Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "12-2000 supersedes 7-96" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

Airports in the 21st Century DRAFT April 12, 2000  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

, Dallas/Fort Worth, Denver International, Orlando and Washington/Dulles in the United StatesAirports in the 21st Century DRAFT April 12, 2000 1 AIRPORTS IN THE 21ST CENTURY Prospects Institute of Technology SUMMARY This paper explores the long-term prospects for airport development between

Entekhabi, Dara

2

BERAC Meeting Minutes December 11-12, 2000 | U.S. DOE Office of Science  

Office of Science (SC) Website

Meeting Minutes December 11-12, 2000 Meeting Minutes December 11-12, 2000 Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC) BERAC Home Meetings BERAC Minutes BERAC Minutes Archive Members Charges/Reports Charter .pdf file (40KB) BER Committees of Visitors BER Home Meetings BERAC Meeting Minutes December 11-12, 2000 Print Text Size: A A A RSS Feeds FeedbackShare Page MINUTES Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC) Meeting Office of Biological and Environmental Research Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy DATE: December 11-12, 2000 LOCATION: American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C. The meeting was announced in the Federal Register. PARTICIPANTS: A list of attendees showing all BERAC members who were present, guests, and participating Department of Energy officials and staff

3

12/2000 Low-Level Waste Disposal Capacity Report Version 2 | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Services » Waste Management » Waste Disposition » 12/2000 Services » Waste Management » Waste Disposition » 12/2000 Low-Level Waste Disposal Capacity Report Version 2 12/2000 Low-Level Waste Disposal Capacity Report Version 2 The purpose of this Report is to assess whether U.S. Department of Energy (DOE or the Department) disposal facilities have sufficient volumetric and radiological capacity to accommodate the low-level waste (LLW) and mixed low-level waste (MLLW) that the Department expects to dispose at these facilities. 12/2000 Low-Level Waste Disposal Capacity Report Version 2 More Documents & Publications EIS-0243: Record of Decision EIS-0200: Record of Decision EIS-0286: Record of Decision Waste Management Nuclear Materials & Waste Tank Waste and Waste Processing Waste Disposition Packaging and Transportation

4

Social Thought and Research, Volume 23, Number 1&2 (2000): Front Matter  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

to the above address. TABLE OF CONTENTS Vol. 23, No. 1&2 2000 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS FEATURE ARTICLE ON AMERICAN SOCIAL THOUGHT Robert J. Kent Dewey and the Project of Critical Social Theory ~ 1 Two EARLY AMERICAN MAsTERS: MEAD AND BLUMER George Herbert Mead Science... Vision in Sociology 199 Clifford L. Staples and William G. Staples Rereading Harry Braverman's LaborandMonopolY Capital After Twenty years 227 Jean Van Delinder Dance as Experience: Pragmatism and Classical Ballet 239 1 ~ I r I I ; J I . I ! SPECIAL...

2000-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

5

Rate Schedule CV-T3 (Supersedes Schedules CV- T2) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

T3 T3 (Supersedes Schedules CV- T2) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT SCHEDULE OF RATE FOR POINT-TO-POINT TRANSMISSION SERVICE Effective: October 1, 2011, through September 30, 2016. Available: Within the marketing area served by the Western Area Power Administration (Western), Sierra Nevada Customer Service Region. Applicable: To customers receiving Central Valley Project (CVP) firm and/or non-firm Point-to-Point (PTP) transmission service. Character and Conditions of Service: Transmission service for three-phase, alternating current at 60-hertz, delivered and metered at the voltages and points of delivery or receipt, adjusted for losses, and delivered to points of

6

Product specification Supersedes data of September 1994  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

specification NPN switching transistors 2N2222; 2N2222A FEATURES · High current (max. 800 mA) · Low voltage (max collector current (DC) - 800 mA Ptot total power dissipation Tamb 25 °C - 500 mW hFE DC current gain IC = 10 mA; VCE = 10 V 75 - fT transition frequency IC = 20 mA; VCE = 20 V; f = 100 MHz 2N2222 250 - MHz 2

Ravikumar, B.

7

Petition for Secretarial Review Dismissed December 12, 2000  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Dennis E. Jantz, Esq. Dennis E. Jantz, Esq. Eastham Johnson Monnheimer & Jantz PO Box 1276 Albuquerque, NM 87103-1276 Patricia Matthews, Esq. 460 St. Michael's, Suite 401 PO Box 6724 Sante Fe, NM 87502-6724 Dear Mr. Jantz and Ms. Matthews: DEC 1 2 2000 Re: Case No. VBB-004 7 This letter concerns Edward Seawalt' s Part 708 complaint against Contract Associates, Inc. Pursuant to the pmiies' request, the complaint was dismissed on December 4, 2000. Accordingly, the related petition for Secretarial review (Case No. VBB-0047) is hereby dismissed. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Janet N. Freimuth at (202) 287-1439. Sincerely, 9LU~ Thomas L. Wieker Deputy Director Office ofHearings and Appeals @ Printed with soy ink on recycled paper

8

Product specification Supersedes data of 2001 Dec 13  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

specification 8-bit A/D and D/A converter PCF8591 1 FEATURES · Single power supply · Operating supply voltage 2. 2 APPLICATIONS · Closed loop control systems · Low power converter for remote data acquisition DIAGRAM handbook, full pagewidth MBL821 I2C BUS INTERFACE ANALOGUE MULTIPLEXER POWER ON RESET OSCILLATOR

Berndt, Richard

9

Product specification Supersedes data of 1993 Sep 01  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

power Schottky TTL (LSTTL). They are specified in compliance with JEDEC standard no. 7A. The 74HC/HCT04 is used to determine the dynamic power dissipation (PD in µW). PD = CPD ? VCC 2 ? fi ? N + (CL ? VCC 2 ns CI input capacitance 3.5 3.5 pF CPD power dissipation capacitance per gate notes 1 and 2 21 24 p

Ravikumar, B.

10

Product specification Supersedes data of 1997 Sep 02  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

µA IDDR supply current (power-saving mode) Tamb = 25 °C - 400 nA Tamb operating ambient temperature diagram. handbook, full pagewidth MLB928 WORD ADDRESS REGISTER SHIFT REGISTER POWER ON RESET INPUT FILTER 8.2 Start and stop conditions 8.3 System configuration 8.4 Acknowledge 8.5 I2C-bus protocol 9

Berns, Hans-Gerd

11

Preliminary specification Supersedes data of 1995 Oct 26  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

· An unpowered node does not disturb the bus lines · At least 110 nodes can be connected · High speed (up to 1 is the interface between the CAN protocol controller and the physical bus. It is primarily intended slope resistor input Fig.2 Pin configuration. handbook, halfpage 1TXD 2 3 4 8 Rs GND CANH VCC CANL RXD

Kozak, Victor R.

12

Journal of Statistical Physics, Vol. 99, Nos. 12, 2000 Poissonian Behavior of Ising Spin Systems  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Journal of Statistical Physics, Vol. 99, Nos. 1?2, 2000 Poissonian Behavior of Ising Spin Systems-half Ising- type models in positive external field which satisfy the FKG inequality. In particular, we show Ising models. KEY WORDS: Poisson approximation; Stein Chen method; Ising models; nucleation. 1

O'Connell, Neil

13

International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics 12 (2000) 151164 151 Automated analysis of rotating probe  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

consists of four steps, namely, a preprocessing stage for conditioning the data, a decision tree based for the rotating probe uses two pancake and one plus-point coil probes. The plus point coil consists of two coils that are oriented orthogonal to each other [2]. Since the pickup coil configuration is differential, lift

Polikar, Robi

14

12/2000 Low-Level Waste Disposal Capacity Report Version 2  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Current and Planned Current and Planned Low-Level Waste Disposal Capacity Report Revision 2 December 2000 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management i TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ES-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1 1.1 Summary of Report Sections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1 1.2 History of Past DOE Low-Level Waste Disposal Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-2 1.3 Current Status of the Low-Level and Mixed Low-Level Waste Disposal Configuration . . 1-3 1.4 Methodology for Base Case and Alternative Scenarios Analyses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-5 1.5 Radiological Assessments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-7 1.6 Data Sources for Waste Disposal Volumes, Waste Radiological Profiles, and Disposal

15

Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 06/12/2000 E.O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

, Research Medicine/Radiation Biophysics Offices 31 Chicken Creek Maintenance Bldg. 36 Grizzly Substation Science 50E Earth Sciences 50F Computing Services, IRD 51 Bevalac/Bevatron (decommissioned) 51A Bevatron

16

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET Revised: June 24, 2010 Supersedes: June 12, 2008 Number of pages: 4  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

, but varies depending on wood species and moisture content. Boiling point: Not applicable. Solubility in water, engineered veneer, bark mulch, wood chips Synonyms: Hardwood plywood, prefinished plywood, melamine Names: Classic CoreTM, Classic LamTM, Classic Core IITM, MelawoodTM EuroplyTM, JayCoreTM, UV WoodTM, CFP

Rollins, Andrew M.

17

OFFICE OF THE PROVOST Supersedes Memoranda dated August 2, 2012 West Lafayette Campus Promotion and Tenure Policy  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

academic rank. SECTION I GENERAL CRITERIA FOR PROMOTION The tasks of University faculty members in the production of scholarly publications, devising curricula, developing courseware, counseling students, interpreting achievements described in the nominating documents in the light of standards appropriate

Ginzel, Matthew

18

OFFICE OF THE PROVOST Supersedes Memoranda dated August 1, 2010 West Lafayette Campus Promotion and Tenure Policy  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

academic rank. SECTION I GENERAL CRITERIA FOR PROMOTION The tasks of University faculty members in the production of scholarly publications, devising curricula, developing courseware, counseling students, interpreting achievements described in the nominating documents in the light of standards appropriate

Ginzel, Matthew

19

EN Official Journal of the European Communities 30.12.2000L 336/14 COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 2889/2000  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

uranium" or "depleted uranium" or thorium in the form of metal, alloy, chemical compound or concentrate materials under item 0C002 (separated plutonium and `uranium enriched in the isotopes 235 or 233' to more as follows: (a) separated plutonium; (b) "uranium enriched in the isotopes 235 or 233" to more than 20

Sussex, University of

20

Quality Assurance (QA) Program Plan Conceptual Design Phase of Project W-521 Waste Feed Delivery Systems [SUPERSEDED BY RPP-6649 Rev. 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Quality Assurance Program Plan (QAPP) describes the quality assurance implementation strategy for Project W-521 during conceptual design.

WHITE, K.A.

2000-08-02T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "12-2000 supersedes 7-96" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

This regulation supersedes EC 1105-2-410, dated 22 August 2008. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY EC 1165-2-209  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

the procedures for ensuring the quality and credibility of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) decision-2-209 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CECW-CP Washington, D.C. 20314-1000 Circular No. 1165-2-209 31 Jan 2010, implementation, and operations and maintenance documents and work products. This EC puts quality on equal footing

US Army Corps of Engineers

22

Environmental Protection, Safety, and Health Protection Program for DOE Operations  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

To transmit revised chapters to the subject Order. The following chapter, revised by the Acting Under Secretary's Task Force, supersede previously published chapters as indicated: Chapter I; Chapter V, which now includes former Chapter IV, also superseded; and Chapter VI.

1981-08-13T23:59:59.000Z

23

Analysis of Impacts on Prime or Unique Agricultural Lands in...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Environmental Policy Act was developed in cooperation with the Department of Agriculture. It updates and supersedes CEQ's previous memorandum on this subject of August...

24

Microsoft Word - Final DOE-CBFO-01-3107 PDP Management Plan_rev...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT PLAN Revision 7 November 2014 U.S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office TRU Sites and Transportation Division This document supersedes DOE...

25

Microsoft Word - 99-2194, Rev. 8  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

of Energy Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Revision 8 January 2013 This document supersedes DOEWIPP-99-2194, Rev.7 Working Copy Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Environmental Monitoring...

26

American Indian Tribal Government Policy  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The attachment to this Order has been replaced and superseded by the attachment to DOE N 144.1. Canceled by DOE O 144.1.

2009-01-16T23:59:59.000Z

27

Sandia Proprietary Information PII  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

CBR (092014) Supersedes (07-2013) Issue Sandia Proprietary Information PII 1 Sandia Proprietary Information CALIFORNIA CONSULTANT PRE-PROCESSING BACKGROUND REVIEW You are...

28

Sandia Proprietary Information PII  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

PRO (09-2014) Supersedes (09-2013) Issue Sandia Proprietary Information PII 1 Sandia Proprietary Information NM CONSULTANT PRE-PROCESSING BACKGROUND REVIEW You are receiving this...

29

DOE-STD-3020-2005 | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

Supersedes DOE NE F3-45 (January 1987) This standard establishes specification and testing requirements for High Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filters procured to provide...

30

G  

Energy Savers [EERE]

until superseded or canceled. Who Is the Intended Audience For this AL? Heads of Contracting Activity (HCAs) and Contracting Officers (COs) responsible for administering and...

31

Hanford Site Evaluation of Electrical Equipment for Beryllium...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Pole-mounted cut-outs This procedure does not supersede any electrical safety, lockouttagout (LOTO), or work management requirements. All work must undergo an appropriate...

32

Microsoft Word - AL2005-01.doc  

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Indexed Site

Acquisition Letters (AL) that remain in effect are identified below. All other previously issued ALs have been superseded by a formal rule-making, incorporated into other...

33

Final DOE Areas Feasibility Study  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

the area California Office of Historic Preservation, Northwest Information Center, Lee Jordan, Coordinator June 26, 1998 and April 12, 2000 Historical and Cultural Resources...

34

E-Print Network 3.0 - alternate water sources Sample Search Results  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

and Conveyance Water Treatment Distribution Customer Use Wastewater Collection and Treatment 12... ;2000 Urban Water-Related Energy Use Sources ... Source: Keller, Arturo A. -...

35

Buildings Energy Data Book: 5.6 Lighting  

Buildings Energy Data Book [EERE]

(2) Standard Fluorescent 59.7 96% Incandescent 38.5 62% Compact Fluorescent 27.6 44% High-Intensity Discharge 20.6 33% Halogen 17.7 29% Note(s): Source(s): EIA, 2003 Commercial...

36

X:\\Data_Publication\\Pma\\current\\ventura\\pma00.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

114.2 - - 2000 Average ... 115.7 112.2 90.7 96.4 - - Dash (-) No data reported. NA Not available. W Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company...

37

Computer Abstractions and Technology  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

& wheel Supersedes roller-ball mechanical mouse #12;Chapter 1 -- Computer Abstractions and Technology to building sized Embedded computers Hidden as components of systems Stringent power of machine instructions executed per operation Processor and memory system Determine how fast instructions

Huang, Chun-Hsi

38

Date: January 16, 2014 Subject: OMB Omni-Circular  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

) on December 26, 2013. The Omni-Circular consolidates, streamlines and supersedes eight existing Circulars, including Circulars A-21, A-110 and A-133. The new regulations will not take effect until December 26, 2014

Grishok, Alla

39

Firearms Modifications List- June 13, 2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This document contains the currently-approved protective force "Firearms Modification List" referred to in Department of Energy Order 473.3, Protection Program Operations. This supersedes any previous versions of this document

40

E-Print Network 3.0 - area midyear review Sample Search Results  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Washington and Lee University Collection: Environmental Sciences and Ecology 43 SF 4400-CFB (11-2008) Supersedes (6-2008) Issue UCI (when completed) Summary: SF 4400-CFB (11-2008)...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "12-2000 supersedes 7-96" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

E-Print Network 3.0 - annual midyear topical Sample Search Results  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Sample search results for: annual midyear topical Page: << < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 1 SF 4400-CFB (11-2008) Supersedes (6-2008) Issue UCI (when completed) Summary: SF 4400-CFB (11-2008)...

42

Exhibit B  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

EE-13 1 WHOLESALE RATES FOR EXCESS ENERGY 1 Supersedes Rate Schedule EE-11. Effective: During the period October 1, 2013, through September 30, 2017, in accordance with interim...

43

DOE-HDBK-1118-99 | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

for Continuing Training Superseding DOE-STD-1060-93 (February 1993) | Replaced by DOE-HDBK-1118-99 (Reaffirmed 2014) This guide provides contractor training organizations with...

44

DOE-HDBK-1116-98 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6-98 DOE-HDBK-1116-98 May 19, 1998 Superseding DOE-STD-1058-93 Guide to Good Practices for Developing and Conducting Case Studies This guide contains a method for learning from...

45

Microsoft Word - 09-3427 Rev 10  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 Waste Data System User's Manual U.S. Department of Energy Revision 10 January 2013 This document supersedes DOEWIPP-09-3427, Rev. 9. Working Copy DOEWIPP-09-3427 2...

46

Microsoft Word - NDA_Drum_PDP_Rev 4-final  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

for the TRU Waste Characterization Program Revision 4 June 2013 This document supersedes DOECBFO-01-1005, Revision 3 U.S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office Office of the...

47

Microsoft Word - NDA Box PDP Plan-Revision 4-final  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Characterization Program Revision 4 May 2013 This document supersedes Revision 3 of DOECBFO-01-1006 U.S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office Office of the National TRU...

48

Maximum Entry and Mandatory Separation Ages for Certain Security Employees  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The Policy in response to government-wide Office of Personnel Management regulations regarding establishment of mandatory retirement ages for employees in certain security related positions. Superseded by DOE P 310.1 Admin Chg 1, 12-1-11.

2001-10-11T23:59:59.000Z

49

Security and Privacy-Preserving Mechanism for Aggregator Based Vehicle-to-Grid Network  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Electrification is foremost actor in superseding internal combustion engine vehicles with electric vehicles (EV). The EV technology will lead to fundamental shift in existing power grid as well as transportation ...

Binod Vaidya; Dimitrios Makrakis; Hussein T. Mouftah

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

50

DOE-STD-3025-99 | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

5-99 DOE-STD-3025-99 March 01, 1998 Quality Assurance Inspection and Testing of HEPA Filters Replaced by DOE-STD-3025-2007 | Superseding DOE NE F 3-43 (February 1990) This standard...

51

DOE-STD-3026-99 | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

6-99 DOE-STD-3026-99 February 24, 2009 Filter Test Facility Quality Program Plan Superseding DOE NE F 3-44 July 1986 This standard was developed primarily for application in U.S....

52

DOE-STD-3022-98 | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

2-98 DOE-STD-3022-98 May 19, 1998 DOE HEPA Filter Test Program Cancelled | Superseding DOE NE F 3-42 (January 1987) This standard establishes essential elements of a Department of...

53

DOE-HDBK-1204-97 | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

4-97 DOE-HDBK-1204-97 July 26, 2005 Guide to Good Practices for the Development of Test Items Supersedes DOE-STD-1009-92 (July 1992) While the methodology used in developing test...

54

THE WHITE HOUSE  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Actions Approved by the Director, MA-1 (Effective: November 18, 2010 - Supersedes May 14, 2010 version) NOTE: This action memorandum is used to request approval of a new or...

55

DOE-TSL-1-2002  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Department of Energy Standards Index Replaced by DOE-TSL-1-2007 | Superseding DOE-TSL-1-99 (May 1999) catalog or index of available DOE standards

56

Le Nombre d'Or  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

... "owes its importance to the fact that it contains the first mention of the aureus numerus, which supersedes the epacts and other contrivances in earlier use for the calculation of ...

H. C. P.

1938-09-10T23:59:59.000Z

57

Federal Staffing Guide for Project Management  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Guide provides an approach to determining the appropriate level and type of federal personnel needed to effectively plan, direct, and oversee project execution. Superseded by DOE G 413.3-19 Admin Chg 1.

2010-06-03T23:59:59.000Z

58

Cancellation of Directive  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

Effective immediately, DOE N 350.6, Acceptance of Valid Workers' Compensation Claims, dated 1-12-01, is canceled because it has been superseded by the rule 10 CFR Part 852.

2003-05-13T23:59:59.000Z

59

NEPA Contracting Reform Guidance (December 1996) | Department...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

NEPA process costs, NEPA contractor evaluation procedures, and details on the DOE NEPA Web site. The statement of work here is superseded by that of the DOE-wide Contracts. NEPA...

60

--No Title--  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

endorsement is made a part of your Blue Cross and Blue Shield of New Mexico (BCBSNM) health care plan benefit booklet and Summary of Benefits and replaces or supersedes any...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "12-2000 supersedes 7-96" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

DOE-HDBK-1206-98 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6-98 DOE-HDBK-1206-98 July 27, 2005 Guide to Good Practices for On-the-Job Training Superseding DOE-STD-1012-92 This guide presents good practices for a systematic approach to...

62

EM Quality Assurance Policy, Revision 0  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Previous EM policy on the use of the corporate Quality Assurance Program (EM-QA-001 Rev. 0). This document has been superseded by Revision 1 of the policy, but is still in use at some EM sites.

63

SR0001  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

For Immediate Release January 12, 2000 Media Contact: Bill Taylor (803) 725-2889 Nuclear Security Oversight Panel Visits SRS As Part Of NSSA Tour Flag Ribbon Art Representatives...

64

2000 TAPPI JOURNAL PEER REVIEWED PAPER DECEMBER 20001 2000 TAPPI JOURNAL PEER REVIEWED PAPER  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

2000 TAPPI JOURNAL PEER REVIEWED PAPER DECEMBER 20001 2000 TAPPI JOURNAL PEER REVIEWED PAPER, United Kingdom #12;2000 TAPPI JOURNAL PEER REVIEWED PAPER DECEMBER 20002 ideal sheets of randomly

Dodson, C.T.J.

65

Federal Water Efficiency Best Management Practices | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Water Efficiency Best Water Efficiency Best Management Practices Federal Water Efficiency Best Management Practices October 7, 2013 - 2:54pm Addthis The Federal Energy Management Program originally developed Federal Water Efficiency Best Management Practices (BMPs) in response to Executive Order (E.O.) 13123 requirements, which required Federal agencies to reduce water use through cost-effective water efficiency improvements. E.O. 13423 supersedes E.O. 13123. To account for the superseded requirement changes, water use patterns, and advancing technologies, the Environmental Protection Agency's WaterSense Office updated the original BMPs. E.O. 13514 expands the water efficiency requirements of E.O. 13423 and the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007. E.O. 13514 does not supersede

66

Table 50. Prime Supplier Sales Volumes of Distillate Fuel Oils...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

2,446.7 3,122.6 31,225.7 99,841.0 21,409.5 121,250.5 152,476.2 648.5 158,694.0 December ... 4,270.1 4,967.9 39,182.7 96,975.5 20,782.4 117,757.9...

67

--No Title--  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

105,378.5 21,571.8 November... 2,446.7 3,122.6 31,225.7 99,841.0 21,409.5 December... 4,270.1 4,967.9 39,182.7 96,975.5 20,782.4 1999 Average......

68

X:\\L6046\\Data_Publication\\Pma\\current\\ventura\\pma.vp  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

10.62 40.58 17.01 3.80 1.38 November ... 7.96 20.89 11.83 36.60 17.61 3.84 1.26 December ... 6.87 20.31 12.71 37.81 18.44 3.07 0.79 2000...

69

Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 6 Acquisition Regulation Date 05/06/10 Department of Energy No. FAL 2010-06 Financial Assistance Regulations Date 05/06/10 ACQUISITION/FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE LETTER This Acquisition/Financial Assistance Letter is issued under the authority of the DOE and NNSA Senior Procurement Executives. Subject: Acquiring Information Technology-Requirement to Comply With Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Attachment: Model Contract Clause When is this Acquisition Letter (AL) effective? This AL is effective upon issuance and supersedes AL-2006-04, dated, 12/14/05. When does this AL Expire? This AL remains in effect until superseded or canceled.

70

A Tale of Two Depositories: Weeding Federal Depository Collections  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

be weeded. Up to that time, only revised titles listed in the Superseded List (purl.access.gpo. gov/GPO/LPS22813) had been weeded on a limited basis. I was familiar with the federal depository print collection because I had recently helped shift many... the col- lection, and items not superseded had to be offered to other depository libraries before withdrawing (purl.access.gpo.gov/ GPO/LPS89341, Chapter 5.14). After establishing what not to weed, criteria for items for removal were created. Because...

Sare, Laura

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

71

UAH Cost Sharing Policy _ revised August 2013 Page 1 COST SHARING ON SPONSORED PROGRAMS  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

UAH Cost Sharing Policy _ revised August 2013 Page 1 COST SHARING ON SPONSORED PROGRAMS Note: This policy supersedes all existing policy governing cost sharing on sponsored programs unless otherwise stated herein. Policy Statement The University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH) engages in cost sharing

Fork, Richard

72

DOE-HDBK-1117-99  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Guide to Good Practices for Maintenance Supervisor Selection and Development Superseding DOE-STD-1059-93 (February 1993) This guide has been developed based on functional responsibilities typical of the electrical, instrument and control, mechanical, and maintenance supervisor positions. This guide applies to all levels of maintenance supervision, up to but not including the maintenance manager.

73

LASER SAFETY POLICY Effective Date: August 30, 2011 Originating Office: Office of the  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

LASER SAFETY POLICY Effective Date: August 30, 2011 Originating Office: Office of the Vice-President, Services Supersedes /Amends: VRS-51/n/a Policy Number: VPS-51 All users of lasers shall be expected to control hazards associated with lasers. Laboratories with high powered (Class 3b and Class 4; see section

Doedel, Eusebius

74

Nevada Test Site Radiological Control Manual  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document supersedes DOE/NV/25946--801, Nevada Test Site Radiological Control Manual, Revision 0 issued in October 2009. Brief Description of Revision: A minor revision to correct oversights made during revision to incorporate the 10 CFR 835 Update; and for use as a reference document for Tenant Organization Radiological Protection Programs.

Radiological Control Managers' Council Nevada Test Site

2010-02-09T23:59:59.000Z

75

Nevada Test Site Radiological Control Manual  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document supersedes DOE/NV/11718--079, NV/YMP Radiological Control Manual, Revision 5 issued in November 2004. Brief Description of Revision: A complete revision to reflect the recent changes in compliance requirements with 10 CFR 835, and for use as a reference document for Tenant Organization Radiological Protection Programs.

Radiological Control Managers' Council - Nevada Test Site

2009-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

76

Interoffice memorandum TO: Executive Vice Presidents, Chancellors, Vice Presidents, Vice Chancellors,  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Requirements for Federal Awards Effective December 26, 2014, the rules related to federally-sponsored awards Awards (Uniform Guidance) was issued in final form on December 26, 2013. This final guidance supersedes and incrementally funded awards effective December 26, 2014. The Audit Requirements detailed within the Uniform

Ginzel, Matthew

77

Systems Engineering Leading Indicators Guide, Version 2.0  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

The Systems Engineering Leading Indicators Guide editorial team is pleased to announce the release of Version 2.0. Version 2.0 supersedes Version 1.0, which was released in July 2007 and was the result of a project initiated ...

Lean Advancement Initiative

2010-06-29T23:59:59.000Z

78

CR Telecommunications Standards January 2006 Cr.ucdavis.edu  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

CR Telecommunications Standards January 2006 Cr.ucdavis.edu TELECOMMUNICATIONS STANDARDS Published JANUARY 2006 #12;CR Telecommunications Standards January 2006 Page 2 of 207 Foreword Approval&E) and their design consultants. Documents Superseded · This standard replaces the CR Telecommunications Standards

California at Davis, University of

79

SUBJECT: Effective Date: Policy Number: Telecommunications Services 12-15-10 4-003  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

SUBJECT: Effective Date: Policy Number: Telecommunications Services 12-15-10 4-003 Supersedes: Page use them. POLICY STATEMENT: University telecommunication services are administered by the Department of Computer Services and Telecommunications. CS&T is the solely authorized provider of telecommunications

Glebov, Leon

80

13 MARCH 2009 VOL 323 SCIENCE www.sciencemag.org1432 CREDIT:C.BICKEL/SCIENCE  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

increasingly want energy thatisrenewable,clean,andaffordable from solar, wind, hydroelectric, geot- hermal). Wood supplied more energy than fossil fuels in the United States until the 1880s, when coal superseded technologies, advanced wood combustion (AWC) is being deployed throughout Europe, supplying heat, cooling

Boyer, Elizabeth W.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "12-2000 supersedes 7-96" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

PROCEDURES FOR ACCESS TO AND CORRECTION OF INFORMATION Procedural Authority: University Secretary Effective Date: January, 2010  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

PROCEDURES FOR ACCESS TO AND CORRECTION OF INFORMATION Procedural Authority: University Secretary Effective Date: January, 2010 Procedural Officer: University Archivist Supersedes: New Last Editorial Change of these procedures is to set out how the university will manage: · freedom of information requests; · requests

Victoria, University of

82

51.04.01.G0.01 Construction Project Procedure Page 1 of 2 STANDARD ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

51.04.01.G0.01 Construction Project Procedure Page 1 of 2 STANDARD ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE 51.04.01.G0.01 Construction Project Procedure Approved September 14, 2000 Revised January 21, 2011 Next ___________________________________________________________________________________ This delegation of authority and procedure pertains to construction projects only and supersedes all existing

83

SUBJECT: Effective Date: Policy Number: Radio Frequency Spectrum 12-15-10 4-011  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

SUBJECT: Effective Date: Policy Number: Radio Frequency Spectrum 12-15-10 4-011 Supersedes: Page. POLICY STATEMENT: Radio frequency spectrum is a critical resource that must be managed to eliminate be approved by UCF Computer Services & Telecommunications to provide spectrum coordination and avoid radio

Glebov, Leon

84

DOE-HDBK-1081-2014  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Primer on Spontaneous Heating and Pyrophoricity Supersedes DOE-HDBK-1081-94 The purpose of this Primer is to provide an understanding of spontaneous heating and pyrophoricity hazards is necessary for DOE facility personnel to operate and maintain facilities and facility support systems in a safe manner.

85

Analysis of Impacts on Prime or Unique Agricultural Lands in Implementing NEPA  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

This Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) memorandum on Analysis of Impacts on Prime or Unique Agricultural Lands in Implementing the National Environmental Policy Act was developed in cooperation with the Department of Agriculture. It updates and supersedes CEQ's previous memorandum on this subject of August 1976.

86

Revised Draft Guidance on Consideration of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Climate Change in NEPA Reviews  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

On December 18, 2014, CEQ released revised draft guidance for public comment that describes how Federal departments and agencies should consider the effects of greenhouse gas emissions and climate change in their National Environmental Policy Act reviews. The revised draft guidance supersedes the draft greenhouse gas and climate change guidance released by CEQ in February 2010.

87

DOE-STD-0100T-93  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Licensed Reactor Nuclear Safety Criteria Applicable to DOE Reactors Canceled | Superseding DOE/NE-0100T (April 1991) This document identifies nuclear safety criteria applied to licensed reactors. The degree of application of these criteria to a DOE-owned reactor, consistent with their application to comparable licensed reactors, must be determined by the DOE and DOE contractor.

88

Sealed Radioactive Source Accountability  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Notice extends DOE N 5400.9, Sealed Radioactive Source Accountability, of 12-24-91, until 12-24-95, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. The contents of DOE N 5400.9 will be updated and incorporated in the revised DOE O 5480.11, Radiation Protection for Occupational Workers.

1994-12-22T23:59:59.000Z

89

DOE-HDBK-1200-97  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Guide to Good Practices for Developing Learning Objectives Supersedes DOE-STD-1005-92 (July 1992) This guide to good practices provides information and guidance on the types of and development of learning objectives in a systematic approach to training (SAT) program.

90

Approved Version Applicability: UW Medicine  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

: PP-00 Superseded Policy(ies) or Entity Policy: N/A Date Established: October 27, 2003 Date Effective, implementation and maintenance of security measures to protect electronic protected health information (PHI); and to manage the conduct of the UW Medicine's workforce in relation to the protection of that information

Queitsch, Christine

91

Nuclear Data Sheets for A = 249  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The evaluated spectroscopic data are presented for known nuclides of mass 249 (Cm, Bk, Cf, Es, Fm, Md, No). {sup 249}No has not been identified as yet. Significant amounts of new data have been added since the last evaluation of A=249 nuclides. This work supersedes earlier full evaluations of A=249 published by 1999Ar21.

Abusaleem, Khalifeh [Department of Physics, University of Jordan, Amman 11942 (Jordan)

2011-08-15T23:59:59.000Z

92

ROYALTY DISTRIBUTION POLICY The University at Buffalo uses a single uniform structure to distribute proceeds derived from the  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

ROYALTY DISTRIBUTION POLICY Summary The University at Buffalo uses a single uniform structure, staff, and students. When those innovations are licensed and generate royalty income for the University, that royalty income is shared with those who made the innovation. This revised policy supersedes all prior

Krovi, Venkat

93

Administration Policy Complete Policy Title  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Administration Policy Complete Policy Title: McMaster University Alcohol Policy Policy Number, 1998 Supersedes/Amends Policy dated: May 11, 1998 Responsible Executive: Vice-President (Administration policy and the written copy held by the policy owner, the written copy prevails. INTRODUCTION Mc

Haykin, Simon

94

Complete Policy Title: Policy Number (if applicable): Violence in the Workplace -  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Complete Policy Title: Policy Number (if applicable): Violence in the Workplace - McMaster University Policy on Approved by: Date of Most Recent Approval: Senate June 2, 2010 Board of Governors June 17, 2010 Date of Original Approval: Supersedes/Amends Policy dated: June 2, 2010 Responsible

Haykin, Simon

95

DOE-HDBK-1205-97  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Guide to Good Practices for the Design, Development, and Implementation of Examinations Supersedes DOE-STD-1011-92 The purpose of this Guide to Good Practices is to provide direction to training personnel in the broad areas of design, development, and implementation of examinations.

96

DOE-HDBK-1114-98 | Department of Energy  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

4-98 DOE-HDBK-1114-98 August 13,1997 DOE-HDBK-1114-98: Guide to Good Practices for Line and Training Manager Activities Superseding DOE-STD-1056-93 (February 1993) The purpose of...

97

University Policy No.: BP3430 Classification: Buildings and Properties  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

, the Gordon Head Complex, Centennial Stadium, Wallace Field, the University's natural and artificial playing of April to August as it is the policy of the University to rest the natural surface playing fields as much/75 FACILITIES Supersedes: May/72 Last Editorial Change: Mandated Review: The Physical Education

Victoria, University of

98

2010 -Astronomy Grant Round Dear Colleagues  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

2010 - Astronomy Grant Round Dear Colleagues Given the timescale for STFC knowing its future budget are expecting to implement the new grant funding scheme from April next year, which essentially supersedes the current Standard and Rolling Grant mechanism, those proposals that will definitely NOT be funded

Crowther, Paul

99

Nuclear data sheets update for A = 210  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Evaluated spectroscopic data for all nuclei with mass number A=210, and corresponding level schemes from radioactive decay and reaction studies are presented. This evaluation supersedes the earlier one by B. Harmatz (81Ha54), published in Nuclear Data Sheets 34, 735 (1981).

E. Browne

1992-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

100

UC SANTA BARBARA POLICY AND PROCEDURE Interim Food Service Policy  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

UC SANTA BARBARA POLICY AND PROCEDURE Interim Food Service Policy Contact: Environmental Health & Safety or Housing and Auxiliary Services Supersedes: Food Services Interim Policy 6005, February 2001 Technical Update: June 2010 Pages: 2 Interim Food Service Policy I. Scope The Interim Food Service Policy

Bigelow, Stephen

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "12-2000 supersedes 7-96" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

Voluntary Product Standard PS 20-10 American Softwood Lumber Standard  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

#12;Voluntary Product Standard PS 20-10 American Softwood Lumber Standard Supersedes Voluntary Product Standard PS 20-05 June 2010 U.S. Department of Commerce Gary Locke, Secretary National Institute of Standards and Technology Patrick D. Gallagher, Director #12;National Institute of Standards & Technology

102

Gaia astrometric science performance - post-launch predictions  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

The standard errors of the end-of-mission Gaia astrometry have been re-assessed after conclusion of the in-orbit commissioning phase of the mission. An analytical relation is provided for the parallax standard error as function of Gaia G magnitude (and V-I colour) which supersedes the pre-launch relation provided in de Bruijne (2012).

de Bruijne, J H J; Antoja, T

2015-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

103

Semiconductors 4-bit I2C LED dimmer  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Philips Semiconductors PCA9533 4-bit I2C LED dimmer Product data sheet Supersedes data of 2003 Sep 19 2004 Oct 01 INTEGRATED CIRCUITS #12;Philips Semiconductors Product data sheet PCA95334-bit I2C LED dimmer 22004 Oct 01 FEATURES · 4 LED drivers (on, off, flashing at a programmable rate) · 2 selectable

Berns, Hans-Gerd

104

The Influence of Science  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

... to supersede the slings and arrows of earlier days. Nothing could be further from the truth, however, than to suppose that these debasing aspects of modern civilisation are necessary ... , however, than to suppose that these debasing aspects of modern civilisation are necessary consequences of scientific progress. They are due to human greed and the same spirit of ...

1922-06-24T23:59:59.000Z

105

Diesel Engines for Road Transport  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

... A REMARKABLE revolution is taking place in the type of engine used in large motor vehicles, and by some it is thought that for road ... motor vehicles, and by some it is thought that for road transport the highspeed oil engine is destined to supersede the long-favoured petrol ...

1933-10-21T23:59:59.000Z

106

Quality Assurance Program Guide  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The directive provides guidance for DOE elements and contractors in developing and implementing an effective Quality Assurance Program. Cancels DOE G 414.1-2A, DOE G 414.1-3 and DOE G 414.1-5. Superseded by Admin Chg 1, 9-27-11.

2011-08-16T23:59:59.000Z

107

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Institute of Standards and Technology  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Testing SUBJECT: Nuclear Density-Moisture Gauges This bulletin is effective immediately and supersedes for the calibration of nuclear density-moisture gauges for construction materials testing laboratories. NIST Handbook the nonconformity, test methods that require the use of a nuclear density-moisture gauge will be deleted from

108

Radiological Source Registry and Tracking (RSRT)  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Department of Energy (DOE) Notice N 234.1 Reporting of Radioactive Sealed Sources has been superseded by DOE Order O 231.1B Environment, Safety and Health Reporting. O 231.1B identifies the requirements for centralized inventory and transaction reporting for radioactive sealed sources.

109

The University of Glasgow, charity number SC004401 DS/SREP 27/08/2010  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Courtial) 5 Radiation Protection Supervisor (Mr. P. T. Barbour) 6 Fire Prevention 6 Fire Alarm Testing 7 AND EMERGENCY PLAN Twelfth Edition ­ 2010 The regulations contained in this document supersede all earlier Working Outwith Normal Hours 7 General Safety 8 Use of Display Screen Equipment 9 Emergency Plan 11

Glasgow, University of

110

Integrated Safety Management System Guide  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The guide provide DOE line management information useful for implementing the provisions of DOE P 450.4A and the requirements and responsibilities of DOE O 450.2. Cancels and supersedes DOE G 450.4-1B and DOE G 450.3-3.

2011-09-29T23:59:59.000Z

111

DOE-STD-3006-2010  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Planning and Conducting Readiness Reviews Superseding DOE-STD-3006-2000 (June 2000) This Standard provides standardized methods and approaches for planning and conducting RRs. This Standard also provides guidance for preparation of exemption requests in accordance with DOE O 251.1C. DOE O 425.1D requirements for RRs apply both to responsible contractors and to DOE

112

Calculating Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) Estimates on Department of Defense Lands: A Review of RUSLE Factors and  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

and configuration of the slope profile. RUSLE does not estimate the amount of sediment leaving a field or watershed Agriculture Handbook No. 703: Predicting soil erosion by water - a guide to conservation planning, Agriculture Handbook No. 703 will supersede Agricultural Handbook No. 537, "Predicting Rainfa

113

MSc/Dip in Speech and Language Processing PROGRAMME HANDBOOK  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

this handbook should be read in conjunction with. This handbook does not supersede the University Regulations that the information contained in this Handbook was correct at the time of going to press, but this Handbook does HANDBOOK 2011-2012 Linguistics and English Language The School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language

Edinburgh, University of

114

MSc/Dip in the Psychology of Individual Differences  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

. This handbook does not supersede the University Regulations, copies of which are available at the PPLS Office contained in this handbook was correct at the time of going to press, but the handbook does not form partMSc/Dip in the Psychology of Individual Differences PROGRAMME HANDBOOK 2011-2012 Psychology

Edinburgh, University of

115

Indiana Natural Gas % of Total Residential - Sales (Percent)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2002 98.9 98.5 98.7 99.1 92.8 99.4 98.8 98.8 99.1 99.0 98.8 97.8 2003 97.0 97.0 97.0 96.3 96.6 97.7 96.1 100.0 97.2 96.4 97.1 96.9 2004 97.0 96.7 96.7 96.3 97.3 96.3 97.8 96.5 96.0 96.1 96.7 96.7 2005 96.8 96.7 96.2 95.7 96.4 96.0 96.3 96.3 96.2 96.1 96.4 96.5 2006 96.2 96.3 96.2 96.3 95.8 96.4 95.5 96.1 96.5 97.0 96.2 96.3 2007 96.4 97.0 95.9 96.6 96.1 95.2 95.0 95.6 95.0 94.8 95.9 95.9 2008 95.9 95.8 95.8 94.2 94.1 94.1 93.9 93.9 93.4 93.1 94.4 94.3 2009 94.0 94.9 93.2 92.8 91.7 93.2 92.8 92.1 91.7 93.1 93.3 93.7 2010 94.1 94.5 94.2 93.1 94.1 92.8 93.0 92.9 92.6 93.1 94.0 94.8 2011 95.2 94.7 94.6 94.4 94.4 94.5 93.9 94.7 93.8 94.2 94.2 94.6

116

--No Title--  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

8.16 18.46 10.62 40.58 17.01 3.80 1.38 November..... 7.96 20.89 11.83 36.60 17.61 3.84 1.26 December..... 6.87 20.31 12.71 37.81 18.44 3.07 0.79 2000 ... 6.21 18.88 13.41...

117

A Weighted Voting-Based Associative Classification Algorithm  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

......17 57 2 24 led7 8 3200 10 25 wine 14 178 3 26 zoo 17 101 17 27...72.5 73.6 69.3 74.3 wine 93.3 98.9 92.7 96.6...is low, the average accuracy increases more slowly. This reveals that...classification, ACWV considers both the quality and number of rules to avoid......

Xiaoyan Zhu; Qinbao Song; Zihan Jia

2010-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

118

Continuous Crystalline Carbonate Apatite Thin Films. A Biomimetic Guofeng Xu,, Ilhan A. Aksay,, and John T. Groves*,,  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

, Princeton Materials Institute, Princeton UniVersity, Princeton, New Jersey 08544 ReceiVed July 12, 2000 techniques1,2,14 to wet chemical routes.1,2,15-20 The dry physical techniques such as plasma spraying of Chemistry. Princeton Materials Institute. Department of Chemical Engineering. (1) Elliot, J. C. Structure

Aksay, Ilhan A.

