National Library of Energy BETA

Sample records for 5 comment responses

  1. CRA Comments & Responses

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    CRA Comments & Responses Home CRA - 2004 Final Recertification Decision CRA Comments & Responses CCA - 1996 CRA CARDs & TSDs CCA CARDs & TSDs Regulatory Tools Completeness Determination-Related Correspondence All EPA & DOE correspondence related to the determination of completeness and the CRA are provided below. Letter Transmitting EPA's CRA Completeness Determination (9/29/05) Notification of Completeness Determination EPA Letter # Subject 1 CRA Comments (5/20/04)

  2. CRA Comments & Responses

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    (51105) 11 Response to CRA Comments (92005) Enclosure 1 - Computer Code VerificationTesting (92005) Inventory and Performance Assessment Reports DOE - Performance...

  3. Comment and Response Management System

    Energy Science and Technology Software Center (OSTI)

    1998-06-09

    CRMS is a Web-based client/server application that helps manage, track, and report on institutional responses to public comments on published documents such as environmental impact statements.

  4. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    ... The FFTF is a 400-megawatt sodium-cooled nuclear reactor ... of the national Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactor program. ... DOE Response: The FFTF and all reactors are required to be ...

  5. Appendix C - Comments and Responses

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    according to comment categories. In compliance with the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act and Council on Environmental Quality regulations, public comments on...

  6. BPA Response to Customer Comments-EBBA

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Integration Team Responses to Customer Comments Received on BPA's Proposed Enhanced BPA Balancing Authority (EBBA) - 61212 Table of Contents 1. Market-based Mechanisms...

  7. The EIS Comment-Response Process | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    The EIS Comment-Response Process The EIS Comment-Response Process This DOE guidance presents a series of recommendations to lead those involved in the preparation and review of a final EIS. The guidance addresses both the substance and the mechanics of the comment-response process and provides advice on tracking and categorizing comments, considering comments and preparing responses, and presenting responses and corresponding changes in a final EIS. PDF icon The EIS Comment-Response Process More

  8. Comment Listing Response to Draft REEE Solicitation FINAL | Department of

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Energy Comment Listing Response to Draft REEE Solicitation FINAL Comment Listing Response to Draft REEE Solicitation FINAL PDF icon Comment ListingResponse_REEE Solicitation_final.pdf More Documents & Publications Draft Advanced Fossil Energy Projects Solicitation Public Comments Draft Advanced Nuclear Energy Solicitation Public Meeting Presentation DOE-LPO_Email-Update_001_Through_11

  9. EPAct Section 242 Comments and DOE Responses | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    EPAct Section 242 Comments and DOE Responses EPAct Section 242 Comments and DOE Responses On July 2, 2014 in the Federal Register, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published and requested comment on draft guidance for implementing Section 242 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005). See 79 FR 37733 (July 2, 2014). In many instances, there were common themes among the commenters. This document consolidates and summarizes the comments and responds to the comments. PDF icon EPAct Section

  10. The EIS Comment-Response Process (DOE, 2004)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This DOE guidance presents a series of recommendations to lead those involved in the preparation and review of a final EIS. The guidance addresses both the substance and the mechanics of the comment-response process and provides advice on tracking and categorizing comments, considering comments and preparing responses, and presenting responses and corresponding changes in a final EIS.

  11. EEI Comments in response to DOE regulatory review RFI, 76 Fed. Reg. 75798

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    (Dec. 5, 2011) | Department of Energy EEI Comments in response to DOE regulatory review RFI, 76 Fed. Reg. 75798 (Dec. 5, 2011) EEI Comments in response to DOE regulatory review RFI, 76 Fed. Reg. 75798 (Dec. 5, 2011) The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is submitting these comments in response to request for information (RFI) issued by the Department of Energy (DOE). In the RFI, DOE is asking for information on ways to streamline and to reduce the burden imposed by its regulations. PDF icon

  12. Responses to Public Comments on Draft Vitrification Melter Evaluation |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy Responses to Public Comments on Draft Vitrification Melter Evaluation Responses to Public Comments on Draft Vitrification Melter Evaluation To provide greater transparency to the Department of Energy's (DOE) cleanup of nuclear legacy waste, DOE made the "West Valley Demonstration Project Draft Waste Incidental to Reprocessing Evaluation for the Vitrification Melter" (Draft WIR Evaluation) available for public and state review and comment and Nuclear Regulatory

  13. QER Public Meeting No. 5 Written Comments of SMUD

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    No. 5 Written Comments of SMUD Page 1 of 6 Quadrennial Energy Review Department of Energy Public Meeting No. 5 Electricity Transmission, Storage and Distribution - West July 11, 2014 Written Comments of the Sacramento Municipal Utility District The Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) appreciates the opportunity to provide its written comments in connection with the July 11, 2014 public meeting conducted by the Department of Energy (DOE) addressing "Electricity Transmission, Storage

  14. QER- Comment of Energy Innovation 5

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hello, Please accept these papers as comments into the QER record for the public meeting on finance and market incentives. Thank you, Hallie

  15. DOE Responses to DOE Challenge Home (formerly Builders Challenge) National Program Requirements Public Comments

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    - Responses to Draft Specification Comments 1 Updated 4/9/2012 DOE Responses to DOE Challenge Home (formerly Builders Challenge) National Program Requirements Public Comments DOE received comments on the draft DOE Challenge Home specifications and requirements from December 15, 2011 through January 31, 2012. This document summarizes the comments received, DOE's responses, and the resulting policy change, if any. All comments were reviewed. Similar comments were grouped together in the responses.

  16. Response to Comments Regarding EPAct 2005 Section 242: October 2014

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    This document contains the response to comments that were received in regards to a revised draft of the EPAct 2005 Section 242 "Hydroelectric Incentive Program" Application Guidance that was released on October 20, 2014.

  17. Telephone Flat Geothermal Development Project Environmental Impact Statement Environmental Impact Report. Final: Comments and Responses to Comments

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1999-02-01

    This document is the Comments and Responses to Comments volume of the Final Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report prepared for the proposed Telephone Flat Geothermal Development Project (Final EIS/EIR). This volume of the Final EIS/EIR provides copies of the written comments received on the Draft EIS/EIR and the leady agency responses to those comments in conformance with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

  18. Environmental Assessment for Conducting Astrophysics and Other Basic Science Experiments - Appendix A Comments and Responses

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    A-1 APPENDIX A COMMENTS AND RESPONSES This appendix contains the comments that were received during the 30-day public comment period on the draft EA (October 23 through November 22, 2000) and their responses. Comments were obtained during public meetings held in Santa Fe, New Mexico, on November 14, 2000, and in Carlsbad, New Mexico, on November 16, 2000, as well as from letters and electronic mail messages. The comment entries are organized according to comment categories. In compliance with

  19. Comments received in response to the DOE-QTR Request For Information |

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Department of Energy Comments received in response to the DOE-QTR Request For Information Comments received in response to the DOE-QTR Request For Information All public comments received by the Department in response to the DOE-QTR RFI published in the Federal Register on March 14, 2011 PDF icon Comments received in response to the DOE-QTR Request For Information More Documents & Publications Comments received in response to the DOE-QTR Request For Information Comments received in

  20. Table of QTR comments in response to Federal Register RFI | Department of

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Energy Table of QTR comments in response to Federal Register RFI QTR table of respondents

  1. Microsoft Word - response public comments letters1.doc

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Ken Niles Oregon Office of Energy 625 Marion Street, NE Suite 1 Salem, Oregon 97301-3742 Dear Mr. Niles: COMMENTS ON THE ENGINEERING EVALUATION/COST ANALYSIS (EE/CA) FOR DISPOSITION OF MIXED WASTE FROM THE 183-H SOLAR EVAPORATION BASINS (DOE/RL-2002-63) Thank you for your April 15, 2003, letter submitting the Oregon Office of Energy's comments on the Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis (EE/CA) for Disposition of Mixed Waste from the 183-H Solar Evaporation Basins (DOE/RL-2002-63). Responses to

  2. Microsoft Word - AppendixH_CommentResponse.doc

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    NFSS Vicinity Property Report October 2010 Doc. No. S06246 Page H-1 Responsiveness Summary The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) released the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program Niagara Falls Storage Site Vicinity Properties, New York: Review of Radiological Conditions at Six Vicinity Properties and Two Drainage Ditches on April 23, 2010, for public comment. Report availability was announced through a message to stakeholders sent on behalf of DOE by USACE. The announcement provided a

  3. Responses to Public Comments on Draft Vitrification Melter Evaluation

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    available for public and state review and comment and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) consultation review. The public comments on the Draft WIR Evaluation were submitted to...

  4. Agency Responses to Comments Received during the 2011 Alaska Forum on the

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Environment | Department of Energy Agency Responses to Comments Received during the 2011 Alaska Forum on the Environment Agency Responses to Comments Received during the 2011 Alaska Forum on the Environment Agency Responses to Comments Received during the 2011 Alaska Forum on the Environment Environmental Justice Interagency Working Group Community Dialogue Anchorage, AK February 7-11, 2011 The EJ IWG conducted 18 community dialogues across the country from February 2011 to November 2011.

  5. Columbia River System Operation Review : Final Environmental Impact Statement, Appendix T (Second Continued Volume): Comments & Responses.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Columbia River System Operation Review

    1995-11-01

    This is Appendix T (second continued volume) giving public comments and responses to the final environmental impact statement for the Columbia River System.

  6. U.S. Department of Energy Responses to Public Comments on the...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Evaluation for the West Valley Demonstration Project Concentrator Feed Makeup Tank and Melter Feed Hold Tank U.S. Department of Energy Responses to Public Comments...

  7. QER- Comment of American Public Power Association 5

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Attached are several documents for consideration for the QER Public Meeting: Electricity Transmission, Storage and Distribution in the West – APPA’s statement on the meeting; APPA’s August 2012, comments to the Department of Energy and Western Area Power Administration’s Joint Operations Team (JOT) on the JOT workshops held following the release of the March 2012, Memorandum from then-Secretary Chu to the PMAs; a January 31, 2014, letter from APPA and the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association (NRECA) to Secretary Moniz expressing concerns about recommendations made pertaining to the PMAs and the Tennessee Valley Authority in a report by the Center for a New Energy Economy; and Secretary Moniz’s response to the January 31, letter. These documents are being submitted herein to demonstrate the importance of recognizing and preserving the fundamental functions and mission of the PMAs. Thank you in advance for your consideration of these documents.

  8. Initial Northwest Power Act Power Sales Contracts : Final Environmental Impact Statement. Volume 4, Comments and Responses.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    United States. Bonneville Power Administration.

    1992-01-01

    This volume of the Initial Northwest Power Act Power Sales Contracts Final Environmental Impact Statement (Final EIS) contains public comments addressing the Initial Northwest Power Act Power Sales Contracts Draft EIS, August 1990 and Bonneville Power Administration`s (BPA) responses. The Introduction provides information about the process BPA follows in addressing these comments. Part I contains a listing of the Alternative Actions evaluated in the Final EIS; Part II is organized by Alternatives and includes summaries of the comments and BPA responses; Part III provides copies of the original comments letters, and, for ease of identification, are coded in the margins according to the alternative(s) addressed.

  9. Title 40 CFR 1503.4 Response to Comments | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    .4 Response to Comments Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- Federal RegulationFederal Regulation: Title 40 CFR 1503.4 Response to...

  10. Response to Comment on Velocity boundary conditions at a tokamak resistive wall [Phys. Plasmas 21, 094701 (2014)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Strauss, H. R.

    2014-09-15

    A response is given to Comment on Velocity boundary conditions at a tokamak resistive wall? [Phys. Plasmas 21, 094701 (2014)].

  11. BPA Response to Comments on Oversupply Management Protocol

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Wind energy producers, regional utilities, interest groups and others submitted approximately 90 comments on Bonneville Power Administration's Feb. 7 proposed protocol for...

  12. DOE Responses to DOE Challenge Home (formerly Builders Challenge) National Program Requirements Public Comments

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE Responses to DOE Challenge Home (formerly Builders Challenge) National Program Requirements Public Comments, a publication of the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.

  13. Comments of Santiago Grijalva: High-Level Response to DOE RFI on Smart Grid Policy

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    High-Level Response to DOE RFI on Smart Grid Policy: This document responds to DOE questions regarding smart grid policy. The approach followed herein is to write concise comments addressing the...

  14. Dual axis radiographic hydrodynamic test facility. Final environmental impact statement, Volume 2: Public comments and responses

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1995-08-01

    On May 12, 1995, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) issued the draft Dual Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test Facility Environmental Impact Statement (DARHT EIS) for review by the State of New Mexico, Indian Tribes, local governments, other Federal agencies, and the general public. DOE invited comments on the accuracy and adequacy of the draft EIS and any other matters pertaining to their environmental reviews. The formal comment period ran for 45 days, to June 26, 1995, although DOE indicated that late comments would be considered to the extent possible. As part of the public comment process, DOE held two public hearings in Los Alamos and Santa Fe, New Mexico, on May 31 and June 1, 1995. In addition, DOE made the draft classified supplement to the DARHT EIS available for review by appropriately cleared individuals with a need to know the classified information. Reviewers of the classified material included the State of New Mexico, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Defense, and certain Indian Tribes. Volume 2 of the final DARHT EIS contains three chapters. Chapter 1 includes a collective summary of the comments received and DOE`s response. Chapter 2 contains the full text of the public comments on the draft DARHT EIS received by DOE. Chapter 3 contains DOE`s responses to the public comments and an indication as to how the comments were considered in the final EIS.

  15. U.S. Department of Energy Responses to Public Comments on the Draft Waste-

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Incidental-to-Reprocessing Evaluation for the West Valley Demonstration Project Concentrator Feed Makeup Tank and Melter Feed Hold Tank | Department of Energy U.S. Department of Energy Responses to Public Comments on the Draft Waste- Incidental-to-Reprocessing Evaluation for the West Valley Demonstration Project Concentrator Feed Makeup Tank and Melter Feed Hold Tank U.S. Department of Energy Responses to Public Comments on the Draft Waste- Incidental-to-Reprocessing Evaluation for the West

  16. Public Comments on the Request for Information on Rapid Response...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Water and Power - Louis Berger Group - Montana Department of Commerce - ... to the RRTT RFI.pdf PDF icon Louis Berger Group - Comments to the RRTT RFI.pdf PDF ...

  17. Comments

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Comments by the Energy Storage Association to the Department of Energy Electricity Advisory Council March 13, 2014 Good afternoon. My name is Katherine Hamilton and I serve as Policy Director for the Energy Storage Association, an international trade association that was established over 20 years ago to foster the development of energy storage technologies. Since then our mission has been the promotion, development and commercialization of competitive and reliable energy storage delivery systems

  18. Response from PEPCO to the Comments from the Virginia Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Environmental Quality on PEPCO's Intention to Commence Planned Transmission Outages | Department of Energy PEPCO to the Comments from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality on PEPCO's Intention to Commence Planned Transmission Outages Response from PEPCO to the Comments from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality on PEPCO's Intention to Commence Planned Transmission Outages Docket No. EO-05-01. Order No. 202-05-03: This letter responds to the allegations of the letter

  19. CRE_Response-DOE_Regulatory_Review_Request_for_Comments.pdf

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Center for Regulatory Effectiveness 1601 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC, 20009 Tel: (202) 265-2383 Fax: (202) 939-6969 secretary1@mbsdc.com www.TheCRE.com 1 REGULATORY REVIEW MEMORANDUM To: Department of Energy From: Jim Tozzi Subject: Regulatory Burden Request for Information Date: September 4, 2012 CC: Boris Bershteyn/Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs This Memorandum serves as an Executive Summary of Center for Regulatory Effectiveness' (CRE's) attached comments

  20. Comments by the Sierra Club in response to the Department of Energy Special

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Environmental Analysis for Actions Taken under the U.S Department of Energy Emergency Orders Regarding Operation of the Potomac River Generating Station in Alexandria, Virginia | Department of Energy by the Sierra Club in response to the Department of Energy Special Environmental Analysis for Actions Taken under the U.S Department of Energy Emergency Orders Regarding Operation of the Potomac River Generating Station in Alexandria, Virginia Comments by the Sierra Club in response to the

  1. Public Comments on the Request for Information on Rapid Response Teams for

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Transmission (April 2012) | Department of Energy on the Request for Information on Rapid Response Teams for Transmission (April 2012) Public Comments on the Request for Information on Rapid Response Teams for Transmission (April 2012) On February 27, 2012, the Department issued a Federal Register Notice seeking information on questions related to permitting of transmission lines. Infrastructure projects - such as high voltage, long distance, electric transmission facilities - often involve

  2. Comments of the Demand Response and Smart Grid Coalition on DOE's

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy | Department of Energy the Demand Response and Smart Grid Coalition on DOE's Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy Comments of the Demand Response and Smart Grid Coalition on DOE's Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access,

  3. Demand response compensation, net Benefits and cost allocation: comments

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Hogan, William W.

    2010-11-15

    FERC's Supplemental Notice of Public Rulemaking addresses the question of proper compensation for demand response in organized wholesale electricity markets. Assuming that the Commission would proceed with the proposal ''to require tariff provisions allowing demand response resources to participate in wholesale energy markets by reducing consumption of electricity from expected levels in response to price signals, to pay those demand response resources, in all hours, the market price of energy for such reductions,'' the Commission posed questions about applying a net benefits test and rules for cost allocation. This article summarizes critical points and poses implications for the issues of net benefit tests and cost allocation. (author)

  4. Customer Comments

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Service Customer Comments Customer Response to July 24August 8 Forums N.Wasco County PUD (08262013) Portland General Electric (08262013) Renewable Northwest Project (0826...

  5. Final New England Clean Power Link Project Environmental Impact Statement Appendix M Comment Response Document

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    (http://wamc/files/styles/default/public/201410/new-england-clean-power-link- map-ctsy-tdi-new-england.jpg" alt="">) 2. NECPL exit from Lake Champlain (Benson, Vermont) courtesy of TDI-NE 3. Lake Bomoseen, Fair Haven, Vermont courtesy of TDI-NE 4. TDI-NE 2014a 1 3 2 4 New England Clean Power Link Appendix M-Comment Response Document Department of Energy October 2015 i Table of Contents 1 Introduction

  6. Remedial investigation plan for Waste Area Grouping 1 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee: Responses to regulator comments

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1991-05-01

    This document, ES/ER-6 D2, is a companion document to ORNL/RAP/Sub-87/99053/4 R1, Remedial Investigation Plan for ORNL Waste Area Grouping 1, dated August 1989. This document lists comments received from the Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4 (EPA) and the Tennessee Department of Health and Environment (TDHE) and responses to each of these comments. As requested by EPA, a revised Remedial Investigation (RI) Plan for Waste Area Grouping (WAG) 1 will not be submitted. The document is divided into two Sections and Appendix. Section I contains responses to comments issued on May 22, 1990, by EPA's Region 4 program office responsible for implementing the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). Section 2 contains responses to comments issued on April 7, 1989, by EPA's program office responsible for implementing the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA); these comments include issues raised by the TDHE. The Appendix contains the attachments referenced in a number of the responses. 35 refs.

  7. Dairyland Power Cooperative comments | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    comments Dairyland Power Cooperative comments Response comments from Dairyland Power Cooperative on the Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logisitical Reliability PDF icon...

  8. Public Comment Procedures | Department of Energy

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Public Comment Procedures Public Comment Procedures In response to an application, any person may file a protest, comments, or a motion to intervene or notice of intervention, as...

  9. DOE Comments Regulatory Burden RFI | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Comments Regulatory Burden RFI DOE Comments Regulatory Burden RFI These comments are submitted by Rheem Manufacturing Company in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) notice appearing in the December 5, 2011 Federal Register requesting information on existing regulations that should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed. PDF icon Reg_Review_DOE_comts_RFI.pdf More Documents & Publications Fourth RFI Comment on Regulatory Review Reducing Regulatory Burden EO 13563 Third

  10. QER - Comment of Entergy | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Entergy QER - Comment of Entergy From: Turton, Daniel [dturton@entergy.com] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 5:12 PM To: QERcomments Subject: Subject: Comments on Enhancing Energy Infrastructure Resiliency and Addressing Vulnerabilities Attachment: Entergy Responses to Key Questions Regarding Energy System Vulnerabiliti....pdf Please find our comments for submission attached. My contact information is below if needed. Dan Turton Vice President, Federal Government Affairs Entergy

  11. Comments of the Demand Response and Smart Grid Coalition on DOE...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy Comments of ... Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy The Demand ...

  12. Supplement analysis for continued operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore. Volume 2: Comment response document

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1999-03-01

    The US Department of Energy (DOE), prepared a draft Supplement Analysis (SA) for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore (SNL-L), in accordance with DOE`s requirements for implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (10 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] Part 1021.314). It considers whether the Final Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report for Continued Operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore (1992 EIS/EIR) should be supplement3ed, whether a new environmental impact statement (EIS) should be prepared, or no further NEPA documentation is required. The SA examines the current project and program plans and proposals for LLNL and SNL-L, operations to identify new or modified projects or operations or new information for the period from 1998 to 2002 that was not considered in the 1992 EIS/EIR. When such changes, modifications, and information are identified, they are examined to determine whether they could be considered substantial or significant in reference to the 1992 proposed action and the 1993 Record of Decision (ROD). DOE released the draft SA to the public to obtain stakeholder comments and to consider those comments in the preparation of the final SA. DOE distributed copies of the draft SA to those who were known to have an interest in LLNL or SNL-L activities in addition to those who requested a copy. In response to comments received, DOE prepared this Comment Response Document.

  13. Public Comments in Response to the November 10, 2011 Federal Register Notice

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Department issued a Federal Register Notice initiating preparations for development of the current National Electric Transmission Congestion Study. DOE requested comments on what publicly-available data and information should be considered, and what types of analysis should be performed to identify and understand the significance and character of transmission congestion. The following public comments were received as of March 30, 2012.

  14. QTR - unedited comments | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    - unedited comments QTR - unedited comments PDF icon Comments received in response to the DOE-QTR Request For Information More Documents & Publications Table of QTR comments in response to Federal Register RFI Table of QTR comments in response to Federal Register RFI QTR table of respondents

  15. Table of QTR comments in response to Federal Register RFI | Department of

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Energy response

  16. Response to Comment on Stationary self-focusing of Gaussian laser beam in relativistic thermal quantum plasma [Phys. Plasmas 21, 064701 (2014)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Patil, S. D.; Takale, M. V.

    2014-06-15

    Habibi and Ghamari have presented a Comment on our paper [Phys. Plasmas 20, 072703 (2013)] by examining quantum dielectric response in thermal quantum plasma. They have modeled the relativistic self-focusing of Gaussian laser beam in cold and warm quantum plasmas and reported that self-focusing length does not change in both situations. In this response, we have reached the following important conclusions about the comment itself.

  17. Reply Comments of Entergy Services, Inc. | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Entergy Services, Inc. Reply Comments of Entergy Services, Inc. Entergy Services, Inc. ("Entergy"), on behalf of itself and its operating affiliates, hereby submits reply comments in response to the Department of Energy's ("DOE") Request for Information ("RFI"), released May 5, 2010, regarding the current and projected communications requirements of electric utilities. Entergy commented on similar issues in proceedings before the Federal Communications Commission

  18. Microsoft Word - DC-#771574-v5-CvD_-_Comments_re_DOE_New_Sec_Det.docx

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    April 6, 2015 Mr. David Henderson Office of Nuclear Energy U.S. Department of Energy Mailstop NE-52 19901 Germantown Road Germantown, MD 20874-1290 RFI-UraniumTransfers@hq.doe.gov VIA E-MAIL Subject: Department of Energy - Excess Uranium Management: Effects of DOE Transfers of Excess Uranium on Domestic Uranium Mining, Conversion, and Enrichment Industries; Notice of Issues for Public Comment - 80 Fed. Reg. 14107 (March 18, 2015) Dear Mr. Henderson: ConverDyn appreciates the opportunity to

  19. Comments of consumer electronics association | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    consumer electronics association Comments of consumer electronics association The Consumer Electronics Association ("CEA") respectfully submits these comments in response to the ...

  20. LLNL's Response to 9/9/2009 Annual Inspection Report Comments B113 Issue #1 and B271 Issue #2

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Schwartz, W W

    2009-11-19

    This is LLNL's responses to comments in the 9/9/2009 Annual Inspection Report concerning Underground Storage Tank (UST) 113-D1U2 (Issue No.1) at Building 113 and UST 271-D2U1 (Issue No.2) at Building 271. Also provided is the required Application for Underground Storage Tank Modification for USTs 113-D1U2 and 271-D2U1 and the specification sheet for the Phil-Tite spill bucket that is proposed to be installed in the 271-D2U1 sump.

  1. Public Comments on the proposed 10 CFR Part 51 rule for renewal of nuclear power plant operating licenses and supporting documents: Review of concerns and NRC staff response. Appendices

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1996-05-01

    This volume contains several appendices. Appendix A contains the list of individuals and organizations providing comments at various stages of the rulemaking process. The names of commenters at the public meetings are listed in the order that they spoke at the meeting; those who submitted written comments are listed by docket number. Appendix B contains the summaries of comments made. Each comment summary is identified by a unique comment number. Appendix C presents the concerns and NRC staff responses. Each concern embodies one or more comments on similar or related issues. The associated comment numbers are referenced for each concern. The concerns are organized by topic areas. A three-letter identifier for the topic, followed by a number, is assigned to each concern.

  2. Response to comments received from the State of Colorado and the public on the Environmental Assessment for resumption of thermal stabilization of plutonium oxide in Building 707

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1994-02-01

    The Department of Energy (DOE) prepared this document to respond to comments from the State of Colorado and the public on the draft Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Resumption of Thermal Stabilization of Plutonium Oxide in Building 707 at the Rocky Flats Plant (RFP) in Golden, Colorado. The draft EA was provided to the State of Colorado and the public on September 8, 1993, for a comment period of 60 days. The Department`s National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Implementing Procedures (10 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 1021.301) requires that prior to approval of the EA, DOE is to allow the host State and Indian Tribe a period of from 14 to 30 days to review and comment on the EA. The Department established a comment period of 60 days for this EA in response to requests by the public during the first public meeting on July 7, 1993, before preparation of the EA. Other issues raised at the July 7 meeting included the range of alternatives to be considered, the time period for preparation of the EA, and the amount of material to be thermally stabilized. These and other comments made by the public at that meeting were carefully considered in preparation of the EA. In addition to providing the preapproval draft EA to the State of Colorado, DOE distributed the EA to all persons and groups on the RFP public information mailing list and placed the EA and reference documents in the DOE Public Reading Rooms in the RFP area. A public meeting was held on October 6, 1993, to hear public comments on the draft EA. All comments on the draft EA, those received both at the October 6 public meeting and through correspondence, have been reproduced in their entirety in this Response to Comments document. Responses to the commenters` questions and concerns are provided, and changes made to the body of the EA are indicated in the responses. All comments received have been considered in the revision of the EA.

  3. Comments of Saton Technology Corporation in response to Smart Grid RFI

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Satcon Technology Corporation Request for Information Response for: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation for US Department of Energy.

  4. Comments by the Sierra Club in response to the Department of...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    by the Sierra Club in response to the Department of Energy Special Environmental Analysis for Actions Taken under the U.S Department of Energy Emergency Orders Regarding Operation...

  5. EIS-0287: Notice of Extension for Time for Comments | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Extension for Time for Comments EIS-0287: Notice of Extension for Time for Comments Preferred Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Technology In response to a public request, the...

