Home

About

Advanced Search

Browse by Discipline

Scientific Societies

E-print Alerts

Add E-prints

E-print Network
FAQHELPSITE MAPCONTACT US


  Advanced Search  

 
GEOMETRY, STEINBERG REPRESENTATIONS AND COMPLEXITY
 

Summary: GEOMETRY, STEINBERG REPRESENTATIONS
AND COMPLEXITY
J.L. ALPERIN \Lambda 1 and G. MASON y1
\Lambda Mathematics Department, University of Chicago, IL 60637, U.S.A.
y Mathematics Department, University of California at Santa Cruz, CA 95064,
U.S.A.
Group representation theory often relates quite different areas of mathe­
matics and we shall give yet another example of this phenomenon. A con­
struction from finite geometries will lead us to a new concept in represen­
tation theory which we shall then apply to the representation theory of Lie
type groups. This, in turn, will involve ideas from the homological approach
to modular representations. We shall, therefore, cover a spectrum of ideas.
One construction of finite projection planes involves the use of spreads.
Suppose that V is a 2n­dimensional vector space over a finite field k of char­
acteristic p. A spread S is a collection of n­dimensional subspaces whose
(set­theoretic) union is all of V but where the intersection of any two mem­
bers of the collection is zero. A group of linear transformations of V preserves
the spread S if its elements permute the members of S.
Proposition 1. If E is an elementary abelian 2­group of linear transfor­
mations of V which preserve S and p = 2 then there is a subgroup F of E

  

Source: Alperin, Jon L. - Department of Mathematics, University of Chicago

 

Collections: Mathematics