- vol. 168, no. 5 the american naturalist november 2006 Host-Parasite Coevolution and Selection on Sex
- ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00333.x
- letters to nature 692 NATURE |VOL 411 |7 JUNE 2001 |www.nature.com
- Copyright 2010 by the Genetics Society of America DOI: 10.1534/genetics.110.115766
- Current Biology 16, R696R704, September 5, 2006 2006 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.063 ReviewEvolution of Sex: Why Do
- Copyright 2005 by the Genetics Society of America DOI: 10.1534/genetics.105.041301
- Supporting Information 3. Host-parasite simulations Deterministic computer simulations were performed to evaluate the effect of maternally-
- Received 8 July 2002 Accepted 10 September 2002
- Maternal effects and the evolution of aposematic signals
- Behav Ecol Sociobiol (2004) 57:139148 DOI 10.1007/s00265-004-0841-2
- Journal of Insect Behavior, Vol. 16, No. 6, November 2003 ( C 2003) An Analysis of Single Clutch Paternity in the
- 29. C. M. Pease, R. Lande, J. J. Bull, Ecology 70, 1657 30. T. J. Case, M. L. Taper, Am. Nat. 155, 583 (2000).
- Infection genetics: gene-for-gene versus matching-alleles models and all points in between
- vol. 174, supplement the american naturalist july 2009 Spatial Heterogeneity and the Evolution of Sex in Diploids
- vol. 158, no. 3 the american naturalist september 2001 On Indirect Genetic Effects in Structured Populations
- Environmental duress and epistasis: how does stress affect the strength
- vol. 174, no. 6 the american naturalist december 2009 Selection, Epistasis, and Parent-of-Origin Effects on Deleterious
- Behav Ecol Sociobiol (2005) 57:566574 DOI 10.1007/s00265-004-0899-x
- BRIEF COMMUNICATION doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00449.x
- 3OHDVHILQGDWWD.KHGWKHILQDOSGIILOHRI\RXU.RQWULEXWLRQZKL.K.DQEHYLHZHGXVLQJWKH $.UREDW5HDGHUYHUVLRQRUKLJKHU:HZRXOGNLQGO\OLNHWRGUDZ\RXUDWWHQWLRQWRWKH
- 2001 The Society for the Study of Evolution. All rights reserved. Evolution, 55(2), 2001, pp. 232245
- Genetica 112113: 3343, 2001. 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands.
- ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01062.x
- vol. 176, no. 2 the american naturalist august 2010 Ecological Determinants of Mutation Load and Inbreeding
- How much do genetic covariances alter the rate of adaptation?
- Supporting Information 1. Deriving analytical approximations for single-species modifier models.
- Copyright 2001 by the Genetics Society of America Recessive Mutations and the Maintenance of Sex in Structured Populations
- LETTER doi:10.1038/nature09449 Higher rates of sex evolve in spatially heterogeneous
- ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00938.x
- PERSPECTIVE doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00558.x
- ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00695.x
- vol. 174, no. 5 the american naturalist november 2009 Sexual Selection and the Random Union of Gametes
- SHORT COMMUNICATION The effect of pathogens on selection against deleterious mutations
- Supporting Information 2. Analytical approximation of selection coefficients generated by host-parasite coevolution.
- Male Drosophila melanogaster have higher mating success when adapted to their thermal environment
- 2006 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. Appendix from A. F. Agrawal and S. P. Otto, "Host-Parasite
- Genetic loads under fitness-dependent mutation rates A. F. AGRAWAL
- Kin recognition and the evolution of altruism Aneil F. Agrawal
- When phenotypic traits are characterized at the molecular level, many have a complex GENETIC
- 2001 The Society for the Study of Evolution. All rights reserved. Evolution, 55(5), 2001, pp. 869879
- Copyright 2011 by the Genetics Society of America DOI: 10.1534/genetics.110.124560
- The effect of sex on the mean and variance of fitness in facultatively sexual rotifers
- Current Biology 22, 204208, February 7, 2012 2012 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2011.12.020 The Effect of Sexual Selection
