Home

About

Advanced Search

Browse by Discipline

Scientific Societies

E-print Alerts

Add E-prints

E-print Network
FAQHELPSITE MAPCONTACT US


  Advanced Search  

 
Previous Up Next Article From References: 2
 

Summary: Previous Up Next Article
Citations
From References: 2
From Reviews: 0
MR2067697 (2005k:11099) 11F70 (11F55 22E50)
Lansky, Joshua (1-AMER); Raghuram, A. (1-IA)
Conductors and newforms for U(1, 1). (English summary)
Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Math. Sci. 114 (2004), no. 4, 319343.
Let F be a non-Archimedean local field whose residue characteristic is odd. The paper under re-
view develops a theory of newforms for G = U(1, 1)(F), building on the authors' previous work
on SL2(F) ["Conductors and newforms for SL2", preprint, available at http://www.american.
edu/faculty/lansky/papers/newforms sl2 new.pdf]. The notion of a conductor for an irreducible
admissible representation of G is defined by considering certain filtrations of maximal compact
subgroups of G, and considering the space of fixed vectors under these filtration subgroups. The pa-
per investigates the growth of these spaces. The theory is analogous to the results of W. Casselman
[Math. Ann. 201 (1973), 301314; MR0337789 (49 #2558)] and of H. Jacquet, I. I. Piatetski-
Shapiro and J. Shalika [Math. Ann. 256 (1981), no. 2, 199214; MR0620708 (83c:22025)]. It is
also proved that the Whittaker functional does not vanish on the newform (the normalised unique
vector in the space of fixed vectors that defines the conductor). This latter result is important in
global applications.

  

Source: Anandavardhanan, U. K. - Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay

 

Collections: Mathematics