Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "3 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

TX, RRC District 3 Onshore Lease Condensate Proved Reserves,...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

75 128 65 74 75 76 1979-2011 Adjustments 3 -2 3 2009-2011 Revision Increases 20 19 18 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 10 16 9 2009-2011 Sales 1 4 11 2009-2011 Acquisitions 1 12 10...

2

Microsoft Word - FINAL DOE IRM Strategic Plan_2009-2011_090808.docx  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

IRM Strategic Plan IRM Strategic Plan Office of the Chief Information Officer FY 2009 - 2011 DOE IRM Strategic Plan i FY 2009 - 2011 U.S. Department of Energy IRM Strategic Plan Office of the Chief Information Officer FY 2009 - 2011 DOE IRM Strategic Plan i TABLE OF CONTENTS MESSAGE FROM THE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER ..................................................................3 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................................4 2.0 IT STRATEGY OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................4 2.1 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY MISSION..........................................................................................

3

Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Increases  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

1,563 2,589 2,071 2009-2011 1,563 2,589 2,071 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 0 0 0 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 0 0 0 2009-2011 Texas 0 0 0 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 1,563 2,589 2,071 2009-2011 Alabama 17 134 23 2009-2011 Arkansas 3 9 0 2009-2011 California 0 0 0 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Colorado 126 937 698 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kansas 8 157 24 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 0 0 0 2009-2011 North 0 0 0 2009-2011 South Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Michigan 0 0 0 2009-2011 Mississippi 0 0 0 2009-2011

4

Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Decreases  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

2,486 2,914 1,668 2009-2011 2,486 2,914 1,668 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 0 0 0 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 0 0 0 2009-2011 Texas 0 0 0 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 2,486 2,914 1,668 2009-2011 Alabama 316 51 86 2009-2011 Arkansas 0 1 3 2009-2011 California 0 0 0 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Colorado 566 1,557 367 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kansas 107 0 14 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 0 0 0 2009-2011 North 0 0 0 2009-2011 South Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Michigan 0 0 0 2009-2011 Mississippi 0 0 0 2009-2011

5

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Increases  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

3,270 3,900 5,096 2009-2011 3,270 3,900 5,096 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 710 879 1,966 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 33 38 25 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 616 790 1,861 2009-2011 Texas 61 51 80 2009-2011 Alaska 394 397 362 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 2,876 3,503 4,734 2009-2011 Alabama 9 9 2 2009-2011 Arkansas 5 12 31 2009-2011 California 427 276 394 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 105 40 118 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 98 22 23 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 192 204 229 2009-2011 State Offshore 32 10 24 2009-2011 Colorado 28 52 71 2009-2011 Florida 8 10 9 2009-2011 Illinois 12 0 6 2009-2011 Indiana 1 0 1 2009-2011 Kansas 49 52 47 2009-2011 Kentucky 4 1 9 2009-2011 Louisiana 100 139 100 2009-2011 North 15 69 16 2009-2011 South Onshore

6

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Decreases, Wet After Lease  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

1,262 1,957 3,682 2009-2011 1,262 1,957 3,682 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 208 214 1,455 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 17 4 15 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 174 183 1,354 2009-2011 Texas 17 27 86 2009-2011 Alaska 152 76 129 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 1,110 1,881 3,553 2009-2011 Alabama 2 5 1 2009-2011 Arkansas 0 0 0 2009-2011 California 119 167 230 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 4 39 10 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 47 2 2 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 68 125 217 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 1 1 2009-2011 Colorado 27 34 56 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 2 2009-2011 Illinois 1 4 2 2009-2011 Indiana 0 0 1 2009-2011 Kansas 21 47 23 2009-2011 Kentucky 3 3 2 2009-2011 Louisiana 69 93 43 2009-2011 North 6 11 4 2009-2011 South Onshore 57 73 34 2009-2011

7

Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

3,642 9,491 23,455 2009-2011 3,642 9,491 23,455 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 3,642 9,491 23,455 2009-2011 Alabama 2 0 2009-2010 Arkansas 261 126 141 2009-2011 California 0 2011-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 2011-2011 Colorado 0 2 0 2009-2011 Kentucky 3 43 11 2009-2011 Louisiana 826 1,878 3,882 2009-2011 North 826 1,878 3,882 2009-2011 Michigan 276 325 151 2009-2011 Montana 34 16 14 2009-2011 New Mexico 2 11 190 2009-2011 East 2 2 146 2009-2011 West 0 9 44 2009-2011 North Dakota 17 343 290 2009-2011 Ohio 0 0 2009-2010 Oklahoma 865 2,117 5,024 2009-2011 Pennsylvania 53 1,583 3,322 2009-2011 Texas 1,267 2,425 10,263 2009-2011 RRC District 1 0 251 48 2009-2011 RRC District 2 Onshore 5 402 2010-2011 RRC District 3 Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011

8

Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

6,363 10,661 25,993 2009-2011 6,363 10,661 25,993 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 6,363 10,661 25,993 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 2009-2010 Arkansas 1,585 861 502 2009-2011 California 912 2011-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 912 2011-2011 Colorado 0 1 4 2009-2011 Kentucky 44 3 44 2009-2011 Louisiana 636 1,856 2,002 2009-2011 North 636 1,856 2,002 2009-2011 Michigan 149 165 140 2009-2011 Montana 42 14 14 2009-2011 New Mexico 2 1 83 2009-2011 East 0 1 68 2009-2011 West 2 0 15 2009-2011 North Dakota 119 528 439 2009-2011 Ohio 0 0 2009-2010 Oklahoma 1,373 1,352 3,709 2009-2011 Pennsylvania 299 1,994 5,238 2009-2011 Texas 2,052 3,580 12,185 2009-2011 RRC District 1 1 322 2,141 2009-2011 RRC District 2 Onshore 6 388 2010-2011 RRC District 3 Onshore

9

TX, RRC District 3 Onshore Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

0 0 1 2007-2011 Adjustments 0 0 1 2009-2011 Revision Increases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011 Extensions 0 0...

10

Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

3,642 9,491 23,455 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 3,642 9,491 23,455 2009-2011 Alabama 2 0 2009-2010 Arkansas 261 126 141 2009-2011 California 0 2011-2011 San...

11

Utah Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

488 518 582 2009-2011 Adjustments 2 13 -16 2009-2011 Revision Increases 126 71 64 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 8 21 23 2009-2011 Sales 8 24 9 2009-2011 Acquisitions 26 3 10...

12

Colorado Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

376 501 555 2009-2011 Adjustments -9 25 -1 2009-2011 Revision Increases 28 52 71 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 27 34 56 2009-2011 Sales 17 3 19 2009-2011 Acquisitions 2 38 4...

13

Infrared Thermography Guide (Revision 3)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Costly equipment outages can be reduced by implementing a comprehensive predictive maintenance program. Infrared thermography (IR), a fundamental component of such programs, uses nonintrusive techniques to monitor the operating condition of equipment and components. This revised report provides updated information to assist utilities in implementing an effective IR program.

2002-05-30T23:59:59.000Z

14

SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING 2009-2011 RESEARCH REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

that Release Therapeutic Agents to modulate Inflammation Following Spinal Cord Injury," National Institutes Crosslinking Effects on Bone Fragility," National Institutes of health (NIh) / The National Institute of Dental in Cortical Bone: Effect of mineral Content," J mechanical Behavior of Biomedical materials, 3(5), 405

Salama, Khaled

15

Arkansas Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

9 42 40 2009-2011 Adjustments 2 3 -2 2009-2011 Revision Increases 5 12 31 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Sales 3 3 28 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 3 2009-2011...

16

NIST SP 800-53 Revision 3, Recommended Security Controls ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Page 1. NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 3 Recommended Security Controls for Federal Information Systems and Organizations ...

2012-02-06T23:59:59.000Z

17

Ohio Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

50 54 55 2009-2011 Adjustments 8 22 3 2009-2011 Revision Increases 6 4 1 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 2 1 2009-2011 Sales 5 37 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 3 22 0 2009-2011...

18

Miscellaneous Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

22 35 42 2009-2011 Adjustments -1 13 2 2009-2011 Revision Increases 5 3 3 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 2 1 2 2009-2011 Sales 0 9 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 5 0 2009-2011 Extensions...

19

Kentucky Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

4 16 22 2009-2011 Adjustments 4 -11 1 2009-2011 Revision Increases 4 1 9 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 3 3 2 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 5 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 6 4 2009-2011 Extensions...

20

Illinois Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

66 64 54 2009-2011 Adjustments 3 10 -10 2009-2011 Revision Increases 12 0 6 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 1 4 2 2009-2011 Sales 0 15 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 9 0 2009-2011...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "3 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Alabama Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

53 60 65 2009-2011 Adjustments 1 12 2 2009-2011 Revision Increases 9 9 2 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 2 5 1 2009-2011 Sales 0 3 11 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 20 2009-2011...

22

NRC comprehensive records disposition schedule. Revision 3  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Title 44 US Code, ``Public Printing and Documents,`` regulations issued by the General Service Administration (GSA) in 41 CFR Chapter 101, Subchapter B, ``Management and Use of Information and Records,`` and regulations issued by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) in 36 CFR Chapter 12, Subchapter B, ``Records Management,`` require each agency to prepare and issue a comprehensive records disposition schedule that contains the NARA approved records disposition schedules for records unique to the agency and contains the NARA`s General Records Schedules for records common to several or all agencies. The approved records disposition schedules specify the appropriate duration of retention and the final disposition for records created or maintained by the NRC. NUREG-0910, Rev. 3, contains ``NRC`s Comprehensive Records Disposition Schedule,`` and the original authorized approved citation numbers issued by NARA. Rev. 3 incorporates NARA approved changes and additions to the NRC schedules that have been implemented since the last revision dated March, 1992, reflects recent organizational changes implemented at the NRC, and includes the latest version of NARA`s General Records Schedule (dated August 1995).

NONE

1998-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

23

Supplemental design requirements document, Project W026. Revision 3  

SciTech Connect

This document supplements and extends the Functional Design Criteria, SP-W026-FDC-001, for the Waste Receiving and Processing Facility (WRAP), Module 1. It provides additional detailed requirements, summarizes key Westinghouse Hanford Company design guidance, and establishes baseline technical agreements to be used in definitive design of the WRAP-1 facility. Revision 3 of the Supplemental Design Requirements Document has been assigned an Impact Level of 3ESQ based on the content of the entire revision. The actual changes made from Revision 2 have an Impact Level of 3S and the basis for these changes was previously reviewed and approved per WHC correspondence No. 9355770.

Weidert, J.R.

1993-10-08T23:59:59.000Z

24

EPRI Materials Degradation Matrix, Revision 3  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Materials Degradation Matrix (MDM) identifies knowledge gaps associated with degradation phenomena that may detrimentally affect reactor operation, reactor safety, or regulatory climate. Where gaps are identified, the MDM assesses the status of research and development (R&D) needed to resolve the knowledge gap. In addition to a general update to address new operating experience and research results, specific objectives for this revision of the MDM ...

2013-05-30T23:59:59.000Z

25

Alaska Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

3,566 3,722 3,852 2009-2011 Adjustments 0 0 1 2009-2011 Revision Increases 394 397 362 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 152 76 129 2009-2011 Sales 7 0 17 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 79...

26

California Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

2,835 2,939 3,009 2009-2011 Adjustments -17 14 32 2009-2011 Revision Increases 427 276 394 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 119 167 230 2009-2011 Sales 3 1 7 2009-2011 Acquisitions 20...

27

Arkansas Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

34 31 31 22 28 21 2005-2011 Adjustments 0 1 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 3 9 0 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 1 3 2009-2011 Sales 31 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 22 0 0 2009-2011...

28

California Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

,835 2,939 3,009 2009-2011 Adjustments -17 14 32 2009-2011 Revision Increases 427 276 394 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 119 167 230 2009-2011 Sales 3 1 7 2009-2011 Acquisitions 20...

29

Federal Offshore, Gulf of Mexico, Louisiana & Alabama Crude Oil...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

,704 4,043 4,567 2009-2011 Adjustments 2 -3 -2 2009-2011 Revision Increases 616 790 1,861 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 174 183 1,354 2009-2011 Sales 20 54 42 2009-2011 Acquisitions...

30

NM, East Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and Production  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

12 0 7 35 23 2007-2011 Adjustments 10 3 66 2009-2011 Revision Increases 0 1 68 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 2 2 146 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011...

31

NM, West Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and Production  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

0 29 88 121 2007-2011 Adjustments 0 0 3 2009-2011 Revision Increases 2 0 15 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 9 44 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011...

32

New Mexico Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and Production  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

12 0 36 123 144 2007-2011 Adjustments 10 3 69 2009-2011 Revision Increases 2 1 83 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 2 11 190 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011...

33

Miscellaneous Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

28 29 41 17 16 17 2005-2011 Adjustments 1 2 3 2009-2011 Revision Increases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 24 2 0 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 1 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011...

34

West Virginia Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Area: Period: Annual : Download Series History: Definitions, Sources & Notes: Show ... 51: 2009-2011: Adjustments -1-3: 1: 2009-2011: Revision Increases : 0: 2: 15 ...

35

PWR Primary-to-Secondary Leak Guidelines - Revision 3  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Primary-to-secondary leakage of steam generator tubes in pressurized water reactors (PWRs) can result from mechanisms that propagate slowly or rapidly. This report represents Revision 3 of industry-wide guidelines first proposed in 1995 to address the issue of leakage.

2004-12-16T23:59:59.000Z

36

Expedited Technology Demonstration Project Baseline Revision 3.0  

SciTech Connect

The Expedited Technology Demonstration Project Plan, MWNT Revised Baseline 3.0, replaces and significantly modifies the current baseline. The revised plan will focus efforts specifically on the demonstration of an integrated Molten Salt Oxidation (MSO) system. In addition to the MSO primary unit, offgas, and salt recycle subsystems, the demonstrations will include the generation of robust final forms from process mineral residues. A simplified process flow chart for the expedited demonstration is shown. To minimize costs and to accelerate the schedule for deployment, the integrated system will be staged in an existing facility at LLNL equipped to handle hazardous and radioactive materials. The MSO systems will be activated in FY97, followed by the activation of final forms in FY98.

Adamson, M.G.; Densley, P.J.

1996-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

37

Microsoft Word - FINAL DOE IRM Strategic Plan_2009-2011_090808...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

... 10 Objective 3: Deploy a Corporate Asset Management system to identify and mitigate vulnerability in information systems, and maintain...

38

Federal Offshore Texas Lease Condensate Proved Reserves, Reserve...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

65 88 76 92 83 64 1981-2011 Adjustments -3 -1 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 27 15 26 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 3 9 29 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0...

39

Kentucky Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and Production  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

21 20 55 10 41 2007-2011 Adjustments -1 -1 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 44 3 44 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 3 43 11 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 45 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 45...

40

Federal Offshore, Gulf of Mexico, Louisiana & Alabama Lease Condensate...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

185 163 151 134 129 129 1981-2011 Adjustments -4 3 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 40 44 30 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 31 28 26 2009-2011 Sales 5 13 8 2009-2011 Acquisitions 1 10...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "3 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Montana Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

77 66 75 37 64 25 2005-2011 Adjustments 0 11 -30 2009-2011 Revision Increases 0 23 0 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 29 0 3 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0...

42

Kansas Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

234 340 301 163 258 228 2005-2011 Adjustments -3 -22 -6 2009-2011 Revision Increases 8 157 24 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 107 0 14 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0...

43

NM, East Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

322 389 530 474 523 507 2005-2011 Adjustments 0 4 -3 2009-2011 Revision Increases 0 72 11 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 30 0 2 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0...

44

Colorado Lease Condensate Proved Reserves, Reserve Changes, and...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

96 107 104 97 115 132 1979-2011 Adjustments 0 4 -1 2009-2011 Revision Increases 15 18 34 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 11 17 8 2009-2011 Sales 12 1 10 2009-2011 Acquisitions 1 2 3...

45

Microsoft Word - CHAP02ESH _REVISED1_3.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

-1 -1 CHAPTER 2 ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY AND HEALTH (revised September 25, 2003) WHAT ARE THE BASIC PRINCIPLES/OBJECTIVES OF THE DEPARTMENT'S ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY AND HEALTH (ES&H) PROGRAM? 1. Work is performed in a manner that protects workers, the public and the environment. 2. The Department holds contractors accountable for the safe performance of work. 3. ES&H functions and activities are an integral and visible part of contractors' business processes. WHY IS THE DEPARTMENT'S ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY AND HEALTH PROGRAM IMPORTANT? The Department has a responsibility to protect people, the environment, and property in the performance of the various missions under its contracts. Because of the sensitivity and potential liabilities associated

46

Microsoft Word - Final DOE CBFO 98-3103 Revision 3.docx  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

922-2478 Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Office of Environmental Compliance Peter Ricca, Environmental Scientist Manager DOECBFO 98-3103 Revision 3 62 StateTribe...

47

Revised for J. Climate CCSM3 special issue Monsoon regimes in the CCSM3  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Revised for J. Climate CCSM3 special issue Monsoon regimes in the CCSM3 Gerald A Meehl1 , Julie M-497-1333 July 29, 2005 1 #12;Abstract: Simulations of regional monsoon regimes, including the Indian, Australian, West African, South American and North American monsoons, are described for the T85 version

48

Utah Lease Condensate Proved Reserves, Reserve Changes, and Production  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 View History Proved Reserves as of Dec. 31 52 62 90 69 78 2007-2011 Adjustments 2 3 -3 2009-2011 Revision Increases 36 6 9 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 7...

49

Human Factors Engineering Program Review Model (NUREG-0711)Revision 3: Update Methodology and Key Revisions  

SciTech Connect

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) reviews the human factors engineering (HFE) programs of applicants for nuclear power plant construction permits, operating licenses, standard design certifications, and combined operating licenses. The purpose of these safety reviews is to help ensure that personnel performance and reliability are appropriately supported. Detailed design review procedures and guidance for the evaluations is provided in three key documents: the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800), the HFE Program Review Model (NUREG-0711), and the Human-System Interface Design Review Guidelines (NUREG-0700). These documents were last revised in 2007, 2004 and 2002, respectively. The NRC is committed to the periodic update and improvement of the guidance to ensure that it remains a state-of-the-art design evaluation tool. To this end, the NRC is updating its guidance to stay current with recent research on human performance, advances in HFE methods and tools, and new technology being employed in plant and control room design. NUREG-0711 is the first document to be addressed. We present the methodology used to update NUREG-0711 and summarize the main changes made. Finally, we discuss the current status of the update program and the future plans.

OHara J. M.; Higgins, J.; Fleger, S.

2012-07-22T23:59:59.000Z

50

Transuranic waste baseline inventory report. Revision No. 3  

SciTech Connect

The Transuranic Waste Baseline Inventory Report (TWBIR) establishes a methodology for grouping wastes of similar physical and chemical properties from across the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) transuranic (TRU) waste system into a series of {open_quotes}waste profiles{close_quotes} that can be used as the basis for waste form discussions with regulatory agencies. The purpose of Revisions 0 and 1 of this report was to provide data to be included in the Sandia National Laboratories/New Mexico (SNL/NM) performance assessment (PA) processes for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). Revision 2 of the document expanded the original purpose and was also intended to support the WIPP Land Withdrawal Act (LWA) requirement for providing the total DOE TRU waste inventory. The document included a chapter and an appendix that discussed the total DOE TRU waste inventory, including nondefense, commercial, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB)-contaminated, and buried (predominately pre-1970) TRU wastes that are not planned to be disposed of at WIPP.

NONE

1996-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

51

Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

6,363 10,661 25,993 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 6,363 10,661 25,993 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 2009-2010 Arkansas 1,585 861 502 2009-2011 California 912 2011-2011...

52

NM, West Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

4,572 3,780 3,461 3,172 3,009 2,851 2005-2011 Adjustments -9 257 -167 2009-2011 Revision Increases 443 490 551 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 323 565 277 2009-2011 Sales 33 12 221...

53

New Mexico Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

4,894 4,169 3,991 3,646 3,532 3,358 1989-2011 Adjustments -9 261 -170 2009-2011 Revision Increases 443 562 562 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 353 565 279 2009-2011 Sales 33 12 221...

54

Louisiana Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and Production  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

6 858 9,307 20,070 21,950 2007-2011 Adjustments 131 2,347 -172 2009-2011 Revision Increases 636 1,856 2,002 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 826 1,878 3,882 2009-2011 Sales 3 11 3,782...

55

North Louisiana Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes,...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

6 858 9,307 20,070 21,950 2007-2011 Adjustments 131 2,347 -172 2009-2011 Revision Increases 636 1,856 2,002 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 826 1,878 3,882 2009-2011 Sales 3 11 3,782...

56

Pennsylvania Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

6 88 3,790 10,708 23,581 2007-2011 Adjustments 450 235 253 2009-2011 Revision Increases 299 1,994 5,238 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 53 1,583 3,322 2009-2011 Sales 0 163 209...

57

Arkansas Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and Production  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1,460 3,833 9,070 12,526 14,808 2007-2011 Adjustments 2 63 655 2009-2011 Revision Increases 1,585 861 502 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 261 126 141 2009-2011 Sales 3 336 6,087...

58

Oklahoma Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and Production  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

44 3,845 6,389 9,670 10,733 2007-2011 Adjustments 1 713 216 2009-2011 Revision Increases 1,373 1,352 3,709 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 865 2,117 5,024 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 1,591...

59

REVISED NOTICE OF PROPOSED AWARDS Advanced Natural Gas Engine Research and Development for Class 3  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

REVISED NOTICE OF PROPOSED AWARDS Advanced Natural Gas Engine Research and Development for Class 3 Notice (PON-12-504) entitled "Advanced Natural Gas Engine research and Development for Class 3 through of natural gas engine concepts for application in light heavy-duty vehicles (LHDV) and medium heavy duty

60

Users Manual for TMY3 Data Sets (Revised)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This users manual describes how to obtain and interpret the data in the Typical Meteorological Year version 3 (TMY3) data sets. These data sets are an update to the TMY2 data released by NREL in 1994.

Wilcox, S.; Marion, W.

2008-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "3 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

TX, RRC District 10 Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

-1 2009-2011 Revision Increases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011 Extensions 0 0 1...

62

Louisiana Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

480 530 525 2009-2011 Adjustments -1 7 -8 2009-2011 Revision Increases 100 139 100 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 69 93 43 2009-2011 Sales 9 23 63 2009-2011 Acquisitions 11 52 53...

63

Michigan Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and Production  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

3,281 2,894 2,499 2,306 1,947 2007-2011 Adjustments -167 305 31 2009-2011 Revision Increases 149 165 140 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 276 325 151 2009-2011 Sales 0 553 682...

64

TX, RRC District 9 Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

7,134 8,700 10,756 12,573 10,276 2007-2011 Adjustments 179 533 42 2009-2011 Revision Increases 580 1,044 3,005 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 469 191 5,864 2009-2011 Sales 53 83...

65

TX, RRC District 5 Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

8,099 11,408 13,691 16,032 19,747 2007-2011 Adjustments 657 105 233 2009-2011 Revision Increases 928 643 3,094 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 587 405 1,405 2009-2011 Sales 5 0 5,772...

66

Texas Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and Production  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

17,256 22,667 28,167 38,048 49,588 2007-2011 Adjustments 990 2,940 450 2009-2011 Revision Increases 2,052 3,580 12,185 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 1,267 2,425 10,263 2009-2011...

67

TX, RRC District 7B Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

2,018 2,336 2,022 2,435 3,466 2007-2011 Adjustments 56 267 -193 2009-2011 Revision Increases 119 273 385 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 181 242 358 2009-2011 Sales 496 0 748...

68

Transportation Engineering University of Florida Revised: 2/3/09 Literature Search Strategies and Resources  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Transportation Engineering University of Florida Revised: 2/3/09 Literature Search Strategies information from transportation journals, conferences proceedings, research reports and ongoing researchLink http://springerlink.com/home/main.mpx · Elsevier Transport Connect www.transportconnect.net Note

Slatton, Clint

69

A:\ZAPPENDA3Matrix(DOEandOther)(REVISED).PDF  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

5 5 Part III Roles and Responsibilities from Other Handbook References (Numbers in the matrix correspond to chapter numbers.) DOE Other Contracting Officer Contracting Officer's Represent. Property Admin. Counsel Head of Contracting Activity Procure. Executive Contractor Industrial Relations Specialist Ops./Field Office Manager Field Element Manager Chief Financial Officer Head of Agency Program Office Source Selection Official Subj. Matter Experts Acquisition Letters: DOE AL 91-10, Balanced Scorecard Performance Management Program for Federal Procurement and Contractor Purchasing Systems DOE AL 93-2, M & O Financial Management 7 DOE AL 93-4, Displaced Workers Benefit Program 3 DOE AL 94-9, Travel Costs 7 7 DOE AL 2000-02, Small Business Programs 12 12 12 DOE AL 96-09, Procedures to Extend Management and

70

Nondestructive Evaluation: Electromagnetic NDE Guide for Balance of Plant Heat Exchangers, Revision 3  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report is Revision 3 to the original report. It presents summaries of nondestructive evaluation (NDE) procedures used for assessing the integrity of BOP heat exchanger tubing. This report is a living document that will be modified and updated with new information as it becomes available. Care has been taken to reorganize the report in a user-friendly layout that can accommodate future growth. As new material, this report contains information about mockups and specific materials. User comments are en...

2009-12-22T23:59:59.000Z

71

Standard technical specifications, Westinghouse Plants: Bases (Sections 2.0--3.3). Volume 2, Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

This NUREG contains the improved Standard Technical Specifications (STS) for Westinghouse plants. Revision 1 incorporates the cumulative changes to Revision 0, which was published in September 1992. The changes reflected in Revision 1 resulted from the experience gained from license amendment applications to convert to these improved STS or to adopt partial improvements to existing technical specifications. This NUREG is the result of extensive public technical meetings and discussions between the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff and various nuclear power plant licensees, Nuclear Steam Supply System (NSSS) Owners Groups, specifically the Westinghouse Owners Group (WOG), NSSS vendors, and the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI). The improved STS were developed based on the criteria in the Final Commission Policy Statement on Technical Specifications Improvements for Nuclear Power Reactors, dated July 22, 1993 (58 FR 39132). Licensees are encouraged to upgrade their technical specifications consistent with those criteria and conforming, to the extent practical and consistent with the licensing basis for the facility, to Revision 1 to the improved STS. The Commission continues to place the highest priority on requests for complete conversions to the improved STS. Licensees adopting portions of the improved STS to existing technical specifications should adopt all related requirements, as applicable, to achieve a high degree of standardization and consistency.

NONE

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

72

Executive Director for Operations REVISION OF NUREG-0654, SUPPLEMENT 3, CRITERIA FOR PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SEVERE  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The purpose of this paper is to seek Commission approval to revise Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) protective action recommendation (PAR) guidance contained in NUREG-0654, Supplement 3 to reflect the results of NUREG/CR-6953, Vol. 1, Review of

Luis A. Reyes

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

73

NMED COMMENTS ITEM 3 REVISE VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND (VOC) TARGET ANALYTE LIST  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3 3 NMED COMMENTS ITEM 3 REVISE VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND (VOC) TARGET ANALYTE LIST OTHER CHANGES TO VOC MONITORING PROGRAM Page 1 of 21 VOC 3·1: PMR Section 3, Topic 1, Table 1 Recalculated Waste Matrix Code Group Weighting Factors based on the 2004 Compliance Recertification Contact Handled (CH) Transuranic (TRU) Waste Inventory (m 3 ) The new weighting factors appear to be based on CH TRU waste only and do not include remote handled (RH) TRU waste. There was no discussion in the PMR addressing possible differences in Waste Matrix Code Group (WMCG) for RH TRU that could potentially impact the weighting factors. Please provide data characterizing the differences in emissions between the two types of waste, in support of the assertion that modeling data from CH TRU waste adequately

74

JM to Revise DOE G 413.3-10, Earned Value Management System (EVMS) for use with DOE O 413.3B  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

DOE O 413.3B, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets, (the Order) was revised November 29, 2010. As a result, the companion 413.3 ...

2011-10-21T23:59:59.000Z

75

January 13, 2012, Technical Qualification Program, Revision 3 - Sandia Site Office  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OF DOCUMENT: OF DOCUMENT: SANDIA SITE OFFICE COORDINATION/APPROVAL SSO CP 0603.03, Technical Qualification Program DESCRIPTION (e.g., summary of changes): Incorporated: (I) changes to governing order (DOE 0 426.1); (2) SSO FR T&Q and CT procedures; (3) recommendations from recent self-assessments. Chan ed re- ualification eriodicity from 3 to 5 ears. REVISION NO.: 3 DATE: 1/11/12 Subject Matter Expert (SME) (name, org., & phone): Allen D. Tate, AMNO 845-4050 COORDINATING/APPROVING ORDER SIGNATURE DATE ORGANIZATION & NAME SME Allen D. Tate Environment, Safety & Health Dan Pellegrino, Assistant Manager Facilities & Projects Mike McFadden, Assistant Manager Nuclear Operations Jim Todd, Assistant Manager, FTCP Agent Safeguards & Security

76

Oklahoma Lease Condensate Proved Reserves, Reserve Changes ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Area: Period: Annual : Download Series History: Definitions, Sources ... 51: 2009-2011: Revision Decreases : 36: 54: 42: 2009-2011: Sales : 5: 1: 26: 2009-2011 ...

77

DRAFT REVISION  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Summary of Changes Summary of Changes to Procedure 243.1 Records Inventory Revised Version Issued as P 243.1B LM Procedure 243.1A, Records Inventory of 7/18/07, has undergone minor revisions. The procedure has been revised to reflect changes in definitions and formatting and to ensure the references cited and associated forms remain current. Please replace LM Procedure 243.1A with LM Procedure 243.1B. The most recent and official controlled hard copy version of this document resides with LM's Directives Coordinator. An electronic version of the controlled document has been placed on the LM Intranet for employee use. Printed hard copies of this electronic version are considered uncontrolled documents. INITIATED BY: Office of Business Operations NO. OF PAGES/ATTACHMENTS: 9 pages, 3 attachments

78

Revision History  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revision History Revision History Rev. 0, August 2012 Original submittal for milestone M3FT-12SN0804032 (Sandia programmatic and classification review) Rev. 1, September 2012 Corrected transposition errors in costing tables; recalculated stainless steel overpacks to be carbon steel; corrected various editorial problems. (SAND2012-7979P) Rev. 2, November 2012 Performed peer review and retitled. Submittal for milestone M2FT-13SN0804031 (formerly milestone M2FT- 12SN0804031) (SAND2012-9737P) Unclassified Unlimited Release Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000.

79

Overall Photocatalytic Water Splitting with NiOx-SrTiO3 A Revised Mechanism  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

NiOx (0 water splitting under UV light. The established mechanism for this and many other NiOx containing catalysts assumes water oxidation to occur at the early transition metal oxide and water reduction at NiOx. Here we show that NiOx-STO is more likely a three component Ni-STO-NiO catalyst, in which STO absorbs the light, Ni reduces protons, and NiO oxidizes water. This interpretation is based on systematic H2/O2 evolution tests of appropriately varied catalyst compositions using oxidized, chemically and photochemically added nickel and NiO nanoparticle cocatalysts. Surface photovoltage (SPV) measurements reveal that Ni(0) serves as an electron trap (site for water reduction) and that NiO serves as a hole trap (site for water oxidation). Electrochemical measurements show that the overpotential for water oxidation correlates with NiO content, whereas the water reduction overpotential depends on Ni content. Photodeposition experiments with NiCl2 and H2PtCl6 on NiO-STO show that electrons are available on the STO surface, not on the NiO particles. Based on photoelectrochemistry, both NiO and Ni particles suppress the Fermi level in STO, but the effect of this shift on catalytic activity is not clear. Overall, the results suggest a revised role for NiO in NiOx-STO and in many other nickel-containing water splitting systems, including NiOx-La:KTaO3, and many layered perovskites.

Townsend, Troy K.; Browning, Nigel D.; Osterloh, Frank

2012-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

80

BWRVIP-41, Revision 3: BWR Vessel and Internals Project, BWR Jet Pump Assembly Inspection and Flaw Evaluation Guidelines  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Boiling Water Reactor Vessel and Internals Project (BWRVIP), formed in June 1994, is an association of utilities focused exclusively on BWR vessel and internals issues. This BWRVIP report provides information on potential failure locations in BWR/3-6 jet pump components and recommends an inspection program designed to ensure that the integrity of all jet pump safety functions is maintained. EPRI published a previous version of this report as BWRVIP-41, Revision 2 (EPRI 1019570). This report (EPRI Rep...

2010-09-10T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "3 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

Federal Offshore California Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

50 363 352 2009-2011 Adjustments -1 -2 1 2009-2011 Revision Increases 33 38 25 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 17 4 15 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011...

82

Michigan Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

52 55 59 2009-2011 Adjustments -13 10 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 21 4 5 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 17 5 4 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011...

83

Kansas Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

64 302 350 2009-2011 Adjustments 20 61 22 2009-2011 Revision Increases 49 52 47 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 21 47 23 2009-2011 Sales 2 6 6 2009-2011 Acquisitions 2 8 19 2009-2011...

84

Mississippi Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

252 254 245 2009-2011 Adjustments -1 25 12 2009-2011 Revision Increases 30 17 14 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 8 9 13 2009-2011 Sales 4 8 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 1 1 2009-2011...

85

Florida Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

9 19 22 2009-2011 Adjustments -1 2 -2 2009-2011 Revision Increases 8 10 9 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 0 2 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011 Extensions...

