Home

About

Advanced Search

Browse by Discipline

Scientific Societies

E-print Alerts

Add E-prints

E-print Network
FAQHELPSITE MAPCONTACT US


  Advanced Search  

 
1. Zoltan Szb points out (p.c.) that Grice may be reluctant to call this background proposition an implicature because the speaker does not really intend to convey this
 

Summary: 1. Zoltan Szábó points out (p.c.) that Grice may be reluctant to call this background
proposition an implicature because the speaker does not really intend to convey this
proposition to the addressee. But there are cases where the speaker may intend the
background proposition as part of, or even as the main point of, what is communicated. See
example (2) below.
-1-
To appear in:
Szabó, Zoltán (ed.) Semantics vs. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
PRESUPPOSITION AND RELEVANCE
Mandy Simons
Carnegie Mellon University, Dept. of Philosophy
simons@andrew.cmu.edu
August 2002
1. Two types of Relevance Implicature
Recall Grice's well-worn example from Logic and Conversation about Smith, his
girlfriend, and his trips to New York:
(1) A: Smith doesn't seem to have a girlfriend these days.
B: He has been paying a lot of visits to NY recently.
Grice says that in this dialogue, B implicates that Smith has, or may have, a girlfriend
in New York. But in saying this, Grice under-describes his own example. For this

  

Source: Andrews, Peter B. - Department of Mathematical Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University

 

Collections: Mathematics