Energy Citations Database
Bookmark and Share

Bibliographic Citation

 
Document
For copies of Journal Articles, please contact the Publisher or your local public or university library and refer to the information in the Resource Relation field.
For copies of other documents, please see the Availability, Publisher, Research Organization, Resource Relation and/or Author (affiliation information) fields and/or Document Availability.
Title Burial diagenesis and porosity evolution, upper Jurassic Smackover, Arkansas and Louisiana
Creator/Author Moore, C.H. ; Druckman, Y.
Publication Date1981 Apr 01
OSTI IdentifierOSTI ID: 5569412
Other Number(s)Journal ID: CODEN: AAPGB
Resource TypeJournal Article
Resource RelationJournal Name: Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol., Bull.; (United States); Journal Volume: 65:4
Research OrgLouisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge
Subject02 PETROLEUM; PETROLEUM DEPOSITS; DIAGENESIS; EXPLORATION; ARKANSAS; CARBONATE ROCKS; GEOLOGY; HYDROCARBONS; JURASSIC PERIOD; LOUISIANA; PETROGRAPHY; POROSITY; STRATIGRAPHY; FEDERAL REGION VI; GEOLOGIC AGES; GEOLOGIC DEPOSITS; MESOZOIC ERA; MINERAL RESOURCES; NORTH AMERICA; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; RESOURCES; ROCKS; SEDIMENTARY ROCKS; USA
Description/AbstractThe Jurassic upper Smackover ooid-lime-grainstone of the central Gulf Coast has been a major hydrocarbon exploration target for nearly half a century. Study of the geologic and sedimentologic framework, petrography, two-phase fluid inclusions, and trace element and stable isotope chemistry indicates the following diagenetic history. The upper Smackover is a blanket ooid grainstone ranging in thickness from 300 to 400 ft and covering at least 4000 sq mi. Three diagenetic zones are present: (1) a northern zone, dominated by oomoldic porosity and preburial spar cementation; (2) a southern zone, characterized by compaction effects, late subsurface cement, primary porosity preservation, and late secondary subsurface porosity generation; and (3) a transitional zone having characteristics common to both the northern and southern zones. This would include carbonate rocks heretofore thought to be well below the depth of carbonate porosity maintenance because of lithostatic load. 13 figures, 7 tables.
Country of PublicationUnited States
LanguageEnglish
FormatMedium: X; Size: Pages: 597-628
System Entry Date2009 Dec 16

Top