86

Indiana Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

8 8 7 2009-2011 Adjustments -7 1 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 1 0 1 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 0 1 2009-2011 Sales 0 2 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 2 0 2009-2011 Extensions 0 0...

87

B3.12 Microbiological and Biomedical Facilities Revision 0 Sitewide Categorical Exclusion for  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 Microbiological and Biomedical Facilities Revision 0 2 Microbiological and Biomedical Facilities Revision 0 Sitewide Categorical Exclusion for Siting, Construction, Operation and Decommissioning of Microbiological and Biomedical Facilities Introduction As defined in the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Richland Operations Office Integrated Management System Procedure, NEPA Analysis at Hanford, a sitewide categorical exclusion is: An application of DOE categorical exclusions described in 10 CFR 1021, Appendices A and B, which may apply to Hanford Site proposed actions (activities) that are "sitewide" in nature and extent, which the cognizant DOE Hanford 1~CO has determined fit within the scope (i.e., same nature and intent, and of the same or lesser scope) of DOE categorical exclusions described in 10

88

Pipe Rupture Frequencies for Internal Flooding Probabilistic Risk Assessments: Revision 3  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report updates a 2010 EPRI report (1021086) on piping system failure rates for use in probabilistic risk assessments (PRAs) involving internal plant flooding and high-energy line breaks (HELBs) and represents the third revision to this pipe failure rate handbook. These failure rate estimates are intended to satisfy requirements of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) and American Nuclear Society (ANS) PRA Standard RA-Sa-2009. The estimates also support an EPRI PRA Scope and ...

2013-04-26T23:59:59.000Z

89

Lower 48 States Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes,...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

23,304 34,428 60,644 97,449 131,616 2007-2011 Adjustments 1,690 7,579 1,584 2009-2011 Revision Increases 6,363 10,661 25,993 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 3,642 9,491 23,455...

90

Final Revised Environmental Assessment for The Proposed Construction and Operation of a Biosafety Level 3 Facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

R R Final Revised Environmental Assessment for The Proposed Construction and Operation of a Biosafety Level 3 Facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California Issued: December 2002 Revised: January 2008 Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Livermore Site Office This page intentionally left blank. FINAL Revised EA for the Proposed Construction and Operation of a Biosafety Level 3 Facility at LLNL ii FORWARD The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) of the Department of Energy (DOE) has responsibility for national programs to reduce and counter threats from weapons of mass destruction including nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons (bioweapons). NNSA's bioscience work at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) in support of these

91

Standard technical specifications - Babcock and Wilcox Plants: Bases (Sections 2.0-3.3). Volume 2, Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

This NUREG contains the improved Standard Technical Specifications (STS) for Babcock and Wilcox (B&W) plants. Revision 1 incorporates the cumulative changes to Revision 0, which was published in September 1992. The changes reflected in Revision 1 resulted from the experience gained from license amendment applications to convert to these improved STS or to adopt partial improvements to existing technical specifications. This NUREG is the result of extensive public technical meetings and discussions between the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff and various nuclear power plant licensees, Nuclear Steam Supply System (NSSS) Owners Groups, specifically the B&W Owners Group (BWOG), NSSS vendors, and the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI). The improved STS were developed based on the criteria in the Final Commission Policy Statement on Technical Specifications Improvements for Nuclear Power Reactors, dated July 22, 1993 (58 FR 39132). Licensees are encouraged to upgrade their technical specifications consistent with those criteria and conforming, to the extent practical and consistent with the licensing basis for the facility, to Revision 1 to the improved STS. The Commission continues to place the highest priority on requests for complete conversions to the improved STS. Licensees adopting portions of the improved STS to existing technical specifications should adopt all related requirements, as applicable, to achieve a high degree of standardization and consistency.

NONE

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

92

2013-2014 Additions and Revisions  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The 2013 2014 Additions and Revisions are now available with seven new methods, including three for testing 3-MCPD, and revisions to 25 previously approved methods. 2013-2014 Additions and Revisions Hardback Books Methods - Analyses Books Methods - An

93

RELAP5/MOD3 code manual: Summaries and reviews of independent code assessment reports. Volume 7, Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Summaries of RELAP5/MOD3 code assessments, a listing of the assessment matrix, and a chronology of the various versions of the code are given. Results from these code assessments have been used to formulate a compilation of some of the strengths and weaknesses of the code. These results are documented in the report. Volume 7 was designed to be updated periodically and to include the results of the latest code assessments as they become available. Consequently, users of Volume 7 should ensure that they have the latest revision available.

Moore, R.L.; Sloan, S.M.; Schultz, R.R.; Wilson, G.E. [Lockheed Idaho Technologies Co., Idaho Falls, ID (United States)

1996-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

94

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves, as of Dec. 31  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Data Series: Proved Reserves as of Dec. 31 Adjustments Revision Increases Revision Decreases Sales Acquisitions Extensions New Field Discoveries New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields Estimated Production Period: Data Series: Proved Reserves as of Dec. 31 Adjustments Revision Increases Revision Decreases Sales Acquisitions Extensions New Field Discoveries New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields Estimated Production Period: Annual Download Series History Download Series History Definitions, Sources & Notes Definitions, Sources & Notes Show Data By: Data Series Area 2009 2010 2011 View History U.S. 22,315 25,181 28,950 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 4,357 4,710 5,171 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 350 363 352 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 3,704 4,043 4,567 2009-2011 Texas 303 304 252 2009-2011 Alaska 3,566 3,722 3,852 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 18,749 21,459 25,098 2009-2011 Alabama 53 60 65 2009-2011 Arkansas 29 42 40 2009-2011

95

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves, as of Dec. 31  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Data Series: Proved Reserves as of Dec. 31 Adjustments Revision Increases Revision Decreases Sales Acquisitions Extensions New Field Discoveries New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields Estimated Production Period: Data Series: Proved Reserves as of Dec. 31 Adjustments Revision Increases Revision Decreases Sales Acquisitions Extensions New Field Discoveries New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields Estimated Production Period: Annual Download Series History Download Series History Definitions, Sources & Notes Definitions, Sources & Notes Show Data By: Data Series Area 2009 2010 2011 View History U.S. 22,315 25,181 28,950 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 4,357 4,710 5,171 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 350 363 352 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 3,704 4,043 4,567 2009-2011 Texas 303 304 252 2009-2011 Alaska 3,566 3,722 3,852 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 18,749 21,459 25,098 2009-2011 Alabama 53 60 65 2009-2011 Arkansas 29 42 40 2009-2011

96

C:\Eco-SSLs\Final Guidance November 2003\Attachments\Attachment 4-3\Revised TRV SOP 12012002.wpd  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3 3 Guidance for Developing Ecological Soil Screening Levels (Eco-SSLs) Eco-SSL Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) #4: Wildlife Toxicity Reference Value Literature Review, Data Extraction and Coding OSWER Directive 92857-55 Issued November 2003 Revised October 2005 This page left intentionally blank Attachment 4-3 Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) #4: Wildlife Toxicity Reference Value Literature Review, Data Extraction and Coding for Ecological Soil Screening Levels (Eco-SSLs) OSWER Directive 92857-55 October 2005 Prepared for USEPA Region 8 by Syracuse Research Corporation Denver, Colorado 80123 maintained by Computer Sciences Corporation Duluth, Minnesota 55804 Contract 68-W01-032, Task Order No. 24 This page left intentionally blank i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION

97

Federal Offshore, Pacific (California) Lease Condensate Proved...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

4 4 0 2 2 2 1979-2011 Adjustments -1 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 5 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 2...

98

State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Environmental Checklist Form 216-B-3 Expansion Ponds Closure Plan. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

The 216-B-3 Expansion Ponds Closure Plan (Revision 1) consists of a Part A Dangerous Waste Permit Application and a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Closure Plan. An explanation of the Part A submitted with this document is provided at the beginning of the Part A Section. The closure plan consists of nine chapters and five appendices. The 216-B-3 Pond System consists of a series of four earthen, unlined, interconnected ponds and the 216-B-3-3 Ditch that receive waste water from various 200 East Area operating facilities. These four ponds, collectively. Waste water (primarily cooling water, steam condensate, and sanitary water) from various 200 East Area facilities is discharged to the 216-B-3-3 Ditch. Water discharged to the 216-8-3-3 Ditch flows directly into the 216-B-3 Pond. In the past, waste water discharges to B Pond and the 216-B-3-3 Ditch contained mixed waste (radioactive waste and dangerous waste). The radioactive portion of mixed waste has been interpreted by the US Department of Energy (DOE) to be regulated under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954; the nonradioactive dangerous portion of mixed waste is regulated under RCRA. Mixed waste also may be considered a hazardous substance under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) when considering remediation of waste sites.

1993-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

99

REVISION POLICY  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

REVISION POLICY REVISION POLICY March 2007 Data are collected at the million cubic feet per month level and all calculations mentioned below are carried out at that precision. However, the data published in the Form EIA-914 Monthly Gas Production Report are rounded to the nearest 0.01 billion cubic feet per day (roughly 300 million cubic feet per month). Monthly estimates of gross production published in the Natural Gas Monthly at the national level are rounded to billion cubic feet and those for marketed production at the State level are rounded to million cubic feet. The prior month's production estimate will always be revised each month, when the production estimate for the latest data month is released. For example, a June estimate would be revised when a July estimate is released.

100

Revising the worksheet with L3: a language and environment for user-script interaction  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

1. J. K. Ousterhout, Tcl and the Tk Toolkit, Addison Wesley,languages, including Tcl [1], Lua [2], and Python [3], as

Hohn, Michael H.

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "3 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Federal Offshore U.S. Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

,357 4,710 5,171 2009-2011 Adjustments 0 -6 -1 2009-2011 Revision Increases 710 879 1,966 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 208 214 1,455 2009-2011 Sales 20 56 42 2009-2011 Acquisitions...

102

Wyoming Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and Production  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

0 0 1 0 2007-2011 Adjustments 1 -1 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 1 2 1 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 4 0 2009-2011 Extensions 0...

103

TX, RRC District 10 Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

0 0 0 0 0 2007-2011 Adjustments 0 0 -1 2009-2011 Revision Increases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011 Extensions...

104

Colorado Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and Production  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

0 0 4 4 10 2007-2011 Adjustments 1 -1 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 0 1 4 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 2 0 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011...

105

Michigan Lease Condensate Proved Reserves, Reserve Changes, and...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

6 5 4 19 15 15 1979-2011 Adjustments -1 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 17 1 2 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 4 1 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011...

106

Alaska Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

0 0 0 0 0 0 2005-2011 Adjustments 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011...

107

North Louisiana Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

1 7 9 0 0 0 2005-2011 Adjustments 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Sales 8 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011...

108

Louisiana Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes,...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

1 7 9 0 0 0 2005-2011 Adjustments 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Sales 8 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011...

109

Federal Offshore, Gulf of Mexico, Louisiana & Alabama Coalbed...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

0 0 0 0 0 0 2005-2011 Adjustments 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011...

110

New York Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

0 0 0 0 0 0 2005-2011 Adjustments 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011...

111

Texas Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

0 0 0 0 0 0 2005-2011 Adjustments 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011...

112

Kentucky Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

0 0 0 0 0 0 2005-2011 Adjustments 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011...

113

LA, South Onshore Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

0 0 0 0 0 0 2005-2011 Adjustments 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011...

114

California Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

0 0 0 0 0 0 2005-2011 Adjustments 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011...

115

DRAFT REVISION  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

4-1 4-1 Records Management Self-Assessment Revised Version Issued as P200.4-1B LM Procedure 200.4-1, Records Management Self-Assessment of 4/17/07, has undergone minor revisions. The procedure has been revised to reflect changes in definitions and formatting. Please replace LM Procedure 200.4-1A with LM Procedure 200.4-1B. The most recent and official controlled hard copy version of this document resides with LM's Directives Coordinator. An electronic version of the controlled document has been placed on the LM Intranet for employee use. Printed hard copies of this electronic version are considered uncontrolled documents. INITIATED BY: Office of Business Operations NO. OF PAGES/ATTACHMENTS: 8 pages, 2 attachments U.S. Department of Energy

116

DRAFT REVISION  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Summary of Changes To Procedure 200.1-5 Records Disaster Prevention, Mitigation, and Recovery Procedure Revised Version Issued as P 200.1-5B LM Procedure 200.1-5, Records Disaster Prevention, Mitigation, and Recovery Procedure of 1/19/07, has undergone revisions. The procedure has been revised to reflect changes in definitions and formatting and updates to the attached Plan. Please replace LM Procedure 200.1-5A with LM Procedure 200.1-5B. The most recent and official controlled hard copy version of this document resides with LM's Directives Coordinator. An electronic version of the controlled document has been placed on the LM Intranet for employee use. Printed hard copies of this electronic version are considered uncontrolled documents.

117

DRAFT REVISION  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

-2 -2 Processing Inactive Records Revised Version Issued as P 200.2-2B LM Procedure 200.2-2A, Processing Internal Inactive Records for Storage of 7/18/07, has undergone revision. The revised procedure includes updated references, definitions, and formatting. Please replace LM Procedure 200.2-2A with LM Procedure 200.2-2B. The most recent and official controlled hard copy version of this document resides with LM's Directives Coordinator. An electronic version of the controlled document has been placed on the LM Intranet for employee use. Printed hard copies of this electronic version are considered uncontrolled documents. Procedure 200.2-2B INITIATED BY: Office of Business Operations NO. OF PAGES/ATTACHMENTS: 10 pages, 4 attachments U.S. Department of Energy

118

Technical Bulletin Number 3 Revised January 4, 2011 Formed in 1982 with federal,  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Board in- cludes 6 representatives from producing state shellfish con- trol agencies, 3 representa sanitation agency. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration ensures the compli- ance of state shellfish sanitation agencies with the Guide for Control of Mollus- can Shellfish. State shellfish sanitation agencies

Florida, University of

119

SCALE: A modular code system for performing standardized computer analyses for licensing evaluation. Miscellaneous -- Volume 3, Revision 4  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

SCALE--a modular code system for Standardized Computer Analyses Licensing Evaluation--has been developed by Oak Ridge National Laboratory at the request of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The SCALE system utilizes well-established computer codes and methods within standard analysis sequences that (1) allow an input format designed for the occasional user and/or novice; (2) automate the data processing and coupling between modules, and (3) provide accurate and reliable results. System developments has been directed at problem-dependent cross-section processing and analysis of criticality safety, shielding, heat transfer, and depletion/decay problems. Since the initial release of SCALE in 1980, the code system has been heavily used for evaluation of nuclear fuel facility and package designs. This revision documents Version 4.2 of the system. This manual is divided into three volumes: Volume 1--for the control module documentation, Volume 2--for the functional module documentation, and Volume 3--for the data libraries and subroutine libraries.

Petrie, L.M.; Jordon, W.C. [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States); Edwards, A.L. [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States)]|[Lawrence Livermore National Lab., CA (United States)] [and others

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

120

Revising the worksheet with L3: a language and environment foruser-script interaction  

SciTech Connect

This paper describes a novel approach to the parameter anddata handling issues commonly found in experimental scientific computingand scripting in general. The approach is based on the familiarcombination of scripting language and user interface, but using alanguage expressly designed for user interaction and convenience. The L3language combines programming facilities of procedural and functionallanguages with the persistence and need-based evaluation of data flowlanguages. It is implemented in Python, has access to all Pythonlibraries, and retains almost complete source code compatibility to allowsimple movement of code between the languages. The worksheet interfaceuses metadata produced by L3 to provide selection of values through thescriptit self and allow users to dynamically evolve scripts withoutre-running the prior versions. Scripts can be edited via text editors ormanipulated as structures on a drawing canvas. Computed values are validscripts and can be used further in other scripts via simplecopy-and-paste operations. The implementation is freely available underan open-source license.

Hohn, Michael H.

2008-01-22T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "3 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Ligand Exchange during Unfolding of Cytochrome c* (Received for publication, February 3, 1999, and in revised form, April 9, 1999)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

, and in revised form, April 9, 1999) Syun-Ru Yeh and Denis L. Rousseau From the Department of Physiology of cytochrome c passes through an obligatory HW intermediate in which the heme is coordinated by a solvent water

Yeh, Syun-Ru

122

APS beamline standard components handbook, Version 1.3. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

This Handbook in its current version (1.3) contains descriptions, specifications, and preliminary engineering design drawings for many of the standard components. The design status and schedules have been provided wherever possible. In the near future, the APS plans to update engineering drawings of identified standard beamline components and complete the Handbook. The completed version of this Handbook will become available to both the CATs and potential vendors. Use of standard components should result in major cost reductions for CATs in the areas of beamline design and construction.

Hahn, U.; Shu, D.; Kuzay, T.M.

1993-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

123

Savannah River Site Environmental Monitoring Plan. Volume 1, Section 1000 Addendum: Revision 3  

SciTech Connect

This document -- the Savannah River Site Environmental Monitoring Plan (SRS EM Plan) -- has been prepared according to guidance contained in the DOE 5400 Series orders, in 10 CFR 834, and in DOE/EH-0173T, Environmental Regulatory Guide for Radiological Effluent Monitoring and environmental Surveillance [DOE, 1991]. The SRS EM Plan`s purpose is to define the criteria, regulations, and guideline requirements with which SRS will comply. These criteria and requirements are applicable to environmental monitoring activities performed in support of the SRS Environmental Monitoring Program (SRS EM Program), WSRC-3Q1-2, Volume 1, Section 1100. They are not applicable to monitoring activities utilized exclusively for process monitoring/control. The environmental monitoring program requirements documented in the SRS EM Plan incorporate all applicable should requirements of DOE/EH-0173T and expand upon them to include nonradiological environmental monitoring program requirements.

Jannik, G.T.

1994-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

124

Functions and requirements for tank farm restoration and safe operations, Project W-314. Revision 3  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Functions and Requirements document (FRD) establishes the basic performance criteria for Project W-314, in accordance with the guidance outlined in the letter from R.W. Brown, RL, to President, WHC, ``Tank Waste Remediation System (TWRS) Project Documentation Methodology,`` 94-PRJ-018, dated 3/18/94. The FRD replaces the Functional Design Criteria (FDC) as the project technical baseline documentation. Project W-314 will improve the reliability of safety related systems, minimize onsite health and safety hazards, and support waste retrieval and disposal activities by restoring and/or upgrading existing Tank Farm facilities and systems. The scope of Project W-314 encompasses the necessary restoration upgrades of the Tank Farms` instrumentation, ventilation, electrical distribution, and waste transfer systems.

Garrison, R.C.

1995-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

125

Coalbed Methane Reserves Extensions  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

724 497 736 2009-2011 724 497 736 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 0 0 0 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 0 0 0 2009-2011 Texas 0 0 0 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 724 497 736 2009-2011 Alabama 21 29 3 2009-2011 Arkansas 0 0 0 2009-2011 California 0 0 0 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Colorado 48 184 220 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kansas 7 1 3 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 0 0 0 2009-2011 North 0 0 0 2009-2011 South Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Michigan 0 0 0 2009-2011 Mississippi 0 0 0 2009-2011 Montana 3 3 0 2009-2011

126

GENERAL BULLETIN 2009-2011 1 GENERAL BULLETIN 2009-2011  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

. Flowsheeting program packages, like CHEMCAD, Aspen Plus, HYSYS, PRO/II, and ProSimPlus, are commonly used

Dormidontova, Elena E.

127

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Reserves Sales  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

249 803 1,024 2009-2011 249 803 1,024 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 20 56 42 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 20 54 42 2009-2011 Texas 0 2 0 2009-2011 Alaska 7 0 17 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 242 803 1,007 2009-2011 Alabama 0 3 11 2009-2011 Arkansas 3 3 28 2009-2011 California 3 1 7 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 1 0 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 2 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 3 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 5 2009-2011 Colorado 17 3 19 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Illinois 0 15 0 2009-2011 Indiana 0 2 0 2009-2011 Kansas 2 6 6 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 5 2009-2011 Louisiana 9 23 63 2009-2011 North 2 5 28 2009-2011 South Onshore 7 7 34 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 11 1 2009-2011

128

Federal Offshore Texas Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Area: Period: Annual : Download Series History: Definitions, Sources & Notes: Show ... 51: 80: 2009-2011: Revision Decreases : 17: 27: 86: 2009-2011: Sales : 0: 2: 0 ...

129

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Reserves Acquisitions  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

344 1,470 1,561 2009-2011 344 1,470 1,561 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 16 108 56 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 14 102 52 2009-2011 Texas 2 6 4 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 79 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 344 1,470 1,482 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 20 2009-2011 Arkansas 0 0 3 2009-2011 California 20 156 40 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 2 154 0 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 1 9 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 18 1 16 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 15 2009-2011 Colorado 2 38 4 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Illinois 0 9 0 2009-2011 Indiana 0 2 0 2009-2011 Kansas 2 8 19 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 6 4 2009-2011 Louisiana 11 52 53 2009-2011 North 1 12 31 2009-2011 South Onshore 7 26 17 2009-2011 State Offshore 3 14 5 2009-2011

130

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Reserves Acquisitions  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

344 1,470 1,561 2009-2011 344 1,470 1,561 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 16 108 56 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 14 102 52 2009-2011 Texas 2 6 4 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 79 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 344 1,470 1,482 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 20 2009-2011 Arkansas 0 0 3 2009-2011 California 20 156 40 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 2 154 0 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 1 9 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 18 1 16 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 15 2009-2011 Colorado 2 38 4 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Illinois 0 9 0 2009-2011 Indiana 0 2 0 2009-2011 Kansas 2 8 19 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 6 4 2009-2011 Louisiana 11 52 53 2009-2011 North 1 12 31 2009-2011 South Onshore 7 26 17 2009-2011 State Offshore 3 14 5 2009-2011

131

Coalbed Methane Reserves Adjustments  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

-14 784 -15 2009-2011 -14 784 -15 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 0 0 0 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 0 0 0 2009-2011 Texas 0 0 0 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States -14 784 -15 2009-2011 Alabama 0 61 -45 2009-2011 Arkansas 0 1 0 2009-2011 California 0 0 0 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Colorado 0 106 73 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kansas -3 -22 -6 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 0 0 0 2009-2011 North 0 0 0 2009-2011 South Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Michigan 0 0 0 2009-2011 Mississippi 0 0 0 2009-2011 Montana

132

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

46 188 207 2009-2011 46 188 207 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 0 -6 -1 2009-2011 Pacific (California) -1 -2 1 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 2 -3 -2 2009-2011 Texas -1 -1 0 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 1 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 46 188 206 2009-2011 Alabama 1 12 2 2009-2011 Arkansas 2 3 -2 2009-2011 California -17 14 32 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 1 0 -3 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 10 15 19 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore -30 1 16 2009-2011 State Offshore 2 -2 0 2009-2011 Colorado -9 25 -1 2009-2011 Florida -1 2 -2 2009-2011 Illinois 3 10 -10 2009-2011 Indiana -7 1 0 2009-2011 Kansas 20 61 22 2009-2011 Kentucky 4 -11 1 2009-2011 Louisiana -1 7 -8 2009-2011 North -4 -7 1 2009-2011 South Onshore 4 13 -6 2009-2011 State Offshore

133

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Reserves Extensions  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

,305 1,766 3,107 2009-2011 ,305 1,766 3,107 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 159 77 29 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 158 61 29 2009-2011 Texas 1 16 0 2009-2011 Alaska 25 30 40 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 1,280 1,736 3,067 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 0 2009-2011 Arkansas 0 6 0 2009-2011 California 30 24 37 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 1 1 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 1 1 6 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 22 13 18 2009-2011 State Offshore 7 9 12 2009-2011 Colorado 37 80 96 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Illinois 3 2 0 2009-2011 Indiana 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kansas 2 5 23 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 26 28 21 2009-2011 North 1 2 0 2009-2011 South Onshore 24 25 17 2009-2011 State Offshore

134

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Reserves Extensions  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

,305 1,766 3,107 2009-2011 ,305 1,766 3,107 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 159 77 29 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 158 61 29 2009-2011 Texas 1 16 0 2009-2011 Alaska 25 30 40 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 1,280 1,736 3,067 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 0 2009-2011 Arkansas 0 6 0 2009-2011 California 30 24 37 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 1 1 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 1 1 6 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 22 13 18 2009-2011 State Offshore 7 9 12 2009-2011 Colorado 37 80 96 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Illinois 3 2 0 2009-2011 Indiana 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kansas 2 5 23 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 26 28 21 2009-2011 North 1 2 0 2009-2011 South Onshore 24 25 17 2009-2011 State Offshore

135

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate New Reservoir Discoveries in...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

North 0 0 0 2009-2011 South Onshore 3 5 2 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 1 0 2009-2011 Michigan 5 0 1 2009-2011 Mississippi 0 0 0 2009-2011 Montana 0 2 1 2009-2011 Nebraska 0 0 0...

136

HNF-37489-FP Revision  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

HNF-37489-FP HNF-37489-FP Revision 0 Project Hanford Management Contractor foc the US. Deparbnsnt of Energy under Contract DE-ACO6-96RL13200 FLUOR, P.O. Box 1000 Richland, Washington Implementation of the Seismic Design Criteria for DOE-STD-I 189-2008, Appendix A HNF-37489-FP Revision 0 Implementation of the Seismic Design Criteria for DOE-STD-1189- 2008, Appendix A S. K. Omberg Fluor Government Group Date Published April 2008 To Be Presented at The Nuclear Renaissanm. Safety Analysls for the New Nuclear Age Energy Facility Contractow Group May 3 - 8,2008 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management Pmject Hanford Management CcntractOr for the US. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC0696RL132W FLUOR, P.O. Box I000

137

OMB Circular A-76 (Revised)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON, DC 20503 May 29, 2003 CIRCULAR NO. A-76 (REVISED) TO THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND ESTABLISHMENTS SUBJECT: Performance of Commercial Activities 1. Purpose. This circular establishes federal policy for the competition of commercial activities. 2. Supersession. This circular supersedes Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular No. A-76 (Revised 1999), August 4, 1983; Circular No. A-76 Revised Supplemental Handbook (Revised 2000), March 1996; Office of Federal Procurement Policy Letter 92-1, "Inherently Governmental Functions," September 23, 1992; and OMB Transmittal Memoranda 1 through 25, Performance of Commercial Activities. 3. Authority. Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1970 (31 U.S.C. § 1111); Executive Order 11541; the Office

138

Federal Offshore U.S. Lease Condensate Proved Reserves, Reserve...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

254 255 227 228 214 195 1981-2011 Adjustments -8 2 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 72 59 56 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 36 37 55 2009-2011 Sales 5 13 8 2009-2011 Acquisitions 1 10...

139

TX, RRC District 1 Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

2 435 1,564 5,123 2007-2011 Adjustments 5 8 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 1 322 2,141 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 251 48 2009-2011 Sales 0 409 1,132 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0...

140

Montana Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and Production  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

140 125 137 186 192 2007-2011 Adjustments 8 40 14 2009-2011 Revision Increases 42 14 14 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 34 16 14 2009-2011 Sales 2 1 42 2009-2011 Acquisitions 2 0 41...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "3 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

North Dakota Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

21 24 368 1,185 1,649 2007-2011 Adjustments 101 235 20 2009-2011 Revision Increases 119 528 439 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 17 343 290 2009-2011 Sales 1 28 115 2009-2011...

142

Miscellaneous Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

6 58 134 121 75 2007-2011 Adjustments 23 0 49 2009-2011 Revision Increases 4 17 19 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 22 77 27 2009-2011 Sales 0 11 89 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0...

143

West Virginia Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

14 688 2,491 6,043 2007-2011 Adjustments 140 701 -2 2009-2011 Revision Increases 58 289 702 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 13 543 139 2009-2011 Sales 0 2 126 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0...

144

TX, RRC District 4 Onshore Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

78 565 2,611 2007-2011 Adjustments 53 0 185 2009-2011 Revision Increases 0 66 792 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 12 295 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 75 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 75...

145

TX, RRC District 8 Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

5 48 24 90 61 2007-2011 Adjustments -1 53 -79 2009-2011 Revision Increases 2 20 45 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 22 0 12 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 20...

146

TX, RRC District 6 Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

0 173 1,161 4,381 6,584 2007-2011 Adjustments 40 1,968 26 2009-2011 Revision Increases 422 1,206 2,322 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 8 1,319 1,860 2009-2011 Sales 0 88 879 2009-2011...

147

West Virginia Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

94 255 246 220 220 139 2005-2011 Adjustments 0 0 -1 2009-2011 Revision Increases 19 15 35 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 38 25 47 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 50 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 5 0...

148

Utah Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and Production  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

750 922 893 725 718 679 2000-2011 Adjustments 0 8 9 2009-2011 Revision Increases 9 77 46 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 110 30 31 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 130 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0...

149

Pennsylvania Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

50 108 102 131 129 124 2005-2011 Adjustments 0 -1 1 2009-2011 Revision Increases 29 2 1 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 1 0 2 2009-2011 Sales 17 0 1 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0...

150

Alabama Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

2,068 2,126 1,727 1,342 1,298 1,210 1989-2011 Adjustments 0 61 -45 2009-2011 Revision Increases 17 134 23 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 316 51 86 2009-2011 Sales 2 266 104 2009-2011...

151

Oklahoma Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

684 1,265 511 338 325 274 2005-2011 Adjustments 1 27 27 2009-2011 Revision Increases 81 82 91 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 216 84 98 2009-2011 Sales 6 6 40 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0...

152

Virginia Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

,813 1,948 1,851 2,261 1,752 1,623 2005-2011 Adjustments 0 1 26 2009-2011 Revision Increases 219 16 87 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 459 199 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011...

153

DRAFT REVISION  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Handling h. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER) Directive No. 9833.3A-1, December 1990, Final Guidance on...

154

Shale Natural Gas New Field Discoveries  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

868 557 232 2009-2011 868 557 232 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 868 557 232 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 2009-2010 Arkansas 0 0 0 2009-2011 California 0 2011-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 2011-2011 Colorado 4 0 0 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 244 48 0 2009-2011 North 244 48 0 2009-2011 Michigan 0 2 0 2009-2011 Montana 0 0 0 2009-2011 New Mexico 0 0 0 2009-2011 East 0 0 0 2009-2011 West 0 0 0 2009-2011 North Dakota 6 8 2 2009-2011 Ohio 0 0 2009-2010 Oklahoma 0 54 37 2009-2011 Pennsylvania 120 49 162 2009-2011 Texas 353 396 31 2009-2011 RRC District 1 353 114 20 2009-2011 RRC District 2 Onshore 282 0 2010-2011 RRC District 3 Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 RRC District 4 Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 RRC District 5 0 0 0 2009-2011

155

Shale Natural Gas New Field Discoveries  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

868 557 232 2009-2011 868 557 232 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 868 557 232 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 2009-2010 Arkansas 0 0 0 2009-2011 California 0 2011-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 2011-2011 Colorado 4 0 0 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 244 48 0 2009-2011 North 244 48 0 2009-2011 Michigan 0 2 0 2009-2011 Montana 0 0 0 2009-2011 New Mexico 0 0 0 2009-2011 East 0 0 0 2009-2011 West 0 0 0 2009-2011 North Dakota 6 8 2 2009-2011 Ohio 0 0 2009-2010 Oklahoma 0 54 37 2009-2011 Pennsylvania 120 49 162 2009-2011 Texas 353 396 31 2009-2011 RRC District 1 353 114 20 2009-2011 RRC District 2 Onshore 282 0 2010-2011 RRC District 3 Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 RRC District 4 Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 RRC District 5 0 0 0 2009-2011

156

Shale Natural Gas Reserves Sales  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

563 1,685 22,694 2009-2011 563 1,685 22,694 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 563 1,685 22,694 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 2009-2010 Arkansas 3 336 6,087 2009-2011 California 0 2011-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 2011-2011 Colorado 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 45 2009-2011 Louisiana 3 11 3,782 2009-2011 North 3 11 3,782 2009-2011 Michigan 0 553 682 2009-2011 Montana 2 1 42 2009-2011 New Mexico 0 0 0 2009-2011 East 0 0 0 2009-2011 West 0 0 0 2009-2011 North Dakota 1 28 115 2009-2011 Ohio 0 0 2009-2010 Oklahoma 0 0 1,591 2009-2011 Pennsylvania 0 163 209 2009-2011 Texas 554 580 9,926 2009-2011 RRC District 1 0 409 1,132 2009-2011 RRC District 2 Onshore 0 61 2010-2011 RRC District 3 Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 RRC District 4 Onshore 0 0 75 2009-2011

157

Policy Flash 2013-38 Revised Merit Review Guide For Financial...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3-38 Revised Merit Review Guide For Financial Assistance Policy Flash 2013-38 Revised Merit Review Guide For Financial Assistance Attached is Policy Flash 2013-38 Revised Merit...

158

Microsoft Word - NDA Box PDP Plan-Revision 4-final  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Characterization Program Revision 4 May 2013 This document supersedes Revision 3 of DOECBFO-01-1006 U.S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office Office of the National TRU...

