup October 2010 Comments and Responses on Proposed TPA Changes to Central Plateau Cleanup Final Comments and Responses Document on Proposed Changes to Central Plateau Cleanup Page 2 Public

  5. Initial Northwest Power Act Power Sales Contracts : Final Environmental Impact Statement. Volume 4, Comments and Responses.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    United States. Bonneville Power Administration.

    1992-01-01

    This volume of the Initial Northwest Power Act Power Sales Contracts Final Environmental Impact Statement (Final EIS) contains public comments addressing the Initial Northwest Power Act Power Sales Contracts Draft EIS, August 1990 and Bonneville Power Administration`s (BPA) responses. The Introduction provides information about the process BPA follows in addressing these comments. Part I contains a listing of the Alternative Actions evaluated in the Final EIS; Part II is organized by Alternatives and includes summaries of the comments and BPA responses; Part III provides copies of the original comments letters, and, for ease of identification, are coded in the margins according to the alternative(s) addressed.

  6. Title 40 CFR 1503.4 Response to Comments | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    .4 Response to Comments Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- Federal RegulationFederal Regulation: Title 40 CFR 1503.4 Response to...

  7. Response to Comment on Velocity boundary conditions at a tokamak resistive wall [Phys. Plasmas 21, 094701 (2014)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Strauss, H. R.

    2014-09-15

    A response is given to Comment on Velocity boundary conditions at a tokamak resistive wall? [Phys. Plasmas 21, 094701 (2014)].

  8. BPA Response to Comments on Oversupply Management Protocol

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Wind energy producers, regional utilities, interest groups and others submitted approximately 90 comments on Bonneville Power Administration's Feb. 7 proposed protocol for...

  9. Responses to Public Comments on Draft Vitrification Melter Evaluation...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Evaluation for the Vitrification Melter" (Draft WIR Evaluation) available for public and state review and comment and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) consultation review. ...

  10. Comments of Santiago Grijalva: High-Level Response to DOE RFI...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    High-Level Response to DOE RFI on Smart Grid Policy: This document responds to DOE questions regarding smart grid policy. The approach followed herein is to write concise comments ...

  11. Agency Responses to Comments Received during the 2011 Alaska Forum on the Environment

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Agency Responses to Comments Received during the 2011 Alaska Forum on the EnvironmentEnvironmental Justice Interagency Working Group Community DialogueAnchorage, AKFebruary 7-11, 2011

  12. QER - Comment of American Public Power Association 5 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    5 QER - Comment of American Public Power Association 5 From: Voyles, Seth [svoyles@publicpower.org] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 2:30 PM To: QERcomments CC: Comment on the QER Public Meeting: Electricity Transmission, Storage and Distribution Attachment: APPA Statement for Portland QER Meeting - Final.docx; APPA WAPA JOT Comments -- 8.17.12.pdf; NRECA APPA ltr to Moniz final 1-31-2014.pdf; EXEC-2014-000699.pdf Attached are several documents for consideration for the QER Public Meeting:

  13. Dual axis radiographic hydrodynamic test facility. Final environmental impact statement, Volume 2: Public comments and responses

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1995-08-01

    On May 12, 1995, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) issued the draft Dual Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test Facility Environmental Impact Statement (DARHT EIS) for review by the State of New Mexico, Indian Tribes, local governments, other Federal agencies, and the general public. DOE invited comments on the accuracy and adequacy of the draft EIS and any other matters pertaining to their environmental reviews. The formal comment period ran for 45 days, to June 26, 1995, although DOE indicated that late comments would be considered to the extent possible. As part of the public comment process, DOE held two public hearings in Los Alamos and Santa Fe, New Mexico, on May 31 and June 1, 1995. In addition, DOE made the draft classified supplement to the DARHT EIS available for review by appropriately cleared individuals with a need to know the classified information. Reviewers of the classified material included the State of New Mexico, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Defense, and certain Indian Tribes. Volume 2 of the final DARHT EIS contains three chapters. Chapter 1 includes a collective summary of the comments received and DOE`s response. Chapter 2 contains the full text of the public comments on the draft DARHT EIS received by DOE. Chapter 3 contains DOE`s responses to the public comments and an indication as to how the comments were considered in the final EIS.

  14. Comments

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Comments by the Energy Storage Association to the Department of Energy Electricity Advisory Council March 13, 2014 Good afternoon. My name is Katherine Hamilton and I serve as Policy Director for the Energy Storage Association, an international trade association that was established over 20 years ago to foster the development of energy storage technologies. Since then our mission has been the promotion, development and commercialization of competitive and reliable energy storage delivery systems

  15. Comments of Santiago Grijalva: High-Level Response to DOE RFI on Smart Grid

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Policy | Department of Energy Santiago Grijalva: High-Level Response to DOE RFI on Smart Grid Policy Comments of Santiago Grijalva: High-Level Response to DOE RFI on Smart Grid Policy High-Level Response to DOE RFI on Smart Grid Policy: This document responds to DOE questions regarding smart grid policy. The approach followed herein is to write concise comments addressing the overall RFI document at a higher level. High-Level Response to DOE RFI on Smart Grid Policy (199.09 KB) More

  16. Response from PEPCO to the Comments from the Virginia Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Environmental Quality on PEPCO's Intention to Commence Planned Transmission Outages | Department of Energy PEPCO to the Comments from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality on PEPCO's Intention to Commence Planned Transmission Outages Response from PEPCO to the Comments from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality on PEPCO's Intention to Commence Planned Transmission Outages Docket No. EO-05-01. Order No. 202-05-03: This letter responds to the allegations of the letter

  17. CRE_Response-DOE_Regulatory_Review_Request_for_Comments.pdf

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Center for Regulatory Effectiveness 1601 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC, 20009 Tel: (202) 265-2383 Fax: (202) 939-6969 secretary1@mbsdc.com www.TheCRE.com 1 REGULATORY REVIEW MEMORANDUM To: Department of Energy From: Jim Tozzi Subject: Regulatory Burden Request for Information Date: September 4, 2012 CC: Boris Bershteyn/Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs This Memorandum serves as an Executive Summary of Center for Regulatory Effectiveness' (CRE's) attached comments

  18. DOE Comments Regulatory Burden RFI | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Comments Regulatory Burden RFI DOE Comments Regulatory Burden RFI These comments are submitted by Rheem Manufacturing Company in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) notice appearing in the December 5, 2011 Federal Register requesting information on existing regulations that should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed. Reg_Review_DOE_comts_RFI.pdf (55.91 KB) More Documents & Publications Rheem Comments Fourth RFI Comment on Regulatory Review Reducing Regulatory Burden

  19. Comments of the Demand Response and Smart Grid Coalition on DOE's

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy | Department of Energy the Demand Response and Smart Grid Coalition on DOE's Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy Comments of the Demand Response and Smart Grid Coalition on DOE's Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access,

  20. Comments by the Sierra Club in response to the Department of Energy Special

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Environmental Analysis for Actions Taken under the U.S Department of Energy Emergency Orders Regarding Operation of the Potomac River Generating Station in Alexandria, Virginia | Department of Energy by the Sierra Club in response to the Department of Energy Special Environmental Analysis for Actions Taken under the U.S Department of Energy Emergency Orders Regarding Operation of the Potomac River Generating Station in Alexandria, Virginia Comments by the Sierra Club in response to the

  1. Public Comments on the Request for Information on Rapid Response Teams for

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Transmission (April 2012) | Department of Energy on the Request for Information on Rapid Response Teams for Transmission (April 2012) Public Comments on the Request for Information on Rapid Response Teams for Transmission (April 2012) On February 27, 2012, the Department issued a Federal Register Notice seeking information on questions related to permitting of transmission lines. Infrastructure projects - such as high voltage, long distance, electric transmission facilities - often involve

  2. Demand response compensation, net Benefits and cost allocation: comments

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Hogan, William W.

    2010-11-15

    FERC's Supplemental Notice of Public Rulemaking addresses the question of proper compensation for demand response in organized wholesale electricity markets. Assuming that the Commission would proceed with the proposal ''to require tariff provisions allowing demand response resources to participate in wholesale energy markets by reducing consumption of electricity from expected levels in response to price signals, to pay those demand response resources, in all hours, the market price of energy for such reductions,'' the Commission posed questions about applying a net benefits test and rules for cost allocation. This article summarizes critical points and poses implications for the issues of net benefit tests and cost allocation. (author)

  3. Customer Comments

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Service Customer Comments Customer Response to July 24August 8 Forums N.Wasco County PUD (08262013) Portland General Electric (08262013) Renewable Northwest Project (0826...

  4. Appendix A Scoping Input Appendix B Comments on Draft SWEA and Responses

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    68 December 2014 List of Appendices Appendix A Scoping Input Appendix B Comments on Draft SWEA and Responses Appendix C Summary of Federal Permits, Licenses, and Entitlements Appendix D Description of the South Platte Water Related Activities Program and the Platte River Recovery Implementation Program Appendix E Section 7 Consultation of the Endangered Species Act Correspondence with the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Appendix F Section 106 Consultation of the National Historic Preservation

  5. Remedial investigation plan for Waste Area Grouping 1 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee: Responses to regulator comments

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1991-05-01

    This document, ES/ER-6 D2, is a companion document to ORNL/RAP/Sub-87/99053/4 R1, Remedial Investigation Plan for ORNL Waste Area Grouping 1, dated August 1989. This document lists comments received from the Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4 (EPA) and the Tennessee Department of Health and Environment (TDHE) and responses to each of these comments. As requested by EPA, a revised Remedial Investigation (RI) Plan for Waste Area Grouping (WAG) 1 will not be submitted. The document is divided into two Sections and Appendix. Section I contains responses to comments issued on May 22, 1990, by EPA's Region 4 program office responsible for implementing the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). Section 2 contains responses to comments issued on April 7, 1989, by EPA's program office responsible for implementing the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA); these comments include issues raised by the TDHE. The Appendix contains the attachments referenced in a number of the responses. 35 refs.

  6. Public Comment Procedures | Department of Energy

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Public Comment Procedures Public Comment Procedures In response to an application, any person may file a protest, comments, or a motion to intervene or notice of intervention, as...

  7. QER - Comment of Entergy | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Entergy QER - Comment of Entergy From: Turton, Daniel [dturton@entergy.com] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 5:12 PM To: QERcomments Subject: Subject: Comments on Enhancing Energy Infrastructure Resiliency and Addressing Vulnerabilities Attachment: Entergy Responses to Key Questions Regarding Energy System Vulnerabiliti....pdf Please find our comments for submission attached. My contact information is below if needed. Dan Turton Vice President, Federal Government Affairs Entergy

  8. Interested Parties- WAPA Public Comment

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Comments Received in Response to Western Area Power Administration's Federal Register Notice Titled 'Notice of Proposed Program and Request for Public Comments.'

  9. QTR - unedited comments | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    - unedited comments QTR - unedited comments Comments received in response to the DOE-QTR Request For Information (24.47 MB) More Documents & Publications Table of QTR comments in response to Federal Register RFI Table of QTR comments in response to Federal Register RFI QTR table of respondents

  10. Supplement analysis for continued operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore. Volume 2: Comment response document

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1999-03-01

    The US Department of Energy (DOE), prepared a draft Supplement Analysis (SA) for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore (SNL-L), in accordance with DOE`s requirements for implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (10 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] Part 1021.314). It considers whether the Final Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore (1992 EIS/EIR) should be supplement3ed, whether a new environmental impact statement (EIS) should be prepared, or no further NEPA documentation is required. The SA examines the current project and program plans and proposals for LLNL and SNL-L, operations to identify new or modified projects or operations or new information for the period from 1998 to 2002 that was not considered in the 1992 EIS/EIR. When such changes, modifications, and information are identified, they are examined to determine whether they could be considered substantial or significant in reference to the 1992 proposed action and the 1993 Record of Decision (ROD). DOE released the draft SA to the public to obtain stakeholder comments and to consider those comments in the preparation of the final SA. DOE distributed copies of the draft SA to those who were known to have an interest in LLNL or SNL-L activities in addition to those who requested a copy. In response to comments received, DOE prepared this Comment Response Document.

  11. Public Comments in Response to the November 10, 2011 Federal Register Notice

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    The Department issued a Federal Register Notice initiating preparations for development of the current National Electric Transmission Congestion Study. DOE requested comments on what publicly-available data and information should be considered, and what types of analysis should be performed to identify and understand the significance and character of transmission congestion. The following public comments were received as of March 30, 2012.

  12. Comments and responses on the Remedial Action Plan and site design for stabilization of the Inactive Uranium Mill Tailings Site, Grand Junction, Colorado. Revision 1

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1994-01-01

    This report contains information concerning public comments and responses on the remedial action plan and site design for stabilization of the inactive uranium mill tailings site in Grand Junction, Colorado.

  13. Response to Comment on Stationary self-focusing of Gaussian laser beam in relativistic thermal quantum plasma [Phys. Plasmas 21, 064701 (2014)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Patil, S. D.; Takale, M. V.

