Powered by Deep Web Technologies
Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "1 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


1

GREEN UNIVERSITY COMMITTEE UNBC Green Strategy, Phase 1 (2009-2011)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

- 1 - GREEN UNIVERSITY COMMITTEE UNBC Green Strategy, Phase 1 (2009-2011) 26 March 2009 PURPOSE The vision, objectives, and strategies contained in the UNBC Green Strategy, Phase 1 (2009- 2011 of the UNBC Green Strategy, Phase 1 (2009-2011) was based primarily on "UNBC's Green Strategy Discussion Paper

Northern British Columbia, University of

2

Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Decreases  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

2,486 2,914 1,668 2009-2011 2,486 2,914 1,668 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 0 0 0 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 0 0 0 2009-2011 Texas 0 0 0 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 2,486 2,914 1,668 2009-2011 Alabama 316 51 86 2009-2011 Arkansas 0 1 3 2009-2011 California 0 0 0 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Colorado 566 1,557 367 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kansas 107 0 14 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 0 0 0 2009-2011 North 0 0 0 2009-2011 South Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Michigan 0 0 0 2009-2011 Mississippi 0 0 0 2009-2011

3

Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Increases  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

1,563 2,589 2,071 2009-2011 1,563 2,589 2,071 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 0 0 0 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 0 0 0 2009-2011 Texas 0 0 0 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 1,563 2,589 2,071 2009-2011 Alabama 17 134 23 2009-2011 Arkansas 3 9 0 2009-2011 California 0 0 0 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Colorado 126 937 698 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kansas 8 157 24 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 0 0 0 2009-2011 North 0 0 0 2009-2011 South Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Michigan 0 0 0 2009-2011 Mississippi 0 0 0 2009-2011

4

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Increases  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

3,270 3,900 5,096 2009-2011 3,270 3,900 5,096 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 710 879 1,966 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 33 38 25 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 616 790 1,861 2009-2011 Texas 61 51 80 2009-2011 Alaska 394 397 362 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 2,876 3,503 4,734 2009-2011 Alabama 9 9 2 2009-2011 Arkansas 5 12 31 2009-2011 California 427 276 394 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 105 40 118 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 98 22 23 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 192 204 229 2009-2011 State Offshore 32 10 24 2009-2011 Colorado 28 52 71 2009-2011 Florida 8 10 9 2009-2011 Illinois 12 0 6 2009-2011 Indiana 1 0 1 2009-2011 Kansas 49 52 47 2009-2011 Kentucky 4 1 9 2009-2011 Louisiana 100 139 100 2009-2011 North 15 69 16 2009-2011 South Onshore

5

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Decreases, Wet After Lease  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

1,262 1,957 3,682 2009-2011 1,262 1,957 3,682 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 208 214 1,455 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 17 4 15 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 174 183 1,354 2009-2011 Texas 17 27 86 2009-2011 Alaska 152 76 129 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 1,110 1,881 3,553 2009-2011 Alabama 2 5 1 2009-2011 Arkansas 0 0 0 2009-2011 California 119 167 230 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 4 39 10 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 47 2 2 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 68 125 217 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 1 1 2009-2011 Colorado 27 34 56 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 2 2009-2011 Illinois 1 4 2 2009-2011 Indiana 0 0 1 2009-2011 Kansas 21 47 23 2009-2011 Kentucky 3 3 2 2009-2011 Louisiana 69 93 43 2009-2011 North 6 11 4 2009-2011 South Onshore 57 73 34 2009-2011

6

Microsoft Word - FINAL DOE IRM Strategic Plan_2009-2011_090808.docx  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

IRM Strategic Plan IRM Strategic Plan Office of the Chief Information Officer FY 2009 - 2011 DOE IRM Strategic Plan i FY 2009 - 2011 U.S. Department of Energy IRM Strategic Plan Office of the Chief Information Officer FY 2009 - 2011 DOE IRM Strategic Plan i TABLE OF CONTENTS MESSAGE FROM THE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER ..................................................................3 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................................4 2.0 IT STRATEGY OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................4 2.1 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY MISSION..........................................................................................

7

Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

3,642 9,491 23,455 2009-2011 3,642 9,491 23,455 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 3,642 9,491 23,455 2009-2011 Alabama 2 0 2009-2010 Arkansas 261 126 141 2009-2011 California 0 2011-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 2011-2011 Colorado 0 2 0 2009-2011 Kentucky 3 43 11 2009-2011 Louisiana 826 1,878 3,882 2009-2011 North 826 1,878 3,882 2009-2011 Michigan 276 325 151 2009-2011 Montana 34 16 14 2009-2011 New Mexico 2 11 190 2009-2011 East 2 2 146 2009-2011 West 0 9 44 2009-2011 North Dakota 17 343 290 2009-2011 Ohio 0 0 2009-2010 Oklahoma 865 2,117 5,024 2009-2011 Pennsylvania 53 1,583 3,322 2009-2011 Texas 1,267 2,425 10,263 2009-2011 RRC District 1 0 251 48 2009-2011 RRC District 2 Onshore 5 402 2010-2011 RRC District 3 Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011

8

Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

6,363 10,661 25,993 2009-2011 6,363 10,661 25,993 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 6,363 10,661 25,993 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 2009-2010 Arkansas 1,585 861 502 2009-2011 California 912 2011-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 912 2011-2011 Colorado 0 1 4 2009-2011 Kentucky 44 3 44 2009-2011 Louisiana 636 1,856 2,002 2009-2011 North 636 1,856 2,002 2009-2011 Michigan 149 165 140 2009-2011 Montana 42 14 14 2009-2011 New Mexico 2 1 83 2009-2011 East 0 1 68 2009-2011 West 2 0 15 2009-2011 North Dakota 119 528 439 2009-2011 Ohio 0 0 2009-2010 Oklahoma 1,373 1,352 3,709 2009-2011 Pennsylvania 299 1,994 5,238 2009-2011 Texas 2,052 3,580 12,185 2009-2011 RRC District 1 1 322 2,141 2009-2011 RRC District 2 Onshore 6 388 2010-2011 RRC District 3 Onshore

9

Fermilab Engineering Manual Appendices Revision 1.0  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Fermilab Engineering Manual Appendices Revision 1.0 Page 1 FERMI NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY:__________________________ DATE:_________ REVISION NO.________ REVISION ISSUE DATE:____________ #12;Fermilab Engineering Manual ..................................... 166 #12;Fermilab Engineering Manual Appendices Revision 1.0 Page 3 A. REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS

Quigg, Chris

10

ISU 2009-2011 B.A. DEGREE in ADVERTISING  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

ISU 2009-2011 B.A. DEGREE in ADVERTISING Recommended timeline for successful completion of a degree.5 Semester 3 SOPHOMORE YEAR Semester 4 Advrt 230 � Advertising Principles 3 Jl MC 201 � Reporting and Writing � Strategic Planning 3 Advrt 334 or 336 � Advertising Creativity 3 Advrt Recommendation � 300-level 3

Lin, Zhiqun

11

DRAFT NISTIR 7628 Revision 1 Guidelines for  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

DRAFT NISTIR 7628 Revision 1 Guidelines for Smart Grid Cyber Security: Vol. 3, Supportive Analyses Revision 1 Guidelines for Smart Grid Cyber Security: Vol. 3, Supportive Analyses and References The Smart as technology advances and as threats to grid security inevitably multiply and diversif

12

FTCP Corrective Action Plan- Revision 1  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

January 2007 FTCP Corrective Action Plan, Revision 1, which is Deliverable B for Commitment 13 in the Department of Energy (DOE) Implementation Plan to Improve Oversight of Nuclear Operations, issued in response to Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 2004- 1, Oversight of Complex, High-Hazard Nuclear Operations

13

Revised: March 1, 2005 Page 1 UCSB Environmental Health & Safety  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

safe for transport. #12;Revised: March 1, 2005 Page 3 · Abandoned and unlabeled chemical containersRevised: March 1, 2005 Page 1 UCSB Environmental Health & Safety Emergency Response Guidelines spill-cleanups, odor complaints, pickup of abandoned chemicals and related alarms (see Attachment). EH

Bigelow, Stephen

14

Revision of DOE Manual 460.2-1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

, 2005 , 2005 TEC/WG 1 Revision of DOE M 460.2-1, Radioactive Material Transportation Practices Manual Revision of DOE M 460.2-1, Radioactive Material Transportation Practices Manual Ella McNeil Office of Transportation, EM-11 September 20, 2005 TEC/WG 2 Getting Started Getting Started * Establish an internal writing team, lead by EM: - Field Representatives - Naval Reactors - NNSA - RW * Kick-off on August 3 (conference call) * Second conference call on Sept. 8 September 20, 2005 TEC/WG 3 Proposed Revision Timeline Proposed Revision Timeline Writing team completes new draft of Manual 1/06 Begin informal DOE review of revised Manual (field, GC, PSOs) 2/06 (3 weeks) Comment resolution by writing team complete, provide draft to internal management for review 3/06 (2 weeks) Draft Manual is provided to SRGs

15

1 INTRODUCTION Japanese standard Law was revised in 1998. The  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

a situation which does not comply with other requirements of the Building Standard Law, concerning fire safety, Ministry of Construction, Japan ABSTRACT: Japanese Building Standard Law was revised in 1998. The highlight1 INTRODUCTION Japanese standard Law was revised in 1998. The highlight related to the structural

Spencer Jr., B.F.

16

Notice of Intent to Revise DOE O 457.1, Nuclear Counterterrorism  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

Intent is to revise DOE O 457.1 and include the content of DOE M 457.1-1 as appendices to the revised order.

2013-02-07T23:59:59.000Z

17

EIS-0288-S1: Revision to EPA Notice of Availability Draft Supplemental...  

Energy Savers [EERE]

288-S1: Revision to EPA Notice of Availability Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0288-S1: Revision to EPA Notice of Availability Draft Supplemental...

18

Revised 1/17/2013 ________________________ __ Environment, Health, & Safety _____ _ __________  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Revised 1/17/2013 ________________________ __ Environment, Health, & Safety _____ _ __________ Training Program EHS 278 ~ Ladder Safety Course Syllabus Subject Category: Occupational Safety Course and set up ladders in order to perform work at LBNL. Course Objectives: After successful completion

Eisen, Michael

19

Revision of DOE Manual 460.2-1  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

6 6 TEC/WG 1 Revision of DOE M 460.2-1, Radioactive Material Transportation Practices Manual Revision of DOE M 460.2-1, Radioactive Material Transportation Practices Manual DOE Writing Team March 2006 TEC/WG 2 Proposed Revision Timeline Proposed Revision Timeline Complete new draft of Manual 2/06 Draft Manual provided to Manual Review Topic Group for review & comment 3/14/06 Comments due from Topic Group 5/01/06 Final draft Manual 7/06 Comment resolution (thru conference calls with Topic Group, as needed) 6/06 March 2006 TEC/WG 3 Proposed Timeline (contd.) Proposed Timeline (contd.) Manual is submitted into the formal Directives process 9/06 Manual reissued 12/06 March 2006 TEC/WG 4 Major Changes Made to the Manual Major Changes Made to the Manual * Clarification/update of information relative

20

Revision to DOE Order 435.1 | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Program Management » Compliance » Revision to DOE Program Management » Compliance » Revision to DOE Order 435.1 Revision to DOE Order 435.1 The Office of Environmental Management has primary responsibility, within DOE, for DOE Order 435.1, the self-regulation of radioactive waste management. As part of this responsibility, EM has decided to update the Order to incorporate several changes to the regulatory process that have taken place over the last decade as well as streamline the Order to improve management of the waste. A comprehensive complex-wide review of DOE radioactive waste management activities associated with implementation of the requirements of DOE Order 435.1, Radioactive Waste Management, was conducted in 2010 in order to gather feedback on the effectiveness of the DOE Order 435.1 requirements (not to assess compliance with the

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "1 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


21

Revised: 1/29/2013 Supplementary Information Report  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

, NMFS prepared the Environmental Assess- ment/Regulatory Impact Review/Initial Regulatory FlexibilityRevised: 1/29/2013 Supplementary Information Report for the 2013 Annual Deployment Plan foreign fleets to observing domestic fleets. The Observer Pro- gram provides the regulatory framework

22

Computer Engineering Undergraduate Handbook Revised: April 1, 2010  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Computer Engineering Undergraduate Handbook Revised: April 1, 2010 BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN COMPUTER ENGINEERING Computer Engineering Program College of Engineering & Computer Science California State University-278-5987 Fax: 657-278-5804 http://www.fullerton.edu/ecs/cpe #12;Computer Engineering Undergraduate Handbook

de Lijser, Peter

23

Revised 1/2010; 4/2013 HANDBOOK FOR FACULTY  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Fall 2008 Revised 1/2010; 4/2013 HANDBOOK FOR FACULTY DISABILITY SERVICES FOR STUDENTS Student accommodations ensures equal opportunities for success in mastery of course material; it does not mean of competency in course work; students with disabilities are no exception. The purpose of this handbook

Cui, Yan

24

(Revision : 1.10) A REPORT TO  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

forest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 5.5 Hill forest Vegetation Types 9 5.1 Submontane forest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 5.2 Upland forest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 5

Webb, Campbell O.

25

Online Load Balancing for Related Machines 1 (Revised Piotr Berman  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

s as follows: load(s; i) = 1 v i X s(j)=i p j ; Load(s) = max i load(s; i) It is easy to observe that findingOn­line Load Balancing for Related Machines 1 (Revised Version) Piotr Berman The Pennsylvania State of randomized algorithms for this problem. Key Words: on­line algorithm, load balancing, related machines

Karpinski, Marek

26

1992 Annual Capacity Report. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Standard Contract for Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and/or High-Level Radioactive Waste (10 CFR Part 961) requires the Department of Energy (DOE) to issue an Annual Capacity Report (ACR) for planning purposes. This report is the fifth in the series published by DOE. In May 1993, DOE published the 1992 Acceptance Priority Ranking (APR) that established the order in which DOE will allocate projected acceptance capacity. As required by the Standard Contract, the acceptance priority ranking is based on the date the spent nuclear fuel (SNF) was permanently discharged, with the owners of the oldest SNF, on an industry-wide basis, given the highest priority. The 1992 ACR applies the projected waste acceptance rates in Table 2.1 to the 1992 APR, resulting in individual allocations for the owners and generators of the SNF. These allocations are listed in detail in the Appendix, and summarized in Table 3.1. The projected waste acceptance rates for SNF presented in Table 2.1 are nominal and assume a site for a Monitored Retrievable Storage (MRS) facility will be obtained; the facility will initiate operations in 1998; and the statutory linkages between the MRS facility and the repository set forth in the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, as amended (NWPA), will be modified. During the first ten years following projected commencement of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System (CRWMS) operation, the total quantity of SNF that could be accepted is projected to be 8,200 metric tons of uranium (MTU). This is consistent with the storage capacity licensing conditions imposed on an MRS facility by the NWPA. The annual acceptance rates provide an approximation of the system throughput and are subject to change as the program progresses.

Not Available

1993-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

27

A:\1FRONT(REVISED).PDF  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Special "Thanks" are given to the many individuals who participated in the multi-disciplinary team from DOE Headquarters and Field Elements. They wrote the chapters or provided insight, input and information arising from their own experiences. It was their valuable expertise which formed the basis for this Reference Book. Sponsor: Richard H. Hopf, Director, Office of Procurement & Assistance Management Lead Office Director: Stephen J. Michelsen, Director, Office of Contract & Resource Management Team Lead: James Tower, Office of Contract & Resource Management Sounding Board Advisors: Donette Cappello, PC-1 Gwendolyn Cowan, MA-51 Leif Erickson, RL Linda Johnson, GC-61 John LaBarge, SC-7 Richard Mehl, FI-10 William C. Meyers, AL

28

International Energy: Subject Thesaurus. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The International Energy Agency: Subject Thesaurus contains the standard vocabulary of indexing terms (descriptors) developed and structured to build and maintain energy information databases. Involved in this cooperative task are (1) the technical staff of the USDOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) in cooperation with the member countries of the International Energy Agency`s Energy Technology Data Exchange (ETDE) and (2) the International Atomic Energy Agency`s International Nuclear Information System (INIS) staff representing the more than 100 countries and organizations that record and index information for the international nuclear information community. ETDE member countries are also members of INIS. Nuclear information prepared for INIS by ETDE member countries is included in the ETDE Energy Database, which contains the online equivalent of the printed INIS Atomindex. Indexing terminology is therefore cooperatively standardized for use in both information systems. This structured vocabulary reflects thscope of international energy research, development, and technological programs. The terminology of this thesaurus aids in subject searching on commercial systems, such as ``Energy Science & Technology`` by DIALOG Information Services, ``Energy`` by STN International and the ``ETDE Energy Database`` by SilverPlatter. It is also the thesaurus for the Integrated Technical Information System (ITIS) online databases of the US Department of Energy.

Not Available

1993-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

29

Supernate source term analysis: Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The HM Process (modified PUREX) has been used in the H-Canyon since 1959 to recover uranium and byproduct neptunium. The PUREX process has been used in the Separation facilities in F and H-Area. This report analyzes both the inhalation and ingestion radionuclide dose impact of the HM and PUREX process soluble portion of their waste streams. The spent fuel assemblies analyzed are the Mark 16B, Mar 22 for the HM process, and the Mark 31A, Mark 31B for the PUREX process. The results from this analysis are combined with an analysis of the current Safety Analysis Report SAR source term to evaluate source terms for HLW supernate. Analysis of fission yield data and SAR source term values demonstrates that a limited number of radionuclides contribute 1% or more to the total dose and that cesium and plutonium isotopes are the radionuclides with major impact in the supernate source term. This report analyses both volatile and evaporative impact as recommended by DOE guidance. In reality, the only radionuclide volatilized during evaporative conditions is tritium. No evidence of selective volatility occurs during forced evaporation in HLW. The results obtained permit reducing the list of radionuclides to be considered in the development of source terms to support the High Level Waste Safety Analysis Report.

Aponte, C.I.

1994-10-13T23:59:59.000Z

30

1. Revised Guide Chapter 70.4, Cooperative Audit Strategy:  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Revised Guide Chapter 70.4, Cooperative Audit Strategy: Revised Guide Chapter 70.4, Cooperative Audit Strategy: Establishes a requirement for the contractor to provide an Internal Audit Design for each 5-year period of a contract. The design is to consist of: (1) Organizational placement of the internal audit function to assure functional independence; (2) Size, experience, and educational requirements of audit staff; (3) Audit standards to be applied; (4) (5) (6) allo (7) a. Plan for internal audit function over 5-year period; Plan for audit of allowable costs; Use ofDCAA for supplementing audit of prime or subcontract wable costs; and Schedule for peer review. b. Provides detailed standards for the Annual Audit Plan. c. Provides detailed standards for the Annual Audit Report. 2.AL 2005-04, Class Deviation to Reflect Changes to the Cooperative Audit Strategy,

31

Seismic analyses of equipment in 2736-Z complex. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report documents the structural qualification for the existing equipment when subjected to seismic loading in the Plutonium Storage Complex. It replaces in entirety Revision 0 and reconciles the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) comments on Revision 0. The Complex consists of 2736-Z Building (plutonium storage vault), 2736-ZA Building (vault ventilation equipment building), and 2736-ZB Building (shipping/receiving, repackaging activities). The existing equipment structurally qualified in this report are the metal storage racks for 7 inch and lard cans in room 2 of Building 2736-Z; the cubicles, can holders and pedestals in rooms 1, 3, and 4 of Building 2736-Z; the ventilation duct including exhaust fans/motors, emergency diesel generator, and HEPA filter housing in Building 2736-ZA; the repackaging glovebox in Building 2736-ZB; and the interface duct between Buildings 2736-Z and 2736-ZA.

Ocoma, E.C.

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

32

Incentive Price Revision-Successive Targets UT-B Contracts Div Page 1 of 3  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Incentive Price Revision-Successive Targets UT-B Contracts Div Jan 2006 Page 1 of 3 incent-price-rev-suc-ext-utbx-jan06.doc INCENTIVE PRICE REVISION - SUCCESSIVE TARGETS (Jan 2006) (a) General. The supplies or services identified in the Agreement as item numbers ______ are subject to price revision in accordance

Pennycook, Steve

33

Incentive Price Revision Firm Target UT-B Contracts Div Page 1 of 2  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Incentive Price Revision ­ Firm Target UT-B Contracts Div Jan 2006 Page 1 of 2 incent-price-rev-firm-ext-utbx-jan06.doc INCENTIVE PRICE REVISION - FIRM TARGET (Jan 2006) (a) General. The supplies or services identified in the Agreement as item numbers __________ are subject to price revision in accordance

Pennycook, Steve

34

nees@UCLA Safety nees@UCLA Safety Handbook revision 04, 7/31/2012 1  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

nees@UCLA Safety Handbook #12;nees@UCLA Safety Handbook revision 04, 7/31/2012 1 Revision History contents & reaffirm (no changes) #12;nees@UCLA Safety Handbook revision 04, 7/31/2012 2 Management Commitment Statement Safety and health at nees@UCLA must be a part of every activity. Without question

Grether, Gregory

35

Approved and Issued By: Issue No: 1 Revision No: Date of Issue: 11.1.2010 Page No: 1  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

of Manual Details of contents Section Number Issue Number Revision Number Issue Date Pages Quality Systems HOLDERS Control Copy Number Holder Designation 1 Chairman, Computer Centre 2 Sr. Systems Engineer 3;------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approved and Issued By: Issue No: 1 Revision No: Date of Issue: 11.1.2010 Page No: 3 QUALITY SYSTEMS

Sivalingam, Krishna M.

36

Microsoft Word - CHAP02ESH _REVISED1_3.doc  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

-1 -1 CHAPTER 2 ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY AND HEALTH (revised September 25, 2003) WHAT ARE THE BASIC PRINCIPLES/OBJECTIVES OF THE DEPARTMENT'S ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY AND HEALTH (ES&H) PROGRAM? 1. Work is performed in a manner that protects workers, the public and the environment. 2. The Department holds contractors accountable for the safe performance of work. 3. ES&H functions and activities are an integral and visible part of contractors' business processes. WHY IS THE DEPARTMENT'S ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY AND HEALTH PROGRAM IMPORTANT? The Department has a responsibility to protect people, the environment, and property in the performance of the various missions under its contracts. Because of the sensitivity and potential liabilities associated

37

Clinical Psychology PhD Program; Student Manual, page 1 Date last revised: August 1, 2014  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Clinical Psychology PhD Program; Student Manual, page 1 Date last revised: August 1, 2014 Clinical Psychology Training at Syracuse University (Effective Fall Semester, 2014) The clinical faculty welcomes you of the Psychology Department The Psychology Department at Syracuse University (http://psychology.syr.edu) has

Doyle, Robert

38

PAGE 1 OF 1Revised 12/09/2013 Anticipated date of graduation Major Advisor's name  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

PAGE 1 OF 1Revised 12/09/2013 Anticipated date of graduation Major Advisor's name Department to your advisor. Once the form has been signed off by the advisor and department head, it should funding source to be used: Approvals: Advisor's name Advisor's signature Date Date Date Department head

Blei, Ron

39

Approved Site Treatment Plan, Volumes 1 and 2. Revision 4  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The US Department of Energy, Savannah River Operations Office (DOE-SR), has prepared the Site Treatment Plan (STP) for Savannah River Site (SRS) mixed wastes in accordance with RCRA Section 3021(b), and SCDHEC has approved the STP (except for certain offsite wastes) and issued an order enforcing the STP commitments in Volume 1. DOE-SR and SCDHEC agree that this STP fulfills the requirements contained in the FFCAct, RCRA Section 3021, and therefore, pursuant to Section 105(a) of the FFCAct (RCRA Section 3021(b)(5)), DOE`s requirements are to implement the plan for the development of treatment capacities and technologies pursuant to RCRA Section 3021. Emerging and new technologies not yet considered may be identified to manage waste more safely, effectively, and at lower cost than technologies currently identified in the plan. DOE will continue to evaluate and develop technologies that offer potential advantages in public acceptance, privatization, consolidation, risk abatement, performance, and life-cycle cost. Should technologies that offer such advantages be identified, DOE may request a revision/modification of the STP in accordance with the provisions of Consent Order 95-22-HW. The Compliance Plan Volume (Volume 1) identifies project activity schedule milestones for achieving compliance with Land Disposal Restrictions (LDR). Information regarding the technical evaluation of treatment options for SRS mixed wastes is contained in the Background Volume (Volume 2) and is provided for information.

Helmich, E.H.; Molen, G.; Noller, D.

1996-03-22T23:59:59.000Z

40

Revisions to the decay heat standard: ANSI/ANS 5.1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This paper presents a summary of the 2005 revision to ANSI/ANS-5.1, Decay Heat Power for Light Water Reactors. The 2005 revision to ANSI/ANS-5.1 [1] represented an important milestone for this Standard. The reconstitution of the working group, incorporation of ENDF/B-VI data, and revisions to the 'simplified method' are the most significant accomplishments realized in the approval and publication of this Standard. A discussion comparing the content of the 2005 revision to the previous version of the Standard [2] is provided. In addition, an outline of the current activities of the working group and goals for the next revision is presented. (authors)

Brady Raap, M. C. [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 902 Battelle Blvd., Richland, WA 99352 (United States); Gauld, I. C. [Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37832 (United States); Dickens, J. K. [Dept. of Physics, Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996 (United States); Wilson, W. B. [Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545 (United States)

2006-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "1 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


41

Notice of Intent to Revise DOE O 452.1D, Nuclear Explosive and Weapon Surety Program  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

NNSA is proposing revisions for the suite of directives in order to (1) revise requirements to improve NES processes and (2) align the directives with the requirements of DOE Order 251.1C, Departmental Directives Program.

2014-06-05T23:59:59.000Z

42

Revision No: 1.1 Review Date: July 2013  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

/Procedure/Guidelines 2.1 Password Policies · Access to all devices must be protected with a `strong' password, ie Protection Act 1998 or which is deemed by the University to be confidential must be protected by encryption

43

Notice of Intent to Revise DOE O 452.1D, Nuclear Explosive and...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

JM O 452.1D, Notice of Intent to Revise DOE O 452.1D, Nuclear Explosive and Weapon Surety Program by Angela Chambers Functional areas: Nuclear Explosive Safety, Safety and Security...

44

PHMC Year 2000 handbook. Revision 1, Volume 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

As the century advances from the 20th to the 21st, information systems (systems) dependent on date processing may fail. Date functions such as comparisons and calculations and use of coded numbers to direct program logic can cause a system to fail or produce erroneous results. Many systems used a two-digit date to minimize data storage, particularly older equipment and infrastructure items. Historically, systems used the values of ``00`` and ``99`` as indicators such as file headers, end of file markers, or control records. These systems will encounter problems as Fiscal Year 1999, January 1, 2000 and other dates occur. (See Appendix 3) The Project Hanford Management Contract (PHMC) work scope is supported by a multitude of information systems. Each system must be evaluated for Year 2000 compliance and the business risk identified for those found to be Year 2000 non-compliant. Because of the constraints on time, funding and resources to fix Year 2000 problems, the PHMC team approach focuses on those systems considered to be mission essential. Mission essential is defined as: any operational system, item of equipment, or component that processes date information requiring Year 2000 compliance whose failure results in (1) injury to personnel, (2) damage to property (public or private), or (3) delays in the performance of mission essential activities. Systems that are not Year 2000 compliant and are considered mission essential must be addressed first to ensure uninterrupted business operations of the PHMC team. Failure to identify and resolve mission essential systems could expose a member of the PHMC team to potential litigation.

Layfield, K.A.

1998-09-02T23:59:59.000Z

45

EFFECTS OF GAMMA IRRADIATION ON EPDM ELASTOMERS (REVISION 1)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Two formulations of EPDM elastomer, one substituting a UV stabilizer for the normal antioxidant in this polymer, and the other the normal formulation, were synthesized and samples of each were exposed to gamma irradiation in initially pure deuterium gas to compare their radiation stability. Stainless steel containers having rupture disks were designed for this task. After 130 MRad dose of cobalt-60 radiation in the SRNL Gamma Irradiation Facility, a significant amount of gas was created by radiolysis; however the composition indicated by mass spectroscopy indicated an unexpected increase in the total amount deuterium in both formulations. The irradiated samples retained their ductility in a bend test. No change of sample weight, dimensions, or density was observed. No change of the glass transition temperature as measured by dynamic mechanical analysis was observed, and most of the other dynamic mechanical properties remained unchanged. There appeared to be an increase in the storage modulus of the irradiated samples containing the UV stabilizer above the glass transition, which may indicate hardening of the material by radiation damage. Revision 1 adds a comparison with results of a study of tritium exposed EPDM. The amount of gas produced by the gamma irradiation was found to be equivalent to about 280 days exposure to initially pure tritium gas at one atmosphere. The glass transition temperature of the tritium exposed EPDM rose about 10 ?C. over 280 days, while no glass transition temperature change was observed for gamma irradiated EPDM. This means that gamma irradiation in deuterium cannot be used as a surrogate for tritium exposure.

Clark, E.

2013-09-13T23:59:59.000Z

46

PHMC Year 2000 handbook. Revision 3, Volume 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The executive overview is intended to provide an understanding of the primary drivers imposed on the PHMC team to achieve compliance with the Year 2000 problems, the process to achieve compliance and the major responsibilities. Revision 3 contains additions for infrastructure and equipment status reporting guidelines.

Layfield, K.A.

1998-09-02T23:59:59.000Z

47

Procedures for Preparing the Research Project Proposal (Revised: March 5, 2010) 1 PROCEDURES FOR A PROJECT  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Procedures for Preparing the Research Project Proposal (Revised: March 5, 2010) 1 PROCEDURES FOR A PROJECT: for the Master of Science in Human-Computer Interaction, IN 46202 Indiana University - Purdue University, Indianapolis (IUPUI) #12;Procedures for Preparing

Zhou, Yaoqi

48

Transfer Guide: Philosophy: General Philosophy Concentration Revised: 1 December 2009 TRANSFER GUIDE AND PLANNING WORKSHEET  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Transfer Guide: Philosophy: General Philosophy Concentration Revised: 1 December 2009 TRANSFER Degree ­ Philosophy general philosophy concentration This planning worksheet represents a guide for community college students transferring to Colorado State University and majoring in Philosophy: general

49

Acquisition Letter 2015-02 - Revision of DOE O 350.1 and Special...  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

(DOE) Order 350.1 and Special H Clause SUMMARY: The purpose of Acquisition Letter (AL) 2015-02 is to communicate the revisions to Chapter VII, Risk Management and Insurance...

50

Guidance document for revision of DOE Order 5820.2A, Radioactive Waste Technical Support Program. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document provides guidance for the revision of DOE Order 5820.2A, ``Radioactive Waste Management.`` Technical Working Groups have been established and are responsible for writing the revised order. The Technical Working Groups will use this document as a reference for polices and procedures that have been established for the revision process. The overall intent of this guidance is to outline how the order will be revised and how the revision process will be managed. In addition, this document outlines technical issues considered for inclusion by a Department of Energy Steering Committee.

Kudera, D.E.; McMurtrey, C.D.; Meagher, B.G.

1993-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

51

Number: SMF 9.1 Revision: 2 Effective Date: 1 Feb 13 Page 1 of 2 OSU SHIP OPERATIONS  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Number: SMF 9.1 Revision: 2 Effective Date: 1 Feb 13 Page 1 of 2 OSU SHIP OPERATIONS OBSERVATION Effective Date: 1 Feb 13 Page 2 of 2 6 Department Head's Review and Recommendations: Department Head Signature: Date: 7 Master's Review and Recommendations: Master Signature: Date: 8 Received by Ship

Kurapov, Alexander

52

Non-Power Reactor Operator Licensing Examiner Standards. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Non-Power Reactor Operator Licensing Examiner Standards provide policy and guidance to NRC examiners and establish the procedures and practices for examining and licensing of applicants for NRC operator licenses pursuant to Part 55 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR 55). They are intended to assist NRC examiners and facility licensees to understand the examination process better and to provide for equitable and consistent administration of examinations to all applicants by NRC examiners. These standards are not a substitute for the operator licensing regulations and are subject to revision or other internal operator examination licensing policy changes. As appropriate, these standards will be revised periodically to accommodate comments and reflect new information or experience.

NONE

1995-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

53

Proposed Revision of the Decay Heat Standard ANSI/ANS-5.1-2005  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The ANSI/ANS-5.1 [1] standard on decay heat in light water reactors is one of the most widely used standards for reactor design and safety analysis. The standard was last revised and issued in 2005. The 2005 revision included several important accomplishments, including incorporation of ENDF/B-VI nuclear data in the development of correction factors implemented in the standard, and revisions to the 'simplified method.' The status of the 2005 ANS-5.1 standard has been summarized previously [2]. Future revisions of the standard under consideration, as proposed by the working group, were to (a) improve the neutron capture effect specification, (b) include contributions from actinides not already addressed by the standard, and (c) specify values for the total recoverable decay energy Q for major fissionable elements. These items are carried over from recommendations by Dickens et al. [3] during development of the 1994 revision. The current working group has also identified the representation of decay heat uncertainties as an area for improvement. This paper discusses recent development activities to further improve and extend the utility of the ANS-5.1 decay heat standard. These developments are in progress, and this paper summarizes the status of the activities. The proposed revisions discussed in this paper are being considered by the working group for adoption in the next publication of the standard.

Gauld, Ian C [ORNL] [ORNL; Rapp, Michelle Brady [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL)] [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL); Schmittroth, F. [Oak Ridge National Laboratory (Retired)] [Oak Ridge National Laboratory (Retired); Wilson, W. [Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL)] [Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL)

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

54

COMSOL MULTIPHYSICS MODEL FOR DWPF CANISTER FILLING, REVISION 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This revision is an extension of the COMSOL Multiphysics model previously developed and documented to simulate the temperatures of the glass during pouring a Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) canister. In that report the COMSOL Multiphysics model used a lumped heat loss term derived from experimental thermocouple data based on a nominal pour rate of 228 lbs./hr. As such, the model developed using the lumped heat loss term had limited application without additional experimental data. Therefore, the COMSOL Multiphysics model was modified to simulate glass pouring and subsequent heat input which, replaced the heat loss term in the initial model. This new model allowed for changes in flow geometry based on pour rate as well as the ability to increase and decrease flow and stop and restart flow to simulate varying process conditions. A revised COMSOL Multiphysics model was developed to predict temperatures of the glass within DWPF canisters during filling and cooldown. The model simulations and experimental data were in good agreement. The largest temperature deviations were {approx} 40 C for the 87 inch thermocouple location at 3000 minutes and during the initial cool down at the 51 inch location occurring at approximately 600 minutes. Additionally, the model described in this report predicts the general temperature trends during filling and cooling as observed experimentally. The revised model incorporates a heat flow region corresponding to the glass pouring down the centerline of the canister. The geometry of this region is dependent on the flow rate of the glass and can therefore be used to see temperature variations for various pour rates. The equations used for this model were developed by comparing simulation output to experimental data from a single pour rate. Use of the model will predict temperature profiles for other pour rates but the accuracy of the simulations is unknown due to only a single flow rate comparison.

Kesterson, M.

2011-09-08T23:59:59.000Z

55

AutoCAD discipline layering convention. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document is a user`s guide to establishing layering standards for drawing development. Uniform layering standards are established to exchange of AutoCAD datasets between organizations and companies. Consistency in the layering conventions assists the user through logical separation and identification of drawing data. This allows the user to view and plot related aspects of a drawing separately or in combination. The use of color and Linetype by layer is the preferred layering convention method, however to accommodate specific needs, colors and linetypes can also be assigned on an entity basis. New drawing setup files (also identified in AutoCAD documentation as Prototype drawings) use this layering convention to establish discipline drawing layers that are routinely used. Additions, deletions or revisions to the layering conventions are encourage.

Nielsen, B.L.

1995-05-17T23:59:59.000Z

56

US Department of Energy radiological control manual. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This manual establishes practices for the conduct of Department of Energy radiological control activities. The Manual states DOE`s positions and views on the best courses of action currently available in the area of radiological controls. Accordingly, the provisions in the Manual should be viewed by contractors as an acceptable technique, method or solution for fulfilling their duties and responsibilities. This Manual shall be used by DOE in evaluating the performance of its contractors. This Manual is not a substitute for Regulations; it is intended to be consistent with all relevant statutory and regulatory requirements and shall be revised whenever necessary to ensure such consistency. Some of the Manual provisions, however, challenge the user to go well beyond minimum requirements. Following the course of action delineated in the Manual will result in achieving and surpassing related statutory or regulatory requirements.