159

CORRECTIVE ACTION DECISION DOCUMENT FOR THE AREA 3 LANDFILL COMPLEX, TONOPAH TEST RANGE, CAU 424, REVISION 0, MARCH 1998  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Decision Document (CADD) has been prepared for the Area 3 Landfill Complex (Corrective Action Unit [CAU] 424) in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) of 1996. Corrective Action Unit 424 is located at the Tonopah Test Range (TTR) and is comprised of the following Corrective Action Sites (CASs), each an individual landfill located around and within the perimeter of the Area 3 Compound (DOE/NV, 1996a): (1) Landfill A3-1 is CAS No. 03-08-001-A301. (2) Landfill A3-2 is CAS No. 03-08-002-A302. (3) Landfill A3-3 is CAS No. 03-08-002-A303. (4) Landfill A3-4 is CAS No. 03-08-002-A304. (5) Landfill A3-5 is CAS No. 03-08-002-A305. (6) Landfill A3-6 is CAS No. 03-08-002-A306. (7) Landfill A3-7 is CAS No. 03-08-002-A307. (8) Landfill A3-8 is CAS No. 03-08-002-A308. The purpose of this CADD is to identify and provide a rationale for the selection of a recommended corrective action alternative for each CAS. The scope of this CADD consists of the following: (1) Develop corrective action objectives. (2) Identify corrective action alternative screening criteria. (3) Develop corrective action alternatives. (4) Perform detailed and comparative evaluations of the corrective action alternatives in relation to the corrective action objectives and screening criteria. (6) Recommend and justify a preferred corrective action alternative for each CAS. In June and July 1997, a corrective action investigation was performed as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan (CAIP) for CAU No. 424: Area 3 Landfill Complex, Tonopah Test Range, Nevada (DOE/NV, 1997). Details can be found in Appendix A of this document. The results indicated four groupings of site characteristics as shown in Table ES-1. Based on the potential exposure pathways, the following corrective action objectives have been identified for CAU No. 424: (1) Prevent or mitigate human exposure to subsurface soils containing waste. (2) Remediate the site per applicable state and federal regulations (NAC, 1996c). (3) Prevent adverse impacts to groundwater quality. Based on the review of existing data, future land use, and current operations at the TTR, the following alternatives were developed for consideration at the Area 3 Landfill Complex CAU: Alternative 1 - No Action; Alternative 2 - Administrative Closure; Alternative 3 - Partial Excavation, Backfill, and Recontouring The corrective action alternatives were evaluated based on four general corrective action standards and five remedy-selection decision factors. Based on the results of this evaluation, preferred alternatives were selected for each CAS as indicated in Table ES-2. The preferred corrective action alternatives were evaluated on their technical merits, focusing on performance, reliability, feasibility, and safety. The alternatives were judged to meet all requirements for the technical components evaluated. These alternatives meet all applicable state and federal regulations for closure of the site and will reduce potential future exposure pathways to the contents of the landfills. During corrective action implementation, these alternatives will present minimal potential threat to site workers who come in contact with the waste. However, procedures will be developed and implemented to ensure worker health and safety.

DOE /NV

1998-03-03T23:59:59.000Z

160

Shale Natural Gas New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

1,613 1,149 699 2009-2011 1,613 1,149 699 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 1,613 1,149 699 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 2009-2010 Arkansas 0 0 0 2009-2011 California 0 2011-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 2011-2011 Colorado 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 1,377 172 140 2009-2011 North 1,377 172 140 2009-2011 Michigan 0 0 0 2009-2011 Montana 0 0 1 2009-2011 New Mexico 0 0 0 2009-2011 East 0 0 0 2009-2011 West 0 0 0 2009-2011 North Dakota 1 1 2 2009-2011 Ohio 0 0 2009-2010 Oklahoma 162 0 0 2009-2011 Pennsylvania 0 871 319 2009-2011 Texas 65 36 93 2009-2011 RRC District 1 0 14 0 2009-2011 RRC District 2 Onshore 2 81 2010-2011 RRC District 3 Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 RRC District 4 Onshore 30 0 12 2009-2011 RRC District 5

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "3 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Revised (05/06)  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OMB No. 1901-0260 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OMB No. 1901-0260 (Revised 03/12) Germantown, MD 20874-1290 Expires: General Information 1. Purpose Standard Remittance Advice (RA) form is a mandatory form designed to serve as the source document for entries into the Department's accounting records under Public Law 97-425 data from Purchasers concerning payment of their contribution to the Nuclear Waste Fund. 2. Who Shall Submit The RA must be submitted by Purchasers who signed the Standard Contract for Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and/or High-Level Radioactive Waste. Submit Copy 1, 2, and 3 to DOE, Energy Finance and Accounting Service Center and retain Copy 4.

162

WindSENSE Project Summary: FY2009-2011  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Renewable resources, such as wind and solar, are providing an increasingly larger percentage of our energy needs. To successfully integrate these intermittent resources into the power grid while maintaining its reliability, we need to better understand the characteristics and predictability of the variability associated with these power generation resources. WindSENSE, a three year project at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, considered the problem of scheduling wind energy on the grid from the viewpoint of the control room operator. Our interviews with operators at Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), Southern California Edison (SCE), and California Independent System Operator (CaISO), indicated several challenges to integrating wind power generation into the grid. As the percentage of installed wind power has increased, the variable nature of the generation has become a problem. For example, in the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) balancing area, the installed wind capacity has increased from 700 MW in 2006-2007 to over 1300 MW in 2008 and more than 2600 MW in 2009. To determine the amount of energy to schedule for the hours ahead, operators typically use 0-6 hour ahead forecasts, along with the actual generation in the previous hours and days. These forecasts are obtained from numerical weather prediction (NWP) simulations or based on recent trends in wind speed in the vicinity of the wind farms. However, as the wind speed can be difficult to predict, especially in a region with complex terrain, the forecasts can be inaccurate. Complicating matters are ramp events, where the generation suddenly increases or decreases by a large amount in a short time (Figure 1, right panel). These events are challenging to predict, and given their short duration, make it difficult to keep the load and the generation balanced. Our conversations with BPA, SCE, and CaISO indicated that control room operators would like (1) more accurate wind power generation forecasts for use in scheduling and (2) additional information that can be exploited when the forecasts do not match the actual generation. To achieve this, WindSENSE had two areas of focus: (1) analysis of historical data for better insights, and (2) observation targeting for improved forecasts. The goal was to provide control room operators with an awareness of wind conditions and energy forecasts so they can make well-informed scheduling decisions, especially in the case of extreme events such as ramps.

Kamath, C

2011-09-25T23:59:59.000Z

163

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

46 188 207 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 0 -6 -1 2009-2011 Pacific (California) -1 -2 1 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 2 -3 -2 2009-2011 Texas -1 -1 0 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 1...

164

Wyoming Lease Condensate Proved Reserves, Reserve Changes, and...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 View History Proved Reserves as of Dec. 31 211 234 272 256 259 2007-2011 Adjustments 7 8 -6 2009-2011 Revision Increases 56 66 31 2009-2011 Revision...

165

SNS FY 2013 Q1-4 Revision 2 Approved  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3 Q1-4 Revision 2 Approved Revised 6112013 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6...

166

Montana Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Area: Period: Annual : Download Series History: Definitions, Sources & Notes: Show ... 51: 2009-2011: Sales : 3: 115: 46: 2009-2011: Acquisitions : 3: 115: 45: 2009 ...

167

2009 Revisions EIA-914  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

for Texas, which was partially the cause for the review of the EIA-914, which, in turn, led to the development and implementation of this new methodology. Downward revisions in...

168

Closure Report (CR) for Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 91: Area 3 U-3fi Injection Well with Errata Sheet and Certification, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

The closure report for CAU 91 has no Use Restriction Form or drawing/map included in the document to describe the use restricted area, however, Section 3.3.3 states that the site will be fenced and signage placed indicating the area as a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Unit. The drawing that was placed in the FFACO indicating the use restricted area lists the coordinates for the RCRA Unit in Nevada State Plan Coordinates - North American Datum of 1983. In the ensuing years the reporting of coordinates has been standardized so that all coordinates are reported in the same manner, which is: NAD 27 UTM Zone 11 N, meters. This Errata Sheet updates the coordinate reporting to the currently accepted method and includes an aerial photo showing the RCRA Unit with the coordinates listed showing the use restricted area.

Navarro Nevada Environmental Services

2010-08-10T23:59:59.000Z

169

Reference: Revised Tariff Sheet  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Company (TrAILCo), a revised tariff sheet to correct the FERC Form No. 1 line reference in TrAILCos formula rate. Pursuant to the authority delegated to the Director, Division of Electric Power Regulation- East, under 18 C.F.R. 375.307, your submittal filed in the above referenced docket is accepted for filing, effective May 17, 2010, as requested. 1 Notice of the filing was published in the Federal Register, with comments, protests, or interventions due on or before June 3, 2010. No protests or adverse comments were filed. American Municipal Power, Inc. and PJM Interconnection, LLC filed timely motions to intervene. Notices of intervention and unopposed timely filed motions to intervene are granted pursuant to Rule 214 of the Commissions Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 C.F.R. 385.214). Any opposed or untimely filed motion to intervene is governed by the provisions of Rule 214. This acceptance for filing shall not be construed as constituting approval of any rate, charge, classification or any rule, regulation, or practice affecting such rate or 1

Stephen Angle Esq; Dear Mr. Angle; Jignasa P. Gadani

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

170

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Reserves Sales  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, ... Michigan : 0: 0: 0: 2009-2011: Mississippi : 4: 8: 0: 2009-2011: Montana : 3: ...

171

Record of Technical Change {number_sign}1 for ''Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 406: Area 3 Building 03-74 and Building 03-58 Underground Discharge Points and Corrective Action Unit 429: Area 3 Building 03-55 and Area 9 Building 09-52 Underground Discharge Points, Tonopah Test Range, Nevada'' Revision 0  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Record of Technical Change provides updates to the technical information included in ''Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 406: Area 3 Building 03-74 and Building 03-58 Underground Discharge Points and Corrective Action Unit 429: Area 3 Building 03-55 and Area 9 Building 09-52 Underground Discharge Points, Tonopah Test Range, Nevada'' Revision 0

US DOE Nevada Operations Office

1999-06-30T23:59:59.000Z

172

Colorado Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

6,344 7,869 8,238 7,348 6,485 6,580 1989-2011 Adjustments 0 106 73 2009-2011 Revision Increases 126 937 698 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 566 1,557 367 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 1,034...

173

Lower 48 States Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

19,620 21,874 20,798 18,578 17,508 16,817 2005-2011 Adjustments -14 784 -15 2009-2011 Revision Increases 1,563 2,589 2,071 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 2,486 2,914 1,668 2009-2011...

174

Revision of DOE Manual 460.2-1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

, 2005 , 2005 TEC/WG 1 Revision of DOE M 460.2-1, Radioactive Material Transportation Practices Manual Revision of DOE M 460.2-1, Radioactive Material Transportation Practices Manual Ella McNeil Office of Transportation, EM-11 September 20, 2005 TEC/WG 2 Getting Started Getting Started * Establish an internal writing team, lead by EM: - Field Representatives - Naval Reactors - NNSA - RW * Kick-off on August 3 (conference call) * Second conference call on Sept. 8 September 20, 2005 TEC/WG 3 Proposed Revision Timeline Proposed Revision Timeline Writing team completes new draft of Manual 1/06 Begin informal DOE review of revised Manual (field, GC, PSOs) 2/06 (3 weeks) Comment resolution by writing team complete, provide draft to internal management for review 3/06 (2 weeks) Draft Manual is provided to SRGs

175

CRADA Order Revision  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CRADA Order Revision CRADA Order Revision Linda Field Patent Counsel Department of Energy Goal CRADA Order DOE O 483.1 CRADA Manual DOE M 483.1-1 CRADA Order DOE O XXXX.X Departmental Directive Program Types of Directives Policies Regulations Orders Notices Manuals Guides Technical Standards Departmental Directive Program Directives Life Cycle Development Coordination Implementation Review (Certification) Development Phase *Orders are uploaded to RevCom for review and comment by all affected parties *60 days to develop draft & submit to MA-90 *Solicits input from stakeholders ( incl. field, contractors, and/or program counsel) Coordination Phase *MA-90 parses directive & sets due dates for review & comment *HQ Directives Points of Contact (DPCs) *Have 45 days to submit official comments on behalf of their

176

ADR Revised Policy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Alternative Dispute Resolution Alternative Dispute Resolution AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Notice of Revised Policy Statement. SUMMARY: On October 24, 1995, the Department of Energy (DOE) published an interim Statement of Policy on Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) (60 FR 54482) to further its commitment to the use of ADR for resolving issues in controversy in a fair, timely, and cost efficient manner, and to comply with the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act (ADRA), 5 U.S.C. §571 et seq. Today, DOE publishes a revised Statement of Policy on Alternative Dispute Resolution to reaffirm its commitment to the use of ADR, including the use of Environmental Conflict Resolution (ECR) and other collaborative processes that may be utilized to prevent or avoid potential conflicts.

177

Shale Natural Gas Reserves Extensions  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

22,332 29,081 32,764 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 22,332 29,081 32,764 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 2009-2010 Arkansas 4,441 3,014 2,073 2009-2011 Colorado 0 3 5...

178

Coal Data Publication Revision Policy  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

THEN Survey Manager determines impact: WHAT happens next to the database and in our coal reports: Respondent provides data that are clearly incorrect or revised data for any...

179

EPA Revises Emissions Estimation Methodology  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

The changes to the historical emission estimates are the result of revisions to the data and estimation ... b K.D . Smythe, RAND ... RAND Environmental Science and ...

180

Energy Department Revises NEPA Regulations to Improve Efficiency |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revises NEPA Regulations to Improve Efficiency Revises NEPA Regulations to Improve Efficiency Energy Department Revises NEPA Regulations to Improve Efficiency October 3, 2011 - 12:39pm Addthis Washington, D.C. -- The U.S. Department of Energy will save time and money in its environmental reviews of many proposed energy projects under revised regulations approved September 27, 2011, to implement the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The revisions focus on the Department's categorical exclusion provisions, and reflect the first update to these provisions in 15 years. A categorical exclusion applies to a class of actions that an agency has determined normally do not individually or cumulatively have a significant impact on the human environment. "Updating our NEPA rule allows us to accomplish our environmental reviews

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "3 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Shale Natural Gas Reserves Extensions  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

22,332 29,081 32,764 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 22,332 29,081 32,764 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 2009-2010 Arkansas 4,441 3,014 2,073 2009-2011 California 43...

182

Shale Natural Gas Reserves Sales  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

563 1,685 22,694 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 563 1,685 22,694 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 2009-2010 Arkansas 3 336 6,087 2009-2011 California 0 2011-2011 San Joaquin...

183

REPORT NO. 6 revised fallout  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

REPORT NO. 6 revised fallout estimates for 1964-1965 and verification of the 1963 predictions October 1964 Report of the FEDERAL RADIATION COUNCIL #12;REPORT NO. 6 revised fallout estimates - #12;SUMMARY On the basis of information available in June 1964, new estimates of the levels of fallout

184

2008 MERRTT Revision Letter  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

November 2, 2007 November 2, 2007 The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Transportation Emergency Preparedness Program (TEPP) is pleased to announce the release of the 2008 Modular Emergency Response Radiological Transportation Training (MERRTT). This revision replaces the 2005 MERRTT CD-ROM set. As required by the WIPP Land Withdrawal Act, the 2008 MERRTT has been sent to the Occupational, Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) for review. The 2008 version of MERRTT includes several enhancements, but the primary enhancement is the addition of the decontamination dress-down video. Comments received on the decontamination video script in the fall 2006 were incorporated into the script and the filming and final editing were completed in the spring 2007. The decontamination video was added to MERRTT to support the students'

185

Recent Revisions to PVWATTS  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

PVWATTS is an Internet-accessible software program that allows the user to easily calculate the energy production and cost savings for grid-connected photovoltaic (PV) systems located throughout the United States. To ensure that PVWATTS continues to meet its users' needs, an online survey form was provided to users to identify areas for improvement. The results of the survey were used to prioritize improvements to PVWATTS in FY2005. PVWATTS was revised by changing the PV system specification input for system size from an AC power rating to a nameplate DC power rating; adding an input for an overall DC to AC derate factor; updating the residential electric rates; adding monthly and yearly solar radiation values for the PV array; and simplifying the user interface for Version 2.

Marion, B.; Anderberg, M.; Gray-Hann, P.

2005-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

186

Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9...

187

Utah Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Million Barrels) Utah Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

188

Utah Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Revision...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6...

189

Utah Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Revision...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6...

190

Utah Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

191

Utah Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

192

Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9...

193

Utah Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Million Barrels) Utah Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

194

Miscellaneous States Shale Gas Proved Reserves Revision Increases...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Miscellaneous States Shale Gas Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7...

195

Miscellaneous States Shale Gas Proved Reserves Revision Decreases...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Miscellaneous States Shale Gas Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7...

196

California Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) California Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

197

California Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) California Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

198

Ohio Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Ohio Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9...

199

Ohio Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Ohio Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9...

200

U.S. Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Reserves Revision Decreases ...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Decreases (Million Barrels) U.S. Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "3 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

U.S. Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Reserves Revision Increases ...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Increases (Million Barrels) U.S. Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

202

Michigan Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Michigan Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

203

Michigan Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Michigan Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

204

U.S. Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) U.S. Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

205

U.S. Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) U.S. Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

206

Colorado Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Colorado Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

207

U.S. Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Decreases (Million Barrels) U.S. Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

208

U.S. Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Increases (Million Barrels) U.S. Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

209

New Mexico - West Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) New Mexico - West Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7...

210

New Mexico Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) New Mexico Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

211

New Mexico - East Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) New Mexico - East Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7...

212

New Mexico - West Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) New Mexico - West Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7...

213

New Mexico - East Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) New Mexico - East Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7...

214

Texas Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Texas Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9...

215

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, EDICS 2.3 / 1.4. REVISED 7/12/99. 1 Exact Distribution of Edge-Preserving MAP Estimators  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

-parametric estimation in the case of incomplete data," Signal Processing, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 3­17, 1995. [7] L Bedini

Erdogan, Hakan

216

Building Technologies Office: Standards Development and Revision  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

and Revision to someone by E-mail Share Building Technologies Office: Standards Development and Revision on Facebook Tweet about Building Technologies Office: Standards Development...

217

ISM Plan - Chemical Sciences Division - Revised May 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

ISM Plan - Chemical Sciences Division - Revised May 2012 ISM Plan - Chemical Sciences Division - Revised May 2012 Page 2 of 25 Page intentionally left blank ISM Plan - Chemical Sciences Division - Revised May 2012 Page 3 of 25 Chemical Sciences Division ISM Plan May 2012 Page 1.0 Policy Statement 5 2.0 Description of Division/Organization, Mission and Scope of Work 5 3.0 Accountability 7 3.01 Line Management Responsibility and Accountability 8 3.02 Specific Principal Investigator Responsibilities 8 3.03 Work Lead EH&S Responsibilities 8 3.04 CSD personnel EH&S Responsibilities (Non-Supervisor or Work Lead) 9 3.05 Students 10 3.06 Work Off-Site 10 3.07 Telecommuting 11

218

Revision of DOE Manual 460.2-1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 TEC/WG 1 Revision of DOE M 460.2-1, Radioactive Material Transportation Practices Manual Revision of DOE M 460.2-1, Radioactive Material Transportation Practices Manual DOE Writing Team March 2006 TEC/WG 2 Proposed Revision Timeline Proposed Revision Timeline Complete new draft of Manual 2/06 Draft Manual provided to Manual Review Topic Group for review & comment 3/14/06 Comments due from Topic Group 5/01/06 Final draft Manual 7/06 Comment resolution (thru conference calls with Topic Group, as needed) 6/06 March 2006 TEC/WG 3 Proposed Timeline (contd.) Proposed Timeline (contd.) Manual is submitted into the formal Directives process 9/06 Manual reissued 12/06 March 2006 TEC/WG 4 Major Changes Made to the Manual Major Changes Made to the Manual * Clarification/update of information relative

219

Long-Term Surveillance Plan for the Collins Ranch Disposal Site, Lakeview, Oregon, DOE/AL/62350-19F, Revision 3, August 1994  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

blank blank This page intentionally left blank LONG-TERM SURMtUANQ M N FOA T ) ( E C O W S RANW D S W S A L S m . IAKEVEW . OREOON T A W UF C O N l W f S TABLE OF CONTENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1 ........................................... 1.1 Background 1-1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.2 Licensing process 1-3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.3 Long-term surveillance plan 1-3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.0 FINAL SITE CONDITIONS 2-1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.1 Site history 2-1 ..................................... 2.2 Final site conditions 2-2 2.2.1 Description and location of the disposal site area . . . . . . . . . . . 2-2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.2.2 Disposal site access and security 2-4 .

220

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 569: Area 3 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 569 is located in Area 3 of the Nevada National Security Site, which is approximately 65 miles northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada. Corrective Action Unit 569 comprises the nine numbered corrective action sites (CASs) and one newly identified site listed below: (1) 03-23-09, T-3 Contamination Area (hereafter referred to as Annie, Franklin, George, and Moth); (2) 03-23-10, T-3A Contamination Area (hereafter referred to as Harry and Hornet); (3) 03-23-11, T-3B Contamination Area (hereafter referred to as Fizeau); (4) 03-23-12, T-3S Contamination Area (hereafter referred to as Rio Arriba); (5) 03-23-13, T-3T Contamination Area (hereafter referred to as Catron); (6) 03-23-14, T-3V Contamination Area (hereafter referred to as Humboldt); (7) 03-23-15, S-3G Contamination Area (hereafter referred to as Coulomb-B); (8) 03-23-16, S-3H Contamination Area (hereafter referred to as Coulomb-A); (9) 03-23-21, Pike Contamination Area (hereafter referred to as Pike); and (10) Waste Consolidation Site 3A. Because CAU 569 is a complicated site containing many types of releases, it was agreed during the data quality objectives (DQO) process that these sites will be grouped. These sites are being investigated because existing information on the nature and extent of potential contamination is insufficient to evaluate and recommend corrective action alternatives (CAAs). Additional information will be obtained by conducting a corrective action investigation before evaluating CAAs and selecting the appropriate corrective action for each study group. The results of the field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of viable CAAs that will be presented in the Corrective Action Decision Document. The sites will be investigated based on the DQOs developed on September 26, 2011, by representatives of the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office. The DQO process was used to identify and define the type, amount, and quality of data needed to develop and evaluate appropriate corrective actions for CAU 569. The presence and nature of contamination at CAU 569 will be evaluated based on information collected from a field investigation. Radiological contamination will be evaluated based on a comparison of the total effective dose (TED) at sample locations to the dose-based final action level (FAL). The TED will be calculated as the total of separate estimates of internal and external dose. Results from the analysis of soil samples will be used to calculate internal radiological dose. Thermoluminescent dosimeters placed at the center of each sample location will be used to measure external radiological dose. A field investigation will be performed to define any areas where TED exceeds the FAL and to determine whether contaminants of concern are present at the site from other potential releases. The presence and nature of contamination from other types of releases (e.g., excavation, migration, and any potential releases discovered during the investigation) will be evaluated using soil samples collected from biased locations indicating the highest levels of contamination. Appendix A provides a detailed discussion of the DQO methodology and the objectives specific to each study group.

Patrick Matthews; Christy Sloop

2012-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "3 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Preference revision via declarative debugging  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Preference criteria are rarely static. Often they are subject to modification and aggregation. The resulting preference criteria may not satisfy the properties of the original ones and must therefore be revised. This paper investigates the problem of ...

Pierangelo DellAcqua; Lus Moniz Pereira

2005-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

222

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 428: Area 3 Septic Waste Systems 1 and 5, Tonopah Test Range, Nevada, REVISION 0, march 1999  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 428, Area 3 Septic Waste Systems 1 and 5, has been developed in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order that was agreed to by the U. S. Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office; the State of Nevada Division of Environmental Protection; and the U. S. Department of Defense. Corrective Action Unit 428 consists of Corrective Action Sites 03- 05- 002- SW01 and 03- 05- 002- SW05, respectively known as Area 3 Septic Waste System 1 and Septic Waste System 5. This Corrective Action Investigation Plan is used in combination with the Work Plan for Leachfield Corrective Action Units: Nevada Test Site and Tonopah Test Range, Nevada , Rev. 1 (DOE/ NV, 1998c). The Leachfield Work Plan was developed to streamline investigations at leachfield Corrective Action Units by incorporating management, technical, quality assurance, health and safety, public involvement, field sampling, and waste management information common to a set of Corrective Action Units with similar site histories and characteristics into a single document that can be referenced. This Corrective Action Investigation Plan provides investigative details specific to Corrective Action Unit 428. A system of leachfields and associated collection systems was used for wastewater disposal at Area 3 of the Tonopah Test Range until a consolidated sewer system was installed in 1990 to replace the discrete septic waste systems. Operations within various buildings at Area 3 generated sanitary and industrial wastewaters potentially contaminated with contaminants of potential concern and disposed of in septic tanks and leachfields. Corrective Action Unit 428 is composed of two leachfield systems in the northern portion of Area 3. Based on site history collected to support the Data Quality Objectives process, contaminants of potential concern for the site include oil/ diesel range total petroleum hydrocarbons, and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act characteristic volatile organic compounds, semivolatile organic compounds, and metals. A limited number of samples will be analyzed for gamma- emitting radionuclides and isotopic uranium from four of the septic tanks and if radiological field screening levels are exceeded. Additional samples will be analyzed for geotechnical and hydrological properties and a bioassessment may be performed. The technical approach for investigating this Corrective Action Unit consists of the following activities: (1) Perform video surveys of the discharge and outfall lines. (2) Collect samples of material in the septic tanks. (3) Conduct exploratory trenching to locate and inspect subsurface components. (4) Collect subsurface soil samples in areas of the collection system including the septic tanks and outfall end of distribution boxes. (5) Collect subsurface soil samples underlying the leachfield distribution pipes via trenching. (6) Collect surface and near- surface samples near potential locations of the Acid Sewer Outfall if Septic Waste System 5 Leachfield cannot be located. (7) Field screen samples for volatile organic compounds, total petroleum hydrocarbons, and radiological activity. (8) Drill boreholes and collect subsurface soil samples if required. (9) Analyze samples for total volatile organic compounds, total semivolatile organic compounds, total Resource Conservation and Recovery Act metals, and total petroleum hydrocarbons (oil/ diesel range organics). Limited number of samples will be analyzed for gamma- emitting radionuclides and isotopic uranium from particular septic tanks and if radiological field screening levels are exceeded. (10) Collect samples from native soils beneath the distribution system and analyze for geotechnical/ hydrologic parameters. (11) Collect and analyze bioassessment samples at the discretion of the Site Supervisor if total petroleum hydrocarbons exceed field- screening levels.

DOE /NV

1999-03-26T23:59:59.000Z

223

CORRRECTIVE ACTION DECISION DOCUMENT FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION UNIT 427: AREA 3 SEPTIC WASTE SYSTEMS 2 AND 6, TONOPAH TEST RANGE, NEVADA, REVISION 0, JUNE 1998  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Decision Document has been prepared for the Area 3 Septic Waste Systems 2 and 6 (Corrective Action Unit 427) in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order of 1996 (FFACO, 1996). Corrective Action Unit 427 is located at the Tonopah Test Range, Nevada, and is comprised of the following Corrective Action Sites, each an individual septic waste system (DOE/NV, 1996a): (1) Septic Waste System 2 is Corrective Action Site Number 03-05-002-SW02. (2) Septic Waste System 6 is Corrective Action Site Number 03-05-002-SW06. The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document is to identify and provide a rationale for the selection of a recommended corrective action alternative for each Corrective Action Site. The scope of this Correction Action Decision Document consists of the following tasks: (1) Develop corrective action objectives. (2) Identify corrective action alternative screening criteria. (3) Develop corrective action alternatives. (4) Perform detailed and comparative evaluations of the corrective action alternatives in relation to the corrective action objectives and screening criteria. (5) Recommend and justify a preferred corrective action alternative for each CAS. From November 1997 through January 1998, a corrective action investigation was performed as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit No. 427: Area 3 Septic Waste System Numbers 2 and 6, Tonopah Test Range, Nevada (DOE/NV, 1997b). Details can be found in Appendix A of this document. The results indicated that contamination is present in some portions of the CAU and not in others as described in Table ES-1 and shown in Figure A.2-2 of Appendix A. Based on the potential exposure pathways, the following corrective action objectives have been identified for Corrective Action Unit 427: (1) Prevent or mitigate human exposure to subsurface soils containing TPH at concentrations greater than 100 milligrams per kilogram (NAC, 1996b). (2) Close Sep tic Tank 33-5 in accordance with Nevada Administrative Code 459 (NAC, 1996c). (3) Prevent adverse impacts to groundwater quality. Based on the review of existing data, future land use, and current operations at the Tonopah Test Range, the following alternatives were developed for consideration at the Area 3 Septic Waste Systems 2 and 6: Alternative 1 - No Further Action; Alternative 2 - Closure of Septic Tank 33-5 and Administrative Controls; Alternative 3 - Closure of Septic Tank 33-5, Excavation, and Disposal The corrective action alternatives were evaluated based on four general corrective action standards and five remedy selection decision factors. Based on the results of this evaluation, the preferred alternative for Corrective Action Unit 427 is Alternative 2, Closure of Septic Tank 33-5 and Administrative Controls. The preferred corrective action alternative was evaluated on technical merit, focusing on performance, reliability, feasibility, and safety. The alternative was judged to meet all requirements for the technical components evaluated. The alternative meets all applicable state and federal regulations for closure of the site and will reduce potential future exposure pathways to the contaminated soils. During corrective action implementation, this alternative will present minimal potential threat to site workers who come in contact with the waste. However, procedures will be developed and implemented to ensure worker health and safety.

DOE /NV

1998-06-23T23:59:59.000Z

224

Directory of Certificates of Compliance for radioactive materials packages: Report of NRC approved quality assurance programs for radioactive materials packages. Volume 3, Revision 15  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this directory is to make available a convenient source of information on packagings which have been approved by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. To assist in identifying packaging, an index by Model Number and corresponding Certificate of Compliance Number is included at the front of Volumes 1 and 2. An alphabetical listing by user name is included in the back of Volume 3 of approved QA programs. The reports include a listing of all users of each package design and approved QA programs prior to the publication date.

NONE

1995-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

225

Policy Flash 2013-22 Section 311 Revised Template January 24 2013 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 Section 311 Revised Template January 24 2013 2 Section 311 Revised Template January 24 2013 Policy Flash 2013-22 Section 311 Revised Template January 24 2013 UPDATE: WORD VERISON OF ALL DOCUEMENTS ARE ATTACHED 311 Notice ALERT - EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY Please ensure all of your Contracting Officers are aware of the changes to the template. Attached are 3 revised templates for sending the Section 311 notices to Congress as prescribed in Acquisition Letter (AL) 2012-07 and Financial Assistance Letter (FAL) 2012-01. The template revises two subcommittee assignment addresses at the end of the letter. The revision changes The Ranking Member, formerly Thad Cochran, to The Honorable Richard C. Shelby and The Ranking Member, formerly Peter Visclosky, to The Honorable Marcy Kaptur. Policy flash 2013-22 Section 311 revised templateJan 24 2013.pdf

226

Policy Flash 2013-22 Section 311 Revised Template January 24 2013 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

22 Section 311 Revised Template January 24 2013 22 Section 311 Revised Template January 24 2013 Policy Flash 2013-22 Section 311 Revised Template January 24 2013 UPDATE: WORD VERISON OF ALL DOCUEMENTS ARE ATTACHED 311 Notice ALERT - EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY Please ensure all of your Contracting Officers are aware of the changes to the template. Attached are 3 revised templates for sending the Section 311 notices to Congress as prescribed in Acquisition Letter (AL) 2012-07 and Financial Assistance Letter (FAL) 2012-01. The template revises two subcommittee assignment addresses at the end of the letter. The revision changes The Ranking Member, formerly Thad Cochran, to The Honorable Richard C. Shelby and The Ranking Member, formerly Peter Visclosky, to The Honorable Marcy Kaptur. Policy flash 2013-22 Section 311 revised templateJan 24 2013.pdf

227

Corrective Action Decision Document for Corrective Action Unit 322: Areas 1 and 3 Release Sites and Injection Wells Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0 with ROTC 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Decision Document has been prepared for Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 322, Areas 1 and 3 Release Sites and Injection Wells, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, in accordance with the ''Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order'' (1996). Corrective Action Unit 322 is comprised of the following corrective action sites (CASs): (1) 01-25-01 - AST Release Site; (2) 03-25-03 - Mud Plant and AST Diesel Release; and (3) 03-20-05 - Injection Wells and BOP Shop. The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document is to identify and provide the rationale for the recommendation of a corrective action alternative for each CAS within CAU 322. Corrective action investigation activities were performed from April 2004 through September 2004, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan. The purposes of the activities as defined during the data quality objectives process were: (1) Determine if contaminants of concern (COCs) are present; (2) If COCs are present, determine their nature and extent; and (3) Provide sufficient information and data to recommend appropriate corrective actions for the CASs. Analytes detected during the corrective action investigation were evaluated against appropriate preliminary action levels to identify contaminants of concern for each corrective action site. Radiological field measurements were compared to unrestricted release criteria. Assessment of the data generated from investigation activities revealed the following: (1) CAS 01-25-01 contains an AST berm contaminated with total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) diesel-range organics (DRO). (2) CAS 03-25-03 includes two distinct areas: Area A where no contamination remains from a potential spill associated with an AST, and Area B where TPH-DRO contamination associated with various activities at the mud plant was identified. The Area B contamination was found at various locations and depths. (3) CAS 03-25-03 Area B contains TPH-DRO contamination at various locations and depths in the area associated with the Mud Plant. (4) CAS 03-20-05 contains TPH-DRO, metals, and radiological contamination within the injection well casing soil and TPH-DRO contamination at the depth coincidental with the bottom of the injection well sump. Based on the evaluation of analytical data from the corrective action investigation, review of future and current operations in Areas 1 and 3 of the Nevada Test Site, and the detailed and comparative analysis of the potential corrective action alternatives, the following corrective actions are recommended for the Corrective Action Unit 322 CASs. Closure in Place with Administrative Controls is the preferred corrective action for the following CASs: (1) CAS 01-25-01, removal of TPH-DRO contamination would pose a significant safety hazard due to the site location. (2) CAS 03-25-03 No contamination remains at Area A (AST Berm); and thus, no further action is the preferred alternative at this part of the CAS. However at Area B, TPH-DRO contamination is varied in concentration and location and the footprint of the CAS is large, removal of contaminated ''pockets'' would be laborious and cost prohibitive. The plutonium-239 surface contamination identified at CAS 03-25-03 Area B has been removed and drummed as a best management practice. (3) CAS 03-20-05, TPH-DRO, metals, and radiological contamination are present in the injection well casing soils. Recommend corrective action includes removal of the liquid in the injection well sump (approximately 3 feet (ft) of liquid at 60 ft below ground surface), grouting the sump, and the area within the injection well casing. The plutonium-239 surface contamination identified at CAS 03-20-05 has been removed and drummed as a best management practice and will be disposed of as low-level radioactive waste. It is recommended that the liquids be removed from the holding tank wells and the sumps of the two outer holding tanks within the BOP Shop, and the sumps be grouted, and the holding tanks filled in to the BOP Shop floor surface. The preferred corrective action alternatives were ev

Boehlecke, Robert

2004-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

228

In-Tank Precipitation Facility (ITP) and H-Tank Farm (HTF) geotechnical report, WSRC-TR-95-0057, Revision 0, Volume 3  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A geotechnical study has been completed in H-Area for the In-Tank Precipitation Facility (ITP) and the balance of the H-Area Tank Farm (HTF) at the Savannah River Site (SRS) in South Carolina. The study consisted of subsurface field exploration, field and laboratory testing, and engineering analyses. The purpose of these investigations is to evaluate the overall stability of the H-Area tanks under static and dynamic conditions. The objectives of the study are to define the site-specific geological conditions at ITP and HTF, obtain engineering properties for the assessment of the stability of the native soils and embankment under static and dynamic loads (i.e., slope stability, liquefaction potential, and potential settlements), and derive properties for soil-structure interaction studies. This document contains the records of cone penetrometer and dilatometer soundings for the In-Tank Precipitation Facility (ITP) and H-Tank Farm (HTF) Geotechnical Report, Volume 3.