    2014-06-15

    Habibi and Ghamari have presented a Comment on our paper [Phys. Plasmas 20, 072703 (2013)] by examining quantum dielectric response in thermal quantum plasma. They have modeled the relativistic self-focusing of Gaussian laser beam in cold and warm quantum plasmas and reported that self-focusing length does not change in both situations. In this response, we have reached the following important conclusions about the comment itself.

  14. Table of QTR comments in response to Federal Register RFI | Department of

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Energy response

  15. Reply Comments of Entergy Services, Inc. | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Entergy Services, Inc. Reply Comments of Entergy Services, Inc. Entergy Services, Inc. ("Entergy"), on behalf of itself and its operating affiliates, hereby submits reply comments in response to the Department of Energy's ("DOE") Request for Information ("RFI"), released May 5, 2010, regarding the current and projected communications requirements of electric utilities. Entergy commented on similar issues in proceedings before the Federal Communications Commission

  16. Notices III. Summary of Public Comments

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    During the public comment period provided, EPA received no comments in response to the ... Order Pursuant to FIFRA section 6(f), EPA hereby approves the requested cancellation ...

  17. Dairyland Power Cooperative comments | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Dairyland Power Cooperative comments Response comments from Dairyland Power Cooperative on the Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logisitical Reliability Dairyland Power ...

  18. LLNL's Response to 9/9/2009 Annual Inspection Report Comments B113 Issue #1 and B271 Issue #2

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Schwartz, W W

    2009-11-19

    This is LLNL's responses to comments in the 9/9/2009 Annual Inspection Report concerning Underground Storage Tank (UST) 113-D1U2 (Issue No.1) at Building 113 and UST 271-D2U1 (Issue No.2) at Building 271. Also provided is the required Application for Underground Storage Tank Modification for USTs 113-D1U2 and 271-D2U1 and the specification sheet for the Phil-Tite spill bucket that is proposed to be installed in the 271-D2U1 sump.

  19. Microsoft Word - DC-#771574-v5-CvD_-_Comments_re_DOE_New_Sec_Det.docx

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    6, 2015 Mr. David Henderson Office of Nuclear Energy U.S. Department of Energy Mailstop NE-52 19901 Germantown Road Germantown, MD 20874-1290 RFI-UraniumTransfers@hq.doe.gov VIA E-MAIL Subject: Department of Energy - Excess Uranium Management: Effects of DOE Transfers of Excess Uranium on Domestic Uranium Mining, Conversion, and Enrichment Industries; Notice of Issues for Public Comment - 80 Fed. Reg. 14107 (March 18, 2015) Dear Mr. Henderson: ConverDyn appreciates the opportunity to provide our

  20. Public Comments on the proposed 10 CFR Part 51 rule for renewal of nuclear power plant operating licenses and supporting documents: Review of concerns and NRC staff response. Appendices

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1996-05-01

    This volume contains several appendices. Appendix A contains the list of individuals and organizations providing comments at various stages of the rulemaking process. The names of commenters at the public meetings are listed in the order that they spoke at the meeting; those who submitted written comments are listed by docket number. Appendix B contains the summaries of comments made. Each comment summary is identified by a unique comment number. Appendix C presents the concerns and NRC staff responses. Each concern embodies one or more comments on similar or related issues. The associated comment numbers are referenced for each concern. The concerns are organized by topic areas. A three-letter identifier for the topic, followed by a number, is assigned to each concern.

  1. CenterPoint Comments | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    CenterPoint Comments CenterPoint Comments CenterPoint Comments on the Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges CenterPoint Comments (5.21 MB) More Documents & Publications City Utilities of Springfield Missouri Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Dairyland Power Cooperative Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Comments of North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) to DOE Smart Grid RFI:

  2. Response to comments received from the State of Colorado and the public on the Environmental Assessment for resumption of thermal stabilization of plutonium oxide in Building 707

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1994-02-01

    The Department of Energy (DOE) prepared this document to respond to comments from the State of Colorado and the public on the draft Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Resumption of Thermal Stabilization of Plutonium Oxide in Building 707 at the Rocky Flats Plant (RFP) in Golden, Colorado. The draft EA was provided to the State of Colorado and the public on September 8, 1993, for a comment period of 60 days. The Department`s National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Implementing Procedures (10 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 1021.301) requires that prior to approval of the EA, DOE is to allow the host State and Indian Tribe a period of from 14 to 30 days to review and comment on the EA. The Department established a comment period of 60 days for this EA in response to requests by the public during the first public meeting on July 7, 1993, before preparation of the EA. Other issues raised at the July 7 meeting included the range of alternatives to be considered, the time period for preparation of the EA, and the amount of material to be thermally stabilized. These and other comments made by the public at that meeting were carefully considered in preparation of the EA. In addition to providing the preapproval draft EA to the State of Colorado, DOE distributed the EA to all persons and groups on the RFP public information mailing list and placed the EA and reference documents in the DOE Public Reading Rooms in the RFP area. A public meeting was held on October 6, 1993, to hear public comments on the draft EA. All comments on the draft EA, those received both at the October 6 public meeting and through correspondence, have been reproduced in their entirety in this Response to Comments document. Responses to the commenters` questions and concerns are provided, and changes made to the body of the EA are indicated in the responses. All comments received have been considered in the revision of the EA.

  3. DOE Extends Comment Period for Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    | Department of Energy Extends Comment Period for Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden DOE Extends Comment Period for Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden March 31, 2011 - 5:13pm Addthis The Department of Energy today announces an extension of the reply comment period for its Request for Information implementing Executive Order 13563, seeking public comment on how best to review its existing regulations. The Department is interested in receiving comment on the suggestions and

  4. Response to Comment on "The National Ignition Facility Laser Performance Status"

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Haynam, C A; Sacks, R A; Moses, E I; Manes, K; Haan, S; Spaeth, M L

    2007-12-11

    We appreciate Stephen Bodner's continuing interest in the performance of the NIF laser system. However, we find it necessary to disagree with the conclusions he reached in his comments [Appl. Opt. 47, XXX (2008)] on 'National Ignition Facility Laser Performance Status' [Appl. Opt. 46, 3276 (2007)]. In fact, repeated and ongoing tests of the NIF beamlines have demonstrated that NIF can be expected not only to meet or exceed its requirements as established in the mid-1990s in the document National Ignition Facility Functional Requirements and Primary Criteria [Revision 1.3, Report NIF-LLNL-93-058 (1994)], but also to have the flexibility that provides for successfully meeting an ever expanding range of mission goals, including those of ignition.

  5. NNMCAB Correspondence 2013-05 (Response Hg SEIS) | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    5 (Response Hg SEIS) NNMCAB Correspondence 2013-05 (Response Hg SEIS) Response to NNMCAB Correspondence 2013-01. DOE provided comment responses on the Mercury Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement comments that were submitted by the NNMCAB. Correspondence 2013-05 - Response Hg Letter (713.92

  6. Comments of the Demand Response and Smart Grid Coalition on DOE...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    the Demand Response and Smart Grid Coalition on DOE's Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy ...

  7. Goodman Manufacturing Company Comment

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    These comments are submitted by Goodman Global, Inc. (“Goodman”) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) request for information (RFI) appearing in the Federal Register on July 3, 2014.

  8. EIS-0287: Notice of Extension for Time for Comments | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Extension for Time for Comments EIS-0287: Notice of Extension for Time for Comments Preferred Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Technology In response to a public request, the...

  9. Comments of the Utilities Telecom Council | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Comments of the Utilities Telecom Council. UTC has filed comments on this issue in response to the DOE's RFI regarding the communication needs of utilities which are incorporated ...

  10. Reply Comments of Southern Company Services, Inc. | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Southern Company Services, Inc. Reply Comments of Southern Company Services, Inc. Southern Company Services, Inc. ("Southern"), on behalf of itself and its operating affiliates, hereby submits its reply comments in response to the Department of Energy's ("DOE's") Request for Information ("RFI"), released May 5, 2010, about current and projected communications requirements of electric utilities.1 Southern appreciates the opportunity to provide DOE with additional

  11. Final Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report for continued operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore. Volume 4, Comments and responses

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1992-08-01

    This Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (EIS/EIR) is prepared pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This document analyzes the potential environmental impacts of the proposed action: continued operation, including near-term (within 5 to 10 years) proposed projects, of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore (SNL, Livermore). Additionally, this document analyzes a no action alternative involving continuing operations at FY 1992 funding levels without further growth, a modification of operations alternative to reduce adverse environmental impacts of operations or facilities, and a shutdown and decommissioning alternative of UC discontinuing its management of LLNL after the current contract expires on September 30, 1992. This document assesses the environmental impacts of the Laboratories` operations on air and water quality, geological and ecological systems, occupational and public health risks, prehistoric and historic resources, endangered species, floodplains and wetlands, socioeconomic resources, hazardous waste management, site contamination, and other environmental issues. The EIS/EIR is divided into five volumes and two companion reports. This volume contains copies of the written comments and transcripts of individual statements at the public hearing and the responses to them.

  12. EIS-0391-FEIS-Volume3-Comment_Response_TOC-2012

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    DOE/EIS-0391 Final Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington Volume 3, Book 1 Section 1: Overview Section 2: Topics of Interest Section 3: Individual Commentors U.S. Department of Energy November 2012 1 Cover Sheet Responsible Agency: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Cooperating Agencies: Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Title: Final Tank Closure and Waste Management

  13. Comments received in response to the DOE-QTR Request For Information |

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    06092010_CHP.pdf (5.45 MB) More Documents & Publications CHP: Connecting the Gap between Markets and Utility Interconnection and Tariff Practices, 2006 CHP: Enabling Resilient Energy Infrastructure - Presentations from April 2013 Webinar Combined Heat and Power - A Decade of Progress, A Vision for the Future, August 2009 Department of Energy

    This 2000 report identifies the short-, medium-, and long-term potential of internal combustion engines, combustion turbines, fuel cells, and

  14. Microsoft Word - Regulatory Burden RFI NEMA Comments regarding small motor regulations 17July2015 v5_1.docx

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    November 28, 2 July 17, 2015 VIA EMAIL TO: Regulatory.Review@hq.doe.gov Mr. Aaron Stevenson U.S. Department of Energy Office of the Assistant General Counsel Legislation, Regulation, and Energy Efficiency 1000 Independence Ave, SW Washington, DC 20585 Reducing Regulatory Burden: Request for Information (RFI) Dear Mr. Stevenson, The National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) appreciates the opportunity to provide the attached comments on the Request for Information to Reduce Regulatory

  15. Final Environmental Impact Statement for the construction and operation of Claiborne Enrichment Center, Homer, Louisiana (Docket No. 70-3-70). Volume 2, Public comments and NRC response

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Zeitoun, A.

    1994-08-01

    The Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) (Volume 1), was prepared by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in accordance with regulation 10 CFR Part 51, which implements the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), to assess the potential environmental impacts for licensing the construction and operation of a proposed gaseous centrifuge enrichment facility to be built in Claiborne Parish, Louisiana by Louisiana Energy Services, L.P. (LES). The proposed facility would have a production capacity of about 866 metric tons annually of up to 5 weight percent enriched UF{sub 6}, using a proven centrifuge technology. Included in the assessment are co on, both normal operations and potential accidents (internal and external events), and the eventual decontamination and decommissioning of the site. In order to help assure that releases from the operation of the facility and potential impacts on the public are as low as reasonably achievable, an environmental monitoring program was developed by LES to detect significant changes in the background levels of uranium around the site. Other issues addressed include the purpose and need for the facility, the alternatives to the proposed action, potential disposition of the tails, the site selection process, and environmental justice. The NRC staff concludes that the facility can be constructed and operated with small and acceptable impacts on the public and the environment, and proposes to issue a license to the applicant, Louisiana Energy Services, to authorize construction and operation of the proposed facility. The letters in this Appendix have been divided into three sections. Section One contains letters to which the NRC responded by addressing specific comments. Section Two contains the letters that concerned the communities of Forest Grove and Center Springs. Section Three is composed of letters that required no response. These letters were generally in support of the facility.

  16. DC OPC Comments. September 17, 2010 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    OPC Comments. September 17, 2010 DC OPC Comments. September 17, 2010 Comments of the office of peoples counsel, washington DC in response to the department of energy's request for information concerning smart grid issues. DC OPC Comments. September 17, 2010 (104.21 KB) More Documents & Publications Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to smart grid Implementation: eMeter Response to Department of Energy RFI Comments of DRSG to DOE Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical

  17. Zero Zone Comment | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Zero Zone Comment Zero Zone Comment These comments are submitted by Zero Zone Inc., a manufacturer of CRE equipment, in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) notice in the July 3, 2014 Federal Register requesting information to assist DOE in reviewing existing regulations and in making its regulatory program more effective and less burdensome. Zero Zone comments (101.48 KB) More Documents & Publications Regulatory Burden RFI Executive Order 13563 certification, compliance and

  18. Customer Comments

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2009) Customer Comments on 2009 PTSA Avista Utilities BPA Power Services Grant County PUD Horizon Wind Energy Iberdrola Renewables Northwest Requirements Utilities Powerex...