  6. Comments of Cisco Systems to Office of Electricity Delivery and...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Cisco Systems provides comments in response to the RFI issued by DOE on addressing policy andlogistical challenges to smart grid implementation. PDF icon Comments of Cisco Systems ...

  7. Comments on RFI on Permitting of Transmission Lines Available | Department

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    of Energy Comments on RFI on Permitting of Transmission Lines Available Comments on RFI on Permitting of Transmission Lines Available April 3, 2012 - 2:12pm Addthis On October 5, 2011, the White House announced the creation of a Rapid Response Team for Transmission (RRTT). In support of the RRTT the Department of Energy's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability released a Federal Register Notice seeking information on questions related to permitting of transmission lines. The

  8. Reply Comments of Southern Company Services, Inc. | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Southern Company Services, Inc. Reply Comments of Southern Company Services, Inc. Southern Company Services, Inc. ("Southern"), on behalf of itself and its operating affiliates, hereby submits its reply comments in response to the Department of Energy's ("DOE's") Request for Information ("RFI"), released May 5, 2010, about current and projected communications requirements of electric utilities.1 Southern appreciates the opportunity to provide DOE with additional

  9. Interested Parties - WAPA Public Comment | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    WAPA Public Comment Interested Parties - WAPA Public Comment Comments Received in Response to Western Area Power Administration's Federal Register Notice Titled 'Notice of Proposed Program and Request for Public Comments.' PDF icon Microsoft Word - AAAA1.doc More Documents & Publications Mid-West Electric Consumers Association Microsoft Word - Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx

  10. Department of Energy Extends Comment Period on Proposed Revisions to its

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    NEPA Rules | Department of Energy Extends Comment Period on Proposed Revisions to its NEPA Rules Department of Energy Extends Comment Period on Proposed Revisions to its NEPA Rules February 17, 2011 - 5:29pm Addthis The Department of Energy today announced that, in response to requests from a number of parties, it has re-opened the public comment period on its proposed revisions to the Department's NEPA rules. The public comment period will be extended three weeks and will now close on March

  11. DOE/EIS-0236, Oakland Operations Office, National Ignition Facility Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement to the Stockpile Stewardship and Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Volume II: Response to Public Comments (January 2

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued the Draft SEIS for public review and comment by mailings to stakeholders and by announcements in the Federal Register (FR) on November 5, 1999, (64 FR 60430) (Attachment 4 of Volume I)...

  12. Final Environmental Impact Statement for the construction and operation of Claiborne Enrichment Center, Homer, Louisiana (Docket No. 70-3-70). Volume 2, Public comments and NRC response

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Zeitoun, A.

    1994-08-01

    The Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) (Volume 1), was prepared by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in accordance with regulation 10 CFR Part 51, which implements the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), to assess the potential environmental impacts for licensing the construction and operation of a proposed gaseous centrifuge enrichment facility to be built in Claiborne Parish, Louisiana by Louisiana Energy Services, L.P. (LES). The proposed facility would have a production capacity of about 866 metric tons annually of up to 5 weight percent enriched UF{sub 6}, using a proven centrifuge technology. Included in the assessment are co on, both normal operations and potential accidents (internal and external events), and the eventual decontamination and decommissioning of the site. In order to help assure that releases from the operation of the facility and potential impacts on the public are as low as reasonably achievable, an environmental monitoring program was developed by LES to detect significant changes in the background levels of uranium around the site. Other issues addressed include the purpose and need for the facility, the alternatives to the proposed action, potential disposition of the tails, the site selection process, and environmental justice. The NRC staff concludes that the facility can be constructed and operated with small and acceptable impacts on the public and the environment, and proposes to issue a license to the applicant, Louisiana Energy Services, to authorize construction and operation of the proposed facility. The letters in this Appendix have been divided into three sections. Section One contains letters to which the NRC responded by addressing specific comments. Section Two contains the letters that concerned the communities of Forest Grove and Center Springs. Section Three is composed of letters that required no response. These letters were generally in support of the facility.

  13. Microsoft Word - Regulatory Burden RFI NEMA Comments regarding small motor regulations 17July2015 v5_1.docx

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    November 28, 2 July 17, 2015 VIA EMAIL TO: Regulatory.Review@hq.doe.gov Mr. Aaron Stevenson U.S. Department of Energy Office of the Assistant General Counsel Legislation, Regulation, and Energy Efficiency 1000 Independence Ave, SW Washington, DC 20585 Reducing Regulatory Burden: Request for Information (RFI) Dear Mr. Stevenson, The National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) appreciates the opportunity to provide the attached comments on the Request for Information to Reduce Regulatory

  14. Application for presidential permit OE Docket No. PP-230-4 International Transmission Company: Comments of The Detriot Edison Company

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Detriot Edison Company hereby submits these comments and a motion in the alternative for leave to intervene out of time in response to the January 5, 2009 filing by international transmission...

  15. Comments of the Utilities Telecom Council | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    the Utilities Telecom Council Comments of the Utilities Telecom Council Comments of the Utilities Telecom Council. UTC has filed comments on this issue in response to the DOE's RFI regarding the communication needs of utilities which are incorporated by reference as part of the comments in this proceeding. PDF icon Comments of the Utilities Telecom Council More Documents & Publications Re: NBP RFI: Communications Requirements NBP RFI: Communications Requirements - Reply Comments of Utilities

  16. Re: Comments on NBP RFI: Data Access | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Comments on NBP RFI: Data Access Re: Comments on NBP RFI: Data Access Consumers Union, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen submit the following comments in response to the U.S. Department of Energy (-DOE or -Department) in the above-referenced matter. PDF icon Re: Comments on NBP RFI: Data Access More Documents & Publications Comments on Smart Grid data access AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments to:DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Smart Grid RFI: Addressing

  17. DC OPC Comments. September 17, 2010 | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    OPC Comments. September 17, 2010 DC OPC Comments. September 17, 2010 Comments of the office of peoples counsel, washington DC in response to the department of energy's request for information concerning smart grid issues. PDF icon DC OPC Comments. September 17, 2010 More Documents & Publications Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to smart grid Implementation: eMeter Response to Department of Energy RFI Comments of DRSG to DOE Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical

  18. Zero Zone Comment | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Zero Zone Comment Zero Zone Comment These comments are submitted by Zero Zone Inc., a manufacturer of CRE equipment, in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) notice in the July 3, 2014 Federal Register requesting information to assist DOE in reviewing existing regulations and in making its regulatory program more effective and less burdensome. PDF icon Zero Zone comments More Documents & Publications Regulatory Burden RFI Executive Order 13563 certification, compliance and

  19. Goodman Manufacturing Company Comment | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Goodman Manufacturing Company Comment Goodman Manufacturing Company Comment These comments are submitted by Goodman Global, Inc. ("Goodman") in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) request for information (RFI) appearing in the Federal Register on July 3, 2014. PDF icon 07-18-2014 Goodman Comments on Regulatory Burden RFI.PDF More Documents & Publications 2014-06-25 Issuance: Energy Conservation Standards for Residential Furnace Fans; Final Rule ISSUANCE 2015-08-21:

  20. Goodman Manufacturing Company Comment | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Goodman Manufacturing Company Comment Goodman Manufacturing Company Comment These comments are submitted by Goodman Global, Inc. ("Goodman") in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) request for information (RFI) appearing in the Federal Register on July 3, 2014. PDF icon 07-18-2014 Goodman Comments on Regulatory Burden RFI.PDF More Documents & Publications 2014-06-25 Issuance: Energy Conservation Standards for Residential Furnace Fans; Final Rule 2014-08-28 Issuance:

  1. Customer Comments

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    2009) Customer Comments on 2009 PTSA Avista Utilities BPA Power Services Grant County PUD Horizon Wind Energy Iberdrola Renewables Northwest Requirements Utilities Powerex...

  2. Customer Comments

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Customer Comments BPA Power (452012) Clark PUD (452012) Cowlitz PUD (452012) Emerald PUD (452012) Franklin PUD (452012) Grant PUD (452012) Iberdrola (452012)...

  3. Comments of the Bonneville Power Administration | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    the Bonneville Power Administration Comments of the Bonneville Power Administration BPA appreciates the opportunity to provide comments and information and submits the following comments in response to the DOE RFI. PDF icon Comments of the Bonneville Power Administration More Documents & Publications RE: NBP RFI: Communication Requirements CX-001184: Categorical Exclusion Determination Communications Requirements of Smart Grid Technologies

  4. Draft Advanced Fossil Energy Projects Solicitation Public Comments |

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Department of Energy Fossil Energy Projects Solicitation Public Comments Draft Advanced Fossil Energy Projects Solicitation Public Comments PDF icon Draft Advanced Fossil Energy Projects Solicitation Public Comments More Documents & Publications Comment Listing Response to Draft REEE Solicitation FINAL Draft Advanced Nuclear Energy Solicitation Public Meeting Presentation

  5. EIS-0396: Notice of Extension of Time to Submit Scoping Comments...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Extension of Time to Submit Scoping Comments EIS-0396: Notice of Extension of Time to Submit Scoping Comments Global Nuclear Energy Partnership In response to public requests, the...

  6. Response to Comment on General rotating quantum vortex filaments in the low-temperature Svistunov model of the local induction approximation [Phys. Fluids 26, 119101 (2014)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Van Gorder, Robert A.

    2014-11-15

    In R. A. Van Gorder, General rotating quantum vortex filaments in the low-temperature Svistunov model of the local induction approximation, Phys. Fluids 26, 065105 (2014) I discussed properties of generalized vortex filaments exhibiting purely rotational motion under the low-temperature Svistunov model of the local induction approximation. Such solutions are stationary in terms of translational motion. In the Comment [N. Hietala, Comment on General rotating quantum vortex filaments in the low-temperature Svistunov model of the local induction approximation [Phys. Fluids 26, 065105 (2014)], Phys. Fluids 26, 119101 (2014)], the author criticizes my paper for not including translational motion (although it was clearly stated that the filament motion was assumed rotational). As it turns out, if one is interested in studying the geometric structure of solutions (which was the point of my paper), one obtains the needed qualitative results on the structure of such solutions by studying the purely rotational case. Nevertheless, in this Response I shall discuss the vortex filaments that have both rotational and translational motions. I then briefly discuss why one might want to study such generalized rotating filament solutions, in contrast to simple the standard helical or planar examples (which are really special cases). I also discuss how one can study the time evolution of filaments which exhibit more complicated dynamics than pure translation and rotation. Doing this, one can study non-stationary solutions which initially appear purely rotational and gradually display other dynamics as the filaments evolve.

  7. National Electrical Manufacturers Association Comment | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy Comment National Electrical Manufacturers Association Comment The National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) appreciates the opportunity to provide the attached comments on the Request for Information to Reduce Regulatory Burden as announced in the U.S. Federal Register Vol. 80, No. 127, beginning on page 38019. PDF icon Regulatory Burden RFI NEMA Comments regarding small motor regulations 17July2015 v5_1 More Documents & Publications National Electrical Manufacturers

  8. Chapter 2 - Comment Documents Final Y-12 SWEIS

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    - Comment Documents Final Y-12 SWEIS February 2011 2-1 COMMENT RESPONSE DOCUMENT, CHAPTER 2: COMMENT DOCUMENTS This chapter is a compilation of all the documents that the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) received on the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Y-12 National Security Complex during the public comment period. The documents are presented alphabetically by commentor's last name. On each document the first number represents the comment number within that

  9. Page comments

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    with-serial-codes-on-login-nodesPageComment101 http:www.nersc.govuserssoftwarecompilersintel-fortran-c-and-cintel-bug-reportsintel-uses-very-old-version-of-libstdc-by-de...

  10. COMMENTS | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    COMMENTS� COMMENTS� PDF icon COMMENTS� More Documents & Publications COMMENTS� CHAPTER 7 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Microsoft Word - Appendix A_2006_Jun

  11. Comments by Battelle Memorial Institute to DOE Rulemaking | Department of

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Energy by Battelle Memorial Institute to DOE Rulemaking Comments by Battelle Memorial Institute to DOE Rulemaking Comments by Battelle Memorial Institute in response to DOE' s July 27, 2010 Notice of Inquiry and Request for Comment (Notice) regarding implementation of Section 934 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (Act). PDF icon Comments by Battelle Memorial Institute to DOE Rulemaking More Documents & Publications Exelon response CSC_Extension.PDF Memorandum

  12. NNMCAB Correspondence 2013-05 (Response Hg SEIS)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Response to NNMCAB Correspondence 2013-01. DOE provided comment responses on the Mercury Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement comments that were submitted by the NNMCAB.

  13. Recommendation 192: Comments on Remediation Effectiveness Report |

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Department of Energy 2: Comments on Remediation Effectiveness Report Recommendation 192: Comments on Remediation Effectiveness Report The ORSSAB presented to DOE Recommendations and Comments on the Draft 2010 Remediation Effectiveness Report for the U.S. Department of Energy Oak Ridge Reservation. PDF icon Recommendation 192 PDF icon DOE response to recommendation 192 More Documents & Publications ORSSAB Meeting - May 2013 ORSSAB Meeting - June 2013 ORSSAB Meeting - April 2014

  14. LTS Plan Workshop Questions and Comments

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    LTS Plan Workshop Questions and Comments August 28, 2002 Monitoring and Maintenance 1. Is there a possibility of spontaneous combustion in the disposal cell? Response J-1: The concerns raised by the comments are valid for certain well-defined scenarios, most of which involve either composting protocols or disposal of organic mass in demolition or municipal landfills. The commentator references the quantity of more than 10,000 cubic yards of wood or other similar materials incorporated into the

  15. DOE responses to Ecology review comments for ``Sampling and analysis plans for the 100-D Ponds voluntary remediation project``

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    NONE

    1996-12-31

    The Sampling and Analysis Plan describes the sampling and analytical activities which will be performed to support closure of the 100-D Ponds at the Hanford Reservation. This report contains responses by the US Department of Energy to Ecology review for ``Sampling and Analysis Plan for the 100-D Ponds Voluntary Remediation Project.``

  16. QER- Comment of Process Gas Consumer Group

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hello, Attached are comments offered by the Process Gas Consumers Group in response to the August 25, 2014 Federal Register Notice soliciting comments on issues related to the Quadrennial Energy Review. Please let us know if you have any questions or would like any additional information.

  17. Department of Energy Extends Comment Period on Proposed Revisions...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Extends Comment Period on Proposed Revisions to its NEPA Rules Department of Energy Extends Comment Period on Proposed Revisions to its NEPA Rules February 17, 2011 - 5:29pm ...

  18. COMMENTS | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    COMMENTS� COMMENTS� PDF icon COMMENTS� More Documents & Publications CHAPTER 7 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Microsoft Word - CHAP02ESH _REVISED1_3.doc

  19. Public Comment re NOI on Convention on Supplementary Compensation for

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Nuclear Damage | Department of Energy NOI on Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Public Comment re NOI on Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage ENERGYSOLUTIONS' Comment in Response to Notice of Inquiry, Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation -75 FR 43945 PDF icon Public Comment re NOI on Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage More Documents & Publications Public comment re

  20. NBP RFI: Communications Requirements - Reply Comments of Utilities Telecom

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Council | Department of Energy Requirements - Reply Comments of Utilities Telecom Council NBP RFI: Communications Requirements - Reply Comments of Utilities Telecom Council The Utilities Telecom Council hereby files its reply comments in response to the Department of Energy (DOE) request for information on the communications needs of electric utilities and other such critical infrastructure industries (CII). The comments on the record- including those by APPA, EEI and NRECA, as well as API -

  1. HPBA Comments NOPR on Energy Conservation Standards for Direct...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    The Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association (HPBA) provides these comments in response to the Department of Energy (DOE) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking entitled "Energy Conservation ...

  2. City of Alexandria, Virginia Comments Regarding Department of...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    The City of Alexandria, Virginia ("Alexandria") hereby submits the following comments in response to the notice of emergency action published in the Federal Register on January...

  3. Comments of the Southern Environmental Law Center and the American...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    the Southern Environmental Law Center and the American Lung Association in response to the ... Comments of the Southern Environmental Law Center and the American Lung Association in ...

  4. Comments of Tendril Networks Inc | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Tendril offers a software and hardware solution that enables residential home energy management and demand response. Therefore, our comments will primarily address issues that ...

  5. Comments of National Grid to the Smart Grid RFI | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    National Grid's Response to the Department of Energy Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges of Smart Grid Implementation PDF icon National Grid's comments More ...

  6. Microsoft Word - NWEC Comments_Momentum Savings Proposed Allocation...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    in response to BPA's notice for comment on the draft momentum savings allocation methodology. This letter outlines our concerns with the current proposal and requests that BPA...

  7. Smart Grid Request for Information and Public Comments | Department...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    RICE Ruling Water Heater Ruling Demand Response and Smart Grid Coalition (DRSG) District of Columbia Office of the People's Counsel (DC OPC) Comments Attachment Divan, Deepak, ...

  8. CA IOUs Comment Letter

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    June 19, 2012 Mr. Daniel Cohen U.S. Department of Energy Office of the General Council 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 6A245 Washington, DC 20585-0121 Dear Mr. Cohen: This letter comprises the comments of the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), Southern California Gas Company (SCGC), San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E), and Southern California Edison (SCE) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Request for Information on Regulatory Burden. The signatories of this

  9. QER - Comment of Dairyland Power Cooperative - FWD by John Richards |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy Dairyland Power Cooperative - FWD by John Richards QER - Comment of Dairyland Power Cooperative - FWD by John Richards From: Richards, John Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 4:01 PM To: QERcomments Subject: FW: DPC written comments Attachment: 2014.08.08 Dairyland Power Cooperative written comments for Chicago QER session.pdf From: Richards, John Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2014 5:28 PM To: 'ashikany@energetics.com' Subject: Fw: DPC written comments From: Sean L Craig

  10. DOE Seeks Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden | Department of

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Energy Seeks Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden DOE Seeks Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden March 22, 2011 - 5:24pm Addthis The Department of Energy today announces the opening of the reply comment period for its Request for Information implementing Executive Order 13563, seeking public comment on how best to review its existing regulations and to identify whether any of its existing regulations should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed. The Department is

  11. QER- Comment of Lisa Petrie

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    To Whom it May Concern: Attached please find my comments for the Quadrennial Energy Review. I attended the meeting and gave the comments orally, but I wasn't able to finish because of the 3-minute time limit, so I'm sending them in written form (with a couple of very small revisions). I'd also like to say that I was disappointed to find that the meeting was poorly publicized, that very few members of the general public or the environmental community were present, and that there were no environmentalists or opponents of the proposed AIM pipeline expansion project among the formal speakers. I sincerely hope that future hearings will be more balanced, in keeping with this Administration's promise of transparent government that's responsive to the needs and concerns of its citizens. Thank you so much for taking the time to read and consider my comments. Respectfully Yours, Lisa Petrie Stay-at-home mom and concerned citizen

  12. Comments of the American Public Power Association | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Public Power Association Comments of the American Public Power Association In response to the U.S. Department of Energy's ("DOE") Request for Information ("RFI") published May 11, 2010 in the Federal Register,1 the American Public Power Association ("APPA") hereby submits its comments in response to questions on data access, third party use, and privacy as related to the implementation of smart grid technology. PDF icon Comments of the American Public Power

  13. DOE Extends Comment Period on Notice of Inquiry Under the Energy Independence and Security Act

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Today, in response to a formal request, General Counsel Scott Blake Harris approved a 30-day extension of the public comment period on DOE's Notice of Inquiry (75 FR 43945) soliciting comment on...

  14. Approval/Variation Request Comment Sheet

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    EA15PC3041-3-0 Mar. 25, 2003 Rev. 0 Page 1 of 2 ApprovalVariation Request Comment Sheet 1. Page of 2. G APPROVAL REQUEST 3. G VARIATION REQUEST 4. ARVR No. 5. POSubcontract No....

  15. Microsoft Word - UTC Comments.doc

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Before the Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 In the Matter of ADDRESSING POLICY AND LOGISTICAL CHALLENGES TO SMART GRID IMPLEMENTATION ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF THE UTILITIES TELECOM COUNCIL The Utilities Telecom Council ("UTC") is pleased to provide the following comments in response to the Department of Energy's ("DOE") Request for Information on Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation. 1 While the RFI raises many important issues

  16. Comment Period Closed Explained

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The public comment period on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) has ended, and DOE is preparing a Final EIS. The Final EIS will consider and respond to all timely public comments on the...

  17. QER- Comment of WIRES

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Attached please find the components of WIRES Comment to the QER. Please direct any questions to Jim Hoecker, below.

  18. TECHNICAL STANDARDS COMMENT RESOLUTION

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    PurposeThis procedure provides guidance for resolving comments on DOE Technical Standards that are received during the coordination process.

  19. Submitting Comments via Email

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Submitting Comments via Email Any contact information provided in your e-mail submission will not be publicly viewable except for your first and last names, organization name (if any), and submitter representative name (if any). Your contact information will be publicly viewable if you include it in the comment itself or in any documents attached to your comment. Any information that you do not want to be publicly viewable should not be included in your comment, nor in any document attached to

  20. 5

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    (Records Required) ... 5 5.6 TEMPERATURE LIMITATIONS - CRANE HOOKS, HOIST HOOKS, AND MISCELLANEOUS HOOKS ......

  1. PTL-5 From: Malin,Debra J - PTL-5

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    M - PFP-6; Clark,Harry W - PTL-5; Wilson,Scott K - PS-6; Olive,J Courtney - LP- 7; Larson,Cheryl A - PS-6 Subject: FW: PPC comments on EPP framework Attachments: PPC Comments -...

  2. HPBA Comments NOPR on Energy Conservation Standards for Direct Heating

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Equipment | Department of Energy Comments NOPR on Energy Conservation Standards for Direct Heating Equipment HPBA Comments NOPR on Energy Conservation Standards for Direct Heating Equipment The Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association (HPBA) provides these comments in response to the Department of Energy (DOE) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking entitled "Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Direct Heating Equipment," published at 76 Fed. Reg. 43941 (July 22,

  3. Information Technology Industry Council Comment | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Information Technology Industry Council Comment Information Technology Industry Council Comment The Information Technology Industry Council (ITI) appreciates the opportunity to submit comments in response to the Regulatory Burden RFI.1 ITI represents the leading global innovators of information and communications technology (ICT), an industry committed to developing energy-efficient solutions both for our own products and to help enable energy efficiency in other more energy intensive sectors.

  4. City Utilities of Springfield Missouri Comments on Smart Grid RFI:

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges | Department of Energy Utilities of Springfield Missouri Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges City Utilities of Springfield Missouri Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges City Utilities of Springfield Missouri provides comments in response to the Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges PDF icon Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges More

  5. NAESCO Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI Final | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy NAESCO Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI Final NAESCO Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI Final The National Association of Energy Service Companies (NAESCO) appreciates the opportunity to submit these comments in response to the Request for Information (RFI) entitled, "Reducing Regulatory Burden," published in the Federal Register on May 15, 2012. PDF icon NAESCO_Cmts_Reducing_Reg_Burden_RFI_Final.pdf More Documents & Publications FPCC Regulatory

  6. Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges, Comments from

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    the Edison Electric Institute | Department of Energy Challenges, Comments from the Edison Electric Institute Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges, Comments from the Edison Electric Institute The Edison Electric Institute ("EEI"), on behalf of its member companies, hereby submits the following comments in response to the request by the Department of Energy ("DOE" or "Department") for information on a wide range of issues dealing with Smart

  7. Microsoft Word - remote handled waste comment extension.doc

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    extends public comment period on the Remote-handled Waste Disposition Project Environmental Assessment Jan. 26, 2009 Media contact: Brad Bugger, (208) 526-0833 In response to a request from the public, the U.S. Department of Energy has extended the deadline to comment on the draft environmental assessment for a proposal to process approximately 327 cubic meters of remote-handled radioactive waste currently stored at Idaho National Laboratory. The public comment period, which originally expired

  8. Air Conditioning Heating and Refrigeration Institute Comment | Department

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    of Energy Air Conditioning Heating and Refrigeration Institute Comment Air Conditioning Heating and Refrigeration Institute Comment These comments are submitted by the Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) notice in the July 3, 2014 Federal Register requesting information to assist DOE in reviewing existing regulations and in making its regulatory program more effective and less burdensome. PDF icon DOE Reg Burden

  9. AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    to:DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges | Department of Energy AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments to:DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments to:DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges AARP submits the following comments on consumers and smart grid issues in response to the

  10. DOE F 1600.5

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

    DOE F 1600.5 (06-94) All Other Editions Are Obsolete OMB Control No. 1910-0400 U.S. Department of Energy Assurance of Compliance Nondiscrimination in Federally Assisted Programs Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 15 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this

  11. DOE F 1600.5

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    5 (06-94) All Other Editions Are Obsolete OMB Control No. 1910-0400 U.S. Department of Energy Assurance of Compliance Nondiscrimination in Federally Assisted Programs Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 15 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden

  12. Microsoft Word - NGP EIS scoping Comment

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Environ me ntal Imp act Statemen t for the Acquisition of a Natural Gas Pipeline and Natural Gas Utility Service at the Hanford Site U.S. Department of Energy Written Comment Form Must be received on or before February 22, 2012. Please use other side if more space is needed. Comment forms may be mailed to: Comment forms may be sent by electronic mail to: Mr. Douglas Chapin naturalgaseis@rl.gov NEPA Document Manager U.S. DOE/Richland Operations Office Box 550, MSIN A5-11 Richland, WA 99352

  13. Response to Comment on Magnetic geometry and physics of advanced divertors: The X-divertor and the snowflake? [Phys. Plasmas 21, 054701 (2014)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kotschenreuther, Mike; Valanju, Prashant; Covele, Brent; Mahajan, Swadesh

    2014-05-15

    Relying on coil positions relative to the plasma, the Comment on Magnetic geometry and physics of advanced divertors: The X-divertor and the snowflake? [Phys. Plasmas 21, 054701 (2014)], emphasizes a criterion for divertor characterization that was critiqued to be ill posed [M. Kotschenreuther et al., Phys. Plasmas 20, 102507 (2013)]. We find that no substantive physical differences flow from this criteria. However, using these criteria, the successful NSTX experiment by Ryutov et al. [Phys. Plasmas 21, 054701 (2014)] has the coil configuration of an X-divertor (XD), rather than a snowflake (SF). On completing the divertor index (DI) versus distance graph for this NSTX shot (which had an inexplicably missing region), we find that the DI is like an XD for most of the outboard wetted divertor plate. Further, the proximity condition, used to define an SF [M. Kotschenreuther et al., Phys. Plasmas 20, 102507 (2013)], does not have a substantive physics basis to override metrics based on flux expansion and line length. Finally, if the criteria of the comment are important, then the results of NSTX-like experiments could have questionable applicability to reactors.

  14. Department of Energy Extends Public Comment Period | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Extends Public Comment Period Department of Energy Extends Public Comment Period September 29, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contacts Darwin J. Morgan morgan@nv.doe.gov 702-295-3521 Kelly K. Snyder snyderk@nv.doe.gov 702-295-3521 In response to public comments and requests, the U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office is extending the public comment period for the Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement (SWEIS) for the Nevada National Security

  15. Extension of DOE N 206.5, Response and Notification Procedures for Data Breaches Involving Personally Identifiable Information

    Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    2008-10-09

    This Notice extends DOE N 206.5, Response and Notification Procedures for Data Breaches Involving Personally Identifiable Information, dated 10-9-07, until 1-9-09.

  16. Reliability Question Comment

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Reliability-Question-Comment Sign In About | Careers | Contact | Investors | bpa.gov Search News & Us Expand News & Us Projects & Initiatives Expand Projects & Initiatives...