Fisk, B.E.; Timian, D.A.

1995-06-02T23:59:59.000Z

229

Revised OMB Circular A-76 (Revised November 14, 2002)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OMB Circular A-76 Revision Comments OMB Circular A-76 Revision Comments DRAFT OMB CIRCULAR A-76 (NOVEMBER 14, 2002) REVIEW COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL COMMENTS: The Department of Energy (DOE) supports the overarching goal of OMB Circular A-76 that agencies should obtain "the best deal to the Taxpayer." We also support revisions to the Circular that "Keep the Process Moving" with the end result being: Faster/Cheaper Competitions; Improved Performance and Measures; Enhanced/Expanded Competition; Fairness; Realizing Significant Savings; and the Redirection of Resources to Mission Critical Requirements. Upon review of the draft Circular, the Department believes the proposed changes to Circular reflect a general improvement over the current version. The Department does, however, have

230

Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Part B Permit Application [for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP)]. Volume 4, Chapter D, Appendix D1 (beginning), Revision 3  

SciTech Connect

The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), which is designed for receipt, handling, storage, and permanent isolation of defense-generated transuranic wastes, is being excavated at a depth of approximately 655 m in bedded halites of the Permian Salado Formation of southeastern New Mexico. Site-characterization activities at the present WIPP site began in 1976. Full construction of the facility began in 1983, after completion of ``Site and Preliminary Design Validation`` (SPDV) activities and reporting. Site-characterization activities since 1983 have had the objectives of updating or refining the overall conceptual model of the geologic, hydrologic, and structural behavior of the WIPP site and providing data adequate for use in WIPP performance assessment. This report has four main objectives: 1. Summarize the results of WIPP site-characterization studies carried out since the spring of 1983 as a result of specific agreements between the US Department of Energy and the State of New Mexico. 2. Summarize the results and status of site-characterization and facility-characterization studies carried out since 1983, but not specifically included in mandated agreements. 3. Compile the results of WIPP site-characterization studies into an internally consistent conceptual model for the geologic, hydrologic, geochemical, and structural behavior of the WIPP site. This model includes some consideration of the effects of the WIPP facility and shafts on the local characteristics of the Salado and Rustler Formations. 4. Discuss the present limitations and/or uncertainties in the conceptual geologic model of the WIPP site and facility. The objectives of this report are limited in scope, and do not include determination of whether or not the WIPP Project will comply with repository-performance criteria developed by the US Environmental Protection Agency (40CFR191).

Not Available

1993-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

231

Addendum to the Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 322: Areas 1 & 3 Release Sites and Injection Wells Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

This document constitutes an addendum to the June 2006, Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 322: Areas 1 & 3 Release Sites and Injection Wells as described in the document Recommendations and Justifications for Modifications for Use Restrictions Established under the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (UR Modification document) dated February 2008. The UR Modification document was approved by NDEP on February 26, 2008. The approval of the UR Modification document constituted approval of each of the recommended UR modifications. In conformance with the UR Modification document, this addendum consists of: This cover page that refers the reader to the UR Modification document for additional information The cover and signature pages of the UR Modification document The NDEP approval letter The corresponding section of the UR Modification document This addendum provides the documentation justifying the cancellation of the URs for: CAS 01-25-01, AST Release CAS 03-25-03, Mud Plant AST Diesel Release These URs were established as part of Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) corrective actions and were based on the presence of contaminants at concentrations greater than the action levels established at the time of the initial investigation (FFACO, 1996; as amended August 2006). Since these URs were established, practices and procedures relating to the implementation of risk-based corrective actions (RBCA) have changed. Therefore, these URs were re-evaluated against the current RBCA criteria as defined in the Industrial Sites Project Establishment of Final Action Levels (NNSA/NSO, 2006c). This re-evaluation consisted of comparing the original data (used to define the need for the URs) to risk-based final action levels (FALs) developed using the current Industrial Sites RBCA process. The re-evaluation resulted in a recommendation to remove these URs because contamination is not present at these sites above the risk-based FALs. Requirements for inspecting and maintaining these URs will be canceled, and the postings and signage at each site will be removed. Fencing and posting may be present at these sites that are unrelated to the FFACO URs such as for radiological control purposes as required by the NV/YMP Radiological Control Manual (NNSA/NSO, 2004f). This modification will not affect or modify any non-FFACO requirements for fencing, posting, or monitoring at these sites.

Lynn Kidman

2008-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

232

Addendum to the Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 423: Area 3 Building 03-60 Underground Discharge Point, Tonopah Test Range, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

This document constitutes an addendum to the July 1999, Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 423: Area 3 Building 0360 Underground Discharge Point, Tonopah Test Range, Nevada as described in the document Recommendations and Justifications for Modifications for Use Restrictions Established under the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (UR Modification document) dated February 2008. The UR Modification document was approved by NDEP on February 26, 2008. The approval of the UR Modification document constituted approval of each of the recommended UR modifications. In conformance with the UR Modification document, this addendum consists of: This cover page that refers the reader to the UR Modification document for additional information The cover and signature pages of the UR Modification document The NDEP approval letter The corresponding section of the UR Modification document This addendum provides the documentation justifying the cancellation of the UR for CAS 03-02-002-0308, Underground Discharge Point. This UR was established as part of a Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) corrective action and is based on the presence of contaminants at concentrations greater than the action levels established at the time of the initial investigation (FFACO, 1996; as amended August 2006). Since this UR was established, practices and procedures relating to the implementation of risk-based corrective actions (RBCA) have changed. Therefore, this UR was re-evaluated against the current RBCA criteria as defined in the Industrial Sites Project Establishment of Final Action Levels (NNSA/NSO, 2006c). This re-evaluation consisted of comparing the original data (used to define the need for the UR) to risk-based final action levels (FALs) developed using the current Industrial Sites RBCA process. The re-evaluation resulted in a recommendation to remove the UR because contamination is not present at the site above the risk-based FALs. Requirements for inspecting and maintaining this UR will be canceled, and the postings and signage at this site will be removed. Fencing and posting may be present at this site that are unrelated to the FFACO UR such as for radiological control purposes as required by the NV/YMP Radiological Control Manual (NNSA/NSO, 2004f). This modification will not affect or modify any non-FFACO requirements for fencing, posting, or monitoring at this site.

Lynn Kidman

2008-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

233

Addendum to the Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 427: Area 3 Septic Waste Systems 2, 6, Tonopah Test Range, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

This document constitutes an addendum to the April 1999, Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 427: Area 3 Septic Waste Systems 2, 6, Tonopah Test Range, Nevada as described in the document Recommendations and Justifications for Modifications for Use Restrictions Established under the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (UR Modification document) dated February 2008. The UR Modification document was approved by NDEP on February 26, 2008. The approval of the UR Modification document constituted approval of each of the recommended UR modifications. In conformance with the UR Modification document, this addendum consists of: This cover page that refers the reader to the UR Modification document for additional information The cover and signature pages of the UR Modification document The NDEP approval letter The corresponding section of the UR Modification document This addendum provides the documentation justifying the cancellation of the URs for: CAS 03-05-002-SW02, Septic Waste System CAS 03-05-002-SW06, Septic Waste System These URs were established as part of Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) corrective actions and were based on the presence of contaminants at concentrations greater than the action levels established at the time of the initial investigation (FFACO, 1996; as amended August 2006). Since these URs were established, practices and procedures relating to the implementation of risk-based corrective actions (RBCA) have changed. Therefore, these URs were re-evaluated against the current RBCA criteria as defined in the Industrial Sites Project Establishment of Final Action Levels (NNSA/NSO, 2006c). This re-evaluation consisted of comparing the original data (used to define the need for the URs) to risk-based final action levels (FALs) developed using the current Industrial Sites RBCA process. The re-evaluation resulted in a recommendation to remove these URs because contamination is not present at these sites above the risk-based FALs. Requirements for inspecting and maintaining these URs will be canceled, and the postings and signage at each site will be removed. Fencing and posting may be present at these sites that are unrelated to the FFACO URs such as for radiological control purposes as required by the NV/YMP Radiological Control Manual (NNSA/NSO, 2004f). This modification will not affect or modify any non-FFACO requirements for fencing, posting, or monitoring at these sites.

Lynn Kidman

2008-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

234

Safe Operating Procedure (Revised 3/11)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

. · Installation of a cooling tower, a discharge permit must be obtained from NDEQ unless the discharge the installation of fuel-burning boilers, kilns, incinerators, or cooling towers, etc., UNL may be required to seek

Farritor, Shane

235

PNGV Battery Test Manual Revision 3  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

69 69 Octoberr 2003 FreedomCAR Battery Test Manual For Power-Assist Hybrid Electric Vehicles Disclaimer This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. References herein to any specific commercial product, process or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions

236

Microsoft Word - Reuse Strategy Revision 3.doc  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Legacy Management Legacy Management Real Property Reuse Strategy August 2009 LMS/S02944 This page intentionally left blank LMS/S02944 Office of Legacy Management Real Property Reuse Strategy August 2009 This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management Real Property Reuse Strategy August 2009 Doc. No. S02944 Page i Contents Executive Summary....................................................................................................................... iii 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................1 1.1 History of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) ...................................................................................................1

237

Microsoft Word - Reuse Strategy Revision 3.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

In 2007, NREL ranked LM sites for renewable energy potential using available resource data and models. The Bluewater Site met the criteria of having adequate solar resources:...

238

PNGV Battery Test Manual Revision 3  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Units Power Assist Dual Mode Pulse discharge power kW 25 (18 s) 45 (12 s) Peak regenerative pulse power kW 30 (2 s) (min 50 Wh over 10 s regen total) 35 (10 s) (97 Wh...

239

Fuel cells: A handbook (Revision 3)  

SciTech Connect

Fuel cells are electrochemical devices that convert the chemical energy of reaction directly into electrical energy. In a typical fuel cell, gaseous fuels are fed continuously to the anode (negative electrode) compartment and an oxidant (i.e., oxygen from air) is fed continuously to the cathode (positive electrode) compartment; the electrochemical reactions take place at the electrodes to produce an electric current. A fuel cell, although having similar components and several characteristics, differs from a typical battery in several respects. The battery is an energy storage device, that is, the maximum energy that is available is determined by the amount of chemical reactant stored within the battery itself. Thus, the battery will cease to produce electrical energy when the chemical reactants are consumed (i.e., discharged). In a secondary battery, the reactants are regenerated by recharging, which involves putting energy into the battery from an external source. The fuel cell, on the other hand, is an energy conversion device which theoretically has the capability of producing electrical energy for as long as the fuel and oxidant are supplied to the electrodes. In reality, degradation or malfunction of components limits the practical operating life of fuel cells.

Hirschenhofer, J.H.; Stauffer, D.B.; Engleman, R.R.

1994-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

240

Microsoft Word - Reuse Strategy Revision 3.doc  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

August 2009 LMSS02944 This page intentionally left blank LMSS02944 Office of Legacy Management Real Property Reuse Strategy August 2009 This page intentionally left blank...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "3 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

NISTIR 7511 Revision 3, Security Content Automation ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Sc anner ... OCIL Open Checklist Interactive Language OMB Office of Management and Budget OS Operating System OVAL Open Vulnerability and ...

2013-04-29T23:59:59.000Z

242

February 2010 Young Leader Revised 3.indd  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

University of Kentucky. Rachel DeLucas. Extraction & Processing Division. Rachel DeLucas is a process engineer in the melting operations and SGQ plant at...

243

Safe Operating Procedure (Revised 3/11)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Containing Building Materials. Tiles, mastics, pipe insulation, countertops, ceiling textures/tile/or contractors regarding management of structural building waste (i.e., carpet, brick, mortar, wood, tile, etc. Potentially Regulated Building Components Remodeling, renovation, and demolition may trigger one or more

Farritor, Shane

244

Revised empirical likelihood  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

for some data sets. To avoid ESP we return from E 3 back toReEL) method. ReEL i) avoids ESP as well as the convex hullthe Empty Set Problem (ESP). ESP concerns the pos- sibility

Grendar, Marian; Judge, George G.

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

245

Page 1 of 2 Revised 1 Feb 2013 UBC Utilities  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

SERVICES: WATER, SANITARY, STORM, GAS, and DISTRICT HEATING Part 3 (a). Water Distribution. Water service.5.7 and Section 02730, Clause 2.5.6). #12;Page 2 of 2 Revised 1 Feb 2013 Part 3 (c). Gas and District Heating (%) District Heating Contractor or UBC Dept Telephone Fax Contractor Primary Contact Email Design by (Company

Vellend, Mark

246

Ris-R-1291(EN) Revised Cost Estimate for the  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Risø-R-1291(EN) Revised Cost Estimate for the Decommissioning of the Reactor DR 3 Edited by Klaus of the cost estimate for the decommissioning of the research Reactor DR 3 as described in the report Risø Procurement of general equipment and material 17 04 Dismantling activities 18 05 Waste processing and storage

247

Report for Batch Leach Analyses on Sediments at 100-HR-3 Operable Unit, Boreholes C7620, C7621, C7622, C7623, C7626, C7627, C7628, C7629, C7630, and C7866. Revision 1.  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This is a revision to a previously released report. This revision contains additional analytical results for the sample with HEIS number B2H4X7. Between November 4, 2010 and October 26, 2011 sediment samples were received from 100-HR-3 Operable Unit for geochemical studies. The analyses for this project were performed at the 331 building located in the 300 Area of the Hanford Site. The analyses were performed according to Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) approved procedures and/or nationally recognized test procedures. The data sets include the sample identification numbers, analytical results, estimated quantification limits (EQL), and quality control data. The preparatory and analytical quality control requirements, calibration requirements, acceptance criteria, and failure actions are defined in the on-line QA plan 'Conducting Analytical Work in Support of Regulatory Programs' (CAW). This QA plan implements the Hanford Analytical Services Quality Assurance Requirements Documents (HASQARD) for PNNL. Samples were received with a chain of custody (COC) and were analyzed according to the sample identification numbers supplied by the client. All Samples were refrigerated upon receipt until prepared for analysis. All samples were received with custody seals intact unless noted in the Case Narrative. Holding time is defined as the time from sample preparation to the time of analyses. The prescribed holding times were met for all analytes unless noted in the Case Narrative. All reported analytical results meet the requirements of the CAW or client specified SOW unless noted in the case narrative. Due to the requirements of the statement of work and sampling events in the field, the 28 day and the 48 hr requirements cannot be met. The statement of work requires samples to be selected at the completion of the borehole. It is not always possible to complete a borehole and have the samples shipped to the laboratory within the hold time requirements. Duplicate RPD for Uranium 238 (38.9%) was above the acceptance limit (35) in 1E05003-DUP1 for ICPMS-Tc-U-WE The sample result is less than 10 times the detection limits. Duplicate recoveries are not applicable to this analyte. Duplicate RPD for Silver 107 (68.2%) was above the acceptance limit (35) in 2C06004-DUP1 for ICPMS-RCRA-AE The sample result is less than 10 times the detection limits. Duplicate recoveries are not applicable to this analyte. Matrix Spike Recovery for Chromium, Hexavalent (48.8%) was outside acceptance limits (75-125) in 1E23001-MS1 for Hexavalent Chromium/Soil. Potential Matrix interference. Sample results associated with this batch are below the EQL. There should be no impact to the data as reported. Matrix Spike Recovery for Chromium, Hexavalent (50.2%) was outside acceptance limits (75-125) in 2B22010-MS1 for Hexavalent Chromium/Soil. Potential Matrix interference. Sample results associated with this batch are below the EQL. There should be no impact to the data as reported.

Lindberg, Michael J.

2012-04-25T23:59:59.000Z

248

Acquisition Career Management Program Handbook, Partial Revision...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Acquisition Career Management Program Handbook, Partial Revision of Chapter 11, Contracting Officer's Representative SUMMARY: The...

249

Draft Waste Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for managing treatment, storage, and disposal of radioactive and hazardous waste. Volume 3, Appendix A: Public response to revised NOI, Appendix B: Environmental restoration, Appendix C, Environmental impact analysis methods, Appendix D, Risk  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Volume three contains appendices for the following: Public comments do DOE`s proposed revisions to the scope of the waste management programmatic environmental impact statement; Environmental restoration sensitivity analysis; Environmental impacts analysis methods; and Waste management facility human health risk estimates.

NONE

1995-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

250

Biosafety Manual Draft Revision  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

copies are not official versions of this manual. Before using the printed copy, verify that it is the most current version. copies are not official versions of this manual. Before using the printed copy, verify that it is the most current version. Biosafety Manual Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory May 18, 2010 This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02- 05CH11231. Biosafety Manual IBC-approved version (May 18, 2010) Printed copies are not official versions of this manual. Before using the printed copy, verify that it is the most current version. 2 Biosafety Manual Contents 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Policy 1.2 Purpose 1.3 Scope 1.4 Manual Administration and Presentation 1.5 Terms, Acronyms, and Abbreviations 1.6 Roles, Responsibilities, and Whom to Call 2.0 Starting and Conducting Work Safely 3.0 Work and Risk Assessment

251

2011-2012 Methods Additions and Revisions  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Additions and revisions (new, updated, or revised methods) are included in print form. Corrections (minor typographical errors) are included in an accompanying CD-ROM. 2011-2012 Methods Additions and Revisions DVD & CD-ROMs Soft Bound Books Methods - An

252

RPP-RPT-42583 Revision  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

RPP-RPT-42583 RPP-RPT-42583 Revision 0 Synthetic Sling Failure - Evaluations and Recommendations Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management Contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection under Contract DE-AC27-08RV14800 Approved for Public Release; Further Dissemination Unlimited RPP-RPT-42583 Revision 0 Synthetic Sling Failure - Evaluations and Recommendations C. S. Henderson T. C. Mackey Washington River Protection Solutions Date Published October 2009 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management Contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection under Contract DE-AC27-08RV14800 ~. washington river ~ protectionso/utions P.O. Box 850 Richland, Washington Approved for Public Release; Further Dissemination Unlimited TRADEMARK

253

RyneRevised.ppt  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Robert Robert D . R yne LBNL NERSC BES Requirements for 2017 October 8-9, 2013 Gaithersburg, MD Present and Future Computing Requirements for "Frontiers in Accelerator Design: Advanced Modeling for Next-Generation BES Accelerators" (repo m669) 1. P roject D escrip6on PI: R obert R yne ( LBNL) Senior p ersonnel: J i Q iang ( LBNL), C ho N g ( SLAC), B ruce C arlsten ( LANL) * repo m 669 s upports B ES a ccelerator d esign * concept e xplora6on; a ccelerator s ystem & a ccelerator component d esign; c ode d evelopment * This p resenta6on f ocuses o n b eam d ynamics m odeling f or future l ight s ources, e specially X ---ray F ree E lectron L asers (XFELs) The LCLS XFEL is a spectacular success γε x,y = 0.4 µm (slice) I pk = 3.0 kA σ E /E = 0.01% (slice) What is so challenging about future XFEL modeling?

254

Clean Air Act. Revision 5  

SciTech Connect

This Reference Book contains a current copy of the Clean Air Act, as amended, and those regulations that implement the statute and appear to be most relevant to DOE activities. The document is provided to DOE and contractor staff for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as legal guidance. This Reference Book has been completely revised and is current through February 15, 1994.

Not Available

1994-02-15T23:59:59.000Z

255

Revised Version DESY 96203 Hiroshima Univ. HUPD9615  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Revised Version DESY 96­203 Hiroshima Univ. HUPD­9615 September 1996 ################ hep , and T. Morozumi x Department of Physics, Hiroshima University 1­3­1 Kagamiyama, Higashi Hiroshima ­ 7393FT­LIPI, Indonesia. E­mail address: handoko@theo.phys.sci.hiroshima­u.ac.jp x E­mail address

256

Revised: September 24, 2013 Page 1 of 2  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Revised: September 24, 2013 Page 1 of 2 ISP Certification Audit Checklist Certification for: (Area Sample Physical Inspection Locations YES NO 6.1 Are PPE hazard assessments and their certifications.3 Are minimum HCP requirements met for all applicable areas? 6.4 Are minimum CHP requirements met for all

Jiang, Wen

257

ADR Revised Policy | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revised Policy Revised Policy ADR Revised Policy SUMMARY: On October 24, 1995, the Department of Energy (DOE) published an interim Statement of Policy on Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) (60 FR 54482) to further its commitment to the use of ADR for resolving issues in controversy in a fair, timely, and cost efficient manner, and to comply with the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act (ADRA), 5 U.S.C. §571 et seq. Today, DOE publishes a revised Statement of Policy on Alternative Dispute Resolution to reaffirm its commitment to the use of ADR, including the use of Environmental Conflict Resolution (ECR) and othercollaborative processes that may be utilized to prevent or avoid potential conflicts. ADR Revised Policy More Documents & Publications Microsoft Word - ADR Revised Policy82508Reformatted.doc

258

NATIONAL EVALUATION OF THE WEATHERIZATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM DURING THE ARRA PERIOD: PROGRAM YEARS 2009-2011  

SciTech Connect

This report describes the third major evaluation of the Program, encompassing program years 2009 to 2011. In this report, this period of time is referred to as the ARRA Period. This is a special period of time for the Program because the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 has allocated $5 billion of funding for the Program. In normal program years, WAP s annual appropriation is in the range of $200-250 million, supporting the weatherization of approximately 100,000 homes. With the addition of ARRA funding during these program years, the expectation is that weatherization activity will exceed 300,000 homes per year. In addition to saving energy and reducing low-income energy bills, expanded WAP funding is expected to stimulate the economy by providing new jobs in the weatherization field and allowing low-income households to spend more money on goods and services by spending less on energy.

Tonn, Bruce Edward [ORNL; Rose, Erin M [ORNL; Schmoyer, Richard L [ORNL; Eisenberg, Joel Fred [ORNL; Ternes, Mark P [ORNL; Schweitzer, Martin [ORNL; Hendrick, Timothy P [ORNL

2012-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

259

GREEN UNIVERSITY COMMITTEE UNBC Green Strategy, Phase 1 (2009-2011)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

after nature ­ Develop a waste management system, including energy waste, that institutes meaningful waste disposal, ecosystem degradation, and climate change. As a result of the confluence of natural in general. CAMPUS SECTORS ENERGY · To maximize energy efficiencies of present UNBC energy systems ­ Conduct

Northern British Columbia, University of

260

NIST Leads Revision of International Coordinate Measuring ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

NIST Leads Revision of International Coordinate Measuring Machine Standard. ... ASME) represents the final step in a decade-long effort led by the ...

2011-04-25T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "3 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

,"Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases "  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

,"Worksheet Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases ",36,"Annual",2011,"6302009" ,"Release...

262

,"Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases "  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

,"Worksheet Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases ",36,"Annual",2011,"6302009" ,"Release...

263

Revision to the Canada Country Analysis Brief  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Revision to the Canada Country Analysis Brief. December 10, 2012. Text incorrectly implied that Encana is developing another major natural gas project off ...

264

Columbia nano 02-02.ppt revised 02/26/02 jty Page 1 ColumbiaUniversityintheCityofNewYorkintheCityofNewYork  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Columbia nano 02-02.ppt revised 02/26/02 jty Page 1 Columbia. Yardley Director, Center for Integrated Science and Engineering #12;Columbia nano 02-02.ppt revised 02;Columbia nano 02-02.ppt revised 02/26/02 jty Page 3 Columbia

Kim, Philip

265

Alaska Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and Production  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 View History Proved Reserves as of Dec. 31 0 0 0 0 0 2007-2011 Adjustments 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 0 0...

266

Policy Flash 2013-38 Revised Merit Review Guide For Financial Assistance |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 Revised Merit Review Guide For Financial 8 Revised Merit Review Guide For Financial Assistance Policy Flash 2013-38 Revised Merit Review Guide For Financial Assistance Attached is Policy Flash 2013-38 Revised Merit Review Guide for Financial Assistance Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Richard Bonnell of the Contract and Financial Assistance Policy Division at (202) 287-1747 or at richard.bonnell@hq.doe.gov. Flash 2013-38 Revisions to the Merit Review Guide 2013.pdf Merit Review Guide FINAL JULY 2013 ATTACHMENT 1 Sample Merit Rev Panel Appt Letter 1-10.docx ATTACHMENT 2 Sample COI ADDED WB LANGUAGE JULY 2013.docx ATTACHMENT 3 - Sample Evaluation and Selection Plan JULY 2013.docx ATTACHMENT 4 Sample Noncompetitive Review Plan.docx ATTACHMENT 5 Sample Initial Compliance Review 1-16.docx

267

Radiological control manual. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

This Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Radiological Control Manual (LBNL RCM) has been prepared to provide guidance for site-specific additions, supplements and interpretation of the DOE Radiological Control Manual. The guidance provided in this manual is one methodology to implement the requirements given in Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations Part 835 (10 CFR 835) and the DOE Radiological Control Manual. Information given in this manual is also intended to provide demonstration of compliance to specific requirements in 10 CFR 835. The LBNL RCM (Publication 3113) and LBNL Health and Safety Manual Publication-3000 form the technical basis for the LBNL RPP and will be revised as necessary to ensure that current requirements from Rules and Orders are represented. The LBNL RCM will form the standard for excellence in the implementation of the LBNL RPP.

Kloepping, R.

1996-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

268

UCSC Injury and Illness Prevention Program Revised 10/01 University of California  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

UCSC Injury and Illness Prevention Program Revised 10 Code of Regulations 8-3203 INJURY AND ILLNESS PREVENTION PROGRAM DEPARTMENTAL PLAN #12;TABLE OF CONTENTS Statement of Purpose 1 Authority and Responsibility 2 Compliance with Safe Work Practices 3

California at Santa Cruz, University of

269

Archived Weekly Files, Revised, 1984 Forward EIA revises its first-round  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Weekly Coal Production> Archive of weekly and monthly coal production data Weekly Coal Production> Archive of weekly and monthly coal production data Archive weekly and monthly coal production -- revised and original estimates About coal production revision estimates EIA revises its weekly (and monthly) original estimates of state-level coal production using quarterly mine-level coal production data from the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) as soon as the data are available. This method guarantees that EIA’s revised coal production estimates for each past quarter conform with the MSHA survey data. The state level revised estimates include refuse coal. EIA uses this equation to revise its weekly coal production estimates: Revised weekly estimate (State A) = original EIA estimate (State A) x MSHA quarterly data (State A) ÷

270

BOREAS SSA-YJP Tower Flux Data Revised  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Tower Flux Data Revised A revised version of the BOREAS TF04 tower flux data is now available from the ORNL DAAC. Data providers have revised the data set entitled "BOREAS TF-04...

271

Advanced Nuclear Technology: Regulatory Performance Requirements for Safety-Related Instrumentation, Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report proposes an acceptable methodology to apply to safety-related instrumentation to demonstrate 95% probability and 95% confidence (95/95) uncertainties in support of the requirements of Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.105 Revision 3. This methodology should serve as a means to specify testing and analysis requirements to instrumentation manufacturers and suppliers for their use in meeting the RG 1.105 Revision 3 95% probability and 95% confidence requirements. A ...

2013-08-07T23:59:59.000Z

272

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 03-02: Revision to Occurrence Report-Based  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3-02: Revision to Occurrence 3-02: Revision to Occurrence Report-Based Noncompliance Tracking System Reporting Criteria Enforcement Guidance Supplement 03-02: Revision to Occurrence Report-Based Noncompliance Tracking System Reporting Criteria Section 1.3 of the Operational Procedures for Enforcement, published in June 1998, provides the opportunity for the Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement (OE) to periodically issue clarifying guidance regarding the processes used in its enforcement activities. OE typically issues such guidance in the form of Enforcement Guidance Supplements (EGS), which provide information or recommendations only and impose no requirements or actions on Department of Energy (DOE) contractors. Enforcement Guidance Supplement 03-02: Revision to Occurrence Report-Based

273

Classification Bulletin GEN-16 Revision | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Classification Bulletin GEN-16 Revision Classification Bulletin GEN-16 Revision Provides guidance to DOE Federal and contractor employees with access to classified information on...

274

Forrestal Garage Parking Guidelines, Revised August 12, 2010...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Forrestal Garage Parking Guidelines, Revised August 12, 2010 Forrestal Garage Parking Guidelines, Revised August 12, 2010 Forrestal Garage Parking Guidelines Forrestal Garage...

275

Microsoft Word - FINAL Class 1 Revise TRUPACT-III Management...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Dear Mr. Kieling: Enclosed is a Class 1 Permit Modification Notification to: * Revise TRUPACT-III Management Language * Revise Procedure Reference for the Bolting Station in Table...

276

Revised November 20, 2009 Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Revised November 20, 2009 Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering Colorado State University for the appropriate semester. #12;Revised November 20, 2009 Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering Colorado

277

Petroleum products demand data revised at regional level ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

A recent revision to petroleum product movements in the Petroleum ... The data revision involves movements of motor gasoline as reported to EIA by one or more survey ...

278

Revised Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, P.L. 110...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Marketing Administration Other Agencies You are here Home Revised Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, P.L. 110-5 Revised Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007,...

279

EIS-0218: Revision to the Record of Decision | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revision to the Record of Decision EIS-0218: Revision to the Record of Decision Proposed Nuclear Weapons Nonproliferation Policy Concerning Foreign Research Reactor Spent Nuclear...

280

Oklahoma Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 837 962 1,026 1980's 1,293 1,262 2,374 2,189 2,245 2,357 2,158 2,251 2,538 1,984 1990's 1,803 1,710 1,988 1,554 1,580 1,892 1,886 2,396 2,995 3,029 2000's 2,498 1,458 2,159 2,892 2,173 3,064 1,515 2,115 2,786 2,894 2010's 3,224 5,142 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 8/1/2013 Next Release Date: 8/1/2014 Referring Pages: Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases Oklahoma Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves Revision Increases

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "3 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Integrated test vehicle program plan: revision C  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This edition dated August 26, 1977, is Revision C of the Integrated Test Vehicle, Program Plan, Phase II - Deliverable Item 2-7-1. The original edition was issued on May 27, 1977. Corrections were made and issued as Proposed Modifications for Integrated Test Vehicle, Program Plan, dated July 8, 1977. For the purpose of documenting changes, the July 8, 1977, version is caled Revision A. The edition dated August 5, 1977, is called Revision B. Each paragraph in this edition is marked to indicate technical changes from previous editions.

Not Available

1977-08-26T23:59:59.000Z

282

Revised Burnup Code System SWAT: Description and Validation Using Postirradiation Examination Data  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The burnup code system Step-Wise Burnup Analysis Code System (SWAT) is revised for use in a burnup credit analysis. An important feature of the revised SWAT is that its functions are achieved by calling validated neutronics codes without any changes to the original codes. This feature is realized with a system function of the operating system, which allows the revised SWAT to be independent of the development status of each code.A package of the revised SWAT contains the latest libraries based on JENDL-3.2 and the second version of the JNDC FP library. These libraries allow us to analyze burnup problems, such as an analysis of postirradiation examination (PIE), using the latest evaluated data of not only cross sections but also fission yield and decay constants.Another function of the revised SWAT is a library generator for the ORIGEN2 code, which is one of the most reliable burnup codes. ORIGEN2 users can obtain almost the same results with the revised SWAT using the library prepared by this function.The validation of the revised SWAT is conducted by calculation of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development/Nuclear Energy Agency burnup credit criticality safety benchmark Phase I-B and analyses of PIE data for spent fuel from Takahama Unit 3. The analysis of PIE data shows that the revised SWAT can predict the isotopic composition of main uranium and plutonium with a deviation of 5% from experimental results taken from UO{sub 2} fuels of 17 x 17 fuel assemblies. Many results of fission products including samarium are within a deviation of 10%. This means that the revised SWAT has high reliability to predict the isotopic composition for pressurized water reactor spent fuel.