  19. Customer Comments

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Customer Comments BPA Power (452012) Clark PUD (452012) Cowlitz PUD (452012) Emerald PUD (452012) Franklin PUD (452012) Grant PUD (452012) Iberdrola (452012)...

  20. Comments of the Bonneville Power Administration | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    the Bonneville Power Administration Comments of the Bonneville Power Administration BPA appreciates the opportunity to provide comments and information and submits the following comments in response to the DOE RFI. Comments of the Bonneville Power Administration (133.04 KB) More Documents & Publications RE: NBP RFI: Communication Requirements CX-001184: Categorical Exclusion Determination Communications Requirements of Smart Grid Technologies

  1. Goodman Manufacturing Company Comment | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    These comments are submitted by Goodman Global, Inc. ("Goodman") in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) request for information (RFI) appearing in the Federal...

  2. National Electrical Manufacturers Association Comment | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy Comment National Electrical Manufacturers Association Comment The National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) appreciates the opportunity to provide the attached comments on the Request for Information to Reduce Regulatory Burden as announced in the U.S. Federal Register Vol. 80, No. 127, beginning on page 38019. Regulatory Burden RFI NEMA Comments regarding small motor regulations 17July2015 v5_1 (174.95 KB) More Documents & Publications Ex Parte Communications in

  3. Response to Comment on General rotating quantum vortex filaments in the low-temperature Svistunov model of the local induction approximation [Phys. Fluids 26, 119101 (2014)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Van Gorder, Robert A.

    2014-11-15

    In R. A. Van Gorder, General rotating quantum vortex filaments in the low-temperature Svistunov model of the local induction approximation, Phys. Fluids 26, 065105 (2014) I discussed properties of generalized vortex filaments exhibiting purely rotational motion under the low-temperature Svistunov model of the local induction approximation. Such solutions are stationary in terms of translational motion. In the Comment [N. Hietala, Comment on General rotating quantum vortex filaments in the low-temperature Svistunov model of the local induction approximation [Phys. Fluids 26, 065105 (2014)], Phys. Fluids 26, 119101 (2014)], the author criticizes my paper for not including translational motion (although it was clearly stated that the filament motion was assumed rotational). As it turns out, if one is interested in studying the geometric structure of solutions (which was the point of my paper), one obtains the needed qualitative results on the structure of such solutions by studying the purely rotational case. Nevertheless, in this Response I shall discuss the vortex filaments that have both rotational and translational motions. I then briefly discuss why one might want to study such generalized rotating filament solutions, in contrast to simple the standard helical or planar examples (which are really special cases). I also discuss how one can study the time evolution of filaments which exhibit more complicated dynamics than pure translation and rotation. Doing this, one can study non-stationary solutions which initially appear purely rotational and gradually display other dynamics as the filaments evolve.

  4. Page comments

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    with-serial-codes-on-login-nodesPageComment101 http:www.nersc.govuserssoftwarecompilersintel-fortran-c-and-cintel-bug-reportsintel-uses-very-old-version-of-libstdc-by-de...

  5. COMMENTS | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    COMMENTS� COMMENTS� COMMENTS� (52.93 KB) More Documents & Publications COMMENTS� Microsoft Word - Appendix A_2006_Jun CHAPTER 7 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

  6. U.S. Department of Energy Responses to Public Comments on the Draft Waste- Incidental-to-Reprocessing Evaluation for the West Valley Demonstration Project Concentrator Feed Makeup Tank and Melter Feed Hold Tank

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is providing responses to the comments received from the public and from state and county agencies on the West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP) Draft Waste-Incidental-to-Reprocessing (WIR) Evaluation for the Concentrator Feed Makeup Tank (CFMT) and the Melter Feed Hold Tank (MFHT), referred to hereafter as the Draft Evaluation.

  7. Comments by Battelle Memorial Institute to DOE Rulemaking | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy by Battelle Memorial Institute to DOE Rulemaking Comments by Battelle Memorial Institute to DOE Rulemaking Comments by Battelle Memorial Institute in response to DOE' s July 27, 2010 Notice of Inquiry and Request for Comment (Notice) regarding implementation of Section 934 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (Act). Comments by Battelle Memorial Institute to DOE Rulemaking (1.03 MB) More Documents & Publications Exelon response CSC_Extension.PDF Memorandum

  8. Comments from Alaska Energy Authority 08-29-13.pdf

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Energy by Battelle Memorial Institute to DOE Rulemaking Comments by Battelle Memorial Institute to DOE Rulemaking Comments by Battelle Memorial Institute in response to DOE' s July 27, 2010 Notice of Inquiry and Request for Comment (Notice) regarding implementation of Section 934 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (Act). Comments by Battelle Memorial Institute to DOE Rulemaking (1.03 MB) More Documents & Publications Exelon response CSC_Extension.PDF Memorandum

  9. Edison Electric Institute Comments | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Comments Edison Electric Institute Comments The Edison Electric Institute (EEi) is submitting this letter and the enclosed comments in response to the above-referenced request for infonnation (RFI). DOE - Reg review - EEI cmts 7-11-16 (497.95 KB) More Documents & Publications Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 47328 Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 28518 (May 15, 2012) Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Reducing

  10. Re: Comments on NBP RFI: Data Access | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Comments on NBP RFI: Data Access Re: Comments on NBP RFI: Data Access Consumers Union, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen submit the following comments in response to the U.S. Department of Energy (-DOE or -Department) in the above-referenced matter. Re: Comments on NBP RFI: Data Access (137.31 KB) More Documents & Publications Comments on Smart Grid data access AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments to:DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Smart Grid RFI: Addressing

  11. QER- Comment of Process Gas Consumer Group

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Hello, Attached are comments offered by the Process Gas Consumers Group in response to the August 25, 2014 Federal Register Notice soliciting comments on issues related to the Quadrennial Energy Review. Please let us know if you have any questions or would like any additional information.

  12. COMMENTS | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    COMMENTS� COMMENTS� COMMENTS� (64.91 KB) More Documents & Publications CHAPTER 7 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Microsoft Word - CHAP02ESH _REVISED1_3.doc CHAPTER 3

  13. DOE responses to Ecology review comments for ``Sampling and analysis plans for the 100-D Ponds voluntary remediation project``

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    NONE

    1996-12-31

    The Sampling and Analysis Plan describes the sampling and analytical activities which will be performed to support closure of the 100-D Ponds at the Hanford Reservation. This report contains responses by the US Department of Energy to Ecology review for ``Sampling and Analysis Plan for the 100-D Ponds Voluntary Remediation Project.``

  14. Mr. Rod Beever, Retrospective Review Comment | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Mr. Rod Beever, Retrospective Review Comment Mr. Rod Beever, Retrospective Review Comment The following content was created in response to the Federal Register, Vol. 81,No.90 published May 10, 2016 in regards to reducing regulatory burden via a Request for Information (RFI). This is part of the implementation of Executive Order 13563. Mr. Rod Beever, Retrospective Review Comment (254.11 KB) More Documents & Publications SEVENTH RFI COMMENTS ON REDUCING REGULATORY BURDEN Notice of

  15. NBP RFI: Communications Requirements - Reply Comments of Utilities Telecom

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Council | Department of Energy Requirements - Reply Comments of Utilities Telecom Council NBP RFI: Communications Requirements - Reply Comments of Utilities Telecom Council The Utilities Telecom Council hereby files its reply comments in response to the Department of Energy (DOE) request for information on the communications needs of electric utilities and other such critical infrastructure industries (CII). The comments on the record- including those by APPA, EEI and NRECA, as well as API -

  16. Sierra Pacific Power Company Alturas Transmission Line Project, Final Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement. Volume 2: Comments and responses

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1995-11-01

    Sierra Pacific Power Company has proposed the construction and operation of a 345,000 volt overhead electric power transmission line from Alturas, California to Reno, Nevada. This Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement will assess the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project and alternatives. This report contains public comments which were received on the Draft EIR/S. Significant issues may be identified through public and agency comments.

  17. Microsoft Word - NWEC Comments_Momentum Savings Proposed Allocation...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    in response to BPA's notice for comment on the draft momentum savings allocation methodology. This letter outlines our concerns with the current proposal and requests that BPA...

  18. Tendril RFI Comments - 11.1.10 - DRAFT

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Tendril offers a software and hardware solution that enables residential home energy management and demand response. Therefore, our comments will primarily address issues that ...

  19. Smart Grid Request for Information and Public Comments | Department...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    RICE Ruling Water Heater Ruling Demand Response and Smart Grid Coalition (DRSG) District of Columbia Office of the People's Counsel (DC OPC) Comments Attachment Divan, Deepak, ...

  20. NBP RFI: Communications Requirements - Reply Comments of Utilities...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    The Utilities Telecom Council hereby files its reply comments in response to the Department of Energy (DOE) request for information on the communications needs of electric ...

  1. NAESCO Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI Final

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    The National Association of Energy Service Companies (NAESCO) appreciates the opportunity to submit these comments in response to the Request for Information (RFI) entitled, “Reducing Regulatory...

  2. CA IOUs Comment Letter

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    June 19, 2012 Mr. Daniel Cohen U.S. Department of Energy Office of the General Council 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 6A245 Washington, DC 20585-0121 Dear Mr. Cohen: This letter comprises the comments of the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), Southern California Gas Company (SCGC), San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E), and Southern California Edison (SCE) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Request for Information on Regulatory Burden. The signatories of this

  3. DOE Seeks Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy Seeks Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden DOE Seeks Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden March 22, 2011 - 5:24pm Addthis The Department of Energy today announces the opening of the reply comment period for its Request for Information implementing Executive Order 13563, seeking public comment on how best to review its existing regulations and to identify whether any of its existing regulations should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed. The Department is

  4. QER- Comment of Lisa Petrie

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    To Whom it May Concern: Attached please find my comments for the Quadrennial Energy Review. I attended the meeting and gave the comments orally, but I wasn't able to finish because of the 3-minute time limit, so I'm sending them in written form (with a couple of very small revisions). I'd also like to say that I was disappointed to find that the meeting was poorly publicized, that very few members of the general public or the environmental community were present, and that there were no environmentalists or opponents of the proposed AIM pipeline expansion project among the formal speakers. I sincerely hope that future hearings will be more balanced, in keeping with this Administration's promise of transparent government that's responsive to the needs and concerns of its citizens. Thank you so much for taking the time to read and consider my comments. Respectfully Yours, Lisa Petrie Stay-at-home mom and concerned citizen

  5. Comments of Tendril Networks Inc | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Tendril Networks Inc Comments of Tendril Networks Inc Tendril is pleased to provide these comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) in response to the Request for Information "Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation." Tendril offers a software and hardware solution that enables residential home energy management and demand response. Therefore, our comments will primarily address issues that affect metering technologies, consumer-facing programs and the

  6. National emission standards for hazardous air pollutants petroleum refineries. Background information for final standards. Summary of public comments and responses. Final report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1995-07-01

    National emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) are promulgated for the petroleum refinery industry under authority of section 112 of the Clean Air Act. This background information document provides technical information and analyses used in the development of the final NESHAP and Agency reponses to public comments on the proposed rule.

  7. Appendix C - Comments and Responses

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    High Economic Growth case projections This page inTenTionally lefT blank 43 U.S. Energy Information Administration | International Energy Outlook 2016 High Economic Growth case projections Table B1. World total primary energy consumption by region, High Economic Growth case, 2011-40 (quadrillion Btu) Region History Projections Average annual percent change, 2012-40 2011 2012 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 OECD OECD Americas 120.6 118.1 128.2 132.3 137.0 142.4 150.1 0.9 United States a 96.8 94.4 103.1

  8. DOE Extends Comment Period on Notice of Inquiry Under the Energy Independence and Security Act

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Today, in response to a formal request, General Counsel Scott Blake Harris approved a 30-day extension of the public comment period on DOE's Notice of Inquiry (75 FR 43945) soliciting comment on...

  9. Reply Comments of T-Mobile USA, Inc. | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    T-Mobile USA, Inc. Reply Comments of T-Mobile USA, Inc. T-Mobile USA, Inc. ("T-Mobile") hereby submits these reply comments in response to the above-captioned Request for ...

  10. Comment Period Closed Explained

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The public comment period on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) has ended, and DOE is preparing a Final EIS. The Final EIS will consider and respond to all timely public comments on the...

  11. QER- Comment of WIRES

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Attached please find the components of WIRES Comment to the QER. Please direct any questions to Jim Hoecker, below.

  12. Submitting Comments via Email

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Submitting Comments via Email Any contact information provided in your e-mail submission will not be publicly viewable except for your first and last names, organization name (if any), and submitter representative name (if any). Your contact information will be publicly viewable if you include it in the comment itself or in any documents attached to your comment. Any information that you do not want to be publicly viewable should not be included in your comment, nor in any document attached to

  13. Ambient Corporation's response to NBP RFI: Communications Requirements...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Ambient Corporation's response to NBP RFI: Communications Requirements Ambient Corporation's response to NBP RFI: Communications Requirements Ambient Corporation's comments on ...