119

A Systems Approach to Managing Oil  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

A Systems Approach to Managing Oil Transportation Risk in Prince William Sound Jason R. W. Merrick Received April 21, 2000; revised June 12, 2000; accepted June 26, 2000MANAGING OIL TRANSPORTATION RISK about the safety of oil transportation in the Prince William Sound, Alaska. As a result, a large number

van Dorp, Johan René

120

Submitted to the IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering Wavelet Compression of ECG Signals by the Set  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Submitted to the IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering Wavelet Compression of ECG Signals 12180-3590 January 12, 2000 Abstract A wavelet ECG data codec based on the Set Partitioning) case and applied it to compression of ECG data. Experiments on selected records from the MIT

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "12-2000 supersedes 7-96" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Kentucky Natural Gas % of Total Residential - Sales (Percent)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2002 92.9 92.8 93.1 92.8 91.4 93.2 94.3 94.4 95.3 91.9 93.4 94.2 2003 93.8 94.2 93.1 93.4 96.9 95.2 94.6 94.5 95.7 92.2 93.9 94.0 2004 94.0 93.9 92.9 92.7 96.0 94.9 95.0 95.3 95.6 93.7 93.7 95.1 2005 94.5 94.5 94.6 94.0 95.7 95.3 95.9 95.8 96.1 93.8 95.3 95.7 2006 96.2 95.5 95.8 98.0 95.5 97.7 96.8 97.3 97.2 95.6 96.4 96.2 2007 96.2 95.9 96.2 95.8 96.4 96.6 96.7 96.9 97.0 95.7 95.8 96.3 2008 96.4 95.9 96.1 96.1 96.0 96.8 97.0 96.5 96.4 95.4 95.7 95.8 2009 95.8 95.3 95.2 94.9 95.3 95.6 95.1 95.6 95.5 94.8 94.9 95.6 2010 95.4 95.7 95.9 95.7 96.0 96.7 96.5 96.3 96.1 94.8 95.3 95.8 2011 95.1 95.0 95.2 95.4 94.9 94.5 95.9 96.5 96.1 97.2 96.3 96.1

122

Subject: References:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Subject: Subject: References: DEAR 970.3102-2 Compensation for personal services DEAR 970.5204-13 Allowable costs and fixed-fee (Management and operating contracts) DEAR 970.5204-14 Allowable costs and fixed-fee (support contracts) When is this ~\.cquisition Letter (AL) Effective? This AL is effective 10 days from the date of issuance. This gui~ce supersedes any previous statutory cap on executive compensation. Existing contracts need to be reviewed to determine whether contract terms and conditions are consistent with the guidance in this AL, or whether contract modifications are necessary. When Does this AL Expire? This AL remain;; in effect until superseded or canceled. Whom do you Contact for More Information? Contact the Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, for questions pertaining to the

123

Fire Protection  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NOT MEASUREMENT NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1066-2012 December 2012 _______________ Supersedes DOE-STD-1066-99 DOE STANDARD FIRE PROTECTION U.S. Department of Energy AREA FIRP Washington, DC 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web page at http://www.hss.doe.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/ DOE-STD-1066-2012 FOREWORD This Department of Energy (DOE) Standard (STD) supersedes DOE-STD-1066-99 1 and is approved for use by DOE and its contractors. The following fire protection standard is canceled with the issuance of this Standard and appropriate technical content was incorporated into this Standard:  DOE-STD-1088-95, Fire Protection for Relocatable Structures

124

Total Energy - Data - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Superseded -- see MER for key annual tables Superseded -- see MER for key annual tables Annual Energy Review archives for data year: 2011 2010 2009 2008 all archives Go CONTENT CHANGES + EXPAND ALL Changes in Annual Energy Review 2011 Annual Energy Review 2011 Release: September 27, 2012 1. Energy Consumption, Expenditures, and Emissions Indicators Estimates (Table 1.5) has been modified to include columns for Gross Output and Energy Expenditures as Share of Gross Output and remove Greenhouse Gas Emissions per Real Dollar of Gross Domestic Product. 2. Sales of Fossil Fuels Produced on Federal and American Indian Lands (Table 1.14) was previously titled "Fossil Fuel Production on Federally Administered Lands." It has been redesigned and now provides data on sales of fossil fuels from Federal and American Indian lands for fiscal years 2003 through 2011.

125

G  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Acquisition Planning Considerations for Management and Operating Contracts Acquisition Planning Considerations for Management and Operating Contracts References: FAR Subpart 6.1 Full and Open Competition FAR Subpart 6.3 Other than Full and Open Competition FAR Part 7 Acquisition Planning FAR Part 34 Major System Acquisition DEAR Subpart 917.6 Management and Operating Contracts DEAR 970.1706-1 Award, Renewal, and Extension Acquisition Guide Chapter 7.1, Acquisition Planning Acquisition Guide Chapter 42.5, Contract Management Planning When is this Acquisition Letter (AL) effective? This AL is effective upon issuance. AL 2009-03 is cancelled and superseded by this AL When does this AL Expire? This AL remains in effect until superseded or canceled. Who Is the Intended Audience For this AL? Department of Energy (DOE) Contracting Officers are the audience for this AL.

126

SF4601-C;Nonemployee's Expense Voucher  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4601-C (7-2008) Supersedes (8-2 NONEMPLOYEES EXPENSE VOUCHER INSTRUCTIONS 4601-C (7-2008) Supersedes (8-2 NONEMPLOYEES EXPENSE VOUCHER INSTRUCTIONS Voucher expenses biweekly or upon return from trip, whichever occurs first. Vouchers should preferably be typewritten. - Keep a daily record of expenses. Use form SF 4601-C worksheet to record expenses as they are incurred. Explain unusual expenses on travel invoice line 32. - Attach the following to the original voucher: - Funds Advance form if funds received. - Original receipts for airfare, car rental, lodging (requires receipts regardless of amount). - Itinerary from Designated Travel Agent, if applicable. (ALL PAGES INCLUDING SUMMARY.) - Copy of Employment Interview Invitation Letter, if applicable, as outlined in Staffing: Sourcing & Select Manual (Chapter 2)

127

Radiological Training for Tritium Facilities DOE-HDBK-1105-2002  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Superseding Superseding DOE-HDBK-1105-96 December 1996 DOE HANDBOOK RADIOLOGICAL TRAINING FOR TRITIUM FACILITIES U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. TS This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. (PART 1 OF 4) Radiological Training for Tritium Facilities Program Management Guide

128

Federal Energy Management Program: Federal Water Efficiency Best Management  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Water Efficiency Best Management Practices Water Efficiency Best Management Practices Water Sense at Work Logo for the EPA WaterSense The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency developed WaterSense at Work, a compilation of water-efficiency best management practices (BMPs), to help commercial and institutional facilities understand and manage water use, help facilities establish effective water-management programs, and identify projects and practices that reduce facility water use. FEMP originally developed Federal Water Efficiency Best Management Practices (BMPs) in response to Executive Order (E.O.) 13123 requirements, which required Federal agencies to reduce water use through cost-effective water efficiency improvements. E.O. 13423 supersedes E.O. 13123. To account for the superseded requirement changes, water use patterns, and advancing technologies, the Environmental Protection Agency's WaterSense Office updated the original BMPs.

129

Specification for HEPA Filters Used By DOE Contractors  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-STD-3020-2005 DOE-STD-3020-2005 December 2005 Supersedes DOE-STD-3020-97 January 1997 DOE TECHNICAL STANDARD Specification for HEPA Filters Used by DOE Contractors U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited FOREWARD This U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) standard supersedes DOE-STD-3020-97 and is approved for use by DOE and its contractors. This standard was developed primarily for application in DOE programs. It provides guidance to DOE contractors for procurement and required testing of High Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filters used in DOE nuclear facilities. Required testing is performed by the filter manufacturer and

130

e-QIP TIP SHEET  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

249-RCI (11-2013) Supersedes (10-2013) 249-RCI (11-2013) Supersedes (10-2013) issue SNL Personnel Security Clearance Office For additional assistance contact Clearance Reinvestigation Specialists: Berlinda Sanchez (505) 844-1975 | Rob Kim (505) 284-6873 Page 1 of 6 CLEARANCE REINVESTIGATION CHECKLIST & INSTRUCTIONS THE FOLLOWING STEPS AND INSTRUCTIONS SHOULD BE FOLLOWED BY AN INDIVIDUAL COMPLETING THEIR CLEARANCE REINVESTIGATION. COMPLETE PERSEC 5633.33 NNSA PERSONNEL SECURITY CLEARANCE ACTION REQUEST FORM WITH YOUR SNL MANAGER OR FACILITY SECURITY OFFICER: PERSEC 5633.33 NNSA PERSONNEL SECURITY CLEARANCE ACTION REQUEST Reinvestigation Review the instructions on pages 2 and 3 of the PERSEC 5633.33 NNSA PERSONNEL SECURITY CLEARANCE ACTION REQUEST FORM. In the "CLEARANCE ACTION" section of the form:

131

Specification for HEPA Filters Used By DOE Contractors  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-STD-3020-2005 DOE-STD-3020-2005 December 2005 Supersedes DOE-STD-3020-97 January 1997 DOE TECHNICAL STANDARD Specification for HEPA Filters Used by DOE Contractors U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited FOREWARD This U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) standard supersedes DOE-STD-3020-97 and is approved for use by DOE and its contractors. This standard was developed primarily for application in DOE programs. It provides guidance to DOE contractors for procurement and required testing of High Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filters used in DOE nuclear facilities. Required testing is performed by the filter manufacturer and

132

Sandia National Laboratories | National Nuclear Security Administration  

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Sandia National Laboratories Sandia National Laboratories Home > About Us > Our Operations > Acquisition and Project Management > M & O Support Department > Sandia National Laboratories Sandia National Laboratories Sandia National Laboratories DE-AC04-94AL85000 Operated by Sandia Corporation a Subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation Contract Updated to Modification 515 dated 09/09/2013 View previous Sandia Contract and Mods (M081-A201). BASIC Contract (Official) Modifications (Official) Funding Mods Available Upon Request Conformed Contract (Updated to Mod 515 dated 09/09/2013) (Unofficial) SNL M202 Section A (Supersedes Basic and all Mods) (pdf, 397KB) SNL M216 (9/15/04) (pdf, 439KB) SNL M202 SecA (Supersedes Basic and all Mods) (pdf, 397KB) SNL Sec B-H (doc, 314KB) SNL M218

133

DOE-STD-3020-97; DOE Standard Specification for HEPA Filters Used By DOE Contractors  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

POUND POUND DOE-STD-3020-97 January 1997 Supersedes DOE NE F3-45 January 1987 DOE STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR HEPA FILTERS USED BY DOE CONTRACTORS U.S. Department of Energy FSC 6910 Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. DE97000782 DOE-STD-3020-97 iii FOREWORD This Department of Energy standard supersedes DOE NE F3-45 and is approved for use by

134

Directory of Points of Contact for the DOE Technical Standard Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2-2002 2-2002 August 2002 Supersedes DOE-TSL-2-98 January 1998 DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS LIST DIRECTORY OF POINTS OF CONTACT FOR THE DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM U.S. Department of Energy AREA SDMP Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. TS NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-TSL-2-2002 August 2002 Supersedes DOE-TSL-2-98 January 1998 DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS LIST

135

Reporting Prescription Drugs, Over-the-Counter Medications, and Dietary Supplements (ORISE 08-NSEM-0227, 2008)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Reporting Reporting Prescription Drugs, Over-the-Counter Medications, and Dietary Supplements Human Reliability Program U.S. Department of Energy Office of Health, Safety and Security Office of Departmental Personnel Security Contents of this brochure are based on 10 CFR Part 712, Human Reliability Program; however, the information presented herein in no way supersedes or has precedence over the provisions of that regulation as published or amended. Table of contents Introduction.......................................................................................................................................1 Prescription drugs .............................................................................................................................1

136

Working Copy  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

DOE/WIPP-99-2286 Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Environmental Notification or Reporting Implementation Plan Revision 7 U.S. Department of Energy December 2013 This document supersedes DOE/WIPP-99-2286, Rev. 6. Working Copy Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Environmental Notification or Reporting Implementation Plan DOE/WIPP-99-2286, Rev. 7 2 TABLE OF CONTENTSCHANGE HISTORY SUMMARY .............................................. 3 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................ 4 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 6 2.0 NOTIFICATION OR REPORTING REQUIREMENTS AND COMMITMENTS ..... 7

137

Self- versus directed- assembly of nanoparticles via pulsed laser induced dewetting of patterned metal films  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A nanoscale, synthetic perturbation was all that was required to nudge a natural, self-assembly process toward significantly higher order. Metallic thin film strips were transformed into nanoparticle arrays by nanosecond, liquid-phase dewetting. Arrays formed according to an evolving Rayleigh-Plateau instability, yet nanoparticle diameter and pitch were poorly controlled. However, by patterning a nanoscale sinusoid onto the original strip edge, a precise nanoparticle diameter and pitch emerged superseding the naturally evolving Rayleigh-Plateau instability.

Fowlkes, Jason Davidson [ORNL; Kondic, Lou [New Jersey Insitute of Technology; Wu, Yeuyeng [University of Tennessee, Knoxville (UTK); Rack, Philip D [ORNL; Diez, Javier A [Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires

2011-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

138

DOE-HDBK-3012-96  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Guide to Good Practices For Operational Readiness Reviews Replaced by DOE-STD-3006-2000 | SUPERSEDING DOE-HDBK-3012-94 (September 1994) This guidance section provides instructions, explanations and examples for the performance of all phases of an Operational Readiness Review (ORR). Details pertinent to the Team Leader (TL), Team Members (TM) and Review Coordinator (RC) are outlined. An appendix contains sample forms and correspondence which are typically used to initiate and perform the ORR.

139

DOE-HDBK-3012-2003  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Guide To Good Practices For Operational Readiness Reviews (ORR), Team Leader's Guide SUPERSEDING DOE-HDBK-3012-96 This guidance provides instructions, explanations and examples for the performance of all phases of an Operational Readiness Review (ORR). Details pertinent to the Team Leader, Team Members, and Review Coordinator are outlined. Appendices contain sample forms and correspondence, which are typically used to initiate and perform the ORR.

140

Comments dataset for A = 204.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Evaluated nuclear structure and decay data for all nuclei within the A = 204 mass chain are presented. The experimental data are evaluated and best values for level and gamma-ray energies, quantum numbers, lifetimes, gamma-ray intensities, and other nuclear properties are recommended. Inconsistencies and discrepancies that exist in the literature are noted. This work supersedes the earlier evaluation by M.R. Schmorak (1994Sc24), published in Nuclear Data Sheets72, 409 (1994).

Kondev, F.; Chiara, C. J. (Nuclear Engineering Division); ( PHY)

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "12-2000 supersedes 7-96" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

DOE-STD-1066-99  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Fire Protection Design Criteria Replaced by DOE-STD-1066-2012 | Superseding DOE-STD-1066-97 This Standard provides supplemental fire protection guidance applicable to the design and construction of DOE facilities and site features (such as water distribution systems) that are also provided for fire protection. It is intended to be used in conjunction with the applicable building code, National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Codes and Standards, and any other applicable DOE construction criteria

142

DOE-STD-3013-2000  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Stabilization, Packaging, and Storage of Plutonium-Bearing Materials Replaced by DOE-STD-3013-2004 | Superseding DOE-STD-3013-99 (November 1999) This Standard provides criteria for stabilization of plutonium-bearing materials at DOE facilities to safe and stable forms that can be packaged and placed in storage with minimal surveillance for up to 50 years. This Standard applies to plutonium-bearing metals and oxides containing at least 30 wt% plutonium plus uranium.

143

DOE-STD-3013-2004  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Stabilization, Packaging, and Storage of Plutonium-Bearing Materials Replaced by DOE-STD-3013-2012 | Superseding DOE-STD-3013-2000 (September 2000) This Standard provides criteria for stabilization of plutonium-bearing materials at DOE facilities to safe and stable forms that can be packaged and placed in storage with minimal surveillance for up to 50 years. This Standard applies to plutonium-bearing metals and oxides containing at least 30 wt% plutonium plus uranium.

144

Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Particle Data Group), JP G 37, 075021 (2010) and 2011 partial update for the 2012 edition (URL: http://pdg.lbl.gov) f1(1420) IG (JPC ) = 0+(1 + +)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

± (K0) + - 1435 ± 9 PROKOSHKIN 97B GAM4 100 - p 0 0 n 1430 ± 4 2 ARMSTRONG 92E OMEG 85,300 + p, p p- +) pfast 1429 ± 3 389 ARMSTRONG 89 OMEG 300 p p K K p p 1425 ± 2 1520 ARMSTRONG 84 OMEG 85 + p, p p (+ ,p This result supersedes ARMSTRONG 84, ARMSTRONG 89. 3 From fit to the K(892)K 1 + + partial wave. 4 Mass error

145

Nuclear Data Sheets for A = 206  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Evaluated nuclear structure and decay data for all nuclei within the A = 206 mass chain are presented. The experimental data are evaluated and recommended best values for level and gamma-ray energies, quantum numbers, lifetimes, gamma-ray intensities and other nuclear properties are presented. Inconsistencies and discrepancies that exist in the literature are noted. This work supersedes the earlier evaluation by E. Browne (1999Br39), published in Nuclear Data Sheets 88, 29 (1999).

F.G. Kondev

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

146

DOE-STD-3006-2000  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Planning and Conduct of Operational Readiness Reviews Replaced by DOE-STD-3006-2010 | Superseding DOE-STD-3006-95 (November 1995) DOE O 425.1B specifies the conditions and circumstances when an Operational Readiness Review (ORR) or a Readiness Assessment (RA) is required as part of a new start or restart process. This standard provides guidance on the planning and conduct of the ORRs and RAs

147

DOE-TSL-4-99  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Directory of DOE and Contractor Personnel Involved in Non-Government Standards Activities; Directory of DOE and Contractor Personnel Involved in Non-Government Standards Activities Superseding DOE-TSL-4-98 May 1998 The body of this document contains a listing of DOE employees and DOE contractors who have submitted form DOE F 1300.2, Record of Non-Government Standards Activity, which is attached to the end of this document.

148

DOE-STD-1020-2002  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Natural Phenomena Hazards Design and Evaluation Criteria for Department of Energy Facilities Replaced by DOE-STD-1020-2012 | Superseding DOE-STD-1020-94 (April 1994) It is the policy of the Department of Energy (DOE) to design, construct, and operate DOE facilities so that workers, the general public, and the environment are protected from the impacts of natural phenomena hazards on DOE facilities.

149

WPN 15-4: QUALITY WORK PLAN REQUIREMENT UPDATE  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Effective October 21, 2014: This guidance provides updates to WPN 14-4 issued December 2, 2013. This guidance supersedes 14-4 and describes requirements to support and verify quality work in the Department of Energys (DOE) Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP). It defines what constitutes a quality installation of weatherization measures, outlines how those measures are inspected and validated, and prescribes acceptable training and credentialing of workers.

150

Double shell tank waste analysis plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Waste analysis plan for the double shell tanks. SD-WM-EV-053 is Superseding SD-WM-EV-057.This document provides the plan for obtaining information needed for the safe waste handling and storage of waste in the Double Shell Tank Systems. In Particular it addresses analysis necessary to manage waste according to Washington Administrative Code 173-303 and Title 40, parts 264 and 265 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

Mulkey, C.H.; Jones, J.M.

1994-12-15T23:59:59.000Z

151

Y73-004PD, B&W Y-12 10 CFR Part 851 Worker Safety and Health Program  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Y73-004PD Rev. Date: 05/10/2011 Supersedes: 4/27/2009 Page 2 of 59 Y73-004PD Rev. Date: 05/10/2011 Supersedes: 4/27/2009 Page 2 of 59 Subject: B&W Y-12 10 CFR Part 851 Worker Safety and Health Program REVISION LOG Revision Date Description of Change Pages Affected 5/10/2011 DMR number: 11-Y12-144 Changed Wackenhut Services to WSI-Oak Ridge Added "All Other Off-site Facilities" to facility list Updated procedure titles and numbers that have been revised since April, 2009. Corrected typographical errors 5,7 7 All All 4/27/2009 DMR number: 09-Y12-259 Updated the change in company name and corrected typographical errors All 5/16/2007 New procedure DMR number: 06-ESH-21 All Y73-004PD Rev. Date: 05/10/2011 Supersedes: 4/27/2009 Page 3 of 59 Subject: B&W Y-12 10 CFR Part 851 Worker Safety and Health Program

152

NETL: News Release - U.S. Energy Department Invites Minority Institutions  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

January 12, 2000 January 12, 2000 U.S. Energy Department Invites Minority Institutions to Compete for Fossil Energy Research Grants; Proposals Due in February The U.S. Department of Energy today announced its annual competition for students and professors from minority institutions to compete for research dollars that will continue to support the nation's clean air goals and help bolster declining domestic oil supplies. Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Other Minority Institutions will compete for $900,000 from the Department of Energy to conduct innovative research and development that converts and uses coal, natural gas and oil. Proposals are due February 18, 2000. The department expects to announce awards in May. DOE anticipates announcing four to six awards from the first six topics (maximum amount $200,000) and four to eight awards in the Faculty/Student Exploratory Research Training grants (maximum award $20,000).

153

Preliminary Notice of Violation EA-2000-03  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7, 2000 7, 2000 Mr. Ron Mencarelli [ ] MOTA Corporation Suite 375 810 Dutch Square Blvd. Columbia, SC 29210 EA-2000-03 Subject: Preliminary Notice of Violation (NTS-CH-AA-ANLE-ANLE-2000-0001) Dear Mr. Mencarelli: This letter refers to an evaluation by the Department of Energy (DOE) of a March 12, 2000, event at Building 211 at Argonne National Laboratory-East (ANL-E), involving your Project Manager. An Investigation Summary Report prepared by DOE on this matter is enclosed. DOE concluded that a violation of 10 CFR Part 835 (Occupational Radiation Protection Rule) likely occurred. This violation is described in the enclosed Preliminary Notice of Violation (PNOV). Specifically, on March 12, 2000, your Project Manager entered a radiologically controlled area and removed slightly activated [metal] from this area

154

An automatic control system for a laboratory precipitation process  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

) 200 mg/1 (from CaC12) 2000 mg/1 (from Na2504) 150 mg/1 (from Na25105~9H20) 5000 mg/1 (additional TDS from NaC1) 50 mg/1 as CaCOS (from NaHCOS) 1025 mg/1 25 at the top for the pH probe and the lime feed tubing. The time interval of the flow...

Burnett, Mary Alice

2012-06-07T23:59:59.000Z

155

The utilization of oilseed proteins as encapsulation agents  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

considerations dictate the use of the least amount of packaging necessary? Balassa and Fanger (1971) claimed excessive oil loss during processing for high oil-to-wall ratios, Official analytical methods for determining the total fat content of encapsulated... 6. 60 7. 46 4. 73 3. 88 4. 96 0. 45 0. 08 0. 81 0. 13 2. 21 77. 49 94. 08 98. 02 91. 84 95. 52 27. 2 53. 3 66. 2 4. 2 41. 2 96. 7 74. 5 95. 5 99. 8 45. 9 69. 7 96. 4 a Moisture-free basis b Estimated by N X 6. 25 Table 3...

Baker, Grey Wayne

2012-06-07T23:59:59.000Z

156

SF 9424-EFT;Electronic Funds Transfer Agreement  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

424-EFT (10-2011) 424-EFT (10-2011) Supersedes (11-2009) Issue ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFER AGREEMENT Mail completed form to Sandia National Laboratories, Supplier Data Management, MS-1486, PO BOX 5800, Albuquerque, NM 87185-1486 or Fax: (505) 284-4798. For questions, contact us at: isupplier@sandia.gov. The undersigned Supplier (hereinafter referred to as Supplier) hereby authorizes Sandia Corporation DBA Sandia National Laboratories (hereinafter referred to as Sandia) to make payment for goods and services covered by an

157

Coal Distribution Database, 2006  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

2009 Final February 2011 2 Overview of 2009 Coal Distribution Tables Introduction The Coal Distribution Report - Annual provides detailed information on domestic coal distribution by origin state, destination state, consumer category, and method of transportation. Also provided is a summary of foreign coal distribution by coal-producing State. This Final 2009 Coal Distribution Report - Annual, supersedes the data contained in the four Quarterly Coal Distribution Reports previously issued for 2009. This report relies on the most current data available from EIA's various monthly, quarterly and annual surveys of the coal industry and electric power generation industry. In addition, the report

158

Microsoft Word - AL2006-01.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6-01 6-01 Acquisition Regulation Date 10/27/05 ACQUISITION LETTER This Acquisition Letter is issued under the authority of the DOE and NNSA Procurement Executives. Subject: Electronic Subcontracting Reporting System (eSRS) References: FAR Subpart 19.7 The Small Business Subcontracting Program DEAR 919.705-6 Postaward responsibilities of the contracting officer AL 2005-07 Small Business Procurement Goals What is the Effective date of this Acquisition Letter (AL)? This AL is effective immediately after the eSRS goes online. When does this AL Expire? This AL remains in effect until superseded or canceled. What are the Points of Contact?

159

GP-8 LAWS AND REGULATIONS  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

DOP (5-2011) DOP (5-2011) Supersedes (7-2010) issue DECLARATION of OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE PROVIDER GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSE All Contractors and their lower-tier subcontractors must comply with the Department of Energy's Worker Safety and Health Program regulation, 10 CFR 851, "Worker Safety and Health Program (WSHP). The WSHP enforces worker safety and health requirements including, but not limited to, standards of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and Workers Compensation Laws as incorporated in the SNL WSHP. APPLICABILITY Contractors at all tiers which meet the applicability criteria must establish and provide comprehensive

160

Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

175: Consultation and Coordination with Indian 175: Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (2000) Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (2000) Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (2000). Establishes standards for regular and meaningful consultation with Tribal officials to strengthen the government-to-government relationships with Indian tribes, including establishment of fundamental principles, policymaking criteria, special requirements of legislative proposals, consultation, accountability principles, and increasing flexibility for Indian Tribal Waivers. EO 13175 supersedes EO 13084. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (2000) More Documents & Publications

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "12-2000 supersedes 7-96" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

SF 2730-NCB;NAME CHANGE REQUEST FOR BADGE OFFICE AND STAFFING  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2730-NCB (02-2011) 2730-NCB (02-2011) Supersedes 12-2010 Version INSTRUCTIONS & INFORMATION The purpose of this form is to report a name change related to marriage, divorce, or legal name change. This form will be used to: * Update your clearance file with DOE (if applicable) * Issue you a new badge, * Update your Sandia Human Resources, Benefits and Health Services records INDIVIDUAL DOE REPORTING REQUIREMENTS (Personnel Security) Name Change Uncleared personnel may report a legal name change at any time. Clearance holders and personnel in process for a security

162

Exhibit B  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

P-13 P-13 1 WHOLESALE RATES FOR HYDRO PEAKING POWER 1 Supersedes Rate Schedule P-11. Effective: During the period October 1, 2013, through September 30, 2017, in accordance with interim approval from Rate Order No. SWPA-66 issued by the Deputy Secretary of Energy on September 30, 2013 and pursuant to final approval by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Available: In the marketing area of Southwestern Power Administration (Southwestern), described generally as the States of Arkansas, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Oklahoma, and Texas. Applicable: To wholesale Customers which have contractual rights from Southwestern to purchase Hydro Peaking Power and associated energy (Peaking Energy and Supplemental Peaking Energy).

163

Natural Phenomena Hazards Analysis and Design Criteria for DOE Facilities  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

STATEMENT. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. STATEMENT. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1020-2012 December 2012 _________________ Supersedes DOE-STD-1020-2002 DOE STANDARD Natural Phenomena Hazards Analysis and Design Criteria for DOE Facilities U.S. Department of Energy AREA NPHZ Washington, D.C. 20585 NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1020-2012 This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web page at http://www.hss.doe.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/ DOE-STD-1020-2012 i Foreword Department of Energy (DOE) Standard (STD)-1020-2012, Natural Phenomena Hazards

164

Executive Order 13592: Improving American Indian and Alaska Native  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

592: Improving American Indian and Alaska Native 592: Improving American Indian and Alaska Native Educational Opportunities and Strengthening Tribal Colleges and Universities (2011) Executive Order 13592: Improving American Indian and Alaska Native Educational Opportunities and Strengthening Tribal Colleges and Universities (2011) Superseded EO 13021 to ensure that all American Indian students, regardless of which institution they attend, receive support from the federal government at elementary through college levels. This EO also creates an Interagency Working Group on AI/AN Education to establish educational goals across the government. Executive Order 13592: Improving American Indian and Alaska Native Educational Opportunities and Strengthening Tribal Colleges and Universities (2011) More Documents & Publications

165

EXEC-2011-004098 - Memo signed by Secretary Chu dated May 5 2011.pdf  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Washington, D.C. 20585 May 5,2011 MEMORANDUM FOR THOMAS P. D' AGOSTINO UNDER SECRETARY FOR NUCLEAR SECURITY AND ADMINISTRATOR OF THE NATIONAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION STEVEN KOONIN UNDER SECRETARY SCIENCE ARUN MAJUMDAR SENIOR ADVISORIDIRECTOR ARPA-E FROM: STEVEN CHU ~ ~tV SUBJECT: Authorize Changes to Workforce Restructuring Policy This memorandum provides revised and consolidated policy and models intended to facilitate and expedite any necessary contractor workforce restructuring activities. Specifically, this memorandum addresses 1) policies applicable only to workforce restructuring at the Department's defense nuclear facilities and 2) the policies applicable to workforce restructuring at all Departmental facilities. This memorandum supersedes any

166

Whistleblower Protection and Nondisclosure Agreements | Department of  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Whistleblower Protection and Nondisclosure Agreements Whistleblower Protection and Nondisclosure Agreements Whistleblower Protection and Nondisclosure Agreements Important Notice Concerning Nondisclosure Acknowledgments or Agreements (NDAs) with the Department of Energy: Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2012 Required Statement Regarding Nondisclosure Agreements: Pursuant to the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2012, the following statement applies to every nondisclosure policy, form, or agreement of the Government (with current or former federal employees), including those in effect before the Act's effective date of December 27, 2012: "These provisions are consistent with and do not supersede, conflict with, or otherwise alter the employee obligations, rights, or liabilities created

167

Job Counting Guidelines  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Environmental Management Environmental Management Definitions and Guidelines for Counting Monthly and Quarterly EM Recovery Act Full Time Equivalents (FTEs) and Cumulative Head-Count The following updated definitions and guidelines are intended to provide EM Recovery Act sites with information to collect and report timely and accurate full-time equivalent and cumulative head-count data for both monthly and quarterly jobs data calls. These revised guidelines supersede the previous monthly jobs data reporting definitions and guidelines dated February 9, 2010. These revised guidelines remain consistent with OMB guidance issued December 18, 2009 and cover subcontractors and vendors as well as prime

168

East Building, PHH-30 U.S. Department 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

East Building, PHH-30 East Building, PHH-30 U.S. Department 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. of Transportation Washington, D.C. 20590 Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Tracking Number: 2008110380 April 30, 2009 To Active Grantees of Special Permit 13133: Based on the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration's editorial review initiated on December 4, 2008, certain special permits were amended by updating regulatory citations when necessary, making needed editorial corrections and by inserting language to indicate that the current revision of the special permit supersedes previous revisions. If you have questions concerning these changes, feel free to contact

169

Fire Protection Engineering Functional Area Qualification Standard, 2007  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

37-2007 37-2007 December 2007 Supersedes DOE-STD-1137-2000 July 2000 DOE STANDARD FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1137-2007 ii Available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web Site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/techstds/ DOE-STD-1137-2007 iv INTENTIONALLY BLANK DOE-STD-1137-2007 v TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENT ..................................................................................................VII PURPOSE.......................................................................................................................

170

Microsoft Word - AL2007-01.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

AL-2007-01 (12/15/06) AL-2007-01 (12/15/06) 1 Department of Energy No. AL-2007-01 Acquisition Regulation Date 12/15/06 ACQUISITION LETTER This Acquisition Letter is issued by the Procurement Executive of DOE. Subject: Implementation of Functional Accountability Requirements References: Secretary of Energy Memorandum dated May 23, 2006, Functional Accountability When is this Acquisition Letter (AL) Effective? This AL, which includes the attached OPAM Implementation Plan and DOE Corporate Implementation Plan, are effective immediately. When does this AL Expire? This AL remains in effect until superseded or canceled and is subject to change as needed. Who is the Point of Contact?

171

Review and Approval of Nuclear Facility Safety Basis and Safety Design Basis Documents  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1104-2009 May 2009 Superseding DOE-STD-1104-96 DOE STANDARD REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF NUCLEAR FACILITY SAFETY BASIS AND SAFETY DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTS U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, DC 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1104-2009 ii Available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards web page at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/ DOE-STD-1104-2009 iii CONTENTS FOREWORD .................................................................................................................................. v INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................

172

Microsoft Word - S07566_Requirements.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

March 2012 LMS/FUSRAP/S07566 Rev. 1 This page intentionally left blank LMS/FUSRAP/S07566 Rev. 1 Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Requirements for Remediated FUSRAP Sites This document supersedes DOE-LM/GJ1242-2006, Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Needs Assessment for the 25 DOE FUSRAP Sites (S01649), December 2006 March 2012 This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy LTS&M Requirements for Remediated FUSRAP Sites March 2012 Doc. No. S07566, Rev. 1 Page i Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... iii 1.0 Acid/Pueblo Canyon, New Mexico, Site ...............................................................................1

173

Rate Schedule CV-RFS4  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

RFS4 RFS4 (Supersedes Schedule CV-RFS3) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT SCHEDULE OF RATE FOR REGULATION AND FREQUENCY RESPONSE SERVICE Effective: October 1, 2011, through September 30, 2016. Available: Within the marketing area served by the Western Area Power Administration (Western), Sierra Nevada Customer Service Region. Applicable: To customers receiving Regulation and Frequency Response Service (regulation). Character and Conditions of Service: Regulation is necessary to provide for the continuous balancing of resources and interchange with load and for maintaining scheduled interconnection frequency at 60-cycles per second. Formula Rate: The formula rate for regulation includes three components:

174

Subject:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0 0 ERRATA SHEET STANDARD RESEARCH SUBCONTRACT (EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION OR NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION) Page 1. Header Information: Delete open parentheses after Phone #: and after Fax #: Page 1. Paragraph 2. Second sentence, add "(Appendix A)" after the word Provisions. In the third sentence, delete misspelled word "supercede" and replace with "supersede." Page 2. Change date to read "August 2010" throughout document. SCHEDULE OF ARTICILES, Article 1. Statement of Work: 1. Page 3, Paragraph 1, revise to read: "The Subcontractor shall perform certain research and develop work identified as "___," dated___, and more fully described in the

175

Natural Phenomena Hazards Analysis and Design Criteria for DOE Facilities  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

STATEMENT. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. STATEMENT. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-STD-1020-2012 December 2012 _________________ Supersedes DOE-STD-1020-2002 DOE STANDARD Natural Phenomena Hazards Analysis and Design Criteria for DOE Facilities U.S. Department of Energy AREA NPHZ Washington, D.C. 20585 NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1020-2012 This document is available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web page at http://www.hss.doe.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/ DOE-STD-1020-2012 i Foreword Department of Energy (DOE) Standard (STD)-1020-2012, Natural Phenomena Hazards

176

Site environmental report for calendar year 1996: Yucca Mountain site, Nye County, Nevada  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The environmental program established by the Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Office (YMSCO) has been designed and implemented to protect, maintain, and restore environmental quality, minimize potential threats to the environment and the public, and comply with environmental policies and US Department of Energy (DOE) Orders. In accordance with DOE Order 5400.1, General Environmental Protection Program (DOE, 1990a), to be superseded by DOE Order 231.1 (under review), the status of the Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project (YMP) environmental program has been summarized in this annual Site Environmental Report (SER) to characterize performance, document compliance with environmental requirements, and highlight significant programs and efforts during calendar year 1996.

NONE

1997-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

177

Summary of fire protection programs of the United States Department of Energy  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This edition of the Annual Summary of DOE Fire Protection Programs continues the series started in 1972. Since May 1950, an annual report has been required from each field organization. The content has varied through the years and most of the accident data reporting requirements have been superseded by the Computerized Accident/Incident Reporting System administered by EG G, Idaho. However, this report is the sole source of information relating to fire protection programs, and to the actions of the field offices and to headquarters that are of general fire protection interest.

Not Available

1991-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

178

1993 Wholesale Power and Transmission Rate Schedules.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Bonneville Power Administration 1993 Wholesale Power Rate Schedules and General Rate Schedule Provisions and 1993 Transmission Rate Schedules and General Transmission Rate Schedule Provisions, contained herein, were approved on an interim basis effective October 1, 1993. These rate schedules and provisions were approved by the Federal Energy Commission, United States Department of Energy, in September, 1993. These rate schedules and provisions supersede the Administration`s Wholesale Power Rate Schedules and General Rate Schedule Provisions and Transmission Rate Schedules and General Transmission Rate Schedule Provisions effective October 1, 1991.

US Bonneville Power Administration

1993-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

179

Bench-Scale Development of a Hybrid Membrane-Absorption CO{sub 2} Capture Process: Preliminary Cost Assessment  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report describes a study of capture costs for a hybrid membrane-absorption capture system based on Membrane Technology and Research, Inc. (MTR)s low-pressure membrane contactors and the University of Texas at Austins 5 m piperazine (PZ) Advanced Flash Stripper (AFS; 5 m PZ AFS) based CO2 capture system. The report is submitted for NETL review, and may be superseded by a final topical report on this topic that will be submitted to satisfy the Task 2 report requirement of the current project (DE-FE0013118).

Freeman, Brice; Kniep, Jay; Pingjiao, Hao; Baker, Richard; Rochelle, Gary; Chen, Eric; Frailie, Peter; Ding, Junyuan; Zhang, Yue

2014-03-31T23:59:59.000Z

180

DOE-HDBK-1092-2013  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Electrical Safety Superseding DOE-HDBK-1092-2004 (December 2004) Generally, the guidance contained in this Department of Energy (DOE) Handbook for Electrical Safety, DOE-HDBK-1092-2013, for implementing electrical safety at DOE facilities is based on well-developed industrial practices, mandatory rules, or nationally-recognized consensus codes or standards. The guidelines are written to be flexible, so that they encompass the range from large, permanent DOE test or production facilities to small research or testing facilities. These guidelines form a compendium of good practices and describe key elements of programs that support electrical safety at DOE facilities.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "12-2000 supersedes 7-96" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

Department of Energy Labor Relations and Standards  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The change would be to remove Chapter I, Labor Relations, and Chapter II Labor Standards from DOE O 350.1 and develop DOE O DOE O 350.3, which will cancel and supersede Chapters I and II in DOE O 350.1. Content of the two chapters will be updated to reflect the Secretarial determination transferring functions for contractor labor relations and labor standards from the Office of Legacy Management to the Office of General Counsel. CRDs for those chapters will also be removed.

2014-02-06T23:59:59.000Z

182

DOE-HDBK-1100-2004  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Chemical Process Hazards Analysis Superseding DOE-HDBK-1100-96 (February 1996) The purpose of this handbook is to facilitate, within the DOE, the performance of chemical process hazards analyses (PrHAs) as required under the PSM Rule. It provides basic information for the performance of PrHAs, and should not be considered a complete resource on PrHA methods. Likewise, to determine if a facility is covered by the PSM rule, the reader should refer to the handbook, ""Process Safety Management for Highly Hazardous Chemicals"" (DOE-HDBK-1101-2004).

183

DOE-HDBK-1101-2004  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Process Safety Management for Highly Hazardous Chemicals Superseding DOE-HDBK-1101-96 (February 1996) This handbook provides information necessary to determine if a chemical process is covered by the PSM Rule and provides an interpretation of the 14 elements of the PSM Rule. An overview of these elements is given in Table 1.1. This handbook also describes DOE programs that may, with or without modification, satisfy the requirements of this Rule. Questions and answers, based on OSHA's responses to questions from industry and labor, are provided at the end of most sections.

184

National Environmental Policy Act Compliance Program  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This Order establishes DOE internal requirements and responsibilities for implementing the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA (40 CFR Parts 1500-1508), and the DOE NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR Part 1021). Chg 1 (9-28-01) reflects the Under Secretary/Administrator of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) approval of certain NNSA environmental impact statements. 9/28/2001. Chg 2 (6-25-10) reflects changes to Deputy Secretary Policy and DOE organization. Superseded by DOE O 451.1B Admin Chg 3.

2000-10-26T23:59:59.000Z

185

Consistent threshold pi0 electro-production at Q^2=0.05, 0.10, and 0.15 GeV^2/c^2  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

New, accurate data are presented on the near threshold p(e,e'p)pi^0 reaction in the range of four-momentum transfers between Q^2=0.05 and 0.15GeV^2/c^2. The data were taken with the spectrometer setup of the A1 Collaboration at the Mainz Microtron MAMI. The complete center of mass solid angle was covered up to a center of mass energy of 4MeV above threshold. These results supersede the previous analysis based on three separate experiments, and are compared with calculations in Heavy Baryon Chiral Perturbation Theory and with phenomenological models.

H. Merkel; P. Achenbach; C. Ayerbe Gayoso; M. Ases Antelo; D. Baumann; A. M. Bernstein; R. Bhm; D. Bosnar; M. Ding; M. O. Distler; L. Doria; J. Garcia Llongo; D. W. Higinbotham; G. Jover Maas; M. Makek; U. Mller; R. Neuhausen; L. Nungesser; R. Prez Benito; J. Pochodzalla; M. Seimetz; S. Sirca; S. Stave; Th. Walcher; M. Weis

2011-09-23T23:59:59.000Z

186

DOE-STD-1020-2012  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Natural Phenomena Hazards Analysis and Design Criteria for Department of Energy Facilities Supersedes DOE-STD-1020-2002 This Department of Energy (DOE) Standard (STD)-1020-2012, Natural Phenomena Hazards Analysis and Design Criteria for DOE Facilities, provides criteria and guidance for the analysis and design of facility structures, systems, and components (SSCs) that are necessary to implement the requirements of DOE Order (O) 420.1C, Facility Safety, and to ensure that the SSCs will be able to effectively perform their intended safety functions under the effects of natural phenomena hazards (NPHs).

187

Dalitz-Plot Analysis of the Decays B+/- -> K+/- pi-/+ pi+/-  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

We report a Dalitz-plot analysis of the charmless hadronic decays of charged B mesons to the state K{sup {+-}} {pi}{sup {-+}}{pi}{sup {+-}}. Using a sample of 226.0 {+-} 2.5 million B{bar B}pairs collected by the BABAR detector, measure the magnitudes and phases of the intermediate resonant and nonresonant amplitudes both charge conjugate decays. We present measurements of the corresponding branching and their charge asymmetries that supersede those of previous BABAR analyses. We find the asymmetries to be consistent with zero.