Not Available

1994-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

57

Nevada Test Site waste acceptance criteria [Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Revision one updates the requirements, terms, and conditions under which the Nevada Test Site (NTS) will accept low-level radioactive and mixed waste for disposal; and transuranic and transuranic mixed waste for interim storage at the NTS. Review each section of this document. This document is not intended to include all of the requirements; rather, it is meant as a guide toward meeting the regulations. All references in this document should be observed to avoid omission of requirements on which acceptance or rejection of waste will be based. The Department of Energy/Nevada Operations Office (DOE/NV) and support contractors are available to assist you in understanding or interpreting this document.

None

1997-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

58

PNNL-18845, Revision 1 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

200-BP-1 Prototype Hanford Barrier ­ 15 Years of Performance Monitoring AL Ward SO Link KE Draper RE/2003) #12;PNNL-18845, Revision 1 200-BP-1 Prototype Hanford Barrier ­ 15 Years of Performance Monitoring AL waste disposal site at the DOE Hanford Site. Monitoring has been almost continuous for the last 15 years

59

The New York Times' Framing of Involvement of the Russian Federation in Arms and Nuclear Trade with the Islamic Republic of Iran in 2009-2011  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

This study examines the mediated portrait of nuclear and arms trade between Russia and Iran in The New York Times in 2009-2011, applying framing theory as a tool. I used three frames, pre-defined in earlier studies: attribution of responsibility...

Bagiev, Artem

2012-05-31T23:59:59.000Z

60

Acquisition Letter 2015-02- Revision of DOE O 350.1 and Special H Clause  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Acquisition Letter 2015-02 - Revision of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 350.1 and Special H Clause The purpose of Acquisition Letter (AL) 2015-02 is to communicate the revisions to Chapter VII, Risk Management and Insurance Programs of DOE Order 350.1, Contractor Human Resource Management Programs (approved on September 30, 2014), and require Contracting Officers to modify applicable contracts no later than January 31, 2015, to include the new STRIPES Special H clause which contains requirements formerly included in the Contractor Requirements Document (CRD) of Chapter VII.

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "1 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


61

Faculty Travel Grant Program Terms Revised: LS 11-06-12 Page 1  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Faculty Travel Grant Program Terms Revised: LS 11-06-12 Page 1 Office of Research Services Phone: (250) 807 9412 UBC Okanagan Campus Internal Grants Program Terms FACULTY TRAVEL GRANT Value: Up to $1 the deadline will be moved to 4 pm of the first working day that follows. Faculty Travel Grant Details Purpose

Michelson, David G.

62

Faculty Travel Grant Program Terms Revised: AW 09-18-13 Page 1  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Faculty Travel Grant Program Terms Revised: AW 09-18-13 Page 1 Office of Research Services Phone: (250) 807 9412 UBC Okanagan Campus Internal Grants Program Terms FACULTY TRAVEL GRANT Value: Up to $1 the deadline will be moved to 4 pm of the first working day that follows. Faculty Travel Grant Details Purpose

Handy, Todd C.

63

Transuranic waste characterization sampling and analysis methods manual. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Methods Manual provides a unified source of information on the sampling and analytical techniques that enable Department of Energy (DOE) facilities to comply with the requirements established in the current revision of the Transuranic Waste Characterization Quality Assurance Program Plan (QAPP) for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Transuranic (TRU) Waste Characterization Program (the Program) and the WIPP Waste Analysis Plan. This Methods Manual includes all of the testing, sampling, and analytical methodologies accepted by DOE for use in implementing the Program requirements specified in the QAPP and the WIPP Waste Analysis Plan. The procedures in this Methods Manual are comprehensive and detailed and are designed to provide the necessary guidance for the preparation of site-specific procedures. With some analytical methods, such as Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry, the Methods Manual procedures may be used directly. With other methods, such as nondestructive characterization, the Methods Manual provides guidance rather than a step-by-step procedure. Sites must meet all of the specified quality control requirements of the applicable procedure. Each DOE site must document the details of the procedures it will use and demonstrate the efficacy of such procedures to the Manager, National TRU Program Waste Characterization, during Waste Characterization and Certification audits.

Suermann, J.F.

1996-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

64

Hanford Facility dangerous waste permit application, general information. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The current Hanford Facility Dangerous Waste Permit Application is considered to be a single application organized into a General Information Portion (this document, number DOE/RL-91-28) and a treatment, storage, and/or disposal Unit-Specific Portion, which includes documentation for individual TSD units (e.g., document numbers DOE/RL-89-03 and DOE/RL-90-01). Both portions consist of a Part A division and a Part B division. The Part B division consists of 15 chapters that address the content of the Part B checklists prepared by the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology 1987) and the US Environmental Protection Agency (40 Code of Federal Regulations 270), with additional information requirements mandated by the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 and revisions of Washington Administrative Code 173-303. For ease of reference, the Washington State Department of Ecology checklist section numbers, in brackets, follow the chapter headings and subheadings. Documentation contained in the General Information Portion (i.e., this document, number DOE/RL-91-28) is broader in nature and applies to all treatment, storage, and/or disposal units for which final status is sought. Because of its broad nature, the Part A division of the General Information Portion references the Hanford Facility Dangerous Waste Part A Permit Application (document number DOE/RL-88-21), a compilation of all Part A documentation for the Hanford Facility.

Not Available

1993-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

65

PSA Vol 1 Tables Revised Ver 2 Print.xls  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

0 1 0 0 0 0 El Salvador 0 0 0 0 0 64 64 Finland 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 France 266 0 27 0 0 2 2 Germany 0 0 1 0 1 5 6 Ghana 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Gibraltar 0 0 0 0 0 304 304 Greece 0 0 2 0 0 1 1...

66

DRAFT REVISION  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Summary of Changes To Procedure 200.1-5 Records Disaster Prevention, Mitigation, and Recovery Procedure Revised Version Issued as P 200.1-5B LM Procedure 200.1-5, Records Disaster Prevention, Mitigation, and Recovery Procedure of 1/19/07, has undergone revisions. The procedure has been revised to reflect changes in definitions and formatting and updates to the attached Plan. Please replace LM Procedure 200.1-5A with LM Procedure 200.1-5B. The most recent and official controlled hard copy version of this document resides with LM's Directives Coordinator. An electronic version of the controlled document has been placed on the LM Intranet for employee use. Printed hard copies of this electronic version are considered uncontrolled documents.

67

DRAFT REVISION  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

4-1 4-1 Records Management Self-Assessment Revised Version Issued as P200.4-1B LM Procedure 200.4-1, Records Management Self-Assessment of 4/17/07, has undergone minor revisions. The procedure has been revised to reflect changes in definitions and formatting. Please replace LM Procedure 200.4-1A with LM Procedure 200.4-1B. The most recent and official controlled hard copy version of this document resides with LM's Directives Coordinator. An electronic version of the controlled document has been placed on the LM Intranet for employee use. Printed hard copies of this electronic version are considered uncontrolled documents. INITIATED BY: Office of Business Operations NO. OF PAGES/ATTACHMENTS: 8 pages, 2 attachments U.S. Department of Energy

68

UAH Cost Sharing Policy _ revised August 2013 Page 1 COST SHARING ON SPONSORED PROGRAMS  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

UAH Cost Sharing Policy _ revised August 2013 Page 1 COST SHARING ON SPONSORED PROGRAMS Note: This policy supersedes all existing policy governing cost sharing on sponsored programs unless otherwise stated herein. Policy Statement The University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH) engages in cost sharing

Fork, Richard

69

SJSU HR: revised 01/13/12 Page 1 of 2 TEMPORARY SUPPORT REQUEST  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

SJSU HR: revised 01/13/12 Page 1 of 2 TEMPORARY SUPPORT REQUEST HUMAN RESOURCES Workforce Planning FOR TEMPORARY SUPPORT Complete and submit this form to Workforce Planning (WFP) at classcomp@sjsu.edu or 0046 consultation with Workforce Planning. GENERAL INFORMATION University Division: Academic Affairs Administration

Eirinaki, Magdalini

70

Available Balance Report Revised 12/2008 Page 1 Available Balance Report  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Available Balance Report ­ Revised 12/2008 Page 1 Available Balance Report The "Available Balance Report" shows total Budget, Encumbrance, Expense, and Available Balance detailed by Budgetary Account of the resources they have available as of a point in time. This report is also used by the Budget Office

Weston, Ken

71

Page 1 of 4 Revised 7/11 Certification of Health Care Provider  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Page 1 of 4 Revised 7/11 Certification of Health Care Provider (Family and Medical Leave Act is meant by a "serious health condition" under the Family and Medical Leave Act. Does the patient school or to perform other daily activities due to the serious health condition, treatment therefore

Meyers, Steven D.

72

Individual Research Grant Eligible Expenses Revised: DA 02-16-12 Page 1  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

and furniture, computers, phone lines, internet connections, etc.). Internal Research Grant Funds may onlyIndividual Research Grant Eligible Expenses Revised: DA 02-16-12 Page 1 Office of Research Services Phone: (250) 807 9412 UBC Okanagan Campus Internal Grants Eligible Expenses INDIVIDUAL RESEARCH GRANT

Michelson, David G.

73

ENERGY COMMITTEE ENERGY TALKING POINTS (ETP) SERIES Revision (or Issued): > 1 of 2  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

study by River Network "The Carbon Footprint of Water", 13% of U.S. energy consumption (521 million MWh), and providing primary fuels or generating electricity is also reliant on water. Herein is the "energyENERGY COMMITTEE ­ ENERGY TALKING POINTS (ETP) SERIES Revision (or Issued): > 1 of 2 ETP

74

Document last revised July 2010 1 Connecticut Environmental Conditions Online www.cteco.uconn.edu  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Document last revised July 2010 1 Connecticut Environmental Conditions Online ­ www (POSM) project. It does not include parcel data from towns located along the Connecticut coastline since July 2010 2 Connecticut Environmental Conditions Online ­ www.cteco.uconn.edu (the assessor's database

Holsinger, Kent

75

1 Revised: May 23, 2013 UC San Diego Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 Revised: May 23, 2013 UC San Diego Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Policies and Procedures £ Does not demonstrate honesty £ Does not contribute to an atmosphere conducive to learning £ Does not treat with respect people from diverse races, genders, religions, sexual orientations

Gleeson, Joseph G.

76

wastewater_sink_disposal_guidance.docx Revision Date: 10/26/2012 Page 1 of 3  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

wastewater_sink_disposal_guidance.docx Revision Date: 10/26/2012 Page 1 of 3 LABORATORY & BUILDING limitations and prohibitions established by the local wastewater treatment authority, the Massachusetts Water for wastewater disposal purposes is strictly prohibited. Hazardous Wastes: Hazardous wastes are prohibited from

Heller, Eric

77

Notice of Intent to Revise DOE O 200.1A, Information Technology Management--Withdrawn  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

Withdrawn 3-24-14. Although DOE O 200.1A was revised in December 2008, there have been significant changes in IT governance processes and Departmental use of new technologies such as Web 2.0 technologies since that time.

2011-12-15T23:59:59.000Z

78

PSA Vol 1 Tables Revised Ver 2 Print.xls  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

0 0 0 3 0 2 2 Finland 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 France -1 0 1 16 2 13 15 Gabon 127 0 0 0 0 0 0 Germany 0 0 0 40 0 12 12 Guatemala 11 0 -2 0 0 -1 -1 Honduras 0 0 -1 0 0 -3 -3 India 0 0 0 8...

79

DRAFT REVISION  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Summary of Changes Summary of Changes to Procedure 243.1 Records Inventory Revised Version Issued as P 243.1B LM Procedure 243.1A, Records Inventory of 7/18/07, has undergone minor revisions. The procedure has been revised to reflect changes in definitions and formatting and to ensure the references cited and associated forms remain current. Please replace LM Procedure 243.1A with LM Procedure 243.1B. The most recent and official controlled hard copy version of this document resides with LM's Directives Coordinator. An electronic version of the controlled document has been placed on the LM Intranet for employee use. Printed hard copies of this electronic version are considered uncontrolled documents. INITIATED BY: Office of Business Operations NO. OF PAGES/ATTACHMENTS: 9 pages, 3 attachments

80

PSA Vol 1 Tables Revised Ver 2 Print.xls  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Plus 33 - 1 25 - 0 48 4 7 Liquefied Petroleum Gases 265 105 109 22 - -4 70 9 426 EthaneEthylene 116 0 1 -55 - -3 0 0 64 PropanePropylene 100 108 90 52 - -1 0 1 350 Normal...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "1 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


81

PSA Vol 1 Tables Revised Ver 2 Print.xls  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

Petroleum Gases 5,202 15,123 23,191 36,994 - -1,344 1,693 1,039 79,122 5,357 EthaneEthylene 148 107 0 0 - 0 0 0 255 0 PropanePropylene 3,359 17,172 20,262 36,150 - -1,318 0...

82

PSA Vol 1 Tables Revised Ver 2 Print.xls  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Oxygenates 29,966 1,285 31,251 26,396 9,648 5,726 41,770 Other HydrocarbonsHydrogen 0 0 0 1,077 678 587 2,342 Oxygenates 29,966 1,285 31,251 25,319 8,970 5,139 39,428...

83

PSA Vol 1 Tables Revised Ver 2 Print.xls  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Plus 30 - 1 -17 - 0 6 1 6 Liquefied Petroleum Gases 172 4 9 -141 - 0 9 1 34 EthaneEthylene 82 0 0 -76 - 0 0 0 6 PropanePropylene 57 8 7 -39 - 0 0 0 33 Normal Butane...

84

PSA Vol 1 Tables Revised Ver 2 Print.xls  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

266 - 47 - 2 188 7 116 Liquefied Petroleum Gases 1,451 573 328 - 15 253 53 2,030 EthaneEthylene 649 20 1 - 10 0 0 660 PropanePropylene 499 540 233 - 6 0 37 1,229 Normal Butane...

85

Beaver Monitoring Protocol for Forest Service Region 2 Revised May 2008 1 USDA FOREST SERVICE REGION 2  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

HILLS NATIONAL FORESTS (Photo from Nature of New England Website ­ http Black Hills National Forest, USDA Forest Service, Custer, SD Revised May 2008 #12;Beaver MonitoringBeaver Monitoring Protocol for Forest Service Region 2 ­ Revised May 2008 1 USDA FOREST SERVICE

Beck, Jeffrey L.

86

The mixed waste management facility. Project baseline revision 1.2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Revision 1.2 to the Project Baseline (PB) for the Mixed Waste Management Facility (MWMF) is in response to DOE directives and verbal guidance to (1) Collocate the Decontamination and Waste Treatment Facility (DWTF) and MWMF into a single complex, integrate certain and overlapping functions as a cost-saving measure; (2) Meet certain fiscal year (FY) new-BA funding objectives ($15.3M in FY95) with lower and roughly balanced funding for out years; (3) Reduce Total Project Cost (TPC) for the MWMF Project; (4) Include costs for all appropriate permitting activities in the project TPC. This baseline revision also incorporates revisions in the technical baseline design for Molten Salt Oxidation (MSO) and Mediated Electrochemical Oxidation (MEO). Changes in the WBS dictionary that are necessary as a result of this rebaseline, as well as minor title changes, at WBS Level 3 or above (DOE control level) are approved as a separate document. For completeness, the WBS dictionary that reflects these changes is contained in Appendix B. The PB, with revisions as described in this document, were also the basis for the FY97 Validation Process, presented to DOE and their reviewers on March 21-22, 1995. Appendix C lists information related to prior revisions to the PB. Several key changes relate to the integration of functions and sharing of facilities between the portion of the DWTF that will house the MWMF and those portions that are used by the Hazardous Waste Management (HWM) Division at LLNL. This collocation has been directed by DOE as a cost-saving measure and has been implemented in a manner that maintains separate operational elements from a safety and permitting viewpoint. Appendix D provides background information on the decision and implications of collocating the two facilities.

Streit, R.D.; Throop, A.L.

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

87

PSA Vol 1 Tables Revised Ver 2 Print.xls  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

0 41 41 Colombia 4,578 0 0 662 0 0 0 Ecuador 68,516 0 0 0 0 0 0 Finland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Germany 0 0 0 198 0 0 0 Japan 0 0 0 176 0 209 209 Korea, South 0 0 41 0 0 1,444 1,444...

88

PSA Vol 1 Tables Revised Ver 2 Print.xls  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Stocks of Crude Oil and Petroleum Products by PAD District, 2005 (Thousand Barrels) 1 2 3 4 5 U.S. Total Crude Oil 15,019 69,501 856,883 14,054 52,791 1,008,248 Refinery 14,213...

89

PSA Vol 1 Tables Revised Ver 2 Print.xls  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

141 PAD District 5 572,765 1,569 Alaska a 315,420 864 South Alaska 7,110 19 North Slope 308,311 845 Arizona 50 0 California a 230,294 631 Nevada 447 1 Federal Offshore PAD...

90

PSA Vol 1 Tables Revised Ver 2 Print.xls  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Plus 3 - 0 0 - 0 0 0 3 Liquefied Petroleum Gases 14 41 64 101 - -4 5 3 217 EthaneEthylene 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 1 PropanePropylene 9 47 56 99 - -4 0 1 214 Normal Butane...

91

PSA Vol 1 Tables Revised Ver 2 Print.xls  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

Liquefied Petroleum Gases 62,852 1,440 3,251 -51,618 - -58 3,410 185 12,388 1,382 EthaneEthylene 29,950 0 0 -27,892 - -9 0 0 2,067 323 PropanePropylene 20,635 2,967 2,659...

92

LLaannggeerrhhaannss LLaabb PPrroottooccoollss Live Fish Care Daily Checklist.docx revised 8/9/13 Page 1 of 1  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

LLaannggeerrhhaannss LLaabb PPrroottooccoollss Live Fish Care Daily Checklist.docx revised 8/9/13 Page 1 of 1 Live Fish Care Daily Checklist D. Clark Labs rooms G-06 & G-08 morning visit: Turn) eggs from fridge in room 382; feed the live fish there Feed hatched Artemia (=brine shrimp) to fry

Langerhans, Brian

93

LLaannggeerrhhaannss LLaabb PPrroottooccoollss Live Fish Photography Protocol.docx revised 10/1/13 by JW Page 1 of 2  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

LLaannggeerrhhaannss LLaabb PPrroottooccoollss Live Fish Photography Protocol.docx revised 10/1/13 by JW Page 1 of 2 Live Fish Photography Protocol Set up: Stand the white board used for preserved to the white board. Position camera so that fish area fills view. Make sure auto focus is on. Make camera

Langerhans, Brian

94

PSA Vol 1 Tables Revised Ver 2 Print.xls  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

Refinery and Blender Net Production of Finished Petroleum Products by PAD and Refining Districts, 2005 (Thousand Barrels) East Coast Appalachian No. 1 Total IN, IL, KY MN, WI, ND,...

95

PSA Vol 1 Tables Revised Ver 2 Print.xls  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Refinery Net Production of Finished Petroleum Products by PAD and Refining Districts, 2005 (Thousand Barrels) East Coast Appalachian No. 1 Total IN, IL, KY MN, WI, ND, SD OK, KS,...

96

PSA Vol 1 Tables Revised Ver 2 Print.xls  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

741 317 245 1,303 IsobutaneIsobutylene 206 7 213 155 55 184 394 Other HydrocarbonsHydrogenOxygenates 512 0 512 29 18 0 47 Other HydrocarbonsHydrogen 0 0 0 28 0 0 28...

97

PSA Vol 1 Tables Revised Ver 2 Print.xls  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

0 0 49 0 85 1,383 1,468 France 0 0 262 5,939 617 4,848 5,465 Gabon 46,515 0 0 0 0 0 0 Germany 0 0 0 14,420 72 4,481 4,553 Guatemala 3,885 0 0 0 0 0 0 India 0 0 0 2,998 98 693 791...

98

PSA Vol 1 Tables Revised Ver 2 Print.xls  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

0 0 0 0 85 1,108 1,193 France 0 0 0 772 617 4,848 5,465 Gabon 33,255 0 0 0 0 0 0 Germany 0 0 0 5,406 72 4,481 4,553 Guatemala 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 India 0 0 0 797 98 693 791 Italy 0...

99

Building a state on shifting sands: An evaluation of the Palestinian National Authority's policy reforms and performance in the West Bank, 2009-2011  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Building a state on shifting sands: An evaluation of the Palestinian National Authoritys policy reforms and performance in the West Bank, 2009-2011 By Kristine Knutter C2013 Submitted to the graduate degree program in Global... deteriorated. The international community, especially the United States (U.S.) and GoI, boycotted the election results and cut funding to the PA because the winning political party, Hamas, was designated as a terrorist organization in these countries. A...

Knutter, Kristine

2013-05-31T23:59:59.000Z

100

PSA Vol 1 Tables Revised Ver 2 Print.xls  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

0 11,522 53,162 0 0 25,617 63,952 Unfinished Oils 88 112 0 242 4,580 0 0 0 10,663 Motor Gasoline Blending Components 127 563 0 639 1,359 0 0 6,275 49,067 Reformulated 22 248 0 24...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "1 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


101

PSA Vol 1 Tables Revised Ver 2 Print.xls  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

0 0 0 1,445 0 0 9,418 Liquefied Petroleum Gases 75 70 11,522 53,162 0 23,315 63,847 Motor Gasoline Blending Components 105 0 615 0 0 3,467 43,510 Reformulated 0 0 0 0 0 3,223...

102

PSA Vol 1 Tables Revised Ver 2 Print.xls  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

Petroleum Gases 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,302 0 Unfinished Oils 88 112 0 242 4,580 0 0 0 Motor Gasoline Blending Components 22 563 0 24 1,359 0 2,808 623 Reformulated 22 248 0 24 0 0...

103

PSA Vol 1 Tables Revised Ver 2 Print.xls  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

424 2,395 7 Liquefied Petroleum Gases 1,039 3,426 8,005 185 6,684 19,338 53 EthaneEthylene 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PropanePropylene 206 544 7,332 12 5,589 13,683 37 Normal Butane...

104

PSA Vol 1 Tables Revised Ver 2 Print.xls  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Petroleum Gases 23,191 39,774 52,534 3,251 905 119,655 328 Ethane 0 22 16 0 0 38 0 Ethylene 0 193 0 0 0 193 1 Propane 17,562 30,489 28,519 2,659 672 79,901 219 Propylene 2,700...

105

PSA Vol 1 Tables Revised Ver 2 Print.xls  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

Pentanes Plus 37 - 0 0 - 0 28 1 8 Liquefied Petroleum Gases 40 68 2 0 - 0 39 18 53 EthaneEthylene 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 PropanePropylene 13 56 2 0 - 0 0 15 56 Normal ButaneButylene...

106

PSA Vol 1 Tables Revised Ver 2 Print.xls  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

95 Liquefied Petroleum Gases 14,528 24,908 905 0 - -17 14,218 6,684 19,456 3,094 EthaneEthylene 44 0 0 0 - -1 0 0 45 0 PropanePropylene 4,842 20,540 672 0 - 130 0 5,589 20,335...

107

PSA Vol 1 Tables Revised Ver 2 Print.xls  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

Petroleum Gases 96,786 38,214 39,774 8,116 - -1,564 25,650 3,426 155,378 28,105 EthaneEthylene 42,381 0 215 -20,104 - -929 0 0 23,421 2,622 PropanePropylene 36,474 39,477...

108

PSA Vol 1 Tables Revised Ver 2 Print.xls  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

- 45 -8 - 2 105 0 93 Liquefied Petroleum Gases 959 354 144 18 - 23 130 22 1,300 EthaneEthylene 450 20 0 131 - 12 0 0 589 PropanePropylene 320 321 78 -112 - 11 0 20 577 Normal...

109

Integrated thermal treatment system study -- Phase 2 results. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report presents the second phase of a study on thermal treatment technologies. The study consists of a systematic assessment of nineteen thermal treatment alternatives for the contact-handled mixed low-level waste (MLLW) currently stored in the US Department of Energy complex. The treatment alternatives consist of widely varying technologies for safely destroying the hazardous organic components, reducing the volume, and preparing for final disposal of the MLLW. The alternatives considered in Phase 2 were innovative thermal treatments with nine types of primary processing units. Other variations in the study examined the effect of combustion gas, air pollution control system design, and stabilization technology for the treatment residues. The Phase 1 study examined ten initial thermal treatment alternatives. The Phase 2 systems were evaluated in essentially the same manner as the Phase 1 systems. The alternatives evaluated were: rotary kiln, slagging kiln, plasma furnace, plasma gasification, molten salt oxidation, molten metal waste destruction, steam gasification, Joule-heated vitrification, thermal desorption and mediated electrochemical oxidation, and thermal desorption and supercritical water oxidation. The quantities, and physical and chemical compositions, of the input waste used in the Phase 2 systems differ from those in the Phase 1 systems, which were based on a preliminary waste input database developed at the onset of the Integrated Thermal Treatment System study. The inventory database used in the Phase 2 study incorporates the latest US Department of Energy information. All systems, both primary treatment systems and subsystem inputs, have now been evaluated using the same waste input (2,927 lb/hr). 28 refs., 88 figs., 41 tabs.

Feizollahi, F.; Quapp, W.J.

1996-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

110

TRAC-P validation test matrix. Revision 1.0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document briefly describes the elements of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission`s (NRC`s) software quality assurance program leading to software (code) qualification and identifies a test matrix for qualifying Transient Reactor Analysis Code (TRAC)-Pressurized Water Reactor Version (-P), or TRAC-P, to the NRC`s software quality assurance requirements. Code qualification is the outcome of several software life-cycle activities, specifically, (1) Requirements Definition, (2) Design, (3) Implementation, and (4) Qualification Testing. The major objective of this document is to define the TRAC-P Qualification Testing effort.

Hughes, E.D.; Boyack, B.E.

1997-09-05T23:59:59.000Z

111

Modeling requirements for in situ vitrification. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document outlines the requirements for the model being developed at the INEL which will provide analytical support for the ISV technology assessment program. The model includes representations of the electric potential field, thermal transport with melting, gas and particulate release, vapor migration, off-gas combustion and process chemistry. The modeling objectives are to (1) help determine the safety of the process by assessing the air and surrounding soil radionuclide and chemical pollution hazards, the nuclear criticality hazard, and the explosion and fire hazards, (2) help determine the suitability of the ISV process for stabilizing the buried wastes involved, and (3) help design laboratory and field tests and interpret results therefrom.

MacKinnon, R.J.; Mecham, D.C.; Hagrman, D.L.; Johnson, R.W.; Murray, P.E.; Slater, C.E.; Marwil, E.S.; Weaver, R.A.; Argyle, M.D.

1991-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

112

Nevada Test Site Radiation Protection Program - Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 835, 'Occupational Radiation Protection,' establishes radiation protection standards, limits, and program requirements for protecting individuals from ionizing radiation resulting from the conduct of U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) activities. 10 CFR 835.101(a) mandates that DOE activities be conducted in compliance with a documented Radiation Protection Program (RPP) as approved by DOE. This document promulgates the RPP for the Nevada Test Site (NTS), related (on-site or off-site) U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) operations, and environmental restoration off-site projects. This NTS RPP promulgates the radiation protection standards, limits, and program requirements for occupational exposure to ionizing radiation resulting from NNSA/NSO activities at the NTS and other operational areas as stated in 10 CFR 835.1(a). NNSA/NSO activities (including design, construction, operation, and decommissioning) within the scope of this RPP may result in occupational exposures to radiation or radioactive material. Therefore, a system of control is implemented through specific references to the site-specific NV/YMP RCM. This system of control is intended to ensure that the following criteria are met: (1) occupational exposures are maintained as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA), (2) DOE's limiting values are not exceeded, (3) employees are aware of and are prepared to cope with emergency conditions, and (4) employees are not inadvertently exposed to radiation or radioactive material.

Radiological Control Managers' Council

2008-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

113

EM Quaility Assurance Program (EM-QA-001 Revision 1)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EM-QA-001 EM-QA-001 Rev. 1 Issue Date 06/11/12 2 Project lifecycles including design, engineering, construction, commissioning, operation, and post-operation, e.g., surveillance and maintenance, deactivation, decommissioning, and environmental restoration. 3.0 APPLICABILITY The requirements contained within this document apply to EM HQ, EM Field/Project Offices, and EM contractors (including flow down to subcontractors, vendors, and suppliers) as applicable to the work being performed by each entity. Each organization will have an organizational-specific Quality Assurance Implementation Plan (QIP) describing how the applicable requirements of this QAP are implemented and/or passed down to lower- tier organizations. This requirement does not alter personnel (i.e., federal, contractor, or

114

PHMC Year 2000 handbook. Revision 0, Volume 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The PHMC Year 2000 Project approach is designed to ensure consistent and comprehensive implementation and reporting across the site. The emphasis of the project is on mission essential systems, prioritized to systems whose failure results in (1) injury to personnel, (2) damage to property (public or private), or (3) cessation, or delays in the performance of mission essential activities. These systems will be reported to DOE HQ and have the highest priority for resources. The same approach will be used on the remaining mission essential systems and these will be reported to DOE-RL. Non-mission essential systems can be addressed as determined by the owner. The scope of the PHMC Year 2000 Project encompasses applications, equipment, infrastructure, and external and internal interfaces and services.

Layfield, K.A.

1998-09-02T23:59:59.000Z

115

Plutonium Focus Area research and development plan. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Department of Energy (DOE) committed to a research and development program to support the technology needs for converting and stabilizing its nuclear materials for safe storage. The R and D Plan addresses five of the six material categories from the 94-1 Implementation Plan: plutonium (Pu) solutions, plutonium metals and oxides, plutonium residues, highly enriched uranium, and special isotopes. R and D efforts related to spent nuclear fuel (SNF) stabilization were specifically excluded from this plan. This updated plan has narrowed the focus to more effectively target specific problem areas by incorporating results form trade studies. Specifically, the trade studies involved salt; ash; sand, slag, and crucible (SS and C); combustibles; and scrub alloy. The plan anticipates possible disposition paths for nuclear materials and identifies resulting research requirements. These requirements may change as disposition paths become more certain. Thus, this plan represents a snapshot of the current progress and will continue to be updated on a regular basis. The paper discusses progress in safeguards and security, plutonium stabilization, special isotopes stabilization, highly-enriched uranium stabilization--MSRE remediation project, storage technologies, engineered systems, core technology, and proposed DOE/Russian technology exchange projects.

NONE

1996-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

116

International energy: Research organizations, 1988--1992. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This publication contains the standardized names of energy research organizations used in energy information databases. Involved in this cooperative task are (1) the technical staff of the US DOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) in cooperation with the member countries of the Energy Technology Data Exchange (ETDE) and (2) the International Nuclear Information System (INIS). ETDE member countries are also members of the International Nuclear Information System (INIS). Nuclear organization names recorded for INIS by these ETDE member countries are also included in the ETDE Energy Database. Therefore, these organization names are cooperatively standardized for use in both information systems. This publication identifies current organizations doing research in all energy fields, standardizes the format for recording these organization names in bibliographic citations, assigns a numeric code to facilitate data entry, and identifies report number prefixes assigned by these organizations. These research organization names may be used in searching the databases ``Energy Science & Technology`` on DIALOG and ``Energy`` on STN International. These organization names are also used in USDOE databases on the Integrated Technical Information System. Research organizations active in the past five years, as indicated by database records, were identified to form this publication. This directory includes approximately 31,000 organizations that reported energy-related literature from 1988 to 1992 and updates the DOE Energy Data Base: Corporate Author Entries.

Hendricks, P.; Jordan, S. [eds.] [USDOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information, Oak Ridge, TN (United States)

1993-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

117

The multiphoton ionization of uranium hexafluoride. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Multiphoton ionization (MPI) time-of-flight mass spectroscopy and photoelectron spectroscopy studies of UF{sub 6} have been conducted using focused light from the Nd:YAG laser fundamental ({lambda}=1064 nm) and its harmonics ({lambda}=532, 355, or 266 nm), as well as other wavelengths provided by a tunable dye laser. The MPI mass spectra are dominated by the singly and multiply charged uranium ions rather than by the UF{sub x}{sup +} fragment ions even at the lowest laser power densities at which signal could be detected. The laser power dependence of U{sup n+} ions signals indicates that saturation can occur for many of the steps required for their ionization. In general, the doubly-charged uranium ion (U{sup 2+}) intensity is much greater than that of the singly-charged uranium ion (U{sup +}). For the case of the tunable dye laser experiments, the U{sup n+} (n = 1- 4) wavelength dependence is relatively unstructured and does not show observable resonance enhancement at known atomic uranium excitation wavelengths. The dominance of the U{sup 2+} ion and the absence or very small intensities of UF{sub x}{sup +} fragments, along with the unsaturated wavelength dependence, indicate that mechanisms may exist other than ionization of bare U atoms after the stepwise photodissociation of F atoms from the parent molecule.

Armstrong, D.P. [Oak Ridge K-25 Site, TN (United States). UEO Enrichment Technical Operations Div.] [Oak Ridge K-25 Site, TN (United States). UEO Enrichment Technical Operations Div.

1992-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

118

Non-Salado flow and transport position paper. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The US Department of Energy (DOE) is preparing to request the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to certify compliance of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) with long-term requirements of the environmental Radiation Protection Standards for Management and Standards for Management and Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel, High-Level and Transuranic Waste (40 CFR Part 191). The DOE must also demonstrate compliance with the long-term requirements of the Land Disposal Restrictions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) (40 CFR Part 268.6). Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) has ben conducting iterative performance assessments (PAs) for the the WIPP to provide guidance to the project on the technical activities required to determine long-term performance of the WIPP disposal system. The most recent PA was conducted in 1992. The objectives of this paper are to: (1) Identify and describe the relationship between non-Salado hydrology and the array of scenarios that might be relevant to the long-term performance of the repository. (2) Identify and describe the array of conceptual and mechanistic models that are required to evaluate the scenarios for the purpose of compliance. (3) Identify and describe the data/information that are required to support the conceptual and mechanistic models.

Axness, C.; Beauheim, R.; Behl, Y. [and others

1994-12-15T23:59:59.000Z

119

Remedial action work plan for the Colonie site. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Colonie site is a DOE Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) site located in the Town of Colonie, New York, and consisting of an interim storage site and several vicinity properties. The Colonie Interim Storage Site (CISS) is the former National Lead (NL) Industries plant located at 1130 Central Avenue. There are 11 vicinity properties that received remedial action in 1984: 7 located south of the site on Yardboro and Palmer Avenues just across the Colonie-Albany town limits in Albany, and 4 located northwest of the site along Central Avenue in Colonie. Of these properties, nine are residences and two are commercial properties. This document describes the engineering design, construction, and associated plans for remedial action on the vicinity properties and the interim storage site. These plans include both radiological and chemical work. Radiological work includes: excavating the above-guideline radioactive wastes on the vicinity properties; designing required facilities for the interim storage site; preparing the interim storage site to receive these contaminated materials; transporting the contaminated materials to the interim waste storage stockpile; and preparing necessary schedules for accomplishing the remedial actions. Chemical work involves: developing the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) closure plans; neutralizing chemical hazards associated with plating solutions; inventorying on-site chemicals; and disposal of chemicals and/or residues. 17 refs., 5 figs., 1 tab.

Not Available

1985-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

120

222-S Laboratory Quality Assurance Plan. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Quality Assurance Plan provides,quality assurance (QA) guidance, regulatory QA requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 830.120), and quality control (QC) specifications for analytical service. This document follows the U.S Department of Energy (DOE) issued Hanford Analytical Services Quality Assurance Plan (HASQAP). In addition, this document meets the objectives of the Quality Assurance Program provided in the WHC-CM-4-2, Section 2.1. Quality assurance elements required in the Guidelines and Specifications for Preparing Quality Assurance Program Plans (QAMS-004) and Interim Guidelines and Specifications for Preparing Quality Assurance Project Plans (QAMS-005) from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are covered throughout this document. A quality assurance index is provided in the Appendix A. This document also provides and/or identifies the procedural information that governs laboratory operations. The personnel of the 222-S Laboratory and the Standards Laboratory including managers, analysts, QA/QC staff, auditors, and support staff shall use this document as guidance and instructions for their operational and quality assurance activities. Other organizations that conduct activities described in this document for the 222-S Laboratory shall follow this QA/QC document.

Meznarich, H.K.