  14. Appendix Table of Contents Appendix I: Detailed Reviewer Comments...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    ... The regulatory roadmap and NFPA database are integrated as a part of the Regulatory and ... Comments and PI Responses I-199 PI Response: The Reviewer identifies an imporant issue. ...

  15. PTL-5 From: Malin,Debra J - PTL-5

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    M - PFP-6; Clark,Harry W - PTL-5; Wilson,Scott K - PS-6; Olive,J Courtney - LP- 7; Larson,Cheryl A - PS-6 Subject: FW: PPC comments on EPP framework Attachments: PPC Comments -...

  16. HPBA Comments NOPR on Energy Conservation Standards for Direct Heating

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Equipment | Department of Energy Comments NOPR on Energy Conservation Standards for Direct Heating Equipment HPBA Comments NOPR on Energy Conservation Standards for Direct Heating Equipment The Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association (HPBA) provides these comments in response to the Department of Energy (DOE) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking entitled "Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Direct Heating Equipment," published at 76 Fed. Reg. 43941 (July 22,

  17. Information Technology Industry Council Comment | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Information Technology Industry Council Comment Information Technology Industry Council Comment The Information Technology Industry Council (ITI) appreciates the opportunity to submit comments in response to the Regulatory Burden RFI.1 ITI represents the leading global innovators of information and communications technology (ICT), an industry committed to developing energy-efficient solutions both for our own products and to help enable energy efficiency in other more energy intensive sectors.

  18. Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges, Comments from

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    the Edison Electric Institute | Department of Energy Challenges, Comments from the Edison Electric Institute Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges, Comments from the Edison Electric Institute The Edison Electric Institute ("EEI"), on behalf of its member companies, hereby submits the following comments in response to the request by the Department of Energy ("DOE" or "Department") for information on a wide range of issues dealing with Smart

  19. AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    to:DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges | Department of Energy AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments to:DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments to:DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges AARP submits the following comments on consumers and smart grid issues in response to the

  20. Air Conditioning Heating and Refrigeration Institute Comment | Department

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    of Energy Air Conditioning Heating and Refrigeration Institute Comment Air Conditioning Heating and Refrigeration Institute Comment These comments are submitted by the Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) notice in the July 3, 2014 Federal Register requesting information to assist DOE in reviewing existing regulations and in making its regulatory program more effective and less burdensome. DOE Reg Burden RFI

  1. Air-conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute Comments |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy Air-conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute Comments Air-conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute Comments These comments are submitted by the Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) notice in the May 10, 2016 Federal Register requesting information to assist DOE in reviewing existing regulations pursuant to Executive Order 13563 "Improving Regulation and Regulatory

  2. City Utilities of Springfield Missouri Comments on Smart Grid RFI:

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges | Department of Energy Utilities of Springfield Missouri Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges City Utilities of Springfield Missouri Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges City Utilities of Springfield Missouri provides comments in response to the Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges (239.41 KB) More

  3. Comments of consumer electronics association | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    consumer electronics association Comments of consumer electronics association The Consumer Electronics Association ("CEA") respectfully submits these comments in response to the Department of Energy's ("DOE") Request for Information ("RFI") in the captioned proceeding. Comments of consumer electronics association (591.03 KB) More Documents & Publications Re: NBP RFI: Data Access A POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR THE 21st CENTURY GRID: Enabling Our Secure Energy Future

  4. 5

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    5 5.6 TEMPERATURE LIMITATIONS - CRANE HOOKS, HOIST HOOKS, AND MISCELLANEOUS ... is required that month. 5.5.1.4 Crane hooks, hoist hooks, and miscellaneous ...

  5. Microsoft Word - NGP EIS scoping Comment

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Environ me ntal Imp act Statemen t for the Acquisition of a Natural Gas Pipeline and Natural Gas Utility Service at the Hanford Site U.S. Department of Energy Written Comment Form Must be received on or before February 22, 2012. Please use other side if more space is needed. Comment forms may be mailed to: Comment forms may be sent by electronic mail to: Mr. Douglas Chapin naturalgaseis@rl.gov NEPA Document Manager U.S. DOE/Richland Operations Office Box 550, MSIN A5-11 Richland, WA 99352

  6. Approval/Variation Request Comment Sheet

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    EA15PC3041-3-0 Mar. 25, 2003 Rev. 0 Page 1 of 2 Approval/Variation Request Comment Sheet 1. Page of 2. G APPROVAL REQUEST 3. G VARIATION REQUEST 4. AR/VR No. 5. PO/Subcontract No. 6. Organization 7. Reviewer 8. Comment: 9. Disposition: Working Copy EA15PC3041-3-0 Mar. 25, 2003 Rev. 0 Page 2 of 2 Instructions for Filling Out Approval/Variation Request Comment Sheet Block 1. Technical Reviewer - Enter the total number of pages upon completion of the review. 2. Technical Reviewer - Check the

  7. DOE F 1600.5

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    5 (06-94) All Other Editions Are Obsolete OMB Control No. 1910-0400 U.S. Department of Energy Assurance of Compliance Nondiscrimination in Federally Assisted Programs Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 15 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden

  8. Updated Class Deviation for FAR 52.209-5, Certifications Regarding Responsibility Matters

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Attached is the updated DOE Class Deviation for FAR 52.209-5, Certifications Regarding Responsibility Matters, addressing felony convictions under Federal laws and unpaid Federal tax liabilities. This Class Deviation was previously provided in Policy Flash 2012-40. The Class Deviation has been updated to reflect additional direction to federal agencies contained in Civilian Agency Acquisition Letter 2014-01. Solicitation provisions are now included for FY 2012 and 2013 funding actions, and for FY 2014 and subsequent year funding actions. A FAR case has been initiated to formally incorporate the guidance into the FAR.

  9. Notice of extension of public comment period for reply comments...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Notice of extension of public comment period for reply comments. On July 27, 2010, the ... incidents.The NOI provided a September 27, 2010, deadline for comments, which was ...

  10. Response to Comment on Magnetic geometry and physics of advanced divertors: The X-divertor and the snowflake? [Phys. Plasmas 21, 054701 (2014)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kotschenreuther, Mike; Valanju, Prashant; Covele, Brent; Mahajan, Swadesh

    2014-05-15

    Relying on coil positions relative to the plasma, the Comment on Magnetic geometry and physics of advanced divertors: The X-divertor and the snowflake? [Phys. Plasmas 21, 054701 (2014)], emphasizes a criterion for divertor characterization that was critiqued to be ill posed [M. Kotschenreuther et al., Phys. Plasmas 20, 102507 (2013)]. We find that no substantive physical differences flow from this criteria. However, using these criteria, the successful NSTX experiment by Ryutov et al. [Phys. Plasmas 21, 054701 (2014)] has the coil configuration of an X-divertor (XD), rather than a snowflake (SF). On completing the divertor index (DI) versus distance graph for this NSTX shot (which had an inexplicably missing region), we find that the DI is like an XD for most of the outboard wetted divertor plate. Further, the proximity condition, used to define an SF [M. Kotschenreuther et al., Phys. Plasmas 20, 102507 (2013)], does not have a substantive physics basis to override metrics based on flux expansion and line length. Finally, if the criteria of the comment are important, then the results of NSTX-like experiments could have questionable applicability to reactors.

  11. Comments of Ingersoll Rand on Smart Grid RFI | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    of Ingersoll Rand on Smart Grid RFI Comments of Ingersoll Rand on Smart Grid RFI Ingersoll Rand Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Ingersoll Rand Comments (215.54 KB) More Documents & Publications Ambient Corporation's response to NBP RFI: Communications Requirements Guidebook for ARRA Smart Grid Program Metrics and Benefits FAQ: Funding Opportunity Announcement-Smart Grid Investment Grants

  12. Reliability Question Comment

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Reliability-Question-Comment Sign In About | Careers | Contact | Investors | bpa.gov Search News & Us Expand News & Us Projects & Initiatives Expand Projects & Initiatives...

  13. TECHNICAL STANDARDS COMMENT RESOLUTION

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    PurposeThis procedure provides guidance for resolving comments on DOE Technical Standards that are received during the coordination process. 

  14. Microsoft Word - 201-007658 - CS Public Comment draft 12Aug2014 incl OMB CI chgs lbnl khl.docx

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Draft for Public Comment National Electric Transmission Congestion Study August 2014 United States Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 Department of Energy | August 2014 National Electric Transmission Congestion Study | Page ii How to File Comments on This Draft Study This draft study has been released for public comment for a period of 60 days. The comment period will close at 5 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time, October 20, 2014. After the close of the public comment period, the Department of

  15. DRSG Comments to DOE Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation" Submitted by the Demand Response and Smart Grid Coalition (DRSG) November 1, 2010 DRSG Comments to DOE Smart Grid ...

  16. Public Comment re NOI on Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    ENERGYSOLUTIONS' Comment in Response to Notice of Inquiry, Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation -75 FR 43945

  17. Extension of DOE N 206.5, Response and Notification Procedures for Data Breaches Involving Personally Identifiable Information

    Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    2008-10-09

    This Notice extends DOE N 206.5, Response and Notification Procedures for Data Breaches Involving Personally Identifiable Information, dated 10-9-07, until 1-9-09.

  18. Comments by Mary Celeste Harris on the Emergency Operation of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    EO-05-01: Comments by Mary Celeste Harris on the Emergency Operation of Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station. "I am writing in response to your order of December 20, 2005, ...

  19. AARP submits the following comments on consumers and smart grid issues in response to the Request for Information (Request or RFI) on smart grid policy and logistical challenges, published by the Department of Energy (DOE) on September 16, 2010

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments to: DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges David Certner Legislative Counsel and Legislative Policy Director AARP Government Relations and Advocacy Olivia Wein, Staff Attorney National Consumer Law Center Tyson Slocum, Director Public Citizen's Energy Program November 1, 2010 2 CONSUMER COMMENTERS: AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen submit the following comments on

  20. QER- Comment of PSEG Services Corporation

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Attached please find the comments and responses of the PSEG Companies (Public Service Electric and Gas Company, PSEG Power LLC and PSEG Long Island LLC) to the questions raised by the U.S. Department of Energy. Should you have any questions or problems regarding the attached document, please do not hesitate to contact me.

  1. QER- Comment of State Energy Advisory Board

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dear Melanie: As you are aware, QER is an area of focus for STEAB and we are working directly with EPSA on it. Attached, please find a copy of the State Energy Advisory Board's response to the Office of Energy Policy and Systems Analysis. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments.

  2. 150122 Traxys DOE RFI Comments

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    TRAXYS RESPONSES to DOE'S RFI ON EXCESS URANIUM MANAGEMENT Summary Statements based on Traxys' contracts and EIA Form 858 Filings: 1. Traxys is a primary, direct participant in the sale and introduction to market of the majority of DOE's excess uranium sales via a contractual relationship with Fluor B&W Portsmouth (FBP) to purchase and monetize all the UF6 it receives from DOE for services. Based on this unique position, Traxys is the only company that can factually comment and have actual

  3. Regulatory Review Comment Section | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Radiation Protection of the Public and the Environment Regulatory Review Comment Section Regulatory Review Comment Section DOE Comments on Radiation Protection (Atomic Energy ...

  4. FINAL CA IOU Comment Letter RFI Regulatory Burden | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    FINAL CA IOU Comment Letter RFI Regulatory Burden FINAL CA IOU Comment Letter RFI Regulatory Burden This letter comprises the comments of the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), Southern California Gas Company (SCGC), San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E), and Southern California Edison (SCE) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Request for Information on Regulatory Burden. FINAL_CA_IOU_comment_letter.pdf (464.44 KB) More Documents & Publications Comments on Docket

  5. Proposed rule: re-opening of public comment period | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Proposed rule: re-opening of public comment period Proposed rule: re-opening of public comment period Proposed rule: re-opening of public comment period. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is re-opening the public comment period for proposed amendments to its regulations governing compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), made available for public comment on January 3, 2011 (76 FR 214). This is being done in response to a request on behalf of multiple organizations CX

  6. OSTIblog Recent comments

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    of Energy (DOE) for the scientific contributor and also for Petroleum Engineering

    Sat, 17 Jan 2015 16:20:00 +0000 comment 1254 at http:www.osti.govhome Microscope repair...

  7. Public Comment Opportunities

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Comments on the Draft EIS and Presidential permit can be submitted verbally during public hearings or in writing to Dr. Julie A Smith at: Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE...

  8. Response of LaBr{sub 3}(Ce) scintillators to 2.5 MeV fusion neutrons

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Cazzaniga, C.; Nocente, M.; Gorini, G.; Istituto di Fisica del Plasma, Associazione EURATOM-ENEA-CNR, Via Roberto Cozzi 53, Milano 20125 ; Tardocchi, M.; Croci, G.; Giacomelli, L.; Angelone, M.; Pillon, M.; Villari, S.; Weller, A.; Petrizzi, L.; Collaboration: ASDEX Upgrade Team; JET-EFDA Contributors

    2013-12-15

    Measurements of the response of LaBr{sub 3}(Ce) to 2.5 MeV neutrons have been carried out at the Frascati Neutron Generator and at tokamak facilities with deuterium plasmas. The observed spectrum has been interpreted by means of a Monte Carlo model. It is found that the main contributor to the measured response is neutron inelastic scattering on {sup 79}Br, {sup 81}Br, and {sup 139}La. An extrapolation of the count rate response to 14 MeV neutrons from deuterium-tritium plasmas is also presented. The results are of relevance for the design of ?-ray diagnostics of fusion burning plasmas.

