 
Summary: Dr P.M.E. ALTHAM, 2010
Retired Director of Studies for the M.Phil. in Statistical Science, Statistical Labo
ratory, University of Cambridge.
1. Exact Bayesian analysis of a 2×2 contingency table and Fisher's `exact' significance
test. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 31, (1969), 261269.
2. The measurement of association of rows and columns for an r×s contingency table.
J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 32, (1970), 6373.
3. The measurement of association in a contingency table: three extensions of the
crossratios and metrics methods. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 32, (1970), 395407.
4. The estimation of I(x = 1 : 2; y). Appendix to Robson, B. and Pain, R.H. Analysis
of the code relating sequence to conformation in proteins: possible implications for
the mechanism of formation in helical regions. J. Molecular Biology 58, (1970).
5. The analysis of matched proportions. Biometrika 58, (1971), 561576.
6. Exact Bayesian analysis of an intraclass 2×2 table. Biometrika 58, (1971), 679680.
(This is actually about the test for HardyWeinberg equilibrium, and so complements
my first paper (1969). I would dearly like to know why there is an identity between
the Bayes posterior probability and the classical pvalue in the test for independence
in both cases. Someone must surely be able to show that these two are special cases
of a general result, for conditional tests in exponential families?)
7. A nonparametric alternative to d # (with Hammerton, M.). Nature 234, (1971),