  17. 5

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    04 Site Management Plan Page 5-1 5.0 Project Schedules and Milestones (FY 2005) 5.1 Establishing Project Schedules and Milestones The SMP establishes the overall plan for remedial actions at the MMTS and milestones against which progress can be measured. The SMP also documents the overall plan for remedial actions at the MVP Site, which has been deleted. The SMP was first prepared in 1995 and was revised in 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, and 2003. As stated in the 2003 SMP, Section 5.0,

  18. Microsoft Word - 201-007658 - CS Public Comment draft 12Aug2014 incl OMB CI chgs lbnl khl.docx

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Draft for Public Comment National Electric Transmission Congestion Study August 2014 United States Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 Department of Energy | August 2014 National Electric Transmission Congestion Study | Page ii How to File Comments on This Draft Study This draft study has been released for public comment for a period of 60 days. The comment period will close at 5 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time, October 20, 2014. After the close of the public comment period, the Department of

  19. AARP submits the following comments on consumers and smart grid issues in response to the Request for Information (Request or RFI) on smart grid policy and logistical challenges, published by the Department of Energy (DOE) on September 16, 2010

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments to: DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges David Certner Legislative Counsel and Legislative Policy Director AARP Government Relations and Advocacy Olivia Wein, Staff Attorney National Consumer Law Center Tyson Slocum, Director Public Citizen's Energy Program November 1, 2010 2 CONSUMER COMMENTERS: AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen submit the following comments on

  20. QER- Comment of PSEG Services Corporation

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Attached please find the comments and responses of the PSEG Companies (Public Service Electric and Gas Company, PSEG Power LLC and PSEG Long Island LLC) to the questions raised by the U.S. Department of Energy. Should you have any questions or problems regarding the attached document, please do not hesitate to contact me.

  1. QER- Comment of American Gas Association 3

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dear Ms. Pickett: Attached please find AGA's comments on natural gas vehicle fueling infrastructure as part of our response to the first phase of the DOE Quadrennial Energy Review (QER), consisting of a cover letter and attachments. Respectfully submitted, Kathryn Clay

  2. QER- Comment of State Energy Advisory Board

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dear Melanie: As you are aware, QER is an area of focus for STEAB and we are working directly with EPSA on it. Attached, please find a copy of the State Energy Advisory Board's response to the Office of Energy Policy and Systems Analysis. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments.

  3. Response of LaBr{sub 3}(Ce) scintillators to 2.5 MeV fusion neutrons

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Cazzaniga, C.; Nocente, M.; Gorini, G.; Istituto di Fisica del Plasma, Associazione EURATOM-ENEA-CNR, Via Roberto Cozzi 53, Milano 20125 ; Tardocchi, M.; Croci, G.; Giacomelli, L.; Angelone, M.; Pillon, M.; Villari, S.; Weller, A.; Petrizzi, L.; Collaboration: ASDEX Upgrade Team; JET-EFDA Contributors

    2013-12-15

    Measurements of the response of LaBr{sub 3}(Ce) to 2.5 MeV neutrons have been carried out at the Frascati Neutron Generator and at tokamak facilities with deuterium plasmas. The observed spectrum has been interpreted by means of a Monte Carlo model. It is found that the main contributor to the measured response is neutron inelastic scattering on {sup 79}Br, {sup 81}Br, and {sup 139}La. An extrapolation of the count rate response to 14 MeV neutrons from deuterium-tritium plasmas is also presented. The results are of relevance for the design of ?-ray diagnostics of fusion burning plasmas.

  4. Notice of extension of public comment period for reply comments. |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy extension of public comment period for reply comments. Notice of extension of public comment period for reply comments. On July 27, 2010, the Department of Energy (DOE) published in the Federal Register a notice of inquiry (NOI) and request for comment from the public in its development of regulations pertaining to section 934, of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (''Act''). Section 934 addresses how the United States will meet its obligations under the

  5. Impact of x-ray dose on the response of CR-39 to 1–5.5 MeV alphas

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Rojas-Herrera, J.; Rinderknecht, H. G.; Zylstra, A. B.; Gatu Johnson, M.; Orozco, D.; Rosenberg, M. J.; Sio, H.; Seguin, F. H.; Frenje, J. A.; Li, C. K.; Petrasso, R. D.

    2015-03-01

    The CR-39 nuclear track detector is used in many nuclear diagnostics fielded at inertial confinement fusion (ICF) facilities. Large x-ray uences generated by ICF experiments may impact the CR-39 response to incident charged particles. To determine the impact of x-ray exposure on the CR-39 response to alpha particles, a thick-target bremsstrahlung x-ray generator was used to expose CR-39 to various doses of 8 keV Cu-Kα and Kβ x-rays. The CR-39 detectors were then exposed to 1-5.5 MeV alphas from an Am-241 source. The regions of the CR-39 exposed to x-rays showed a smaller track diameter than those not exposed to x-rays: for example, a dose of 3.0 ± 0.1 Gy causes a decrease of (19 ± 2)% in the track diameter of a 5.5 MeV alpha particle, while a dose of 60.0 ± 1.3 Gy results in a decrease of (45 ± 5)% in the track diameter. The reduced track diameters were found to be predominantly caused by a comparable reduction in the bulk etch rate of the CR-39 with x-ray dose. A residual effect depending on alpha particle energy is characterized using an empirical formula.

  6. Impact of x-ray dose on the response of CR-39 to 1–5.5 MeV alphas

    DOE Public Access Gateway for Energy & Science Beta (PAGES Beta)

    Rojas-Herrera, J.; Rinderknecht, H. G.; Zylstra, A. B.; Gatu Johnson, M.; Orozco, D.; Rosenberg, M. J.; Sio, H.; Seguin, F. H.; Frenje, J. A.; Li, C. K.; et al

    2015-03-01

    The CR-39 nuclear track detector is used in many nuclear diagnostics fielded at inertial confinement fusion (ICF) facilities. Large x-ray uences generated by ICF experiments may impact the CR-39 response to incident charged particles. To determine the impact of x-ray exposure on the CR-39 response to alpha particles, a thick-target bremsstrahlung x-ray generator was used to expose CR-39 to various doses of 8 keV Cu-Kα and Kβ x-rays. The CR-39 detectors were then exposed to 1-5.5 MeV alphas from an Am-241 source. The regions of the CR-39 exposed to x-rays showed a smaller track diameter than those not exposed tomore » x-rays: for example, a dose of 3.0 ± 0.1 Gy causes a decrease of (19 ± 2)% in the track diameter of a 5.5 MeV alpha particle, while a dose of 60.0 ± 1.3 Gy results in a decrease of (45 ± 5)% in the track diameter. The reduced track diameters were found to be predominantly caused by a comparable reduction in the bulk etch rate of the CR-39 with x-ray dose. A residual effect depending on alpha particle energy is characterized using an empirical formula.« less

  7. Impact of x-ray dose on the response of CR-39 to 15.5 MeV alphas

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Rojas-Herrera, J.; Rinderknecht, H. G.; Zylstra, A. B.; Gatu Johnson, M.; Orozco, D.; Rosenberg, M. J.; Sio, H.; Seguin, F. H.; Frenje, J. A.; Li, C. K.; Petrasso, R. D.

    2015-03-01

    The CR-39 nuclear track detector is used in many nuclear diagnostics #12;fielded at inertial con#12;nement fusion (ICF) facilities. Large x-ray uences generated by ICF experiments may impact the CR-39 response to incident charged particles. To determine the impact of x-ray exposure on the CR-39 response to alpha particles, a thick-target bremsstrahlung x-ray generator was used to expose CR-39 to various doses of 8 keV Cu-K?#11; and K#12;? x-rays. The CR-39 detectors were then exposed to 1-5.5 MeV alphas from an Am-241 source. The regions of the CR-39 exposed to x-rays showed a smaller track diameter than those not exposed to x-rays: for example, a dose of 3.0#6; 0.1 Gy causes a decrease of (19 #6;2)% in the track diameter of a 5.5 MeV alpha particle, while a dose of 60.0 #6;1.3 Gy results in a decrease of (45 #6;5)% in the track diameter. The reduced track diameters were found to be predominantly caused by a comparable reduction in the bulk etch rate of the CR-39 with x-ray dose. A residual eff#11;ect depending on alpha particle energy is characterized using an empirical formula.

  8. 150122 Traxys DOE RFI Comments

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    TRAXYS RESPONSES to DOE'S RFI ON EXCESS URANIUM MANAGEMENT Summary Statements based on Traxys' contracts and EIA Form 858 Filings: 1. Traxys is a primary, direct participant in the sale and introduction to market of the majority of DOE's excess uranium sales via a contractual relationship with Fluor B&W Portsmouth (FBP) to purchase and monetize all the UF6 it receives from DOE for services. Based on this unique position, Traxys is the only company that can factually comment and have actual

  9. QER - Comment of Edison Electric Institute (EEI) 2 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Edison Electric Institute (EEI) 2 QER - Comment of Edison Electric Institute (EEI) 2 From: Hatch, Maryanne [Mhatch@eei.org] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 5:02 PM To: QERcomments Cc: Ingram, Tony; Hatch, Maryanne Subject: Second Set of Comments of Edison Electric Institute Attachment: Edison Electric Institue Comments and Resources- QER - FINAL.pdf Good evening, Please find the Second Set of Comments of the Edison Electric Institute on the Quadrennial Energy Review attached. Thank you for the

  10. FINAL CA IOU Comment Letter RFI Regulatory Burden | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    FINAL CA IOU Comment Letter RFI Regulatory Burden FINAL CA IOU Comment Letter RFI Regulatory Burden This letter comprises the comments of the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), Southern California Gas Company (SCGC), San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E), and Southern California Edison (SCE) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Request for Information on Regulatory Burden. PDF icon FINAL_CA_IOU_comment_letter.pdf More Documents & Publications Comments on Docket ID:

  11. Proposed rule: re-opening of public comment period | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Proposed rule: re-opening of public comment period Proposed rule: re-opening of public comment period Proposed rule: re-opening of public comment period. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is re-opening the public comment period for proposed amendments to its regulations governing compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), made available for public comment on January 3, 2011 (76 FR 214). This is being done in response to a request on behalf of multiple organizations PDF icon

  12. Public Comment Opportunities

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Comments on the Draft EIS and Presidential permit can be submitted verbally during public hearings or in writing to Dr. Julie A Smith at: Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE...

  13. OSTIblog Recent comments

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    of Energy (DOE) for the scientific contributor and also for Petroleum Engineering

    Sat, 17 Jan 2015 16:20:00 +0000 comment 1254 at http:www.osti.govhome Microscope repair...

  14. EA and SOWP Comments

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    EA and SOWP Comments This document covers Knight Piisold's technical comments to the Environmental Assessment of Ground Water Compliance at the Shiprock Uranium Mill Tailings Site (EA) and the Shiprock Site Observational Work Plan (SOWP). The major areas of concern include the following: 1. The contaminant sources on site may not be properly defined. In particular, the disposal cell and the residual vadose zone soil contamination need to be redefined in the conceptual model and the transport

  15. Regulatory Review Comment Section | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Radiation Protection of the Public and the Environment » Regulatory Review Comment Section Regulatory Review Comment Section DOE Comments on Radiation Protection (Atomic Energy Act) DOE Comments on Radioactive Waste

  16. Fundamental limitation to the magnitude of piezoelectric response of (001)pc textured K0.5Na0.5NbO3 ceramic

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Gupta, Shashaank; Belianinov, Alex; Okatan, Mahmut B; Jesse, Stephen; Kalinin, Sergei V; Priya, Shashaank

    2014-01-01

    (001)pc textured K0.5Na0.5NbO3 (KNN) ceramic was found to exhibit a 65% improvement in the longitudinal piezoelectric response as compared to its random counterpart. Piezoresponse force microscopy study revealed the existence of larger 180 and non-180 domains for textured ceramic as compared to that of the random ceramic. Improvement in piezoresponse by the development of (001)pc texture is discussed in terms of the crystallographic nature of KNN and domain morphology. A comparative analysis performed with a rhombohedral composition suggested that the improvement in longitudinal piezoresponse of polycrystalline ceramics by the development of (001)pc texture is limited by the crystal structure.

  17. Comments of On-Ramp Wireless, Inc. | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    On-Ramp Wireless, Inc. Comments of On-Ramp Wireless, Inc. On-Ramp Wireless, Inc. ("On-Ramp") hereby submits comments in response to the Department of Energy's ("DOE") May 11, 2010 Request for Information as to the communications needs of electric utilities to inform federal Smart Grid policy. In these comments, On-Ramp addresses two vital aspects of the need for wireless communications in connection with Smart Grid-more specifically, for customer smart meters and devices and

  18. Hazardous Waste Facility Permit Public Comments to Community Relations Plan

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Annual Summary of Comments for July 2012 through August 2013 Last saved on: 8/30/2013 Annual Summary of CRP comment for July 2011- August 2012 1 SECTION COMMENT POST? 2.0 & 4.0 1. Fix broken links on pages 3 and 4 for the HWA permit. Yes 2.0 2. Revise a sentence on page 4 to: "Limits on LANL waste facilities may be found in Attachment J of the Permit." Yes 3. Delete Section 5.3.7 on RACER. Provide a description of Intellus. Yes 2.0 Yes 5.1 Yes Hazardous Waste Facility Permit

  19. Tendril RFI Comments - 11.1.10 - DRAFT

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Tendril Networks, Inc. 1 COMMENTS OF TENDRIL NETWORKS, INC. Department of Energy Request for Information: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation November 1, 2010 Introduction Tendril is pleased to provide these comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) in response to the Request for Information "Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation." Tendril offers a software and hardware solution that enables residential home

  20. Reply Comments by the National Association of State Utility Consumer

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Advocates | Department of Energy by the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates Reply Comments by the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates The National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates ("NASUCA") submits these reply comments in response to the United States Department of Energy's ("DOE") Request for Information ("RFI") entitled "Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart

  1. Public Comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Damage Contingent Cost Allocation | Department of Energy Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation Public Comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation Comments by International Group on Nuclear Liability (CIGNL), in response to U.S. Department of Energy Notice of Inquiry on Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation, 75 Fed. Reg. 43945 (Jul. 27, 2010)

  2. Comments by the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates |

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Department of Energy The National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates ("NASUCA") hereby submits the following comments in response to the United States Department of Energy ("DOE") Request for Information ("RFI") entitled "Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy." See 75 Fed. Reg. 26203 (May 11, 2010). The RFI requests comments and information from

  3. Comments of the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies |

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Department of Energy Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies Comments of the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies The Media and Technology Institute and the Climate Change Initiative at the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies ("Joint Center")1 respectfully submit these comments in response to the United States Department of Energy's ("DoE") Request for Information regarding its implementation of the Smart Grid provisions of Federal

  4. Response to Comment on Twin symmetry texture of energetically condensed niobium thin films on sapphire substrate [J. Appl. Phys. 112, 016101 (2012)

    DOE Public Access Gateway for Energy & Science Beta (PAGES Beta)

    Zhao, X.; Philips, L.; Reece, C. E.; Seo, Kang; Krishnan, M.; Valderrama, E.

    2012-07-01

    Welander is correct about the misidentified crystal-directions in the top-view sapphire lattice (Fig. 4 [Zhao et al., J. Appl. Phys. 110, 033523 (2011)]). He is also correct about the misorientation of the pole figures in Fig. 4. In Fig. 1 of this response, we have corrected these errors. Perhaps because of these errors, Welander misconstrued our discussion of the Nbcrystal growth as claiming a new 3D registry. That was not our intention. Rather, we wished to highlight the role of energetic condensation that drives low-defect crystal growth by a combination of non-equilibrium sub-plantation that disturbs the substrate lattice and thermalmoreannealing that annihilates defects and promotes large-grain crystal growth.less

  5. Title 36 CFR 215 Notice, Comment, and Appeal Procedures for National...

    Open Energy Info (EERE)

    5 Notice, Comment, and Appeal Procedures for National Forest System Projects and Activities Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document-...

  6. QER- Comment of Diane Cray

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Good afternoon, Would it be possible to get a list of presenters and their written comments on meeting agenda?

  7. QER- Comment of Xcel Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Attached are the comments of Xcel Energy Services Inc. Please let me know if you have any questions.

  8. Thymidylate Synthase Gene Polymorphism Affects the Response to Preoperative 5-Fluorouracil Chemoradiation Therapy in Patients With Rectal Cancer

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Hur, Hyuk; Kang, Jeonghyun; Kim, Nam Kyu; Min, Byung Soh; Lee, Kang Young; Shin, Sang Joon; Keum, Ki Chang; Choi, Junjeong; Kim, Hoguen; Choi, Sung Ho; Lee, Mi-Young

    2011-11-01

    Purpose: This study aims to correlate thymidylate synthase (TS) gene polymorphisms with the tumor response to preoperative 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in patients with rectal cancer. Methods and Materials: Forty-four patients with rectal cancer treated with 5-FU-based preoperative CRT were prospectively enrolled in this study. Thymidylate synthase expression and TS gene polymorphisms were evaluated in tumor obtained before preoperative CRT and were correlated with the pathologic response, as assessed by histopathologic staging (pTNM) and tumor regression grade. Results: Patients exhibited 2R/3R and 3R/3R tandem repeat polymorphisms in the TS gene. With regard to TS expression in these genotypes, 2R/3RC and 3RC/3RC were defined as the low-expression group and 2R/3RG, 3RC/3RG, and 3RG/3RG as the high-expression group. There was no significant correlation between TS expression and tumor response. There was no significant difference in the tumor response between patients homozygous for 3R/3R and patients heterozygous for 2R/3R. However, 13 of 14 patients in the low-expression group with a G>C single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) (2R/3RC [n = 5] or 3RC/3RC [n = 9]) exhibited a significantly greater tumor downstaging rate, as compared with only 12 of 30 patients in the high-expression group without the SNP (2R/3RG [n = 10], 3RC/3RG [n = 9], or 3RG/3RG [n = 11]) (p = 0.001). The nodal downstaging rate was also significantly greater in this low-expression group, as compared with the high-expression group (12 of 14 vs. 14 of 30, p = 0.014). However, there was no significant difference in the tumor regression grade between these groups. Conclusions: This study suggests that SNPs within the TS enhancer region affect the tumor response to preoperative 5-FU-based CRT in rectal cancer.

  9. DOE Extends Comment Period on Certification and Enforcement Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    In response to a formal request, the Department has extended to October 29, 2010, the deadline for submission of comments in response to the Notice or Proposed Rulemaking on the certification and...

  10. Response Response

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Attachment 7 Response Response Response Response Response Response Response Response Response Response Response Response Percent of Mentors that are People with Disabilities 9.00% Total number of Mentors (The count used to calculate the Mentor percentages) 252 Demographic Information Percent of Mentors Two or More Races Not reported Percent of White Mentors 63.00% Percent of Female Mentors 39.00% Percent of Male Mentors 61.00% Percent of Veteran Mentors 21.00% Percent of Asian American Mentors

  11. QER- Comment of Jennifer Markens 5

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The term natural gas is deceptive: the gas increasingly available to the Northeast is unconventional gas, and is higher in radioactivity (Resnikoff, 2012), as well as chemical content from hydraulic fracturing that is deadly to biological integrity- known carcinogens, neurotoxins, poisons . . . there is no oversight of what is in these pipelines. Pipelines leak at a rate of between 8% and 11%: : The proposed pipeline(s) runs through every single aquifer that supplies drinking water to residents of Massachusetts. Marcellus gas also has a high likelihood of increasing lung cancer among gas customers in Massachusetts, as detailed in Resnikoff's 2012 executive summary. The advertising currently being played over and over again on our airwaves is chilling in the face of this known risk. The fact that unconventional gas ruins drinking water at alarming rates, and the acquisition of this gas is structured in a manner that guarantees no accountability or liability for desecration of arguably the most basic necessity for life is being falsely advertised as "better for the environment". There are not only worse emissions from this industry, but a second, concomitant ruining of water. Both Northeast Utilities and Kinder Morgan stand to make significant profit for their private investors. Meanwhile, Massachusetts are being asked to subsidize the destruction of their homes, their health, their water, and their neighborhoods to enrich a few individuals who are seeking a shipping route manipulating "eminent domain" to sell shale gas abroad. This is a destructive and extreme plan, and there are many other options that have not been adequately explored or investigated. In this instance, windmills off the coast seems a lot less immediately destructive than poisoning our drinking water. Or is the intention to euthanize a certain number of citizens? Best regards, Jennifer Markens

  12. Comments of Cisco Systems to Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Reliability | Department of Energy of Cisco Systems to Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Comments of Cisco Systems to Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Cisco Systems provides comments in response to the RFI issued by DOE on addressing policy andlogistical challenges to smart grid implementation. PDF icon Comments of Cisco Systems to Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability More Documents & Publications NIST Activities in Support of the

  13. From: Onaran, Karen To: Congestion Study Comments Cc: Meyer, David; Fama, Jim; Ingram, Tony; Bartholomot, Henri

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Onaran, Karen To: Congestion Study Comments Cc: Meyer, David; Fama, Jim; Ingram, Tony; Bartholomot, Henri Subject: Draft National Electric Transmission Congestion Study Date: Monday, October 20, 2014 4:37:41 PM Attachments: image001.png Third Triennial Congestion Study - EEI Comments.pdf Mr. Meyer, et al., Attached please find EEI's comments in response to the DOE Draft National Electric Transmission Congestion Study, 79 Fed. Reg. 49076 (Aug. 19, 2014). Please do not hesitate to contact us

  14. NBP RFI: Data Access, Third Party Use and Privacy- Comments of Utilities

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Telecom Council | Department of Energy Use and Privacy- Comments of Utilities Telecom Council NBP RFI: Data Access, Third Party Use and Privacy- Comments of Utilities Telecom Council The Utilities Telecom Council hereby comments in response to the Department of Energy (DOE) request for information on data access, third party use, and privacy. In summary, UTC submits that the innovative deployment by energy utilities of smart meters and smart control systems will create a smart energy grid

  15. Natural Gas Industry Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid | Department of Energy Natural Gas Industry Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Natural Gas Industry Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid The undersigned members of the natural gas industry are pleased to submit for your consideration the following comments in response to the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability's

  16. QER- Comment of Natural Gas Supply Association

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    TO: Quadrennial Energy Review Task Force In response to the Department of Energy’s August 25, 2014 Federal Register Notice seeking input on the Quadrennial Energy Review, attached are comments from the Natural Gas Supply Association. Thank you for this opportunity to share our views on the important issue of energy infrastructure. If we can be of further assistance, please let me know. Regards,

  17. Microsoft Word - OKalossa Comments.doc

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Room 8H033 Washington, D.C. 20585 RE: Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation, 75 Fed. Reg. 57,006 (September 17, 2010). Ladies and Gentlemen: Okaloosa Gas District (The District) an Independent Special District of the State of Florida is appreciative of the opportunity to submit for your consideration the following comments in response to

  18. Electronic Comment Form | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Electronic Comment Form | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Library Bios Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Photo Gallery Jobs Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at

  19. Response

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Response SEAB Recommendations Related to the Evaluation of New Funding Constructs for Energy R&D in the Department of Energy Introduction Over the past seven years, the Department of Energy (DOE) has introduced several new energy research and development (R&D) management and funding mechanisms, designed to complement each other, with the goal of maximizing the Nation's ability to achieve energy breakthroughs as quickly as possible. * Energy Frontier Research Centers (EFRCs) focus on

  20. CenterPoint Comments | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    CenterPoint Comments CenterPoint Comments CenterPoint Comments on the Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges PDF icon CenterPoint Comments More Documents & Publications City Utilities of Springfield Missouri Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Dairyland Power Cooperative Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Comments of North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) to DOE Smart Grid RFI:

  1. Consumer Electronics Association Comment | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Consumer Electronics Association Comment Consumer Electronics Association Comment The Consumer Electronics Association (CEA) is the preeminent trade association promoting growth in the $285 billion U.S. consumer electronics industry. PDF icon CEA comments re DOE Regulatory Burden RFI_7-17-15 More Documents & Publications Comments of consumer electronics association Re: NBP RFI: Data Access AHAM Comments Regulatory Burden RFI

  2. QER - Comment of Khamsune Vongkhamchanh 1 | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    VONGKHAMCHANH, KHAMSUNE [KVONGKH@entergy.com] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 3:59 PM To: QERcomments Subject: QER Public Meeting: Petroleum Product Transmission & Distribution I attended the subject meeting on 5/27. I apologize for not jotting the information down, but by when are comments requested to be submitted? Thanks. Kham Vongkhamchanh Transmission Regulatory Support Entergy Services, Inc. (504) 576-2097 More Documents & Publications QER - Comment of Khamsune Vongkhamchanh 2 QER -

  3. From: Mary Mauch To: Congestion Study Comments Subject:

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Mary Mauch To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: Comments on NEITC and Congestion Study Date: Friday, October 03, 2014 5:07:39 PM I am vehemently opposed to NEITCs- under any guise. Until we have exhausted all alternatives, such as local distributed generation, it is ludicrous and wrong to take private, productive, non-renewable land for unnecessary transmission corridors- probably being lobbied for by private companies for private gain. "Clean" Line Energy Partners and their 14 LLC's

  4. Public Comments on DOE's NOI re Section 934 of the Energy Independence and

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Security Act of 2007 | Department of Energy Comments on DOE's NOI re Section 934 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 Public Comments on DOE's NOI re Section 934 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 Comments by the United States Enrichrnent Corporation (USEC) in response to DOE's Notice of Inquiry (N0l) on the Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage (CSC) Contingent Cost Allocation. 75 Fed. Reg. 43945 (July 27, 2010). PDF icon Public Comments

  5. NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Reply Comments of AT&T Inc. |

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Department of Energy Reply Comments of AT&T Inc. NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Reply Comments of AT&T Inc. AT&T Inc., on behalf of itself and its affiliates ("AT&T"), respectfully submits these reply comments in response to the Department Of Energy"s Request for Information ("RFI") on the communications requirements of electric utilities in Smart Grid deployments.1 In its initial comments, AT&T highlighted the expanding demand for network

  6. Comment Response Document | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    DOE 2005 DOE 2006 DOE 2008a DOE 2008b DOE 2008c DOE 2010 DOE 2011a DOE 2011b Doser and Smith 1985 Dransfield and Gardner 1985 Fink Anderson 2000 Gardner 1987 Gardner et al 1990 ...

  7. Comments/Questions | Critical Materials Institute

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Comments/Questions To offer comments on the CMI website or to ask questions, please contact us: CMIdirector@ameslab.gov 515-296-4500 or use this web form for comments. Thanks!

  8. Comments - Change package

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Card comments on the Change packages: 1)Overriding assumptions that the amount of work is finite - such as: - Finite # of dollars available - Finite # of highly trained contract workers - Finite amount of contaminated groundwater - Permits with finite terms -Secondary assumption that work can be characterized and prioritized - What appears to be infinite is the time available to mitigate the problem. No way to realistically estimate how long mitigation will take. The decision making process

  9. web_comments.xls

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Date Rec Type Recommendations/ Comments Name Organization 1/9/2004 Reliability Standards Future reliability standards must strike a balance between detailed, rigid requirements, which provide little or no latitude for deviation, and standards, which are objective-based and allow for innovation and invention to achieve intended goals. Each standard should identify its importance on the BPS reliability in terms of the potential short-term (operating time horizon) vs. long-term (planning time

  10. Microsoft Word - CLWR scoping Comment

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Impact Statement for the Production of Tritium in a Commercial Light Water Reactor U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Written Comment Form Must be...

  11. QER- Comment of Bridger LLC

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Attn: Quadrennial Energy Review Task Force Task Force: Please find attached written comments by Bridger LLC for the Quadrennial Energy Review Report.