  9. Impact of x-ray dose on the response of CR-39 to 1–5.5 MeV alphas

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Rojas-Herrera, J. Rinderknecht, H. G.; Zylstra, A. B.; Gatu Johnson, M.; Orozco, D.; Rosenberg, M. J.; Sio, H.; Seguin, F. H.; Frenje, J. A.; Li, C. K.; Petrasso, R. D.

    2015-03-15

    The CR-39 nuclear track detector is used in many nuclear diagnostics fielded at inertial confinement fusion (ICF) facilities. Large x-ray fluences generated by ICF experiments may impact the CR-39 response to incident charged particles. To determine the impact of x-ray exposure on the CR-39 response to alpha particles, a thick-target bremsstrahlung x-ray generator was used to expose CR-39 to various doses of 8 keV Cu-K{sub α} and K{sub β} x-rays. The CR-39 detectors were then exposed to 1–5.5 MeV alphas from an Am-241 source. The regions of the CR-39 exposed to x-rays showed a smaller track diameter than those not exposed to x-rays: for example, a dose of 3.0 ± 0.1 Gy causes a decrease of (19 ± 2)% in the track diameter of a 5.5 MeV alpha particle, while a dose of 60.0 ± 1.3 Gy results in a decrease of (45 ± 5)% in the track diameter. The reduced track diameters were found to be predominantly caused by a comparable reduction in the bulk etch rate of the CR-39 with x-ray dose. A residual effect depending on alpha particle energy is characterized using an empirical formula.

  10. Impact of x-ray dose on the response of CR-39 to 1–5.5 MeV alphas

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Rojas-Herrera, J.; Rinderknecht, H. G.; Zylstra, A. B.; Gatu Johnson, M.; Orozco, D.; Rosenberg, M. J.; Sio, H.; Seguin, F. H.; Frenje, J. A.; Li, C. K.; Petrasso, R. D.

    2015-03-01

    The CR-39 nuclear track detector is used in many nuclear diagnostics fielded at inertial confinement fusion (ICF) facilities. Large x-ray uences generated by ICF experiments may impact the CR-39 response to incident charged particles. To determine the impact of x-ray exposure on the CR-39 response to alpha particles, a thick-target bremsstrahlung x-ray generator was used to expose CR-39 to various doses of 8 keV Cu-Kα and Kβ x-rays. The CR-39 detectors were then exposed to 1-5.5 MeV alphas from an Am-241 source. The regions of the CR-39 exposed to x-rays showed a smaller track diameter than those not exposed to x-rays: for example, a dose of 3.0 ± 0.1 Gy causes a decrease of (19 ± 2)% in the track diameter of a 5.5 MeV alpha particle, while a dose of 60.0 ± 1.3 Gy results in a decrease of (45 ± 5)% in the track diameter. The reduced track diameters were found to be predominantly caused by a comparable reduction in the bulk etch rate of the CR-39 with x-ray dose. A residual effect depending on alpha particle energy is characterized using an empirical formula.

  11. Impact of x-ray dose on the response of CR-39 to 1–5.5 MeV alphas

    DOE Public Access Gateway for Energy & Science Beta (PAGES Beta)

    Rojas-Herrera, J.; Rinderknecht, H. G.; Zylstra, A. B.; Gatu Johnson, M.; Orozco, D.; Rosenberg, M. J.; Sio, H.; Seguin, F. H.; Frenje, J. A.; Li, C. K.; et al

    2015-03-01

    The CR-39 nuclear track detector is used in many nuclear diagnostics fielded at inertial confinement fusion (ICF) facilities. Large x-ray uences generated by ICF experiments may impact the CR-39 response to incident charged particles. To determine the impact of x-ray exposure on the CR-39 response to alpha particles, a thick-target bremsstrahlung x-ray generator was used to expose CR-39 to various doses of 8 keV Cu-Kα and Kβ x-rays. The CR-39 detectors were then exposed to 1-5.5 MeV alphas from an Am-241 source. The regions of the CR-39 exposed to x-rays showed a smaller track diameter than those not exposed tomore » x-rays: for example, a dose of 3.0 ± 0.1 Gy causes a decrease of (19 ± 2)% in the track diameter of a 5.5 MeV alpha particle, while a dose of 60.0 ± 1.3 Gy results in a decrease of (45 ± 5)% in the track diameter. The reduced track diameters were found to be predominantly caused by a comparable reduction in the bulk etch rate of the CR-39 with x-ray dose. A residual effect depending on alpha particle energy is characterized using an empirical formula.« less

  12. Impact of x-ray dose on the response of CR-39 to 15.5 MeV alphas

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Rojas-Herrera, J.; Rinderknecht, H. G.; Zylstra, A. B.; Gatu Johnson, M.; Orozco, D.; Rosenberg, M. J.; Sio, H.; Seguin, F. H.; Frenje, J. A.; Li, C. K.; Petrasso, R. D.

    2015-03-01

    The CR-39 nuclear track detector is used in many nuclear diagnostics #12;fielded at inertial con#12;nement fusion (ICF) facilities. Large x-ray uences generated by ICF experiments may impact the CR-39 response to incident charged particles. To determine the impact of x-ray exposure on the CR-39 response to alpha particles, a thick-target bremsstrahlung x-ray generator was used to expose CR-39 to various doses of 8 keV Cu-K?#11; and K#12;? x-rays. The CR-39 detectors were then exposed to 1-5.5 MeV alphas from an Am-241 source. The regions of the CR-39 exposed to x-rays showed a smaller track diameter than those not exposed to x-rays: for example, a dose of 3.0#6; 0.1 Gy causes a decrease of (19 #6;2)% in the track diameter of a 5.5 MeV alpha particle, while a dose of 60.0 #6;1.3 Gy results in a decrease of (45 #6;5)% in the track diameter. The reduced track diameters were found to be predominantly caused by a comparable reduction in the bulk etch rate of the CR-39 with x-ray dose. A residual eff#11;ect depending on alpha particle energy is characterized using an empirical formula.

  13. Comments of On-Ramp Wireless, Inc. | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    On-Ramp Wireless, Inc. Comments of On-Ramp Wireless, Inc. On-Ramp Wireless, Inc. ("On-Ramp") hereby submits comments in response to the Department of Energy's ("DOE") May 11, 2010 Request for Information as to the communications needs of electric utilities to inform federal Smart Grid policy. In these comments, On-Ramp addresses two vital aspects of the need for wireless communications in connection with Smart Grid-more specifically, for customer smart meters and devices and

  14. Hazardous Waste Facility Permit Public Comments to Community Relations Plan

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Annual Summary of Comments for July 2012 through August 2013 Last saved on: 8/30/2013 Annual Summary of CRP comment for July 2011- August 2012 1 SECTION COMMENT POST? 2.0 & 4.0 1. Fix broken links on pages 3 and 4 for the HWA permit. Yes 2.0 2. Revise a sentence on page 4 to: "Limits on LANL waste facilities may be found in Attachment J of the Permit." Yes 3. Delete Section 5.3.7 on RACER. Provide a description of Intellus. Yes 2.0 Yes 5.1 Yes Hazardous Waste Facility Permit

  15. DOE Responses to DOE Challenge Home (formerly Builders Challenge) National

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Program Requirements Public Comments | Department of Energy Responses to DOE Challenge Home (formerly Builders Challenge) National Program Requirements Public Comments DOE Responses to DOE Challenge Home (formerly Builders Challenge) National Program Requirements Public Comments DOE Responses to DOE Challenge Home (formerly Builders Challenge) National Program Requirements Public Comments, a publication of the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.

  16. Comments by the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy The National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates ("NASUCA") hereby submits the following comments in response to the United States Department of Energy ("DOE") Request for Information ("RFI") entitled "Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy." See 75 Fed. Reg. 26203 (May 11, 2010). The RFI requests comments and information from

  17. Comments of the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies Comments of the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies The Media and Technology Institute and the Climate Change Initiative at the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies ("Joint Center")1 respectfully submit these comments in response to the United States Department of Energy's ("DoE") Request for Information regarding its implementation of the Smart Grid provisions of Federal

  18. Reply Comments by the National Association of State Utility Consumer

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Advocates | Department of Energy by the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates Reply Comments by the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates The National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates ("NASUCA") submits these reply comments in response to the United States Department of Energy's ("DOE") Request for Information ("RFI") entitled "Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart

  19. Tendril RFI Comments - 11.1.10 - DRAFT

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Tendril Networks, Inc. 1 COMMENTS OF TENDRIL NETWORKS, INC. Department of Energy Request for Information: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation November 1, 2010 Introduction Tendril is pleased to provide these comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) in response to the Request for Information "Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation." Tendril offers a software and hardware solution that enables residential home

  20. CMRR-NF Supplemental EIS Scoping Comments | National Nuclear Security

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Administration | (NNSA) CMRR-NF Supplemental EIS Scoping Comments CMRR-NF Supplemental EIS Scoping Comments Additional CMRR Scoping Comments - 47A Additional CMRR Scoping Comments - 48A Additional CMRR Scoping Comments - 62 Additional CMRR Scoping Comments - 63 Additional CMRR Scoping Comments - 64 Additional CMRR Scoping Comments - 66A Additional CMRR Scoping Comments - 66B Additional CMRR Scoping Comments - 66C Additional CMRR Scoping Comments - 76 Additional CMRR Scoping Comments - 77

  1. Title 36 CFR 215 Notice, Comment, and Appeal Procedures for National...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    5 Notice, Comment, and Appeal Procedures for National Forest System Projects and Activities Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document-...

  2. QER- Comment of Xcel Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Attached are the comments of Xcel Energy Services Inc. Please let me know if you have any questions.

  3. QER- Comment of Diane Cray

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Good afternoon, Would it be possible to get a list of presenters and their written comments on meeting agenda?

  4. Carrier Comments | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Carrier Comments Carrier Comments United Technologies Climate, Controls, and Security and its Carrier business would like to submit the following comments to the proposed questions as well as additional commentary as requested and referenced in the RFI. UTC-CCS Comments on Rugulatory Burden 07112016 Version 1 2 (333.82 KB) More Documents & Publications ISSUANCE 2016-05-19: Energy Conservation Program: Test Procedures for Central Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps Final Rule 2015-02-13 Issuance:

  5. DOE Extends Comment Period on Certification and Enforcement Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    In response to a formal request, the Department has extended to October 29, 2010, the deadline for submission of comments in response to the Notice or Proposed Rulemaking on the certification and...

  6. NIOSH comments to DOL on the Occupational Safety and Health Administration proposed rule on hazardous waste operations and emergency response by R. A. Lemen, December 1987

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1987-12-01

    The testimony concerns the views of NIOSH regarding the safety or workers engaged in hazardous waste operations and emergency response. NIOSH suggests the following requirements: adequate worker training before the worker begins handling hazardous wastes; the use of site control zones and a thorough site evaluation prior to the beginning work at the site; the use of handling techniques that limit the potential for human exposure to hazardous substances; and medical surveillance of all workers potentially exposed to hazardous substances. Suggested modifications to the proposed OSHA regulation are attached and deal with the following areas: scope, application and definitions for the work; contractors and subcontractors; site characterization and analysis; site control; training; medical examinations and consultations; recordkeeping; engineering controls; personal protective equipment; informational programs; shipping and transport; decontamination; procedures for handling emergency incidents; specialist employees; and sanitation at temporary workplaces.

  7. Response to “Comment on ‘Twin symmetry texture of energetically condensed niobium thin films on sapphire substrate’ ” [J. Appl. Phys. 112, 016101 (2012)

    DOE Public Access Gateway for Energy & Science Beta (PAGES Beta)

    Zhao, X.; Philips, L.; Reece, C. E.; Seo, Kang; Krishnan, M.; Valderrama, E.

    2012-07-01

    Welander is correct about the misidentified crystal-directions in the top-view sapphire lattice (Fig. 4 [Zhao et al., J. Appl. Phys. 110, 033523 (2011)]). He is also correct about the misorientation of the pole figures in Fig. 4. In Fig. 1 of this response, we have corrected these errors. Perhaps because of these errors, Welander misconstrued our discussion of the Nbcrystal growth as claiming a new 3D registry. That was not our intention. Rather, we wished to highlight the role of energetic condensation that drives low-defect crystal growth by a combination of non-equilibrium sub-plantation that disturbs the substrate lattice and thermalmore » annealing that annihilates defects and promotes large-grain crystal growth.« less

  8. Fundamental limitation to the magnitude of piezoelectric response of (001)pc textured K0.5Na0.5NbO3 ceramic

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Gupta, Shashaank; Belianinov, Alex; Okatan, Mahmut B; Jesse, Stephen; Kalinin, Sergei V; Priya, Shashaank

    2014-01-01

    (001)pc textured K0.5Na0.5NbO3 (KNN) ceramic was found to exhibit a 65% improvement in the longitudinal piezoelectric response as compared to its random counterpart. Piezoresponse force microscopy study revealed the existence of larger 180 and non-180 domains for textured ceramic as compared to that of the random ceramic. Improvement in piezoresponse by the development of (001)pc texture is discussed in terms of the crystallographic nature of KNN and domain morphology. A comparative analysis performed with a rhombohedral composition suggested that the improvement in longitudinal piezoresponse of polycrystalline ceramics by the development of (001)pc texture is limited by the crystal structure.