Aubert, B.; Barate, R.; Boutigny, D.; Couderc, F.; Karyotakis, Y.; Lees, J.P.; Poireau, V.; Tisserand, V.; Zghiche, A.; /Annecy, LAPP; Grauges, E.; /Barcelona, IFAE; Palano, A.; Pappagallo, M.; Pompili, A.; /Bari U. /INFN, Bari; Chen, J.C.; Qi, N.D.; Rong, G.; Wang, P.; Zhu, Y.S.; /Beijing, Inst. High Energy Phys.; Eigen, G.; Ofte, I.; Stugu, B. /Bergen U. /LBL, Berkeley /UC, Berkeley /Birmingham U. /Ruhr U., Bochum /Bristol U. /British Columbia U. /Brunel U. /Novosibirsk, IYF /UC, Irvine /UCLA /UC, Riverside /UC, San

2005-10-04T23:59:59.000Z

188

Information Basic to Farm Adjustments in the High Plains Cotton Area of Texas.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

-drawn implements were superseded by two-row horse-drawn machinery which in turn was replaced by multi-row tractor equipment. The rapid shift to larger power and equipment has greatly increased the efficiency of labor. Under psual conditions, pre- harvest labor... amounting to 10.45 hours waskequired per acre of cotton with single-row horse machinery and 6.65 hours with two- row horse-drawn implements. With two- and four-row tractor- drawn equipment the requirements for pre-harvest labor per acre of cotton were...

Thibodeaux, B. H. (Ben Hur); Bonnen, C. A. (Clarence Alfred); Magee, A. C. (Aden Combs)

1944-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

189

Content of System Design Descriptions  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-STD-3024-2011 August 2011 ________________________ Superseding DOE-STD-3024-98 DOE STANDARD CONTENT OF SYSTEM DESIGN DESCRIPTIONS U.S. Department of Energy AREA EDCO Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-3024-2011 ii Available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards web page at http://www.hss.energy.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/ DOE-STD-3024-2011 iii CONTENTS PAGE Foreword ..................................................................................................................................................... iv 1. PURPOSE ............................................................................................................................................1

190

DOE Technical Standards Archived Collection | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

sort ascending Title Date sort ascending Title Date DOE-TSL-4-99 Directory of DOE and Contractor Personnel Involved in Non-Government Standards Activities; Directory of DOE and Contractor Personnel Involved in Non-Government Standards Activities Superseding DOE-TSL-4-98 May 1998 The body of this document contains a listing of DOE employees and DOE contractors who have submitted form DOE F 1300.2, Record of Non-Government Standards Activity, which is attached to the end of this document. 05/21/1999 DOE-TSL-2-2002 Directory of Points of Contact for the DOE Technical Standards Program Replaced by DOE-TSL-2-2006 | Supersedes DOE-TSL-2-98 (January 1998) This TSL supplements DOE manuals, directives, orders, and standards. It provides basic and fundamental information for DOE Component personnel involved in identifying standardization documents. It also provides listings of points of contact within DOE and identifies links to points of contact within the Department of Defense (DoD) for coordination of standardization activities. 09/24/2002

191

chall4.PDF  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

91 91 SPECIAL REPORT MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES AT THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL OFFICE OF AUDIT SERVICES November 28, 2000 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman (Signed) Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Special Report on "Management Challenges at the Department of Energy" BACKGROUND On October 12, 2000, the Chairmen of several committees of the U.S. Congress requested an assessment by the Office of Inspector General of the most significant management challenges facing the Department of Energy. We have received similar requests annually since 1997. As in the past,

192

DRAFT EM SSAB Chairs Meeting Waste Disposition Strategies Update  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EM SSAB Chairs Meeting Christine M. Gelles Deputy Assistant Secretary for Waste Management Office of Environmental Management 5 November 2013 Educational Session #1 - Discussion on DOE's National Recycling Policy www.energy.gov/EM 2 * Nickel Background/Status/Path Forward SSAB Discussion Outline www.energy.gov/EM 3 Background: Volumetrically Contaminated Nickel Recycling * The Secretarial policy restrictions are in place: - January 12, 2000, Moratorium prohibits unrestricted release of volumetrically-contaminated metal into commerce - July 13, 2000, Suspension prohibits unrestricted release of all scrap metals from DOE radiological areas into commerce * Total Estimated Contaminated Nickel Inventory = 30,300 tons - Oak Ridge (ETTP) stored barrier shreds 5,600 tons

193

Percent of Commercial Natural Gas Deliveries in Massachusetts Represented  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 99.9 99.9 99.9 99.9 99.9 99.9 99.9 99.9 99.9 99.9 99.9 99.9 1990 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 99.8 99.8 99.8 99.7 99.7 1991 99.8 99.8 99.9 99.9 99.9 99.8 99.7 99.6 99.6 99.8 99.9 99.9 1992 99.9 99.9 99.8 99.8 99.7 99.8 99.7 99.6 99.6 99.6 99.7 99.8 1993 98.9 98.7 98.5 97.7 96.5 97.7 96.8 89.2 97.5 96.7 96.9 97.8 1994 75.2 78.4 72.5 69.8 69.8 61.2 67.0 86.0 79.7 90.6 81.2 87.1 1995 87.9 89.4 92.0 88.3 88.0 82.7 74.6 77.3 77.5 81.0 81.6 79.5 1996 84.7 83.5 82.4 80.2 79.2 71.3 68.1 61.3 55.4 69.5 62.5 68.9 1997 68.0 69.0 72.9 74.1 69.9 48.5 46.0 41.3 43.8 48.7 62.9 68.6

194

Percent of Commercial Natural Gas Deliveries in Colorado Represented by the  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 98.0 98.1 98.3 97.8 97.3 97.3 95.0 91.8 95.8 95.6 96.9 97.2 1990 98.1 98.0 97.9 97.6 97.3 97.4 94.7 94.5 95.5 94.6 97.0 97.0 1991 96.8 97.1 96.1 96.2 96.9 97.2 93.7 93.9 93.6 92.3 94.7 96.3 1992 96.7 96.7 95.9 95.7 95.1 96.0 94.2 93.3 93.6 91.2 93.7 96.2 1993 96.6 96.4 96.5 95.8 95.2 95.5 93.0 93.1 95.2 90.6 94.1 95.9 1994 95.9 96.1 95.7 94.9 95.3 94.3 91.2 91.7 93.1 91.5 93.2 95.5 1995 95.9 96.0 95.1 94.3 95.1 95.5 92.3 89.7 89.3 89.8 93.5 93.8 1996 94.5 95.5 93.8 93.1 92.4 92.5 88.0 87.1 90.6 89.1 92.8 94.3 1997 94.6 95.4 94.4 93.9 93.7 92.9 86.2 83.1 90.2 86.9 89.8 93.0 1998 95.4 95.1 96.1 95.8 95.0 91.6 92.0 91.1 93.2 87.5 94.0 95.2

195

Microsoft Word - table_06.doc  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Table 6. Wellhead Value and Marketed Production of Natural Gas, 2004-2008, and by State, 2008 2004 Total ............................ 15,223,749 -- 5.46 19,517,491 106,521,974 2005 Total ............................ 15,425,867 -- 7.33 18,927,095 138,750,746 2006 Total ............................ 15,981,421 -- 6.39 19,409,674 124,074,399 2007 Total ............................ R 16,335,710 -- R 6.25 R 20,196,346 R 126,164,553 2008 Total ............................ 18,424,440 -- 7.96 21,239,516 169,038,089 Alabama ............................... 246,747 2,382,188 9.65 257,884 2,489,704 Alaska................................... 337,359 2,493,128 7.39 398,442 2,944,546 Arizona ................................. 503 3,568 7.09 523 3,710 Arkansas...............................

196

Detector error and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The question of how data collected in the spin- Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiment become compatible with local realism for increasing detector error is investigated in two ways. (1) It is shown that data obtained in any experiment with three settings of one detector axis and any number of settings of the other will be compatible with local realism if the detector error is such that data obtained with any two settings of each detector axis are compatible with local realism. (The error rate must be more than 7.96% for this to be so.) (2) It is shown that a detector error rate of 14.64% is enough to mask nonclassical correlations in any experiment with any number of settings of both detector axes; this improves on the figure of 21.13% given by Mermin and Schwarz.

Anupam Garg

1983-08-15T23:59:59.000Z

197

Digestibility of Sugar, Starches, and Pentosans of Roughages.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

gms. No. 3649-50. ..................... Eaten ........................................ Excreted 1491 gms. No. 3700.. .................. Sugars Mono. 55.8 2.6 53.2 1.5 51.7 97.2 97.5 F8.0 28.0 Starch. 212.4 10.0 202.4 6.7 195.7 96.6... 95.9 35.2 35.2 Di. 54.0 .3 -- 53.7 .7 53.5 99.6 99.7 12.8 12.8 .1 99.2 99.2 33.6 0 33.6 1.1 32.5 96.7 1.2 ................................. Digested. Reduc- ing sugar from hemi- cellulose. 111.2 5.2 106.0 48.8 57...

Fraps, G. S. (George Stronach)

1916-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

198

Total Marketed Production ..............  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

billion cubic feet per day) billion cubic feet per day) Total Marketed Production .............. 68.95 69.77 70.45 71.64 71.91 71.70 71.46 71.57 72.61 72.68 72.41 72.62 70.21 71.66 72.58 Alaska ......................................... 1.04 0.91 0.79 0.96 1.00 0.85 0.77 0.93 0.97 0.83 0.75 0.91 0.93 0.88 0.87 Federal GOM (a) ......................... 3.93 3.64 3.44 3.82 3.83 3.77 3.73 3.50 3.71 3.67 3.63 3.46 3.71 3.70 3.62 Lower 48 States (excl GOM) ...... 63.97 65.21 66.21 66.86 67.08 67.08 66.96 67.14 67.92 68.18 68.02 68.24 65.58 67.07 68.09 Total Dry Gas Production .............. 65.46 66.21 66.69 67.79 68.03 67.83 67.61 67.71 68.69 68.76 68.50 68.70 66.55 67.79 68.66 Gross Imports ................................ 8.48 7.60 7.80 7.95 8.27 7.59 7.96 7.91 7.89 7.17 7.61 7.73 7.96 7.93 7.60 Pipeline ........................................

199

The Solar Heavy Element Abundances: II. Constraints from Stellar Atmospheres  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Estimates of the bulk metal abundance of the Sun derived from the latest generation of model atmospheres are significantly lower than the earlier standard values. In Paper I we demonstrated that a low solar metallicity is inconsistent with helioseismology if the quoted errors in the atmospheres models (of order 0.05 dex) are correct. In this paper we undertake a critical analysis of the solar metallicity and its uncertainty from a model atmospheres perspective, focusing on CNO. We argue that the non-LTE corrections for abundances derived from atomic features are overestimated in the recent abundance studies, while systematic errors in the absolute abundances are underestimated. If we adopt the internal consistency between different indicators as a measure of goodness of fit, we obtain intermediate abundances [C/H] = 8.44 +/- 0.06, [N/H] = 7.96 +/- 0.10 and [O/H] = 8.75 +/- 0.08. The errors are too large to conclude that there is a solar abundance problem, and permit both the high and low scales. However, the center-to-limb continuum flux variations predicted in the simulations appear to be inconsistent with solar data, which would favor the traditional thermal structure and lead to high CNO abundances of (8.52, 7.96, 8.80) close to the seismic scale. We argue that further empirical tests of non-LTE corrections and the thermal structure are required for precise absolute abundances. The implications for beryllium depletion and possible sources of error in the numerical simulations are discussed.

M. H. Pinsonneault; Franck Delahaye

2006-06-04T23:59:59.000Z

200

DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER.  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

000 TITLE 15-COMMERCE AND TRADE § 000 TITLE 15-COMMERCE AND TRADE § 715k products produced in violation of State law, and for other purposes,'' as amended (15 U.S.C. 715 et seq.), ex- cept those vested in the President by section 4 of the act (15 U.S.C. 715c). SEC. 2. The Secretary of the Interior may make such provisions in the Department of the Interior as he may deem appropriate to administer the said act. SEC. 3. This Executive order supersedes Executive Order No. 6979 of February 28, 1935, Executive Order No. 7756 of December 1, 1937 (2 F.R. 2664), Executive Order No. 9732 of June 3, 1946 (11 F.R. 5985), and paragraph (q) of section 1 of Executive Order No. 10250 of June 5, 1951 (16 F.R. 5385). DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER. § 715k. Saving clause If any provision of this chapter, or the applica-

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "12-2000 supersedes 7-96" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Natural Phenomena Hazards Design and Evaluation Criteria for Department of Energy Facilities  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0-2002 0-2002 January 2002 Superseding DOE-STD-1020-94 April 1994 DOE STANDARD NATURAL PHENOMENA HAZARDS DESIGN AND EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY FACILITIES U.S. Department of Energy AREA NPHZ Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. TS This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-1020-2002 iii Foreword This revision provides information to help meet the requirements of 10 CFR Part 830, "Nuclear

202

Quarterly Coal Distribution Report - Energy Information Administration  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Quarterly Coal Distribution Report Quarterly Coal Distribution Report Release Date: October 01, 2013 | Next Release Date: January 3, 2014 | full report The Quarterly Coal Distribution Report (QCDR) provides detailed U.S. domestic coal distribution data by coal origin state, coal destination state, mode of transportation, and consuming sector. Quarterly data for all years are preliminary and will be superseded by the release of the corresponding "Annual Coal Distribution Report." Highlights for the second quarter 2013: Total domestic coal distribution was an estimated 205.8 million short tons (mmst) in the second quarter 2013. This value is 0.7 mmst (i.e. 0.3 percent) higher than the previous quarter and 6.3 mmst (i.e. 3.1 percent) higher than the second quarter of 2012 estimates.

203

Department of Energy No. AL-2010-01 Acquisition Regulation Date 11/25/09  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

k k Department of Energy No. AL-2010-01 Acquisition Regulation Date 11/25/09 ACQUISITION LETTER This Acquisition Letter is issued under the authority of the Senior Procurement Executives of DOE and NNSA Subject: Implementation of the General Provisions of the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2010 References: Energy and Water Development and Title 111, sections 301, 305, and 501 Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2010 When Is this Acquisition Letter (AL) Effective? The statutory provisions addressed in this AL are effective on the date of the enactment of the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 201 0, which is October 28,2009. When Does this AL Expire? This AL remains in effect until superseded or canceled.

204

Department of Energy No  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

98-01 98-01 Acquisition Regulation Date March 20, 1998 Acquisition/Financial Assistance Letter The status of Acquisition Letters and Financial Assistance Letters is identified below. All others previously issued have been superseded by a formal rulemaking, incorporated into other guidance, and/or canceled. Please note that some of the following titles have been revised to more accurately reflect the subject matter. Acquisition Letters In Effect Number Date Subject 90-3R Rev. 11/30/92 Internal Audit 91-5 08/06/91 Guidance on Implementing DOE Fee Policy 91-8 10/23/91 Special Considerations - Educational Institutions 92-2R 04/08/93 Foreign Ownership, Control or Influence 93-2 03/05/93 M & O Financial Management 93-4 04/07/93 Displaced Workers Benefits Program

205

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

61 - 4670 of 9,640 results. 61 - 4670 of 9,640 results. Download DOE-HDBK-1118-99 Guide to Good Practices for Continuing Training Superseding DOE-STD-1060-93 (February 1993) This guide provides contractor training organizations with information and methods useful in the development and implementation of continuing training programs using a Systematic Approach to Training (SAT) process. http://energy.gov/hss/downloads/doe-hdbk-1118-99 Download DOE-STD-1146-2007 General Technical Base Qualification Standard The General Technical Base Qualification Standard establishes common technical competency requirements for all DOE personnel who provide assistance in, direction or guidance to, or oversight or evaluation of contractor technical activities that could impact the safe operation of DOE's defense nuclear facilities.

206

OMB and CEQ Memorandum on Environmental Collaboration and Conflict  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

OMB and CEQ Memorandum on Environmental Collaboration and Conflict OMB and CEQ Memorandum on Environmental Collaboration and Conflict Resolution OMB and CEQ Memorandum on Environmental Collaboration and Conflict Resolution September 18, 2012 - 3:01pm Addthis The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) on September 7, 2012, issued a joint memorandum calling for department and agency commitment to the goals identified in the Memorandum on Environmental Collaboration and Conflict Resolution, and the goals identified in related policy guidance. This memorandum supersedes an OMB/CEQ joint memorandum issued in November 28, 2005, on Environmental Conflict Resolution. It broadens the efforts called for under the 2005 memorandum by explicitly encouraging appropriate and effective upfront environmental collaboration to minimize or prevent

207

AL2007-05.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7-05 7-05 Acquisition Regulation Date 03/29/2007 ACQUISITION LETTER This Acquisition Letter is issued under the authority of the DOE and NNSA Procurement Executives. Acquisition Letters (AL) that remain in effect are identified below. All other previously issued ALs have been superseded by a formal rule-making, incorporated into other guidance, and/or canceled. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ACQUISITION LETTERS REMAINING IN EFFECT NUMBER DATE SUBJECT 93-4 04/07/93 Displaced Workers Benefits Program 94-19 12/09/94 Basic Labor Policies Fringe Benefits 95-06 06/28/95 Personal Property Letter System 95-14 11/17/95 Subcontracts under the New Independent States - Industrial Partnering Program

208

Microsoft Word - Final MR AL.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

No. AL 2009-01 No. AL 2009-01 Acquisition Regulation Date: 10/06/2008 ACQUISITION LETTER This Acquisition Letter is issued under the authority of the DOE and NNSA Procurement Executives. Subject: Management Reserve and Contingency References: FAR Subpart 15.4 Contract Pricing FAR Part 31 Contract Cost Principles and Procedures FAR 31.205-7 Contingencies DEAR 915.404-4-70-2 Weighted Guidelines System DOE Order 413.3A Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets DOE Acquisition Guide Weighted Guidelines Chapter 15.4-2 When is this Acquisition Letter (AL) effective? This AL is effective upon issuance. When does this AL Expire? This AL remains in effect until superseded or canceled.

209

DOE-HDBK-1203-97; Guide to Good Practices for Training of Technical Staff and Managers  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

MEASUREMENT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-HDBK-1203-97 January 1997 Supersedes DOE-STD-1008-92 July 1992 DOE HANDBOOK GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR TRAINING OF TECHNICAL STAFF AND MANAGERS U.S. Department of Energy FSC 6910 Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE97000785 DOE-HDBK-1203-97 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy (DOE) Handbook is approved for use by all DOE

210

G  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act of 2011, Title I, Section 1101(a)(2) Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act of 2011, Title I, Section 1101(a)(2) Pub. L. No. Law 112-10 Energy and Water Development and Related Title III, sections 301, 305, and 501 Agencies Appropriations Act, 2010, Public Law 111-85 When Is this Acquisition Letter (AL) Effective? The statutory provisions addressed in this AL are a continuation of the provisions effective on the enactment date of the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2010 enacted October 28, 2009. When Does this AL Expire? This AL remains in effect until superseded or canceled. Who Is the Point of Contact? Contact Barbara Binney of the Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy at (202) 287-1340 or at Barbara.binney@hq.doe.gov or Stephen Law, of the National Nuclear

211

Microsoft Word - AL2006-09.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6-09 (07/24/06) 6-09 (07/24/06) 1 Subject: Energy Efficiency of Energy Consuming Products - Implementation of Section 104 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 References: Energy Policy Act of 2005, Section 104 Executive Order 13123, Greening the Government through Energy Efficient Management, Section 403 DOE Acquisition Guide Chapter 23, Greening the Government - Environmental Considerations in Contracting FAR Subpart 23.2, Energy and Water Efficiency and Renewable Energy When is this Acquisition Letter (AL) Effective? This AL is effective immediately upon issuance. When does this AL Expire? The AL remains in effect until superseded by anticipated FAR coverage or it is canceled. Who are the Points of Contact? Richard Langston, Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, MA-61, (202) 287-1339 or

212

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

401 - 5410 of 28,905 results. 401 - 5410 of 28,905 results. Download DOE-STD-0100T-93 Licensed Reactor Nuclear Safety Criteria Applicable to DOE Reactors Canceled | Superseding DOE/NE-0100T (April 1991) This document identifies nuclear safety criteria applied to licensed reactors. The degree of application of these criteria to a DOE-owned reactor, consistent with their application to comparable licensed reactors, must be determined by the DOE and DOE contractor. http://energy.gov/hss/downloads/doe-std-0100t-93 Download EIS-0236: Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Stockpile Stewardship and Management http://energy.gov/nepa/downloads/eis-0236-final-programmatic-environmental-impact-statement Download EIS-0285-SA-81: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program

213

DOE-HDBK-1200-97; Guide to Good Practices for Developing Learning Objectives  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

200-97 200-97 January 1997 Supersedes DOE-STD-1005-92 July 1992 DOE HANDBOOK GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR DEVELOPING LEARNING OBJECTIVES U.S. Department of Energy FSC 6910 Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE97000781 DOE-HDBK-1200-97 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy (DOE) Handbook is approved for use by all DOE Components

214

Annual Coal Distribution Report - Energy Information Administration  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Annual Coal Distribution Report Annual Coal Distribution Report Release Date: December 19, 2013 | Next Release Date: November 2014 | full report | Revision/Correction The Annual Coal Distribution Report (ACDR) provides detailed information on domestic coal distribution by origin state, destination state, consumer category, and method of transportation. Also provided is a summary of foreign coal distribution by coal-producing state. All data for 2012 are final, and this report supersedes the 2012 quarterly coal distribution reports. Highlights for 2012: Total coal distributions for 2012 were 1,003.1 million short tons (mmst), a decrease of 7.9% compared to 2011. Distributions to domestic destinations were 877.3 mmst, a decrease of 104.1 mmst (i.e. 10.6% decrease) compared to 2011. Distributions to

215

Nuclear Explosive Safety Study Process  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3015-2001 3015-2001 February 2001 Superseding DOE-STD-3015-97 January 1997 DOE STANDARD NUCLEAR EXPLOSIVE SAFETY STUDY PROCESS U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-3015-2001 iii CONTENTS FOREWORD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v 1. PURPOSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2. SCOPE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

216

OMB and CEQ Memorandum on Environmental Collaboration and Conflict  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

OMB and CEQ Memorandum on Environmental Collaboration and Conflict OMB and CEQ Memorandum on Environmental Collaboration and Conflict Resolution OMB and CEQ Memorandum on Environmental Collaboration and Conflict Resolution September 18, 2012 - 3:01pm Addthis The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) on September 7, 2012, issued a joint memorandum calling for department and agency commitment to the goals identified in the Memorandum on Environmental Collaboration and Conflict Resolution, and the goals identified in related policy guidance. This memorandum supersedes an OMB/CEQ joint memorandum issued in November 28, 2005, on Environmental Conflict Resolution. It broadens the efforts called for under the 2005 memorandum by explicitly encouraging appropriate and effective upfront environmental collaboration to minimize or prevent

217

AUTHORITY  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

AUTHORITY AUTHORITY All Acquisition Letters, remaining in effect, as of March 7, 1996, are listed below. All other Acquisition Letters have either been superseded by formal rulemaking or are otherwise canceled. Financial Assistance Letters are not shown. Please file this listing in your Acquisition Letter binder. AL 96-01 (03/08/96) No. Date Subject 84-1R Rev. 12/92 Acquisition Letters 87-3R Rev. 12/87 Prescreening Policies and Procedures 87-5 09/04/87 Patents and Technical Data 88-1 05/25/88 Rights in Technical Data Facilities 90-3R Rev. 11/30/92 Internal Audit 91-5 08/06/91 Guidance on Implementing DOE Fee Policy 91-7 12/04/91 Rights in Data - Technology Transfer Activities 91-8 10/23/91 Special Considerations Educational Institutions

218

Microsoft Word - AL2008-05.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Department of Energy No. AL 2008-05 Department of Energy No. AL 2008-05 Acquisition Regulation Date 04/03/2008 ACQUISITION LETTER This Acquisition Letter is issued under the authority of the DOE and NNSA Procurement Executives. Subject: Environmental, Energy, and Transportation Management References: Executive Order 13423, dated January 24, 2007 Implementing Instructions, dated March 28, 2007 When is this Acquisition Letter (AL) effective? This AL is effective upon issuance. When does this AL Expire? This AL remains in effect until superseded or canceled by amendments of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) or the Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation (DEAR). Whom do you Contact for More Information? For Department of Energy (DOE) contracts, contact Richard Langston, Office of Procurement

219

DOE-HDBK-3012-2003; DOE Handbook Guide to Good Practices for Operational Readiness Reviews (ORR) Team Leader's Guide  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NOT MEASUREMENT NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-HDBK-3012-2003 SUPERSEDING DOE-HDBK-3012-96 DOE HANDBOOK GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR OPERATIONAL READINESS REVIEWS (ORR) TEAM LEADER'S GUIDE U.S. Department of Energy AREA MISC Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-HDBK-3012-2003 FOREWORD This Department of Energy handbook, Guide to Good Practices for Conducting Operational Readiness Reviews (ORR) Team Leader's Handbook, is approved for use by all DOE Components and their contractors. The guidance in this document is the distillation of the experience and lessons learned during numerous operational readiness reviews contributed by team leaders with a wide range of backgrounds. There are

220

Materials Science Division Project Safety Review  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Miller, Electron Microscopes Miller, Electron Microscopes Project No. 20006.3 Materials Science Division Project Safety Review Safety Analysis Form (03/08) Date of Submission March 12, 2010 FWP No.: 58405 Project Title User Experimental Work with Electron Microscopes in the Electron Microscopy Center This Safety Analysis Form (SAF) supersedes previous versions of 20006 and its modifications. Is this a (check one) new submission renewal supplemental modification X Principal Investigator(s) Dean Miller Other Participants (excluding administrative support personnel) EMC staff and EMC users (Attach participant signature sheet) Project dates: Start: March 2010 End: Open-ended This form is to be completed for all new investigations or experimental projects that are conducted in MSD laboratories, and for all ongoing such projects that undergo significant change from their original

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "12-2000 supersedes 7-96" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

1  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

03-09) 03-09) SECTION II GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS THE FOLLOWING CLAUSES APPLY TO THIS CONTRACT AS INDICATED UNLESS SPECIFICALLY DELETED, OR EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THEY ARE SPECIFICALLY SUPPLEMENTED OR AMENDED IN WRITING IN THE SIGNATURE PAGE OR SECTION I OF THIS CONTRACT. INT01 ACCEPTANCE OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS This Contract integrates, merges, and supersedes any prior offers, negotiations, and agreements concerning the subject matter hereof and constitutes the entire agreement between the parties. Seller, by signing this Contract, delivering Items ordered under this Contract, and/or acceptance of payment shall constitute Seller's unqualified acceptance of this Contract. Sandia hereby objects to any terms and conditions contained in any acknowledgment of this Contract that are different

222

1  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

CO (10-99) CO (10-99) SECTION II STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR CONSULTANT AND OTHER PROFESSIONAL PROVIDER SERVICE CONTRACTS THE FOLLOWING CLAUSES APPLY TO REQUESTS FOR QUOTATION AND CONTRACTS AS INDICATED UNLESS SPECIFICALLY DELETED, OR EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THEY ARE SPECIFICALLY SUPPLEMENTED OR AMENDED IN WRITING IN THE COVER PAGE OR SECTION I. CO-01 - ACCEPTANCE OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS This Contract integrates, merges, and supersedes any prior offers, negotiations, and agreements concerning the subject matter hereof and constitutes the entire agreement between the parties. Contractor, by signing this Contract, delivering Items ordered under this Contract, and/or acceptance of payment shall constitute Contractor's unqualified acceptance of this Contract. Sandia hereby objects to any terms and conditions contained

223

G  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Implications of Receiving Time-Limited Funds on Contract Planning, Award, and Implications of Receiving Time-Limited Funds on Contract Planning, Award, and Administration References: Bona Fide Need Statute 31 U.S.C. § 1502(a) Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act 41 U.S.C. § 3902 FAR 32.703-3 Contracts Crossing Fiscal Years When Is this Acquisition Letter (AL) Effective? This AL is effective immediately upon issuance. When Does this AL Expire? This AL remains in effect until superseded or canceled. Who Is the Intended Audience For this AL? Department of Energy (DOE) Contracting Officers are the audience for this AL. Who Is the Point of Contact For this AL? Contracting Officers may contact Michael Righi or Jason Taylor of the Contracts and Financial Assistance Policy Division, Office of Policy, Office of Procurement and Assistance Management by

224

DOE-STD-3022-98; DOE Standard DOE HEPA Filter Test Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

22-98 22-98 May 1998 Superseding DOE NE F 3-42 January 1987 DOE STANDARD DOE HEPA FILTER TEST PROGRAM U.S. Department of Energy FSC 4460 Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. Order No. DE98001294 DOE-STD-3022-98 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy (DOE) Standard is approved for use by all DOE components and contractors.

225

Attachment 13 - DB Oregon.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

OR030001 02/13/2004 OR1 DE-RQ01-04ME90001 OR030001 02/13/2004 OR1 DE-RQ01-04ME90001 ATTACHMENT 13 Superseded General Decision Number: OR020001 State: Oregon Construction Types: Building Counties: Baker, Benton, Clackamas, Clatsop, Columbia, Crook, Deschutes, Gilliam, Grant, Harney, Hood River, Jackson, Jefferson, Klamath, Lake, Lane, Lincoln, Linn, Malheur, Marion, Morrow, Multnomah, Polk, Sherman, Tillamook, Umatilla, Union, Wallowa, Wasco, Washington, Wheeler and Yamhill Counties in Oregon. BUILDING CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS (does not include residential construction consisting of single family homes and apartments up to and including 4 stories) Modification Number Publication Date 0 06/13/2003 1 02/06/2004

226

Microsoft Word - AL2000-05.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Παγε 1 οφ 2 Παγε 1 οφ 2 Subject: DOE Authorized Subcontract for Use by DOE Management and Operating (M&O) Contractors with New Independent States' Scientific Institutes through the Science and Technology Center in Ukraine References: DEAR 970.7103 - Contractor Purchasing System When is this Acquisition Letter (AL) Effective? This AL is effective 10 business days from the date of issuance. When Does this AL Expire? This AL remains in effect until superseded or canceled. Who is the Point of Contact? Contact Robert Webb of the Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy at (202) 586-8264, or via e-mail at Robert.Webb@hq.doe.gov Visit our website at www.pr.doe.gov for information on Acquisition Letters and other policy

227

PowerPoint Presentation  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Records Scheduling Request Records Scheduling Request DOE F 243.2 (8-2013) Instructions: Complete one request per records schedule or series item. Appointed records contacts will submit completed form to the Departmental Records Officer via DOERM@hq.doe.gov for review, decision and coordination, as appropriate. 1. RLO/RMFO Name (Prepare) 2. PRO Name (Review/Clear) Date (IM-23 Use Only) 3. Program Subject Matter Expert Name(s) - position title(s) optional 4. DOE Element (e.g., OCIO (IM-1)) 5. Subordinate Organizational Unit (e.g., RMD (IM-23))- if applicable 6. Requested Action: (select one) Establish (new) Revise Cancel (discontinue active schedule) 7. Schedule Authority - If establishing, no information needed. If requesting revision to supersede a NARA- approved schedule, or requesting cancellation, cite the NARA schedule authority. (e.g.,GRS 1 item 4, N1-

228

G  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Labor Standards Considerations under DOE Management and Labor Standards Considerations under DOE Management and Operating Contracts References: Davis-Bacon Act of 1931, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141, et seq.) 29 CFR Parts 1, 3, and 5, Department of Labor Implementing Regulations for Davis-Bacon Act FAR Subpart 22.4 Labor Standards for Contracts Involving Construction DEAR 970.2204-1-1 Administrative Controls and Criteria for Application of the Davis-Bacon Act in Operational or Maintenance Activities DOE O 350.1 Contractor Human Resources Management Programs DOE Acquisition Guide, Chapter 22.1, Labor Standards for Construction When Is this Acquisition Letter (AL) Effective? This AL is effective upon the date of issuance. When Does this AL Expire? This AL remains in effect until superseded or canceled.

229

Planning and Conduct of Operational Readiness Reviews (ORR)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-STD-3006-2000 DOE-STD-3006-2000 June 2000 Superseding DOE-STD-3006-95 November 1995 DOE STANDARD PLANNING AND CONDUCT OF OPERATIONAL READINESS REVIEWS (ORR) U.S. Department of Energy AREA OPER Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823 Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-3006-2000 iii PLANNING AND CONDUCT OF OPERATIONAL READINESS REVIEWS (ORR)

230

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

61 - 14070 of 28,905 results. 61 - 14070 of 28,905 results. Download Roadmap for Nondestructive Evaluation of Reactor Pressure Vessel Research and Development by the Light Water Reactor Sustainability Program The Department of Energy's (DOE's) Light Water Reactor Sustainability (LWRS) Program is a five year effort that works to develop the fundamental scientific basis to understand, predict, and measure... http://energy.gov/ne/downloads/roadmap-nondestructive-evaluation-reactor-pressure-vessel-research-and-development Download DOE-STD-3015-2001 Nuclear Explosive Safety Study Process Superseding DOE-STD-3015-97 (January 1997) This technical standard provides specific requirements and guidance for nuclear explosive safety (NES) studies and is in accordance with DOE Order 452.2B, SAFETY OF NUCLEAR EXPLOSIVE OPERATIONS

231

Facility Representatives  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

063-2011 063-2011 February 2011 Superseding DOE-STD-1063-2006 April 2006 DOE STANDARD FACILITY REPRESENTATIVES U.S. Department of Energy AREA MGMT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1063-2011 ii Available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web site at http://www.hss.doe.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstds/ DOE-STD-1063-2011 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy (DOE) standard is approved for use by all DOE/National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Components. 2. The revision to this DOE standard was developed by a working group consisting of headquarters and field participants. Beneficial comments (recommendations,

232

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

61 - 11370 of 28,905 results. 61 - 11370 of 28,905 results. Download DOE-HDBK-1200-97 Guide to Good Practices for Developing Learning Objectives Supersedes DOE-STD-1005-92 (July 1992) This guide to good practices provides information and guidance on the types of and development of learning objectives in a systematic approach to training (SAT) program. http://energy.gov/hss/downloads/doe-hdbk-1200-97 Download EXECUTIVE ORDER 13514 http://energy.gov/management/downloads/executive-order-13514 Rebate City of San Francisco- Green Building Code San Francisco adopted a mandatory green building code for new construction projects in September 2008, establishing strict guidelines for residential and commercial buildings according to the... http://energy.gov/savings/city-san-francisco-green-building-code

233

Department of Energy No. AL-2006-04 Acquisition Regulation Date 12/14/05  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

AL-2006-04 AL-2006-04 Acquisition Regulation Date 12/14/05 ACQUISITION LETTER 1 T h ~ s A c q u ~ s i t ~ o n Letter 1s issued under the author~ty of the DOE and NNSA Procurement Executives. Subject: Acquiring Information Technology-Requirement to Comply With Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Attachment: Model Contract Clause What is the Effective date of this Acquisition Letter (AL)? This AL is effective upon issuance. When does this AL Expire? 'his AL remains in effect until superseded or canceled. What are the Points of Contact? For procurement related questions, contact: Michael Righi of the Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy at (202) 287-1 337 or M~cliacI.R~~hi~i~,licl.doc q o ~ ; or Douglas Baptist of the Office of Management Systeins and Services at (202) 287-1658 or D

234

Microsoft Word - 2050p.dot  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

50-P (3-2008) 50-P (3-2008) Supersedes (3-2006) issue UCI (WHEN COMPLETED) UCI (WHEN COMPLETED) 1 Sandia National Laboratories REPORT OF OCCUPATIONAL INJURY/ILLNESS (Based on the OSHA definitions and requirements which may or may not be consistent with various state compensation laws) NOTICE OF INCIDENT (Pursuant to Chapter 52, NMSA 1978 section 52-1-29) Instructions: All personnel are required to complete pages 1 and 2 of this form (e.g., employees at remote sites, contractors). Page 3 pertains only to contracting personnel only. Page 4 provides a list of the causal factors to be used in the course of the investigation. Date received in Medical Case No. Date received in Injury/Illness Reporting Name(Last, First, MI) Org. Gender Date of Birth

235

Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order, December 9, 1991 Summary  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order State Idaho Agreement Type Federal Facility Agreement Legal Driver(s) CERCLA Scope Summary Ensure that the environmental impacts associated with releases or hazardous substances are thoroughly investigated and that appropriate response action are taken. Parties DOE; US EPA; State of Idaho Date 12/9/1991 SCOPE * Ensure that the environmental impacts associated with releases or hazardous substances are thoroughly investigated and that appropriate response action are taken. * Establish a procedural framework and schedule for developing, prioritizing, implementing, and monitoring appropriate response actions. * Supersede the Consent Order and Compliance Agreement Docket No. 1086-05-16- 3008/3013, executed on July 10, 1987.

236

DOE-STD-1063-2000 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0 0 DOE-STD-1063-2000 March 31, 2000 Establishing and Maintaining a Facility Representative Program at DOE Facilities Replaced by DOE-STD-1063-2006 | Superseding DOE-STD-1063-97 (October 1997) This standard, Facility Representatives, DOE-STD-1063-2000, defines the duties, responsibilities and qualifications for DOE Facility Representatives, based on facility hazard classification; risks to workers, the public, and the environment; and the operational activity level. DOE-STD-1063-2000, Establishing and Maintaining a Facility Representative Program at DOE Facilities More Documents & Publications 1Q CY2000 (PDF), Facility Representative Program Performance Indicators Quarterly Report 4Q CY2000 (PDF), Facility Representative Program Performance Indicators Quarterly Report

237

G  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers under Service Contracts Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers under Service Contracts References: Executive Order 13495 FAR 22.12 FAR 52.222-17 DEAR 970.5244-1 When Is this Acquisition Letter (AL) Effective? This AL is effective immediately upon issuance. When Does this AL Expire? This AL remains in effect until superseded or canceled. Who Is the Intended Audience For this AL? Department of Energy (DOE) and National Nuclear Security Agency (NNSA) Contracting Officers are the audience for this AL. Who Is the Point of Contact For this AL? DOE Contracting Officers may contact Jason Taylor of the Contracts and Financial Assistance Policy Division, Office of Policy, Office of Acquisition and Project Management by phone at (202) 287-1560 or by email at Jason.Taylor@hq.doe.gov. For National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

238

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

41 - 14750 of 31,917 results. 41 - 14750 of 31,917 results. Download DOE-HDBK-1116-98 Guide to Good Practices for Developing and Conducting Case Studies Superseding DOE-STD-1058-93 This guide contains a method for learning from experience to prevent mistakes from occurring; that method is the case study. http://energy.gov/hss/downloads/doe-hdbk-1116-98 Download Annual Trilateral U.S. - EU - Japan Conference on Critical Materials for a Clean Energy Future, October 4-5, 2011 Agenda from the first meeting of the Annual Trilateral U.S. - EU - Japan Conference on Critical Materials for a Clean Energy Future http://energy.gov/pi/office-policy-and-international-affairs/downloads/annual-trilateral-us-eu-japan-conference Article You Asked, Chu Answered We sifted through your questions and recently discussed many of them with

239

G  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Applying the changes of the May 3, 2013, Final Rule on Contractor Legal Management Applying the changes of the May 3, 2013, Final Rule on Contractor Legal Management Requirements to existing contracts References: 10 CFR 719 Contractor Legal Management Requirements DEAR 931.205-19 Insurance and indemnification DEAR 931.205-33 Professional and consultant service costs DEAR 952.231-71 Insurance-litigation and claims DEAR 970.2803-2 Contract clause DEAR 970.3102-05-33 Professional and consultant service costs DEAR 970.5228-1 Insurance-Litigation and Claims When is this Acquisition Letter (AL) effective? This AL is effective upon issuance. When does this AL Expire? This AL remains in effect until superseded or canceled. Who Is the Intended Audience For this AL? Department of Energy (DOE), including National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA),

240

Microsoft Word - AL2006-08.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Acquisition Letters (AL) that remain in effect are identified below. All other previously issued ALs have been superseded by a formal rule-making, incorporated into other guidance, and/or canceled. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ACQUISITION LETTERS REMAINING IN EFFECT NUMBER DATE SUBJECT 93-4 04/07/93 Displaced Workers Benefits Program 94-19 12/09/94 Basic Labor Policies Fringe Benefits 95-06 06/28/95 Personal Property Letter System 95-14 11/17/95 Subcontracts under the New Independent States - Industrial Partnering Program 96-09 09/16/96 Full and Open Competition - Management and Operating Contracts 99-06 08/27/99 DOE Authorized Subcontract for Use by DOE Management and

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "12-2000 supersedes 7-96" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

G  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Meal Costs in Management and Operating Contracts Meal Costs in Management and Operating Contracts References: FAR 31.201-2 Determining Allowability FAR 31.201-3 Determining Reasonableness FAR 31.205-13 Employee morale, health, welfare, food service, and dormitory costs and credits FAR 31.205-14 Entertainment costs FAR 31.205-34 Recruitment costs FAR 31.205-43 Trade, business, technical and professional activity costs DEAR 970.5232-2 Payments and Advances When Is this Acquisition Letter (AL) Effective? This AL is effective immediately upon issuance. When Does this AL Expire? This AL remains in effect until superseded or canceled. Who Is the Intended Audience For this AL? Department of Energy (DOE) Contracting Officers who are responsible for determining the

242

Microsoft Word - AL2005-16.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 6 Acquisition Regulation Date 10/04/05 ACQUISITION LETTER This Acquisition Letter is issued under the authority of the DOE and NNSA Procurement Executives. Subject: Implementation of HSPD-12 References: Homeland Security Presidential Directive 12 (HSPD-12) Federal Information Processing Standard Publication 201 (FIPS Pub 201) DOE Notice 206.2 Identity Proofing Acquisition Letter 2005-10 dated July 7, 2005 When is this Acquisition Letter (AL) Effective? This AL is effective upon issuance. When does this AL Expire? This AL remains in effect until superseded or canceled. Who is the Point of Contact? Contact Robert M. Webb of the Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy at (202) 287-1338 or

243

SF 4003-GEC (8-99)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8/8/2012 8/8/2012 SF 4003-REC (8-2012) supersedes (12-2011) issue UCI Sandia National Laboratories Retiree ECP/United Way NAME ADDRESS: City State Zip Code Phone No.: Select One: I would like to make a continuous monthly pension deduction of $______ for a total annual gift of $________ Your pension deduction will be set up by the Retirement Coordinator in the SNL HBES Center: send an email to: retiring@sandia.gov and you will be contacted by a representative to get this set up. One-time contribution (Make check payable to United Way of Central New Mexico) of $__________ Please bill me for $________ per quarter for a total annual

244

Best Practices for Continuing Training  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-HDBK-1118-99 Reaffirmed January 2014 Superseding DOE-STD-1060-93 February 1993 DOE HANDBOOK BEST PRACTICES FOR CONTINUING TRAINING U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE HDBK-1118-99 Errata January 2014 Table of Changes Page/Section Change Page 0 Best Practices for Continuing Training Page i/Section 2

245

DOE-STD-1063-97; DOE Standard Establishing and Maintaining a Facility Representative Program at DOE Facilities  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3-97 3-97 October 1997 Supersedes DOE-STD-1063-93 DOE STANDARD ESTABLISHING AND MAINTAINING A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE PROGRAM AT DOE FACILITIES U.S. Department of Energy AREA FACR Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE98001286 DOE-STD-1063-97 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy standard is approved for use by all DOE Components.

