Some alternatives to the mixed oxide fuel cycle
While on initial examination each of the six fuel cycle concepts (tandem cycle, extended burnup, fuel rejuvenation, coprocessing, partial reprocessing, and thorium) described in the report may have some potential for improving safeguards, none of the six appears to have any other major or compelling advantages over the mixed oxide (MOX) fuel cycle. Compared to the MOX cycle, all but coprocessing appear to have major disadvantages, including severe cost penalties. Three of the concepts-tandem, extended burnup, and rejuvenation--share the basic problems of the throwaway cycle (GESMO Alternative 6): without reprocessing, high-level waste volumes and costs are substantially increased, and overall uranium utilization decreases for three reasons. First, the parasitic fission products left in the fuel absorb neutrons in later irradiation steps reducing the overall neutronic efficiencies of these cycles. Second, discarded fuel still has sufficient fissile values to warrant recycle. Third, perhaps most important, the plutonium needed for breeder start-up will not be available; without the breeder, uranium utilization would drop by about a factor of sixty. Two of the concepts--coprocessing and partial reprocessing--involve variations of the basic MOX fuel cycle's chemical reprocessing step to make plutonium diversion potentially more difficult. These concepts could be used with the MOX fuel cycle or in conjunction with the tandem, extended burnup and rejuvenation concepts to eliminate some of the problems with those cycles. But in so doing, the basic impetus for those cycles--elimination of reprocessing for safeguards purposes--no longer exists. Of all the concepts considered, only coprocessing--and particularly the ''master blend'' version--appears to have sufficient promise to warrant a more detailed study. The master blend concept could possibly make plutonium diversion more difficult with minimal impact on the reprocessing and MOX fuel fabrication operations.
- Research Organization:
- Battelle Pacific Northwest Labs., Richland, WA (United States)
- DOE Contract Number:
- EY-76-C-06-1830
- OSTI ID:
- 7270540
- Report Number(s):
- BNWL-2197; TRN: 77-011302
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Study of safeguards system on dry reprocessing for fast breeder reactor
Fast flux fluid fuel reactor: A concept for the next generation of nuclear power production
Related Subjects
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS
FUEL CYCLE
ECONOMICS
PLANNING
NUCLEAR FUELS
REPROCESSING
NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS
WATER COOLED REACTORS
COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS
COST
PLUTONIUM DIOXIDE
SAFEGUARDS
THORIUM
URANIUM DIOXIDE
ACTINIDE COMPOUNDS
ACTINIDES
CHALCOGENIDES
ELEMENTS
ENERGY SOURCES
FUELS
METALS
NUCLEAR FACILITIES
OXIDES
OXYGEN COMPOUNDS
PLUTONIUM COMPOUNDS
PLUTONIUM OXIDES
POWER PLANTS
REACTOR MATERIALS
REACTORS
SEPARATION PROCESSES
THERMAL POWER PLANTS
TRANSURANIUM COMPOUNDS
URANIUM COMPOUNDS
URANIUM OXIDES
210802* - Nuclear Power Plants- Economics- Fuel Cycle
050800 - Nuclear Fuels- Spent Fuels Reprocessing