  12. QER- Comment of Elaine Mroz

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Elaine Mroz Quadrennial Energy Review: Comment on the Public Meetings Infrastructure Restraints- New England held April 21, 2014, in Providence, RI and Hartford, CT. Please see attached file.

  13. QER- Comment of Honda Motor Co., Inc.

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Quadrennial Energy Review : Comment on the Public Meeting “Enhancing Infrastructure Resiliency,” Held April 11, 2014, - Please provide link to where public comments are available.

  14. QER- Comment of Dakota Resource Council

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Attached are comments from the Dakota Resource Council, a membership-based organization of North Dakotans. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Infrastructure Constraints.

  15. September 5, 2014 SEAB Meeting | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    September 5, 2014 SEAB Meeting September 5, 2014 SEAB Meeting September 5, 2014 - 12:25pm Addthis SECRETARY OF ENERGY ADVISORY BOARD MEETING U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue SW Washington, DC Room 8E-089 September 5, 2014 Download Meeting Minutes AGENDA 8:30 AM Welcome & Response to SEAB activities Secretary Ernest J. Moniz 9:15 AM Comments John Deutch, SEAB Co-Chair 9:30 AM Updates from SEAB Task Force Chairs Albert Carnesale - Nuclear Nonproliferation Task Force Richard

  16. QER- Comment of Michael Kirkwood

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Please accept the attached comments from Pascoag Utility District regarding the Quadrennial Energy Review process. Out comments focus on the difficulty with our current RTO market structure and its lack of providing appropriate cost-effective solutions to our energy infrastructure needs in New England.

  17. Site Data System Engineering Roles and Responsibilities

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    history and comments in sections 5, 6, and 7 regarding rebooting of instrument computers: Instrument computers should not be rebooted unless the system is frozen...

  18. DOE Extends Comment Period on Notice of Inquiry Under the Energy Independence and Security Act

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Today, in response to a formal request, General Counsel Scott Blake Harris approved a second and final extension of the public comment period to November 30, 2010 on DOEs Notice of Inquiry (75 FR...

  19. Comments of the Natural Resource Defense Council on DOE's Request for Information on Reducing Regulatory Burden

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    On behalf of the Natural Resources Defense Council and our more than 1.3 million members and online activists, we submit the following comments in response to the Department of Energys (DOE)...

  20. QER- Comment of Governors' Wind Energy Coalition

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Attached please find the Governors' Wind Energy Coalition's comments on the QER. Thank you. Larry Pearce

  1. DOE - BCS TSD comments | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    - BCS TSD comments DOE - BCS TSD comments PowerPoint slides presenting AHAM and PTI comments on technical support document. PDF icon DOE - BCS TSD comments More Documents & Publications Ex Parte Meeting with DOE and Navigant Consulting on Battery Charger Energy Fact Sheet: Lithium-Ion Batteries for Stationary Energy Storage (October 2012) EV Everywhere Batteries Workshop - Beyond Lithium Ion Breakout Session Report

  2. Tribal Comments Database | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Comments Database Tribal Comments Database Summary of all comments from the DOE Office of Indian Energy roundtables held between March 16 and April 14, 2011. PDF icon TribalEnergyRoundtable_CommentsDatabase.pdf More Documents & Publications 1. INTRODUCTION Tribal Roundable Executive Summary Pala Roundtable Summary

  3. QER- Comment of Northeast Gas Association

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Please find enclosed comments of the Northeast Gas Association regarding the Quadrennial Energy Review. Thank you.

  4. OPOWER RFI Response | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    OPOWER RFI Response OPOWER RFI Response OPOWER submits these comments to the Department of Energy in response to the recently issued Request for Information on smart grid implementation challenges. In particular, OPOWER writes to comment on the importance of effective customer engagement in smart grid policy making. PDF icon OPOWER RFI Response More Documents & Publications Insights from Smart Meters: The Potential for Peak Hour Savings from Behavior-Based Programs Voices of Experience:

  5. Comments on the Request for Information on Improving Performance...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    to October 31, 2013. Comments received are available below. PDF icon Comments from Lee Cunningham, sent September 23, 2013 PDF icon Comments from Patrick Ledger of Arizona's...

  6. Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    from Dr. Contreras Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Dr. Contreras Comment submitted on updated Part 2 application. PDF icon Comment from Dr. Contreras ...

  7. Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    from Marshall Hughes Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Marshall Hughes Comment submitted on updated Part 2 application. PDF icon Comment from Marshall ...

  8. Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Comment submitted on updated Part 2 application. Comment from Lewis Cain 6-8-15.pdf More Documents & Publications Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from...

  9. EIS-0374: Notice of Extension of Comment Period | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    of Comment Period EIS-0374: Notice of Extension of Comment Period Klondike IIIBiglow Canyon Wind Integration Project This notice extends the close of comment for scoping from the...

  10. .Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association's Comments on DOE's Regulatory...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    .Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association's Comments on DOE's Regulatory Burden RFI .Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association's Comments on DOE's Regulatory Burden RFI Comments from...

  11. Reply Comments of Verizon and Verizon Wireless | Department of...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    of Verizon and Verizon Wireless More Documents & Publications Comments of Verizon and Verizon Wireless Comments of Verizon and Verizon Wireless Reply Comments of T-Mobile USA, Inc....

  12. Microsoft Word - Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx | Department...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx Microsoft Word - Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx PDF icon Microsoft Word - Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx More Documents & Publications...

  13. QER- Comment of Cynthia Henshaw

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Hello, I have several comments regarding the hearing and document put together regarding infrastructure constraints in New England. 1. Why did the document not discuss the waste and losses of natural gas through existing pipeline leaks? The most cost-effective carbon savings within New England is to repair existing natural gas leaks. If we invested our dollars to upgrade existing transmission, storage and distribution capacity in New England we would not need additional gas pipelines and we'd help protect out health and the environment. These infrastructure improvements should be completed before creating more environmental damage and disruption to additional communities. 2. The best way to encourage investment in infrastructure that will address vulnerabilities is to encourage local energy production - continue to expand local solar panel use (on houses, store roofs and larger systems) and encourage continued development of alternative wind turbines that do not have the environmental and community impacts as the large turbines so that they can be cited near the electric demand. We need to take responsibility for the energy that we use. That means understanding how to generate our own electricity, and promoting conservation and energy efficiency throughout New England. 3. Tennessee Gas is proposing a new gas pipeline across the northern tier of Massachusetts. Why are they not expanding their existing infrastructure that already runs across the southern tier of the state? They already have the rights-of-way and infrastructure in place. The company has not been forthcoming with answers, which sows seeds of distrust. If the company, and federal and state regulators want to increase pipeline capacity then answers to reasonable questions need to be given. AND the public needs to have more than ONE WEEK to provide questions. 4. The Tennessee Gas Pipeline proposed for the northern tier of Massachusetts targets existing conservation infrastructure that was protected for a wide variety of public goods and services. However a gas pipeline that disrupts the soil, air and water was NOT one of the reasons. This proposed pipeline route intentionally targets these areas. This is unacceptable! Thank you for considering my questions and comments. Cynthia Henshaw

  14. Microsoft Word - CLWR scoping Comment

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Impact Statement for the Production of Tritium in a Commercial Light Water Reactor U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Written Comment Form Must be received on or before November 14, 2011. Please use other side if more space is needed. Comment forms may be mailed to: Comment forms may be faxed to: Mr. Curtis Chambellan Mr. Curtis Chambellan CLWR SEIS Document Manager (505) 845-5872 U.S. DOE/NNSA Box 5400 or sent by electronic mail to: Albuquerque, NM 87185-5400

  15. Microsoft Word - RRTT RFI - FINAL EEI Comments.docx

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Mr. Lamont Jackson Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE-20) U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Submitted electronically via email to: Lamont.Jackson@hq.doe.gov Re: Department of Energy - Rapid Response Team for Transmission Request for Information, RRTT-IR-01, 77 Fed. Reg. 11517 (Feb. 27, 2012) Dear Mr. Jackson: I. INTRODUCTION The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is pleased to provide these comments in response to the questions

  16. COMMENTS OF THE LARGE-SCALE SOLAR ASSOCIATION TO DEPARTMENT

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    COMMENTS OF THE LARGE-SCALE SOLAR ASSOCIATION TO DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S RAPID RESPONSE TEAM FOR TRANSMISSION'S REQUEST FOR INFORMATION Submitted by electronic mail to: Lamont.Jackson@hq.doe.gov The Large-scale Solar Association appreciates this opportunity to respond to the Department of Energy's (DOE) Rapid Response Team for Transmission's (RRTT) Request for Information. 1 We applaud the DOE for creating the RRTT and continuing to advance the efforts already made under the Memorandum of

  17. From: Jane Wilsdorf To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: Comment

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Jane Wilsdorf To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: Comment Date: Friday, September 19, 2014 9:37:00 AM I am opposed to the establishment of National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors (NIETC's) for the following reasons. First, the easements place an undo burden on landowners on and near the transmission lines. The compensation cannot begin to cover the all of the losses, tangible and intangible that landowners would suffer. Second, I believe that condemning private property for

  18. Response to 'Comment on 'Elastic incoherent neutron scattering operating by varying instrumental energy resolution: Principle, simulations, and experiments of the resolution elastic neutron scattering (RENS)'' [Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83, 107101 (2012)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Magazu, Salvatore; Migliardo, Federica; Benedetto, Antonio [Dipartimento di Fisica, Universita di Messina, C.da Papardo n Degree-Sign 31, P.O. Box 55, Vill. S. Agata 98166 Messina (Italy)

    2012-10-15

    Recently [S. Magazu et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82, 105115 (2011)] we have proposed a new method for characterizing, by neutron scattering, the dynamical properties of complex material systems, such as, the ones of interest in the biophysical field. This approach called Resolution Elastic Neutron Scattering, in short RENS, is based on the detection of the elastically scattered neutron intensity as a function of the instrumental energy resolution. By experimental, theoretical, and numerical findings, we have pointed out that an inflection point occurs in the elastic intensity when the system relaxation time approaches the instrumental energy resolution time. This approach, differently from quasi-elastic neutron scattering (QENS), gives the chance to evaluate the system relaxation times without using pre-defined models that can be wrong and/or misleading. Here, we reply to a Comment on the above-mentioned main paper in which Wuttke proposes a different approach to evaluate the above-mentioned inflection point; on this regard, it should be noticed that the existence of the inflection point, which is the main topic of our work, is not questioned and that the approach proposed by Wuttke in the Comment, although valid for a class of dynamical processes, is not applicable when different and distinct processes occur simultaneously at different time scale.

  19. QER- Comment of Emily Crowell

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    One of the Senator’s constituents dropped off comments that she wanted to pass along to your office re: the QER public meeting. For your records her contact information is below:

  20. Scoping Comment Summary 092412.docx

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Scoping Comment Summary for the Surplus Plutonium Disposition Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration, and Tennessee Valley Authority Since announcement of the Surplus Plutonium Disposition Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SPD Supplemental EIS), DOE has provided three opportunities for the public to provide scoping comments (2007 [72 FR 14543]; 2010 [75 FR 41850]; and 2012 [77 FR 1920]). The public scoping

  1. QER- Comment of Stephen Kurkoski

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    I attended the meeting yesterday in Hartford, Conn. I thank you for the opportunity to speak during the public comment period. I thanked the moderator, Fred Hanson, for bringing up the option of Conservation and Energy Efficiency to the last panel. The following are the comments I presented. I would first like to say that the Northeast does not have an energy supply problem. The problem that we have is a demand/supply issue. If the problem is only referred to as a supply problem then only supply solutions will be looked at. When we talk about meeting our energy needs, the conversation should start with: 1st Conservation 2nd Energy Efficiency …..and if we have a concern about Climate Change 3rd Renewables 4th Polluting technologies such as Fossil Fuels and Nuclear If we do not implement this list in the above order we will leave a very different climate and a planet that is difficult to live on for our children. I would next like to illustrate the power of Conservation, Energy Efficiency and Renewables. Two years ago my wife and I had the good fortune to be chosen to participate in the National Grid Deep Energy Retrofit Pilot Program. Thank you to National Grid and the state of Massachusetts. By super insulating and air sealing our house, installing an air-source heat pump and a 2.4kW solar system, along with practicing conservation, our total energy bill for last year was $60, which equals 300 pounds of CO2 equivalent. This includes this past winter with its "polar vortex". Conservation, Efficiency and Renewables have been mentioned by a few of the presenters today. We need to bring Conservation, Efficiency and Renewables to center stage to solve our energy needs. Recommendations: 1. Institute to a greater extent "Peak Load Shaving". 2. Make it mandatory that all buildings that are built are Zero Net Energy or Zero Plus Energy. 3. Institute a more aggressive "Time of Use" Electric and Gas Metering System that Mr Reilly of the Vermont Electric Power Company mentioned earlier. 4. Put a severe Carbon Tax on all polluting Energy Producers. 5. Measure CO2 emissions for the complete cycle of extraction, transportation, storage and burning of all Energy options. 6. Remove all incentives and support for Energy Producers of Fossil Fuel and Nuclear. Thank you, Stephen Kurkoski

  2. MNDR Comments Response and Letter: Missouri Nepartment of Natural Resources Comments on Interim Response Actions (IRAs).

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

  3. Oak Ridge National Laboratory Corrective Action Plan in response to Tiger Team assessment. Volume 2, Revision 5

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kuliasha, Michael A.

    1991-08-23

    This report presents a complete response to the Tiger Team assessment that was conducted to Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) and at the US Department of Energy (DOE) Oak Ridge Operations Office (ORO) from October 2, 1990, through November 30, 1990. The action plans have undergone both a discipline review and a cross-cutting review with respect to root cause. In addition, the action plans have been integrated with initiatives being pursued across Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc., in response to Tiger Team findings at other DOE facilities operated by Energy Systems. The root cause section is complete and describes how ORNL intends to address the root cause of the findings identified during the assessment. This report is concerned with reactors safety and health findings, responses, and planned actions. Specific areas include: organization and administration; quality verification; operations; maintenance; training and certification; auxiliary systems; emergency preparedness; technical support; nuclear criticality safety; security/safety interface; experimental activities; site/facility safety review; radiological protection; personnel protection; fire protection; management findings, responses, and planned actions; self-assessment findings, responses, and planned actions; and summary of planned actions, schedules, and costs.

  4. Re: NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of AT&T Inc. |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy Comments of AT&T Inc. Re: NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of AT&T Inc. AT&T Inc., on behalf of itself and its affiliates ("AT&T"), respectfully submits these comments in response to the Department Of Energy"s Request for Information ("RFI") on the communications requirements of utilities. AT&T supports DOE"s efforts and coordination with various Federal, State and private initiatives to implement the Smart

  5. Reply Comments of T-Mobile USA, Inc. | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    T-Mobile USA, Inc. Reply Comments of T-Mobile USA, Inc. T-Mobile USA, Inc. ("T-Mobile") hereby submits these reply comments in response to the above-captioned Request for Information ("RFI")1 issued by the Department of Energy ("DOE"). T-Mobile appreciates the opportunity to submit reply comments and commends the DOE for undertaking a comprehensive examination of the communications requirements necessary to deploy smart grid technology so consumers can experience

  6. Oak Ridge National Laboratory Corrective Action Plan in response to Tiger Team assessment. Volume 1, Revision 5

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kuliasha, Michael A.

    1991-08-23

    This report presents a complete response to the Tiger Team assessment that was conducted at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) and at the US Department of Energy (DOE) Oak Ridge Operations Office (ORO) from October 22, 1990, through November 30, 1990. The action plans have undergone both a discipline review and a cross-cutting review with respect to root cause. In addition, the action plans have been integrated with initiatives being pursued across Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc., in response to Tiger Team findings at other DOE facilities operated by Energy Systems. The root cause section is complete and describes how ORNL intends to address the root causes of the findings identified during the assessment. The action plan has benefited from a complete review by various offices at DOE Headquarters as well as review by the Tiger Team that conducted the assessment to ensure that the described actions are responsive to the observed problems.

  7. Comments by Mary Celeste Harris on the Emergency Operation of Mirant's

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Potomac River Generating Station. | Department of Energy Mary Celeste Harris on the Emergency Operation of Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station. Comments by Mary Celeste Harris on the Emergency Operation of Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station. Docket No. EO-05-01: Comments by Mary Celeste Harris on the Emergency Operation of Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station. "I am writing in response to your order of December 20, 2005, declaring the emergency operation of Mirant's

  8. Comments from The Center for Democracy and Technology and the Electric

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Frontier Foundation: Implementing the Fips in the Smart Grid | Department of Energy from The Center for Democracy and Technology and the Electric Frontier Foundation: Implementing the Fips in the Smart Grid Comments from The Center for Democracy and Technology and the Electric Frontier Foundation: Implementing the Fips in the Smart Grid The Center for Democracy & Technology and the Electronic Frontier Foundation are pleased to file these comments in response to the September 17, 2010

  9. The following comments are provided on behalf of Ingersoll Rand, Residential Sol

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    following comments are provided on behalf of Ingersoll Rand, Residential Solutions, manufacturer of Trane and American Standard residential air conditioners, heat pumps, furnaces and accessories therefore. --- Ingersoll Rand appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Department of Energy's request for information on "Reducing Regulatory Burden" in the spirit of Executive Order 13563 ---- It is ironic that the response interval for the RFI on reducing regulatory burden overlaps the

  10. LG to DOE General Counsel; Re:Request for Comment on Large Capacity Clothes

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Washers | Department of Energy LG to DOE General Counsel; Re:Request for Comment on Large Capacity Clothes Washers LG to DOE General Counsel; Re:Request for Comment on Large Capacity Clothes Washers LG response to DOE's request for information regarding alternative test procedures for large-capacity clothes washer models, December 7, 2010. After DOE requested the views of interested parties concerning implementation of an alternative test procedure for large-capacity clothes washer models,

  11. Comments of Hughes Network Systems, LLC and Inmarsat Inc. | Department of

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Energy Hughes Network Systems, LLC and Inmarsat Inc. Comments of Hughes Network Systems, LLC and Inmarsat Inc. Hughes Network Systems, LLC ("Hughes") and Inmarsat Inc. ("Inmarsat") hereby submit these comments in response to the Department of Energy's Request for Information ("RFI") in the above-referenced proceeding. Hughes and Inmarsat are global leaders in providing satellite networks and services and satellite services, respectively. Hughes and Inmarsat,

  12. Microsoft Word - Smart_Grid_Comments_NAF_11.1.10.doc

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Comments of the New America Foundation's Open Technology Initiative submitted to U.S. Department of Energy regarding Request for Information on Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation November 1, 2010 The New America Foundation's Open Technology Initiative ("NAF") respectfully submits these comments in response to the United States Department of Energy's ("DOE") Request for Information (RFI) entitled "Addressing Policy and Logistical

  13. Microsoft Word - 2012 Congestion Study - DRAFT EEI Comments -10.20.14 - CLEAN.docx

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Page 1 October 20, 2014 Mr. David Meyer Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Submitted electronically via email to: Congestionstudy.comments@hq.doe.gov Re: Department of Energy - Draft National Electric Transmission Congestion Study, 79 Fed. Reg. 49076 (Aug. 19, 2014) Dear Mr. Meyer: I. INTRODUCTION The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is pleased to provide these comments in response to the

  14. DRSG Comments to DOE Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    DRSG Comments to DOE Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges DRSG- 1 DOE Smart Grid RFI Titled "Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation" Submitted by the Demand Response and Smart Grid Coalition (DRSG) November 1, 2010 DRSG Comments to DOE Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges DRSG- 2 I. Definition and Scope 1. What significant policy challenges are likely to remain unaddressed if we employ Title XIII's

  15. Microsoft Word - CLWR Draft SEIS Comment

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Comment forms may be mailed to: Comment forms may be sent by electronic mail to: Mr. Curtis Chambellan tritium.readiness.seis@doeal.gov CLWR SEIS Document Manager U.S. DOENNSA...

  16. QER- Comment of Berkshire Environmental Action Team

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dear members of the Quadrennial Energy Review Task Force, Please find attached comments from the Berkshire Environmental Action Team, Inc. (BEAT) regarding the proposed natural gas pipeline expansion. Thank you for considering our comments.

  17. Comments/Questions? | The Ames Laboratory

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Comments/Questions? Name (optional): Email Address (optional): Comment/Question: * CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Submit

  18. Public Comment Procedures | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Dockets Open for Public Comment A list of current dockets open for public comment can be found on at this web page here. FILINGS: Filings may be submitted using one of the ...

  19. Lochinvar Preliminary Plan Comments | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Lochinvar Preliminary Plan Comments Lochinvar Preliminary Plan Comments Comments to DOE on Certification, Compliance and Enforcement Regulations for Consumer Products and Commercial and Industrial Equipment EO 13563 Preliminary Plan PDF icon Microsoft Word - Lochinvar Comments -EO 13563 Preliminary Plan.docx More Documents & Publications Notice of Availability of Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules Regulatory Burden RFI AHRI Preliminary Plan for Retrospective

  20. QER- Comment of Geotherman Energy Association (GEA)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hi the Geothermal Energy Association would like to submit the attached comments for the 2014 QER process. Thanks,

  1. QER- Comment of National Resource Defense Council

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Please accept this paper as a comment into the QER record on siting energy and transmission resources.

  2. Comments on backreaction and cosmic acceleration

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kolb, Edward W.; Matarrese, Sabinio; Riotto, Antonion; /CERN

    2005-11-01

    In this brief WEB note we comment on recent papers related to our paper ''On Acceleration Without Dark Energy''.

  3. Public Comment Opportunities | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Public Comment Opportunities Public Comment Opportunities Below are links to DOE NEPA projects with open comment periods, including comment periods on the proposed scope of planned NEPA documents and on draft NEPA documents (e.g., draft environmental assessments and draft environmental impacts statements). EIS-0514: Colusa-Sutter 500-kilovolt Transmission Line Project; Colusa and Sutter Counties, California Western Area Power Administration (Western) and the Sacramento Municipal Utility District

  4. QER- Comment of American Water

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dear QER Team; Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments to the Quadrennial Energy Review Task Force to discuss the water and energy nexus, advances in water innovative technologies, and the impact of climate change on water issues. On behalf of American Water, I wish to submit the following White Papers which we have prepared on these critical issues: Innovations in Energy Use Sustainability and Resiliency Planning for Water Utilities One Water Water/Energy Correlation The Value of Water Challenges in the Water Industry: Climate Change Challenges in the Water Industry: Meeting Demand in the West Innovation Solutions Within the Water Industry: Desalination Innovation Solutions Within the Water Industry: Going Green Innovation Solutions Within the Water Industry: Water Reuse Bridging the Water Innovation Gap. Founded in 1886, American Water is the largest publicly traded U.S. water and wastewater utility company. With headquarters in Voorhees, NJ, the company employs approximately 6,600 dedicated professionals who provide drinking water, wastewater and other related services to an estimated 14 million people in more than 40 states. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or if there is any way American Water can be helpful to your mission. Respectfully Yours, Martin (See attached file: White Papers.pdf) Martin D. Kerckhoff Vice President and Divisional General Counsel Central Division American Water CONFIDENTIAL & PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION This email and any attachments hereto constitute a legally confidential communication from the Legal Department of American Water. The information contained herein is subject to attorney-client privilege and is for the sole use of the intended original addressee. If you are not the intended original addressee, you are hereby notified that any reading, disclosure, copying, distribution, use, or taking of any action in reliance on the contents contained herein is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us at 314.966.2241 and delete this message from your system. WARNING: Although American Water has taken reasonable precautions to ensure that no viruses are present in this email, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free. No responsibility is accepted by American Water for any loss or damage arising in any way from the receipt and/or use of this email.

  5. QER- Comment of Institute for Energy Research

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Institute for Energy Research would like to submit a comment for the DOE's Quadrennial Energy Review. You will find the comment attached, and we would like to be listed as: Institute for Energy Research 1155 15th St Nw, Suite 1900 Washington, D.C. 20005 Thank you for the opportunity to comment!

  6. QER- Comment of American Gas Association 2

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Attached please find AGA's comments relating to critical issues facing the natural gas distribution industry, which we believe could be usefully addressed in the first phase of the DOE Quadrennial Energy Review (QER). Our comments as submitted here consist of a cover letter and four additional attachments. My colleague Pam Lacey has previously submitted AGA's comments relating to methane emissions under separate cover.

  7. Accuracy of the electron transport in mcnp5 and its suitability for ionization chamber response simulations: A comparison with the egsnrc and penelope codes

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Koivunoro, Hanna; Siiskonen, Teemu; Kotiluoto, Petri; Auterinen, Iiro; Hippelaeinen, Eero; Savolainen, Sauli

    2012-03-15

    Purpose: In this work, accuracy of the mcnp5 code in the electron transport calculations and its suitability for ionization chamber (IC) response simulations in photon beams are studied in comparison to egsnrc and penelope codes. Methods: The electron transport is studied by comparing the depth dose distributions in a water phantom subdivided into thin layers using incident energies (0.05, 0.1, 1, and 10 MeV) for the broad parallel electron beams. The IC response simulations are studied in water phantom in three dosimetric gas materials (air, argon, and methane based tissue equivalent gas) for photon beams ({sup 60}Co source, 6 MV linear medical accelerator, and mono-energetic 2 MeV photon source). Two optional electron transport models of mcnp5 are evaluated: the ITS-based electron energy indexing (mcnp5{sub ITS}) and the new detailed electron energy-loss straggling logic (mcnp5{sub new}). The electron substep length (ESTEP parameter) dependency in mcnp5 is investigated as well. Results: For the electron beam studies, large discrepancies (>3%) are observed between the mcnp5 dose distributions and the reference codes at 1 MeV and lower energies. The discrepancy is especially notable for 0.1 and 0.05 MeV electron beams. The boundary crossing artifacts, which are well known for the mcnp5{sub ITS}, are observed for the mcnp5{sub new} only at 0.1 and 0.05 MeV beam energies. If the excessive boundary crossing is eliminated by using single scoring cells, the mcnp5{sub ITS} provides dose distributions that agree better with the reference codes than mcnp5{sub new}. The mcnp5 dose estimates for the gas cavity agree within 1% with the reference codes, if the mcnp5{sub ITS} is applied or electron substep length is set adequately for the gas in the cavity using the mcnp5{sub new}. The mcnp5{sub new} results are found highly dependent on the chosen electron substep length and might lead up to 15% underestimation of the absorbed dose. Conclusions: Since the mcnp5 electron transport calculations are not accurate at all energies and in every medium by general clinical standards, caution is needed, if mcnp5 is used with the current electron transport models for dosimetric applications.

  8. Summary of comments received from workshops on radiological criteria for decommissioning

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Caplin, J.; Page, G.; Smith, D.; Wiblin, C.

    1994-01-01

    The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is conducting an enhanced participatory rulemaking to establish radiological criteria for site cleanup and decommissioning of NRC-licensed facilities. Open public meetings were held during 1993 in Chicago, IL, San Francisco, CA, Boston, MA, Dallas, TX, Philadelphia, PA, Atlanta, GA, and Washington, DC. Interested parties were invited to provide input on the rulemaking issues before the NRC staff develops a draft proposed rule. This report summarizes 3,635 comments categorized from transcripts of the seven workshops and 1,677 comments from 100 NRC docketed letters from individuals and organizations. No analysis or response to the comments is included. The comments reflect a broad spectrum of viewpoints on the issues related to radiological criteria for site cleanup and decommissioning. The NRC also held public meetings on the scope of the Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS) during July 1993. The GEIS meetings were held in Washington, DC., San Francisco, CA, Oklahoma City, OK, and Cleveland, OH. Related comments from these meetings were reviewed and comments which differed substantially from those from the workshops are also summarized in the body of the report. A summary of the comments from the GEIS scoping meetings is included as an Appendix.