246

DOE-HDBK-1205-97; Guide to Good Practices for the Design, Development, and Implementation of Examinations  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5-97 5-97 June 1997 Supersedes DOE-STD-1011-92 DOE HANDBOOK GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR THE DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, AND IMPLEMENTATION OF EXAMINATIONS U.S. Department of Energy FSC 6910 Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. DOE-HDBK-1205-97 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy (DOE) Handbook is approved for use by all DOE

247

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

801 - 5810 of 26,764 results. 801 - 5810 of 26,764 results. Download ARPA-E Technical Support Memo The Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy (ARPA-E) submits this memorandum in support of proposed categorical exclusion (CX) B5.25, "Small-scale renewable energy research and development and... http://energy.gov/nepa/downloads/arpa-e-technical-support-memo Download EA-1638: Finding of No Significant Impact Loan Guarantee to Solyndra, Inc. for Construction of a Photovoltaic Manufacturing Facility and Leasing of an Existing Commercial Facility in Fremont, California http://energy.gov/nepa/downloads/ea-1638-finding-no-significant-impact Download DOE-STD-3022-98 DOE HEPA Filter Test Program Cancelled | Superseding DOE NE F 3-42 (January 1987) This standard establishes essential elements of a Department of Energy

248

C:\DS\97-2238, Rev. 8 - Final.wpd  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

WIPP-97-2238 WIPP-97-2238 Periodic Confirmatory Measurement Protocol for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant United States Department of Energy Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Carlsbad Field Office Carlsbad, New Mexico Revision 8 August 2008 This document supersedes DOE/WIPP-97-2238, Revision 7. Working Copy Periodic Confirmatory Measurement Protocol for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant DOE/WIPP-97-2238, Rev. 8 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.0 CLASSIFICATION OF RELEASE POINTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3.0 MEASUREMENT PROTOCOL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 4.0 EFFLUENT MONITORING DURING NORMAL ACTIVITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 5.0 EFFLUENT MONITORING DURING KNOWN OR SUSPECTED RELEASES . . 6 6.0 FLOW RATE MEASUREMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

249

Handbook For the Mentee  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE HANDBOOK WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE HANDBOOK U.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 August 16, 2012 AVAILABLE ONLINE AT: INITIATED BY: URL TBD Office of Management Page 1 FOREWORD This handbook was developed by the Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Acquisition and Project Management (APM) for use on DOE projects by Federal Project Directors (FPD) and industry contractors. It provides suggested guidance and best practices on the development of product-oriented Work Breakdown Structures (WBS) that should be used by all projects within DOE to organize and subdivide total project work scope. This handbook supersedes the U.S. DOE Office of Management, Budget and Evaluation Work

250

DOE-STD-3025-99; DOE Standard Quality Assurance Inspection and Testing of HEPA Filters  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5-99 5-99 February 1999 Superseding DOE NE F 3-43 February 1990 DOE STANDARD QUALITY ASSURANCE INSPECTION AND TESTING OF HEPA FILTERS U.S. Department of Energy FSC 4460 Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-3025-99 iii FOREWORD This Department of Energy standard supercedes DOE NE F 3-43 and is approved for use by all DOE

251

DOE-STD-3006-95; DOE Standard Planning and Conduct of Operational Readiness Reviews (ORR)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3006-95 3006-95 November 1995 SUPERSEDING DOE-STD-3006-93 November 1993 DOE STANDARD PLANNING AND CONDUCT OF OPERATIONAL READINESS REVIEWS (ORR) U.S. Department of Energy AREA MISC Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (615) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. DOE-STD-3006-95 i PLANNING AND CONDUCT OF OPERATIONAL READINESS REVIEWS (ORR) FOREWORD 1. DOE 0 425.1 establishes the requirement to conduct Operational Readiness Reviews

252

thereto, are mandatory and applicable according to their terms following approva  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

thereto, are mandatory and applicable according to their terms following approval thereto, are mandatory and applicable according to their terms following approval by the Commission and shall remain in effect until withdrawn, disapproved or superseded by standards issued by the Electric Reliability Organization. Standards in effect pursuant to the transitional provisions of this subsection shall be enforceable by the Commission. "(k) Coordination with Canada and Mexico.--The Electric Reliability Organization shall take all appropriate steps to gain recognition in Canada and Mexico. The United States shall seek to enter into international agreements with the governments of Canada and Mexico to provide for effective compliance with standards and to provide for the effectiveness of the Electric Reliability Organization in carrying out its mission and responsibilities.

253

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

31 - 16040 of 28,560 results. 31 - 16040 of 28,560 results. Download Audit Report: OAS-M-04-01 Management Controls Over Subcontract Administration by the Argonne National Laboratory http://energy.gov/ig/downloads/audit-report-oas-m-04-01 Download Executive Order 13423- Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and Transportation Management http://energy.gov/nepa/downloads/executive-order-13423-strengthening-federal-environmental-energy-and-transportation Download Spectrum Sciences Decision and Data Handling Issues http://energy.gov/gc/downloads/spectrum-sciences-decision-and-data-handling-issues Download DOE-STD-7501-99 The DOE Corporate Lessons Learned Programs Superseding DOE-STD-7501-95 Including Change Notice No. 1 (September 1997) This technical standard provides management expectations and a framework

254

DOE-STD-3003-2000; Backup Power Sources for DOE Facilities  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-STD-3003-2000 January 2000 Superseding DOE-STD-3003-94 September 1994 DOE STANDARD BACKUP POWER SOURCES FOR DOE FACILITIES U.S. Department of Energy AREA EDCN Washington, D.C. 20858 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. METRIC This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-3003-2000 iii FOREWORD 1. This Standard is approved for use by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). This

255

ACQUISITION LETTER  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Department of Energy No. 2001-03 Department of Energy No. 2001-03 Acquisition Regulation Date May 25, 2001 ACQUISITION LETTER This Acquisition Letter is issued under the authority of the Procurement Executives of DOE and NNSA. Subject: COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH WHISTLEBLOWER ACTIONS References: DEAR 931.205-47(h) DEAR 952.216-7, Alt II DEAR 970.3102-05-47(h) DEAR 970.5232-2, Payments and Advances When Does this Acquisition Letter Expire? This Acquisition Letter will expire when this guidance is distributed as an Acquisition Guide section or otherwise superseded. Whom Do You Contact for More Information? Contact Terry Sheppard of the Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy at (202) 586-8193 or terry.sheppard@hq.doe.gov Visit our website at www.pr.doe.gov for information on Acquisition Letters and other policy

256

Electrical Safety  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NOT MEASUREMENT NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE HANDBOOK ELECTRICAL SAFETY DOE-HDBK-1092-2013 July 2013 Superseding DOE-HDBK-1092-2004 December 2004 U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C.20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-HDBK-1092-2013 Available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web site at http://www.hss.doe.gov/nuclearsafety/techstds/ ii DOE-HDBK-1092-2013 FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy (DOE) Handbook is approved for use by the Office of Health, Safety and Security and is available to all DOE components and their contractors. 2. Specific comments (recommendations, additions, deletions, and any pertinent data) to enhance this document should be sent to: Patrick Tran

257

Planning and Conducting Readiness Reviews  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3006-2010 3006-2010 ________________________ Superseding DOE-STD-3006-2000 June 2000 DOE STANDARD PLANNING AND CONDUCTING READINESS REVIEWS U.S. Department of Energy AREA OPER Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. TS This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-3006-YR i CONTENTS FOREWORD................................................................................................................................. 1

258

DOE-HDBK-1101-2004; Process Safety Management for Highly Hazardous Chemicals  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

HDBK-1101-2004 HDBK-1101-2004 August 2004 Superseding DOE-HDBK-1101-96 February 1996 DOE HANDBOOK PROCESS SAFETY MANAGEMENT FOR HIGHLY HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-HDBK-1101-2004 ii This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161;

259

45 Fed Reg 59189: Publishing of Three Memoranda for Heads of Agencies |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

45 Fed Reg 59189: Publishing of Three Memoranda for Heads of 45 Fed Reg 59189: Publishing of Three Memoranda for Heads of Agencies 45 Fed Reg 59189: Publishing of Three Memoranda for Heads of Agencies The Council on Environmental Quality is publishing three Memoranda for Heads of Agencies. The first memorandum, dated August 11,1980, on Analysis of Impacts on Prime and Unique Agricultural Lands in Implementing the National Environmental Policy Act was developed in cooperation with the Department of Agriculture. It updates and supersedes the Council's previous memorandum on this subject of August 1970. The second memorandum, dated August 11,1980, requests information on agency agriculatural land policies and other information related to the implementation of the first memorandum. The third memorandum, dated August 20,1980, on Interagency Consultation to

260

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

41 - 5850 of 31,917 results. 41 - 5850 of 31,917 results. Download CX-004792: Categorical Exclusion Determination Cycloidal Wave Energy Converter CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 12/20/2010 Location(s): Colorado Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office http://energy.gov/nepa/downloads/cx-004792-categorical-exclusion-determination Download CX-003690: Categorical Exclusion Determination Solar Upgrade CX(s) Applied: A9, B5.1 Date: 09/07/2010 Location(s): California Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Golden Field Office http://energy.gov/nepa/downloads/cx-003690-categorical-exclusion-determination Download Frequently Asked Questions- Certification Grace Period (08/17/2010) This document has been superseded. All FAQs are now available at http://www1.eere.energy.gov/guidance/default.aspx?pid=2&spid=1.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "12-2000 supersedes 7-96" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

DOE-STD-0100T-93 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0100T-93 0100T-93 DOE-STD-0100T-93 July 12, 1996 Licensed Reactor Nuclear Safety Criteria Applicable to DOE Reactors Canceled | Superseding DOE/NE-0100T (April 1991) This document identifies nuclear safety criteria applied to licensed reactors. The degree of application of these criteria to a DOE-owned reactor, consistent with their application to comparable licensed reactors, must be determined by the DOE and DOE contractor. DOE-STD-0100T-93, Licensed Reactor Nuclear Safety Criteria Applicable to DOE Reactors More Documents & Publications DOE-STD-101-92 National Report Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management DOE Draft Standard, Development and Use of Probabilistic Risk Assessments in Department of Energy Nuclear Safety Applications, 12/10

262

Microsoft Word - AL2005-15.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5 5 Acquisition Regulation Date 10/05/05 ACQUISITION LETTER This Acquisition Letter is issued under the authority of the DOE and NNSA Procurement Executives. Subject: Implementation of the Price-Anderson Amendments Act of 2005 References: DEAR 970.250-70, Nuclear Hazards Indemnification Agreement. The Price-Anderson Amendments Act of 2005, §§ 601-611 of the Energy Policy Act, 2005, Pub.L. 109-58. When is this Acquisition Letter (AL) Effective? This AL is effective upon issuance. When does this AL Expire? This AL remains in effect until superseded or canceled. Who is the Point of Contact? Contact Robert M. Webb of the Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy at

263

DOE-HDBK-1118-99; Guide to Good Practices for Continuing Training  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8-99 8-99 October 1999 Superseding DOE-STD-1060-93 February 1993 DOE HANDBOOK GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR CONTINUING TRAINING U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. TS This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-HDBK-1118-99 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy (DOE) Handbook is approved for use by all DOE Components and their contractors. The Handbook incorporates editorial changes to DOE-STD-

264

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

41 - 7850 of 28,560 results. 41 - 7850 of 28,560 results. Download Audit Report: OAS-L-10-05 The National Nuclear Security Administration's Site Office Training and Staffing http://energy.gov/ig/downloads/audit-report-oas-l-10-05 Download DOE-STD-3020-2005 Specification for HEPA Filters used by DOE Contractors Supersedes DOE NE F3-45 (January 1987) This standard establishes specification and testing requirements for High Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filters procured to provide personnel and environmental protection when installed in DOE nuclear facilities. The standard specifies minimum requirements to be included in contractor specifications. http://energy.gov/hss/downloads/doe-std-3020-2005-0 Download Reference Buildings by Climate Zone and Representative City: 3C San Francisco, California

265

G  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Allowability of Contractor Litigation Defense and Settlement Costs Allowability of Contractor Litigation Defense and Settlement Costs References: FAR 31.205-47 Costs related to legal and other proceedings. When Is this Acquisition Letter (AL) Effective? This AL is effective immediately upon issuance. When Does this AL Expire? This AL remains in effect until superseded or canceled. Who Is the Intended Audience For this AL? Department of Energy (DOE) and National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Contracting Officers who are responsible for determining the allowability of contractor litigation defense and settlement costs are the audience for this AL. Who Is the Point of Contact For this AL? DOE Contracting Officers may contact Michael Righi of the Contracts and Financial Assistance Policy

266

Safety Management System Policy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

POLICY POLICY Washington, D.C. Approved: 4-25-11 SUBJECT: INTEGRATED SAFETY MANAGEMENT POLICY PURPOSE AND SCOPE To establish the Department of Energy's (DOE) expectation for safety, 1 including integrated safety management that will enable the Department's mission goals to be accomplished efficiently while ensuring safe operations at all departmental facilities and activities. This Policy cancels and supersedes DOE Policy (P) 411.1, Safety Management Functions, Responsibilities, and Authorities Policy, dated 1-28-97; DOE P 441.1, DOE Radiological Health and Safety Policy, dated 4-26-96; DOE P 450.2A, Identifying, Implementing and Complying with Environment, Safety and Health Requirements, dated 5-15-96; DOE P 450.4, Safety Management

267

Microsoft Word - AL2005-13.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Department of Energy No. 2005-13 Department of Energy No. 2005-13 Acquisition Regulation Date 09/30/05 ACQUISITION LETTER This Acquisition Letter is issued under the authority of the DOE Procurement Executive. Subject: Performance-Based Service Acquisition References: FAR 37.6 Performance-Based Contracting DEAR 970.1100-1 Performance-Based Contracting DOE Acquisition Guide Chapter 37.2 Performance-Based Service Acquisition DOE Acquisition Guide Chapter 70.8 Performance-Based Contracting When is this Acquisition Letter (AL) Effective? This AL is effective 10 business days from the date of issuance. When Does this AL Expire? This AL remains in effect until superseded or canceled. Who is the Point of Contact?

268

G  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Management and operating contractors' audit coverage of cost- Management and operating contractors' audit coverage of cost- reimbursement subcontracts References: DEAR 970.5203-1 Management controls DEAR 970.5232-3 Accounts, records, and inspection DEAR 970.5244-1 Contractor purchasing system Acquisition Guide Chapter 70.4 Cooperative Audit Strategy When is this Acquisition Letter (AL) effective? This AL is effective upon issuance. When does this AL Expire? This AL remains in effect until superseded or canceled. Who Is the Intended Audience For this AL? Department of Energy (DOE), including National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), Contracting Officers are the audience for this AL. Who is the Point of Contact for this AL? Contracting Officers may contact Michael Righi of the Contracts and Financial

269

Microsoft Word - 2712cvc.doc  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

SA 2712-CVC # (10-2002) SA 2712-CVC # (10-2002) Supersedes (3-2002) issue CONTRACTOR/VISITOR - COMPUTERS TEMPORARY, ONE-TIME EXCEPTION TO SNL POLICY Complete this form to take Computers into Sandia premises (both Limited Areas and Property Protection Areas (PPAs)). This form may also be used to obtain authorization for potential TSE (technical surveillance equipment). FAX the completed form (or send a copy) to the host's Center Computer Security Representative (CSR) BEFORE going on-site. Register in NWIS for any one of these conditions: network connections; or multiple visits; or for stays exceeding one month. Visitor Name Start Date Visitor Business Affiliation End Date SNL Host Name Phone Center's CSR's Name CSR FAX (or mail stop)

270

Long-Term Surveillance Plan for the Burrell Vicinity Property, Blairsville, Pennsylvania, GJO-2002-331-TAR, MAC-LBUR 1.1, Revised April 2000  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Program Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Program Long-Term Surveillance Plan for the U.S. Department of Energy Burrell Vicinity Property Blairsville, Pennsylvania April 2000 Revised This document supersedes document number UMTRA-DOE/AL/62350-3F Ver.2, Rev.2 Prepared by U.S. Department of Energy Grand Junction Office Grand Junction, Colorado Work Performed Under DOE Contract Number DE-AC13-96GJ87335 Task Order Number MAC 00-06 Document Number S00350 DOE/Grand Junction Office LTSP for Burrell April 2000 Revision Page iii Contents 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Purpose ..................................................................................................................... 1-1

271

DOE-STD-1090-99; DOE Standard Hoisting and Rigging (Formerly Hoisting and Rigging Manual)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

TS TS INCH-POUND DOE-STD-1090-99 March 1999 Superseding DOE-STD-1090-96 September 1996 DOE STANDARD HOISTING AND RIGGING (Formerly Hoisting and Rigging Manual) U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE STANDARD HOISTING AND RIGGING (Formerly Hoisting and Rigging Manual) Summary of Changes as of March 1999

272

Microsoft Word - 01-3199 Rev 6 Final w_o signature  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

WIPP 01-3199 WIPP 01-3199 Recertification Project Plan Revision 6 February 2013 This document supersedes DOE/WIPP 01-3199, Revision 5. U.S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office 2 Recertification Project Plan Revision 6 February 2013 U.S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office //signature on file// 02/14/2013 Jose R. Franco / Date Manager, Carlsbad Field Office Recertification Project Plan DOE/WIPP 01-3199, Rev. 6 3 This document has been submitted as required to: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information PO Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 (865) 576-8401 Additional information about this document may be obtained by calling 1-800-336-9477 Unlimited, publicly available full-text scientific and technical reports

273

C:\DS\99-3119, Rev. 5 - Final.wpd  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

WIPP 99-3119 WIPP 99-3119 Compliance Monitoring Implementation Plan for 40 CFR §191.14(b), Assurance Requirement U.S. Department of Energy Revision 5 December 2007 This document supersedes Revision 4.1 of DOE/WIPP 99-3119. Working Copy Compliance Monitoring Implementation Plan DOE/WIPP 99-3119, Rev. 5 This document has been submitted as required to: Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 (865) 576-8401 Additional information about this document may be obtained by calling 1-800-336-9477. Copies may be obtained by contacting the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22101. Working Copy Compliance Monitoring Implementation Plan DOE/WIPP 99-3119, Rev. 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

274

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

01 - 6910 of 9,640 results. 01 - 6910 of 9,640 results. Download Public Comment on Price Anderson Act from the University of Chicago http://energy.gov/gc/downloads/public-comment-price-anderson-act-university-chicago Download Comments of Avista Corporation on DOE Request for Information-Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Customers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy http://energy.gov/gc/downloads/comments-avista-corporation-doe-request-information-implementing-national-broadband Download Frequently Asked Questions- Certification Grace Period (08/17/2010) This document has been superseded. All FAQs are now available at http://www1.eere.energy.gov/guidance/default.aspx?pid=2&spid=1. http://energy.gov/gc/downloads/frequently-asked-questions-certification-grace-period-08172010

275

DOE-HDBK-1206-98; Guide to Good Practices for On-the-Job Training  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

206-98 206-98 April 1998 Superseding DOE-STD-1012-92 DOE HANDBOOK GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR ON-THE-JOB TRAINING U.S. Department of Energy FSC 6910 Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. Order No. DE98001292 DOE-HDBK-1206-98 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy (DOE) Handbook is approved for use by all DOE Components and their contractors. The Handbook incorporates editorial changes to DOE-

276

Stabilization, Packaging, and Storage of Plutonium-Bearing Materials  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-STD-3013-2000 September 2000 Superseding DOE-STD-3013-99 November 1999 DOE STANDARD STABILIZATION, PACKAGING, AND STORAGE OF PLUTONIUM-BEARING MATERIALS U.S. Department of Energy AREA PACK Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. TS This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-3013-2000 iii ABSTRACT This Standard provides guidance for the stabilization, packaging and safe storage of plutonium-

277

DOE-HDBK-1201-97; Guide to Good Practices Evaluation Instrument Examples  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1-97 1-97 January 1997 Supersedes DOE-STD-1006-92 July 1992 DOE HANDBOOK GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES EVALUATION INSTRUMENT EXAMPLES U.S. Department of Energy FSC 6910 Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE97000784 DOE-HDBK-1201-97 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy (DOE) Handbook is approved for use by all DOE Components and their contractors. The Handbook incorporates editorial changes to DOE-

278

Coal Distribution Database, 2006  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Domestic Distribution of U.S. Coal by Origin State, Domestic Distribution of U.S. Coal by Origin State, Consumer, Destination and Method of Transportation, 2009 Final February 2011 2 Overview of 2009 Coal Distribution Tables Introduction The Coal Distribution Report - Annual provides detailed information on domestic coal distribution by origin state, destination state, consumer category, and method of transportation. Also provided is a summary of foreign coal distribution by coal-producing State. This Final 2009 Coal Distribution Report - Annual, supersedes the data contained in the four Quarterly Coal Distribution Reports previously issued for 2009. This report relies on the most current data available from EIA's various monthly, quarterly and annual surveys

279

Chemical Process Hazards Analysis (DOE-HDBK-1100-2004)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ENGLISH ENGLISH DOE-HDBK-1100-2004 August 2004 Superseding DOE-HDBK-1100-96 February 1996 DOE HANDBOOK CHEMICAL PROCESS HAZARDS ANALYSIS U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-HDBK-1100-2004

280

Executive Orders Defining Tribal Relationships | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Executive Orders Defining Tribal Relationships Executive Orders Defining Tribal Relationships Executive Orders Defining Tribal Relationships Executive Order 13592 Improving American Indian and Alaska Native Educational Opportunities and Strengthening Tribal Colleges and Universities (2011). Superseded EO 13021 to ensure that all American Indian students, regardless of which institution they attend, receive support from the federal government at elementary through college levels. This EO also creates an Interagency Working Group on AI/AN Education to establish educational goals across the government. Executive Order 13096 American Indian and Alaska Education (1998). Directs federal agencies to improve the academic performance of American Indian and Alaska Native students via six goals: (1) improving reading and mathematics (2) increasing high school completion

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "12-2000 supersedes 7-96" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Federal Facility Compliance Agreement on Storage of Polychlorinated Biphenyls, August 8, 1996  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Facility Compliance Agreement on Storage of Polychlorinated Biphenyls, August.. Page 1 of 18 Facility Compliance Agreement on Storage of Polychlorinated Biphenyls, August.. Page 1 of 18 EM Home | Regulatory Compliance | Environmental Compliance Agreements Federal Facility Compliance Agreement on Storage of Polychlorinated Biphenyls, August 8, 1996 NOTE: As of December 16, 1996, for the Oak Ridge Reservation this National Agreement was superseded by the Oak Ridge Reservation Polychlorinated Biphenyl Federal Facilities Compliance Agreement (ORR-PCB-FFCA). The ORR-PCB-FFCA will be available soon. Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Definitions III. Covered Materials IV. Statement of Facts & Conclusions of Law V. Compliance Requirements VI. Submittal and Review of Annual Status Report VII. Notification VIII. Dispute Resolution IX. Extensions

282

Stailization, Packaging, and Storage of Plutonium-Bearing Materials  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-STD-3013-2012 MARCH 2012 DOE STANDARD STABILIZATION, PACKAGING, AND STORAGE OF PLUTONIUM-BEARING MATERIALS U.S. Department of Energy AREA PACK Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. TS Available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web site at http://www.hss.energy.gov/NuclearSafety/ns/techstds/ DOE-STD-3013-2012 iii ABSTRACT This Standard provides guidance for the stabilization, packaging, and safe storage of plutonium- bearing metals and oxides containing at least 30 wt% plutonium plus uranium. It supersedes DOE-STD-3013-2004, "Stabilization, Packaging, and Storage of Plutonium-Bearing Materials," and is approved for use by all DOE organizations and their contractors. Metals are stabilized by

283

DOE-STD-3026-99; DOE Standard Filter Test Facility Quality Program Plan  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6-99 6-99 February 1999 Superseding DOE NE F 3-44 July 1986 DOE STANDARD FILTER TEST FACILITY QUALITY PROGRAM PLAN U.S. Department of Energy FSC 4460 Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-3026-99 iii FOREWORD This Department of Energy standard supercedes DOE NE F 3-44 and is approved for use by all DOE components and their contractors.

284

DOE-HDBK-1092-2004 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

092-2004 092-2004 DOE-HDBK-1092-2004 December 17, 2004 DOE-HDBK-1092-2004: Electrical Safety Superseding DOE-HDBK-1092-98 (January 1998) | Replaced by DOE-HDBK-1092-2013 (June 2013) The Electrical Safety Handbook presents the Department of Energy (DOE) safety standards for DOE field offices or facilities involved in the use of electrical energy. It has been prepared to provide a uniform set of electrical safety guidance and information for DOE installations to effect a reduction or elimination of risks associated with the use of electrical energy. The objectives of this handbook are to enhance electrical safety awareness and mitigate electrical hazards to employees, the public, and the environment. DOE-HDBK-1092-2004, Electrical Safety More Documents & Publications

285

Radiological Source Registry and Tracking  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Radiological Source Registry and Tracking (RSRT) Radiological Source Registry and Tracking (RSRT) Home HSS Logo Radiological Source Registry and Tracking (RSRT) Department of Energy (DOE) Notice N 234.1 Reporting of Radioactive Sealed Sources has been superseded by DOE Order O 231.1B Environment, Safety and Health Reporting. O 231.1B identifies the requirements for centralized inventory and transaction reporting for radioactive sealed sources. Each DOE site/facility operator that owns, possesses, uses or maintains in custody those accountable radioactive sealed sources identified in Title 10 Code of Federal Regulation Part 835, Occupational Radiation Protection (10 CFR 835), Appendix E, and International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Categories 1 and 2 radioactive sealed sources identified in Attachment 5, Appendix A of O 321.1B, will submit information to the DOE Radiological Source Registry and Tracking (RSRT) System.

286

1  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

10-03) 10-03) SECTION II GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS THE FOLLOWING CLAUSES APPLY TO THIS CONTRACT AS INDICATED UNLESS SPECIFICALLY DELETED, OR EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THEY ARE SPECIFICALLY SUPPLEMENTED OR AMENDED IN WRITING IN THE SIGNATURE PAGE OR SECTION I OF THIS CONTRACT. INT01 ACCEPTANCE OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS This Contract integrates, merges, and supersedes any prior offers, negotiations, and agreements concerning the subject matter hereof and constitutes the entire agreement between the parties. Seller, by signing this Contract, delivering Items ordered under this Contract, and/or acceptance of payment shall constitute Seller's unqualified acceptance of this Contract. Sandia hereby objects to any terms and conditions contained in any acknowledgment of this Contract that are different

287

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

51 - 6160 of 26,764 results. 51 - 6160 of 26,764 results. Download Before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform By: Deputy Secretary Daniel Poneman, U.S. Department of Energy http://energy.gov/congressional/downloads/house-committee-oversight-and-government-reform Download Audit Report: WR-B-00-01 Analytical Laboratory Capabilities at the Hanford Site http://energy.gov/ig/downloads/audit-report-wr-b-00-01 Article President Obama Announces More Key Administration Posts http://energy.gov/articles/president-obama-announces-more-key-administration-posts-4 Download DOE-TSL-1-2002 Department of Energy Standards Index Replaced by DOE-TSL-1-2007 | Superseding DOE-TSL-1-99 (May 1999) catalog or index of available DOE standards http://energy.gov/hss/downloads/doe-tsl-1-2002 Download A Design-Builder's Perspective: Anaerobic Digestion, Forest County

288

Process Rule | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Process Rule Process Rule Process Rule The Department of Energy (DOE) conducted a formal effort between 1995 and 1996 to improve the process it used to develop appliance efficiency standards. This effort involved many different stakeholders, including manufacturers, energy-efficiency advocates, trade associations, state agencies, utilities, and other interested parties. The result was the publication of the Process Rule: 61 FR 36974 (July 15, 1996). Found in the Code of Federal Regulations at 10 CFR 430 Appendix A to Subpart C, the Process Rule describes the procedures, interpretations, and policies that guide DOE in establishing new or revised energy-efficiency standards for consumer products. Elements of the Process Rule have been superseded or supplemented by more recent practices described elsewhere on

289

The Secretary of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

May 5,2011 May 5,2011 MEMORANDUM FOR THOMAS P. D' AGOSTINO UNDER SECRETARY FOR NUCLEAR SECURITY AND ADMINISTRATOR OF THE NATIONAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION STEVEN KOONIN UNDER SECRETARY SCIENCE ARUN MAJUMDAR SENIOR ADVISORIDIRECTOR ARPA-E FROM: STEVEN CHU ~ ~tV SUBJECT: Authorize Changes to Workforce Restructuring Policy This memorandum provides revised and consolidated policy and models intended to facilitate and expedite any necessary contractor workforce restructuring activities. Specifically, this memorandum addresses 1) policies applicable only to workforce restructuring at the Department's defense nuclear facilities and 2) the policies applicable to workforce restructuring at all Departmental facilities. This memorandum supersedes any prior policy and guidance that is inconsistent with this document. Sites that follow the

290

EXHIBIT B  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Project, LLC Project, LLC 1 of 2 EXHIBIT B (EA Project Schedule, Cost Estimates, and Payment Schedule) 1. This Exhibit B made this day of , 20XX, under and as a part of Contract No. XX-UGPR-XX, dated , 20XX, hereinafter called the Contract, shall become effective on the effective date of the Contract, and shall remain in effect until superseded by another Exhibit B or termination of the Contract. 2. EA PROJECT SCHEDULE AND COST ESTIMATES: The tables below include an EA Project Cost Estimate and EA Project Schedule Estimate for environmental work to be performed by Western. The Parties understand that it may be necessary to revise the EA Project Schedule and Cost Estimates from time to time as the Parties further define their responsibilities under the Contract. The Parties shall use good faith efforts to meet target

291

Department of Energy Standards Index  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

TSL-1-2002 TSL-1-2002 December 2002 Superseding DOE-TSL-1-99 May 1999 DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS LIST DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY STANDARDS INDEX U.S. Department of Energy AREA SDMP Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-TSL-1-2002 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy (DOE) Technical Standards list (TSL) has been prepared by the Office of Nuclear and Facility Safety Policy (EH-53) on the basis of currently available technical information.

292

EXHIBIT B  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Wind, LLC Wind, LLC 1 of 3 EXHIBIT B (EIS Project Schedule, Cost Estimates, and Payment Schedule) 1. This Exhibit B made this day of , 20XX, under and as a part of Contract No. XX-UGPR-XX, dated , 20XX, hereinafter called the Contract, shall become effective on the effective date of the Contract, and shall remain in effect until superseded by another Exhibit B or termination of the Contract. 2. EIS PROJECT COST AND SCHEDULE ESTIMATES: The tables below include Project Cost Estimates and Project Schedule Estimates of environmental work to be performed by Western. The Parties understand that it may be necessary to revise the Project Schedule and Cost Estimates from time to time as the Parties further define their responsibilities under the Contract. The Parties

293

Microsoft Word - Appendix L_ContingencyPlan.doc  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Well Field Contingency Plan U.S. Department of Energy Weldon Spring Site LTS&M Plan July 2005 Doc. No. S0079000 Page L-3 L1.0 Planning and Preparation Under this contingency plan, which supersedes the Well Field Contingency Plan (DOE 1992b), any production capacity lost to the existing well field due to confirmed contaminant migration from the Weldon Spring Quarry (Quarry) will be replaced. While it is highly unlikely that such measures will be implemented, this plan defines the minimum planning and preparation required to facilitate a rapid and effective response. Planning and preparation measures include the following: * Selection of a reliable alternate source of water to replace or supplement the existing well field. * Preparation of a plan for data collection to facilitate development of the selected alternate

294

OTS NOTE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

August 4, 1992 August 4, 1992 TO: Alexander Williams FROM: Ed Mitchell, Steve Fieser ' 565 SUBJECT: Revised Designation Package for Baker Brothers Site We have prepared the Designation Summary you requested for Baker Brothers Site, in Toledo, Ohio. This package supersedes the previous one provided on May 1, 1992, to reflect the documents that have since been finalized. The designationpackage consists of the following: o Designation Summary (8/4/92) o Authority Review (7/16/92) o Radiological Survey (3/92) A copy of each is enclosed. Also enclosed for your consideration is draft correspondence to FSRD, to designate this site for remedial action under FUSRAP. cc: C. Young, w/o enclosure J. Herman, w/o enclosure i DOE disk copy, EM-421 EM-421 Author (A. Williams, 3-8149)

295

Microsoft Word - FAL2004-01.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Financial Assistance Letters (FALs) that remain in effect are identified below. All other previously issued FALs have been superseded by a formal rulemaking, incorporated into other guidance, and/or canceled. *************** Financial Assistance Letters Remaining in Effect Number Date Subject 96-01 03/08/96 Implementation Guidance on Sections 3001 and 3002 of EPAct 96-02 08/01/96 Implementation Guidance on Section 2306 of EPAct 97-05 12/18/97 Merit Review/Lobbying 2001-02 07/30/01 Preservation of Open Competition and Government Neutrality Towards Contractor's Labor Relations on Federally Funded Construction Projects 2001-03 10/12/01 Determining Appropriate Award Instrument 2001-04 10/25/01 Management of Report Deliverables

296

DOE F 1340-3  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

(10-96) All Other Editions Are Obsolete OMB Control No. 1910-1500 OMB Burden Disclosure Statement on Back of Page 1 1. Title of Publication 4. Brief Description of Purpose and Contents 5. Originating Office (Address, Room, Building,and Routing Symbol) 17. Estimated Printing Costs (Supplied by GPO Liaison Office) 2. Document No. (Supplied After Approval) 3. Date of This Request 6. Person to Contact 7. Telephone Number (Include Area Code) 15. Reviews Required and Obtained by Submitting Office Program Technical Review Policy and Evaluation Office of General Counsel 8. Type of Publication 9. New Publication Supersedes 11. Identify Titles of Similar Government Publication 13. Distribution of Old Inventory New publication Major revision Minor revision Reprint (without changes)

297

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

71 - 22380 of 26,764 results. 71 - 22380 of 26,764 results. Download Ground-Water Table and Chemical Changes in an Alluvial Aquifer During Sustained Pumping at the Monticello, Utah, Zero-Valent Iron Treatment Cells Ground-Water Table and Chemical Changes in an Alluvial Aquifer During Sustained Pumping at the Monticello, Utah, Zero-Valent Iron Treatment Cells http://energy.gov/lm/downloads/ground-water-table-and-chemical-changes-alluvial-aquifer-during Download DOE-STD-3006-2000 Planning and Conduct of Operational Readiness Reviews Replaced by DOE-STD-3006-2010 | Superseding DOE-STD-3006-95 (November 1995) DOE O 425.1B specifies the conditions and circumstances when an Operational Readiness Review (ORR) or a Readiness Assessment (RA) is required as part of a new start or restart process. This standard provides guidance on the

298

G  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Subject: Guidance for Fast-Track Cooperative Research And Development Agreement (CRADA) Programs at DOE Facilities. References: DOE Cooperative Research And Development Agreements Order DOE O 483.1 DOE Cooperative Research And Development Agreements Manual DOE M 483.1 Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act 15 U.S.C. § 3710a FFRDCs 48 CFR 35.017 Technology Transfer 48 CFR 970.2770 Technology Transfer Mission 48 CFR 970.5227-3 Federal Laboratory 15 U.S.C. § 3703(6) When Is this Acquisition Letter (AL) Effective? This AL is effective immediately upon issuance. When Does this AL Expire? This AL remains in effect until superseded or canceled. Who Is the Intended Audience For this AL?

299

G  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Contract Periods of Performance Exceeding 5 Years Contract Periods of Performance Exceeding 5 Years References: FAR Subpart 17.204(e) DEAR 970.1706 Acquisition Letter 2013-3 Competition in Contracting Act of 1984 When Is this Acquisition Letter (AL) Effective? This revision is effective immediately upon issuance. When Does this AL Expire? This AL remains in effect until superseded or canceled. Who Is the Intended Audience For this AL? Department of Energy (DOE) Contracting Officers are the audience for this AL. Who Is the Point of Contact For this AL? DOE Contracting Officers may contact Jason Taylor of the Contracts and Financial Assistance Policy Division, Office of Policy, Office of Acquisition and Project Management by phone at (202) 287-1560 or by email to Jason.Taylor@hq.doe.gov.

300

Job Counting Guidelines | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Mission » Recovery Act » Job Counting Guidelines Mission » Recovery Act » Job Counting Guidelines Job Counting Guidelines The following updated definitions and guidelines are intended to provide EM Recovery Act sites with information to collect and report timely and accurate full-time equivalent and cumulative head-count data for both monthly and quarterly jobs data calls. These revised guidelines supersede the previous monthly jobs data reporting definitions and guidelines dated February 9, 2010. These revised guidelines remain consistent with OMB guidance issued December 18, 2009 and cover subcontractors and vendors as well as prime contractors. Job Counting Guidelines More Documents & Publications EA-1548: Finding of No Significant Impact Microsoft Word - Horizon Wind Energy Comments.docx Proceedings of the Computational Needs for the Next Generation Electric

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "12-2000 supersedes 7-96" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Standards Actions - May 2000  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Project Canceled Project Canceled The following DOE Technical Standards project was recently canceled. If you have any questions about this action, please contact the person listed below. • Equipment Qualification Program for DOE-Owned Nuclear Facilities and Operations, Project Number FACR-0012; Samuel Rosenbloom, EH-31; 301-903-5749, Fax 301-903- 8693, Samuel.Rosenbloom@eh.doe.gov. The need for this document no longer ex- ists. DOE Technical Standards Recently Published The following DOE Technical Standard has recently been published: • DOE-STD-1063-2000, Facility Representatives, March 2000. This document updates and supersedes DOE-STD-1063-97, October 1997. DOE employees and DOE contractors may obtain copies from the ES&H Technical Infor- mation Services, U.S. Department of Energy; 1-800-473-4375, Fax 301-903-9823.

