Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "2 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Decreases  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

2,486 2,914 1,668 2009-2011 2,486 2,914 1,668 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 0 0 0 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 0 0 0 2009-2011 Texas 0 0 0 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 2,486 2,914 1,668 2009-2011 Alabama 316 51 86 2009-2011 Arkansas 0 1 3 2009-2011 California 0 0 0 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Colorado 566 1,557 367 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kansas 107 0 14 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 0 0 0 2009-2011 North 0 0 0 2009-2011 South Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Michigan 0 0 0 2009-2011 Mississippi 0 0 0 2009-2011

2

Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Increases  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

1,563 2,589 2,071 2009-2011 1,563 2,589 2,071 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 0 0 0 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 0 0 0 2009-2011 Texas 0 0 0 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 1,563 2,589 2,071 2009-2011 Alabama 17 134 23 2009-2011 Arkansas 3 9 0 2009-2011 California 0 0 0 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Colorado 126 937 698 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kansas 8 157 24 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 0 0 0 2009-2011 North 0 0 0 2009-2011 South Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Michigan 0 0 0 2009-2011 Mississippi 0 0 0 2009-2011

3

Microsoft Word - FINAL DOE IRM Strategic Plan_2009-2011_090808.docx  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

IRM Strategic Plan IRM Strategic Plan Office of the Chief Information Officer FY 2009 - 2011 DOE IRM Strategic Plan i FY 2009 - 2011 U.S. Department of Energy IRM Strategic Plan Office of the Chief Information Officer FY 2009 - 2011 DOE IRM Strategic Plan i TABLE OF CONTENTS MESSAGE FROM THE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER ..................................................................3 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................................4 2.0 IT STRATEGY OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................4 2.1 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY MISSION..........................................................................................

4

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Increases  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

3,270 3,900 5,096 2009-2011 3,270 3,900 5,096 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 710 879 1,966 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 33 38 25 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 616 790 1,861 2009-2011 Texas 61 51 80 2009-2011 Alaska 394 397 362 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 2,876 3,503 4,734 2009-2011 Alabama 9 9 2 2009-2011 Arkansas 5 12 31 2009-2011 California 427 276 394 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 105 40 118 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 98 22 23 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 192 204 229 2009-2011 State Offshore 32 10 24 2009-2011 Colorado 28 52 71 2009-2011 Florida 8 10 9 2009-2011 Illinois 12 0 6 2009-2011 Indiana 1 0 1 2009-2011 Kansas 49 52 47 2009-2011 Kentucky 4 1 9 2009-2011 Louisiana 100 139 100 2009-2011 North 15 69 16 2009-2011 South Onshore

5

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Decreases, Wet After Lease  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

1,262 1,957 3,682 2009-2011 1,262 1,957 3,682 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 208 214 1,455 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 17 4 15 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 174 183 1,354 2009-2011 Texas 17 27 86 2009-2011 Alaska 152 76 129 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 1,110 1,881 3,553 2009-2011 Alabama 2 5 1 2009-2011 Arkansas 0 0 0 2009-2011 California 119 167 230 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 4 39 10 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 47 2 2 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 68 125 217 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 1 1 2009-2011 Colorado 27 34 56 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 2 2009-2011 Illinois 1 4 2 2009-2011 Indiana 0 0 1 2009-2011 Kansas 21 47 23 2009-2011 Kentucky 3 3 2 2009-2011 Louisiana 69 93 43 2009-2011 North 6 11 4 2009-2011 South Onshore 57 73 34 2009-2011

6

Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

3,642 9,491 23,455 2009-2011 3,642 9,491 23,455 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 3,642 9,491 23,455 2009-2011 Alabama 2 0 2009-2010 Arkansas 261 126 141 2009-2011 California 0 2011-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 2011-2011 Colorado 0 2 0 2009-2011 Kentucky 3 43 11 2009-2011 Louisiana 826 1,878 3,882 2009-2011 North 826 1,878 3,882 2009-2011 Michigan 276 325 151 2009-2011 Montana 34 16 14 2009-2011 New Mexico 2 11 190 2009-2011 East 2 2 146 2009-2011 West 0 9 44 2009-2011 North Dakota 17 343 290 2009-2011 Ohio 0 0 2009-2010 Oklahoma 865 2,117 5,024 2009-2011 Pennsylvania 53 1,583 3,322 2009-2011 Texas 1,267 2,425 10,263 2009-2011 RRC District 1 0 251 48 2009-2011 RRC District 2 Onshore 5 402 2010-2011 RRC District 3 Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011

7

Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

6,363 10,661 25,993 2009-2011 6,363 10,661 25,993 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 6,363 10,661 25,993 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 2009-2010 Arkansas 1,585 861 502 2009-2011 California 912 2011-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 912 2011-2011 Colorado 0 1 4 2009-2011 Kentucky 44 3 44 2009-2011 Louisiana 636 1,856 2,002 2009-2011 North 636 1,856 2,002 2009-2011 Michigan 149 165 140 2009-2011 Montana 42 14 14 2009-2011 New Mexico 2 1 83 2009-2011 East 0 1 68 2009-2011 West 2 0 15 2009-2011 North Dakota 119 528 439 2009-2011 Ohio 0 0 2009-2010 Oklahoma 1,373 1,352 3,709 2009-2011 Pennsylvania 299 1,994 5,238 2009-2011 Texas 2,052 3,580 12,185 2009-2011 RRC District 1 1 322 2,141 2009-2011 RRC District 2 Onshore 6 388 2010-2011 RRC District 3 Onshore

8

Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

3,642 9,491 23,455 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 3,642 9,491 23,455 2009-2011 Alabama 2 0 2009-2010 Arkansas 261 126 141 2009-2011 California 0 2011-2011 San...

9

Utah Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

488 518 582 2009-2011 Adjustments 2 13 -16 2009-2011 Revision Increases 126 71 64 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 8 21 23 2009-2011 Sales 8 24 9 2009-2011 Acquisitions 26 3 10...

10

Colorado Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

376 501 555 2009-2011 Adjustments -9 25 -1 2009-2011 Revision Increases 28 52 71 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 27 34 56 2009-2011 Sales 17 3 19 2009-2011 Acquisitions 2 38 4...

11

FTCP Corrective Action Plan- Revision 2  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

March 2009 FTCP Corrective Action Plan, Revision 2, which is Deliverable B for Commitment 13 in the Department of Energy (DOE) Implementation Plan to Improve Oversight of Nuclear Operations, issued in response to Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 2004-1, Oversight of Complex, High-Hazard Nuclear Operations

12

Florida Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

9 19 22 2009-2011 Adjustments -1 2 -2 2009-2011 Revision Increases 8 10 9 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 0 2 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011 Extensions...

13

Miscellaneous Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

22 35 42 2009-2011 Adjustments -1 13 2 2009-2011 Revision Increases 5 3 3 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 2 1 2 2009-2011 Sales 0 9 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 5 0 2009-2011 Extensions...

14

Alabama Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

53 60 65 2009-2011 Adjustments 1 12 2 2009-2011 Revision Increases 9 9 2 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 2 5 1 2009-2011 Sales 0 3 11 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 20 2009-2011...

15

Arkansas Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

9 42 40 2009-2011 Adjustments 2 3 -2 2009-2011 Revision Increases 5 12 31 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Sales 3 3 28 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 3 2009-2011...

16

Kansas Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

64 302 350 2009-2011 Adjustments 20 61 22 2009-2011 Revision Increases 49 52 47 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 21 47 23 2009-2011 Sales 2 6 6 2009-2011 Acquisitions 2 8 19 2009-2011...

17

Indiana Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

8 8 7 2009-2011 Adjustments -7 1 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 1 0 1 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 0 1 2009-2011 Sales 0 2 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 2 0 2009-2011 Extensions 0 0...

18

Federal Offshore California Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

50 363 352 2009-2011 Adjustments -1 -2 1 2009-2011 Revision Increases 33 38 25 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 17 4 15 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011...

19

Ohio Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

50 54 55 2009-2011 Adjustments 8 22 3 2009-2011 Revision Increases 6 4 1 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 2 1 2009-2011 Sales 5 37 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 3 22 0 2009-2011...

20

Illinois Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

66 64 54 2009-2011 Adjustments 3 10 -10 2009-2011 Revision Increases 12 0 6 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 1 4 2 2009-2011 Sales 0 15 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 9 0 2009-2011...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "2 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Kentucky Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

4 16 22 2009-2011 Adjustments 4 -11 1 2009-2011 Revision Increases 4 1 9 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 3 3 2 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 5 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 6 4 2009-2011 Extensions...

22

Federal Offshore, Pacific (California) Lease Condensate Proved...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

4 4 0 2 2 2 1979-2011 Adjustments -1 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 5 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 2...

23

WindSENSE Project Summary: FY2009-2011  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Renewable resources, such as wind and solar, are providing an increasingly larger percentage of our energy needs. To successfully integrate these intermittent resources into the power grid while maintaining its reliability, we need to better understand the characteristics and predictability of the variability associated with these power generation resources. WindSENSE, a three year project at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, considered the problem of scheduling wind energy on the grid from the viewpoint of the control room operator. Our interviews with operators at Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), Southern California Edison (SCE), and California Independent System Operator (CaISO), indicated several challenges to integrating wind power generation into the grid. As the percentage of installed wind power has increased, the variable nature of the generation has become a problem. For example, in the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) balancing area, the installed wind capacity has increased from 700 MW in 2006-2007 to over 1300 MW in 2008 and more than 2600 MW in 2009. To determine the amount of energy to schedule for the hours ahead, operators typically use 0-6 hour ahead forecasts, along with the actual generation in the previous hours and days. These forecasts are obtained from numerical weather prediction (NWP) simulations or based on recent trends in wind speed in the vicinity of the wind farms. However, as the wind speed can be difficult to predict, especially in a region with complex terrain, the forecasts can be inaccurate. Complicating matters are ramp events, where the generation suddenly increases or decreases by a large amount in a short time (Figure 1, right panel). These events are challenging to predict, and given their short duration, make it difficult to keep the load and the generation balanced. Our conversations with BPA, SCE, and CaISO indicated that control room operators would like (1) more accurate wind power generation forecasts for use in scheduling and (2) additional information that can be exploited when the forecasts do not match the actual generation. To achieve this, WindSENSE had two areas of focus: (1) analysis of historical data for better insights, and (2) observation targeting for improved forecasts. The goal was to provide control room operators with an awareness of wind conditions and energy forecasts so they can make well-informed scheduling decisions, especially in the case of extreme events such as ramps.

Kamath, C

2011-09-25T23:59:59.000Z

24

SNS FY 2013 Q1-4 Revision 2 Approved  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

3 Q1-4 Revision 2 Approved Revised 6112013 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6...

25

Revision of DOE Manual 460.2-1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

, 2005 , 2005 TEC/WG 1 Revision of DOE M 460.2-1, Radioactive Material Transportation Practices Manual Revision of DOE M 460.2-1, Radioactive Material Transportation Practices Manual Ella McNeil Office of Transportation, EM-11 September 20, 2005 TEC/WG 2 Getting Started Getting Started * Establish an internal writing team, lead by EM: - Field Representatives - Naval Reactors - NNSA - RW * Kick-off on August 3 (conference call) * Second conference call on Sept. 8 September 20, 2005 TEC/WG 3 Proposed Revision Timeline Proposed Revision Timeline Writing team completes new draft of Manual 1/06 Begin informal DOE review of revised Manual (field, GC, PSOs) 2/06 (3 weeks) Comment resolution by writing team complete, provide draft to internal management for review 3/06 (2 weeks) Draft Manual is provided to SRGs

26

Miscellaneous Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

28 29 41 17 16 17 2005-2011 Adjustments 1 2 3 2009-2011 Revision Increases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 24 2 0 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 1 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011...

27

NM, East Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and Production  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

12 0 7 35 23 2007-2011 Adjustments 10 3 66 2009-2011 Revision Increases 0 1 68 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 2 2 146 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011...

28

New Mexico Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and Production  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

12 0 36 123 144 2007-2011 Adjustments 10 3 69 2009-2011 Revision Increases 2 1 83 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 2 11 190 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011...

29

Federal Offshore, Gulf of Mexico, Louisiana & Alabama Crude Oil...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

,704 4,043 4,567 2009-2011 Adjustments 2 -3 -2 2009-2011 Revision Increases 616 790 1,861 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 174 183 1,354 2009-2011 Sales 20 54 42 2009-2011 Acquisitions...

30

California Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

2,835 2,939 3,009 2009-2011 Adjustments -17 14 32 2009-2011 Revision Increases 427 276 394 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 119 167 230 2009-2011 Sales 3 1 7 2009-2011 Acquisitions 20...

31

Wyoming Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and Production  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

0 0 1 0 2007-2011 Adjustments 1 -1 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 1 2 1 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 4 0 2009-2011 Extensions 0...

32

NM, West Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and Production  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

0 29 88 121 2007-2011 Adjustments 0 0 3 2009-2011 Revision Increases 2 0 15 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 9 44 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011...

33

Colorado Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and Production  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

0 0 4 4 10 2007-2011 Adjustments 1 -1 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 0 1 4 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 2 0 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011...

34

California Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

,835 2,939 3,009 2009-2011 Adjustments -17 14 32 2009-2011 Revision Increases 427 276 394 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 119 167 230 2009-2011 Sales 3 1 7 2009-2011 Acquisitions 20...

35

Michigan Lease Condensate Proved Reserves, Reserve Changes, and...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

6 5 4 19 15 15 1979-2011 Adjustments -1 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 17 1 2 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 4 1 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011...

36

Revision of DOE Manual 460.2-1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 6 TEC/WG 1 Revision of DOE M 460.2-1, Radioactive Material Transportation Practices Manual Revision of DOE M 460.2-1, Radioactive Material Transportation Practices Manual DOE Writing Team March 2006 TEC/WG 2 Proposed Revision Timeline Proposed Revision Timeline Complete new draft of Manual 2/06 Draft Manual provided to Manual Review Topic Group for review & comment 3/14/06 Comments due from Topic Group 5/01/06 Final draft Manual 7/06 Comment resolution (thru conference calls with Topic Group, as needed) 6/06 March 2006 TEC/WG 3 Proposed Timeline (contd.) Proposed Timeline (contd.) Manual is submitted into the formal Directives process 9/06 Manual reissued 12/06 March 2006 TEC/WG 4 Major Changes Made to the Manual Major Changes Made to the Manual * Clarification/update of information relative

37

Fast Flux Test Facility project plan. Revision 2  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF) Transition Project Plan, Revision 2, provides changes to the major elements and project baseline for the deactivation activities necessary to transition the FFTF to a radiologically and industrially safe shutdown condition.

Hulvey, R.K.

1995-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

38

Guidance document for revision of DOE Order 5820.2A, Radioactive Waste Technical Support Program. Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document provides guidance for the revision of DOE Order 5820.2A, ``Radioactive Waste Management.`` Technical Working Groups have been established and are responsible for writing the revised order. The Technical Working Groups will use this document as a reference for polices and procedures that have been established for the revision process. The overall intent of this guidance is to outline how the order will be revised and how the revision process will be managed. In addition, this document outlines technical issues considered for inclusion by a Department of Energy Steering Committee.

Kudera, D.E.; McMurtrey, C.D.; Meagher, B.G.

1993-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

39

Nuclear safety guide TID-7016 Revision 2  

SciTech Connect

The present revision of TID-7016 Nuclear Safety Guide is discussed. This Guide differs significantly from its predecessor in that the latter was intentionally conservative in its recommendations. Firmly based on experimental evidence of criticality, the original Guide and the first revision were considered to be of most value to organizations whose activities with fissionable materials were not extensive and, secondarily, that it would serve as a point of departure for members of established nuclear safety teams, experienced in the field. The reader will find a significant change in the character of information presented in this version. Nuclear Criticality Safety has matured in the past twelve years. The advance of calculational capability has permitted validated calculations to extend and substitute for experimental data. The broadened data base has enabled better interpolation, extension, and understanding of available, information, especially in areas previously addressed by undefined but adequate factors of safety. The content has been thereby enriched in qualitative guidance. The information inherently contains, and the user can recapture, the quantitative guidance characteristic of the former Guides by employing appropriate safety factors. In fact, it becomes incumbent on the Criticality Safety Specialist to necessarily impose safety factors consistent with the possible normal and abnormal credible contingencies of an operation as revealed by his evaluation. In its present form the Guide easily becomes a suitable module in any compendium or handbook tailored for internal use by organizations. It is hoped the Guide will continue to serve immediate needs and will encourage continuing and more comprehensive efforts toward organizing nuclear criticality safety information.

Thomas, J.T.

1980-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

40

West Virginia Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Area: Period: Annual : Download Series History: Definitions, Sources & Notes: Show ... 51: 2009-2011: Adjustments -1-3: 1: 2009-2011: Revision Increases : 0: 2: 15 ...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "2 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Federal Offshore Texas Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Area: Period: Annual : Download Series History: Definitions, Sources & Notes: Show ... 51: 80: 2009-2011: Revision Decreases : 17: 27: 86: 2009-2011: Sales : 0: 2: 0 ...

42

Page 1 of 2 Revised 1 Feb 2013 UBC Utilities  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

SERVICES: WATER, SANITARY, STORM, GAS, and DISTRICT HEATING Part 3 (a). Water Distribution. Water service.5.7 and Section 02730, Clause 2.5.6). #12;Page 2 of 2 Revised 1 Feb 2013 Part 3 (c). Gas and District Heating (%) District Heating Contractor or UBC Dept Telephone Fax Contractor Primary Contact Email Design by (Company

Vellend, Mark

43

Revised: September 24, 2013 Page 1 of 2  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Revised: September 24, 2013 Page 1 of 2 ISP Certification Audit Checklist Certification for: (Area Sample Physical Inspection Locations YES NO 6.1 Are PPE hazard assessments and their certifications.3 Are minimum HCP requirements met for all applicable areas? 6.4 Are minimum CHP requirements met for all

Jiang, Wen

44

Revision Date: 2/4/03  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4/24/03 FY Award __________________ 4/24/03 FY Award __________________ FEMP SERVICES INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT FOR DOE SUPER ESPC Support Requesting Agency Agreement Number: [Requesting Agency inserts their number] Part I. General Information 1) Name and Address of Requesting Agency POC: [Insert agency information, as indicated in paragraph 2) below.] 2) Name and Address of Performing Agency POC: Department of Energy/Golden Field Office FEMP Services Attn: Lincoln Capstick, Contract Specialist 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, CO 80401 Part II. Ordering Information 1) Purpose of this agreement: This Agreement authorizes the Requesting Agency to provide funds to the Department of Energy for the purpose of obtaining FEMP Services in support of a SUPER ESPC project. 2) Scope of Work:

45

Revision Date: 2/4/03  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT FOR DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE) PROJECT FACILITATOR SUPPORT FORM| FY Award __ FY of award Project Facilitator Number: ] Task Order Number: ] [Golden Field Office will complete these two fields] Requesting Agency Agreement Number: [Requesting Agency inserts their number] Part I. General Information 1) Name and Address of Requesting Agency Point of Contact (POC): [Insert agency information, as indicated in paragraph 2 below.] 2) Name and Address of Servicing Agency POC: Department of Energy (DOE)/Golden Field Office (GFO) Office of Acquisition and Financial Assistance (OAFA) Attn: [Insert Name] Contract Specialist 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, CO 80401 Part II. Ordering Information 1) Purpose of this Interagency Agreement

46

Revision Date: 2/4/03  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

4/4/03 FY Award: (FY of award) 4/4/03 FY Award: (FY of award) FEMP SERVICES INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT BLANKET ORDERING AGREEMENT Requesting Agency Agreement Number: [Requesting Agency inserts their number] Part I. General Information 1) Name and Address of Requesting Agency Point of Contact: [Insert agency information, as below in paragraph 2] 2) Name and Address of Performing Agency Point of Contact: Department of Energy/Golden Field Office FEMP Services Attn: Lincoln Capstick, Contract Specialist 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, CO 80401 Part II. Blanket Ordering Information 1) Purpose of this agreement: This Agreement represents a blanket agreement that authorizes the Requesting Agency to provide funds to the Department of Energy for the purpose of obtaining FEMP Services for different agency sites or projects,

47

NRC comprehensive records disposition schedule. Revision 2  

SciTech Connect

Title 44 United States Code, ``Public Printing and Documents,`` regulations cited in the General Services Administration`s (GSA) ``Federal Information Resources Management Regulations`` (FIRMR), Part 201-9, ``Creation, Maintenance, and Use of Records,`` and regulation issued by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) in 36 CFR Chapter XII, Subchapter B, ``Records Management,`` require each agency to prepare and issue a comprehensive records disposition schedule that contains the NARA approved records disposition schedules for records unique to the agency and contains the NARA`s General Records Schedules for records common to several or all agencies. The approved records disposition schedules specify the appropriate duration of retention and the final disposition for records created or maintained by the NRC. NUREG-0910, Rev. 2, contains ``NRC`s Comprehensive Records Disposition Schedule,`` and the original authorized approved citation numbers issued by NARA. Rev. 2 totally reorganizes the records schedules from a functional arrangement to an arrangement by the host office. A subject index and a conversion table have also been developed for the NRC schedules to allow staff to identify the new schedule numbers easily and to improve their ability to locate applicable schedules.

Not Available

1992-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

48

Reflecting the Revised PM 2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Reflecting the Revised PM 2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard in NEPA Evaluations Reflecting the Revised PM 2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard in NEPA Evaluations This...

49

Alabama Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

2,068 2,126 1,727 1,342 1,298 1,210 1989-2011 Adjustments 0 61 -45 2009-2011 Revision Increases 17 134 23 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 316 51 86 2009-2011 Sales 2 266 104 2009-2011...

50

West Virginia Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

14 688 2,491 6,043 2007-2011 Adjustments 140 701 -2 2009-2011 Revision Increases 58 289 702 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 13 543 139 2009-2011 Sales 0 2 126 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0...

51

Pennsylvania Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

50 108 102 131 129 124 2005-2011 Adjustments 0 -1 1 2009-2011 Revision Increases 29 2 1 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 1 0 2 2009-2011 Sales 17 0 1 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0...

52

TX, RRC District 1 Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

2 435 1,564 5,123 2007-2011 Adjustments 5 8 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 1 322 2,141 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 251 48 2009-2011 Sales 0 409 1,132 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0...

53

Montana Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and Production  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

140 125 137 186 192 2007-2011 Adjustments 8 40 14 2009-2011 Revision Increases 42 14 14 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 34 16 14 2009-2011 Sales 2 1 42 2009-2011 Acquisitions 2 0 41...

54

NM, East Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

322 389 530 474 523 507 2005-2011 Adjustments 0 4 -3 2009-2011 Revision Increases 0 72 11 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 30 0 2 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0...

55

Virginia Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

,813 1,948 1,851 2,261 1,752 1,623 2005-2011 Adjustments 0 1 26 2009-2011 Revision Increases 219 16 87 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 459 199 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011...

56

TX, RRC District 4 Onshore Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

78 565 2,611 2007-2011 Adjustments 53 0 185 2009-2011 Revision Increases 0 66 792 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 12 295 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 75 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 75...

57

TX, RRC District 8 Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

5 48 24 90 61 2007-2011 Adjustments -1 53 -79 2009-2011 Revision Increases 2 20 45 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 22 0 12 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 20...

58

TX, RRC District 6 Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

0 173 1,161 4,381 6,584 2007-2011 Adjustments 40 1,968 26 2009-2011 Revision Increases 422 1,206 2,322 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 8 1,319 1,860 2009-2011 Sales 0 88 879 2009-2011...

59

Federal Offshore U.S. Lease Condensate Proved Reserves, Reserve...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

254 255 227 228 214 195 1981-2011 Adjustments -8 2 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 72 59 56 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 36 37 55 2009-2011 Sales 5 13 8 2009-2011 Acquisitions 1 10...

60

Colorado Lease Condensate Proved Reserves, Reserve Changes, and...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

96 107 104 97 115 132 1979-2011 Adjustments 0 4 -1 2009-2011 Revision Increases 15 18 34 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 11 17 8 2009-2011 Sales 12 1 10 2009-2011 Acquisitions 1 2 3...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "2 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

TX, RRC District 3 Onshore Lease Condensate Proved Reserves,...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

75 128 65 74 75 76 1979-2011 Adjustments 3 -2 3 2009-2011 Revision Increases 20 19 18 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 10 16 9 2009-2011 Sales 1 4 11 2009-2011 Acquisitions 1 12 10...

62

Revised SRC-I project baseline. Volume 2  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The SRC Process Area Design Baseline consists of six volumes. The first four were submitted to DOE on 9 September 1981. The fifth volume, summarizing the Category A Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs), was not submitted. The sixth volume, containing proprietary information on Kerr-McGee's Critical Solvent Deashing System, was forwarded to BRHG Synthetic Fuels, Inc. for custody, according to past instructions from DOE, and is available for perusal by authorized DOE representatives. DOE formally accepted the Design Baseline under ICRC Release ECP 4-1001, at the Project Configuration Control Board meeting in Oak Ridge, Tennessee on 5 November 1981. The documentation was then revised by Catalytic, Inc. to incorporate the Category B and C and Post-Baseline Engineering Change Proposals. Volumes I through V of the Revised Design Baseline, dated 22 October 1982, are nonproprietary and they were issued to the DOE via Engineering Change Notice (ECN) 4-1 on 23 February 1983. Volume VI again contains proprieary information on Kerr-McGee Critical Solvent Deashing System; it was issued to Burns and Roe Synthetic Fuels, Inc. Subsequently, updated process descriptions, utility summaries, and errata sheets were issued to the DOE and Burns and Roe Synthetic Fuels, Inc. on nonproprietary Engineering Change Notices 4-2 and 4-3 on 24 May 1983.

Not Available

1984-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

63

JM to Revise DOE O 472.2, Personnel Security  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The order is being revised to clarify the responsibilities for adjudicating dual citizens and make consultation with the Office of Intelligence and ...

2013-08-02T23:59:59.000Z

64

Utah Lease Condensate Proved Reserves, Reserve Changes, and Production  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 View History Proved Reserves as of Dec. 31 52 62 90 69 78 2007-2011 Adjustments 2 3 -3 2009-2011 Revision Increases 36 6 9 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 7...

65

NV/YMP radiological control manual, Revision 2  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Nevada Test Site (NTS) and the adjacent Yucca Mountain Project (YMP) are located in Nye County, Nevada. The NTS has been the primary location for testing nuclear explosives in the continental US since 1951. Current activities include operating low-level radioactive and mixed waste disposal facilities for US defense-generated waste, assembly/disassembly of special experiments, surface cleanup and site characterization of contaminated land areas, and non-nuclear test operations such as controlled spills of hazardous materials at the hazardous Materials (HAZMAT) Spill Center (HSC). Currently, the major potential for occupational radiation exposure is associated with the burial of low-level nuclear waste and the handling of radioactive sources. Planned future remediation of contaminated land areas may also result in radiological exposures. The NV/YMP Radiological Control Manual, Revision 2, represents DOE-accepted guidelines and best practices for implementing Nevada Test Site and Yucca Mountain Project Radiation Protection Programs in accordance with the requirements of Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations Part 835, Occupational Radiation Protection. These programs provide protection for approximately 3,000 employees and visitors annually and include coverage for the on-site activities for both personnel and the environment. The personnel protection effort includes a DOE Laboratory Accreditation Program accredited dosimetry and personnel bioassay programs including in-vivo counting, routine workplace air sampling, personnel monitoring, and programmatic and job-specific As Low as Reasonably Achievable considerations.

Gile, A.L. [comp.] [comp.

1996-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

66

Approved Site Treatment Plan, Volumes 1 and 2. Revision 4  

SciTech Connect

The US Department of Energy, Savannah River Operations Office (DOE-SR), has prepared the Site Treatment Plan (STP) for Savannah River Site (SRS) mixed wastes in accordance with RCRA Section 3021(b), and SCDHEC has approved the STP (except for certain offsite wastes) and issued an order enforcing the STP commitments in Volume 1. DOE-SR and SCDHEC agree that this STP fulfills the requirements contained in the FFCAct, RCRA Section 3021, and therefore, pursuant to Section 105(a) of the FFCAct (RCRA Section 3021(b)(5)), DOE`s requirements are to implement the plan for the development of treatment capacities and technologies pursuant to RCRA Section 3021. Emerging and new technologies not yet considered may be identified to manage waste more safely, effectively, and at lower cost than technologies currently identified in the plan. DOE will continue to evaluate and develop technologies that offer potential advantages in public acceptance, privatization, consolidation, risk abatement, performance, and life-cycle cost. Should technologies that offer such advantages be identified, DOE may request a revision/modification of the STP in accordance with the provisions of Consent Order 95-22-HW. The Compliance Plan Volume (Volume 1) identifies project activity schedule milestones for achieving compliance with Land Disposal Restrictions (LDR). Information regarding the technical evaluation of treatment options for SRS mixed wastes is contained in the Background Volume (Volume 2) and is provided for information.

Helmich, E.H.; Molen, G.; Noller, D.

1996-03-22T23:59:59.000Z

67

Civilian radioactive waste management program plan. Revision 2  

SciTech Connect

This revision of the Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Program Plan describes the objectives of the Civilian Radioactive Waste management Program (Program) as prescribed by legislative mandate, and the technical achievements, schedule, and costs planned to complete these objectives. The Plan provides Program participants and stakeholders with an updated description of Program activities and milestones for fiscal years (FY) 1998 to 2003. It describes the steps the Program will undertake to provide a viability assessment of the Yucca Mountain site in 1998; prepare the Secretary of Energy`s site recommendation to the President in 2001, if the site is found to be suitable for development as a repository; and submit a license application to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in 2002 for authorization to construct a repository. The Program`s ultimate challenge is to provide adequate assurance to society that an operating geologic repository at a specific site meets the required standards of safety. Chapter 1 describes the Program`s mission and vision, and summarizes the Program`s broad strategic objectives. Chapter 2 describes the Program`s approach to transform strategic objectives, strategies, and success measures to specific Program activities and milestones. Chapter 3 describes the activities and milestones currently projected by the Program for the next five years for the Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project; the Waste Acceptance, Storage and Transportation Project; ad the Program Management Center. The appendices present information on the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, as amended, and the Energy Policy Act of 1992; the history of the Program; the Program`s organization chart; the Commission`s regulations, Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Wastes in geologic Repositories; and a glossary of terms.

1998-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

68

Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

6,363 10,661 25,993 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 6,363 10,661 25,993 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 2009-2010 Arkansas 1,585 861 502 2009-2011 California 912 2011-2011...

69

A Revised Land Surface Parameterization (SiB2) for Atmospheric GCMS. Part I: Model Formulation  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The formulation of a revised land surface parameterization for use within atmospheric general circulation models (GCMs) is presented. The model (SiB2) incorporates several significant improvements over the first version of the Simple Biosphere ...

P.J. Sellers; D.A. Randall; G.J. Collatz; J.A. Berry; C.B. Field; D.A. Dazlich; C. Zhang; G.D. Collelo; L. Bounoua

1996-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

70

Lower 48 States Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

19,620 21,874 20,798 18,578 17,508 16,817 2005-2011 Adjustments -14 784 -15 2009-2011 Revision Increases 1,563 2,589 2,071 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 2,486 2,914 1,668 2009-2011...

71

TX, RRC District 7B Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

2,018 2,336 2,022 2,435 3,466 2007-2011 Adjustments 56 267 -193 2009-2011 Revision Increases 119 273 385 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 181 242 358 2009-2011 Sales 496 0 748...

72

Michigan Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and Production  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

3,281 2,894 2,499 2,306 1,947 2007-2011 Adjustments -167 305 31 2009-2011 Revision Increases 149 165 140 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 276 325 151 2009-2011 Sales 0 553 682...

73

Texas Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and Production  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

17,256 22,667 28,167 38,048 49,588 2007-2011 Adjustments 990 2,940 450 2009-2011 Revision Increases 2,052 3,580 12,185 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 1,267 2,425 10,263 2009-2011...

74

Louisiana Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and Production  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

6 858 9,307 20,070 21,950 2007-2011 Adjustments 131 2,347 -172 2009-2011 Revision Increases 636 1,856 2,002 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 826 1,878 3,882 2009-2011 Sales 3 11 3,782...

75

North Louisiana Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes,...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

6 858 9,307 20,070 21,950 2007-2011 Adjustments 131 2,347 -172 2009-2011 Revision Increases 636 1,856 2,002 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 826 1,878 3,882 2009-2011 Sales 3 11 3,782...

76

TX, RRC District 10 Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

-1 2009-2011 Revision Increases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011 Extensions 0 0 1...

77

Louisiana Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

480 530 525 2009-2011 Adjustments -1 7 -8 2009-2011 Revision Increases 100 139 100 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 69 93 43 2009-2011 Sales 9 23 63 2009-2011 Acquisitions 11 52 53...

78

NM, West Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

4,572 3,780 3,461 3,172 3,009 2,851 2005-2011 Adjustments -9 257 -167 2009-2011 Revision Increases 443 490 551 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 323 565 277 2009-2011 Sales 33 12 221...

79

Arkansas Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and Production  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1,460 3,833 9,070 12,526 14,808 2007-2011 Adjustments 2 63 655 2009-2011 Revision Increases 1,585 861 502 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 261 126 141 2009-2011 Sales 3 336 6,087...

80

Oklahoma Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and Production  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

44 3,845 6,389 9,670 10,733 2007-2011 Adjustments 1 713 216 2009-2011 Revision Increases 1,373 1,352 3,709 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 865 2,117 5,024 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 1,591...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "2 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

DRAFT REVISION  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

-2 -2 Processing Inactive Records Revised Version Issued as P 200.2-2B LM Procedure 200.2-2A, Processing Internal Inactive Records for Storage of 7/18/07, has undergone revision. The revised procedure includes updated references, definitions, and formatting. Please replace LM Procedure 200.2-2A with LM Procedure 200.2-2B. The most recent and official controlled hard copy version of this document resides with LM's Directives Coordinator. An electronic version of the controlled document has been placed on the LM Intranet for employee use. Printed hard copies of this electronic version are considered uncontrolled documents. Procedure 200.2-2B INITIATED BY: Office of Business Operations NO. OF PAGES/ATTACHMENTS: 10 pages, 4 attachments U.S. Department of Energy

82

DRAFT FIPS 201-2 (Revised), Personal Identity Verification of ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... CRL Distribution .....50 5.5.2 OCSP Status Responders ... and changes that may impact existing implementations. ...

2013-04-25T23:59:59.000Z

83

FGD Chemistry and Analytical Methods Handbook, Volume 2: Chemical and Physical Test Methods, Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Utilities operating flue gas desulfurization (FGD) systems can increase system reliability and reduce operating costs by monitoring and controlling process chemistry. A revision of volume 2 of this handbook, an industry standard for FGD chemistry labs, incorporates the latest advances in FGD analytical chemistry and introduces methods for determining liquid-phase thiosulfate and boron concentrations.

