Home

About

Advanced Search

Browse by Discipline

Scientific Societies

E-print Alerts

Add E-prints

E-print Network
FAQHELPSITE MAPCONTACT US


  Advanced Search  

 
Copyright 2001 Psychonomic Society, Inc. 168 Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
 

Summary: Copyright 2001 Psychonomic Society, Inc. 168
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
2001, 8 (1), 168-176
There has been much recent interest in the hypothesis
that performance in many cognitive tasks is simultane-
ously mediated by qualitatively distinct processing sys-
tems. Arguments for multiple systems have come from
such diverse fields as memory (Mishkin, Malamut, &
Bachevalier, 1984; Schacter, 1987; Squire, 1992), reason-
ing (Sloman, 1996), motor learning (Willingham, Nissen,
& Bullemer, 1989), discrimination learning (Kendler &
Kendler, 1962), and function learning (Hayes & Broad-
bent, 1988). In general, these studies have suggested at
least two distinct types of learning systems: (1) an explicit,
rule-based system tied to language functions and con-
scious awareness, and (2) an implicit or habit-forming sys-
tem, which may not have access to conscious awareness.
Within the domain of category learning, there also
were early arguments for multiple systems. For example,
Brooks (1978) hypothesized that category learning is

  

Source: Ashby, F. Gregory - Department of Psychology, University of California at Santa Barbara

 

Collections: Biology and Medicine; Computer Technologies and Information Sciences