302

Microsoft Word - al2005-06.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2005-06 2005-06 Acquisition Regulation Date 03/11/05 ACQUISITION LETTER This Acquisition Letter is issued under the authority of the DOE and NNSA Procurement Executives. Subject: Small Business Procurement Goals References: FAR Subpart 19.7 The Small Business Subcontracting Program 13 CFR Chapter 1 Small Business Administration OFPP Letter 99-1 Small Business Procurement Goals Small Business Administration (SBA) Goaling guidelines for the Small Business Preference Programs for Prime When is this Acquisition Letter (AL) Effective? This AL is effective immediately upon issuance. When does this AL Expire? This AL remains in effect until superseded or canceled. Who is the Point of Contact? Contact Stephen Zvolensky of the Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Procurement and

303

DOE-HDBK-1204-97; Guide to Good Practices for the Development of Test Items  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4-97 4-97 January 1997 Supersedes DOE-STD-1009-92 July 1992 DOE HANDBOOK GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF TEST ITEMS U.S. Department of Energy FSC 6910 Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE97000786 DOE-HDBK-1204-97 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy (DOE) Handbook is approved for use by all DOE

304

DOE-HDBK-1204-97 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4-97 4-97 DOE-HDBK-1204-97 July 26, 2005 Guide to Good Practices for the Development of Test Items Supersedes DOE-STD-1009-92 (July 1992) While the methodology used in developing test items can vary significantly, to ensure quality examinations, test items should be developed systematically. Test design and development is discussed in the DOE Guide to Good Practices for Design, Development, and Implementation of Examinations. DOE-HDBK-1204-97, Guide to Good Practices for the Development of Test Items More Documents & Publications Order Module--DOE-HDBK-1203-97, GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR TRAINING OF TECHNICAL STAFF AND MANAGERS, DOE-HDBK-1204-97, GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF TEST ITEMS,DOE-HDBK-1205-97, GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR THE DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT

305

Notice of Availability of a Record of Decision for the Mint Farm Generation Project (2/27/02)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

48 48 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 39 / Wednesday, February 27, 2002 / Notices 5. Duration and Effective Date 5.1 All actions pursuant to any authority delegated prior to this Order or pursuant to any authority delegated by this Order taken prior to and in effect on the date of this Order are ratified, and remain in force as if taken under this Order, unless or until rescinded, amended or superseded. 5.2 This Order is effective December 6, 2001. Spencer Abraham, Secretary of Energy. [FR Doc. 02-4564 Filed 2-26-02; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-M DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Bonneville Power Administration Mint Farm Generation Project AGENCY: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), Department of Energy (DOE). ACTION: Notice of availability of Record of Decision (ROD). SUMMARY: This notice announces the

306

DOE-HDBK-3012-96; Team Leader's Preparation Guide for Operational Readiness Reviews (ORR)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

INCH-POUND INCH-POUND DOE-HDBK-3012-96 June 1996 SUPERSEDING DOE-HDBK-3012-94 September 1994 DOE HANDBOOK GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR OPERATIONAL READINESS REVIEWS (ORR) TEAM LEADER'S GUIDE U.S. Department of Energy AREA MISC Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE96009471 DOE-HDBK-3012-96 iii FOREWORD This Department of Energy handbook, Guide to Good Practices for Conducting Operational

307

DOE-STD-7501-99; The DOE Corporate Lessons Learned Program  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7501-99 7501-99 December 1999 Superseding DOE-STD-7501-95 Including Change Notice No. 1 September 1997 DOE STANDARD THE DOE CORPORATE LESSONS LEARNED PROGRAM U.S. Department of Energy AREA MGMT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. DOE-STD-7501-99 iii FOREWORD This Department of Energy Technical Standard is approved for use by all DOE Components and

308

DOE-HDBK-1117-99; Guide to Good Practices for Maintenance Supervisor Selection and Development  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7-99 7-99 October 1999 Superseding DOE-STD-1059-93 February 1993 DOE HANDBOOK GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR SELECTION AND DEVELOPMENT U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. TS This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-HDBK-1117-99 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy (DOE) Handbook is approved for use by all DOE

309

DOE Technical Standards List: Directory of DOE and Contractor Personnel Involved in Non-Government Standards Activities  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4-99 4-99 May 1999 Superseding DOE-TSL-4-98 May 1998 DOE TECHNICAL STANDARDS LIST DIRECTORY OF DOE AND CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL INVOLVED IN NON- GOVERNMENT STANDARDS ACTIVITIES U.S. Department of Energy AREA SDMP Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-TSL-4-99 iii 1. GENERAL GUIDANCE 1.1 Purpose. Public Law (PL) 104-113 [15 USC 272(b), March 7, 1996], The

310

AL/FAL 99-01  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

AL/FAL 99-01 AL/FAL 99-01 Date: April 1, 1999 The status of Acquisition Letters and Financial Assistance Letters is identified below. All others previously issued have been superseded by a formal rulemaking, incorporated into other guidance, and/or canceled. Please note that some of the following titles have been revised to more accurately reflect the subject matter. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Acquisition Letters In Effect Number Date Subject 93-2 03/05/93 M & O Financial Management 93-4 04/07/93 Displaced Workers Benefits Program 94-3 03/09/94 Compensation for Personal Services 94-9 07/25/94 Travel Costs 94-13 08/25/94 Contractor Litigation Costs 94-16 11/18/94 Time-and-Materials D&F 94-19 12/09/94 Basic Labor Policies Fringe Benefits

311

Chapter 04 - Accounting Systems and Organization  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 11, 2011 July 11, 2011 Chapter 4-1 CHAPTER 4 ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS AND ORGANIZATION 1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE. This chapter describes the Departmental finance and accounting organizational structure and the primary accounting system. a. Applicability. This chapter applies to all Departmental elements to include contractors as listed under item 2 of this chapter. The Power Marketing Administrations (PMAs) are subject to all financial policies and procedures of the Department of Energy (DOE) unless these policies and procedures are superseded by the Federal Columbia River Transmission System Act, the Government Corporation Control Act, or other statutory authority. When in conflict with the provisions of this chapter, PMAs shall observe the policies and meet the reporting requirements of the Federal Energy Regulatory

312

DOE-HDBK-1119-99; DOE Handbook; Guide to Good Practices for the Selection, Training, and Qualification of Shift Supervisors  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

9-99 9-99 April 1999 Superseding DOE-STD-1061-93 February 1993 DOE HANDBOOK GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR THE SELECTION, TRAINING, AND QUALIFICATION OF SHIFT SUPERVISORS U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. DOE-HDBK-1119-99 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy (DOE) Handbook is approved for use by all DOE

313

DOE-HDBK-1092-2004; Electrical Safety  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

HANDBOOK HANDBOOK ELECTRICAL SAFETY U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOE-HDBK-1092-2004 December 2004 Superseding DOE-HDBK-1092-98 January 1998 NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-HDBK-1092-2004 i Available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web site at http://tis.eh.doe.gov/techstds/. DOE-HDBK-1092-2004 ii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy (DOE) Handbook is approved for use by the Office of Environment, Safety, and Health and is available to all DOE components and their contractors. 2. Specific comments (recommendations, additions, deletions, and any pertinent data) to enhance this document should be sent to:

314

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

71 - 11680 of 26,764 results. 71 - 11680 of 26,764 results. Download DOE-HDBK-1119-99 Guide to Good Practices for the Selection, Training, and Qualification of Shift Supervisors Superseding DOE-STD-1061-93 (February 1993) This guide, used in conjunction with a facility-specific job analysis, provides a framework for the selection, training, qualification, and professional development of reactor facility and non-reactor nuclear facility shift supervisors. Training and qualification programs based on this guide should provide assurance that shift supervisors perform their jobs safely and competently. http://energy.gov/hss/downloads/doe-hdbk-1119-99 Rebate Technology Adoption and Commercialization Program (New Brunswick, Canada) The Technology Adoption and Commercialization Program (TAC) is intended to

315

Exhibit B  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

SRD-13 SRD-13 1 WHOLESALE RATES FOR HYDRO POWER AND ENERGY SOLD TO SAM RAYBURN DAM ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. (CONTRACT NO. DE-PM75-92SW00215) 1 Supersedes Rate Schedule SRD-08 Effective: During the period October 1, 2013, through September 30, 2017, in accordance with interim approval from Rate Order No. SWPA-67 issued by the Deputy Secretary of Energy on September 30, 2013, and pursuant to final approval by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Applicable: To the power and energy purchased by Sam Rayburn Dam Electric Cooperative, Inc. (SRDEC) from the Southwestern Power Administration (Southwestern) under the terms and conditions of the Power Sales Contract dated October 7, 1992, as amended, for the sale of all Hydro Power and Energy generated at the

316

Neutrino Factory Feasibility Study - 2-1 - April 15  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2-1 - April 15 2-1 - April 15 th , 2000 2. Introduction A muon storage ring as a source of intense neutrino beams supersedes a standard neutrino source in many ways. Classical neutrino sources have long decay channels which are used to generate ν µ,e ,ν µ,e beams from pions coming from a target that is hit with an intense proton beam. In a muon storage ring the muons circulate after injection until they decay. A fraction of these muons will decay in the straight section, which will produce an intense, well collimated neutrino beam. If the muon beam divergence in the straight section is small compared to the decay angle, the opening angle of the neutrino beam is completely dominated by the decay kinematics. Given the energy of the muons this angle basically equals 1/γ

317

Rate Schedule CV-NWT5  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

NWT5 NWT5 (Supersedes Schedule CV-NWT4) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT SCHEDULE OF RATE FOR NETWORK INTEGRATION TRANSMISSION SERVICE Effective: October 1, 2011, through September 30, 2016. Available: Within the marketing area served by the Western Area Power Administration (Western), Sierra Nevada Customer Service Region. Applicable: To customers receiving Central Valley Project (CVP) Network Integration Transmission Service (NITS). Character and Conditions of Service: Transmission service for three-phase, alternating current at 60-hertz, delivered and metered at the voltages and points of delivery or receipt, adjusted for losses, and delivered to points of delivery. This service includes scheduling and system control and dispatch service needed to

318

Rate Schedule COTP-T3  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

COTP-T3 COTP-T3 (Supersedes Schedule COTP-T2) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION CALIFORNIA-OREGON TRANSMISSION PROJECT SCHEDULE OF RATE FOR POINT-TO-POINT TRANSMISSION SERVICE Effective: October 1, 2011, through September 30, 2016. Available: Within the marketing area served by the Western Area Power Administration (Western), Sierra Nevada Customer Service Region. Applicable: To customers receiving California-Oregon Transmission Project (COTP) firm and/or non-firm point-to-point (PTP) transmission service. Character and Conditions of Service: Transmission service for three-phase, alternating current at 60-hertz, delivered and metered at the voltages and points of delivery or receipt, adjusted for losses, and delivered to points of

319

Nuclear Explosives Safety Evaluation Process (DOE-STD-3015-2004)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

SENSITIVE DOE-STD-3015-2004 November 2004 Superseding DOE-STD-3015-2001 DOE STANDARD NUCLEAR EXPLOSIVE SAFETY EVALUATION PROCESS U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program Web site at http://tis.eh.doe.gov/techstds/. DOE-STD-3015-2004 iii FOREWORD This Department of Energy (DOE) Technical Standard is approved for use by the Assistant Deputy Administrator for Military Application and Stockpile Operations, National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), and is available for use with DOE O 452.1, NUCLEAR EXPLOSIVE AND WEAPON SURETY PROGRAM, and DOE O 452.2, SAFETY OF

320

DOE-STD-1137-2007 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7 7 DOE-STD-1137-2007 December 05, 2007 DOE-STD-1137-2007: Fire Protection Engineering Functional Area Qualification Standard Supersedes DOE-STD-1137-2000 - July 2000 Fire protection engineers use science and technology to evaluate the effects of fires to protect workers, public, people, environment, and property. They analyze how facilities are used, how fires start and grow, and how fire and smoke affect people, buildings and property. Fire protection engineers evaluate many facets of the fire protection field. DOE-STD-1137-2007, Fire Protection Engineering Functional Area Qualification Standard More Documents & Publications FAQS Gap Analysis Qualification Card - Fire Protection Engineering DOE-STD-1137-2000 FAQS Job Task Analyses - Fire Protection Engineering

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "12-2000 supersedes 7-96" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

DOE-HDBK-1116-98; DOE Handbook Guide to Good Practices for the Selection, Training, and Qualification of Shift Technical Advisors  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

5-98 5-98 December 1998 Superseding DOE-STD-1057-93 February 1993 DOE HANDBOOK GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR THE SELECTION, TRAINING, AND QUALIFICATION OF SHIFT TECHNICAL ADVISORS U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-HDBK-1115-98 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy (DOE) Handbook is approved for use by all DOE

322

G  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Executive Compensation Executive Compensation References: FAR 31.205-6 Compensation for personal services DEAR 970.3102-05-6 Compensation for personal services DEAR 970.5232-2 Payments and Advances NNSA BOP-003-0601 NNSA Contractor Human Resources (CHR) Policy Guidance When Is this Acquisition Letter (AL) Effective? This Acquisition Letter (AL) is effective immediately upon issuance. When Does this AL Expire? This AL remains in effect until superseded or canceled. This Acquisition Letter cancels and replaces AL 2007-02, which remains available in Acquisition Letter Archives on the Office of Acquisition and Project Management homepage. Who Is the Intended Audience For this AL? Heads of Contracting Activity (HCA) and Contracting Officers (CO) responsible for

323

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

41 - 10950 of 28,905 results. 41 - 10950 of 28,905 results. Download Draft Report to Congress: Energy Policy Act of 2005, Section 1813, Indian Land Rights-of-Way Study http://energy.gov/oe/downloads/draft-report-congress-energy-policy-act-2005-section-1813-indian-land-rights-way-study Download EA-1626: Final Environmental Assessment Midwest Geological Sequestration Consortium (MGSC) Phase III Large-Scale Field Test http://energy.gov/nepa/downloads/ea-1626-final-environmental-assessment Download Technical Standards Newsletter- December 2007 The Standards Forum and Standards Actions - December 2007 http://energy.gov/hss/downloads/technical-standards-newsletter-december-2007 Download DOE-HDBK-1101-2004 Process Safety Management for Highly Hazardous Chemicals Superseding DOE-HDBK-1101-96 (February 1996)

324

Microsoft Word - AL2002-03.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

AL 2002-03 (3/13/2002) AL 2002-03 (3/13/2002) Subject: Public Relations Requirements References: Deputy Secretary Letter dated February 25, 2002 When is this Acquisition Letter (AL) Effective? This AL is effective 10 business days from the date of issuance. When does this AL Expire? This AL remains in effect until superseded or canceled. Who is the Point of Contact? Contact Bob Webb of the Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy at (202) 586-8264, or via e-mail at robert.webb@hq.doe.gov Visit our website at www.pr.doe.gov for information on Acquisition Letters and other policy issues. What is the Purpose of this AL? The purpose of this AL is to provide guidance regarding the processing of procurement requests for obtaining contractual services from public relations

325

DOE-STD-3013-2004; Stabilization, Packaging, and Storage of Plutonium-Bearing Materials  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-3013-2004 April 2004 Superseding DOE-STD-3013-2000 September 2000 DOE STANDARD STABILIZATION, PACKAGING, AND STORAGE OF PLUTONIUM-BEARING MATERIALS U.S. Department of Energy AREA PACK Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services. U.S. Department of Energy. (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U. S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605- 6000. DOE-STD-3013-2004 iii

326

DOE-TSL-2-2002 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2-2002 2-2002 DOE-TSL-2-2002 September 24, 2002 Directory of Points of Contact for the DOE Technical Standards Program Replaced by DOE-TSL-2-2006 | Supersedes DOE-TSL-2-98 (January 1998) This TSL supplements DOE manuals, directives, orders, and standards. It provides basic and fundamental information for DOE Component personnel involved in identifying standardization documents. It also provides listings of points of contact within DOE and identifies links to points of contact within the Department of Defense (DoD) for coordination of standardization activities. DOE-TSL-2-2002, Directory of Points of Contact for the DOE Technical Standards Program More Documents & Publications Technical Standards Newsletter - August 2006 Technical Standards Newsletter- April 2008

327

Microsoft Word - AL 2010-07 Acquistion Letters Remaining in Effect May 2010 revision 1 June 2010  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

No. AL 2010-07 Rev. 1 No. AL 2010-07 Rev. 1 Acquisition Regulation Date 06/01/2010 ACQUISITION LETTER This Acquisition Letter is issued under the authority of the DOE and NNSA Senior Procurement Executives. Acquisition Letters (AL) that remain in effect are identified below. All other previously issued ALs have been superseded by a formal rule-making, incorporated into other guidance, and/or canceled. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ACQUISITION LETTERS REMAINING IN EFFECT NUMBER DATE SUBJECT 93-4 04/07/1993 Displaced Workers Benefits Program 94-19 12/09/1994 Basic Labor Policies Fringe Benefits 95-06 06/28/1995 Personal Property Letter System 2000-09 11/11/2000 Source Selection Authority 2005-11 07/15/2005 Home Office Expenses for Management and

328

Rate Schedule CV-F13  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

F13 F13 (Supersedes Schedule CV-F12) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT SCHEDULE OF RATES FOR BASE RESOURCE AND FIRST PREFERENCE POWER Effective: October 1, 2011, through September 30, 2016. Available: Within the marketing area served by the Western Area Power Administration (Western), Sierra Nevada Customer Service Region. Applicable: To the Base Resource (BR) and First Preference (FP) Power Customers. Character and Conditions of Service: Alternating current, 60-hertz, three-phase, delivered and metered at the voltages and points established by contract. This service includes the Central Valley Project (CVP) transmission (to include reactive supply and voltage control from Federal generation sources needed to support

329

Microsoft Word - 6432cm.doc  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

CM (8-2003) CM (8-2003) Supersedes (10-96) issue INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETION OF FORM Item 7 - In the extreme left of the 12 blocks, enter the first letter of the current fiscal year month in which contract work is performed. Enter successive months of the current fiscal year, as required. Item 8 - Enter current fiscal year. Item 9 - a - Enter an appropriate scale in dollars for the horizontal lines in the grid and indicate unit of measure (e.g., thousands). On the grid formed by the dollar scale and the months of the year, plot planned cumulative cost (using a solid a dashed line) for the current fiscal year and actual cumulative cost (using a solid line) for month being reported, with a dotted line extended from the point to indicate estimate of costs to be incurred

330

Rate Schedule CV-TPT7  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

TPT7 TPT7 (Supersedes Schedule CV-TPT6) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT SCHEDULE OF RATE FOR TRANSMISSION OF WESTERN POWER BY OTHERS Effective: October 1, 2011, through September 30, 2016. Available: Within the marketing area served by the Western Area Power Administration (Western), Sierra Nevada Customer Service Region. Applicable: To Western's power service customers who require transmission service by a third party to receive power sold by Western. Character and Conditions of Service: Transmission service for three-phase, alternating current at 60-hertz, delivered and metered at the voltages and points of delivery or receipt, adjusted for losses, and delivered to points as

331

DOE-HDBK-1202-97; Guide to Good Practices for Teamwork Training and Diagnostic Skills Development  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2-97 2-97 June 1997 Supersedes DOE-STD-1007-92 DOE HANDBOOK GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR TEAMWORK TRAINING AND DIAGNOSTIC SKILLS DEVELOPMENT U.S. Department of Energy FSC 6910 Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650 DOE-HDBK-1202-97 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy (DOE) Handbook is approved for use by all DOE Components and their contractors. The Handbook incorporates editorial changes to DOE-

332

EM Quality Assurance Program (EM-QA-001 Revision 0) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Services » Program Management » Quality Assurance » EM Quality Services » Program Management » Quality Assurance » EM Quality Assurance Program (EM-QA-001 Revision 0) EM Quality Assurance Program (EM-QA-001 Revision 0) Previous revision of the Environmental Management Quality Assurance Program. The program is the EM management system to ensure we"do work correctly." This document has been superseded by Revision 1 of the program, but is still in use at some EM sites. EM Quality Assurance Program (EM-QA-001 Revision 0) More Documents & Publications Quality Assurance Program EM Quality Assurance Program (EM-QA-001 Revision 1) SOPP-43, EM-23 Quality Assurance Oversight Waste Management Nuclear Materials & Waste Tank Waste and Waste Processing Waste Disposition Packaging and Transportation Site & Facility Restoration

333

Facility Representatives  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-STD-1063-2006 April 2006 Superseding DOE-STD-1063-2000 March 2000 DOE STANDARD FACILITY REPRESENTATIVES U.S. Department of Energy AREA MGMT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1063-2006 ii Available on the Department of Energy Technical Standards Program web site at http://www.eh.doe.gov/techstds/ DOE-STD-1063-2006 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy standard is approved for use by all DOE Components. 2. The revision to this DOE standard was developed by a working group consisting of headquarters and field participants. Beneficial comments (recommendations, additions, deletions) and any pertinent data that may improve this document should

334

Microsoft Word - DOE-CBFO-01-3107 PDP Management Plan_Final  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

CBFO-01-3107 CBFO-01-3107 PERFORMANCE DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM MANAGEMENT PLAN Revision 6 June 2013 U.S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office Office of the National TRU Program This document supersedes DOE/CBFO-01-3107, Revision 5 DOE/CBFO-01-3107 Revision 6 PDP Management Plan June 2013 2 Performance Demonstration Program Management Plan DOE/CBFO-01-3107 Revision 6 June 2013 Approved By: //signature on file// Date: 6-14-13 Office Director Office of the National TRU Program Concurred By: //signature on file// Date: 6-14-13 Office Director Office of Quality Assurance Prepared By: //signature on file// Date: 6-14-13 PDP Appointee Office of the National TRU Program DOE/CBFO-01-3107 Revision 6 PDP Management Plan June 2013

335

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

51 - 16460 of 26,764 results. 51 - 16460 of 26,764 results. Download DOE-HDBK-1201-97 Guide to Good Practices: Evaluation Instrument Examples Supersedes DOE-STD-1006-92 (July 1992) This guide provides information on evaluation instruments used to gather employee, supervisor, and instructor feedback to identify strengths and weaknesses of training programs at DOE facilities. It should be used in conjunction with DOE Training Program Handbook: A Systematic Approach to Training and DOE Handbook, Alternative Systematic Approaches to Training. http://energy.gov/hss/downloads/doe-hdbk-1201-97 Download EIS-0279: Record of Decision Savannah River Site Spent Nuclear Fuel Management Final Environmental Impact Statement, Aiken, South Carolina http://energy.gov/nepa/downloads/eis-0279-record-decision

336

Buildings Energy Data Book: 4.4 Legislation Affecting Energy Consumption of Federal Buildings and Facilities  

Buildings Energy Data Book [EERE]

1 1 Energy Policy Act of 2005, Provisions Affecting Energy Consumption in Federal Buildings Source(s): Energy Management Requirements - Amended reduction goals set by the National Energy Conservation Policy Act, and requires increasing percentage reductions in energy consumption through FY 2015, with a final energy consumption reduction goal of 20 percent savings in FY 2015, as compared to the baseline energy consumption of Federal buildings in FY 2003. (These goals were superseded by Section 431 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007.) [Section 102] Energy Use Measurement and Accountability - Requires that all Federal buildings be metered to measure electricity use by 2012. [Section 103] Procurement of Energy Efficient Products - Requires all Federal agencies to procure ENERGY STAR qualified products, for product

337

Microsoft Word - AL2000-01.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Letters (AL) that remain in effect are identified below. All other previously issued ALs have been Letters (AL) that remain in effect are identified below. All other previously issued ALs have been superseded by a formal rulemaking, incorporated into other guidance, and/or canceled. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Acquisition Letters Remaining In Effect Number Date Subject 93-4 04/07/93 Displaced Workers Benefits Program 94-19 12/09/94 Basic Labor Policies Fringe Benefits 95-06 06/28/95 Personal Property Letter System 95-14 11/17/95 Subcontracts under the New Independent States - Industrial Partnering Program 96-05 05/10/96 Trade Agreements 96-09 09/16/96 Full and Open Competition - Management and Operating Contracts 97-02 01/20/97 M&O Legal Services Subcontracts

338

P  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

P P - . . - - 4 v - r REQUEST FOR RECORDS Dl To: NATIONAL ARCHIVES and RECORDS ADMINISTRATION (NIR) WASHINGTON, DC 20408 1. FROM (Agency or establishment) NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMIN. 2. MAJOR SUBDIVISION OFFICE OF SPECIAL AND REGIONAL ARCHIVES DATE RECEIVED 6-3-7 6 NOTIFICATION TO AGENCY In accordance with the provisions of 44 U. S. C. 3 303 a, the disposition request, including amendments, is approved except for items that may be marked 3. MINOR SUBDIVISION I is not required; is attached; or has been requested, I "disposition not approved or "withdrawn" in column 10. DATE 8-1 7-76 NATIONAL ARCHIVES-PACIFIC SOUTHWEST REG. 8. DESCRIPTION OF ITEM AND PROPOSED DISPOSITION I 9 GRS OR SUPERSEDED ~~O&~~E~~~$ NO. JOB CITATION

339

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

01 - 810 of 31,917 results. 01 - 810 of 31,917 results. Download Project Management Plan Examples 1- 80 The following material has been extracted from several project management plans. The order in which it is presented is arbitrary. The descriptions below should be used to navigate to the subject of... http://energy.gov/em/downloads/project-management-plan-examples-1-80 Download Enforcement Letter, Kaiser-Hill Company, L.L.C.- July 20, 1998 Issued to Kaiser-Hill Company, LLC related to Recurring Weaknesses in Implementing Quality Assurance Rule Requirements at the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site http://energy.gov/hss/downloads/enforcement-letter-kaiser-hill-company-llc-july-20-1998 Download DOE-HDBK-3012-96 Guide to Good Practices For Operational Readiness Reviews Replaced by DOE-STD-3006-2000 | SUPERSEDING DOE-HDBK-3012-94 (September

340

No  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

97-01 97-01 Date February 24, 1997 AUTHORITY All Acquisition Letters remaining in effect, as of February 24, 1997, are listed below. All other Acquisition Letters have either been superseded by a formal rulemaking or have been previously canceled. Financial Assistance Letters are not shown. Please file this listing in your Acquisition Letter binder. No. Date Subject 84-1R Rev. 12/92 Acquisition Letters 87-5 09/04/87 Patents and Technical Data 88-1 05/25/88 Rights in Technical Data - Facilities 90-3R Rev. 11/30/92 Internal Audit 91-5 08/06/91 Guidance on Implementing DOE Fee Policy 91-7 12/04/91 Rights in Data - Technology Transfer Activities 91-8 10/23/91 Special Considerations - Educational Institutions 92-2R 04/08/93 Foreign Ownership, Control or Influence

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "12-2000 supersedes 7-96" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for a Container System  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

the Navy (Lead Agency) the Navy (Lead Agency) Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program Department of Energy (Cooperating Agency) - DOE/EIS-0251 Prepared in accordance with: National Environmental Policy Act Section 102 (2) (C) FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR A CONTAINER SYSTEM FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF NAVAL SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL Contact: William Knoll Department of the Navy Code NAVSEA 08U 2531 Jefferson Davis Highway Arlington, VA 22242-5160 Telephone Number: 703-602-8229 Abstract: This Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) addresses six general alternative systems for the loading, storage, transport, and possible disposal of naval spent nuclear fuel following examination. It supersedes the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for a Container System for the Management of Naval Spent Nuclear Fuel dated May 1996.

342

Hoisting and Rigging  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE-STD-1090-2011 DOE-STD-1090-2011 September 2011 Superseding DOE-STD-1090-2007 August 2007 DOE STANDARD HOISTING AND RIGGING U.S. Department of Energy AREA SAFT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. INCH-POUND INTENTIONALLY BLANK DOE-STD-1090-2011 iii Introduction The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hoisting and Rigging Standard is intended to be used by supervisors, line managers, safety personnel, equipment operators, riggers and other personnel responsible for the safety of hoisting and rigging operations at DOE sites. It may be used as either contract document or as a best practices guide at the site's or program office's discretion. The standard invokes applicable OSHA and national consensus standards but also delineates

343

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

11 - 16020 of 29,416 results. 11 - 16020 of 29,416 results. Page Space Power Systems The Department of Energy (DOE) and its predecessors have provided radioisotope power systems that have safely enabled deep space exploration and national security missions for five decades. http://energy.gov/ne/nuclear-reactor-technologies/space-power-systems Download FY 2013 Environmental Management Budget Request to Congress http://energy.gov/em/downloads/fy-2013-environmental-management-budget-request-congress Download DOE-STD-1137-2007 DOE-STD-1137-2007: Fire Protection Engineering Functional Area Qualification Standard Supersedes DOE-STD-1137-2000 - July 2000 Fire protection engineers use science and technology to evaluate the effects of fires to protect workers, public, people, environment, and

344

OMB and CEQ Joint Memorandum on Environmental Collaboration and Conflict  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

OMB and CEQ Joint Memorandum on Environmental Collaboration and OMB and CEQ Joint Memorandum on Environmental Collaboration and Conflict Resolution OMB and CEQ Joint Memorandum on Environmental Collaboration and Conflict Resolution This Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) joint memorandum expands and builds on the November 28, 2005, Environmental Conflict Resolution (ECR) Memorandum, directing departments and agencies to increase the appropriate and effective use of third-party assisted environmental collaboration as well as environmental conflict resolution to resolve problems and conflicts that arise in the context of environmental, public lands, or natural resources issues, including matters related to energy, transportation, and water and land management. This memorandum supersedes and broadens the 2005 memorandum on ECR by

345

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

31 - 5540 of 28,560 results. 31 - 5540 of 28,560 results. Download DOE-STD-1066-2012 Fire Protection Supersedes DOE-STD-1066-99 This Standard was developed to provide acceptable methods and approaches for meeting DOE fire protection program and design requirements and to address special or unique fire protection issues at DOE facilities that are not comprehensively or adequately addressed in national consensus standards or other design criteria. http://energy.gov/hss/downloads/doe-std-1066-2012 Download Audit Report: OAS-L-10-10 The Audit of Precious Metals at NNSA Sites http://energy.gov/ig/downloads/audit-report-oas-l-10-10 Download VWA-0044- In the Matter of Janet K. Benson This Initial Agency Decision concerns a whistleblower complaint filed in 1994 by Janet K. Benson (the Complainant) against Lawrence Livermore

346

Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

AL 2012-01 AL 2012-01 Acquisition Regulation Date 10/04/2011 ACQUISITION LETTER This Acquisition Letter is issued under the authority of the DOE and NNSA Senior Procurement Executives. Acquisition Letters (AL) that remain in effect are identified below. All other previously issued ALs have been superseded by a formal rule-making, incorporated into other guidance, and/or canceled. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ACQUISITION LETTERS REMAINING IN EFFECT NUMBER DATE SUBJECT 93-4 04/07/1993 Displaced Workers Benefits Program 94-19 12/09/1994 Basic Labor Policies Fringe Benefits 2000-09 11/11/2000 Source Selection Authority 2005-11 07/15/2005 Home Office Expenses for Management and

347

DOE-STD-3026-99 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6-99 6-99 DOE-STD-3026-99 February 24, 2009 Filter Test Facility Quality Program Plan Superseding DOE NE F 3-44 July 1986 This standard was developed primarily for application in U.S. Department of Energy programs. It contains specific direction for HEPA filter testing performed at a DOE-accepted HEPA Filter Test Facility (FTF). Beneficial comments (recommendations, additions, deletions) and any pertinent data that may improve this document should be sent to the Office of Nuclear Safety Policy and Standards (EH-31), U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C. 20585, by letter or by using the self-addressed Document Improvement Proposal form (DOE F 1300.3) appearing at the end of this document. DOE-STD-3026-99: Filter Test Facility Quality Program Plan More Documents & Publications

348

FAL 2006-04, Financial Assistance Letters Remaining in Effect  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Financial Assistance Letters (FALs) that remain in effect are identified below. All other previously issued FALs Financial Assistance Letters (FALs) that remain in effect are identified below. All other previously issued FALs have been superseded by a formal rulemaking, incorporated into other guidance, and/or canceled. *************** Financial Assistance Letters Remaining in Effect Number Date Subject 2006-03 05/10/2006 Implementation Guidance for Awarding Technology Investment Agreements Financial Assistance Letters Discontinued Number Date Subject Disposition 2004-03 02/12/2004 Intellectual Property Moved to the Guide to Financial Assistance 2004-06 11/02/2004 Award Terms Moved to the Guide to Financial Assistance 2005-03 06/27/2005 Eligibility Determination Required by Section 2306 of the Energy Policy Act Moved to the Guide to

349

DOE-STD-0100T; DOE Standard Licensed Reactor Nuclear Safety Criteria Applicable to DOE Reactors  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

00T 00T November 1993 Superseding DOE/NE-0100T April 1991 DOE STANDARD LICENSED REACTOR NUCLEAR SAFETY CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO DOE REACTORS U.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 AREA SAFT DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly frorn the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (615) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 487-4650. Order No. DE94005221 CONTENTS

350

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

71 - 5780 of 31,917 results. 71 - 5780 of 31,917 results. Article Secretary Chu's Remarks at the City Club of Cleveland-- As Prepared for Delivery On January 18, 2012, Secretary Chu spoke at the City Club of Cleveland in Cleveland, OH. http://energy.gov/articles/secretary-chus-remarks-city-club-cleveland-prepared-delivery Download VEE-0084- In the Matter of Gas'n Shop, Inc. On March 26, 2002, Gas'n Shop, Inc. (Gas'n Shop) of Lincoln, Nebraska filed an Application for Exception with the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Energy (DOE). In its... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/vee-0084-matter-gas-n-shop-inc Download DOE-STD-3013-2000 Stabilization, Packaging, and Storage of Plutonium-Bearing Materials Replaced by DOE-STD-3013-2004 | Superseding DOE-STD-3013-99 (November 1999)

351

Federal Energy Management Program: Energy Policy Act of 1992  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1992 1992 The Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPAct 1992) amended the National Energy Conservation Policy Act (NECPA) and established several energy management goals. These requirements span the following topics: Definitions Water Conservation Federal Energy Efficiency Fund Utility Incentive Programs Financial Incentive Program Demonstration of New Technology General Services Administration Federal Buildings Fund Energy Savings Performance Contracts Energy Audit Teams Energy-Efficient Product Procurement United States Postal Service and Congressional Building Regulations Fleet Management This content is intended as a reference only. You should refer to the full text of EPAct 1992 for more details or other sections relevant to your work. Please note, the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA 2007), Executive Order (E.O.) 13423, and EPAct 2005 have been issued subsequent to the passage of EPAct 1992. These authorities update and/or supersede many of its requirements.

352

G  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Subject: Provisional Payment of Fee References: FAR Part 16 Types of Contracts FAR Subpart 16.4 Incentive Contracts FAR Part 32 Contract Financing When Is this Acquisition Letter (AL) Effective? This AL is effective immediately upon issuance. When Does this AL Expire? This AL remains in effect until superseded or canceled. Who Is the Intended Audience For this AL? Department of Energy (DOE) Contracting Officers who are considering providing for provisional payment of fee under their non management and operating (M&O) contracts are the audience for this AL. Who Is the Point of Contact For this AL? Contact Michael Righi of the Contracts and Financial Assistance Policy Division, Office of Policy, Office of Acquisition and Project Management at (202) 287-1337 or

353

DOE-STD-1063-2000 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3-2000 3-2000 DOE-STD-1063-2000 March 31, 2000 Establishing and Maintaining a Facility Representative Program at DOE Facilities Replaced by DOE-STD-1063-2006 | Superseding DOE-STD-1063-97 (October 1997) This standard, Facility Representatives, DOE-STD-1063-2000, defines the duties, responsibilities and qualifications for DOE Facility Representatives, based on facility hazard classification; risks to workers, the public, and the environment; and the operational activity level. DOE-STD-1063-2000, Establishing and Maintaining a Facility Representative Program at DOE Facilities More Documents & Publications 1Q CY2000 (PDF), Facility Representative Program Performance Indicators Quarterly Report DOE-STD-1063-97 Incentives for the Department's Facility Representative Program,

354

DOE-HDBK-1114-98; Guide to Good Practices for Line and Training Manager Activities  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

4-98 4-98 June 1998 Superseding DOE-STD-1056-93 February 1993 DOE HANDBOOK GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR LINE AND TRAINING MANAGER ACTIVITIES U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. Order No. DE98003917 DOE-HDBK-1114-98 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy (DOE) Handbook is approved for use by all DOE Components and

355

Microsoft Word - AL-ARRAGAODeviation 6.12.09.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Department of Energy No. AL 2009-09 Department of Energy No. AL 2009-09 Acquisition Regulation Date 06/30/09 (DEAR) ACQUISITION LETTER This Acquisition Letter is issued under the authority of the DOE and NNSA Procurement Executives. Subject: Class Deviation DEAR 970.5232-3 Accounts, Records, and Inspections References: Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009, Pub. L. 110-417, Section 871 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Pub. L. 111-5, Section 902 FAR 52.215-2, Audit and Records - Negotiation DEAR 970.5232-3, Accounts, Records and Inspection DOE Acquisition Guide Chapter 1 When is this Acquisition Letter (AL) effective? This AL is effective upon issuance. When does this AL Expire? This AL remains in effect until superseded or canceled.

356

hubblerpp.dvi  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

November November 2013, by O. Lahav (University College London) and A.R. Liddle (University of Edinburgh). 23.1. Parametrizing the Universe Rapid advances in observational cosmology have led to the establishment of a precision cosmological model, with many of the key cosmological parameters determined to one or two significant figure accuracy. Particularly prominent are measurements of cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies, with the highest precision observations being those of the Planck Satellite [1,2] which for temperature anisotropies supersede the iconic WMAP results [3,4]. However the most accurate model of the Universe requires consideration of a range of different types of observation, with complementary probes providing consistency checks, lifting parameter degeneracies, and enabling the strongest constraints to be placed. The term 'cosmological parameters'

357

Annual Energy Review - Energy Information Administration  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Annual Energy Review Annual Energy Review Superseded -- see MER for key annual tables Annual Energy Review archives for data year: 2011 2010 2009 2008 all archives Go EIA has expanded the Monthly Energy Review (MER) to include annual data as far back as 1949 for those data tables that are found in both the Annual Energy Review (AER) and the MER . During this transition, EIA will not publish the 2012 edition of the AER. In the list of tables below, grayed-out table numbers now go to MER tables that contain 1949-2012 (and later) data series. New interactive tables and graphs have also been added and are currently on EIA's Beta site. Data categories + EXPAND ALL Energy Overview 1.0 Total Energy Flow, GRAPH 1.1 Primary Energy Overview, 1949- PDF XLS CSV INTERACTIVE 1.2 Primary Energy Production by Source, 1949- PDF XLS CSV INTERACTIVE

358

Version 2 Global Fire Emissions Database Available  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Global Fire Emissions Database Available Global Fire Emissions Database Available The ORNL DAAC announces the release of the data set "Global Fire Emissions Database, Version 2 (GFEDv2)." This data set, which supersedes and replaces the Global Fire Emissions Database, Version 1 (GFEDv1), consists of 1 degree x 1 degree gridded monthly burned area, fuel loads, combustion completeness, and fire emissions of carbon (C), carbon dioxide (CO2), carbon monoxide (CO), methane (CH4), non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHC), molecular hydrogen (H2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), nitrous oxide (N2O), particulate matter (PM2.5), total particulate matter (TPM), total carbon (TC), organic carbon (OC), and black carbon (BC) for the time period January 1997 - December 2004. For more information or to access this data set, please see the Vegetation

359

Data:98df1814-468a-4015-8176-c54a7a737b28 | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

df1814-468a-4015-8176-c54a7a737b28 df1814-468a-4015-8176-c54a7a737b28 No revision has been approved for this page. It is currently under review by our subject matter experts. Jump to: navigation, search Loading... 1. Basic Information 2. Demand 3. Energy << Previous 1 2 3 Next >> Basic Information Utility name: Park Electric Coop Inc Effective date: End date if known: Rate name: Residential - Large Sector: Residential Description: * Service on this schedule is limited to single phase consumers requiring not more than 50 KVA of installed transformer capacity. Park Electric will provide as standard service, up to 200 Amp capacity for the base rate. Over 200 Amp service will be $.50 per KVA in excess of 15 KVA plus the base rate. Line extension minimums under contract will supersede these minimums, if the line extension minimum is higher.

360

DOE Approved Technical Standards | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Technical Standards Program » DOE DOE Technical Standards Program » DOE Approved Technical Standards DOE Approved Technical Standards Document ID Filter Document ID sort ascending Title Date DOE-STD-7501-99 The DOE Corporate Lessons Learned Programs Superseding DOE-STD-7501-95 Including Change Notice No. 1 (September 1997) This technical standard provides management expectations and a framework for the DOE Corporate Lessons Learned Program. The framework is intended to support development and implementation of a DOE-wide lessons learned infrastructure 01/20/2000 DOE-STD-6005-01 Industrial Hygiene Practices This standard recommends industrial hygiene practices to support components of the Worker Protection Program required by Department of Energy (DOE) Order 440.1A, “Worker Protection Management for DOE Federal and Contractor Employees. 04/30/2001

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "12-2000 supersedes 7-96" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

21 - 13130 of 29,416 results. 21 - 13130 of 29,416 results. Download Internal Controls Guidance Internal Controls Evaluations Guidance http://energy.gov/cfo/downloads/internal-controls-guidance Download DOE-STD-3024-2011 Content of System Design Descriptions Superseding DOE-STD-3024-98 This Standard provides criteria and guidance for the technical content and organizational structure of system design descriptions (SDDs) at Department of Energy (DOE) facilities. This Standard should be used to develop an SDD for all active safety class (SC) and safety significant (SS) systems for nuclear facilities http://energy.gov/hss/downloads/doe-std-3024-2011 Download Guidelines for Software Measurement, SQAS http://energy.gov/cio/downloads/guidelines-software-measurement-sqas Download Response to several FOIA requests- Renewable Energy.

362

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Acquisition and Financial Assistance Guide for the Acquisition and Financial Assistance Guide for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 ERRATA SHEET Date Version Change Content Replace 3/20/09 1.0 Basic Guide issued Flashes 2009-27 and 2009- 28 4/01/09 1.0 1 Update to Chapter 4.4 Replace page 18 Update to Attachment 4, Special Terms and Conditions - Acquisition clause 1) Clause is now dated Apr 2009 2) The flow down provision in paragraph A was updated to be consistent with the requirements of the new FAR clauses. 3) Paragraphs H, I, and J were deleted as they were superseded by the FAR clauses prescribed in the Interim Rules. 4) Minor wording changes to Paragraph B Replace Attachment 4 05/05/09 2.0 Guide updated and revised See sections with a line down the right side for changed Chapters.

363

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

01 - 15110 of 28,905 results. 01 - 15110 of 28,905 results. Download DOE-HDBK-1202-97 Guide to Good Practices for Teamwork Training and Diagnostic Skills Development Supersedes DOE-STD-1007-92 This guide provides assistance in the development, implementation, and improvement of training on teamwork and diagnostics. DOE and contractor representatives identified the need for teamwork and diagnostics training guidance. This need was based on the increasing emphasis of properly applying knowledge and skills to complete assigned tasks. Teamwork and diagnostic skills have become a focal point because of the impact they have on effective facility operation and safety. http://energy.gov/hss/downloads/doe-hdbk-1202-97 Download A Review of Power Outages and Restoration Following the June 2012 Derecho

364

OMB Circular A-76 (Revised)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON, DC 20503 May 29, 2003 CIRCULAR NO. A-76 (REVISED) TO THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND ESTABLISHMENTS SUBJECT: Performance of Commercial Activities 1. Purpose. This circular establishes federal policy for the competition of commercial activities. 2. Supersession. This circular supersedes Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular No. A-76 (Revised 1999), August 4, 1983; Circular No. A-76 Revised Supplemental Handbook (Revised 2000), March 1996; Office of Federal Procurement Policy Letter 92-1, "Inherently Governmental Functions," September 23, 1992; and OMB Transmittal Memoranda 1 through 25, Performance of Commercial Activities. 3. Authority. Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1970 (31 U.S.C. § 1111); Executive Order 11541; the Office

365

Microsoft Word - al2005-04.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 Subject: CLASS DEVIATION TO REFLECT CHANGES TO THE COOPERATIVE AUDIT STRATEGY References: DEAR 970.5203-1 Management Controls DEAR 970.5232-3 Accounts, Records, and Inspection DOE Acquisition Guide Chapter 70.4 Cooperative Audit Strategy When is this Acquisition Letter (AL) Effective? This AL is effective upon issuance. The use of the clauses authorized by the attached class deviation shall be used in all solicitations and contracts in place of the parallel clauses currently contained in the DEAR. When Does This AL Expire? This AL remains in effect until superseded by the publication of a final rule incorporating the clauses that are the subject of the class deviation into the DEAR. Who is the Point of Contact?

366

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

01 - 15010 of 26,764 results. 01 - 15010 of 26,764 results. Download DOE-STD-1063-2006 Facility Representatives Replaced by DOE-STD-1063 | Superseding DOE-STD-1063-2000 (March 2000) The purpose of the DOE Facility Representative Program is to ensure that competent DOE staff personnel are assigned to oversee the day-to-day contractor operations at DOE's hazardous nuclear and non-nuclear facilities. http://energy.gov/hss/downloads/doe-std-1063-2006 Download CX-010684: Categorical Exclusion Determination Cottonwood-Roseville Optical Groundwire Project CX(s) Applied: B4.6, B4.7, B4.11, B4.13 Date: 07/03/2013 Location(s): California Offices(s): Western Area Power Administration-Sierra Nevada Region http://energy.gov/nepa/downloads/cx-010684-categorical-exclusion-determination Download Midea: Proposed Penalty (2010-SE-0110, 2012-SE-1402, 2012-SE-1404)

367

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

21 - 24430 of 26,764 results. 21 - 24430 of 26,764 results. Download Examination Report: OAS-RA-13-23 Area Community Services Employment and Training Council - Weatherization Assistance Program Funds Provided by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 http://energy.gov/ig/downloads/examination-report-oas-ra-13-23 Download DOE-STD-1090-2011 Hoisting and Rigging (Formerly Hoisting and Rigging Manual) Superseding DOE-STD-1090-2007 (August 2007) The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hoisting and Rigging Standard is intended to be used by supervisors, line managers, safety personnel, equipment operators, riggers and other personnel responsible for the safety of hoisting and rigging operations at DOE sites. It may be used as either contract document or as a best practices guide at the site's or program

368

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

61 - 8470 of 28,905 results. 61 - 8470 of 28,905 results. Download EIS-0285-SA-115: Supplement Analysis Transmission System Vegetation Management Program, Shelton-Fairmount # 1-4, Jefferson County, Washington http://energy.gov/nepa/downloads/eis-0285-sa-115-supplement-analysis Download Reply Comments of T-Mobile USA, Inc. http://energy.gov/gc/downloads/reply-comments-t-mobile-usa-inc Download Audit Report: OAS-L-12-09 Tank Waste Feed Delivery System Readiness at the Hanford Site http://energy.gov/ig/downloads/audit-report-oas-l-12-09 Download DOE-STD-3020-2005 Specification for HEPA Filters used by DOE Contractors Supersedes DOE NE F3-45 (January 1987) This standard establishes specification and testing requirements for High Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filters procured to provide personnel and

369

US Department of Energy Chernobyl accident bibliography  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This bibliography has been prepared by Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) for the US Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Health and Environmental Research to provide bibliographic information in a usable format for research studies relating to the Chernobyl nuclear accident that occurred in the Ukrainian Republic, USSR in 1986. This report is a product of the Chernobyl Database Management project. The purpose of this project is to produce and maintain an information system that is the official United States repository for information related to the accident. Two related products prepared for this project are the Chernobyl Bibliographic Search System (ChernoLit{trademark}) and the Chernobyl Radiological Measurements Information System (ChernoDat). This report supersedes the original release of Chernobyl Bibliography (Carr and Mahaffey, 1989). The original report included about 2200 references. Over 4500 references and an index of authors and editors are included in this report.