1995-07-31T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "1 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


121

Operating System Concepts Silberschatz and Galvin 2004 revised by Wiseman1.1 http://www.bell-labs.com/topic/books/os-book/  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Operating System Concepts Silberschatz and Galvin 2004 revised by Wiseman1.1 )89 System Concepts Silberschatz and Galvin 2004 revised by Wiseman1.2 What is an Operating System convenient to use. ­ Use the computer hardware in an efficient manner. Operating System Concepts Silberschatz

Wiseman, Yair

122

Fiscal year 1998 Battelle performance evaluation agreement revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Fiscal Year 1998 represents the second full year utilizing a results-oriented, performance-based contract. This document describes the critical outcomes, objectives, performance indicators, expected levels of performance, and the basis for the evaluation of the Contractors performance for the period October 1, 1997 through September 30, 1998, as required by Articles entitled Use of Objective Standards of Performance, Self Assessment and Performance Evaluation and Critical Outcomes Review of the Contract DE-AC08-76RLO1830. In partnership with the Contractor and other key customers, the Department of Energy (DOE) Richland Operations Office has defined six critical outcomes that same as the core for the Contractors performance evaluation. The Contractor also utilizes these outcomes as a basis for overall management of the Laboratory. As stated above six critical outcomes have been established for FY 1998. These outcomes are based on the following needs identified by DOE-HQ, RL and other customers of the Laboratory. Our Energy Research customer desires relevant, quality and cost effective science. Our Environmental Management customer wants technology developed, demonstrated, and deployed to solve environmental cleanup issues. To ensure the diversification and viability of the Laboratory as a National asset, RL and HQ alike want to increase the Science and Technical contributions of PNNL related to its core capabilities. RL wants improved leadership/management, cost-effective operations, and maintenance of a work environment, which fosters innovative thinking and high morale. RL and HQ alike desire compliance with environment, safety and health (ES and H) standards and disciplined conduct of operations for protection of the worker, environment, and the public, As with all of Hanford, DOE expects contribution of the Laboratory to the economic development of the Tri-Cities community, and the region, to build a new local economy that is less reliant on the Hanford mission, as well as enhancing the status of the Laboratory as a valued corporate citizen of the Northwest Region. The Critical Outcome system focuses all of these customer desires into specific objectives and performance indicators, with supporting measures to track and foster continued improvement in meeting the needs (outcomes) of the Laboratory's customers.

DAVIS, T.L.

1998-10-22T23:59:59.000Z

123

revision:20090902 modified:20090903  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

871 revision:2009­09­02 modified:2009­09­03 A trichotomy of countable, stable, unsuperstable and DMS 0600940 and Israel Science Foundation Grant no. 242/03. Publica­ tion 871. 1 #12; 871 revision of formulas (see Definition 2.3). The origins of these 2 #12; 871 revision:2009­09­02 modified:2009

Shelah, Saharon

124

REVISED-FINAL-1ST-QUARTER-FY-2013-SCORECARD-09-05-13.xlsx  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

3-SCORECARD-09-05-13.xlsx 3-SCORECARD-09-05-13.xlsx Page 1 of 95 EA & PEA MILESTONES MET DURING QUARTER (10/2012 - 12/2012) / TOTAL QUARTER EA & PEA MILESTONES ON SCHEDULE EA & PEA MILESTONES NEXT FOUR QUARTERS (01/2013 - 12/2013) / TOTAL FOUR QUARTERS EA & PEA MILESTONES Argonne (ANL) GREEN N / A (0 / 0) N / A (0 / 0) N / A N / A N / A Brookhaven (BNL) GREEN GREEN (1 / 1) GREEN (0 / 0) N / A N / A N / A Carlsbad / Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (CBFO / WIPP) GREEN N / A (0 / 0) N / A (0 / 0) N / A N / A SA Completed Energy Technology Engineering Center (ETEC) GREEN GREEN (0 / 0) GREEN (0 / 0) N / A N / A EIS Idaho (INL) GREEN GREEN (2 / 2) GREEN (7 / 7) N / A PA Revision ROD Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) GREEN GREEN (0 / 0) GREEN (1 / 1) N / A N / A N / A Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL)

125

Knowledge and abilities catalog for nuclear power plant operators: Boiling water reactors, Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Knowledge and Abilities Catalog for Nuclear Power Plant Operators: Boiling-Water Reactors (BWRs) (NUREG-1123, Revision 1) provides the basis for the development of content-valid licensing examinations for reactor operators (ROs) and senior reactor operators (SROs). The examinations developed using the BWR Catalog along with the Operator Licensing Examiner Standards (NUREG-1021) and the Examiner`s Handbook for Developing Operator Licensing Written Examinations (NUREG/BR-0122), will cover the topics listed under Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 55 (10 CFR 55). The BWR Catalog contains approximately 7,000 knowledge and ability (K/A) statements for ROs and SROs at BWRs. The catalog is organized into six major sections: Organization of the Catalog, Generic Knowledge and Ability Statements, Plant Systems grouped by Safety Functions, Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions, Components, and Theory. Revision 1 to the BWR Catalog represents a modification in form and content of the original catalog. The K/As were linked to their applicable 10 CFR 55 item numbers. SRO level K/As were identified by 10 CFR 55.43 item numbers. The plant-wide generic and system generic K/As were combined in one section with approximately one hundred new K/As. Component Cooling Water and Instrument Air Systems were added to the Systems Section. Finally, High Containment Hydrogen Concentration and Plant Fire On Site evolutions added to the Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions section.

NONE

1995-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

126

Revision History  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Revision History Revision History Rev. 0, August 2012 Original submittal for milestone M3FT-12SN0804032 (Sandia programmatic and classification review) Rev. 1, September 2012 Corrected transposition errors in costing tables; recalculated stainless steel overpacks to be carbon steel; corrected various editorial problems. (SAND2012-7979P) Rev. 2, November 2012 Performed peer review and retitled. Submittal for milestone M2FT-13SN0804031 (formerly milestone M2FT- 12SN0804031) (SAND2012-9737P) Unclassified Unlimited Release Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000.

127

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 21:AUDIOVISUAL RECORDS (Revision...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

AUDIOVISUAL RECORDS (Revision 1) ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS SCHEDULE 21:AUDIOVISUAL RECORDS (Revision 1) This schedule covers audiovisual and related records created by or for...

128

Faculty Handbook -1. The Faculty Handbook Revisions approved by Faculty Senate on 1/20/2009 and by president and provost on 1/27/2009.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

the academic year, Faculty Handbook Committee does the following: monitors Faculty Senate actions that affectFaculty Handbook - 1. The Faculty Handbook Revisions approved by Faculty Senate on 1/20/2009 and by president and provost on 1/27/2009. The Faculty Handbook is the official statement of Iowa State University

Daniels, Thomas E.

129

Feasibility study of tank leakage mitigation using subsurface barriers. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document reflects the evaluations and analyses performed in response to Tri-Party Agreement Milestone M-45-07A - {open_quotes}Complete Evaluation of Subsurface Barrier Feasibility{close_quotes} (September 1994). In addition, this feasibility study was revised reflecting ongoing work supporting a pending decision by the DOE Richland Operations Office, the Washington State Department of Ecology, and the US Environmental Protection Agency regarding further development of subsurface barrier options for SSTs and whether to proceed with demonstration plans at the Hanford Site (Tri-Party Agreement Milestone M-45-07B). Analyses of 14 integrated SST tank farm remediation alternatives were conducted in response to the three stated objectives of Tri-Party Agreement Milestone M-45-07A. The alternatives include eight with subsurface barriers and six without. Technologies used in the alternatives include three types of tank waste retrieval, seven types of subsurface barriers, a method of stabilizing the void space of emptied tanks, two types of in situ soil flushing, one type of surface barrier, and a clean-closure method. A no-action alternative and a surface-barrier-only alternative were included as nonviable alternatives for comparison. All other alternatives were designed to result in closure of SST tank farms as landfills or in clean-closure. Revision 1 incorporates additional analyses of worker safety, large leak scenarios, and sensitivity to the leach rates of risk controlling constituents. The additional analyses were conducted to support TPA Milestone M-45-07B.

Treat, R.L.; Peters, B.B.; Cameron, R.J. [Enserch Environmental, Inc., Richland, WA (United States)] [and others

1995-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

130

Codes and standards and other guidance cited in regulatory documents. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

As part of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Standard Review Plan Update and Development Program, Pacific Northwest Laboratory developed a listing of industry consensus codes and standards and other government and industry guidance referred to in regulatory documents. In addition to updating previous information, Revision 1 adds citations from the NRC Inspection Manual and the Improved Standard Technical Specifications. This listing identifies the version of the code or standard cited in the regulatory document, the regulatory document, and the current version of the code or standard. It also provides a summary characterization of the nature of the citation. This listing was developed from electronic searches of the Code of Federal Regulations and the NRC`s Bulletins, Information Notices, Circulars, Generic Letters, Policy Statements, Regulatory Guides, and the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800).

Ankrum, A.; Nickolaus, J.; Vinther, R.; Maguire-Moffitt, N.; Hammer, J.; Sherfey, L.; Warner, R. [Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (United States)

1994-08-01T23:59:59.000Z

131

#2340 -$10.00 US Received August 25, 1997; Revised November 5, 1997 (C) 1997 OSA 10 November 1997 / Vol. 1, No. 10 / OPTICS EXPRESS 293  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

/ Vol. 1, No. 10 / OPTICS EXPRESS 293 #12;#2340 - $10.00 US Received August 25, 1997; Revised November 5, 1997 (C) 1997 OSA 10 November 1997 / Vol. 1, No. 10 / OPTICS EXPRESS 294 #12;#2340 - $10.00 US Received August 25, 1997; Revised November 5, 1997 (C) 1997 OSA 10 November 1997 / Vol. 1, No. 10 / OPTICS EXPRESS

Walsworth, Ronald L.

132

Miscellaneous States Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Miscellaneous States Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4...

133

UNBC HPC Policy last revised: 2/1/2007, 2:49:29 PM UNBC Enhanced High Performance Computing Center  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

UNBC HPC Policy last revised: 2/1/2007, 2:49:29 PM UNBC Enhanced High Performance Computing Center and contracts are sought by Principal Investigators. Membership Policies The UNBC Enhanced High Performance Computing Center (called " UNBC HPC" hereafter) provides computing resources and services to members

Northern British Columbia, University of

134

Latest revised date: October 26, 2011 Page 1 of 6 Prepared by: Department of Health & Safety S-009  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Latest revised date: October 26, 2011 Page 1 of 6 Prepared by: Department of Health & Safety S-009 Page 2 of 6 Prepared by: Department of Health & Safety S-009 Printed Copies of this Document with the Department of Health & Safety) the type of hand protection required for the specific hand hazard; Provide

deYoung, Brad

135

Page 1 of 2 Revised 11/17/09 Request for Alien Information for Employees and Fellows  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Page 1 of 2 Revised 11/17/09 Request for Alien Information for Employees and Fellows IMPORTANT - Request for Alien Information is used to obtain basic taxpayer information for aliens. Part 2 for Alien Information: Payee's U.S. Social Security Number or Individual Tax Identification Number

Suzuki, Masatsugu

136

Treatments for the Preservation of Seawater Samples Revision: 14 Mar 2014 Tucson Marine Phage Lab Page 1 of 5  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

04700 - Tube storage boxes Procedures: Pre-filter Seawater: This step is optional depending on samplingTreatments for the Preservation of Seawater Samples Revision: 14 Mar 2014 Tucson Marine Phage Lab Page 1 of 5 Treatments for the Preservation of Seawater Samples Tucson Marine Phage Lab Version: 6

Sullivan, Matthew B.

137

Notice of Intent to Revise Department of Energy Order 350.1, Contractor Human Resources Management Program  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

DOE O 350.1 establishes responsibilities, requirements, and cost allow-ability criteria for the management an oversight of contractor human resource management programs, is being revised to remove contractor requirements from Chapter IV, Compensation, Chapter V, Benefits, and Chapter VI Pensions

2012-10-19T23:59:59.000Z

138

309 Building fire protection analysis and justification for deactivation of sprinkler system. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Provide a `graded approach` fire evaluation in preparation for turnover to Environmental Restoration Contractor for D&D. Scope includes revising 309 Building book value and evaluating fire hazards, radiological and toxicological releases, and life safety issues.

Conner, R.P.

1997-06-25T23:59:59.000Z

139

Revised: 10.08.2012 Bb 9(SP13): Adding a Document p. 1 of 4 Adding a Syllabus  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Revised: 10.08.2012 Bb 9(SP13): Adding a Document p. 1 of 4 Adding a Syllabus Posting course(SP13): Adding a Document p. 2 of 4 3. Click Build Content and a drop down menu will appear. Under.08.2012 Bb 9(SP13): Adding a Document p. 3 of 4 2. The Link Title is an option and allows you rename the link

Qiu, Weigang

140

Y-12 Groundwater Protection Program Groundwater Monitoring Data Compendium, Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document is a compendium of water quality and hydrologic characterization data obtained through December 2005 from the network of groundwater monitoring wells and surface water sampling stations (including springs and building sumps) at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Y-12 National Security Complex (Y-12) in Oak Ridge, Tennessee that have been sampled since January 2003. The primary objectives of this document, hereafter referenced as the Y-12 Groundwater Protection Program (GWPP) Compendium, are to: (1) Serve as a single-source reference for monitoring data that meet the requirements of the Y-12 GWPP, as defined in the Y-12 GWPP Management Plan (BWXT Y-12 L.L.C. [BWXT] 2004); (2) Maintain a detailed analysis and evaluation of the monitoring data for each applicable well, spring, and surface water sampling station, with a focus on results for the primary inorganic, organic, and radiological contaminants in groundwater and surface water at Y-12; and (3) Ensure retention of ''institutional knowledge'' obtained over the long-term (>20-year) history of groundwater and surface water monitoring at Y-12 and the related sources of groundwater and surface water contamination. To achieve these goals, the Y-12 GWPP Compendium brings together salient hydrologic, geologic, geochemical, water-quality, and environmental compliance information that is otherwise disseminated throughout numerous technical documents and reports prepared in support of completed and ongoing environmental contamination assessment, remediation, and monitoring activities performed at Y-12. The following subsections provide background information regarding the overall scope and format of the Y-12 GWPP Compendium and the planned approach for distribution and revision (i.e., administration) of this ''living'' document.

None

2006-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "1 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


141

Criminal Background Check Request Form revised 08/13/2013 #404 Page 1 of 2  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

: Recruitment & Workforce Planning MS 1255 jobpath@tamu.edu Fax (979) 847-8877 NEED HELP? Recruitment & Workforce Planning Phone (979) 845-5154 jobpath@tamu.edu #12;Criminal Background Check Request Form revised-google-email-account.html It is important you read, understand and comply with following information: Recruitment and Workforce Planning

Boas, Harold P.

142

Addendum to Revision 1 of the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 98: Frenchman Flat, Nevada Test Site, Nevada (Addendum Revision No. 1)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document is submitted as an addendum to the Corrective Action Investigation Plan (CAIP) for Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 98: Frenchman Flat, Nevada Test Site (NTS), Nevada. The addendum was prepared to propose work activities in response to comments resulting from the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's) review of the draft Frenchman Flat CAU model of groundwater flow and contaminant transport completed in April 1999. The reviewers included an external panel of experts and the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection. As a result of the review, additional work scope, including new data-collection and modeling activities, has been identified for the Frenchman Flat CAU. The proposed work scope described in this addendum will be conducted in accordance with the revised Underground Test Area strategy contained in the December 2000 amendment to the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order. The Frenchman Flat CAU model is a group of interdependent models designed to predict the extent of contamination in groundwater due to the underground nuclear tests conducted within this CAU. At the time of the DOE review, the CAU model consisted of a CAU groundwater flow and transport model comprised of two major components: a groundwater flow model and a recharge model. The CAU groundwater flow model is supported by a hydrostratigraphic model and a recharge model, whereas the CAU transport model is supported by a source-term model. As part of the modeling activities proposed in this addendum, two new major components may be added to the Frenchman Flat CAU model: a total-system model and two local groundwater flow and transport models. The reviewers identified several issues relating to insufficiency of data and inadequacy of the modeling process that should be addressed to provide additional confidence in the modeling results with respect to the potential for contaminant migration to the Lower Carbonate Aquifer. The proposed additional work scope includes new data-collection activities, development and use of local-scale models of the two underground nuclear testing areas, and potential revisions of draft CAU groundwater flow and transport models. Upon completion of this work, an evaluation will be made by DOE to ensure that all issues have been resolved.

U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Operations Office

2001-06-06T23:59:59.000Z

143

Notice of Intent to Revise DOE G 226.1-2, Federal Line Management Oversight of Department of Energy Nuclear Facilities  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

This revision will incorporate new content devoted to Federal oversight and evaluation of effectiveness of activity-level work planning and control (WP&C) at Hazard Category 1, 2, and 3 nuclear facilities.

2013-04-04T23:59:59.000Z

144

Waste generation forecast for DOE-ORO`s Environmental Restoration OR-1 Project: FY 1995-FY 2002, September 1994 revision  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

A comprehensive waste-forecasting task was initiated in FY 1991 to provide a consistent, documented estimate of the volumes of waste expected to be generated as a result of U.S. Department of Energy-Oak Ridge Operations (DOE-ORO) Environmental Restoration (ER) OR-1 Project activities. Continual changes in the scope and schedules for remedial action (RA) and decontamination and decommissioning (D&D) activities have required that an integrated data base system be developed that can be easily revised to keep pace with changes and provide appropriate tabular and graphical output. The output can then be analyzed and used to drive planning assumptions for treatment, storage, and disposal (TSD) facilities. The results of this forecasting effort and a description of the data base developed to support it are provided herein. The initial waste-generation forecast results were compiled in November 1991. Since the initial forecast report, the forecast data have been revised annually. This report reflects revisions as of September 1994.

Not Available

1994-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

145

Savannah River Site mixed waste Proposed Site Treatment Plan (PSTP). Volumes 1 and 2 and reference document: Revision 2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The DOE is required by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act to prepare site treatment plans describing the development of treatment capacities and technologies for treating mixed waste. This proposed plan contains Savannah River Site`s preferred options and schedules for constructing new facilities, and otherwise obtaining treatment for mixed wastes. The proposed plan consists of 2 volumes. Volume 1, Compliance Plan, identifies the capacity to be developed and the schedules as required. Volume 2, Background, provides a detailed discussion of the preferred options with technical basis, plus a description of the specific waste streams. Chapters are: Introduction; Methodology; Mixed low level waste streams; Mixed transuranic waste; High level waste; Future generation of mixed waste streams; Storage; Process for evaluation of disposal issues in support of the site treatment plans discussions; Treatment facilities and treatment technologies; Offsite waste streams for which SRS treatment is the Preferred Option (Naval reactor wastes); Summary information; and Acronyms and glossary. This revision does not contain the complete revised report, but only those pages that have been revised.

Helmich, E.; Noller, D.K.; Wierzbicki, K.S.; Bailey, L.L.

1995-07-13T23:59:59.000Z

146

REVISION POLICY  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

REVISION POLICY REVISION POLICY March 2007 Data are collected at the million cubic feet per month level and all calculations mentioned below are carried out at that precision. However, the data published in the Form EIA-914 Monthly Gas Production Report are rounded to the nearest 0.01 billion cubic feet per day (roughly 300 million cubic feet per month). Monthly estimates of gross production published in the Natural Gas Monthly at the national level are rounded to billion cubic feet and those for marketed production at the State level are rounded to million cubic feet. The prior month's production estimate will always be revised each month, when the production estimate for the latest data month is released. For example, a June estimate would be revised when a July estimate is released.

147

Revision notice  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

All Natural Gas Reports U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves With Data for 2013 | Release Date: December 4, 2014 | Revision: December 19, 2014 Next Release Date: December...

148

Long-Term Surveillance Plan for the Burrell Vicinity Property, Blairsville, Pennsylvania, GJO-2002-331-TAR, MAC-LBUR 1.1, Revised April 2000  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Program Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Program Long-Term Surveillance Plan for the U.S. Department of Energy Burrell Vicinity Property Blairsville, Pennsylvania April 2000 Revised This document supersedes document number UMTRA-DOE/AL/62350-3F Ver.2, Rev.2 Prepared by U.S. Department of Energy Grand Junction Office Grand Junction, Colorado Work Performed Under DOE Contract Number DE-AC13-96GJ87335 Task Order Number MAC 00-06 Document Number S00350 DOE/Grand Junction Office LTSP for Burrell April 2000 Revision Page iii Contents 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Purpose ..................................................................................................................... 1-1

149

Feasibility study report for the 200-BP-1 operable unit. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This feasibility study (FS) examines a range of alternatives and provides recommendations for selecting a preferred altemative for remediating contamination at the 200-BP-1 operable unit. The 200-BP-1 operable unit is located in the center of the Hanford Site along the northern boundary of the 200 East Area. The 241-BY Tank Farm is located immediately to the south of the operable unit. 200-BP-1 is a source operable unit with contaminated soils associated primarily with nine inactive cribs (known as the 216-B cribs). These cribs were used for disposal of low-level radioactive liquid waste from U Plant uranium recovery operations, and waste storage tank condensate from the adjacent 241-BY Tank Farm. The cribs used for disposal of U Plant waste were in operation from 1955--1965, and the cribs used for disposal of tank condensate were in operation from 1965-1975. In addition to the cribs, four unplanned releases of radioactive materials have occurred within the operable unit. Contaminated surface soils associated with the unplanned releases have been consolidated over the cribs and covered with clean soil to reduce contaminant migration and exposure. Discharge of wastes to the cribs has resulted in soil and groundwater contamination. The groundwater is being addressed as part of the 200 East Aggregate Area groundwater operable unit. Contaminated soils at the site can be categorized by the types of contaminants, their distribution in the soil column, and the risk posed by the various potential exposure pathways. Below the clean soil cover, the near surface soils contain low-:levels of contamination with cesium-137, radium-226, strontium-90, thorium-228 and uranium. The lifetime incremental cancer risk associated with these soils if they were exposed at the surface is 9 {times} 10{sup 5}.

Not Available

1994-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

150

FY 93 thermal loading systems study final report: Volume 1. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The ability to meet the overall performance requirements for the proposed Mined Geology Disposal System at Yucca Mountain, Nevada requires the two major subsystem (natural barriers and engineered barriers) to positively contribute to containment and radionuclide isolation. In addition to the postclosure performance the proposed repository must meet preclosure requirements of safety, retrievability, and operability. Cost and schedule were also considered. The thermal loading strategy chosen may significantly affect both the postclosure and preclosure performance of the proposed repository. Although the current Site Characterization Plan reference case is 57 kilowatts (kW)/acre, other thermal loading strategies (different areal mass loadings) have been proposed which possess both advantages and disadvantages. The objectives of the FY 1993 Thermal Loading Study were to (1) place bounds on the thermal loading which would establish the loading regime that is ``too hot`` and the loading regime that is ``too cold``, to (2) ``grade`` or evaluate the performance, as a function of thermal loading, of the repository to contain high level wastes against performance criteria and to (3) evaluate the performance of the various options with respect to cost, safety, and operability. Additionally, the effort was to (4) identify important uncertainties that need to be resolved by tests and/or analyses in order to complete a performance assessment on the effects of thermal loading. The FY 1993 Thermal Loading Study was conducted from December 1, 1992 to December 30, 1993 and this final report provides the findings of the study. Volume 1 contains the Introduction; Performance requirements; Input and assumptions; Near-field thermal analysis; Far-field thermal analysis; Cost analysis; Other considerations; System analysis; Additional thermal analysis; and Conclusions and recommendations. 71 refs., 54 figs.

Saterlie, S.F.; Thomson, B.H.

1994-08-29T23:59:59.000Z

151

APS beamline standard components handbook, Version 1.3. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Handbook in its current version (1.3) contains descriptions, specifications, and preliminary engineering design drawings for many of the standard components. The design status and schedules have been provided wherever possible. In the near future, the APS plans to update engineering drawings of identified standard beamline components and complete the Handbook. The completed version of this Handbook will become available to both the CATs and potential vendors. Use of standard components should result in major cost reductions for CATs in the areas of beamline design and construction.

Hahn, U.; Shu, D.; Kuzay, T.M.

1993-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

152

Aqueous sample from B-Plant, Tank 9-1. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Eight liquid samples were received from B-Plant Tank 9-1 in four lots of two samples each, for inorganic and organic analysis. This is the final report for the sampling and analysis effort; included are summary tables of the analytical and quality control data as well as all raw data. The analyses include pH, OH, inductively coupled plasma spectrography, ion chromatograph, total organic carbon, total inorganic carbon, and differential scanning calorimetry. Included are copies of the chain of custody and request for special analysis forms.

Bell, K.E.

1995-05-18T23:59:59.000Z

153

Description of work for 200-UP-1 characterization of monitoring wells. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This description of work details the field activities associated with the drilling, soil sampling, and construction of groundwater monitoring and dual-use wells as part of the Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Work Plan for the 200-UP-1 Groundwater Operable Unit and will serve as a field guide for those performing the work. It will be used in conjunction with DOE-RE and Environmental Investigations and Site Characterization Manual. Groundwater wells are being constructed to characterize the vertical and horizontal extent of the Uranium and {sup 99}Tc plumes and to define aquifer properties such as hydraulic communication between aquifers and hydrostratigraphy. Some of these wells may be utilized for extraction purposes during the Interim Remedial Measures (IRM) phase anticipated at this operable unit and are being designed with a dual use in mind. These data will be used to optimize the IRM for the cleanup of these two plumes. The data will also be used with later Limited Field Investigation data to perform a Qualitative Risk Assessment for the operable unit. The locations for the proposed groundwater wells are presented. The contaminants of concern for the project are presented also.

Innis, B.E.; Kelty, G.G.

1994-03-31T23:59:59.000Z

154

DRAFT REVISION  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

-2 -2 Processing Inactive Records Revised Version Issued as P 200.2-2B LM Procedure 200.2-2A, Processing Internal Inactive Records for Storage of 7/18/07, has undergone revision. The revised procedure includes updated references, definitions, and formatting. Please replace LM Procedure 200.2-2A with LM Procedure 200.2-2B. The most recent and official controlled hard copy version of this document resides with LM's Directives Coordinator. An electronic version of the controlled document has been placed on the LM Intranet for employee use. Printed hard copies of this electronic version are considered uncontrolled documents. Procedure 200.2-2B INITIATED BY: Office of Business Operations NO. OF PAGES/ATTACHMENTS: 10 pages, 4 attachments U.S. Department of Energy

155

Solid waste integrated forecast technical (SWIFT) report: FY1997 to FY 2070, Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This web site provides an up-to-date report on the radioactive solid waste expected to be managed by Hanford's Waste Management (WM) Project from onsite and offsite generators. It includes: an overview of Hanford-wide solid waste to be managed by the WM Project; program-level and waste class-specific estimates; background information on waste sources; and comparisons with previous forecasts and with other national data sources. This web site does not include: liquid waste (current or future generation); waste to be managed by the Environmental Restoration (EM-40) contractor (i.e., waste that will be disposed of at the Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility (ERDF)); or waste that has been received by the WM Project to date (i.e., inventory waste). The focus of this web site is on low-level mixed waste (LLMW), and transuranic waste (both non-mixed and mixed) (TRU(M)). Some details on low-level waste and hazardous waste are also provided. Currently, this web site is reporting data th at was requested on 10/14/96 and submitted on 10/25/96. The data represent a life cycle forecast covering all reported activities from FY97 through the end of each program's life cycle. Therefore, these data represent revisions from the previous FY97.0 Data Version, due primarily to revised estimates from PNNL. There is some useful information about the structure of this report in the SWIFT Report Web Site Overview.

Valero, O.J.; Templeton, K.J.; Morgan, J.

1997-01-07T23:59:59.000Z

156

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate New Field Discoveries  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

141 124 481 2009-2011 141 124 481 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 96 10 410 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 34 10 410 2009-2011 Texas 62 0 0 2009-2011 Alaska 9 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 132 124 481 2009-2011 Alabama 0 1 1 2009-2011 Arkansas 0 0 0 2009-2011 California 0 0 0 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Colorado 0 0 0 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Illinois 0 0 0 2009-2011 Indiana 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kansas 2 2 2 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 0 0 1 2009-2011 North 0 0 0 2009-2011 South Onshore 0 0 1 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Michigan 10 0 8 2009-2011

157

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate New Field Discoveries  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

141 124 481 2009-2011 141 124 481 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 96 10 410 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 34 10 410 2009-2011 Texas 62 0 0 2009-2011 Alaska 9 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 132 124 481 2009-2011 Alabama 0 1 1 2009-2011 Arkansas 0 0 0 2009-2011 California 0 0 0 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Colorado 0 0 0 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Illinois 0 0 0 2009-2011 Indiana 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kansas 2 2 2 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 0 0 1 2009-2011 North 0 0 0 2009-2011 South Onshore 0 0 1 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Michigan 10 0 8 2009-2011

158

April 27, 2010, Department letter transmitting revised Implementation Plan for Recommendation 2009-1, Risk Assessment Methodologies at Defense Nuclear Facilities  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

April 27, 20 10 April 27, 20 10 The Honorable Peter S. Winokur Chairman Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board 625 Indiana Avenue, NW, Suite 700 Washington, DC 20004-294 1 Dear Mr. Chairman: In a letter to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board dated February 1, 20 10, I reaffirmed our acceptance of Recommendation 2009- 1, Risk Assessment Methodologies at Defense Nuclear Facilities, and committed to several changes to the Department's Plan for implementing the recommendations therein. Enclosed please find the revised Implementation Plan for Defense Nuclear Facilities Safity Board Recommendation 2009-1 that incorporates those changes. I want to express my thanks for your staffs input on this revision and look forward to similar contributions as we revise the Department's Nuclear Safety Policy and implement

159

Coalbed Methane Reserves Extensions  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

724 497 736 2009-2011 724 497 736 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 0 0 0 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 0 0 0 2009-2011 Texas 0 0 0 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 724 497 736 2009-2011 Alabama 21 29 3 2009-2011 Arkansas 0 0 0 2009-2011 California 0 0 0 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Colorado 48 184 220 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kansas 7 1 3 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 0 0 0 2009-2011 North 0 0 0 2009-2011 South Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Michigan 0 0 0 2009-2011 Mississippi 0 0 0 2009-2011 Montana 3 3 0 2009-2011

160

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Reserves Acquisitions  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

344 1,470 1,561 2009-2011 344 1,470 1,561 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 16 108 56 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 14 102 52 2009-2011 Texas 2 6 4 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 79 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 344 1,470 1,482 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 20 2009-2011 Arkansas 0 0 3 2009-2011 California 20 156 40 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 2 154 0 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 1 9 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 18 1 16 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 15 2009-2011 Colorado 2 38 4 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Illinois 0 9 0 2009-2011 Indiana 0 2 0 2009-2011 Kansas 2 8 19 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 6 4 2009-2011 Louisiana 11 52 53 2009-2011 North 1 12 31 2009-2011 South Onshore 7 26 17 2009-2011 State Offshore 3 14 5 2009-2011

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "1 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


161

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Reserves Acquisitions  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

344 1,470 1,561 2009-2011 344 1,470 1,561 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 16 108 56 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 14 102 52 2009-2011 Texas 2 6 4 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 79 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 344 1,470 1,482 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 20 2009-2011 Arkansas 0 0 3 2009-2011 California 20 156 40 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 2 154 0 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 1 9 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 18 1 16 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 15 2009-2011 Colorado 2 38 4 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Illinois 0 9 0 2009-2011 Indiana 0 2 0 2009-2011 Kansas 2 8 19 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 6 4 2009-2011 Louisiana 11 52 53 2009-2011 North 1 12 31 2009-2011 South Onshore 7 26 17 2009-2011 State Offshore 3 14 5 2009-2011

162

SCALE: A modular code system for performing Standardized Computer Analyses for Licensing Evaluation. Volume 1, Part 2: Control modules S1--H1; Revision 5  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

SCALE--a modular code system for Standardized Computer Analyses Licensing Evaluation--has been developed by Oak Ridge National Laboratory at the request of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The SCALE system utilizes well-established computer codes and methods within standard analysis sequences that (1) allow an input format designed for the occasional user and/or novice, (2) automated the data processing and coupling between modules, and (3) provide accurate and reliable results. System development has been directed at problem-dependent cross-section processing and analysis of criticality safety, shielding, heat transfer, and depletion/decay problems. Since the initial release of SCALE in 1980, the code system has been heavily used for evaluation of nuclear fuel facility and package designs. This revision documents Version 4.3 of the system.

NONE

1997-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

163

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Reserves Sales  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

249 803 1,024 2009-2011 249 803 1,024 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 20 56 42 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 20 54 42 2009-2011 Texas 0 2 0 2009-2011 Alaska 7 0 17 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 242 803 1,007 2009-2011 Alabama 0 3 11 2009-2011 Arkansas 3 3 28 2009-2011 California 3 1 7 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 1 0 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 2 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 3 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 5 2009-2011 Colorado 17 3 19 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Illinois 0 15 0 2009-2011 Indiana 0 2 0 2009-2011 Kansas 2 6 6 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 5 2009-2011 Louisiana 9 23 63 2009-2011 North 2 5 28 2009-2011 South Onshore 7 7 34 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 11 1 2009-2011

164

Radiological and chemical source terms for Solid Waste Operations Complex. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this document is to describe the radiological and chemical source terms for the major projects of the Solid Waste Operations Complex (SWOC), including Project W-112, Project W-133 and Project W-100 (WRAP 2A). For purposes of this document, the term ``source term`` means the design basis inventory. All of the SWOC source terms involve the estimation of the radiological and chemical contents of various waste packages from different waste streams, and the inventories of these packages within facilities or within a scope of operations. The composition of some of the waste is not known precisely; consequently, conservative assumptions were made to ensure that the source term represents a bounding case (i.e., it is expected that the source term would not be exceeded). As better information is obtained on the radiological and chemical contents of waste packages and more accurate facility specific models are developed, this document should be revised as appropriate. Radiological source terms are needed to perform shielding and external dose calculations, to estimate routine airborne releases, to perform release calculations and dose estimates for safety documentation, to calculate the maximum possible fire loss and specific source terms for individual fire areas, etc. Chemical source terms (i.e., inventories of combustible, flammable, explosive or hazardous chemicals) are used to determine combustible loading, fire protection requirements, personnel exposures to hazardous chemicals from routine and accident conditions, and a wide variety of other safety and environmental requirements.

Boothe, G.F.

1994-06-03T23:59:59.000Z

165

A Revision of the Genera Pelomyia Williston  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

A Revision of the Genera Pelomyia Williston and Masoniella Vockeroth (Diptera: Tethinidae) GEORGE A O G Y · N U M B E R 6 1 9 A Revision of the Genera Pelomyia Williston and Masoniella Vockeroth. Mathis. A Revision of the Genera Pelomyia Williston and Masoniella Vockeroth (Diptera: Tethinidae

Mathis, Wayne N.

166

Coalbed Methane Reserves Acquisitions  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

24 226 1,710 2009-2011 24 226 1,710 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 0 0 0 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 0 0 0 2009-2011 Texas 0 0 0 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 24 226 1,710 2009-2011 Alabama 0 151 219 2009-2011 Arkansas 22 0 0 2009-2011 California 0 0 0 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Colorado 0 0 1,021 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kansas 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 0 0 0 2009-2011 North 0 0 0 2009-2011 South Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Michigan 0 0 0 2009-2011 Mississippi 0 0 0 2009-2011 Montana

167

Coalbed Methane Reserves Sales  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

08 366 1,775 2009-2011 08 366 1,775 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 0 0 0 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 0 0 0 2009-2011 Texas 0 0 0 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 208 366 1,775 2009-2011 Alabama 2 266 104 2009-2011 Arkansas 31 0 0 2009-2011 California 0 0 0 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Colorado 0 0 1,034 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kansas 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 8 0 0 2009-2011 North 8 0 0 2009-2011 South Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Michigan 0 0 0 2009-2011 Mississippi 0 0 0 2009-2011 Montana

168

Coalbed Methane Reserves Acquisitions  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

24 226 1,710 2009-2011 24 226 1,710 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 0 0 0 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 0 0 0 2009-2011 Texas 0 0 0 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 24 226 1,710 2009-2011 Alabama 0 151 219 2009-2011 Arkansas 22 0 0 2009-2011 California 0 0 0 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Colorado 0 0 1,021 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kansas 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 0 0 0 2009-2011 North 0 0 0 2009-2011 South Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Michigan 0 0 0 2009-2011 Mississippi 0 0 0 2009-2011 Montana

169

LabJack U12 User's Guide Revision 1.09  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

to be a critical component in life support or systems where malfunction can reasonably be expected to result................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Hardware Installation ...........................................................................................................1 2. Hardware Description

Haller, Gary L.

