Diagnosis of acute acalculous cholecystitis: a comparison of sonography, scintigraphy, and CT
The clinical and laboratory diagnosis of acute acalculous cholecystitis is difficult, and the reliability of various diagnostic imaging techniques has not been established. The results of several imaging procedures performed over a 6-year period on 56 patients with clinically suspected acute acalculous cholecystitis were evaluated retrospectively. Sonography and CT were both highly sensitive (92% and 100%, respectively) and specific (96% and 100%, respectively). Hepatobiliary scintigraphy was compromised by frequent false-positives; the result was a specificity of only 38%. Percutaneous bile aspiration was insufficiently sensitive (33%) for diagnosis. Sonography was as sensitive as hepatobiliary scintigraphy and was more specific in establishing the diagnosis. Because sonography is relatively inexpensive and can be performed at the bedside, it should be regarded as a satisfactory screening procedure. However, CT is a good alternative in an easily transported patient when other intraabdominal disease is suspected.
- Research Organization:
- Univ. of Maryland Medical System/Hospital, Baltimore
- OSTI ID:
- 7134563
- Journal Information:
- AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol.; (United States), Vol. 6
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Cholecystokinin cholecystography, sonography, and scintigraphy: detection of chronic acalculous cholecystitis
Low sensitivity of sonography and cholescintigraphy in acalculous cholecystitis
Related Subjects
BILIARY TRACT
COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY
SCINTISCANNING
ULTRASONOGRAPHY
DIGESTIVE SYSTEM DISEASES
DIAGNOSIS
ACCIDENTS
BILE
LIVER
PATIENTS
BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS
BODY
BODY FLUIDS
COUNTING TECHNIQUES
DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES
DIGESTIVE SYSTEM
DISEASES
GLANDS
MATERIALS
ORGANS
RADIOISOTOPE SCANNING
TOMOGRAPHY
550601* - Medicine- Unsealed Radionuclides in Diagnostics