Kennedy, R.A.; Mahaffey, J.A.; Carr, F. Jr.

1992-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

370

Ukraine's muddling through: National identity and postcommunist transition  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

The paper argues that the profound identity split strongly influences Ukraine's postcommunist development, precluding effectively consolidation of any political system either democratic or authoritarian. In most cases, the identity issue supersedes all other issues on the agendas of political parties and largely determines the character and results of electoral rivalry, and the way in which both domestic and international politics is viewed and articulated. The paper examines historical roots of competing identities in Ukraine, their essence and impact on two different visions of Ukrainian past, future, and Ukrainianness itself. The use and misuse of identity issues by Ukrainian authorities is a special concern of the paper that stresses the need of alternative policy aimed at a national reconciliation.

Mykola Riabchuk

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

371

Protocol for Uniformly Measuring and Expressing the Performance of Energy Storage Systems  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Protocol for Uniformly Measuring and Expressing the Performance of Energy Storage Systems (PNNL-22010) was first issued in November 2012 as a first step toward providing a foundational basis for developing an initial standard for the uniform measurement and expression of energy storage system (ESS) performance. Its subsequent use in the field and review by the protocol working group and most importantly the users subgroup and the thermal subgroup has led to the fundamental modifications reflected in this update of the 2012 Protocol. As an update of the 2012 Protocol, this document (the June 2014 Protocol) is intended to supersede its predecessor and be used as the basis for measuring and expressing ESS performance. The foreword provides general and specific details about what additions, revisions, and enhancements have been made to the 2012 Protocol and the rationale for them in arriving at the June 2014 Protocol.

Conover, David R.; Crawford, Aladsair J.; Viswanathan, Vilayanur V.; Ferreira, Summer; Schoenwald, David

2014-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

372

Billiard in the space with a time machine  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

We study a system of an elastic ball moving in the non-relativistic spacetime with a nontrivial causal structure produced by a wormhole-based time machine. For such a system it is possible to formulate a simple model of the so-called `grandfather paradox': for certain `paradoxical' initial conditions the standard straight trajectory of the ball would self-collide inconsistently. We analyze globally consistent solutions of local equations of motion, namely, we find all trajectories with one self-collision. It is demonstrated that all standard initial conditions have a consistent evolution, including those `paradoxical' ones, for which the inconsistent collision-free trajectory is superseded by a special consistent self-colliding trajectory. Moreover, it is shown that for a wide class of initial conditions more than one globally consistent evolution exist. The nontrivial causal structure thus breaks the uniqueness of the classical theory even for locally deterministic physical laws.

Jindrich Dolansky; Pavel Krtous

2010-11-12T23:59:59.000Z

373

Study of the impacts of regulations affecting the acceptance of Integrated Community Energy Systems: public utility, energy facility siting and municipal franchising regulatory programs in Florida. Preliminary background report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The authority to regulate public utilities is vested generally in the Florida Public Service Commission. The Commission is comprised of five members appointed by the governor with the approval of the senate. The governor must choose his appointees from a list of persons recommended by the nine-person Florida Public Service Commission Nominating Council. Commissioners serve either three- or four-year terms. They must be free from any employment or pecuniary interests in any utility subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission. Within the purview of its powers, the authority of the Commission supersedes that of local governments. Public utility regulatory statutes, energy facility siting programs, and municipal franchising authority are examined to identify how they may impact on the ability of an organization, whether or not it be a regulated utility, to construct and operate an ICES.

Feurer, D.A.; Weaver, C.L.; Gallagher, K.C.; Hejna, D.; Rielley, K.J.

1980-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

374

Nuclear Data Sheets for A = 210  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Abstract Evaluated spectroscopic data for 210Au, 210Hg, 210Tl, 210Pb, 210Bi, 210Po, 210At, 210Rn, 210Fr, 210Ra, 210Ac, and 210Th and corresponding level schemes from radioactive decay and reaction studies are presented. This evaluation supersedes the previous evaluation by E. Browne (2003Br13). Highlights of this publication are the identification of new ?s isomers of 210Hg by 2013Go10 and measurement of an excited level energy at 1709 keV 30 of 210Rn from 214Rn ? decay: 68.6 ?s by 2006Ku26 denoted as x+1664.6 in the Adopted Levels. Earlier experimental limits for x?50 keV was proposed in 1979Po19 and 1982Po03 (HI,xn?).

M. Shamsuzzoha Basunia

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

375

Tuning MonteCarlo generators: The Perugia tunes  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

We present 9 new tunes of the p?-ordered shower and underlying-event model in Pythia 6.4. These Perugia tunes update and supersede the older S0 family. The data sets used to constrain the models include hadronic Z0 decays at LEP, Tevatron min-bias data at 630, 1800, and 1960GeV, Tevatron Drell-Yan data at 1800 and 1960GeV, and SPS min-bias data at 200, 546, and 900GeV. In addition to the central parameter set, called Perugia 0, we introduce a set of 8 related Perugia variations that attempt to systematically explore soft, hard, parton density, and color structure variations in the theoretical parameters. Based on these variations, a best-guess prediction of the charged track multiplicity in inelastic, nondiffractive minimum-bias events at the LHC is made. Note that these tunes can only be used with Pythia 6, not with Pythia 8.

Peter Z. Skands

2010-10-20T23:59:59.000Z

376

Design of a next-generation regional weather research and forecast model.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Weather Research and Forecast (WRF) model is a new model development effort undertaken jointly by the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and a number of collaborating institutions and university scientists. The model is intended for use by operational NWP and university research communities, providing a common framework for idealized dynamical studies, fill physics numerical weather prediction, air-quality simulation, and regional climate. It will eventually supersede large, well-established but aging regional models now maintained by the participating institutions. The WRF effort includes re-engineering the underlying software architecture to produce a modular, flexible code designed from the outset to provide portable performance across diverse computing architectures. This paper outlines key elements of the WRF software design.

Michalakes, J.

1999-01-13T23:59:59.000Z

377

A:\dod_cmts.wpd [PFP#601936043]  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

REGION 4 REGION 4 61 Forsyth Street Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3104 June 23, 2000 4WD-OTS MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Amended Guidance on Ecological Risk Assessment at Military Bases: Process Considerations, Timing of Activities, and Inclusion of Stakeholders FROM: Ted W. Simon, PhD, DABT Toxicologist Office of Technical Services TO: Jon D.Johnston, Chief, FFB Earl Bozeman, Chief, DOD Section, FFB FFB Remedial Project Managers CC: Elmer W. Akin, Chief, OTS The purpose of this memorandum is to clarify and expand a previous memorandum dated December 22, 1998. This memorandum supersedes the previous one. The reason for an amended version of this memorandum is to provide and emphasize flexibility in implementing the ecological risk assessment process at DOD facilities in Region 4. Acknowledgments are given to Robert

378

Rate Schedule CV-EID4  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

EID4 EID4 (Supersedes Schedule CV-EID3) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT SCHEDULE OF RATE FOR ENERGY IMBALANCE SERVICE Effective: October 1, 2011, through September 30, 2016. Available: Within the marketing area served by the Western Area Power Administration (Western), Sierra Nevada Customer Service Region. Applicable: To customers receiving Energy Imbalance (EI) service. Character and Conditions of Service: EI is provided when a difference occurs between the scheduled and the actual delivery of energy to a load within the Sub-Balancing Authority (SBA) over an hour or in accordance with approved policies and procedures. The deviation, in megawatts, is the net scheduled amount of

379

G  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Full Year Continuing Appropriations Act of 2011, Title I, Section 1101(a)(2) Full Year Continuing Appropriations Act of 2011, Title I, Section 1101(a)(2) Pub. L. No. Law 112-10 Energy and Water Development and Related Title III, sections 301, 305, and 501 Agencies Appropriations Act, 2010, Public Law 111-85 When Is this Acquisition Letter (AL) Effective? The statutory provisions addressed in this AL are a continuation of the provisions effective on the enactment date of the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2010 enacted October 28, 2009. When Does this AL Expire? This AL remains in effect until superseded or canceled. Who Is the Point of Contact? Contact Barbara Binney of the Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy at (202) 287-1340 or at Barbara.binney@hq.doe.gov or Stephen Law, of the National Nuclear

380

DISCLAIMER:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Recovery Act: Deployment of Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Systems, District Energy Systems, Waste Energy Recovery Systems, and Efficient Industrial Equipment Funding Opportunity Number: DE-FOA-0000044 Announcement Type: Amendment 000005 CFDA Number: 81.087 Issue Date: 07/07/2009 Letter of Intent Due Date: Not Applicable Pre-Application Due Date: Not Applicable Application Due Date: 07/14/2009, 8:00 PM Eastern Time THIS AMENDMENT SUPERSEDES THE ORIGINAL ANNOUNCEMENT AND ANY PREVIOUSLY ISSUED AMENDMENTS. THIS DOCUMENT REPRESENTS THE ANNOUNCEMENT IN FULL. It is not necessary to access the Body or any other previous versions for information. 1 The purpose of this Amendment No. 000005 to DE-FOA-0000044 is to: Add a requirement for submission of an additional appendix (Project Economics) to the Project

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "12-2000 supersedes 7-96" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

EIA -Quarterly Coal Distribution  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Coal Distribution Coal Distribution Home > Coal> Quarterly Coal Distribution Back Issues Quarterly Coal Distribution Archives Release Date: June 27, 2013 Next Release Date: September 2013 The Quarterly Coal Distribution Report (QCDR) provides detailed quarterly data on U.S. domestic coal distribution by coal origin, coal destination, mode of transportation and consuming sector. All data are preliminary and superseded by the final Coal Distribution - Annual Report. Year/Quarters By origin State By destination State Report Data File Report Data File 2009 January-March pdf xls pdf xls April-June pdf xls pdf xls July-September pdf xls pdf October-December pdf xls pdf 2010 January-March pdf xls pdf xls April-June pdf xls pdf xls July-September pdf xls pdf xls

382

Domestic Distribution of U.S. Coal by Destination State,  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

2008 2008 Final May 2010 2008 Changes in Coal Distribution Table Format and Data Sources Introduction The Coal Distribution Report - Annual provides detailed information on domestic coal distribution by origin State, destination State, consumer category, and method of transportation. Also provided is a summary of foreign coal distribution by coal-exporting State. This Final 2008 Coal Distribution Report - Annual, supersedes the Preliminary 2008 Coal Distribution Report - Annual. This report relies on the most current data available from EIA's various monthly, quarterly and annual surveys of the coal industry and electric power generation industry. In addition, the report contains actual annual data instead of imputed data for smaller electric generation plants that are excluded from the

383

Page 1 of 2  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

"benchmark compensation amount" is to be used for contractor FY 2004 and subsequent "benchmark compensation amount" is to be used for contractor FY 2004 and subsequent contractor FY s unless and until revised by OFFP. This benchmark compensation amount applies to contract costs incurred after January 1,2004, under covered contracts of both defense and civilian procurement agencies, as specified in Section 808 of Pub. L.I05-85. This "benchmark compensation amount" supersedes the amount cited in Headquarters Policy Flash 2003-19, August 26,2003. Applicability of the FAR to M&O contracts is addressed at 48 CFR 31.205-6(p) and 48CFR 970.3102-O5-6(p), respectively. For questions related to this Flash, contact Terry Sheppard at (202) 586-8193 or via e-mail at terrv.sheQoard@hg.doe.gov Attachment Cc: PP AG Members FLASH 2004.16

384

DOE Strategic Human Capital Plan (FY 2011 - 2015) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Strategic Human Capital Plan (FY 2011 - 2015) Strategic Human Capital Plan (FY 2011 - 2015) DOE Strategic Human Capital Plan (FY 2011 - 2015) The Strategic Human Capital Plan sets forth the framework for managing the Department of Energy's (DOE) human capital system through 2015. This Plan, which supersedes the 2006 Strategic Human Capital Management Plan and the 2008 Strategic Human Capital Management Addendum, aligns with the following priority of the Management Excellence Agenda from the DOE Strategic Plan and the DOE Operations Management Council: Develop the most highly-qualified, capable, and flexible federal workforce, beginning with hiring reform as a cornerstone of transformation. The goals of the Plan directly support DOE Management Principle #3: We will treat our people as our greatest asset.

385

G  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Subject: Home Office Expenses for Management and Operating Contracts References: DEAR 970.3102-3-70 Home office expenses FAR 15.404-1 Proposal analysis techniques FAR 31.109 Advance agreements FAR Appendix B Subpart 9904.403 Allocation of home office expenses to segments When Is this Acquisition Letter (AL) Effective? This AL is effective immediately upon issuance. When Does this AL Expire? This AL remains in effect until superseded or canceled. Who Is the Intended Audience For this AL? Department of Energy (DOE) Contracting Officers who are responsible for determining the allowability, if any, and amount of home office expense under management and operation (M&O) contracts are the audience for this AL.

386

DOE-STD-1066-99; Fire Protection Design Criteria  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6-99 6-99 July 1999 Superseding DOE-STD-1066-97 DOE STANDARD FIRE PROTECTION DESIGN CRITERIA U.S. Department of Energy AREA FIRP Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-1066-99 iii FOREWORD This Department of Energy (DOE) Standard is approved for use by all DOE elements and their contractors. DOE Standards are part of the DOE Directives System and are issued to provide supplemental

387

Subject: DOE PERSONAL PROPERTY FOREIGN TRANSACTIONS  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE PERSONAL PROPERTY FOREIGN TRANSACTIONS DOE PERSONAL PROPERTY FOREIGN TRANSACTIONS (Title Transfer, Loan, and Abandonment) References: Atomic Energy Act Sections 161g and 161j., Title 42 of the United States Code (U.S.C.) sections 2201g, and 22201j 42 U.S.C 16312 (Public Law 109-58, title IX, section 972, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 899), 41 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 102-36.380-395, Federal Management Regulation (FMR) DOE Order 580.1, Department of Energy Personal Property Program 4.c(3) DOE Guide 580.1-1, Department of Energy Personal Property Management Guide Chapter 11.8 When is this Acquisition Letter (AL) Effective? This AL is effective immediately upon issuance. When Does This AL Expire? This AL remains in effect until superseded, or canceled. Guidance in this Acquisition Letter shall

388

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

51 - 9160 of 9,640 results. 51 - 9160 of 9,640 results. Download DOE-HDBK-1200-97 Guide to Good Practices for Developing Learning Objectives Supersedes DOE-STD-1005-92 (July 1992) This guide to good practices provides information and guidance on the types of and development of learning objectives in a systematic approach to training (SAT) program. http://energy.gov/hss/downloads/doe-hdbk-1200-97 Download DOE-STD-6002-96 Safety of Magnetic Fusion Facilities: Requirements This Standard identifies safety requirements for magnetic fusion facilities. Also, safety principles are established to provide a framework within which the requirements can be implemented to build safety into fusion facility design and operations. http://energy.gov/hss/downloads/doe-std-6002-96 Download Build a Floating Oil Rig

389

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

91 - 15200 of 26,764 results. 91 - 15200 of 26,764 results. Download Watermark: Proposed Penalty (2011-SW-2908) DOE alleged in a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that Watermark Designs, Ltd. manufactured and distributed noncompliant showerhead basic model SH-FAL90 in the U.S. http://energy.gov/gc/downloads/watermark-proposed-penalty-2011-sw-2908 Download DOE-STD-1063-2006 Facility Representatives Replaced by DOE-STD-1063 | Superseding DOE-STD-1063-2000 (March 2000) The purpose of the DOE Facility Representative Program is to ensure that competent DOE staff personnel are assigned to oversee the day-to-day contractor operations at DOE's hazardous nuclear and non-nuclear facilities. http://energy.gov/hss/downloads/doe-std-1063-2006 Download VBZ-0084- In the Matter of Steven F. Collier This Decision considers an Appeal of an Initial Agency Decision (IAD)

390

G  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

G G Subject: The Allowability of Incurred Costs Due to Contractor Errors References: FAR 31.201-2 Determining Allowability FAR 31.201-3 Determining Reasonableness When Is this Acquisition Letter (AL) Effective? This AL is effective immediately upon issuance. When Does this AL Expire? This AL remains in effect until superseded or canceled. Who Is the Intended Audience For this AL? Department of Energy (DOE) Contracting Officers who are responsible for determining the allowability of incurred costs due to contractor errors are the audience for this AL. Who Is the Point of Contact For this AL? DOE Contracting Officers may contact Michael Righi of the Contract and Financial Assistance Policy Division, Office of Policy, Office of Procurement and Assistance Management at (202) 287-1337 or at

391

Microsoft Word - AL2005-07.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DOE Order 361.1A, Acquisition Career Development DOE Order 361.1A, Acquisition Career Development Program, Chapter I, Contracting and Purchasing Career Development Program Module Revised DOE Core Curriculum References: DOE Order 361.1A Acquisition Career Development Program When is this Acquisition Letter (AL) Effective? This AL is effective immediately. The information and guidance provided in the AL does not apply to the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). When Does This AL Expire? This AL remains in effect until superseded or canceled. Who is the Point of Contact? Contact Cynthia Yee, Director, Acquisition Career Development Program, Office of Procurement and Assistance Management at (202) 287-1666 or by email at Cynthia.Yee@hq.doe.gov. Visit our website at www.pr.doe.gov for additional information on Acquisition

392

Microsoft Word - AL2005-10.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

0 0 Acquisition Regulation Date 07/07/05 ACQUISITION LETTER This Acquisition Letter is issued under the authority of the DOE and NNSA Procurement Executives. Subject: Implementation of HSPD-12 References: Homeland Security Presidential Directive 12 (HSPD-12) Federal Information Processing Standard Publication 201 (FIPS Pub 201) When is this Acquisition Letter (AL) Effective? This AL is effective upon issuance. When does this AL Expire? This AL remains in effect until superseded or canceled. Who is the Point of Contact? Contact Robert M. Webb of the Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy at (202)287-1338 or Robert.Webb@hq.doe.gov. Visit our website at www.pr.doe.gov for information on Acquisition Letters and other policy issues.

393

City of Chicago - Building Energy Code | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Chicago - Building Energy Code Chicago - Building Energy Code City of Chicago - Building Energy Code < Back Eligibility Residential Savings Category Heating & Cooling Home Weatherization Construction Commercial Weatherization Commercial Heating & Cooling Design & Remodeling Insulation Program Info State Illinois Program Type Building Energy Code Provider City of Chicago The Chicago Energy Conservation Code (CECC) requires residential buildings applying for building permits to comply with energy efficient measures which go beyond those required by the [http://www.dsireusa.org/library/includes/incentive2.cfm?Incentive_Code=I... Illinois Building Energy Code]. The applicability of the CECC to commercial construction was superseded when the state of Illinois adopted the more stringent IECC 2009 model code. Illinois state law in 2009 also mandated

394

DOE-STD-1063-2000 - Facility Representatives  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

NOT MEASUREMENT NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE DOE-STD-1063-2000 March 2000 Superseding DOE-STD-1063-97 October 1997 DOE STANDARD FACILITY REPRESENTATIVES U.S. Department of Energy AREA MGMT Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. TS This document has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services, U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. DOE-STD-1063-2000 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy standard is approved for use by all DOE Components. 2. The Revision to this DOE standard was developed by a working group consisting of

395

Microsoft Word - AL2006-10.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

AL-2006-10 AL-2006-10 Acquisition Regulation Date 08/11/06 ACQUISITION LETTER This Acquisition Letter is issued under the authority of the DOE and NNSA Procurement Executives. Subject: CLASS DEVIATION FOR CERTAIN DEAR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CLAUSES References: DEAR 970.2704 Rights in Data DEAR 970.2770 Technology Transfer DEAR 970.5227-2 Rights in Data-Technology Transfer DEAR 970.5227-3 Technology Transfer Mission When is this Acquisition Letter (AL) Effective? This AL is effective upon issuance. When does this AL Expire? This AL remains in effect until superseded or canceled. Who is the Point of Contact? Contact Robert M. Webb of the Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy at (202)287-1338 or Robert.Webb@hq.doe.gov.

396

DOE-TSL-2-2002 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2-2002 2-2002 DOE-TSL-2-2002 September 24, 2002 Directory of Points of Contact for the DOE Technical Standards Program Replaced by DOE-TSL-2-2006 | Supersedes DOE-TSL-2-98 (January 1998) This TSL supplements DOE manuals, directives, orders, and standards. It provides basic and fundamental information for DOE Component personnel involved in identifying standardization documents. It also provides listings of points of contact within DOE and identifies links to points of contact within the Department of Defense (DoD) for coordination of standardization activities. DOE-TSL-2-2002, Directory of Points of Contact for the DOE Technical Standards Program More Documents & Publications Technical Standards, Newsletter-June 1997 DOE-TSL-1-2002 Diversity Employment and Recruitment Sources

397

Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

No. AL 2010-07 No. AL 2010-07 Acquisition Regulation Date 05/13/2010 ACQUISITION LETTER This Acquisition Letter is issued under the authority of the DOE and NNSA Senior Procurement Executives. Acquisition Letters (AL) that remain in effect are identified below. All other previously issued ALs have been superseded by a formal rule-making, incorporated into other guidance, and/or canceled. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ACQUISITION LETTERS REMAINING IN EFFECT NUMBER DATE SUBJECT 93-4 04/07/1993 Displaced Workers Benefits Program 94-19 12/09/1994 Basic Labor Policies Fringe Benefits 95-06 06/28/1995 Personal Property Letter System 96-09 09/16/1996 Full and Open Competition - Management and

398

Microsoft Word - AL2005-11.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 Acquisition Regulation Date 07/15/05 _ ACQUISITION LETTER This Acquisition Letter is issued under the authority of the DOE and NNSA Procurement Executives. Subject: Home Office Expenses for Management and Operating Contracts References: DEAR 970.3102-3-70 Home office expenses FAR 15.404-1 Proposal analysis techniques FAR 31.109 Advance agreements FAR Appendix B Subpart 9904.403 Allocation of home office expenses to segments When is this Acquisition Letter (AL) Effective? This AL is effective immediately upon issuance. When does this AL Expire? This AL remains in effect until superseded or canceled. Who is the Point of Contact? Contact Michael Righi of the Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy at

399

Attachment 11 - DB Washington.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

DC030003 01/02/2004 DC3 DE-RQ01-04ME90001 DC030003 01/02/2004 DC3 DE-RQ01-04ME90001 ATTACHMENT 11 Superseded General Decision Number: DC020003 State: District of Columbia Construction Type: Building County: District of Columbia Statewide. BUILDING CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS (Does not include single family homes and apartments up to and including 4 stories) Modification Number Publication Date 0 06/13/2003 1 10/03/2003 2 10/31/2003 3 01/02/2004 ASBE0024-001 03/01/2003 Rates Fringes Asbestos Worker/Heat and Frost Insulator Includes application of all insulating materials, protective coverings, coatings and

400

The Standards Actions May 1999  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

these documents is available on these documents is available on the Technical Standards Program (TSP) Internet Site at the URL shown at the bottom of this page. If you wish to comment on these documents, please notify your TSM. • Guidance for Nuclear Criticality Safety Engineer Training and Qualification, SAFT-0070, Jerry McKamy, EH-34, 301-903-8031, Jerry.McKamy@eh.doe.gov. Comments are due June 19, 1999. • Review Guide for Criticality Safety Evaluations, SAFT-0071, Jerry McKamy, EH-34, 301-903-8031, Jerry.McKamy @eh.doe.gov. Comments are due June 19, 1999. DOE Documents Recently Published The following DOE documents have recently been published: • DOE-STD-1090-99, Hoisting and Rigging (Formerly Hoisting and Rigging Manual), March 1999 (superseding DOE-STD-1090-96, September 1996). • DOE-STD-1111-98, The Department of Energy Laboratory Ac-

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "12-2000 supersedes 7-96" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

DOE-HDBK-1116-98; Guide to Good Practices for Developing and Conducting Case Studies  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6-98 6-98 January 1998 Superseding DOE-STD-1058-93 DOE HANDBOOK GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICES FOR DEVELOPING AND CONDUCTING CASE STUDIES U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG Washington, D.C. 20585 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161; (703) 605-6000. Order No. DE98001291 DOE-HDBK-1116-98 iii FOREWORD 1. This Department of Energy (DOE) Handbook is approved for use by all DOE Components

402

G Subject: Implementation of Division B, Title III, Title V and Division C  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

B, Title III, Title V and Division C B, Title III, Title V and Division C Title VII, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012, Pub. L. No. 112-74 References: Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012, Title III, Section 301(a), 301(b), 316 Pub. L. No. 112-74 Title V, Sections 501, 504, 505 Title VII, Sections 725 When is this Financial Assistance Letter (FAL) effective? The statutory provisions addressed in this FAL were effective on the enactment date of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012, December 23, 2011. When does this FAL expire? This FAL remains in effect until superseded or canceled. Who is the intended audience? Department of Energy (DOE) and National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Contracting Officers. Who is the point of contact?

403

DOE F 5634  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

1 1 (09/2012) Replaces DOE F 470.1 (05-05) All Other Editions are Obsolete U.S. Department of Energy CONTRACT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION SPECIFICATION (CSCS) 1. CSCS No.: 2. Previous CSCS No.: 3a. Reason for Action: (Check one) Add Change Terminate b. Item Numbers Modified: 4. This Specification Is For: (Complete as applicable) 5. Specification Is: (Complete as applicable) - 1 - (Check one) a. Contract or Other Number Solicitation Contract Type: a. Original (Complete date in all cases) Date: b. Revised (Supersedes all previous specifications) Date: Did This Item come from a DD-254? Yes No b. Contract Number: End Date: (estimated) c. Certificate of Possession. Retention of Classified Matter is Authorized until

404

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

81 - 17290 of 29,416 results. 81 - 17290 of 29,416 results. Download Independent Oversight Review, Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project- Federal- June 2012 Review of the Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Project - Integrated Waste Treatment Unit Federal Operational Readiness Review http://energy.gov/hss/downloads/independent-oversight-review-sodium-bearing-waste-treatment-project-federal-june-2012 Download DOE-STD-3015-2001 Nuclear Explosive Safety Study Process Superseding DOE-STD-3015-97 (January 1997) This technical standard provides specific requirements and guidance for nuclear explosive safety (NES) studies and is in accordance with DOE Order 452.2B, SAFETY OF NUCLEAR EXPLOSIVE OPERATIONS http://energy.gov/hss/downloads/doe-std-3015-2001 Download Virginia Recovery Act State Memo

405

G  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Revision of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 350.1 Revision of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 350.1 and Special H Clause References: DOE Order 350.1, "Contractor Human Resource Management Programs" Special H Clause: Pay and Benefits FAR 31.205-6 Compensation for personal services FAR 28.307-2 Liability DEAR 970.3102-05-6 Compensation for personal services DEAR 970.5222-2 Overtime Management DEAR 970.5228-1 Insurance-Litigation and Claims DEAR 970.2201-1 Policies DEAR 970.2803-1 Workers' Compensation Insurance When Is this Acquisition Letter (AL) Effective? This Acquisition Letter (AL) is effective immediately upon issuance. When Does this AL Expire? This AL remains in effect until superseded or canceled. Who Is the Intended Audience For this AL? Heads of Contracting Activity (HCAs) and Contracting Officers (COs) responsible for

406

Executive Order 13423 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

423 423 Executive Order 13423 October 8, 2013 - 1:44pm Addthis Executive Order (E.O.) 13423, Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and Transportation Management, was signed on January 24, 2007, to strengthen key goals for the Federal Government. It set more challenging goals than the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005) and superseded E.O. 13123 and E.O. 13149. This summary below is intended as a reference only. You should refer to the full text of E.O. 13423 for more details relevant to your work. Implementing Instructions In consultation with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, the Chairman of the Council on Environmental Quality issued instructions and defined requirements for implementing E.O. 13423. The implementation instructions identify the entities responsible for coordination and

407

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

21 - 3730 of 28,905 results. 21 - 3730 of 28,905 results. Download Technical Standards Newsletter- July 2006 The Standards Forum and Standards Actions, July 2006 http://energy.gov/hss/downloads/technical-standards-newsletter-july-2006 Download EA-1190: Final Environmental Assessment Wastewater Treatment Capability Upgrade http://energy.gov/nepa/downloads/ea-1190-final-environmental-assessment Download DOE-HDBK-1092-2004 Electrical Safety Superseding DOE-HDBK-1092-98 (January 1998) | Replaced by DOE-HDBK-1092-2013 The Electrical Safety Handbook presents the Department of Energy (DOE) safety standards for DOE field offices or facilities involved in the use of electrical energy. It has been prepared to provide a uniform set of electrical safety guidance and information for DOE installations to effect

408

Page not found | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

31 - 12840 of 28,905 results. 31 - 12840 of 28,905 results. Download PSH-12-0025- In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing The individual is an employee of a DOE contractor and an applicant for an access authorization. To address concerns related to the individual's past use of alcohol and marijuana, other prior... http://energy.gov/oha/downloads/psh-12-0025-matter-personnel-security-hearing Download DOE-STD-3024-2011 Content of System Design Descriptions Superseding DOE-STD-3024-98 This Standard provides criteria and guidance for the technical content and organizational structure of system design descriptions (SDDs) at Department of Energy (DOE) facilities. This Standard should be used to develop an SDD for all active safety class (SC) and safety significant (SS) systems for nuclear facilities

409

m049.dvi  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

S) S) I G (J PC ) = 0 - (1 - - ) Υ(1S) MASS Υ(1S) MASS Υ(1S) MASS Υ(1S) MASS VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 9460.30± 0.26 OUR AVERAGE 9460.30± 0.26 OUR AVERAGE 9460.30± 0.26 OUR AVERAGE 9460.30± 0.26 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 3.3. 9460.51± 0.09 ± 0.05 1 ARTAMONOV 00 MD1 e + e - → hadrons 9459.97± 0.11 ± 0.07 MACKAY 84 REDE e + e - → hadrons * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 9460.60± 0.09 ± 0.05 2,3 BARU 92B REDE e + e - → hadrons 9460.59± 0.12 BARU 86 REDE e + e - → hadrons 9460.6 ± 0.4 3,4 ARTAMONOV 84 REDE e + e - → hadrons 1 Reanalysis of BARU 92B and ARTAMONOV 84 using new electron mass (COHEN 87). 2 Superseding BARU 86. 3 Superseded by ARTAMONOV 00. 4 Value includes data of ARTAMONOV 82. Υ(1S) WIDTH Υ(1S) WIDTH Υ(1S) WIDTH Υ(1S) WIDTH VALUE (keV) DOCUMENT ID 54.02± 1.25 OUR EVALUATION 54.02± 1.25 OUR EVALUATION 54.02± 1.25

410

Radioactive air emissions notice of construction HEPA filtered vacuum radioactive air emission units  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This notice of construction (NOC) requests a categorical approval for construction and operation of certain portable high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtered vacuum radionuclide airborne emission units (HVUs). Approval of this NOC application is intended to allow operation of the HVUs without prior project-specific approval. This NOC does not request replacement or supersedence of any previous agreements/approvals by the Washington State Department of Health for the use of vacuums on the Hanford Site. These previous agreement/approvals include the approved NOCs for the use of EuroClean HEPA vacuums at the T Plant Complex (routine technical meeting 12/10/96) and the Kelly Decontamination System at the Plutonium-Uranium Extraction (PUREX) Plant (routine technical meeting 06/25/96). Also, this NOC does not replace or supersede the agreement reached regarding the use of HEPA hand-held/shop-vacuum cleaners for routine cleanup activities conducted by the Environmental Restoration Project. Routine cleanup activities are conducted during the surveillance and maintenance of inactive waste sites (Radioactive Area Remedial Action Project) and inactive facilities. HEPA hand-held/shop-vacuum cleaners are used to clean up spot surface contamination areas found during outdoor radiological field surveys, and to clean up localized radiologically contaminated material (e.g., dust, dirt, bird droppings, animal feces, liquids, insects, spider webs, etc.). This agreement, documented in the October 12, 1994 Routine Meeting Minutes, is based on routine cleanup consisting of spot cleanup of low-level contamination provided that, in each case, the source term potential would be below 0.1 millirem per year.

JOHNSON, R.E.

1999-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

411

Iowa Natural Gas Input Supplemental Fuels (Million Cubic Feet)  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Input Supplemental Fuels (Million Cubic Feet) Input Supplemental Fuels (Million Cubic Feet) Iowa Natural Gas Input Supplemental Fuels (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1960's 0 0 0 1970's 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1980's 57 64 68 23 53 45 44 40 34 82 1990's 81 46 45 84 123 96 301 137 17 12 2000's 44 39 23 143 30 31 46 40 27 3 2010's 2 1 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 12/12/2013 Next Release Date: 1/7/2014 Referring Pages: Total Supplemental Supply of Natural Gas Iowa Supplemental Supplies of Natural Gas Supplies of Natural Gas Supplemental Fuels (Annual Supply & Disposition

412

Audit Report: IG-0481 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

81 81 Audit Report: IG-0481 September 12, 2000 The Decontamination and Decommissioning Contract at the East Tennessee Technology Park The East Tennessee Technology Park (ETTP), formerly known as the K-25 Site, contains about 400 buildings and 4,700 acres on the Oak Ridge Reservation. The K-25 Site was established in 1942 to produce enriched uranium. Since the production mission ended in 1987, the Oak Ridge Operations Office (Operations Office) has focused on environmental management of the site. Audit Report: IG-0481 More Documents & Publications Audit Report: IG-0611 Preliminary Notice of Violation, BNFL, Inc - EA-2003-01 Above on the left is K-25, at Oak Ridge before and after the 844,000 sq-ft demolition. In addition, on the right: K Cooling Tower at Savannah River Site demolition.

413

O:\ELECTRIC\ORDERS\EA-223.PDF  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

CMS Marketing, Services and Trading Company CMS Marketing, Services and Trading Company Order No. EA-223 I. BACKGROUND Exports of electricity from the United States to a foreign country are regulated and require authorization under section 202(e) of the Federal Power Act (FPA) (16 U.S.C. §824a(e)). On May 12, 2000, CMS Marketing, Services and Trading Company (CMS MS&T) applied to the Office of Fossil Energy (FE) of the Department of Energy (DOE) for authorization to transmit electric energy to Canada as a power marketer. CMS MS&T, a Michigan corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary of CMS Enterprises Company which is in turn a wholly owned subsidiary of CMS Energy Corporation. CMS MS&T is a power marketer that does not own or control any electric generation, transmission, or distribution facilities, nor does it have any franchised electric service

414

Microsoft Word - EM SSAB Chairs Letter Reclamation of Asset Metals 070909.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

July 9, 2009 July 9, 2009 Inés R. Triay Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management U.S. Department of Energy, EM-1 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Dear Assistant Secretary Triay: On January 12, 2000, the Department of Energy (DOE) placed a moratorium on the free release of volumetrically contaminated metals pending a decision by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) on establishment of national standards. The NRC continues to review this issue, and the moratorium remains in effect. On July 13, 2000, DOE further restricted the release of all scrap metals with radiation levels above the detectable background. This moratorium seeks to prevent public exposure to radiation above background resulting from recycling/reuse of contaminated DOE material in

415

LCC-0036 cover.PDF  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

6 12/01/00 6 12/01/00 QUADRUPOLE VIBRATION MEASUREMENTS FOR QM1B AND QC3 IN THE FINAL FOCUS TEST BEAM at SLAC January 12, 2000 R. J. Fenn, T. Slaton, M. Woods Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Stanford, CA Abstract: We have taken vibration measurements of quadrupoles QM1B and QC3 in the Final Focus Test Beam (FFTB) tunnel at SLAC. We present results for power spectra and integrated power spectra of the vibrations in the frequency range 1-128Hz. For QM1B, we find 2nm rms vertical motion with respect to the FFTB tunnel floor for f>3Hz. The relevance of this data to NLC performance is discussed. In particular, we estimate a 4% luminosity loss if an IR quad were to have similar vibrations as QM1B. - - 1 LCC-0036 January, 2000 QUADRUPOLE VIBRATION MEASUREMENTS FOR QM1B AND QC3

416

Special Report: IG-0491 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

491 491 Special Report: IG-0491 November 28, 2000 Management Challenges at the Department of Energy On October 12, 2000, the Chairmen of several committees of the U.S. Congress requested an assessment by the Office of Inspector General of the most significant management challenges facing the Department of Energy. We have received similar requests annually since 1997. As in the past, our response to this year's inquiry parallels the Department's reporting under the Federal Managers' Financial Integrity Act. The Office of Inspector General has a significant role in the Integrity Act process, which has traditionally resulted in an effective depiction of long-standing, institution-wide problems facing the Department of Energy. This special report constitutes our response to the congressional inquiry. The analysis

417

DOE Awards Contract for Management of WIPP  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

NEWS NEWS MEDIA CONTACTS: FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Tom Welch, 202/586-4316 October 12, 2000 Greg Sahd (Carlsbad), 505/234-7532 Department of Energy Competitively Awards Contract for the Management of Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Secretary of Energy Bill Richardson today announced that the Energy Department will award a $500 million, five-year contract for the management and operation of the department's Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) in Carlsbad, New Mexico, to Westinghouse TRU Solutions LLC. Westinghouse TRU Solutions LLC, based in Carlsbad, is a joint venture between Westinghouse Government Environmental Services Company LLC and Roy F. Weston, Inc. "By holding an open competition, the department was able to challenge industry to bring their best ideas forward on actions needed to maintain and improve WIPP's safety and operational

418

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-03  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EGS:00-03 EGS:00-03 Appendix E- Operational Procedures for Enforcement Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 September 12, 2000 MEMORANDUM FOR DOE PAAA COORDINATORS CONTRACTOR PAAA COORDINATORS FROM: R. KEITH CHRISTOPHER DIRECTOR OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND INVESTIGATION SUBJECT: Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-03: Specific Issues on Applicability of 10 CFR 830 Section 1.3 of the Operational Procedure entitled Enforcement of DOE Nuclear Safety Requirements under Price-Anderson Amendments Act of 1988, published in June 1998, provides the opportunity for the Office of Enforcement and Investigation (EH- Enforcement) to issue clarifying guidance in a timely manner with respect to the processes used in enforcement activities. This enforcement guidance focuses on several issues related to applicability of 10 CFR 830 that have been observed in

419

Preliminary Notice of Violation, MOTA Corporation - EA-2000-03 | Department  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

MOTA Corporation - EA-2000-03 MOTA Corporation - EA-2000-03 Preliminary Notice of Violation, MOTA Corporation - EA-2000-03 April 17, 2000 Preliminary Notice of Violation issued to MOTA Corporation, related to the Unauthorized Removal of Material at Building 211 at Argonne National Laboratory-East, April 17, 2000 (EA-2000-03) This letter refers to an evaluation by the Department of Energy (DOE) of a March 12, 2000, event at Building 211 at Argonne National Laboratory-East (ANL-E), involving your Project Manager. An Investigation Summary Report prepared by DOE on this matter is enclosed. Preliminary Notice of Violation, MOTA Corporation - EA-2000-03 More Documents & Publications Preliminary Notice of Violation, Argonne National Laboratory-East - EA-1999-10 Enforcement Letter, Argonne National Laboratory-East - April 23, 1997

420

Georgia Natural Gas Input Supplemental Fuels (Million Cubic Feet)  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Input Supplemental Fuels (Million Cubic Feet) Input Supplemental Fuels (Million Cubic Feet) Georgia Natural Gas Input Supplemental Fuels (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1960's 0 0 0 1970's 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1980's 24 57 151 84 28 121 124 248 241 292 1990's 209 185 166 199 123 130 94 14 16 12 2000's 73 51 7 14 5 0 3 2 52 2010's 732 701 660 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 12/12/2013 Next Release Date: 1/7/2014 Referring Pages: Total Supplemental Supply of Natural Gas Georgia Supplemental Supplies of Natural Gas Supplies of Natural Gas Supplemental Fuels (Annual Supply &

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "12-2000 supersedes 7-96" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Enforcement Guidance Supplements (EGS)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Supplements (EGS) Supplements (EGS) EGS 05-01: Contractor Investigation, Causal Analysis, and Corrective Actions (09/23/2005) EGS 03-02: Revision to Occurrence Report-Based Noncompliance Tracking System Reporting Criteria (09/05/2003) EGS 03-01: Supplemental Guidance Concerning the Factual Bases for Issuing Consent Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR 820.23 (07/21/2003) EGS 02-01: Enforcement Position Relative to 10 CFR 835 Bioassay Accreditation (02/21/2002) EGS 01-02: Management and Independent Assessment (12/17/2001) EGS 01-01: Nuclear Weapons Program Enforcement Issues (10/15/2001) EGS 00-04: Factual Bases for Issuing Consent Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR 820.23 and Compliance Orders Pursuant to 10 CFR Subpart C (10/26/2000) EGS 00-03: Specific Issues on Applicability of 10 CFR 830 (09/12/2000)

422

Technological Options to Address Global Climate Change  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

2K-2854 RAB 4/01 2K-2854 RAB 4/01 Hydro 8% Coal 22% Coal 22% Other 1% Gas 23% Gas 23% Coal 19% Coal 19% Gas 28% Gas 28% Fossil Fuels Will Continue as Key to World Economy 1999 data from International Energy Annual 1999 (February 2001) 2020 data from International Energy Outlook 2001 (March 2001) + 6 0 % Oil 40% Hydro 7% Other 0.7% Nuclear 7% 1999 85% Fossil Energy 382 Qbtu / yr 2020 85% Fossil Energy 607 Qbtu / yr Oil 40% Nuclear 4% 2K-2854 RAB 4/01 World Energy Demand Growing Dramatically 0 2 4 6 8 12 2000 2050 2100 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 Population (Billions) Energy Consumption (Qbtu / yr) Population Projections: United Nations "Long-Range World Population Projections: Based on the 1998 Revision" Energy Projections: "Global Energy Perspectives" ITASA / WEC World Population Population of

423

Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-03, Specific Issues on Applicability of 10 CFR 830  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

00-03 00-03 Appendix E- Operational Procedures for Enforcement Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 September 12, 2000 MEMORANDUM FOR DOE PAAA COORDINATORS CONTRACTOR PAAA COORDINATORS FROM: R. KEITH CHRISTOPHER DIRECTOR OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND INVESTIGATION SUBJECT: Enforcement Guidance Supplement 00-03: Specific Issues on Applicability of 10 CFR 830 Section 1.3 of the Operational Procedure entitled Enforcement of DOE Nuclear Safety Requirements under Price-Anderson Amendments Act of 1988, published in June 1998, provides the opportunity for the Office of Enforcement and Investigation (EH- Enforcement) to issue clarifying guidance in a timely manner with respect to the processes used in enforcement activities. This enforcement guidance focuses on

424

INEEL Lead Recycling in a Moratorium Environment  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Since 1999, the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL) Lead Project successfully recycled over 700,000 pounds of excess INEEL lead to the private sector. On February 14, 2000, the Secretary of Energy, Bill Richardson, formalized the January 12, 2000, moratorium on recycling radioactive scrap metal that prevented the unrestricted release of recycled scrap metals to the private sector. This moratorium created significant problems for the INEEL lead recycling program and associated plans; however, through the cooperative efforts of the INEEL and Idaho State University as well as innovative planning and creative thinking the recycling issues were resolved. This collaboration has recycled over 160,000 pounds of excess lead to Idaho State University with a cost savings of over $.5M.