1988-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

84

ENERGY COMMITTEE ENERGY TALKING POINTS (ETP) SERIES Revision (or Issued): > 1 of 2  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

that is generated by all of the nation's hydroelectric dams in a typical year. THE ENERGY-WATER NEXUS The Department. As the U.S.'s appetite for energy grows so does the demand for increased water usage and the potentialENERGY COMMITTEE ­ ENERGY TALKING POINTS (ETP) SERIES Revision (or Issued): > 1 of 2 ETP

85

Transportation Engineering University of Florida Revised: 2/3/09 Literature Search Strategies and Resources  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Transportation Engineering University of Florida Revised: 2/3/09 Literature Search Strategies information from transportation journals, conferences proceedings, research reports and ongoing researchLink http://springerlink.com/home/main.mpx · Elsevier Transport Connect www.transportconnect.net Note

Slatton, Clint

86

HRSG/SR Revised 07/01/08 Page 1 of 2 HAZARD ASSESSMENT SURVEY & ANALYSIS  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

HRSG/SR Revised 07/01/08 Page 1 of 2 HAZARD ASSESSMENT SURVEY & ANALYSIS PERSONAL PROTECTIVE is accomplished by surveying the workplace to determine where physical or health hazards are present or likely to noise levels. (>85 dBA 8-hour TWA) Ear muffs or plugs Nuisance dust/mist Welding fumes Asbestos

Eirinaki, Magdalini

87

Publication Number: Special Publication 800-56A Revision 2 ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... Final Publication: http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST. SP.800- 56Ar2.pdf Related Information on CSRC: ...

2013-06-13T23:59:59.000Z

88

Page 1 of 2 Revised 8 February 2013 UBC Utilities  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

(Pre-board,1,2,3 or 4) Part 3. MECHANICAL SERVICES: WATER, SANITARY, STORM, GAS, and DISTRICT HEATING 3 (c). Gas and District Heating Distribution · Service to meet requirements of UBC Technical Guidelines Division 2, Section 02685 (gas) and Section (TBA-District Heating ­ contact UBC Utilities. · Fax

Vellend, Mark

89

Integrated thermal treatment system study -- Phase 2 results. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

This report presents the second phase of a study on thermal treatment technologies. The study consists of a systematic assessment of nineteen thermal treatment alternatives for the contact-handled mixed low-level waste (MLLW) currently stored in the US Department of Energy complex. The treatment alternatives consist of widely varying technologies for safely destroying the hazardous organic components, reducing the volume, and preparing for final disposal of the MLLW. The alternatives considered in Phase 2 were innovative thermal treatments with nine types of primary processing units. Other variations in the study examined the effect of combustion gas, air pollution control system design, and stabilization technology for the treatment residues. The Phase 1 study examined ten initial thermal treatment alternatives. The Phase 2 systems were evaluated in essentially the same manner as the Phase 1 systems. The alternatives evaluated were: rotary kiln, slagging kiln, plasma furnace, plasma gasification, molten salt oxidation, molten metal waste destruction, steam gasification, Joule-heated vitrification, thermal desorption and mediated electrochemical oxidation, and thermal desorption and supercritical water oxidation. The quantities, and physical and chemical compositions, of the input waste used in the Phase 2 systems differ from those in the Phase 1 systems, which were based on a preliminary waste input database developed at the onset of the Integrated Thermal Treatment System study. The inventory database used in the Phase 2 study incorporates the latest US Department of Energy information. All systems, both primary treatment systems and subsystem inputs, have now been evaluated using the same waste input (2,927 lb/hr). 28 refs., 88 figs., 41 tabs.

Feizollahi, F.; Quapp, W.J.

1996-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

90

303-K Storage Facility closure plan. Revision 2  

SciTech Connect

Recyclable scrap uranium with zircaloy-2 and copper silicon alloy, uranium-titanium alloy, beryllium/zircaloy-2 alloy, and zircaloy-2 chips and fines were secured in concrete billets (7.5-gallon containers) in the 303-K Storage Facility, located in the 300 Area. The beryllium/zircaloy-2 alloy and zircaloy-2 chips and fines are designated as mixed waste with the characteristic of ignitability. The concretion process reduced the ignitability of the fines and chips for safe storage and shipment. This process has been discontinued and the 303-K Storage Facility is now undergoing closure as defined in the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) Dangerous Waste Regulations, WAC 173-303-040. This closure plan presents a description of the 303-K Storage Facility, the history of materials and waste managed, and the procedures that will be followed to close the 303-K Storage Facility. The 303-K Storage Facility is located within the 300-FF-3 (source) and 300-FF-5 (groundwater) operable units, as designated in the Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (Tri-Party Agreement) (Ecology et al. 1992). Contamination in the operable units 300-FF-3 and 300-FF-5 is scheduled to be addressed through the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980 remedial action process. Therefore, all soil remedial action at the 304 Facility will be conducted as part of the CERCLA remedial action of operable units 300-FF-3 and 300-FF-5.

Not Available

1993-12-15T23:59:59.000Z

91

Microsoft Word - S04801_Avian2008 _2_ revised.doc  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Final Report Final Report Avian Wetland Surveys at Monticello Mill Tailings Site, 2008 November 2008 LMS/MNT/S04801 This page intentionally left blank LMS/MNT/S04801 Final Report Avian Wetland Surveys at Monticello Mill Tailing Site, 2008 November 2008 This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy Avian Wetland Surveys at Monticello Mill Tailing Site, 2008 November 2008 Doc. No. S0480100 Page i Contents 1.0 Summary ................................................................................................................................1 2.0 Methods..................................................................................................................................1 3.0 Results ....................................................................................................................................3

92

UNBC HPC Policy last revised: 2/1/2007, 2:49:29 PM UNBC Enhanced High Performance Computing Center  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

UNBC HPC Policy last revised: 2/1/2007, 2:49:29 PM UNBC Enhanced High Performance Computing Center and contracts are sought by Principal Investigators. Membership Policies The UNBC Enhanced High Performance Computing Center (called " UNBC HPC" hereafter) provides computing resources and services to members

Northern British Columbia, University of

93

The mixed waste management facility. Project baseline revision 1.2  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Revision 1.2 to the Project Baseline (PB) for the Mixed Waste Management Facility (MWMF) is in response to DOE directives and verbal guidance to (1) Collocate the Decontamination and Waste Treatment Facility (DWTF) and MWMF into a single complex, integrate certain and overlapping functions as a cost-saving measure; (2) Meet certain fiscal year (FY) new-BA funding objectives ($15.3M in FY95) with lower and roughly balanced funding for out years; (3) Reduce Total Project Cost (TPC) for the MWMF Project; (4) Include costs for all appropriate permitting activities in the project TPC. This baseline revision also incorporates revisions in the technical baseline design for Molten Salt Oxidation (MSO) and Mediated Electrochemical Oxidation (MEO). Changes in the WBS dictionary that are necessary as a result of this rebaseline, as well as minor title changes, at WBS Level 3 or above (DOE control level) are approved as a separate document. For completeness, the WBS dictionary that reflects these changes is contained in Appendix B. The PB, with revisions as described in this document, were also the basis for the FY97 Validation Process, presented to DOE and their reviewers on March 21-22, 1995. Appendix C lists information related to prior revisions to the PB. Several key changes relate to the integration of functions and sharing of facilities between the portion of the DWTF that will house the MWMF and those portions that are used by the Hazardous Waste Management (HWM) Division at LLNL. This collocation has been directed by DOE as a cost-saving measure and has been implemented in a manner that maintains separate operational elements from a safety and permitting viewpoint. Appendix D provides background information on the decision and implications of collocating the two facilities.

Streit, R.D.; Throop, A.L.

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

94

Revision of DOE Manual 460.2-1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Best Practices Review Best Practices Review Eric Huang Office of Transportation, EM-11 September 20, 2005 2 Rail Best Practices Review Rail shipment incidents Brookhaven shipment to Envirocare - railcars arrived with water (melted snow) leaking (March 2005) Portsmouth shipment to Envirocare - Metal debris gondola car arrived with portion of burrito bag open (May 2005) Mound shipment to Envirocare - Utah NOV for railcar not in a strong tight condition due to a minor breach of the railcar liner (May 2005) Review conducted May 18 - 19 , 2005 Host site - Oak Ridge Focused on loading and securement September 20, 2005 3 Who Participated? EM generator/shipping sites: Fernald Brookhaven Rocky Flats Savannah River Oak Ridge (ETTP) Portsmouth Paducah Receiver Sites - Envirocare and WCS

95

Microsoft Word - ARRA INVESTMENT RELEASE REVISED FINAL Aug 2  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

WIPP USES RECOVERY ACT FUNDING TO WIPP USES RECOVERY ACT FUNDING TO REDUCE NUCLEAR WASTE FOOTPRINT CARLSBAD, N.M., August 2, 2011 - The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's) Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) reduced the nuclear waste footprint by using American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funds to expedite the clean up of five transuranic (TRU) waste storage sites and to make important infrastructure improvements at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). Expediting TRU waste shipments supports DOE's goal to dispose of 90 percent of legacy TRU waste by 2015, saving taxpayers million of dollars in storage and maintenance costs. Recovery Act funds allowed highly trained teams to safely prepare and load waste shipments ahead of schedule and resulted in the clean up of defense-related TRU from the

96

UMTRA Surface Project management action process document: Final. Revision 2  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Title 1 of the UMTRCA authorized the DOE to undertake remedial actions at these designed sites and associated vicinity properties (VP), which contain uranium mill tailings and other residual radioactive materials (RRM) derived from the processing sites. Title 2 of the UMTRCA addresses uranium mill sites that were licensed at the time the UMTRCA was enacted. Cleanup of these Title 2 sites is the responsibility of the licensees. The cleanup of the Title 1 sites has been split into two separate projects: the Surface Project, which deals with the mill buildings, tailings, and contaminated soils at the sites and VPs; and the Ground Water Project, which is limited to the contaminated ground water at the sites. This management action process (MAP) document discusses the Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Surface Project. Since its inception through March 1996, the Surface Project (hereinafter called the Project) has cleaned up 16 of the 24 designated processing sites and approximately 5,000 VPs, reducing the risk to human health and the environment posed by the uranium mill tailings. Two of the 24 sites, Belfield and Bowman, North Dakota, will not be remediated at the request of the state, reducing the total number of sites to 22. By the start of FY1998, the remaining 6 processing sites and associated VPs will be cleaned up. The remedial action activities to be funded in FY1998 by the FY1998 budget request are remediation of the remaining Grand Junction, Colorado, VPs; closure of the Cheney disposal cell in Grand Junction, Colorado; and preparation of the completion reports for 4 completed sites.

NONE

1996-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

97

DRAFT REVISION  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

4-1 4-1 Records Management Self-Assessment Revised Version Issued as P200.4-1B LM Procedure 200.4-1, Records Management Self-Assessment of 4/17/07, has undergone minor revisions. The procedure has been revised to reflect changes in definitions and formatting. Please replace LM Procedure 200.4-1A with LM Procedure 200.4-1B. The most recent and official controlled hard copy version of this document resides with LM's Directives Coordinator. An electronic version of the controlled document has been placed on the LM Intranet for employee use. Printed hard copies of this electronic version are considered uncontrolled documents. INITIATED BY: Office of Business Operations NO. OF PAGES/ATTACHMENTS: 8 pages, 2 attachments U.S. Department of Energy

98

Standard technical specifications, Westinghouse Plants: Bases (Sections 2.0--3.3). Volume 2, Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

This NUREG contains the improved Standard Technical Specifications (STS) for Westinghouse plants. Revision 1 incorporates the cumulative changes to Revision 0, which was published in September 1992. The changes reflected in Revision 1 resulted from the experience gained from license amendment applications to convert to these improved STS or to adopt partial improvements to existing technical specifications. This NUREG is the result of extensive public technical meetings and discussions between the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff and various nuclear power plant licensees, Nuclear Steam Supply System (NSSS) Owners Groups, specifically the Westinghouse Owners Group (WOG), NSSS vendors, and the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI). The improved STS were developed based on the criteria in the Final Commission Policy Statement on Technical Specifications Improvements for Nuclear Power Reactors, dated July 22, 1993 (58 FR 39132). Licensees are encouraged to upgrade their technical specifications consistent with those criteria and conforming, to the extent practical and consistent with the licensing basis for the facility, to Revision 1 to the improved STS. The Commission continues to place the highest priority on requests for complete conversions to the improved STS. Licensees adopting portions of the improved STS to existing technical specifications should adopt all related requirements, as applicable, to achieve a high degree of standardization and consistency.

NONE

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

99

Oklahoma Lease Condensate Proved Reserves, Reserve Changes ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Area: Period: Annual : Download Series History: Definitions, Sources ... 51: 2009-2011: Revision Decreases : 36: 54: 42: 2009-2011: Sales : 5: 1: 26: 2009-2011 ...

100

Savannah River Site mixed waste Proposed Site Treatment Plan (PSTP). Volumes 1 and 2 and reference document: Revision 2  

SciTech Connect

The DOE is required by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act to prepare site treatment plans describing the development of treatment capacities and technologies for treating mixed waste. This proposed plan contains Savannah River Site`s preferred options and schedules for constructing new facilities, and otherwise obtaining treatment for mixed wastes. The proposed plan consists of 2 volumes. Volume 1, Compliance Plan, identifies the capacity to be developed and the schedules as required. Volume 2, Background, provides a detailed discussion of the preferred options with technical basis, plus a description of the specific waste streams. Chapters are: Introduction; Methodology; Mixed low level waste streams; Mixed transuranic waste; High level waste; Future generation of mixed waste streams; Storage; Process for evaluation of disposal issues in support of the site treatment plans discussions; Treatment facilities and treatment technologies; Offsite waste streams for which SRS treatment is the Preferred Option (Naval reactor wastes); Summary information; and Acronyms and glossary. This revision does not contain the complete revised report, but only those pages that have been revised.

Helmich, E.; Noller, D.K.; Wierzbicki, K.S.; Bailey, L.L.

1995-07-13T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "2 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Revision History  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revision History Revision History Rev. 0, August 2012 Original submittal for milestone M3FT-12SN0804032 (Sandia programmatic and classification review) Rev. 1, September 2012 Corrected transposition errors in costing tables; recalculated stainless steel overpacks to be carbon steel; corrected various editorial problems. (SAND2012-7979P) Rev. 2, November 2012 Performed peer review and retitled. Submittal for milestone M2FT-13SN0804031 (formerly milestone M2FT- 12SN0804031) (SAND2012-9737P) Unclassified Unlimited Release Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000.

102

Preliminary environmental assessment for the Satellite Power System (SPS). Revision 1. Volume 2. Detailed assessment  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

The Department of Energy (DOE) is considering several options for generating electrical power to meet future energy needs. The satellite power system (SPS), one of these options, would collect solar energy through a system of satellites in space and transfer this energy to earth. A reference system has been described that would convert the energy to microwaves and transmit the microwave energy via directive antennas to large receiving/rectifying antennas (rectennas) located on the earth. At the rectennas, the microwave energy would be converted into electricity. The potential environmental impacts of constructing and operating the satellite power system are being assessed as a part of the Department of Energy's SPS Concept Development and Evaluation Program. This report is Revision I of the Preliminary Environmental Assessment for the Satellite Power System published in October 1978. It refines and extends the 1978 assessment and provides a basis for a 1980 revision that will guide and support DOE recommendations regarding future SPS development. This is Volume 2 of two volumes. It contains the technical detail suitable for peer review and integrates information appearing in documents referenced herein. The key environmental issues associated with the SPS concern human health and safety, ecosystems, climate, and electromagnetic systems interactions. In order to address these issues in an organized manner, five tasks are reported: (I) microwave-radiation health and ecological effects; (II) nonmicrowave health and ecological effectss; (III) atmospheric effects; (IV) effects on communication systems due to ionospheric disturbance; and (V) electromagnetic compatibility. (WHK)

Not Available

1980-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

103

Underwater Maintenance Guide: Revision 2: A Guide to Diving and Remotely-Operated Vehicle Operations for Nuclear Maintenance Personnel  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The use of water in nuclear power generating stations, both as an effective radiation barrier and thermal transfer medium, is critical to basic station operations. Consequently, underwater services play an important role in the maintenance and repair of these stations. Revision 2 of this guide expands previous discussions on underwater maintenance and provides new information on underwater welding and cutting operations and tasks.

1994-05-02T23:59:59.000Z

104

Materials Reliability Program: Computer-Based NDE Training for Thermal Fatigue Cracking (MRP-36, Revision 2)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This product comes packaged together and contains both #1022875, Materials Reliability Program: NDE Technology for Detection of Thermal Fatigue Damage in Piping, (MRP-23, Revision 1) and Product #1024915, Computer-Based NDE Training for Thermal ...

2012-11-20T23:59:59.000Z

105

Reflecting the Revised PM 2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard in NEPA Evaluations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

This letter, from the Director of the Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Federal Activities, outlines EPA's position as to how the revised National Air Quality Standard should be reflected in NEPA evaluations of proposed actions.

106

JM-DOE O 243.2, Notice of Intent to Revise DOE O 243.2, Vital Records  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

This Order has not been revised since 2006. Since that time the development of new policies and technologies has resulted in substantial growth in the volume ...

2011-12-15T23:59:59.000Z

107

Michigan Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

52 55 59 2009-2011 Adjustments -13 10 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 21 4 5 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 17 5 4 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011...

108

Mississippi Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

252 254 245 2009-2011 Adjustments -1 25 12 2009-2011 Revision Increases 30 17 14 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 8 9 13 2009-2011 Sales 4 8 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 1 1 2009-2011...

109

Demonstration testing and evaluation of in situ soil heating. Management Plan, Revision 2  

SciTech Connect

This is the second revision to the Management Plan for US DOE contract entitled, ``Demonstration Testing and Evaluation of In Situ Soil Heating,`` Contract Number DE-AC05-93OR22160, IITRI Project Number C06787. The cost plan and schedule have been revised herein. The Management Plan was revised once before, in March 1994. In this project IITRI will demonstrate its in situ soil heating and decontamination technology which uses 60 Hz AC power to heat soil to a temperature of about 900C. This technology is aimed at the decontamination of soil by the removal of organic hazardous constituents by the action of heat and a vacuum gas collection system.

Dev, H.

1995-03-06T23:59:59.000Z

110

Guidelines for Electromagnetic Interference Testing of Power Plant Equipment: Revision 2 to TR-102323  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This revision to the original guide, which received U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) approval in a Safety Evaluation Report (SER) in April 1996, reduces excessive conservatism in plant equipment emission and susceptibility testing limits. It identifies emissions sources in nuclear power plants, recommends susceptibility and emissions standards, and details design and layout practices for minimizing susceptibility to electromagnetic interference (EMI).

2000-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

111

Liquid effluent FY 1996 program plan WBS 1.2.2.1. Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Liquid Effluents Program supports the three Hanford Site mission components: (1) Clean up the site, (2) provide scientific and technological excellence to meet global needs, and (3) Partner in the economic diversification of the region. Nine Hanford Site objectives have been established for the Hanford Site programs to accomplish all three components of this mission.

NONE

1995-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

112

EPRI Alpha Monitoring and Control Guidelines for Operating Nuclear Power Stations, Revision 2  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In 2006, the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) first published the EPRI Alpha Monitoring Guidelines for Operating Nuclear Stations (EPRI report 1013509), to provide standardized guidance for monitoring alpha contamination. Minor revisions were made to the guidelines, which were re-issued in 2009 (1019500). Most US and some international utilities have implemented the guidelines, and several areas of improvement were identified to enhance information to support the monitoring and ...

2013-08-29T23:59:59.000Z

113

July 12, 2006, Department letter forwarding the Department's revised implementation plan in response to the Board's recommendation 2004-2, Active Confinement Systems  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

1 1 2 , 2 0 0 6 The Honorable A. J. Eggenberger Chairman Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board 625 Indiana Avenue, NW, Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20004 - 2901 Dear Mr. Chairman: Enclosed is a revised Department of Energy (DOE) Implementation Plan (IP) in response to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 2004-2, Active Conjinement Systems. The changes in Revision 1 of the IP are summarized in the "Background" section of Revision 1. This revision establishes a phased-in schedule for several commitments relating to confinement systems in the DOE complex. This phased-in schedule reflects an increased understanding of the time and resources that are needed at several DOE sites to effectively review new and existing facility active confinement ventilation systems

114

REVISION POLICY  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

REVISION POLICY REVISION POLICY March 2007 Data are collected at the million cubic feet per month level and all calculations mentioned below are carried out at that precision. However, the data published in the Form EIA-914 Monthly Gas Production Report are rounded to the nearest 0.01 billion cubic feet per day (roughly 300 million cubic feet per month). Monthly estimates of gross production published in the Natural Gas Monthly at the national level are rounded to billion cubic feet and those for marketed production at the State level are rounded to million cubic feet. The prior month's production estimate will always be revised each month, when the production estimate for the latest data month is released. For example, a June estimate would be revised when a July estimate is released.

115

Standard technical specifications - Babcock and Wilcox Plants: Bases (Sections 2.0-3.3). Volume 2, Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

This NUREG contains the improved Standard Technical Specifications (STS) for Babcock and Wilcox (B&W) plants. Revision 1 incorporates the cumulative changes to Revision 0, which was published in September 1992. The changes reflected in Revision 1 resulted from the experience gained from license amendment applications to convert to these improved STS or to adopt partial improvements to existing technical specifications. This NUREG is the result of extensive public technical meetings and discussions between the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff and various nuclear power plant licensees, Nuclear Steam Supply System (NSSS) Owners Groups, specifically the B&W Owners Group (BWOG), NSSS vendors, and the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI). The improved STS were developed based on the criteria in the Final Commission Policy Statement on Technical Specifications Improvements for Nuclear Power Reactors, dated July 22, 1993 (58 FR 39132). Licensees are encouraged to upgrade their technical specifications consistent with those criteria and conforming, to the extent practical and consistent with the licensing basis for the facility, to Revision 1 to the improved STS. The Commission continues to place the highest priority on requests for complete conversions to the improved STS. Licensees adopting portions of the improved STS to existing technical specifications should adopt all related requirements, as applicable, to achieve a high degree of standardization and consistency.

NONE

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

116

DRAFT REVISION  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Summary of Changes Summary of Changes to Procedure 243.1 Records Inventory Revised Version Issued as P 243.1B LM Procedure 243.1A, Records Inventory of 7/18/07, has undergone minor revisions. The procedure has been revised to reflect changes in definitions and formatting and to ensure the references cited and associated forms remain current. Please replace LM Procedure 243.1A with LM Procedure 243.1B. The most recent and official controlled hard copy version of this document resides with LM's Directives Coordinator. An electronic version of the controlled document has been placed on the LM Intranet for employee use. Printed hard copies of this electronic version are considered uncontrolled documents. INITIATED BY: Office of Business Operations NO. OF PAGES/ATTACHMENTS: 9 pages, 3 attachments

117

DRAFT REVISION  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Summary of Changes To Procedure 200.1-5 Records Disaster Prevention, Mitigation, and Recovery Procedure Revised Version Issued as P 200.1-5B LM Procedure 200.1-5, Records Disaster Prevention, Mitigation, and Recovery Procedure of 1/19/07, has undergone revisions. The procedure has been revised to reflect changes in definitions and formatting and updates to the attached Plan. Please replace LM Procedure 200.1-5A with LM Procedure 200.1-5B. The most recent and official controlled hard copy version of this document resides with LM's Directives Coordinator. An electronic version of the controlled document has been placed on the LM Intranet for employee use. Printed hard copies of this electronic version are considered uncontrolled documents.

118

Facility Decontamination and Decommissioning Program Surveillance and Maintenance Plan, Revision 2  

SciTech Connect

This Surveillance and Maintenance (S&M) Plan describes the activities performed between deactivation and final decommissioning of the following facilities located on the Nevada National Security Site, as documented in the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order under the Industrial Sites program as decontamination and decommissioning sites: ? Engine Maintenance, Assembly, and Disassembly (EMAD) Facility: o EMAD Building (Building 25-3900) o Locomotive Storage Shed (Building 25-3901) ? Test Cell C (TCC) Facility: o Equipment Building (Building 25-3220) o Motor Drive Building (Building 25-3230) o Pump Shop (Building 25-3231) o Cryogenic Lab (Building 25-3232) o Ancillary Structures (e.g., dewars, water tower, piping, tanks) These facilities have been declared excess and are in various stages of deactivation (low-risk, long-term stewardship disposition state). This S&M Plan establishes and implements a solid, cost-effective, and balanced S&M program consistent with federal, state, and regulatory requirements. A graded approach is used to plan and conduct S&M activities. The goal is to maintain the facilities in a safe condition in a cost-effective manner until their final end state is achieved. This plan accomplishes the following: ? Establishes S&M objectives and framework ? Identifies programmatic guidance for S&M activities to be conducted by National Security Technologies, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office (NNSA/NFO) ? Provides present facility condition information and identifies hazards ? Identifies facility-specific S&M activities to be performed and their frequency ? Identifies regulatory drivers, NNSA/NFO policies and procedures, and best management practices that necessitate implementation of S&M activities ? Provides criteria and frequencies for revisions and updates ? Establishes the process for identifying and dispositioning a condition that has not been previously identified or documented ? Provides instructions for implementing annual S&M inspections and activities The following facilities that were included in Revision 1 of this plan have reached final disposition and are no longer in the S&M program: ? Reactor Maintenance, Assembly, and Disassembly Facility, Building 25-3110 ? Test Cell A Facility, Building 25-3113 ? TCC Facility, Building 25-3210 ? Pluto Disassembly Facility, Building 26-2201 ? Super Kukla Facility, Building 27-5400

Poderis, Reed J. [NSTec] [NSTec; King, Rebecca A. [NSTec] [NSTec

2013-09-30T23:59:59.000Z

119

Alaska Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

0 0 0 0 0 0 2005-2011 Adjustments 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011...

120

Arkansas Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

34 31 31 22 28 21 2005-2011 Adjustments 0 1 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 3 9 0 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 1 3 2009-2011 Sales 31 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 22 0 0 2009-2011...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "2 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

North Louisiana Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

1 7 9 0 0 0 2005-2011 Adjustments 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Sales 8 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011...

122

Louisiana Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes,...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

1 7 9 0 0 0 2005-2011 Adjustments 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Sales 8 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011...

123

Federal Offshore, Gulf of Mexico, Louisiana & Alabama Coalbed...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

0 0 0 0 0 0 2005-2011 Adjustments 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011...

124

New York Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

0 0 0 0 0 0 2005-2011 Adjustments 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011...

125

Texas Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

0 0 0 0 0 0 2005-2011 Adjustments 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011...

126

Kentucky Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

0 0 0 0 0 0 2005-2011 Adjustments 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011...

127

LA, South Onshore Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

0 0 0 0 0 0 2005-2011 Adjustments 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011...

128

TX, RRC District 10 Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

0 0 0 0 0 2007-2011 Adjustments 0 0 -1 2009-2011 Revision Increases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011 Extensions...

129

TX, RRC District 3 Onshore Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

0 0 1 2007-2011 Adjustments 0 0 1 2009-2011 Revision Increases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011 Extensions 0 0...

130

California Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

0 0 0 0 0 0 2005-2011 Adjustments 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0 2009-2011...

131

Federal Offshore U.S. Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

,357 4,710 5,171 2009-2011 Adjustments 0 -6 -1 2009-2011 Revision Increases 710 879 1,966 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 208 214 1,455 2009-2011 Sales 20 56 42 2009-2011 Acquisitions...

132

Alaska Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

3,566 3,722 3,852 2009-2011 Adjustments 0 0 1 2009-2011 Revision Increases 394 397 362 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 152 76 129 2009-2011 Sales 7 0 17 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 79...

133

JM to Revise DOE G 420.2-1, Accelerator Facility Safety Implementation Guide for DOE Order (0) 420.2C, Safety of Accelerator Facilities  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The revision will address implementation of roles and responsibilities, improve operational efficiency using operating experience, and clarify the use of ...

2013-07-17T23:59:59.000Z

134

A Revised Land Surface Parameterization (SiB2) for Atmospheric GCMS. Part II: The Generation of Global Fields of Terrestrial Biophysical Parameters from Satellite Data  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The global parameter fields used in the revised Simple Biosphere Model (SiB2) of Sellers et al. are reviewed. The most important innovation over the earlier SiB1 parameter set of Dorman and Sellers is the use of satellite data to specify the time-...

Piers J. Sellers; Compton J. Tucker; G. James Collatz; Sietse O. Los; Christopher O. Justice; Donald A. Dazlich; David A. Randall

1996-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

135

Title: Sampling Soil and Vegetation at Facility Sites No.: SOP-5139 Page 2 of 9 Revision: 1 Effective Date: June 24, 2011  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

#12;Title: Sampling Soil and Vegetation at Facility Sites No.: SOP-5139 Page 2 of 9 Revision: 1 for collecting soil, sediment, and vegetation samples at facilities such as the Material Disposal Area G (Area G the basic requirements for collecting soil, sediment and vegetation samples at certain facilities. Work

136

Ms.#A-3433_revised_v2_flat_LBNL  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Arsenic Removal from Groundwater Using Iron Arsenic Removal from Groundwater Using Iron Electrocoagulation: Effect of Charge Dosage Rate Susan E. Amrose 1,2 , Ashok Gadgil 1,2 , Venkat Srinivasan 2 , Kristin Kowolik 2 , Marc Muller 1 , Jessica Huang 1 , Robert Kostecki 2 1 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of California at Berkeley Berkeley, California 94720, USA 2 Environmental Energy Technologies Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, California 94720, USA April 2013 Support for this work was provided by the the Richard C. Blum Center for Developing Economies, the USEPA P3 (People, Prosperity, and Planet) Phase I award, the UC Berkeley Bears Breaking Boundaries Contest and LDRD funds from Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory under U.S. Department of Energy

137

Technical Review Report for the Safety Analysis Report for Packaging Model 9977 S-SARP-G-00001 Revision 2  

SciTech Connect

This Technical Review Report (TRR) summarizes the review findings for the Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (SARP) for the Model 9977 B(M)F-96 shipping container. The content analyzed for this submittal is Content Envelope C.1, Heat Sources, in assemblies of Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators or food-pack cans. The SARP under review, i.e., S-SARP-G-00001, Revision 2 (August 2007), was originally referred to as the General Purpose Fissile Material Package. The review presented in this TRR was performed using the methods outlined in Revision 3 of the Department of Energy's (DOE's) Packaging Review Guide (PRG) for Reviewing Safety Analysis Reports for Packages. The format of the SARP follows that specified in Revision 2 of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's, Regulatory Guide 7.9, i.e., Standard Format and Content of Part 71 Applications for Approval of Packages for Radioactive Material. Although the two documents are similar in their content, they are not identical. Formatting differences have been noted in this TRR, where appropriate. The Model 9977 Package is a 35-gallon drum package design that has evolved from a family of packages designed by DOE contractors at the Savannah River Site. The Model 9977 Package design includes a single, 6-inch diameter, stainless steel pressure vessel containment system (i.e., the 6CV) that was designed and fabricated in accordance with Section III, Subsection NB, of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code. The earlier package designs, i.e., the Model 9965, 9966, 9967 and 9968 Packages, were originally designed and certified in the 1980s. In the 1990s, updated package designs that incorporated design features consistent with new safety requirements, based on International Atomic Energy Agency guidelines, were proposed. The updated package designs were the Model 9972, 9973, 9974 and 9975 Packages, respectively. The Model 9975 Package was certified by the Packaging Certification Program, under the Office of Safety Management and Operations. Differences between the Model 9975 Package and the Model 9977 Package include: (1) The lead shield present in the Model 9975 Package is absent in the Model 9977 Package; (2) The Model 9975 Package has eight allowable contents, while the Model 9977 Package has a single allowable content. (3) The 6CV of the Model 9977 Package is similar in design to the outer Containment Vessel of the Model 9975 Package that also incorporates a 5-inch Containment Vessel as the inner Containment Vessel. (4) The Model 9975 Package uses a Celotex{reg_sign}-based impact limiter while the Model 9977 Package uses Last-A-Foam{reg_sign}, a polyurethane foam, for the impact limiter. (5) The Model 9975 Package has two Containment Vessels, while the Model 9977 Package has a single Containment Vessel.

DiSabatino, A; Hafner, R; West, M

2007-10-04T23:59:59.000Z

138

Greenhouse effect and climatic change. Revised edition. Current issue review No. 79-2E  

SciTech Connect

This current issues paper covers the following topics: The relationship between atmospheric CO{sub 2} and climate, sources of carbon dioxide (fossil fuels and deforestation), sinks of carbon dioxide (vegetation and oceans), evidence of an increase in greenhouse gases, implications of increased atmospheric levels of CO{sub 2}, and parliamentary action. A chronology and bibliography conclude the paper.

Milko, R.

1990-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

139

Revised Attachment 2 on 8-30-2004 of FINAL PA.doc  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

General Monitoring Building 1953 Aiken X Area SupportSafety 701-2A A R032312 Gate House 1953 Aiken X AreaSecurity 701-3A A R032313 Gate House 1952 Aiken X AreaSecurity...

140

Track 2 sites: Guidance for assessing low probability hazard sites at the INEL. Revision 6  

SciTech Connect

This document presents guidance for assessment of Track 2 low probability hazard sites (LPHS) at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL). The Track 2 classification was developed specifically for the INEL to streamline the implementation of Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act. Track 2 LPHSs are described as sites where insufficient data are available to make a decision concerning the risk level or to select or design a remedy. As such, these types of sites are not described in the National Contingency Plan or existing regulatory guidance. The goal of the Track 2 process is to evaluate LPHSs using existing qualitative and quantitative data to minimize the collection of new environmental data. To this end, this document presents a structured format consisting of a series of questions and tables. A qualitative risk assessment is used. The process is iterative, and addresses an LPHS from multiple perspectives (i.e., historical, empirical, process) in an effort to generate a reproducible and defensible method. This rigorous approach follows the data quality objective process and establishes a well organized, logical approach to consolidate and assess existing data, and set decision criteria. If necessary, the process allows for the design of a sampling and analysis strategy to obtain new environmental data of appropriate quality to support decisions for each LPHS. Finally, the guidance expedites consensus between regulatory parties by emphasizing a team approach to Track 2 investigations.