  9. NBP RFI: Data Access, Third Party Use and Privacy- Comments of Utilities

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Telecom Council | Department of Energy Use and Privacy- Comments of Utilities Telecom Council NBP RFI: Data Access, Third Party Use and Privacy- Comments of Utilities Telecom Council The Utilities Telecom Council hereby comments in response to the Department of Energy (DOE) request for information on data access, third party use, and privacy. In summary, UTC submits that the innovative deployment by energy utilities of smart meters and smart control systems will create a smart energy grid

  10. Comments of Cisco Systems to Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Reliability | Department of Energy of Cisco Systems to Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Comments of Cisco Systems to Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Cisco Systems provides comments in response to the RFI issued by DOE on addressing policy andlogistical challenges to smart grid implementation. Comments of Cisco Systems to Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (68.83 KB) More Documents & Publications NIST Activities in Support of

  11. QER- Comment of Natural Gas Supply Association

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    TO: Quadrennial Energy Review Task Force In response to the Department of Energy’s August 25, 2014 Federal Register Notice seeking input on the Quadrennial Energy Review, attached are comments from the Natural Gas Supply Association. Thank you for this opportunity to share our views on the important issue of energy infrastructure. If we can be of further assistance, please let me know. Regards,

  12. QER- Comment of Jennifer Markens 5

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    The term natural gas is deceptive: the gas increasingly available to the Northeast is unconventional gas, and is higher in radioactivity (Resnikoff, 2012), as well as chemical content from hydraulic fracturing that is deadly to biological integrity- known carcinogens, neurotoxins, poisons . . . there is no oversight of what is in these pipelines. Pipelines leak at a rate of between 8% and 11%: : The proposed pipeline(s) runs through every single aquifer that supplies drinking water to residents of Massachusetts. Marcellus gas also has a high likelihood of increasing lung cancer among gas customers in Massachusetts, as detailed in Resnikoff's 2012 executive summary. The advertising currently being played over and over again on our airwaves is chilling in the face of this known risk. The fact that unconventional gas ruins drinking water at alarming rates, and the acquisition of this gas is structured in a manner that guarantees no accountability or liability for desecration of arguably the most basic necessity for life is being falsely advertised as "better for the environment". There are not only worse emissions from this industry, but a second, concomitant ruining of water. Both Northeast Utilities and Kinder Morgan stand to make significant profit for their private investors. Meanwhile, Massachusetts are being asked to subsidize the destruction of their homes, their health, their water, and their neighborhoods to enrich a few individuals who are seeking a shipping route manipulating "eminent domain" to sell shale gas abroad. This is a destructive and extreme plan, and there are many other options that have not been adequately explored or investigated. In this instance, windmills off the coast seems a lot less immediately destructive than poisoning our drinking water. Or is the intention to euthanize a certain number of citizens? Best regards, Jennifer Markens

  13. Thymidylate Synthase Gene Polymorphism Affects the Response to Preoperative 5-Fluorouracil Chemoradiation Therapy in Patients With Rectal Cancer

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Hur, Hyuk; Kang, Jeonghyun; Kim, Nam Kyu; Min, Byung Soh; Lee, Kang Young; Shin, Sang Joon; Keum, Ki Chang; Choi, Junjeong; Kim, Hoguen; Choi, Sung Ho; Lee, Mi-Young

    2011-11-01

    Purpose: This study aims to correlate thymidylate synthase (TS) gene polymorphisms with the tumor response to preoperative 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in patients with rectal cancer. Methods and Materials: Forty-four patients with rectal cancer treated with 5-FU-based preoperative CRT were prospectively enrolled in this study. Thymidylate synthase expression and TS gene polymorphisms were evaluated in tumor obtained before preoperative CRT and were correlated with the pathologic response, as assessed by histopathologic staging (pTNM) and tumor regression grade. Results: Patients exhibited 2R/3R and 3R/3R tandem repeat polymorphisms in the TS gene. With regard to TS expression in these genotypes, 2R/3RC and 3RC/3RC were defined as the low-expression group and 2R/3RG, 3RC/3RG, and 3RG/3RG as the high-expression group. There was no significant correlation between TS expression and tumor response. There was no significant difference in the tumor response between patients homozygous for 3R/3R and patients heterozygous for 2R/3R. However, 13 of 14 patients in the low-expression group with a G>C single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) (2R/3RC [n = 5] or 3RC/3RC [n = 9]) exhibited a significantly greater tumor downstaging rate, as compared with only 12 of 30 patients in the high-expression group without the SNP (2R/3RG [n = 10], 3RC/3RG [n = 9], or 3RG/3RG [n = 11]) (p = 0.001). The nodal downstaging rate was also significantly greater in this low-expression group, as compared with the high-expression group (12 of 14 vs. 14 of 30, p = 0.014). However, there was no significant difference in the tumor regression grade between these groups. Conclusions: This study suggests that SNPs within the TS enhancer region affect the tumor response to preoperative 5-FU-based CRT in rectal cancer.

  14. From: Mary Mauch To: Congestion Study Comments Subject:

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Mary Mauch To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: Comments on NEITC and Congestion Study Date: Friday, October 03, 2014 5:07:39 PM I am vehemently opposed to NEITCs- under any guise. Until we have exhausted all alternatives, such as local distributed generation, it is ludicrous and wrong to take private, productive, non-renewable land for unnecessary transmission corridors- probably being lobbied for by private companies for private gain. "Clean" Line Energy Partners and their 14 LLC's

  15. Invitation for Public Comment to Inform the Design of a Consent-Based

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Siting Process | Department of Energy Invitation for Public Comment to Inform the Design of a Consent-Based Siting Process Invitation for Public Comment to Inform the Design of a Consent-Based Siting Process As part of the consent-based siting initiative, the Department requested public input through an Invitation for Public Comment in the Federal Register. The comment period ended on July 31, 2016. The responses the Department received through July 1, 2016 are included at the bottom of this

  16. Public Comments on DOE's NOI re Section 934 of the Energy Independence and

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Security Act of 2007 | Department of Energy Comments on DOE's NOI re Section 934 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 Public Comments on DOE's NOI re Section 934 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 Comments by the United States Enrichrnent Corporation (USEC) in response to DOE's Notice of Inquiry (N0l) on the Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage (CSC) Contingent Cost Allocation. 75 Fed. Reg. 43945 (July 27, 2010). Public Comments on DOE's

  17. ATVM Response to MEMA | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ATVM Response to MEMA ATVM Response to MEMA ATVM Response to MEMA.pdf (282.75 KB) More Documents & Publications Interested Parties - MEMA MEMA: Letter MEMA: Appendix to Comments

  18. Comments/Questions | Critical Materials Institute

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Comments/Questions To offer comments on the CMI website or to ask questions, please contact us: CMIdirector@ameslab.gov 515-296-4500 or use this web form for comments. Thanks!

  19. Q & A for Toshiba RFI Comments | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Q & A for Toshiba RFI Comments Q & A for Toshiba RFI Comments Q & A for Toshiba RFI Comments PDF icon Q & A for Toshiba RFI Comments More Documents & Publications Comments of DRSG ...

  20. Response Response

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Attachment 7 Response Response Response Response Response Response Response Response Response Response Response Response Percent of Mentors that are People with Disabilities 9.00% Total number of Mentors (The count used to calculate the Mentor percentages) 252 Demographic Information Percent of Mentors Two or More Races Not reported Percent of White Mentors 63.00% Percent of Female Mentors 39.00% Percent of Male Mentors 61.00% Percent of Veteran Mentors 21.00% Percent of Asian American Mentors

  1. OE Requests Comments on Potential Creation of a Reserve of Large Power

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Transformers | Department of Energy Requests Comments on Potential Creation of a Reserve of Large Power Transformers OE Requests Comments on Potential Creation of a Reserve of Large Power Transformers July 9, 2015 - 5:45pm Addthis Patricia A. Hoffman Patricia A. Hoffman Assistant Secretary, Office of Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability Today, the Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE) issued a Request for Information (RFI), asking for comments on the possible

  2. QER- Comment of Bridger LLC

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Attn: Quadrennial Energy Review Task Force Task Force: Please find attached written comments by Bridger LLC for the Quadrennial Energy Review Report.

  3. Microsoft Word - CLWR scoping Comment

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Impact Statement for the Production of Tritium in a Commercial Light Water Reactor U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Written Comment Form Must be ...

  4. Comment Response Document | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    DOE 2005 DOE 2006 DOE 2008a DOE 2008b DOE 2008c DOE 2010 DOE 2011a DOE 2011b Doser and Smith 1985 Dransfield and Gardner 1985 Fink Anderson 2000 Gardner 1987 Gardner et al 1990 ...

  5. QER- Comment of Honda Motor Co., Inc.

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Quadrennial Energy Review : Comment on the Public Meeting “Enhancing Infrastructure Resiliency,” Held April 11, 2014, - Please provide link to where public comments are available.

  6. QER- Comment of Dakota Resource Council

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Attached are comments from the Dakota Resource Council, a membership-based organization of North Dakotans. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Infrastructure Constraints.

  7. Response

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    | Department of Energy Impacts of Demand-Side Resources on Electric Transmission Planning Report: Impacts of Demand-Side Resources on Electric Transmission Planning This report assesses the relationship between high levels of demand-side resources (including end-use efficiency, demand response, and distributed generation) and investment in new transmission or utilization of existing transmission. It summarizes the extensive modeling of transmission scenarios done through DOE-funded studies

  8. Response

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    of New Funding Constructs for Energy R&D in the Department of Energy Introduction ... Typical awards are 2-5 millionyear, for an initial five-year project period. Forty-six ...

  9. Blackout 2003: Summary of Comments from Forum and Email | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy Summary of Comments from Forum and Email Blackout 2003: Summary of Comments from Forum and Email This Excel file is a summary of all comments and recommendations received by DOE on the Blackout Report via email and the Blackout Forum as of 1-12-04. Summary of Comments from Forum and Email (170.5 KB) More Documents & Publications Blackout 2003: Blackout Final Implementation Report Blackout 2003: Final Report on the August 14, 2003 Blackout in the United States and Canada: Causes

  10. QER- Comment of Michael Kirkwood

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Please accept the attached comments from Pascoag Utility District regarding the Quadrennial Energy Review process. Out comments focus on the difficulty with our current RTO market structure and its lack of providing appropriate cost-effective solutions to our energy infrastructure needs in New England.

  11. DOE Extends Comment Period on Notice of Inquiry Under the Energy Independence and Security Act

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Today, in response to a formal request, General Counsel Scott Blake Harris approved a second and final extension of the public comment period to November 30, 2010 on DOE’s Notice of Inquiry (75 FR...

  12. Department of Energy Extends Comment Period on Proposed Revisions to its NEPA Rules

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Department of Energy today announced that,  in response to requests from a number of parties, it has re-opened the public comment period on its proposed revisions to the Department’s NEPA rules...

  13. Natural Gas Industry Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The undersigned members of the natural gas industry are pleased to submit for your consideration the following comments in response to the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Electricity Delivery...

  14. Public Comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Comments by International Group on Nuclear Liability (CIGNL), in response to U.S. Department of Energy Notice of Inquiry on Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent...

  15. QER- Comment of Governors' Wind Energy Coalition

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Attached please find the Governors' Wind Energy Coalition's comments on the QER. Thank you. Larry Pearce

  16. Tribal Comments Database | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Comments Database Tribal Comments Database Summary of all comments from the DOE Office of Indian Energy roundtables held between March 16 and April 14, 2011. TribalEnergyRoundtable_CommentsDatabase.pdf (610.95 KB) More Documents & Publications 1. INTRODUCTION Tribal Roundable Executive Summary ICEIWG Meeting Agendas and Summaries

  17. QER- Comment of Northeast Gas Association

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Please find enclosed comments of the Northeast Gas Association regarding the Quadrennial Energy Review. Thank you.