Suyama, Kenya [Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute (Japan); Mochizuki, Hiroki [Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute (Japan); Kiyosumi, Takehide [Japan Research Institute, Ltd. (Japan)

2002-05-15T23:59:59.000Z

283

Colorado Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Colorado Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 116 226 373 1980's 250 131 322 167 160 368 372 340 473 431 1990's 394 719 718 1,000 696 555 802 959 1,898 2,788 2000's 1,825 1,882 2,029 2,114 1,505 2,018 1,178 3,924 3,244 1,601 2010's 2,973 2,509 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 8/1/2013 Next Release Date: 8/1/2014 Referring Pages: Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases Colorado Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves Revision Increases

284

Oklahoma Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 1,016 969 1,211 1980's 1,303 1,371 2,520 1,891 1,611 1,648 1,963 2,047 2,280 1,732 1990's 1,542 1,456 1,263 1,008 932 1,049 1,602 1,282 1,997 2,251 2000's 1,331 1,895 1,513 2,843 1,912 2,945 1,868 1,366 2,580 3,592 2010's 3,474 6,856 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 8/1/2013 Next Release Date: 8/1/2014 Referring Pages: Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases Oklahoma Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves Revision Decreases

285

Portland General Electric Company Fourth Revision of Sheet No. 32-1 P.U.C. Oregon No. E-17 Canceling Third Revision of Sheet No. 32-1  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Portland General Electric Company Fourth Revision of Sheet No. 32-1 P.U.C. Oregon No. E-17, Vice President on and after January 1, 2004 #12;Portland General Electric Company Fifth Revision) Renewable Usage 0.800¢ per kWh in addition to Energy Charge Fixed Renewable $3.50 per month per block

286

Predictive Maintenance Primer: Revision to NP-7205  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The "Predictive Maintenance Primer" revision provides nuclear plant personnel with current information regarding the predictive maintenance technologies and their applications. This guide will assist a plant in improving its predictive maintenance program.

2003-11-06T23:59:59.000Z

287

Water Mass Formation from Revised COADS Data  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Surface heat and freshwater fluxes from the Comprehensive 0cean-Atmosphere Data Set are revised and used diagnostically to compute air-sea transformation rates on density, temperature, and salinity classes over the domain of the data. Maximum ...

Kevin G. Speer; H-J. Isemer; A. Biastoch

1995-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

288

Green Vegetable Oil Processing, Revised First Edition  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This book addresses alternative green technologies at various stages of oilseed and vegetable oil processing. The Revised First Edition includes much of the content of the first edition, but incorporates updated data, details, images, figures, and captions

289

Requesting a Revision to PUB-3000  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Requesting a Change to the ES&H Manual Requesting a Change to the ES&H Manual The following procedure describes the process for making changes to Berkeley Lab's ES&H Manual (PUB-3000). It identifies Responsible Authors who participate in the revision process. A request to revise the ES&H Manual may be initiated by any Berkeley Lab employee; however, all requests must be sent to the Responsible Author and approved by the ES&H Manual Manager, Mike Wisherop. If you wish to request a change to a PUB-3000 chapter, follow these steps: Contact the Responsible Author for the chapter in need of revision. Submit PUB-3000 revisions to the Responsible Author and the ES&H Manual Manager. Direct all questions or comments concerning ES&H Manual content to the ES&H Manual Manager.

290

2008 MERRTT Revision Letter | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 MERRTT Revision Letter 8 MERRTT Revision Letter 2008 MERRTT Revision Letter The 2008 version of MERRTT includes several enhancements, but the primary enhancement is the addition of the decontamination dress-down video. Comments received on the decontamination video script in the fall 2006 were incorporated into the script and the filming and final editing were completed in the spring 2007. The decontamination video was added to MERRTT to support the students' understanding of the decontamination dress-down process at an accident scene. Additional enhancements included the streamlining of objectives from the Terminology & Units and Assessing Package Integrity modules into other existing modules. 2008 MERRTT Revision Letter More Documents & Publications 2009 TEPP Annual Report

291

CAO-94-1001 Revision 1  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office Information Management Plan DOEWIPP-12-3429 Revision 0 May 2012 DOEWIPP-12-3429 Rev. 0 2 U. S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field...

292

A Revised Version of Lettau's Evapoclimatonomy Model  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In this paper a revised version of Lettau's evapoclimatonomy model is introduced. Climatonomy is a one-dimensional representation of mean climate, which includes a complete characterization of the surface energy and water balances. The model is ...

Sharon E. Nicholson; Andrew R. Lare; JosiA. Marengo; Pablo Santos

1996-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

293

CALIFORNIA ENERGY DEMAND 20142024 REVISED FORECAST  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

CALIFORNIA ENERGY DEMAND 20142024 REVISED FORECAST Volume 2: Electricity Demand Robert P. Oglesby Executive Director #12;i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The demand forecast is the combined prepared the commercial sector forecast. Mehrzad Soltani Nia helped prepare the industrial forecast

294

EPRI Maintenance Excellence Matrix Revision Status  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report documents the progress in revising the Electric Power Research Institute EPRI 2002 Report 1004705, Maintenance Excellence Matrix Assessment Guideline for Fossil Power Plants, which provides utilities a comprehensive self-assessment guideline for improving maintenance processes.

2008-12-23T23:59:59.000Z

295

New and revised standards for coke production  

SciTech Connect

The need for new and revised standards for coke production in Ukraine and Russia is outlined. Such standards should address improvements in plant operation, working conditions, environmental protection, energy conservation, fire and explosion safety, and economic indices.

G.A. Kotsyuba; M.I. Alpatov; Y.G. Shapoval [Giprokoks, the State Institute for the Design of Coke-Industry Enterprises, Kharkov (Ukraine)

2009-07-15T23:59:59.000Z

296

Revision of the DELFIC Particle Activity Module  

SciTech Connect

The Defense Land Fallout Interpretive Code (DELFIC) was originally released in 1968 as a tool for modeling fallout patterns and for predicting exposure rates. Despite the continual advancement of knowledge of fission yields, decay behavior of fission products, and biological dosimetry, the decay data and logic of DELFIC have remained mostly unchanged since inception. Additionally, previous code revisions caused a loss of conservation of radioactive nuclides. In this report, a new revision of the decay database and the Particle Activity Module is introduced and explained. The database upgrades discussed are replacement of the fission yields with ENDF/B-VII data as formatted in the Oak Ridge Isotope Generation (ORIGEN) code, revised decay constants, revised exposure rate multipliers, revised decay modes and branching ratios, and revised boiling point data. Included decay logic upgrades represent a correction of a flaw in the treatment of the fission yields, extension of the logic to include more complex decay modes, conservation of nuclides (including stable nuclides) at all times, and conversion of key variables to double precision for nuclide conservation. Finally, recommended future work is discussed with an emphasis on completion of the overall radiation physics upgrade, particularly for dosimetry, induced activity, decay of the actinides, and fractionation.

Hooper, David A [ORNL; Jodoin, Vincent J [ORNL

2010-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

297

1. Revised Guide Chapter 70.4, Cooperative Audit Strategy:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revised Guide Chapter 70.4, Cooperative Audit Strategy: Revised Guide Chapter 70.4, Cooperative Audit Strategy: Establishes a requirement for the contractor to provide an Internal Audit Design for each 5-year period of a contract. The design is to consist of: (1) Organizational placement of the internal audit function to assure functional independence; (2) Size, experience, and educational requirements of audit staff; (3) Audit standards to be applied; (4) (5) (6) allo (7) a. Plan for internal audit function over 5-year period; Plan for audit of allowable costs; Use ofDCAA for supplementing audit of prime or subcontract wable costs; and Schedule for peer review. b. Provides detailed standards for the Annual Audit Plan. c. Provides detailed standards for the Annual Audit Report. 2.AL 2005-04, Class Deviation to Reflect Changes to the Cooperative Audit Strategy,

298

Belief revision in non-monotonic reasoning and logic programming  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Keywords: belief revision, logic programming, logics of knowledge and beliefs, non-monotonic reasoning

Jos Jlio Alferes; Lus Moniz Pereira; Teodor C. Przymusinski

1996-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

299

Department of Energy Extends Comment Period on Proposed Revisions to its  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Extends Comment Period on Proposed Revisions Extends Comment Period on Proposed Revisions to its NEPA Rules Department of Energy Extends Comment Period on Proposed Revisions to its NEPA Rules February 17, 2011 - 5:29pm Addthis The Department of Energy today announced that, in response to requests from a number of parties, it has re-opened the public comment period on its proposed revisions to the Department's NEPA rules. The public comment period will be extended three weeks and will now close on March 7, 2011. DOE, on January 3, 2011, issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to amend its regulations governing compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The proposals focus primarily on the Department's categorical exclusion provisions, and reflect the first update to these provisions in

300

U.S. Department of Energy Releases Revised Total System Life Cycle Cost  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Releases Revised Total System Life Cycle Releases Revised Total System Life Cycle Cost Estimate and Fee Adequacy Report for Yucca Mountain Project U.S. Department of Energy Releases Revised Total System Life Cycle Cost Estimate and Fee Adequacy Report for Yucca Mountain Project August 5, 2008 - 2:40pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC -The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today released a revised estimate of the total system life cycle cost for a repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. The 2007 total system life cycle cost estimate includes the cost to research, construct and operate Yucca Mountain during a period of 150 years, from the beginning of the program in 1983 through closure and decommissioning in 2133. The new cost estimate of $79.3 billion, when updated to 2007 dollars comes to $96.2 billion, a 38 percent

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "3 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 569: Area 3 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites Nevada National Security Site, Nevada with ROTC 1, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report presents information supporting the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 569: Area 3 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada. CAU 569 comprises the following nine corrective action sites (CASs): 03-23-09, T-3 Contamination Area 03-23-10, T-3A Contamination Area 03-23-11, T-3B Contamination Area 03-23-12, T-3S Contamination Area 03-23-13, T-3T Contamination Area 03-23-14, T-3V Contamination Area 03-23-15, S-3G Contamination Area 03-23-16, S-3H Contamination Area 03-23-21, Pike Contamination Area The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 569 based on the implementation of the corrective actions listed in Table ES-2.

Sloop, Christy

2013-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

302

Microsoft Word - LBNL-57260-Revision.doc  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

7260-Revision 7260-Revision ERNEST ORLANDO LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY Energy Efficiency Improvement and Cost Saving Opportunities for the Pharmaceutical Industry An ENERGY STAR ® Guide for Energy and Plant Managers Christina Galitsky, Sheng-chieh Chang, Ernst Worrell, and Eric Masanet Environmental Energy Technologies Division Sponsored by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency March 2008 Disclaimer This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. While this document is believed to contain correct information, neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor The Regents of the University of California, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes

303

Radiation Safety (Revised March 2010)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

.8 106.3 13.1 (14.5°) 9.3 1.3952 0.256 62 Triethylene glycol dimethyl ether -45 216 7.5 1.4224 0.253 63 2 CALIFORNIUM EINSTEINIUM FERMIUM MENDELEVIUM NOBELIUM SAMARIUM EUROPIUM GADOLINIUM TERBIUM DYSPROSIUM HOLMIUM

Ford, James

304

FTCP Corrective Action Plan- Revision 1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

January 2007 FTCP Corrective Action Plan, Revision 1, which is Deliverable B for Commitment 13 in the Department of Energy (DOE) Implementation Plan to Improve Oversight of Nuclear Operations, issued in response to Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 2004- 1, Oversight of Complex, High-Hazard Nuclear Operations

305

FTCP Corrective Action Plan- Revision 2  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

March 2009 FTCP Corrective Action Plan, Revision 2, which is Deliverable B for Commitment 13 in the Department of Energy (DOE) Implementation Plan to Improve Oversight of Nuclear Operations, issued in response to Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 2004-1, Oversight of Complex, High-Hazard Nuclear Operations

306

BSCMeasuresInformationRevisionSept2005.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Procurement System Balanced Scorecard Performance Measures Information Document Office of Procurement and Assistance Management Revised: September 2005 2 Table of Contents Purpose ...................................................................................................... 4 CUSTOMER PERSPECTIVE Customer Satisfaction: Timeliness ........................................................................................... 5 Quality ................................................................................................ 7 Effective Service/Partnership ........................................................................... 9 INTERNAL BUSINESS PERSPECTIVE Acquisition Excellence .................................................................................. 11

307

Anomalies of Nuclear Criticality, Revision 6  

SciTech Connect

This report is revision 6 of the Anomalies of Nuclear Criticality. This report is required reading for the training of criticality professionals in many organizations both nationally and internationally. This report describes many different classes of nuclear criticality anomalies that are different than expected.

Clayton, E. D.; Prichard, Andrew W.; Durst, Bonita E.; Erickson, David; Puigh, Raymond J.

2010-02-19T23:59:59.000Z

308

CALIFORNIA ENERGY DEMAND 20142024 REVISED FORECAST  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

CALIFORNIA ENERGY DEMAND 2014­2024 REVISED FORECAST Volume 1: Statewide Electricity Demand in this report. #12;i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The demand forecast is the combined product of the hard work listed previously, Mohsen Abrishami prepared the commercial sector forecast. Mehrzad Soltani Nia helped

309

REVISED CALIFORNIA ENERGY DEMAND FORECAST 20122022  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

REVISED CALIFORNIA ENERGY DEMAND FORECAST 20122022 Volume 2: Electricity Demand by Utility ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The staff demand forecast is the combined product of the hard work and expertise of numerous, Mohsen Abrishami prepared the commercial sector forecast. Mehrzad Soltani Nia helped prepare

310

REVISED CALIFORNIA ENERGY DEMAND FORECAST 20122022  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

REVISED CALIFORNIA ENERGY DEMAND FORECAST 20122022 Volume 1: Statewide Electricity Demand in this report. #12;i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The staff demand forecast is the combined product of the hard work listed previously, Mohsen Abrishami prepared the commercial sector forecast. Mehrzad Soltani Nia helped

311

Revision Policy for EIA Weekly Underground Natural Gas Storage Estimates  

Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report (EIA)

April 26, 2005 April 26, 2005 This report consists of the following sections: General EIA Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report Revisions Policy - a description of how revisions to the Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report estimates may occur EIA Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report Policy to Allow Unscheduled Release of revisions - a description of the policy that will be implemented in the event of an out-of-cycle release Revisions to the Historical Database - a description of how revisions will be noted in the Historical database Revisions may be presented for the most recent estimates of working gas in storage under a number of circumstances that occur after release of the estimates. These include: I. A respondent revises previously submitted data (respondents are requested to submit revisions if the change is greater than 500 million

312

U.S. Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File) U.S. Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) U.S. Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)...

313

U.S. Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File) U.S. Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) U.S. Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)...

314

ANSI C Cryptographic API Profile for SHA-3 Candidate ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Page 1. ANSI C Cryptographic API Profile for SHA-3 Candidate Algorithm Submissions Revision 5: February 11, 2008 1. Overview ...

2012-06-20T23:59:59.000Z

315

2011-2012 and 2013-2014 Additions and Revisions Package  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

2011-2012 Additions and Revisions + 2013 2014 Additions and Revisions package 2011-2012 and 2013-2014 Additions and Revisions Package Methods - Analyses Books Methods - Analyses Books The 2013 2014 Additions and Revisions are now av

316

Microsoft Word - DOE-EA-1707D_Revised_Predecisional_EA Closure_NRDWL-SWL08232011.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7D 7D REVISED PREDECISIONAL DRAFT AUGUST 2011 Environmental Assessment Closure of Nonradioactive Dangerous Waste Landfill (NRDWL) and Solid Waste Landfill (SWL), Hanford Site, Richland, Washington U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Richland, Washington 99352 DOE/EA-1707D REVISED PREDECISIONAL DRAFT AUGUST 2011 DOE/EA-1707D REVISED PREDECISIONAL DRAFT iii AUGUST 2011 Contents 1 1 Introduction and Purpose and Need ............................................................................................. 1-1 2 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1-1 3 1.2 Purpose and Need ................................................................................................................... 1-2 4

317

Nuclear Maintenance Applications Center: Repair and Reconditioning Specification Guidance for AC Squirrel-Cage and Salient Pole Sync hronous Motors with Voltage Ratings of 2.3 to 13.2 kV: Revision 1 of 1000897  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The power industry is experiencing a loss of expertise as the workforce ages and some work is being outsourced to specialty suppliers. Many of the major electric motors in plants were also beginning to experience aging effects. To assist with obtaining proper motor service, EPRI published Report 1000897, Repair and Reconditioning Specification for AC Squirrel-Cage Motors with Voltage Ratings of 2.3 to 13.2 kV in 2000.

2008-12-18T23:59:59.000Z

318

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 322: Areas 1 and 3 Release Sites and Injection Wells, Nevada Test Site, Nevada: Revision 0, Including Record of Technical Change No. 1  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Investigation Plan contains the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office's approach to collect the data necessary to evaluate corrective action alternatives (CAAs) appropriate for the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 322, Areas 1 and 3 Release Sites and Injection Wells, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. Corrective Action Unit 322 consists of three Corrective Action Sites (CASs): 01-25-01, AST Release (Area 1); 03-25-03, Mud Plant AST Diesel Release (Area 3); 03-20-05, Injection Wells (Area 3). Corrective Action Unit 322 is being investigated because existing information on the nature and extent of potential contamination is insufficient to evaluate and recommend corrective action alternatives. The investigation of three CASs in CAU 322 will determine if hazardous and/or radioactive constituents are present at concentrations and locations that could potentially pose a threat to human health and the environment. The results of this field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of corrective action alternatives in the corrective action decision document.

U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office

2003-07-16T23:59:59.000Z

319

CBECS Buildings Characteristics --Revised Tables  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Geographic Location Tables Geographic Location Tables (24 pages, 136kb) CONTENTS PAGES Table 3. Census Region, Number of Buildings and Floorspace, 1995 Table 4. Census Region and Division, Number of Buildings, 1995 Table 5. Census Region and Division, Floorspace, 1995 Table 6. Climate Zone, Number of Buildings and Floorspace, 1995 Table 7. Metropolitan Status, Number of Buildings and Floorspace, 1995 These data are from the 1995 Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS), a national probability sample survey of commercial buildings sponsored by the Energy Information Administration, that provides information on the use of energy in commercial buildings in the United States. The 1995 CBECS was the sixth survey in a series begun in 1979. The data were collected from a sample of 6,639 buildings representing 4.6 million commercial buildings

320

MESON LISTINGS UNDER REVISION (FOR ENCODERS)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

MESON LISTINGS UNDER REVISION MESON LISTINGS UNDER REVISION (FOR ENCODERS) This WWW page is designed so that encoders can get current Listings of encoded particles with the 'NODES' on the right-hand side of the page. Disclaimer These sections are private PDG files. Please do not quote or refer to them. The authors reserve the right to radically alter these non-completed sections from minute to minute. They are certainly not error free. Conservation Laws The List by Particle Code (includes hidden particle codes) The List in Book Order by Name Light Unflavored Mesons Summary Table Other Light Unflavored Mesons Strange Mesons Summary Table Charmed Mesons Summary Table Charmed, Strange Mesons Summary Table (c cbar) Mesons Summary Table (b bbar) Mesons Summary Table Non (q qbar) Candidates

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "3 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Revisions to Energy Efficiency Enforcement Regulations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6450-01-P 6450-01-P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 10 CFR Parts 430 and 431 Docket No. EERE-2010-BT-CE-0014 RIN 1904-AC23 Revisions to Energy Efficiency Enforcement Regulations AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy and Office of the General Counsel, Department of Energy. ACTION: Request for Information (RFI); request for comment. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE or the "Department") intends to expand and revise its existing energy efficiency enforcement regulations for certain consumer products and commercial and industrial equipment covered under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975, as amended (EPCA or the "Act"). These regulations provide for manufacturer submission of compliance statements and

322

Last Revised: 7/23/10 (Gades  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Revised: 7/23/10 (Gades) Revised: 7/23/10 (Gades) Instructions for Requesting Dry Ice at the APS Dry Ice requests are handled by APS Detector Pool staff. Dry ice should be requested through the Detector Pool database, similar to how detectors are requested. Dry ice is only available during normal business hours. Since dry ice must be obtained from a building other than the APS, requests must be made in advance to ensure availability of a government vehicle for transporting dry ice. Access the Detector Pool database via the link below. Requestors will be taken to a log-in page similar to the log-in page for the ESAF system. https://beam.aps.anl.gov/pls/apsweb/wam0002.dds_main_menu The page can also be found on the Optics and Detector Group homepage (the "Submit a Detector

323

Southeast Regional Clean Energy Policy Analysis (Revised)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Southeast Regional Clean Southeast Regional Clean Energy Policy Analysis Revised Joyce McLaren Technical Report NREL/TP-6A20-49192 Revised April 2011 ERRATA SHEET NREL REPORT/PROJECT NUMBER: TP-6A20-49192 TITLE: Southeast Regional Clean Energy Policy Analysis AUTHOR(S): Joyce McLaren ORIGINAL PUBLICATION DATE: January 2011 DATE OF CORRECTIONS (MM/YYYY): 04/2011 The following figures and tables were replaced: Page vii, Figure ES-2 Page ix, Table ES-1 Page 12, Table 1 Page 20, Figure 10 Page 51, Table 11 Page 52, Figure 18 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401

324

Coal within a revised energy perspective  

SciTech Connect

The author considers the use of coal within a revised energy perspective, focusing on the factors that will drive which fuels are used to generate electricity going forward. He looks at the world markets for fossil fuels and the difficulties of predicting oil and natural gas supply and prices, as demonstrated by the variability in projections from one year to another in the EIA's Annual Energy Outlook. 4 refs., 1 tab.

Darmstadter, J. [Resources for the Future (RFF), Washington, DC (United States)

2006-07-15T23:59:59.000Z

325

Advanced Lighting Guidelines: 1993 (Revision 1)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This series of guidelines, originally published in 1990 by the California Energy Commission, provides both technical and practical information about energy-efficient lighting equipment and design techniques. This revised version updates the 1990 information and adds four new sections on lighting controls and daylighting. EPRI's cofunding and publication of these guidelines will facilitate utility access to this information, resulting in increased lighting quality and energy efficiency.

1993-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

326

Revision Policy for EIA Weekly Underground Natural Gas Storage Estimates  

Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report (EIA)

September 23, 2013 September 23, 2013 This report consists of the following sections: General EIA Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report Revisions Policy - a description of how revisions to the Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report estimates may occur EIA Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report Policy to Allow Unscheduled Release of revisions - a description of the policy that will be implemented in the event of an out-of-cycle release Revisions to the Historical Database - a description of how revisions will be noted in the Historical database The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) is announcing changes Revisions may be presented for the most recent estimates of working gas in storage under a number of circumstances that occur after release of the estimates. These include: I. A respondent revises previously submitted data (respondents are

327

Environmental Monitoring Plan, Revision 6  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of environmental monitoring is to promote the early identification of, and response to, potential adverse environmental impacts associated with Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) operations. Environmental monitoring supports the Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS), International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 14001 Environmental Management Systems standard, and U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) Order 458.1, Radiation Protection of the Public and the Environment. Specifically, environmental monitoring enables LLNL to detect, characterize, and respond to releases from LLNL activities; assess impacts; estimate dispersal patterns in the environment; characterize the pathways of exposure to members of the public; characterize the exposures and doses to individuals and to the population; and to evaluate the potential impacts to the biota in the vicinity of LLNL. Environmental monitoring is also a major component of compliance demonstration for permits and other regulatory requirements. The Environmental Monitoring Plan (EMP) addresses the sample collection and analytical work supporting environmental monitoring to ensure the following: (1) A consistent system for collecting, assessing, and documenting environmental data of known and documented quality; (2) A validated and consistent approach for sampling and analysis of samples to ensure laboratory data meets program-specific needs and requirements within the framework of a performance-based approach for analytical laboratory work; and (3) An integrated sampling approach to avoid duplicative data collection. LLNL prepares the EMP because it provides an organizational framework for ensuring that environmental monitoring work, which is integral to the implementation of LLNL's Environmental Management System, is conducted appropriately. Furthermore, the Environmental Monitoring Plan helps LLNL ensure compliance with DOE Order 231.1 Change 2, Environment, Safety and Health Reporting, which require the publication of an annual report that characterizes the site's environmental management performance. To summarize, the general regulatory drivers for this environmental monitoring plan are ISO 14001, DOE Order 458.1, and DOE Order 231.1. The environmental monitoring addressed by this plan includes preoperational characterization and assessment, effluent and surveillance monitoring, and permit and regulatory compliance monitoring. Additional environmental monitoring is conducted at LLNL as part of compliance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA, also known as Superfund). LLNL coordinates its ground water surveillance monitoring program with the CERCLA monitoring program to gain sampling efficiencies.

Gallegos, G M; Bertoldo, N A; Blake, R G; Campbell, C G; Grayson, A R; Nelson, J C; Revelli, M A; Rosene, C A; Wegrecki, T; Williams, R A; Wilson, K R; Jones, H E

2012-03-02T23:59:59.000Z

328

Guidance document for revision of DOE Order 5820.2A, Radioactive Waste Technical Support Program. Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document provides guidance for the revision of DOE Order 5820.2A, ``Radioactive Waste Management.`` Technical Working Groups have been established and are responsible for writing the revised order. The Technical Working Groups will use this document as a reference for polices and procedures that have been established for the revision process. The overall intent of this guidance is to outline how the order will be revised and how the revision process will be managed. In addition, this document outlines technical issues considered for inclusion by a Department of Energy Steering Committee.

Kudera, D.E.; McMurtrey, C.D.; Meagher, B.G.

1993-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

329

6ka_PanMonsoons , Liu et al., final revision, 09/05/2003 1 Global Monsoons in the mid-Holocene and Oceanic Feedback*  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

6ka_PanMonsoons , Liu et al., final revision, 09/05/2003 1 Global Monsoons in the mid., Madison, WI 53706; zliu3@wisc.edu #12;6ka_PanMonsoons , Liu et al., final revision, 09/05/2003 2 Abstract The response of the six major summer monsoon systems (the North American monsoon, the northern Africa monsoon

Wisconsin at Madison, University of

330

Portland General Electric Company Second Revision of Sheet No. 7-1 P.U.C. Oregon No. E-17 Canceling First Sheet No. 7-1  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Portland General Electric Company Second Revision of Sheet No. 7-1 P.U.C. Oregon No. E-17 Canceling on and after January 1, 2003 #12;Portland General Electric Company First Revision of Sheet No. 7-2 PWh in addition to Energy Charge Renewable Usage 0.800¢ per kWh in addition to Energy Charge Fixed Renewable $3

331

Environmental Monitoring Plan, Revision 5  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of environmental monitoring is to promote the early identification of, and response to, potential adverse environmental impacts associated with Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) operations. Environmental monitoring supports the Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS), International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 14001 Environmental Management Systems standard, and U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) Order 450.1A, Environmental Protection Program. Specifically, in conformance with DOE Order 450.1A, Attachment 1, paragraph 1(b)(5), environmental monitoring enables LLNL to detect, characterize, and respond to releases from LLNL activities; assess impacts; estimate dispersal patterns in the environment; characterize the pathways of exposure to members of the public; characterize the exposures and doses to individuals and to the population; and to evaluate the potential impacts to the biota in the vicinity of LLNL. Environmental monitoring also serves to demonstrate compliance with permits and other regulatory requirements. The Environmental Monitoring Plan (EMP) addresses the sample collection and analytical work supporting environmental monitoring to ensure the following: (1) A consistent system for collecting, assessing, and documenting environmental data of known and documented quality. (2) A validated and consistent approach for sampling and analysis of samples to ensure laboratory data meets program-specific needs and requirements within the framework of a performance-based approach for analytical laboratory work. (3) An integrated sampling approach to avoid duplicative data collection. Until its cancellation in January 2003, DOE Order 5400.1 required the preparation of an environmental monitoring plan. Neither DOE Order 450.1A nor the ISO 14001 standard are as prescriptive as DOE Order 5400.1, in that neither expressly requires an EMP. However, LLNL continues to prepare the EMP because it provides an organizational framework for ensuring that this work, which is integral to the implementation of LLNL's Environmental Management System, is conducted appropriately. Furthermore, the Environmental Monitoring Plan helps LLNL ensure compliance with DOE Order 5400.5, Radiation Protection of the Public and the Environment, and DOE Order 231.1 Change 2, Environment, Safety and Health Reporting, which require the publication of an annual report that characterizes the site's environmental management performance. To summarize, the general regulatory drivers for this environmental monitoring plan are ISO 14001, DOE Order 450.1A, DOE Order 5400.5, and DOE Order 231.1. The environmental monitoring addressed by this plan includes preoperational characterization and assessment, effluent and surveillance monitoring, and permit and regulatory compliance monitoring. Additional environmental monitoring is conducted at LLNL as part of compliance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA, also known as Superfund). LLNL coordinates its ground water surveillance monitoring program with the CERCLA monitoring program to gain sampling efficiencies. (See LLNL [1992] and LLNL [2008] for information about LLNL's CERCLA activities).

Gallegos, G M; Blake, R G; Bertoldo, N A; Campbell, C G; Coty, J; Folks, K; Grayson, A R; Jones, H E; Nelson, J C; Revelli, M A; Wegrecki, T; Williams, R A; Wilson, K

2010-01-27T23:59:59.000Z

332

Post-closure permit application for the Upper East Fork Poplar Creek hydrogeologic regime at the Y-12 Plant: New Hope Pond and Eastern S-3 ponds plume. Revision 2  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The intent of this Post-Closure, Permit Application (PCPA) is to satisfy the post-closure permitting requirements of the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC) Rule 1200-1-11. This application is for the entire Upper East Fork Poplar Creek Hydrogeologic Regime (East Fork Regime), which is within the Bear Creek Valley (BCV). This PCPA has been prepared to include the entire East Fork Regime because, although there are numerous contaminant sources within the regime, the contaminant plumes throughout the East Fork Regime have coalesced and can no longer be distinguished as separate plumes. This PCPA focuses on two recognized Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) interim status units: New Hope Pond (NHP) and the eastern S-3 Ponds plume. This PCPA presents data from groundwater assessment monitoring throughout the regime, performed since 1986. Using this data, this PCPA demonstrates that NHP is not a statistically discernible source of groundwater contaminants and that sites upgradient of NHP are the likely sources of groundwater contamination seen in the NHP vicinity. As such, this PCPA proposes a detection monitoring program to replace the current assessment monitoring program for NHP.

NONE

1995-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

333

Selection of 3013 containers for field surveillance: LA-14310, Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

This document is the fifth in a series of reports that document the binning, statistical sampling, and sample selection of 3013 containers for field surveillance. 1,2,3,39 Revisions to binning assignments documented in this report are primarily a result of new prompt gamma data. This report also documents changes to the random sample specification resulting from these binning changes and identifies and provides the rationale for the engineering judgment sample items for Fiscal Year (FY) 2008 and 2009. This revision also updates the changes to the previous surveillance sample resulting from changes to the order that specific containers undergo surveillance. This report will continue to be reviewed regularly and revised as needed to meet the requirements of the surveillance program.

Peppers, Larry; Kelly, Elizabeth; McClard, James; Friday, Gary; Venetz, Theodore; Stakebake, Jerry

2009-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

334

Revised SRC-I project baseline. Volume 2  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The SRC Process Area Design Baseline consists of six volumes. The first four were submitted to DOE on 9 September 1981. The fifth volume, summarizing the Category A Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs), was not submitted. The sixth volume, containing proprietary information on Kerr-McGee's Critical Solvent Deashing System, was forwarded to BRHG Synthetic Fuels, Inc. for custody, according to past instructions from DOE, and is available for perusal by authorized DOE representatives. DOE formally accepted the Design Baseline under ICRC Release ECP 4-1001, at the Project Configuration Control Board meeting in Oak Ridge, Tennessee on 5 November 1981. The documentation was then revised by Catalytic, Inc. to incorporate the Category B and C and Post-Baseline Engineering Change Proposals. Volumes I through V of the Revised Design Baseline, dated 22 October 1982, are nonproprietary and they were issued to the DOE via Engineering Change Notice (ECN) 4-1 on 23 February 1983. Volume VI again contains proprieary information on Kerr-McGee Critical Solvent Deashing System; it was issued to Burns and Roe Synthetic Fuels, Inc. Subsequently, updated process descriptions, utility summaries, and errata sheets were issued to the DOE and Burns and Roe Synthetic Fuels, Inc. on nonproprietary Engineering Change Notices 4-2 and 4-3 on 24 May 1983.

Not Available

1984-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

335

April2002SAR Revised Final 6-3-02.pub  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4 4 October 1, 2001 - March 31, 2002 Office of Inspector General Office of Inspector General The Inspector General's Message - Page 1 The Department's Management Challenges Page 2 Other Significant Accomplishments Page 33 OIG Reports Issued and Followup Action Process - Page 41 Statistical Data-Savings, Questioned Costs, Hotline Statistics, and Fines, Settlements and Recoveries Page 45 United States Department of Energy Report to Congress Semiannual At Your Service Dear Secretary Abraham: I am pleased to submit the Office of Inspector General's (OIG) Semiannual Report to Congress. This Report summarizes significant OIG activities and accomplishments during the 6-month period ending March 31, 2002. The Report reflects our continuing commitment to focus OIG efforts on the issues and

336

NISTIR 7275 Revision 3, Specification for the Extensible ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... and guidelines for the cost-effective security ... over the same systems across their operational lifetimes ... that can be a standalone XCCDF document ...