  9. BPA-2015-01544-FOIA Response

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Dec 9, 2014 at 9:15 AM, DeClerck,Angela (BPA) - TSE-TPP-2 wrote: Hello Jason, We are putting together responses to a comment letter we received in July from...

  10. Comments of North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) to DOE

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges | Department of Energy North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) to DOE Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Comments of North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) to DOE Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Response to the Department of Energy's ("DOE") Request for Information (RFI) regarding the "Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical

  11. QER - Comment of National Rural Electric Cooperative Association 3 |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy Association 3 QER - Comment of National Rural Electric Cooperative Association 3 From: Silberstein, Pam M. [pamela.silberstein@nreca.coop] Sent: Friday, October 03, 2014 2:57 PM To: QERcomments Subject: RE: QER submission attached Attachment: Brief17_RuralEnergyConservation (1).pdf; Tri-State Response to DOE RFI on Draft IPP Process Oct 31 2013.pdf In addition to the below, please find these supporting materials. Thank you. -p ___________________________________ From:

  12. Comments by the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates |

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Department of Energy These comments are submitted on behalf of the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates (NASUCA) in response to the request for information (RFI) of the Department of Energy (DOE) entitled "Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy." See 75 Fed. Reg. 26206 (May 11, 2010).1 NASUCA is a voluntary organization comprised of offices from 40 states and

  13. Comments of the American Petroleum Institute | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Petroleum Institute Comments of the American Petroleum Institute Similar to the electric utility industry's implementation of smart grid, oil and natural gas companies are in the midst of transitioning to next generation communications technology that will provide significant benefits in terms of safety, incident response, effectiveness and efficiency that are critical to United States energy independence. At the same time, however, API's members find themselves increasingly constrained by the

  14. From: Mills, Pamela To: Congestion Study Comments Cc: Strack, Jan

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Mills, Pamela To: Congestion Study Comments Cc: Strack, Jan Subject: National Electric Transmission Congestion Study - Draft for Public Comment Date: Friday, October 17, 2014 6:18:37 PM Attachments: SDGE Comments on the National Electric Transmission Congestion Study - Draft for Public Comment.docx Please find attached SDG&E's comments on the National Electric Transmission Congestion Study - Draft for Public Comment. Any questions or comments regarding the attached document should be

  15. ARM - Datastreams - gms5hovmuller

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Datastreamsgms5hovmuller Documentation XDC documentation Data Quality Plots ARM Data Discovery Browse Data Comments? We would love to hear from you! Send us a note below or call us at 1-888-ARM-DATA. Send Datastream : GMS5HOVMULLER GMS-5: hovmuller diagram Active Dates 1996.10.01 - 2001.08.01 Originating Instrument Geostationary Meteorological Satellite (GMS

  16. QER - Comment of GridWise Alliance 1 | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    1 QER - Comment of GridWise Alliance 1 From: Becky Harrison [BHarrison@gridwise.org] Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 5:00 PM To: QERcomments CC: Ladeene Freimuth; Lee Coogan Subject: Comments on QER Attachment: GridWise Alliance - QER Workshop 04112014 Remarks.docx; GridWise Improving Electric Grid Reliability and Resilience Report June 2013.pdf Please find attached the GridWise Alliance's Improving Electric Grid Reliability and Resilience report and my comments from today's workshop. Thank to the

  17. Motion to Intervene and Initial Comments of PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. |

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Department of Energy Initial Comments of PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. Motion to Intervene and Initial Comments of PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. Motion to Intervene and Initial Comments of PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. On January 5, 2009, ITC Transmission filed with the Department of Energy a request to amend Presidential Permit PP-230-3, which authorizes ITC to own and operate specified electric transmission facilities at the Bunce Creek station that interconnect ITC with Hydro One Networks Inc

  18. QER- Comment of Southern Company

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Southern Company Services, Inc., as agent for Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power Company, Gulf Power Company, and Mississippi Power Company, (collectively, “Southern Companies”), are pleased to hereby provide their comments to the Department of Energy as it prepares the Quadrennial Energy Review. If there is anything else that we can do in this regard, please feel free to contact us.

  19. QER- Comment of Silvia Wessel

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    One additional comment I have: In order to ensure success of the H2 infrastructure the fueling stations need to meet the expectations of the customer and more specifically the H2 quality specifications necessary to protect the fuel cell vehicles.

  20. QER- Comment of Mitsubishi Electric

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dear Karen: On behalf of Brian Heery, president and CEO of Mitsubishi Electric Power Products, attached are comments regarding the Quadrennial Energy Review. As a US-based manufacturer of large transformers and other energy infrastructure technologies, we welcome the opportunity to meet with you on issues affecting the Nations transmission grid.

  1. Response to Comment on Motion of a helical vortex filament in superfluid {sup 4}He under the extrinsic form of the local induction approximation [Phys. Fluids 26, 019101 (2014)

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Van Gorder, Robert A.

    2014-01-15

    I agree with the authors regarding their comments on the Donnelly-Glaberson instability for such helical filaments as those obtained in my paper. I also find merit in their derivation of the quantum LIA (local induction approximation) in the manner of the LIA of Boffetta et al. However, I disagree with the primary criticisms of Hietala and Hnninen. In particular, though they suggest LIA and local nonlinear equation modes are not comparable since the former class of models contains superfluid friction parameters, note that since these parameters are small one may take them to zero and consider a qualitative comparison of the models (which is what was done in my paper). Second, while Hietala and Hnninen criticize certain assumptions made in my paper (and the paper of Shivamoggi where the model comes from) since the results break-down when Ak ? ?, note that in my paper I state that any deviations from the central axis along which the filament is aligned must be sufficiently bounded in variation. Therefore, it was already acknowledged that Ak(=|?{sub x}|) should be sufficiently bounded, precluding the Ak ? ? case. I also show that, despite what Hietala and Hnninen claim, the dispersion relation obtained in my paper is consistent with LIA, where applicable. Finally, while Hietala and Hnninen claim that the dispersion parameter should be complex valued, I show that their dispersion relation is wrong, since it was derived incorrectly (they assume the complex modulus of the potential function is constant, yet then use this to obtain a potential function with non-constant modulus)

  2. DOE Issues Two Notices Seeking Comment on the Implementation of Its

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Certification and Enforcement Rules | Department of Energy Two Notices Seeking Comment on the Implementation of Its Certification and Enforcement Rules DOE Issues Two Notices Seeking Comment on the Implementation of Its Certification and Enforcement Rules April 21, 2011 - 5:08pm Addthis Last week, the Department of Energy issued two Notices related to the application of its certification and enforcement regulations. First, the Department issued a Request for Information seeking information

  3. QER- Comment of IEEE

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dear Bill: The IEEE Joint Task Force on Quadrennial Energy Review (QER) is pleased to submit our draft report on the priority topics as requested in your April 29 letter. We have recruited leaders from our membership to develop responses based on work by IEEE members and other industry publications. The leaders have engaged a large IEEE volunteer community to support this initiative.

  4. Absolute Calibration of Kodak Biomax-MS Film Response to X Rays in the 1.5- to 8-keV Energy Range

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Marshall, F.J.; Knauer, J.P.; Anderson, D.; Schmitt, B.L.

    2006-09-28

    The absolute response of Kodak Biomax-MS film to x rays in the range from 1.5- to 8-keV has been measured using a laboratory e-beam generated x-ray source. The measurements were taken at specific line energies by using Bragg diffraction to produce monochromatic beams of x rays. Multiple exposures were taken on Biomax MS film up to levels exceeding optical densities of 2 as measured by a microdensitometer. The absolute beam intensity for each exposure was measured with a Si(Li) detector. Additional response measurements were taken with Kodak direct exposure film (DEF) so as to compare the results of this technique to previously published calibrations.

  5. DOE Extends Comment Period for Reply Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Department of Energy today announces an extension of the reply comment period for its Request for Information implementing Executive Order 13563, seeking public comment on how best to review...

  6. Electro-optically responsive composites of gold nanospheres in 5CB liquid crystal under direct current and alternating current joint action

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Hadjichristov, Georgi B.; Marinov, Yordan G.; Petrov, Alexander G.; Bruno, Emanuela; Marino, Lucia; Scaramuzza, Nicola

    2014-02-28

    Direct current (DC) electro-optical (EO) control of transmitted laser beam intensity based on EO controlled coherent light scattering and diffraction by stationary longitudinal texture pattern (LTP) is achieved in planar-oriented cells with a composite mixture of polymer-coated gold spherical nanoparticles (Au-NPs) with a mean diameter of about 12?nm and the room-temperature nematic pentylcyanobiphenyl (5CB). At relatively low DC voltage of about 5 V, the effective scattering/diffraction by Au-NPs/5CB composites leads to a spatial spreading of transmitted coherent light from a low-power continuous wave laser beam, resulting in a drastic reduction of its local intensity. The effect is polarization dependent and is strongest when the polarization of the input laser beam is along the LTP. The EO response of Au-NPs/5CB mixtures is studied under DC and alternating current (AC) joint action with the aim of the potential use of these composite materials as EO controlled diffusers. The specific V-shaped sharp dip in the DC voltage-dependent coherent light transmittance of Au-NPs/5CB planar films, as well as the possibility for erasing the scattering/diffractive LTP in the films by joint low AC voltage, can be useful for EO applications in the field of process control and for detection of weak dynamic electric fields.

  7. Public Comment Received on Proposed Revisions to DOE's NEPA Rule...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Public Comment Received on Proposed Revisions to DOE's NEPA Rule: 10 CFR Part 1021 Public Comment Received on Proposed Revisions to DOE's NEPA Rule: 10 CFR Part 1021 Public Comment...

  8. Q & A for Toshiba RFI Comments | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Q & A for Toshiba RFI Comments Q & A for Toshiba RFI Comments More Documents & Publications Comments of DRSG to DOE Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges DC...

  9. Comments of Ingersoll Rand on Smart Grid RFI | Department of...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Comments of Ingersoll Rand on Smart Grid RFI Comments of Ingersoll Rand on Smart Grid RFI Ingersoll Rand Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges PDF...

  10. PIA - DOE OCIO, Open Government Plan Comment Box | Department...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    DOE OCIO, Open Government Plan Comment Box PIA - DOE OCIO, Open Government Plan Comment Box PIA - DOE OCIO, Open Government Plan Comment Box PDF icon PIA - DOE OCIO, Open...

  11. Modifications for Public Comment - Hanford Site

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Modifications for Public Comment Tri-Party Agreement The Agreement Announcements List of Approved Changes TPA Project Manager's Lists Modifications for Public Comment Data Management MP-14 WIDS Information Hanford Site Waste Management Units Report Hanford Public Involvement Plan Administrative Record (AR) Related Links Modifications for Public Comment Email Email Page | Print Print Page |Text Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size NOTE: Some documents are in the Adobe Acrobat Portable Document

  12. Fourth RFI_Comment on Regulatory Review.pdf

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    47328 Vol. 77, No. 153 Wednesday, August 8, 2012 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 5 CFR Chapter XXII 10 CFR Chapters II, III, X Reducing Regulatory Burden AGENCY: Office of the General Counsel, Department of Energy. ACTION: Request for information. SUMMARY: As part of its implementation of Executive Order 13563, ''Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' issued by the President on January 18, 2011, the Department of Energy (Department or DOE) is seeking comments and information from interested parties

  13. From: Ed Doughty To: Congestion Study Comments Subject:

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Ed Doughty To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: Opposed to NIETC"s Date: Friday, October 03, 2014 5:00:09 PM I am opposed to the establishment of National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors (NIETC's) for the following reasons. First, the easements place an undo burden on landowners on and near the transmission lines. The compensation cannot begin to cover the all of the losses, tangible and intangible that landowners would suffer. Second, I believe that condemning private property for

  14. From: Peter Schumann To: Congestion Study Comments Subject:

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Peter Schumann To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: National Electric Transmission Congestion Study Date: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 5:24:51 PM We are opposed to the establishment of National Interest Energy Transmission Corridors (NIETC's) for the following reasons. First, the easements place an undo burden on landowners on and near the transmission lines. The compensation cannot begin to cover the all of the losses, tangible and intangible that landowners would suffer. Second, we believe

  15. Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Chantel |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy from Chantel Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Chantel Comment submitted on updated Part 2 application. PDF icon Comment from Chantel 06-09-15.pdf More Documents & Publications Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Mr. Garrett Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Ms. Rutherford Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Ms. Campbell

  16. Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Marshall

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Hughes | Department of Energy from Marshall Hughes Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Marshall Hughes Comment submitted on updated Part 2 application. PDF icon Comment from Marshall Hughes 07-10-15.pdf More Documents & Publications Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Mr. Dyer Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Sheila Beck Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Patti McCutchen

  17. Comments of Crow Wing Power | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Crow Wing Power Comments of Crow Wing Power Comments of Crow Wing Power on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy PDF icon Comments of Crow Wing Power More Documents & Publications NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Meeker Cooperative Light and Power- Minnesota Comments of Steele-Waseca Cooperative Electric Comments of East Central Energy- Minnesota

  18. QER- Comment of Berkshire Hathaway Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Attached for filing is a brief comment from Berkshire Hathaway Energy along with a supporting attachment for DOE’s consideration. Regards, Jay

  19. Public Comment Opportunities | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    and Saguaro, Arizona substations. EIS-0463: Northern Pass Transmission Line Project, New Hampshire Draft EIS and Supplement to the Draft EIS: Public Comment Periods End 1416...

  20. SunZia Southwest Transmission Project Comments

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Transmission Project Comments Provided to the US Department of Energy Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Request for Information Relating to the Permitting...

  1. QER- Comment of American Gas Association 4

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    From: Peterson, Christopher (EIA)Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 12:11 PMTo: Pierpoint, LaraSubject: FW: AGA comments to QER: Natural Gas Emissions Section

  2. QER- Comment of Energy Innovation 2

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hello, Please accept these papers as comments into the QER record for the August 8th public meeting on infrastructure constraints. Thank you, Hallie

  3. QER- Comment of Energy Innovation 4

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hello, Please accept this paper as comment into the QER record for the August 21st public meeting on infrastructure siting. Thank you, Hallie

  4. QER- Comment of Energy Innovation 3

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hello, Please accept this paper as comment into the QER record for the August 11th public meeting on state, local and tribal issues. Thank you, Hallie

  5. QER- Comment of Airlines for America

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Attached please find the comments of Airlines for America concerning the October 6 meeting, energy infrastructure. Please contact the undersigned if you have any questions.

  6. QER- Comment of Energy Innovation 8

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hello, Please accept these papers as comments into the QER record for the public meeting on rural electrification, biomass processing and transportation. Thank you, Hallie

  7. Comments of North American Electric Reliability Corporation ...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) to DOE Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Comments of North American Electric Reliability...

  8. HPBA Comments NOPR on Energy Conservation Standards for Direct...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    HPBA Comments NOPR on Energy Conservation Standards for Direct Heating Equipment HPBA Comments NOPR on Energy Conservation Standards for Direct Heating Equipment The Hearth, Patio ...

  9. NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Baltimore Gas...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Requirements- Comments of Baltimore Gas & Electric Company Comments of Baltimore Gas & Electric Company on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the...

  10. National Congestion Study Notice of Public Comment: Federal Register...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    of Public Comment: Federal Register Notice, Volume 79, No. 160, August 19, 2014 National Congestion Study Notice of Public Comment: Federal Register Notice, Volume 79, No....

  11. NBP RFI: Communications Requirements - Reply Comments of Utilities...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Requirements - Reply Comments of Utilities Telecom Council NBP RFI: Communications Requirements - Reply Comments of Utilities Telecom Council The Utilities Telecom Council hereby...

  12. NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Meeker Cooperative...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Meeker Cooperative Light and Power- Minnesota NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Meeker Cooperative Light and Power- Minnesota Comments of Meeker Cooperative Light...

  13. Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Block Plains and Eastern Clean Line: Arkansas and Oklahoma Comment submitted on updated Part 2 application. PDF icon ...

  14. Extension of Comment Period on the Draft Integrated, Interagency...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    of Comment Period on the Draft Integrated, Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process for Electric Transmission Projects Requiring Federal Authorizations Extension of Comment...

  15. Public comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation on...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Compensation on Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation Public comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation on Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation Comments by the...

  16. NNSA Seeking Comments on Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    NNSA Seeking Comments on Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support Services Draft NNSA Seeking Comments on Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support Services Draft July 17, 2013 ...

  17. Comments of Avista Corporation on DOE Request forInformation...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Customers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy Comments of ... Customers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy Comments of ...

  18. City of Fort Collins Comment on Information Collection Extension...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    City of Fort Collins Comment on Information Collection Extension, October 2011 City of Fort Collins Comment on Information Collection Extension, October 2011 The City of Fort...

  19. Dairyland Power Cooperative Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments to:DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Florida Power and Light Comments on...

  20. NNSA Seeking Comments on Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    NNSA Seeking Comments on Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support Services Draft NNSA Seeking Comments on Consolidated IT and Cyber Security Support Services Draft July 17, 2013...

  1. City Utilities of Springfield Missouri Comments on Smart Grid...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Utilities of Springfield Missouri Comments on Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges City Utilities of Springfield Missouri Comments on Smart Grid RFI:...

  2. PEPCO Comments on Special Environmental Analysis For Actions...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Operation of the Potomac River Generating Station in Alexandria, Virginia PEPCO Comments ... Order No. 202-05-3 of the District of Columbia Public Service Commission Comments on ...

  3. Comments of Current Group, LLC | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Comments of Current Group, LLC regarding the request for information: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation PDF icon Comments of Current Group, ...

  4. Ambient Corporation's Reply comments to DOE RFI: Addressing Policy...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Ambient Corporation's Reply comments to DOE RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation Ambient Corporation's Reply comments to DOE RFI: ...

  5. Toward Energy Efficient Municipalities: General Comments on Policy...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Toward Energy Efficient Municipalities: General Comments on Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation Toward Energy Efficient Municipalities: General Comments ...

  6. Comments of Verizon and Verizon Wireless | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Verizon and Verizon Wireless comments to DOE on the Smart Grid RFI: Addressing policy and logistical challenges to smart grid implementation PDF icon Comments of Verizon and ...

  7. CMRR-NF Supplemental EIS Scoping Comments | National Nuclear...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Office of General Counsel National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) NEPA Reading Room CMRR-NF Supplemental EIS Scoping Comments CMRR-NF Supplemental EIS Scoping Comments...

  8. QER- Comment of Tremolux

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dear Sirs, Despite what might have been your best intentions, your 2013 report on Low-E storm windows is Worthless! All of the careful calculations and measurements are Worthless if the actual price of low-E storms is 4X what you claim! Given that a high-quality low-E storm window costs over $220 each, including installation, the payback period is Absurd! Who the hell is responsible for this Bullshit? Go shopping for low-E storms ... we Dare You! You might find some very cheap, plain grey, aluminum units ... but even those will be 3X the price that you claim. Don't you understand what we're saying? Your entire Cost/Benefit analysis is a FRAUD! Time to wake up! Tremolux

  9. http://www.hanford.gov/boards/hab/response/092a.htm

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    99352 99-OEA-105 Advice # 92 From: Lloyd Piper for Keith Klein Ms. Merilyn Reeves, Chair Hanford Advisory Board 723 The Parkway, Suite 200: B1 -41 Richland, Washington 99352 May 21, 1999 Dear Ms. Reeves: HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD CONSENSUS ADVICE #92 TRI-PARTIES RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENTS Thank you for your recent advice regarding responses to public comments, concerns, and suggestions. They are good suggestions, and provide us with an improved framework for responding to comments and concerns

  10. Comments of the Southern Environmental Law Center and the American Lung

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Association in response to the Department of Energy's Emergency Order to Resume Operations at the Potomac River Generating Station in Alexandria, VA | Department of Energy the Southern Environmental Law Center and the American Lung Association in response to the Department of Energy's Emergency Order to Resume Operations at the Potomac River Generating Station in Alexandria, VA Comments of the Southern Environmental Law Center and the American Lung Association in response to the Department

  11. ARM - Datastreams - 5ebbr

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    ebbr Documentation Data Quality Plots Citation DOI: 10.5439/1025346 [ What is this? ] Generate Citation ARM Data Discovery Browse Data Comments? We would love to hear from you! Send us a note below or call us at 1-888-ARM-DATA. Send Example 5ebbr Archive Data Plot Example 5ebbr Archive Data Plot Datastream : 5EBBR Energy Balance Bowen Ratio(EBBR) station: surf. Met & soil data for heat flux, 5-min Active Dates 1993.07.04 - 2016.03.10 Measurement Categories Radiometric Originating Instrument

  12. Microsoft Word - OPower RFI Response_110510.doc

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    OPOWER submits these comments to the Department of Energy in response to the recently issued Request for Information on smart grid implementation challenges. In particular, OPOWER writes to comment on the importance of effective customer engagement in smart grid policy making. OPOWER is an energy efficiency software company that uses behavioral science and data analytics to help utilities better engage their customers and motivate them to use less energy. OPOWER is partnering with 43 utilities

  13. QER- Comment of Wyoming Infrastructure Authority

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Office of Energy Policy and Systems Analysis: Please accept the attached letter of comments pursuant to the above referenced meeting. I have also mailed the letter. We appreciate the scheduling of the meeting in Cheyenne and the opportunity to provide comments on permitting and siting of infrastructure on public lands. Regards,

  14. QER- Comment of American Hydrogen Northeast, Inc.

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dear Sir or Madam, Attached please find the Hydrogen Association and the American Hydrogen Northeast,inc's Comments on the first round of QER review. I wish to thank Secretary Moniz and Senator Reed for attending the Providence hearing and providing this opportunity to submit these comments.

  15. QER- Comment of Canadian Electricity Association

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dear Ms. Pickett and/or DOE staff: Attached please find comments of the Canadian Electricity Association (CEA) on the Quadrennial Energy Review. Please confirm receipt at your convenience and please advise if you require anything further. Many thanks for this opportunity to provide comments. Best regards,

  16. QER- Comment of American Gas Association 1

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Attached please find AGA's comments on methane emissions issues in the first phase of the DOE Quadrennial Energy Review (QER), consisting of a cover letter and attachments. Dr. Kathryn Clay will be submitting AGA's comments on other aspects of the QER. Please let me know if you have any questions.

  17. QER- Comment of Electric Drive Transportation Association

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Please find attached the comments of the Electric Drive Transportation Association regarding the first volume of the Department of Energy’s QER. If you have questions about our submittal or require further information, please contact me using the information provided below. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Genevieve Cullen

  18. QER- Comment of American petroleum Institute (API)

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Please find attached API's comments (and associated attachments) to the Department of Energy's Public Comment on the Quadrennial Energy Review [79 FR 50638, Doc. No. 2014-20114]. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions or need anything else.

  19. QER- Comment of Tate Sullivan

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Thank you. From: QERcomments [mailto:QERcomments@Hq.Doe.Gov] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 4:14 PM To: Tate Sullivan, CLSA Subject: RE: QER Public Meeting: Petroleum Product Transmission & Distribution Tate, You can find the panelists' statements and other information, including a link to a video of meetings when available, at www.energy.gov/qer. We will post transcripts for all meetings, which will include the facilitated discussion and any public comments given during the open mic, on the same website in the weeks following each meeting. All comments we receive through this email will eventually become public, but not until later this fall. Regards, Karen Karen G. Wayland, Ph.D. Deputy Director for State, Local and Tribal Cooperation Energy Policy and Systems Analysis U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave. SW Washington, DC 20585 From: Tate Sullivan, CLSA Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 10:47 AM To: QERcomments Subject: QER Public Meeting: Petroleum Product Transmission & Distribution Are any of the presentations or comments during this public meeting going to be released in electronic form? Have they been released? Is there a replay available of the event? Thank you. Tate Sullivan, CFA CLSA Americas, LLC Vice President CLSA is committed to reducing consumption for a better environment and is ISO14001 certified. The content of this communication is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request. CLSA is committed to reducing consumption for a better environment and is ISO14001 certified. The content of this communication is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.

  20. Absolute calibration of Kodak Biomax-MS film response to x rays in the 1.5- to 8-keV energy range

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Marshall, F. J.; Knauer, J. P.; Anderson, D.; Schmitt, B. L

    2006-10-15

    The absolute response of Kodak Biomax-MS film to x rays in the range from 1.5- to 8-keV has been measured using a laboratory electron-beam generated x-ray source. The measurements were taken at specific line energies by using Bragg diffraction to produce monochromatic beams of x rays. Multiple exposures were taken on Biomax MS film up to levels exceeding optical densities of 2 as measured by a microdensitometer. The absolute beam intensity for each exposure was measured with a Si(Li) detector. Additional response measurements were taken with Kodak direct exposure film (DEF) so as to compare the results of this technique to previously published calibrations. The Biomax-MS results have been fitted to a semiempirical mathematical model (Knauer et al., these proceedings). Users of the model can infer absolute fluences from observed exposure levels at either interpolated or extrapolated energies. To summarize the results: Biomax MS has comparable sensitivity to DEF film below 3 keV but has reduced sensitivity above 3 keV ({approx}50%). The lower exposure results from thinner emulsion layers, designed for use with phosphor screens. The ease with which Biomax-MS can be used in place of DEF (same format film, same developing process, and comparable sensitivity) makes it a good replacement.

  1. QER- Comment of Jerry Toenyes

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Quadrennial Energy Review (QER), specifically the water/energy nexus. Unfortunately there is little relationship between water operations and power generation in decisions involving the Federal hydropower facilities located in California. Power is the lowest priority of the various project purposes met by the Federal projects and does not receive consideration in short term and long term planning. Water only flows through Federal power plants while it is being released by the dams to meet other project purposes.

  2. Toshiba RFI Comments.xlsx

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Definition and Scope Answer/Comment 1 What significant policy challenges are likely to remain unaddressed if we employ Title XIII's definition? The following points are not referencedd in EISA 1301. ・Power provider should also control the output fluctuation of renewable resources. ・The end user should have the choice of which form of power storage to be used. Certain types of energy conservation and storage could work better in different applications (e.g. not only electricity power but also

  3. QER- Comment of Tate Sullivan

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Are any of the presentations or comments during this public meeting going to be released in electronic form? Have they been released? Is there a replay available of the event? Thank you. Tate Sullivan, CFA CLSA Americas, LLC Vice President CLSA is committed to reducing consumption for a better environment and is ISO14001 certified. The content of this communication is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request.

  4. Comments to Section 934 Rulemaking | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    to Section 934 Rulemaking Comments to Section 934 Rulemaking ConverDyn's comments on section 934 rulemaking PDF icon Comments to Section 934 Rulemaking More Documents & Publications NOPR ConverDyn Memo to DOE re conference call minutes Public Comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation

  5. QER- Comment of Sander Resources

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Good morning. I wanted to follow up on our discussion regarding Section 4.4 of the briefing document used for the QER event on Energy Infrastructure Financing. Per my earlier comments, information in that section does not accurately reflect the business model of pipelines, and particularly for the "midstream" sector, or those gathering and processing activities and intrastate pipelines. Further, it does not accurately describe the "utility" designation of these lines or how or why these designations are used. It is also important to note that the reference to "take-or-pay" contracts is particularly concerning as those types of contracts are prohibited in many states as I understand it. I have attached an updated redline version of that section that addresses the issues. I would be more than happy to work with someone to correct the language if the suggested language does not work for any reason. Thank you for your consideration of the comments and proposed changes. Please let me know if you have any questions or if I can be of further assistance.

