| | |
Summary: 5. E. Borowsky and E. Gafni, ``Immediate atomic snapshots and fast renaming,'' in
Proceedings of the 12th Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Com
puting, pages 41--51, 1993.
6. E. Borowsky and E. Gafni, ``The implication of the BorowskyGafni simulation on
the set consensus hierarchy,'' Technical Report 930021, UCLA Computer Science
Dept., 1993.
7. S. Chaudhuri, ``More Choices Allow More Faults: Set Consensus Problems in To
tally Asynchronous Systems,'' Information and Computation, 105 (1), pages 132--
158, July 1993.
8. S. Chaudhuri, M.P. Herlihy, N. Lynch, and M.R. Tuttle, ``A tight lower bound for
kset agreement,'' in Proceedings of the 34th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of
Computer Science, October 1993.
9. D. Dolev, N. Lynch, S. Pinter, E. Stark and W. Weihl, ``Reaching Approximate
Agreement in the Presence of Faults,'' Journal of the ACM, 33 (3), pages 499--516,
1986.
10. M. Fischer, N.A. Lynch, and M.S. Paterson, ``Impossibility of distributed commit
with one faulty process,'' Journal of the ACM, 32(2), pages 374--382, 1985.
11. E. Gafni, E. Koutsoupias, ``3processor tasks are undecidable,'' Brief Announce
ment in Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Dis
tributed Computing, page 271, August 1995.
|