2012-02-29T23:59:59.000Z

337

Steam Generator Management Program: Administrative Procedures, Revision 3  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Nuclear Energy Institute's "Guideline for the Management of Materials Issues" (NEI 03-08) is the industry's guideline for management of materials issues, and "Steam Generator Program Guidelines" (NEI 97-06) describes the fundamental elements that are included in a utility's steam generator program. With nuclear safety as the priority, these elements incorporate a balance of prevention, inspection, evaluation, repair, and leakage monitoring measures. NEI 97 06 establishes these measures with reference...

2010-12-13T23:59:59.000Z

338

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 1: PERSONNEL RECORDS (Revision 3)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

The records include, employee concerns programs, labor agreements and negotiations, labor relations, academic and outreach programs, apprenticeship programs, job vacancies, unemployment...

339

Page 1 of 3 Revised: January 13, 2012  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

LIGHTING THE PATH TO UNDERSTANDING Foreign Policy Challenges for the New Administration: Iran on Lighting the Path to Understanding #12;Foreign Policy Challenges for the New Administration: Iran Administration: Iran and the Middle East March 5-6, 2009 Tufts University, Medford/Somerville, MA Sponsored

340

DRAFT NISTIR 7511 Revision 3.04, Security Content ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... 1 http://www.cio.gov/documents/FDCC_memo.pdf 2 The SCAP ... through a repository supplied by the National Vulnerability Database (NVD)6. All of ...

2013-04-29T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "3 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

NMED COMMENTS ITEM 3 REVISE VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND (VOC) TARGET...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

* Hydrogen and Methane Data Validation Checklist (WP 12-VC3209) * EDD Review and Data Package Validation Table (WP 12-VC3209) * VacuumPressure Comparison between Field and...

342

Ground water hydrology report: Revision 1, Attachment 3. Final  

SciTech Connect

This report presents ground water hydrogeologic activities for the Maybell, Colorado, Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action Project site. The Department of Energy has characterized the hydrogeology, water quality, and water resources at the site and determined that the proposed remedial action would comply with the requirements of the EPA ground water protection standards.

NONE

1996-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

343

NIST SP 800-53 Revision 3, Recommended Security Controls ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... the wireless transmission such that it cannot transit the physical perimeter of the organization; (ii) employing measures such as TEMPEST to control ...

2012-02-22T23:59:59.000Z

344

OCRWM Systems Engineering Management Plan (SEMP). Revision 3  

SciTech Connect

The Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Systems Engineering Management Plan (OCRWM SEMP) specifies the technical management approach for the development of the waste management system, and specifies the approach for the development of each of the system elements -- the waste acceptance system, the transportation system, the Monitored Retrievable Storage (MRS) facility, and the mined geologic disposal system, which includes site characterization activity. The SEMP also delineates how systems engineering will be used by OCRWM to describe the system development process; it identifies responsibilities for its implementation, and specifies the minimum requirements for systems engineering. It also identifies the close interrelationship of system engineering and licensing processes. This SEMP, which is a combined OCRWM and M&O SEMP, is part of the top-level program documentation and is prepared in accordance with the direction provided in the Program Management System Manual (PMSM). The relationship of this document to other top level documents in the CRWMS document hierarchy is defined in the PMSM. A systems engineering management plan for each project, which specifies the actions to be taken in implementing systems engineering at the project level, shall be prepared by the respective project managers. [``Program`` refers to the CRWMS-wide activity and ``project`` refers to that level responsible for accomplishing the specific activities of that segment of the program.] The requirements for the project level SEMPs are addressed in Section 4.2.2.2. They represent the minimum set of requirements, and do not preclude the broadening of systems engineering activities to meet the specific needs of each project.

1994-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

345

DOE Revises its NEPA Regulations, Including Categorical Exclusions |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revises its NEPA Regulations, Including Categorical Exclusions Revises its NEPA Regulations, Including Categorical Exclusions DOE Revises its NEPA Regulations, Including Categorical Exclusions September 30, 2011 - 2:30pm Addthis On September 27, 2011, the Department of Energy (DOE) approved revisions to its National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) regulations, and on September 28th, submitted the revisions to the Federal Register. The final regulations, which become effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register, are the culmination of a 2-year process to review and update DOE's NEPA implementing procedures. This process involved internal evaluation, public participation, and Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) review. The revisions are designed to focus Departmental resources on projects with the potential for significant environmental impact, to better

346

Steam Generator Management Program Administrative Procedures, Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Steam Generator Management Program (SGMP) developed many of the guidelines that implement NEI 97-06, Steam Generator Program Guidelines, including a 2001 document that defined and formalized the programmatic elements of SGMP itself. This revision of SGMP Administrative Procedures aligns SGMP with the May 2003 guideline NEI 03-08, which addressed several recent issues involving materials degradation. The revision defines how guidelines are to be revised and approved and presents the SGMP charter, whic...

2004-12-09T23:59:59.000Z

347

Program on Technology Innovation: Utility Requirements Document - Revision 9  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Revision 9 updates the Utility Requirements Document (URD) with a comprehensive set of detailed requirements for new light water reactor (LWR) designs. The revision is based on industry research and development (R&D) accomplished since the document's last revision. By providing plant designers with a thorough set of industry requirements, the URD allows designers to better understand utility expectations and provide compliant nuclear plant designs. Due to the large number of requirements and the need to ...

2008-02-25T23:59:59.000Z

348

Salvo and Geiger Page 1 Fuel Mix and Air Quality during the 2009-2011 Natural Experiments  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

renewable sources. This will include bioethanol from wheat and sugar beet, biodiesel from oil seed rape scarcer even though suitable habitat is available elsewhere. Conversely, mobile and general- ist species and novel crops such as monocultures of high- sugar grass species or biomass crops such as Miscanthus

Schweik, Charles M.

349

JM to Revise DOE O 150.1, Continuity Programs  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The revision will bring DOE O 150.1 into compliance with mandatory Department of Homeland Security (DHS) directives published since the Order was issued in ...

2013-10-03T23:59:59.000Z

350

NIST Issues Major Revision of Core Computer Security Guide ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... State-of-the-practice security controls and control enhancements have been integrated into the new revision to address the evolving technology ...

2013-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

351

Revised March 10, 2010 Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Revised March 10, 2010 Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering Colorado State University 10, 2010 Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering Colorado State University (Circle one) ECE

352

,"U.S. Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","U.S. Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2011 ,"Release...

353

,"U.S. Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","U.S. Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2011 ,"Release...

354

EA-1679: Revision Sheet for Final Environmental Assessment |...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EA-1679: Revision Sheet for Final Environmental Assessment Grand Coulee's Third Power plant 500-kV Transmission Line Replacement Project, Grant and Okanogon Counties,...

355

EIS-0218: Revised Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Record of Decision EIS-0218: Revised Record of Decision Proposed Nuclear Weapons Nonproliferation Policy Concerning Foreign Research Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel The Department of...

356

JM to Revise DOE O 472.2, Personnel Security  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The order is being revised to clarify the responsibilities for adjudicating dual citizens and make consultation with the Office of Intelligence and ...

2013-08-02T23:59:59.000Z

357

,"U.S. Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

ame","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","U.S. Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2011 ,"Release...

358

,"U.S. Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

ame","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","U.S. Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2011 ,"Release...

359

A New Approach To Kimberlite Facies Terminology Using A Revised...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Deposits- Descriptive To Genetic Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Journal Article: A New Approach To Kimberlite Facies Terminology Using A Revised...

360

,"California Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","California Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2011...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "3 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

,"California Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","California Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2011...

362

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 03-02, Revision to Occurrence...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

COORDINATORS CONTRACTOR PAAA COORDINATORS FROM: STEPHEN M. SOHINKI DIRECTOR OFFICE OF PRICE-ANDERSON ENFORCEMENT SUBJECT: Enforcement Guidance Supplement 03-02: Revision to...

363

Solar Position Algorithm for Solar Radiation Applications (Revised...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Revised January 2008 * NRELTP-560-34302 Solar Position Algorithm for Solar Radiation Applications Ibrahim Reda and Afshin Andreas National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole...

364

,"Texas Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

,"Worksheet Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Texas Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2011...

365

,"Texas Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

,"Worksheet Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Texas Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2011...

366

,"U.S. Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","U.S. Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels)",1,"Annual",2011...

367

,"U.S. Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","U.S. Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels)",1,"Annual",2011...

368

,"New Mexico Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","New Mexico Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2011...

369

,"New Mexico Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","New Mexico Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2011...

370

The mixed waste management facility. Project baseline revision 1.2  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Revision 1.2 to the Project Baseline (PB) for the Mixed Waste Management Facility (MWMF) is in response to DOE directives and verbal guidance to (1) Collocate the Decontamination and Waste Treatment Facility (DWTF) and MWMF into a single complex, integrate certain and overlapping functions as a cost-saving measure; (2) Meet certain fiscal year (FY) new-BA funding objectives ($15.3M in FY95) with lower and roughly balanced funding for out years; (3) Reduce Total Project Cost (TPC) for the MWMF Project; (4) Include costs for all appropriate permitting activities in the project TPC. This baseline revision also incorporates revisions in the technical baseline design for Molten Salt Oxidation (MSO) and Mediated Electrochemical Oxidation (MEO). Changes in the WBS dictionary that are necessary as a result of this rebaseline, as well as minor title changes, at WBS Level 3 or above (DOE control level) are approved as a separate document. For completeness, the WBS dictionary that reflects these changes is contained in Appendix B. The PB, with revisions as described in this document, were also the basis for the FY97 Validation Process, presented to DOE and their reviewers on March 21-22, 1995. Appendix C lists information related to prior revisions to the PB. Several key changes relate to the integration of functions and sharing of facilities between the portion of the DWTF that will house the MWMF and those portions that are used by the Hazardous Waste Management (HWM) Division at LLNL. This collocation has been directed by DOE as a cost-saving measure and has been implemented in a manner that maintains separate operational elements from a safety and permitting viewpoint. Appendix D provides background information on the decision and implications of collocating the two facilities.

Streit, R.D.; Throop, A.L.

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

371

INTEGRATED ENERGY POLICY REPORT COMMITTEE REVISED HEARING AGENDA  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

INTEGRATED ENERGY POLICY REPORT COMMITTEE REVISED HEARING AGENDA DAY 1 Committee's Draft 2007 Integrated Energy Policy Report Monday, October 15, 2007 9:00 a.m. Hearing Room A ­ California Energy. General Public Comments #12;INTEGRATED ENERGY POLICY REPORT COMMITTEE REVISED HEARING AGENDA DAY 2

372

Computer Engineering Undergraduate Handbook Revised: April 1, 2010  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Computer Engineering Undergraduate Handbook Revised: April 1, 2010 BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN COMPUTER-278-5987 Fax: 657-278-5804 http://www.fullerton.edu/ecs/cpe #12;Computer Engineering Undergraduate Handbook Engineering Undergraduate Handbook Revised: April 1, 2010 TOC 1 COMPUTER ENGINEERING PROGRAM UNDERGRADUATE

de Lijser, Peter

373

Computer Engineering Undergraduate Handbook Revised: June 4, 2012  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Computer Engineering Undergraduate Handbook Revised: June 4, 2012 BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN COMPUTER-278-5987 Fax: 657-278-5804 http://www.fullerton.edu/ecs/cpe #12;Computer Engineering Undergraduate Handbook Engineering Undergraduate Handbook Revised: June 4, 2012 TOC 1 COMPUTER ENGINEERING PROGRAM UNDERGRADUATE

de Lijser, Peter

374

Revision: October 2013 White Papers on Materials for  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Revision: October 2013 White Papers on Materials for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting, Wooni Choi, Muhammad N. Huda, Su-Huai Wei DOE PEC Working Group #12;Revision: October 2013 PEC White Papers: III-V Semiconductors for PEC III-V semiconductor systems for high-efficiency solar water

375

Revised 1997 Retail Electricity Price Forecast Principal Author: Ben Arikawa  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Revised 1997 Retail Electricity Price Forecast March 1998 Principal Author: Ben Arikawa Electricity Energy Commission until adopted at a public meeting. #12;Revised 1997 Retail Price Forecast, December ELECTRICITY PRICE FORECAST Introduction The Electricity Analysis Office of the California Energy Commission

376

Building America House Simulation Protocols (Revised)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

House House Simulation Protocols Robert Hendron and Cheryn Engebrecht National Renewable Energy Laboratory Revised October 2010 Prepared by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory For the U.S. Department of Energy Building Technologies Program ii NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process,

377

Fig 9-revised Flowchart.xls  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

9 9 Soil Nature and Extent AOI Identification Process d The PRG value for lead is not a calculated PRG, but rather is taken from the EPA guidance document Revised Interim Soil Lead Guidance for CERCLA Sites and RCRA Correction Action Facilities (1994). e For surface soil (0 to 0.5 ft), WRW surface soil (0 to 0.5 ft) PRGs are used. For subsurface soil (0.5 ft to a maximum depth of 209 ft), WRW subsurface soil (0.5 to 8 ft) PRGs are used. a Soil "superset" for soil samples collected from June 28, 1991 through August 22, 2005. c Soil PRGs are defined as 1 x 10 -6 WRW PRGs based on using an HI of 0.1 or a risk of 1 x 10 -6 (the more conservative of the two values was used for the PRG). b Background level is defined as the background M2SD. RI-Ready Soil Data

378

A Review of Criticality Accidents 2000 Revision  

SciTech Connect

Criticality accidents and the characteristics of prompt power excursions are discussed. Sixty accidental power excursions are reviewed. Sufficient detail is provided to enable the reader to understand the physical situation, the chemistry and material flow, and when available the administrative setting leading up to the time of the accident. Information on the power history, energy release, consequences, and causes are also included when available. For those accidents that occurred in process plants, two new sections have been included in this revision. The first is an analysis and summary of the physical and neutronic features of the chain reacting systems. The second is a compilation of observations and lessons learned. Excursions associated with large power reactors are not included in this report.

Thomas P. McLaughlin; Shean P. Monahan; Norman L. Pruvost; Vladimir V. Frolov; Boris G. Ryazanov; Victor I. Sviridov

2000-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

379

Nuclear safety guide TID-7016 Revision 2  

SciTech Connect

The present revision of TID-7016 Nuclear Safety Guide is discussed. This Guide differs significantly from its predecessor in that the latter was intentionally conservative in its recommendations. Firmly based on experimental evidence of criticality, the original Guide and the first revision were considered to be of most value to organizations whose activities with fissionable materials were not extensive and, secondarily, that it would serve as a point of departure for members of established nuclear safety teams, experienced in the field. The reader will find a significant change in the character of information presented in this version. Nuclear Criticality Safety has matured in the past twelve years. The advance of calculational capability has permitted validated calculations to extend and substitute for experimental data. The broadened data base has enabled better interpolation, extension, and understanding of available, information, especially in areas previously addressed by undefined but adequate factors of safety. The content has been thereby enriched in qualitative guidance. The information inherently contains, and the user can recapture, the quantitative guidance characteristic of the former Guides by employing appropriate safety factors. In fact, it becomes incumbent on the Criticality Safety Specialist to necessarily impose safety factors consistent with the possible normal and abnormal credible contingencies of an operation as revealed by his evaluation. In its present form the Guide easily becomes a suitable module in any compendium or handbook tailored for internal use by organizations. It is hoped the Guide will continue to serve immediate needs and will encourage continuing and more comprehensive efforts toward organizing nuclear criticality safety information.

Thomas, J.T.

1980-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

380

Status of Revisions to ASHRAE Standard 62  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The American Society of Heating Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) Standard 62- 1989 "Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor air Quality", adopted in 1989, is widely used by HVAC engineers to determine ventilation rates for various occupancies. This standard has also been cited in court to help demonstrate compliance with state-of the- art indoor environmental design. In August 1996, ASHRAE released for public review Standard 62-1989R, the highly controversial proposed revisions to the Standard 62- 1989. Over 8,000 comments were received on the proposed revision. Due to the significant number of concerns expressed by ASHRAE members as well as others, ASHRAE withdrew the proposed new standard and placed the current standard in "continuous maintenance." As part of the continuous maintenance process ASHRAE is transforming the current Standard 62- 1989 from a design standard to code ready document. Furthermore, two code documents will be produced4ne for low-rise residential buildings and another for other types of occupancy. Finally, two new documents, a user's manual and an IAQ guideline, will be written concurrent with the code documents. The guideline document is intended to provide state-of-the-art guidance to designers while good IAQ practices not appropriate for codification will be incorporated into the guideline. It is likely that many of the provision in Standard 62-1989R will survive in some manner in one or more of the new documents to be produced. This paper will detail some of the more significant changes that were proposed in Standard 62-1989R and review the current state of standard development.

Gallo, F. M.

1998-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "3 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Yakima Fisheries Project : Revised Draft Environmental Impact Statement.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

BPA proposes to fund several fishery-related activities in the Yakima River Basin. The Yakima Fisheries Project (YFP), included in the Northwest Power Planning Council`s fish and wildlife program, would be jointly managed by the State of Washington and the Yakima Indian Nation. Fisheries resources in the Yakima River are severely reduced from historical levels and there is a significant potential for enhancement of these resources. BPA`s proposed action is to fund (1) information gathering on the implementation of supplementation techniques and on feasibility of reintroducing coho salmon in an environment where native populations have become extinct; (2) research activities based on continuous assessment, feedback and improvement of research design and activities ({open_quotes}adaptive management{close_quotes}); and (3) the construction, operation, and maintenance of facilities for supplementing populations of upper Yakima spring chinook salmon. The project has been considerably revised from the original proposal described in the first draft EIS. Examined in addition to No Action (which would leave present anadromous fisheries resources unchanged in the, Basin) are two alternatives for action: (1) supplementation of depressed natural populations of upper Yakima spring chinook and (2) that same supplementation plus a study to determine the feasibility of re-establishing (via stock imported from another basin) naturally spawning population and a significant fall fishery for coho in the Yakima Basin. Alternative 2 has been identified as the preferred action. Major issues examined in the Revised Draft EIS include potential impacts of the project on genetic and ecological resources of existing fish populations, on water quality and quantity, on threatened and endangered species listed under the Endangered Species Act, and on the recreational fishery.

United States. Bonneville Power Administration.

1995-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

382

Microsoft Word - Creston-Bell Revision Sheet__final.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revision Sheet for Final Environmental Assessment Revision Sheet for Final Environmental Assessment Creston-Bell Transmission Line Rebuild Project Department of Energy Bonneville Power Administration Revision Sheet DOE/EA-4406 Summary Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) released the Creston-Bell Transmission Line Rebuild Project Preliminary Environmental Assessment (EA) in April 2012 for public comment. BPA sent the Preliminary EA to agencies and interested parties. Notification that the EA was available and how to request a copy was sent to all others on the mailing list of potentially affected parties. BPA received six comments and responded to these comments in this revision sheet. This revision sheet documents the changes to be incorporated into the EA. The Preliminary EA, with the addition of these changes, constitutes the Final EA, which will not be reprinted.

383

Notice, Revised Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement - July 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Notice, Revised Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement - Notice, Revised Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement - July 2013 Notice, Revised Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement - July 2013 August 29, 2013 - 4:19pm Addthis Notice, Revised Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement - July 2013 The "Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement, Standard Form 312" (SF 312) was revised in July 2013 by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) to conform with two new federal statutes: The Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Act (Public Law 112-74); and Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act (WPEA) (Public Law 112-199). The WPEA strengthens protections for federal employees who disclose evidence of waste, fraud, or abuse. The WPEA requires that each agreement

384

EIS-0286: Revised Draft Environmental Import Statement | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6: Revised Draft Environmental Import Statement 6: Revised Draft Environmental Import Statement EIS-0286: Revised Draft Environmental Import Statement Richland Operations Office, Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program, Richland, Washington The revised draft of the Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement (HSW EIS) provides environmental and technical information concerning U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) proposed waste management practices at the Hanford Site. DOE/EIS-0286, Richland Operations Office, Revised Draft Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement, Richland, Washington - Summary (March 2003) EIS-0286-D2-DEIS-01-2003.pdf EIS-0286-D2-DEIS-02-2003_0.pdf More Documents & Publications

385

Established and Revised Federal Agency NEPA Procedures, 2000 - 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and Revised Federal Agency NEPA Procedures, 2000 - 2011 and Revised Federal Agency NEPA Procedures, 2000 - 2011 ` Established and Revised Federal Agency NEPA Procedures Last Updated on January 11, 2013 Department/Agency Action Title/Citation Federal Register Notice(s) 2000 Department of Health and Human Services Revised NEPA Procedures Revised General Administration Manual, HHS Part 30, Environmental Protection Published for comment on January 11, 1999 (64 Federal Register [FR] 1655). Published as final procedures on February 25, 2000 (65 FR 10229). Bureau of Reclamation Department of the Interior Notice of Availability of a Draft Agency Handbook on the National Environmental Policy Act Department Manual (DM) Part 516, Chapter 6: Managing the NEPA Process (Appendix 7) Published on April 20, 2000 (65 FR 21210) with

386

PUB-3000 Chapter 10 | CONSTRUCTION SAFETY | REVISED 09/11  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Appendix A. Code of Safe Practices Appendix A. Code of Safe Practices Contents Approved by Aaron Zude Revised 09/11 A.1 Cranes A.1.1 Scope and Application A.1.2 Requirements A.1.3 ALL CRANES Used on LBNL Projects Must Meet the Following Minimum Criteria A.1.4 Critical Lift Requirements at LBNL A.1.5 High-Consequence/High-Value Lifts at LBNL A.1.6 Approval of High-Consequence/High-Value Lift Procedures A.1.7 High-Consequence/High-Value Lift Personnel A.2 Demolition A.2.1 Scope and Application A.2.2 Requirements A.2.3 Chutes A.2.4 Removal of Materials through Floor Openings A.2.5 Manual Removal of Floor A.2.6 Removal of Material with Equipment A.2.7 Storage of Materials A.2.8 Removal of Steel Construction A.2.9 Demolition Using Mechanical Equipment A.2.10 Training A.3 Electrical A.3.1 Scope and Application

387

Alternative approaches for promoting fertilizer use in africa, with particular reference to the role of fertilizer subsidies. Revised draft paper  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Why promote fertilizer use? Revised draft 1Table of Contents 1. Introduction................................................................................................................................. 1 2. Rationale for increased use of fertilizer in Africa....................................................................... 3 2.1 Structural transformation and the role of soil fertility.......................................................... 3 2.2 Soil fertility and fertilizer use in Africa................................................................................ 4

Eric W. Crawford; T. S. Jayne; Valerie A. Kelly

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

388

EIS-0286: EPA Notice of Availability of the Revised Draft Environmenta...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revised Draft Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0286: EPA Notice of Availability of the Revised Draft Environmental Impact Statement Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous)...

389

Policy Flash 2013-66 Revised Merit Review Guide for Financial...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 Revised Merit Review Guide for Financial Assistance, JULY 2013 Policy Flash 2013-66 Revised Merit Review Guide for Financial Assistance, JULY 2013 Questions concerning this...

390

Appendix C Impact of Revisions on Major Series, 2012-2013  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

C Impact of Revisions on Major Series, 2012-2013" "(Thousands of Barrels per Day Except Where Noted)" "This table contains information on revisions to published statistics. The...

391

The Science Behind EPA's Proposed Revisions to the National Ambient Air  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

The Science Behind EPA's Proposed Revisions to the National Ambient Air The Science Behind EPA's Proposed Revisions to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for Ozone (O3) and Particulate Matter Speaker(s): Morton Lippmann Date: May 17, 1997 - 12:00pm Location: 90-3148 Seminar Host/Point of Contact: Richard Sextro Most scientific studies that are relevant to the setting of the NAAQS were not designed or performed with that specific application in mind, resulting in bits and pieces of the overall puzzle. Despite these limitations, the particulate matter (PM) and O3 literature reviews and analyses in the recently issued EPA Criteria documents and staff papers are the best prepared and most comprehensive ever available to an EPA Administrator as a basis for NAAQS decisions. This seminar will discuss the scientific basis

392

Consumer price index revision electricity workbook  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Since electricity is considered one of the more difficult ELIs to price, the Revision Electricity Workbook has been developed to serve as a reference for Economic Assistants when pricing and initiating electricity quotes. As there are relatively few outlets available, (typically one per PSU), and electricity is published for each publication area, any error made when pricing electricity can seriously impact the CPI. To best utilize this workbook, read through it entirely and review the examples found in Section IV. The `Industry Overview` and `Electricity Sampling` sections provide background information that may be useful when interacting with the respondent. The `Specifications Review` section contains detailed descriptions of the checklist specifications as well as examples of how to correctly complete certain specification elements. Examples of how to handle rate schedules, complicated tax structures, refunds, etc., are grouped together in Section IV. The `Initiation` section provides procedural guidelines which must be used during initiation. The final section in the workbook outlines the procedures to be used when pricing CPI/PPI Overlap outlets (companies which participate in both the CPI and PPI surveys). As stated above, this workbook is to be used as a reference guide. If a situation arises that is not covered in this workbook, please contact your regional office for assistance.

NONE

1997-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

393

3  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

noise levels depend upon vehicle type, speed, traffic volume, surface conditions, surface gradient, and distance to receptors. 3.5 SOCIOECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE...

394

EIS-0183: Revised Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revised Record of Decision Revised Record of Decision EIS-0183: Revised Record of Decision Electrical Interconnection of the Summit/Westward Project The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) has decided to amend its July 25, 2003, Record of Decision (ROD) regarding the proposed Summit/Westward Project (Project) to offer contract terms for an optional interconnection of this Project into the Federal Columbia River Transmission System (FCRTS). Under this optional interconnection plan, BPA would integrate electric power from the Project into the FCRTS at a point adjacent to Clatskanie People's Utility District (CPUD) existing Wauna Substation. DOE/EIS-0183, Bonneville Power Administration, Revised Record of Decision for the Electrical Interconnection of the Summit/Westward Project (October

395

EIS-0183: Revised Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revised Record of Decision Revised Record of Decision EIS-0183: Revised Record of Decision Offer of Conditional Commitment for a Loan Guarantee for, and Electrical Interconnection of, the Shepherds Flat Wind Project; Bonneville Power Administration The U.S. Department of Energy announces its decisions to provide a conditional loan guarantee for, and interconnection to the Federal Columbia River Transmission River (FCRTS) of, the 846-megawatt (MW) Shepherds. DOE/EIS-0183, Revised Record of Decision for Offer of Conditional Commitment for a Loan Guarantee for, and Electrical Interconnection of, the Shepherds Flat Wind Project; Bonneville Power Administration, (October 2010) More Documents & Publications EIS-0183: DOE Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision EIS-0183: DOE Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision

396

NE-20 ACTION: SSDP Project Charter Revision CONCURRENCES RTG SYMBOL  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

0 0 ACTION: SSDP Project Charter Revision CONCURRENCES RTG SYMBOL James W. Vaughan, Jr. N-923 Acting Assistant Secretary . for Nuclear Energy Murphi Attached for your signature is a revised Project Charter for the 1/ 86 Shippingport Station Decommissioning Project (SSDP). Since our original M determination in July that there was a need to revise the SSDP Charter, we N K23 have been in discussion with the Richland Operations Field Office (RL). INe Significant differences in management philosophy surfaced between RL and DeLaney Headquarters that required discussions up to and including the RL Manager DAE/86 and myself. I now feel that the revised Charter reflects a mutually acceptable working arrangement between the appropriate organizations. The RTGSYMBOL general roles and responsibilities defined in this Charter will facilitate

397

IAEA Information Circular 225 Revision 5: Fact Sheet | National Nuclear  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

IAEA Information Circular 225 Revision 5: Fact Sheet | National Nuclear IAEA Information Circular 225 Revision 5: Fact Sheet | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > Media Room > Fact Sheets > IAEA Information Circular 225 Revision 5: Fact Sheet Fact Sheet IAEA Information Circular 225 Revision 5: Fact Sheet Mar 23, 2012 The Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration

398

SUMMARY OF REVISED TORNADO, HURRICANE AND EXTREME STRAIGHT WIND...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

@ E A R T H L I N K . N E T SUMMARY OF REVISED TORNADO, HURRICANE AND EXTREME STRAIGHT WIND CHARACTERISTICS AT NUCLEAR FACILITY SITES Categorization of Natural Hazard Phenomenon...

399

Questions and answers based on revised 10 CFR Part 20  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

NUREG/CR-6204 is a collection of questions and answers that were originally issued in seven sets and which pertain to revised 10 CFR Part 20. The questions came from both outside and within the NRC. The answers were compiled and provided by NRC staff within the offices of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, Nuclear Regulatory Research, the Office of State Programs, and the five regional offices. Although all of the questions and answers have been reviewed by attorneys in the NRC Office of the General Counsel, they do not constitute official legal interpretations relevant to revised 10 CFR Part 20. The questions and answers do, however, reflect NRC staff decisions and technical options on aspects of the revised 10 CFR Part 20 regulatory requirements. This NUREG is being made available to encourage communication among the public, industry, and NRC staff concerning the major revisions of the NRC`s standards for protection against radiation.

Borges, T.; Stafford, R.S.; Lu, P.Y. [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States); Carter, D. [Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC (United States)

1994-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

400

Fast Flux Test Facility project plan. Revision 2  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF) Transition Project Plan, Revision 2, provides changes to the major elements and project baseline for the deactivation activities necessary to transition the FFTF to a radiologically and industrially safe shutdown condition.

Hulvey, R.K.

1995-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "3 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Use a Vent Condenser to Recover Flash Steam Energy (Revised)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This revised ITP tip sheet on vent condenser to recover flash steam energy provides how-to advice for improving industrial steam systems using low-cost, proven practices and technologies.

Not Available

2006-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

402

A Revised Catalog of Available X.500 Implementations  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document is the result of a survey that gathered new or updated descriptions of currently available implementations of X.500, including commercial products and openly available offerings. This document is a revision of RFC 1292. We contacted each ...

A. Getchell; S. Sataluri

1994-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

403

Microsoft Word - TLVT Manual Revision 1 _122012_ - Final.doc  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

INL-EXT-12-27920 U.S. Department of Energy Vehicle Technologies Program Battery Technology Life Verification Test Manual Revision 1 DECEMBER 2012 The Idaho National Laboratory is...

404

Notice of Revised Scope for the Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8:45 am BILLING CODE 4000-01-P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Notice of Revised Scope for the Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement,...

405

Geothermal grant program for local governments: revised grant application manual  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This revised grant application manual describes the kinds of activities eligible for geothermal grants, who may apply, and how to apply. It also describes the criteria and procedures the California Energy Commission will use in selecting proposals for grant awards.

Not Available

1983-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

406

Condensate Polishing Guidelines for PWR and BWR Plants -- 1997 Revision  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Successful condensate polishing operations maintain control of ionic and particulate impurity transport to the PWR steam generator and the BWR reactor and recirculation system. This report presents revisions of EPRI's 1993 nuclear industry consensus guidelines for the design and operation of deep bed and filter demineralizer condensate polishers. This advice is consistent with the 1996 revisions of EPRI's BWR Water Chemistry Guidelines (TR-103515-R1) and PWR Secondary Water Chemistry Guidelines (TR-10213...

1997-10-31T23:59:59.000Z

407

Fuel Reliability Guidelines: Fuel Surveillance and Inspection, Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) report presents revised guidance for performing nuclear fuel assessments and inspections. The revision provides technical guidance on the scope and frequency of fuel performance assessments and inspections to support the industry goal of zero fuel failures and performance issues. To help achieve this goal, both failed and healthy fuel must be inspected. Such inspections advance the understanding of fuel failure mechanisms and unit-specific fuel margins, leadi...

2012-03-30T23:59:59.000Z

408

The Energy Information Administration is proposing the following revisions to their electricity survey forms in 2011:  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Energy Information Administration proposed the following revisions to their electricity Energy Information Administration proposed the following revisions to their electricity survey forms in 2011: F or m E I A -411, " C oor dinated B ulk Power Supply Pr ogr am R epor t." * Change form name to "Coordinated Bulk Power Supply & Demand Program Report;" return to collecting projected reliability data on a 10-year basis as opposed to 5 years. Change "Council" to "Regional Entity" and add submission of Sub-regional level breakout of data. * Return to reporting on capacity and transmission planning for a 10-year horizon, rather than a 5-year horizon. * Adopt the current NERC 2009 Schedule 3 for summer and winter aggregated demand and supply information. Changes are as follows: Demand category additions include

409

JM to Revise DOE O 320.1, Acquiring and Positioning Human Resources  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The revision clarifies provisions in regulations and assists in the administration of human capital programs.

2011-09-15T23:59:59.000Z

410

[3  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

AC Argentina AR Aruba AA Bahamas, The BF Barbados BB Belize BH Bolivia BL ... Table 6.3 World Total Net Electric Generation, 1980-2006 (Billion Kilowatthours) Page ...