Kooda, K. E.; Galloway, K.; McCray, C. W.; Aitken, D. W.

2003-02-26T23:59:59.000Z

425

INEEL Lead Recycling in a Moratorium Environment  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Since 1999, the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL) Lead Project successfully recycled over 700,000 pounds of excess INEEL lead to the private sector. On February 14, 2000, the Secretary of Energy, Bill Richardson, formalized the January 12, 2000, moratorium on recycling radioactive scrap metal that prevented the unrestricted release of recycled scrap metals to the private sector. This moratorium created significant problems for the INEEL lead recycling program and associated plans; however, through the cooperative efforts of the INEEL and Idaho State University as well as innovative planning and creative thinking the recycling issues were resolved. This collaboration has recycled over 160,000 pounds of excess lead to Idaho State University with a cost savings of over $.5M.

Kooda, Kevin Evan; Mc Cray, Casey William; Aitken, Darren William; Galloway, Kelly

2003-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

426

Table 16. Total Energy Consumption, Projected vs. Actual Projected  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Total Energy Consumption, Projected vs. Actual Total Energy Consumption, Projected vs. Actual Projected (quadrillion Btu) 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 AEO 1994 88.0 89.5 90.7 91.7 92.7 93.6 94.6 95.7 96.7 97.7 98.9 100.0 100.8 101.7 102.7 103.6 104.3 105.2 AEO 1995 89.2 90.0 90.6 91.9 93.0 93.8 94.6 95.3 96.2 97.2 98.4 99.4 100.3 101.2 102.1 102.9 103.9 AEO 1996 90.6 91.3 92.5 93.5 94.3 95.1 95.9 96.9 98.0 99.2 100.4 101.4 102.1 103.1 103.8 104.7 105.5 AEO 1997 92.6 93.6 95.1 96.6 97.9 98.8 99.9 101.2 102.4 103.4 104.7 105.8 106.6 107.2 107.9 108.6 AEO 1998 94.7 96.7 98.6 99.8 101.3 102.4 103.4 104.5 105.8 107.3 108.6 109.9 111.1 112.2 113.1 AEO 1999 94.6 97.0 99.2 100.9 102.0 102.8 103.6 104.7 106.0 107.2 108.5 109.7 110.8 111.8

427

Table 7. Petroleum Net Imports, Projected vs. Actual  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Petroleum Net Imports, Projected vs. Actual Petroleum Net Imports, Projected vs. Actual (million barrels per day) 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 AEO 1982 7.58 7.45 7.12 6.82 6.66 7.09 AEO 1983 5.15 5.44 5.73 5.79 5.72 5.95 6.96 AEO 1984 4.85 5.11 5.53 5.95 6.31 6.59 8.65 AEO 1985 4.17 4.38 4.73 4.93 5.36 5.72 6.23 6.66 7.14 7.39 7.74 AEO 1986 5.15 5.38 5.46 5.92 6.46 7.09 7.50 7.78 7.96 8.20 8.47 8.74 9.04 9.57 9.76 AEO 1987 5.81 6.04 6.81 7.28 7.82 8.34 8.71 8.94 8.98 10.01 AEO 1989* 6.28 6.84 7.49 7.96 8.53 8.83 9.04 9.28 9.60 9.64 9.75 10.02 10.20 AEO 1990 7.20 7.61 9.13 9.95 11.02 AEO 1991 7.28 7.25 7.34 7.48 7.72 8.10 8.57 9.09 9.61 10.07 10.51 11.00 11.44 11.72 11.86 12.11 12.30 12.49 12.71 12.91 AEO 1992 6.86 7.42 7.88 8.16 8.55 8.80 9.06 9.32 9.50 9.80 10.17 10.35 10.56 10.61 10.85 11.00 11.15 11.29 11.50 AEO 1993 7.25 8.01 8.49 9.06

428

THE SOLAR HEAVY ELEMENT ABUNDANCES. II. CONSTRAINTS FROM STELLAR ATMOSPHERES  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Estimates of the bulk metal abundance of the Sun derived from the latest generation of model atmospheres are significantly lower than the earlier standard values. In Paper I, we demonstrated that helioseismic data combined with stellar interiors theory set strong bounds on the solar metal abundance. The seismically derived abundances are inconsistent with the low photospheric abundances if the quoted errors in the atmospheric models (of order 0.05 dex) are correct. In this paper, we undertake a critical analysis of the solar metallicity and its uncertainty from a model atmospheric perspective, focusing on CNO. We argue that the non-LTE (NLTE) corrections for abundances derived from atomic features are overestimated in the recent abundance studies, while systematic errors in the absolute abundances are underestimated. In general, abundances derived from molecular features are lower than those derived from atomic features for the three-dimensional hydro models, while a weaker trend in the opposite direction tends to hold for abundances derived from one-dimensional models. If we adopt the internal consistency between different indicators as a measure of goodness of fit, we obtain intermediate abundances [C/H] = 8.44 +- 0.06, [N/H] = 7.96 +- 0.10 and [O/H] = 8.75 +- 0.08. The errors reflect the fact that both the high and low scales are internally consistent within the errors, and they are too large to conclude that there is a solar abundance problem. However, the center-to-limb continuum flux variations predicted in the simulations appear to be inconsistent with solar data based on recently published work. This would favor the traditional thermal structure and lead to high CNO abundances of (8.52, 7.96, 8.80) close to the seismic scale. We argue that further empirical tests of NLTE corrections and the thermal structure are required for precise absolute abundances. The sensitivity of the simulations to spatial resolution and systematic errors in the underlying atmospheric physics should also be examined, and these effects may lead to an overestimate of the impact of convective overshooting on the thermal structure of the outer layers of the solar atmosphere. The uncertainties in the solar oxygen also imply that strong conclusions about the absence of solar beryllium depletion cannot be made.

Pinsonneault, M. H. [Department of Astronomy, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210 (United States); Delahaye, Franck [CEA, IRFU, Serv. Astrophys., F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette (France)

2009-10-20T23:59:59.000Z

429

S:\VM3\RX97\TBL_LIST.WPD [PFP#201331587]  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

b. Appliances by Four Most Populated States, b. Appliances by Four Most Populated States, Percent of U.S. Households, 1997 Appliance Types and Characteristics RSE Column Factor: Total Four Most Populated States RSE Row Factors New York California Texas Florida 0.4 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.4 Total .............................................................. 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 Households With Electric Air-Conditioning Equipment ...................... 72.5 62.6 41.4 91.7 96.0 3.5 Central Equipment Not Used ....................... 0.3 Q 1.2 0.5 1.1 29.3 Room Air Conditioners Not Used ................ 0.7 Q Q Q 1.1 36.9 Households Using Electric Air-Conditioning 1 ........................................ 71.6 62.2 39.9 91.2 94.3 3.3 Type of Electric Air-Conditioning Used Central Air-Conditioning 2 ............................

430

X:\Data_Publication\Pma\current\ventura\pma00.vp  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

25.8 25.8 85.6 88.1 90.8 90.9 97.9 80.8 February ............................. 142.5 94.5 96.1 100.2 99.1 107.7 88.6 March .................................. 123.9 91.1 94.1 101.4 100.4 100.7 84.0 April .................................... 117.7 86.2 89.9 96.7 96.5 94.8 79.7 May ..................................... 117.2 87.3 91.5 96.9 97.7 94.5 81.5 June .................................... 116.3 88.6 92.7 98.4 97.5 95.2 82.5 July ..................................... 115.0 89.7 92.5 98.3 98.6 95.5 83.7 August ................................ 119.0 97.1 99.4 102.2 106.4 101.7 91.6 September .......................... 132.0 109.8 111.6 116.6 118.2 115.3 104.4 October ............................... 136.6 109.5 112.8 116.0 119.1 115.8 103.2 November ........................... 139.7 109.3 112.6 114.6

431

Microsoft Word - table_22.doc  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

5 5 Table 22. Average City Gate Price of Natural Gas in the United States, 2003-2007 (Nominal Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet) Alabama ............................... 6.06 6.65 8.47 10.26 8.78 Alaska................................... 2.33 3.05 3.74 5.25 6.75 Arizona ................................. 4.87 5.63 7.32 7.67 8.25 Arkansas............................... 6.07 7.12 8.83 7.96 8.55 California .............................. 5.16 6.04 7.88 6.76 6.82 Colorado ............................... 4.11 5.02 6.10 7.61 6.23 Connecticut........................... 5.59 7.56 9.74 9.11 8.67 Delaware .............................. 5.88 6.13 8.32 8.84 7.58 Florida................................... 5.87 6.60 9.30 8.32 7.97 Georgia................................. 6.25 6.81 9.85 9.37 8.15

432

Pennsylvania Natural Gas Prices  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 View 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 View History Wellhead Price NA NA NA NA 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use Price 1967-2005 Citygate Price 9.35 10.39 7.81 7.04 6.28 5.52 1984-2012 Residential Price 14.66 16.22 14.74 12.90 12.46 11.99 1967-2012 Percentage of Total Residential Deliveries included in Prices 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 91.2 88.6 1989-2012 Commercial Price 12.77 14.29 11.83 10.47 10.42 10.24 1967-2012 Percentage of Total Commercial Deliveries included in Prices 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 48.5 42.1 1990-2012 Industrial Price 10.64 12.09 9.19 8.23 9.86 9.58 1997-2012 Percentage of Total Industrial Deliveries included in Prices 5.4 5.7 4.5 3.8 2.0 1.3 1997-2012 Vehicle Fuel Price 10.83 8.30 5.15 3.76 3.40 7.96 1990-2012

433

 

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

(Ce) (Ce) Quantity Value Units Value Units Atomic number 58 Atomic mass 140.116(1) g mole-1 Density 6.77 g cm-3 Mean excitation energy 523.0 eV Minimum ionization 1.234 MeV g-1cm2 8.353 MeV cm-1 Nuclear collision length 102.6 g cm-2 15.15 cm Nuclear interaction length 175.7 g cm-2 25.96 cm Pion collision length 126.6 g cm-2 18.70 cm Pion interaction length 203.0 g cm-2 29.99 cm Radiation length 7.96 g cm-2 1.175 cm Critical energy 10.40 MeV (for e-) 10.04 MeV (for e+) Molière radius 16.23 g cm-2 2.397 cm Plasma energy 48.24 eV Muon critical energy 185. GeV For muons, dE/dx = a(E) + b(E) E. Tables of b(E): PS PDF TEXT Table of muon dE/dx and Range: PS PDF TEXT Explanation of some entries Table of isotopes Warning: may not be current

434

Microsoft Word - table_22.doc  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

5 5 Table 22. Average City Gate Price of Natural Gas in the United States, 2004-2008 (Nominal Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet) Alabama ............................... 6.65 8.47 10.26 8.78 9.84 Alaska................................... 3.05 3.74 5.25 6.75 6.74 Arizona ................................. 5.63 7.32 7.67 8.25 8.49 Arkansas............................... 7.12 8.83 7.96 8.55 8.88 California .............................. 6.04 7.88 6.76 6.82 8.11 Colorado ............................... 5.02 6.10 7.61 6.23 6.98 Connecticut........................... 7.56 9.74 9.11 8.67 10.24 Delaware .............................. 6.13 8.32 8.84 7.58 8.32 Florida................................... 6.60 9.30 8.32 7.97 9.73 Georgia................................. 6.81 9.85 9.37 8.15 9.35

435

X:\Data_Publication\Pma\current\ventura\pma00.vp  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

83.0 83.0 87.6 90.8 90.6 87.7 78.5 February ............................. 91.6 95.5 100.2 98.4 96.5 86.2 March .................................. 91.3 94.4 101.4 100.8 97.0 85.6 April .................................... 86.3 90.0 96.7 96.7 92.3 80.4 May ..................................... 87.4 91.6 96.9 98.1 93.3 82.2 June .................................... 88.8 92.8 98.4 97.9 94.6 83.0 July ..................................... 89.9 92.5 98.3 99.1 95.0 84.2 August ................................ 97.4 99.2 102.2 106.8 101.0 92.5 September .......................... 110.0 111.4 116.6 118.4 114.1 105.3 October ............................... 109.7 113.0 116.0 119.4 114.1 104.5 November ........................... 109.0 112.4 114.6 118.6 112.9 103.7 December ...........................

436

 

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

6. Natural Gas Expenditures by Census Region for Non-Mall Buildings, 2003 6. Natural Gas Expenditures by Census Region for Non-Mall Buildings, 2003 Total Natural Gas Expenditures (million dollars) Natural Gas Expenditures (dollars) per Thousand Cubic Feet per Square Foot North- east Mid- west South West North- east Mid- west South West North- east Mid- west South West All Buildings* ............................... 3,553 4,844 3,866 2,261 8.56 7.09 8.40 7.28 0.39 0.37 0.29 0.29 Building Floorspace (Square Feet) 1,001 to 5,000 ................................ 456 782 599 317 9.84 8.57 9.21 7.94 0.89 0.73 0.69 0.51 5,001 to 10,000 .............................. 348 427 582 332 9.15 7.54 9.08 7.60 0.56 0.45 0.43 0.44 10,001 to 25,000 ............................ 502 945 656 422 9.74 7.96 9.41 7.02 0.43 0.39 0.32 0.31

437

Buildings Energy Data Book: 8.3 Commercial Sector Water Consumption  

Buildings Energy Data Book [EERE]

2 2 Average Water Use of Commercial and Institutional Establishments (Gallons per Establishment per Day) Average Variation % Total % of CI % Seasonal Daily Use In Use (1) CI Use Customers Use (2) Hotels and Motels 7,113 5.41 5.8% 1.9% 23.1% Laundries/Laundromats 3,290 8.85 4.0% 1.4% 13.4% Car Washes 3,031 3.12 0.8% 0.4% 14.2% Urban Irrigation 2,596 8.73 28.5% 30.2% 86.9% Schools and Colleges 2,117 12.13 8.8% 4.8% 58.0% Hospitals/Medical Offices 1,236 78.5 3.9% 4.2% 23.2% Office Buildings 1,204 6.29 10.2% 11.7% 29.0% Restaurants 906 7.69 8.8% 11.2% 16.1% Food Stores 729 16.29 2.9% 5.2% 19.4% Auto Shops (3) 687 7.96 2.0% 6.7% 27.2% Membership Organizations (4) 629 6.42 2.0% 5.6% 46.2% Total 77.6% 83.3% Note(s): Source(s): 23,538 Estimated from 24 months of water utility billing data in five Western locations: four locations in Southern California and one in Arizona. 1)

438

Pennsylvania Natural Gas Summary  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

NA NA NA NA 1967-2010 NA NA NA NA 1967-2010 Pipeline and Distribution Use 1967-2005 Citygate 9.35 10.39 7.81 7.04 6.28 5.52 1984-2012 Residential 14.66 16.22 14.74 12.90 12.46 11.99 1967-2012 Commercial 12.77 14.29 11.83 10.47 10.42 10.24 1967-2012 Industrial 10.64 12.09 9.19 8.23 9.86 9.58 1997-2012 Vehicle Fuel 10.83 8.30 5.15 3.76 3.40 7.96 1990-2012 Electric Power 8.01 10.46 4.60 5.27 4.85 3.15 1997-2012 Dry Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves as of 12/31 3,361 3,577 6,985 13,960 26,529 1977-2011 Adjustments 181 -201 65 -373 -224 1977-2011 Revision Increases 326 655 668 2,892 7,077 1977-2011 Revision Decreases 418 502 502 1,938 4,872 1977-2011 Sales 4 275 52 678 799 2000-2011 Acquisitions

439

Natural Gas Weekly Update  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

12, 2007 (next release 2:00 p.m. on April 19, 2007) 12, 2007 (next release 2:00 p.m. on April 19, 2007) Unseasonably cold temperatures in most regions of the country led to increases of both spot and futures prices since Wednesday, April 4. On the week (Wednesday-Wednesday, April 4-11) the Henry Hub spot price increased 50 cents per MMBtu, or about 6.7 percent, to $7.96. At the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX), the futures contract for May delivery increased 34 cents per MMBtu to a daily settlement of $7.855 yesterday (April 11). The first weekly report of the traditional injection season brought natural gas volumes in underground storage to 1,592 Bcf as of Friday, April 6, which is 28.4 percent above the 5-year average inventory for the report week. The spot price for the West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil decreased $2.42 per barrel to $61.98 per barrel or $10.69 per MMBtu.

440

Microsoft Word - table_22.doc  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

3 3 Table 22. Average City Gate Price of Natural Gas in the United States, 2002-2006 (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet) Alabama ............................... 4.74 6.06 6.65 8.47 10.26 Alaska................................... 2.36 2.33 3.05 3.74 5.25 Arizona ................................. 3.77 4.87 5.63 7.32 7.67 Arkansas............................... 5.17 6.07 7.12 8.83 7.96 California .............................. 3.20 5.16 6.04 7.88 6.76 Colorado ............................... 2.72 4.11 5.02 6.10 7.61 Connecticut........................... 6.42 5.59 7.56 R 9.74 9.11 Delaware .............................. 5.37 5.88 6.13 8.32 8.84 Florida................................... 3.90 5.87 6.60 9.30 8.32 Georgia................................. 4.55 6.25 6.81 9.85 9.37 Hawaii...................................

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "12-2000 supersedes 7-96" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

TITLE  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

e ~ a r t m e n t of Energy Oak Ridge Operations P.O. Box 2001 Oak Ridge. Tennessee 37831- November 7, 1995 Dave To1 b e r t B&T Metals Company & B&T F l o o r Company P. 0 . Box 163520 Columbus, Ohio 43216-3520 Dear M r . To1 b e r t : REAL ESTATE LICENSE REORDOER-7-96-0103, B&T METALS COHPANY, COLUMBUS, OH Enclosed f o r your records i s a copy o f the f u l l y executed 1 icense between B&T Metals Company and the Department o f Energy. Is t h e separate l i c e n s e f o r B&T F l o o r Company a l s o being transmitted t o t h i s o f f i c e ? Thank you f o r your cooperation and assistance i n t h i s action. I f you have any questions concerning t h e r e a l e s t a t e instrument, please f e e l f r e e t o contact m e a t 423- 576-0977. Sincerely, Katy Kates Realty O f f i c e r Enclosure As stated

442

Ebola outbreak in Conakry, Guinea: Epidemiological, clinical, and outcome features  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

AbstractObjectives The authors studied the epidemiological, clinical, and outcome features of the Ebola virus disease in patients hospitalized at the Ebola treatment center (ETC) in Conakry to identify clinical factors associated with death. Materials and methods A prospective study was conducted from March 25 to August 20, 2014. The diagnosis of Ebola virus infection was made on real-time PCR. Results Ninety patients, with a positive test result, were hospitalized. Their mean age was 34.1214.29years and 63% were male patients. Most worked in the informal sector (38%) and in the medical and paramedical staff (physicians 12%, nurses 6%, and laboratory technicians 1%). Most patients lived in the Conakry suburbs (74%) and in Boffa (11%). The main clinical signs were physical asthenia (80%) and fever (72%). Hemorrhagic signs were observed in 26% of patients. The comparison of clinical manifestations showed that hiccups (P=0.04), respiratory distress (P=0.04), and hemorrhagic symptoms (P=0.01) were more frequent among patients who died. Malaria (72%) and diabetes (2%) were the most frequent co-morbidities. The crude case fatality rate was 44% [95% confidence interval (3354%)]. The average hospital stay was 7.965.81days. Conclusion The first Ebola outbreak in Conakry was characterized by the young age of patients, discrete hemorrhagic signs related to lethality. Its control relies on a strict use of preventive measures.

M. Barry; F.A. Traor; F.B. Sako; D.O. Kpamy; E.I. Bah; M. Poncin; S. Keita; M. Cisse; A. Tour

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

443

Interferometric adaptive optics for high power laser pointing, wave-front control and phasing  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Implementing the capability to perform fast ignition experiments, as well as, radiography experiments on the National Ignition Facility (NIF) places stringent requirements on the control of each of the beam's pointing and overall wavefront quality. One quad of the NIF beams, 4 beam pairs, will be utilized for these experiments and hydrodynamic and particle-in-cell simulations indicate that for the fast ignition experiments, these beams will be required to deliver 50% (4.0 kJ) of their total energy (7.96 kJ) within a 40 {micro}m diameter spot at the end of a fast ignition cone target. This requirement implies a stringent pointing and overall phase conjugation error budget on the adaptive optics system used to correct these beam lines. The overall encircled energy requirement is more readily met by phasing of the beams in pairs but still requires high Strehl ratios, Sr, and rms tip/tilt errors of approximately one {micro}rad. To accomplish this task we have designed an interferometric adaptive optics system capable of beam pointing, high Strehl ratio and beam phasing with a single pixilated MEMS deformable mirror and interferometric wave-front sensor. We present the design of a testbed used to evaluate the performance of this wave-front sensor below along with simulations of its expected performance level.

Baker, K L; Stappaerts, E A; Homoelle, D C; Henesian, M A; Bliss, E S; Siders, C W; Barty, C J

2009-01-21T23:59:59.000Z

444

table7.2_02.xls  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

2 Average Prices of Purchased Energy Sources, 2002; 2 Average Prices of Purchased Energy Sources, 2002; Level: National and Regional Data; Row: NAICS Codes; Column: All Energy Sources Collected; Unit: U.S. Dollars per Million Btu. Bituminous and NAICS Coal Subbituminous Coal Petroleum Code(a) Subsector and Industry TOTAL Acetylene Breeze Total Anthracite Coal Lignite Coke Coke Total United States RSE Column Factors: 1.1 2.1 0.6 0.9 0.6 0.9 1.4 0.7 0.9 311 Food 6.42 113.78 0 1.46 W 1.46 0 5.18 0 311221 Wet Corn Milling 3.11 106.84 0 1.32 0 1.32 0 0 0 31131 Sugar 3.14 80.39 0 1.65 W 1.64 0 5.18 0 311421 Fruit and Vegetable Canning 7.09 103.28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 312 Beverage and Tobacco Products 7.53 123.52 0 2.32 0 2.32 0 0 0 3121 Beverages 7.96 124.83

445

Data:B4d0cb8d-1da8-4ab7-84df-80c581a1e2a0 | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

d0cb8d-1da8-4ab7-84df-80c581a1e2a0 d0cb8d-1da8-4ab7-84df-80c581a1e2a0 No revision has been approved for this page. It is currently under review by our subject matter experts. Jump to: navigation, search Loading... 1. Basic Information 2. Demand 3. Energy << Previous 1 2 3 Next >> Basic Information Utility name: Park Electric Coop Inc Effective date: End date if known: Rate name: Residential - Net-Metered - Base #1 Sector: Residential Description: * Service on this schedule is limited to single phase consumers requiring not more than 50 KVA of installed transformer capacity. Park Electric will provide as standard service, up to 200 Amp capacity for the base rate. Over 200 Amp service will be $.50 per KVA in excess of 15 KVA plus the base rate. Line extension minimums under contract will supersede these minimums, if the line extension minimum is higher.

446

Data:2dd6a9ee-8267-4a08-be40-25539b50e1e4 | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

dd6a9ee-8267-4a08-be40-25539b50e1e4 dd6a9ee-8267-4a08-be40-25539b50e1e4 No revision has been approved for this page. It is currently under review by our subject matter experts. Jump to: navigation, search Loading... 1. Basic Information 2. Demand 3. Energy << Previous 1 2 3 Next >> Basic Information Utility name: Park Electric Coop Inc Effective date: End date if known: Rate name: Residential - Net-Metered - Base #3 Sector: Residential Description: * Service on this schedule is limited to single phase consumers requiring not more than 50 KVA of installed transformer capacity. Park Electric will provide as standard service, up to 200 Amp capacity for the base rate. Over 200 Amp service will be $.50 per KVA in excess of 15 KVA plus the base rate. Line extension minimums under contract will supersede these minimums, if the line extension minimum is higher.

447

m074.dvi  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

60) 60) I G (J PC ) = ? ? (1 - - ) Seen in radiative return from e + e - collisions at √ s = 9.54-10.58 GeV by AUBERT,B 05I, HE 06B, and YUAN 07, and in e + e - collisions at √ s ≈ 4.26 GeV by COAN 06. Possibly seen by AUBERT 06 in B - → K - π + π - J/ψ. See also the mini-review under the X (3872). (See the index for the page number.) X (4260) MASS X (4260) MASS X (4260) MASS X (4260) MASS VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 4250± 9 OUR AVERAGE 4250± 9 OUR AVERAGE 4250± 9 OUR AVERAGE 4250± 9 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.6. See the ideogram below. 4245± 5± 4 1 LEES 12AC BABR 10.58 e + e - → γ π + π - J/ψ 4247± 12 + 17 - 32 2 YUAN 07 BELL 10.58 e + e - → γ π + π - J/ψ 4284 + 17 - 16 ± 4 13.6 HE 06B CLEO 9.4-10.6 e + e - → γ π + π - J/ψ * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 4259± 8 + 2 - 6 125 3 AUBERT,B 05I BABR 10.58 e + e - → γ π + π - J/ψ 1 From a single-resonance fit. Supersedes

448

L  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

l l M n y r-r \ REQUEST FOR I I n eccordance with the proviaions of 44 U.S.C. 3303a the disposition request, including arnrmduumts, is ap roved except fnr items that ma be m a d "dis ositi011 wt apprw~d* I * ;Gi~uimwhn in c D P - 10. Toby Hedemon (SO-3 1 2 ) Rs - - -- 7 . I 10, ACTIaNP ITEM 8- DVEScRlrmoN OF ITEM AND PROPOSED DlSPOSlTlON SUPERSEDED TAKEN (NARA NO. JOB CITATION USE ONLY) Schedule coven all records-of the Department of no existing disposition authority .e., Strate@c Petroleum Reserve ewe Project Wee in New Orleans, and Dyn-McD ems, were reviewed for accuracy and c the records of Ule currently active 4 S attached 3 pages for S~hedule. t I I N ~ T E : JIemJIem3D of this schedule eanels Nc11434814 item 2 I I . 1 16-1 09 NSN 7540-00-634-4064 STANDARD FORM 115 (REV. 3-91

449

Data:Eec227ff-726f-49ed-9b24-041ea06d27a1 | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Eec227ff-726f-49ed-9b24-041ea06d27a1 Eec227ff-726f-49ed-9b24-041ea06d27a1 No revision has been approved for this page. It is currently under review by our subject matter experts. Jump to: navigation, search Loading... 1. Basic Information 2. Demand 3. Energy << Previous 1 2 3 Next >> Basic Information Utility name: Park Electric Coop Inc Effective date: End date if known: Rate name: Seasonal Rate Sector: Residential Description: * Available for service to cabins, wells, sheds and other seasonal domestic type loads adjacent to existing distribution lines subject to the established rules and regulations of the Cooperative. This schedule is not available for temporary service or commercial seasonal service. Park Electric will provide as standard service up to 200 Amp capacity for the base rate. Over 200 Amp service will be $6.00 per KVA for each KVA in excess of 15 KVA plus base rate. Line extension minimums under contract will supersede these minimums, if the line extension minimum is higher.

450

Data:77783627-d5af-4901-aaf1-164d97736691 | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

-d5af-4901-aaf1-164d97736691 -d5af-4901-aaf1-164d97736691 No revision has been approved for this page. It is currently under review by our subject matter experts. Jump to: navigation, search Loading... 1. Basic Information 2. Demand 3. Energy << Previous 1 2 3 Next >> Basic Information Utility name: PUD No 1 of Cowlitz County Effective date: 2011/11/01 End date if known: Rate name: PRIVATE STREET AND AREA LIGHTING SCHEDULE 10 Sodium Vapor 200 watts Sector: Lighting Description: Applicable to street, roadway, and area lighting for residential and commercial property. SPECIAL CONDITIONS All lighting equipment, including mast arms, brackets, control equipment, transformers, wiring and supports, shall be owned, operated and maintained by the District. For new installations which do not utilize an existing District-owned pole and require the setting of a new pole for the light, the customer shall pay in advance $300 as an Aid-to- Construction. The District will require a Special Contract for service hereunder for a term of not less than sixty (60) consecutive months reflecting monthly payments computed in accordance with this Rate Schedule as it may be amended or superseded.

451

s008.dvi  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

8 8 π ± I G (J P ) = 1 - (0 - ) We have omitted some results that have been superseded by later NODE=S008 experiments. The omitted results may be found in our 1988 edition Physics Letters B204 B204 B204 B204 1 (1988). π ± MASS π ± MASS π ± MASS π ± MASS NODE=S008M The most accurate charged pion mass measurements are based upon x- NODE=S008M ray wavelength measurements for transitions in π - -mesonic atoms. The observed line is the blend of three components, corresponding to different K-shell occupancies. JECKELMANN 94 revisits the occupancy question, with the conclusion that two sets of occupancy ratios, resulting in two dif- ferent pion masses (Solutions A and B), are equally probable. We choose the higher Solution B since only this solution is consistent with a positive mass-squared for the muon neutrino, given the precise muon momentum measurements now available (DAUM 91, ASSAMAGAN

452

Data:E43ada81-47c3-4830-a717-6cb806a5e67e | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

ada81-47c3-4830-a717-6cb806a5e67e ada81-47c3-4830-a717-6cb806a5e67e No revision has been approved for this page. It is currently under review by our subject matter experts. Jump to: navigation, search Loading... 1. Basic Information 2. Demand 3. Energy << Previous 1 2 3 Next >> Basic Information Utility name: Park Electric Coop Inc Effective date: End date if known: Rate name: Residential - Net-Metered - Base #2 Sector: Residential Description: * Service on this schedule is limited to single phase consumers requiring not more than 50 KVA of installed transformer capacity. Park Electric will provide as standard service, up to 200 Amp capacity for the base rate. Over 200 Amp service will be $.50 per KVA in excess of 15 KVA plus the base rate. Line extension minimums under contract will supersede these minimums, if the line extension minimum is higher.

453

s017.dvi  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

n n I (J P ) = 1 2 ( 1 2 + ) Status: ∗∗∗∗ We have omitted some results that have been superseded by later experiments. See our earlier editions. Anyone interested in the neutron should look at these two new review articles: D. Dubbers and M.G. Schmidt, "The neutron and its role in cosmology and particle physics," Reviews of Modern Physics 83 83 83 83 1111 (2011); and F.E. Wietfeldt and G.L. Greene, "The neutron lifetime," Reviews of Modern Physics 83 83 83 83 1173 (2011). n MASS (atomic mass units u) n MASS (atomic mass units u) n MASS (atomic mass units u) n MASS (atomic mass units u) The mass is known much more precisely in u (atomic mass units) than in MeV. See the next data block. VALUE (u) DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 1.00866491600± 0.00000000043 1.00866491600± 0.00000000043 1.00866491600± 0.00000000043 1.00866491600± 0.00000000043 MOHR 12 RVUE 2010 CODATA value

454

A J  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

2008-06 2008-06 $&upFP, Acquisition Regulation Date 0211 9/08 [ $ 1 . y A J b J ' : . %wd ACQUISITION LETTER T h ~ s Acquls~tlon Letter Ir Issued under the author~ty ot the DOE and NN9A Procurement kuecut~ves Subject: Domestic and Foreign Procurement Preference Requirements References: FAR Part 25 - Foreign Acquisition DEAR Part 925 - Foreign Acquisition Buy American Act, 41 {J.S.C. 1 O a Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. 3 13 1 et seq Trade Agreements Act, 1 9 U.S.C. 25 12 When is this Acquisition Letter (AL) Effective? This AL is effective upon issuance. When Does this AL Expire? This AL remains in effect until superseded or canceled. Who is the Point of Contact? Kevin M. Smith, Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy, (202)287-1614, or at l i e \ i n . M . S ~ l l i t I ~ ( I I1~1.cioc.go~ .

455

Data:A384e673-627e-4c3b-bf30-287829ad2cc7 | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

4e673-627e-4c3b-bf30-287829ad2cc7 4e673-627e-4c3b-bf30-287829ad2cc7 No revision has been approved for this page. It is currently under review by our subject matter experts. Jump to: navigation, search Loading... 1. Basic Information 2. Demand 3. Energy << Previous 1 2 3 Next >> Basic Information Utility name: Park Electric Coop Inc Effective date: End date if known: Rate name: Residential - Small Sector: Residential Description: * Service on this schedule is limited to single phase consumers requiring not more than 50 KVA of installed transformer capacity. Park Electric will provide as standard service, up to 200 Amp capacity for the base rate. Over 200 Amp service will be $.50 per KVA in excess of 15 KVA plus the base rate. Line extension minimums under contract will supersede these minimums, if the line extension minimum is higher.

456

s014.dvi  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 4 η I G (J PC ) = 0 + (0 - + ) We have omitted some results that have been superseded by later NODE=S014 experiments. The omitted results may be found in our 1988 edition Physics Letters B204 B204 B204 B204 (1988). η MASS η MASS η MASS η MASS NODE=S014M Recent measurements resolve the obvious inconsistency in previous η mass NODE=S014M measurements in favor of the higher value first reported by NA48 (LAI 02). We use only precise measurements consistent with this higher mass value for our η mass average. NODE=S014M VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 547.862 ± 0.018 OUR AVERAGE 547.862 ± 0.018 OUR AVERAGE 547.862 ± 0.018 OUR AVERAGE 547.862 ± 0.018 OUR AVERAGE NEW [547.853 ± 0.024 MeV OUR 2012 AVERAGE] 547.873 ± 0.005 ± 0.027 1M GOSLAWSKI 12 SPEC d p → 3 He η 547.874 ± 0.007 ± 0.029 AMBROSINO 07B KLOE e + e - → φ → η γ 547.785 ± 0.017 ± 0.057 16k MILLER 07 CLEO ψ(2S) → J/ψ η

457

m164.dvi  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

600) 600) I G (J PC ) = 1 - (1 - + ) π 1 (1600) MASS π 1 (1600) MASS π 1 (1600) MASS π 1 (1600) MASS VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 1662 + 8 - 9 OUR AVERAGE 1662 + 8 - 9 OUR AVERAGE 1662 + 8 - 9 OUR AVERAGE 1662 + 8 - 9 OUR AVERAGE 1660± 10 + 0 - 64 420k ALEKSEEV 10 COMP 190 π - P b → π - π - π + Pb ' 1664± 8± 10 145k 1 LU 05 B852 18 π - p → ω π - π 0 p 1709± 24 ± 41 69k 2 KUHN 04 B852 18 π - p → η π + π - π - p 1597± 10 + 45 - 10 2 IVANOV 01 B852 18 π - p → η ' π - p * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 1593± 8 + 29 - 47 2,3 ADAMS 98B B852 18.3 π - p → π + π - π - p 1 May be a different state: natural and unnatural parity exchanges. 2 Natural parity exchange. 3 Superseded by DZIERBA 06 excluding this state in a more refined PWA analysis, with 2.6 M events of π - p → π - π - π + p and 3 M events of π - p → π - π 0 π 0 p of E852 data. π 1 (1600) WIDTH π 1 (1600) WIDTH π 1 (1600) WIDTH π 1 (1600) WIDTH VALUE

458

s024.dvi  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4 4 Ω - I (J P ) = 0( 3 2 + ) Status: ∗∗∗∗ The unambiguous discovery in both production and decay was by NODE=S024 BARNES 64. The quantum numbers follow from the assignment of the particle to the baryon decuplet. DEUTSCHMANN 78 and BAUBILLIER 78 rule out J = 1/2 and find consistency with J = 3/2. AUBERT,BE 06 finds from the decay angular distributions of Ξ 0 c → Ω - K + and Ω 0 c → Ω - K + that J = 3/2; this depends on the spins of the Ξ 0 c and Ω 0 c being J = 1/2, their supposed values. We have omitted some results that have been superseded by later experiments. See our earlier editions. Ω - MASS Ω - MASS Ω - MASS Ω - MASS NODE=S024M The fit assumes the Ω - and Ω + masses are the same, and averages them NODE=S024M together. NODE=S024M VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 1672.45 ± 0.29 OUR FIT 1672.45 ± 0.29 OUR FIT 1672.45 ± 0.29 OUR FIT 1672.45 ± 0.29 OUR FIT 1672.43 ± 0.32 OUR AVERAGE

459

s020.dvi  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

- - I (J P ) = 1( 1 2 + ) Status: ∗∗∗∗ We have omitted some results that have been superseded by later experiments. See our earlier editions. Σ - MASS Σ - MASS Σ - MASS Σ - MASS The fit uses Σ + , Σ 0 , Σ - , and Λ mass and mass-difference measurements. VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 1197.449± 0.030 OUR FIT 1197.449± 0.030 OUR FIT 1197.449± 0.030 OUR FIT 1197.449± 0.030 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 1.2. 1197.45 ± 0.04 OUR AVERAGE 1197.45 ± 0.04 OUR AVERAGE 1197.45 ± 0.04 OUR AVERAGE 1197.45 ± 0.04 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.2. 1197.417± 0.040 GUREV 93 SPEC Σ - C atom, crystal diff. 1197.532± 0.057 GALL 88 CNTR Σ - Pb, Σ - W atoms 1197.43 ± 0.08 3000 SCHMIDT 65 HBC See note with Λ mass * * * We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. * * * 1197.24 ± 0.15 1 DUGAN 75 CNTR Exotic atoms 1 GALL 88 concludes that the DUGAN 75 mass needs to be

460

Parton distributions in the LHC era: MMHT 2014 PDFs  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

We present LO, NLO and NNLO sets of parton distribution functions (PDFs) of the proton determined from global analyses of the available hard scattering data. These MMHT2014 PDFs supersede the `MSTW2008' parton sets, but are obtained within the same basic framework. We include a variety of new data sets, from the LHC, updated Tevatron data and the HERA combined H1 and ZEUS data on the total and charm structure functions. We also improve the theoretical framework of the previous analysis. These new PDFs are compared to the `MSTW2008' parton sets. Almost always the PDFs, and the predictions, are within one standard deviation of those of MSTW2008. The major changes are the $u-d$ valence quark difference at small $x$ due to an improved parameterisation and, to a lesser extent, the strange quark PDF due to the effect of some LHC data and a better treatment of the $D \\to \\mu$ branching ratio. We compare our MMHT PDF sets with those of other collaborations; in particular with the NNPDF3.0 sets, which are contemporary with the present analysis.

L. A. Harland-Lang; A. D. Martin; P. Motylinski; R. S. Thorne

2014-12-12T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "12-2000 supersedes 7-96" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

Hanford facility dangerous waste permit application, general information portion  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The `Hanford Facility Dangerous Waste Permit Application` is considered to be a single application organized into a General Information Portion (this document, DOE/RL-91-28) and a Unit- Specific Portion. The scope of the General Information Portion includes information that could be used to discuss operating units, units undergoing closure, or units being dispositioned through other options. Documentation included in the General Information Portion is broader in nature and could be used by multiple treatment, storage, and/or disposal units. A checklist indicating where information is contained in the General Information Portion, in relation to the Washington State Department of Ecology guidance documentation, is located in the Contents Section. The intent of the General Information Portion is: (1) to provide an overview of the Hanford Facility; and (2) to assist in streamlining efforts associated with treatment, storage, and/or disposal unit-specific Part B permit application, preclosure work plan, closure work plan, closure plan, closure/postclosure plan, or postclosure permit application documentation development, and the `Hanford Facility Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Permit` modification process. Revision 2 of the General Information Portion of the `Hanford Facility Dangerous Waste Permit Application` contains information current as of May 1, 1996. This document is a complete submittal and supersedes Revision 1.

Price, S.M., Westinghouse Hanford

1996-07-29T23:59:59.000Z

462

brain control of coughing  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

There is an overwhelming body of evidence to support the existence of higher brain circuitries involved in the sensory detection of airways irritation and the motor control of coughing. The concept that cough is purely a reflex response to airways irritation is now superseded by the recognition that perception of an urge-to-cough and altered behavioral modification of coughing are key elements of cough disorders associated with airways disease. Understanding the pathways by which airway sensory nerves ascend into the brain and the patterns of neural activation associated with airways irritation will undoubtedly provide new insights into disordered coughing. This brief review aims to explore our current understanding of higher order cough networks by summarizing data from recent neuroanatomical and functional studies in animals and humans. We provide evidence for the existence of distinct higher order network components involved in the discrimination of signals arising from the airways and the motor control of coughing. The identification of these network components provides a blueprint for future research and the development of targeted managements for cough and the urge-to-cough. John Widdicombe remembered In 2002, while holidaying in London, I (SBM) received a pleasant email invitation to join John and his wife

Stuart B Mazzone; Alice E Mcgovern; Seung-kwon Yang; Ariel Woo; Ayaka Ando; Jennifer Leech; Michael J Farrell

463

Study of the impacts of regulations affecting the acceptance of Integrated Community Energy Systems: public utility, energy facility siting and municipal franchising regulatory programs in Pennsylvania. Preliminary background report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The authority to regulate public utilities is generally vested in the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission. The Commission is comprised of five members appointed by the governor with the advice and consent of two-thirds of the senate. Commission members are appointed for 10 year terms. They must be free from any employment which is incompatible with the duties of the Commission, and are subject to a statutory code of ethics. The Commission is charged with responsibility for enforcing the Public Utility Law. Within the purview of its powers, the authority of the Commission supersedes that of local governments. The Commission, for example, may grant exemptions from local zoning requirements, and has approving authority over privileges or franchises granted by municipalities to public utilities. The Commission, however, has no authority over municipally owned utilities operating within municipal boundaries. Public utility regulatory statutes, energy facility siting programs, and municipal franchising authority are examined to identify how they may impact on the ability of an organization, whether or not it be a regulated utility, to construct and operate an ICES.