170

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

46 188 207 2009-2011 46 188 207 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 0 -6 -1 2009-2011 Pacific (California) -1 -2 1 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 2 -3 -2 2009-2011 Texas -1 -1 0 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 1 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 46 188 206 2009-2011 Alabama 1 12 2 2009-2011 Arkansas 2 3 -2 2009-2011 California -17 14 32 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 1 0 -3 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 10 15 19 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore -30 1 16 2009-2011 State Offshore 2 -2 0 2009-2011 Colorado -9 25 -1 2009-2011 Florida -1 2 -2 2009-2011 Illinois 3 10 -10 2009-2011 Indiana -7 1 0 2009-2011 Kansas 20 61 22 2009-2011 Kentucky 4 -11 1 2009-2011 Louisiana -1 7 -8 2009-2011 North -4 -7 1 2009-2011 South Onshore 4 13 -6 2009-2011 State Offshore

171

MULTI-AGENCY RADIATION SURVEY AND SITE INVESTIGATION MANUAL, REVISION 1, CORRECTIONS  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xxiii Conversion Factors of Energy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-7 1.4.4 Department

172

Assessment of plutonium in the Savannah River Site environment. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Plutonium in the Savannah River Site Environment is published as a part of the Radiological Assessment Program (RAP). It is the fifth in a series of eight documents on individual radioisotopes released to the environment as a result of Savannah River Site (SRS) operations. These are living documents, each to be revised and updated on a two-year schedule. This document describes the sources of plutonium in the environment, its release from SRS, environmental transport and ecological concentration of plutonium, and the radiological impact of SRS releases to the environment. Plutonium exists in the environment as a result of above-ground nuclear weapons tests, the Chernobyl accident, the destruction of satellite SNAP 9-A, plane crashes involving nuclear weapons, and small releases from reactors and reprocessing plants. Plutonium has been produced at SRS during the operation of five production reactors and released in small quantities during the processing of fuel and targets in chemical separations facilities. Approximately 0.6 Ci of plutonium was released into streams and about 12 Ci was released to seepage basins, where it was tightly bound by clay in the soil. A smaller quantity, about 3.8 Ci, was released to the atmosphere. Virtually all releases have occurred in F- and H-Area separation facilities. Plutonium concentration and transport mechanisms for the atmosphere, surface water, and ground water releases have been extensively studied by Savannah River Technology Center (SRTC) and ecological mechanisms have been studied by Savannah River Ecology Laboratory (SREL). The overall radiological impact of SRS releases to the offsite maximum individual can be characterized by a total dose of 15 mrem (atmospheric) and 0.18 mrem (liquid), compared with the dose of 12,960 mrem from non-SRS sources during the same period of time (1954--1989). Plutonium releases from SRS facilities have resulted in a negligible impact to the environment and the population it supports.

Carlton, W.H.; Evans, A.G.; Geary, L.A.; Murphy, C.E. Jr.; Pinder, J.E.; Strom, R.N.

1992-12-31T23:59:59.000Z

173

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Estimated Production, Wet After Lease  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

1,929 1,991 2,065 2009-2011 1,929 1,991 2,065 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 599 590 504 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 22 19 22 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 522 518 432 2009-2011 Texas 55 53 50 2009-2011 Alaska 210 195 206 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 1,719 1,796 1,859 2009-2011 Alabama 7 7 8 2009-2011 Arkansas 6 5 6 2009-2011 California 208 198 196 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 18 18 20 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 15 15 15 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 161 152 149 2009-2011 State Offshore 14 13 12 2009-2011 Colorado 30 33 41 2009-2011 Florida 1 2 2 2009-2011 Illinois 5 4 4 2009-2011 Indiana 1 1 1 2009-2011 Kansas 40 41 41 2009-2011 Kentucky 2 1 1 2009-2011 Louisiana 68 66 68 2009-2011 North 11 10 11 2009-2011 South Onshore 48 47 47 2009-2011

174

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Reserves Extensions  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

,305 1,766 3,107 2009-2011 ,305 1,766 3,107 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 159 77 29 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 158 61 29 2009-2011 Texas 1 16 0 2009-2011 Alaska 25 30 40 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 1,280 1,736 3,067 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 0 2009-2011 Arkansas 0 6 0 2009-2011 California 30 24 37 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 1 1 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 1 1 6 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 22 13 18 2009-2011 State Offshore 7 9 12 2009-2011 Colorado 37 80 96 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Illinois 3 2 0 2009-2011 Indiana 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kansas 2 5 23 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 26 28 21 2009-2011 North 1 2 0 2009-2011 South Onshore 24 25 17 2009-2011 State Offshore

175

Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Reserves Extensions  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

,305 1,766 3,107 2009-2011 ,305 1,766 3,107 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 159 77 29 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 158 61 29 2009-2011 Texas 1 16 0 2009-2011 Alaska 25 30 40 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 1,280 1,736 3,067 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 0 2009-2011 Arkansas 0 6 0 2009-2011 California 30 24 37 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 1 1 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 1 1 6 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 22 13 18 2009-2011 State Offshore 7 9 12 2009-2011 Colorado 37 80 96 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Illinois 3 2 0 2009-2011 Indiana 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kansas 2 5 23 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 26 28 21 2009-2011 North 1 2 0 2009-2011 South Onshore 24 25 17 2009-2011 State Offshore

176

Coalbed Methane Reserves Adjustments  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

-14 784 -15 2009-2011 -14 784 -15 2009-2011 Federal Offshore U.S. 0 0 0 2009-2011 Pacific (California) 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana & Alabama 0 0 0 2009-2011 Texas 0 0 0 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States -14 784 -15 2009-2011 Alabama 0 61 -45 2009-2011 Arkansas 0 1 0 2009-2011 California 0 0 0 2009-2011 Coastal Region Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Los Angeles Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Colorado 0 106 73 2009-2011 Florida 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kansas -3 -22 -6 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 0 0 0 2009-2011 North 0 0 0 2009-2011 South Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 State Offshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 Michigan 0 0 0 2009-2011 Mississippi 0 0 0 2009-2011 Montana

177

Opening Packages Containing RAM in Clinical Areas Procedure: 7.511 Created: 07/24/2013 Version: 1.0 Revised  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

with a radiation detection survey meter before discarding. If contaminated, treat this material as radioactive: a. Monitor the package for radioactive contamination as described above. b. .0 Revised: Page 1 of 4 A. Purpose Incoming packages containing radioactive materials must be surveyed

Jia, Songtao

178

Matlab's Loss is Nobody's Gain Created Aug. 1998, revised July 31, 2004 http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~wkahan/MxMulEps.pdf Page 1/36  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Matlab's Loss is Nobody's Gain Created Aug. 1998, revised July 31, 2004 http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~wkahan/MxMulEps.pdf Page 1/36 Matlab's Loss is Nobody's Gain Prof. W. Kahan Mathematics Dept. & Elect. Eng. & Computer Sci. Dept. University of California Berkeley CA 94720-1776 Abstract: Matlab has become the software package

California at Berkeley, University of

179

Handbook of M.S. Programs -Industrial & Systems Engineering Department, Wayne State University Revised: May 8, 2013 Pg. 1 of 10  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Handbook of M.S. Programs - Industrial & Systems Engineering Department, Wayne State University Revised: May 8, 2013 Pg. 1 of 10 M.S. Programs Handbook Industrial & Systems Engineering Department Wayne Engineering at Wayne State University: Master of Science in Industrial Engineering Master of Science

Berdichevsky, Victor

180

(Created 1/02; Revised 5/05, 5/08, 7/12) UNL Environmental Health and Safety (402) 472-4925 http://ehs.unl.edu  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

(Created 1/02; Revised 5/05, 5/08, 7/12) UNL Environmental Health and Safety · (402) 472://ehs.unl.edu/) Security of dangerous chemicals in laboratories, shops, and other areas at UNL is of increasing concern and call EHS. · Keep an accurate inventory of highly toxic, dangerous, or reactive materials

Farritor, Shane

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "1 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


181

A pilot application of risk-informed methods to establish inservice inspection priorities for nuclear components at Surry Unit 1 Nuclear Power Station. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

As part of the Nondestructive Evaluation Reliability Program sponsored by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory has developed risk-informed approaches for inservice inspection plans of nuclear power plants. This method uses probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) results to identify and prioritize the most risk-important components for inspection. The Surry Nuclear Power Station Unit 1 was selected for pilot application of this methodology. This report, which incorporates more recent plant-specific information and improved risk-informed methodology and tools, is Revision 1 of the earlier report (NUREG/CR-6181). The methodology discussed in the original report is no longer current and a preferred methodology is presented in this Revision. This report, NUREG/CR-6181, Rev. 1, therefore supersedes the earlier NUREG/CR-6181 published in August 1994. The specific systems addressed in this report are the auxiliary feedwater, the low-pressure injection, and the reactor coolant systems. The results provide a risk-informed ranking of components within these systems.

Vo, T.V.; Phan, H.K.; Gore, B.F.; Simonen, F.A.; Doctor, S.R. [Pacific Northwest National Lab., Richland, WA (United States)

1997-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

182

Microsoft Word - S03924_ITL STP Final RevisionA-3-1-10.doc  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

Office of Environmental Management and Office of Environmental Management and Office of Legacy Management Site Transition Plan for the Inhalation Toxicology Laboratory March 2010 This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy Site Transition Plan for the Inhalation Toxicology Laboratory March 2010 Doc. No. S03924 Rev. 0 Page i Contents Abbreviations...................................................................................................................................v Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... vii 1.0 Introduction......................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Overview of the Site Transition Planning Process...............................................

183

CRADA Order Revision  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

CRADA Order Revision CRADA Order Revision Linda Field Patent Counsel Department of Energy Goal CRADA Order DOE O 483.1 CRADA Manual DOE M 483.1-1 CRADA Order DOE O XXXX.X Departmental Directive Program Types of Directives Policies Regulations Orders Notices Manuals Guides Technical Standards Departmental Directive Program Directives Life Cycle Development Coordination Implementation Review (Certification) Development Phase *Orders are uploaded to RevCom for review and comment by all affected parties *60 days to develop draft & submit to MA-90 *Solicits input from stakeholders ( incl. field, contractors, and/or program counsel) Coordination Phase *MA-90 parses directive & sets due dates for review & comment *HQ Directives Points of Contact (DPCs) *Have 45 days to submit official comments on behalf of their

184

1 WJL WJL 3/14/00 revised PC dimensions, requiring LV panels to go to space in a second rack REQUIRED SIGNATURES, DATE  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 WJL WJL 3/14/00 revised PC dimensions, requiring LV panels to go to space in a second rack INCHES ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TOFp DRAWING NUMBER REV. DATE DATE W.J. Llope 1/26/00 DRWN BY TOFp Rack NUMBER REV. DATECOGNIZANT ENG PRODUCTION APP TOFp/pVPD Rack1 Contents 5U Breaker Panel 15U SM255 Mount

Llope, William J.

185

OMB Circular A-76 (Revised)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON, DC 20503 May 29, 2003 CIRCULAR NO. A-76 (REVISED) TO THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND ESTABLISHMENTS SUBJECT: Performance of Commercial Activities 1. Purpose. This circular establishes federal policy for the competition of commercial activities. 2. Supersession. This circular supersedes Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular No. A-76 (Revised 1999), August 4, 1983; Circular No. A-76 Revised Supplemental Handbook (Revised 2000), March 1996; Office of Federal Procurement Policy Letter 92-1, "Inherently Governmental Functions," September 23, 1992; and OMB Transmittal Memoranda 1 through 25, Performance of Commercial Activities. 3. Authority. Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1970 (31 U.S.C. § 1111); Executive Order 11541; the Office

186

SCALE: A modular code system for performing standardized computer analyses for licensing evaluation. Control modules -- Volume 1, Revision 4  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

SCALE--a modular code system for Standardized Computer Analyses Licensing Evaluation--has been developed by Oak Ridge National Laboratory at the request of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The SCALE system utilizes well-established computer codes and methods within standard analysis sequences that (1) allow an input format designed for the occasional user and/or novice, (2) automate the data processing and coupling between modules, and (3) provide accurate and reliable results. System development has been directed at problem-dependent cross-section processing and analysis of criticality safety, shielding, heat transfer, and depletion/decay problems. Since the initial release of SCALE in 1980, the code system has been heavily used for evaluation of nuclear fuel facility and package designs. This revision documents Version 4.2 of the system. This manual is divided into three volumes: Volume 1--for the control module documentation, Volume 2--for the functional module documentation, and Volume 3 for the documentation of the data libraries and subroutine libraries.

Landers, N.F.; Petrie, L.M.; Knight, J.R. [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States)] [and others

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

187

MA373 S13 Test 1-4 Solutions Revised.pdf  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

May 2, 2013 ... borrow 1,000,000 at a floating interest rate that changes each year. Man enters into a swap in order to fix the interest rate that must be paid on...

jeffb_000

2013-12-10T23:59:59.000Z

188

REVISED-FINAL-1ST-QUARTER-FY-2013-SCORECARD-09-05-13.xlsx  

Office of Environmental Management (EM)

1) GREEN (0 0) N A N A N A Carlsbad Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (CBFO WIPP) GREEN N A (0 0) N A (0 0) N A N A SA Completed Energy Technology Engineering...

189

State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Environmental Checklist Form 216-B-3 Expansion Ponds Closure Plan. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The 216-B-3 Expansion Ponds Closure Plan (Revision 1) consists of a Part A Dangerous Waste Permit Application and a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Closure Plan. An explanation of the Part A submitted with this document is provided at the beginning of the Part A Section. The closure plan consists of nine chapters and five appendices. The 216-B-3 Pond System consists of a series of four earthen, unlined, interconnected ponds and the 216-B-3-3 Ditch that receive waste water from various 200 East Area operating facilities. These four ponds, collectively. Waste water (primarily cooling water, steam condensate, and sanitary water) from various 200 East Area facilities is discharged to the 216-B-3-3 Ditch. Water discharged to the 216-8-3-3 Ditch flows directly into the 216-B-3 Pond. In the past, waste water discharges to B Pond and the 216-B-3-3 Ditch contained mixed waste (radioactive waste and dangerous waste). The radioactive portion of mixed waste has been interpreted by the US Department of Energy (DOE) to be regulated under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954; the nonradioactive dangerous portion of mixed waste is regulated under RCRA. Mixed waste also may be considered a hazardous substance under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) when considering remediation of waste sites.

Not Available

1993-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

190

MA FI QPR Scoring Elements 4th Qtr FY 2009 Revision v1.xls  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Reference Reference Due Date Element Measure Critical? Score > ≤ 8/15 8/15 8/22 8/22 95% 100% 80% 95% 0% 80% 2.0% 1.8% 2.0% 0.0% 1.8% 1.0% 0.5% 1.0% 0.0% 0.5% 8/30 8/30 99.9% 0.0% 99.9% 9/30 9/30 9/30 9/30 Program specific elements, negotiated with Programs: Program specific measures, negotiated with Programs: Overall Score: Green * All critical elements green, and * No more then one non-critical element yellow Yellow * Any critical element yellow, or * Any non-critical red, or * Two or more non-critical elements yellow Red * Any critical element red or * Two or more non-critical elements red TYRT September 30, 2009 Input submitted to update TYRT Submission timeliness 1 1 2 2 Enter Date or Percentage Proximity to spending target August 15, 2009 Overall Score: Yes MA F&I Quarterly Performance Report

191

Tank characterization report for single-shell tak 241-C-112. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

One major function of the Tank Waste Remediation System (IWRS) is to characterize wastes in support of waste management and disposal activities at the Hanford Site. Analytical data from sampling and analysis and other available information about a tank are compiled and maintained in a tank characterization report (CR). This report and its appendixes serve as the CR for single-shell tank 24 1 -C- 1 12. The objectives of this report are: 1) to use characterization data in response to technical issues associated with tank 24 1 -C- 1 12 waste, and 2) to provide a standard characterization of this waste in terms of a best-basis inventory estimate. Section 2.0 summarizes the response to technical issues, Section 3.0 shows the best-basis inventory estimate, and Section 4.0 makes recommendations regarding safety status and additional sampling needs. The appendixes contain supporting data and information. This report supports the requirements of the Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order, Milestone M-44-05 (Ecology et al. 1996).

Simpson, B.C.

1997-06-11T23:59:59.000Z

192

Microsoft Word - Revised LM SMG Dec 2013 Update 15 FINAL 1-9-14.docx  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Table of Contents Table of Contents 1.0 - Introduction ......................................................................................................... Page 3 2.0 - Purpose ................................................................................................................. Page 3 3.0 - Site Types ............................................................................................................. Page 4 4.0 - Site Counts ........................................................................................................... Page 4 5.0 - Site Nomenclature ............................................................................................... Page 5 6.0 - Site Transition Policy .......................................................................................... Page 6

193

Determining plasma-fueling sources with an end-loss ion spectrometer. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

To help identify the major sources of fueling gas in Tandem Mirror Experiment-Upgrade (TMX-U), we mounted a mass-sensitive, E parallel B, end-loss ion spectrometer (ELIS) near the machine's centerline. We set the electric field in the ELIS to simultaneously measure the axial loss currents of both hydrogen and deuterium. We then initiated plasma discharges, where we injected either hydrogen or deuterium gas into the central cell. We also selected and deselected the central-cell neutral beams that were fueled with hydrogen gas. The end-cell neutral beams were always selected and fueled with deuterium. By taking the ratio of the hydrogen end-loss current to the deuterium end-loss current (with a known deuterium-gas feed rate), we were able to infer the effective fueling rates that were due to wall reflux, central-cell beams, and end-cell beams. The results were the following: wall reflux, 6 Torr x 1/s; central-cell beams, 15 Torr x 1/s; and end-cell beams 1 Torr x 1/s.

Grubb, D.P.; Foote, J.H.

1986-03-04T23:59:59.000Z

194

Supplemental design requirements document, Multifunction Waste Tank Facility, Project W-236A. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Multi-Function Waste Tank Facility (MWTF) consists of four, nominal 1 million gallon, underground double-shell tanks, located in the 200-East area, and two tanks of the same capacity in the 200-West area. MWTF will provide environmentally safe storage capacity for wastes generated during remediation/retrieval activities of existing waste storage tanks. This document delineates in detail the information to be used for effective implementation of the Functional Design Criteria requirements.

Groth, B.D.

1995-01-11T23:59:59.000Z

195

ELEC3028 Digital Transmission Overview & Information Theory S Chen Revision of Lecture 1  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

.04 Average codeword length is 3 bits for BCD · For equiprobable case, H = log2 8 = 3 bits/symbol, and coding Memoryless source with independent symbols (code each symbol by log2 q bits is called binary coded decimal (BCD)) mi, pi 1 i q E BCD: log2 q (bits/symbol) symbol rate Rs (symbols/s) data bit rate: Rs

Chen, Sheng

196

Report of clean out and flushing of UO{sub 3} Plant processing equipment: Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The UO{sub 3} Plant went through a clean out leading to the deactivation of the facility. This clean out consisted of three phases. Phase 1 consisted of the removal of residual process material and the deactivation of most process equipment and instrumentation. Phase 2 consisted of the fixing or removal of contamination so storm water processing would be no longer required. Phase 3 consisted of the remaining activities that had to be completed before the facility was turned over to the Surplus Facility Program. Since the activities of Phase 2 and 3 were closely related, these two phases were worked simultaneously. The first part of this document summarizes the Phase 1 clean out procedures and their results. Phase 1 was completed on February 28, 1994. The second part summarizes the Phase 2/3 clean out procedures and their results. Phase 2/3 was completed before December 31, 1994. Because tanks and equipment were flushed simultaneously or in a specific sequence, the clean out processes are discussed per workplan.

Gonsalves, E.

1994-12-02T23:59:59.000Z

197

Microsoft PowerPoint - 15 Baker 2010 PM workshop draft 28 Feb1 (2) revised  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Title Title Project Management Career Presentation Title Project Management Career Development Program (PMCDP) Marylee H. Baker Lead Professional Career Development Analyst Lead Professional Career Development Analyst Project Management Career Development Program Department of Energy Office of Engineering & Construction Management 1 Office of Engineering & Construction Management 3/15/2010 Agenda * Program Objective * PMCDP in FY 2009 * FY 2009 Program Statistics * PMCDP in FY 2010 * Future Initiatives 2 3/15/2010 2 PMCDP Objective Ensure that we have well Ensure that we have well trained, qualified and experienced Federal Project Directors overseeing our Directors overseeing our projects 3 3/15/2010 3 PMCDP in FY 2009 PMCDP met all its 2009 goals

198

Status report on resolution of Waste Tank Safety Issues at the Hanford Site. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this report is to provide and update the status of activities supporting the resolution of waste tank safety issues and system deficiencies at the Hanford Site. This report provides: (1) background information on safety issues and system deficiencies; (2) a description of the Tank Waste Remediation System and the process for managing safety issues and system deficiencies; (3) changes in safety issue description, prioritization, and schedules; and (4) a summary of the status, plans, order of magnitude, cost, and schedule for resolving safety issues and system deficiencies.

Dukelow, G.T.; Hanson, G.A. [Los Alamos Technical Associates, Inc., Kennewick, WA (United States)

1995-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

199

Safety equipment list for 241-C-106 waste retrieval, Project W-320: Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The goals of the C-106 sluicing operation are: (1) to stabilize the tank by reducing the heat load in the tank to less than 42 MJ/hr (40,000 Btu/hour), and (2) to initiate demonstration of single-shell tank (SST) retrieval technology. The purpose of this supporting document (SD) is as follows: (1) to provide safety classifications for items (systems, structures, equipment, components, or parts) for the waste retrieval sluicing system (WRSS), and (2) to document and methodology used to develop safety classifications. Appropriate references are made with regard to use of existing systems, structures, equipments, components, and parts for C-106 single-shell transfer tank located in the C Tank Farm, and 241-AY-102 (AY-102) double shell receiver tanks (DST) located in the Aging Waste Facility (AWF). The Waste Retrieval Sluicing System consists of two transfer lines that would connect the two tanks, one to carry the sluiced waste slurry to AY-102, and the other to return the supernatant liquid to C-106. The supernatant, or alternate fluid, will be used to mobilize waste in C-106 for the sluicing process. The equipment necessary for the WRSS include pumps in each tank, sluicers to direct the supernatant stream in C-106, a slurry distributor in AY-102, HVAC for C-106, instrumentation and control devices, and other existing components as required.

Conner, J.C.

1994-11-15T23:59:59.000Z

200

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for the CNTA Subsurface Sites (CAU Number 443), Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Corrective Action Investigation Plan (CAIP) describes the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's) planned environmental investigation of the subsurface Central Nevada Test Area (CNTA) Corrective Action Unit (CAU) No. 443. The CNTA is located in Hot Creek Valley in Nye County, Nevada, adjacent to U.S. Highway 6, about 48 kilometers (km) (30 miles [mi]) north of Warm Springs, Nevada. The CNTA was the site of Project Faultless, a nuclear device detonated in the subsurface by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) in January 1968. The purposes of this test were to gauge the seismic effects of a relatively large, high-yield detonation completed in Hot Creek Valley (outside the Nevada Test Site) and to determine the suitability of the site for future large detonations. The yield of the Faultless test was between 200 kilotons and 1 megaton. Two similar tests were planned for the CNTA, but neither of them was completed. Based on the general definition of a corrective action investigation (CAI) from Section IV.14 of the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO), the purpose of the CAI is ''to gather data sufficient to characterize the nature, extent, and rate of migration or potential rate of migration from releases or discharges of pollutants or contaminants and/or potential releases or discharges from corrective action units identified at the facilities''. For CNTA CAU 443 the concepts developed for the Underground Test Area (UGTA) CAUs will be applied on a limited scale. For the UGTA CAUs, ''the objective of the CAI process is to define boundaries around each UGTA CAU that establish areas that contain water that may be unsafe for domestic and municipal use,'' as stated in Appendix VI of the FFACO (1996). Based on this strategy the CAI for CAU 443 will start with modeling using existing data. New data collection activities are generally contingent upon the results of the modeling and may or may not be part of the CAI. Specific objectives of the CAI ar e as follows: (1) determine the characteristics of the groundwater flow system, the sources of contamination, and the transport processes to acceptable levels of uncertainty; (2) develop a credible numerical model of groundwater flow and contaminant transport for the UC-1 Subsurface Corrective Action Site (CAS) and downgradient areas; and, (3) develop stochastic predictions of the contaminant boundary at an acceptable level of uncertainty.

USDOE/NV

1999-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "1 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


201

Preliminary estimation of isotopic inventories of 2000 MWt ABR (revision 1).  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The isotopic inventories of a 2000 MWt Advanced Burner Reactor (ABR) core have been estimated to support the ABR accident analysis to be reported in the Appendix D of the Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS). Based on the Super-PRISM design, a preliminary core design of 2000 MWt ABR was developed to achieve a one-year cycle length with 3-batch fuel management scheme. For a bounding estimation of transuranics (TRU) inventory, a low TRU conversion ratio ({approx}0.3) was targeted to increase the TRU enrichment. By changing the fuel compositions, isotopic inventories of mass and radioactivity were evaluated for four different core configurations: recycled metal fuel core, recycled oxide fuel core, startup metal fuel core, and startup oxide fuel core. For recycled cores, the TRU recovered from ABR spent fuel was used as the primary TRU feed, and the TRU recovered from 10-year cooled light water reactor spent fuel was used as the makeup TRU feed. For startup cores, weapons-grade plutonium was used as TRU feed without recycling ABR spent fuel. It was also assumed that a whole batch of discharged fuel assemblies is stored in the in-vessel storage for an entire irradiation cycle. For both metal and oxide fuel cores, the estimated TRU mass at beginning of equilibrium cycle (BOEC), including spent fuel TRU stored in the in-vessel storage, was about 8.5-8.7 MT for the recycled cores and 5.2 MT for the startup cores. Since a similar power was generated, the fission product mass are comparable for all four cores: 1.4 MT at BOEC and about 2.0 MT at end of equilibrium cycle (EOEC). Total radioactivity at BOEC is about 8.2 x 10{sup 8} curies in recycled cores and about 6.9 x 10{sup 8} curies in startup cores, and increases to about 1.1 x 10{sup 10} curies at EOEC for all four cases. Fission products are the dominant contributor (more than 80%) to the total radioactivity at EOEC for all four cases, but the fission product radioactivity decreases by 79% after one-year cooling. The heavy metal radioactivity in recycled cores is higher than that of the startup core because of the higher TRU inventory at BOEC. The leading contributors at EOEC are U-239, Np-239, Am-242 and Pu-243 at EOEC, but these short-lived nuclides decay out quickly during the refueling time. As a result, the leading contributors at BOEC are Pu-241, Cm-242, Cm-244, and Pu-238.

Kim, T. K.; Yang, W. S.; Nuclear Engineering Division

2008-06-16T23:59:59.000Z

202

Microsoft Word - Final_CRB_Panel_questions_Revisions_6_1_2011 (2)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

from the Certification Review Board Panel Discussion from the Certification Review Board Panel Discussion OECM Annual Project Management Workshop, March 16, 2011 1 Question: Does the Certification Review Board (CRB or the Board) consider past performance when determining whether to grant or deny Federal Project Director (FPD) certification? Answer: The Board does consider past performance. An FPD's performance on his/her projects is one indicator of his/her ability to successfully manage future projects, especially at Levels 3 and 4 which tend to be more complicated and have a higher level of risk. Question: If I take over a failing project, does that automatically mean that my performance will be judged as inadequate? Answer: The Board is interested in a candidate's performance to determine if he/she made a positive

203

Microsoft Word - Final_CRB_Panel_questions_Revisions_6_1_2011 (2)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

from the Certification Review Board Panel Discussion from the Certification Review Board Panel Discussion OECM Annual Project Management Workshop, March 16, 2011 1 Question: Does the Certification Review Board (CRB or the Board) consider past performance when determining whether to grant or deny Federal Project Director (FPD) certification? Answer: The Board does consider past performance. An FPD's performance on his/her projects is one indicator of his/her ability to successfully manage future projects, especially at Levels 3 and 4 which tend to be more complicated and have a higher level of risk. Question: If I take over a failing project, does that automatically mean that my performance will be judged as inadequate? Answer: The Board is interested in a candidate's performance to determine if he/she made a positive

204

Conversion and Blending Facility highly enriched uranium to low enriched uranium as oxide. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Conversion and Blending Facility (CBF) will have two missions: (1) convert HEU materials into pure HEU oxide and (2) blend the pure HEU oxide with depleted and natural uranium oxide to produce an LWR grade LEU product. The primary emphasis of this blending operation will be to destroy the weapons capability of large, surplus stockpiles of HEU. The blended LEU product can only be made weapons capable again by the uranium enrichment process. To the extent practical, the chemical and isotopic concentrations of blended LEU product will be held within the specifications required for LWR fuel. Such blended LEU product will be offered to the United States Enrichment Corporation (USEC) to be sold as feed material to the commercial nuclear industry. Otherwise, blended LEU will be produced as a waste suitable for storage or disposal.

NONE

1995-07-05T23:59:59.000Z

205

Uranium hexafluoride packaging tiedown systems overview at Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant, Piketon, Ohio. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant (PORTS) in Piketon, Ohio, is operated by Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc., through the US Department of Energy-Oak Ridge Operations Office (DOE-ORO) for the US Department of Energy-Headquarters, Office of Nuclear Energy. The PORTS conducts those operations that are necessary for the production, packaging, and shipment of uranium hexafluoride (UF{sub 6}). Uranium hexafluoride enriched uranium than 1.0 wt percent {sup 235}U shall be packaged in accordance with the US Department of Transportation (DOT) regulations of Title 49 CFR Parts 173 (Reference 1) and 178 (Reference 2), or in US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) or US Department of Energy (DOE) certified package designs. Concerns have been expressed regarding the various tiedown methods and condition of the trailers being used by some shippers/carriers for international transport of the UF{sub 6} cylinders/overpacks. Because of the concerns about international shipments, the US Department of Energy-Headquarters (DOE-HQ) Office of Nuclear Energy, through DOE-HQ Transportation Management Division, requested Westinghouse Hanford Company (Westinghouse Hanford) to review UF{sub 6} packaging tiedown and shipping practices used by PORTS, and where possible and appropriate, provide recommendations for enhancing these practices. Consequently, a team of two individuals from Westinghouse Hanford visited PORTS on March 5 and 6, 1990, for the purpose of conducting this review. The paper provides a brief discussion of the review activities and a summary of the resulting findings and recommendations. A detailed reporting of the is documented in Reference 4.

Becker, D.L.; Green, D.J.; Lindquist, M.R.

1993-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

206

The Role of Dispersion in Radionuclide Transport - Data and Modeling Requirements: Revision No. 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document is the collaborative effort of the members of an ad hoc subcommittee of the Underground Test Area Project Technical Working Group. This subcommittee was to answer questions and concerns raised by the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection to the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office, regarding Pahute Mesa Corrective Action Units (CAUs) 101 and 102. The document attempts to synthesize the combined comments made by each member of this subcommittee into insights made in the role of dispersion in radionuclide transport data and modeling. Dispersion is one of many processes that control the concentration of radionuclides in groundwater beneath the Nevada Test Site where CAUs 101 and 102 are located. In order to understand the role of dispersion in radionuclide transport, there is a critical need for CAU- or site-specific data related to transport parameters which is currently lacking, particularly in the case of Western a nd Central Pahute Mesa. The purpose of this technical basis document is to: (1) define dispersion and its role in contaminant transport, (2) present a synopsis of field-scale dispersion measurements, (3) provide a literature review of theories to explain field-scale dispersion, (4) suggest approaches to account for dispersion in CAU-scale radionuclide modeling, and (5) to determine if additional dispersion measurements should be made at this time.

Stoller-Navarro Joint Venture

2004-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

207

3718-F Alkali Metal Treatment and Storage Facility Closure Plan. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Hanford Site, located northwest of the city of Richland, Washington, houses reactors, chemical-separation systems, and related facilities used for the production of special nuclear materials, as well as for activities associated with nuclear energy development. The 300 Area of the Hanford Site contains reactor fuel manufacturing facilities and several research and development laboratories. The 3718-F Alkali Metal Treatment and Storage Facility (3718-F Facility), located in the 300 Area, was used to store and treat alkali metal wastes. Therefore, it is subject to the regulatory requirements for the storage and treatment of dangerous wastes. Closure will be conducted pursuant to the requirements of the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 173-303-610 (Ecology 1989) and 40 CFR 270.1. Closure also will satisfy the thermal treatment facility closure requirements of 40 CFR 265.381. This closure plan presents a description of the 3718-F Facility, the history of wastes managed, and the approach that will be followed to close the facility. Only hazardous constituents derived from 3718-F Facility operations will be addressed.

none,

1992-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

208

Waste minimization for commercial radioactive materials users generating low-level radioactive waste. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The objective of this document is to provide a resource for all states and compact regions interested in promoting the minimization of low-level radioactive waste (LLW). This project was initiated by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and Massachusetts waste streams have been used as examples; however, the methods of analysis presented here are applicable to similar waste streams generated elsewhere. This document is a guide for states/compact regions to use in developing a system to evaluate and prioritize various waste minimization techniques in order to encourage individual radioactive materials users (LLW generators) to consider these techniques in their own independent evaluations. This review discusses the application of specific waste minimization techniques to waste streams characteristic of three categories of radioactive materials users: (1) industrial operations using radioactive materials in the manufacture of commercial products, (2) health care institutions, including hospitals and clinics, and (3) educational and research institutions. Massachusetts waste stream characterization data from key radioactive materials users in each category are used to illustrate the applicability of various minimization techniques. The utility group is not included because extensive information specific to this category of LLW generators is available in the literature.

Fischer, D.K.; Gitt, M.; Williams, G.A.; Branch, S. [EG and G Idaho, Inc., Idaho Falls, ID (United States); Otis, M.D.; McKenzie-Carter, M.A.; Schurman, D.L. [Science Applications International Corp., Idaho Falls, ID (United States)

1991-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

209

Information management fiscal year 1996 site support program plan, WBS 6.4. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In the recent past, information resource management (IRM) was a neatly separable component of the overall DOE mission, concerned primarily with procuring and implementing automatic data processing (ADP) systems. As the DOE missions have shifted from producing product to managing processes, those clear lines have blurred. Today, IRM is firmly embedded in all aspects of the DOE mission. BCS Richland, Inc., (BCSR) provides IRM for the Hanford Site. The main focus in executing this mission is to meet customer goals by providing high-quality, timely, and cost-effective electronic communication, computing, and information services. Information resources provide the US Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office (RL) and the Hanford Site contractors the ability to generate, store, access, and communicate information quickly, reliably, and cost effectively. BCSR plans, implements, and operates electronic communication, computing and information management systems that enable effective operation of the Hanford Site. Five strategic initiatives to encompass the vision provide guidance and focus to the information technology (IT) direction for developing the BCSR program plan. These strategic initiatives are the program vision and are as follows: primary focus; fast response; accessible information; world class information management infrastructure; powerful desktop. The business directions that guide the development of the BCSR Program Plan are: (1) emphasize providing cost-effective and value-added communication, computing, and information systems products and services to the Site missions; (2) strengthen the alignment of products and services with Site projects and programs and eliminate duplications Sitewide; (3) focus on the effective resolution of critical Site information management (IM) issues.

NONE

1995-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

210

Notice of Intent to Revise Department of Energy Order 460.1C, Packaging and Transportation Safety  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The purpose of this memorandum is to provide justification for the proposed revision of Department of Energy (DOE} Order (O} 460.lC, Packaging and Transportation Safety as part of the quadrennial review and recertification required by DOE O 251.lC, Departmental Directives Program.

2015-01-15T23:59:59.000Z

211

Revised Manuscript  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1.0 4.7 0.7 2250 650 1200 2 - 14.128 1371.0 1.0 11.8 1.0 6650 700 300 2 - 14.150 1603 2 14.370 1692 2 33 3 (1, 2) - 14.455 1949 3 38 10 (0, 1) + 14.699 2030...

212

Revised Manuscript  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Gal, Phys. Rept. 184 (1989) 1 1989DO1N Dover, Proc. 6th Course Int. Schl. of Intermediate Energy Nucl. Phys., Venice, Italy 1988 (Singapore: World Sci. 1989) p. 164 1989ER1B...

213

Revised Manuscript  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1059 1956EL1A El-Bedewi, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) A69 (1956) 221 1956FA1C Faull, AERE RR 1919 (1956); Phys. Abs. 7393 (1956) 1956FL1B Flerov and Talyzin, Sov. J. Nucl....

214

Revised Manuscript  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

(1964) B338 1965BA06 F. Baldeweg, V. Bredel, H. Guratzsch, R. Klabes, B. Kuhn and G. Stiller, Nucl. Phys. 64 (1965) 55 1965BR1B Brill, Yad. Fiz. 1 (1965) 55; Sov. J. Nucl. Phys....