411

NV/YMP radiological control manual, Revision 2  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Nevada Test Site (NTS) and the adjacent Yucca Mountain Project (YMP) are located in Nye County, Nevada. The NTS has been the primary location for testing nuclear explosives in the continental US since 1951. Current activities include operating low-level radioactive and mixed waste disposal facilities for US defense-generated waste, assembly/disassembly of special experiments, surface cleanup and site characterization of contaminated land areas, and non-nuclear test operations such as controlled spills of hazardous materials at the hazardous Materials (HAZMAT) Spill Center (HSC). Currently, the major potential for occupational radiation exposure is associated with the burial of low-level nuclear waste and the handling of radioactive sources. Planned future remediation of contaminated land areas may also result in radiological exposures. The NV/YMP Radiological Control Manual, Revision 2, represents DOE-accepted guidelines and best practices for implementing Nevada Test Site and Yucca Mountain Project Radiation Protection Programs in accordance with the requirements of Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations Part 835, Occupational Radiation Protection. These programs provide protection for approximately 3,000 employees and visitors annually and include coverage for the on-site activities for both personnel and the environment. The personnel protection effort includes a DOE Laboratory Accreditation Program accredited dosimetry and personnel bioassay programs including in-vivo counting, routine workplace air sampling, personnel monitoring, and programmatic and job-specific As Low as Reasonably Achievable considerations.

Gile, A.L. [comp.] [comp.

1996-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

412

Household appliance choice: revision of REEPS behavioral models. Final report  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report describes the analysis of household decisions to install space heating, central cooling, and water heating in new housing as well as decisions to own freezers and second refrigerators. This analysis was conducted as part of the enhancements to the Residential End-Use Energy Planning System (REEPS) under EPRI project RP1918-1. The empirical models used in this analysis were the multinomial logit and its generalization the nested logit. The choice model parameters were estimated statistically on national and regional survey data. The results show that capital and operating costs are significant determinants of appliance market penetrations, and the relative magnitudes of the cost coefficients imply discount rates ranging from 3.4 to twenty-one percent. Several tests were conducted to examine the temporal and geographical stability of the key parameters. The estimated parameters have been incorporated into the REEPS computer code. The revised version of REEPS is now available on a limited release basis to EPRI member utilities for testing on their system.

Goett, A.A.

1984-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

413

ADDENDUM: CHANGES TO REVISED COGENERATION PROJECT COMPENSATORY MITIGATION PLAN  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

changes requested at that meeting are discussed here under five topics and presented in the order that they are presented in the Plan. 1. East Restoration Area The wetland planned for restoration in the East Restoration Area will now be expanded to total 0.5 acre in size. As discussed in Section 4.6, the Plan had only intended to restore the 0.2 acre of existing wetland area within the East Restoration Area. Figure 3 Restoration Areas Plan Topography and Plant Community Distribution has been revised to demonstrate the change. As previously, post-mitigation topography of the East Restoration Area will direct most surface and subsurface runoff to the wetland area. A portion of this water will travel directly from the upland area to be re-created within the Restoration Area. The remaining moisture will enter the wetland as surface water diverted to the seasonally inundated wetland area from a ditch that will be installed along the south edge of the East Restoration Area. As explained in the Plan, the surface water delivery will be designed to minimize intra-seasonal water level fluctuation and prevent flooding.

unknown authors

2003-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

414

New Mexico Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) New Mexico Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 952 491 490 1980's 734 1,012 1,013 753 517 1,487 491 650 613 2,914 1990's 491 1,043 898 1,377 956 551 1,115 1,868 1,882 864 2000's 684 1,244 2,239 1,941 1,771 2,269 1,203 2,431 2,657 1,708 2010's 1,833 2,229 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 8/1/2013 Next Release Date: 8/1/2014 Referring Pages: Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases New Mexico Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves Revision Decreases

415

Revised cost savings estimate with uncertainty for enhanced sludge washing of underground storage tank waste  

SciTech Connect

Enhanced Sludge Washing (ESW) has been selected to reduce the amount of sludge-based underground storage tank (UST) high-level waste at the Hanford site. During the past several years, studies have been conducted to determine the cost savings derived from the implementation of ESW. The tank waste inventory and ESW performance continues to be revised as characterization and development efforts advance. This study provides a new cost savings estimate based upon the most recent inventory and ESW performance revisions, and includes an estimate of the associated cost uncertainty. Whereas the author`s previous cost savings estimates for ESW were compared against no sludge washing, this study assumes the baseline to be simple water washing which more accurately reflects the retrieval activity along. The revised ESW cost savings estimate for all UST waste at Hanford is $6.1 B {+-} $1.3 B within 95% confidence. This is based upon capital and operating cost savings, but does not include development costs. The development costs are assumed negligible since they should be at least an order of magnitude less than the savings. The overall cost savings uncertainty was derived from process performance uncertainties and baseline remediation cost uncertainties, as determined by the author`s engineering judgment.

DeMuth, S.

1998-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

416

EA-1442: Final Environmental Assessment, Revised  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

Proposed Construction and Operation of a Biosafety Level 3 Facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California

417

High-Level Waste Systems Plan. Revision 7  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This revision of the High-Level Waste (HLW) System Plan aligns SRS HLW program planning with the DOE Savannah River (DOE-SR) Ten Year Plan (QC-96-0005, Draft 8/6), which was issued in July 1996. The objective of the Ten Year Plan is to complete cleanup at most nuclear sites within the next ten years. The two key principles of the Ten Year Plan are to accelerate the reduction of the most urgent risks to human health and the environment and to reduce mortgage costs. Accordingly, this System Plan describes the HLW program that will remove HLW from all 24 old-style tanks, and close 20 of those tanks, by 2006 with vitrification of all HLW by 2018. To achieve these goals, the DWPF canister production rate is projected to climb to 300 canisters per year starting in FY06, and remain at that rate through the end of the program in FY18, (Compare that to past System Plans, in which DWPF production peaked at 200 canisters per year, and the program did not complete until 2026.) An additional $247M (FY98 dollars) must be made available as requested over the ten year planning period, including a one-time $10M to enhance Late Wash attainment. If appropriate resources are made available, facility attainment issues are resolved and regulatory support is sufficient, then completion of the HLW program in 2018 would achieve a $3.3 billion cost savings to DOE, versus the cost of completing the program in 2026. Facility status information is current as of October 31, 1996.

Brooke, J.N.; Gregory, M.V.; Paul, P.; Taylor, G.; Wise, F.E.; Davis, N.R.; Wells, M.N.

1996-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

418

Greensburg, Kansas: A Better, Greener Place to Live (Revised) (Brochure) |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Greensburg, Kansas: A Better, Greener Place to Live (Revised) Greensburg, Kansas: A Better, Greener Place to Live (Revised) (Brochure) Greensburg, Kansas: A Better, Greener Place to Live (Revised) (Brochure) Content includes EERE subject matter and mentions DOE's role in rebuilding. The layout is designed to be used as a template for other cities in similar situations. 45086.pdf More Documents & Publications A Tale of Two Cities: Greensburg Rebuilds as a National Model for Green Communities (Fact Sheet), Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) NREL Helps Greensburg Set the Model for Green Communities (Fact Sheet), Innovation: The Spectrum of Clean Energy Innovation, NREL (National Renewable Energy Laboratory) Greensburg, Kansas: Building a Model Green Community, How Would You Rebuild a Town - Green? April 2009 (Brochure)

419

Revision to DOE Order 435.1 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Program Management » Compliance » Revision to DOE Program Management » Compliance » Revision to DOE Order 435.1 Revision to DOE Order 435.1 The Office of Environmental Management has primary responsibility, within DOE, for DOE Order 435.1, the self-regulation of radioactive waste management. As part of this responsibility, EM has decided to update the Order to incorporate several changes to the regulatory process that have taken place over the last decade as well as streamline the Order to improve management of the waste. A comprehensive complex-wide review of DOE radioactive waste management activities associated with implementation of the requirements of DOE Order 435.1, Radioactive Waste Management, was conducted in 2010 in order to gather feedback on the effectiveness of the DOE Order 435.1 requirements (not to assess compliance with the

420

Test Procedure Development and Revision | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Test Procedure Development and Revision Test Procedure Development and Revision Test Procedure Development and Revision Most energy conservation standards rulemakings are accompanied by a concurrent test procedure rulemaking. Test procedures detail the protocols that manufacturers must follow when testing their products for compliance with Department of Energy (DOE) standards. DOE also uses the test procedures to determine compliance with the applicable standards in any verification or enforcement testing. The procedures specify how to measure and calculate the energy efficiency and/or energy use of each appliance. Test procedures also specify how to calculate an estimate of an appliance's annual operating cost, which is used on the EnergyGuide label as required by the Federal Trade Commission.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "3 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

EIS-0218: Revised Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revision of the Record of Decision for a Nuclear Weapons Nonproliferation Revision of the Record of Decision for a Nuclear Weapons Nonproliferation Policy Concerning Foreign Research Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel DOE has decided to extend the FRR SNF Acceptance Policy for an additional 10 years beyond its current expiration until May 12, 2016, for irradiation of eligible fuel, and until May 12, 2019, for fuel acceptance. DOE has also decided to include the Australian RRR as a reactor eligible to participate in the acceptance program. For the small amount of RRR fuel that would be added to 1996 estimates, DOE will continue limitations on shipment cask curie activity and will ensure that the upper limit estimate for the source term assumed in the FRR SNF EIS accident analysis will not be exceeded. EIS-0218-RevisedROD-2004.pdf More Documents & Publications

422

Memorandum: Revised Guidance for the Office of Environmental Management  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revised Guidance for the Office of Environmental Revised Guidance for the Office of Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards Memorandum: Revised Guidance for the Office of Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards From: Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson (EM-1) To: SSAB Members (J. Bierer, T. Martin, M. Wilson, P. Claire, J. Brannon, D. Mosby, B. Tanner, V. Holm, W. Waters) The purpose of this memorandum is to provide guidance and direction for restructuring and managing the Environmental Management (EM) Site Specific Advisory Boards procurement mechanisms that support activities of the Boards. Roberson Memorandum - July 7, 2003 More Documents & Publications Letter: Implementation of the Guidance for the Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards Letter from EM-1, Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson regarding

423

EIS-0226: Revised Draft Environmental Impact Statement | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6: Revised Draft Environmental Impact Statement 6: Revised Draft Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0226: Revised Draft Environmental Impact Statement Decommissioning and/or Long-Term Stewardship at the West Valley Demonstration Project and Western New York Nuclear Service Center This EIS has been prepared in accordance with NEPA and SEQR to examine the potential environmental impacts of the range of reasonable alternatives to decommission and/or maintain long-term stewardship at WNYNSC. The alternatives analyzed in this Draft EIS include the Sitewide Removal Alternative, the Sitewide Close-In-Place Alternative, the Phased Decisionmaking Alternative (Preferred Alternative), and the No Action Alternative. The analysis and information contained in this EIS is intended to assist DOE and NYSERDA with the consideration of environmental impacts

424

Rebuilding After Disaster: Going Green from the Ground Up (Revised)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Rebuilding After Disaster: Going Green from the Ground Up (Revised) Rebuilding After Disaster: Going Green from the Ground Up (Revised) (Brochure), U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) Rebuilding After Disaster: Going Green from the Ground Up (Revised) (Brochure), U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) 20-page "how-to" guide describing ways to turn a disaster into an opportunity to rebuild with greener energy technologies. It covers such topics as the importance of energy, options for communities, instructions for developing an energy plan, and other considerations. This guide is intended for the community leaders who have experienced a disaster. 45136.pdf More Documents & Publications Greensburg Webinars Q&A From Tragedy to Triumph - Rebuilding Green Buildings after Disaster, EERE

425

Rebuilding After Disaster: Going Green from the Ground Up (Revised)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

After Disaster: Going Green from the Ground Up (Revised) After Disaster: Going Green from the Ground Up (Revised) (Brochure), U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) Rebuilding After Disaster: Going Green from the Ground Up (Revised) (Brochure), U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) 20-page "how-to" guide describing ways to turn a disaster into an opportunity to rebuild with greener energy technologies. It covers such topics as the importance of energy, options for communities, instructions for developing an energy plan, and other considerations. This guide is intended for the community leaders who have experienced a disaster. 45136.pdf More Documents & Publications From Tragedy to Triumph - Rebuilding Green Buildings after Disaster, EERE

426

Greensburg, Kansas: A Better, Greener Place to Live (Revised) (Brochure) |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Greensburg, Kansas: A Better, Greener Place to Live (Revised) Greensburg, Kansas: A Better, Greener Place to Live (Revised) (Brochure) Greensburg, Kansas: A Better, Greener Place to Live (Revised) (Brochure) Content includes EERE subject matter and mentions DOE's role in rebuilding. The layout is designed to be used as a template for other cities in similar situations. 45086.pdf More Documents & Publications NREL Helps Greensburg Set the Model for Green Communities (Fact Sheet), Innovation: The Spectrum of Clean Energy Innovation, NREL (National Renewable Energy Laboratory) A Tale of Two Cities: Greensburg Rebuilds as a National Model for Green Communities (Fact Sheet), Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) Greensburg, Kansas: Building a Model Green Community, How Would You Rebuild a Town - Green? April 2009 (Brochure)

427

Original","Revised","Data  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

,,"Original","Revised","Data" ,,"Original","Revised","Data" "Data Type","Product","End Use","PADD","State","Data 2003","Data 2003","Different" "Sales","No. 1 Distillate","Residential","U.S. TOTAL",,110032,110032 "Sales","No. 1 Distillate","Residential","PADD 1",,4232,4232 "Sales","No. 1 Distillate","Residential","PADD 1A",,2085,2085 "Sales","No. 1 Distillate","Residential","Connecticut","CT" "Sales","No. 1 Distillate","Residential","Maine","ME",536,536 "Sales","No. 1 Distillate","Residential","Massachusetts","MA",678,678

428

Revised Acquisition Guide Chapter 42.5, Contract Management Planning  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2-24 2-24 Date: February 21, 2012 To: Procurement Directors From: Director Contract and Financial Assistance Policy Division Office of Policy Office of Procurement and Assistance Management Subject: Revised Acquisition Guide Chapter 42.5, Contract Management Planning Summary: The Department of Energy (DOE) has been on GAO's High Risk List for the past several years as a result of inadequate contract and project management. Accordingly, the improvement of contract administration is a critical issue for DOE. The Acquisition Guide chapter on Contract Management Planning has been completely revised to address this matter.

429

Addendum to the Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 406: Area 3 Building 03-74 & Building 03-58 Underground Discharge Points and Corrective Action Unit 429: Area 3 Building 03-55 & Area 9 Building 09-52 Underground Discharge Points, Tonopah Test Range, Nevada, Revision 0  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document constitutes an addendum to the March 2000, Corrective Action Decision Document / Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 406: Area 3 Building 03-74 & 03-58 Underground Discharge Points and Corrective Action Unit 429: Area 3 Building 03-55 & Area 9 Building 09-52 Underground Discharge Points (TTR) as described in the document Recommendations and Justifications for Modifications for Use Restrictions Established under the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (UR Modification document) dated February 2008. The UR Modification document was approved by NDEP on February 26, 2008. The approval of the UR Modification document constituted approval of each of the recommended UR modifications. In conformance with the UR Modification document, this addendum consists of: This cover page that refers the reader to the UR Modification document for additional information The cover and signature pages of the UR Modification document The NDEP approval letter The corresponding section of the UR Modification document This addendum provides the documentation justifying the cancellation of the UR for CAS 03-51-001-0355 Photo Shop UDP, Drains in CAU 429. It should be noted that there are no changes to CAU 406. This UR was established as part of a Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) corrective action and is based on the presence of contaminants at concentrations greater than the action levels established at the time of the initial investigation (FFACO, 1996; as amended August 2006). Since this UR was established, practices and procedures relating to the implementation of risk-based corrective actions (RBCA) have changed. Therefore, this UR was re-evaluated against the current RBCA criteria as defined in the Industrial Sites Project Establishment of Final Action Levels (NNSA/NSO, 2006c). This re-evaluation consisted of comparing the original data (used to define the need for the UR) to risk-based final action levels (FALs) developed using the current Industrial Sites RBCA process. The re-evaluation resulted in a recommendation to remove the UR because contamination is not present at the site above the risk-based FALs. Requirements for inspecting and maintaining this UR will be canceled, and the postings and signage at this site will be removed. Fencing and posting may be present at this site that are unrelated to the FFACO UR such as for radiological control purposes as required by the NV/YMP Radiological Control Manual (NNSA/NSO, 2004f). This modification will not affect or modify any non-FFACO requirements for fencing, posting, or monitoring at this site.

Lynn Kidman

2008-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

430

Revised potentiometric-surface map, Yucca Mountain and vicinity, Nevada  

SciTech Connect

The revised potentiometric-surface map presented in this report updates earlier maps of the Yucca Mountain area using mainly 1988 average water levels. Because of refinements in the corrections to the water-level measurements, these water levels have increased accuracy and precision over older values. The small-gradient area to the southeast of Yucca Mountain is contoured with a 0.25-meter interval and ranges in water-level altitude from 728.5 to 73 1.0 meters. Other areas with different water levels, to the north and west of Yucca Mountain, are illustrated with shaded patterns. The potentiometric surface can be divided into three regions: (1) A small-gradient area to the southeast of Yucca Mountain, which may be explained by flow through high-transmissivity rocks or low ground-water flux through the area; (2) A moderate-gradient area, on the western side of Yucca Mountain, where the water-level altitude ranges from 775 to 780 meters, and appears to be impeded by the Solitario Canyon Fault and a splay of that fault; and (3) A large-gradient area, to the north-northeast of Yucca Mountain, where water level altitude ranges from 738 to 1,035 meters, possibly as a result of a semi-perched groundwater system. Water levels from wells at Yucca Mountain were examined for yearly trends using linear least-squares regression. Data from five wells exhibited trends which were statistically significant, but some of those may be a result of slow equilibration of the water level from drilling in less permeable rocks. Adjustments for temperature and density changes in the deep wells with long fluid columns were attempted, but some of the adjusted data did not fit the surrounding data and, thus, were not used.

Ervin, E.M.; Luckey, R.R.; Burkhardt, D.J.

1994-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

431

Single-shell tank closure work plan. Revision A  

SciTech Connect

In January 1994, the Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Conset Order (Tri-Party Agreement) was amended to reflect a revised strategy for remediation of radioactive waste in underground storage tanks. These amendments include milestones for closure of the single-shell tank (SST) operable units, to be initiated by March 2012 and completed by September 2024. This SST-CWP has been prepared to address the principal topical areas identified in Tri-Party Agreement Milestone M-45-06 (i.e., regulatory pathway, operable unit characterization, waste retrieval, technology development, and a strategy for achieving closure). Chapter 2.0 of this SST-CWP provides a brief description of the environmental setting, SST System, the origin and characteristics of SST waste, and ancillary equipment that will be remediated as part of SST operable unit closure. Appendix 2A provides a description of the hydrogeology of the Hanford Site, including information on the unsaturated sediments (vadose zone) beneath the 200 Areas Plateau. Chapter 3.0 provides a discussion of the laws and regulations applicable to closure of the SST farm operable units. Chapter 4.0 provides a summary description of the ongoing characterization activities that best align with the proposed regulatory pathway for closure. Chapter 5.0 describes aspects of the SST waste retrieval program, including retrieval strategy, technology, and sequence, potential tank leakage during retrieval, and considerations of deployment of subsurface barriers. Chapter 6.0 outlines a proposed strategy for closure. Chapter 7.0 provides a summary of the programs underway or planned to develop technologies to support closure. Ca. 325 refs.

NONE

1995-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

432

Civilian radioactive waste management program plan. Revision 2  

SciTech Connect

This revision of the Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Program Plan describes the objectives of the Civilian Radioactive Waste management Program (Program) as prescribed by legislative mandate, and the technical achievements, schedule, and costs planned to complete these objectives. The Plan provides Program participants and stakeholders with an updated description of Program activities and milestones for fiscal years (FY) 1998 to 2003. It describes the steps the Program will undertake to provide a viability assessment of the Yucca Mountain site in 1998; prepare the Secretary of Energy`s site recommendation to the President in 2001, if the site is found to be suitable for development as a repository; and submit a license application to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in 2002 for authorization to construct a repository. The Program`s ultimate challenge is to provide adequate assurance to society that an operating geologic repository at a specific site meets the required standards of safety. Chapter 1 describes the Program`s mission and vision, and summarizes the Program`s broad strategic objectives. Chapter 2 describes the Program`s approach to transform strategic objectives, strategies, and success measures to specific Program activities and milestones. Chapter 3 describes the activities and milestones currently projected by the Program for the next five years for the Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project; the Waste Acceptance, Storage and Transportation Project; ad the Program Management Center. The appendices present information on the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, as amended, and the Energy Policy Act of 1992; the history of the Program; the Program`s organization chart; the Commission`s regulations, Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Wastes in geologic Repositories; and a glossary of terms.

1998-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

433

ETAUTP3R0.PDF  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3 3 Revision 0 Effective March 23, 2001 Implementation of SAE J1634 May93 - "Electric Vehicle Energy Consumption and Range Test Procedure" Prepared by Electric Transportation Applications Prepared by: _______________________________ Date: ________ Steven R. Ryan Approved by: _________________________________________________ Date: ____________ Jude M. Clark ETA-UTP003 Revision 0 ©2001 Electric Transportation Applications All Rights Reserved 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Objectives 3 2.0 Purpose 3 3.0 Documentation Support 3 4.0 Initial Conditions and Prerequisites 4 5.0 Dynamometer Setup 7 6.0 Road Load Test Cycle 10 7.0 Data Reduction and Acceptability Criteria 14

434

Design criteria, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). Revised Mission Concept-IIA (RMC-IIA). Revision 3  

SciTech Connect

This document provides design criteria which shall be used by the architect-engineer in the Title II detail design of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. The design criteria present requirements which the architect-engineer must address in the design of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant.

Not Available

1982-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

435

Impact of the Revised 10 CFR 835 on the Neutron Dose Rates at LLNL  

SciTech Connect

In June 2007, 10 CFR 835 [1] was revised to include new radiation weighting factors for neutrons, updated dosimetric models, and dose terms consistent with the newer ICRP recommendations. A significant aspect of the revised 10 CFR 835 is the adoption of the recommendations outlined in ICRP-60 [2]. The recommended new quantities demand a review of much of the basic data used in protection against exposure to sources of ionizing radiation. The International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements has defined a number of quantities for use in personnel and area monitoring [3,4,5] including the ambient dose equivalent H*(d) to be used for area monitoring and instrument calibrations. These quantities are used in ICRP-60 and ICRP-74. This report deals only with the changes in the ambient dose equivalent and ambient dose rate equivalent for neutrons as a result of the implementation of the revised 10 CFR 835. In the report, the terms neutron dose and neutron dose rate will be used for convenience for ambient neutron dose and ambient neutron dose rate unless otherwise stated. This report provides a qualitative and quantitative estimate of how much the neutron dose rates at LLNL will change with the implementation of the revised 10 CFR 835. Neutron spectra and dose rates from selected locations at the LLNL were measured with a high resolution spectroscopic neutron dose rate system (ROSPEC) as well as with a standard neutron rem meter (a.k.a., a remball). The spectra obtained at these locations compare well with the spectra from the Radiation Calibration Laboratory's (RCL) bare californium source that is currently used to calibrate neutron dose rate instruments. The measurements obtained from the high resolution neutron spectrometer and dose meter ROSPEC and the NRD dose meter compare within the range of {+-}25%. When the new radiation weighting factors are adopted with the implementation of the revised 10 CFR 835, the measured dose rates will increase by up to 22%. The health physicists should consider this increase for any areas that have dose rates near a posting limit, such as near the 100 mrem/hr for a high radiation area, as this increase in measured dose rate may result in some changes to postings and consequent radiological controls.

Radev, R

2009-01-13T23:59:59.000Z

436

Belief Revision in Non-Monotonic Reasoning and Logic Programming  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In order to be able to explicitly reason about beliefs, we've introduced a non-monotonic formalism, called the Autoepistemic Logic of Beliefs, AEB, obtained by augmenting classical propositional logic with a belief operator, ?. For this language ... Keywords: Belief Revision, Logic Programming, Logics of Knowledge and Beliefs, Non-Monotonic Reasoning

Jos Jlio Alferes; Lus Moniz Pereira; Teodor C. Przymusinski

1996-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

437

Towards secure multi-sited transactional revision control systems  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Version control systems play a very important role in maintaining the revision history of software and facilitating software evolution. As the software development process is gradually taking the form of a collaborative effort among several teams hosted ... Keywords: Configuration management, Security, Transaction processing, Version control

Junxing Zhang; Indrajit Ray

2007-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

438

Property:NEPA RevisedApplicationDate | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

RevisedApplicationDate RevisedApplicationDate Jump to: navigation, search Property Name NEPA RevisedApplicationDate Property Type Date This is a property of type Date. Pages using the property "NEPA RevisedApplicationDate" Showing 19 pages using this property. D DOI-BLM-CA-ES-2013-002+1793-EIS + 5 June 2012 + DOI-BLM-NV-C010-2010-0006-EA + 16 November 2009 + DOI-BLM-NV-C010-2010-0010-EA + 15 October 2009 + DOI-BLM-NV-C010-2011-0016-EA + 15 March 2011 + DOI-BLM-NV-C010-2012-0050-EA + 14 February 2012 + DOI-BLM-NV-C010-2012-0051-EA + 1 December 2011 + DOI-BLM-NV-C010-2012-0069-CX + 9 August 2012 + DOI-BLM-NV-C010-2012-0070-CX + 27 July 2012 + DOI-BLM-NV-E030-2011-0017-CX + 2 March 2011 + DOI-BLM-NV-W010-2010-0004-EA + 23 November 2009 + DOI-BLM-NV-W010-2011-0001-EA + 4 June 2010 +

439

Pressurized Water Reactor Secondary Water Chemistry Guidelines Revision 6  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

State-of-the-art water chemistry programs reduce equipment corrosion and enhance steam generator reliability. A committee of industry experts prepared these revised "Pressurized Water Reactor Secondary Water Chemistry Guidelines" to incorporate the latest field and laboratory data on secondary system corrosion and performance issues. Pressurized water reactor (PWR) operators can use these guidelines to update their secondary water chemistry programs.

2004-12-13T23:59:59.000Z

440

Revised May 17, 2011 Advanced Workshop in Regulation and Competition  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

. These include: Low natural gas prices ­ large increases in U.S. shale gas production and the tripling of acknowledged reserves are depressing current and projected natural gas prices; Zero carbon price ­ prospectsRevised May 17, 2011 Advanced Workshop in Regulation and Competition 30th Annual Eastern Conference

Lin, Xiaodong

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "3 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Pressurized Water Reactor Secondary Water Chemistry Guidelines - Revision 7  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

State-of-the-art water chemistry programs reduce equipment corrosion and enhance steam generator reliability. A committee of industry experts prepared these revised PWR Secondary Water Chemistry Guidelines to incorporate the latest field and laboratory data on secondary system corrosion and performance issues. Pressurized water reactor (PWR) operators can use these guidelines to update their secondary water chemistry programs.

2009-02-17T23:59:59.000Z

442

Revised June 2013 REIMBURSEMENT OF PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

to 8 ½ x 11 paper. Remember to white-out or black out credit card/account numbers and any line itemsRevised June 2013 REIMBURSEMENT OF PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES (IN ACCORDANCE WITH AD 10 eligibility in accordance with Policy AD10-11. Once a determination is made on eligibility, notification

Kavanagh, Karen L.

443

CALIFORNIA ENERGY DEMAND 2008-2018 STAFF REVISED FORECAST  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION CALIFORNIA ENERGY DEMAND 2008-2018 STAFF REVISED FORECAST forecast is the combined product of the hard work and expertise of numerous staff members in the Demand prepared the residential sector forecast. Mohsen Abrishami prepared the commercial sector forecast. Lynn

444

*See Appendix (Developed by EOP) REVISED May 2012  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

and enters into negotiations with selected candidate. All Negotiated terms are subject to the approval*See Appendix (Developed by EOP) REVISED May 2012 Office of the Provost Faculty Search Checklist and Procedures I. Exemptions This Faculty Search Checklist is intended to guide you in your search for tenure

Belogay, Eugene A.

445

Sourcebook for Plant Layup and Equipment Preservation (Revision 1)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This revision of a 1987 sourcebook documents preferred industry layup practices for the various systems and components of PWR and BWR nuclear plants. Plants that have not implemented layup programs will find the sourcebook a useful reference document in program development.

1992-07-14T23:59:59.000Z

446

Revised design for the Tokamak experimental power reactor  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

A new, preliminary design has been identified for the tokamak experimental power reactor (EPR). The revised EPR design is simpler, more compact, less expensive and has somewhat better performance characteristics than the previous design, yet retains many of the previously developed design concepts. This report summarizes the principle features of the new EPR design, including performance and cost.

Stacey, W.M. Jr.; Abdou, M.A.; Brooks, J.N.

1977-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

447

Subject: 06-362r7 SPC-4 Error history Revision history  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

b) Added resumption of debug log updates when resets occur; c) Add statement after resume that "debug log may include data captured while log update was suspended"; d) Added CLR_SUP bit in READ BUFFER Retrieve Debug Log data; e) In table new2, increase MAXIMUM AVAILABLE LENGTH field to 4 bytes; and f) Add statement to WRITE BUFFER defining action when debug log update is suspended; Revision 2 (15 January 2007) Incorporated editorial changes in 5.11.3 requested at 11/8/2006 CAP WG meeting.

unknown authors

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

448

Subject: 06-362r5 SPC-4 Error history Revision history  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

b) Added resumption of debug log updates when resets occur; c) Add statement after resume that "debug log may include data captured while log update was suspended"; d) Added CLR_SUP bit in READ BUFFER Retrieve Debug Log data; e) In table new2, increase MAXIMUM AVAILABLE LENGTH field to 4 bytes; and f) Add statement to WRITE BUFFER defining action when debug log update is suspended; Revision 2 (15 January 2007) Incorporated editorial changes in 5.11.3 requested at 11/8/2006 CAP WG meeting.

unknown authors

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

449

Subject: 06-362r6 SPC-4 Error history Revision history  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

b) Added resumption of debug log updates when resets occur; c) Add statement after resume that "debug log may include data captured while log update was suspended"; d) Added CLR_SUP bit in READ BUFFER Retrieve Debug Log data; e) In table new2, increase MAXIMUM AVAILABLE LENGTH field to 4 bytes; and f) Add statement to WRITE BUFFER defining action when debug log update is suspended; Revision 2 (15 January 2007) Incorporated editorial changes in 5.11.3 requested at 11/8/2006 CAP WG meeting.

unknown authors

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

450

Subject: 06-362r4 SPC-4 Error history Revision history  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

b) Added resumption of debug log updates when resets occur; c) Add statement after resume that "debug log may include data captured while log update was suspended"; d) Added CLR_SUP bit in READ BUFFER Retrieve Debug Log data; e) In table new2, increase MAXIMUM AVAILABLE LENGTH field to 4 bytes; and f) Add statement to WRITE BUFFER defining action when debug log update is suspended; Revision 2 (15 January 2007) Incorporated editorial changes in 5.11.3 requested at 11/8/2006 CAP WG meeting.

unknown authors

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

451

A revised exposition of the Green-Naghdi theory of heat propagation  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We offer a revised exposition of the three types of heat-propagation theories proposed by Green and Naghdi, in the form they were given in 1992-3. Those theories, which make use of the notion of thermal displacement and allow for heat waves, are at variance with the standard Fourier theory; they have attracted considerable interest, and have been applied in a number of disparate physical circumstances, where heat propagation is coupled with elasticity, viscous flows, etc. However, their derivation is not exempt from criticisms, that we here detail, in hopes of opening the way to reconsideration of old applications and proposition of new ones.

Swantje Bargmann; Antonino Favata; Paolo Podio-Guidugli

2012-11-19T23:59:59.000Z

452

U.S. Department of Energy Releases Revised Total System Life...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Releases Revised Total System Life Cycle Cost Estimate and Fee Adequacy Report for Yucca Mountain Project U.S. Department of Energy Releases Revised Total System Life Cycle Cost...

453

EM Quality Assurance Program (EM-QA-001 Revision 1) | Department...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Program (EM-QA-001 Revision 1) EM Quality Assurance Program (EM-QA-001 Revision 1) The purpose of this document is to describe the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of...

454

POLICY FLASH 2013-66 Revised Merit Review Guide for FInancail...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

POLICY FLASH 2013-66 Revised Merit Review Guide for FInancail Assistance, July 2013 POLICY FLASH 2013-66 Revised Merit Review Guide for FInancail Assistance, July 2013 Questions...

455

Policy Flash 2013-22 Section 311 Revised Template January 24...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 Section 311 Revised Template January 24 2013 Policy Flash 2013-22 Section 311 Revised Template January 24 2013 UPDATE: WORD VERISON OF ALL DOCUEMENTS ARE ATTACHED 311 Notice...

456

Reflecting the Revised PM 2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reflecting the Revised PM 2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard in NEPA Evaluations Reflecting the Revised PM 2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard in NEPA Evaluations This...

457

California Energy Commission REVISED STAFF DRAFT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

by enlightened leaders. Biofuels may have a role to play, but there are some major difficulties we will discuss and hydro in the "less than 7 cents/kWh" category, and can be as low as 3 cents/kWh wholesale. Solar? Is this a way of storing wind energy? (Note: Zubrin emphasizes biofuels, which is not what I am talking about

458

JM to Revise DOE O 483.1, Notice of Intent to Revise DOE O 483.1, Cooperative Research and Development Agreements and DOE M 483.1-1, Cooperative Research and Development Agreements Manual  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

Justification memorandum approving revision of the outdated DOE O 483.1 to incorporate DOE M 483.1-1 into the revised order.

