Keeping the peaceful atom from raising the risk of war. Third of four articles
Many opponents of nuclear power contend that by the end of the century worldwide expansion of peaceful atomic energy will lead to the spread of nuclear weaponry among small nations and terrorists. Champions of fission power, though, say terrorists would have a tough time fashioning a bomb from commercial nuclear fuel, but that national governments might use civil atomic power as a shortcut to atomic weapons. It is not easy to divert fuel under the present system of international surveillance, but some proposed new safeguards could make it much harder. The world has about ten years in which to adopt such safeguards. Countries without reactors have one of two technical hurdles to surmount to convert commercial reactor fuel to bombs--converting the uranium in new, unburned reactor fuel to bomb material and extracting bomb material from spent commercial fuel. President Carter in deferring indefinitely the reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel hoped to set an example that other countries would follow. It has not deterred France, Britain, and West Germany from proceeding with construction of their own reprocessing plants, nor lessened their enthusiasm for breeder reactors. Terrorists compared to governments are considered to be a smaller threat of potential diverters of nuclear fuel for bombs. Many experts are convinced that new political arrangements must be supplemented with technical fixes and the most interesting proposals involve the denaturing or spiking of commercial reactor fuel. Proposals made by Princeton's Program on Nuclear Policy Alternatives, EPRI, Britain's Atomic Energy Authority, and Allied Chemical are discussed briefly.
- OSTI ID:
- 6267605
- Journal Information:
- Fortune; (United States), Vol. 99:7
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Nuclear exports: the perilous enterprise
The Back End of the Fuel Cycle Moves Front and Center
Related Subjects
POLICY AND ECONOMY
98 NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT, SAFEGUARDS, AND PHYSICAL PROTECTION
NUCLEAR MATERIALS DIVERSION
REVIEWS
PROLIFERATION
SAFEGUARDS
CIVEX PROCESS
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
FUEL REPROCESSING PLANTS
GLOBAL ASPECTS
NATIONAL DEFENSE
NON-PROLIFERATION TREATY
NUCLEAR WEAPONS
PETROLEUM
PLUTONIUM
RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT
RISK ASSESSMENT
SABOTAGE
SPENT FUELS
USA
ACTINIDES
DOCUMENT TYPES
ELEMENTS
ENERGY SOURCES
FOSSIL FUELS
FUELS
MANAGEMENT
METALS
NORTH AMERICA
NUCLEAR FACILITIES
NUCLEAR FUELS
REACTOR MATERIALS
REPROCESSING
SEPARATION PROCESSES
TRANSURANIUM ELEMENTS
TREATIES
WASTE MANAGEMENT
WEAPONS
290600* - Energy Planning & Policy- Nuclear Energy
055001 - Nuclear Fuels- Safeguards
Inspection
& Accountability- Technical Aspects