215

Revised Manuscript  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Phil. Mag. 46 (1955) 841 1955CA1A Catala, Aguilar and Senent, An. Real. Soc. Espan. Fis. Y. Quim. A51 (1955) 173 1955CA1C Catala, Senent, Aguilar and Font, An. Real. Soc....

216

Revised Manuscript  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1980ST1J Stach, Kretschmer, Wango and Rebel, Nukleonika 25 (1980) 1025 1980ST25 K. Stricker, J.A. Carr and H. McManus, Phys. Rev. C22 (1980) 2043 1980TA1K Tamura, Udagawa and...

217

Shale Natural Gas New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

1,613 1,149 699 2009-2011 1,613 1,149 699 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 1,613 1,149 699 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 2009-2010 Arkansas 0 0 0 2009-2011 California 0 2011-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 2011-2011 Colorado 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 1,377 172 140 2009-2011 North 1,377 172 140 2009-2011 Michigan 0 0 0 2009-2011 Montana 0 0 1 2009-2011 New Mexico 0 0 0 2009-2011 East 0 0 0 2009-2011 West 0 0 0 2009-2011 North Dakota 1 1 2 2009-2011 Ohio 0 0 2009-2010 Oklahoma 162 0 0 2009-2011 Pennsylvania 0 871 319 2009-2011 Texas 65 36 93 2009-2011 RRC District 1 0 14 0 2009-2011 RRC District 2 Onshore 2 81 2010-2011 RRC District 3 Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 RRC District 4 Onshore 30 0 12 2009-2011 RRC District 5

218

Revised Manuscript  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

A relativistic microscopic optical potential is derived from the relativistic Brueckner- Bethe-Goldstone equation in (1992CH1E). Relativistic effects on quasielastic spin...

219

Ohio Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Ohio Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7...

220

Shale Natural Gas New Field Discoveries  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

868 557 232 2009-2011 868 557 232 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 868 557 232 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 2009-2010 Arkansas 0 0 0 2009-2011 California 0 2011-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 2011-2011 Colorado 4 0 0 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 244 48 0 2009-2011 North 244 48 0 2009-2011 Michigan 0 2 0 2009-2011 Montana 0 0 0 2009-2011 New Mexico 0 0 0 2009-2011 East 0 0 0 2009-2011 West 0 0 0 2009-2011 North Dakota 6 8 2 2009-2011 Ohio 0 0 2009-2010 Oklahoma 0 54 37 2009-2011 Pennsylvania 120 49 162 2009-2011 Texas 353 396 31 2009-2011 RRC District 1 353 114 20 2009-2011 RRC District 2 Onshore 282 0 2010-2011 RRC District 3 Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 RRC District 4 Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 RRC District 5 0 0 0 2009-2011

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "1 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


221

Shale Natural Gas New Field Discoveries  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

868 557 232 2009-2011 868 557 232 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 868 557 232 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 2009-2010 Arkansas 0 0 0 2009-2011 California 0 2011-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 2011-2011 Colorado 4 0 0 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 0 2009-2011 Louisiana 244 48 0 2009-2011 North 244 48 0 2009-2011 Michigan 0 2 0 2009-2011 Montana 0 0 0 2009-2011 New Mexico 0 0 0 2009-2011 East 0 0 0 2009-2011 West 0 0 0 2009-2011 North Dakota 6 8 2 2009-2011 Ohio 0 0 2009-2010 Oklahoma 0 54 37 2009-2011 Pennsylvania 120 49 162 2009-2011 Texas 353 396 31 2009-2011 RRC District 1 353 114 20 2009-2011 RRC District 2 Onshore 282 0 2010-2011 RRC District 3 Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 RRC District 4 Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 RRC District 5 0 0 0 2009-2011

222

Revised Manuscript  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

a high 3 He+ 3 He cluster purity, a 6 Be state at 11.5 MeV is not expected. The cross section factor S(E c.m. ) 5.5 - 3.1 E c.m. + 1.4 E 2 c.m. MeV b error in S is...

223

Revised Manuscript  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

219 1985LE1L Lee and Chung, New Phys. 25 (1985) 381; Phys. ABs. 30342 (1987) 1985LI19 H. Liu and L. Zamick, Phys. Rev. C32 (1985) 1754 1985LO1C Lobov, in AIP Conf. Proc. 125...

224

Revised Manuscript  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Y. Cui, P. Fan and D. Wang, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. A255 (1987) 115 1987LI1K Y. Liu and Y.-G. Li, Phys. Energ. Fortis and Phys. Nucl. 11 (1987) 68 1987LI1L Y.-G. Li,...

225

Revised Manuscript  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Phys. Rev. 88 (1952) 618 1952CA1B Catala, Senent and Aguilar, An. Real. Soc. Espan. Fis. y Quim. A48 (1952) 73; Phys. Abs. 57 (1954) 1709 1952CO1C D.B. Cowie, N.P. Heydenburg...

226

Revised Manuscript  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

A. Pushkin and I.J. Thompson, Eur. Phys. J. A1 (1998) 447 1998FA05 M.S. Fayache, E. Moya de Guerra, P. Sarriguren, Y.Y. Sharon and L. Zamick, Phys. Rev. C57 (1998) 2351;...

227

Revised Manuscript  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Chieze and Vangioni-Flam, Astron. Astrophys. 91 (1980) 49 1980AY01 T. Aytimur and J.P. Svenne, Can. J. Phys. 58 (1980) 1026 1980BA1M Barker et al., Proc. Int. Conf. in At....

228

Revised Manuscript  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

and N.R. Fletcher, Nucl. Phys. A144 (1970) 129 1970GU01 H. Guratzsch, J. Slotta and G. Stiller, Nucl. Phys. A140 (1970) 129 1970GU1E Guman, Sliv and Kharitonov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys....

229

Revised Manuscript  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Amer. Phys. Soc. 14 (1969) 163 1969GU02 H. Guratzsch, G. Hofmann, H. Muller and G. Stiller, Nucl. Phys. A129 (1969) 405 1969HA1G Hanna, Proc. Int. Conf., Montreal (1969) 443...

230

Revised Manuscript  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Phys. Rev. 93 (1954) 146 1954CA1C Catala, Senent and Casanova, An. Real. Soc. Espan. Fis. y Quim. A50 (1954) 145 1954FE16 G.A. Ferguson, J. Halpern, R. Nathans and P.F. Yergin,...

231

Revised Manuscript  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Srinivasa Rao and Susila, in Houston, AIP Conf. Proc. 54 (1979) 430 1979ST02 K. Stricker, H. McManus and J.A. Carr, Phys. Rev. C19 (1979) 929 1979ST1D Stanley, Glover and...

232

Revised Manuscript  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Phys. Energ. Fortis Phys. Nucl. 4 (1980) 43; Phys. Abs. 47420 (1980) 1980ST25 K. Stricker, J.A. Carr and H. McManus, Phys. Rev. C22 (1980) 2043 1980TA1L Tadic, Rept. Prog....

233

Revised Manuscript  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Phys. A149 (1970) 323 1970KO15 S. Kobayashi, S. Motonaga, Y. Chiba, K. Katori, A. Stricker, T. Fujisawa and T. Wada, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 29 (1970) 1 1970KO25 V.I. Komarov, G.E....

234

Revised Manuscript  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Analysis in both PWBA and DWBA is reported by (1961HA1G): the latter leads to nearly ten times larger 2 n . The cross section for 7 Li(d, p) 8 Li*() 8 Li has been...

235

Revised Manuscript  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

249 (1970) 195 1970AL1E Albert, Wagner, Uberall and Werntz, Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on High Energy Phys. and Nucl. Struct., New York, 1969 (Plenum, 1970) 89; Phys. Abs. 43447 (1971)...

236

Revised Manuscript  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

18 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A 18-20 was published in Nuclear Physics A300 (1978), p. 1....

237

Revised Manuscript  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

22 1983CI1E Cierjacks et al, Proc. Int. Conf., Antwerp, Belgium 1982 (Dordrecht, Netherland: Reidel 1983) 383; Phys. Abs. 37600 (1984) 1983CO09 E.R. Cohen, A.H. Wapstra, Nucl....

238

Revised Manuscript  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

A195 (1972) 91 125 1972HE1E Hermans, Oberski and Verhaar, Ned. Tijdschr. Natuurk. (Netherland) 38 (1972) 172; Phys. Abs. 49832 (1972) 1972HO56 H. Horiuchi, K. Ikeda and Y....

239

Revised Manuscript  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

1 March 2008 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A 20 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A 18-20 was...

240

Notice of Intent to Revise DOE O 475.2A, Identifying Classified Information  

Broader source: Directives, Delegations, and Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

The revision will incorporate changes that were identified during the 1-year review after initial issuance

2014-03-06T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "1 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


241

Shale Natural Gas Reserves Sales  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

563 1,685 22,694 2009-2011 563 1,685 22,694 2009-2011 Alaska 0 0 0 2009-2011 Lower 48 States 563 1,685 22,694 2009-2011 Alabama 0 0 2009-2010 Arkansas 3 336 6,087 2009-2011 California 0 2011-2011 San Joaquin Basin Onshore 0 2011-2011 Colorado 0 0 0 2009-2011 Kentucky 0 0 45 2009-2011 Louisiana 3 11 3,782 2009-2011 North 3 11 3,782 2009-2011 Michigan 0 553 682 2009-2011 Montana 2 1 42 2009-2011 New Mexico 0 0 0 2009-2011 East 0 0 0 2009-2011 West 0 0 0 2009-2011 North Dakota 1 28 115 2009-2011 Ohio 0 0 2009-2010 Oklahoma 0 0 1,591 2009-2011 Pennsylvania 0 163 209 2009-2011 Texas 554 580 9,926 2009-2011 RRC District 1 0 409 1,132 2009-2011 RRC District 2 Onshore 0 61 2010-2011 RRC District 3 Onshore 0 0 0 2009-2011 RRC District 4 Onshore 0 0 75 2009-2011

242

Tritium in the Savannah River environment addendum to WSRC-RP--90-424-1, Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document is an addendum to Tritium in the Savannah River Site Environment,'' WSRC-RP90-424- 1, released in May of 1991. The purpose of this report is to update the information found in WSRC-RP-90-424-1 for the four year period 1987--1990. Some data has also been included from 1991. The report includes summaries of atmospheric and aqueous monitoring of tritium and estimates of the dose to the population surrounding the Savannah River Site.

Murphy, C.E. Jr.; Carlton, W.H.

1992-05-28T23:59:59.000Z

243

Tritium in the Savannah River environment addendum to WSRC-RP--90-424-1, Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document is an addendum to ``Tritium in the Savannah River Site Environment,`` WSRC-RP90-424- 1, released in May of 1991. The purpose of this report is to update the information found in WSRC-RP-90-424-1 for the four year period 1987--1990. Some data has also been included from 1991. The report includes summaries of atmospheric and aqueous monitoring of tritium and estimates of the dose to the population surrounding the Savannah River Site.

Murphy, C.E. Jr.; Carlton, W.H.

1992-05-28T23:59:59.000Z

244

SCALE: A modular code system for performing standardized computer analyses for licensing evaluation. Functional modules F1--F8 -- Volume 2, Part 1, Revision 4  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

SCALE--a modular code system for Standardized Computer Analyses Licensing Evaluation--has been developed by Oak Ridge National Laboratory at the request of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The SCALE system utilizes well-established computer codes and methods within standard analysis sequences that (1) allow an input format designed for the occasional user and/or novice, (2) automate the data processing and coupling between modules, and (3) provide accurate and reliable results. System development has been directed at problem-dependent cross-section processing and analysis of criticality safety, shielding, heat transfer, and depletion/decay problems. Since the initial release of SCALE in 1980, the code system has been heavily used for evaluation of nuclear fuel facility and package designs. This revision documents Version 4.2 of the system. The manual is divided into three volumes: Volume 1--for the control module documentation; Volume 2--for functional module documentation; and Volume 3--for documentation of the data libraries and subroutine libraries.

Greene, N.M.; Petrie, L.M.; Westfall, R.M.; Bucholz, J.A.; Hermann, O.W.; Fraley, S.K. [Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States)

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

245

Revised Manuscript  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

in the decay of the first excited state in 16 O 1989DE22 Addendum to 1988DE22 1989FO1D Cold fusion results still unexplained 1989SU01 Isoscalar E0 & E2 strength of 16 O in an ...

246

Revised Manuscript  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Struct., Tokyo, Japan, 1967; Suppl. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 24 (1968) 250 1968BR1K K.A. Brueckner, J.R. Buchler and M.M. Kelly, Phys. Rev. 173 (1968) 944 1968CA08 F. Catara, M. Di...

247

Revised Manuscript  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

D.P. Stahel and J. Cerny, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37 (1976) 812 1976JA14 U. Janetzki, Q.K.K. Liu, D. Hahn, H. Homeyer and J. Scheer, Nucl. Phys. A267 (1976) 285 1976JA1G Jacobs,...

248

Revised Manuscript  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

82 1958TY47 H. Tyren and T.A.J. Maris, Nucl. Phys. 6 (1958) 446 1958WE1E Wegner and Hall, Bull. Amer. Phys. Soc. 3 (1958) 338 1958WI41 D.H. Wilkinson, Phys. Rev. 109 (1958)...

249

Revised Manuscript  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

614 1979SO1D Sober et al., in Houston, AIP Conf. Proc. 54 (1979) 170 1979ST02 K. Stricker, H. McManus and J.A. Carr, Phys. Rev. C19 (1979) 929 1979ST10 R.G. Stokstad, R.M....

250

Revised Manuscript  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

A347 (1980) 389 1980ST1K Strikman and Frankfurt, Yad. Fiz. 32 (1980) 1403 1980ST25 K. Stricker, J.A. Carr and H. McManus, Phys. Rev. C22 (1980) 2043 1980TA15 H. Taneichi, H. Ueno,...

251

RELAP5/MOD3 code manual: Summaries and reviews of independent code assessment reports. Volume 7, Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Summaries of RELAP5/MOD3 code assessments, a listing of the assessment matrix, and a chronology of the various versions of the code are given. Results from these code assessments have been used to formulate a compilation of some of the strengths and weaknesses of the code. These results are documented in the report. Volume 7 was designed to be updated periodically and to include the results of the latest code assessments as they become available. Consequently, users of Volume 7 should ensure that they have the latest revision available.

Moore, R.L.; Sloan, S.M.; Schultz, R.R.; Wilson, G.E. [Lockheed Idaho Technologies Co., Idaho Falls, ID (United States)

1996-10-01T23:59:59.000Z

252

Cryogenic System Revised June 1994  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Chapter 9. Cryogenic System Revised June 1994 9.1. Introduction 9.2. Heat Loads and Refrigeration Duties -- 175 -- #12; 176 Cryogenic System #12; Cryogenic System 177 9.3. Two Phase Helium Cooling 9.4. The Refrigerator and Control #12; 178 Cryogenic System 9.5. Cryogen Delivery and Control 9.6. Three Cooling

Brookhaven National Laboratory - Experiment 821

253

(Revised May 25, 2012) Radioactivity  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

(Revised May 25, 2012) Radioactivity GOALS (1) To gain a better understanding of naturally-occurring. (3) To measure the amount of "background radiation" from natural sources. (4) To test whether and man-made radiation sources. (2) To use a Geiger-Mueller tube to detect both beta and gamma radiation

Collins, Gary S.

254

Definitive design report: Design report project W-025, Radioactive Mixed Waste (RMW) Land Disposal Facility NON-DRAG-OFF. Revision 1, Volume 1 and 2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this report is to describe the definitive design of the Radioactive Mixed Waste (RMW) Non-Drag-Off disposal facility, Project W-025. This report presents a n of the major landfill design features and a discussion of how each of the criteria is addressed in the design. The appendices include laboratory test results, design drawings, and individual analyses that were conducted in support of the design. Revision 1 of this document incorporates design changes resulting from an increase in the required operating life of the W-025 landfill from 2 to 20 years. The rationale for these design changes is described in Golder Associates Inc. 1991a. These changes include (1) adding a 1.5-foot-thick layer of compacted admix directory-under the primary FML on the floor of the landfill to mitigate the effects of possible stress cracking in the primary flexible membrane liner (FML), and (2) increasing the operations layer thickness from two to three feet over the entire landfill area, to provide additional protection for the secondary admix layer against mechanical damage and the effects of freezing and desiccation. The design of the W-025 Landfill has also been modified in response to the results of the EPA Method 9090 chemical compatibility testing program (Golder Associates Inc. 1991b and 1991c), which was completed after the original design was prepared. This program consisted of testing geosynthetic materials and soil/bentonite admix with synthetic leachate having the composition expected during the life of the W-025 Landfill., The results of this program indicated that the polyester geotextile originally specified for the landfill might be susceptible to deterioration. On this basis, polypropylene geotextiles were substituted as a more chemically-resistant alternative. In addition, the percentage of bentonite in the admix was increased to provide sufficiently low permeability to the expected leachate.

Roscha, V.

1994-11-29T23:59:59.000Z

255

Revised (05/06)  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OMB No. 1901-0260 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OMB No. 1901-0260 (Revised 03/12) Germantown, MD 20874-1290 Expires: General Information 1. Purpose Standard Remittance Advice (RA) form is a mandatory form designed to serve as the source document for entries into the Department's accounting records under Public Law 97-425 data from Purchasers concerning payment of their contribution to the Nuclear Waste Fund. 2. Who Shall Submit The RA must be submitted by Purchasers who signed the Standard Contract for Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and/or High-Level Radioactive Waste. Submit Copy 1, 2, and 3 to DOE, Energy Finance and Accounting Service Center and retain Copy 4.

256

,"U.S. Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","U.S. Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2013...

257

,"U.S. Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","U.S. Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2013...

258

,"New York Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","New York Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2012...

259

,"New York Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","New York Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2012...

260

Pennsylvania Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Pennsylvania Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "1 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


261

Colorado Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Colorado Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7...

262

Pennsylvania Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Pennsylvania Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7...

263

Virginia Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Virginia Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7...

264

Oklahoma Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7...

265

Arkansas Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Arkansas Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7...

266

Oklahoma Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7...

267

Colorado Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Colorado Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7...

268

Arkansas Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Arkansas Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7...

269

Virginia Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases ...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Virginia Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7...

270

EM Quality Assurance Policy, Revision 0  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Previous EM policy on the use of the corporate Quality Assurance Program (EM-QA-001 Rev. 0). This document has been superseded by Revision 1 of the policy, but is still in use at some EM sites.

271

Phase II Transport Model of Corrective Action Unit 98: Frenchman Flat, Nevada Test Site, Nye County, Nevada, Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document, the Phase II Frenchman Flat transport report, presents the results of radionuclide transport simulations that incorporate groundwater radionuclide transport model statistical and structural uncertainty, and lead to forecasts of the contaminant boundary (CB) for a set of representative models from an ensemble of possible models. This work, as described in the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) Underground Test Area (UGTA) strategy (FFACO, 1996; amended 2010), forms an essential part of the technical basis for subsequent negotiation of the compliance boundary of the Frenchman Flat corrective action unit (CAU) by Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP) and National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO). Underground nuclear testing via deep vertical shafts was conducted at the Nevada Test Site (NTS) from 1951 until 1992. The Frenchman Flat area, the subject of this report, was used for seven years, with 10 underground nuclear tests being conducted. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), NNSA/NSO initiated the UGTA Project to assess and evaluate the effects of underground nuclear tests on groundwater at the NTS and vicinity through the FFACO (1996, amended 2010). The processes that will be used to complete UGTA corrective actions are described in the Corrective Action Strategy in the FFACO Appendix VI, Revision No. 2 (February 20, 2008).

Gregg Ruskuaff

2010-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

272

St. Louis Airport Site. Annual site environmental report, calendar year 1985. Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

During 1985, the environmental monitoring program was continued at the St. Louis Airport Site (SLAPS) in St. Louis County, Missouri. The ditches north and south of the site have been designated for cleanup as part of the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). The monitoring program at the SLAPS measures radon gas concentrations in air; external gamma radiation dose rates; and uranium, thorium, and radium concentrations in surface water, groundwater, and sediment. Potential radiation doses to the public are also calculated. Because the site is not controlled or regulated by the DOE, the DOE Derived Concentration Guides (DCGs) are not applicable to SLAPS, but are included only as a basis for comparison. The DOE DCGs and the DOE radiation protection standard have been revised. (Appendix B). During 1985, annual average radon levels in air at the SLAPS were below the DCG for uncontrolled areas. External gamma monitoring in 1985 showed measured annual gamma dose rates ranging from 3 to 2087 mrem/y, with the highest value occurring in an area known to be contaminated. The calculated maximum dose at the site boundary, assuming limited occupancy, would be 6 mrem/y. Average annual concentrations of /sup 230/Th, /sup 226/Ra, and total uranium in surface waters remained below the DOE DCG. The on-site groundwater measurements showed that average annual concentrations of /sup 230/Th, /sup 226/Ra and total uranium were within the DOE DCGs. Although there are no DCGs for sediments, all concentrations of total uraniu, /sup 230/Th, and /sup 226/Ra were below the FUSRAP Guidelines.

Not Available

1986-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

273

2009 Revisions EIA-914  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

for Texas, which was partially the cause for the review of the EIA-914, which, in turn, led to the development and implementation of this new methodology. Downward revisions in...

274

Journal of Machine Learning Research 1 (2008) 815-857 Submitted 6/05; Revised 2/07; Published 5/08 Finite-Time Bounds for Fitted Value Iteration  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Journal of Machine Learning Research 1 (2008) 815-857 Submitted 6/05; Revised 2/07; Published 5-approximation methods (e.g., neural networks, adaptive regression trees, kernel machines, locally weighted learning and Barto, 1997), machine maintenance (Ma- hadevan et al., 1997), dynamic channel allocation (Singh

Szepesvari, Csaba

275

Technical Review Report for the Model 9978-96 Package Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (S-SARP-G-00002, Revision 1, March 2009)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Technical Review Report (TRR) documents the review, performed by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Staff, at the request of the Department of Energy (DOE), on the 'Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (SARP), Model 9978 B(M)F-96', Revision 1, March 2009 (S-SARP-G-00002). The Model 9978 Package complies with 10 CFR 71, and with 'Regulations for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Material-1996 Edition (As Amended, 2000)-Safety Requirements', International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Safety Standards Series No. TS-R-1. The Model 9978 Packaging is designed, analyzed, fabricated, and tested in accordance with Section III of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME B&PVC). The review presented in this TRR was performed using the methods outlined in Revision 3 of the DOE's 'Packaging Review Guide (PRG) for Reviewing Safety Analysis Reports for Packages'. The format of the SARP follows that specified in Revision 2 of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Regulatory Guide 7.9, i.e., 'Standard Format and Content of Part 71 Applications for Approval of Packages for Radioactive Material'. Although the two documents are similar in their content, they are not identical. Formatting differences have been noted in this TRR, where appropriate. The Model 9978 Packaging is a single containment package, using a 5-inch containment vessel (5CV). It uses a nominal 35-gallon drum package design. In comparison, the Model 9977 Packaging uses a 6-inch containment vessel (6CV). The Model 9977 and Model 9978 Packagings were developed concurrently, and they were referred to as the General Purpose Fissile Material Package, Version 1 (GPFP). Both packagings use General Plastics FR-3716 polyurethane foam as insulation and as impact limiters. The 5CV is used as the Primary Containment Vessel (PCV) in the Model 9975-96 Packaging. The Model 9975-96 Packaging also has the 6CV as its Secondary Containment Vessel (SCV). In comparison, the Model 9975 Packagings use Celotex{trademark} for insulation and as impact limiters. To provide a historical perspective, it is noted that the Model 9975-96 Packaging is a 35-gallon drum package design that has evolved from a family of packages designed by DOE contractors at the Savannah River Site. Earlier package designs, i.e., the Model 9965, the Model 9966, the Model 9967, and the Model 9968 Packagings, were originally designed and certified in the early 1980s. In the 1990s, updated package designs that incorporated design features consistent with the then-newer safety requirements were proposed. The updated package designs at the time were the Model 9972, the Model 9973, the Model 9974, and the Model 9975 Packagings, respectively. The Model 9975 Package was certified by the Packaging Certification Program, under the Office of Safety Management and Operations. The Model 9978 Package has six Content Envelopes: C.1 ({sup 238}Pu Heat Sources), C.2 ( Pu/U Metals), C.3 (Pu/U Oxides, Reserved), C.4 (U Metal or Alloy), C.5 (U Compounds), and C.6 (Samples and Sources). Per 10 CFR 71.59 (Code of Federal Regulations), the value of N is 50 for the Model 9978 Package leading to a Criticality Safety Index (CSI) of 1.0. The Transport Index (TI), based on dose rate, is calculated to be a maximum of 4.1.

West, M

2009-03-06T23:59:59.000Z

276

Latest revised date: October 26, 2011 Page 1 of 3 Prepared by: Department of Health & Safety E-002  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

halon. Note: Replacement of fixed halon fire protection systems with ozone friendly extinguishing agent of this Document are Uncontrolled 1.0 OBJECTIVE 1.1 To promote an awareness of environmental protection and prudent practices pertaining to protection of the ozone layer. 1.2 To ensure compliance with environmental

deYoung, Brad

277

Minor Revision to Masters Program in Applied Social Psychology  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Minor Revision to Masters Program in Applied Social Psychology 1. Proposal Identification 1 1. Department contact person: Dr. Peter Grant Applied Social Psychology Program Coordinator Department of Psychology Tel: 966-6675 Fax: 966-6630 E-mail: peter.qrant(usaskca · Name of Revised Program: Masters program

Saskatchewan, University of

278

Latest revised date: October 26, 2011 Page 1 of 5 Prepared by: Department of Health & Safety S-016  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1.0 PREAMBLE 1.0 While hot work usually involving brazing, oxyacetylene cutting, grinding, soldering equipment including brazing, oxyacetylene cutting, soldering, grinding, torch applied roofing and welding designed maintenance areas. 3.0 To promote awareness of conditions and situations which can lead

deYoung, Brad

279

Closure Report for CAU No. 430: Buried Depleted Uraniuim Artillery Round No. 1, Tonopah Test Range, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

1.1 Purpose This Closure Report presents the information obtained from investigative actions performed to justify the decision for clean closure of CAU 430 through "No Further Action." The investigative actions were performed per the Streamlined Approach for Environmental Restoration Plan, CA UNO. 430: Buried Depleted Uranium Artille~ Round No. 1, Tonopah Test Range (DOE/NV, 1996a) (hereafter referred to as the SAFER Plan). The Buried DU Artillery Round No. 1 is located approximately 1.1 kilometers (km) (0.7 mile [mi]) south of Avenue 13 in the test area south of Area 9 (Figure 1-2). The site was thought to consist of a potentially unexploded W-79 Joint Test Assembly (JTA) test artillery projectile with high explosives (HE) and DU. The DU was substituted for Special Nuclear Material to prevent a nuclear explosion and yet retain the physical characteristics of uranium for ballistic and other mechanical tests. The projectile was reportedly buried in one pit, approximately 5 to 10 feet (ft) deep (Smith, 1993; Smith, 1996; Quas, 1996). The exact location of the burial pit is unknown; however, three disturbed areas (Sites A, B, and C) were identified through geophysical surveys, site visits, and employee interviews as possible locations of the test projectile (Figure 1-3). Results of the investigation are summarized within this Closure Report. Additional information about the site and investigation activities may be found in the SAFER Plan (DOE/NV, 1996a). 1.2 Scope The objectives of the SAFER Plan (DOE/NV, 1996a) activities were to prepare the site for closure through locating and identi~ing the projectile (Buried DU Artillery Round No. 1), destroying the projectile and any remaining components, collecting soil samples to detect residual contamination resulting from projectile destruction, and finally, remediating residual contamination.

None

1997-02-25T23:59:59.000Z

280

Environmental Regulatory Compliance Plan for Site Characterization; Yucca Mountain Site, Nevada Research and Development Area, Nevada: Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The DOE is committed to conduct its operations in an environmentally safe and sound manner, and will comply with applicable environmental statutes and regulations. These objectives are described in DOE Order 5400.1 (Environmental Protection Program Requirements). This document -- the Environmental Regulatory Compliance Plan (ERCP) -- is one method of implementing the policy set forth in DOE Order 5400.1 and the NWPA. The ERCP describes the plan by which the DOE will comply with applicable Federal environmental statutes and regulations. The ERCP also discusses how DOE will address State and local environmental statutes and regulations. 180 refs., 27 figs., 1 tab.

NONE

1988-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "1 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


281

Revised corrective action plan for underground storage tank 2331-U at the Building 9201-1 Site  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document represents the Corrective Action Plan for underground storage tank (UST) 2331-U, previously located at Building 9201-1, Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Tank 2331-U, a 560-gallon UST, was removed on December 14, 1988. This document presents a comprehensive summary of all environmental assessment investigations conducted at the Building 9201-1 Site and the corrective action measures proposed for remediation of subsurface petroleum product contamination identified at the site. This document is written in accordance with the regulatory requirements of the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC) Rule 1200-1-15-.06(7).

Bohrman, D.E.; Ingram, E.M. [Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant, TN (United States)

1993-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

282

RETRAN-02: A program for transient thermal-hydraulic analysis of complex fluid flow systems: Volume 1, Theory and numerics (Revision 4)  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

RETRAN-02 represents a significant achievement in the development of a versatile and reliable computer program for use in best-estimate transient thermal-hydraulic analysis of light water reactor systems. The RETRAN-02 computer program is an extension of the RETRAN-01 program designed to provide analysis capabilities for (1) BWR and PWR transients, (2) small break loss of coolant accidents, (3) balance of plant modeling, and (4) anticipated transients without scram, while maintaining the analysis capabilities of the predecessor code. The RETRAN-02 computer code is constructed in a semimodular and dynamic dimensioned form where additions to the code can be easily carried out as new and improved models are developed. The NRC, at the request of a group of utilities, had Argonne National Laboratory perform a technical review of RETRAN-01 MOD003 and RETRAN-02 MOD002. This review was completed in May 1983, and the NRC issued a Safety Evaluation Report on RETRAN in September 1984. Revision 4 of the RETRAN-02 computer code manuals describes the MOD005 version of the code. This report (the first of a four-volume computer code manual) describes the theory and numerical algorithms of the RETRAN-02 code. The three companion volumes describe the programming details, the user input requirements and sample problem input and output files, and the verification and qualification performed with RETRAN. 186 refs., 75 figs., 30 tabs.

McFadden, J.H.; Narum, R.E.; Peterson, C.E.; Noble, C.; Farman, R.F.; McClure, J.A.; Paulsen, M.P.; Richert, K.D.; Hughes, E.D.; Gose, G.C.

1988-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

283

revision:19960317 modified:19960317  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

restrict our­ self to certain concrete classes then we may be able to retain compactness. In this paper we375 revision:1996­03­17 modified:1996­03­17 Some Compact Logics ­ Results in ZFC Alan H. Mekler order logic is so strong that it fails to have nice model theoretic properties such as compactness

Shelah, Saharon

284

Effective: September 1, 2013 AGENDA ITEM NO.: 5.I. Revised August 19, 2013 MEETING DATE: 08/19/2013  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

review, deliberations and changes Where appropriate, the RPS Procurement Plan includes section citations ALAMEDA MUNICIPAL POWER RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES PROCUREMENT PLAN (PER SENATE BILL X1 2) Approved-2012 First Extraordinary Session of the Legislature, modified the state's renewable portfolio standard (RPS

285

Revised version Water Practice & Technology, Vol 2 (1) 2007. doi10.2166/wpt.2007.0008  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

compounds for sewage sludge spreading on agricultural land, and also the central role of the sewage sludge of organic pollutants after sewage sludge spreading on agricultural soils: a 30-years field-scale recording 1) and residues derived from plastics (PAE-phthalates) end up in sewage sludge. In order to evaluate and quantify

Paris-Sud XI, Université de

286

Microsoft Word - AL 2010-07 Acquistion Letters Remaining in Effect May 2010 revision 1 June 2010  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

No. AL 2010-07 Rev. 1 No. AL 2010-07 Rev. 1 Acquisition Regulation Date 06/01/2010 ACQUISITION LETTER This Acquisition Letter is issued under the authority of the DOE and NNSA Senior Procurement Executives. Acquisition Letters (AL) that remain in effect are identified below. All other previously issued ALs have been superseded by a formal rule-making, incorporated into other guidance, and/or canceled. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ACQUISITION LETTERS REMAINING IN EFFECT NUMBER DATE SUBJECT 93-4 04/07/1993 Displaced Workers Benefits Program 94-19 12/09/1994 Basic Labor Policies Fringe Benefits 95-06 06/28/1995 Personal Property Letter System 2000-09 11/11/2000 Source Selection Authority 2005-11 07/15/2005 Home Office Expenses for Management and

287

Department of Homeland Security Inventory DHS_inventory_form_revision_4_2011.doc Page 1 of 5  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

-90-3 Phosphorus oxychloride 10025-87-3 Phosphorus trichloride 7719-12-2 Thiodiglycol 111-48-8 #12;Department feet) Acetylene 74-86-2 Ammonia (anhydrous) 7664-41-7 Arsine 7784-42-1 Boron trichloride 10294-77-4 Diborane 19287-45-7 Dichlorosilane 4109-96-0 Dinitrogen tetroxide 10544-72-6 Fluorine 7782-41-4 Germane

Pawlowski, Wojtek

288

Policy Flash 2013-62 Acquisition Letter 09 - Revision of Department...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Letter 09 - Revision of Department of Energy (DOE) Order 350.1 and Special H Clause Policy Flash 2013-62 Acquisition Letter 09 - Revision of Department of Energy (DOE) Order...

289

Revised: May 2011 Fraud Prevention Policy  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Revised: May 2011 Fraud Prevention Policy #12;Fraud Prevention Policy March 2011 1 Contents Page 1 of Audit 6 10. Notification of Suspected Fraud 7 11. Fraud Response Plan 7 12. Dissemination of the Policy 8 Appendix A Fraud Response Plan 9 Appendix B Further Reference 15 #12;Fraud Prevention Policy March

Mottram, Nigel

290

Evaluation of geotechnical monitoring data from the ESF North Ramp Starter Tunnel, April 1994 to June 1995. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report presents the results of instrumentation measurements and observations made during construction of the North Ramp Starter Tunnel (NRST) of the Exploratory Studies Facility (ESF). The information in this report was developed as part of the Design Verification Study, Section 8.3.1.15.1.8 of the Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Plan (DOE 1988). The ESF is being constructed by the US Department of Energy (DOE) to evaluate the feasibility of locating a potential high-level nuclear waste repository on lands within and adjacent to the Nevada Test Site (NTS), Nye County, Nevada. The Design Verification Studies are performed to collect information during construction of the ESF that will be useful for design and construction of the potential repository. Four experiments make up the Design Verification Study: Evaluation of Mining Methods, Monitoring Drift Stability, Monitoring of Ground Support Systems, and The Air Quality and Ventilation Experiment. This report describes Sandia National Laboratories` (SNL) efforts in the first three of these experiments in the NRST.

NONE

1995-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

291

Conversion and Blending Facility highly enriched uranium to low enriched uranium as uranyl nitrate hexahydrate. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Conversion and Blending Facility (CBF) will have two missions: (1) convert HEU materials to pure HEU uranyl nitrate (UNH) and (2) blend pure HEU UNH with depleted and natural UNH to produce HEU UNH crystals. The primary emphasis of this blending operation will be to destroy the weapons capability of large, surplus stockpiles of HEU. The blended LEU product can only be made weapons capable again by the uranium enrichment process. To the extent practical, the chemical and isotopic concentrations of blended LEU product will be held within the specifications required for LWR fuel. Such blended LEU product will be offered to the United States Enrichment Corporation (USEC) to be sold as feed material to the commercial nuclear industry. Otherwise, blended LEU Will be produced as a waste suitable for storage or disposal.

NONE

1995-07-05T23:59:59.000Z

292

Office of River Protection, plan for Developing Hanford Tank Waste Processing Alternatives, Revision 1, December 15, 1999  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In August 2000, The Department of Energy (DOE) must decide whether to authorize BNFL Inc. (BNFL) to construct and operate tank waste processing facilities as proposed or to take another path. This will be a multi-billion dollar commitment, requiring that the best path forward be chosen. The plan for reaching this decision is described in reference 1. The alternative evaluations in this plan are directed toward acquiring information needed for the August 2000 decision and for preparing an alternate path plan, should an acceptable agreement with BNFL not be reached. Many of the alternatives considered may still be applicable for failures that could occur after the year 2000, however, depending on the cause of later failures, others alternatives may need to be developed.

WODRICH, D.D.