Not Available

1994-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "2 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate New Field Discoveries  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

141 124 481 2009-2011 141 124 481 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 96 10 410 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 34 10 410 2009-2011 Texas 62 0 0 2009-2011 Alaska 9 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 132 124 481 2009-2011 Alabama 0 1 1 2009-2011 Arkansas 0 0 0 2009-2011 California 0 0 0 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Colorado 0 0 0 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Illinois 0 0 0 2009-2011 Indiana 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kansas 2 2 2 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 0 0 1 2009-2011 North 0 0 0 2009-2011 South Onshore 0 0 1 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Michigan 10 0 8 2009-2011

142

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate New Field Discoveries  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

141 124 481 2009-2011 141 124 481 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 96 10 410 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 34 10 410 2009-2011 Texas 62 0 0 2009-2011 Alaska 9 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 132 124 481 2009-2011 Alabama 0 1 1 2009-2011 Arkansas 0 0 0 2009-2011 California 0 0 0 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Colorado 0 0 0 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Illinois 0 0 0 2009-2011 Indiana 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kansas 2 2 2 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 0 0 1 2009-2011 North 0 0 0 2009-2011 South Onshore 0 0 1 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Michigan 10 0 8 2009-2011

143

Reevaluation of the Hadronic Contribution to $?(M_Z^2)$ (revised)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

We reevaluate the hadronic part of the electromagnetic vacuum expectation value using the standard dispersion integral approach that utilizes the hadronic cross section measured in $\\ee$ experiments as input. Previous analyses are based upon point-by-point trapezoidal integration which has the effect of weighting all inputs equally. We use a technique that weights the experimental inputs by their stated uncertainties, includes correlations, and incorporates some refinements. We find the hadronic contribution to the fractional change in the electromagnetic coupling constant at $q^2=M_Z^2$ to be $0.02666\\pm0.00075$, which leads to a value of the electromagnetic coupling constant, $\\alpha^{-1}(M_Z^2) = 129.08\\pm0.10$. This value significantly shifts the Standard Model predictions for the effective weak mixing angle measured at the $Z$ pole and moderately shifts the predicted $Z$ width.

Morris L. Swartz

1994-11-21T23:59:59.000Z

144

Microsoft PowerPoint - 15 Baker 2010 PM workshop draft 28 Feb1 (2) revised  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Title Title Project Management Career Presentation Title Project Management Career Development Program (PMCDP) Marylee H. Baker Lead Professional Career Development Analyst Lead Professional Career Development Analyst Project Management Career Development Program Department of Energy Office of Engineering & Construction Management 1 Office of Engineering & Construction Management 3/15/2010 Agenda * Program Objective * PMCDP in FY 2009 * FY 2009 Program Statistics * PMCDP in FY 2010 * Future Initiatives 2 3/15/2010 2 PMCDP Objective Ensure that we have well Ensure that we have well trained, qualified and experienced Federal Project Directors overseeing our Directors overseeing our projects 3 3/15/2010 3 PMCDP in FY 2009 PMCDP met all its 2009 goals

145

Microsoft Word - LBNL Multifamily retrofits paper submitted_2nd revision_final_no track changes  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Protocol for Maximizing Energy Savings and Protocol for Maximizing Energy Savings and Indoor Environmental Quality Improvements when Retrofitting Apartments Federico Noris 1 , William W. Delp 1 , Kimberly Vermeer 2 , Gary Adamkiewicz 3 , Brett C. Singer 1 and William J. Fisk 1 1 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Environmental Energy Technologies Division Indoor Environment Group Berkeley, CA, USA 2 Urban Habitat Initiatives Inc. Boston, MA, USA 3 Department of Environmental Health Harvard School of Public Health Boston, MA, USA June 18, 2012 Funding was provided by the California Energy Commission, Public Interest Energy Research Program, Energy Related Environmental Research Program, through contract 500-09-022 and by the Assistant

146

RCRA Part A permit characterization plan for the U-2bu subsidence crater. Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This plan presents the characterization strategy for Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 109, U-2bu Subsidence Crater (referred to as U-2bu) in Area 2 at the Nevada Test Site (NTS). The objective of the planned activities is to obtain sufficient characterization data for the crater soils and observed wastes under the conditions of the current Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Part A permit. The scope of the characterization plan includes collecting surface and subsurface soil samples with hand augers and for the purpose of site characterization. The sampling strategy is to characterize the study area soils and look for RCRA constituents. Observable waste soils and surrounding crater soils will be analyzed and evaluated according to RCRA closure criteria. Because of the status of the crater a RCRA Part A permit site, acquired radionuclide analyses will only be evaluated in regards to the health and safety of site workers and the disposition of wastes generated during site characterization. The U-2bu Subsidence Crater was created in 1971 by a Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory underground nuclear test, event name Miniata, and was used as a land-disposal unit for radioactive and hazardous waste from 1973 to 1988.

NONE

1998-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

147

Power Quality for Electrical Contractors: Application Guide, Volume 2: Recommended Practices: Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

A wide variety of sensitive electronic equipment is finding its way into new and existing buildings. To insure that this equipment functions properly, building owners and equipment users are showing more concern for their buildings' power quality. Volume 2, Focusing on Recommended Practices, of the Power Quality for Electrical Contractors Applications Guide discusses the issues involved in providing good power quality.

1999-08-17T23:59:59.000Z

148

State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) environmental checklist forms for 304 Concretion Facility Closure Plan. Revision 2  

SciTech Connect

The 300 Area of the Hanford Site contains reactor fuel manufacturing facilities and several research and development laboratories. Recyclable scrap uranium with zircaloy-2 and copper silicon alloy, uranium-titanium alloy, beryllium/zircaloy-2 alloy, and zircaloy-2 chips and fines were secured in concrete billets (7.5-gallon containers) in the 304 Facility, located in the 300 Area. The beryllium/zircaloy-2 alloy and zircaloy-2 chips and fines are designated as mixed waste with the characteristic of ignitability. The concretion process reduced the ignitability of the fines and chips for safe storage and shipment. This process has been discontinued and the 304 Facility is now undergoing closure as defined in the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) Dangerous Waste Regulations, WAC 173-303-040. This closure plan presents a description of the 304 Facility, the history of materials and waste managed, and the procedures that will be followed to close the 304 Facility. The 304 Facility is located within the 300-FF-3 (source) and 300-FF-5 (groundwater) operable units, as designated in the Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (Tri-Party Agreement) (Ecology et al. 1992). Contamination in the operable units 300-FF-3 and 300-FF-5 is scheduled to be addressed through the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980 remedial action process. Therefore, all soil remedial action at the 304 Facility will be conducted as part of the CERCLA remedial action of operable units 300-FF-3 and 300-FF-5.

Not Available

1993-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

149

Investigation of synchrotron radiation-induced photodesorption in cryosorbing quasi-cooled geometry. Revision 2  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

We report 4.2-K photodesorption experiments in two quasi -- closed geometries-a simple tube and a tube with a coaxial perforated liner -- designed to manure separately the desorption coefficients of tightly bound and physisorbed molecules. The results are important for the beam tube vacuum of the next generation of superconducting proton colliders that have been contemplated-the 20-TeV Superconducting Super Collider (SSC) in the United States and the 7.3-TeV Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN.

Anashin, V.V.; Malyshev, O.B.; Osipov, V.N. [AN SSSR, Novosibirsk (Russian Federation). Inst. Yadernoj Fiziki; Maslennikov, I.L.; Turner, W.C. [Superconducting Super Collider Lab., Dallas, TX (United States)

1994-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

150

Directory of Certificates of Compliance for radioactive materials packages: Certificates of Compliance. Volume 2, Revision 18  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The purpose of this directory is to make available a convenient source of information on packagings which have been approved by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. To assist in identifying packaging, an index by Model Number and corresponding Certificate of Compliance Number is included at the front of Volumes 1 and 2. An alphabetical listing by user name is included in the back of Volume 3 of approved QA programs. The reports include a listing of all users of each package design and approved QA programs prior to the publication date.

NONE

1995-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

151

Microsoft PowerPoint - 12 Holman White PM Conference 2010 Rev 2 revised  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Management in NNSA Management in NNSA Cliff H l Cliff Holman NNSA Service Center/NA-54 NNSA Service Center/NA-54 What is Value? * Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary - "a fair return or equivalent in goods, services, or money for something exchanged, " or " the monetary worth of something," or something's "relative worth, utility, or importance." p * Physiologists and economists studying value for over 100 years. * Determined value to be very personal. * Something is worth whatever a person believes it to g p be worth. 2 NNSA Value Management - 2005 * Secretary of Energy delegated VM authority to PSOs in 2005. * NNSA delegated to NA-50 * NA-50 asked NA-54 to lead the NNSA charge g *

152

200 Area Treated Effluent Disposal Facility operational test specification. Revision 2  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document identifies the test specification and test requirements for the 200 Area Treated Effluent Disposal Facility (200 Area TEDF) operational testing activities. These operational testing activities, when completed, demonstrate the functional, operational and design requirements of the 200 Area TEDF have been met. The technical requirements for operational testing of the 200 Area TEDF are defined by the test requirements presented in Appendix A. These test requirements demonstrate the following: pump station No.1 and associated support equipment operate both automatically and manually; pump station No. 2 and associated support equipment operate both automatically and manually; water is transported through the collection and transfer lines to the disposal ponds with no detectable leakage; the disposal ponds accept flow from the transfer lines with all support equipment operating as designed; and the control systems operate and status the 200 Area TEDF including monitoring of appropriate generator discharge parameters.

Crane, A.F.

1995-02-09T23:59:59.000Z

153

Environmental Monitoring Plan United States Department of Energy Richland Operations Office. Revision 2  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Environmental Monitoring Plan was prepared for the US Department of Energy`s (DOE`s) Richland Operations Office (RL) to implement the requirements of DOE Order 5400.1. According to the Order, each DOE site, facility, or activity that uses, generates, releases, or manages significant pollutants or hazardous materials shall prepare a written environmental monitoring plan covering two major activities: (1) effluent monitoring and (2) environmental surveillance. The plan is to contain information discussing the rationale and design criteria for the monitoring programs, sampling locations and schedules, quality assurance requirements, program implementation procedures, analytical procedures, and reporting requirements. The plan`s purpose is to assist DOE in the management of environmental activities at the Hanford Site and to help ensure that operations on the site are conducted in an environmentally safe and sound manner.

NONE

1997-11-10T23:59:59.000Z

154

Sliding and Rocking of Unanchored Components and Structures: Chapter 7.6 ASCE 4 Revision 2  

SciTech Connect

Chapter 7.6 of ASCE 4-Rev 2, Seismic Analysis of Safety-Related Nuclear Structures: Standard and Commentary, provides updated guidance for analysis of rocking and sliding of unanchored structures and components subjected to seismic load. This guidance includes provisions both for simplified approximate energy-based approaches, and for detailed probabilistic time history analysis using nonlinear methods. Factors to be applied to the analytical results are also provided with the intent of ensuring achievement of the 80% non-exceedence probability target of the standard. The present paper surveys the published literature supporting these provisions. The results of available testing and analysis are compared to results produced by both simplified and probabilistic approaches. In addition, adequacy of the standard's provisions for analysis methods and factors is assessed. A comparison is made between the achieved level of conservatism and the standard's non-exceedence probability target.

S. R. Jensen

2011-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

155

AEO2011_Newell_SENR_Testimony_2 03_11final revised  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

NATURAL RESOURCES NATURAL RESOURCES UNITED STATES SENATE February 3, 2011 2 Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee: I appreciate the opportunity to appear before you today to discuss the energy and oil market outlook. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) is the statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy. EIA collects, analyzes, and disseminates independent and impartial energy information to promote sound policymaking, efficient markets, and public understanding regarding energy and its interaction with the economy and the environment. EIA is the Nation's premier source of energy information and, by law, its data, analyses, and forecasts are independent of approval by any other officer or employee of the United States Government.

156

FY 93 thermal loading systems study final report: Volume 2. Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The ability to meet the overall performance requirements for the proposed Mined Geology Disposal System at Yucca Mountain, Nevada requires the two major subsystem (natural barriers and engineered barriers) to positively contribute to containment and radionuclide isolation. In addition to the postclosure performance the proposed repository must meet preclosure requirements of safety, retrievability, and operability. Cost and schedule were also considered. The thermal loading strategy chosen may significantly affect both the postclosure and preclosure performance of the proposed repository. Although the current Site Characterization Plan reference case is 57 kilowatts (kW)/acre, other thermal loading strategies (different areal mass loadings) have been proposed which possess both advantages and disadvantages. The objectives of the FY 1993 Thermal Loading Study were to (1) place bounds on the thermal loading which would establish the loading regime that is ``too hot`` and the loading regime that is ``too cold``, to (2) ``grade`` or evaluate the performance, as a function of thermal loading, of the repository to contain high level wastes against performance criteria and to (3) evaluate the performance of the various options with respect to cost, safety, and operability. Additionally, the effort was to (4) identify important uncertainties that need to be resolved by tests and/or analyses in order to complete a performance assessment on the effects of thermal loading. The FY 1993 Thermal Loading Study was conducted from December 1, 1992 to December 30, 1993 and this final report provides the findings of the study. Volume 2 consists of 10 appendices which contain the following: Waste Stream Analysis; Waste Package Design Inputs; Subsurface Design Inputs; Thermal-Hydrologic Model Inputs; Near-Field Calculations; Far-Field; Reliability of Electronics as a Function of Temperature; Cost Analysis Details; Geochemistry; and Areas of Uncertainty in Thermal Loading.

NONE

1994-08-29T23:59:59.000Z

157

Acceptable knowledge document for INEEL stored transuranic waste -- Rocky Flats Plant waste. Revision 2  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document and supporting documentation provide a consistent, defensible, and auditable record of acceptable knowledge for waste generated at the Rocky Flats Plant which is currently in the accessible storage inventory at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory. The inventory consists of transuranic (TRU) waste generated from 1972 through 1989. Regulations authorize waste generators and treatment, storage, and disposal facilities to use acceptable knowledge in appropriate circumstances to make hazardous waste determinations. Acceptable knowledge includes information relating to plant history, process operations, and waste management, in addition to waste-specific data generated prior to the effective date of the RCRA regulations. This document is organized to provide the reader a comprehensive presentation of the TRU waste inventory ranging from descriptions of the historical plant operations that generated and managed the waste to specific information about the composition of each waste group. Section 2 lists the requirements that dictate and direct TRU waste characterization and authorize the use of the acceptable knowledge approach. In addition to defining the TRU waste inventory, Section 3 summarizes the historical operations, waste management, characterization, and certification activities associated with the inventory. Sections 5.0 through 26.0 describe the waste groups in the inventory including waste generation, waste packaging, and waste characterization. This document includes an expanded discussion for each waste group of potential radionuclide contaminants, in addition to other physical properties and interferences that could potentially impact radioassay systems.

NONE

1998-01-23T23:59:59.000Z

158

Environmental restoration risk-based prioritization work package planning and risk ranking methodology. Revision 2  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document presents the risk-based prioritization methodology developed to evaluate and rank Environmental Restoration (ER) work packages at the five US Department of Energy, Oak Ridge Field Office (DOE-ORO) sites [i.e., Oak Ridge K-25 Site (K-25), Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant (PORTS), Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (PGDP), Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), and the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant (Y-12)], the ER Off-site Program, and Central ER. This prioritization methodology was developed to support the increased rigor and formality of work planning in the overall conduct of operations within the DOE-ORO ER Program. Prioritization is conducted as an integral component of the fiscal ER funding cycle to establish program budget priorities. The purpose of the ER risk-based prioritization methodology is to provide ER management with the tools and processes needed to evaluate, compare, prioritize, and justify fiscal budget decisions for a diverse set of remedial action, decontamination and decommissioning, and waste management activities. The methodology provides the ER Program with a framework for (1) organizing information about identified DOE-ORO environmental problems, (2) generating qualitative assessments of the long- and short-term risks posed by DOE-ORO environmental problems, and (3) evaluating the benefits associated with candidate work packages designed to reduce those risks. Prioritization is conducted to rank ER work packages on the basis of the overall value (e.g., risk reduction, stakeholder confidence) each package provides to the ER Program. Application of the methodology yields individual work package ``scores`` and rankings that are used to develop fiscal budget requests. This document presents the technical basis for the decision support tools and process.

Dail, J.L.; Nanstad, L.D.; White, R.K.

1995-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

159

Advanced Simulation and Computing FY08-09 Implementation Plan, Volume 2, Revision 0.5  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Stockpile Stewardship Program (SSP) is a single, highly integrated technical program for maintaining the surety and reliability of the U.S. nuclear stockpile. The SSP uses past nuclear test data along with current and future non-nuclear test data, computational modeling and simulation, and experimental facilities to advance understanding of nuclear weapons. It includes stockpile surveillance, experimental research, development and engineering programs, and an appropriately scaled production capability to support stockpile requirements. This integrated national program requires the continued use of current facilities and programs along with new experimental facilities and computational enhancements to support these programs. The Advanced Simulation and Computing Program (ASC)1 is a cornerstone of the SSP, providing simulation capabilities and computational resources to support the annual stockpile assessment and certification, to study advanced nuclear-weapons design and manufacturing processes, to analyze accident scenarios and weapons aging, and to provide the tools to enable Stockpile Life Extension Programs (SLEPs) and the resolution of Significant Finding Investigations (SFIs). This requires a balanced resource, including technical staff, hardware, simulation software, and computer science solutions. In its first decade, the ASC strategy focused on demonstrating simulation capabilities of unprecedented scale in three spatial dimensions. In its second decade, ASC is focused on increasing its predictive capabilities in a three-dimensional simulation environment while maintaining the support to the SSP. The program continues to improve its unique tools for solving progressively more difficult stockpile problems (focused on sufficient resolution, dimensionality and scientific details); to quantify critical margins and uncertainties (QMU); and to resolve increasingly difficult analyses needed for the SSP. Moreover, ASC has restructured its business model from one that was very successful in delivering an initial capability to one that is integrated and focused on requirements-driven products that address long-standing technical questions related to enhanced predictive capability in the simulation tools. ASC must continue to meet three objectives: Objective 1. Robust Tools--Develop robust models, codes, and computational techniques to support stockpile needs such as refurbishments, SFIs, LEPs, annual assessments, and evolving future requirements. Objective 2--Prediction through Simulation. Deliver validated physics and engineering tools to enable simulations of nuclear-weapons performances in a variety of operational environments and physical regimes and to enable risk-informed decisions about the performance, safety, and reliability of the stockpile. Objective 3. Balanced Operational Infrastructure--Implement a balanced computing platform acquisition strategy and operational infrastructure to meet Directed Stockpile Work (DSW) and SSP needs for capacity and high-end simulation capabilities.

Kusnezov, D; Bickel, T; McCoy, M; Hopson, J

2007-09-13T23:59:59.000Z

160

Advanced Simulation and Computing FY09-FY10 Implementation Plan, Volume 2, Revision 0.5  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Stockpile Stewardship Program (SSP) is a single, highly integrated technical program for maintaining the surety and reliability of the U.S. nuclear stockpile. The SSP uses past nuclear test data along with current and future non-nuclear test data, computational modeling and simulation, and experimental facilities to advance understanding of nuclear weapons. It includes stockpile surveillance, experimental research, development and engineering programs, and an appropriately scaled production capability to support stockpile requirements. This integrated national program requires the continued use of current facilities and programs along with new experimental facilities and computational enhancements to support these programs. The Advanced Simulation and Computing Program (ASC)1 is a cornerstone of the SSP, providing simulation capabilities and computational resources to support the annual stockpile assessment and certification, to study advanced nuclear weapons design and manufacturing processes, to analyze accident scenarios and weapons aging, and to provide the tools to enable stockpile Life Extension Programs (LEPs) and the resolution of Significant Finding Investigations (SFIs). This requires a balanced resource, including technical staff, hardware, simulation software, and computer science solutions. In its first decade, the ASC strategy focused on demonstrating simulation capabilities of unprecedented scale in three spatial dimensions. In its second decade, ASC is focused on increasing its predictive capabilities in a three-dimensional simulation environment while maintaining support to the SSP. The program continues to improve its unique tools for solving progressively more difficult stockpile problems (focused on sufficient resolution, dimensionality and scientific details); to quantify critical margins and uncertainties (QMU); and to resolve increasingly difficult analyses needed for the SSP. Moreover, ASC has restructured its business model from one that was very successful in delivering an initial capability to one that is integrated and focused on requirements-driven products that address long-standing technical questions related to enhanced predictive capability in the simulation tools. ASC must continue to meet three objectives: Objective 1. Robust Tools--Develop robust models, codes, and computational techniques to support stockpile needs such as refurbishments, SFIs, LEPs, annual assessments, and evolving future requirements. Objective 2. Prediction through Simulation--Deliver validated physics and engineering tools to enable simulations of nuclear weapons performance in a variety of operational environments and physical regimes and to enable risk-informed decisions about the performance, safety, and reliability of the stockpile. Objective 3. Balanced Operational Infrastructure--Implement a balanced computing platform acquisition strategy and operational infrastructure to meet Directed Stockpile Work (DSW) and SSP needs for capacity and high-end simulation capabilities.

Meisner, R; Hopson, J; Peery, J; McCoy, M

2008-10-07T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "2 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Reserves Acquisitions  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

344 1,470 1,561 2009-2011 344 1,470 1,561 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 16 108 56 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 14 102 52 2009-2011 Texas 2 6 4 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 79 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 344 1,470 1,482 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 20 2009-2011 Arkansas 0 0 3 2009-2011 California 20 156 40 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 2 154 0 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 1 9 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 18 1 16 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 15 2009-2011 Colorado 2 38 4 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Illinois 0 9 0 2009-2011 Indiana 0 2 0 2009-2011 Kansas 2 8 19 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 6 4 2009-2011 Louisiana 11 52 53 2009-2011 North 1 12 31 2009-2011 South Onshore 7 26 17 2009-2011 State Offshore 3 14 5 2009-2011

162

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Reserves Sales  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

249 803 1,024 2009-2011 249 803 1,024 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 20 56 42 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 20 54 42 2009-2011 Texas 0 2 0 2009-2011 Alaska 7 0 17 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 242 803 1,007 2009-2011 Alabama 0 3 11 2009-2011 Arkansas 3 3 28 2009-2011 California 3 1 7 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 1 0 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 2 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 3 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 5 2009-2011 Colorado 17 3 19 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Illinois 0 15 0 2009-2011 Indiana 0 2 0 2009-2011 Kansas 2 6 6 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 5 2009-2011 Louisiana 9 23 63 2009-2011 North 2 5 28 2009-2011 South Onshore 7 7 34 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 11 1 2009-2011

163

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Reserves Acquisitions  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

344 1,470 1,561 2009-2011 344 1,470 1,561 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 16 108 56 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 14 102 52 2009-2011 Texas 2 6 4 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 79 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 344 1,470 1,482 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 20 2009-2011 Arkansas 0 0 3 2009-2011 California 20 156 40 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 2 154 0 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 1 9 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 18 1 16 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 15 2009-2011 Colorado 2 38 4 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Illinois 0 9 0 2009-2011 Indiana 0 2 0 2009-2011 Kansas 2 8 19 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 6 4 2009-2011 Louisiana 11 52 53 2009-2011 North 1 12 31 2009-2011 South Onshore 7 26 17 2009-2011 State Offshore 3 14 5 2009-2011

164

OMB Circular A-76 (Revised)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON, DC 20503 May 29, 2003 CIRCULAR NO. A-76 (REVISED) TO THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND ESTABLISHMENTS SUBJECT: Performance of Commercial Activities 1. Purpose. This circular establishes federal policy for the competition of commercial activities. 2. Supersession. This circular supersedes Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular No. A-76 (Revised 1999), August 4, 1983; Circular No. A-76 Revised Supplemental Handbook (Revised 2000), March 1996; Office of Federal Procurement Policy Letter 92-1, "Inherently Governmental Functions," September 23, 1992; and OMB Transmittal Memoranda 1 through 25, Performance of Commercial Activities. 3. Authority. Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1970 (31 U.S.C. § 1111); Executive Order 11541; the Office

165

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

46 188 207 2009-2011 46 188 207 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 0 -6 -1 2009-2011 Pacific (California) -1 -2 1 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 2 -3 -2 2009-2011 Texas -1 -1 0 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 1 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 46 188 206 2009-2011 Alabama 1 12 2 2009-2011 Arkansas 2 3 -2 2009-2011 California -17 14 32 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 1 0 -3 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 10 15 19 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore -30 1 16 2009-2011 State Offshore 2 -2 0 2009-2011 Colorado -9 25 -1 2009-2011 Florida -1 2 -2 2009-2011 Illinois 3 10 -10 2009-2011 Indiana -7 1 0 2009-2011 Kansas 20 61 22 2009-2011 Kentucky 4 -11 1 2009-2011 Louisiana -1 7 -8 2009-2011 North -4 -7 1 2009-2011 South Onshore 4 13 -6 2009-2011 State Offshore

166

Coalbed Methane Reserves Sales  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

08 366 1,775 2009-2011 08 366 1,775 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 0 0 0 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 0 0 0 2009-2011 Texas 0 0 0 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 208 366 1,775 2009-2011 Alabama 2 266 104 2009-2011 Arkansas 31 0 0 2009-2011 California 0 0 0 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Colorado 0 0 1,034 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kansas 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 8 0 0 2009-2011 North 8 0 0 2009-2011 South Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Michigan 0 0 0 2009-2011 Mississippi 0 0 0 2009-2011 Montana

167

Guidelines for PWR Steam Generator Tubing Specifications and Repair: Volume 2, Revision 1: Guidelines for Procurement of Alloy 690 S team Generator Tubing  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This revised document provides guidelines for procuring Alloy 690 steam generator tubing and sleeve material.

1999-04-14T23:59:59.000Z

168

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate New Reservoir Discoveries in...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

North 0 0 0 2009-2011 South Onshore 3 5 2 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 1 0 2009-2011 Michigan 5 0 1 2009-2011 Mississippi 0 0 0 2009-2011 Montana 0 2 1 2009-2011 Nebraska 0 0 0...

169

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Estimated Production, Wet After Lease  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

1,929 1,991 2,065 2009-2011 1,929 1,991 2,065 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 599 590 504 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 22 19 22 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 522 518 432 2009-2011 Texas 55 53 50 2009-2011 Alaska 210 195 206 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 1,719 1,796 1,859 2009-2011 Alabama 7 7 8 2009-2011 Arkansas 6 5 6 2009-2011 California 208 198 196 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 18 18 20 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 15 15 15 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 161 152 149 2009-2011 State Offshore 14 13 12 2009-2011 Colorado 30 33 41 2009-2011 Florida 1 2 2 2009-2011 Illinois 5 4 4 2009-2011 Indiana 1 1 1 2009-2011 Kansas 40 41 41 2009-2011 Kentucky 2 1 1 2009-2011 Louisiana 68 66 68 2009-2011 North 11 10 11 2009-2011 South Onshore 48 47 47 2009-2011

170

DRAFT REVISION  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Business Operations NO. OF PAGESATTACHMENTS: 10 pages, 4 attachments U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management Procedure: 200.2-2B Effective: 81108 SUBJECT:...

171

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Reserves Extensions  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

,305 1,766 3,107 2009-2011 ,305 1,766 3,107 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 159 77 29 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 158 61 29 2009-2011 Texas 1 16 0 2009-2011 Alaska 25 30 40 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 1,280 1,736 3,067 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 0 2009-2011 Arkansas 0 6 0 2009-2011 California 30 24 37 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 1 1 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 1 1 6 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 22 13 18 2009-2011 State Offshore 7 9 12 2009-2011 Colorado 37 80 96 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Illinois 3 2 0 2009-2011 Indiana 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kansas 2 5 23 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 26 28 21 2009-2011 North 1 2 0 2009-2011 South Onshore 24 25 17 2009-2011 State Offshore

172

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Reserves Extensions  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

,305 1,766 3,107 2009-2011 ,305 1,766 3,107 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 159 77 29 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 158 61 29 2009-2011 Texas 1 16 0 2009-2011 Alaska 25 30 40 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 1,280 1,736 3,067 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 0 2009-2011 Arkansas 0 6 0 2009-2011 California 30 24 37 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 1 1 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 1 1 6 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 22 13 18 2009-2011 State Offshore 7 9 12 2009-2011 Colorado 37 80 96 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Illinois 3 2 0 2009-2011 Indiana 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kansas 2 5 23 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 26 28 21 2009-2011 North 1 2 0 2009-2011 South Onshore 24 25 17 2009-2011 State Offshore

173

Nuclear Maintenance Applications Center: Application Guide for Motor-Operated Valves in Nuclear Power Plants - Revision 2  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Motor-operated gate and globe valves are widely used in both safety-related and non-safety-related systems in nuclear power plants. Their proper operation is essential for reliable plant performance and can help eliminate costly downtime. This second revision of the Application Guide for Motor-Operated Valves provides the latest in methods for conducting engineering evaluations in order to confirm that motor-operated gate, globe, and butterfly valves will perform their required function and offers sugges...

2007-08-22T23:59:59.000Z

174

Health effects models for nuclear power plant accident consequence analysis. Part 1, Introduction, integration, and summary: Revision 2  

SciTech Connect

This report is a revision of NUREG/CR-4214, Rev. 1, Part 1 (1990), Health Effects Models for Nuclear Power Plant Accident Consequence Analysis. This revision has been made to incorporate changes to the Health Effects Models recommended in two addenda to the NUREG/CR-4214, Rev. 1, Part 11, 1989 report. The first of these addenda provided recommended changes to the health effects models for low-LET radiations based on recent reports from UNSCEAR, ICRP and NAS/NRC (BEIR V). The second addendum presented changes needed to incorporate alpha-emitting radionuclides into the accident exposure source term. As in the earlier version of this report, models are provided for early and continuing effects, cancers and thyroid nodules, and genetic effects. Weibull dose-response functions are recommended for evaluating the risks of early and continuing health effects. Three potentially lethal early effects -- the hematopoietic, pulmonary, and gastrointestinal syndromes are considered. Linear and linear-quadratic models are recommended for estimating the risks of seven types of cancer in adults - leukemia, bone, lung, breast, gastrointestinal, thyroid, and ``other``. For most cancers, both incidence and mortality are addressed. Five classes of genetic diseases -- dominant, x-linked, aneuploidy, unbalanced translocations, and multifactorial diseases are also considered. Data are provided that should enable analysts to consider the timing and severity of each type of health risk.

Evans, J.S. [Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA (United States); Abrahmson, S. [Wisconsin Univ., Madison, WI (United States); Bender, M.A. [Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, NY (United States); Boecker, B.B.; Scott, B.R. [Inhalation Toxicology Research Inst., Albuquerque, NM (United States); Gilbert, E.S. [Battelle Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (United States)

1993-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

175

West Virginia Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

94 255 246 220 220 139 2005-2011 Adjustments 0 0 -1 2009-2011 Revision Increases 19 15 35 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 38 25 47 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 50 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 5 0...

176

Utah Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and Production  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

750 922 893 725 718 679 2000-2011 Adjustments 0 8 9 2009-2011 Revision Increases 9 77 46 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 110 30 31 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 130 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0...

177

Montana Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

77 66 75 37 64 25 2005-2011 Adjustments 0 11 -30 2009-2011 Revision Increases 0 23 0 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 29 0 3 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0...

178

Kansas Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

234 340 301 163 258 228 2005-2011 Adjustments -3 -22 -6 2009-2011 Revision Increases 8 157 24 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 107 0 14 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0...

179

Oklahoma Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

684 1,265 511 338 325 274 2005-2011 Adjustments 1 27 27 2009-2011 Revision Increases 81 82 91 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 216 84 98 2009-2011 Sales 6 6 40 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0...

180

North Dakota Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

21 24 368 1,185 1,649 2007-2011 Adjustments 101 235 20 2009-2011 Revision Increases 119 528 439 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 17 343 290 2009-2011 Sales 1 28 115 2009-2011...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "2 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Miscellaneous Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

6 58 134 121 75 2007-2011 Adjustments 23 0 49 2009-2011 Revision Increases 4 17 19 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 22 77 27 2009-2011 Sales 0 11 89 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0...

182

Kentucky Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and Production  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

21 20 55 10 41 2007-2011 Adjustments -1 -1 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 44 3 44 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 3 43 11 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 45 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 45...

183

Federal Offshore Texas Lease Condensate Proved Reserves, Reserve...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

65 88 76 92 83 64 1981-2011 Adjustments -3 -1 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 27 15 26 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 3 9 29 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 0 2009-2011 Acquisitions 0 0 0...

184

Federal Offshore, Gulf of Mexico, Louisiana & Alabama Lease Condensate...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

185 163 151 134 129 129 1981-2011 Adjustments -4 3 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 40 44 30 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 31 28 26 2009-2011 Sales 5 13 8 2009-2011 Acquisitions 1 10...

185

Nuclear Computerized Library for Assessing Reactor Reliability (NUCLARR): Data manual. Part 2: Human error probability (HEP) data; Volume 5, Revision 4  

SciTech Connect

This data manual contains a hard copy of the information in the Nuclear Computerized Library for Assessing Reactor Reliability (NUCLARR) Version 3.5 database, which is sponsored by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. NUCLARR was designed as a tool for risk analysis. Many of the nuclear reactors in the US and several outside the US are represented in the NUCLARR database. NUCLARR includes both human error probability estimates for workers at the plants and hardware failure data for nuclear reactor equipment. Aggregations of these data yield valuable reliability estimates for probabilistic risk assessments and human reliability analyses. The data manual is organized to permit manual searches of the information if the computerized version is not available. Originally, the manual was published in three parts. In this revision the introductory material located in the original Part 1 has been incorporated into the text of Parts 2 and 3. The user can now find introductory material either in the original Part 1, or in Parts 2 and 3 as revised. Part 2 contains the human error probability data, and Part 3, the hardware component reliability data.

Reece, W.J.; Gilbert, B.G.; Richards, R.E. [EG and G Idaho, Inc., Idaho Falls, ID (United States)

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

186

GENERAL BULLETIN 2009-2011 1 GENERAL BULLETIN 2009-2011  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

. Flowsheeting program packages, like CHEMCAD, Aspen Plus, HYSYS, PRO/II, and ProSimPlus, are commonly used

Dormidontova, Elena E.

187

Revised (05/06)  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OMB No. 1901-0260 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OMB No. 1901-0260 (Revised 03/12) Germantown, MD 20874-1290 Expires: General Information 1. Purpose Standard Remittance Advice (RA) form is a mandatory form designed to serve as the source document for entries into the Department's accounting records under Public Law 97-425 data from Purchasers concerning payment of their contribution to the Nuclear Waste Fund. 2. Who Shall Submit The RA must be submitted by Purchasers who signed the Standard Contract for Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and/or High-Level Radioactive Waste. Submit Copy 1, 2, and 3 to DOE, Energy Finance and Accounting Service Center and retain Copy 4.

