- Abstract Large size often confers a fitness advantage to female insects because fecundity increases with body
- Arch. Hydrobiol. 160 2 145151 Stuttgart, June 2004 Are mayfly anti-predator responses to fish odour
- BEHAVIOURAL ECOLOGY Andrea C. Encalada Barbara L. Peckarsky
- Abstract The supply of recruits plays an important role in plant and animal population dynamics, and may be
- Sarah A. Vance Barbara L. Peckarsky The effect of mermithid parasitism on predation
- Angus R. McIntosh Barbara L. Peckarsky Brad W. Taylor
- Brad W. Taylor Chester R. Anderson Barbara L. Peckarsky
- Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Alternative predator avoidance syndromes of stream-dwelling mayfly larvae
- Ecology, 84(8), 2003, pp. 21332144 2003 by the Ecological Society of America
- Ecology, 89(9), 2008, pp. 24262435 2008 by the Ecological Society of America
- Contradictory results from different methods for measuring direction of insect flight
- Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. LIfe histories and the strengths of species interactions: Combining mortalit...
- Oecologia (2003) 137:188194 DOI 10.1007/s00442-003-1326-0
- Are populations of mayflies living in adjacent fish and fishless streams genetically differentiated?
- PLANT ANIMAL INTERACTIONS Maruxa A lvarez Barbara L. Peckarsky
- Primary Research Paper Effects of pulsed and pressed disturbances on the benthic invertebrate
- Stable isotopes identify dispersal patterns of stonefly populations living along stream corridors
- Ecological Applications, 16(2), 2006, pp. 612621 2006 by the Ecological Society of America
- APPLIED ISSUES Spatial and temporal impacts of a diesel fuel spill
- Elsevier US 0mse24 27-2-2006 3:24p.m. Page No: 561 Predator-Prey
- Ecology, 85(8), 2004, pp. 22792290 2004 by the Ecological Society of America
- ORIGINAL PAPER A comparative study of the costs of alternative mayfly
- Ecology, 89(9), 2008, pp. 24362445 2008 by the Ecological Society of America
- TRIBUTE TO STANLEY DODSON Does the morphology of beaver ponds alter downstream
- 152 American Entomologist Fall 2011 vulnerable mayflies
- 22 The Open Ecology Journal, 2010, 3, 22-30 1874-2130/10 2010 Bentham Open
- Abstract The supply of recruits plays an important role in plant and animal population dynamics, and may be
- Abstract Large size often confers a fitness advantage to female insects because fecundity increases with body
- Ecology, 84(8), 2003, pp. 21332144 2003 by the Ecological Society of America
- DOI 10.1007/s00442-011-2147-1 POPULATION ECOLOGY -ORIGINAL PAPER
- Ecology, 82(3), 2001, pp. 740757 2001 by the Ecological Society of America
- Limnol. Oceanogr., 47(3), 2002, 893899 2002, by the American Society of Limnology and Oceanography, Inc.
- Genetic structure in a montane mayfly Baetis bicaudatus (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae), from the Rocky Mountains,
- Ecosystem engineering by beavers affects mayfly life MATTHEW R. FULLER*, ,
- ECOHYDROLOGY Ecohydrol. 1, 176186 (2008)
- ORIGINAL PAPER A comparative study of the costs of alternative mayfly
- Ecology, 83(6), 2002, pp. 16201634 2002 by the Ecological Society of America
- Ecology, 89(9), 2008, pp. 24162425 2008 by the Ecological Society of America
- Ecology, 89(9), 2008, pp. 24362445 2008 by the Ecological Society of America
- Oecologia (2008) 156:431440 DOI 10.1007/s00442-008-1004-3
- The influence of recruitment on within-generation population dynamics of a mayfly
- Sampling stream invertebrates using electroshocking techniques: implications for
- CURRICULUM VITAE (January 2012)
- Ecology, 89(9), 2008, pp. 24262435 2008 by the Ecological Society of America
- The influence of predatory fish on mayfly drift: extrapolating from experiments to nature
- 9 UnderstandingtheRoleof PredationinOpenSystems
- Aquatic Insects, Vol. 21 (1999), No. 3, pp. 179185 0165-0424/99/2103-0179$15.00 Swets & Zeitlinger
- Barbara L. Peckarsky Angus R. McIntosh Fitness and community consequences of avoiding multiple predators
- Ecology, 83(3), 2002, pp. 612618 2002 by the Ecological Society of America