  18. Consumer Electronics Association Comment | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Comment Consumer Electronics Association Comment The Consumer Electronics Association (CEA) is the preeminent trade association promoting growth in the $285 billion U.S. consumer electronics industry. CEA comments re DOE Regulatory Burden RFI_7-17-15 (164.06 KB) More Documents & Publications Consumer Electronics Association Comments

  19. Isotropic octupolar second harmonic generation response in LaBGeO{sub 5} glass-ceramic with spherulitic precipitation

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Truong, Lo Nhat; Fargin, Evelyne E-mail: fargin@icmcb-bordeaux.cnrs.fr Vigouroux, Hélène; Fargues, Alexandre; Dussauze, Marc E-mail: fargin@icmcb-bordeaux.cnrs.fr Adamietz, Frédéric; Rodriguez, Vincent E-mail: fargin@icmcb-bordeaux.cnrs.fr; Santos, Luis

    2015-04-20

    A spherulitic crystallization of the crystalline phase LaBGeO{sub 5} is generated in the 25La{sub 2}O{sub 3}-25B{sub 2}O{sub 3}-50 GeO{sub 2} glass system. Linear and nonlinear optical properties of lanthanum borogermanate glass-ceramic have been investigated at both macroscopic and microscopic scales. Polarized μ-Raman analysis has evidenced a radial distribution of the crystallites along the c-axis inside spherulites, whereas polarized μ-Second Harmonic Generation (SHG) analysis revealed intensity maxima perpendicularly to the c-axis crystallites orientation. Polarized SHG mapping of a spherulite indicate that no dipolar response along the c-axis oriented crystallites occurs despite the individual dipolar symmetry C{sub 3} of the crystallites. At a larger mm scale, the isotropic scattering of spherulites recorded from macroscopic SHG experiment in the forward direction is consistent with an average coherent octupolar response per spherulite. These SHG analyses at different scale are both in accordance with radial antiferroelectric orientation along the c-axis of crystallites inside each spherulite.

  20. Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    from Dr. Contreras Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Dr. Contreras Comment submitted on updated Part 2 application. PDF icon Comment from Dr. Contreras ...

  1. Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Ms. Callahan Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Ms. Callahan Comment submitted on updated Part 2 application. PDF icon Comment from Ms. Callahan ...

  2. Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Comment from Mr. Garrett Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Ms. Rutherford Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Ms. Campbell

  3. EIS-0374: Notice of Extension of Comment Period | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    of Comment Period EIS-0374: Notice of Extension of Comment Period Klondike IIIBiglow Canyon Wind Integration Project This notice extends the close of comment for scoping from the...

  4. Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Comment from Downwind, LLC Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Sheila Beck Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Crystal Yarbrough

  5. .Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association's Comments on DOE's Regulatory...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Association's Comments on DOE's Regulatory Burden RFI .Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association's Comments on DOE's Regulatory Burden RFI Comments from Hearth, Patio & Barbecue ...

  6. Microsoft Word - AGA Comments on 2011 Regulatory Burden RFI ...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    AGA Comments on 2011 Regulatory Burden RFI Microsoft Word - AGA Comments on 2011 ... 76, No. 23, February 3, 2011 PDF icon Microsoft Word - AGA Comments on 2011 Regulatory ...

  7. QER- Comment of Cynthia Henshaw

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hello, I have several comments regarding the hearing and document put together regarding infrastructure constraints in New England. 1. Why did the document not discuss the waste and losses of natural gas through existing pipeline leaks? The most cost-effective carbon savings within New England is to repair existing natural gas leaks. If we invested our dollars to upgrade existing transmission, storage and distribution capacity in New England we would not need additional gas pipelines and we'd help protect out health and the environment. These infrastructure improvements should be completed before creating more environmental damage and disruption to additional communities. 2. The best way to encourage investment in infrastructure that will address vulnerabilities is to encourage local energy production - continue to expand local solar panel use (on houses, store roofs and larger systems) and encourage continued development of alternative wind turbines that do not have the environmental and community impacts as the large turbines so that they can be cited near the electric demand. We need to take responsibility for the energy that we use. That means understanding how to generate our own electricity, and promoting conservation and energy efficiency throughout New England. 3. Tennessee Gas is proposing a new gas pipeline across the northern tier of Massachusetts. Why are they not expanding their existing infrastructure that already runs across the southern tier of the state? They already have the rights-of-way and infrastructure in place. The company has not been forthcoming with answers, which sows seeds of distrust. If the company, and federal and state regulators want to increase pipeline capacity then answers to reasonable questions need to be given. AND the public needs to have more than ONE WEEK to provide questions. 4. The Tennessee Gas Pipeline proposed for the northern tier of Massachusetts targets existing conservation infrastructure that was protected for a

  8. Response of the Potomac Electric Power Company to the Operating...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Preliminary Response of PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. to the Operating Plan of Mirant Potomac River, LLC Comments on Department of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume Limited ...

  9. OPOWER RFI Response | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    OPOWER RFI Response OPOWER RFI Response OPOWER submits these comments to the Department of Energy in response to the recently issued Request for Information on smart grid implementation challenges. In particular, OPOWER writes to comment on the importance of effective customer engagement in smart grid policy making. OPOWER RFI Response (51.98 KB) More Documents & Publications Insights from Smart Meters: The Potential for Peak Hour Savings from Behavior-Based Programs Voices of Experience:

  10. QER- Comment of Elaine Mroz

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Elaine Mroz Quadrennial Energy Review: Comment on the Public Meetings ‘‘Infrastructure Restraints- New England” held April 21, 2014, in Providence, RI and Hartford, CT. Please see attached file.

  11. QER- Comment of Emily Crowell

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    One of the Senator’s constituents dropped off comments that she wanted to pass along to your office re: the QER public meeting. For your records her contact information is below:

  12. Scoping Comment Summary 092412.docx

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Scoping Comment Summary for the Surplus Plutonium Disposition Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration, and Tennessee Valley Authority Since announcement of the Surplus Plutonium Disposition Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SPD Supplemental EIS), DOE has provided three opportunities for the public to provide scoping comments (2007 [72 FR 14543]; 2010 [75 FR 41850]; and 2012 [77 FR 1920]). The public scoping

  13. QER- Comment of Stephen Kurkoski

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    I attended the meeting yesterday in Hartford, Conn. I thank you for the opportunity to speak during the public comment period. I thanked the moderator, Fred Hanson, for bringing up the option of Conservation and Energy Efficiency to the last panel. The following are the comments I presented. I would first like to say that the Northeast does not have an energy supply problem. The problem that we have is a demand/supply issue. If the problem is only referred to as a supply problem then only supply solutions will be looked at. When we talk about meeting our energy needs, the conversation should start with: 1st Conservation 2nd Energy Efficiency …..and if we have a concern about Climate Change 3rd Renewables 4th Polluting technologies such as Fossil Fuels and Nuclear If we do not implement this list in the above order we will leave a very different climate and a planet that is difficult to live on for our children. I would next like to illustrate the power of Conservation, Energy Efficiency and Renewables. Two years ago my wife and I had the good fortune to be chosen to participate in the National Grid Deep Energy Retrofit Pilot Program. Thank you to National Grid and the state of Massachusetts. By super insulating and air sealing our house, installing an air-source heat pump and a 2.4kW solar system, along with practicing conservation, our total energy bill for last year was $60, which equals 300 pounds of CO2 equivalent. This includes this past winter with its "polar vortex". Conservation, Efficiency and Renewables have been mentioned by a few of the presenters today. We need to bring Conservation, Efficiency and Renewables to center stage to solve our energy needs. Recommendations: 1. Institute to a greater extent "Peak Load Shaving". 2. Make it mandatory that all buildings that are built are Zero Net Energy or Zero Plus Energy. 3. Institute a more aggressive "Time of Use" Electric and Gas Metering System that Mr Reilly of the Vermont Electric Power Company

  14. Comments Received on the Coordination of Federal Authorizations...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Comment from Jeff Berns February 16, 2016 Comment from Judith Lee & Bob Cunningham February 16, 2016 Comment from Sarah Ball and Richard Loughery of EEI March 22, 2016 Comment from ...

  15. Response to 'Comment on 'Elastic incoherent neutron scattering operating by varying instrumental energy resolution: Principle, simulations, and experiments of the resolution elastic neutron scattering (RENS)'' [Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83, 107101 (2012)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Magazu, Salvatore; Migliardo, Federica; Benedetto, Antonio [Dipartimento di Fisica, Universita di Messina, C.da Papardo n Degree-Sign 31, P.O. Box 55, Vill. S. Agata 98166 Messina (Italy)

    2012-10-15

    Recently [S. Magazu et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82, 105115 (2011)] we have proposed a new method for characterizing, by neutron scattering, the dynamical properties of complex material systems, such as, the ones of interest in the biophysical field. This approach called Resolution Elastic Neutron Scattering, in short RENS, is based on the detection of the elastically scattered neutron intensity as a function of the instrumental energy resolution. By experimental, theoretical, and numerical findings, we have pointed out that an inflection point occurs in the elastic intensity when the system relaxation time approaches the instrumental energy resolution time. This approach, differently from quasi-elastic neutron scattering (QENS), gives the chance to evaluate the system relaxation times without using pre-defined models that can be wrong and/or misleading. Here, we reply to a Comment on the above-mentioned main paper in which Wuttke proposes a different approach to evaluate the above-mentioned inflection point; on this regard, it should be noticed that the existence of the inflection point, which is the main topic of our work, is not questioned and that the approach proposed by Wuttke in the Comment, although valid for a class of dynamical processes, is not applicable when different and distinct processes occur simultaneously at different time scale.

  16. MNDR Comments Response and Letter: Missouri Nepartment of Natural Resources Comments on Interim Response Actions (IRAs).

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

  17. From: Maryellen H. McVicker To: Congestion Study Comments Subject...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Maryellen H. McVicker To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors Date: Monday, September 22, 2014 5:41:37 PM I oppose the transfer of ...

  18. Dielectric relaxation and magnetodielectric response in DyMn{sub 0.5}Cr{sub 0.5}O{sub 3}

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Yuan, B.; Yang, J. Zuo, X. Z.; Zhu, X. B.; Dai, J. M.; Song, W. H.; Kan, X. C.; Zu, L.; Sun, Y. P.

    2015-09-28

    We investigate the structural, magnetic, and magnetodielectric properties of DyMn{sub 0.5}Cr{sub 0.5}O{sub 3}. The sample can be indexed with an orthorhombic phase with B site disordered space group Pbnm. The valence state of both Mn and Cr ions are suggested to be +3 based on the results of x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Two thermally excited dielectric relaxation at temperatures T{sub N2} < T< 300 K and large magnetodielectric effect (MDC = 20%–30%) due to the disordered arrangement of Mn{sup 3+}/Cr{sup 3+} ions associated with electron hopping between them are observed. The absence of any noticeable magnetoresistance effect (MR < 0.5%) demonstrates that the observed magnetodielectric effect is an intrinsic behavior. These results suggest that DyMn{sub 0.5}Cr{sub 0.5}O{sub 3} is a magnetodielectric compound, whose dielectric properties are dependence of the applied magnetic field, which exhibits such effects near room temperature and holds great promise for future device applications.

  19. QER- Comment of Berkshire Environmental Action Team

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dear members of the Quadrennial Energy Review Task Force, Please find attached comments from the Berkshire Environmental Action Team, Inc. (BEAT) regarding the proposed natural gas pipeline expansion. Thank you for considering our comments.

  20. Comments/Questions? | The Ames Laboratory

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Comments/Questions? Name (optional): Email Address (optional): Comment/Question: * CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Submit

  1. Public Comment Procedures | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Dockets Open for Public Comment A list of current dockets open for public comment can be found on at this web page here. FILINGS: Filings may be submitted using one of the ...

