Home

About

Advanced Search

Browse by Discipline

Scientific Societies

E-print Alerts

Add E-prints

E-print Network
FAQHELPSITE MAPCONTACT US


  Advanced Search  

 
Neuropsychologia 45 (2007) 784795 Exploring the functional and anatomical bases of mirror-image and
 

Summary: Neuropsychologia 45 (2007) 784­795
Exploring the functional and anatomical bases of mirror-image and
anatomical imitation: The role of the frontal lobes
Claudia Chiavarino, Ian A. Apperly, Glyn W. Humphreys
Behavioural Brain Sciences Centre, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
Received 31 October 2005; received in revised form 9 August 2006; accepted 14 August 2006
Available online 9 October 2006
Abstract
Humans are the most imitative species on earth, but how imitation is accomplished and which areas of the brain are directly involved in different
kinds of imitation is still under debate. One view is that imitation entails representing observed behaviours as a set of hierarchically organised goals,
which subsequently drive the construction of an action pattern [Bekkering, H., Wohlschl¨ager, A., & Gattis, M. (2000). Imitation of gestures in
children is goal-directed. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 153­164; Wohlschl¨ager, A., Gattis, M., & Bekkering, H. (2003).
Action generation and action perception in imitation: An instance of the ideomotor principle. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of
London, 358, 501­515]. On this view, when working memory resources are limited, only the goals at the top-end of the hierarchy will be accurately
reproduced. In the present study, neurologically intact participants and patients with frontal and non-frontal lesions were asked to make imitative
responses that were either mirror-image (e.g., the observer's right side corresponding to the model's left side) or anatomically (e.g., the observer's
right side corresponding to the model's right side) matching. Experiment 1 confirmed that individuals with brain damage, though globally impaired
compared with neurologically intact controls, nevertheless followed the same goal hierarchy. However, there was a selective deficit in performing
anatomical imitation for the frontal group. Experiment 2 demonstrated that the problem for frontal patients stemmed from an impaired ability to
remember and reproduce incompatible stimulus-response mappings, which is fundamental for the selection of the appropriate frame of reference

  

Source: Apperly, Ian - School of Psychology, University of Birmingham

 

Collections: Biology and Medicine