2000-01-03T23:59:59.000Z

293

Revised: 6.25.2012 Bb 9: Creating Podcasts & Subscribing in iTunes p. 1 of 6 This document contains step-by-step instructions for using Wimba Podcaster in Blackboard.  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Revised: 6.25.2012 Bb 9: Creating Podcasts & Subscribing in iTunes p. 1 of 6 This document containsTunes" in this document, we mean the iTunes program, not the iTunes store or iTunes U. Preparing to use Wimba Podcaster recording equipment at Hunter College, please see page 5 of this document. To create a podcast episode

Qiu, Weigang

294

Phase II Documentation Overview of Corrective Action Unit 98: Frenchman Flat, Nevada Test Site, Nye County, Nevada, Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) initiated the Underground Test Area (UGTA) Subproject to assess and evaluate radiologic groundwater contamination resulting from underground nuclear testing at the NTS. These activities are overseen by the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) (1996, as amended March 2010). For Frenchman Flat, the UGTA Subproject addresses media contaminated by the underground nuclear tests, which is limited to geologic formations within the saturated zone or 100 meters (m) or less above the water table. Transport in groundwater is judged to be the primary mechanism of migration for the subsurface contamination away from the Frenchman Flat underground nuclear tests. The intent of the UGTA Subproject is to assess the risk to the public from the groundwater contamination produced as a result of nuclear testing. The primary method used to assess this risk is the development of models of flow and contaminant transport to forecast the extent of potentially contaminated groundwater for the next 1,000 years, establish restrictions to groundwater usage, and implement a monitoring program to verify protectiveness. For the UGTA Subproject, contaminated groundwater is that which exceeds the radiological standards of the Safe Drinking Water Act (CFR, 2009) the State of Nevadas groundwater quality standard to protect human health and the environment. Contaminant forecasts are expected to be uncertain, and groundwater monitoring will be used in combination with land-use control to build confidence in model results and reduce risk to the public. Modeling forecasts of contaminant transport will provide the basis for negotiating a compliance boundary for the Frenchman Flat Corrective Action Unit (CAU). This compliance boundary represents a regulatory-based distinction between groundwater contaminated or not contaminated by underground testing. Transport modeling simulations are used to compute radionuclide concentrations in time and space within the CAU for the 1,000-year contaminant boundary. These three-dimensional (3-D) concentration simulations are integrated into probabilistic forecasts of the likelihood of groundwater exceeding or remaining below the radiological standards of the Safe Drinking Water Act (CFR, 2009) defined as the contaminant boundary. Contaminant boundaries are not discrete predictions of the location or concentration of contaminants, but instead are spatial representations of the probability of exceeding Safe Drinking Water Act radiological standards. The forecasts provide planning tools to facilitate regulatory decisions designed to protect the health and safety of the public.

Greg Ruskauff

2010-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

295

Development of Revised Energy Standards for Texas Buildings: Preliminary Results  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

for Energy Studies (CES) at The University of Texas at Austin is revising and updating the nonresidential building portion of the Energy Conservation Manual. The proposed revision is a Texas-specific adaptation of ASHRAE Standard 90.1P ("Energy Efficient...

Hunn, B. D.; Jones, J. W.; Silver, S. C.

1988-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

296

Revised 1997 Retail Electricity Price Forecast Principal Author: Ben Arikawa  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Revised 1997 Retail Electricity Price Forecast March 1998 Principal Author: Ben Arikawa Electricity 1997 FORE08.DOC Page 1 CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION ELECTRICITY ANALYSIS OFFICE REVISED 1997 RETAIL ELECTRICITY PRICE FORECAST Introduction The Electricity Analysis Office of the California Energy Commission

297

Hydrologic Tests at Characterization Wells R-9i, R-13, R-19, R-22, and R-31, Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Hydrologic information is essential for environmental efforts at Los Alamos National Laboratory. Testing at new characterization wells being drilled to the regional aquifer (''R wells'') to improve the conceptual hydrogeologic model of the Pajarito Plateau is providing such information. Field tests were conducted on various zones of saturation penetrated by the R wells to collect data needed for determining hydraulic properties. This document provides details of the design and execution of testing as well as an analysis of data for five new wells: R-9i, R-13, R-19, R-22, and R-31. One well (R-13) was evaluated by a pumping test and the rest (R-9i, R-19, R-22, and R-31) were evaluated by injection tests. Characterization well R-9i is located in Los Alamos Canyon approximately 0.3 mi west of the Route 4/Route 502 intersection. It was completed at a depth of 322 ft below ground surface (bgs) in March 2000. This well was constructed with two screens positioned below the regional water table. Both screens were tested. Screen 1 is completed at about 189-200 ft bgs in fractured basalt, and screen 2 is completed at about 270-280 ft bgs in massive basalt. Specific capacity analysis of the screen 1 data suggests that the fractured basalt has a transmissivity (T) of 589 ft{sup 2}/day and corresponds to a hydraulic conductivity (K) of 7.1 ft/day based on a saturated thickness of 83 ft. The injection test data from the massive basalt near screen 2 were analyzed by the Bouwer-Rice slug test methodology and suggest that K is 0.11 ft/day, corresponding to a T of about 2.8 ft{sup 2}/day based on a saturated thickness of 25 ft. Characterization well R-13 is located in Mortandad Canyon just west of the eastern Laboratory boundary. It was completed at a depth of 1029 ft bgs in February 2002. This well was constructed with one 60-ft long screen positioned about 125 ft below the regional water table. This screen is completed at about 958-1019 ft bgs and straddles the geologic contact between the Puye fanglomerate and unassigned pumiceous units. The specific capacity analysis of a 12 minute pumping test indicates that the Puye fanglomerates near the R-13 screen have a T of 5269 ft{sup 2}/day and correspond to a hydraulic conductivity (K) of 17.6 ft/day based on a saturated thickness of 300 ft. Characterization well R-19 is located east of firing site IJ in Technical Area (TA) 36 on the mesa between Three-mile and Potrillo Canyons. It was completed at a depth of 1885 ft bgs in April 2000. This well was constructed with two screens positioned above the regional water table and five screens positioned below the regional water table. Only the bottom two screens were tested. Screen 6 is completed at about 1727-1734 ft bgs in Puye fanglomerate, and screen 7 is completed at about 1832-1849 ft bgs in Puye fanglomerate. Specific capacity analysis of the screen 6 data suggests that T is about 6923 ft{sup 2}/day and corresponds to a K of 18.6 ft/day based on a saturated thickness of 373 ft. Specific capacity analysis of the screen 7 data suggests that T is about 8179 ft{sup 2}/day and corresponds to a K of 22.0 ft/day based on a saturated thickness of 373 ft. Characterization well R-22 is located on Mesita del Buey between Canada del Buey and Pajarito Canyons immediately east of Material Disposal Area (MDA) G in TA-54. It was completed at a depth of 1489 ft bgs in October 2000. This well was constructed with five screens positioned at or below the regional water table; however, only screens 2-5 were tested. Screen 1 is completed at the regional water table at about 872-914 ft bgs in Cerros del Rio basalt. Screen 2 is completed at about 947-989 ft bgs in Cerros del Rio basalt. Screen 3 is completed at about 1272-1279 ft bgs in Puye fanglomerate. Screen 4 is completed at about 1378-1452 ft bgs in older basalt. Screen 5 is completed at about 1447-1452 ft bgs in older fanglomerate. Bouwer-Rice analyses of the injection-test recovery data suggest K values of 0.04, 0.32, 0.54, and 0.27 ft/day for screens 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. These values correspond to

S.G.McLin; W.J. Stone

2004-06-01T23:59:59.000Z

298

An Assessment of the Economics of Future Electric Power Generation Options and the Implications for Fusion - Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This study examines the potential range of electric power costs for some major alternatives to fusion electric power generation when it is ultimately deployed in the middle of the 21st century and, thus, offers a perspective on the cost levels that fusion must achieve to be competitive. The alternative technologies include coal burning, coal gasification, natural gas, nucle& fission, and renewable energy. The cost of electricity (COE) from the alternatives to fusion should be in a 30-53 mills/kWh (1999 dollars) range if carbon sequestration is not needed, 30-61 mills/kWh if sequestration is required, or as high as 83 mills/kWh for the worst-case scenario for cost uncertainty. The reference COE range for fusion was estimated at 65-102 mills/kWh for l- to 1.3-GW(e) scale power plants. Fusion costs will have tqbe, reduced and/or alternative concepts devised before fusion will be competitive with the alternatives for the future production of electricity. Fortunately, there are routes to achieve this goal.

Delene, J.G.; Sheffield, J.; Williams, K.A.; Reid, R.L.; Hadley, S.

2000-02-01T23:59:59.000Z

299

Secondary wastes and high explosive residues generated during production of main high explosive charges for nuclear weapons. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This study identifies the sources of high-explosive (HE) residues and hazardous and nonhazardous wastes generated during the production of the main HE charges for nuclear weapons, and estimates their quantities and characteristics. The results can be used as a basis for design of future handling and treatment systems for solid and liquid HE residues and wastes at any proposed new HE production facilities. This paper outlines a general methodology for documenting and estimating the volumes and characteristics of the solid and liquid HE residues and hazardous and nonhazardous wastes. To facilitate the estimating, we separated the HE main-charge production process into ten discrete unit operations and four support operations, and identified the corresponding solid and liquid HE residues and waste quantities. Four different annual HE main-charge production rates of 100, 500, 1000, and 2000 HE units/yr were assumed to develop the volume estimates and to establish the sensitivity of the estimates to HE production rates. The total solids (HE residues and hazardous and nonhazardous wastes) estimated range from 800 to 2800 ft{sup 3}/yr and vary uniformly with the assumed HE production rate. The total liquids estimated range from 73,000 to 1,448.000 gal/yr and also vary uniformly with the assumed production rate. Of the estimated solids, the hazardous wastes (e.g., electrical vehicle batteries and light tubes) were about 2% of the total volumes. The generation of solid HE residues varied uniformly with the HE production rates and ranged from about 20% of the total solids volume for the 100 HE units/yr case to about 60% for the 2000 units/yr case. The HE machining operations generated 60 to 80% of the total solid HE residues, depending on the assumed production rate, and were also the sources of the most concentrated HE residues.

Jardine, L.J.; McGee, J.T.

1995-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

300

Analysis of removal alternatives for the Heavy Water Components Test Reactor at the Savannah River Site. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This engineering study evaluates different alternatives for decontamination and decommissioning of the Heavy Water Components Test Reactor (HWCTR). Cooled and moderated with pressurized heavy water, this uranium-fueled nuclear reactor was designed to test fuel assemblies for heavy water power reactors. It was operated for this purpose from march of 1962 until December of 1964. Four alternatives studied in detail include: (1) dismantlement, in which all radioactive and hazardous contaminants would be removed, the containment dome dismantled and the property restored to a condition similar to its original preconstruction state; (2) partial dismantlement and interim safe storage, where radioactive equipment except for the reactor vessel and steam generators would be removed, along with hazardous materials, and the building sealed with remote monitoring equipment in place to permit limited inspections at five-year intervals; (3) conversion for beneficial reuse, in which most radioactive equipment and hazardous materials would be removed and the containment building converted to another use such as a storage facility for radioactive materials, and (4) entombment, which involves removing hazardous materials, filling the below-ground structure with concrete, removing the containment dome and pouring a concrete cap on the tomb. Also considered was safe storage, but this approach, which has, in effect, been followed for the past 30 years, did not warrant detailed evaluation. The four other alternatives were evaluate, taking into account factors such as potential effects on the environment, risks, effectiveness, ease of implementation and cost. The preferred alternative was determined to be dismantlement. This approach is recommended because it ranks highest in the comparative analysis, would serve as the best prototype for the site reactor decommissioning program and would be most compatible with site property reuse plans for the future.

Owen, M.B.

1997-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "1 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


301

Greater-than-Class C low-level radioactive waste characterization: Estimated volumes, radionuclide activities, and other characteristics. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Department of Energy`s (DOE`s) planning for the disposal of greater-than-Class C low-level radioactive waste (GTCC LLW) requires characterization of the waste. This report estimates volumes, radionuclide activities, and waste forms of GTCC LLW to the year 2035. It groups the waste into four categories, representative of the type of generator or holder of the waste: Nuclear Utilities, Sealed Sources, DOE-Held, and Other Generator. GTCC LLW includes activated metals (activation hardware from reactor operation and decommissioning), process wastes (i.e., resins, filters, etc.), sealed sources, and other wastes routinely generated by users of radioactive material. Estimates reflect the possible effect that packaging and concentration averaging may have on the total volume of GTCC LLW. Possible GTCC mixed LLW is also addressed. Nuclear utilities will probably generate the largest future volume of GTCC LLW with 65--83% of the total volume. The other generators will generate 17--23% of the waste volume, while GTCC sealed sources are expected to contribute 1--12%. A legal review of DOE`s obligations indicates that the current DOE-Held wastes described in this report will not require management as GTCC LLW because of the contractual circumstances under which they were accepted for storage. This report concludes that the volume of GTCC LLW should not pose a significant management problem from a scientific or technical standpoint. The projected volume is small enough to indicate that a dedicated GTCC LLW disposal facility may not be justified. Instead, co-disposal with other waste types is being considered as an option.

Not Available

1994-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

302

HNF-37489-FP Revision  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

HNF-37489-FP HNF-37489-FP Revision 0 Project Hanford Management Contractor foc the US. Deparbnsnt of Energy under Contract DE-ACO6-96RL13200 FLUOR, P.O. Box 1000 Richland, Washington Implementation of the Seismic Design Criteria for DOE-STD-I 189-2008, Appendix A HNF-37489-FP Revision 0 Implementation of the Seismic Design Criteria for DOE-STD-1189- 2008, Appendix A S. K. Omberg Fluor Government Group Date Published April 2008 To Be Presented at The Nuclear Renaissanm. Safety Analysls for the New Nuclear Age Energy Facility Contractow Group May 3 - 8,2008 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management Pmject Hanford Management CcntractOr for the US. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC0696RL132W FLUOR, P.O. Box I000

303

ADR Revised Policy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Alternative Dispute Resolution Alternative Dispute Resolution AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Notice of Revised Policy Statement. SUMMARY: On October 24, 1995, the Department of Energy (DOE) published an interim Statement of Policy on Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) (60 FR 54482) to further its commitment to the use of ADR for resolving issues in controversy in a fair, timely, and cost efficient manner, and to comply with the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act (ADRA), 5 U.S.C. §571 et seq. Today, DOE publishes a revised Statement of Policy on Alternative Dispute Resolution to reaffirm its commitment to the use of ADR, including the use of Environmental Conflict Resolution (ECR) and other collaborative processes that may be utilized to prevent or avoid potential conflicts.

304

(Created 1/09; Revised 10/09, 3/11, 7/11) UNL Environmental Health and Safety (402) 472-4925 http://ehs.unl.edu  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

from a single nonchromosomal or viral DNA source, though one or more of the segments may be a synthetic-4925 · http://ehs.unl.edu Safe Operating Procedure (Revised 11/13) RECOMBINANT OR SYNTHETIC NUCLEIC ACIDS://ehs.unl.edu/) All recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid molecule (r/sNA) projects at the University of Nebraska

Farritor, Shane

305

Standard format and content acceptance criteria for the Material Control and Accounting (MC and A) Reform Amendment: 10 CFR Part 74, Subpart E. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In 1987 the NRC revised the material control and accounting requirements for NRC licensees authorized to possess and use a formula quantity (i.e., 5 formula kilograms or more) of strategic special nuclear material. Those revisions issued as 10 CFR 74.51-59 require timely monitoring of in-process inventory and discrete items to detect anomalies potentially indicative of material losses. Timely detection and enhanced loss localization capabilities are beneficial to alarm resolution and also for material recovery in the event of an actual loss. NUREG-1280 was issued in 1987 to present criteria that could be used by applicants, licensees, and NRC license reviewers in the initial preparation and subsequent review of fundamental nuclear material control (FNMC) plans submitted in response to the Reform Amendment. This document is also intended for both licensees and license reviewers with respect to FNMC plan revisions. General performance objectives, system capabilities, process monitoring, item monitoring, alarm resolution, quality assurance, and accounting are addressed. This revision to NUREG-1280 is an expansion of the initial edition, which clarifies and expands upon several topics and addresses issues identified under Reform Amendment implementation experience.

NONE

1995-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

306

Revised Spring 2008 NIH Public Access Policy  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Revised Spring 2008 NIH Public Access Policy Notice Number: NOT-OD-08-033 - (See Notice NOT-OD-08-161 (Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008), the NIH voluntary Public Access Policy (NOT-OD-05-022) is now mandatory shall implement the public access policy in a manner consistent with copyright law. Specifics 1. The NIH

307

FTCP Corrective Action Plan- Revision 2  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

March 2009 FTCP Corrective Action Plan, Revision 2, which is Deliverable B for Commitment 13 in the Department of Energy (DOE) Implementation Plan to Improve Oversight of Nuclear Operations, issued in response to Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 2004-1, Oversight of Complex, High-Hazard Nuclear Operations

308

OPTIMIZATION TOPICS LIST Revised April 2012  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 OPTIMIZATION TOPICS LIST Revised April 2012 For Fall 2012 and Spring 2013 we will adopt. Bertsimas and J. Tsitsiklis, Introduction to Linear Optimization, Athena Scientific, 1997 2. M. C. Ferris, O and mixed integer models · Existence of optimal solutions, optimality conditions · Branch and bound methods

Radeloff, Volker C.

309

Last revised July 2008 Harvard University  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Last revised July 2008 Harvard University Purchasing Card Individual Cardholder Application, Part 1 Harvard Office Mailing Address City, State, Zip Code Harvard Phone Number ( ) - 33-Digit Default General") are pleased to offer you the Purchasing Card. The Purchasing Card represents Harvard's trust in you

Chen, Yiling

310

Addendum to the Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 326: Areas 6 and 27 Release Sites, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document constitutes an addendum to the Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 326: Areas 6 and 27 Release Sites, Nevada Test Site, Nevada (Revision 1), December 2002 as described in the document Supplemental Investigation Report for FFACO Use Restrictions, Nevada Test Site, Nevada (SIR) dated November 2008. The SIR document was approved by NDEP on December 5, 2008. The approval of the SIR document constituted approval of each of the recommended UR removals. In conformance with the SIR document, this addendum consists of: This page that refers the reader to the SIR document for additional information The cover, title, and signature pages of the SIR document The NDEP approval letter The corresponding section of the SIR document This addendum provides the documentation justifying the cancellation of the UR for CAS 06-25-01, CP-1 Heating Oil Release. This UR was established as part of a Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) corrective action and is based on the presence of contaminants at concentrations greater than the action levels established at the time of the initial investigation (FFACO, 1996). Since this UR was established, practices and procedures relating to the implementation of risk-based corrective actions (RBCA) have changed. Therefore, this UR was reevaluated against the current RBCA criteria as defined in the Industrial Sites Project Establishment of Final Action Levels (NNSA/NSO, 2006). This re-evaluation consisted of comparing the original data (used to define the need for the UR) to risk-based final action levels (FALs) developed using the current Industrial Sites RBCA process. The re-evaluation resulted in a recommendation to remove the UR because contamination is not present at the site above the risk-based FALs. Requirements for inspecting and maintaining this UR will be canceled, and the postings and signage at this site will be removed. Fencing and posting may be present at this site that are unrelated to the FFACO UR such as for radiological control purposes as required by the NV/YMP Radiological Control Manual (NNSA/NSO, 2004). This modification will not affect or modify any non-FFACO requirements for fencing, posting, or monitoring at this site.

Grant Evenson

2009-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

311

Cumulative Revision Map  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Unlike static documents, version-controlled documents are edited by one or more authors over a certain period of time. Examples include large scale computer code, papers authored by a team of scientists, and online discussion boards. Such collaborative revision process makes traditional document modeling and visualization techniques inappropriate. In this paper we propose a new visualization technique for version-controlled documents that reveals interesting authoring patterns in papers, computer code and Wikipedia articles. The revealed authoring patterns are useful for the readers, participants in the authoring process, and supervisors.

Kim, Seungyeon; Lebanon, Guy

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

312

The Ohio State University Office of Human Resources Page 1 of 1 Policy 1.50 Preventing and Reporting Abuse in Programs with Minor Participants Revised 05/08/13  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

.osu.edu/policy/resources/150understand.ppt Ohio Revised Code ORC 2921.22, Failure to report a crime or knowledge of a death or burn injury, codes.ohio.gov/orc/2921.22 ORC 2151.421, Reporting child abuse or neglect, codes.ohio.gov/orc

Howat, Ian M.

313

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

6,30958,29947,29680,31605,30694,29922,27766,29226 "Total Emission Rate (lbsMWh)" "Sulfur Dioxide",1.1,1.2,1.3,1.5,1.1,1.2,1.8,1.8,1.9,1.9,1.9,2,1.9,1.7,1.9,1.9,2,2,1.7,1.9,1.8,1.8...

314

Supplemental design requirements document, Project W026. Revision 3  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This document supplements and extends the Functional Design Criteria, SP-W026-FDC-001, for the Waste Receiving and Processing Facility (WRAP), Module 1. It provides additional detailed requirements, summarizes key Westinghouse Hanford Company design guidance, and establishes baseline technical agreements to be used in definitive design of the WRAP-1 facility. Revision 3 of the Supplemental Design Requirements Document has been assigned an Impact Level of 3ESQ based on the content of the entire revision. The actual changes made from Revision 2 have an Impact Level of 3S and the basis for these changes was previously reviewed and approved per WHC correspondence No. 9355770.

Weidert, J.R.

1993-10-08T23:59:59.000Z

315

5/3/12 Revision 1 of ESH Bulletin 02 1/2www.phy.ornl.gov/divops/ESH/04-10.html  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

that these amounts are larger than previously allowed. Material Reporting Quantity Depleted Uranium 1000 g(rams) Lithium enriched in 6Li 1000 g Natural Uranium 1000 g Thorium 1000 g Deuterium 100 g Americium241 1.0 g Americium243 1.0 g Curium 1.0 g Neptunium237 1.0 g Uranium enriched in 235U 0.050 g Plutonium 0.050 g

316

BRAINA JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

.1093/brain/awr179 Brain 2011: Page 1 of 22 | 1 Received March 17, 2011. Revised May 25, 2011. Accepted June

Dickerson, Brad

317

Proposed Revisions for Regents Policy  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Proposed Revisions for Regents Policy: Faculty Tenure Arlene Carney Vice Provost for Faculty family friendliness for probationary period #12;Basis for Revisions of Faculty Tenure Policy · Changed definitions of Academic Freedom and Responsibility required changes in the tenure policy. · As more untenured

Amin, S. Massoud

318

REPORT NO. 6 revised fallout  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

predictions October 1964 Report of the FEDERAL RADIATION COUNCIL #12;REPORT NO. 6 revised fallout estimates estimate and does not change the 30-year and 70-year dose estimates made on the basis of the originalREPORT NO. 6 revised fallout estimates for 1964-1965 and verification of the 1963

319

Revised: 9/25/13 COMBINED MAJOR BIOLOGY/PSYCHOLOGY  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Revised: 9/25/13 COMBINED MAJOR BIOLOGY/PSYCHOLOGY CONCENTRATION FORM (To be submitted ____________________ 5. Biology 75, 110, 115, 116, or 134 ________________________________ II. Five Psychology courses 1. Psychology 31 __________________ 2. Psychology 32 _____________________ (or Bio 132) __________________ 3

Patel, Aniruddh D.

320

Colorado Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Colorado Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "1 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


321

THIRD EDITION (REVISED PRINTING) SERVICE-ORIENTED COMPUTING  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

....................................................................................................10 1.3 Service-Oriented Architecture and ComputingTHIRD EDITION (REVISED PRINTING) SERVICE-ORIENTED COMPUTING AND WEB SOFTWARE INTEGRATION FROM) ............................................................................................................xv Part I Distributed Service-Oriented Software Development and Web Data Management

Chen, Yinong

322

Texas State Offshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Million Barrels) Texas State Offshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6...

323

Texas State Offshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Million Barrels) Texas State Offshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6...

324

Wyoming Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Wyoming Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9...

325

Arkansas Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Arkansas Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

326

Kansas Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Kansas Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9...

327

California Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) California Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

328

Montana Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Montana Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9...

329

Louisiana Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Louisiana Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

330

Florida Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Florida Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9...

331

Michigan Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Michigan Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

332

Alabama Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Alabama Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9...

333

Mississippi Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Mississippi Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

334

Mississippi Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Mississippi Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

335

Virginia Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Virginia Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

336

Wyoming Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Wyoming Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9...

337

Michigan Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Michigan Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

338

Texas Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Texas Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9...

339

Ohio Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Ohio Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9...

340

Alaska Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Alaska Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "1 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


341

Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9...

342

Texas Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Texas Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9...

343

Florida Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Florida Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9...

344

Alabama Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Alabama Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9...

345

Montana Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Montana Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9...

346

California Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) California Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

347

Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9...

348

Ohio Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Ohio Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9...

349

Pennsylvania Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Pennsylvania Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

350

Alaska Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Alaska Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9...

351

Virginia Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Virginia Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

352

Arkansas Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...  

Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update (EIA)

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Arkansas Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

353

Louisiana Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Louisiana Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

354

Pennsylvania Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Pennsylvania Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

355

Kansas Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic...  

Annual Energy Outlook 2013 [U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)]

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Kansas Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9...

356

Revised 4/10/2002 _____________________________ Environment, Health, & Safety _________ __________________  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Revised 4/10/2002 _____________________________ Environment, Health, & Safety to all potentially exposed personnel). · Specific work practices, labeling, engineering controls, and personal protective equipment used for working at Biosafety levels 1 and 2. · Disinfection, spill response

Eisen, Michael

357

Miscellaneous States Shale Gas Proved Reserves Revision Decreases...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Miscellaneous States Shale Gas Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7...

358

Miscellaneous States Shale Gas Proved Reserves Revision Increases...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Miscellaneous States Shale Gas Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7...

359

Wyoming Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Wyoming Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

360

New Mexico Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) New Mexico Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "1 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


361

U.S. Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) U.S. Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

362

Montana Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Montana Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

363

U.S. Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) U.S. Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

364

Utah Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

365

New Mexico Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) New Mexico Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7...

366

Kansas Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Kansas Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

367

West Virginia Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) West Virginia Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7...

368

Montana Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Montana Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

369

Wyoming Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Wyoming Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

370

Kansas Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Kansas Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

371

Utah Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8...

372

West Virginia Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) West Virginia Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7...

373

Revised 3/30/09 High Energy Physics  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Revised 3/30/09 1 High Energy Physics INTERNAL CONTROLS Procedures for FY 2009 Organizational Chart updated on 3/27/2009 2. Only appropriate individuals with the proper degree of job responsibility

Kemner, Ken

374

Revised 30/04/2014 Lecture 12 -Memory  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 Revised 30/04/2014 Lecture 12 - Memory The Physiology of the Senses www.tutis.ca/Senses/ Contents ............................................................................................................ 2 Types of Memory............................................................................................................ 2 Mechanisms of Learning Procedural Memories

Vilis, Tutis

375

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1,16371,14128,16853,17896,15142,18450,17504,16129 "Total Emission Rate (lbsMWh)" "Sulfur Dioxide",1.2,1.3,1.6,1.9,1.7,1.9,1.7,1.7,1.9,1.9,1.9,5,3.9,1.9,2.1,1.9,3.2,3.2,1.8,1.8,1.8...

376

Notice, Revised Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Notice, Revised Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement - July 2013 Notice, Revised Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement - July 2013 August 29, 2013 - 4:19pm...

377

2008 MERRTT Revision Letter  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

November 2, 2007 November 2, 2007 The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Transportation Emergency Preparedness Program (TEPP) is pleased to announce the release of the 2008 Modular Emergency Response Radiological Transportation Training (MERRTT). This revision replaces the 2005 MERRTT CD-ROM set. As required by the WIPP Land Withdrawal Act, the 2008 MERRTT has been sent to the Occupational, Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) for review. The 2008 version of MERRTT includes several enhancements, but the primary enhancement is the addition of the decontamination dress-down video. Comments received on the decontamination video script in the fall 2006 were incorporated into the script and the filming and final editing were completed in the spring 2007. The decontamination video was added to MERRTT to support the students'

378

Original","Revised","Data  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

,,"Original","Revised","Data" ,,"Original","Revised","Data" "Data Type","Product","End Use","PADD","State","Data 2003","Data 2003","Different" "Sales","No. 1 Distillate","Residential","U.S. TOTAL",,110032,110032 "Sales","No. 1 Distillate","Residential","PADD 1",,4232,4232 "Sales","No. 1 Distillate","Residential","PADD 1A",,2085,2085 "Sales","No. 1 Distillate","Residential","Connecticut","CT" "Sales","No. 1 Distillate","Residential","Maine","ME",536,536 "Sales","No. 1 Distillate","Residential","Massachusetts","MA",678,678

379

Southeast Regional Clean Energy Policy Analysis (Revised)  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Southeast Regional Clean Southeast Regional Clean Energy Policy Analysis Revised Joyce McLaren Technical Report NREL/TP-6A20-49192 Revised April 2011 ERRATA SHEET NREL REPORT/PROJECT NUMBER: TP-6A20-49192 TITLE: Southeast Regional Clean Energy Policy Analysis AUTHOR(S): Joyce McLaren ORIGINAL PUBLICATION DATE: January 2011 DATE OF CORRECTIONS (MM/YYYY): 04/2011 The following figures and tables were replaced: Page vii, Figure ES-2 Page ix, Table ES-1 Page 12, Table 1 Page 20, Figure 10 Page 51, Table 11 Page 52, Figure 18 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401

380

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1.3,1.7,1.6,4.4,3.4,2.9,2.2,2.6,2.3,2.3,2.1,3.3,7,9.6,10.9,9.9,6.4,9.5,2.8,3.2,3,6.1,7.3 "Nitrogen Oxide",1,1.1,1.1,1.7,1.4,1.4,1.4,1.4,1.4,1.5,1.1,1.8,3,3.5,3.7,3.7,2.6,4.1,1.9,2....

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "1 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


381

Coal within a revised energy perspective  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The author considers the use of coal within a revised energy perspective, focusing on the factors that will drive which fuels are used to generate electricity going forward. He looks at the world markets for fossil fuels and the difficulties of predicting oil and natural gas supply and prices, as demonstrated by the variability in projections from one year to another in the EIA's Annual Energy Outlook. 4 refs., 1 tab.

Darmstadter, J. [Resources for the Future (RFF), Washington, DC (United States)

2006-07-15T23:59:59.000Z

382

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

4384,4302,4502,4183,4096,4111,4042,3945,4071,4209 "Total Emission Rate (lbsMWh)" "Sulfur Dioxide",0.9,0.9,1,1.2,1.1,1.4,1.4,1.4,1.5,1.5,2.4,2.5,5,4.3,6.6,5.9,6.1,6.1,4.1,4,4.4,5,7...

383

RCRA and operational monitoring (ROM): Multi-year program plan and fiscal year 96 work plan. WBS 1.5.3, Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The RCRA & Operational Monitoring (ROM) Program Office manages the Hanford Site direct funded Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and Operational Monitoring under Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) 1.01.05.03. The ROM Program Office is included in Hanford Technical Services, a part of Projects & Site Services of Westinghouse Hanford Company (WHC). The 1996 Multi-Year Program Plan (MYPP) includes the Fiscal Year Work Plan (FYWP). The Multi-Year Program Plan takes its direction from the Westinghouse Planning Baseline Integration Organization. The MYPP provides both the near term, enhanced details and the long term, projected details for the Program Office to use as baseline Cost, Scope and Schedule. Change Control administered during the fiscal year is against the baseline provided by near term details of this document. The MYPP process has been developed by WHC to meet its internal planning and integration needs and complies with the requirements of the US Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office (RL) Long Range Planning Process Directive (RLID 5000.2). Westinghouse Hanford Company (WHC) has developed the multi-year planning process for programs to establish the technical, schedule and cost baselines for program and support activities under WHC`s scope of responsibility. The baseline information is developed by both WHC indirect funded support services organization, and direct funded programs in WHC. WHC Planning and Integration utilizes the information presented in the program specific MYPP and the Program Master Baseline Schedule (PMBS) to develop the Site-Wide Integrated Schedule.

NONE

1995-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

384

REVISED INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION SURVEY OF A AND B RADIOACTIVE WASTE TRANSFER LINES TRENCH BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

REVISED INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION SURVEY OF THE A AND B RADIOACTIVE WASTE TRANSFER LINES TRENCH, BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY 5062-SR-01-1

P.C. Weaver

2010-02-10T23:59:59.000Z

385

E-Print Network 3.0 - adopting revised frequencies Sample Search...  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Received February 26, 2007; revised May 1... A semiconductor laser under negative optoelectronic feedback is applied to the generation of a microwave ... Source: Chan, Sze-Chun -...

386

FOR OFFICERS REVISED AND PUBLISHED  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Council 2007 Revision HANOVER, NEW HAMPSHIRE #12;To Dartmouth Club Officers: The development) 646-2253 Career Services (603) 646-2215 Club Mailings, Lists, Changes (603) 646-3497 Club Scholarships ............................................................................................................................ 8 Public Information Chair

Lotko, William

387

GETEM Manuals and Revision Notes  

Broader source: Energy.gov [DOE]

Please refer to these manuals and revision notes prior to downloading and running theGeothermal Electricity Technology Evaluation Model (GETEM). Because this is a beta version, you are urged to...

388

Environmental Restoration Program project management plan for the DOE Oak Ridge Field Office Major System Acquisition OR-1. Revision 1, Environmental Restoration Program  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

In the early 1940s, the Manhattan Project was conducted in a regulatory and operational environment less sophisticated than today. Less was known of the measures needed to protect human health and safety and the environment from the dangers posed by radioactive and hazardous wastes, and experience in dealing with these hazardous materials has grown slowly. Certain hazards were recognized and dealt with from the beginning. However, the techniques used, though standard practices at the time, are now known to have been inadequate. Consequently, the DOE has committed to an aggressive program for cleaning up the environment and has initiated an Environmental Restoration Program involving all its field offices. The objective of this program is to ensure that inactive and surplus DOE facilities and sites meet current standards to protect human health and the environment. The objective of these activities is to ensure that risks posed to human health and safety and the environment by inactive sites and surplus facilities contaminated with radioactive, hazardous, and/or mixed wastes are either eliminated or reduced to prescribed safe levels. This Project Management Plan for Major System Acquisition OR-1 Project documents, communicates, and contributes to the evolution of, the management organizations, systems, and tools necessary to carry out effectively the long-range complex cleanup of the DOE sites on the Oak Ridge Reservation, and at the Paducah, Kentucky, and Piketon, Ohio, uranium enrichment plants managed by the Department of Energy Oak Ridge Field Office; the cleanup of off-site contamination resulting from past releases; and the Decontamination and Decommissioning of surplus DOE facilities at these installations.

Not Available

1992-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

389

HLW system plan - revision 2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The projected ability of the Tank Farm to support DWPF startup and continued operation has diminished somewhat since revision 1 of this Plan. The 13 month delay in DWPF startup, which actually helps the Tank Farm condition in the near term, was more than offset by the 9 month delay in ITP startup, the delay in the Evaporator startups and the reduction to Waste Removal funding. This Plan does, however, describe a viable operating strategy for the success of the HLW System and Mission, albeit with less contingency and operating flexibility than in the past. HLWM has focused resources from within the division on five near term programs: The three evaporator restarts, DWPF melter heatup and completion of the ITP outage. The 1H Evaporator was restarted 12/28/93 after a 9 month shutdown for an extensive Conduct of Operations upgrade. The 2F and 2H Evaporators are scheduled to restart 3/94 and 4/94, respectively. The RHLWE startup remains 11/17/97.

Not Available

1994-01-14T23:59:59.000Z

390

NE-20 ACTION: SSDP Project Charter Revision CONCURRENCES RTG SYMBOL  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

0 0 ACTION: SSDP Project Charter Revision CONCURRENCES RTG SYMBOL James W. Vaughan, Jr. N-923 Acting Assistant Secretary . for Nuclear Energy Murphi Attached for your signature is a revised Project Charter for the 1/ 86 Shippingport Station Decommissioning Project (SSDP). Since our original M determination in July that there was a need to revise the SSDP Charter, we N K23 have been in discussion with the Richland Operations Field Office (RL). INe Significant differences in management philosophy surfaced between RL and DeLaney Headquarters that required discussions up to and including the RL Manager DAE/86 and myself. I now feel that the revised Charter reflects a mutually acceptable working arrangement between the appropriate organizations. The RTGSYMBOL general roles and responsibilities defined in this Charter will facilitate

391

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

4,4.1,3.9,6.4,6,6.4,6.8,6.9,7.3,7,7.6,8.3,9.1,10.3,10.1,10.2,11.2,12.7,14,13.8,13.9,13.4 "Nitrogen Oxide",1.6,1.7,1.9,1.9,3,2.6,3.1,3.7,4,4.1,4.2,4.3,4.5,4.9,5.1,5.1,5.4,5.7,10.3,1...