  2. Idaho National Laboratory Radiological Response Training Range draft

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    environmental assessment available for public review and comment Idaho National Laboratory Radiological Response Training Range draft environmental assessment available for public review and comment August 4, 2010 Media contact: Brad Bugger, 208-526-0833 The public is invited to read and comment on a draft environmental assessment that the U.S. Department of Energy has published for a proposed radiological response training range at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL). At the range, INL

  3. The following comments are provided on behalf of Ingersoll Rand, Residential Sol

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    following comments are provided on behalf of Ingersoll Rand, Residential Solutions, manufacturer of Trane and American Standard residential air conditioners, heat pumps, furnaces and accessories therefore. --- Ingersoll Rand appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Department of Energy's request for information on "Reducing Regulatory Burden" in the spirit of Executive Order 13563 ---- It is ironic that the response interval for the RFI on reducing regulatory burden overlaps the

  4. Microsoft Word - 2012 Congestion Study - DRAFT EEI Comments -10.20.14 - CLEAN.docx

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Page 1 October 20, 2014 Mr. David Meyer Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Submitted electronically via email to: Congestionstudy.comments@hq.doe.gov Re: Department of Energy - Draft National Electric Transmission Congestion Study, 79 Fed. Reg. 49076 (Aug. 19, 2014) Dear Mr. Meyer: I. INTRODUCTION The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is pleased to provide these comments in response to the

  5. Microsoft Word - Smart_Grid_Comments_NAF_11.1.10.doc

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Comments of the New America Foundation's Open Technology Initiative submitted to U.S. Department of Energy regarding Request for Information on Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation November 1, 2010 The New America Foundation's Open Technology Initiative ("NAF") respectfully submits these comments in response to the United States Department of Energy's ("DOE") Request for Information (RFI) entitled "Addressing Policy and Logistical

  6. LG to DOE General Counsel; Re:Request for Comment on Large Capacity Clothes

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Washers | Department of Energy to DOE General Counsel; Re:Request for Comment on Large Capacity Clothes Washers LG to DOE General Counsel; Re:Request for Comment on Large Capacity Clothes Washers LG response to DOE's request for information regarding alternative test procedures for large-capacity clothes washer models, December 7, 2010. After DOE requested the views of interested parties concerning implementation of an alternative test procedure for large-capacity clothes washer models,

  7. Comments by Mary Celeste Harris on the Emergency Operation of Mirant's

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Potomac River Generating Station. | Department of Energy Mary Celeste Harris on the Emergency Operation of Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station. Comments by Mary Celeste Harris on the Emergency Operation of Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station. Docket No. EO-05-01: Comments by Mary Celeste Harris on the Emergency Operation of Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station. "I am writing in response to your order of December 20, 2005, declaring the emergency operation of Mirant's

  8. Comments from The Center for Democracy and Technology and the Electric

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Frontier Foundation: Implementing the Fips in the Smart Grid | Department of Energy from The Center for Democracy and Technology and the Electric Frontier Foundation: Implementing the Fips in the Smart Grid Comments from The Center for Democracy and Technology and the Electric Frontier Foundation: Implementing the Fips in the Smart Grid The Center for Democracy & Technology and the Electronic Frontier Foundation are pleased to file these comments in response to the September 17, 2010

  9. Comments of National Grid to the Smart Grid RFI | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    National Grid to the Smart Grid RFI Comments of National Grid to the Smart Grid RFI National Grid's Response to the Department of Energy Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges of Smart Grid Implementation National Grid's comments (117.88 KB) More Documents & Publications NBP RFI-Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation. September 10, 2009 Re: NBP RFI-Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of

  10. Comments of the Natural Resource Defense Council on DOE's Request for

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Information on Reducing Regulatory Burden | Department of Energy Natural Resource Defense Council on DOE's Request for Information on Reducing Regulatory Burden Comments of the Natural Resource Defense Council on DOE's Request for Information on Reducing Regulatory Burden On behalf of the Natural Resources Defense Council and our more than 1.3 million members and online activists, we submit the following comments in response to the Department of Energy's (DOE) Request for Information on

  11. QER- Comment of Geotherman Energy Association (GEA)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hi the Geothermal Energy Association would like to submit the attached comments for the 2014 QER process. Thanks,

  12. Lochinvar Preliminary Plan Comments | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Lochinvar Preliminary Plan Comments Lochinvar Preliminary Plan Comments Comments to DOE on Certification, Compliance and Enforcement Regulations for Consumer Products and Commercial and Industrial Equipment EO 13563 Preliminary Plan Microsoft Word - Lochinvar Comments -EO 13563 Preliminary Plan.docx (111.29 KB) More Documents & Publications Notice of Availability of Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules Regulatory Burden RFI AHRI Preliminary Plan for Retrospective

  13. Comments on backreaction and cosmic acceleration

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kolb, Edward W.; Matarrese, Sabinio; Riotto, Antonion; /CERN

    2005-11-01

    In this brief WEB note we comment on recent papers related to our paper ''On Acceleration Without Dark Energy''.

  14. QER- Comment of National Resource Defense Council

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Please accept this paper as a comment into the QER record on siting energy and transmission resources.

  15. Chris Carthel comments | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Chris Carthel comments Chris Carthel comments I offer the following comments and suggestions for your consideration regarding the Request for Information (RFI) that was published in the Federal Register on May 10, 2016 (81 FR 28736). Regulatory Burden RFI_Chris Carthel comments (61.27 KB) More Documents & Publications Inspection Report: IG-0732 Federal Register Notice, Amending 10 CFR part 707, Workplace Ssubustance Abuse Programs at DOE Sites Fact Sheet on the Consequences of a Positive

  16. DOE - BCS TSD comments | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    - BCS TSD comments DOE - BCS TSD comments PowerPoint slides presenting AHAM and PTI comments on technical support document. DOE - BCS TSD comments (182.68 KB) More Documents & Publications Ex Parte Meeting with DOE and Navigant Consulting on Battery Charger Energy Fact Sheet: Lithium-Ion Batteries for Stationary Energy Storage (October 2012) EV Everywhere Batteries Workshop - Beyond Lithium Ion Breakout Session Report

  17. QER- Comment of American Gas Association 2

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Attached please find AGA's comments relating to critical issues facing the natural gas distribution industry, which we believe could be usefully addressed in the first phase of the DOE Quadrennial Energy Review (QER). Our comments as submitted here consist of a cover letter and four additional attachments. My colleague Pam Lacey has previously submitted AGA's comments relating to methane emissions under separate cover.

  18. QER- Comment of Institute for Energy Research

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Institute for Energy Research would like to submit a comment for the DOE's Quadrennial Energy Review. You will find the comment attached, and we would like to be listed as: Institute for Energy Research 1155 15th St Nw, Suite 1900 Washington, D.C. 20005 Thank you for the opportunity to comment!

  19. QER- Comment of American Water

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Dear QER Team; Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments to the Quadrennial Energy Review Task Force to discuss the water and energy nexus, advances in water innovative technologies, and the impact of climate change on water issues. On behalf of American Water, I wish to submit the following White Papers which we have prepared on these critical issues: Innovations in Energy Use Sustainability and Resiliency Planning for Water Utilities One Water Water/Energy Correlation The Value of Water Challenges in the Water Industry: Climate Change Challenges in the Water Industry: Meeting Demand in the West Innovation Solutions Within the Water Industry: Desalination Innovation Solutions Within the Water Industry: Going Green Innovation Solutions Within the Water Industry: Water Reuse Bridging the Water Innovation Gap. Founded in 1886, American Water is the largest publicly traded U.S. water and wastewater utility company. With headquarters in Voorhees, NJ, the company employs approximately 6,600 dedicated professionals who provide drinking water, wastewater and other related services to an estimated 14 million people in more than 40 states. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or if there is any way American Water can be helpful to your mission. Respectfully Yours, Martin (See attached file: White Papers.pdf) Martin D. Kerckhoff Vice President and Divisional General Counsel Central Division American Water CONFIDENTIAL & PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION This email and any attachments hereto constitute a legally confidential communication from the Legal Department of American Water. The information contained herein is subject to attorney-client privilege and is for the sole use of the intended original addressee. If you are not the intended original addressee, you are hereby notified that any reading, disclosure, copying, distribution, use, or taking of any action in reliance on the contents contained herein is strictly prohibited. If you have received this

  20. Summary of comments received from workshops on radiological criteria for decommissioning

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Caplin, J.; Page, G.; Smith, D.; Wiblin, C.

    1994-01-01

    The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is conducting an enhanced participatory rulemaking to establish radiological criteria for site cleanup and decommissioning of NRC-licensed facilities. Open public meetings were held during 1993 in Chicago, IL, San Francisco, CA, Boston, MA, Dallas, TX, Philadelphia, PA, Atlanta, GA, and Washington, DC. Interested parties were invited to provide input on the rulemaking issues before the NRC staff develops a draft proposed rule. This report summarizes 3,635 comments categorized from transcripts of the seven workshops and 1,677 comments from 100 NRC docketed letters from individuals and organizations. No analysis or response to the comments is included. The comments reflect a broad spectrum of viewpoints on the issues related to radiological criteria for site cleanup and decommissioning. The NRC also held public meetings on the scope of the Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS) during July 1993. The GEIS meetings were held in Washington, DC., San Francisco, CA, Oklahoma City, OK, and Cleveland, OH. Related comments from these meetings were reviewed and comments which differed substantially from those from the workshops are also summarized in the body of the report. A summary of the comments from the GEIS scoping meetings is included as an Appendix.

  1. From: Mills, Pamela To: Congestion Study Comments Cc: Strack, Jan

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Mills, Pamela To: Congestion Study Comments Cc: Strack, Jan Subject: National Electric Transmission Congestion Study - Draft for Public Comment Date: Friday, October 17, 2014 6:18:37 PM Attachments: SDGE Comments on the National Electric Transmission Congestion Study - Draft for Public Comment.docx Please find attached SDG&E's comments on the National Electric Transmission Congestion Study - Draft for Public Comment. Any questions or comments regarding the attached document should be

  2. AHAM Comments_Regulatory Burden RFI | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Comments_Regulatory Burden RFI AHAM Comments_Regulatory Burden RFI The Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM) respectfully submits the following comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) on its Regulatory Burden RFI, 81 Fed. Reg. 28736 (May 10, 2016). AHAM Comments_DOE Reducing Regulatory Burden_July 2016_FINAL (00050574) (74.64 KB) More Documents & Publications Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers Comment Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers Comment AHAM Comments

  3. Oak Ridge National Laboratory Corrective Action Plan in response to Tiger Team assessment. Volume 2, Revision 5

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kuliasha, Michael A.

    1991-08-23

    This report presents a complete response to the Tiger Team assessment that was conducted to Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) and at the US Department of Energy (DOE) Oak Ridge Operations Office (ORO) from October 2, 1990, through November 30, 1990. The action plans have undergone both a discipline review and a cross-cutting review with respect to root cause. In addition, the action plans have been integrated with initiatives being pursued across Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc., in response to Tiger Team findings at other DOE facilities operated by Energy Systems. The root cause section is complete and describes how ORNL intends to address the root cause of the findings identified during the assessment. This report is concerned with reactors safety and health findings, responses, and planned actions. Specific areas include: organization and administration; quality verification; operations; maintenance; training and certification; auxiliary systems; emergency preparedness; technical support; nuclear criticality safety; security/safety interface; experimental activities; site/facility safety review; radiological protection; personnel protection; fire protection; management findings, responses, and planned actions; self-assessment findings, responses, and planned actions; and summary of planned actions, schedules, and costs.

  4. Comments of the American Petroleum Institute | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Petroleum Institute Comments of the American Petroleum Institute Similar to the electric utility industry's implementation of smart grid, oil and natural gas companies are in the midst of transitioning to next generation communications technology that will provide significant benefits in terms of safety, incident response, effectiveness and efficiency that are critical to United States energy independence. At the same time, however, API's members find themselves increasingly constrained by the

  5. Questions, Comments, and Answers for Draft Request for Proposal Documents |

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    National Nuclear Security Administration | (NNSA) Questions, Comments, and Answers for Draft Request for Proposal Documents DE-SOL-0008470 Responses to Draft Solicitation (Updated May 23, 2016) Related Topics apm contract Sandia National Laboratories snl Related News NNSA Statement Regarding Nevada National Security Site Management & Operating Contract NNSA Awards Nevada National Security Site Management & Operating Contract to NVS3T Los Alamos National Laboratory Steam Plant Project

  6. Comments of North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) to DOE

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges | Department of Energy North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) to DOE Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Comments of North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) to DOE Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Response to the Department of Energy's ("DOE") Request for Information (RFI) regarding the "Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical

  7. QER - Comment of National Rural Electric Cooperative Association 3 |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy Rural Electric Cooperative Association 3 QER - Comment of National Rural Electric Cooperative Association 3 From: Silberstein, Pam M. [pamela.silberstein@nreca.coop] Sent: Friday, October 03, 2014 2:57 PM To: QERcomments Subject: RE: QER submission attached Attachment: Brief17_RuralEnergyConservation (1).pdf; Tri-State Response to DOE RFI on Draft IPP Process Oct 31 2013.pdf In addition to the below, please find these supporting materials. Thank you. -p

  8. Oak Ridge National Laboratory Corrective Action Plan in response to Tiger Team assessment. Volume 1, Revision 5

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kuliasha, Michael A.

    1991-08-23

    This report presents a complete response to the Tiger Team assessment that was conducted at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) and at the US Department of Energy (DOE) Oak Ridge Operations Office (ORO) from October 22, 1990, through November 30, 1990. The action plans have undergone both a discipline review and a cross-cutting review with respect to root cause. In addition, the action plans have been integrated with initiatives being pursued across Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc., in response to Tiger Team findings at other DOE facilities operated by Energy Systems. The root cause section is complete and describes how ORNL intends to address the root causes of the findings identified during the assessment. The action plan has benefited from a complete review by various offices at DOE Headquarters as well as review by the Tiger Team that conducted the assessment to ensure that the described actions are responsive to the observed problems.

  9. Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI, 76 Fed. Reg. 75798 (Dec. 5, 2011)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is submitting these comments in response to the above-referenced request for information (RFI) issued by the Department of Energy (DOE).

  10. QER - Comment of GridWise Alliance 1 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    1 QER - Comment of GridWise Alliance 1 From: Becky Harrison [BHarrison@gridwise.org] Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 5:00 PM To: QERcomments CC: Ladeene Freimuth; Lee Coogan Subject: Comments on QER Attachment: GridWise Alliance - QER Workshop 04112014 Remarks.docx; GridWise Improving Electric Grid Reliability and Resilience Report June 2013.pdf Please find attached the GridWise Alliance's Improving Electric Grid Reliability and Resilience report and my comments from today's workshop. Thank to the