188

2008 MERRTT Revision Letter  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

November 2, 2007 November 2, 2007 The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Transportation Emergency Preparedness Program (TEPP) is pleased to announce the release of the 2008 Modular Emergency Response Radiological Transportation Training (MERRTT). This revision replaces the 2005 MERRTT CD-ROM set. As required by the WIPP Land Withdrawal Act, the 2008 MERRTT has been sent to the Occupational, Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) for review. The 2008 version of MERRTT includes several enhancements, but the primary enhancement is the addition of the decontamination dress-down video. Comments received on the decontamination video script in the fall 2006 were incorporated into the script and the filming and final editing were completed in the spring 2007. The decontamination video was added to MERRTT to support the students'

189

Shale Natural Gas New Field Discoveries  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

868 557 232 2009-2011 868 557 232 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 868 557 232 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 2009-2010 Arkansas 0 0 0 2009-2011 California 0 2011-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 2011-2011 Colorado 4 0 0 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 244 48 0 2009-2011 North 244 48 0 2009-2011 Michigan 0 2 0 2009-2011 Montana 0 0 0 2009-2011 New Mexico 0 0 0 2009-2011 East 0 0 0 2009-2011 West 0 0 0 2009-2011 North Dakota 6 8 2 2009-2011 Ohio 0 0 2009-2010 Oklahoma 0 54 37 2009-2011 Pennsylvania 120 49 162 2009-2011 Texas 353 396 31 2009-2011 RRC District 1 353 114 20 2009-2011 RRC District 2 Onshore 282 0 2010-2011 RRC District 3 Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 RRC District 4 Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 RRC District 5 0 0 0 2009-2011

190

Shale Natural Gas New Field Discoveries  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

868 557 232 2009-2011 868 557 232 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 868 557 232 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 2009-2010 Arkansas 0 0 0 2009-2011 California 0 2011-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 2011-2011 Colorado 4 0 0 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 244 48 0 2009-2011 North 244 48 0 2009-2011 Michigan 0 2 0 2009-2011 Montana 0 0 0 2009-2011 New Mexico 0 0 0 2009-2011 East 0 0 0 2009-2011 West 0 0 0 2009-2011 North Dakota 6 8 2 2009-2011 Ohio 0 0 2009-2010 Oklahoma 0 54 37 2009-2011 Pennsylvania 120 49 162 2009-2011 Texas 353 396 31 2009-2011 RRC District 1 353 114 20 2009-2011 RRC District 2 Onshore 282 0 2010-2011 RRC District 3 Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 RRC District 4 Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 RRC District 5 0 0 0 2009-2011

191

Recent Revisions to PVWATTS  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

PVWATTS is an Internet-accessible software program that allows the user to easily calculate the energy production and cost savings for grid-connected photovoltaic (PV) systems located throughout the United States. To ensure that PVWATTS continues to meet its users' needs, an online survey form was provided to users to identify areas for improvement. The results of the survey were used to prioritize improvements to PVWATTS in FY2005. PVWATTS was revised by changing the PV system specification input for system size from an AC power rating to a nameplate DC power rating; adding an input for an overall DC to AC derate factor; updating the residential electric rates; adding monthly and yearly solar radiation values for the PV array; and simplifying the user interface for Version 2.

Marion, B.; Anderberg, M.; Gray-Hann, P.

2005-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

192

Regulatory Guide 5.29, Revision 2, "Special Nuclear Material Control and Accounting Systems for Nuclear Power Plants".  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION June 2013 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION June 2013 Revision 2 REGULATORY GUIDE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH Written suggestions regarding this guide or development of new guides may be submitted through the NRC's public Web site under the Regulatory Guides document collection of the NRC Library at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/reg-guides/contactus.html. Electronic copies of this regulatory guide, previous versions of this guide, and other recently issued guides are available through the NRC's public Web site under the Regulatory Guides document collection of the NRC Library at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/. The regulatory guide is also available through the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) at

193

SCALE: A modular code system for performing Standardized Computer Analyses for Licensing Evaluation. Volume 1, Part 2: Control modules S1--H1; Revision 5  

SciTech Connect

SCALE--a modular code system for Standardized Computer Analyses Licensing Evaluation--has been developed by Oak Ridge National Laboratory at the request of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The SCALE system utilizes well-established computer codes and methods within standard analysis sequences that (1) allow an input format designed for the occasional user and/or novice, (2) automated the data processing and coupling between modules, and (3) provide accurate and reliable results. System development has been directed at problem-dependent cross-section processing and analysis of criticality safety, shielding, heat transfer, and depletion/decay problems. Since the initial release of SCALE in 1980, the code system has been heavily used for evaluation of nuclear fuel facility and package designs. This revision documents Version 4.3 of the system.

NONE

1997-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

194

Shale Natural Gas New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

1,613 1,149 699 2009-2011 1,613 1,149 699 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 1,613 1,149 699 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 2009-2010 Arkansas 0 0 0 2009-2011 California 0 2011-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 2011-2011 Colorado 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 1,377 172 140 2009-2011 North 1,377 172 140 2009-2011 Michigan 0 0 0 2009-2011 Montana 0 0 1 2009-2011 New Mexico 0 0 0 2009-2011 East 0 0 0 2009-2011 West 0 0 0 2009-2011 North Dakota 1 1 2 2009-2011 Ohio 0 0 2009-2010 Oklahoma 162 0 0 2009-2011 Pennsylvania 0 871 319 2009-2011 Texas 65 36 93 2009-2011 RRC District 1 0 14 0 2009-2011 RRC District 2 Onshore 2 81 2010-2011 RRC District 3 Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 RRC District 4 Onshore 30 0 12 2009-2011 RRC District 5

195

CAO-94-1001 Revision 1  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office Information Management Plan DOEWIPP-12-3429 Revision 0 May 2012 DOEWIPP-12-3429 Rev. 0 2 U. S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field...

196

CALIFORNIA ENERGY DEMAND 20142024 REVISED FORECAST  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

CALIFORNIA ENERGY DEMAND 20142024 REVISED FORECAST Volume 2: Electricity Demand Robert P. Oglesby Executive Director #12;i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The demand forecast is the combined prepared the commercial sector forecast. Mehrzad Soltani Nia helped prepare the industrial forecast

197

Shale Natural Gas Reserves Sales  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

563 1,685 22,694 2009-2011 563 1,685 22,694 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 563 1,685 22,694 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 2009-2010 Arkansas 3 336 6,087 2009-2011 California 0 2011-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 2011-2011 Colorado 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 45 2009-2011 Louisiana 3 11 3,782 2009-2011 North 3 11 3,782 2009-2011 Michigan 0 553 682 2009-2011 Montana 2 1 42 2009-2011 New Mexico 0 0 0 2009-2011 East 0 0 0 2009-2011 West 0 0 0 2009-2011 North Dakota 1 28 115 2009-2011 Ohio 0 0 2009-2010 Oklahoma 0 0 1,591 2009-2011 Pennsylvania 0 163 209 2009-2011 Texas 554 580 9,926 2009-2011 RRC District 1 0 409 1,132 2009-2011 RRC District 2 Onshore 0 61 2010-2011 RRC District 3 Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 RRC District 4 Onshore 0 0 75 2009-2011

198

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

46 188 207 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 0 -6 -1 2009-2011 Pacific (California) -1 -2 1 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 2 -3 -2 2009-2011 Texas -1 -1 0 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 1...

199

Wyoming Lease Condensate Proved Reserves, Reserve Changes, and...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 View History Proved Reserves as of Dec. 31 211 234 272 256 259 2007-2011 Adjustments 7 8 -6 2009-2011 Revision Increases 56 66 31 2009-2011 Revision...

200

Integrated test vehicle program plan: revision C  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This edition dated August 26, 1977, is Revision C of the Integrated Test Vehicle, Program Plan, Phase II - Deliverable Item 2-7-1. The original edition was issued on May 27, 1977. Corrections were made and issued as Proposed Modifications for Integrated Test Vehicle, Program Plan, dated July 8, 1977. For the purpose of documenting changes, the July 8, 1977, version is caled Revision A. The edition dated August 5, 1977, is called Revision B. Each paragraph in this edition is marked to indicate technical changes from previous editions.

Not Available

1977-08-26T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "2 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

2009 Revisions EIA-914  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

for Texas, which was partially the cause for the review of the EIA-914, which, in turn, led to the development and implementation of this new methodology. Downward revisions in...

202

SCALE: A modular code system for performing standardized computer analyses for licensing evaluation. Functional modules F1--F8 -- Volume 2, Part 1, Revision 4  

SciTech Connect

SCALE--a modular code system for Standardized Computer Analyses Licensing Evaluation--has been developed by Oak Ridge National Laboratory at the request of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The SCALE system utilizes well-established computer codes and methods within standard analysis sequences that (1) allow an input format designed for the occasional user and/or novice, (2) automate the data processing and coupling between modules, and (3) provide accurate and reliable results. System development has been directed at problem-dependent cross-section processing and analysis of criticality safety, shielding, heat transfer, and depletion/decay problems. Since the initial release of SCALE in 1980, the code system has been heavily used for evaluation of nuclear fuel facility and package designs. This revision documents Version 4.2 of the system. The manual is divided into three volumes: Volume 1--for the control module documentation; Volume 2--for functional module documentation; and Volume 3--for documentation of the data libraries and subroutine libraries.

Greene, N.M.; Petrie, L.M.; Westfall, R.M.; Bucholz, J.A.; Hermann, O.W.; Fraley, S.K. [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States)

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

203

Shale Natural Gas Reserves Adjustments  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

90 7,579 1,584 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 1,690 7,579 1,584 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 2009-2010 Arkansas 2 63 655 2009-2011 Colorado 1 -1 0 2009-2011 Kentucky -1...

204

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Reserves Sales  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

249 803 1,024 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 20 56 42 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 20 54 42 2009-2011 Texas 0 2 0 2009-2011 Alaska 7 0 17...

205

Clean Cities Now: Vol. 15, No. 2, September 2011 (Brochure) (Revised), Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

2 2 October 2011 AFDC Celebrates 20 Years Idle Reduction Equipment Benefits Bottom Line Coordinators Inducted into Clean Cities Hall of Fame Clean Cities Revs Its Engines in Indianapolis at Stakeholder Summit Dear Readers, It's been an exciting summer for Clean Cities. It started out with a bang in late June when we traveled to Indianapolis for our first-ever Stakeholder Summit. At this groundbreaking event, we announced the 12 charter members of the National Clean Fleets Partnership and inducted two coordinators into the new Clean Cities Hall of Fame, which celebrates outstanding coordinators who have significantly decreased conventional fuel use in their communities. See the Coordinator Profile on p5 to read about the inaugural members of the Hall of Fame. Our feature story on p6 provides a full recap of the Stake-

206

Pre-title I safety evaluation for the retrieval operations of transuranic waste drums in the Solid Waste Disposal Facility. Revision 2  

SciTech Connect

Phase I of the Transuranic (TRU) Waste Facility Line Item Project includes the retrieval and safe storage of the pad drums that are stored on TRU pads 2-6 in the Solid Waste Disposal Facility (SWDF). Drums containing TRU waste were placed on these pads as early as 1974. The pads, once filled, were mounded with soil. The retrieval activities will include the excavation of the soil, retrieval of the pad drums, placing the drums in overpacks (if necessary) and venting and purging the retrieved drums. Once the drums have been vented and purged, they will be transported to other pads within the SWDF or in a designated area until they are eventually treated as necessary for ultimate shipment to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant in Carlsbad, New Mexico. This safety evaluation provides a bounding assessment of the radiological risk involved with the drum retrieval activities to the maximally exposed offsite individual and the co-located worker. The results of the analysis indicate that the risk to the maximally exposed offsite individual and the co-located worker using maximum frequencies and maximum consequences are within the acceptance criteria defined in WSRC Procedural Manual 9Q. The purpose of this evaluation is to demonstrate the incremental risk from the SWDF due to the retrieval activities for use as design input only. As design information becomes available, this evaluation can be revised to satisfy the safety analysis requirements of DOE Orders 4700 and 5480.23.

Rabin, M.S.

1992-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

207

DWPF saltstone study: Effects of thermal history on leach index and physical integrity. Part 2, Final report: Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

This report summarizes the observations made during the curing and testing of DWPF simulated saltstones which have been cured under isothermal conditions in sealed glass envelopes at temperatures from room temperature to 95{degrees}C. This study was performed to evaluate the effect of curing at and around temperatures representing conditions created within large pours of grout. There appears to be no difference in the leaching resistance of samples cured at the same temperature for varying times to 1 year. Curing at higher temperatures decreases the effective diffusivity of this waste formulation. These results are encouraging in that leaching resistance for samples near the expected maximum vault temperature (55{degrees}C) show effective diffusion coefficients (D{sub effective} {approximately}10{sup {minus}8} cm{sup 2}/sec) that agree with previous work and values that are believed to adequately protect the groundwater. The isothermal conditions of these tests simulate the nearly adiabatic conditions existing near the centerline of the monolith. The elevated temperatures due to hydration heat decrease over long times. This has been simulated by a series (1X) of staged isothermal cures. Since modeling indicated it would take nearly two years for emplaced grout to cool to near ambient temperatures, accelerated (2X) cooling curves were also tested. Specimens cured under these staged-isothermal conditions appear to be no different from specimens cured under isothermal conditions for the same time at the maximum temperature. The unexpected generation of nitrous oxide within saltstone creates internal stresses which cause fracturing when exposed to leaching conditions. Such fracturing is not considered significant for saltstone emplaced in engineered vaults for disposal.

Orebaugh, E.G.

1992-11-18T23:59:59.000Z

208

Final safety analysis report for the Galileo mission: Volume 3 (Book 2), Nuclear risk analysis document: Appendices: Revision 1  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

It is the purpose of the NRAD to provide an analysis of the range of potential consequences of accidents which have been identified that are associated with the launching and deployment of the Galileo mission spacecraft. The specific consequences analyzed are those associated with the possible release of radioactive material (fuel) of the Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators (RTGs). They are in terms of radiation doses to people and areas of deposition of radioactive material. These consequence analyses can be used in several ways. One way is to identify the potential range of consequences which might have to be dealt with if there were to be an accident with a release of fuel, so as to assure that, given such an accident, the health and safety of the public will be reasonably protected. Another use of the information, in conjunction with accident and release probabilities, is to estimate the risks associated with the mission. That is, most space launches occur without incident. Given an accident, the most probable result relative to the RTGs is complete containment of the radioactive material. Only a small fraction of accidents might result in a release of fuel and subsequent radiological consequences. The combination of probability with consequence is risk, which can be compared to other human and societal risks to assure that no undue risks are implied by undertaking the mission. Book 2 contains eight appendices.

Not Available

1989-01-25T23:59:59.000Z

209

DOE Revises its NEPA Regulations, Including Categorical Exclusions |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revises its NEPA Regulations, Including Categorical Exclusions Revises its NEPA Regulations, Including Categorical Exclusions DOE Revises its NEPA Regulations, Including Categorical Exclusions September 30, 2011 - 2:30pm Addthis On September 27, 2011, the Department of Energy (DOE) approved revisions to its National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) regulations, and on September 28th, submitted the revisions to the Federal Register. The final regulations, which become effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register, are the culmination of a 2-year process to review and update DOE's NEPA implementing procedures. This process involved internal evaluation, public participation, and Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) review. The revisions are designed to focus Departmental resources on projects with the potential for significant environmental impact, to better

210

GRISET certification package. Revision 2  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The GRISET (GRIMHX setup) computer code is an input driver for the three dimensional G computer code (Reference 4). GRISET provides a method for automating the creation of G geometry and associated problem specific information such as the reactor maps and the cross section data references. GRISET provides methods which allow the user to model control rod positioning, safety rod insertion with any number failing, control rod withdrawal or insertion, and full or partial melting of control rods. GRISET also calculates the radial shape factor, tilt, roof-top-ratios, and the assembly power peaking.

Taylor, J.J.; Cefus, G.R.

1992-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

211

HNF-37489-FP Revision  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

HNF-37489-FP HNF-37489-FP Revision 0 Project Hanford Management Contractor foc the US. Deparbnsnt of Energy under Contract DE-ACO6-96RL13200 FLUOR, P.O. Box 1000 Richland, Washington Implementation of the Seismic Design Criteria for DOE-STD-I 189-2008, Appendix A HNF-37489-FP Revision 0 Implementation of the Seismic Design Criteria for DOE-STD-1189- 2008, Appendix A S. K. Omberg Fluor Government Group Date Published April 2008 To Be Presented at The Nuclear Renaissanm. Safety Analysls for the New Nuclear Age Energy Facility Contractow Group May 3 - 8,2008 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management Pmject Hanford Management CcntractOr for the US. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC0696RL132W FLUOR, P.O. Box I000

212

ADR Revised Policy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Alternative Dispute Resolution Alternative Dispute Resolution AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Notice of Revised Policy Statement. SUMMARY: On October 24, 1995, the Department of Energy (DOE) published an interim Statement of Policy on Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) (60 FR 54482) to further its commitment to the use of ADR for resolving issues in controversy in a fair, timely, and cost efficient manner, and to comply with the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act (ADRA), 5 U.S.C. §571 et seq. Today, DOE publishes a revised Statement of Policy on Alternative Dispute Resolution to reaffirm its commitment to the use of ADR, including the use of Environmental Conflict Resolution (ECR) and other collaborative processes that may be utilized to prevent or avoid potential conflicts.

213

CRADA Order Revision  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

CRADA Order Revision CRADA Order Revision Linda Field Patent Counsel Department of Energy Goal CRADA Order DOE O 483.1 CRADA Manual DOE M 483.1-1 CRADA Order DOE O XXXX.X Departmental Directive Program Types of Directives Policies Regulations Orders Notices Manuals Guides Technical Standards Departmental Directive Program Directives Life Cycle Development Coordination Implementation Review (Certification) Development Phase *Orders are uploaded to RevCom for review and comment by all affected parties *60 days to develop draft & submit to MA-90 *Solicits input from stakeholders ( incl. field, contractors, and/or program counsel) Coordination Phase *MA-90 parses directive & sets due dates for review & comment *HQ Directives Points of Contact (DPCs) *Have 45 days to submit official comments on behalf of their

214

Policy Flash 2013-22 Section 311 Revised Template January 24...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 Section 311 Revised Template January 24 2013 Policy Flash 2013-22 Section 311 Revised Template January 24 2013 UPDATE: WORD VERISON OF ALL DOCUEMENTS ARE ATTACHED 311 Notice...

215

INTEGRATED ENERGY POLICY REPORT COMMITTEE REVISED HEARING AGENDA  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

INTEGRATED ENERGY POLICY REPORT COMMITTEE REVISED HEARING AGENDA DAY 1 Committee's Draft 2007 Integrated Energy Policy Report Monday, October 15, 2007 9:00 a.m. Hearing Room A ­ California Energy. General Public Comments #12;INTEGRATED ENERGY POLICY REPORT COMMITTEE REVISED HEARING AGENDA DAY 2

216

Colorado Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

6,344 7,869 8,238 7,348 6,485 6,580 1989-2011 Adjustments 0 106 73 2009-2011 Revision Increases 126 937 698 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 566 1,557 367 2009-2011 Sales 0 0 1,034...

217

New Mexico Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

4,894 4,169 3,991 3,646 3,532 3,358 1989-2011 Adjustments -9 261 -170 2009-2011 Revision Increases 443 562 562 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 353 565 279 2009-2011 Sales 33 12 221...

218

TX, RRC District 9 Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

7,134 8,700 10,756 12,573 10,276 2007-2011 Adjustments 179 533 42 2009-2011 Revision Increases 580 1,044 3,005 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 469 191 5,864 2009-2011 Sales 53 83...

219

TX, RRC District 5 Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

8,099 11,408 13,691 16,032 19,747 2007-2011 Adjustments 657 105 233 2009-2011 Revision Increases 928 643 3,094 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 587 405 1,405 2009-2011 Sales 5 0 5,772...

220

Pennsylvania Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

6 88 3,790 10,708 23,581 2007-2011 Adjustments 450 235 253 2009-2011 Revision Increases 299 1,994 5,238 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 53 1,583 3,322 2009-2011 Sales 0 163 209...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "2 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

BSCMeasuresInformationRevisionSept2005.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Federal Procurement System Balanced Scorecard Performance Measures Information Document Office of Procurement and Assistance Management Revised: September 2005 2 Table of Contents Purpose ...................................................................................................... 4 CUSTOMER PERSPECTIVE Customer Satisfaction: Timeliness ........................................................................................... 5 Quality ................................................................................................ 7 Effective Service/Partnership ........................................................................... 9 INTERNAL BUSINESS PERSPECTIVE Acquisition Excellence .................................................................................. 11

222

REVISED CALIFORNIA ENERGY DEMAND FORECAST 20122022  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

REVISED CALIFORNIA ENERGY DEMAND FORECAST 20122022 Volume 2: Electricity Demand by Utility ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The staff demand forecast is the combined product of the hard work and expertise of numerous, Mohsen Abrishami prepared the commercial sector forecast. Mehrzad Soltani Nia helped prepare

223

EIS-0286: Revised Draft Environmental Import Statement | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6: Revised Draft Environmental Import Statement 6: Revised Draft Environmental Import Statement EIS-0286: Revised Draft Environmental Import Statement Richland Operations Office, Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program, Richland, Washington The revised draft of the Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement (HSW EIS) provides environmental and technical information concerning U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) proposed waste management practices at the Hanford Site. DOE/EIS-0286, Richland Operations Office, Revised Draft Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement, Richland, Washington - Summary (March 2003) EIS-0286-D2-DEIS-01-2003.pdf EIS-0286-D2-DEIS-02-2003_0.pdf More Documents & Publications

224

Coal Data Publication Revision Policy  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

THEN Survey Manager determines impact: WHAT happens next to the database and in our coal reports: Respondent provides data that are clearly incorrect or revised data for any...

225

EPA Revises Emissions Estimation Methodology  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

The changes to the historical emission estimates are the result of revisions to the data and estimation ... b K.D . Smythe, RAND ... RAND Environmental Science and ...

226

SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING 2009-2011 RESEARCH REPORT  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

that Release Therapeutic Agents to modulate Inflammation Following Spinal Cord Injury," National Institutes Crosslinking Effects on Bone Fragility," National Institutes of health (NIh) / The National Institute of Dental in Cortical Bone: Effect of mineral Content," J mechanical Behavior of Biomedical materials, 3(5), 405

Salama, Khaled

227

REPORT NO. 6 revised fallout  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

REPORT NO. 6 revised fallout estimates for 1964-1965 and verification of the 1963 predictions October 1964 Report of the FEDERAL RADIATION COUNCIL #12;REPORT NO. 6 revised fallout estimates - #12;SUMMARY On the basis of information available in June 1964, new estimates of the levels of fallout

228

Health effects models for nuclear power plant accident consequence analysis. Modification of models resulting from addition of effects of exposure to alpha-emitting radionuclides: Revision 1, Part 2, Scientific bases for health effects models, Addendum 2  

SciTech Connect

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has sponsored several studies to identify and quantify, through the use of models, the potential health effects of accidental releases of radionuclides from nuclear power plants. The Reactor Safety Study provided the basis for most of the earlier estimates related to these health effects. Subsequent efforts by NRC-supported groups resulted in improved health effects models that were published in the report entitled {open_quotes}Health Effects Models for Nuclear Power Plant Consequence Analysis{close_quotes}, NUREG/CR-4214, 1985 and revised further in the 1989 report NUREG/CR-4214, Rev. 1, Part 2. The health effects models presented in the 1989 NUREG/CR-4214 report were developed for exposure to low-linear energy transfer (LET) (beta and gamma) radiation based on the best scientific information available at that time. Since the 1989 report was published, two addenda to that report have been prepared to (1) incorporate other scientific information related to low-LET health effects models and (2) extend the models to consider the possible health consequences of the addition of alpha-emitting radionuclides to the exposure source term. The first addendum report, entitled {open_quotes}Health Effects Models for Nuclear Power Plant Accident Consequence Analysis, Modifications of Models Resulting from Recent Reports on Health Effects of Ionizing Radiation, Low LET Radiation, Part 2: Scientific Bases for Health Effects Models,{close_quotes} was published in 1991 as NUREG/CR-4214, Rev. 1, Part 2, Addendum 1. This second addendum addresses the possibility that some fraction of the accident source term from an operating nuclear power plant comprises alpha-emitting radionuclides. Consideration of chronic high-LET exposure from alpha radiation as well as acute and chronic exposure to low-LET beta and gamma radiations is a reasonable extension of the health effects model.

Abrahamson, S. [Wisconsin Univ., Madison, WI (United States); Bender, M.A. [Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, NY (United States); Boecker, B.B.; Scott, B.R. [Lovelace Biomedical and Environmental Research Inst., Albuquerque, NM (United States). Inhalation Toxicology Research Inst.; Gilbert, E.S. [Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (United States)

1993-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

229

2013-2014 Additions and Revisions  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The 2013 2014 Additions and Revisions are now available with seven new methods, including three for testing 3-MCPD, and revisions to 25 previously approved methods. 2013-2014 Additions and Revisions Hardback Books Methods - Analyses Books Methods - An

230

Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9...

231

Utah Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Million Barrels) Utah Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

232

Utah Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Revision...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6...

233

Utah Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Revision...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6...

234

Utah Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

235

Utah Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

236

Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9...

237

Utah Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Million Barrels) Utah Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

238

U.S. Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) U.S. Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

239

U.S. Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) U.S. Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

240

U.S. Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Reserves Revision Decreases ...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Decreases (Million Barrels) U.S. Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "2 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

U.S. Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Reserves Revision Increases ...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Increases (Million Barrels) U.S. Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

242

Miscellaneous States Shale Gas Proved Reserves Revision Increases...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Miscellaneous States Shale Gas Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7...

243

Miscellaneous States Shale Gas Proved Reserves Revision Decreases...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Miscellaneous States Shale Gas Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7...

244

California Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) California Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

245

California Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) California Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

246

Ohio Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Ohio Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9...

247

Ohio Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Ohio Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9...

248

Colorado Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Colorado Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

249

Michigan Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Michigan Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

250

Michigan Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Michigan Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

251

U.S. Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Decreases (Million Barrels) U.S. Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

252

U.S. Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Increases (Million Barrels) U.S. Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

253

New Mexico - West Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) New Mexico - West Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7...

254

New Mexico Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) New Mexico Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

255

New Mexico - East Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) New Mexico - East Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7...

256

New Mexico - West Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) New Mexico - West Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7...

257

New Mexico - East Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) New Mexico - East Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7...

258

Texas Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Texas Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9...

259

Building Technologies Office: Standards Development and Revision  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

and Revision to someone by E-mail Share Building Technologies Office: Standards Development and Revision on Facebook Tweet about Building Technologies Office: Standards Development...

260

Supplemental design requirements document, Project W026. Revision 3  

SciTech Connect

This document supplements and extends the Functional Design Criteria, SP-W026-FDC-001, for the Waste Receiving and Processing Facility (WRAP), Module 1. It provides additional detailed requirements, summarizes key Westinghouse Hanford Company design guidance, and establishes baseline technical agreements to be used in definitive design of the WRAP-1 facility. Revision 3 of the Supplemental Design Requirements Document has been assigned an Impact Level of 3ESQ based on the content of the entire revision. The actual changes made from Revision 2 have an Impact Level of 3S and the basis for these changes was previously reviewed and approved per WHC correspondence No. 9355770.

Weidert, J.R.

1993-10-08T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "2 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Reference: Revised Tariff Sheet  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Company (TrAILCo), a revised tariff sheet to correct the FERC Form No. 1 line reference in TrAILCos formula rate. Pursuant to the authority delegated to the Director, Division of Electric Power Regulation- East, under 18 C.F.R. 375.307, your submittal filed in the above referenced docket is accepted for filing, effective May 17, 2010, as requested. 1 Notice of the filing was published in the Federal Register, with comments, protests, or interventions due on or before June 3, 2010. No protests or adverse comments were filed. American Municipal Power, Inc. and PJM Interconnection, LLC filed timely motions to intervene. Notices of intervention and unopposed timely filed motions to intervene are granted pursuant to Rule 214 of the Commissions Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 C.F.R. 385.214). Any opposed or untimely filed motion to intervene is governed by the provisions of Rule 214. This acceptance for filing shall not be construed as constituting approval of any rate, charge, classification or any rule, regulation, or practice affecting such rate or 1

Stephen Angle Esq; Dear Mr. Angle; Jignasa P. Gadani

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

262

Policy Flash 2013-22 Section 311 Revised Template January 24 2013 |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 Section 311 Revised Template January 24 2013 2 Section 311 Revised Template January 24 2013 Policy Flash 2013-22 Section 311 Revised Template January 24 2013 UPDATE: WORD VERISON OF ALL DOCUEMENTS ARE ATTACHED 311 Notice ALERT - EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY Please ensure all of your Contracting Officers are aware of the changes to the template. Attached are 3 revised templates for sending the Section 311 notices to Congress as prescribed in Acquisition Letter (AL) 2012-07 and Financial Assistance Letter (FAL) 2012-01. The template revises two subcommittee assignment addresses at the end of the letter. The revision changes The Ranking Member, formerly Thad Cochran, to The Honorable Richard C. Shelby and The Ranking Member, formerly Peter Visclosky, to The Honorable Marcy Kaptur. Policy flash 2013-22 Section 311 revised templateJan 24 2013.pdf

263

Preference revision via declarative debugging  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Preference criteria are rarely static. Often they are subject to modification and aggregation. The resulting preference criteria may not satisfy the properties of the original ones and must therefore be revised. This paper investigates the problem of ...

Pierangelo DellAcqua; Lus Moniz Pereira

2005-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

264

Shale Natural Gas Reserves Extensions  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

22,332 29,081 32,764 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 22,332 29,081 32,764 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 2009-2010 Arkansas 4,441 3,014 2,073 2009-2011 Colorado 0 3 5...

265

Shale Natural Gas Reserves Adjustments  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

90 7,579 1,584 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 1,690 7,579 1,584 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 2009-2010 Arkansas 2 63 655 2009-2011 California 1 2011-2011 San Joaquin...

266

Shale Natural Gas Reserves Extensions  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

22,332 29,081 32,764 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 22,332 29,081 32,764 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 2009-2010 Arkansas 4,441 3,014 2,073 2009-2011 California 43...

267

Southeast Regional Clean Energy Policy Analysis (Revised)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Southeast Regional Clean Southeast Regional Clean Energy Policy Analysis Revised Joyce McLaren Technical Report NREL/TP-6A20-49192 Revised April 2011 ERRATA SHEET NREL REPORT/PROJECT NUMBER: TP-6A20-49192 TITLE: Southeast Regional Clean Energy Policy Analysis AUTHOR(S): Joyce McLaren ORIGINAL PUBLICATION DATE: January 2011 DATE OF CORRECTIONS (MM/YYYY): 04/2011 The following figures and tables were replaced: Page vii, Figure ES-2 Page ix, Table ES-1 Page 12, Table 1 Page 20, Figure 10 Page 51, Table 11 Page 52, Figure 18 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401

268

Revised OMB Circular A-76 (Revised November 14, 2002)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

OMB Circular A-76 Revision Comments OMB Circular A-76 Revision Comments DRAFT OMB CIRCULAR A-76 (NOVEMBER 14, 2002) REVIEW COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL COMMENTS: The Department of Energy (DOE) supports the overarching goal of OMB Circular A-76 that agencies should obtain "the best deal to the Taxpayer." We also support revisions to the Circular that "Keep the Process Moving" with the end result being: Faster/Cheaper Competitions; Improved Performance and Measures; Enhanced/Expanded Competition; Fairness; Realizing Significant Savings; and the Redirection of Resources to Mission Critical Requirements. Upon review of the draft Circular, the Department believes the proposed changes to Circular reflect a general improvement over the current version. The Department does, however, have

269

System Plan Revision 4  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

@ 90, Hanford 2 pumps @ 180 * Different Feed Receipt Constraints - SRS "good glass", Hanford RCRA and rheology DST Mixing and HLW Certification 19 52109 Programmatic...

270

Infrared Thermography Guide (Revision 3)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Costly equipment outages can be reduced by implementing a comprehensive predictive maintenance program. Infrared thermography (IR), a fundamental component of such programs, uses nonintrusive techniques to monitor the operating condition of equipment and components. This revised report provides updated information to assist utilities in implementing an effective IR program.

2002-05-30T23:59:59.000Z

271

Acquisition Career Management Program Handbook, Partial Revision...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Acquisition Career Management Program Handbook, Partial Revision of Chapter 11, Contracting Officer's Representative SUMMARY: The...

272

Record of Technical Change {number_sign}2 for ''Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 240: Area 25 Vehicle Washdown, Nevada Test Site, Nevada,'' Revision 0, DOE/NV--532  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Record of Technical Change updates the technical informatioin provided in ''Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 240: Area 25 Vehicle Washdown, Nevada Test Site, Nevada,'' Revision 0, DOE/NV--532.

USDOE Nevada Operations Office

2000-03-16T23:59:59.000Z

273

2011-2012 Methods Additions and Revisions  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Additions and revisions (new, updated, or revised methods) are included in print form. Corrections (minor typographical errors) are included in an accompanying CD-ROM. 2011-2012 Methods Additions and Revisions DVD & CD-ROMs Soft Bound Books Methods - An

274

Biosafety Manual Draft Revision  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

copies are not official versions of this manual. Before using the printed copy, verify that it is the most current version. copies are not official versions of this manual. Before using the printed copy, verify that it is the most current version. Biosafety Manual Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory May 18, 2010 This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02- 05CH11231. Biosafety Manual IBC-approved version (May 18, 2010) Printed copies are not official versions of this manual. Before using the printed copy, verify that it is the most current version. 2 Biosafety Manual Contents 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Policy 1.2 Purpose 1.3 Scope 1.4 Manual Administration and Presentation 1.5 Terms, Acronyms, and Abbreviations 1.6 Roles, Responsibilities, and Whom to Call 2.0 Starting and Conducting Work Safely 3.0 Work and Risk Assessment

275

SUBMITTED APRIL 2, 2007 FOR PUBLICATION IN THE IEEE T. ON ROBOTICS, REVISED SEPT 18, 2007. ACCEPTED ON MARCH 29, 2008 1 On the Synthesis of Haptic Textures  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Machines, McGill University, Montr´eal, Qu´ebec, H3A 2A7 Canada. (e-mail: champ@cim.mcgill.ca and hayward@cim

Hayward, Vincent

276

Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Part B Permit Application [of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP)]. Volume 2, Revision 1.0  

SciTech Connect

This report, Part B ( Vol. 2) of the permit application for the WIPP facility, contains information related to the WIPP site on hydrology, geology, maps, and rock salt properties.

Not Available

1990-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

277

A Revised Land Surface Parameterization (SiB2) for GCMS. Part III: The Greening of the Colorado State University General Circulation Model  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

SiB2, the second-generation land-surface parameterization developed by Sellers et al., has been incorporated into the Colorado State University general circulation model and tested in multidecade simulation. The control run uses a bucket ...

D.A. Randall; D.A. Dazlich; C. Zhang; A.S. Denning; P.J. Sellers; C.J. Tucker; L. Bounoua; J.A. Berry; G.J. Collatz; C.B. Field; S.O. Los; C.O. Justice; I. Fung

1996-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

278

Revised Acquisition Guide Chapter 42.5, Contract Management Planning  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2-24 2-24 Date: February 21, 2012 To: Procurement Directors From: Director Contract and Financial Assistance Policy Division Office of Policy Office of Procurement and Assistance Management Subject: Revised Acquisition Guide Chapter 42.5, Contract Management Planning Summary: The Department of Energy (DOE) has been on GAO's High Risk List for the past several years as a result of inadequate contract and project management. Accordingly, the improvement of contract administration is a critical issue for DOE. The Acquisition Guide chapter on Contract Management Planning has been completely revised to address this matter.

