Home

About

Advanced Search

Browse by Discipline

Scientific Societies

E-print Alerts

Add E-prints

E-print Network
FAQHELPSITE MAPCONTACT US


  Advanced Search  

 
A Proof-Theoretic Foundation of Abortive Continuations
 

Summary: A Proof-Theoretic Foundation of
Abortive Continuations
Zena M. Ariola 
University of Oregon
Hugo Herbelin
INRIA-Futurs
Amr Sabry y
Indiana University
Abstract. We give an analysis of various classical axioms and characterize a notion
of minimal classical logic that enforces Peirce's law without enforcing Ex Falso
Quodlibet. We show that a \natural" implementation of this logic is Parigot's clas-
sical natural deduction. We then move on to the computational side and emphasize
that Parigot's  corresponds to minimal classical logic. A continuation constant
must be added to  to get full classical logic. We then map the extended  to a
new theory of control, -C -top, which extends Felleisen's reduction theory. -C -top
allows one to distinguish between aborting and throwing to a continuation. It is also
in correspondence with the proofs of a re nement of Prawitz's natural deduction.
Keywords: callcc, continuation
1. Introduction
Traditionally, classical logic is de ned by extending intuitionistic logic

  

Source: Ariola, Zena M. - Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Oregon

 

Collections: Computer Technologies and Information Sciences