2013-02-21T23:59:59.000Z

459

(NT43067) Revised NETL Report Covers  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

! ! "#$!%&'()!*+,-!"$./012.32*456327! ! 89'(:;((+?(;@@!A;B+(:! CD'E9'(=!F!G'(HI!13JJK! ! G;HI'EL@M@!N;')LE?!:+!0+.$OL@:;EH;!+P!Q'@! 'E)!R=)(':;!LE!#H;'E!S;)LM;E:@! ! ! "#$%&''()!$*+! ,-..-/0#.(''.!12.'&'#'(!34!5(/023637*! 88!,-..-/0#.(''.!9:(! ;-%$?@AB! ! 50(!C2&:(<.&'*!34!5(D-.!-'!9#.'&2! @!C2&:(A>>! 9#.'&2=!5E!8F8@?G>??F! ! H<(I-<()!43<+! C2&'()!"'-'(.!J(I-<'%(2'!34!K2(<7*! L-'&32-6!K2(<7*!5(/023637*!M-$3<-'3<*! ! ! April 30, 2010 Office of Fossil Energy Disclaimer - This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes

460

Materials Reliability Program: Administrative Procedures, Revision 3 (MRP-130, Rev. 3)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 03-08 is the industrys guideline for the management of materials issues. With nuclear safety as the priority, the elements of the program incorporate a balance of prevention, inspection, evaluation, repair, and leakage monitoring measures. Because of the importance of NEI 03-08 requirements to the industry and their regulatory implications, the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) developed the Materials Reliability Program Administrative Procedures to ...

2013-10-10T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "3 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Flat ATIR Optics Approach to CPV: December 3, 2009 - December 3, 2010 (Revised)  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

An agglomeration of factors has stifled the economic promise of CPV technology. Foremost among these factors are: insufficient optical efficiency, misfit with existing solar infrastructure and production capabilities, and inadequate reliability of the optic-receiver pairing. These difficulties are largely driven by the choice of optics. The CPV industry is constrained in a paradigm of bulky reflective or refractive optics that operate best at either low concentration (2-5X) or high concentration (100X and above). Low concentration approaches are plagued by marginal economics, while high concentration approaches face heightened technical risks. High concentration systems inevitably face thermal management hurdles and often do not fit well with the existing solar infrastructure. Using Aggregated Total Internal Reflection (ATIR) as the optical mechanism for gathering light, a cost effective, line-focus optic can be produced at scale to provide superior optical efficiency in a flat profile and operate at a mid level of concentration to mitigate the tradeoff between economic benefit and adoptability. Substantiating this motivational premise behind the ATIR optics approach to CPV requires performance data. Foremost among the goals for establishing the viability of ATIR optics in solar is demonstrating optical efficiency. Banyan Energy performed an outdoor test of optical efficiency (OE) based on short circuit current using the line-focus Lens Step prototype.

Schultz, D.

2011-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

462

A REVIEW OF ASSUMPTIONS AND ANALYSIS IN EPRI EA-3409, "HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCE CHOICE: REVISION OF REEPS BEHAVIORAL MODELS"  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

EPRI EA-3409, "Household Appliance Choice: Revision of REEPSEA",3409: "HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCE CHOICE: REVISION OF REEPSreport EA-3409, "Household Appliance Choice: Revi- sion of

Wood, D.J.

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

463

Microsoft Word - EHS206_revised.doc  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

________________________ _____Environment, Health, & Safety _____ ______________________ ________________________ _____Environment, Health, & Safety _____ ______________________ Training Program EHS 206 ~ Crane Hoist Operator -Greater than 2 Tons Course Syllabus Subject Category: Occupational Safety Course Prerequisite: No Course Length: Four hour lecture plus one hour practical Medical Approval: Every 3 years Delivery Mode: Classroom and hands-on practical Schedule: Quarterly or as needed Location/Time: EHS Training facility Course Purpose: This course has both a classroom and hands-on practical component. It is designed for individuals who, as part of their job, need to operate cranes on an incidental basis with a load greater than two ton. The primary objective of this course is to

464

Perspectives on reactor safety. Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) maintains a technical training center at Chattanooga, Tennessee to provide appropriate training to both new and experienced NRC employees. This document describes a one-week course in reactor safety concepts. The course consists of five modules: (1) the development of safety concepts; (2) severe accident perspectives; (3) accident progression in the reactor vessel; (4) containment characteristics and design bases; and (5) source terms and offsite consequences. The course text is accompanied by slides and videos during the actual presentation of the course.

Haskin, F.E. [New Mexico Univ., Albuquerque, NM (United States). Dept. of Chemical and Nuclear Engineering; Camp, A.L. [Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (United States); Hodge, S.A. [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States). Engineering Technology Div.

1997-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

465

Natural Gas Liquids Reserves Revision Increases  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

882 1,232 968 845 1,187 1,192 1979-2008 882 1,232 968 845 1,187 1,192 1979-2008 Federal Offshore U.S. 118 148 114 118 116 85 1981-2008 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Louisiana & Alabama 89 104 89 99 90 71 1981-2008 Texas 29 44 25 19 26 14 1981-2008 Alaska 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Lower 48 States 882 1,232 968 845 1,187 1,192 1979-2008 Alabama 8 4 2 5 2 9 1979-2008 Arkansas 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 California 12 22 31 8 16 12 1979-2008 Coastal Region Onshore 1 3 2 3 2 1 1979-2008 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 1 0 1 0 1 0 1979-2008 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 10 19 28 5 13 11 1979-2008 State Offshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979-2008 Colorado 51 72 55 34 105 93 1979-2008 Florida 0 0 0 0 2 0 1979-2008 Kansas 11 44 12 44 22 19 1979-2008

466

From Tragedy to Triumph - Rebuilding Green Homes after Disaster (Revised)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

From Tragedy to Triumph - Rebuilding Green Homes after Disaster From Tragedy to Triumph - Rebuilding Green Homes after Disaster (Revised) (Fact Sheet) From Tragedy to Triumph - Rebuilding Green Homes after Disaster (Revised) (Fact Sheet) These Greensburg fact sheet sheets help citizens understand what they can do as a part of the focus. Saving energy & water, using renewable energy (particular interest in small wind), driving "green", general sustainability, & living green. 45138.pdf More Documents & Publications From Tragedy to Triumph - Rebuilding Green Buildings after Disaster, EERE (Fact Sheet) Rebuilding Greensburg, Kansas, as a Model Green Community: A Case Study; NREL's Technical Assistance to Greensburg, June 2007-May 2009 From Tragedy to Triumph - Rebuilding with Renewable Energy after Disaster,

467

ACMP Handbook Change 2011-01 - Revised Financial Assistance Certification  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

1-01 - Revised Financial Assistance Certification 1-01 - Revised Financial Assistance Certification 1 Chapter 4 Financial Assistance Certification Financial Assistance Qualification Standards Financial assistance award and administration within DOE is performed by both GS-1102 contracting personnel and non-GS1102 contracting personnel. In order to ensure that personnel in the financial assistance area possess the requisite skill set the Financial Assistance Program (FAP), certification is required. The Financial Assistance Certification Program (FACP) curriculum is designed to provide members with the necessary financial assistance skills and with experience in a wide range of thinking, approaches, and practices. Level IV is for only those individuals involved in the award and administration of Technology

468

Hanford Site National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) characterization. Revision 9  

SciTech Connect

This ninth revision of the Hanford Site National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Characterization presents current environmental data regarding the hanford Site and its immediate environs. This information is intended for use in preparing Chapters 4 and 6 in Hanford Site-related NEPA documents. Chapter 4.0 (Affected Environment) includes information on climate and meteorology, geology, hydrology, ecology, cultural, archaeological and historical resources, socioeconomics, and noise. Chapter 6.0 (Statutory and Regulatory Requirements) provides the preparer with the federal and state regulations, DOE directives and permits, and environmental standards directly applicable to the NEPA documents on the Hanford Site. Not all of the sections have been updated for this revision. The following lists the updated sections: climate and meteorology; ecology (threatened and endangered species section only); culture, archaeological, and historical resources; socioeconomics; all of Chapter 6.

Neitzel, D.A. [ed.] [ed.; Bjornstad, B.N.; Fosmire, C.J. [and others] [and others

1997-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

469

Microsoft Word - ADR Revised Policy82508Reformatted.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Alternative Dispute Resolution Alternative Dispute Resolution AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Notice of Revised Policy Statement. SUMMARY: On October 24, 1995, the Department of Energy (DOE) published an interim Statement of Policy on Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) (60 FR 54482) to further its commitment to the use of ADR for resolving issues in controversy in a fair, timely, and cost efficient manner, and to comply with the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act (ADRA), 5 U.S.C. §571 et seq. Today, DOE publishes a revised Statement of Policy on Alternative Dispute Resolution to reaffirm its commitment to the use of ADR, including the use of Environmental Conflict Resolution (ECR) and other collaborative processes that may be utilized to prevent or avoid potential conflicts.

470

Non-Power Reactor Operator Licensing Examiner Standards. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

The Non-Power Reactor Operator Licensing Examiner Standards provide policy and guidance to NRC examiners and establish the procedures and practices for examining and licensing of applicants for NRC operator licenses pursuant to Part 55 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR 55). They are intended to assist NRC examiners and facility licensees to understand the examination process better and to provide for equitable and consistent administration of examinations to all applicants by NRC examiners. These standards are not a substitute for the operator licensing regulations and are subject to revision or other internal operator examination licensing policy changes. As appropriate, these standards will be revised periodically to accommodate comments and reflect new information or experience.

NONE

1995-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

471

Toward a Revised NBS Handbook of Mathematical Functions  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Abstract. A modernized and updated revision of Abramowitz and Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions, first published in 1964 by the National Bureau of Standards, is being planned for publication on the World Wide Web. The authoritative status of the original will be preserved by enlisting the aid of qualified mathematicians and scientists. The practical emphasis on formulas, graphs and numerical evaluation will be extended by providing an interactive capability to permit generation of tables and graphs on demand. This report provides background information and early status of the project. This paper was presented at the SIAM Annual Meeting at Stanford University on July 14, 1997, in the Minisymposium on Handbooks for Special Functions and the World Wide Web. The Minisymposium was sponsored by the SIAM Activity Group on Orthogonal Polynomials and Special Functions. Comments on any aspect of a revised Handbook of Mathematical Functions will be gratefully received. Further information and an e-mail address for providing comments is available at

Daniel W. Lozier; Daniel W. Lozier

1997-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

472

Management Earnings Forecasts and Value of Analyst Forecast Revisions  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Prior studies evaluate the relative importance of the sources of value that financial analysts bring to the market based on the price impact of forecast revisions over the event time. We find that management earnings forecasts influence the timing and precision of analyst forecasts. More importantly, evidence suggests that prior studies finding of weaker (stronger) stock-price responses to forecast revisions in the period immediately after (before) the prior-quarter earnings announcement is likely to be the artifact of a temporal pattern of management earnings forecasts over the event time. To the extent that management earnings forecasts are public disclosures, our results suggest that the relative importance of analysts ' information discovery role documented in prior studies is likely to be overstated.

Yongtae Kim; Minsup Song

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

473

DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Record 11009: Revised Portable Power Fuel Cell Targets  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1009 Date: May 26, 2011 1009 Date: May 26, 2011 Title: Revised Portable Power Fuel Cell Targets Originator: Jacob Spendelow, Donna Ho, Dimitrios Papageorgopoulos Approved by: Sunita Satyapal Date: July 18, 2011 Research and development targets for fuel cells deployed in portable power applications have been updated to the values listed in Tables 1-3. Table 1. Fuel cell system targets for portable power applications under 2 W 1 Units 2011 Status 2013 2015 Specific Power 2 W/kg 5 8 10 Power Density 2 W/L 7 10 13 Specific Energy 2,3 Wh/kg 110 200 230 Energy Density 2,3 Wh/L 150 250 300 Cost 4 $/system 150 130 70 Durability 5,6 hours 1500 3000 5000 Mean Time Between Failures 6,7 hours 500 1500 5000 Table 2. Fuel cell system targets for 10 - 50 W portable power applications

474

Guidelines for Electromagnetic Interference Testing in Power Plants: Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Concern about the effect of electromagnetic emissions on the safe, reliable operation of digital equipment has resulted in requirements for utilities to create detailed emissions maps. This guide identifies emissions sources in nuclear power plants, recommends susceptibility and emissions standards, and details design and layout practices for minimizing susceptibility to electromagnetic interference (EMI). Revision 1 reflects modifications to the original document, which received NRC approval in a Safety...

1997-04-16T23:59:59.000Z

475

PWR Primary Water Chemistry Guidelines: Volume 1 Revision 4  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

State-of-the art water chemistry programs help ensure the continued integrity of reactorcoolant system (RCS) materials of construction and fuel cladding, ensure satisfactorycore performance, and support the industry trend toward reduced radiation fields. These revised PWR Primary Water Chemistry Guidelines, prepared by a committee ofindustry experts, reflect the recent field and laboratory data on primary coolant systemcorrosion and performance issues. PWR operators can use these Guidelines to updatethei...

1999-03-31T23:59:59.000Z

476

Field Guide Visual Inspection of NCI: Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The EPRI "Field Guide Visual Inspection of NCI, Revision 1" is a compilation of photographs that illustrate various conditions and factors that commonly affect transmission line non-ceramic insulators (NCI, also called polymer or composite insulators) in the field, along with their likely causes, a maintenance priority rating, and suggested actions to be taken by utility personnel. The photos are arranged according to the portion of the NCI affected, that is, the shed, sheath, shed and sheath, co...

2004-06-30T23:59:59.000Z

477

1992 Annual Capacity Report. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

The Standard Contract for Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and/or High-Level Radioactive Waste (10 CFR Part 961) requires the Department of Energy (DOE) to issue an Annual Capacity Report (ACR) for planning purposes. This report is the fifth in the series published by DOE. In May 1993, DOE published the 1992 Acceptance Priority Ranking (APR) that established the order in which DOE will allocate projected acceptance capacity. As required by the Standard Contract, the acceptance priority ranking is based on the date the spent nuclear fuel (SNF) was permanently discharged, with the owners of the oldest SNF, on an industry-wide basis, given the highest priority. The 1992 ACR applies the projected waste acceptance rates in Table 2.1 to the 1992 APR, resulting in individual allocations for the owners and generators of the SNF. These allocations are listed in detail in the Appendix, and summarized in Table 3.1. The projected waste acceptance rates for SNF presented in Table 2.1 are nominal and assume a site for a Monitored Retrievable Storage (MRS) facility will be obtained; the facility will initiate operations in 1998; and the statutory linkages between the MRS facility and the repository set forth in the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, as amended (NWPA), will be modified. During the first ten years following projected commencement of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System (CRWMS) operation, the total quantity of SNF that could be accepted is projected to be 8,200 metric tons of uranium (MTU). This is consistent with the storage capacity licensing conditions imposed on an MRS facility by the NWPA. The annual acceptance rates provide an approximation of the system throughput and are subject to change as the program progresses.

Not Available

1993-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

478

Preliminary hazards analysis of thermal scrap stabilization system. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

This preliminary analysis examined the HA-21I glovebox and its supporting systems for potential process hazards. Upon further analysis, the thermal stabilization system has been installed in gloveboxes HC-21A and HC-21C. The use of HC-21C and HC-21A simplified the initial safety analysis. In addition, these gloveboxes were cleaner and required less modification for operation than glovebox HA-21I. While this document refers to glovebox HA-21I for the hazards analysis performed, glovebox HC-21C is sufficiently similar that the following analysis is also valid for HC-21C. This hazards analysis document is being re-released as revision 1 to include the updated flowsheet document (Appendix C) and the updated design basis (Appendix D). The revised Process Flow Schematic has also been included (Appendix E). This Current revision incorporates the recommendations provided from the original hazards analysis as well. The System Design Description (SDD) has also been appended (Appendix H) to document the bases for Safety Classification of thermal stabilization equipment.

Lewis, W.S.

1994-08-23T23:59:59.000Z

479

Development of Revised Energy Standards for Texas Buildings: Preliminary Results  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

In 1977, the State of Texas published a two-part Energy Conservation Manual to aid designers, builders, and contractors in the design of energy-efficient state buildings. Under the sponsorship of the Governor's Energy Management Center, the Center for Energy Studies (CES) at The University of Texas at Austin is revising and updating the nonresidential building portion of the Energy Conservation Manual. The proposed revision is a Texas-specific adaptation of ASHRAE Standard 90.1P ("Energy Efficient Design of New Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings"). These modifications include editorial changes, such as deletion of criteria that do not apply to Texas climates, as well as improved envelope criteria and the addition of HVAC system performance criteria. This paper documents the approach taken in the development of the revised Texas standards. Preliminary results are presented for the new envelope calculation procedures that will be included in the compliance software. This software will parallel that provided for the envelope and lighting sections in the ASHRAE Standard and will ultimately extend the standard to include a performance-based approach for HVAC systems and whole-building Energy Targets.

Hunn, B. D.; Jones, J. W.; Silver, S. C.

1988-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

480

Revised Draft Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Import Statement, Richland, Washington - Summary  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Link to Main Report Link to Main Report RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: COVER SHEET 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office TITLE: Revised Draft Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement, Richland, Benton County, Washington (DOE/EIS-0286D2) CONTACT: For further information on this document, write or call: Mr. Michael S. Collins HSW EIS Document Manager Richland Operations Office U.S. Department of Energy, A6-38 P.O. Box 550 Richland, Washington 99352-0550 Telephone: (800) 426-4914 Fax: (509) 372-1926 Email: hsweis@rl.gov For further information on the Department's National Environmental Policy Act process,

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "3 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

REVISED-FINAL-1ST-QUARTER-FY-2013-SCORECARD-09-05-13.xlsx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3-SCORECARD-09-05-13.xlsx 3-SCORECARD-09-05-13.xlsx Page 1 of 95 EA & PEA MILESTONES MET DURING QUARTER (10/2012 - 12/2012) / TOTAL QUARTER EA & PEA MILESTONES ON SCHEDULE EA & PEA MILESTONES NEXT FOUR QUARTERS (01/2013 - 12/2013) / TOTAL FOUR QUARTERS EA & PEA MILESTONES Argonne (ANL) GREEN N / A (0 / 0) N / A (0 / 0) N / A N / A N / A Brookhaven (BNL) GREEN GREEN (1 / 1) GREEN (0 / 0) N / A N / A N / A Carlsbad / Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (CBFO / WIPP) GREEN N / A (0 / 0) N / A (0 / 0) N / A N / A SA Completed Energy Technology Engineering Center (ETEC) GREEN GREEN (0 / 0) GREEN (0 / 0) N / A N / A EIS Idaho (INL) GREEN GREEN (2 / 2) GREEN (7 / 7) N / A PA Revision ROD Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) GREEN GREEN (0 / 0) GREEN (1 / 1) N / A N / A N / A Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL)

482

COMSOL MULTIPHYSICS MODEL FOR DWPF CANISTER FILLING, REVISION 1  

SciTech Connect

This revision is an extension of the COMSOL Multiphysics model previously developed and documented to simulate the temperatures of the glass during pouring a Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) canister. In that report the COMSOL Multiphysics model used a lumped heat loss term derived from experimental thermocouple data based on a nominal pour rate of 228 lbs./hr. As such, the model developed using the lumped heat loss term had limited application without additional experimental data. Therefore, the COMSOL Multiphysics model was modified to simulate glass pouring and subsequent heat input which, replaced the heat loss term in the initial model. This new model allowed for changes in flow geometry based on pour rate as well as the ability to increase and decrease flow and stop and restart flow to simulate varying process conditions. A revised COMSOL Multiphysics model was developed to predict temperatures of the glass within DWPF canisters during filling and cooldown. The model simulations and experimental data were in good agreement. The largest temperature deviations were {approx} 40 C for the 87 inch thermocouple location at 3000 minutes and during the initial cool down at the 51 inch location occurring at approximately 600 minutes. Additionally, the model described in this report predicts the general temperature trends during filling and cooling as observed experimentally. The revised model incorporates a heat flow region corresponding to the glass pouring down the centerline of the canister. The geometry of this region is dependent on the flow rate of the glass and can therefore be used to see temperature variations for various pour rates. The equations used for this model were developed by comparing simulation output to experimental data from a single pour rate. Use of the model will predict temperature profiles for other pour rates but the accuracy of the simulations is unknown due to only a single flow rate comparison.

Kesterson, M.

2011-09-08T23:59:59.000Z

483

Proposed License Amendments "Revised Pressure/Temperature (P/T) Curves, and  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

(FPL) requests that Appendix A of Facility Operating Licenses DPR-31 and DPR-41 for Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 be amended to extend the heatup, cooldown, and inservice test limitations for the Reactor Coolant System (RCS). The present pressure/temperature (P/T) limits specified in Technical Specification (TS) 3/4.4.9, and in TS Figures 3.4-2, 3.4-3 and 3.4-4 apply for operation up to 19 Effective Full Power Years (EFPY). The proposed amendments will extend the service period for the new P/T limits to a maximum of 32 EFPY. The proposed amendments also revise TS 3.4.9.3, Cold Overpressure Mitigation System (COMS) setpoints. COMS is the Westinghouse version of Low Temperature Overpressure Protection (LTOP). The maximum permissible Power Operated Relief Valve (PORV) setpoint for low temperature operation of the RCS is being changed from 415 + 15 psig to < 561 psig, which includes instrument uncertainty of 70 psig, as a result of the P/T limit changes. The enable temperature for the

In Accordance Cfr; Florida Power; Light Company

2000-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

484

Utility Energy Services Contracts: Enabling Documents, May 2009 (Revised) (Book)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

www.femp.energy.gov ENERGY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Utility Energy Services Contracts: Enabling Documents Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Federal Energy Management Program Revised June 2013 DOE/GO-102009-2588 UESCs: Enabling Documents 1 Department of Energy Washington, D.C. Dear Colleagues, The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) is pleased to present this third edition of Utility Energy Services Contracts: Enabling Documents. These documents provide a selected set of background information materials that clarify the authority for Federal agencies to enter into utility energy services

485

Utility Energy Services Contracts: Enabling Documents, May 2009 (Revised) (Book)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

www.femp.energy.gov ENERGY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Utility Energy Services Contracts: Enabling Documents Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Federal Energy Management Program Revised June 2013 DOE/GO-102009-2588 UESCs: Enabling Documents 1 Department of Energy Washington, D.C. Dear Colleagues, The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) is pleased to present this third edition of Utility Energy Services Contracts: Enabling Documents. These documents provide a selected set of background information materials that clarify the authority for Federal agencies to enter into utility energy services

486

EM Quality Assurance Program (EM-QA-001 Revision 0) | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Services » Program Management » Quality Assurance » EM Quality Services » Program Management » Quality Assurance » EM Quality Assurance Program (EM-QA-001 Revision 0) EM Quality Assurance Program (EM-QA-001 Revision 0) Previous revision of the Environmental Management Quality Assurance Program. The program is the EM management system to ensure we"do work correctly." This document has been superseded by Revision 1 of the program, but is still in use at some EM sites. EM Quality Assurance Program (EM-QA-001 Revision 0) More Documents & Publications Quality Assurance Program EM Quality Assurance Program (EM-QA-001 Revision 1) SOPP-43, EM-23 Quality Assurance Oversight Waste Management Nuclear Materials & Waste Tank Waste and Waste Processing Waste Disposition Packaging and Transportation Site & Facility Restoration

487

EIS-0183: Notice of Availability of the Revised Record of Decision |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revised Record of Decision Revised Record of Decision EIS-0183: Notice of Availability of the Revised Record of Decision Bonneville Power Administration, Summit/Westward Project This notice announces the availability of the Revised ROD to offer contract terms for an optional electrical interconnection of the proposed Summit/Westward Project into the Federal Columbia River Transmission System at a point near the existing Wauna Substation of the Clatskanie People's Utility District (CPUD), Columbia County, Oregon. EIS-0183; Notice of Availability of the Revised Record of Decision for the Bonneville Power Administration, Summit/Westward Project (October 2004) More Documents & Publications EIS-0183: Revised Record of Decision EIS-0183: Record of Decision EIS-0349: DOE Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision

488

EIS-0183: Notice of Availability of the Revised Record of Decision |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

183: Notice of Availability of the Revised Record of Decision 183: Notice of Availability of the Revised Record of Decision EIS-0183: Notice of Availability of the Revised Record of Decision Bonneville Power Administration, Summit/Westward Project This notice announces the availability of the Revised ROD to offer contract terms for an optional electrical interconnection of the proposed Summit/Westward Project into the Federal Columbia River Transmission System at a point near the existing Wauna Substation of the Clatskanie People's Utility District (CPUD), Columbia County, Oregon. EIS-0183; Notice of Availability of the Revised Record of Decision for the Bonneville Power Administration, Summit/Westward Project (October 2004) More Documents & Publications EIS-0183: Revised Record of Decision EIS-0183: Record of Decision

489

Economic Impacts of Marcellus Shale in Pennsylvania: Employment and Income in 2009 2011 Penn State Extension and Penn College www.msetc.org 1  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Economic Impacts of Marcellus Shale in Pennsylvania: Employment and Income in 2009 ©2011 Penn State Extension and Penn College www.msetc.org 1 Economic Impacts of Marcellus Shale in Pennsylvania: Employment and Income in 2009 August 2011 www.msetc.org The Marcellus Shale Education & Training Center (MSETC

Boyer, Elizabeth W.

490

(1) Shaw AREVA MOX Services Revised Updated Reply to Notice of Violation 70-  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Materials" This letter corrects an error in our letter of September 1,2011. In that letter, we stated in Item 5 on Page 6 of the Enclosure, that document DCSOI-ZMJ-DS-NTE-N-65973 had been revised. The revision was not approved until September 6, 2011. The Enclosure has been revised accordingly. If you have any questions, please contact Jim O'Dell, Regulatory Compliance Manager, at (803) 819-2234. Sincerely,

Kelly Trice; Eric Chassard; Mox Services; Sam Glenn Nnsa/srs; William Gloersen Nrc/rii; Mark Gober; Mox Services; Dealis Gwyn; Mox Services; Melvin Shannon Nrc/srs

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

491

Mixed Oxide (MOX) Fuel Fabrication Facility Construction Authorization Request Change Pages and Revised Response to AP-03 References:  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Enclosed are change pages for Duke Cogema Stone & Webster's (DCS) request for authorization of construction of the Mixed Oxide (MOX) Fuel Fabrication Facility. The enclosed change pages replace pages in the Construction Authorization Request as updated through Reference 1. The enclosed change pages do not contain information which is considered to be proprietary to DCS. Enclosure 1 provides twenty-five copies of the change pages, which may be disclosed to the public. Enclosure 2 provides the page replacement instructions. The changed pages are the result of additional clarifications to Draft Safety Evaluation Report (DSER) Open Items. Also included as Enclosure 3 is the revised response for open item AP-3. IUmsso(1

Duke Cogema; Stone Webster; Duke Cogema Stone; Duke Cogema Stone; Andrew Persinko Usnrc/hq

2003-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

492

REVISED INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION SURVEY OF A AND B RADIOACTIVE WASTE TRANSFER LINES TRENCH BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY  

SciTech Connect

REVISED INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION SURVEY OF THE A AND B RADIOACTIVE WASTE TRANSFER LINES TRENCH, BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY 5062-SR-01-1

P.C. Weaver

2010-02-10T23:59:59.000Z

493

EIS-0226: DOE Notice of Availability of the Revised Draft Environmenta...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EIS-0226: DOE Notice of Availability of the Revised Draft Environmental Impact Statement Decommissioning andor Long-Term Stewardship at the West Valley Demonstration Project and...

494

NIST SP 800-53A Revision 1, Guide for Assessing the ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Page 1. NIST Special Publication 800-53A Guide for Assessing the Security Revision 1 Controls in Federal Information Systems and Organizations ...

2012-02-06T23:59:59.000Z

495

HAPO Plant acquisition and construction budget for FY 1966 and revision of budget for FY 1965  

SciTech Connect

This report provides the Hanford Atomic Products Operation plant acquisition and construction budget for fiscal year 1966 and the revision of budget for fiscal year 1965.

Connell, R.A.

1964-04-28T23:59:59.000Z

496

JM to Revise DOE O 420.1B, Facility Safety (9-23-10)  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

This approval includes revision of the three implementing Guides: DOE G 420.1-1, Nonreactor Nuclear Safety Design Criteria and Explosive Safety Criteria Guide ...

2010-09-23T23:59:59.000Z

497

Hanford Site National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) characterization. Revision 7  

SciTech Connect

This seventh revision of the Hanford Site National Environmental Policy (NEPA) Characterization presents current environmental data regarding the Hanford Site and its immediate environs. This information is intended for use in preparing Site-related NEPA documentation. Chapter 4.0 summarizes up-to-date information on climate and meteorology, geology, hydrology, environmental monitoring, ecology, history and archaeology, socioeconomics, land use, and noise levels prepared by Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) staff. More detailed data are available from reference sources cited or from the authors. Chapter 5.0 was not updated from the sixth revision (1994). It describes models, including their principal underlying assumptions, that are to be used in simulating realized or potential impacts from nuclear materials at the Hanford Site. Included are models of radionuclide transport in groundwater and atmospheric pathways, and of radiation dose to populations via all known pathways from known initial conditions. The updated Chapter 6.0 provides the preparer with the federal and state regulations, DOE Orders and permits, and environmental standards directly applicable to the NEPA documents on the Hanford Site, following the structure of Chapter 4.0. No conclusions or recommendations are given in this report. Rather, it is a compilation of information on the Hanford Site environment that can be used directly by Site contractors. This information can also be used by any interested individual seeking baseline data on the Hanford Site and its past activities by which to evaluate projected activities and their impacts.

Cushing, C.E. [ed.] ed.; Baker, D.A.; Chamness, M.A. [and others] and others

1995-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

498

Hanford Site National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) characterization. Revision 8  

SciTech Connect

This eighth revision of the Hanford Site National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Characterization presents current environmental data regarding the Hanford Site and its immediate environs. This information is intended for use in preparing Chapters 4 and 6 in Hanford Site-related NEPA documents. Chapter 4 (Affected Environment) includes information on climate and meteorology, geology, hydrology, ecology, historical, archaeological and cultural resources, socioeconomics, and noise. Chapter 6 (Statutory and Regulatory Requirements) provides the preparer with the federal and state regulations, DOE directives and permits, and environmental standards directly applicable to the NEPA documents on the Hanford Site. The following sections were updated in this revision: climate and meteorology; ecology (threatened and endangered species section only); historical; archaeological and cultural resources; and all of chapter 6. No conclusions or recommendations are given in this report. Rather, it is a compilation of information on the Hanford Site environment that can be used directly by Site contractors. This information can also be used by any interested individual seeking baseline data on the hanford Site and its past activities by which to evaluate projected activities and their impacts.

Neitzel, D.A. [ed.] [ed.; Bjornstad, B.N.; Fosmire, C.J.; Fowler, R.A. [and others] [and others

1996-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

499

Hanford Site National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Characterization, Revision 15  

SciTech Connect

This document describes the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Hanford Site environment. It is updated each year and is intended to provide a consistent description of the Hanford Site environment for the many National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documents being prepared by DOE contractors. No statements of significance or environmental consequences are provided. This year's report is the thirteenth revision of the original document published in 1988 and is (until replaced by the fourteenth revision) the only version that is relevant for use in the preparation of Hanford NEPA, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), and Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) documents. The two chapters included in this document (Chapters 4 and 6) are numbered to correspond to the chapters where such information is typically presented in environmental impact statements (Weiss) and other Hanford Site NEPA or CERCLA documentation. Chapter 4.0 (Affected Environment) describes Hanford Site climate and meteorology, geology, hydrology, ecology, cultural, archaeological, and historical resources, socioeconomics, occupational safety, and noise. Chapter 6.0 (Statutory and Regulatory Requirements) describes federal and state laws and regulations, DOE directives and permits, and presidential executive orders that are applicable to the NEPA documents prepared for Hanford Site activities.

Neitzel, Duane A.; Bunn, Amoret L.; Burk, Kenneth W.; Cannon, Sandra D.; Duncan, Joanne P.; Fowler, Richard A.; Fritz, Brad G.; Harvey, David W.; Hendrickson, Paul L.; Horton, Duane G.; Last, George V.; Poston, Ted M.; Prendergast-Kennedy, Ellen L.; Reidel, Steve P.; Scott, Michael J.; Thorne, Paul D.; Woody, Dave M.

2003-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

500

Tank safety screening data quality objective. Revision 1  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Tank Safety Screening Data Quality Objective (DQO) will be used to classify 149 single shell tanks and 28 double shell tanks containing high-level radioactive waste into safety categories for safety issues dealing with the presence of ferrocyanide, organics, flammable gases, and criticality. Decision rules used to classify a tank as ``safe`` or ``not safe`` are presented. Primary and secondary decision variables used for safety status classification are discussed. The number and type of samples required are presented. A tabular identification of each analyte to be measured to support the safety classification, the analytical method to be used, the type of sample, the decision threshold for each analyte that would, if violated, place the tank on the safety issue watch list, and the assumed (desired) analytical uncertainty are provided. This is a living document that should be evaluated for updates on a semiannual basis. Evaluation areas consist of: identification of tanks that have been added or deleted from the specific safety issue watch lists, changes in primary and secondary decision variables, changes in decision rules used for the safety status classification, and changes in analytical requirements. This document directly supports all safety issue specific DQOs and additional characterization DQO efforts associated with pretreatment and retrieval. Additionally, information obtained during implementation can assist in resolving assumptions for revised safety strategies, and in addition, obtaining information which will support the determination of error tolerances, confidence levels, and optimization schemes for later revised safety strategy documentation.

Hunt, J.W.

1995-04-27T23:59:59.000Z