Feurer, D.A.; Weaver, C.L.; Gallagher, K.C.; Hejna, D.; Rielley, K.J.

1980-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

464

Life Cycle Asset Management  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

(The following directives are deleted or consolidated into this Order and shall be phased out as noted in Paragraph 2: DOE 1332.1A; DOE 4010.1A; DOE 4300.1C; DOE 4320.1B; DOE 4320.2A; DOE 4330.4B; DOE 4330.5; DOE 4540.1C; DOE 4700.1). This Order supersedes specific project management provisions within DOE O 430.1A, LIFE CYCLE ASSET MANAGEMENT. The specific paragraphs canceled by this Order are 6e(7); 7a(3); 7b(11) and (14); 7c(4),(6),(7),(11), and (16); 7d(4) and (8); 7e(3),(10), and (17); Attachment 1, Definitions (item 30 - Line Item Project, item 42 - Project, item 48 - Strategic System); and Attachment 2, Contractor Requirements Document (paragraph 1d regarding a project management system). The remainder of DOE O 430.1A remains in effect. Cancels DOE O 430.1. Canceled by DOE O 413.3.

1998-10-14T23:59:59.000Z

465

Near Facility Environmental Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Quality Assurance Project Plan addresses the quality assurance requirements for the activities associated with the preoperational and near-facility environmental monitoring directed by Waste Management Technical Services and supersedes HNF-EP-0538-4. This plan applies to all sampling and monitoring activities performed by Waste Management Technical Services in implementing near-facility environmental monitoring at the Hanford Site. This Quality Assurance Project Plan is required by U.S. Department of Energy Order 5400.1 (DOE 1990) as a part of the Environmental Monitoring Plan (DOE-RL 1997) and is used to define: Environmental measurement and sampling locations used to monitor environmental contaminants near active and inactive facilities and waste storage and disposal sites; Procedures and equipment needed to perform the measurement and sampling; Frequency and analyses required for each measurement and sampling location; Minimum detection level and accuracy; Quality assurance components; and Investigation levels. Near-facility environmental monitoring for the Hanford Site is conducted in accordance with the requirements of U.S. Department of Energy Orders 5400.1 (DOE 1990), 5400.5 (DOE 1993), 5484.1 (DOE 1990), and 435.1 (DOE 1999), and DOE/EH-O173T (DOE 1991). It is Waste Management Technical Services' objective to manage and conduct near-facility environmental monitoring activities at the Hanford Site in a cost-effective and environmentally responsible manner that is in compliance with the letter and spirit of these regulations and other environmental regulations, statutes, and standards.

MCKINNEY, S.M.

2000-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

466

The AMTEX Partnership{trademark}: Policy and procedures  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The AMTEX Partnership is a path-finding research and development collaboration among the US Department of Energy, the contract operators of its national laboratories, and research, education, technology transfer (RETT) consortia representing the integrated textile industry. The goal of AMTEX is to strengthen the competitiveness of the US textile industry. The complex nature of the collaboration requires consistent and reliable policy direction. The policies, stated in the form of a Mission, Vision, and Key Principles have remained largely unchanged since the inception of AMTEX in March of 1993. The policies define the primary roles and public accountabilities of the AMTEX participants whether in government, industry, or federal research laboratories. The organizational structure and procedures of AMTEX have evolved as better ways were found to implement and fulfill the intent of the Mission, Vision, and Key Principles. This document describes the policies and procedures of the AMTEX Partnership{trademark} as approved by the AMTEX Operating Committee on July 20, 1995. It supersedes all previous AMTEX policies and procedures.

NONE

1995-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

467

Hanford Borehole Geologic Information System (HBGIS) Updated Users Guide for Web-based Data Access and Export  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Hanford Borehole Geologic Information System (HBGIS) is a prototype web-based graphical user interface (GUI) for viewing and downloading borehole geologic data. The HBGIS is being developed as part of the Remediation Decision Support function of the Soil and Groundwater Remediation Project, managed by Fluor Hanford, Inc., Richland, Washington. Recent efforts have focused on improving the functionality of the HBGIS website in order to allow more efficient access and exportation of available data in HBGIS. Users will benefit from enhancements such as a dynamic browsing, user-driven forms, and multi-select options for selecting borehole geologic data for export. The need for translating borehole geologic data into electronic form within the HBGIS continues to increase, and efforts to populate the database continue at an increasing rate. These new web-based tools should help the end user quickly visualize what data are available in HBGIS, select from among these data, and download the borehole geologic data into a consistent and reproducible tabular form. This revised users guide supersedes the previous users guide (PNNL-15362) for viewing and downloading data from HBGIS. It contains an updated data dictionary for tables and fields containing borehole geologic data as well as instructions for viewing and downloading borehole geologic data.

Mackley, Rob D.; Last, George V.; Allwardt, Craig H.

2008-09-24T23:59:59.000Z

468

Nuclear data sheets for {sup 165}Lu  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The experimental nuclear structure data for {sup 165}Lu have been compiled and evaluated. Extensive revisions to all the data sets for this nuclide have been made, based on the new high-spin study of 1995Sc39. From the interconnections of different rotational bands in 1995Sc39, the assignment of the ground state and its spin have been revised. There does not seem any evidence to support isomerism in {sup 165}Lu as proposed earlier in the 1987 Nuclear Data Sheets (and the 1992 update) of A=165, the Wall Chart of Nuclides and by 1997Au04. The assignment of 1/2+ to the ground state is also supported by the recent (1998Ge13) laser-spectroscopic measurements of hyperfine structure. A superdeformed (triaxial) structure is reported by 1995Sc39. This revision supersedes earlier {sup 165}Lu data contained in the A-165 update published by L.K. Peker. Nuclear Data Sheets 65, 439 (1992) with literature coverage up to Nov. 1, 1990. The transitions connecting the low lying states to the ground state are expected to be in the low-energy region of 5 to 24 keV for which experiments to measure conversion electrons are needed.

Singh, B.; Chenkin, J.

1999-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

469

Maintenance Plan for the Performance Assessments and Composite Analyses for the Area 3 and Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Sites at the NTS  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Manual M 435.1-1 requires that performance assessments (PAs) and composite analyses (CAs) for low-level waste (LLW) disposal facilities be maintained by the field offices. This plan describes the activities performed to maintain the PA and the CA for the Area 3 and Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Sites (RWMSs) at the Nevada Test Site (NTS). This plan supersedes the Maintenance Plan for the Performance Assessments and Composite Analyses for the Area 3 and Area 5 Radioactive Waste Management Sites at the Nevada Test Site (DOE/NV/11718--491-REV 1, dated September 2002). The plan is based on U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Order 435.1 (DOE, 1999a), DOE Manual M 435.1-1 (DOE, 1999b), the DOE M 435.1-1 Implementation Guide DOE G 435.1-1 (DOE, 1999c), and the Maintenance Guide for PAs and CAs (DOE, 1999d). The plan includes a current update on PA/CA documentation, a revised schedule, and a section on Quality Assurance.

Vefa Yucel

2007-01-03T23:59:59.000Z

470

Parton distributions for the LHC  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

We present updated leading-order, next-to-leading order and next-to-next-to-leading order parton distribution functions ("MSTW 2008") determined from global analysis of hard-scattering data within the standard framework of leading-twist fixed-order collinear factorisation in the MSbar scheme. These parton distributions supersede the previously available "MRST" sets and should be used for the first LHC data-taking and for the associated theoretical calculations. New data sets fitted include CCFR/NuTeV dimuon cross sections, which constrain the strange quark and antiquark distributions, and Tevatron Run II data on inclusive jet production, the lepton charge asymmetry from W decays and the Z rapidity distribution. Uncertainties are propagated from the experimental errors on the fitted data points using a new dynamic procedure for each eigenvector of the covariance matrix. We discuss the major changes compared to previous MRST fits, briefly compare to parton distributions obtained by other fitting groups, and giv...

Martin, A D; Thorne, R S; Watt, G

2009-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

471

1996 Wholesale Power and Transmission Rate Schedules.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Bonneville Power Administration`s (BPA) 1996 Wholesale Power Rate Schedules, 1996 Ancillary Products and Services Rate Schedule, 1996 Transmission Rate Schedules, and General Rate Schedule Provisions, contained herein, were approved on an interim basis effective October 1, 1996. These rate schedules and provisions were approved by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), United States Department of Energy, in September 1996 (Docket Nos EF96-2011-000 and EF96f-2021-000). These rate schedules and General Rate Schedule Provisions were approved on a final basis by the FERC July 30, 1997, in Dept. of Energy--Bonneville Power Administration, Docket Nos. EF96-2011-000 and EF96-2021-000. Except as noted elsewhere, these 1996 rate schedules and provisions supersede BPA`s Wholesale Power Rate Schedules and General Rate Schedule Provisions, and Transmission Rate Schedules and General Transmission Rate Schedule Provisions, effective October 1, 1995. These rate schedules and general rate schedule provisions include all errata.

United States. Bonneville Power Administration.

1996-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

472

2007 Wholesale Power Rate Schedules : 2007 General Rate Schedule Provisions.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This schedule is available for the contract purchase of Firm Power to be used within the Pacific Northwest (PNW). Priority Firm (PF) Power may be purchased by public bodies, cooperatives, and Federal agencies for resale to ultimate consumers, for direct consumption, and for Construction, Test and Start-Up, and Station Service. Rates in this schedule are in effect beginning October 1, 2006, and apply to purchases under requirements Firm Power sales contracts for a three-year period. The Slice Product is only available for public bodies and cooperatives who have signed Slice contracts for the FY 2002-2011 period. Utilities participating in the Residential Exchange Program (REP) under Section 5(c) of the Northwest Power Act may purchase Priority Firm Power pursuant to the Residential Exchange Program. Rates under contracts that contain charges that escalate based on BPA's Priority Firm Power rates shall be based on the three-year rates listed in this rate schedule in addition to applicable transmission charges. This rate schedule supersedes the PF-02 rate schedule, which went into effect October 1, 2001. Sales under the PF-07 rate schedule are subject to BPA's 2007 General Rate Schedule Provisions (2007 GRSPs). Products available under this rate schedule are defined in the 2007 GRSPs. For sales under this rate schedule, bills shall be rendered and payments due pursuant to BPA's 2007 GRSPs and billing process.

United States. Bonneville Power Administration.

2006-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

473

Site operator program final report for fiscal years 1992 through 1996  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Site Operator Program was an electric vehicle testing and evaluation program sponsored by US Department of Energy and managed at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory. The Program`s goals included the field evaluation of electric vehicles in real-world applications and environments; the support of electric vehicle technology advancement; the development of infrastructure elements necessary to support significant electric vehicle use; and increasing the awareness and acceptance of electric vehicles. This report covers Program activities from 1992 to 1996. The Site Operator Program ended in September 1996, when it was superseded by the Field Operations Program. Electric vehicle testing included baseline performance testing, which was performed in conjunction with EV America. The baseline performance parameters included acceleration, braking, range, energy efficiency, and charging time. The Program collected fleet operations data on electric vehicles operated by the Program`s thirteen partners, comprising electric utilities, universities, and federal agencies. The Program`s partners had over 250 electric vehicles, from vehicle converters and original equipment manufacturers, in their operating fleets. Test results are available via the World Wide Web site at http://ev.inel.gov/sop.

Francfort, J.E. [Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Co., Idaho Falls, ID (United States). Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Lab.; Bassett, R.R. [Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (United States); Birasco, S. [Los Angeles Dept. of Water and Power, CA (United States)] [and others

1998-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

474

LAYOUT AND SIZING OF ESF ALCOVES AND REFUGE CHAMBERS  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this analysis is to establish size requirements and approximate locations of Exploratory Studies Facility (ESF) test and operations alcoves, including refuge chambers during construction of the Topopah Spring (TS) loop. Preliminary conceptual layouts for non-deferred test alcoves will be developed to examine construction feasibility based on current test plans and available equipment. The final location and configuration layout for alcoves will be developed when in-situ rock conditions can be visually determined. This will be after the TBM has excavated beyond the alcove location and the rock has been exposed. The analysis will examine the need for construction of walkways and electrical alcoves in the ramps and main drift. Niches that may be required to accommodate conveyor booster drives and alignments are not included in this analysis. The analysis will develop design criteria for refuge chambers to meet MSHA requirements and will examine the strategic location of refuge chambers based on their potential use in various ESF fire scenarios. This document supersedes DI:BABE00000-01717-0200-00003 Rev 01, ''TS North Ramp Alcove and Stubout Location Analysis'' in its entirety (Reference 5-6).

John Beesley and Romeo S. Jurani

1995-08-25T23:59:59.000Z

475

Continuous improvement in nitrogen rejection unit design  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The design and fabrication of Nitrogen Rejection Units (NRU) has advanced considerably over the past 15 years. Improvements have been made in all aspects of producing an NRU plant and cold box. This paper presents the primary areas involved that have seen these improvements. (1) Process design: the two-column process has been superseded by an approach which utilizes multiple flash drums and one column. This leads to a smaller and lower cost cold box. With low nitrogen content feeds, the prefractionater recovers half the methane as a high pressure residue gas and reduces the cold box size. (2) Mechanical Design: improved software enables the design process to be more accurate, eliminate piping and equipment interferences, reduce the size of the box and save design time. (3) Manufacturing: the interfacing of the 3D software design tools and the manufacturing process enables the shop floor personnel to reduce the manufacturing time by 10%. All of these individual improvements have reduced the real cost of an NRU substantially over the past 15 years.

O`Brien, J.V. [Process Systems International, Inc., Westborough, MA (United States); Maloney, J.J. [Praxair, Inc., Tonawanda, NY (United States)

1997-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

476

EIA Publications Directory, 1977--1989  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Enacted in 1977, the Department of Energy (DOE) Organization Act established the Energy Information Administration (EIA) as the Department's independent statistical and analytical agency, with a mandate to collect and publish data and prepare analyses on energy production, consumption, prices, and resources, and projections of energy supply and demand. This cumulative edition of the EIA Publications Directory (formerly entitled EIA Publications Directory: A User's Guide) contains titles and abstracts of periodicals and one-time reports produced by the EIA from October 1977 through December 1989. It supersedes all previous issues of the Directory. EIA publications have undergone a great many changes over the last decade. The EIA inherited periodicals from the Bureau of Mines, Federal Power Commission, and the Federal Energy Administration. Some of these periodicals have been retitled, consolidated, or discontinued. These changes are noted in the abstracts. The body of the Directory contains citations and abstracts arranged by broad subject categories, such as coal, petroleum, and natural gas and subcategories such as reserves, products and byproducts, and marketing and economics. All reports are indexed alphabetically by subject and title and numerically by report number. EIA appreciates the assistance of DOE's Office of Scientific and Technical Information in sharing portions of the Energy Data Base.

Not Available

1990-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

477

International nuclear waste management fact book  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The International Nuclear Waste Management Fact Book has been compiled to provide current data on fuel cycle and waste management facilities, R and D programs, and key personnel in 24 countries, including the US; four multinational agencies; and 20 nuclear societies. This document, which is in its second year of publication supersedes the previously issued International Nuclear Fuel Cycle Fact Book (PNL-3594), which appeared annually for 12 years. The content has been updated to reflect current information. The Fact Book is organized as follows: National summaries--a section for each country that summarizes nuclear policy, describes organizational relationships, and provides addresses and names of key personnel and information on facilities. International agencies--a section for each of the international agencies that has significant fuel cycle involvement and a list of nuclear societies. Glossary--a list of abbreviations/acronyms of organizations, facilities, and technical and other terms. The national summaries, in addition to the data described above, feature a small map for each country and some general information that is presented from the perspective of the Fact Book user in the US.

Abrahms, C W; Patridge, M D; Widrig, J E

1995-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

478

Experimenting an optical second with strontium lattice clocks  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Progress in realizing the SI second had multiple technological impacts and enabled to further constraint theoretical models in fundamental physics. Caesium microwave fountains, realizing best the second according to its current definition with a relative uncertainty of 2-4x10^(-16), have already been superseded by atomic clocks referenced to an optical transition, both more stable and more accurate. Are we ready for a new definition of the second? Here we present an important step in this direction: our system of five clocks connects with an unprecedented consistency the optical and the microwave worlds. For the first time, two state-of-the-art strontium optical lattice clocks are proven to agree within their accuracy budget, with a total uncertainty of 1.6x10^(-16). Their comparison with three independent caesium fountains shows a degree of reproducibility henceforth solely limited at the level of 3.1x10^(-16) by the best realizations of the microwave-defined second.

Targat, R Le; Coq, Y Le; Zawada, M; Guna, J; Abgrall, M; Gurov, M; Rosenbusch, P; Rovera, D G; Nagrny, B; Gartman, R; Westergaard, P G; Tobar, M E; Lours, M; Santarelli, G; Clairon, A; Bize, S; Laurent, P; Lemonde, P; Lodewyck, J

2013-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

479

Prediction of external corrosion for steel storage cylinders  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The US Department of Energy (DOE) currently manages the UF{sub 6} Cylinder Program (the program). The program was formed to address the depleted-uranium hexafluoride (UF{sub 6}) stored in approximately 50,000 carbon steel cylinders. The cylinders are located at three DOE sites: the K-25 site (K-25) at Oak Ridge, Tennessee; the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (PGDP) in Paducah, Kentucky, and the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant (PORTS) in Portsmouth, Ohio. The System Requirements Document (SRD) (LMES 1996a) delineates the requirements of the program. The appropriate actions needed to fulfill these requirements are then specified within the System Engineering Management Plan (SEMP) (LMES 1996b). The report presented herein documents activities that in whole or in part satisfy specific requirements and actions stated in the UF{sub 6} Cylinder Program SRD and SEMP with respect to forecasting cylinder conditions. The wall thickness projections made in this report are based on the assumption that the corrosion trends noted will continue. Some activities planned may substantially reduce the rate of corrosion, in which case the results presented here are conservative. The results presented here are intended to supersede those presented previously, as the quality of several of the datasets has improved.

Lyon, B.F.

1997-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

480

Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology  

Science Journals Connector (OSTI)

Objectives This study compares 2 measures of effective dose, E1990 and E2007, for 8 dentoalveolar and maxillofacial cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) units and a 64-slice multidetector CT (MDCT) unit. Study design Average tissue-absorbed dose, equivalent dose, and effective dose were calculated using thermoluminescent dosimeter chips in a radiation analog dosimetry phantom. Effective doses were derived using 1990 and the superseding 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) recommendations. Results Large-field of view (FOV) CBCT E2007 ranged from 68 to 1,073 ?Sv. Medium-FOV CBCT E2007 ranged from 69 to 560 ?Sv, whereas a similar-FOV MDCT produced 860 ?Sv. The E2007 calculations were 23% to 224% greater than E1990. Conclusions The 2007 recommendations of the ICRP, which include salivary glands, extrathoracic region, and oral mucosa in the calculation of effective dose, result in an upward reassessment of fatal cancer risk from oral and maxillofacial radiographic examinations. Dental CBCT can be recommended as a dose-sparing technique in comparison with alternative medical CT scans for common oral and maxillofacial radiographic imaging tasks.

John B. Ludlow; Marija Ivanovic

2008-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "12-2000 supersedes 7-96" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

A pilot application of risk-informed methods to establish inservice inspection priorities for nuclear components at Surry Unit 1 Nuclear Power Station. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

As part of the Nondestructive Evaluation Reliability Program sponsored by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory has developed risk-informed approaches for inservice inspection plans of nuclear power plants. This method uses probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) results to identify and prioritize the most risk-important components for inspection. The Surry Nuclear Power Station Unit 1 was selected for pilot application of this methodology. This report, which incorporates more recent plant-specific information and improved risk-informed methodology and tools, is Revision 1 of the earlier report (NUREG/CR-6181). The methodology discussed in the original report is no longer current and a preferred methodology is presented in this Revision. This report, NUREG/CR-6181, Rev. 1, therefore supersedes the earlier NUREG/CR-6181 published in August 1994. The specific systems addressed in this report are the auxiliary feedwater, the low-pressure injection, and the reactor coolant systems. The results provide a risk-informed ranking of components within these systems.

Vo, T.V.; Phan, H.K.; Gore, B.F.; Simonen, F.A.; Doctor, S.R. [Pacific Northwest National Lab., Richland, WA (United States)

1997-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

482

Laboratory measurement verification of laser hazard analysis for miles weapon simulators used in force on force exercises.  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Due to the change in the batteries used with the Small Arm Laser Transmitters (SALT) from 3-volts dc to 3.6-volts dc and changes to SNL MILES operating conditions, the associated laser hazards of these units required re-evaluation to ensure that the hazard classification of the laser emitters had not changed as well. The output laser emissions of the SNL MILES, weapon simulators and empire guns, used in Force-On-Force (FOF) training exercises, was measured in accordance to the ANSI Standard Z136.4-2005, ''Recommended Practice for Laser Safety Measurements for Hazard Evaluation''. The laser hazard class was evaluated in accordance with the ANSI Standard Z136.1-2000, ''Safe Use of Lasers'', using ''worst'' case conditions associated with these MILES units. Laser safety assessment was conducted in accordance with the ANSI Standard Z136.6-2005, ''Safe Use of Lasers Outdoors''. The laser hazard evaluation of these MILES laser emitters was compared to and supersedes SAND Report SAND2002-0246, ''Laser Safety Evaluation of the MILES and Mini MILES Laser Emitting Components'', which used ''actual'' operating conditions of the laser emitters at the time of its issuance.

Augustoni, Arnold L.

2006-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

483

The impact of two Department of Energy orders on the design and cost of select plutonium facilities at Los Alamos National Laboratory  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) is a research and development facility in northern New Mexico, owned by the federal government and operated for the US Department of Energy (DOE) by the University of California (UC). LANL conducts research and experiments in many arenas including plutonium. Its plutonium facilities are required to meet the facility design and safety criteria of applicable DOE orders as specified in the UC contract. Although DOE 420.1, Facility Safety, superseded DOE 6430.1A, General Design Criteria, the UC contract requires LANL to adhere to DOE 6430.1A, Division 13 in its special nuclear facilities. A comparison of costs and savings relative to installation of double-wall piping at two LANL plutonium facilities is demonstrated. DOE 6430.1A is prescriptive in its design criteria whereas DOE 420.1 is a performance-based directive. The differences in these orders impact time and design costs in nuclear construction projects. LANL`s approach to integrated quality and conduct of operations for design, needs to be re-evaluated. In conclusion, there is a need for highly-technical, knowledgeable people and an integrated, quality/conduct of operations-based approach to assure that nuclear facilities are designed and constructed in a safe and cost-effective manner.

Rey, V.C.

1999-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

484

DOE Standard: Fire protection design criteria  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The development of this Standard reflects the fact that national consensus standards and other design criteria do not comprehensively or, in some cases, adequately address fire protection issues at DOE facilities. This Standard provides supplemental fire protection guidance applicable to the design and construction of DOE facilities and site features (such as water distribution systems) that are also provided for fire protection. It is intended to be used in conjunction with the applicable building code, National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Codes and Standards, and any other applicable DOE construction criteria. This Standard replaces certain mandatory fire protection requirements that were formerly in DOE 5480.7A, ``Fire Protection``, and DOE 6430.1A, ``General Design Criteria``. It also contains the fire protection guidelines from two (now canceled) draft standards: ``Glove Box Fire Protection`` and ``Filter Plenum Fire Protection``. (Note: This Standard does not supersede the requirements of DOE 5480.7A and DOE 6430.1A where these DOE Orders are currently applicable under existing contracts.) This Standard, along with the criteria delineated in Section 3, constitutes the basic criteria for satisfying DOE fire and life safety objectives for the design and construction or renovation of DOE facilities.

Not Available

1999-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

485

Superallowed 0+ --> 0+ nuclear beta decays: 2014 critical survey, with precise results for Vud and CKM unitarity  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

A new critical survey is presented of all half-life, decay-energy and branching-ratio measurements related to 20 superallowed 0+ --> 0+ beta decays. Included are 222 individual measurements of comparable precision obtained from 177 published references. Compared with our last review in 2008, we have added results from 24 new publications and eliminated 9 references, the results from which having been superseded by much more precise modern data. We obtain world-average ft-values for each of the eighteen transitions that have a complete set of data, then apply radiative and isospin-symmetry-breaking corrections to extract corrected Ft values. Fourteen of these Ft values now have a precision of order 0.1% or better. In the process of obtaining these results we carefully evaluate the available calculations of the isospin-symmetry-breaking corrections by testing the extent to which they lead to Ft values consistent with conservation of the vector current (CVC). Only one set of calculations satisfactorily meets thi...

Hardy, J C

2014-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

486

Documentation of Hanford Site independent review of the Hanford Waste Vitrification Plant Preliminary Safety Analysis Report. Revision 3  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Westinghouse Hanford Company (WHC) is the Integrating Contractor for the Hanford Waste Vitrification Plant (HWVP) Project, and as such is responsible for preparation of the HWVP Preliminary Safety Analysis Report (PSAR). The HWVP PSAR was prepared pursuant to the requirements for safety analyses contained in US Department of Energy (DOE) Orders 4700.1, Project Management System (DOE 1987); 5480.5, Safety of Nuclear Facilities (DOE 1986a); 5481.lB, Safety Analysis and Review System (DOE 1986b) which was superseded by DOE order 5480-23, Nuclear Safety Analysis Reports, for nuclear facilities effective April 30, 1992 (DOE 1992); and 6430.lA, General Design Criteria (DOE 1989). The WHC procedures that, in large part, implement these DOE requirements are contained in WHC-CM-4-46, Nonreactor Facility Safety Analysis Manual. This manual describes the overall WHC safety analysis process in terms of requirements for safety analyses, responsibilities of the various contributing organizations, and required reviews and approvals.

Herborn, D.I.

1993-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

487

Parallel programming with PCN. Revision 2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

PCN is a system for developing and executing parallel programs. It comprises a high-level programming language, tools for developing and debugging programs in this language, and interfaces to Fortran and Cthat allow the reuse of existing code in multilingual parallel programs. Programs developed using PCN are portable across many different workstations, networks, and parallel computers. This document provides all the information required to develop parallel programs with the PCN programming system. It includes both tutorial and reference material. It also presents the basic concepts that underlie PCN, particularly where these are likely to be unfamiliar to the reader, and provides pointers to other documentation on the PCN language, programming techniques, and tools. PCN is in the public domain. The latest version of both the software and this manual can be obtained by anonymous ftp from Argonne National Laboratory in the directory pub/pcn at info.mcs. ani.gov (cf. Appendix A). This version of this document describes PCN version 2.0, a major revision of the PCN programming system. It supersedes earlier versions of this report.

Foster, I.; Tuecke, S.

1993-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

488

Parallel programming with PCN  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

PCN is a system for developing and executing parallel programs. It comprises a high-level programming language, tools for developing and debugging programs in this language, and interfaces to Fortran and Cthat allow the reuse of existing code in multilingual parallel programs. Programs developed using PCN are portable across many different workstations, networks, and parallel computers. This document provides all the information required to develop parallel programs with the PCN programming system. It includes both tutorial and reference material. It also presents the basic concepts that underlie PCN, particularly where these are likely to be unfamiliar to the reader, and provides pointers to other documentation on the PCN language, programming techniques, and tools. PCN is in the public domain. The latest version of both the software and this manual can be obtained by anonymous ftp from Argonne National Laboratory in the directory pub/pcn at info.mcs. ani.gov (cf. Appendix A). This version of this document describes PCN version 2.0, a major revision of the PCN programming system. It supersedes earlier versions of this report.

Foster, I.; Tuecke, S.

1993-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

489

A comprehensive program to develop correlations for physical properties of kraft black liquor. Final report  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A wide variety of experimental techniques have been used in this work, and many of these have been developed completely or improved significantly in the course of the research done during this program. Therefore, it is appropriate to describe these techniques in detail as a reference for future workers so that the techniques can be used in future work with little additional effort or so that the results reported from this program can be compared better with future results from other work. In many cases, the techniques described are for specific analytical instruments. It is recognized that these may be superseded by future developments and improvements in instrumentation if a complete description of techniques used successfully in the past on other instrumentation is available. The total pulping and liquor preparation research work performed included chip and white liquor preparation, digestion, pulp washing, liquor and wash recovery, liquor sampling, weak liquor concentration in two steps to about 45--50% solids with an intermediate soap skimming at about 140F and 27--30% solids, determination of pulp yield and Kappa number, determination of total liquor solids, and a check on the total material balance for pulping. All other research was performed either on a sample of the weak black liquor (the combined black liquor and washes from the digester) or on the skimmed liquor that had been concentrated.

Fricke, A.L.; Zaman, A.A.; Stoy, M.O.; Schmidl, G.W.; Dong, D.J.; Speck, B.

1998-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

490

Rocky Flats Compliance Program; Technology summary  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Department of Energy (DOE) established the Office of Technology Development (EM-50) (OTD) as an element of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management (EM) in November 1989. The primary objective of the Office of Technology Development, Rocky Flats Compliance Program (RFCP), is to develop altemative treatment technologies for mixed low-level waste (wastes containing both hazardous and radioactive components) to use in bringing the Rocky Flats Plant (RFP) into compliance with Federal and state regulations and agreements. Approximately 48,000 cubic feet of untreated low-level mixed waste, for which treatment has not been specified, are stored at the RFP. The cleanup of the Rocky Flats site is driven by agreements between DOE, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Colorado Department of Health (CDH). Under these agreements, a Comprehensive Treatment and Management Plan (CTMP) was drafted to outline the mechanisms by which RFP will achieve compliance with the regulations and agreements. This document describes DOE`s strategy to treat low-level mixed waste to meet Land Disposal Restrictions and sets specific milestones related to the regulatory aspects of technology development. These milestones detail schedules for the development of technologies to treat all of the mixed wastes at the RFP. Under the Federal Facilities Compliance Act (FFCA), the CTMP has been incorporated into Rocky Flats Plant Conceptual Site Treatment Plan (CSTP). The CSTP will become the Rocky Flats Plant site Treatment Plan in 1995 and will supersede the CTMP.

NONE

1994-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

491

NACRE II: an update of the NACRE compilation of charged-particle-induced thermonuclear reaction rates for nuclei with mass number $A < 16$  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

An update of the NACRE compilation [Angulo et al., Nucl. Phys. A 656 (1999) 3] is presented. This new compilation, referred to as NACRE II, reports thermonuclear reaction rates for 34 charged-particle induced, two-body exoergic reactions on nuclides with mass number $A<16$, of which fifteen are particle-transfer reactions and the rest radiative capture reactions. When compared with NACRE, NACRE II features in particular (1) the addition to the experimental data collected in NACRE of those reported later, preferentially in the major journals of the field by early 2013, and (2) the adoption of potential models as the primary tool for extrapolation to very low energies of astrophysical $S$-factors, with a systematic evaluation of uncertainties. As in NACRE, the rates are presented in tabular form for temperatures in the $10^{6}$ $\\simeq\\leq$ T $\\leq$ $10^{10}$ K range. Along with the 'adopted' rates, their low and high limits are provided. The new rates are available in electronic form as part of the Brussels Library (BRUSLIB) of nuclear data. The NACRE II rates also supersede the previous NACRE rates in the Nuclear Network Generator (NETGEN) for astrophysics. [http://www.astro.ulb.ac.be/databases.html.

Yi Xu; Kohji Takahashi; Stephane Goriely; Marcel Arnould; Masahisa Ohta; Hiroaki Utsunomiya

2013-10-26T23:59:59.000Z

492

DOE standard guidelines for use of probabilistic seismic hazard curves at Department of Energy sites  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Standard is intended to provide guidance in the use of the seismic hazard curves developed by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). Experience to-date has shown that application of these methodologies can yield significantly different results. In response to this issue, a Seismic Working Group (SWG) has been formed at the Department of Energy (DOE) Headquarters to coordinate the application of these methodologies within DOE in a consistent manner. The position developed by the SWG and contained in this Standard is intended for immediate use in developing seismic hazard estimates at DOE sites for the evaluation of new and existing, nuclear and non-nuclear DOE facilities. This Standard is needed not only to address the LLNL/EPRI issue but also to assure that state-of-the-art seismic hazard methods are incorporated into DOE standards as soon as possible. The DOE is currently involved in a joint program with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and EPRI to evaluate these existing probabilistic seismic hazard methodologies and to develop recommendations for an improved methodology for the 1990`s. The final product of this effort is expected to result in more stable hazard estimates and will supersede this Standard in approximately two years.

Not Available

1992-12-28T23:59:59.000Z

493

Data:19a9ca48-9216-4ec4-a384-cc1a9f1f56a0 | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

8-9216-4ec4-a384-cc1a9f1f56a0 8-9216-4ec4-a384-cc1a9f1f56a0 No revision has been approved for this page. It is currently under review by our subject matter experts. Jump to: navigation, search Loading... 1. Basic Information 2. Demand 3. Energy << Previous 1 2 3 Next >> Basic Information Utility name: PUD No 1 of Cowlitz County Effective date: 2011/11/01 End date if known: Rate name: PRIVATE STREET AND AREA LIGHTING SCHEDULE 10 Sodium Vapor 100 watts Sector: Lighting Description: Applicable to street, roadway, and area lighting for residential and commercial property. SPECIAL CONDITIONS All lighting equipment, including mast arms, brackets, control equipment, transformers, wiring and supports, shall be owned, operated and maintained by the District. For new installations which do not utilize an existing District-owned pole and require the setting of a new pole for the light, the customer shall pay in advance $300 as an Aid-to- Construction. The District will require a Special Contract for service hereunder for a term of not less than sixty (60) consecutive months reflecting monthly payments computed in accordance with this Rate Schedule as it may be amended or superseded.

494

Program integration on the Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The recent development and implementation of a revised Program Approach for the Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System (CRWMS) was accomplished in response to significant changes in the environment in which the program was being executed. The lack of an interim storage site, growing costs and schedule delays to accomplish the full Yucca Mountain site characterization plan, and the development and incorporation of a multi-purpose (storage, transport, and disposal) canister (MPC) into the CRWMS required a reexamination of Program plans and priorities. Dr. Daniel A. Dreyfus, the Director of the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM), established top-level schedule, targets and cost goals and commissioned a Program-wide task force of DOE and contractor personnel to identify and evaluate alternatives to meet them. The evaluation of the suitability of Yucca Mountain site by 1998 and the repository license application data of 2001 were maintained and a target date of January 1998 for MPC availability was established. An increased multi-year funding profile was baselined and agreed to by Congress. A $1.3 billion reduction in Yucca Mountain site characterization costs was mandated to hold the cost to $5 billion. The replanning process superseded all previous budget allocations and focused on program requirements and their relative priorities within the cost profiles. This paper discusses the process for defining alternative scenarios to achieve the top-level program goals in an integrated fashion.

Trebules, V.B. [USDOE Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, Washington, DC (United States). Program Management Div.; King, M.H. [TRW Environmental Safety Systems Inc., Vienna, VA (United States)

1995-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

495

week0617  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

7,1996 7,1996 N Y M E X P r i c e F u t u r e s v s H e n r y H u b S p o t P r i c e 1 . 5 0 1 . 7 5 2 . 0 0 2 . 2 5 2 . 5 0 2 . 7 5 3 . 0 0 Dollars Per Million BTU N Y M E X S e t t l e m e n t P r i c e H e n r y H u b S p o t A P R - 9 6 N o t e : T H e H e n r y H u b s p o t p r i c e i s f r o m t h e G A S D A I L Y a n d i s t h e m i d p o i n t o f t h e i r h i g h a n d l o w p r i c e f o r a d a y . M A Y - 9 6 J U N E - 9 6 H ig h T e m p e r a tu r e f o r F o u r S e l e c t e d C i ti e s 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 0 9 0 1 0 0 5/26/96 5/27/96 5/28/96 5/29/96 5/30/96 5/31/96 6/1/96 6/2/96 6/3/96 6/4/96 6/5/96 6/6/96 6/7/96 6/8/96 6/9/96 6/10/96 6/11/96 6/12/96 6/13/96 6/14/96 6/15/96 Degrees in Fahrenheit A tla n ta C h ic a g o H o u s to n N Y C W o r k i n g G a s I n S t o r a g e 5 4 6 5 7 3 6 4 1 6 9 4 7 5 4 8 1 3 8 9 6 1 0 7 2 8 4 3 1 5 2 1 1 8 9 5 9 8 4 0 2 0 0 4 0 0 6 0 0 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 1 8 0 0 2 0 0 0 12/96 19/96 26/96 30/96 /3/96 10/96 17/96 24/96 31/96 /7/96 14/96 21/96 28/96 30/96 Billion Cubic Feet A G A E s t i m a t e E I A 6 Y e a r H i s t o r ic a l L o w f o r t h e M o n t h

496

week0624  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

4,1996 4,1996 N Y M E X P r i c e F u t u r e s v s H e n r y H u b S p o t P r i c e 1 . 5 0 1 . 7 5 2 . 0 0 2 . 2 5 2 . 5 0 2 . 7 5 3 . 0 0 Dollars Per Million BTU N Y M E X S e t t l e m e n t P r i c e H e n r y H u b S p o t A P R - 9 6 N o t e : T H e H e n r y H u b s p o t p r i c e i s f r o m t h e G A S D A I L Y a n d i s t h e m i d p o i n t o f t h e i r h i g h a n d l o w p r i c e f o r a d a y . M A Y - 9 6 J U N E - 9 6 H ig h T e m p e r a tu r e f o r F o u r S e l e c t e d C i ti e s 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 0 9 0 1 0 0 6/2/96 6/3/96 6/4/96 6/5/96 6/6/96 6/7/96 6/8/96 6/9/96 6/10/96 6/11/96 6/12/96 6/13/96 6/14/96 6/15/96 6/16/96 6/17/96 6/18/96 6/19/96 6/20/96 6/21/96 6/22/96 Degrees in Fahrenheit A tla n ta C h ic a g o H o u s to n N Y C W o r k i n g G a s I n S t o r a g e 5 4 6 5 7 3 6 4 1 6 9 4 7 5 4 8 1 3 8 9 6 1 0 7 2 1 1 5 9 8 4 3 1 5 2 1 1 8 9 5 9 8 4 0 2 0 0 4 0 0 6 0 0 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 4 0 0 1 6 0 0 1 8 0 0 2 0 0 0 12/96 19/96 26/96 30/96 /3/96 10/96 17/96 24/96 31/96 6/7/96 14/96 21/96 28/96 30/96 Billion Cubic Feet A G A E s t i m a t e E I A 6 Y e a r H i s t o r i c a l L o w f o r t h e M o n t h

497

X:\L6046\Data_Publication\Pma\current\ventura\pma.vp  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

101.6 101.6 101.5 95.6 90.4 83.0 90.5 110.0 109.8 101.7 94.9 - 97.1 February ............................. 101.3 101.2 94.5 88.7 84.1 89.2 110.1 109.8 100.6 93.2 - 95.6 March .................................. 96.7 96.8 91.1 84.3 79.4 85.0 105.8 105.5 97.0 88.6 - 91.3 April .................................... 111.3 111.2 105.8 101.5 92.0 101.0 119.7 119.5 111.3 105.8 - 107.6 May ..................................... 123.0 122.7 114.7 109.8 96.9 108.9 130.6 130.2 118.8 113.0 - 115.0 June .................................... 110.5 110.0 98.6 89.6 83.5 90.5 119.6 118.9 103.9 92.9 - 96.5 July ..................................... 92.3 92.1 84.6 76.2 71.2 77.1 101.9 101.6 90.5 80.1 - 83.6 August ................................ 97.7 97.8 92.0 88.0 75.0 86.7 105.5 105.4 96.8 90.6 - 92.7 September ..........................

498

Table 34. Reformulated Motor Gasoline Prices by Grade, Sales Type,  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

59.5 59.5 58.9 54.4 42.1 37.1 46.8 70.2 69.7 61.7 46.4 - 56.9 February ............................. 57.3 56.7 52.7 40.6 39.2 45.9 68.2 67.7 60.2 44.8 W 55.3 March .................................. 64.5 64.4 60.1 52.3 48.6 55.3 74.2 73.8 67.6 55.6 W 63.8 April .................................... 82.3 81.6 79.9 62.3 57.2 69.6 92.4 91.6 84.9 65.4 W 78.7 May ..................................... 79.8 78.9 76.3 59.2 54.0 66.0 90.6 89.9 82.9 63.9 W 76.6 June .................................... 74.7 74.6 71.0 61.1 58.0 64.9 85.2 84.8 77.6 64.9 W 73.4 July ..................................... 79.4 79.3 75.9 69.7 66.3 71.9 89.3 88.9 81.9 72.6 NA 78.7 August ................................ 86.5 86.0 82.9 73.3 73.5 77.7 96.4 95.7 88.9 76.6 W 84.8 September .......................... 86.9 86.3 82.0 73.5 70.5 76.9 96.3 95.6 88.7 77.5 W

499

Table 24. Refining Industry Energy Consumption  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

- Corrections to Tables 24 to 32 - Corrections to Tables 24 to 32 Table 24. Refining Industry Energy Consumption 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2002- 2025 Carbon Dioxide Emissions 4/ (million metric tons) 190.4 185.7 188.0 191.3 207.3 215.6 220.0 222.8 225.1 226.3 228.0 230.7 234.1 237.5 238.5 239.4 239.4 238.6 240.6 240.5 242.2 244.2 245.9 246.3 246.6 1.2% Table 25. Food Industry Energy Consumption 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2002- 2025 Carbon Dioxide Emissions 3/ (million metric tons) 87.8 89.4 87.5 87.8 89.2 90.2 90.9 91.4 92.2 93.5 94.5 95.7 96.7 97.7 98.6 99.6 100.8 101.9 102.9 104.1 105.4 107.0 108.7 110.3 112.1 1.0% Table 26. Paper Industry Energy Consumption 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

500

F:\sup99f\sup99f.wpd  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

3. Electric Generation by Electricity Market Module Region and Source 3. Electric Generation by Electricity Market Module Region and Source (Billion Kilowatthours) 1997- 2020 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 East Central Area Reliability Coordination Agreement Coal 477.61 479.75 493.17 494.17 503.92 510.92 513.61 512.01 511.59 514.21 517.82 528.49 529.96 529.37 533.63 532.03 534.72 537.09 543.59 543.52 546.49 550.24 550.04 552.48 0.6% Petroleum 1.77 1.37 1.20 1.23 1.24 1.35 1.38 1.35 1.31 1.34 1.23 1.26 1.34 1.31 1.31 1.30 1.26 1.20 1.28 1.29 1.25 1.27 1.27 1.25 -1.5% Natural Gas 2.28 24.46 12.81 6.53 7.29 7.96 9.29 13.09 17.37 22.09 28.46 35.43 40.70 47.50 53.43 60.41 65.57 72.93 88.55 101.44 113.12 119.76 127.68 131.61 19.3% Nuclear 47.40 48.19 49.66 50.07 50.44 50.74 50.91 51.09 51.26 50.51 43.86 28.47 28.58 28.68 28.78