392

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

8,30364,29172,28603,28930,27924,27418,24355,28388 "Total Emission Rate (lbsMWh)" "Sulfur Dioxide",0.9,0.9,0.9,1,1.2,1.5,1.7,1.8,2.3,3.1,3.3,3.7,4.1,4.5,5,5.3,5.2,5.1,4.1,4,4.2,4,4...

393

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

2753,10226,12061,9641,12716,11143,11306,8767,8544 "Total Emission Rate (lbsMWh)" "Sulfur Dioxide",0.4,0.3,0.3,0.3,0.2,0.2,0.2,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.5,1.9,1.8,1.7,1.7,1.2,1.5,1.3,1.9,1.9,2...

394

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

,1.1,1.5,2.2,2.7,3.2,3.2,4.1,4.5,4.9,5,6.3,7.2,8.6,9.4,9.2,8.8,8,9.4,10.1,10.8,11.1,10.6 "Nitrogen Oxide",0.8,0.8,1,1.2,1.7,2,2.1,2.3,2.5,2.7,2.9,3.5,3.6,3.9,4.1,4.2,4.3,4.2,4.4,4....

395

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

8,19979,19117,20148,18744,16170,15512,14277,13637 "Total Emission Rate (lbsMWh)" "Sulfur Dioxide",0.1,0.2,0.5,0.4,1.2,1.6,2,2.4,1.9,1.9,1.7,1.8,3.1,2.5,2.5,3.8,4,3,2.3,2.5,2.8,3,3...

396

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

0,50126,47131,50273,62249,54453,57981,50078,52656 "Total Emission Rate (lbsMWh)" "Sulfur Dioxide",0.1,0,0,0,0,0.2,0.3,0.3,0.3,0.2,0.8,0.5,1.3,1.6,1.5,1.6,1.6,1.4,0.9,0.7,0.8,0.7,1...

397

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

7,36340,33396,33339,39019,37629,35848,33395,33111 "Total Emission Rate (lbsMWh)" "Sulfur Dioxide",0.4,0.6,0.7,0.6,0.8,1,0.9,1,1.2,1.5,1.5,1.6,1.7,1.9,2.6,3.3,3.5,3.6,4,4,3.8,3.9,4...

398

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

,10.4,10.9,10.4,10.2,10.4,9.8,10.4,9.9,10.5,10.9,11.4,11.1,10.8,11.9,14.9,17.1,17.7,18.2 "Nitrogen Oxide",0.9,1.3,1.3,1.3,1.9,1.9,2.1,2,2,2.1,2.8,3.2,3.5,3.5,3.6,3.9,3.8,3.8,5.1,5....

399

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

9,7.7,8.7,8.5,10.3,9.5,9.7,9.5,11,11.4,11.3,12.4,12.6,12.6,13.5,13.7,14.2,14.5,15.6,15.6 "Nitrogen Oxide",1.3,1.4,1.3,1.2,1.8,1.8,1.8,1.9,1.9,1.9,2.4,2.6,2.4,2.5,3,3.2,3.4,3.5,4.2,...

400

Last Revision Date: 8/16/2010 Last Merged Filing ID:  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Revision Date: 8/16/2010 Last Merged Filing ID: Revision Date: 8/16/2010 Last Merged Filing ID: Tariffs, Rate Schedules, and Other Tariff Documents Southwestern Power Administration Tariffs, Rate Schedules, and Other Tariff Documents Document Generated On: 10/1/2010 Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................................................................................1 PREAMBLE: AUTHORITIES AND OBLIGATIONS .............................................................................................1

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "1 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


401

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

8,42077,42436,41570,44235,41830,44103,40261,41292 "Total Emission Rate (lbsMWh)" "Sulfur Dioxide",1.9,3.6,3.1,3.6,3.9,4,4.1,4.2,4.2,4.2,5.5,5.3,3.9,4.9,5.1,5.2,5.1,5.6,4.4,4.1,4.1...

402

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

4,58620,52924,56979,53404,53613,60067,64917,69088 "Total Emission Rate (lbsMWh)" "Sulfur Dioxide",0.5,0.8,1,1,1.3,1.9,1.9,2.8,3.8,4.1,3.8,4,4.7,4.6,5.1,4.4,3.4,4.3,4.7,5.4,6.2,6.5...

403

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

,11.2,12.8,13.6,13.7,13.1,12.6,13.2,14.2,16,17.2,18.1,18.1,17.1,23.4,24.6,24.8,28.8,27.8 "Nitrogen Oxide",2.1,2.2,2.1,2.1,3.2,3.3,3.4,3.5,3.7,4.5,4.7,5.4,5.5,6.1,6.6,7,7.1,6.8,9.8,...

404

SEED Grant Guidelines Revised February 2014 UNBC RESEARCH SEED GRANT  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

SEED Grant Guidelines � Revised February 2014 UNBC RESEARCH SEED GRANT GUIDELINES OBJECTIVE OF APPLICATIONS 1.1 Quality of proposal. 1.2 Likelihood of the Seed Grant leading to external funding. 1 external sources. A member's term must not end before the seed grant ends. 2.2 Faculty in their first year

Northern British Columbia, University of

405

Revised OMB Circular A-76 (Revised November 14, 2002)  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

OMB Circular A-76 Revision Comments OMB Circular A-76 Revision Comments DRAFT OMB CIRCULAR A-76 (NOVEMBER 14, 2002) REVIEW COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL COMMENTS: The Department of Energy (DOE) supports the overarching goal of OMB Circular A-76 that agencies should obtain "the best deal to the Taxpayer." We also support revisions to the Circular that "Keep the Process Moving" with the end result being: Faster/Cheaper Competitions; Improved Performance and Measures; Enhanced/Expanded Competition; Fairness; Realizing Significant Savings; and the Redirection of Resources to Mission Critical Requirements. Upon review of the draft Circular, the Department believes the proposed changes to Circular reflect a general improvement over the current version. The Department does, however, have

406

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

9,2.3,2.5,2.7,3.8,3.3,3.5,4,4.4,4.4,4.3,5,6.2,10.2,13.5,13.8,11.3,9.8,12,12,14,13.7,14.5 "Nitrogen Oxide",0.7,0.8,0.9,0.9,1.3,1.3,1.4,1.5,1.7,1.8,2.1,2.5,2.9,3.8,4.7,5.1,4.2,3.8,5....

407

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

5.2,6.9,8.3,10.1,10.4,11,11.8,11.1,16.7,13.5,15.3,15,15.3,16,15.7,26.8,28,29.3,29.1,24.3 "Nitrogen Oxide",1.4,1.5,1.3,1.1,2.2,3.3,3.3,3.5,3.9,4.5,5,7.5,5.8,6.2,6.5,7.2,7.2,7,7.7,8....

408

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

,7.9,8.7,10.3,10.9,11.6,10.7,11.2,12.6,14.2,13.7,14.6,14.5,15.7,21.3,23.1,23.1,23.1,24.4 "Nitrogen Oxide",1.8,1.9,1.9,1.8,3.3,3.6,3.5,3.4,3.5,4.1,4.4,4.9,5.3,6.6,7,7.9,8.4,8.5,8.3,...

409

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

,4.4,5.5,6.9,7.2,7.3,6.6,7.3,7.4,8.1,9.2,10.1,10.7,10.5,10.7,11.3,11.2,12.2,11.8,12.5,14 "Nitrogen Oxide",0.7,0.9,1,0.8,1.7,1.9,1.9,2.1,2.2,2.4,2.7,3,3.4,3.6,3.8,4,4.1,4.4,5.2,5.9,...

410

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

,11.7,12.2,11.6,11.7,11.1,11.5,11.2,11,11.5,11.9,11.6,11.5,10.5,11.8,12.8,13.2,13.8,17.9 "Nitrogen Oxide",1.3,1.3,1.3,1.2,1.9,2.4,2.8,2.7,2.8,3,3.3,3.5,3.5,4.5,5.1,5,5.1,4.5,4.8,5,...

411

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

5.6,5.9,6.1,6.2,6.2,6.6,6.8,6.5,6.4,6.5,6.1,7.4,8.1,9,10.9,10.8,17.6,18.2,24.1,24.8,26.9 "Nitrogen Oxide",1.6,1.4,1.3,1.3,2,2.4,2.6,2.8,2.9,3.4,3.5,3.7,4.3,5.2,5.8,5.7,5.7,5.6,9.2,...

412

EM Quality Assurance Program (EM-QA-001 Revision 0) | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Services » Program Management » Quality Assurance » EM Quality Services » Program Management » Quality Assurance » EM Quality Assurance Program (EM-QA-001 Revision 0) EM Quality Assurance Program (EM-QA-001 Revision 0) Previous revision of the Environmental Management Quality Assurance Program. The program is the EM management system to ensure we"do work correctly." This document has been superseded by Revision 1 of the program, but is still in use at some EM sites. EM Quality Assurance Program (EM-QA-001 Revision 0) More Documents & Publications Quality Assurance Program EM Quality Assurance Program (EM-QA-001 Revision 1) SOPP-43, EM-23 Quality Assurance Oversight Waste Management Nuclear Materials & Waste Tank Waste and Waste Processing Waste Disposition Packaging and Transportation Site & Facility Restoration

413

Revised Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, P.L. 110...  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Revised Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, P.L. 110-5 Revised Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, P.L. 110-5 Policy Flash Revised Continuing Appropriations...

414

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

4,31204,33492,29245,30412,30333,25011,27654,27517 "Total Emission Rate (lbsMWh)" "Sulfur Dioxide",1.5,1.7,1.9,2.2,4.1,4.6,4.9,6,5.3,6.1,5.5,5.4,5.2,5.6,5.7,5.8,5.9,5.2,3.8,3.9,4.1...

415

Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Part B Permit Application [for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP)]. Volume 5, Chapter D, Appendix D1 (conclusion), Revision 3  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The reference design for the underground facilities at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant was developed using the best criteria available at initiation of the detailed design effort. These design criteria are contained in the US Department of Energy document titled Design Criteria, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). Revised Mission Concept-IIA (RMC-IIA), Rev. 4, dated February 1984. The validation process described in the Design Validation Final Report has resulted in validation of the reference design of the underground openings based on these criteria. Future changes may necessitate modification of the Design Criteria document and/or the reference design. Validation of the reference design as presented in this report permits the consideration of future design or design criteria modifications necessitated by these changes or by experience gained at the WIPP. Any future modifications to the design criteria and/or the reference design will be governed by a DOE Standard Operation Procedure (SOP) covering underground design changes. This procedure will explain the process to be followed in describing, evaluating and approving the change.

Not Available

1993-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

416

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

2.1,2.4,2.1,3.2,3.3,3.9,3.9,4.6,4.7,3.7,5.7,7.7,7.7,9.5,7.7,8.1,7,7.7,12.3,10.1,9.2,10.5 "Nitrogen Oxide",0.9,1.1,1.2,1.2,1.9,2.2,2.2,2.1,2.5,2.6,2.4,2.4,3.8,4,4,3.6,3.7,4,4.2,4.3,...

417

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

3,1.8,1.9,2.3,2.4,2.4,3.5,3.5,3.7,4.4,5.5,6.3,6.7,7.2,6.7,5.9,7.2,6.7,8.2,10.5,11.7,11.7 "Nitrogen Oxide",0.8,0.8,0.9,0.9,1,0.9,1.1,1.4,1.5,1.7,2,2.3,2.5,2.5,2.9,3.1,3,3.1,2.8,3.3,...

418

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

.4,1.7,2.2,2.3,4.2,6.2,7.9,8.2,8,7.8,8,8.4,8.5,8.9,9.2,10.1,9.7,8.7,8.6,10.3,9.9,8.7,9.4 "Nitrogen Oxide",1,0.9,1,0.8,1,1,1.8,1.8,2,2.4,2.7,2.9,3.1,3.9,4.5,5.4,5.5,5.5,4.9,5.8,5.7,...

419

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1,31462,30403,26415,27126,26383,23236,24059,23664 "Total Emission Rate (lbsMWh)" "Sulfur Dioxide",1.5,1.9,2.2,2.3,3.4,3.7,4.9,4.7,5,4.9,4.6,5.1,4.9,5.4,5.5,5.6,6,5.1,5.7,5.3,5,5.4...

420

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

13336,14496,11303,9735,8510,8633,9758,11760,12103 "Total Emission Rate (lbsMWh)" "Sulfur Dioxide",0.4,0.1,0.1,0.1,0.3,0.3,0.3,0.5,0.4,0.6,0.8,2.4,3.5,3.4,5.7,6.6,4.5,1.9,1.7,2,2.6...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "1 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


421

Original","Revised","Data  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

llate","Residential","PADD 3",,72,72 "Sales","No. 1 Distillate","Residential","Alabama","AL" "Sales","No. 1 Distillate","Residential","Arkansas","AR",54,54 "Sales","No. 1...

422

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

.4,5,5.1,6,6.2,7.4,7.6,8.1,8.5,23.6,11.4,8.2,8.9,9.8,11,9.3,8.9,10.8,10.6,13.8,14.7,14.7 "Nitrogen Oxide",1.4,1.6,1.7,1.8,2.3,2.4,2.8,2.9,3.2,3.4,13.2,5.8,4.2,4.4,4.6,5.2,4.6,4.5,7...

423

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

.6,7.9,5.1,8.8,8.1,9.5,8.5,8.8,12.8,13.9,13.2,10.8,13.7,14,12.4,12.3,14.2,15.6,14.7,14.1 "Nitrogen Oxide",6.3,4.1,4.1,8.1,5.5,5.4,9.7,6.6,10.3,5.7,5,5.6,5.5,5.8,5.4,7.3,3.8,5.2,2.2...

424

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

0.2,2.5,3.4,3.4,3.3,3.7,3.7,4.2,4.8,5.4,5.6,6.8,7,7.1,7.2,7.5,6,6.8,7.5,6.4,7.5,6.7,10.7 "Nitrogen Oxide",0.5,0.6,0.6,0.6,0.6,0.6,0.9,1,1.1,1.3,1.3,1.4,1.9,2.2,2.4,3,2.4,3.8,3.2,2....

425

Electrical Safety Program Date of last revision: August 2014  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

1 Electrical Safety Program Date of last revision: August 2014 #12;2 Table of Contents Table ............................................................................................................... 19 Table 1 ­ Approach Boundaries to Energized Electrical Conductors and Circuit Parts for Shock.) ............................................................................................................................ 21 Table 1a Approach Boundariesa to Energized Electrical Conductors or Circuit Parts for Shock

Stuart, Steven J.

426

Revised evaluations for ENDF/B-VI Revision 2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this paper is to report on revised cross-section evaluations for 17 nuclides that have been prepared for ENDF/B-VI Revision 2. The nuclides considered include five fission products and various isotopes of cadmium and hafnium. The previous ENDF/B-VI evaluations for these 17 nuclides were carried over from ENDF/B-V and were completed in the 1974--1980 time period. By utilizing the experimental data that have become available since 1980 the revised evaluations will result in significant improvements in the evaluated nuclear data files. The primary emphasis was placed on the resolved and unresolved resonance regions, but new experimental data were also used to improve the cross sections for energies above the unresolved resonance region. Negative elastic scattering cross sections were encountered in some of the previous evaluations; since the revised evaluations use multilevel Breit-Wigner (MLBW) parameters, rather than single-level Breit-Wigner (SLBW), this problem is eliminated.

Wright, R.Q.

1993-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

427

Oklahoma Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 1,016 969 1,211 1980's 1,303 1,371 2,520 1,891 1,611 1,648 1,963 2,047 2,280 1,732 1990's 1,542 1,456 1,263 1,008 932 1,049 1,602 1,282 1,997 2,251 2000's 1,331 1,895 1,513 2,843 1,912 2,945 1,868 1,366 2,580 3,592 2010's 3,474 6,856 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 8/1/2013 Next Release Date: 8/1/2014 Referring Pages: Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases Oklahoma Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves Revision Decreases

428

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

4,45212,44218,43174,41124,42104,40164,39732,36742 "Total Emission Rate (lbsMWh)" "Sulfur Dioxide",2.1,2.7,2.6,2.7,2.8,3.2,3.4,3.4,3.8,4,4.1,4.1,3.8,4.1,4,4.5,4.6,4.8,4.4,4.6,4.8,4...

429

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

,232746,222316,221911,227088,211306,212365,213056 "Total Emission Rate (lbsMWh)" "Sulfur Dioxide",1.8,2,2.3,2.3,2.5,2.5,3.1,3.1,3.2,3.6,3.7,3.6,3.6,4.4,4.4,5.1,4.6,4.6,4,4.6,4.3,4...

430

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

9,26630,28255,25880,24148,21754,24164,23698,23426 "Total Emission Rate (lbsMWh)" "Sulfur Dioxide",2.8,2.9,2.7,2.9,3.1,3.3,3.5,4.5,3.7,3.5,3.5,3.9,4.2,4.1,4.1,4.5,4.9,4.7,4.1,4,4.2...

431

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

e",2.1,1.9,2.6,3,4,3.2,3.6,3.5,4,3.3,6.7,3.9,3,5.1,5.3,4.3,3.3,8.1,8.4,11.7,10.2,9.9,9.7 "Nitrogen Oxide",1.9,1.7,2.6,3,4.1,3.5,4.3,4.5,4.7,4.2,7,4.8,3.8,4.6,5.2,3.8,3.5,3.6,2.7,3....

432

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

.4,13.6,13.8,14.8,15.6,17.1,16.4,16.9,17,18.9,19.7,20.9,21,17.7,31.9,32.2,32.1,33.7,34.7 "Nitrogen Oxide",1.5,2,1.9,1.8,3.2,3.2,3.2,3.3,3.7,5,5.2,4.9,5.2,6.2,7.2,7.8,8.2,7.8,8.2,8....

433

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

2,7.1,9.4,8.7,9.2,8.5,9.7,10.7,11.4,11.7,14,9,13,20.1,16.9,16.7,18.6,19.9,23.2,14.1,22.5 "Nitrogen Oxide",0.7,1.4,1.9,2.6,3.4,3.3,3.5,3.7,3.6,3.9,4.2,4.2,4.6,4.4,4.7,5.6,4.8,4.9,5....

434

Nevada Revised Statutes | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

Revised Statutes Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: Nevada Revised StatutesLegal Published NA Year Signed or Took...

435

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

.1,3.5,3.4,4.5,4.1,4.2,4.2,4.1,4.6,4.5,4.3,5.3,10.6,9.4,10,9.3,9.1,8.4,4.5,4.8,6.3,6.7,8 "Nitrogen Oxide",4,4.1,4.3,4.5,4.2,4.4,5.5,5.7,5.7,5.6,6.1,5.5,5.4,5.9,6,5.8,5.7,5.8,3.3,3....

436

Biosafety Manual Draft Revision  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

copies are not official versions of this manual. Before using the printed copy, verify that it is the most current version. copies are not official versions of this manual. Before using the printed copy, verify that it is the most current version. Biosafety Manual Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory May 18, 2010 This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02- 05CH11231. Biosafety Manual IBC-approved version (May 18, 2010) Printed copies are not official versions of this manual. Before using the printed copy, verify that it is the most current version. 2 Biosafety Manual Contents 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Policy 1.2 Purpose 1.3 Scope 1.4 Manual Administration and Presentation 1.5 Terms, Acronyms, and Abbreviations 1.6 Roles, Responsibilities, and Whom to Call 2.0 Starting and Conducting Work Safely 3.0 Work and Risk Assessment

437

REVISION PAGE ADMINISTRATIVE  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

in accordance with the procedures outlined in Section C. C. Submission of Retaliation Complaint 1) A complaint

O'Toole, Alice J.

438

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

3.5,5.4,5.7,6.3,6.3,7.2,8.2,7.9,8.4,10.5,11.5,11.6,12.8,13.3,13.4,21.8,24.3,21.8,21,22.1 "Nitrogen Oxide",0.7,0.8,0.9,0.8,2,2.3,2.3,2.2,2.4,3.1,3.5,3.6,3.7,4.3,5.1,6.1,6,7.6,6.5,7....

439

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

,7.8,8.3,8.8,8.5,8.7,10.1,9,9.1,10.3,9.8,12.2,12.8,12,11.6,14.5,10.5,10.3,10.2,13.8,10.9 "Nitrogen Oxide",2.8,3,3.3,3.8,4.3,4.7,4.9,4.9,5.4,5,5,5.3,5.1,5.4,6.5,6.4,7.1,7.9,5,5.3,5....

440

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

1,19341,19466,18078,19658,18190,18569,17903,16695 "Total Emission Rate (lbsMWh)" "Sulfur Dioxide",0.3,0.3,0.4,0.4,0.5,0.5,0.6,2.7,2.9,3.1,3.1,3.2,3,3.2,3.3,3.7,4.2,4.2,4.3,4.5,5,5...

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "1 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


441

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

4,40041,39618,36573,35268,37069,32496,30791,28797 "Total Emission Rate (lbsMWh)" "Sulfur Dioxide",1.7,2.9,3.6,3.7,4.3,5.6,5.9,6.5,6.1,6.9,8.6,7.3,8.1,8.8,8.5,8.9,8.6,9.7,8,8.6,8.8...

442

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

8,35237,34536,33940,33747,33333,31201,30651,31917 "Total Emission Rate (lbsMWh)" "Sulfur Dioxide",1.4,2.2,2.3,2.7,3.5,3.6,3.9,4.2,4.5,4.5,4.2,4.1,4.8,4.6,4.5,5.5,5,4.7,6.3,6.1,5.7...

443

Revised Manuscript May  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

such as, (1) detailed calculations of the vector and tensor analyzing powers for neutron and proton scattering by deuterium which led to the discovery of the still...

444

Hydrometeorological Report Revised Report  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

southwo.rd dis· pJ.o.oomont of both somiprlntmcnt centers of n.cticn during this period, tc:S;:..rthor 1

445

KEVIN KELLY, OLIVER SCHULTE, VINCENT HENDRICKS RELIABLE BELIEF REVISION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

KEVIN KELLY, OLIVER SCHULTE, VINCENT HENDRICKS RELIABLE BELIEF REVISION ABSTRACT. Philosophical with the principles.2 1For general introductions, cf. (Osherson et al., 1986) and (Kelly, 1995). 2Hilary Putnam (Putnam, 1963) responded to Rudolf Carnap's theory of con rmation in just this way. 1 #12;2 KEVIN KELLY

Andrews, Peter B.

446

KEVIN KELLY , OLIVER SCHULTE , VINCENT HENDRICKS RELIABLE BELIEF REVISION  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

KEVIN KELLY , OLIVER SCHULTE , VINCENT HENDRICKS RELIABLE BELIEF REVISION ABSTRACT. Philosophical with the principles. 2 1 For general introductions, cf. (Osherson et al., 1986) and (Kelly, 1995). 2 Hilary Putnam (Putnam, 1963) responded to Rudolf Carnap's theory of confirmation in just this way. 1 #12; 2 KEVIN KELLY

Schulte, Oliver

447

Memorandum: Revised Guidance for the Office of Environmental Management  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Revised Guidance for the Office of Environmental Revised Guidance for the Office of Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards Memorandum: Revised Guidance for the Office of Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards From: Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson (EM-1) To: SSAB Members (J. Bierer, T. Martin, M. Wilson, P. Claire, J. Brannon, D. Mosby, B. Tanner, V. Holm, W. Waters) The purpose of this memorandum is to provide guidance and direction for restructuring and managing the Environmental Management (EM) Site Specific Advisory Boards procurement mechanisms that support activities of the Boards. Roberson Memorandum - July 7, 2003 More Documents & Publications Letter: Implementation of the Guidance for the Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Boards Letter from EM-1, Assistant Secretary, Jessie H. Roberson regarding

448

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

7,51856,47710,51484,49648,48940,46743,44986,44983 "Total Emission Rate (lbsMWh)" "Sulfur Dioxide",2.3,2.5,2.7,2.4,2.2,2.5,3,3,3,4.5,4,4.6,4.1,4.6,4.7,5.1,4.7,4.5,6.9,6.6,4.8,3.5,3...

449

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

0,14,22,26,15,44,141,44,56,17,9,24,21,22,46,64,41 "Total Emission Rate (lbsMWh)" "Sulfur Dioxide",0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0.1,0,0.1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0 "Nitrogen Oxide",0.2,0.2,0.2,0....

450

Minimizing Shortfall (revised)  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Extreme Risk model. 2.1 Volatility and Expected Shortfallas Risk Measures Volatility, or the square root of variance,gains and losses. Volatility is the central concept in many

Goldberg, Lisa R.; Hayes, Michael Y.; Mahmoud, Ola

2012-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

451

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

65,17616522,16390466,20891079,11851148,10954286,3289871,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0 "Combined Heat and Power, Electric",83912,82838,187909,301143,370153,1853067,1959088,1688843,1873640,1...

452

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

8,6024831,7077737,6865919,6652748,5271458,4428571,1402289,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0 "Combined Heat and Power, Electric",1143118,750678,758313,675335,1578822,132091,101557,129440,128361,1...

453

Long-Term Surveillance Plan for the Upper Burbank Disposal Cell, Uravan, Colorado, DOE/AL/62350-250, Revision 1, July 1999  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

LONG-TERM SURVEILLANCE PLAN LONG-TERM SURVEILLANCE PLAN FOR THE UPPER BURBANK DISPOSAL CELL URAUAN, COLORADO July 1999 Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Restoration Dhrision U MTRA Project Team Albuquerque, New Mexico DOElAU62350-250 REV. 1 Prepared by Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Albuquerque, New Mexico This page intentionally left blank LONG-TERM GURMIWNCE P U N FOR THE UPPER BURBANK DrsPosAL CEU. WYAAI. COhORAOD TABLE OF DONENTe TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PURPOSEANDSCOPE .............................................................................................. 1-1 2 . 1 1 FINAL SlTE CONDITIONS ................... ...-.... ...............................................*.............. 2-1 ..................................................................... ................... 2

454

Policy Flash 2013-38 Revised Merit Review Guide For Financial Assistance |  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

8 Revised Merit Review Guide For Financial 8 Revised Merit Review Guide For Financial Assistance Policy Flash 2013-38 Revised Merit Review Guide For Financial Assistance Attached is Policy Flash 2013-38 Revised Merit Review Guide for Financial Assistance Questions concerning this policy flash should be directed to Richard Bonnell of the Contract and Financial Assistance Policy Division at (202) 287-1747 or at richard.bonnell@hq.doe.gov. Flash 2013-38 Revisions to the Merit Review Guide 2013.pdf Merit Review Guide FINAL JULY 2013 ATTACHMENT 1 Sample Merit Rev Panel Appt Letter 1-10.docx ATTACHMENT 2 Sample COI ADDED WB LANGUAGE JULY 2013.docx ATTACHMENT 3 - Sample Evaluation and Selection Plan JULY 2013.docx ATTACHMENT 4 Sample Noncompetitive Review Plan.docx ATTACHMENT 5 Sample Initial Compliance Review 1-16.docx

455

Revision of Calceocrinidae  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

brachials of the axil- arms as axillaries is specious, (1) because the whole axil-arm structure precisely corresponds to that of a normal uniserial pinnulate arm, as seen in Decadocri- nus and many other inadunates, and (2) because the EXPLANATION OF PLATE 2... brachials of the axil- arms as axillaries is specious, (1) because the whole axil-arm structure precisely corresponds to that of a normal uniserial pinnulate arm, as seen in Decadocri- nus and many other inadunates, and (2) because the EXPLANATION OF PLATE 2...

Moore, R. C.

1962-07-09T23:59:59.000Z

456

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

2,18389,17124,17124,15100,15699,13314,14449,13558 "Total Emission Rate (lbsMWh)" "Sulfur Dioxide",3.7,4.2,3.9,4.5,4.7,4.3,4.5,4.7,4.7,4.6,4.3,4.6,4.2,4.1,4,4.4,4.8,4.8,5.2,5.3,4.8...

457

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

7059,6952,3385,3849,3311,5941,4712,4906,3852,2055 "Total Emission Rate (lbsMWh)" "Sulfur Dioxide",0.5,0.5,0.6,0.5,0.4,0.6,0.5,0.6,0.6,0.7,0.7,0.9,0.7,0.6,0.6,0.4,0.3,0.4,1,0.8,0.9...

458

Revised: June 19, 2014  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

5,77409,77660,75173,75232,69775,68609,72024,71755 "Total Emission Rate (lbsMWh)" "Sulfur Dioxide",4.4,4.8,5,6.3,6.7,6.5,6.4,6.5,6.5,7.2,6.7,7.3,8.2,8.6,9.7,8.7,7.8,7.8,9.1,7.7,8.2...

459

Statistical & thermal physics revision questions 1. [June 2007] Explain what is meant by a function of state. Give an expression for  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

of the cycle is = 1 - T1 T2 . Hence estimate the maximum efficiency possible for a practical steam engine when the steam is heated to 800 K. [7] 3. [June 2008] Write down expressions for the thermodynamic Helmholtz

Schekochihin, Alexander A.

460

RPP-RPT-42583 Revision  

Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

RPP-RPT-42583 RPP-RPT-42583 Revision 0 Synthetic Sling Failure - Evaluations and Recommendations Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management Contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection under Contract DE-AC27-08RV14800 Approved for Public Release; Further Dissemination Unlimited RPP-RPT-42583 Revision 0 Synthetic Sling Failure - Evaluations and Recommendations C. S. Henderson T. C. Mackey Washington River Protection Solutions Date Published October 2009 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management Contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection under Contract DE-AC27-08RV14800 ~. washington river ~ protectionso/utions P.O. Box 850 Richland, Washington Approved for Public Release; Further Dissemination Unlimited TRADEMARK

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "1 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


461

ISM Plan - Chemical Sciences Division - Revised May 2012  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

ISM Plan - Chemical Sciences Division - Revised May 2012 ISM Plan - Chemical Sciences Division - Revised May 2012 Page 2 of 25 Page intentionally left blank ISM Plan - Chemical Sciences Division - Revised May 2012 Page 3 of 25 Chemical Sciences Division ISM Plan May 2012 Page 1.0 Policy Statement 5 2.0 Description of Division/Organization, Mission and Scope of Work 5 3.0 Accountability 7 3.01 Line Management Responsibility and Accountability 8 3.02 Specific Principal Investigator Responsibilities 8 3.03 Work Lead EH&S Responsibilities 8 3.04 CSD personnel EH&S Responsibilities (Non-Supervisor or Work Lead) 9 3.05 Students 10 3.06 Work Off-Site 10 3.07 Telecommuting 11

462

Oklahoma Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 837 962 1,026 1980's 1,293 1,262 2,374 2,189 2,245 2,357 2,158 2,251 2,538 1,984 1990's 1,803 1,710 1,988 1,554 1,580 1,892 1,886 2,396 2,995 3,029 2000's 2,498 1,458 2,159 2,892 2,173 3,064 1,515 2,115 2,786 2,894 2010's 3,224 5,142 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 8/1/2013 Next Release Date: 8/1/2014 Referring Pages: Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases Oklahoma Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves Revision Increases

463

Fig 9-revised Flowchart.xls  

Office of Legacy Management (LM)

9 9 Soil Nature and Extent AOI Identification Process d The PRG value for lead is not a calculated PRG, but rather is taken from the EPA guidance document Revised Interim Soil Lead Guidance for CERCLA Sites and RCRA Correction Action Facilities (1994). e For surface soil (0 to 0.5 ft), WRW surface soil (0 to 0.5 ft) PRGs are used. For subsurface soil (0.5 ft to a maximum depth of 209 ft), WRW subsurface soil (0.5 to 8 ft) PRGs are used. a Soil "superset" for soil samples collected from June 28, 1991 through August 22, 2005. c Soil PRGs are defined as 1 x 10 -6 WRW PRGs based on using an HI of 0.1 or a risk of 1 x 10 -6 (the more conservative of the two values was used for the PRG). b Background level is defined as the background M2SD. RI-Ready Soil Data

464

E-Print Network 3.0 - al ions revision Sample Search Results  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Search Powered by Explorit Topic List Advanced Search Sample search results for: al ions revision Page: << < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 1 538 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PLASMA SCIENCE, VOL....

465

Three Paths to a Revised Information and Computer  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Three Paths to a Revised Information and Computer Literacy Requirement May 1, 2006 Summary implementation of the Computer Literacy requirement. We have attempted to reconcile UGC's desire not to implement previous vote to abolish the Computer Literacy requirement. We have also taken into consideration

Gering, Jon C.

466

Proposal for Revision of the Computer Science Curriculum Drew University  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

for programs that grant degrees in computer science. The committees generating such reports are composed for graduate school: The line between research and industry in computing is not well-defined. Obvious examplesProposal for Revision of the Computer Science Curriculum Drew University Shannon Bradshaw1, Steve

Bradshaw, Shannon

467

RyneRevised.ppt  

Broader source: All U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office Webpages (Extended Search)

Robert Robert D . R yne LBNL NERSC BES Requirements for 2017 October 8-9, 2013 Gaithersburg, MD Present and Future Computing Requirements for "Frontiers in Accelerator Design: Advanced Modeling for Next-Generation BES Accelerators" (repo m669) 1. P roject D escrip6on PI: R obert R yne ( LBNL) Senior p ersonnel: J i Q iang ( LBNL), C ho N g ( SLAC), B ruce C arlsten ( LANL) * repo m 669 s upports B ES a ccelerator d esign * concept e xplora6on; a ccelerator s ystem & a ccelerator component d esign; c ode d evelopment * This p resenta6on f ocuses o n b eam d ynamics m odeling f or future l ight s ources, e specially X ---ray F ree E lectron L asers (XFELs) The LCLS XFEL is a spectacular success γε x,y = 0.4 µm (slice) I pk = 3.0 kA σ E /E = 0.01% (slice) What is so challenging about future XFEL modeling?

468

Health effects models for nuclear power plant accident consequence analysis. Modification of models resulting from addition of effects of exposure to alpha-emitting radionuclides: Revision 1, Part 2, Scientific bases for health effects models, Addendum 2  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has sponsored several studies to identify and quantify, through the use of models, the potential health effects of accidental releases of radionuclides from nuclear power plants. The Reactor Safety Study provided the basis for most of the earlier estimates related to these health effects. Subsequent efforts by NRC-supported groups resulted in improved health effects models that were published in the report entitled {open_quotes}Health Effects Models for Nuclear Power Plant Consequence Analysis{close_quotes}, NUREG/CR-4214, 1985 and revised further in the 1989 report NUREG/CR-4214, Rev. 1, Part 2. The health effects models presented in the 1989 NUREG/CR-4214 report were developed for exposure to low-linear energy transfer (LET) (beta and gamma) radiation based on the best scientific information available at that time. Since the 1989 report was published, two addenda to that report have been prepared to (1) incorporate other scientific information related to low-LET health effects models and (2) extend the models to consider the possible health consequences of the addition of alpha-emitting radionuclides to the exposure source term. The first addendum report, entitled {open_quotes}Health Effects Models for Nuclear Power Plant Accident Consequence Analysis, Modifications of Models Resulting from Recent Reports on Health Effects of Ionizing Radiation, Low LET Radiation, Part 2: Scientific Bases for Health Effects Models,{close_quotes} was published in 1991 as NUREG/CR-4214, Rev. 1, Part 2, Addendum 1. This second addendum addresses the possibility that some fraction of the accident source term from an operating nuclear power plant comprises alpha-emitting radionuclides. Consideration of chronic high-LET exposure from alpha radiation as well as acute and chronic exposure to low-LET beta and gamma radiations is a reasonable extension of the health effects model.

