Science does not support consensus' on climate change
This article looks at the question of anthropogenic greenhouse gas sources as major drivers of climatic change from the perspective of so called skeptics, who question the linkages claimed by many who are classified as more alarmist about these concerns. The author presents his judgement on the scientific evidence, which he attempts to document in this article. In part this judgement is that it is the so called alarmists who rehash old arguments in defense of the eroding position of global warming alarmists. The only exception is, perhaps, the newfound concern that rising CO[sub 2] concentrations may instead cause catastrophic cooling in the North Atlantic basin due to changes in ocean currents. The author argues that the alarmists certainly cite no new data that enhances the credibility of the hypothesis that fluctuations in CO[sub 2] were the primary cause of climate change over the past 220,000 years.
- OSTI ID:
- 7073612
- Journal Information:
- Electricity Journal; (United States), Vol. 7:1; ISSN 1040-6190
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
SEA screening of voluntary climate change plans: A story of non-compliant discretion
The evolution of an energy contrarian
Related Subjects
POLICY AND ECONOMY
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CARBON DIOXIDE
EMISSION
CLIMATIC CHANGE
GREENHOUSE EFFECT
GREENHOUSE GASES
CARBON COMPOUNDS
CARBON OXIDES
CHALCOGENIDES
OXIDES
OXYGEN COMPOUNDS
290300* - Energy Planning & Policy- Environment
Health
& Safety
540120 - Environment
Atmospheric- Chemicals Monitoring & Transport- (1990-)