279

CORRRECTIVE ACTION DECISION DOCUMENT FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION UNIT 427: AREA 3 SEPTIC WASTE SYSTEMS 2 AND 6, TONOPAH TEST RANGE, NEVADA, REVISION 0, JUNE 1998  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Decision Document has been prepared for the Area 3 Septic Waste Systems 2 and 6 (Corrective Action Unit 427) in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order of 1996 (FFACO, 1996). Corrective Action Unit 427 is located at the Tonopah Test Range, Nevada, and is comprised of the following Corrective Action Sites, each an individual septic waste system (DOE/NV, 1996a): (1) Septic Waste System 2 is Corrective Action Site Number 03-05-002-SW02. (2) Septic Waste System 6 is Corrective Action Site Number 03-05-002-SW06. The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document is to identify and provide a rationale for the selection of a recommended corrective action alternative for each Corrective Action Site. The scope of this Correction Action Decision Document consists of the following tasks: (1) Develop corrective action objectives. (2) Identify corrective action alternative screening criteria. (3) Develop corrective action alternatives. (4) Perform detailed and comparative evaluations of the corrective action alternatives in relation to the corrective action objectives and screening criteria. (5) Recommend and justify a preferred corrective action alternative for each CAS. From November 1997 through January 1998, a corrective action investigation was performed as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit No. 427: Area 3 Septic Waste System Numbers 2 and 6, Tonopah Test Range, Nevada (DOE/NV, 1997b). Details can be found in Appendix A of this document. The results indicated that contamination is present in some portions of the CAU and not in others as described in Table ES-1 and shown in Figure A.2-2 of Appendix A. Based on the potential exposure pathways, the following corrective action objectives have been identified for Corrective Action Unit 427: (1) Prevent or mitigate human exposure to subsurface soils containing TPH at concentrations greater than 100 milligrams per kilogram (NAC, 1996b). (2) Close Sep tic Tank 33-5 in accordance with Nevada Administrative Code 459 (NAC, 1996c). (3) Prevent adverse impacts to groundwater quality. Based on the review of existing data, future land use, and current operations at the Tonopah Test Range, the following alternatives were developed for consideration at the Area 3 Septic Waste Systems 2 and 6: Alternative 1 - No Further Action; Alternative 2 - Closure of Septic Tank 33-5 and Administrative Controls; Alternative 3 - Closure of Septic Tank 33-5, Excavation, and Disposal The corrective action alternatives were evaluated based on four general corrective action standards and five remedy selection decision factors. Based on the results of this evaluation, the preferred alternative for Corrective Action Unit 427 is Alternative 2, Closure of Septic Tank 33-5 and Administrative Controls. The preferred corrective action alternative was evaluated on technical merit, focusing on performance, reliability, feasibility, and safety. The alternative was judged to meet all requirements for the technical components evaluated. The alternative meets all applicable state and federal regulations for closure of the site and will reduce potential future exposure pathways to the contaminated soils. During corrective action implementation, this alternative will present minimal potential threat to site workers who come in contact with the waste. However, procedures will be developed and implemented to ensure worker health and safety.

DOE /NV

1998-06-23T23:59:59.000Z

280

ISM Plan - Chemical Sciences Division - Revised May 2012  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

ISM Plan - Chemical Sciences Division - Revised May 2012 ISM Plan - Chemical Sciences Division - Revised May 2012 Page 2 of 25 Page intentionally left blank ISM Plan - Chemical Sciences Division - Revised May 2012 Page 3 of 25 Chemical Sciences Division ISM Plan May 2012 Page 1.0 Policy Statement 5 2.0 Description of Division/Organization, Mission and Scope of Work 5 3.0 Accountability 7 3.01 Line Management Responsibility and Accountability 8 3.02 Specific Principal Investigator Responsibilities 8 3.03 Work Lead EH&S Responsibilities 8 3.04 CSD personnel EH&S Responsibilities (Non-Supervisor or Work Lead) 9 3.05 Students 10 3.06 Work Off-Site 10 3.07 Telecommuting 11

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "2 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Received: 2 April 2009, Revised: 7 July 2009, Accepted: 15 July 2009, Published online in Wiley InterScience: 2009 Library screening by fragment-based docking  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

. Recognit. (2009) Copyright ? 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. #12;similar to a breadth-first search. (ii to the relevance of plasmepsins as drug targets. We used our fragment-based docking procedure to search-ray structure of the aldehyde peptidic inhibitor benzoyl-Nle-Lys-Arg-Arg-H (PDB code 2fp7) (bottom left). Only

Caflisch, Amedeo

282

TEMPEST: A three-dimensional time-dependence computer program for hydrothermal analysis: Volume 1, Numerical methods and input instructions: Revision 2  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

TEMPEST offers simulation capabilities over a wide range of hydrothermal problems that are definable by input instructions. These capabilities are summarized by categories as follows: modeling capabilities; program control; and I/O control. 10 refs., 22 figs., 2 tabs. (LSP)

Trent, D.S.; Eyler, L.L.

1989-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

283

RPP-RPT-42583 Revision  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

RPP-RPT-42583 RPP-RPT-42583 Revision 0 Synthetic Sling Failure - Evaluations and Recommendations Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management Contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection under Contract DE-AC27-08RV14800 Approved for Public Release; Further Dissemination Unlimited RPP-RPT-42583 Revision 0 Synthetic Sling Failure - Evaluations and Recommendations C. S. Henderson T. C. Mackey Washington River Protection Solutions Date Published October 2009 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management Contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection under Contract DE-AC27-08RV14800 ~. washington river ~ protectionso/utions P.O. Box 850 Richland, Washington Approved for Public Release; Further Dissemination Unlimited TRADEMARK

284

Pahute Mesa Well Development and Testing Analyses for Wells ER-20-7, ER-20-8 #2, and ER-EC-11, Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report analyzes the following data collected from ER-20-7, ER-20-8 No.2, and ER-EC-11 during WDT operations: (1) Chemical indicators of well development (Section 2.0); (2) Static hydraulic head (Section 3.0); (3) Radiochemistry and geochemistry (Section 4.0); (4) Drawdown observed at locations distal to the pumping well (Section 5.0); and (5) Drilling water production, flow logs, and temperature logs (Section 6.0). The new data are further considered with respect to existing data as to how they enhance or change interpretations of groundwater flow and transport, and an interim small-scale conceptual model is also developed and compared to Phase I concepts. The purpose of well development is to remove drilling fluids and drilling-associated fines from the formation adjacent to a well so samples reflecting ambient groundwater water quality can be collected, and to restore hydraulic properties near the well bore. Drilling fluids can contaminate environmental samples from the well, resulting in nonrepresentative measurements. Both drilling fluids and preexisting fines in the formation adjacent to the well can impede the flow of water from the formation to the well, creating artifacts in hydraulic response data measured in the well.

Greg Ruskauff

2011-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

285

Clean Air Act. Revision 5  

SciTech Connect

This Reference Book contains a current copy of the Clean Air Act, as amended, and those regulations that implement the statute and appear to be most relevant to DOE activities. The document is provided to DOE and contractor staff for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as legal guidance. This Reference Book has been completely revised and is current through February 15, 1994.

Not Available

1994-02-15T23:59:59.000Z

286

Oklahoma Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 837 962 1,026 1980's 1,293 1,262 2,374 2,189 2,245 2,357 2,158 2,251 2,538 1,984 1990's 1,803 1,710 1,988 1,554 1,580 1,892 1,886 2,396 2,995 3,029 2000's 2,498 1,458 2,159 2,892 2,173 3,064 1,515 2,115 2,786 2,894 2010's 3,224 5,142 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 8/1/2013 Next Release Date: 8/1/2014 Referring Pages: Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases Oklahoma Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves Revision Increases

287

Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 137: Waste Disposal Sites, Nevada Test Site, Nevada (Revision 0) with ROTC 1 and 2  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation for closure of CAU 137 with no further corrective action. To achieve this, corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from February 28 through August 17, 2006, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 137: Waste Disposal Sites. The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill the following data needs as defined during the data quality objective process: Determine whether contaminants of concern (COCs) are present. If COCs are present, determine their nature and extent. Provide sufficient information and data to complete appropriate corrective actions. ROTC-1: Downgrade FFACO UR at CAU 137, CAS 07-23-02, Radioactive Waste Disposal Site to an Administrative UR. ROTC-2: Downgrade FFACO UR at CAU 137, CAS 01-08-01, Waste Disposal Site to an Administrative UR.

Krauss, Mark J

2007-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

288

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 105: Area 2 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 105 is located in Area 2 of the Nevada National Security Site, which is approximately 65 miles northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada. CAU 105 is a geographical grouping of sites where there has been a suspected release of contamination associated with atmospheric nuclear testing. This document describes the planned investigation of CAU 105, which comprises the following corrective action sites (CASs): 02-23-04, Atmospheric Test Site - Whitney 02-23-05, Atmospheric Test Site T-2A 02-23-06, Atmospheric Test Site T-2B 02-23-08, Atmospheric Test Site T-2 02-23-09, Atmospheric Test Site - Turk These sites are being investigated because existing information on the nature and extent of potential contamination is insufficient to evaluate and recommend corrective action alternatives (CAAs). Additional information will be obtained by conducting a corrective action investigation before evaluating CAAs and selecting the appropriate corrective action for each CAS. The results of the field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of viable CAAs that will be presented in the Corrective Action Decision Document. The sites will be investigated based on the data quality objectives (DQOs) developed on April 30, 2012, by representatives of the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office. The DQO process was used to identify and define the type, amount, and quality of data needed to develop and evaluate appropriate corrective actions for CAU 105. The site investigation process will also be conducted in accordance with the Soils Activity Quality Assurance Plan, which establishes requirements, technical planning, and general quality practices to be applied to this activity. The potential contamination sources associated with all CAU 105 CASs are from atmospheric nuclear testing activities. The presence and nature of contamination at CAU 105 will be evaluated based on information collected from a field investigation. Radiological contamination will be evaluated based on a comparison of the total effective dose at sample locations to the dose-based final action level. The total effective dose will be calculated as the total of separate estimates of internal and external dose. Results from the analysis of soil samples will be used to calculate internal radiological dose. Thermoluminescent dosimeters placed at the center of each sample location will be used to measure external radiological dose. Appendix A provides a detailed discussion of the DQO methodology and the DQOs specific to each CAS. This Corrective Action Investigation Plan has been developed in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order that was agreed to by the State of Nevada; DOE, Environmental Management; U.S. Department of Defense; and DOE, Legacy Management. Under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order, this Corrective Action Investigation Plan will be submitted to the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for approval. Fieldwork will be conducted after the plan is approved.

Patrick Matthews

2012-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

289

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 410: Waste Disposal Trenches, Tonopah Test Range, Nevada, Revision 0 (includes ROTCs 1, 2, and 3)  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Investigation Plan contains the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Operations Office's approach to collect the data necessary to evaluate corrective action alternatives appropriate for the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 410 under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. Corrective Action Unit 410 is located on the Tonopah Test Range (TTR), which is included in the Nevada Test and Training Range (formerly the Nellis Air Force Range) approximately 140 miles northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada. This CAU is comprised of five Corrective Action Sites (CASs): TA-19-002-TAB2, Debris Mound; TA-21-003-TANL, Disposal Trench; TA-21-002-TAAL, Disposal Trench; 09-21-001-TA09, Disposal Trenches; 03-19-001, Waste Disposal Site. This CAU is being investigated because contaminants may be present in concentrations that could potentially pose a threat to human health and/or the environment, and waste may have been disposed of with out appropriate controls. Four out of five of these CASs are the result of weapons testing and disposal activities at the TTR, and they are grouped together for site closure based on the similarity of the sites (waste disposal sites and trenches). The fifth CAS, CAS 03-19-001, is a hydrocarbon spill related to activities in the area. This site is grouped with this CAU because of the location (TTR). Based on historical documentation and process know-ledge, vertical and lateral migration routes are possible for all CASs. Migration of contaminants may have occurred through transport by infiltration of precipitation through surface soil which serves as a driving force for downward migration of contaminants. Land-use scenarios limit future use of these CASs to industrial activities. The suspected contaminants of potential concern which have been identified are volatile organic compounds; semivolatile organic compounds; high explosives; radiological constituents including depleted uranium, beryllium, total petroleum hydrocarbons; and total Resource Conservation and Recovery Act metals. Field activities will consist of geophysical and radiological surveys, and collecting soil samples at biased locations by appropriate methods. A two-step data quality objective strategy will be followed: (1) define the nature of contamination at each CAS location by identifying any contamination above preliminary action levels (PALs); and, (2) determine the extent of contamination identified above PALs. The results of this field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of corrective action alternatives in the corrective action decision document.

NNSA /NV

2002-07-16T23:59:59.000Z

290

Corrective Action Decision Document for Corrective Action Unit 204: Storage Bunkers, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0 with ROTC 1, 2, and Errata  

SciTech Connect

This Corrective Action Decision Document (CADD) has been prepared for Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 204 Storage Bunkers, Nevada Test Site (NTS), Nevada, in accordance with the ''Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order'' (FFACO) that was agreed to by the State of Nevada; U.S. Department of Energy (DOE); and the U.S. Department of Defense (FFACO, 1996). The NTS is approximately 65 miles (mi) north of Las Vegas, Nevada (Figure 1-1). The Corrective Action Sites (CASs) within CAU 204 are located in Areas 1, 2, 3, and 5 of the NTS, in Nye County, Nevada (Figure 1-2). Corrective Action Unit 204 is comprised of the six CASs identified in Table 1-1. As shown in Table 1-1, the FFACO describes four of these CASs as bunkers one as chemical exchange storage and one as a blockhouse. Subsequent investigations have identified four of these structures as instrumentation bunkers (CASs 01-34-01, 02-34-01, 03-34-01, 05-33-01), one as an explosives storage bunker (CAS 05-99-02), and one as both (CAS 05-18-02). The six bunkers included in CAU 204 were primarily used to monitor atmospheric testing or store munitions. The ''Corrective Action Investigation Plan (CAIP) for Corrective Action Unit 204: Storage Bunkers, Nevada Test Site, Nevada'' (NNSA/NV, 2002a) provides information relating to the history, planning, and scope of the investigation; therefore, it will not be repeated in this CADD. This CADD identifies potential corrective action alternatives and provides a rationale for the selection of a recommended corrective action alternative for each CAS within CAU 204. The evaluation of corrective action alternatives is based on process knowledge and the results of investigative activities conducted in accordance with the CAIP (NNSA/NV, 2002a) that was approved prior to the start of the Corrective Action Investigation (CAI). Record of Technical Change (ROTC) No. 1 to the CAIP (approval pending) documents changes to the preliminary action levels (PALs) agreed to by the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP) and DOE, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO). This ROTC specifically discusses the radiological PALs and their application to the findings of the CAU 204 corrective action investigation.

Wickline, Alfred

2004-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

291

Addendum to the Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 427: Area 3 Septic Waste Systems 2, 6, Tonopah Test Range, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

This document constitutes an addendum to the April 1999, Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 427: Area 3 Septic Waste Systems 2, 6, Tonopah Test Range, Nevada as described in the document Recommendations and Justifications for Modifications for Use Restrictions Established under the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (UR Modification document) dated February 2008. The UR Modification document was approved by NDEP on February 26, 2008. The approval of the UR Modification document constituted approval of each of the recommended UR modifications. In conformance with the UR Modification document, this addendum consists of: This cover page that refers the reader to the UR Modification document for additional information The cover and signature pages of the UR Modification document The NDEP approval letter The corresponding section of the UR Modification document This addendum provides the documentation justifying the cancellation of the URs for: CAS 03-05-002-SW02, Septic Waste System CAS 03-05-002-SW06, Septic Waste System These URs were established as part of Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) corrective actions and were based on the presence of contaminants at concentrations greater than the action levels established at the time of the initial investigation (FFACO, 1996; as amended August 2006). Since these URs were established, practices and procedures relating to the implementation of risk-based corrective actions (RBCA) have changed. Therefore, these URs were re-evaluated against the current RBCA criteria as defined in the Industrial Sites Project Establishment of Final Action Levels (NNSA/NSO, 2006c). This re-evaluation consisted of comparing the original data (used to define the need for the URs) to risk-based final action levels (FALs) developed using the current Industrial Sites RBCA process. The re-evaluation resulted in a recommendation to remove these URs because contamination is not present at these sites above the risk-based FALs. Requirements for inspecting and maintaining these URs will be canceled, and the postings and signage at each site will be removed. Fencing and posting may be present at these sites that are unrelated to the FFACO URs such as for radiological control purposes as required by the NV/YMP Radiological Control Manual (NNSA/NSO, 2004f). This modification will not affect or modify any non-FFACO requirements for fencing, posting, or monitoring at these sites.

Lynn Kidman

2008-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

292

Addendum to the Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 355: Area 2 Cellars/Mud Pits Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect

This document constitutes an addendum to the November 2003, Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 355: Area 2 Cellars/Mud Pits as described in the document Recommendations and Justifications for Modifications for Use Restrictions Established under the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (UR Modification document) dated February 2008. The UR Modification document was approved by NDEP on February 26, 2008. The approval of the UR Modification document constituted approval of each of the recommended UR modifications. In conformance with the UR Modification document, this addendum consists of: This cover page that refers the reader to the UR Modification document for additional information The cover and signature pages of the UR Modification document The NDEP approval letter The corresponding section of the UR Modification document This addendum provides the documentation justifying the cancellation of the URs for: CAS 02-37-01, Cellar & Mud Pit CAS 02-37-03, Cellar & Mud Pit CAS 02-37-04, Cellar & Mud Pit CAS 02-37-05, Cellar & Mud Pit CAS 02-37-06, Cellar & Mud Pit CAS 02-37-07, Cellar & Mud Pit CAS 02-37-10, Cellar & Mud Pit CAS 02-37-11, Cellar & Mud Pit CAS 02-37-12, Cellar & Mud Pit CAS 02-37-13, Cellar & Mud Pit CAS 02-37-14, Cellar & Mud Pit CAS 02-37-15, Cellar & Mud Pit CAS 02-37-16, Cellar & Mud Pit CAS 02-37-17, Cellar CAS 02-37-18, Cellar & Tanks These URs were established as part of Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) corrective actions and were based on the presence of contaminants at concentrations greater than the action levels established at the time of the initial investigation (FFACO, 1996; as amended August 2006). Since these URs were established, practices and procedures relating to the implementation of risk-based corrective actions (RBCA) have changed. Therefore, these URs were re-evaluated against the current RBCA criteria as defined in the Industrial Sites Project Establishment of Final Action Levels (NNSA/NSO, 2006c). This re-evaluation consisted of comparing the original data (used to define the need for the URs) to risk-based final action levels (FALs) developed using the current Industrial Sites RBCA process. The re-evaluation resulted in a recommendation to remove these URs because contamination is not present at these sites above the risk-based FALs. Requirements for inspecting and maintaining these URs will be canceled, and the postings and signage at each site will be removed. Fencing and posting may be present at these sites that are unrelated to the FFACO URs such as for radiological control purposes as required by the NV/YMP Radiological Control Manual (NNSA/NSO, 2004f). This modification will not affect or modify any non-FFACO requirements for fencing, posting, or monitoring at these sites.

Lynn Kidman

2008-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

293

ADR Revised Policy | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revised Policy Revised Policy ADR Revised Policy SUMMARY: On October 24, 1995, the Department of Energy (DOE) published an interim Statement of Policy on Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) (60 FR 54482) to further its commitment to the use of ADR for resolving issues in controversy in a fair, timely, and cost efficient manner, and to comply with the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act (ADRA), 5 U.S.C. §571 et seq. Today, DOE publishes a revised Statement of Policy on Alternative Dispute Resolution to reaffirm its commitment to the use of ADR, including the use of Environmental Conflict Resolution (ECR) and othercollaborative processes that may be utilized to prevent or avoid potential conflicts. ADR Revised Policy More Documents & Publications Microsoft Word - ADR Revised Policy82508Reformatted.doc

294

Revision 2 Yucca Mountain Review Plan  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The Yucca Mountain Review Plan provides guidance for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff to evaluate a U.S. Department of Energy license application for a geologic repository. It is not a regulation and does not impose regulatory requirements. The licensing criteria are contained in the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 10, Part 63

unknown authors

2003-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

295

Closed Cooling Water Chemistry Guideline: Revision 2  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Closed Cooling Water Chemistry Guideline addresses the use of chemicals and monitoring methods to mitigate corrosion, fouling, and microbiological growth in the closed cooling-water (CCW) systems of nuclear and fossil-fueled power plants. The chemical additives used for these purposes depend on plant-design characteristics, water quality, operating parameters, and the specifications of the Nuclear Steam Supply System (NSSS) suppliers. The list of chemicals is not as extensive as that ...

2013-12-09T23:59:59.000Z

296

China energy databook. Revision 2, 1992 edition  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Energy Analysis Program at the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory (LBL) first became involved in Chinese energy issues through a joint China-US symposium on markets and demand for energy held in Nanjing in November of 1988. Discovering common interests, EAP began to collaborate on projects with the Energy Research Institute of China`s State Planning Commission. In the course of this work it became clear that a major issue in the furtherance of our research was the acquisition of reliable data. In addition to other, more focused activities-evaluating programs of energy conservation undertaken in China and the prospects for making Chinese industries more energy-efficient, preparing historical reviews of energy supply and demand in the People`s Republic of China, sponsoring researchers from China to work with experts at LBL on such topics as energy efficiency standards for buildings, adaptation of US energy analysis software to Chinese conditions, and transportation issues, we decided to compile, assess, and organize Chinese energy data. We are hopeful that this volume will not only help us in our work, but help build a broader community of Chinese energy policy studies within the US. In order to select appropriate data from what was available we established several criteria. Our primary interest was to use the data to help understand the historical evolution and likely future of the Chinese energy system. A primary criterion was thus that the data relate to the structure of energy supply and demand in the past and indicate probable developments (e.g., as indicated by patterns of investment). Other standards were accuracy, consistency with other information, and completeness of coverage. This is not to say that all the data presented herein are accurate, consistent, and complete, but where discrepancies and omissions do occur we have tried to note them.

Sinton, J.E.; Levine, M.D.; Liu, Feng; Davis, W.B. [eds.] [Lawrence Berkeley Lab., CA (United States); Jiang Zhenping; Zhuang Xing; Jiang Kejun; Zhou Dadi [eds.] [State Planning Commission of China, Beijing, BJ (China). Energy Research Inst.

1993-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

297

Nevada Test Site Treatment Plan. Revision 2  

SciTech Connect

Treatment Plans (STPS) are required for facilities at which the US Department of Energy (DOE) or stores mixed waste, defined by the Federal Facility Compliance Act (FFCAct) as waste containing both a hazardous waste subject to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and a radioactive material subject to the Atomic Energy Act. On April 6, 1993, DOE published a Federal Register notice (58 FR 17875) describing its proposed process for developing the STPs in three phases including a Conceptual, a Draft, and a Proposed Site Treatment Plan (PSTP). All of the DOE Nevada Operations Office STP iterations have been developed with the state of Nevada`s input. The options and schedules reflect a ``bottoms-up`` approach and have been evaluated for impacts on other DOE sites, as well as impacts to the overall DOE program. Changes may have occurred in the preferred option and associated schedules between the PSTP, which was submitted to the state of Nevada and US Environmental Protection Agency April 1995, and the Final STP (hereafter referred to as the STP) as treatment evaluations progressed. The STP includes changes that have occurred since the submittal of the PSTP as a result of state-to-state and DOE-to-state discussions.

1996-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

298

NIST Leads Revision of International Coordinate Measuring ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

NIST Leads Revision of International Coordinate Measuring Machine Standard. ... ASME) represents the final step in a decade-long effort led by the ...

2011-04-25T23:59:59.000Z

299

,"Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases "  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

,"Worksheet Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases ",36,"Annual",2011,"6302009" ,"Release...

300

,"Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases "  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

,"Worksheet Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases ",36,"Annual",2011,"6302009" ,"Release...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "2 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Revision to the Canada Country Analysis Brief  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Revision to the Canada Country Analysis Brief. December 10, 2012. Text incorrectly implied that Encana is developing another major natural gas project off ...

302

L S U H S C -N O S t u d e n t F i n a n c i a l A i d O f f i c e AdditionalFederalStaffordLoanRequestForm Page 1 of 1 Revised 2/11/2010  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

L S U H S C - N O S t u d e n t F i n a n c i a l A i d O f f i c e AdditionalFederalStaffordLoanRequestForm Page 1 of 1 Revised 2/11/2010 Federal Stafford Loan for 2010-2011 Additional Amount Request Form You have already requested a Federal Stafford loan for the 2010-2011 academic year using the Master

303

Fig 9-revised Flowchart.xls  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

9 9 Soil Nature and Extent AOI Identification Process d The PRG value for lead is not a calculated PRG, but rather is taken from the EPA guidance document Revised Interim Soil Lead Guidance for CERCLA Sites and RCRA Correction Action Facilities (1994). e For surface soil (0 to 0.5 ft), WRW surface soil (0 to 0.5 ft) PRGs are used. For subsurface soil (0.5 ft to a maximum depth of 209 ft), WRW subsurface soil (0.5 to 8 ft) PRGs are used. a Soil "superset" for soil samples collected from June 28, 1991 through August 22, 2005. c Soil PRGs are defined as 1 x 10 -6 WRW PRGs based on using an HI of 0.1 or a risk of 1 x 10 -6 (the more conservative of the two values was used for the PRG). b Background level is defined as the background M2SD. RI-Ready Soil Data

304

EIS-0226: Revision to the Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revision to the Record of Decision Revision to the Record of Decision EIS-0226: Revision to the Record of Decision Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Disposal Phase The Department of Energy (DOE), pursuant to its implementing regulations under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 10 CFR 1021.315, is revising its Record of Decision for the Department of Energy's Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Disposal Phase (WIPP ROD), 63 FR 3624 (Jan. 23, 1998). DOE has decided to dispose of up to 2,500 cubic meters of transuranic (TRU) waste containing polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in concentrations of 50 parts per million (ppm) or greater at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) near Carlsbad, New Mexico. DOE/EIS-0226, Revision to the Record of Decision for the Department of Energy's Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Disposal Phase, 69 FR 39456 (June

305

Policy Flash 2013-38 Revised Merit Review Guide For Financial Assistance |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 Revised Merit Review Guide For Financial 8 Revised Merit Review Guide For Financial Assistance Policy Flash 2013-38 Revised Merit Review Guide For Financial Assistance Attached is Policy Flash 2013-38 Revised Merit Review Guide for Financial Assistance Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Richard Bonnell of the Contract and Financial Assistance Policy Division at (202) 287-1747 or at richard.bonnell@hq.doe.gov. Flash 2013-38 Revisions to the Merit Review Guide 2013.pdf Merit Review Guide FINAL JULY 2013 ATTACHMENT 1 Sample Merit Rev Panel Appt Letter 1-10.docx ATTACHMENT 2 Sample COI ADDED WB LANGUAGE JULY 2013.docx ATTACHMENT 3 - Sample Evaluation and Selection Plan JULY 2013.docx ATTACHMENT 4 Sample Noncompetitive Review Plan.docx ATTACHMENT 5 Sample Initial Compliance Review 1-16.docx

306

Oklahoma Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 1,016 969 1,211 1980's 1,303 1,371 2,520 1,891 1,611 1,648 1,963 2,047 2,280 1,732 1990's 1,542 1,456 1,263 1,008 932 1,049 1,602 1,282 1,997 2,251 2000's 1,331 1,895 1,513 2,843 1,912 2,945 1,868 1,366 2,580 3,592 2010's 3,474 6,856 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 8/1/2013 Next Release Date: 8/1/2014 Referring Pages: Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases Oklahoma Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves Revision Decreases

307

Radiological control manual. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

This Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Radiological Control Manual (LBNL RCM) has been prepared to provide guidance for site-specific additions, supplements and interpretation of the DOE Radiological Control Manual. The guidance provided in this manual is one methodology to implement the requirements given in Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations Part 835 (10 CFR 835) and the DOE Radiological Control Manual. Information given in this manual is also intended to provide demonstration of compliance to specific requirements in 10 CFR 835. The LBNL RCM (Publication 3113) and LBNL Health and Safety Manual Publication-3000 form the technical basis for the LBNL RPP and will be revised as necessary to ensure that current requirements from Rules and Orders are represented. The LBNL RCM will form the standard for excellence in the implementation of the LBNL RPP.

Kloepping, R.

1996-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

308

BOREAS SSA-YJP Tower Flux Data Revised  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Tower Flux Data Revised A revised version of the BOREAS TF04 tower flux data is now available from the ORNL DAAC. Data providers have revised the data set entitled "BOREAS TF-04...

309

Archived Weekly Files, Revised, 1984 Forward EIA revises its first-round  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Weekly Coal Production> Archive of weekly and monthly coal production data Weekly Coal Production> Archive of weekly and monthly coal production data Archive weekly and monthly coal production -- revised and original estimates About coal production revision estimates EIA revises its weekly (and monthly) original estimates of state-level coal production using quarterly mine-level coal production data from the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) as soon as the data are available. This method guarantees that EIA’s revised coal production estimates for each past quarter conform with the MSHA survey data. The state level revised estimates include refuse coal. EIA uses this equation to revise its weekly coal production estimates: Revised weekly estimate (State A) = original EIA estimate (State A) x MSHA quarterly data (State A) ÷

310

Property:NEPA RevisedApplicationDate | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

RevisedApplicationDate RevisedApplicationDate Jump to: navigation, search Property Name NEPA RevisedApplicationDate Property Type Date This is a property of type Date. Pages using the property "NEPA RevisedApplicationDate" Showing 19 pages using this property. D DOI-BLM-CA-ES-2013-002+1793-EIS + 5 June 2012 + DOI-BLM-NV-C010-2010-0006-EA + 16 November 2009 + DOI-BLM-NV-C010-2010-0010-EA + 15 October 2009 + DOI-BLM-NV-C010-2011-0016-EA + 15 March 2011 + DOI-BLM-NV-C010-2012-0050-EA + 14 February 2012 + DOI-BLM-NV-C010-2012-0051-EA + 1 December 2011 + DOI-BLM-NV-C010-2012-0069-CX + 9 August 2012 + DOI-BLM-NV-C010-2012-0070-CX + 27 July 2012 + DOI-BLM-NV-E030-2011-0017-CX + 2 March 2011 + DOI-BLM-NV-W010-2010-0004-EA + 23 November 2009 + DOI-BLM-NV-W010-2011-0001-EA + 4 June 2010 +

311

Colorado Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Colorado Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 116 226 373 1980's 250 131 322 167 160 368 372 340 473 431 1990's 394 719 718 1,000 696 555 802 959 1,898 2,788 2000's 1,825 1,882 2,029 2,114 1,505 2,018 1,178 3,924 3,244 1,601 2010's 2,973 2,509 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 8/1/2013 Next Release Date: 8/1/2014 Referring Pages: Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases Colorado Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves Revision Increases

312

Revised Burnup Code System SWAT: Description and Validation Using Postirradiation Examination Data  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The burnup code system Step-Wise Burnup Analysis Code System (SWAT) is revised for use in a burnup credit analysis. An important feature of the revised SWAT is that its functions are achieved by calling validated neutronics codes without any changes to the original codes. This feature is realized with a system function of the operating system, which allows the revised SWAT to be independent of the development status of each code.A package of the revised SWAT contains the latest libraries based on JENDL-3.2 and the second version of the JNDC FP library. These libraries allow us to analyze burnup problems, such as an analysis of postirradiation examination (PIE), using the latest evaluated data of not only cross sections but also fission yield and decay constants.Another function of the revised SWAT is a library generator for the ORIGEN2 code, which is one of the most reliable burnup codes. ORIGEN2 users can obtain almost the same results with the revised SWAT using the library prepared by this function.The validation of the revised SWAT is conducted by calculation of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development/Nuclear Energy Agency burnup credit criticality safety benchmark Phase I-B and analyses of PIE data for spent fuel from Takahama Unit 3. The analysis of PIE data shows that the revised SWAT can predict the isotopic composition of main uranium and plutonium with a deviation of 5% from experimental results taken from UO{sub 2} fuels of 17 x 17 fuel assemblies. Many results of fission products including samarium are within a deviation of 10%. This means that the revised SWAT has high reliability to predict the isotopic composition for pressurized water reactor spent fuel.

Suyama, Kenya [Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute (Japan); Mochizuki, Hiroki [Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute (Japan); Kiyosumi, Takehide [Japan Research Institute, Ltd. (Japan)

2002-05-15T23:59:59.000Z

313

UCSC Injury and Illness Prevention Program Revised 10/01 University of California  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

UCSC Injury and Illness Prevention Program Revised 10 Code of Regulations 8-3203 INJURY AND ILLNESS PREVENTION PROGRAM DEPARTMENTAL PLAN #12;TABLE OF CONTENTS Statement of Purpose 1 Authority and Responsibility 2 Compliance with Safe Work Practices 3

California at Santa Cruz, University of

314

Classification Bulletin GEN-16 Revision | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Classification Bulletin GEN-16 Revision Classification Bulletin GEN-16 Revision Provides guidance to DOE Federal and contractor employees with access to classified information on...

315

Petroleum products demand data revised at regional level ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

A recent revision to petroleum product movements in the Petroleum ... The data revision involves movements of motor gasoline as reported to EIA by one or more survey ...

316

Revised November 20, 2009 Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Revised November 20, 2009 Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering Colorado State University for the appropriate semester. #12;Revised November 20, 2009 Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering Colorado

317

Forrestal Garage Parking Guidelines, Revised August 12, 2010...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Forrestal Garage Parking Guidelines, Revised August 12, 2010 Forrestal Garage Parking Guidelines, Revised August 12, 2010 Forrestal Garage Parking Guidelines Forrestal Garage...

318

Microsoft Word - FINAL Class 1 Revise TRUPACT-III Management...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Dear Mr. Kieling: Enclosed is a Class 1 Permit Modification Notification to: * Revise TRUPACT-III Management Language * Revise Procedure Reference for the Bolting Station in Table...

319

EIS-0218: Revision to the Record of Decision | Department of...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revision to the Record of Decision EIS-0218: Revision to the Record of Decision Proposed Nuclear Weapons Nonproliferation Policy Concerning Foreign Research Reactor Spent Nuclear...

320

Revised Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, P.L. 110...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Marketing Administration Other Agencies You are here Home Revised Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, P.L. 110-5 Revised Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007,...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "2 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

Lower 48 States Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes,...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

23,304 34,428 60,644 97,449 131,616 2007-2011 Adjustments 1,690 7,579 1,584 2009-2011 Revision Increases 6,363 10,661 25,993 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 3,642 9,491 23,455...

322

Alaska Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and Production  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 View History Proved Reserves as of Dec. 31 0 0 0 0 0 2007-2011 Adjustments 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Increases 0 0 0 2009-2011 Revision Decreases 0 0 0...

