| | |
Summary: 100
Modifying the Software Development Life Cycle to Include Software Performance Assurance
David C. Robertsand David A. Grosman
Officeof Wormation Technology
Washington, D.C. 20505
droberts@seas.gwu.eduand dgrossml@osfl.gmu.edu
Abstract:
When performance assurance is not included in the
softwaredevelopmentprocess, the poor performance
of resulting applicationswill create strong interest in
the subject and motivation to change the process to
addressthe problem. In spite of this strong interest,
however, such a change in the process can be more
" l t than expected. Based on our experience in
adding performance assurance to a software
development process that did not include it, we
present guidelines for establishing performance
assurance in an environment of large-scale
application development. In our environment, a
centralized organization was responsible for
|