  6. QER- Comment of Brian West

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hello, Thanks for the invitation to the QER workshop. Here are a couple of comments that I was probably unable to fully articulate in the main session, although I did try to make some of these points in the breakout session: When considering alternatives and policy that drives alternative fuel use, it is important to learn from Policy successes and failures. Policy drivers put in place in Thailand, Brazil, and Sweden have been successful in transitions to greater alternative fuel use. US policy for Flex Fuel Vehicles has been largely unsuccessful at encouraging alternative fuel use. The fuel economy credit for the OEMs to build FFVs was generous but encouraged only modest production; nonetheless there are over 15M FFVs on the road. However, they use very little ethanol fuel due to cost ($/mile), range, etc. Natural Gas has a very real value proposition (lower $/gge) so fleet owners have good financial incentive to make the switch, even if investments are required. One participant commented that infrastructure costs are small compared to costs of imported oil. I agree with this statement. One presenter mentioned (a city?) with a law that requires infrastructure to support future EV charging be installed in any new parking garage. Great idea. (Better to have and not need than need and not have, especially when cost differential is small on the front end and very large on the back end). In the US we install about 20,000-40,000 new fuel dispensers per year (according to Gilbarco/Wayne). It would be a horrible missed opportunity to not put policy in place that encourages/requires E25 or E85-compatible dispensers. With a successful policy driver, in the next five years the nation could have over 100,000 ethanol-compatible dispensers in place, ready for a new High Octane Fuel (that could very likely contain more than 10 or 15% ethanol). Thanks Brian H. West Fuels, Engines, and Emissions Research Center Oak Ridge National Laboratory http://www.ornl.gov/ http://feerc.ornl.gov/ http://www.fueleconomy.gov/ From: Tillemann, Levi Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2014 3:52 PM To: West, Brian H. Subject: AMR/QER Technical Workshop Dear Brian: On behalf of the Department of Energy's Office of Energy Policy and Systems Analysis (EPSA) I want to thank you for your participation at the June 20th AMR/QER Alternative Transportation Refueling Infrastructure technical workshop. Your contribution in the breakout sessions and general discussion sessions provided valuable insight that will help inform EPSA during the QER process going forward. During the course of the workshop, detailed notes were taken. These have been anonymized and will be made publically available to you and the general public in the coming weeks. Once they are posted, we will provide you with a link for accessing them online. We encourage you to submit additional comments regarding infrastructure for transmission, storage or distribution of alternative transportation fuels to qercomments@hq.doe.gov. For more information about the QER's stakeholder meeting locations, areas of analysis and public comments you can visit the QER website at: http://energy.gov/epsa/initiatives/quadrennial-energy-review-qer. Please feel free to contact me or Sallie Gilbert (sallie.gilbert@hq.doe.gov) if you have additional questions. I will be leaving the DOE August 1, thereafter you may contact Renee Picket (adonica.pickett@hq.doe.gov) or Carla Frisch (carla.frisch@hq.doe.gov) with questions or comments. Thank you again for making the workshop a great success. I look forward to working together with all of you on these issues in the future. Best regards, Levi Tillemann, Ph.D. Special Advisor, EPSA US Department of Energy

  7. Comments on Docket ID: DOE-HQ-2011-0014 | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    on Docket ID: DOE-HQ-2011-0014 Comments on Docket ID: DOE-HQ-2011-0014 This letter comprises the comments of the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), Southern California Gas Company (SCGC), San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E), and Southern California Edison (SCE) in response to the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Request for Information on Regulatory Burden. The signatories of this letter, collectively referred to herein as the California Investor Owned Utilities (CA IOUs) represent

  8. EIS-0236-S4: Extension of Comment Period | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Extension of Comment Period EIS-0236-S4: Extension of Comment Period Complex Transformation Extension of Comment Period for the Draft Complex Transformation Supplemental...

  9. Public Comments Received on the Draft Congestion Study | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy Public Comments Received on the Draft Congestion Study Public Comments Received on the Draft Congestion Study On August 19, 2014, the Department issued a Federal Register Notice announcing the availability of a draft of its National Electric Transmission Congestion Study for public comment. The draft study is available for review and downloading. The public comment period closed on October 20, 2014. Comments are available through the links below, as of October 20, 2014. Click on the

  10. EPAct 2005 Section 1817 Public Comments | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Section 1817 Public Comments EPAct 2005 Section 1817 Public Comments Following are all comments received by the U.S. Department of Energy on the February 2007 draft of the Study, "The Potential Benefits of Distributed Generation and Rate-Related Issued That May Impede Their Expansion." All comments are provided in their original, unedited format. PDF icon EPAct 2005 Section 1817 Public Comments More Documents & Publications The Potential Benefits of Distributed Generation and the

  11. Comments of ATT&T Inc | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    ATT&T Inc Comments of ATT&T Inc AT&T Inc comments on the Department of Energy's third Request for Information (RFI) on Smart Grid issues. PDF icon Comments of ATT&T Inc More Documents & Publications Re: NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of AT&T Inc. Re: NBP RFI: Communications Requirements NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Reply Comments of AT&T Inc.

  12. Comments of Baltimore Gas & Electric Company | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Baltimore Gas & Electric Company Comments of Baltimore Gas & Electric Company BGE comments to DOE addressing policy and logistical challenges PDF icon Comments of Baltimore Gas & Electric Company More Documents & Publications NBP RFI: Data Access, Third Party Use and Privacy- Comments of Baltimore Gas & Electric Company NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Baltimore Gas & Electric Company The Need for Essential Consumer Protections: Smart Metering Proposals

  13. NEMA Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Reducing Regulatory Burden NEMA Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden The National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) thanks you for the opportunity to provide comments on the Department of Energy's efforts to make its regulatory program more effective and less burdensome in achieving its regulatory objectives. PDF icon NEMA_Comments_on_Reducing_Reg_Burden.pdf More Documents & Publications NEMA Comments on DOE Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI NEMA Comments on DOE Reducing Regulatory

  14. RE: NBP RFI Reply Comments: Communications Requirements | Department of

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Energy RE: NBP RFI Reply Comments: Communications Requirements RE: NBP RFI Reply Comments: Communications Requirements The National Rural Electric Cooperative Association and American Public Power Association file these brief reply comments in support of the comments and reply comments filed by the Utilities Telecom Council ("UTC"). Both organizations strongly believe that the Administration should ensure that adequate spectrum is available for internal, utility networks.

  15. Comments of Mille Lacs Energy Cooperative | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Mille Lacs Energy Cooperative Comments of Mille Lacs Energy Cooperative Comments of Mille Lacs Energy Cooperative on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy PDF icon Comments of Mille Lacs Energy Cooperative More Documents & Publications Comments of Utilities Telecom Council Communications Requirements of Smart Grid Technologies NBP RFI: Communications Requirements - Reply Comments of

  16. NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Avista Corporation |

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Department of Energy Avista Corporation NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Avista Corporation Comments of Avista Corporation on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy PDF icon NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Avista Corporation More Documents & Publications AT&T, Inc.'s Reply Comments Comments of Utilities Telecom Council RE: NBP RFI: Com

  17. National Electric Transmission Congestion Study - Draft for Public Comment

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    August 2014 | Department of Energy - Draft for Public Comment August 2014 National Electric Transmission Congestion Study - Draft for Public Comment August 2014 On August 19, 2014, the Department issued a Federal Register Notice announcing the availability of a draft of its National Electric Transmission Congestion Study for public comment. The draft study is available below for review and downloading. The public comment period closed on October 20, 2014. Comments have been posted online.

  18. .Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association's Comments on DOE's Regulatory Burden

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    RFI | Department of Energy .Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association's Comments on DOE's Regulatory Burden RFI .Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association's Comments on DOE's Regulatory Burden RFI Comments from Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association on DOE's Regulatory Burden RFI PDF icon .Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association's Comments on DOE's Regulatory Burden RFI More Documents & Publications HPBA Comments NOPR on Energy Conservation Standards for Direct Heating Equipment

  19. AHAM Comments Regulatory Burden RFI | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Comments Regulatory Burden RFI AHAM Comments Regulatory Burden RFI The Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM) respectfully submits the following comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) on its Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 47328 (Aug. 8, 2012). PDF icon AHAM Comments_DOE Reg Review Sept 2012_FINAL.pdf More Documents & Publications Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 28518 (May 15, 2012) Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers Comment AHAM Retrospective Preliminary

  20. Dockets Open for Public Comment | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Dockets Open for Public Comment Dockets Open for Public Comment Below is a list of the dockets that are currently open for public comment. The PDF files below contain more information on how to submit your comments. No Dockets Opened for Public Comment: More Documents & Publications Federal Register Notice for Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Perspective on Exporting Liquefied Natural Gas from the United States EIS-0520: Notice of Intent EIS-0519: Notice of Intent

  1. Attachment_5_Dana_Ward_Public_Comment.pdf

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

  2. Microsoft Word - CLWR Draft SEIS Comment

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Draft Suppl emen tal Envi ron mental I mpa ct Statemen t for the Production of Tritium in a Commercial Light Water Reactor U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Written Comment Form Must be received on or before September 22, 2014. Please use other side if more space is needed. Comment forms may be mailed to: Comment forms may be sent by electronic mail to: Mr. Curtis Chambellan tritium.readiness.seis@doeal.gov CLWR SEIS Document Manager U.S. DOE/NNSA Box 5400

  3. Comments from the City of Alexandria in Support of the Comments from the

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Virginia Department of Environmental Quality on PEPCO's Intention to Commence Planned Transmission Outages | Department of Energy from the City of Alexandria in Support of the Comments from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality on PEPCO's Intention to Commence Planned Transmission Outages Comments from the City of Alexandria in Support of the Comments from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality on PEPCO's Intention to Commence Planned Transmission Outages Docket No.

  4. From: Diana Rivera To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: Comments of Clean Line Energy on Draft Congestion Study

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Diana Rivera To: Congestion Study Comments Subject: Comments of Clean Line Energy on Draft Congestion Study Date: Monday, October 20, 2014 3:54:46 PM Attachments: image002.png Clean Line Comments to DOE 2014 Draft Congestion Study.pdf Hello, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the draft congestion study. Please see the attached comments from Clean Line Energy Partners. We would be happy to answer any questions or provide additional information. Best regards, Diana Diana Rivera CLEAN LINE

  5. Question/comment: An estimate of the direct productive labor hours (DPLH) per l

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Question/comment: An estimate of the direct productive labor hours (DPLH) per labor category is not provided in the Request for Proposal for DE-SOL-0005388. Will the Government provide such information so that Offerors may develop a responsive proposal? Response: Historical data reflecting full time equivalent (FTE) support personnel by labor category is provided in Section J.9, Attachment D of the RFP in the table titled Position Qualifications. Each Offeror is expected to propose the labor

  6. Comments from the City of Alexandria in Support of the Comments...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    of the comments from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality on PEPCO's intention to commence planned transmission outages of the 230kV transmission lines that serve...

  7. COMMENTS

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ... system to maintain the physical assets in a condition suitable for their intended use, * The preventive, predictive, and corrective maintenance to ensure physical asset ...

  8. COMMENTS

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    -1 CHAPTER 11 REAL PROPERTY, PERSONAL PROPERTY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT WHAT ARE THE BASIC PRINCIPLES AND OBJECTIVES OF PROPERTY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT? WHY IS REAL PROPERTY, PERSONAL PROPERTY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT IMPORTANT? The Government has a significant investment in both real and personal property. The proper management of both real and personal property help to conserve costly Government resources. Proper transportation management helps to ensure that supplies and

  9. COMMENTS

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    B-1 APPENDIX B RELATED INTERNET WEB SITES WHERE CAN I ACCESS ELECTRONIC COPIES OF REFERENCES LISTED IN THIS REFERENCE BOOK? http://www.cfo.doe.gov/policy/actindex/index.html-ssi DOE Accounting Handbook http://www.pr.doe.gov/acqguide.html DOE Acquisition Guide http://www.pr.doe.gov//acqltr.html DOE Acquisition Letters http://www.pr.doe.gov/dear.html DOE Acquisition Regulation (DEAR) http://www.cfo.doe.gov/progliaison/bmop/index.htm DOE Business Management Oversight Process Web Page

  10. COMMENTS

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    -1 CHAPTER 11 REAL PROPERTY, PERSONAL PROPERTY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT WHAT ARE THE BASIC PRINCIPLES AND OBJECTIVES OF PROPERTY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT? WHY IS REAL PROPERTY, PERSONAL PROPERTY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT IMPORTANT? The Government has a significant investment in both real and personal property. The proper management of both real and personal property help to conserve costly Government resources. Proper transportation management helps to ensure that supplies and

  11. COMMENTS

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    4 SECURITY (RESERVED)

  12. COMMENTS

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    ... agency ethics official for ethics advise on specific conduct ... * Delays in the contract work are minimized; and * ... of members of the contract administration team. ...

  13. QER- Comment of Cloud Peak Energy Inc

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dear Ms Pickett Please find attached comments from Cloud Peak Energy as input to the Department of Energy’s Quadrennial Energy Review. If possible I would appreciate a confirmation that this email has been received Thank you.

  14. QER- Comment of Marcellus Shale Coalition

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Attached please find the Marcellus Shale Coalitions comments with regard to the U.S. Department of Energys Quadrennial Energy Review Task Force Hearing - Natural Gas Transmission, Storage and Distribution. Thank you

  15. QER- Comment of National Propane Gas Association

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Ladies and Gentlemen: Please find attached the QER comments of the National Propane Gas Association. Please feel to contact us if we can provide further information. Thank you for your attention to our submission.

  16. QER- Comment of ND Ethanol Council

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    To whom it may concern, Attached please find comments from the North Dakota Ethanol Council regarding infrastructure constraints in preparation for the OER Public Meeting, which will be held in Bismarck, N.D., on August 8. Sincerely, Deana Wies

  17. QER- Comment of ALLETE Clean Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Please accept the attached comments for docketing. These are submitted on behalf of ALLETE Clean Energy. If you have any questions or need anything further, please do not hesitate to contact me. Many thanks,

  18. QER- Comment of Skibo Systems LLC

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Paul M. Klemencic, Skibo Systems LLC: Comments regarding the current state of all major energy markets, addressing customer costs and needs, infrastructure, market controls and optimization, and build out of green energy sources.

  19. MHI Comments to DOE-Regulatory Review

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    On behalf of the Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI) I am pleased to respond to the Department of Energys (DOEs) May 15, 2012 request for comments and information regarding regulations that...

  20. QER- Comment of Husch Blackwell LLP

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Good afternoon, Today, WIRES (www.wiresgroup.com) is submitting the attached communication to the United States Secretary of Energy pertaining to the Quadrennial Energy Review. Your comments are welcome and can be sent to me.

  1. Energy Citations Database (ECD) - Alerts Comments

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Alerts Comments If you have a question about Energy Citations Database Alerts, we recommend you check frequently asked questions. If your question still has not been answered or if...

  2. Community Relations-Written Public Comments and Corresponding Responses to Comments

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

  3. QER- Comment of Sempra Energy 2

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Sempra Energy, on behalf of its subsidiaries, San Diego Gas and Electric Company (SDG&E), Southern California Gas Company, (SoCalGas) and Sempra U.S. Gas & Power1, respectfully submit the attached comments to the Department of Energy. The attached document provides Sempra Energy’s comments regarding the U.S. Department of Energy’s Quadrennial Energy review meeting on natural gas transmission, storage and distribution.

  4. QER- Comment of Quebec Government Office

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hello, I am pleased to forward the attached QER comments on behalf of Québec’s Delegate General in New York. These comments from the Government of Québec relate to Part II of the New England Regional Infrastructure Constraints Public Meeting on April 21st, 2014. Thank you for allowing the Government of Québec to participate in this important initiative. Please do not hesitate to reach out should you have further questions. Best regards, Tim

  5. QER- Comment of Sempra Energy 1

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Sempra Energy, on behalf of its subsidiaries, San Diego Gas and Electric Company (SDG&E), Southern California Gas Company, (SoCalGas) and Sempra U.S. Gas & Power, respectfully submit the attached comments to the Department of Energy. The attached document provides Sempra Energy’s comments regarding the U.S. Department of Energy’s Quadrennial Energy review meeting on electricity transportation, distribution and storage in the west.

  6. Comments of Qualcomm Incorporated | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Qualcomm Incorporated Comments of Qualcomm Incorporated Qualcomm is pleased to provide these detailed comments to the Department of Energy ("DOE" or "Department") on how current and future wireless broadband communications capabilities can support the energy management needs of electric utilities, businesses, and consumers, which include requirements for the evolving and growing Smart Grid. The DOE should be applauded for timely following-up on the recommendations in the

  7. Comment On: DOE-HQ-2011-0014-0001 Reducing Regulatory Burden | Department

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    of Energy Comments on reducing regulatory burden

  8. BPA, Response to public comment on 2012 Oversupply Management...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    only Renewable Energy Credits, Production Tax Credits, and contract costs caused by the failure to generate. We understand that there may be other costs associated with reducing...

  9. Microsoft Word - 2013 Public Comment Responses Final.docx

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    NEPA analyses. See, for example, Whistling Ridge Environmental Impact Statement, (August 2011) and Record of Decision for the Electrical Interconnection of the...

  10. 20120328 WEST Comments on RRTT RFI Response Request

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    March 2 8, 2 012 Mr. L amont J ackson Office o f E lectricity D elivery a nd E nergy R eliability ( OE---20) U.S. D epartment o f E nergy 1000 I ndependence A venue, S W...

  11. 20120328 WEST Comments on RRTT RFI Response Request

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    March 2 8, 2 012 Mr. L amont J ackson Office o f E lectricity D elivery a nd E nergy R eliability ( OE---20) U.S. D epartment o f E nergy 1000 I ndependence A venue, S W Washington, D C 2 0585 Submitted e lectronically v ia d ocket ( Document I D D OE_FRDOC_0001---1840) a nd e mail t o: Lamont.Jackson@hq.doe.gov Re: Department o f E nergy --- R apid R esponse T eam f or T ransmission R equest for I nformation, R RTT---IR---01, 7 7 F ed. R eg. 1 1517 ( Feb. 2 7, 2 012) 1 Dear M r. J ackson: I.

  12. Oct_2015_IM_Response_to_Public_Comments.xlsx

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    e nrollment a nd p rior t o a ny S EM a ctivity, u tilities w ill r eceive a " user n ame" a nd "password" t o a ccess t he s ecure o nline E SI S ecure F ile S hare (...

  13. Central Plateau Cleanup Final Comments and Responses Document...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    ... It has always been the intent of the Parties to status the Tribal Governments on the ... 8 of the Action Plan, Facility Decommissioning Process (now Facility Disposition Process). ...

  14. Response from PEPCO to the Comments from the Virginia Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    More Documents & Publications Re: Potomac River Generating Station Department of Energy Case ... Extension of Order No. 202-05-3 of the District of Columbia Public Service Commission

  15. COMMENTS OF THE WESTERN PUBLIC AGENCIES GROUP IN RESPONSE TO...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Association, Tanner Electric Cooperative, the Cities of Port Angeles, Ellensburg and Milton, Washington, the Towns of Eatonville and Steilacoom, Washington; Alder Mutual Light...

  16. QER - Comment of the New England Local Distribution Companies, submitted by

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Schiff Hardin LLP | Department of Energy Davis, Noy S. [NDavis@schiffhardin.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 5:22 PM To: QERcomments Subject: Comments on New England Regional Infrastructure Constraints Attachment: Comments of New England LDCs with cover letter 18 June 2014.PDF Please see attached. Noy S. Davis Attorney Schiff Hardin, LLC 901 K Street NW Suite 700 Washington, DC 20001 www.schiffhardin.com t 202.778.6412 f 202.778.6460 e ndavis@schiffhardin.com

  17. Submit a Public Comment on The Atmosphere to Electrons (A2e) External Merit

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Review Meeting Summary | Department of Energy Submit a Public Comment on The Atmosphere to Electrons (A2e) External Merit Review Meeting Summary Submit a Public Comment on The Atmosphere to Electrons (A2e) External Merit Review Meeting Summary March 5, 2014 - 9:01am Addthis The Atmosphere to Electrons (A2e) Initiative within the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy is a multi-year DOE research initiative targeting significant reductions in the

  18. AT&T, Inc.'s Reply Comments | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    AT&T, Inc.'s Reply Comments AT&T, Inc.'s Reply Comments Attachment to NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Reply Comments of AT&T Inc. PDF icon AT&T, Inc.'s Reply Comments More Documents & Publications Comments of Utilities Telecom Council NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Avista Corporation Future Communications Needs

  19. ARM - Field Campaign - CLEX-5 Campaign

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    govCampaignsCLEX-5 Campaign Comments? We would love to hear from you Send us a note below or call us at 1-888-ARM-DATA. Send Campaign : CLEX-5 Campaign 1999.11.01 - 1999.11.30...

  20. QER- Comment of James Bennett

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hello, The notice for the April 21 meeting was too short. The April 15 letter just found its way to me. I hope that there will be more such focused meetings in the not too distant future. If possible, please add me to your notification email list for such meetings. Comments: There is increasing conern over the routing and purpose of additional Natural Gas Pipelines in Massachusetts. There is skepticism that the pipelines will be used for export and that the any improvement in the Energy supply for New England will be shortlived due to a rapid depletion of reserves. In other words, why tear up the landscape with little benefit to the region. If the pipelines are contructed, can a restraint be placed on them to prevent export? Have the impacts of leaks and fires been properly considered? New England has heavily forrested areas and we have been having more frequent exteremly dry summers. At least one pipeline route has been suggested that would run through large wooded areas. A pipeline initiated fire would be devestating. Sincerely, Jim Bennett

  1. QER- Comment of Philip Saunders

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dear Sir/Madam: Please oppose the Northeast Expansion of the Tennessee Gas Pipeline. For reasons having to do with climate change, which I don't need to explain to you, it is not in our interest to be enabling further carbon combustion here or anywhere else in the world. Natural gas is not needed in Mass. as a "bridge" fuel. Mass. is making good progress toward lowering CO2 emissions, and with continued declines in the cost of photovoltaic installations, changes in net meter regulations, and expansion of offshore wind power, Mass. can produce enough renewable energy to replace the electric power lost from the closure of coal-fired plants. To the extent that gas through the proposed pipeline will be exported, I see no reason for Mass. to bear the burden of providing natural gas to China and others. The pipeline would inevitably go through wetlands, conservation land, land trust land, and agriculturally restricted land, which owners, donors, and taxpayers have gone to great lengths and expense over the generations to protect. All of this would be undone and wasted, merely so Kinder Morgan could increase its bottom line. We'd be paying the price and they would be reaping the profit. Federal approvals for the project should be withheld. Thank you for allowing me to comment. Very truly yours, Philip Saunders, Jr., Ph.D. ___________________________ PHILIP SAUNDERS ASSOCIATES Economic and Financial Analysis

  2. QER- Comment of Laurel Greenberg

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    To the Energy Review Task Force, I am a resident of Boston and also have property in Cummington, Mass. I am commenting specifically on a proposed gas pipeline by Kinder Morgan through the state of Massachusetts, but also generically on energy policy in New England. I am against building another gas pipeline in Massachusetts. The environmental and ecological risk of running a high pressure gas pipeline through conservation land, pristine nature, important water reservoirs, and residents farms and properties is great, and not where we as stewards of the earth should be putting our efforts. We should heed the findings that climate change is upon us and to the recommendations that we must curtail global warming emissions (like methane) and promote and support renewable energy. We should pay attention to recent independent findings that hydraulic fracturing has serious environmental problems, contributes to global warming, is harming water supplies, causes earthquakes, and is not a safe, secure, renewable method of obtaining energy. In summary, as leaders in environmental policy, we in New England should not be encouraging the production of fracked gas by building a conduit for that gas through our states. Laurel Greenberg

  3. QER- Comment of Debra Walworth

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    To Whom It May Concern: I want to state upfront that my name is the only thing I want disclosed in my comments--please do not disclose my address or any other personal contact information to the extent to the law. I attended the QER in North Dakota, and want to thank the entire delegation for coming to North Dakota. I found it very interesting and informative. I would like to support the basic idea of a complete energy package that includes oil, coal, wind, solar and bio-fuels. I understand that coal and oil are under a lot of scrutiny for environmental affects. However, we (as a country) are not in a position to stop the use of any of our energy resources. At this point in time, to do so, in my opinion, would be harmful to our country's national security. I feel the dramatic mandates being placed on coal to make other energy resources competitive, is counter-intuitive to national security and future development of alternative energy resources. North Dakota has lead the nation in environmental strategies for clean air, clean water, and clean environment. We also produce a lot of energy from coal. I think the national energy policy should take common sense steps towards the national energy policy that includes all energy resources, instead of knee-jerk reactions from misunderstood and lop-sided actions. Thank you for the opportunity to provide input on this very important topic. Sincerely, Debra Walworth

  4. Ambient Corporation's response to NBP RFI: Communications Requirements |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy Ambient Corporation's response to NBP RFI: Communications Requirements Ambient Corporation's response to NBP RFI: Communications Requirements Ambient Corporation's comments on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy PDF icon Ambient Corporation's response to NBP RFI: Communications Requirements More Documents & Publications Communications Requirements of Smart Grid

  5. Comments of the District of Columbia Public Service Commission...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Comments of the District of Columbia Public Service Commission Comments of the District of Columbia Public Service Commission Docket No. EO-05-01: Pursuant to Order No. 202-06-1,...

  6. H-Prize Draft Guideline Comments Deadline Extended to Monday...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    H-Prize Draft Guideline Comments Deadline Extended to Monday, April 28 H-Prize Draft Guideline Comments Deadline Extended to Monday, April 28 April 22, 2014 - 2:00pm Addthis The...

  7. PUBLIC COMMENT ON FEDERAL REGISTER - DOE IS BUSH CHENEY SCUM...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    PUBLIC COMMENT ON FEDERAL REGISTER - DOE IS BUSH CHENEY SCUM COUNTRY THESE DAYS - WE NEED ... PUBLIC COMMENT ON FEDERAL REGISTER - DOE IS BUSH CHENEY SCUM COUNTRY THESE DAYS - WE NEED ...

  8. Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers Comment | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Burden RFI_July 2015_FINAL (00039560) More Documents & Publications Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers Comment AHAM Comments Regulatory Burden RFI Regulatory Burden RFI, 77 Fed. Reg. 28518 (May 15, 2012)

  9. Power North America RFI Comments | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    North America RFI Comments Power North America RFI Comments Power North America RFI Comments: Under most regulatory rules and policies in the U.S., utilities are incentivized to making the lowest cost investment which yields the highest return in the case of shareowner companies, the least immediate rate impacts for municipal utilities and the longest potential payback for rural electric coops. PDF icon Power North America RFI Comments More Documents & Publications Browning: Email in

  10. Public Comments Submitted by E-mail | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Public Comments Submitted by E-mail Public Comments Submitted by E-mail In order to gather information and recommendations for the Quadrennial Energy Review, EPSA solicited comments from stakeholders and the general public. The public comments are located on this page and can be sorted by heading, searched by topic using the tags below, or by entering search terms in the search field. Tags EPSA QER Downloads Page Title Name of Organization Name of Submitter Tags

  11. Reducing Regulatory Burden EO 13563 Third RFI Comment Extension |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy RFI Comment Extension Reducing Regulatory Burden EO 13563 Third RFI Comment Extension This notice announces that the period for submitting comments on the Department of Energy's (DOE) request for information (RFI) issued as part of its implementation of Executive Order 13563, ''Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' is extended to June 19, 2012. PDF icon ReducRegBurden_EO_13563_Third_RFI_Comt_ Ext.pdf More Documents & Publications Fourth RFI Comment on

  12. Hanford Advisory Board Guidelines for Public Comment at Board Meetings

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Guidelines for Public Comment at Board Meetings Welcome to this Hanford Advisory Board meeting. The Board appreciates this opportunity to hear your views and comments on Hanford cleanup activities. Your comments will be summarized in the Board meeting minutes. Board meetings are also routinely audio-recorded. If you wish, you may at any time provide written comments to the Board at: Hanford Advisory Board c/o EnviroIssues Hanford Project Office 713 Jadwin #3 Richland, Washington 99352

  13. QER- Comment of Office of Franklin County Commissioner Paula Brooks

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Please see the attached comments from Franklin County, Ohio Commissioner Paula Brooks on the Quadrennial Energy Review.