323

1. Revised Guide Chapter 70.4, Cooperative Audit Strategy:  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revised Guide Chapter 70.4, Cooperative Audit Strategy: Revised Guide Chapter 70.4, Cooperative Audit Strategy: Establishes a requirement for the contractor to provide an Internal Audit Design for each 5-year period of a contract. The design is to consist of: (1) Organizational placement of the internal audit function to assure functional independence; (2) Size, experience, and educational requirements of audit staff; (3) Audit standards to be applied; (4) (5) (6) allo (7) a. Plan for internal audit function over 5-year period; Plan for audit of allowable costs; Use ofDCAA for supplementing audit of prime or subcontract wable costs; and Schedule for peer review. b. Provides detailed standards for the Annual Audit Plan. c. Provides detailed standards for the Annual Audit Report. 2.AL 2005-04, Class Deviation to Reflect Changes to the Cooperative Audit Strategy,

324

Requesting a Revision to PUB-3000  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Requesting a Change to the ES&H Manual Requesting a Change to the ES&H Manual The following procedure describes the process for making changes to Berkeley Lab's ES&H Manual (PUB-3000). It identifies Responsible Authors who participate in the revision process. A request to revise the ES&H Manual may be initiated by any Berkeley Lab employee; however, all requests must be sent to the Responsible Author and approved by the ES&H Manual Manager, Mike Wisherop. If you wish to request a change to a PUB-3000 chapter, follow these steps: Contact the Responsible Author for the chapter in need of revision. Submit PUB-3000 revisions to the Responsible Author and the ES&H Manual Manager. Direct all questions or comments concerning ES&H Manual content to the ES&H Manual Manager.

325

2008 MERRTT Revision Letter | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8 MERRTT Revision Letter 8 MERRTT Revision Letter 2008 MERRTT Revision Letter The 2008 version of MERRTT includes several enhancements, but the primary enhancement is the addition of the decontamination dress-down video. Comments received on the decontamination video script in the fall 2006 were incorporated into the script and the filming and final editing were completed in the spring 2007. The decontamination video was added to MERRTT to support the students' understanding of the decontamination dress-down process at an accident scene. Additional enhancements included the streamlining of objectives from the Terminology & Units and Assessing Package Integrity modules into other existing modules. 2008 MERRTT Revision Letter More Documents & Publications 2009 TEPP Annual Report

326

Predictive Maintenance Primer: Revision to NP-7205  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The "Predictive Maintenance Primer" revision provides nuclear plant personnel with current information regarding the predictive maintenance technologies and their applications. This guide will assist a plant in improving its predictive maintenance program.

2003-11-06T23:59:59.000Z

327

Water Mass Formation from Revised COADS Data  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Surface heat and freshwater fluxes from the Comprehensive 0cean-Atmosphere Data Set are revised and used diagnostically to compute air-sea transformation rates on density, temperature, and salinity classes over the domain of the data. Maximum ...

Kevin G. Speer; H-J. Isemer; A. Biastoch

1995-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

328

Green Vegetable Oil Processing, Revised First Edition  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This book addresses alternative green technologies at various stages of oilseed and vegetable oil processing. The Revised First Edition includes much of the content of the first edition, but incorporates updated data, details, images, figures, and captions

329

A Revised Version of Lettau's Evapoclimatonomy Model  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In this paper a revised version of Lettau's evapoclimatonomy model is introduced. Climatonomy is a one-dimensional representation of mean climate, which includes a complete characterization of the surface energy and water balances. The model is ...

Sharon E. Nicholson; Andrew R. Lare; JosiA. Marengo; Pablo Santos

1996-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

330

EPRI Maintenance Excellence Matrix Revision Status  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This report documents the progress in revising the Electric Power Research Institute EPRI 2002 Report 1004705, Maintenance Excellence Matrix Assessment Guideline for Fossil Power Plants, which provides utilities a comprehensive self-assessment guideline for improving maintenance processes.

2008-12-23T23:59:59.000Z

331

New and revised standards for coke production  

SciTech Connect

The need for new and revised standards for coke production in Ukraine and Russia is outlined. Such standards should address improvements in plant operation, working conditions, environmental protection, energy conservation, fire and explosion safety, and economic indices.

G.A. Kotsyuba; M.I. Alpatov; Y.G. Shapoval [Giprokoks, the State Institute for the Design of Coke-Industry Enterprises, Kharkov (Ukraine)

2009-07-15T23:59:59.000Z

332

U.S. Department of Energy Releases Revised Total System Life Cycle Cost  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Releases Revised Total System Life Cycle Releases Revised Total System Life Cycle Cost Estimate and Fee Adequacy Report for Yucca Mountain Project U.S. Department of Energy Releases Revised Total System Life Cycle Cost Estimate and Fee Adequacy Report for Yucca Mountain Project August 5, 2008 - 2:40pm Addthis WASHINGTON, DC -The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today released a revised estimate of the total system life cycle cost for a repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. The 2007 total system life cycle cost estimate includes the cost to research, construct and operate Yucca Mountain during a period of 150 years, from the beginning of the program in 1983 through closure and decommissioning in 2133. The new cost estimate of $79.3 billion, when updated to 2007 dollars comes to $96.2 billion, a 38 percent

333

Belief revision in non-monotonic reasoning and logic programming  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Keywords: belief revision, logic programming, logics of knowledge and beliefs, non-monotonic reasoning

Jos Jlio Alferes; Lus Moniz Pereira; Teodor C. Przymusinski

1996-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

334

Revision of the DELFIC Particle Activity Module  

SciTech Connect

The Defense Land Fallout Interpretive Code (DELFIC) was originally released in 1968 as a tool for modeling fallout patterns and for predicting exposure rates. Despite the continual advancement of knowledge of fission yields, decay behavior of fission products, and biological dosimetry, the decay data and logic of DELFIC have remained mostly unchanged since inception. Additionally, previous code revisions caused a loss of conservation of radioactive nuclides. In this report, a new revision of the decay database and the Particle Activity Module is introduced and explained. The database upgrades discussed are replacement of the fission yields with ENDF/B-VII data as formatted in the Oak Ridge Isotope Generation (ORIGEN) code, revised decay constants, revised exposure rate multipliers, revised decay modes and branching ratios, and revised boiling point data. Included decay logic upgrades represent a correction of a flaw in the treatment of the fission yields, extension of the logic to include more complex decay modes, conservation of nuclides (including stable nuclides) at all times, and conversion of key variables to double precision for nuclide conservation. Finally, recommended future work is discussed with an emphasis on completion of the overall radiation physics upgrade, particularly for dosimetry, induced activity, decay of the actinides, and fractionation.

Hooper, David A [ORNL; Jodoin, Vincent J [ORNL

2010-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

335

Nuclear Maintenance Applications Center: Repair and Reconditioning Specification Guidance for AC Squirrel-Cage and Salient Pole Sync hronous Motors with Voltage Ratings of 2.3 to 13.2 kV: Revision 1 of 1000897  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The power industry is experiencing a loss of expertise as the workforce ages and some work is being outsourced to specialty suppliers. Many of the major electric motors in plants were also beginning to experience aging effects. To assist with obtaining proper motor service, EPRI published Report 1000897, Repair and Reconditioning Specification for AC Squirrel-Cage Motors with Voltage Ratings of 2.3 to 13.2 kV in 2000.

2008-12-18T23:59:59.000Z

336

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves, as of Dec. 31  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Data Series: Proved Reserves as of Dec. 31 Adjustments Revision Increases Revision Decreases Sales Acquisitions Extensions New Field Discoveries New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields Estimated Production Period: Data Series: Proved Reserves as of Dec. 31 Adjustments Revision Increases Revision Decreases Sales Acquisitions Extensions New Field Discoveries New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields Estimated Production Period: Annual Download Series History Download Series History Definitions, Sources & Notes Definitions, Sources & Notes Show Data By: Data Series Area 2009 2010 2011 View History U.S. 22,315 25,181 28,950 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 4,357 4,710 5,171 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 350 363 352 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 3,704 4,043 4,567 2009-2011 Texas 303 304 252 2009-2011 Alaska 3,566 3,722 3,852 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 18,749 21,459 25,098 2009-2011 Alabama 53 60 65 2009-2011 Arkansas 29 42 40 2009-2011

337

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves, as of Dec. 31  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Data Series: Proved Reserves as of Dec. 31 Adjustments Revision Increases Revision Decreases Sales Acquisitions Extensions New Field Discoveries New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields Estimated Production Period: Data Series: Proved Reserves as of Dec. 31 Adjustments Revision Increases Revision Decreases Sales Acquisitions Extensions New Field Discoveries New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields Estimated Production Period: Annual Download Series History Download Series History Definitions, Sources & Notes Definitions, Sources & Notes Show Data By: Data Series Area 2009 2010 2011 View History U.S. 22,315 25,181 28,950 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 4,357 4,710 5,171 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 350 363 352 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 3,704 4,043 4,567 2009-2011 Texas 303 304 252 2009-2011 Alaska 3,566 3,722 3,852 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 18,749 21,459 25,098 2009-2011 Alabama 53 60 65 2009-2011 Arkansas 29 42 40 2009-2011

338

SOLAR NEUTRINOS REVIEW Revised December  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

+ + 2 e . (1) Positrons annihilate with electrons. Therefore, when consider- ing the solar thermal energy generation, a relevant expression is 4p + 2e - 4 He + 2 e + 26.73...

339

mph_hpca_revise.dvi  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Examples are call MPHgetargument("alpha",alpha2) call MPHgetargument("beta",beta) call MPHgetargument(fieldnum1,fieldvalfilename) Thus alpha2 will get the value...

340

Microsoft Word - DOE-EA-1707D_Revised_Predecisional_EA Closure_NRDWL-SWL08232011.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

7D 7D REVISED PREDECISIONAL DRAFT AUGUST 2011 Environmental Assessment Closure of Nonradioactive Dangerous Waste Landfill (NRDWL) and Solid Waste Landfill (SWL), Hanford Site, Richland, Washington U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Richland, Washington 99352 DOE/EA-1707D REVISED PREDECISIONAL DRAFT AUGUST 2011 DOE/EA-1707D REVISED PREDECISIONAL DRAFT iii AUGUST 2011 Contents 1 1 Introduction and Purpose and Need ............................................................................................. 1-1 2 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1-1 3 1.2 Purpose and Need ................................................................................................................... 1-2 4

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "2 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

RPSEA_Final_Report_revised  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

November 2 8, 2 011 PI: G eorge J . M oridis (gjmoridis@lbl.gov) Co---PIs: M atthew T . R eagan ( LBNL), T homas A . B lasingame ( TAMU), M ichael N ikolaou ( UH) Additional A...

342

Microsoft Word - LBNL-57260-Revision.doc  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

7260-Revision 7260-Revision ERNEST ORLANDO LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY Energy Efficiency Improvement and Cost Saving Opportunities for the Pharmaceutical Industry An ENERGY STAR ® Guide for Energy and Plant Managers Christina Galitsky, Sheng-chieh Chang, Ernst Worrell, and Eric Masanet Environmental Energy Technologies Division Sponsored by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency March 2008 Disclaimer This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. While this document is believed to contain correct information, neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor The Regents of the University of California, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes

343

NISTIR 7511 Revision 2 Update 2 (Draft) Security Content ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... collect the environmental metrics from the network, configuration database, system inventory ... NOTE: As stated by the CIO Council, 'the USGCB is a ...

2013-04-29T23:59:59.000Z

344

FTCP Corrective Action Plan- Revision 1  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE))

January 2007 FTCP Corrective Action Plan, Revision 1, which is Deliverable B for Commitment 13 in the Department of Energy (DOE) Implementation Plan to Improve Oversight of Nuclear Operations, issued in response to Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 2004- 1, Oversight of Complex, High-Hazard Nuclear Operations

345

Anomalies of Nuclear Criticality, Revision 6  

SciTech Connect

This report is revision 6 of the Anomalies of Nuclear Criticality. This report is required reading for the training of criticality professionals in many organizations both nationally and internationally. This report describes many different classes of nuclear criticality anomalies that are different than expected.

Clayton, E. D.; Prichard, Andrew W.; Durst, Bonita E.; Erickson, David; Puigh, Raymond J.

2010-02-19T23:59:59.000Z

346

CALIFORNIA ENERGY DEMAND 20142024 REVISED FORECAST  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

CALIFORNIA ENERGY DEMAND 2014­2024 REVISED FORECAST Volume 1: Statewide Electricity Demand in this report. #12;i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The demand forecast is the combined product of the hard work listed previously, Mohsen Abrishami prepared the commercial sector forecast. Mehrzad Soltani Nia helped

347

REVISED CALIFORNIA ENERGY DEMAND FORECAST 20122022  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

REVISED CALIFORNIA ENERGY DEMAND FORECAST 20122022 Volume 1: Statewide Electricity Demand in this report. #12;i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The staff demand forecast is the combined product of the hard work listed previously, Mohsen Abrishami prepared the commercial sector forecast. Mehrzad Soltani Nia helped

348

Revision Policy for EIA Weekly Underground Natural Gas Storage Estimates  

Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report (EIA)

April 26, 2005 April 26, 2005 This report consists of the following sections: General EIA Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report Revisions Policy - a description of how revisions to the Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report estimates may occur EIA Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report Policy to Allow Unscheduled Release of revisions - a description of the policy that will be implemented in the event of an out-of-cycle release Revisions to the Historical Database - a description of how revisions will be noted in the Historical database Revisions may be presented for the most recent estimates of working gas in storage under a number of circumstances that occur after release of the estimates. These include: I. A respondent revises previously submitted data (respondents are requested to submit revisions if the change is greater than 500 million

349

Microsoft Word - NDA Box PDP Plan-Revision 4-final  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Characterization Program Revision 4 May 2013 This document supersedes Revision 3 of DOECBFO-01-1006 U.S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office Office of the National TRU...

350

U.S. Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (EIA)

View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File) U.S. Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) U.S. Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)...

351

U.S. Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File) U.S. Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) U.S. Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)...

352

NIST SP 800-53 Revision 3, Recommended Security Controls ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Page 1. NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 3 Recommended Security Controls for Federal Information Systems and Organizations ...

2012-02-06T23:59:59.000Z

353

Date issued: Date approved: Date revised: Date revision approved:  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

1.0 Reason for Terms of Reference The terms of Reference for the Radiation Protection Committee 1 are set out in accordance with the Procedures and the Policy entitled "Radiation Safety", in connection with the Radiation Safety program for all radioactive material, X-ray equipment and other sources of ionizing radiation in all areas under the control of the University of Manitoba. 2.0 Terms of Reference 2.1 Radiation Protection Committee The University has established and shall maintain a Radiation Protection Committee comprising members of the University community and stakeholders knowledgeable in the safe use of radioactive material, X-ray equipment and other sources of ionizing radiation. The Committee shall report to the Executive Director of Human Resources. The Radiation Protection Committee is authorized to: a) Advise on the safe use of radioactive material, X-ray equipment and other sources of ionizing radiation;

unknown authors

2004-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

354

2011-2012 and 2013-2014 Additions and Revisions Package  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

2011-2012 Additions and Revisions + 2013 2014 Additions and Revisions package 2011-2012 and 2013-2014 Additions and Revisions Package Methods - Analyses Books Methods - Analyses Books The 2013 2014 Additions and Revisions are now av

355

Radiation Safety (Revised March 2010)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

.8 106.3 13.1 (14.5°) 9.3 1.3952 0.256 62 Triethylene glycol dimethyl ether -45 216 7.5 1.4224 0.253 63 2 CALIFORNIUM EINSTEINIUM FERMIUM MENDELEVIUM NOBELIUM SAMARIUM EUROPIUM GADOLINIUM TERBIUM DYSPROSIUM HOLMIUM

Ford, James

356

Policy Flash 2013-62 Acquisition Letter 09 - Revision of Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 Acquisition Letter 09 - Revision of Department 2 Acquisition Letter 09 - Revision of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 350.1 and Special H Clause Policy Flash 2013-62 Acquisition Letter 09 - Revision of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 350.1 and Special H Clause Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Robert M. Myers, Director, Contractor Human Resources Policy Division (MA-612) at (202) 287-1584 or robert.myers@hq.doe.gov. Policy Flash - DOE O 350 1.pdf Consolidated Model H-Clause 06-27-13.pdf Acquisition Letter - DOE O 350 1 6-27-13.pdf More Documents & Publications Chapter 30 - Cost Accounting Standards Administration OPAM Policy Acquisition Guides GAO-04-539 Department of Energy: Certain Postretirement Benefits for Contractor Employees Are Unfunded and Program Oversight Could Be Improved

357

Revisions to Energy Efficiency Enforcement Regulations  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6450-01-P 6450-01-P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 10 CFR Parts 430 and 431 Docket No. EERE-2010-BT-CE-0014 RIN 1904-AC23 Revisions to Energy Efficiency Enforcement Regulations AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy and Office of the General Counsel, Department of Energy. ACTION: Request for Information (RFI); request for comment. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE or the "Department") intends to expand and revise its existing energy efficiency enforcement regulations for certain consumer products and commercial and industrial equipment covered under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975, as amended (EPCA or the "Act"). These regulations provide for manufacturer submission of compliance statements and

358

Last Revised: 7/23/10 (Gades  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Revised: 7/23/10 (Gades) Revised: 7/23/10 (Gades) Instructions for Requesting Dry Ice at the APS Dry Ice requests are handled by APS Detector Pool staff. Dry ice should be requested through the Detector Pool database, similar to how detectors are requested. Dry ice is only available during normal business hours. Since dry ice must be obtained from a building other than the APS, requests must be made in advance to ensure availability of a government vehicle for transporting dry ice. Access the Detector Pool database via the link below. Requestors will be taken to a log-in page similar to the log-in page for the ESAF system. https://beam.aps.anl.gov/pls/apsweb/wam0002.dds_main_menu The page can also be found on the Optics and Detector Group homepage (the "Submit a Detector

359

MESON LISTINGS UNDER REVISION (FOR ENCODERS)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

MESON LISTINGS UNDER REVISION MESON LISTINGS UNDER REVISION (FOR ENCODERS) This WWW page is designed so that encoders can get current Listings of encoded particles with the 'NODES' on the right-hand side of the page. Disclaimer These sections are private PDG files. Please do not quote or refer to them. The authors reserve the right to radically alter these non-completed sections from minute to minute. They are certainly not error free. Conservation Laws The List by Particle Code (includes hidden particle codes) The List in Book Order by Name Light Unflavored Mesons Summary Table Other Light Unflavored Mesons Strange Mesons Summary Table Charmed Mesons Summary Table Charmed, Strange Mesons Summary Table (c cbar) Mesons Summary Table (b bbar) Mesons Summary Table Non (q qbar) Candidates

360

Revision Policy for EIA Weekly Underground Natural Gas Storage Estimates  

Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report (EIA)

September 23, 2013 September 23, 2013 This report consists of the following sections: General EIA Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report Revisions Policy - a description of how revisions to the Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report estimates may occur EIA Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report Policy to Allow Unscheduled Release of revisions - a description of the policy that will be implemented in the event of an out-of-cycle release Revisions to the Historical Database - a description of how revisions will be noted in the Historical database The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) is announcing changes Revisions may be presented for the most recent estimates of working gas in storage under a number of circumstances that occur after release of the estimates. These include: I. A respondent revises previously submitted data (respondents are

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "2 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Coal within a revised energy perspective  

SciTech Connect

The author considers the use of coal within a revised energy perspective, focusing on the factors that will drive which fuels are used to generate electricity going forward. He looks at the world markets for fossil fuels and the difficulties of predicting oil and natural gas supply and prices, as demonstrated by the variability in projections from one year to another in the EIA's Annual Energy Outlook. 4 refs., 1 tab.

Darmstadter, J. [Resources for the Future (RFF), Washington, DC (United States)

2006-07-15T23:59:59.000Z

362

Advanced Lighting Guidelines: 1993 (Revision 1)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This series of guidelines, originally published in 1990 by the California Energy Commission, provides both technical and practical information about energy-efficient lighting equipment and design techniques. This revised version updates the 1990 information and adds four new sections on lighting controls and daylighting. EPRI's cofunding and publication of these guidelines will facilitate utility access to this information, resulting in increased lighting quality and energy efficiency.

1993-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

363

EPRI Materials Degradation Matrix, Revision 3  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Materials Degradation Matrix (MDM) identifies knowledge gaps associated with degradation phenomena that may detrimentally affect reactor operation, reactor safety, or regulatory climate. Where gaps are identified, the MDM assesses the status of research and development (R&D) needed to resolve the knowledge gap. In addition to a general update to address new operating experience and research results, specific objectives for this revision of the MDM ...

2013-05-30T23:59:59.000Z

364

Environmental Monitoring Plan, Revision 6  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of environmental monitoring is to promote the early identification of, and response to, potential adverse environmental impacts associated with Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) operations. Environmental monitoring supports the Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS), International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 14001 Environmental Management Systems standard, and U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) Order 458.1, Radiation Protection of the Public and the Environment. Specifically, environmental monitoring enables LLNL to detect, characterize, and respond to releases from LLNL activities; assess impacts; estimate dispersal patterns in the environment; characterize the pathways of exposure to members of the public; characterize the exposures and doses to individuals and to the population; and to evaluate the potential impacts to the biota in the vicinity of LLNL. Environmental monitoring is also a major component of compliance demonstration for permits and other regulatory requirements. The Environmental Monitoring Plan (EMP) addresses the sample collection and analytical work supporting environmental monitoring to ensure the following: (1) A consistent system for collecting, assessing, and documenting environmental data of known and documented quality; (2) A validated and consistent approach for sampling and analysis of samples to ensure laboratory data meets program-specific needs and requirements within the framework of a performance-based approach for analytical laboratory work; and (3) An integrated sampling approach to avoid duplicative data collection. LLNL prepares the EMP because it provides an organizational framework for ensuring that environmental monitoring work, which is integral to the implementation of LLNL's Environmental Management System, is conducted appropriately. Furthermore, the Environmental Monitoring Plan helps LLNL ensure compliance with DOE Order 231.1 Change 2, Environment, Safety and Health Reporting, which require the publication of an annual report that characterizes the site's environmental management performance. To summarize, the general regulatory drivers for this environmental monitoring plan are ISO 14001, DOE Order 458.1, and DOE Order 231.1. The environmental monitoring addressed by this plan includes preoperational characterization and assessment, effluent and surveillance monitoring, and permit and regulatory compliance monitoring. Additional environmental monitoring is conducted at LLNL as part of compliance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA, also known as Superfund). LLNL coordinates its ground water surveillance monitoring program with the CERCLA monitoring program to gain sampling efficiencies.

Gallegos, G M; Bertoldo, N A; Blake, R G; Campbell, C G; Grayson, A R; Nelson, J C; Revelli, M A; Rosene, C A; Wegrecki, T; Williams, R A; Wilson, K R; Jones, H E

2012-03-02T23:59:59.000Z

365

Environmental Monitoring Plan, Revision 5  

SciTech Connect

The purpose of environmental monitoring is to promote the early identification of, and response to, potential adverse environmental impacts associated with Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) operations. Environmental monitoring supports the Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS), International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 14001 Environmental Management Systems standard, and U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) Order 450.1A, Environmental Protection Program. Specifically, in conformance with DOE Order 450.1A, Attachment 1, paragraph 1(b)(5), environmental monitoring enables LLNL to detect, characterize, and respond to releases from LLNL activities; assess impacts; estimate dispersal patterns in the environment; characterize the pathways of exposure to members of the public; characterize the exposures and doses to individuals and to the population; and to evaluate the potential impacts to the biota in the vicinity of LLNL. Environmental monitoring also serves to demonstrate compliance with permits and other regulatory requirements. The Environmental Monitoring Plan (EMP) addresses the sample collection and analytical work supporting environmental monitoring to ensure the following: (1) A consistent system for collecting, assessing, and documenting environmental data of known and documented quality. (2) A validated and consistent approach for sampling and analysis of samples to ensure laboratory data meets program-specific needs and requirements within the framework of a performance-based approach for analytical laboratory work. (3) An integrated sampling approach to avoid duplicative data collection. Until its cancellation in January 2003, DOE Order 5400.1 required the preparation of an environmental monitoring plan. Neither DOE Order 450.1A nor the ISO 14001 standard are as prescriptive as DOE Order 5400.1, in that neither expressly requires an EMP. However, LLNL continues to prepare the EMP because it provides an organizational framework for ensuring that this work, which is integral to the implementation of LLNL's Environmental Management System, is conducted appropriately. Furthermore, the Environmental Monitoring Plan helps LLNL ensure compliance with DOE Order 5400.5, Radiation Protection of the Public and the Environment, and DOE Order 231.1 Change 2, Environment, Safety and Health Reporting, which require the publication of an annual report that characterizes the site's environmental management performance. To summarize, the general regulatory drivers for this environmental monitoring plan are ISO 14001, DOE Order 450.1A, DOE Order 5400.5, and DOE Order 231.1. The environmental monitoring addressed by this plan includes preoperational characterization and assessment, effluent and surveillance monitoring, and permit and regulatory compliance monitoring. Additional environmental monitoring is conducted at LLNL as part of compliance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA, also known as Superfund). LLNL coordinates its ground water surveillance monitoring program with the CERCLA monitoring program to gain sampling efficiencies. (See LLNL [1992] and LLNL [2008] for information about LLNL's CERCLA activities).

Gallegos, G M; Blake, R G; Bertoldo, N A; Campbell, C G; Coty, J; Folks, K; Grayson, A R; Jones, H E; Nelson, J C; Revelli, M A; Wegrecki, T; Williams, R A; Wilson, K

2010-01-27T23:59:59.000Z

366

NATIONAL EVALUATION OF THE WEATHERIZATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM DURING THE ARRA PERIOD: PROGRAM YEARS 2009-2011  

SciTech Connect

This report describes the third major evaluation of the Program, encompassing program years 2009 to 2011. In this report, this period of time is referred to as the ARRA Period. This is a special period of time for the Program because the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 has allocated $5 billion of funding for the Program. In normal program years, WAP s annual appropriation is in the range of $200-250 million, supporting the weatherization of approximately 100,000 homes. With the addition of ARRA funding during these program years, the expectation is that weatherization activity will exceed 300,000 homes per year. In addition to saving energy and reducing low-income energy bills, expanded WAP funding is expected to stimulate the economy by providing new jobs in the weatherization field and allowing low-income households to spend more money on goods and services by spending less on energy.

Tonn, Bruce Edward [ORNL; Rose, Erin M [ORNL; Schmoyer, Richard L [ORNL; Eisenberg, Joel Fred [ORNL; Ternes, Mark P [ORNL; Schweitzer, Martin [ORNL; Hendrick, Timothy P [ORNL

2012-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

367

GREEN UNIVERSITY COMMITTEE UNBC Green Strategy, Phase 1 (2009-2011)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

after nature ­ Develop a waste management system, including energy waste, that institutes meaningful waste disposal, ecosystem degradation, and climate change. As a result of the confluence of natural in general. CAMPUS SECTORS ENERGY · To maximize energy efficiencies of present UNBC energy systems ­ Conduct

Northern British Columbia, University of

368

Microsoft Word - FINAL DOE IRM Strategic Plan_2009-2011_090808...  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

... 10 Objective 3: Deploy a Corporate Asset Management system to identify and mitigate vulnerability in information systems, and maintain...

369

6ka_PanMonsoons , Liu et al., final revision, 09/05/2003 1 Global Monsoons in the mid-Holocene and Oceanic Feedback*  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

6ka_PanMonsoons , Liu et al., final revision, 09/05/2003 1 Global Monsoons in the mid., Madison, WI 53706; zliu3@wisc.edu #12;6ka_PanMonsoons , Liu et al., final revision, 09/05/2003 2 Abstract The response of the six major summer monsoon systems (the North American monsoon, the northern Africa monsoon

Wisconsin at Madison, University of

370

Portland General Electric Company Second Revision of Sheet No. 7-1 P.U.C. Oregon No. E-17 Canceling First Sheet No. 7-1  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Portland General Electric Company Second Revision of Sheet No. 7-1 P.U.C. Oregon No. E-17 Canceling on and after January 1, 2003 #12;Portland General Electric Company First Revision of Sheet No. 7-2 PWh in addition to Energy Charge Renewable Usage 0.800¢ per kWh in addition to Energy Charge Fixed Renewable $3

371

Selection of 3013 containers for field surveillance: LA-14310, Revision 1  

SciTech Connect

This document is the fifth in a series of reports that document the binning, statistical sampling, and sample selection of 3013 containers for field surveillance. 1,2,3,39 Revisions to binning assignments documented in this report are primarily a result of new prompt gamma data. This report also documents changes to the random sample specification resulting from these binning changes and identifies and provides the rationale for the engineering judgment sample items for Fiscal Year (FY) 2008 and 2009. This revision also updates the changes to the previous surveillance sample resulting from changes to the order that specific containers undergo surveillance. This report will continue to be reviewed regularly and revised as needed to meet the requirements of the surveillance program.

Peppers, Larry; Kelly, Elizabeth; McClard, James; Friday, Gary; Venetz, Theodore; Stakebake, Jerry

2009-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

372

PUB-3000 Chapter 10 | CONSTRUCTION SAFETY | REVISED 09/11  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Appendix A. Code of Safe Practices Appendix A. Code of Safe Practices Contents Approved by Aaron Zude Revised 09/11 A.1 Cranes A.1.1 Scope and Application A.1.2 Requirements A.1.3 ALL CRANES Used on LBNL Projects Must Meet the Following Minimum Criteria A.1.4 Critical Lift Requirements at LBNL A.1.5 High-Consequence/High-Value Lifts at LBNL A.1.6 Approval of High-Consequence/High-Value Lift Procedures A.1.7 High-Consequence/High-Value Lift Personnel A.2 Demolition A.2.1 Scope and Application A.2.2 Requirements A.2.3 Chutes A.2.4 Removal of Materials through Floor Openings A.2.5 Manual Removal of Floor A.2.6 Removal of Material with Equipment A.2.7 Storage of Materials A.2.8 Removal of Steel Construction A.2.9 Demolition Using Mechanical Equipment A.2.10 Training A.3 Electrical A.3.1 Scope and Application

373

Revised Industry Steam Generator Program Generic License Change Package  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

License Change Package for NRC review and endorsement. Industry events during the subsequent months have delayed the NRC review and presented an opportunity for the industry to improve the submittal. A summary of the major changes from the February submittal is provided in Enclosure 1. The resulting package (Enclosures 2 through 8), which supercedes the earlier version in its entirety, is enclosed for your endorsement. Although the events of the last ten months have resulted in some changes to the industry steam generator program guidance, the fundamental principles remain sound. Equally as important, the program has demonstrated its resiliency. The steam generator program guidance is designed to accommodate new knowledge and experience, and that is precisely what is occurring. The enclosed Generic License Change Package includes changes that reflect recent experience. In addition, the appropriate underlying technical documents are currently being revised or supplemental guidance is being developed as necessary to reflect new information. The industry and the NRC worked diligently to address the technical and licensing issues that ultimately resulted in the February 2000 version of the Steam Generator Program Generic License Change Package. Although these documents have been revised since the previous submittal, the differences do not represent a change in our position on the issues.

David J. Modeen; Mr. Samuel; J. Collins; U. S. Nuclear; Regulatory Commission; Xuo Mr; Samuel J. Collins

2000-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

374

Transuranic waste baseline inventory report. Revision No. 3  

SciTech Connect

The Transuranic Waste Baseline Inventory Report (TWBIR) establishes a methodology for grouping wastes of similar physical and chemical properties from across the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) transuranic (TRU) waste system into a series of {open_quotes}waste profiles{close_quotes} that can be used as the basis for waste form discussions with regulatory agencies. The purpose of Revisions 0 and 1 of this report was to provide data to be included in the Sandia National Laboratories/New Mexico (SNL/NM) performance assessment (PA) processes for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). Revision 2 of the document expanded the original purpose and was also intended to support the WIPP Land Withdrawal Act (LWA) requirement for providing the total DOE TRU waste inventory. The document included a chapter and an appendix that discussed the total DOE TRU waste inventory, including nondefense, commercial, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB)-contaminated, and buried (predominately pre-1970) TRU wastes that are not planned to be disposed of at WIPP.

NONE

1996-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

375

Program Plan for Revision of the Z-Area Saltstone Disposal Facility Performance Assessment  

SciTech Connect

Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) and the Saltstone Project, are embarking on the next revision to the Saltstone Disposal Facility (SDF) performance assessment (PA). This program plan has been prepared to outline the general approach, scope, schedule and resources for the PA revision. The plan briefly describes the task elements of the PA process. It discusses critical PA considerations in the development of conceptual models and interpretation of results. Applicable quality assurance (QA) requirements are identified and the methods for implementing QA for both software and documentation are described. The plan identifies project resources supporting the core team and providing project oversight. Program issues and risks are identified as well as mitigation of those risks. Finally, a preliminary program schedule has been developed and key deliverables identified. A number of significant changes have been implemented since the last PA revision resulting in a new design for future SDF disposal units. This revision will encompass the existing and planned disposal units, PA critical radionuclides and exposure pathways important to SDF performance. An integrated analysis of the overall facility layout, including all disposal units, will be performed to assess the impact of plume overlap on PA results. Finally, a rigorous treatment of uncertainty will be undertaken using probabilistic simulations. This analysis will be reviewed and approved by DOE-SR, DOE-HQ and potentially the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This revision will be completed and ready for the start of the DOE review at the end of December 2006. This work supports a Saltstone Vault 2 fee-bearing milestone. This milestone includes completion of the Vault 2 module of the PA revision by the end of FY06.

Cook, James R.

2005-12-07T23:59:59.000Z

376

Microsoft Word - CHAP02ESH _REVISED1_3.doc  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

-1 -1 CHAPTER 2 ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY AND HEALTH (revised September 25, 2003) WHAT ARE THE BASIC PRINCIPLES/OBJECTIVES OF THE DEPARTMENT'S ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY AND HEALTH (ES&H) PROGRAM? 1. Work is performed in a manner that protects workers, the public and the environment. 2. The Department holds contractors accountable for the safe performance of work. 3. ES&H functions and activities are an integral and visible part of contractors' business processes. WHY IS THE DEPARTMENT'S ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY AND HEALTH PROGRAM IMPORTANT? The Department has a responsibility to protect people, the environment, and property in the performance of the various missions under its contracts. Because of the sensitivity and potential liabilities associated

377

Steam Generator Management Program Administrative Procedures, Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Steam Generator Management Program (SGMP) developed many of the guidelines that implement NEI 97-06, Steam Generator Program Guidelines, including a 2001 document that defined and formalized the programmatic elements of SGMP itself. This revision of SGMP Administrative Procedures aligns SGMP with the May 2003 guideline NEI 03-08, which addressed several recent issues involving materials degradation. The revision defines how guidelines are to be revised and approved and presents the SGMP charter, whic...

2004-12-09T23:59:59.000Z

378

Program on Technology Innovation: Utility Requirements Document - Revision 9  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Revision 9 updates the Utility Requirements Document (URD) with a comprehensive set of detailed requirements for new light water reactor (LWR) designs. The revision is based on industry research and development (R&D) accomplished since the document's last revision. By providing plant designers with a thorough set of industry requirements, the URD allows designers to better understand utility expectations and provide compliant nuclear plant designs. Due to the large number of requirements and the need to ...

