skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Assessment of BoneTtissue Mineralization by Conventional X-ray Microcomputed tomography: Comparison with Synchrotron Radiation Microcomputed Tomography and Ash Measurements

Journal Article · · Medical Physics
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2924210· OSTI ID:960044

Assessment of bone tissue mineral density (TMD) may provide information critical to the understanding of mineralization processes and bone biomechanics. High-resolution three-dimensional assessment of TMD has recently been demonstrated using synchrotron radiation microcomputed tomography (SR{mu}CT); however, this imaging modality is relatively inaccessible due to the scarcity of SR facilities. Conventional desktop {mu}CT systems are widely available and have been used extensively to assess bone microarchitecture. However, the polychromatic source and cone-shaped beam geometry complicate assessment of TMD by conventional {mu}CT. The goal of this study was to evaluate {mu}CT-based measurement of degree and distribution of tissue mineralization in a quantitative, spatially resolved manner. Specifically, {mu}CT measures of bone mineral content (BMC) and TMD were compared to those obtained by SR{mu}CT and gravimetric methods. Cylinders of trabecular bone were machined from human femoral heads (n=5), vertebrae (n=5), and proximal tibiae (n=4). Cylinders were imaged in saline on a polychromatic {mu}CT system at an isotropic voxel size of 8 {mu}m. Volumes were reconstructed using beam hardening correction algorithms based on hydroxyapatite (HA)-resin wedge phantoms of 200 and 1200 mgHA/cm3. SR{mu}CT imaging was performed at an isotropic voxel size of 7.50 {mu}m at the National Synchrotron Light Source. Attenuation values were converted to HA concentration using a linear regression derived by imaging a calibration phantom. Architecture and mineralization parameters were calculated from the image data. Specimens were processed using gravimetric methods to determine ash mass and density. {mu}CT-based BMC values were not affected by altering the beam hardening correction. Volume-averaged TMD values calculated by the two corrections were significantly different (p=0.008) in high volume fraction specimens only, with the 1200 mgHA/cm3 correction resulting in a 4.7% higher TMD value. {mu}CT and SR{mu}CT provided significantly different measurements of both BMC and TMD (p<0.05). In high volume fraction specimens, {mu}CT with 1200 mgHA/cm3 correction resulted in BMC and TMD values 16.7% and 15.0% lower, respectively, than SR{mu}CT values. In low volume fraction specimens, {mu}CT with 1200 mgHA/cm3 correction resulted in BMC and TMD values 12.8% and 12.9% lower, respectively, than SR{mu}CT values. {mu}CT and SR{mu}CT values were well-correlated when volume fraction groups were considered individually (BMC R2=0.97-1.00; TMD R2=0.78-0.99). Ash mass and density were higher than the SR{mu}CT equivalents by 8.6% in high volume fraction specimens and 10.9% in low volume fraction specimens (p<0.05). BMC values calculated by tomography were highly correlated with ash mass (ash versus {mu}CT R2=0.96-1.00; ash versus SR{mu}CT R2=0.99-1.00). TMD values calculated by tomography were moderately correlated with ash density (ash versus {mu}CT R2=0.64-0.72; ash versus SR{mu}CT R2=0.64). Spatially resolved comparisons highlighted substantial geometric nonuniformity in the {mu}CT data, which were reduced (but not eliminated) using the 1200 mg HA/cm3 beam hardening correction, and did not exist in the SR{mu}CT data. This study represents the first quantitative comparison of {mu}CT mineralization evaluation against SR{mu}CT and gravimetry. Our results indicate that {mu}CT mineralization measures are underestimated but well-correlated with SR{mu}CT and gravimetric data, particularly when volume fraction groups are considered individually.

Research Organization:
Brookhaven National Lab. (BNL), Upton, NY (United States). National Synchrotron Light Source
Sponsoring Organization:
Doe - Office Of Science
DOE Contract Number:
DE-AC02-98CH10886
OSTI ID:
960044
Report Number(s):
BNL-83030-2009-JA; MPHYA6; TRN: US1005890
Journal Information:
Medical Physics, Vol. 35, Issue 7; ISSN 0094-2405
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English