  14. Draft Powerpoint: Toward Energy Efficient Municipalities, LLC comment |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy Powerpoint: Toward Energy Efficient Municipalities, LLC comment Draft Powerpoint: Toward Energy Efficient Municipalities, LLC comment Green Grid Gateway @ North Coast Oregon. America's First Smart Grid R&D Testing Business Campus PDF icon Draft Powerpoint: Toward Energy Efficient Municipalities, LLC comment More Documents & Publications Toward Energy Efficient Municipalities: General Comments on Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation Smart

  15. WIPP RCRA Documents - Class 2 Mods for comment

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    RCRA Public Comments Menu Public Invited to Comment on Permit Modifications The public is invited to comment on the following proposed modifications to the Hazardous Waste Facility Permit for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Comments should be directed via e-mail to Ricardo.Maestas@state.nm.us or by regular mail to: Mr. Ricardo Maestas New Mexico Environment Department Hazardous Waste Bureau 2905 Rodeo Park Drive, Building E Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505 Temporary Authorization Requests: Temporary

  16. Uranium Leasing Program Draft Programmatic EIS Issued for Public Comment |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy Uranium Leasing Program Draft Programmatic EIS Issued for Public Comment Uranium Leasing Program Draft Programmatic EIS Issued for Public Comment March 15, 2013 - 11:08am Addthis Uranium Leasing Program Draft Programmatic EIS Issued for Public Comment DOE has issued the Draft Uranium Leasing Program Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (ULP PEIS)(DOE/EIS-0472D) for public review and comment. The document is available here and on the ULP PEIS website. Under the

  17. QER- Comment of Association of Oil Pipe Lines

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Please find attached AOPL's comments to DOE's safety discussion in preparation for the New Orleans, LA public meeting. Thanks, John

  18. Silver Spring Networks comments on DOE NBP RFI: Comms Requirements |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy Comms Requirements Silver Spring Networks comments on DOE NBP RFI: Comms Requirements Comments of Silver Spring Networks on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy PDF icon Silver Spring Networks comments on DOE NBP RFI: Comms Requirements More Documents & Publications Silver Spring Networks comments on DOE NBP RFI: Data Access NBP RFI: Communications Requirements-

  19. Reply Comments of Motorola, Inc. | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Motorola, Inc. Reply Comments of Motorola, Inc. Reply comments from Motorola, Inc. on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy PDF icon Reply Comments of Motorola, Inc. More Documents & Publications Comments of Motorola, Inc. Re: DOE Request for Information - Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart

  20. Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers Comments on Smart Grid RFI |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers Comments on Smart Grid RFI Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers Comments on Smart Grid RFI Comments made on behalf of the Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM), on the Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges, 75 Fed. Reg. 57,006 (Sept. 17, 2010). PDF icon Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy And Logistical Challenges. November 1, 2010 More Documents & Publications Comments of DRSG to DOE

  1. QER - Comment of Energy Storage Association | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Storage Association QER - Comment of Energy Storage Association From: Katherine Hamilton [katherine@38northsolutions.com] on behalf of Katherine Hamilton [k.hamilton@energystorage.org] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 4:37 PM To: QERcomments Subject: Comments from Energy Storage Association Attachment: ESA QER Comments10 10 14FINAL.pdf; ATT00001.htm Attached please find comments from the Energy Storage Association on the Department of Energy's Quadrennial Energy Review. Thank you for the

  2. From: Cutting, John To: Congestion Study Comments; Meyer, David

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Cutting, John To: Congestion Study Comments; Meyer, David Cc: Buechler, John; Duffy, Timothy; Patka, Carl; Regulatory Affairs Subject: NYISO comments re: draft National Electric Transmission Congestion Study Date: Monday, October 20, 2014 12:29:46 PM Attachments: 20141020_NYISO_Comments_DOE_Congestion_Study.pdf Please find attached above the comments of the New York Independent System Operator, Inc. regarding the draft National Electric Transmission Congestion Study. John C. Cutting Regulatory

  3. From: Henderson, Michael To: Congestion Study Comments; Meyer, David

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Henderson, Michael To: Congestion Study Comments; Meyer, David Cc: Doe, Stanley; Kowalski, Richard; Paradise, Theodore Subject: DOE Congestion Study Date: Monday, October 20, 2014 10:12:20 AM Attachments: image001.png ISO New England is pleased to provide comments on the public draft of the DOE Congestion Study. The ISO appreciates DOE's consideration of several specific comments shown in red below. Comments: Figure ES-2: It is possible to identify the consistent impacts of a few specific

  4. From: Tunnell, Andrew To: Congestion Study Comments Subject:

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Southern Companies" Comments to Draft National Electric Transmission Congestion Study Date: Monday, October 20, 2014 3:17:22 PM Attachments: balch_logof0638c DOE Congestion Comments.pdf In accordance with the Department of Energy's instructions provided at: http://www.energy.gov/oe/downloads/national-congestion-study-notice-public-comment-federal- register-notice-volume-79-no, find attached Southern Companies' comments regarding the draft Transmission National Electric Congestion Study that

  5. Request for Public and Agency Comments on a Floodplain Assessment |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Department of Energy Request for Public and Agency Comments on a Floodplain Assessment Request for Public and Agency Comments on a Floodplain Assessment Request for Public and Agency Comments on a Floodplain Assessment for Installation of a Renewable Energy Anaerobic Digester Facility at the University of California, Davis in Yolo County, California. PDF icon Request for Public and Agency Comments More Documents & Publications Floodplain Assessment and Statement of Findings Floodplain

  6. How to Participate or Comment | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Appliance & Equipment Standards » Rulemakings & Notices » How to Participate or Comment How to Participate or Comment The Department of Energy (DOE) encourages stakeholders and the general public to participate in its rulemakings. You can participate in rulemakings by: Viewing Federal Register notices, supporting documents, and public comments in the rulemaking docket found on Regulations.gov By submitting comments to the docket By attending public meetings or participating in webinars

  7. Comments of Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC Comments of Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC Comments of Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy PDF icon Comments of Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC More Documents & Publications Current Communications Needs Future Communications Needs NBP RFI: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy- Comments of Oncor

  8. Comments of Steele-Waseca Cooperative Electric | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Steele-Waseca Cooperative Electric Comments of Steele-Waseca Cooperative Electric Comments of Steele-Waseca Cooperative Electric onImplementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy PDF icon Comments of Steele-Waseca Cooperative Electric More Documents & Publications NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Great River Energy Communications Requirements of Smart Grid Technologies NBP RFI:

  9. Comments of the Lower Colorado River Authority | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Lower Colorado River Authority Comments of the Lower Colorado River Authority Comments of the Lower Colorado River Authority on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy PDF icon Comments of the Lower Colorado River Authority More Documents & Publications Lower Colorado River Authority Lower Colorado River Authority NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Meeker Cooperative Light

  10. DOE Comments - Radiation Protection (Atomic Energy Act) | Department of

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Energy - Radiation Protection (Atomic Energy Act) DOE Comments - Radiation Protection (Atomic Energy Act) PDF icon 1. United States Department of Energy Comments on "Application of Protective Action Guides (PAGs) for Radiological Dispersal Devices (RDD) and Improvised Nuclear Device (IND) Incidents"; Notice (71 FR 174; January 3, 2006) PDF icon 2. Department of Energy Comments on NCRP SC 64-23 Draft Report PDF icon 3. DOE Comments on: "Uniform Federal Policy for Quality

  11. NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Baltimore Gas & Electric

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Company | Department of Energy Baltimore Gas & Electric Company NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Baltimore Gas & Electric Company Comments of Baltimore Gas & Electric Company on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy PDF icon NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Baltimore Gas & Electric Company More Documents & Publications Comments of

  12. NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Tacoma Public |

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Department of Energy Tacoma Public NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Tacoma Public Comments of Tacoma Public on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy PDF icon NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Tacoma Public More Documents & Publications Comments of Utilities Telecom Council Communications Requirements of Smart Grid Technologies NBP RFI: Communications

  13. EIS-0489: Notice of Comment Period Extension and Additional Scoping

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Meetings | Department of Energy Comment Period Extension and Additional Scoping Meetings EIS-0489: Notice of Comment Period Extension and Additional Scoping Meetings Jordan Cove Liquefaction Project (Coos County, OR) and Pacific Connector Pipeline Project (Coos, Klamath, Jackson, and Douglas Counties, OR) FERC announces the extension of the public comment periond and additional scoping meetings. The comment period has been extended from September 4, 2012 to October 29, 2012. For more

  14. A.O. Smith Corporation Response to Preliminary Plan for Retrospective

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Analysis of | Department of Energy A.O. Smith Corporation Response to Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of A.O. Smith Corporation Response to Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of A.O. Smith Corporation is the largest manufacturer of residential and commercial water heating equipment in the United States. We have the ollowing comments in response to the July 11, 2011, Notice of Availability in the Federal Register, in which DOE sought comments regarding its EO 13563

  15. NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Lake Region Electric

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Cooperative- Minnesota | Department of Energy Lake Region Electric Cooperative- Minnesota NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Lake Region Electric Cooperative- Minnesota Comments of Lake Region Electric Cooperative- Minnesota on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy PDF icon NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Lake Region Electric Cooperative- Minnesota More

  16. Exelon response | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Exelon response Exelon response This letter constitutes the response of Exelon Generation Company, LLC and its operating unit, Exelon Nuclear Partners, to the Department of Energy's request for comments and information (July 27, 2010 at 75 Fed. Reg. 43945) to assist in DOE's development of regulations pertaining to Section 934 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, 42 U.S.C. § 17373. PDF icon Section_934_of_the_Energy_Independence_and_Security_Act_of_2007.PDF More Documents &

  17. QER- Comment of America's Wetland Foundation

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Thank you for the opportunity to make oral remarks on behalf of the America¹s WETLAND Foundation in New Orleans on May 27, 2014 during the public comment period at the meeting held by the U.S. Department of Energy as the Secretariat for the Quadrennial Energy Review (QER). In follow up, attached is a summation of those comments, along with three reports released by the Foundation for your review that will provide information helpful to the committee. Please do not hesitate to contact me if there are questions or if more information is desired, Sidney Coffee

  18. Comments from the Sierra Club on the Department of Energy Emergency Order

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    to Resume Limited Operation at the Potomac River Generating Station in Alexandria, VA | Department of Energy from the Sierra Club on the Department of Energy Emergency Order to Resume Limited Operation at the Potomac River Generating Station in Alexandria, VA Comments from the Sierra Club on the Department of Energy Emergency Order to Resume Limited Operation at the Potomac River Generating Station in Alexandria, VA Docket No. EO-05-01: This letter is in response to the Department of Energy

  19. Comments on Emergency Order to Resume Limited Operation at the Potomac

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    River Generating Station, Alexandria, VA from the Chesapeake Climate Action Network. | Department of Energy on Emergency Order to Resume Limited Operation at the Potomac River Generating Station, Alexandria, VA from the Chesapeake Climate Action Network. Comments on Emergency Order to Resume Limited Operation at the Potomac River Generating Station, Alexandria, VA from the Chesapeake Climate Action Network. Docket No. EO-05-01: This letter is in response to the Department of Energy Emergency

  20. Microsoft Word - Comments on Alexandria Mirant Plant-DOE order to re-open-final.doc

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    P.O. Box 11138 Takoma Park, MD 20912 (301) 891-6726 info@chesapeakeclimate.org March 22, 2006 Mr. Lawrence Mansueti Permitting, Siting, and Analysis Division Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585-0119 Re: Comments on Emergency Order to Resume Limited Operation at the Potomac River Generating Station, Alexandria, VA. Dear Mr. Mansueti, This letter is in response to the Department of Energy Emergency Order

  1. Microsoft Word - DOE Smart Grid RFI_APGA Comments 110110.doc

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Room 8H033 Washington, D.C. 20585 RE: Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation, 75 Fed. Reg. 57,006 (September 17, 2010). Ladies and Gentlemen: The American Public Gas Association (APGA) is pleased to submit for your consideration the following comments in response to the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy

  2. Microsoft Word - DRAFT-0010.1 - Ingersoll Rand comment.docx

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Ingersoll Rand Comments Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges Definition and Scope The deployment of technology to make the nation's electric grid a more interactive, efficient and responsive system is already underway. At the early stages of any major technological shift, stakeholders often use the same term-of-art to mean different things which can lead to miscommunication. To minimize confusion as we identify policy challenges and recommendations, this RFI uses the broad

  3. Microsoft Word - IIP Request for Information FINAL EEI Comments.docx

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    October 31, 2013 Ms. Julie A. Smith Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE-20) U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Submitted electronically via email to: juliea.smith@hq.doe.gov Re: Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects, Request for Information, 78 Fed. Reg. 53436 (Aug. 29, 2013) Dear Ms. Smith: The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is pleased to provide these comments in response to the

  4. Microsoft Word - NAESCO Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden RFI, Final.doc

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    ________________________________________________________ 1615 M Street, NW, Suite 800 Tel 202/822-0950 Washington, DC 20036 Fax 202/822-0955 http://www.naesco.org May 29, 2012 U.S. Department of Energy Office of the General Counsel 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Room 6A245 Washington, DC 20585 Re: Regulatory Burden RFI Dear Sir or Madam: The National Association of Energy Service Companies (NAESCO) appreciates the opportunity to submit these comments in response to the Request for Information

  5. Pepco and PJM Interconnection Comments on District of Columbia Public

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Service Commission, Docket No. EO-05-01 Comments and Answer to Requests for Rehearing | Department of Energy Pepco and PJM Interconnection Comments on District of Columbia Public Service Commission, Docket No. EO-05-01 Comments and Answer to Requests for Rehearing Pepco and PJM Interconnection Comments on District of Columbia Public Service Commission, Docket No. EO-05-01 Comments and Answer to Requests for Rehearing Docket No. EO-05-01: In accordance with Order No. 202-06-1, issued by the

  6. QER - Comment of Honda Motor Co., Inc. | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Honda Motor Co., Inc. QER - Comment of Honda Motor Co., Inc. From: Edward_Cohen@hna.honda.com Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 12:42 PM To: QERcomments Subject: Quadrennial Energy Review : Comment on the Public Meeting _&Enhancing Infrastructure Resiliency,_8 Held April 11, 2014, Washington, D.C. filed by American Honda Motor Co., Inc. Attachment: QER Comments 6.10.2014.pdf Attached please find comments for the record for the Quadrennial Energy Review : Comment on the Public Meeting

  7. QER- Comment of Don Ogden

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    To the Quadrennial Energy Review Task Force and Energy Policy Systems Analysis Staff: We are unable to attend today's public meeting in Hartford, CT. With only four working days advanced notice of this event we find it difficult to believe that any real effort has been made on your part to reach out to the public for their input. Be that as it may, we want to take this opportunity to comment on the very subject of this meeting. The only true energy related "Infrastructure constraints" we are aware of here in New England are those experienced by corporate entities who seek to export our precious resources to other nations for profit. This, of course, is not at all in the public's interest. Certainly you recall all the efforts our goverment put into establishing "Energy Independence"? That phrase has, and continues to be the watchword heard throughout our nation. Why now, when so-called "Energy Independence" has yet to be established, would we choose to enable private corporations to export gas and oil to other countries at our expense? Further, why is it that corporations and their supporters in government are not actively seeking to repair the massive and dangerous leaks in our existing pipelines? How can corporations and government agencies who reportedly oversee energy corporations even consider building new pipelines when the existing ones are in so need of repair? With this in mind, the only "constraints" we are aware of are the lack of constraints on energy corporations run amok, forever seeking more profits at the expense of the public good. Please recall your mission: "The mission of the Energy Department is to ensure America's security and prosperity by addressing its energy, environmental and nuclear challenges through transformative science and technology solutions." Such security is only possible if we plan ahead for future generations in the midst of the Climate Crisis. Selling off our energy resources to other nations until they are depleted is not in keeping with that mission. Allowing existing energy infrastructure to leak methane and other elements into our compromised atmosphere is not in keeping with that mission. Let's have some of those "transformative solutions", let's put every effort into limiting gas & oil leaks and keeping our energy resources here at home. Don Ogden, producer/co-host The Enviro Show WXOJ-LP & WMCB

  8. QER- Comment of Portland General Electric

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Thanks, Karen. As per our email exchange earlier this week, we're attaching prepared comments from PGE to support the statement Jim Piro offered at the QER public meeting in Portland this past summer. We appreciate your flexibility on the submission deadline! Please let me know if you need anything else from us.

  9. QER- Comment of Stephen Arthur 2

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    I was simply curious about the preliminary reports about the final meeting of the QER. I know the deadline for public comments is quickly approaching and was wondering if the last meeting in New York, Iowa, and final meeting in Washington D.C. were still going to occur? Thank you. Sincerely, Stephen Arthur

  10. QER- Comment of Western Environmental Law Center

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    To whom it may concern, I provided the following comments at the public meeting in Santa Fe, NM on 8/11/14: My name is Thomas Singer, and I am a Senior Policy Advisor at the Western Environmental Law Center.

  11. QER- Comment of Allen Young 2

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Here is a comment from me on the issue of energy infrastructure in Massachusetts. I will address only one issue: the proposed Kinder Morgan pipelines from Albany to Dracut. I am absolutely opposed to the construction of this pipeline and here are my reasons

  12. QER- Comment of ISO New England, Inc.

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Attached please find comments from ISO New England President & CEO Gordon van Welie on the US Department of Energy’s Quadrennial Energy Review. If you are unable to open or access the attached PDF for whatever reason, please contact me at the number below. Thank you,

  13. Photocatalytic hydrogen production using visible-light-responsive Ta{sub 3}N{sub 5} photocatalyst supported on monodisperse spherical SiO{sub 2} particulates

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Liu, Xiaoming; Zhao, Lan; Domen, Kazunari; Takanabe, Kazuhiro

    2014-01-01

    Graphical abstract: A simple and effective solgel process followed by nitridation in an NH{sub 3} flow has been developed to deposit Ta{sub 3}N{sub 5} semiconductor photocatalyst layers onto monodisperse spherical SiO{sub 2} particles. The obtained Ta{sub 3}N{sub 5}/SiO{sub 2} particles maintain an original spherical morphology of SiO{sub 2} and a sub-micrometer size with a narrow size distribution and without aggregation. The presence of SiO{sub 2} support shows at least no detrimental effects on photocatalytic activity, but tunes the secondary particle size to control dispersibility of the photocatalyst in the solution. - Highlights: Fine nanoparticles of Ta{sub 3}N{sub 5} were immobilized on the surfaces of SiO{sub 2} giving SiO{sub 2}@Ta{sub 3}N{sub 5} coreshell spheres successfully produced H{sub 2} from methanol solution under visible light. The presence of support (SiO{sub 2}) ensures the dispersion of the particulate in solution maintaining high photocatalytic activity of Ta{sub 3}N{sub 5}. The obtained supported photocatalyst gives uniform size distribution and control the degree of dispersibility in the solution, which may control nature of light absorption and reflection of the photoreactor. - Abstract: Fine nanoparticles of Ta{sub 3}N{sub 5} (1020 nm) were synthesized on the surfaces of SiO{sub 2} spheres with a diameter of ?550 nm. A solgel method was used to modify the surface of SiO{sub 2} with Ta{sub 2}O{sub 5} from TaCl{sub 5} dissolved in ethanol in the presence of citric acid and polyethylene glycol. The resulting oxide composites were treated in an NH{sub 3} flow at 1123 K to form coreshell structured Ta{sub 3}N{sub 5}/SiO{sub 2} sub-microspheres. The obtained samples were characterized using powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectra (EDX), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and photocatalytic activity measurements for H{sub 2} evolution from an aqueous methanol solution. The XRD results demonstrate the expected sequential formation of Ta{sub 2}O{sub 5} layers, followed by Ta{sub 3}N{sub 5} after nitridation on the Ta{sub 2}O{sub 5}/SiO{sub 2} composite. SEM and TEM observations indicate that the obtained Ta{sub 3}N{sub 5}/SiO{sub 2} sub-microspheres have a uniform size distribution with high crystallinity and an obvious coreshell structure. The presence of support maintained the intrinsic photocatalytic activity of Ta{sub 3}N{sub 5} nanoparticles, but it did drastically improve the dispersion of the photocatalysts in the solution. This study proposes the use of an inert support in photocatalytic reactors to improve ease of handling the powder photocatalyst for gas-phase photocatalysis and the suspension of the solution, controlling nature of light harvesting and degree of scattering of the photoreactor.

  14. RegReview_ReplyComments_Lennox_Hearth_Products.PDF | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    RegReview_ReplyComments_Lennox_Hearth_Products.PDF RegReview_ReplyComments_Lennox_Hearth_Products.PDF PDF icon RegReview_ReplyComments_Lennox_Hearth_Products.PDF More Documents & Publications Re: Regulatory Burden RFI Department of Energy Request for Information: Reducing Regulatory Burden (Reply Comments) .Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association's Comments on DOE's Regulatory Burden RFI

  15. SuppCompensationNuclearDamage_ExtensionComments.PDF | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    SuppCompensationNuclearDamage_ExtensionComments.PDF SuppCompensationNuclearDamage_ExtensionComments.PDF PDF icon SuppCompensationNuclearDamage_ExtensionComments.PDF More Documents & Publications CSC_Extension.PDF Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation Notice of extension of public comment period for reply comments.

  16. Response to Weatherization Questions | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Response to Weatherization Questions Response to Weatherization Questions August 30, 2010 - 4:53pm Addthis Andy Oare Andy Oare Former New Media Strategist, Office of Public Affairs Last week as part of Vice President Biden's announcement of 200,000 homes weatherized under the Recovery act, we asked you to send us your questions and comments about the weatherization process. Today, we're following up with answers experts from the Department's Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program: 1) From

  17. Draft Energy Sector Cybersecurity Framework Implementation Guidance Available for Public Comment

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Department of Energy (DOE) has issued a Notice of Public Comment in the Federal Register, inviting the public to comment on DOE's Energy Sector Cybersecurity Framework Implementation Guidance. The document is available for a 30 day comment period.

  18. QER- Comment of Janice Kurkoski

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Proposal for Conservation Reward Rate for Electricity First of all, thank you for the time you are taking to hear from the public along with the industry and government officials in this critical matter. I attended the public hearing in Hartford CT two days ago and was able to comment on parts of what we are proposing here. We are writing to open a conversation with you about a proposal that we have been discussing in our past meetings. We would like to see you initiate legislation that would mandate a "stepped rate" for electricity, under which consumers who used less would pay a lower rate per kilowatt hour than those who used more. Background North Quabbin Energy is a community group from the nine North Quabbin towns in north central Massachusetts that focuses on education and local action relating to ways to conserve energy and support local and regional enterprises that reduce our dependence on imported resources. The towns are Athol, Orange, Petersham, Royalston, Warwick, Wendell, New Salem, Erving and Phillipston. Our members include representatives from the appointed Energy Committees of these towns. For the past six years, we have participated in many different types of events and activities, always with an emphasis on the idea that the single best way to address the high financial, social, and environmental costs of our current energy use patterns is to consume less energy in the first place. What we have discovered in our community work is that most people seem aware of the reasons for conserving energy (lowering greenhouse gas emissions, saving money, reducing dependence on oil and other imported resources, etc.). Many are also knowledgeable about the basic weatherization and conservation strategies that utilities, municipalities, and community groups like ours try to promote (for example, adding insulation to homes, turning thermostats down, or using fluorescent or LED lighting rather than incandescent bulbs). Yet except when energy prices are extraordinarily high, it appears that there is a great deal of inertia among the general public about actually making changes in their energy consumption patterns. This proposal would address that issue of inertia by creating a direct incentive program for using less electricity. People could very quickly and easily make changes that would lower their electric use, and would see immediate results on their electric bills. Comparable programs Many utilities are beginning to offer peak and off-peak metering as a way to equalize demand on the electric grid, but although this is useful in making people more aware of their energy use patterns, it does nothing to reduce overall demand and may actually encourage more wasteful consumption at off-peak times. A few utilities are starting to offer the kind of stepped rate or rewards program that we are proposing. For example, Western Massachusetts Electric Company recently inaugurated a program that awards "points" (redeemable for consumer items) for the numbers of kilowatt hours saved. In our opinion, this kind of program sends the wrong message because it encourages people to save in one area (electricity use) in order to consume in another. Examples of programs more in line with what we are proposing already exist. One is British Columbia Hydro's "Conservation Rate," started in April 2010. Under their Residential Conservation Rate, customers pay 7.52 cents per kWh for the first 1,350 kWh they use over an average two-month billing period. Above that amount, customers pay 11.27 cents per kWh for the balance of the electricity used during the billing period. In nearby Vermont, the Washington Electric Cooperative has had stepped or tiered rates for years. They reward residential users with a relatively very low rate of 9.43 cents per kWhr for the first 200 kWhrs, and then charge a significantly higher rate of 21.06 cents thereafter. As a result, their customers use on average about 11% less than the households in our area. Points for discussion What might be a reasonable target figure for the stepped rate? The current Massachusetts average is about 610 kWh/month. Members of North Quabbin Energy have demonstrated that it is quite possible to use a half or even a third of that amount without any decline in standard or quality of living1. In fact, this level of reduction is imperative given the seriousness of climate change and resource depletion. How could this change best be promoted to the public? We would argue that this is not a rate increase, but rather a rate redistribution that rewards lower energy consumption. It seems important to emphasize the positive rewards of this kind of change, rather than framing it as a penalty for higher use2. It also seems crucial to demonstrate from the outset that reducing a household's electric use can be done with surprising ease, given a greater awareness of how much energy waste can be avoided with a change in behavior. How could the concerns of low-income customers, those with large families, or those who heat exclusively with electricity be addressed? The BCHydro and Washington Electric Cooperative programs provide useful models for addressing these questions, and there is a great deal of regional data that shows how these consumers would by no means be penalized in the kind of pricing structure we are proposing. What programs could be funded with the increased revenues? Public outrage would be justified if the money went into the general coffers of the utility companies and fossil fuel energy supply and distribution companies. Enhanced conservation programs should be the target of these revenues. Attachments: 1 NQE individual.pdf, 2 NQE proposed incentive rate Note - if attachments do not go through, see this web page for these documents: http://northquabbinenergy.org/wordpress/?page_id=205