Abrahamson, S. [Wisconsin Univ., Madison, WI (United States); Bender, M.A. [Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, NY (United States); Boecker, B.B.; Scott, B.R. [Lovelace Biomedical and Environmental Research Inst., Albuquerque, NM (United States). Inhalation Toxicology Research Inst.; Gilbert, E.S. [Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (United States)

1993-05-01T23:59:59.000Z

469

ADR Revised Policy | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Revised Policy Revised Policy ADR Revised Policy SUMMARY: On October 24, 1995, the Department of Energy (DOE) published an interim Statement of Policy on Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) (60 FR 54482) to further its commitment to the use of ADR for resolving issues in controversy in a fair, timely, and cost efficient manner, and to comply with the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act (ADRA), 5 U.S.C. §571 et seq. Today, DOE publishes a revised Statement of Policy on Alternative Dispute Resolution to reaffirm its commitment to the use of ADR, including the use of Environmental Conflict Resolution (ECR) and othercollaborative processes that may be utilized to prevent or avoid potential conflicts. ADR Revised Policy More Documents & Publications Microsoft Word - ADR Revised Policy82508Reformatted.doc

470

Mini-review Received: 8 April 2013 Revised: 1 July 2013 Accepted article published: 13 July 2013 Published online in Wiley Online Library: 9 August 2013  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Integrated furfural production as a renewable fuel and chemical platform from lignocellulosic biomass Charles precursor to furan-based chemicals and has the potential to become a major renewable platform chemical production of suitable biomass-based platform chemicals.1 In recent years, furfural has received renewed

California at Riverside, University of

471

Errata Sheet for the Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 538: Spill Sites, Nevada Test Site, Nevada with ROTC-1, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Erratum is being issued to DOE/NV--1185 ROTC-1 for the CAU 538 Closure Report to correct three items. The original ROTC which was issued on November 30, 2011 corrected the Use Restriction for CAS 12-29-06 to remove a coordinate point from the Use Restriction. However, the ROTC contained three errors as follows: 1. The number of digits after the decimal place on the UR form was one while the map displayed two digits after the decimal place. The UR form and map were aligned as part of this Erratum so that only a single digit was shown after the decimal place. 2. On the figure (Figure 1) included with the UR form issued as part of ROTC-1, CAU 538 was incorrectly called out as CAU 583. This error was corrected as part of this Erratum. 3. The coordinates on the UR form were developed from NAD 27 while the coordinate system stated on the form was UTM, Zone 11, NAD 83 meters. The coordinates were corrected on the UR form, developed as part of this Erratum, to reflect the UTM, Zone 11, NAD 83 meters system.

Patrick Matthews

2011-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

472

Microsoft Word - DOE-EA-1707D_Revised_Predecisional_EA Closure_NRDWL-SWL08232011.docx  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

7D 7D REVISED PREDECISIONAL DRAFT AUGUST 2011 Environmental Assessment Closure of Nonradioactive Dangerous Waste Landfill (NRDWL) and Solid Waste Landfill (SWL), Hanford Site, Richland, Washington U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Richland, Washington 99352 DOE/EA-1707D REVISED PREDECISIONAL DRAFT AUGUST 2011 DOE/EA-1707D REVISED PREDECISIONAL DRAFT iii AUGUST 2011 Contents 1 1 Introduction and Purpose and Need ............................................................................................. 1-1 2 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1-1 3 1.2 Purpose and Need ................................................................................................................... 1-2 4

473

Utilization of Cs{sup 137} to generate a radiation barrier for weapons grade plutonium immobilized in borosilicate glass canisters. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

One of the ways recommended by a recent National Academy of Sciences study to dispose of excess weapons-grade plutonium is to encapsulate the plutonium in a glass in combination with high-level radioactive wastes (HLW) to generate an intense radiation dose rate field. The objective is to render the plutonium as difficult to access as the plutonium contained in existing US commercial spent light-water reactor (LWR) fuel until it can be disposed of in a permanent geological repository. A radiation dose rate from a sealed canister of 1,000 rem/h (10 Sv/h) at 1 meter for at least 30 years after fabrication was assumed in this paper to be a radiation dose comparable to spent LWR fuel. This can be achieved by encapsulating the plutonium in a borosilicate glass with an adequate amount of a single fission product in the HLWS, namely radioactive Cs{sup 137}. One hundred thousand curies of Cs{sup 137} will generate a dose rate of 1,000 rem/h (10 Sv/h) at 1 meter for at least 30 years when imbedded into canisters of the size proposed for the Savannah River Site`s vitrified high-level wastes. The United States has a current inventory of 54 MCi of CS{sup 137} that has been separated from defense HLWs and is in sealed capsules. This single curie inventory is sufficient to spike 50 metric tons of excess weapons-grade plutonium if plutonium can be loaded at 5.5 wt% in glass, or 540 canisters. Additional CS{sup 137} inventories exist in the United States` HLWs from past reprocessing operations, should additional curies be required. Using only one fission product, CS{sup 137}, rather than the multiple chemical elements and compounds in HLWs to generate a high radiation dose rate from a glass canister greatly simplifies the processing engineering retirement for encapsulating plutonium in a borosilicate glass.

Jardine, L.J.; Armantrout, G.A.; Collins, L.F.

1995-01-01T23:59:59.000Z

474

Google Doc projects 1.2: Exploring NCEP atmospheric reanalysis data GFD-1 Winter 2011 1 Feb 2011 to be revised frequently (stay tuned). We will load some ocean data and  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Google Doc projects 1.2: Exploring NCEP atmospheric reanalysis data GFD-1 Winter 2011 1 Feb 2011 ideas related to NCEP atmospheric data. The idea is to explore this data with Matlab (or other plotting increase right up to the stratosphere (look here at a map view over the North Pole..with Matlab

475

Colorado Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Colorado Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 116 226 373 1980's 250 131 322 167 160 368 372 340 473 431 1990's 394 719 718 1,000 696 555 802 959 1,898 2,788 2000's 1,825 1,882 2,029 2,114 1,505 2,018 1,178 3,924 3,244 1,601 2010's 2,973 2,509 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 8/1/2013 Next Release Date: 8/1/2014 Referring Pages: Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases Colorado Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves Revision Increases

476

Identification and characterization of conservative organic tracers for use as hydrologic tracers for the Yucca Mountain site characterization project: Quality Assurance Project Plan, Revision 1; Quarterly progress report, October 1, 1993--December 31, 1993  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this work is to identify and characterize candidate conservative organic tracers for use as hydrologic tracers for experiments to be conducted at the Yucca Mountain C-well complex. During this quarter the main effort was directed towards rewriting the quality assurance program in preparation for a review and audit by the USGS. However, due to budget constraints the review and audit were not carried out. The tracer QA plan and standard operating procedures (SOPs) were revised and copies are included in the report. Instrumental problems were encountered and corrected with the addition of new integration and sample control software. In the sampling, there was an unexplained peak in the chromatograms of the tracers being tested in the light tuff. This was not correctable and these experiments will be repeated in the next quarter.

Stetzenbach, K.J.

1993-12-13T23:59:59.000Z

477

REVISED FINAL REPORT INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION SURVEY ACTIVITIES AT THE SEPARATIONS PROCESS RESEARCH UNIT SITES, NISKAYUNA, NEW YORK DCN 0496-SR-06-1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Separations Process Research Unit (SPRU) complex located on the Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory (KAPL) site in Niskayuna, New York, was constructed in the late 1940s to research the chemical separation of plutonium and uranium (Figure A-1). SPRU operated as a laboratory scale research facility between February 1950 and October 1953. The research activities ceased following the successful development of the reduction oxidation and plutonium/uranium extraction processes. The oxidation and extraction processes were subsequently developed for large scale use by the Hanford and Savannah River sites (aRc 2008a). Decommissioning of the SPRU facilities began in October 1953 and continued through the 1990s.

Evan Harpenau

2011-10-10T23:59:59.000Z

478

TRU waste certification compliance requirements for acceptance of contact-handled wastes retrieved from storage to be shipped to the WIPP. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Compliance requirements are presented for certifying that unclassified, contact-handled (CH) transuranic (TRU) solid defense wastes retrieved from storage at DOE sites meet the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC). All applicable DOE orders must continue to be met. The compliance requirements for certified waste retrieved from certified storage are addressed in another document. The compliance requirements are divided into four sections, primarily determined by the general feature that the requirements address. These sections are General Requirements, Waste Container Requirements, Waste Form Requirements, and Waste Package Requirements. The waste package is the combination of waste container and waste. 2 refs., 1 fig.

Not Available

1985-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

479

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 567: Miscellaneous Soil Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, with ROTC 1 Revision 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 567 is located in Areas 1, 3, 5, 20, and 25 of the Nevada National Security Site, which is approximately 65 miles northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada. CAU 567 is a grouping of sites where there has been a suspected release of contamination associated with nuclear testing. This document describes the planned investigation of CAU 567, which comprises the following corrective action sites (CASs): 01-23-03, Atmospheric Test Site T-1 03-23-25, Seaweed E Contamination Area 05-23-07, A5b RMA 20-23-08, Colby Mud Spill 25-23-23, J-11 Soil RMA These sites are being investigated because existing information on the nature and extent of potential contamination is insufficient to evaluate and recommend corrective action alternatives (CAAs). Additional information will be obtained by conducting a corrective action investigation before evaluating CAAs and selecting the appropriate corrective action for each CAS. The results of the field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of viable CAAs that will be presented in the investigation report. The sites will be investigated based on the data quality objectives (DQOs) developed on May 6, 2013, by representatives of the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office. The DQO process was used to identify and define the type, amount, and quality of data needed to develop and evaluate appropriate corrective actions for CAU 567. The site investigation process will also be conducted in accordance with the Soils Activity Quality Assurance Plan, which establishes requirements, technical planning, and general quality practices to be applied to this activity. The potential contamination sources associated with CAU 567 releases are nuclear test operations and other NNSS operations. The DQO process resulted in an assumption that total effective dose (TED) within a default contamination boundary at Atmospheric Test Site T-1 exceeds the final action level (FAL) and requires corrective action. The presence and nature of contamination outside the default contamination boundary at Atmospheric Test Site T-1 and all other CAU 567 CASs will be evaluated based on information collected from a field investigation. Radiological contamination will be evaluated based on a comparison of the TED at sample locations to the dose-based FAL. The TED will be calculated as the total of separate estimates of internal and external dose. Results from the analysis of soil samples will be used to calculate internal radiological dose. Thermoluminescent dosimeters placed at the center of each sample location will be used to measure external radiological dose. Appendix A provides a detailed discussion of the DQO methodology and the DQOs specific to each CAS.

Matthews, Patrick K.

2013-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

480

Streamlined Approach for Environmental Restoration (SAFER) Plan for Corrective Action Unit 415: Project 57 No. 1 Plutonium Dispersion (NTTR), Nevada, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Streamlined Approach for Environmental Restoration (SAFER) Plan addresses the actions needed to achieve closure for Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 415, Project 57 No. 1 Plutonium Dispersion (NTTR). CAU 415 is located on Range 4808A of the Nevada Test and Training Range (NTTR) and consists of one corrective action site: NAFR-23-02, Pu Contaminated Soil. The CAU 415 site consists of the atmospheric release of radiological contaminants to surface soil from the Project 57 safety experiment conducted in 1957. The safety experiment released plutonium (Pu), uranium (U), and americium (Am) to the surface soil over an area of approximately 1.9 square miles. This area is currently fenced and posted as a radiological contamination area. Vehicles and debris contaminated by the experiment were subsequently buried in a disposal trench within the surface-contaminated, fenced area and are assumed to have released radiological contamination to subsurface soils. Potential source materials in the form of pole-mounted electrical transformers were also identified at the site and will be removed as part of closure activities.

Matthews, Patrick; Burmeister, Mark

2014-04-01T23:59:59.000Z

Note: This page contains sample records for the topic "1 2009-2011 revision" from the National Library of EnergyBeta (NLEBeta).
While these samples are representative of the content of NLEBeta,
they are not comprehensive nor are they the most current set.
We encourage you to perform a real-time search of NLEBeta
to obtain the most current and comprehensive results.


481

Waste Generation Forecast for DOE-ORO`s Environmental Restoration OR-1 Project: FY 1994--FY 2001. Environmental Restoration Program, September 1993 Revision  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Waste Generation Forecast for DOE-ORO`s Environmental Restoration OR-1 Project. FY 1994--FY 2001 is the third in a series of documents that report current estimates of the waste volumes expected to be generated as a result of Environmental Restoration activities at Department of Energy, Oak Ridge Operations Office (DOE-ORO), sites. Considered in the scope of this document are volumes of waste expected to be generated as a result of remedial action and decontamination and decommissioning activities taking place at these sites. Sites contributing to the total estimates make up the DOE-ORO Environmental Restoration OR-1 Project: the Oak Ridge K-25 Site, the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, the Y-12 Plant, the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant, the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant, and the off-site contaminated areas adjacent to the Oak Ridge facilities (collectively referred to as the Oak Ridge Reservation Off-Site area). Estimates are available for the entire fife of all waste generating activities. This document summarizes waste estimates forecasted for the 8-year period of FY 1994-FY 2001. Updates with varying degrees of change are expected throughout the refinement of restoration strategies currently in progress at each of the sites. Waste forecast data are relatively fluid, and this document represents remediation plans only as reported through September 1993.

Not Available

1993-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

482

Statement of basis/proposed plan for the Central Shops Burning/Rubble Pit (631-6G). Revision 1, Final  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The purpose of this plan is to describe the preferred alternative for addressing the Central Shops Burning/Rubble Pit 631-6G (BRP6G) located at SRS, in northwestern Barnwell County, South Carolina and to provide an opportunity for public input into the remedial action selection process. Arsenic, beryllium, iron, and octachloro-dibenzo-p-dioxin isomers (OCDD) concentrations in the pit soil are at levels consistent with those found in the background. Therefore, the only contamination attributable to actions in BRP6G is PCB-1254. After the risk contributions of these chemicals are eliminated, the only remaining risk attributable to the pit soil is from PCB-1254 (about 2 {times} 10{sup {minus}6} via ingestion of vegetables grown on-site). The maximum concentration of PCB-1254 detected in the pit was 0.115 mg/kg, approximately 10% of the residential action level for PCBs of 1 mg/kg. Based on the results of the remedial investigation and the BRA, it is proposed that No Action be performed for the BRP6G. Considering the low levels of residual contamination present principally below 1.2 meters (4 feet) within the pit and the associated risks (about 2 {times} 10{sup {minus}6}) within the lower level of EPA`s target risk range, action is not warranted for this unit.

Palmer, E.

1996-10-24T23:59:59.000Z

483

RETRAN-02: a program for transient thermal-hydraulic analysis of complex fluid flow systems. Volume 1. Theory and numerics (Revision 2). [PWR; BWR  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

RETRAN-02 represents a significant achievement in the development of a versatile and reliable computer program for use in best-estimate transient thermal-hydraulic analysis of LWR systems. The RETRAN-02 computer program is an extension of the RETRAN-01 program designed to provide analysis capabilities for: (1) BWR and PWR transients; (2) small-break loss-of-coolant accidents; (3) balance of plant modeling; and (4) anticipated transients without scram, while maintaining the analysis capabilities of the predecessor code. This report (the first of a four-volume computer code manual) describes the theory and numerical algorithms of the RETRAN-02 code. The three companion volumes describe the programming aspects, the programming details, and the verification and qualification performed with RETRAN.

McFadden, J.H.; Narum, R.E.; Peterson, C.E.; Noble, C.; Farman, R.F.; McClure, J.A.; Paulsen, M.P.; Richert, K.D.; Hughes, E.D.; Gose, G.C.

1984-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

484

TRU waste certification compliance requirements for acceptance of newly generated contact-handled wastes to be shipped to the WIPP. Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Compliance requirements are presented for certifying that unclassified, newly generated, contact-handled (CH) transuranic (TRU) solid wastes from defense programs meet the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC). Where appropriate, transportation and interim storage requirements are incorporated, however, interim storage sites may have additional requirements consistent with these requirements. All applicable DOE orders must continue to be met. The compliance requirements for stored or buried waste are not addressed in this document. The compliance requirements are divided into four sections, primarily determined by the general feature that the requirements address. These sections are General Requirements, Waste Container Requirements, Waste Form Requirements, and Waste Package Requirements. The waste package is the combination of waste container and waste. 2 refs., 1 fig.

Not Available

1985-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

485

Corrective Action Decision Document/Corrective Action Plan for Corrective Action Unit 98: Frenchman Flat, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This CADD/CAP follows the Corrective Action Investigation (CAI) stage, which results in development of a set of contaminant boundary forecasts produced from groundwater flow and contaminant transport modeling of the Frenchman Flat CAU. The Frenchman Flat CAU is located in the southeastern portion of the NNSS and comprises 10 underground nuclear tests. The tests were conducted between 1965 and 1971 and resulted in the release of radionuclides in the subsurface in the vicinity of the test cavities. Two important aspects of the corrective action process are presented within this CADD/CAP. The CADD portion describes the results of the Frenchman Flat CAU data-collection and modeling activities completed during the CAI stage. The corrective action objectives and the actions recommended to meet the objectives are also described. The CAP portion describes the corrective action implementation plan. The CAP begins with the presentation of CAU regulatory boundary objectives and initial use restriction boundaries that are identified and negotiated by NNSA/NSO and the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP). The CAP also presents the model evaluation process designed to build confidence that the flow and contaminant transport modeling results can be used for the regulatory decisions required for CAU closure. The first two stages of the strategy have been completed for the Frenchman Flat CAU. A value of information analysis and a CAIP were developed during the CAIP stage. During the CAI stage, a CAIP addendum was developed, and the activities proposed in the CAIP and addendum were completed. These activities included hydrogeologic investigation of the underground testing areas, aquifer testing, isotopic and geochemistry-based investigations, and integrated geophysical investigations. After these investigations, a groundwater flow and contaminant transport model was developed to forecast contaminant boundaries that enclose areas potentially exceeding the Safe Drinking Water Act radiological standards at any time within 1,000 years. An external peer review of the groundwater flow and contaminant transport model was completed, and the model was accepted by NDEP to allow advancement to the CADD/CAP stage. The CADD/CAP stage focuses on model evaluation to ensure that existing models provide adequate guidance for the regulatory decisions regarding monitoring and institutional controls. Data-collection activities are identified and implemented to address key uncertainties in the flow and contaminant transport models. During the CR stage, final use restriction boundaries and CAU regulatory boundaries are negotiated and established; a long-term closure monitoring program is developed and implemented; and the approaches and policies for institutional controls are initiated. The model evaluation process described in this plan consists of an iterative series of five steps designed to build confidence in the site conceptual model and model forecasts. These steps are designed to identify data-collection activities (Step 1), document the data-collection activities in the 0CADD/CAP (Step 2), and perform the activities (Step 3). The new data are then assessed; the model is refined, if necessary; the modeling results are evaluated; and a model evaluation report is prepared (Step 4). The assessments are made by the modeling team and presented to the pre-emptive review committee. The decision is made by the modeling team with the assistance of the pre-emptive review committee and concurrence of NNSA/NSO to continue data and model assessment/refinement, recommend additional data collection, or recommend advancing to the CR stage. A recommendation to advance to the CR stage is based on whether the model is considered to be sufficiently reliable for designing a monitoring system and developing effective institutional controls. The decision to advance to the CR stage or to return to step 1 of the process is then made by NDEP (Step 5).

Irene Farnham and Sam Marutzky

2011-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

486

Streamlined Approach for Environmental Restoration (SAFER) Plan for Corrective Action Unit 465: Hydronuclear Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, with ROTC 1, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This Streamlined Approach for Environmental Restoration (SAFER) Plan addresses the actions needed to achieve closure for Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 465, Hydronuclear, identified in the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO). Corrective Action Unit 465 comprises the following four corrective action sites (CASs) located in Areas 6 and 27 of the Nevada National Security Site: (1) 00-23-01, Hydronuclear Experiment; (2) 00-23-02, Hydronuclear Experiment; (3) 00-23-03, Hydronuclear Experiment; (4) 06-99-01, Hydronuclear. The sites will be investigated based on the data quality objectives (DQOs) developed on July 6, 2011, by representatives of the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office. The DQO process was used to identify and define the type, amount, and quality of data needed to determine and implement appropriate corrective actions for each CAS in CAU 465. For CAU 465, two potential release components have been identified. The subsurface release component includes potential releases of radiological and nonradiological contaminants from the subsurface hydronuclear experiments and disposal boreholes. The surface release component consists of other potential releases of radiological and nonradiological contaminants to surface soils that may have occurred during the pre- and post-test activities. This plan provides the methodology for collection of the necessary information for closing each CAS component. There is sufficient information and process knowledge from historical documentation, contaminant characteristics, existing regional and site groundwater models, and investigations of similar sites regarding the expected nature and extent of potential contaminants to recommend closure of CAU 465 using the SAFER process. For potential subsurface releases, flow and transport models will be developed to integrate existing data into a conservative description of contaminant migration in the unsaturated zone from the hydronuclear experiments and disposal boreholes. For the potential surface releases, additional information will be obtained by conducting a field investigation before selecting the appropriate corrective action for each CAS component. It is anticipated that results of the flow and transport models, the field investigation, and implementation of the corrective action of closure in place will support a defensible recommendation that no further corrective action is necessary. This will be presented in a closure report that will be prepared and submitted to NDEP for review and approval. The following text summarizes the SAFER activities that will support the closure of CAU 465: (1) Perform site preparation activities (e.g., utilities clearances, and radiological and visual surveys). (2) Move or remove and dispose of debris at various CASs, as required. (3) Collect environmental samples from designated target populations (e.g., stained soil) to confirm or disprove the presence of contaminants of concern as necessary to supplement existing information. (4) Evaluate and analyze existing data to develop conservative flow and transport models to simulate the potential for contaminant migration from the hydronuclear experiments and disposal boreholes to the water table within 1,000 years. (5) Confirm the preferred closure option (closure in place with use restrictions) is sufficient to protect human health and the environment.

Patrick Matthews

2011-11-01T23:59:59.000Z

487

?Framework for a Risk-Informed Groundwater Compliance Strategy for Corrective Action Unit 98: Frenchman Flat, Nevada National Security Site, Nye County, Nevada, Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Note: This document was prepared before the NTS was renamed the Nevada National Security Site (August 23, 2010); thus, all references to the site herein remain NTS. Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 98, Frenchman Flat, at the Nevada Test Site (NTS) was the location of ten underground nuclear tests between 1965 and 1971. As a result, radionuclides were released in the subsurface in the vicinity of the test cavities. Corrective Action Unit 98 and other CAUs at the NTS and offsite locations are being investigated. The Frenchman Flat CAU is one of five Underground Test Area (UGTA) CAUs at the NTS that are being evaluated as potential sources of local or regional impact to groundwater resources. For UGTA sites, including Frenchman Flat, contamination in and around the test cavities will not be remediated because it is technologically infeasible due to the depth of the test cavities (150 to 2,000 feet [ft] below ground surface) and the volume of contaminated groundwater at widely dispersed locations on the NTS. Instead, the compliance strategy for these sites is to model contaminant flow and transport, estimate the maximum spatial extent and volume of contaminated groundwater (over a period of 1,000 years), maintain institutional controls, and restrict access to potentially contaminated groundwater at areas where contaminants could migrate beyond the NTS boundaries.

Sam Marutzky

2010-09-01T23:59:59.000Z

488

Pahute Mesa Well Development and Testing Analyses for Wells ER-20-7, ER-20-8 #2, and ER-EC-11, Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

This report analyzes the following data collected from ER-20-7, ER-20-8 No.2, and ER-EC-11 during WDT operations: (1) Chemical indicators of well development (Section 2.0); (2) Static hydraulic head (Section 3.0); (3) Radiochemistry and geochemistry (Section 4.0); (4) Drawdown observed at locations distal to the pumping well (Section 5.0); and (5) Drilling water production, flow logs, and temperature logs (Section 6.0). The new data are further considered with respect to existing data as to how they enhance or change interpretations of groundwater flow and transport, and an interim small-scale conceptual model is also developed and compared to Phase I concepts. The purpose of well development is to remove drilling fluids and drilling-associated fines from the formation adjacent to a well so samples reflecting ambient groundwater water quality can be collected, and to restore hydraulic properties near the well bore. Drilling fluids can contaminate environmental samples from the well, resulting in nonrepresentative measurements. Both drilling fluids and preexisting fines in the formation adjacent to the well can impede the flow of water from the formation to the well, creating artifacts in hydraulic response data measured in the well.

Greg Ruskauff

2011-12-01T23:59:59.000Z

489

EIS-0286: Notice of Revised Scope | Department of Energy  

Broader source: Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

Notice of Revised Scope EIS-0286: Notice of Revised Scope Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has decided to revise the...

490

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 266: Area 25 Building 3124 Leachfield, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 1, February 1999  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 266, Area 25 Building 3124 Leachfield, has been developed in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order that was agreed to by the U.S. Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office; the State of Nevada Division of Environmental Protection; and the U.S. Department of Defense. Corrective Action Unit 266 consists of the Corrective Action Site 25-05-09 sanitary leachfield and associated collection system. This Corrective Action Investigation Plan is used in combination with the Work Plan for Leachfield Corrective Action Units: Nevada Test Site and Tonopah Test Range, Nevada (DOE/NV, 1998d). This Corrective Action Investigation Plan provides investigative details specific to Corrective Action Unit 266. Corrective Action Unit 266 is located southwest of Building 3124 which is located southwest and adjacent to Test Cell A. Test Cell A was operational during the 1960s to test nuclear rocket reactors in support of the Nuclear Rocket Development Station. Operations within Building 3124 from 1962 through the early 1990s resulted in effluent releases to the leachfield and associated collection system. The subsurface soils in the vicinity of the collection system and leachfield may have been impacted by effluent containing contaminants of potential concern generated by support activities associated with Test Cell A reactor testing operations, various laboratories including a high-level radioactivity environmental sample handling laboratory, and possibly the Treatability Test Facility. Based on site history collected to support the Data Quality Objectives process, contaminants of potential concern for the site include radionuclides, oil/diesel range total petroleum hydrocarbons, and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act characteristic volatile organic compounds, semivolatile organic compounds, and metals. Samples will also be analyzed for radionuclides and polychlorinated biphenyls not considered during the DQO process. Additional samples will be analyzed for geotechnical and hydrological properties and a bioassessment may be performed. The technical approach for investigating this Corrective Action Unit consists of the following activities: (1) Perform a radiological walkover survey. (2) Perform video and radiation surveys of the discharge and outfall lines. (3) Collect samples from within the septic tank. (4) Mark approximate locations of leachfield distribution lines on the ground surface. (5) Collect subsurface soil samples in areas of the collection system including the septic tank and outfall end of the diversion chamber. (6) Collect subsurface soil samples underlying the leachfield distribution pipes. (7) Field screen samples for volatile organic compounds and radiological activity. (8) Drill boreholes and collect subsurface soil samples if required. (9) Analyze soil samples for total volatile organic compounds, total semivolatile organic compounds, total Resource Conservation and Recovery Act metals, total petroleum hydrocarbons (oil/diesel-range organics), and polychlorinated biphenyls. (1) Analyze a minimum of 25 percent of the soil samples for gamma-emitting radionuclides, isotopic uranium, isotopic plutonium, isotopic americium, and strontium-90 if radiological field screening levels are exceeded. (2) Collect samples from native soils beneath the distribution system and analyze for geotechnical/hydrologic parameters. (3) Collect and analyze bioassessment samples at Site Supervisors discretion if volatile organic compounds exceed field-screening levels. Additional sampling and analytical details are presented.

U.S. Department Of Energy, Nevada Operations Office

1999-02-24T23:59:59.000Z

491

Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Part B Permit Application [for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP)]. Volume 4, Chapter D, Appendix D1 (beginning), Revision 3  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), which is designed for receipt, handling, storage, and permanent isolation of defense-generated transuranic wastes, is being excavated at a depth of approximately 655 m in bedded halites of the Permian Salado Formation of southeastern New Mexico. Site-characterization activities at the present WIPP site began in 1976. Full construction of the facility began in 1983, after completion of ``Site and Preliminary Design Validation`` (SPDV) activities and reporting. Site-characterization activities since 1983 have had the objectives of updating or refining the overall conceptual model of the geologic, hydrologic, and structural behavior of the WIPP site and providing data adequate for use in WIPP performance assessment. This report has four main objectives: 1. Summarize the results of WIPP site-characterization studies carried out since the spring of 1983 as a result of specific agreements between the US Department of Energy and the State of New Mexico. 2. Summarize the results and status of site-characterization and facility-characterization studies carried out since 1983, but not specifically included in mandated agreements. 3. Compile the results of WIPP site-characterization studies into an internally consistent conceptual model for the geologic, hydrologic, geochemical, and structural behavior of the WIPP site. This model includes some consideration of the effects of the WIPP facility and shafts on the local characteristics of the Salado and Rustler Formations. 4. Discuss the present limitations and/or uncertainties in the conceptual geologic model of the WIPP site and facility. The objectives of this report are limited in scope, and do not include determination of whether or not the WIPP Project will comply with repository-performance criteria developed by the US Environmental Protection Agency (40CFR191).

Not Available

1993-03-01T23:59:59.000Z

492

Bench-scale testing of on-line control of column flotation using a novel analyzer. Revised final report, [October 1992--October 1993]: Volume 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

The main advantage of the project is that it allowed PTI to gain knowledge and experience about the proper approach, methods and hardware required to properly optimize and control column flotation performance. Many operational problems were incurred during the project, some of that PTI was able to solve during the project and other that must be overcome as the technology is further developed and commercialized. The key operating problems experienced with the KEN-FLOTE{sup TM} Column that must be further researched and overcome include: (1)The low concentrate solids content which limited the throughput capacity of the column, due to high froth washing requirements. The low concentrate solids content also lead to difficulty obtaining accurate On-Line Monitor measurements, due to the poor measurement sensitivity obtained with low solids content samples (particularly less than 5.0 wt %). (2) The higher-than-anticipated reagent dosages that undoubtedly contributed to the low solids content listed above, and also caused foaming problems within PTI`s On-Line Monitor. A defoaming reagent addition (Nalco 7810) was required to provide consistent sample size and reproducible On-Line Monitor counts for the concentrate samples collected within the circuit. PTI and UK`s CAER staff will continue to research alternative column design, particularly alternative air bubble generation and air distribution systems, to try to maximize column concentrate solids content while reducing reagent dosage requirements. In addition to the KEN-FLOTE{sup TM} Column operation there were also a number of hardware problems with PTI`s On-Line Quality Monitor that must be remedied for future commercial installations.

Not Available

1993-10-27T23:59:59.000Z

493

Property:NEPA RevisedApplicationDate | Open Energy Information  

Open Energy Info (EERE)

RevisedApplicationDate RevisedApplicationDate Jump to: navigation, search Property Name NEPA RevisedApplicationDate Property Type Date This is a property of type Date. Pages using the property "NEPA RevisedApplicationDate" Showing 19 pages using this property. D DOI-BLM-CA-ES-2013-002+1793-EIS + 5 June 2012 + DOI-BLM-NV-C010-2010-0006-EA + 16 November 2009 + DOI-BLM-NV-C010-2010-0010-EA + 15 October 2009 + DOI-BLM-NV-C010-2011-0016-EA + 15 March 2011 + DOI-BLM-NV-C010-2012-0050-EA + 14 February 2012 + DOI-BLM-NV-C010-2012-0051-EA + 1 December 2011 + DOI-BLM-NV-C010-2012-0069-CX + 9 August 2012 + DOI-BLM-NV-C010-2012-0070-CX + 27 July 2012 + DOI-BLM-NV-E030-2011-0017-CX + 2 March 2011 + DOI-BLM-NV-W010-2010-0004-EA + 23 November 2009 + DOI-BLM-NV-W010-2011-0001-EA + 4 June 2010 +

494

REVISED HYDROGEN SULFIDE DRILLING CONTINGENCY PLAN  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

REVISED HYDROGEN SULFIDE DRILLING CONTINGENCY PLAN OCEAN DRILLING PROGRAM TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY;PREFACE Attached is the "REVISED HYDROGEN SULFIDE DRILLING CONTINGENCY PLAN" that will be used for ODP coring and drilling operations on legs where hydrogen sulfide is likely to be encountered. Prior

495

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 561: Waste Disposal Areas, Nevada Test Site, Nevada with ROTC 1, Revision 0  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 561 is located in Areas 1, 2, 3, 5, 12, 22, 23, and 25 of the Nevada Test Site, which is approximately 65 miles northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada. Corrective Action Unit 561 is comprised of the 10 corrective action sites (CASs) listed below: 01-19-01, Waste Dump 02-08-02, Waste Dump and Burn Area 03-19-02, Debris Pile 05-62-01, Radioactive Gravel Pile 12-23-09, Radioactive Waste Dump 22-19-06, Buried Waste Disposal Site 23-21-04, Waste Disposal Trenches 25-08-02, Waste Dump 25-23-21, Radioactive Waste Dump 25-25-19, Hydrocarbon Stains and Trench These sites are being investigated because existing information on the nature and extent of potential contamination is insufficient to evaluate and recommend corrective action alternatives. Additional information will be obtained by conducting a corrective action investigation before evaluating corrective action alternatives and selecting the appropriate corrective action for each CAS. The results of the field investigation will support a defensible evaluation of viable corrective action alternatives that will be presented in the Corrective Action Decision Document. The sites will be investigated based on the data quality objectives (DQOs) developed on April 28, 2008, by representatives of the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection; U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office; Stoller-Navarro Joint Venture; and National Security Technologies, LLC. The DQO process was used to identify and define the type, amount, and quality of data needed to develop and evaluate appropriate corrective actions for CAU 561. Appendix A provides a detailed discussion of the DQO methodology and the DQOs specific to each CAS. The scope of the Corrective Action Investigation for CAU 561 includes the following activities: Move surface debris and/or materials, as needed, to facilitate sampling. Conduct radiological surveys. Perform exploratory excavations. Perform field screening. Collect and submit environmental samples for laboratory analysis to determine the nature and extent of any contamination released by each CAS. Collect samples of source material to determine the potential for a release. Collect samples of potential remediation wastes. Collect quality control samples.

Grant Evenson

2008-07-01T23:59:59.000Z

496

Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) in Catfish and Carp Collected from the Rio Grande Upstream and Downstream of Los Alamos National Laboratory: Revision 1  

SciTech Connect (OSTI)

Concern has existed for years that the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), a complex of nuclear weapons research and support facilities, has released polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) to the environment that may have reached adjacent bodies of water through canyons that connect them. In 1997, LANL's Ecology Group began measuring PCBs in fish in the Rio Grande upstream and downstream of ephemeral streams that cross LANL and later began sampling fish in Abiquiu and Cochiti reservoirs, which are situated on the Rio Chama and Rio Grande upstream and downstream of LANL, respectively. In 2002, we electroshocked channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) and common carp (Carpiodes carpio) in the Rio Grande upstream and downstream of LANL and analyzed fillets for PCB congeners. We also sampled soils along the Rio Chama and Rio Grande drainages to discern whether a background atmospheric source of PCBs that could impact surface water adjacent to LANL might exist. Trace concentrations of PCBs measured in soil (mean = 4.7E-05 {micro}g/g-ww) appear to be from background global atmospheric sources, at least in part, because the bimodal distribution of low-chlorinated PCB congeners and mid-chlorinated PCB congeners in the soil samples is interpreted to be typical of volatilized PCB congeners that are found in the atmosphere and dust from global fallout. Upstream catfish (n = 5) contained statistically (P = 0.047) higher concentrations of total PCBs (mean = 2.80E-02 {micro}g/g-ww) than downstream catfish (n = 10) (mean = 1.50E-02 {micro}g/g-ww). Similarly, upstream carp (n = 4) contained higher concentrations of total PCBs (mean = 7.98E-02 {micro}g/g-ww) than downstream carp (n = 4) (3.07E-02 {micro}g/g-ww); however, the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.42). The dominant PCB homologue in all fish samples was hexachlorobiphenyls. Total PCB concentrations in fish in 2002 are lower than 1997; however, differences in analytical methods and other uncertainties exist. A review of historical quantitative PCB data for fish from the Rio Grande and Abiquiu and Cochiti reservoirs does not indicate a distinct contribution of PCBs from LANL to fish in the Rio Grande or Cochiti. Analysis of homologue patterns for fish does not provide sufficient evidence of a LANL contribution. Nevertheless, concentrations of PCBs in fillets of fish sampled from the Rio Grande are indicative of potential adverse chronic health impact from consumption of these fish on a long-term basis.

Gilbert J. Gonzales

2008-05-12T23:59:59.000Z

497

CBER-DETR Nevada Coincident and Leading Employment Benchmark Revisions Add Employment to Nevada  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

Statistics. The Nevada Coincident EmploymentCBER-DETR Nevada Coincident and Leading Employment Indexes1 Benchmark Revisions Add Employment to Nevada The Nevada Coincident Employment Index measures the ups and downs of the Nevada economy using

Ahmad, Sajjad

498

December 26, 2012 12:27 WSPC/INSTRUCTION FILE acs-revision-disagreementreviews-v2  

E-Print Network [OSTI]

December 26, 2012 12:27 WSPC/INSTRUCTION FILE acs-revision- disagreementreviews-v2 Advances and cultural structures that anticipate, in part or in whole, this kind of collabo- 1 #12;December 26, 2012 12

Grimaldo, Francisco

499

U.S. Federal Offshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Decreases (Million Barrels) U.S. Federal Offshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6...

500

U.S. Federal Offshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision...  

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Indexed Site

Increases (Million Barrels) U.S. Federal Offshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6...