2008-02-25T23:59:59.000Z

379

JM to Revise DOE O 150.1, Continuity Programs  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The revision will bring DOE O 150.1 into compliance with mandatory Department of Homeland Security (DHS) directives published since the Order was issued in ...

2013-10-03T23:59:59.000Z

380

,"U.S. Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

ame","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","U.S. Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2011 ,"Release...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "2 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

,"U.S. Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

ame","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","U.S. Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2011 ,"Release...

382

,"U.S. Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","U.S. Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2011 ,"Release...

383

,"U.S. Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","U.S. Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2011 ,"Release...

384

EA-1679: Revision Sheet for Final Environmental Assessment |...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

EA-1679: Revision Sheet for Final Environmental Assessment Grand Coulee's Third Power plant 500-kV Transmission Line Replacement Project, Grant and Okanogon Counties,...

385

EIS-0218: Revised Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Record of Decision EIS-0218: Revised Record of Decision Proposed Nuclear Weapons Nonproliferation Policy Concerning Foreign Research Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel The Department of...

386

Revised March 10, 2010 Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Revised March 10, 2010 Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering Colorado State University 10, 2010 Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering Colorado State University (Circle one) ECE

387

A New Approach To Kimberlite Facies Terminology Using A Revised...  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Deposits- Descriptive To Genetic Jump to: navigation, search GEOTHERMAL ENERGYGeothermal Home Journal Article: A New Approach To Kimberlite Facies Terminology Using A Revised...

388

,"California Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","California Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2011...

389

,"California Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","California Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2011...

390

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 03-02, Revision to Occurrence...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

COORDINATORS CONTRACTOR PAAA COORDINATORS FROM: STEPHEN M. SOHINKI DIRECTOR OFFICE OF PRICE-ANDERSON ENFORCEMENT SUBJECT: Enforcement Guidance Supplement 03-02: Revision to...

391

NIST Issues Major Revision of Core Computer Security Guide ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... State-of-the-practice security controls and control enhancements have been integrated into the new revision to address the evolving technology ...

2013-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

392

Solar Position Algorithm for Solar Radiation Applications (Revised...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

Revised January 2008 * NRELTP-560-34302 Solar Position Algorithm for Solar Radiation Applications Ibrahim Reda and Afshin Andreas National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole...

393

,"Texas Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

,"Worksheet Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Texas Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2011...

394

,"Texas Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

,"Worksheet Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Texas Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2011...

395

,"U.S. Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","U.S. Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels)",1,"Annual",2011...

396

,"U.S. Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","U.S. Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels)",1,"Annual",2011...

397

,"New Mexico Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","New Mexico Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2011...

398

,"New Mexico Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","New Mexico Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2011...

399

Alternative approaches for promoting fertilizer use in africa, with particular reference to the role of fertilizer subsidies. Revised draft paper  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Why promote fertilizer use? Revised draft 1Table of Contents 1. Introduction................................................................................................................................. 1 2. Rationale for increased use of fertilizer in Africa....................................................................... 3 2.1 Structural transformation and the role of soil fertility.......................................................... 3 2.2 Soil fertility and fertilizer use in Africa................................................................................ 4

Eric W. Crawford; T. S. Jayne; Valerie A. Kelly

2005-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

400

Yakima Fisheries Project : Revised Draft Environmental Impact Statement.  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

BPA proposes to fund several fishery-related activities in the Yakima River Basin. The Yakima Fisheries Project (YFP), included in the Northwest Power Planning Council`s fish and wildlife program, would be jointly managed by the State of Washington and the Yakima Indian Nation. Fisheries resources in the Yakima River are severely reduced from historical levels and there is a significant potential for enhancement of these resources. BPA`s proposed action is to fund (1) information gathering on the implementation of supplementation techniques and on feasibility of reintroducing coho salmon in an environment where native populations have become extinct; (2) research activities based on continuous assessment, feedback and improvement of research design and activities ({open_quotes}adaptive management{close_quotes}); and (3) the construction, operation, and maintenance of facilities for supplementing populations of upper Yakima spring chinook salmon. The project has been considerably revised from the original proposal described in the first draft EIS. Examined in addition to No Action (which would leave present anadromous fisheries resources unchanged in the, Basin) are two alternatives for action: (1) supplementation of depressed natural populations of upper Yakima spring chinook and (2) that same supplementation plus a study to determine the feasibility of re-establishing (via stock imported from another basin) naturally spawning population and a significant fall fishery for coho in the Yakima Basin. Alternative 2 has been identified as the preferred action. Major issues examined in the Revised Draft EIS include potential impacts of the project on genetic and ecological resources of existing fish populations, on water quality and quantity, on threatened and endangered species listed under the Endangered Species Act, and on the recreational fishery.

United States. Bonneville Power Administration.

1995-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "2 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Google Doc projects 1.2: Exploring NCEP atmospheric reanalysis data GFD-1 Winter 2011 1 Feb 2011 to be revised frequently (stay tuned). We will load some ocean data and  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Google Doc projects 1.2: Exploring NCEP atmospheric reanalysis data GFD-1 Winter 2011 1 Feb 2011/calculating tools available), and write your findings as a `journal' in your Google Doc. Don't try to do everything

402

Special Analysis: Revision of Saltstone Vault 4 Disposal Limits (U)  

SciTech Connect

New disposal limits have been computed for Vault 4 of the Saltstone Disposal Facility based on several revisions to the models in the existing Performance Assessment and the Special Analysis issued in 2002. The most important changes are the use of a more rigorous groundwater flow and transport model, and consideration of radon emanation. Other revisions include refinement of the aquifer mesh to more accurately model the footprint of the vault, a new plutonium chemistry model accounting for the different transport properties of oxidation states III/IV and V/VI, use of variable infiltration rates to simulate degradation of the closure system, explicit calculation of gaseous releases and consideration of the effects of settlement and seismic activity on the vault structure. The disposal limits have been compared with the projected total inventory expected to be disposed in Vault 4. The resulting sum-of-fractions of the 1000-year disposal limits is 0.2, which indicates that the performance objectives and requirements of DOE 435.1 will not be exceeded. This SA has not altered the conceptual model (i.e., migration of radionuclides from the Saltstone waste form and Vault 4 to the environment via the processes of diffusion and advection) of the Saltstone PA (MMES 1992) nor has it altered the conclusions of the PA (i.e., disposal of the proposed waste in the SDF will meet DOE performance measures). Thus a PA revision is not required and this SA serves to update the disposal limits for Vault 4. In addition, projected doses have been calculated for comparison with the performance objectives laid out in 10 CFR 61. These doses are 0.05 mrem/year to a member of the public and 21.5 mrem/year to an inadvertent intruder in the resident scenario over a 10,000-year time-frame, which demonstrates that the 10 CFR 61 performance objectives will not be exceeded. This SA supplements the Saltstone PA and supersedes the two previous SAs (Cook et al. 2002; Cook and Kaplan 2003).

Cook, J

2005-05-26T23:59:59.000Z

403

Revision: October 2013 White Papers on Materials for  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Revision: October 2013 White Papers on Materials for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting, Wooni Choi, Muhammad N. Huda, Su-Huai Wei DOE PEC Working Group #12;Revision: October 2013 PEC White Papers: III-V Semiconductors for PEC III-V semiconductor systems for high-efficiency solar water

404

Computer Engineering Undergraduate Handbook Revised: April 1, 2010  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Computer Engineering Undergraduate Handbook Revised: April 1, 2010 BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN COMPUTER-278-5987 Fax: 657-278-5804 http://www.fullerton.edu/ecs/cpe #12;Computer Engineering Undergraduate Handbook Engineering Undergraduate Handbook Revised: April 1, 2010 TOC 1 COMPUTER ENGINEERING PROGRAM UNDERGRADUATE

de Lijser, Peter

405

Computer Engineering Undergraduate Handbook Revised: June 4, 2012  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Computer Engineering Undergraduate Handbook Revised: June 4, 2012 BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN COMPUTER-278-5987 Fax: 657-278-5804 http://www.fullerton.edu/ecs/cpe #12;Computer Engineering Undergraduate Handbook Engineering Undergraduate Handbook Revised: June 4, 2012 TOC 1 COMPUTER ENGINEERING PROGRAM UNDERGRADUATE

de Lijser, Peter

406

Revised 1997 Retail Electricity Price Forecast Principal Author: Ben Arikawa  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Revised 1997 Retail Electricity Price Forecast March 1998 Principal Author: Ben Arikawa Electricity Energy Commission until adopted at a public meeting. #12;Revised 1997 Retail Price Forecast, December ELECTRICITY PRICE FORECAST Introduction The Electricity Analysis Office of the California Energy Commission

407

Building America House Simulation Protocols (Revised)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

House House Simulation Protocols Robert Hendron and Cheryn Engebrecht National Renewable Energy Laboratory Revised October 2010 Prepared by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory For the U.S. Department of Energy Building Technologies Program ii NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process,

408

A Review of Criticality Accidents 2000 Revision  

SciTech Connect

Criticality accidents and the characteristics of prompt power excursions are discussed. Sixty accidental power excursions are reviewed. Sufficient detail is provided to enable the reader to understand the physical situation, the chemistry and material flow, and when available the administrative setting leading up to the time of the accident. Information on the power history, energy release, consequences, and causes are also included when available. For those accidents that occurred in process plants, two new sections have been included in this revision. The first is an analysis and summary of the physical and neutronic features of the chain reacting systems. The second is a compilation of observations and lessons learned. Excursions associated with large power reactors are not included in this report.

Thomas P. McLaughlin; Shean P. Monahan; Norman L. Pruvost; Vladimir V. Frolov; Boris G. Ryazanov; Victor I. Sviridov

2000-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

409

Energy Department Revises NEPA Regulations to Improve Efficiency |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revises NEPA Regulations to Improve Efficiency Revises NEPA Regulations to Improve Efficiency Energy Department Revises NEPA Regulations to Improve Efficiency October 3, 2011 - 12:39pm Addthis Washington, D.C. -- The U.S. Department of Energy will save time and money in its environmental reviews of many proposed energy projects under revised regulations approved September 27, 2011, to implement the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The revisions focus on the Department's categorical exclusion provisions, and reflect the first update to these provisions in 15 years. A categorical exclusion applies to a class of actions that an agency has determined normally do not individually or cumulatively have a significant impact on the human environment. "Updating our NEPA rule allows us to accomplish our environmental reviews

410

Established and Revised Federal Agency NEPA Procedures, 2000 - 2011  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

and Revised Federal Agency NEPA Procedures, 2000 - 2011 and Revised Federal Agency NEPA Procedures, 2000 - 2011 ` Established and Revised Federal Agency NEPA Procedures Last Updated on January 11, 2013 Department/Agency Action Title/Citation Federal Register Notice(s) 2000 Department of Health and Human Services Revised NEPA Procedures Revised General Administration Manual, HHS Part 30, Environmental Protection Published for comment on January 11, 1999 (64 Federal Register [FR] 1655). Published as final procedures on February 25, 2000 (65 FR 10229). Bureau of Reclamation Department of the Interior Notice of Availability of a Draft Agency Handbook on the National Environmental Policy Act Department Manual (DM) Part 516, Chapter 6: Managing the NEPA Process (Appendix 7) Published on April 20, 2000 (65 FR 21210) with

411

Microsoft Word - Creston-Bell Revision Sheet__final.docx  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revision Sheet for Final Environmental Assessment Revision Sheet for Final Environmental Assessment Creston-Bell Transmission Line Rebuild Project Department of Energy Bonneville Power Administration Revision Sheet DOE/EA-4406 Summary Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) released the Creston-Bell Transmission Line Rebuild Project Preliminary Environmental Assessment (EA) in April 2012 for public comment. BPA sent the Preliminary EA to agencies and interested parties. Notification that the EA was available and how to request a copy was sent to all others on the mailing list of potentially affected parties. BPA received six comments and responded to these comments in this revision sheet. This revision sheet documents the changes to be incorporated into the EA. The Preliminary EA, with the addition of these changes, constitutes the Final EA, which will not be reprinted.

412

Notice, Revised Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement - July 2013  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Notice, Revised Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement - Notice, Revised Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement - July 2013 Notice, Revised Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement - July 2013 August 29, 2013 - 4:19pm Addthis Notice, Revised Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement - July 2013 The "Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement, Standard Form 312" (SF 312) was revised in July 2013 by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) to conform with two new federal statutes: The Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Act (Public Law 112-74); and Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act (WPEA) (Public Law 112-199). The WPEA strengthens protections for federal employees who disclose evidence of waste, fraud, or abuse. The WPEA requires that each agreement

413

Status of Revisions to ASHRAE Standard 62  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

The American Society of Heating Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) Standard 62- 1989 "Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor air Quality", adopted in 1989, is widely used by HVAC engineers to determine ventilation rates for various occupancies. This standard has also been cited in court to help demonstrate compliance with state-of the- art indoor environmental design. In August 1996, ASHRAE released for public review Standard 62-1989R, the highly controversial proposed revisions to the Standard 62- 1989. Over 8,000 comments were received on the proposed revision. Due to the significant number of concerns expressed by ASHRAE members as well as others, ASHRAE withdrew the proposed new standard and placed the current standard in "continuous maintenance." As part of the continuous maintenance process ASHRAE is transforming the current Standard 62- 1989 from a design standard to code ready document. Furthermore, two code documents will be produced4ne for low-rise residential buildings and another for other types of occupancy. Finally, two new documents, a user's manual and an IAQ guideline, will be written concurrent with the code documents. The guideline document is intended to provide state-of-the-art guidance to designers while good IAQ practices not appropriate for codification will be incorporated into the guideline. It is likely that many of the provision in Standard 62-1989R will survive in some manner in one or more of the new documents to be produced. This paper will detail some of the more significant changes that were proposed in Standard 62-1989R and review the current state of standard development.

Gallo, F. M.

1998-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

414

Policy Flash 2013-38 Revised Merit Review Guide For Financial...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

3-38 Revised Merit Review Guide For Financial Assistance Policy Flash 2013-38 Revised Merit Review Guide For Financial Assistance Attached is Policy Flash 2013-38 Revised Merit...

415

New Mexico Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) New Mexico Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 952 491 490 1980's 734 1,012 1,013 753 517 1,487 491 650 613 2,914 1990's 491 1,043 898 1,377 956 551 1,115 1,868 1,882 864 2000's 684 1,244 2,239 1,941 1,771 2,269 1,203 2,431 2,657 1,708 2010's 1,833 2,229 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 8/1/2013 Next Release Date: 8/1/2014 Referring Pages: Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases New Mexico Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves Revision Decreases

416

Revised FINALREPORT NO. 2: INDEPENDENT CONFIRMATORY SURVEY SUMMARY AND RESULTS FOR THE ENRICO FERMI ATOMIC POWER PLANT, UNIT 1, NEWPORT, MICHIGAN (DOCKET NO. 50 16; RFTA 10-004) 2018-SR-02-1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant, Unit 1 (Fermi 1) was a fast breeder reactor design that was cooled by sodium and operated at essentially atmospheric pressure. On May 10, 1963, the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) granted an operating license, DPR-9, to the Power Reactor Development Company (PRDC), a consortium specifically formed to own and operate a nuclear reactor at the Fermi 1 site. The reactor was designed for a maximum capability of 430 megawatts (MW); however, the maximum reactor power with the first core loading (Core A) was 200 MW. The primary system was filled with sodium in December 1960 and criticality was achieved in August 1963. The reactor was tested at low power during the first couple years of operation. Power ascension testing above 1 MW commenced in December 1965 immediately following the receipt of a high-power operating license. In October 1966 during power ascension, zirconium plates at the bottom of the reactor vessel became loose and blocked sodium coolant flow to some fuel subassemblies. Two subassemblies started to melt and the reactor was manually shut down. No abnormal releases to the environment occurred. Forty-two months later after the cause had been determined, cleanup completed, and the fuel replaced, Fermi 1 was restarted. However, in November 1972, PRDC made the decision to decommission Fermi 1 as the core was approaching its burn-up limit. The fuel and blanket subassemblies were shipped off-site in 1973. Following that, the secondary sodium system was drained and sent off-site. The radioactive primary sodium was stored on-site in storage tanks and 55 gallon (gal) drums until it was shipped off-site in 1984. The initial decommissioning of Fermi 1 was completed in 1975. Effective January 23, 1976, DPR-9 was transferred to the Detroit Edison Company (DTE) as a 'possession only' license (DTE 2010a). This report details the confirmatory activities performed during the second Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) site visit to Fermi 1 in November 2010. The survey was strategically planned during a Unit 2 (Fermi 2) outage to take advantage of decreased radiation levels that were observed and attributed to Fermi 2 from the operating unit during the first site visit. However, during the second visit there were elevated radiation levels observed and attributed to the partially dismantled Fermi 1 reactor vessel and a waste storage box located on the 3rd floor of the Fermi 1 Turbine Building. Confirmatory surveys (unshielded) performed directly in the line of sight of these areas were affected. The objective of the confirmatory survey was to verify that the final radiological conditions were accurately and adequately described in Final Status Survey (FSS) documentation, relative to the established release criteria. This objective was achieved by performing document reviews, as well as independent measurements and sampling. Specifically, documentation of the planning, implementation, and results of the FSS were evaluated; side-by-side FSS measurement and source comparisons were performed; site areas were evaluated relative to appropriate FSS classification; and areas were assessed for residual, undocumented contamination.

Erika Bailey

2011-10-27T23:59:59.000Z

417

Policy Flash 2013-66 Revised Merit Review Guide for Financial...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6 Revised Merit Review Guide for Financial Assistance, JULY 2013 Policy Flash 2013-66 Revised Merit Review Guide for Financial Assistance, JULY 2013 Questions concerning this...

418

EIS-0286: EPA Notice of Availability of the Revised Draft Environmenta...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revised Draft Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0286: EPA Notice of Availability of the Revised Draft Environmental Impact Statement Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous)...

419

Appendix C Impact of Revisions on Major Series, 2012-2013  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

C Impact of Revisions on Major Series, 2012-2013" "(Thousands of Barrels per Day Except Where Noted)" "This table contains information on revisions to published statistics. The...

420

B3.12 Microbiological and Biomedical Facilities Revision 0 Sitewide Categorical Exclusion for  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

2 Microbiological and Biomedical Facilities Revision 0 2 Microbiological and Biomedical Facilities Revision 0 Sitewide Categorical Exclusion for Siting, Construction, Operation and Decommissioning of Microbiological and Biomedical Facilities Introduction As defined in the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Richland Operations Office Integrated Management System Procedure, NEPA Analysis at Hanford, a sitewide categorical exclusion is: An application of DOE categorical exclusions described in 10 CFR 1021, Appendices A and B, which may apply to Hanford Site proposed actions (activities) that are "sitewide" in nature and extent, which the cognizant DOE Hanford 1~CO has determined fit within the scope (i.e., same nature and intent, and of the same or lesser scope) of DOE categorical exclusions described in 10

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "2 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Consumer price index revision electricity workbook  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Since electricity is considered one of the more difficult ELIs to price, the Revision Electricity Workbook has been developed to serve as a reference for Economic Assistants when pricing and initiating electricity quotes. As there are relatively few outlets available, (typically one per PSU), and electricity is published for each publication area, any error made when pricing electricity can seriously impact the CPI. To best utilize this workbook, read through it entirely and review the examples found in Section IV. The `Industry Overview` and `Electricity Sampling` sections provide background information that may be useful when interacting with the respondent. The `Specifications Review` section contains detailed descriptions of the checklist specifications as well as examples of how to correctly complete certain specification elements. Examples of how to handle rate schedules, complicated tax structures, refunds, etc., are grouped together in Section IV. The `Initiation` section provides procedural guidelines which must be used during initiation. The final section in the workbook outlines the procedures to be used when pricing CPI/PPI Overlap outlets (companies which participate in both the CPI and PPI surveys). As stated above, this workbook is to be used as a reference guide. If a situation arises that is not covered in this workbook, please contact your regional office for assistance.

NONE

1997-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

422

NRC comprehensive records disposition schedule. Revision 3  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Title 44 US Code, ``Public Printing and Documents,`` regulations issued by the General Service Administration (GSA) in 41 CFR Chapter 101, Subchapter B, ``Management and Use of Information and Records,`` and regulations issued by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) in 36 CFR Chapter 12, Subchapter B, ``Records Management,`` require each agency to prepare and issue a comprehensive records disposition schedule that contains the NARA approved records disposition schedules for records unique to the agency and contains the NARA`s General Records Schedules for records common to several or all agencies. The approved records disposition schedules specify the appropriate duration of retention and the final disposition for records created or maintained by the NRC. NUREG-0910, Rev. 3, contains ``NRC`s Comprehensive Records Disposition Schedule,`` and the original authorized approved citation numbers issued by NARA. Rev. 3 incorporates NARA approved changes and additions to the NRC schedules that have been implemented since the last revision dated March, 1992, reflects recent organizational changes implemented at the NRC, and includes the latest version of NARA`s General Records Schedule (dated August 1995).

NONE

1998-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

423

Chemistry and Materials Science progress report, FY 1994. Revision 2  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Thrust areas of the weapons-supporting research include surface science, fundamentals of the physics and processing of metals, energetic materials, etc. The laboratory directed R and D include director`s initiatives, individual projects, and transactinium science studies.

NONE

1996-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

424

Medical and Biohazardous Waste Generator's Guide (Revision 2)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

as radioactive, mixed, or hazardous waste, depending on theas radioactive, mixed, or chemical waste, depending on the

Waste Management Group

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

425

Medical and Biohazardous Waste Generator's Guide (Revision 2)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Biohazardous Waste Training Medical/Biohazardous WasteInspections 7. Forms and Supplies Medical Waste AccumulationLog Ordering Medical Waste Supplies 8. Solid Medical Waste

Waste Management Group

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

426

Tank farm health and safety plan. Revision 2  

SciTech Connect

This Tank Farm Health and Safety Plan (HASP) for the conduct of all operations and work activities at the Hanford Site 200 Area Tank Farms is provided in order to minimize health and safety risks to workers and other onsite personnel. The HASP accomplishes this objective by establishing requirements, providing general guidelines, and conveying farm and facility-specific hazard communication information. The HASP, in conjunction with the job-specific information required by the HASP, is provided also as a reference for use during the planning of work activities at the tank farms. This HASP applies to Westinghouse Hanford Company (WHC), other prime contractors to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), and subcontractors to WHC who may be involved in tank farm work activities. This plan is intended to be both a requirements document and a useful reference to aid tank farm workers in understanding the safety and health issues that are encountered in routine and nonroutine work activities. The HASP defines the health and safety responsibilities of personnel working at the tank farms. It has been prepared in recognition of and is consistent with National Institute of Safety and Health (NIOSH), and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)/Unlimited State Coast Guard (USCG)/U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Occupational Safety and Health Guidance Manual for Hazardous Waste Site Activities (NIOSH 1985); WHC-CM-4-3, Industrial Safety Manual, Volume 4, {open_quotes}Health and Safety Programs for Hazardous Waste Operations;{close_quotes} 29 CFR 1910.120, Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response; WHC-CM-1-1, Management Policies; and WHC-CM-1-3, Management Requirements and Procedures. When differences in governing regulations or policies exist, the more stringent requirements shall apply until the discrepancy can be resolved.

Mickle, G.D.

1995-03-29T23:59:59.000Z

427

Medical and Biohazardous Waste Generator's Guide (Revision 2)  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Home LBNL A-Z Index LBNL Search LBNL Phone Book Privacy & SecurityHome LBNL A-Z Index LBNL Search LBNL Phone Book Privacy & SecurityHome LBNL A-Z Index LBNL Search LBNL Phone Book Privacy & Security

Waste Management Group

2006-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

428

NIST SP 800-61 Revision 2, Computer Security Incident ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... those caused by natural disasters, power failures ... are reflected in response operations. ... addition, following standardized responses should minimize ...

2013-08-29T23:59:59.000Z

429

Tank 241-C-103 tank characterization plan. Revision 2  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document is a plan that identifies the information needed to address relevant issues concerning short-term and long-term safe storage and long-term management of Single-Shell Tank (SST) 241-C-103.

Homi, C.S.

1995-10-04T23:59:59.000Z

430

Investigation-Derived Waste Management Plan. Revision 2  

SciTech Connect

SRS has implemented a comprehensive environmental program to maintain compliance with environmental regulations and mitigate impacts to the environment. One element of the environmental program is the investigation of inactive waste units. Environmental Investigation-Derived Waste (IDW). IDW may include purge water , soil cuttings, drilling fluids, well pumping test and development water, decontamination solutions, contaminated equipment, and personal protection equipment (PPE). In cases where investigations confirm the presence of contamination and the IDW contains waste constituents in concentrations high enough to be of environmental or health concern, special management procedures are warranted. This IDW Management Plan describes specific SRS initiatives for IDW management. The goal is the development of a plan for prudent management of IDW from environmental investigations that is protective of human health and the environment.

Molen, G.

1995-05-24T23:59:59.000Z

431

Environmental restoration and decontamination & decommissioning safety documentation. Revision 2  

SciTech Connect

This document presents recommendations of a working group designated by the Environmental Restoration and Remediation (ER) and Decontamination and Decommissioning (D&D) subcommittees of the Westinghouse M&O (Management and Operation) Nuclear Facility Safety Committee. A commonalty of approach to safety documentation specific to ER and D&D activities was developed and is summarized below. Allowance for interpretative tolerance and documentation flexibility appropriate to the activity, graded for hazard category, duration, and complexity, was a primary consideration in development of this guidance.

Hansen, J.L. [Westinghouse Savannah River Co., Aiken, SC (United States); Frauenholz, L.H. [Westinghouse Idaho Nuclear Co., Inc. (United States); Kerr, N.R. [Westinghouse Hanford Co., Richland, WA (United States)

1993-05-18T23:59:59.000Z

432

Tank waste remediation system integrated technology plan. Revision 2  

SciTech Connect

The Hanford Site, located in southeastern Washington State, is operated by the US Department of Energy (DOE) and its contractors. Starting in 1943, Hanford supported fabrication of reactor fuel elements, operation of production reactors, processing of irradiated fuel to separate and extract plutonium and uranium, and preparation of plutonium metal. Processes used to recover plutonium and uranium from irradiated fuel and to recover radionuclides from tank waste, plus miscellaneous sources resulted in the legacy of approximately 227,000 m{sup 3} (60 million gallons) of high-level radioactive waste, currently in storage. This waste is currently stored in 177 large underground storage tanks, 28 of which have two steel walls and are called double-shell tanks (DSTs) an 149 of which are called single-shell tanks (SSTs). Much of the high-heat-emitting nuclides (strontium-90 and cesium-137) has been extracted from the tank waste, converted to solid, and placed in capsules, most of which are stored onsite in water-filled basins. DOE established the Tank Waste Remediation System (TWRS) program in 1991. The TWRS program mission is to store, treat, immobilize and dispose, or prepare for disposal, the Hanford tank waste in an environmentally sound, safe, and cost-effective manner. Technology will need to be developed or improved to meet the TWRS program mission. The Integrated Technology Plan (ITP) is the high-level consensus plan that documents all TWRS technology activities for the life of the program.

Eaton, B.; Ignatov, A.; Johnson, S.; Mann, M.; Morasch, L.; Ortiz, S.; Novak, P. [eds.] [Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (United States)

1995-02-28T23:59:59.000Z

433

Molded Case Circuit Breaker Application and Maintenance Guide: Revision 2  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Molded case circuit breakers (MCCBs) provide power and circuit protection in nuclear plant electrical distribution systems. Their proper operation is essential to the safe and reliable operation of such systems. This guide applies to both nuclear and non-nuclear power generating facilities and can help improve the maintenance and reliability of MCCBs.

2004-12-22T23:59:59.000Z

434

USABC electric vehicle Battery Test Procedures Manual. Revision 2  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This manual summarizes the procedural information needed to perform the battery testing being sponsored by the United States Advanced Battery Consortium (USABC). This information provides the structure and standards to be used by all testing organizations, including the USABC developers, national laboratories, or other relevant test facilities.

NONE

1996-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

435

July 22, 2002, Department letter enclosing Revision 2 of the...  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

of Rocky Flats Ash for disposition to WIPP, 301 Magnesium hydroxide precipitation process started in 900 and oxalate precipitation in 801 Completed metals stabilization and...

436

Microsoft Word - ARRA INVESTMENT RELEASE REVISED FINAL Aug 2  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

- California Nevada National Security Site (Nevada Test Site) - Nevada Nuclear Radiation Development, LLC - New York Three additional sites are expected to be cleaned of...

437

Resource directory of DOE information organizations. Revision 2  

SciTech Connect

This Directory, the 1985 update of DOE/TIC-4616, is a guide to 199 information components of the Department of Energy (DOE) and is arranged by organization. When applicable, individual offices are listed hierarchically. Organization and personal name indexes are included.

Jared, M.W. (ed.)

1985-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

438

Safety analysis report for the Waste Storage Facility. Revision 2  

SciTech Connect

This safety analysis report outlines the safety concerns associated with the Waste Storage Facility located in the Radioactive Waste Management Complex at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory. The three main objectives of the report are: define and document a safety basis for the Waste Storage Facility activities; demonstrate how the activities will be carried out to adequately protect the workers, public, and environment; and provide a basis for review and acceptance of the identified risk that the managers, operators, and owners will assume.

Bengston, S.J.

1994-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

439

Revised 2-14-2013 Date ____/_____/___ Participant Number ________________________  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

________________________________________ Age _________ Height ___________ Weight __________ Last name First name Middle initial Date of Birth ____________________________________________ Telephone (home) (_____) _____-________ City ____________________________________________ Telephone (work-ray _________________________ _____/_____/_____ ____________________________ Ultrasound _________________________ _____/_____/_____ ____________________________ Nuclear Medicine

440

NIST SP 800-61 Revision 2, Computer Security Incident ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... laptop, loaded with appropriate software (eg, packet sniffers, digital forensics ... 22 The National Software Reference Library (NSRL) Project maintains ...

2012-08-06T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "2 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Nondestructive Evaluation: Buried Pipe NDE Reference Guide--Revision 2  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

The infrastructure of todays fleet of nuclear power plants has been in place for several decades. Aging mechanisms have had time to potentially challenge the structural and leakage integrity of systems, structures, and components, such as buried piping and tanks. Instances of inadvertent release of fluid containing small amounts of radioactive effluents into the surrounding soil have resulted. Although it is ...

2012-12-12T23:59:59.000Z

442

BioFacts: Fueling a stronger economy, Biodiesel. Revision 2  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Biodiesel is a substitute for or an additive to diesel fuel that is derived from the oils and fats of plants. It is an alternative fuel that can be used in diesel engines and provides power similar to conventional diesel fuel. It is a biodegradable transportation fuel that contributes little, if any, net carbon dioxide or sulfur to the atmosphere, and is low in particulate emission. It is a renewable, domestically produced liquid fuel that can help reduce US dependence on foreign oil imports. This overview presents the resource potential, history, processing techniques, US DOE programs cost and utilization potential of biodiesel fuels.

NONE

1995-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

443

NE-20 ACTION: SSDP Project Charter Revision CONCURRENCES RTG SYMBOL  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

0 0 ACTION: SSDP Project Charter Revision CONCURRENCES RTG SYMBOL James W. Vaughan, Jr. N-923 Acting Assistant Secretary . for Nuclear Energy Murphi Attached for your signature is a revised Project Charter for the 1/ 86 Shippingport Station Decommissioning Project (SSDP). Since our original M determination in July that there was a need to revise the SSDP Charter, we N K23 have been in discussion with the Richland Operations Field Office (RL). INe Significant differences in management philosophy surfaced between RL and DeLaney Headquarters that required discussions up to and including the RL Manager DAE/86 and myself. I now feel that the revised Charter reflects a mutually acceptable working arrangement between the appropriate organizations. The RTGSYMBOL general roles and responsibilities defined in this Charter will facilitate

444

IAEA Information Circular 225 Revision 5: Fact Sheet | National Nuclear  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

IAEA Information Circular 225 Revision 5: Fact Sheet | National Nuclear IAEA Information Circular 225 Revision 5: Fact Sheet | National Nuclear Security Administration Our Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing Proliferation Powering the Nuclear Navy Emergency Response Recapitalizing Our Infrastructure Continuing Management Reform Countering Nuclear Terrorism About Us Our Programs Our History Who We Are Our Leadership Our Locations Budget Our Operations Media Room Congressional Testimony Fact Sheets Newsletters Press Releases Speeches Events Social Media Video Gallery Photo Gallery NNSA Archive Federal Employment Apply for Our Jobs Our Jobs Working at NNSA Blog Home > Media Room > Fact Sheets > IAEA Information Circular 225 Revision 5: Fact Sheet Fact Sheet IAEA Information Circular 225 Revision 5: Fact Sheet Mar 23, 2012 The Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration

445

EIS-0183: Revised Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revised Record of Decision Revised Record of Decision EIS-0183: Revised Record of Decision Electrical Interconnection of the Summit/Westward Project The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) has decided to amend its July 25, 2003, Record of Decision (ROD) regarding the proposed Summit/Westward Project (Project) to offer contract terms for an optional interconnection of this Project into the Federal Columbia River Transmission System (FCRTS). Under this optional interconnection plan, BPA would integrate electric power from the Project into the FCRTS at a point adjacent to Clatskanie People's Utility District (CPUD) existing Wauna Substation. DOE/EIS-0183, Bonneville Power Administration, Revised Record of Decision for the Electrical Interconnection of the Summit/Westward Project (October

446

EIS-0183: Revised Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revised Record of Decision Revised Record of Decision EIS-0183: Revised Record of Decision Offer of Conditional Commitment for a Loan Guarantee for, and Electrical Interconnection of, the Shepherds Flat Wind Project; Bonneville Power Administration The U.S. Department of Energy announces its decisions to provide a conditional loan guarantee for, and interconnection to the Federal Columbia River Transmission River (FCRTS) of, the 846-megawatt (MW) Shepherds. DOE/EIS-0183, Revised Record of Decision for Offer of Conditional Commitment for a Loan Guarantee for, and Electrical Interconnection of, the Shepherds Flat Wind Project; Bonneville Power Administration, (October 2010) More Documents & Publications EIS-0183: DOE Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision EIS-0183: DOE Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision

447

SUMMARY OF REVISED TORNADO, HURRICANE AND EXTREME STRAIGHT WIND...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

@ E A R T H L I N K . N E T SUMMARY OF REVISED TORNADO, HURRICANE AND EXTREME STRAIGHT WIND CHARACTERISTICS AT NUCLEAR FACILITY SITES Categorization of Natural Hazard Phenomenon...

448

Microsoft Word - TLVT Manual Revision 1 _122012_ - Final.doc  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

INL-EXT-12-27920 U.S. Department of Energy Vehicle Technologies Program Battery Technology Life Verification Test Manual Revision 1 DECEMBER 2012 The Idaho National Laboratory is...