  19. QER- Comment of Liberty Goodwin

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    As suggested by Sen. Jack Reed, below and attached are my comments on energy policy for now and the future: ***************************************************************************** AN OUTLINE FOR PRACTICAL & FRUITFUL ENERGY DEVELOPMENT WITH SPECIAL ATTENTION TO SENSIBLE PUBLIC INVESTMENT (Thoughts on intelligent action for energy that is abundant, affordable, associated with many jobs and economic health in New England and the nation) ** CLINGING TO OUTMODED & DESTRUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES – WE DON'T NEED TO ARGUE ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE TO SEE THE WAY FORWARD 1. Fossil fuels and nuclear have clear and present dangers and damaging effects, on human and environmental health. This includes the uncontestable pollution involved in production and use, and the risks of greater disasters, along with concerns about toxic waste that can contaminate our water and more. 2. Renewable sources offer a vast number of possibilities for energy production for a variety of uses. To not explore them is wasteful. To stick to same-old, same-old is foolish, and will leave us at the rear of the pack re: future energy development. **SMALL IS BEAUTIFUL – LESS RISKY – MORE PRODUCTIVE – MORE LOCAL 1 Solyndra is the bad apple that makes the point. Because something costs millions, or even billions of dollars doesn't mean it is the way to achieve huge results. The only thing that is huge about propping up mega-corporations is the risk. 2 Making the money available in far smaller amounts to a variety of solar efforts is both less risky and more promising – gives more chance of positive results. And, to anyone who can do the math – millions of small installations is as productive as one giant. 3 Smaller projects tend to be more labor-intensive – and offer local employment in a bunch of different places, benefiting the economies of all. **BENEFICIAL INNOVATION IS NOT BORN IN A CORPORATE THINK TANK, BUT IN THE MINDS OF INDIVIDUAL GENIUSES. 1. History tells us that great inventions have been developed by unknowns working in garages, bike shops, etc. We need to look beyond the elite in corporate money tanks and prestigious academia to find the gems in our own backyards. 2. One such, Paul Klinkman, has at least 50 inventions on hand, is developing several, has one patent and a few more in process, most related to alternative energy production. 3. The point is that we would find many like him – if we would only look. 4. Also, we should be seeking not just new technologies, but new business models. Check out the example from our greenhouse flyer, below. **SAVVY INVESTORS DON'T PUT THE BULK OF THEIR FORTUNES IN JUST A COUPLE OF STOCKS. THEY SPREAD THE RISK BY DIVERSIFYING. LET US BE LIKEWISE SMART IN USE OF PUBLIC MONEY 1 "Renewable energy" is not just about electricity, or even that and hot water. It is not even just those and wind, and certainly more than "solar panels". 2 We need to explore and use the many different types of alternatives, just as we do in most other aspects of our society. 3 Taking the kind of money that was allocated to Solyndra (or even to 38 Studios here in Rhode Island, and instead investing it in even 10 small projects, is a much wiser choice than betting it on another big boondoggle. **WHAT TO DO? PUT OUR MONEY INTO SUPPORT FOR WIDESPREAD USE OF CURRENT "GREEN" ENERGY TECHNOLOGY, AND EVALUATION & DEVELOPMENT OF NEW, TRULY INNOVATIVE OPTIONS 1 Make renewable energy credits available for all solar, wind and other technologies that show promise for meeting our energy needs. 2 Consider setting up an Important Innovations Center like the one described on the other side. TWO EXAMPLES OF NEW & EXCITING RESEARCH & BUSINESS MODELS A. PROPOSED NEW KSD NON-PROFIT IMPORTANT INNOVATIONS CENTER PURPOSES **Provide a place where small inventors can get help in evaluating and developing their ideas. **Provide a place which will focus specifically on inventions that have the potential to benefit the world and its people. **Provide a place which will especially focus on solutions to energy needs – and to environmental pollution and other damage. **Provide a place to enable people interested in doing good rather than getting rich to network and cooperate on accomplishing this kind of change in our world. MEANS **Invite ideas to be submitted and considered. **Focus on those inventors who don't have a large corporation or prestigious university behind them. **Vet the submissions for both efficacy and social value. **Locate funding sources that will support such work. **Locate local and regional businesses interested in marketing and/or manufacturing new and beneficial designs and products. **Connect resources with inventors and their ideas. **Support projects that utilize such innovations for good. WHAT NOT TO DO: Turn these to large multi-national corporations to exploit for their own gain. ****************************************************************************** **** B. THE UNIQUE KSD BUSINESS MODEL FOR SOLAR GREENHOUSE DEVELOPMENT **Provide a KSD design package kit that will allow farmers & other handy people to build their own greenhouses **Include expert consultation & tech support to assist them throughout the process of building.. **Train able local people as helpers to do the on-site assistance in various parts of the country. **Provide training to locally owned small businesses such as sheet metal shops to manufacture desired parts, such as the solar concentrating collectors. **Work to develop a network of local resources that could market, manufacture & install greenhouses. Some might also produce & sell biofuel from algae. **Include non-profit organizations, as partners that could raise money from selling the kits & subsidize or give units to community gardens, food banks, etc.) **Develop a residential version that could provide gardening & sun space, as well as supplementary heat to an adjacent house. ****************************************************************************** ********* SUBMITTED BY: LIBERTY GOODWIN, CO-OWNER, (WITH PAUL KLINKMAN) KLINKMAN SOLAR DESIGN (KSD), P.O. Box 40572, Providence, RI 02940, Tel. 401-351-9193, E-Mail: info@klinkmansolar.com, Website: www.klinkmansolar.com ******************************************************************************

  20. QER - Comment of Canadian Hydropower Association | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Canadian Hydropower Association QER - Comment of Canadian Hydropower Association From: Pierre Lundahl [lundap@me.com] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 2:13 PM To: QERcomments CC: Jacob Irving Subject: Quadrennial Energy Review Comments Attachment: page2image18720.png; ATT00001.htm; Canadian Hydropower Association QER Submission_Oct-10-2014-Final.pdf; ATT00002.htm Dear DOE, You will find attached the comments of the Canadian Hydropower Association on the Quadriennal Energy Review. Inquiries about

  1. QER - Comment of Energy Innovation 6 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    6 QER - Comment of Energy Innovation 6 From: Hallie Kennan [hallie@energyinnovation.org] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 4:37 PM To: QERcomments CC: Sonia Aggarwal Subject: Comment on the QER Public Meeting in Atlanta, GA: Business/Economic Development Attachment: APP-UTILITIES.pdf; SPSC-CREPC_NewRegulatoryModels.pdf Hello, Please accept these papers as comments into the QER record for the public meeting on finance and market incentives. Thank you, Hallie

  2. QER - Comment of Energy Innovation 7 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    7 QER - Comment of Energy Innovation 7 From: Hallie Kennan [hallie@energyinnovation.org] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 4:41 PM To: QERcomments CC: Sonia Aggarwal Subject: RE: Comment on the QER Public Meeting in Atlanta, GA: Business/Economic Development Attachment: APP-UTILITIES.pdf; SPSC-CREPC_NewRegulatoryModels.pdf Apologies. Please accept these papers as comments for the QER public meeting on business/economic development.

  3. Fourth RFI Comment on Regulatory Review | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Fourth RFI Comment on Regulatory Review Fourth RFI Comment on Regulatory Review As part of its implementation of Executive Order 13563, ''Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' issued by the President on January 18, 2011, the Department of Energy (Department or DOE) is seeking comments and information from interested parties to assist DOE in reviewing its existing regulations to determine whether any such regulations should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed. PDF icon Fourth

  4. DOE Review of Regulations - Center for Regulatory Effectiveness Comments |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy Review of Regulations - Center for Regulatory Effectiveness Comments DOE Review of Regulations - Center for Regulatory Effectiveness Comments The Center for Regulatory Effectiveness (CRE) is pleased to submit these comments to the Department of Energy (DOE) on how DOE can best review its existing regulations and to identify whether any of its existing regulations should be modified, streamlined, expanded or repealed. PDF icon

  5. Comments on reducing regulatory burden | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    reducing regulatory burden Comments on reducing regulatory burden Comments on reducing regulatory burden from Ingersoll Rand, Residential Solutions, manufacturer of Trane and American Standard residential air conditioners, heat pumps, furnaces, and accessories PDF icon Comments on reducing regulatory burden More Documents & Publications Regulatory Burden RFI [76 FR 75798] Notice of Availability of Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules 2014-09-18 Issuance: Energy

  6. QER - Comment of National Resource Defense Council | Department of Energy

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Chen, Jennifer [jchen@nrdc.org] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 6:14 PM To: QERcomments Subject: QER comments -- electricity transmission, storage, and distribution (eastern focus) Attachments: Sustainable FERC QER comments.pdf Good evening, The Sustainable FERC Project coalition appreciates this opportunity to submit comments on electricity transmission, storage, and distribution. Please find them attached. We look forward to continuing dialogue with DOE and other stakeholders as the QER process

  7. Smart Grid RFI Public Comments and Replies | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Smart Grid RFI Public Comments and Replies Smart Grid RFI Public Comments and Replies As part of its ongoing effort to assist in the formation of policies that will govern the integration of broadband technologies with the Smart Grid, the DOE General Counsel's office issued two Requests for Information (RFIs) in May of 2010. The first RFI was issued to solicit comments from electric utilities, consumer groups, and other stakeholders on ongoing federal, state, and private efforts to protect

  8. National Congestion Study Notice of Public Comment: Federal Register

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Notice, Volume 79, No. 160, August 19, 2014 | Department of Energy National Congestion Study Notice of Public Comment: Federal Register Notice, Volume 79, No. 160, August 19, 2014 National Congestion Study Notice of Public Comment: Federal Register Notice, Volume 79, No. 160, August 19, 2014 On August 19, 2014, the Department issued a Federal Register Notice announcing the availability of a draft of its current National Electric Transmission Congestion Study for public comment. The Notice is

  9. QER - Comment of Sempra Energy 3 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Sempra Energy 3 QER - Comment of Sempra Energy 3 From: Gill, Kellen C. [KGill@Sempra.com] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 6:43 PM To: QERcomments Subject: Sempra Energy's Comments regarding the DOE QER - Natural Gas-Electricity Interdependence Attachment: Sempra Energy - Comments on the DOE QER - Natural Gas-Electricity Interdependence.pdf Thursday, September 25, 2014 To: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Policy and Systems Analysis Submitted via electronic mail:

  10. ESPC Project Review Comment Template | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Review Comment Template ESPC Project Review Comment Template Template for project facilitator review of the preliminary assessment, investment-grade audit, commissioning plan, and other energy service company deliverables for an energy savings performance contract (ESPC). File p3-03review_comments_7.docx More Documents & Publications FEMP ESPC Project Development Resource Guide ESPC ENABLE ACQUISITION PLAN TEMPLATE Project Facilitation and Quality Assurance for Federal ESPCs

  11. Town of Danvers Comment on Information Collection Extension | Department of

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Energy Town of Danvers Comment on Information Collection Extension Town of Danvers Comment on Information Collection Extension The Town of Danvers provided comments to the Department of Energy's notice of intent to seek approval of an extension of Information Collection 1910-5149 for Recovery Act Smart Grid Investment Grant reporting for four years, which was published in the Federal Register August 10, 2011, Vol. 76, No. 154, page 49460. Danvers finds the current collection period

  12. Request for Comments on the Electric Grid Integration Technical Workshops

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Summaries: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 35 - Feb. 21, 2013 | Department of Energy Comments on the Electric Grid Integration Technical Workshops Summaries: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 35 - Feb. 21, 2013 Request for Comments on the Electric Grid Integration Technical Workshops Summaries: Federal Register Notice Volume 78, No. 35 - Feb. 21, 2013 Notice is hereby given that two documents are publicly available and the Department of Energy is requesting public comments. The

  13. Ambient Corporation's Reply comments to DOE RFI: Addressing Policy and

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation | Department of Energy Ambient Corporation's Reply comments to DOE RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation Ambient Corporation's Reply comments to DOE RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation Ambient Corporation submits the following comments to the US Department of Energy (DOE) in hopes that their contribution can highlight and further the understanding of the DOE on

  14. Public comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation on Nuclear

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Damage Contingent Cost Allocation | Department of Energy Compensation on Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation Public comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation on Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation Comments by the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) on Convention on Supplementary Compensation on Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation; Section 934 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 PDF icon Public comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation on

  15. QER - Comment of Energy Innovation 1 | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    1 QER - Comment of Energy Innovation 1 From: Hallie Kennan [hallie@energyinnovation.org] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 4:19 PM To: QERcomments CC: Sonia Aggarwal Subject: Comment on the QER Public Meeting: Electricity Transmission, Storage and Distribution Attachment: APP-DER-PAPER.pdf; APP-DG-PAPER.pdf; APP-TRANSMISSION-PAPER.pdf Hello, Please accept these papers as comments into the QER record for the July 11th public meeting on electricity transmission, storage, and distribution. Thank you,

  16. QER - Comment of Information Technology Industry Council 1 | Department of

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Energy 1 QER - Comment of Information Technology Industry Council 1 From: Hankin, Chris [chankin@itic.org] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 8:32 AM To: QERcomments CC: Steve Crout; Welsh, Peggy; Pickett, Adonica (Renee) Subject: QER -- Comments of the Information Technology Industry Council Attachment: DOEQERITIcomments2014.pdf All: Please find attached the comments of the Information Technology Industry Council (ITI) to assist in the Department's Quadrennial Energy Review. The contacts as

  17. QER - Comment of National Rural Electric Cooperative Association |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy Association QER - Comment of National Rural Electric Cooperative Association From: Gutierrez, Paul [Paul.Gutierrez@nreca.coop] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2014 4:20 PM To: QERcomments CC: Silberstein, Pam M.; Steve Sharp Subject: Comment on the Public Meeting in Chicago, IL: Rail, Barge, Truck Transportation Attachment: CURE Power Point filed with DOE QER August 2014.pdf Please find attached comments regarding the agenda item, "RAIL - HOW A CRITICAL COMPONENT OF OUR

  18. From: Tunnell, Andrew To: Congestion Study Comments Subject:

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    RE: Southern Companies" Comments to Draft National Electric Transmission Congestion Study Date: Monday, October 20, 2014 3:28:05 PM Attachments: DOE Congestion Comments.pdf I'm resending the comments described below as I did not receive any confirmation email. Please contact me at the number provided below if there is anything else that needs to be done in this regard. Thanks Andrew Tunnell From: Tunnell, Andrew Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 2:17 PM To:

  19. DOE Seeks Comment on Regional Standards Enforcement Plan | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy Seeks Comment on Regional Standards Enforcement Plan DOE Seeks Comment on Regional Standards Enforcement Plan November 12, 2015 - 4:50pm Addthis DOE has proposed regulations setting forth how the Department would enforce the regional standards for central air conditioners and is seeking comment from the public about the enforcement plan. The proposed rule was developed by a working group of efficiency advocates, manufacturers, utility representatives, contractors, and distributors.

  20. Public Meetings and Comment Deadlines | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Appliance & Equipment Standards » Rulemakings & Notices » Public Meetings and Comment Deadlines Public Meetings and Comment Deadlines The Department of Energy (DOE) provides the public with an opportunity to participate in meetings to discuss proposed changes to rulemakings and product standards. The table below lists all upcoming public meeting and comment close dates, and provides links to the relevant Federal Register notices. If there are no entries, no public meetings are

  1. City of Fort Collins Comment on Information Collection Extension, October

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    2011 | Department of Energy City of Fort Collins Comment on Information Collection Extension, October 2011 City of Fort Collins Comment on Information Collection Extension, October 2011 The City of Fort Collins provided comments to the Department of Energy's notice of intent to seek approval of an extension of Information Collection 1910-5149 for Recovery Act Smart Grid Investment Grant reporting for four years, which was published in the Federal Register August 10, 2011, Vol. 76, No. 154,

  2. DOE Comments on Radioactive Waste | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    on Radioactive Waste DOE Comments on Radioactive Waste PDF icon 1. Summary Comments on Draft Branch Technical Position on a Performance Assessment Methodology for Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities PDF icon 2. Department of Energy (DOE) Consolidated Comments on the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 30 November 1994 Preproposal Draft of 40 CFR Part 193, Environmental Standards for the Management, Storage and Disposal of Low-Level Radioactive Waste (LLW) More Documents &

  3. Microsoft Word - Public Comments EPAct 1817 061507.doc

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    EPAct 2005 Section 1817 Public Comments Following are all comments received by the U.S. Department of Energy on the February 2007 draft of the Study, "The Potential Benefits of Distributed Generation and Rate-Related Issued That May Impede Their Expansion." All comments are provided in their original, unedited format. Table of Contents 1. IDAHO ENERGY DIVISION ..............................................................................1 2. MARK B. LIVELY, LIVELY UTILITY (CONSULTING)

  4. NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Meeker Cooperative Light

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    and Power- Minnesota | Department of Energy Meeker Cooperative Light and Power- Minnesota NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Meeker Cooperative Light and Power- Minnesota Comments of Meeker Cooperative Light and Power- Minnesota on Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying the Communications Requirements of Electric Utilities to Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy PDF icon NBP RFI: Communications Requirements- Comments of Meeker Cooperative Light and Power- Minnesota

  5. Smart Grid Request for Information and Public Comments | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Energy Services » Technology Development » Smart Grid » Smart Grid Request for Information and Public Comments Smart Grid Request for Information and Public Comments As part of its ongoing effort regarding the formation of smart grid policy, the Department of Energy issued a Request for Information in September of 2010 on the topic of "Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges to Smart Grid Implementation." The purpose was to solicit comments from interested stakeholders on

  6. FOIA Comments January 23, 2009 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Comments January 23, 2009 FOIA Comments January 23, 2009 Comments on proposed amendments to 10CFR 1004 (FOIA REGS) RIN 1901-AA32 as of January 23,2009 PDF icon DUPLICATION FEES More Documents & Publications FIA-14-0036 - In the Matter of Tim Hadley FIA-14-0039 - In the Matter of Tim Hadley FIA-14-0040 - In the Matter of Tim Hadley

  7. SunZia Southwest Transmission Project Comments

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    SunZia Southwest Transmission Project Comments Provided to the US Department of Energy Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Request for Information Relating to the Permitting of Transmission Lines Submitted as of March 28, 2012 2 1.0 Background. SunZia Southwest Transmission Project (SunZia or the Project) is a joint development effort currently underway in Arizona and New Mexico. The Project definition includes licensing, permitting, financing, constructing and operating up to

  8. Review comments from 2004 ATD Annual Review

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Report on the Annual Review of the FY 2005 Advanced Technology Development Program [pic] August 9 & 10, 2005 Argonne IL November 2005 U.S. Department of Energy Office of FreedomCAR and Vehicle Technologies High Power Energy Storage Program November 3, 2005 Dear Colleague: This document is a summary of the evaluation and comments provided by the review panel for the FY 2005 Department of Energy (DOE) Advanced Technology Development (ATD) program annual review. The review was held at the

  9. Comments to DOE QER Quadrennial Energy Review:

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    to DOE QER Quadrennial Energy Review: Comment on the Public Meeting ''Enhancing Infrastructure Resiliency'' Remarks of Duane D. Highley Washington, DC April 11, 2014 Introduction:  Thank you for inviting me to participate in this important discussion today. My name is Duane Highley, and I am the President, CEO and Chief Affordability Officer for the Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corp. (AECC), a non-profit, member-owned power supply cooperative serving 2/3 of the land mass in Arkansas, and

  10. QER- Comment of Jennifer Markens 9

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    To the QER committee; Over the last six months, as an average citizen, I have learned a great deal about current energy policy. We have no real news any longer, so it takes much work to find out about things that affect our lives as citizens. This opportunity for comment, for example, is really not in any sense "an opportunity for public commentary" since the U.S. public is largely uninformed in any real sense.

  11. Summary of Questions, Answers and Comments

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Meeting: Data/Communication Standards and Interoperability of Building Appliances, Equipment, and Systems Summary of Questions, Answers and Comments in the Discussion Periods Following Presentations Presentation: Introductions and purpose (Joe Hagerman) Question (Q): What is the difference between the April 30 public meeting and this non-public meeting? What is the end goal / end game / timeline? Answer (A): DOE is hosting a series of meetings to ensure we've done our due diligence before we

  12. Comments of Motorola, Inc. | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Motorola, Inc. Comments of Motorola, Inc. Motorola, Inc. ("Motorola") hereby responds to the National Broadband Plan Request for Information (" NBP RFI") on the communications requirements of utilities, including but not limited to requirements for Smart Grid.1 Motorola supports the efforts of the Department of Energy ("DOE") to fully assess utilities' requirements before the communications solutions for Smart Grid and other requirements are addressed. Based on

  13. Microsoft Word - supplemental comment letter.doc

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    March 23, 2006 Lawrence Mansueti Permitting, Siting, and Analysis Division Office of Electricity and Energy Reliability U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585-0119 Re: Supplemental Comments on the Department of Energy's Emergency Order To Resume Operation at Mirant's Potomac River Generating Station Dear Mr. Mansueti: The Institute for Public Representation, on behalf of the Anacostia Riverkeeper at Earth Conservation Corps, the Patuxent Riverkeeper, and the

  14. Microsoft Word - DOE Comments on IIP

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    David R. Moeller Senior Attorney 218-723-3963 dmoeller@allete.com October 30, 2013 Julie A. Smith Christopher Lawrence Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Mail Code: OE-20 United States Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 RE: Minnesota Power's Comments Department of Energy - Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects Request for Information, 78 Fed. Reg. 53,436 (August 29, 2013) Dear Ms. Smith and Mr.

  15. Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Dr. Contreras

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    | Department of Energy from Dr. Contreras Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Dr. Contreras Comment submitted on updated Part 2 application. PDF icon Comment from Dr. Contreras 6-10-15.pdf More Documents & Publications Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Dr. Contreras Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Dr. Contreras Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Dr. Contreras

  16. Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Ms. Callahan

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    | Department of Energy Ms. Callahan Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Ms. Callahan Comment submitted on updated Part 2 application. PDF icon Comment from Ms. Callahan 07-13-15.pdf More Documents & Publications Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Cynthia Blansett (COE) Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Dr. Contreras Plains and Eastern Clean Line Transmission Line: Comment from Simon Mahan (SWEA)

  17. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act Section 120(e)(5). Annual report to Congress for Fiscal year 1992

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1993-08-01

    The US Department of Energy (DOE) is committed to conducting its operations in a safe and environmentally sound manner. High priorities for the Department are identifying and correcting environmental problems at DOE facilities that resulted from past operations, and preventing environmental problems from occurring during present and future operations. In this regard, the Department is committed to clean up the 1989 inventory of sites in the Environmental Restoration Program by the year 2019. DOE has issued an Order and guidance establishing policy and procedures for activities conducted under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA), and has developed a Five-Year Plan, updated annually, that integrates planning for corrective activities, environmental restoration and waste management operations at its facilities. DOE also continues to conduct assessments (e.g., Management Audits, Environmental Safety and Health (ES & H) Progress Assessments, Internal Self Assessments) at its operating facilities to provide the Secretary of Energy with information on current environmental compliance status and follow-up on findings.

  18. QER- Comment of New England State Committee on Electricity

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    Attached are comments of the New England States Committee on Electricity (NESCOE) on the QER meeting held in New England on April 21, 2014.

  19. EIS-0433: DOE Comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    XL Project. Comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Keystone XL Pipeline Project, DOEEIS-433 (July 2010) More Documents & Publications EIS-0433: Final...

  20. Comments of NRDC on Department of Energy Interim Final Rule:...

    Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    NRDC's comments on Interim Final Rule: Energy Conservation for New Federal Commercial and Multi-Family High-Rise Residential Buildings and New Federal Low-Rise Residential ...

  1. AHAM Comments_DOE Reducing Regulatory Burden July 2015_FINAL...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    standards, but in many cases, DOE has failed to ... Minimally acceptable engineering analysis and sound policy conclusions ... opportunity for the public to comment on the ...

  2. CEQ Extends Comment Period on Revised Draft Guidance on Consideration...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    in NEPA Reviews CEQ Extends Comment Period on Revised Draft Guidance on Consideration of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and the Effects of Climate Change in NEPA Reviews February 20, ...

  3. Comments of the Natural Resource Defense Council on DOE's Request...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    for Information on Reducing Regulatory Burden Comments of the Natural Resource Defense Council on DOE's Request for Information on Reducing Regulatory Burden On behalf of the...

  4. Supplemental Comments of David K. Paylor, Director of the Commonwealth...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    David K. Paylor, Director of the Commonwealth of Virginia's Department of Environmental Quality Supplemental Comments of David K. Paylor, Director of the Commonwealth of Virginia's ...

  5. Public Comment re NOI on Convention on Supplementary Compensation...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation -75 FR 43945 PDF icon Public Comment re NOI on Convention on Supplementary Compensation for...

  6. Notice of Extension of Public Comment Period for Application...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Extension of Public Comment Period for Application for Proposed Project for Clean Line Plains & Eastern Transmission Line: Federal Register Notice, Volume 80, No. 116 - Jun. 17, ...

  7. Public comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation Contingent...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Compensation Contingent Cost Allocation Public comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation Contingent Cost Allocation DOE published a Notice of Inquiry in the Federal...

  8. Public Comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation for...

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost Allocation Public Comment re Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage Contingent Cost...

  9. Comments from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality on PEPCO's Intention to Commence Planned Transmission Outages Comments from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality...

  10. FEMP Seeking Public Comment on Draft M&V Guidelines

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    FEMP is continuing its request for public comments on the Draft M&V Guidelines: Measurement and Verification for Performance-Based Contracts (Version 4.0).

  11. QER- Comment of American Wind Energy Association 2

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    QER Task Force Attached please find brief supplemental comments that AWEA would like to submit for your consideration as you continuing drafting the QER.

  12. Comments of Southern Company Services, Inc. on DOE Request for...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Southern Company Services, Inc. on DOE Request for Information-Implementing the National ... Comments of Southern Company Services, Inc. on DOE Request for Information-Implementing ...

  13. BPA's proposed oversupply management protocol for comment, Feb...

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    charge. BPA is seeking comments on the proposal, which is described in two documents: a) new tariff language for addressing oversupply (Attachment P); and b) a more detailed...

  14. Hazardous Waste Facility Permit Public Comments to Community Relations Plan

    Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

    Last saved on: 7/22/2011 Final CRP comment for June 2011 1 SECTION TEXT COMMENT POST? GENERAL COMMENTS N/A We urge the DOE, NNSA and LANL to establish a community calendar so that the various LANL organizations who are scheduling public meetings are aware of other community events, such as the public comment periods on various documents, including PMRs, semi-annual meetings (e.g., CMRR and storm water permit meetings), Northern New Mexico Citizens' Advisory Board meetings, RACER, New Mexico

  15. Reply comments to DOE Request for Information-Implementing the...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy Reply comments to DOE Request for Information-Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Customers and the Smart Grid: Data Access...

  16. Comments of Tendril Networks, Inc. on DOE Request for Information...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy Comments of ... Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy Tendril is ...

  17. Exhibits to Sierra Club's Motion to Intervene, Protest, and Comments |

    Energy Savers [EERE]

    Department of Energy Exhibits to Sierra Club's Motion to Intervene, Protest, and Comments Exhibits to Sierra Club's Motion to Intervene, Protest, and Comments PDF icon Ex._01_-_Declaration PDF icon Ex._02_-_LNG_rulemaking_petition PDF icon Ex._03_-_EIA_analysis PDF icon Ex._04_-_Brooks_Model_LNG_Exports_from_the_US PDF icon Ex._05_-_Deloitte_Analysis_for_Excelerate PDF icon Ex._06_-_EPA_Region_10_Scoping_Comments PDF icon Ex._07_-_EPA_Region_3_Scoping_Comments PDF icon

  18. Comments Received on Proposed Rulemaking for regulation implementing...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    section 216(h): Coordination of Federal Transmission Permitting on Federal Lands Comments Received on Proposed Rulemaking for regulation implementing section 216(h): Coordination ...

  19. QER- Comment of National Rural Electric Cooperative Association 4

    Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

    NRECA is submitting additional comments to supplement the one previously filed on October 3rd. Please let me know if you have any questions.

  20. AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

    AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Public Citizen Comments to:DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Smart Grid RFI: Addressing Policy and Logistical Challenges AARP, National Consumer Law ...