Home
About
Advanced Search
Browse by Discipline
Scientific Societies
E-print Alerts
Add E-prints
FAQ
•
HELP
•
SITE MAP
•
CONTACT US
Search
Advanced Search
Inglis, Matthew - Department of Mathematical Sciences, Loughborough University
2006. In Novotn, J., Moraov, H., Krtk, M. & Stehlkov, N. (Eds.). Proceedings 30th Conference of the
Representation Systems and Undergraduate Proof Production: A Comment on Weber
R163B -Eye movements and time-based selection Running head: EYE MOVEMENTS AND TIME-BASED SELECTION
Hewitt, D. (2006) Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics 26(2) June 2006 IS IT EVER APPROPRIATE TO JUDGE
Modelling Mathematical Argumentation: The Importance of Qualification
On the persuasiveness of visual arguments in mathematics Matthew Inglis
Semantic contamination and mathematical proof: Can a non-proof prove? 1
Does Generating Examples Aid Proof Production? Paola Iannone
Conditional inference and advanced mathematical study: Further evidence
Review of "Proof in Mathematics Education: Research, Learning and Teaching" (David Reid and Christine Knipping)
Conditional inference and advanced mathematical study Matthew Inglis
Authority and Mathematical Argumentation 1 Running head: AUTHORITY AND MATHEMATICAL ARGUMENTS
How persuaded are you? How persuaded are you? A typology of responses
Students' use of optional learning resources 1 Running head: STUDENTS' USE OF OPTIONAL LEARNING RESOURCES
SHORTER CONTRIBUTIONS. ARITHMETIC BY SMELL.
PME 32 and PME-NA XXX 2008 3 -73 PROCESS-AND OBJECT-BASED THINKING IN ARITHMETIC
Three worlds and the imaginary MATTHEW INGLIS
Non-Verbal Number Acuity and Symbolic Mathematics Running head: NON-VERBAL NUMBER ACUITY AND SYMBOLIC MATHEMATICS
Running head: Reading Mathematical Proofs
Mathematicians' Different Standards When Evaluating Proofs 1 Running head: MATHEMATICIANS' DIFFERENT STANDARDS WHEN EVALUATING