449

Questions and answers based on revised 10 CFR Part 20  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

NUREG/CR-6204 is a collection of questions and answers that were originally issued in seven sets and which pertain to revised 10 CFR Part 20. The questions came from both outside and within the NRC. The answers were compiled and provided by NRC staff within the offices of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, Nuclear Regulatory Research, the Office of State Programs, and the five regional offices. Although all of the questions and answers have been reviewed by attorneys in the NRC Office of the General Counsel, they do not constitute official legal interpretations relevant to revised 10 CFR Part 20. The questions and answers do, however, reflect NRC staff decisions and technical options on aspects of the revised 10 CFR Part 20 regulatory requirements. This NUREG is being made available to encourage communication among the public, industry, and NRC staff concerning the major revisions of the NRC`s standards for protection against radiation.

Borges, T.; Stafford, R.S.; Lu, P.Y. [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States); Carter, D. [Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC (United States)

1994-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

450

Use a Vent Condenser to Recover Flash Steam Energy (Revised)  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This revised ITP tip sheet on vent condenser to recover flash steam energy provides how-to advice for improving industrial steam systems using low-cost, proven practices and technologies.

Not Available

2006-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

451

A Revised Catalog of Available X.500 Implementations  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This document is the result of a survey that gathered new or updated descriptions of currently available implementations of X.500, including commercial products and openly available offerings. This document is a revision of RFC 1292. We contacted each ...

A. Getchell; S. Sataluri

1994-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

452

Notice of Revised Scope for the Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

8:45 am BILLING CODE 4000-01-P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Notice of Revised Scope for the Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement,...

453

Geothermal grant program for local governments: revised grant application manual  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

This revised grant application manual describes the kinds of activities eligible for geothermal grants, who may apply, and how to apply. It also describes the criteria and procedures the California Energy Commission will use in selecting proposals for grant awards.

Not Available

1983-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

454

Condensate Polishing Guidelines for PWR and BWR Plants -- 1997 Revision  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Successful condensate polishing operations maintain control of ionic and particulate impurity transport to the PWR steam generator and the BWR reactor and recirculation system. This report presents revisions of EPRI's 1993 nuclear industry consensus guidelines for the design and operation of deep bed and filter demineralizer condensate polishers. This advice is consistent with the 1996 revisions of EPRI's BWR Water Chemistry Guidelines (TR-103515-R1) and PWR Secondary Water Chemistry Guidelines (TR-10213...

1997-10-31T23:59:59.000Z

455

Fuel Reliability Guidelines: Fuel Surveillance and Inspection, Revision 1  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

This Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) report presents revised guidance for performing nuclear fuel assessments and inspections. The revision provides technical guidance on the scope and frequency of fuel performance assessments and inspections to support the industry goal of zero fuel failures and performance issues. To help achieve this goal, both failed and healthy fuel must be inspected. Such inspections advance the understanding of fuel failure mechanisms and unit-specific fuel margins, leadi...

2012-03-30T23:59:59.000Z

456

JM to Revise DOE O 320.1, Acquiring and Positioning Human Resources  

Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

The revision clarifies provisions in regulations and assists in the administration of human capital programs.

2011-09-15T23:59:59.000Z

457

Microsoft Word - 2013-07-11_ESF Mission Report_Revision 0  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

RP-2013-00303 RP-2013-00303 EPA/600/R-13/135 Revision 0 REPORT OF THE UNITED STATES EMBASSY SCIENCE FELLOWS SUPPORT TO THE GOVERNMENT OF JAPAN - MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT OBSERVATIONS AND COMMENTARY ON REMEDIATION OF THE LANDS OFF-SITE FROM THE FUKUSHIMA DAIICHI REACTORS Mission dates: 4 February - 29 March 2013 JULY 2013 REPORT APPROVED for Release for Unlimited (Release to Public) SRNL-RP-2013-00303 EPA/600/R-13/135 Revision 0 Page 2 of 133 DISCLAIMERS This work was prepared under an agreement with and funded by the U.S. Government. Neither the U.S. Government or its employees, nor any of its contractors, subcontractors or their employees, makes any express or implied:

458

December 20, 2005, Department letter forwarding the revised version of the  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

December 20, 2005 December 20, 2005 The Honorable A. J. Eggenberger Chairman Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board 625 Indiana Ave, Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20004 Dear Mr. Chairman: This letter transmits to you a revised version of the Department of Energy’s draft Manual DOE M 450.4-X, Integrated Safety Management System Manual. This revised version represents a significant improvement over the November 2, 2005 version previously provided to your staff. This improvement occurred by addressing internal DOE comments on the Manual. The Department has also addressed various informal comments provided by your staff. The Department remains interested in the Board’s comments on this Manual. Please forward any comments regarding this draft document by January 18, 2006. If you have any questions, please contact me at (202) 586-3887.

459

Solar PV Project Financing: Regulatory and Legislative Challenges for Third-Party PPA System Owners (Revised)  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

23 23 Revised February 2010 Solar PV Project Financing: Regulatory and Legislative Challenges for Third-Party PPA System Owners Katharine Kollins Duke University Bethany Speer and Karlynn Cory National Renewable Energy Laboratory National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 303-275-3000 * www.nrel.gov NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC Contract No. DE-AC36-08-GO28308 Technical Report NREL/TP-6A2-46723 Revised February 2010 Solar PV Project Financing: Regulatory and Legislative Challenges for Third-Party PPA System Owners Katharine Kollins Duke University Bethany Speer and Karlynn Cory

460

ADDENDUM: CHANGES TO REVISED COGENERATION PROJECT COMPENSATORY MITIGATION PLAN  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

changes requested at that meeting are discussed here under five topics and presented in the order that they are presented in the Plan. 1. East Restoration Area The wetland planned for restoration in the East Restoration Area will now be expanded to total 0.5 acre in size. As discussed in Section 4.6, the Plan had only intended to restore the 0.2 acre of existing wetland area within the East Restoration Area. Figure 3 Restoration Areas Plan Topography and Plant Community Distribution has been revised to demonstrate the change. As previously, post-mitigation topography of the East Restoration Area will direct most surface and subsurface runoff to the wetland area. A portion of this water will travel directly from the upland area to be re-created within the Restoration Area. The remaining moisture will enter the wetland as surface water diverted to the seasonally inundated wetland area from a ditch that will be installed along the south edge of the East Restoration Area. As explained in the Plan, the surface water delivery will be designed to minimize intra-seasonal water level fluctuation and prevent flooding.

unknown authors

2003-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "2 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Memorandum: Revised Guidance for the Office of Environmental Management  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revised Guidance for the Office of Environmental Revised Guidance for the Office of Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards Memorandum: Revised Guidance for the Office of Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards From: Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson (EM-1) To: SSAB Members (J. Bierer, T. Martin, M. Wilson, P. Claire, J. Brannon, D. Mosby, B. Tanner, V. Holm, W. Waters) The purpose of this memorandum is to provide guidance and direction for restructuring and managing the Environmental Management (EM) Site Specific Advisory Boards procurement mechanisms that support activities of the Boards. Roberson Memorandum - July 7, 2003 More Documents & Publications Letter: Implementation of the Guidance for the Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards Letter from EM-1, Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson regarding

462

EIS-0226: Revised Draft Environmental Impact Statement | Department of  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

6: Revised Draft Environmental Impact Statement 6: Revised Draft Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0226: Revised Draft Environmental Impact Statement Decommissioning and/or Long-Term Stewardship at the West Valley Demonstration Project and Western New York Nuclear Service Center This EIS has been prepared in accordance with NEPA and SEQR to examine the potential environmental impacts of the range of reasonable alternatives to decommission and/or maintain long-term stewardship at WNYNSC. The alternatives analyzed in this Draft EIS include the Sitewide Removal Alternative, the Sitewide Close-In-Place Alternative, the Phased Decisionmaking Alternative (Preferred Alternative), and the No Action Alternative. The analysis and information contained in this EIS is intended to assist DOE and NYSERDA with the consideration of environmental impacts

463

Rebuilding After Disaster: Going Green from the Ground Up (Revised)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

After Disaster: Going Green from the Ground Up (Revised) After Disaster: Going Green from the Ground Up (Revised) (Brochure), U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) Rebuilding After Disaster: Going Green from the Ground Up (Revised) (Brochure), U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) 20-page "how-to" guide describing ways to turn a disaster into an opportunity to rebuild with greener energy technologies. It covers such topics as the importance of energy, options for communities, instructions for developing an energy plan, and other considerations. This guide is intended for the community leaders who have experienced a disaster. 45136.pdf More Documents & Publications From Tragedy to Triumph - Rebuilding Green Buildings after Disaster, EERE

464

Greensburg, Kansas: A Better, Greener Place to Live (Revised) (Brochure) |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Greensburg, Kansas: A Better, Greener Place to Live (Revised) Greensburg, Kansas: A Better, Greener Place to Live (Revised) (Brochure) Greensburg, Kansas: A Better, Greener Place to Live (Revised) (Brochure) Content includes EERE subject matter and mentions DOE's role in rebuilding. The layout is designed to be used as a template for other cities in similar situations. 45086.pdf More Documents & Publications NREL Helps Greensburg Set the Model for Green Communities (Fact Sheet), Innovation: The Spectrum of Clean Energy Innovation, NREL (National Renewable Energy Laboratory) A Tale of Two Cities: Greensburg Rebuilds as a National Model for Green Communities (Fact Sheet), Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) Greensburg, Kansas: Building a Model Green Community, How Would You Rebuild a Town - Green? April 2009 (Brochure)

465

Greensburg, Kansas: A Better, Greener Place to Live (Revised) (Brochure) |  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Greensburg, Kansas: A Better, Greener Place to Live (Revised) Greensburg, Kansas: A Better, Greener Place to Live (Revised) (Brochure) Greensburg, Kansas: A Better, Greener Place to Live (Revised) (Brochure) Content includes EERE subject matter and mentions DOE's role in rebuilding. The layout is designed to be used as a template for other cities in similar situations. 45086.pdf More Documents & Publications A Tale of Two Cities: Greensburg Rebuilds as a National Model for Green Communities (Fact Sheet), Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) NREL Helps Greensburg Set the Model for Green Communities (Fact Sheet), Innovation: The Spectrum of Clean Energy Innovation, NREL (National Renewable Energy Laboratory) Greensburg, Kansas: Building a Model Green Community, How Would You Rebuild a Town - Green? April 2009 (Brochure)

466

Revision to DOE Order 435.1 | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Program Management » Compliance » Revision to DOE Program Management » Compliance » Revision to DOE Order 435.1 Revision to DOE Order 435.1 The Office of Environmental Management has primary responsibility, within DOE, for DOE Order 435.1, the self-regulation of radioactive waste management. As part of this responsibility, EM has decided to update the Order to incorporate several changes to the regulatory process that have taken place over the last decade as well as streamline the Order to improve management of the waste. A comprehensive complex-wide review of DOE radioactive waste management activities associated with implementation of the requirements of DOE Order 435.1, Radioactive Waste Management, was conducted in 2010 in order to gather feedback on the effectiveness of the DOE Order 435.1 requirements (not to assess compliance with the

467

Test Procedure Development and Revision | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Test Procedure Development and Revision Test Procedure Development and Revision Test Procedure Development and Revision Most energy conservation standards rulemakings are accompanied by a concurrent test procedure rulemaking. Test procedures detail the protocols that manufacturers must follow when testing their products for compliance with Department of Energy (DOE) standards. DOE also uses the test procedures to determine compliance with the applicable standards in any verification or enforcement testing. The procedures specify how to measure and calculate the energy efficiency and/or energy use of each appliance. Test procedures also specify how to calculate an estimate of an appliance's annual operating cost, which is used on the EnergyGuide label as required by the Federal Trade Commission.

468

Rebuilding After Disaster: Going Green from the Ground Up (Revised)  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Rebuilding After Disaster: Going Green from the Ground Up (Revised) Rebuilding After Disaster: Going Green from the Ground Up (Revised) (Brochure), U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) Rebuilding After Disaster: Going Green from the Ground Up (Revised) (Brochure), U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) 20-page "how-to" guide describing ways to turn a disaster into an opportunity to rebuild with greener energy technologies. It covers such topics as the importance of energy, options for communities, instructions for developing an energy plan, and other considerations. This guide is intended for the community leaders who have experienced a disaster. 45136.pdf More Documents & Publications Greensburg Webinars Q&A From Tragedy to Triumph - Rebuilding Green Buildings after Disaster, EERE

469

EIS-0218: Revised Record of Decision | Department of Energy  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Revision of the Record of Decision for a Nuclear Weapons Nonproliferation Revision of the Record of Decision for a Nuclear Weapons Nonproliferation Policy Concerning Foreign Research Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel DOE has decided to extend the FRR SNF Acceptance Policy for an additional 10 years beyond its current expiration until May 12, 2016, for irradiation of eligible fuel, and until May 12, 2019, for fuel acceptance. DOE has also decided to include the Australian RRR as a reactor eligible to participate in the acceptance program. For the small amount of RRR fuel that would be added to 1996 estimates, DOE will continue limitations on shipment cask curie activity and will ensure that the upper limit estimate for the source term assumed in the FRR SNF EIS accident analysis will not be exceeded. EIS-0218-RevisedROD-2004.pdf More Documents & Publications

470

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 2: PAYROLL AND PAY ADMINISTRATION...  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

More Documents & Publications ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 2: PAYROLL AND PAY ADMINISTRATION RECORDS-Revision 2 Financial Management Handbook Handbook on Overseas Assignments...

471

Single-shell tank closure work plan. Revision A  

SciTech Connect

In January 1994, the Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Conset Order (Tri-Party Agreement) was amended to reflect a revised strategy for remediation of radioactive waste in underground storage tanks. These amendments include milestones for closure of the single-shell tank (SST) operable units, to be initiated by March 2012 and completed by September 2024. This SST-CWP has been prepared to address the principal topical areas identified in Tri-Party Agreement Milestone M-45-06 (i.e., regulatory pathway, operable unit characterization, waste retrieval, technology development, and a strategy for achieving closure). Chapter 2.0 of this SST-CWP provides a brief description of the environmental setting, SST System, the origin and characteristics of SST waste, and ancillary equipment that will be remediated as part of SST operable unit closure. Appendix 2A provides a description of the hydrogeology of the Hanford Site, including information on the unsaturated sediments (vadose zone) beneath the 200 Areas Plateau. Chapter 3.0 provides a discussion of the laws and regulations applicable to closure of the SST farm operable units. Chapter 4.0 provides a summary description of the ongoing characterization activities that best align with the proposed regulatory pathway for closure. Chapter 5.0 describes aspects of the SST waste retrieval program, including retrieval strategy, technology, and sequence, potential tank leakage during retrieval, and considerations of deployment of subsurface barriers. Chapter 6.0 outlines a proposed strategy for closure. Chapter 7.0 provides a summary of the programs underway or planned to develop technologies to support closure. Ca. 325 refs.

NONE

1995-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

472

Revisions to the hydrogen gas generation computer model  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Waste Management Technology has requested SRTC to maintain and extend a previously developed computer model, TRUGAS, which calculates hydrogen gas concentrations within the transuranic (TRU) waste drums. TRUGAS was written by Frank G. Smith using the BASIC language and is described in the report A Computer Model of gas Generation and Transport within TRU Waste Drums (DP- 1754). The computer model has been partially validated by yielding results similar to experimental data collected at SRL and LANL over a wide range of conditions. The model was created to provide the capability of predicting conditions that could potentially lead to the formation of flammable gas concentrations within drums, and to assess proposed drum venting methods. The model has served as a tool in determining how gas concentrations are affected by parameters such as filter vent sizes, waste composition, gas generation values, the number and types of enclosures, water instrusion into the drum, and curie loading. The success of the TRUGAS model has prompted an interest in the program`s maintenance and enhancement. Experimental data continues to be collected at various sites on such parameters as permeability values, packaging arrangements, filter designs, and waste contents. Information provided by this data is used to improve the accuracy of the model`s predictions. Also, several modifications to the model have been made to enlarge the scope of problems which can be analyzed. For instance, the model has been used to calculate hydrogen concentrations inside steel cabinets containing retired glove boxes (WSRC-RP-89-762). The revised TRUGAS computer model, H2GAS, is described in this report. This report summarizes all modifications made to the TRUGAS computer model and provides documentation useful for making future updates to H2GAS.

Jerrell, J.W.

1992-08-31T23:59:59.000Z

473

Revisions to the hydrogen gas generation computer model  

DOE Green Energy (OSTI)

Waste Management Technology has requested SRTC to maintain and extend a previously developed computer model, TRUGAS, which calculates hydrogen gas concentrations within the transuranic (TRU) waste drums. TRUGAS was written by Frank G. Smith using the BASIC language and is described in the report A Computer Model of gas Generation and Transport within TRU Waste Drums (DP- 1754). The computer model has been partially validated by yielding results similar to experimental data collected at SRL and LANL over a wide range of conditions. The model was created to provide the capability of predicting conditions that could potentially lead to the formation of flammable gas concentrations within drums, and to assess proposed drum venting methods. The model has served as a tool in determining how gas concentrations are affected by parameters such as filter vent sizes, waste composition, gas generation values, the number and types of enclosures, water instrusion into the drum, and curie loading. The success of the TRUGAS model has prompted an interest in the program's maintenance and enhancement. Experimental data continues to be collected at various sites on such parameters as permeability values, packaging arrangements, filter designs, and waste contents. Information provided by this data is used to improve the accuracy of the model's predictions. Also, several modifications to the model have been made to enlarge the scope of problems which can be analyzed. For instance, the model has been used to calculate hydrogen concentrations inside steel cabinets containing retired glove boxes (WSRC-RP-89-762). The revised TRUGAS computer model, H2GAS, is described in this report. This report summarizes all modifications made to the TRUGAS computer model and provides documentation useful for making future updates to H2GAS.

Jerrell, J.W.

1992-08-31T23:59:59.000Z

474

Subject: 06-362r7 SPC-4 Error history Revision history  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

b) Added resumption of debug log updates when resets occur; c) Add statement after resume that "debug log may include data captured while log update was suspended"; d) Added CLR_SUP bit in READ BUFFER Retrieve Debug Log data; e) In table new2, increase MAXIMUM AVAILABLE LENGTH field to 4 bytes; and f) Add statement to WRITE BUFFER defining action when debug log update is suspended; Revision 2 (15 January 2007) Incorporated editorial changes in 5.11.3 requested at 11/8/2006 CAP WG meeting.

unknown authors

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

475

Subject: 06-362r5 SPC-4 Error history Revision history  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

b) Added resumption of debug log updates when resets occur; c) Add statement after resume that "debug log may include data captured while log update was suspended"; d) Added CLR_SUP bit in READ BUFFER Retrieve Debug Log data; e) In table new2, increase MAXIMUM AVAILABLE LENGTH field to 4 bytes; and f) Add statement to WRITE BUFFER defining action when debug log update is suspended; Revision 2 (15 January 2007) Incorporated editorial changes in 5.11.3 requested at 11/8/2006 CAP WG meeting.

unknown authors

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

476

Subject: 06-362r6 SPC-4 Error history Revision history  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

b) Added resumption of debug log updates when resets occur; c) Add statement after resume that "debug log may include data captured while log update was suspended"; d) Added CLR_SUP bit in READ BUFFER Retrieve Debug Log data; e) In table new2, increase MAXIMUM AVAILABLE LENGTH field to 4 bytes; and f) Add statement to WRITE BUFFER defining action when debug log update is suspended; Revision 2 (15 January 2007) Incorporated editorial changes in 5.11.3 requested at 11/8/2006 CAP WG meeting.

unknown authors

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

477

Subject: 06-362r4 SPC-4 Error history Revision history  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

b) Added resumption of debug log updates when resets occur; c) Add statement after resume that "debug log may include data captured while log update was suspended"; d) Added CLR_SUP bit in READ BUFFER Retrieve Debug Log data; e) In table new2, increase MAXIMUM AVAILABLE LENGTH field to 4 bytes; and f) Add statement to WRITE BUFFER defining action when debug log update is suspended; Revision 2 (15 January 2007) Incorporated editorial changes in 5.11.3 requested at 11/8/2006 CAP WG meeting.

unknown authors

2007-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

478

(NT43067) Revised NETL Report Covers  

NLE Websites -- All DOE Office Websites (Extended Search)

! ! "#$!%&'()!*+,-!"$./012.32*456327! ! 89'(:;((+?(;@@!A;B+(:! CD'E9'(=!F!G'(HI!13JJK! ! G;HI'EL@M@!N;')LE?!:+!0+.$OL@:;EH;!+P!Q'@! 'E)!R=)(':;!LE!#H;'E!S;)LM;E:@! ! ! "#$%&''()!$*+! ,-..-/0#.(''.!12.'&'#'(!34!5(/023637*! 88!,-..-/0#.(''.!9:(! ;-%$?@AB! ! 50(!C2&:(<.&'*!34!5(D-.!-'!9#.'&2! @!C2&:(A>>! 9#.'&2=!5E!8F8@?G>??F! ! H<(I-<()!43<+! C2&'()!"'-'(.!J(I-<'%(2'!34!K2(<7*! L-'&32-6!K2(<7*!5(/023637*!M-$3<-'3<*! ! ! April 30, 2010 Office of Fossil Energy Disclaimer - This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes

479

Revised Version arXiv:hepph/0511264  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

-Universitat, D-55099 Mainz, Germany 2 Institute of High Energy Physics and Informatization, Tbilisi State University, 0186 Tbilisi, Georgia (Dated: February 23, 2006) We present complete analytical O(" 2 ) results

480

Original","Revised","Data  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

,,"Original","Revised","Data" ,,"Original","Revised","Data" "Data Type","Product","End Use","PADD","State","Data 2003","Data 2003","Different" "Sales","No. 1 Distillate","Residential","U.S. TOTAL",,110032,110032 "Sales","No. 1 Distillate","Residential","PADD 1",,4232,4232 "Sales","No. 1 Distillate","Residential","PADD 1A",,2085,2085 "Sales","No. 1 Distillate","Residential","Connecticut","CT" "Sales","No. 1 Distillate","Residential","Maine","ME",536,536 "Sales","No. 1 Distillate","Residential","Massachusetts","MA",678,678

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "2 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

NISTIR 7511 Revision 1, Security Content Automation ...  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

... CONTENT AUTOMATION PROTOCOL (SCAP) VERSION 1.0 VALIDATION PROGRAM TEST REQUIREMENTS (DRAFT) XCCDF.V.2: The vendor ...

2013-04-29T23:59:59.000Z

482

Page 1 of2  

Energy.gov (U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)) Indexed Site

Page 1 of2 The DOE Executive Salary Approval parameters contained in AL2000-12 are hereby reinstated pending final issuance of revised DOE Order 350.1 X, Contractor Human Resources...

483

Impact of the Revised 10 CFR 835 on the Neutron Dose Rates at LLNL  

SciTech Connect

In June 2007, 10 CFR 835 [1] was revised to include new radiation weighting factors for neutrons, updated dosimetric models, and dose terms consistent with the newer ICRP recommendations. A significant aspect of the revised 10 CFR 835 is the adoption of the recommendations outlined in ICRP-60 [2]. The recommended new quantities demand a review of much of the basic data used in protection against exposure to sources of ionizing radiation. The International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements has defined a number of quantities for use in personnel and area monitoring [3,4,5] including the ambient dose equivalent H*(d) to be used for area monitoring and instrument calibrations. These quantities are used in ICRP-60 and ICRP-74. This report deals only with the changes in the ambient dose equivalent and ambient dose rate equivalent for neutrons as a result of the implementation of the revised 10 CFR 835. In the report, the terms neutron dose and neutron dose rate will be used for convenience for ambient neutron dose and ambient neutron dose rate unless otherwise stated. This report provides a qualitative and quantitative estimate of how much the neutron dose rates at LLNL will change with the implementation of the revised 10 CFR 835. Neutron spectra and dose rates from selected locations at the LLNL were measured with a high resolution spectroscopic neutron dose rate system (ROSPEC) as well as with a standard neutron rem meter (a.k.a., a remball). The spectra obtained at these locations compare well with the spectra from the Radiation Calibration Laboratory's (RCL) bare californium source that is currently used to calibrate neutron dose rate instruments. The measurements obtained from the high resolution neutron spectrometer and dose meter ROSPEC and the NRD dose meter compare within the range of {+-}25%. When the new radiation weighting factors are adopted with the implementation of the revised 10 CFR 835, the measured dose rates will increase by up to 22%. The health physicists should consider this increase for any areas that have dose rates near a posting limit, such as near the 100 mrem/hr for a high radiation area, as this increase in measured dose rate may result in some changes to postings and consequent radiological controls.

Radev, R

2009-01-13T23:59:59.000Z

484

Revised potentiometric-surface map, Yucca Mountain and vicinity, Nevada  

SciTech Connect

The revised potentiometric-surface map presented in this report updates earlier maps of the Yucca Mountain area using mainly 1988 average water levels. Because of refinements in the corrections to the water-level measurements, these water levels have increased accuracy and precision over older values. The small-gradient area to the southeast of Yucca Mountain is contoured with a 0.25-meter interval and ranges in water-level altitude from 728.5 to 73 1.0 meters. Other areas with different water levels, to the north and west of Yucca Mountain, are illustrated with shaded patterns. The potentiometric surface can be divided into three regions: (1) A small-gradient area to the southeast of Yucca Mountain, which may be explained by flow through high-transmissivity rocks or low ground-water flux through the area; (2) A moderate-gradient area, on the western side of Yucca Mountain, where the water-level altitude ranges from 775 to 780 meters, and appears to be impeded by the Solitario Canyon Fault and a splay of that fault; and (3) A large-gradient area, to the north-northeast of Yucca Mountain, where water level altitude ranges from 738 to 1,035 meters, possibly as a result of a semi-perched groundwater system. Water levels from wells at Yucca Mountain were examined for yearly trends using linear least-squares regression. Data from five wells exhibited trends which were statistically significant, but some of those may be a result of slow equilibration of the water level from drilling in less permeable rocks. Adjustments for temperature and density changes in the deep wells with long fluid columns were attempted, but some of the adjusted data did not fit the surrounding data and, thus, were not used.

Ervin, E.M.; Luckey, R.R.; Burkhardt, D.J.

1994-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

485

Human Factors Engineering Program Review Model (NUREG-0711)Revision 3: Update Methodology and Key Revisions  

SciTech Connect

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) reviews the human factors engineering (HFE) programs of applicants for nuclear power plant construction permits, operating licenses, standard design certifications, and combined operating licenses. The purpose of these safety reviews is to help ensure that personnel performance and reliability are appropriately supported. Detailed design review procedures and guidance for the evaluations is provided in three key documents: the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800), the HFE Program Review Model (NUREG-0711), and the Human-System Interface Design Review Guidelines (NUREG-0700). These documents were last revised in 2007, 2004 and 2002, respectively. The NRC is committed to the periodic update and improvement of the guidance to ensure that it remains a state-of-the-art design evaluation tool. To this end, the NRC is updating its guidance to stay current with recent research on human performance, advances in HFE methods and tools, and new technology being employed in plant and control room design. NUREG-0711 is the first document to be addressed. We present the methodology used to update NUREG-0711 and summarize the main changes made. Finally, we discuss the current status of the update program and the future plans.

OHara J. M.; Higgins, J.; Fleger, S.

2012-07-22T23:59:59.000Z

486

Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

2,669 16,713 33,802 33,035 36,571 53,473 1977-2011 2,669 16,713 33,802 33,035 36,571 53,473 1977-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 2,798 1,864 2,017 1,871 2,242 2,993 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 22 10 87 7 10 21 1977-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 2,201 1,429 1,312 1,417 1,771 2,260 1981-2011 Texas 575 425 618 447 461 712 1981-2011 Alaska 376 112 4,068 108 452 206 1977-2011 Lower 48 States 22,293 16,601 29,734 32,927 36,119 53,267 1977-2011 Alabama 208 35 732 328 173 157 1977-2011 Arkansas 113 146 189 621 301 324 1977-2011 California 419 273 491 189 451 1,889 1977-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 12 26 69 14 16 31 1977-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 29 16 66 24 5 4 1977-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 371 217 327 148 427 1,854 1977-2011 State Offshore

487

Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

2,669 16,713 33,802 33,035 36,571 53,473 1977-2011 2,669 16,713 33,802 33,035 36,571 53,473 1977-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 2,798 1,864 2,017 1,871 2,242 2,993 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 22 10 87 7 10 21 1977-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 2,201 1,429 1,312 1,417 1,771 2,260 1981-2011 Texas 575 425 618 447 461 712 1981-2011 Alaska 376 112 4,068 108 452 206 1977-2011 Lower 48 States 22,293 16,601 29,734 32,927 36,119 53,267 1977-2011 Alabama 208 35 732 328 173 157 1977-2011 Arkansas 113 146 189 621 301 324 1977-2011 California 419 273 491 189 451 1,889 1977-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 12 26 69 14 16 31 1977-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 29 16 66 24 5 4 1977-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 371 217 327 148 427 1,854 1977-2011 State Offshore

488

Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

0,833 32,174 30,674 31,416 40,521 53,601 1977-2011 0,833 32,174 30,674 31,416 40,521 53,601 1977-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 2,030 1,815 1,699 2,312 2,978 2,467 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 43 49 23 79 23 39 1977-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 1,606 1,430 1,230 1,637 2,617 2,050 1981-2011 Texas 381 336 446 596 338 378 1981-2011 Alaska 2,853 2,147 184 1,868 622 928 1977-2011 Lower 48 States 17,980 30,027 30,490 29,548 39,899 52,673 1977-2011 Alabama 234 163 283 99 206 455 1977-2011 Arkansas 101 321 1,249 1,912 1,072 631 1977-2011 California 156 355 263 259 548 1,486 1977-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 28 32 21 41 38 20 1977-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 7 15 1 35 9 11 1977-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 112 296 239 180 488 1,444 1977-2011 State Offshore

489

Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

0,833 32,174 30,674 31,416 40,521 53,601 1977-2011 0,833 32,174 30,674 31,416 40,521 53,601 1977-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 2,030 1,815 1,699 2,312 2,978 2,467 1990-2011 Pacific (California) 43 49 23 79 23 39 1977-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 1,606 1,430 1,230 1,637 2,617 2,050 1981-2011 Texas 381 336 446 596 338 378 1981-2011 Alaska 2,853 2,147 184 1,868 622 928 1977-2011 Lower 48 States 17,980 30,027 30,490 29,548 39,899 52,673 1977-2011 Alabama 234 163 283 99 206 455 1977-2011 Arkansas 101 321 1,249 1,912 1,072 631 1977-2011 California 156 355 263 259 548 1,486 1977-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 28 32 21 41 38 20 1977-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 7 15 1 35 9 11 1977-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 112 296 239 180 488 1,444 1977-2011 State Offshore

490

PWR Primary-to-Secondary Leak Guidelines - Revision 3  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Primary-to-secondary leakage of steam generator tubes in pressurized water reactors (PWRs) can result from mechanisms that propagate slowly or rapidly. This report represents Revision 3 of industry-wide guidelines first proposed in 1995 to address the issue of leakage.

2004-12-16T23:59:59.000Z

491

Belief Revision in Non-Monotonic Reasoning and Logic Programming  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

In order to be able to explicitly reason about beliefs, we've introduced a non-monotonic formalism, called the Autoepistemic Logic of Beliefs, AEB, obtained by augmenting classical propositional logic with a belief operator, ?. For this language ... Keywords: Belief Revision, Logic Programming, Logics of Knowledge and Beliefs, Non-Monotonic Reasoning

Jos Jlio Alferes; Lus Moniz Pereira; Teodor C. Przymusinski

1996-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

492

Towards secure multi-sited transactional revision control systems  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

Version control systems play a very important role in maintaining the revision history of software and facilitating software evolution. As the software development process is gradually taking the form of a collaborative effort among several teams hosted ... Keywords: Configuration management, Security, Transaction processing, Version control

Junxing Zhang; Indrajit Ray

2007-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

493

Revised Version DESY 96203 Hiroshima Univ. HUPD9615  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Revised Version DESY 96­203 Hiroshima Univ. HUPD­9615 September 1996 ################ hep , and T. Morozumi x Department of Physics, Hiroshima University 1­3­1 Kagamiyama, Higashi Hiroshima ­ 7393FT­LIPI, Indonesia. E­mail address: handoko@theo.phys.sci.hiroshima­u.ac.jp x E­mail address

494

Revised May 17, 2011 Advanced Workshop in Regulation and Competition  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

. These include: Low natural gas prices ­ large increases in U.S. shale gas production and the tripling of acknowledged reserves are depressing current and projected natural gas prices; Zero carbon price ­ prospectsRevised May 17, 2011 Advanced Workshop in Regulation and Competition 30th Annual Eastern Conference

Lin, Xiaodong

495

Pressurized Water Reactor Secondary Water Chemistry Guidelines - Revision 7  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

State-of-the-art water chemistry programs reduce equipment corrosion and enhance steam generator reliability. A committee of industry experts prepared these revised PWR Secondary Water Chemistry Guidelines to incorporate the latest field and laboratory data on secondary system corrosion and performance issues. Pressurized water reactor (PWR) operators can use these guidelines to update their secondary water chemistry programs.

2009-02-17T23:59:59.000Z

496

Ris-R-1291(EN) Revised Cost Estimate for the  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

Risø-R-1291(EN) Revised Cost Estimate for the Decommissioning of the Reactor DR 3 Edited by Klaus of the cost estimate for the decommissioning of the research Reactor DR 3 as described in the report Risø Procurement of general equipment and material 17 04 Dismantling activities 18 05 Waste processing and storage

497

Pressurized Water Reactor Secondary Water Chemistry Guidelines Revision 6  

Science Conference Proceedings (OSTI)

State-of-the-art water chemistry programs reduce equipment corrosion and enhance steam generator reliability. A committee of industry experts prepared these revised "Pressurized Water Reactor Secondary Water Chemistry Guidelines" to incorporate the latest field and laboratory data on secondary system corrosion and performance issues. Pressurized water reactor (PWR) operators can use these guidelines to update their secondary water chemistry programs.

2004-12-13T23:59:59.000Z

498

*See Appendix (Developed by EOP) REVISED May 2012  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

and enters into negotiations with selected candidate. All Negotiated terms are subject to the approval*See Appendix (Developed by EOP) REVISED May 2012 Office of the Provost Faculty Search Checklist and Procedures I. Exemptions This Faculty Search Checklist is intended to guide you in your search for tenure

Belogay, Eugene A.

499

Revised June 2013 REIMBURSEMENT OF PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

to 8 ½ x 11 paper. Remember to white-out or black out credit card/account numbers and any line itemsRevised June 2013 REIMBURSEMENT OF PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES (IN ACCORDANCE WITH AD 10 eligibility in accordance with Policy AD10-11. Once a determination is made on eligibility, notification

Kavanagh, Karen L.

500

CALIFORNIA ENERGY DEMAND 2008-2018 STAFF REVISED FORECAST  

E-Print Network (OSTI)

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION CALIFORNIA ENERGY DEMAND 2008-2018 STAFF REVISED FORECAST forecast is the combined product of the hard work and expertise of numerous staff members in the Demand prepared the residential sector forecast. Mohsen Abrishami prepared the commercial sector forecast. Lynn