Home

About

Advanced Search

Browse by Discipline

Scientific Societies

E-print Alerts

Add E-prints

E-print Network
FAQHELPSITE MAPCONTACT US


  Advanced Search  

 
CS 6100 Program 3: Social Choice (40 points) The reasons I'm asking you to do this lab are
 

Summary: CS 6100 Program 3: Social Choice (40 points)
Purpose
The reasons I'm asking you to do this lab are:
I want you to play with social welfare functions so that you get familiar with the concept.
I want you to see that the various voting mechanisms choose very different candidates (so that
you do not mistakenly believe that all of them will select the same "most preferred" candidate).
I want you to try to develop a social choice mechanism yourself.
The Problem
This program should run on CSILM. Arrow's impossibility theorem says that there is no social choice
mechanism that takes individual preference patterns and generates a fair societal preference pattern.
Arrow defined fairness according to axioms, and showed that all the axioms could not be
simultaneously satisfied. Voting methods are attempts to take individual preference patterns and create
a "fair" societal preference pattern. We should be able to identify situations where the voting
mechanism breaks down. Since there is no way for voting to be fair, the task of somebody who is
designing a voting mechanism is to minimize the unfairness.
Consider a society of seven voters (A-G) who are trying to reach a consensus on which of the
alternatives they want (say, Coke, Sunkist, Root Beer, Milk, OJ) for the title "CS Department Favorite
Drink". 1 represents the first choice and 5 the last choice. Each agent ranks them as 1 (meaning the
best) and 5 (meaning the worst).
One method will utilize a confidence in the vote. Each individual has a varying confidence in his/her

  

Source: Allan, Vicki H. - Department of Computer Science, Utah State University

 

Collections: Computer Technologies and Information Sciences