skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Path Forward for Groundwater Compliance Strategy at the Tuba City, Arizona, Disposal Site - 19581

Conference ·
OSTI ID:23005435
; ; ;  [1];  [2]
  1. Navarro Research and Engineering, Inc., 2597 Legacy Way, Grand Junction, Colorado 81503 (United States)
  2. US Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management, 2597 Legacy Way, Grand Junction, Colorado 81503 (United States)

The Tuba City, Arizona, Disposal Site is located in the Navajo Nation and near the Hopi Reservation. A uranium mill operated at the site from 1956 to 1966. During the operational period, mill tailings were slurried to an unlined impoundment. Excess slurry water was transferred to unlined evaporation ponds. Groundwater contamination resulting from the infiltration of fluids in the mill tailings impoundment and evaporation ponds was characterized in the 1990's. The site's Groundwater Compliance Action Plan was prepared in 1999, and a groundwater extraction and treatment system was constructed in 2002. Issues with aquifer productivity and treatment plant reliability led to the suspension of operations in 2014. The limitations of the remediation system prompted a realization that the site conceptual model should be reevaluated. An integrated study to better understand the geochemical and hydrologic factors affecting contaminant transport, to support the development of a new groundwater compliance strategy, was initiated in 2017 and is ongoing. In addition to the groundwater science components, the study included the evaluation of enhanced evaporation methods. The integrated evaluation will lead to refinement of the site groundwater flow model and development of a contaminant transport model and subsequent development of remedial alternatives. Remedial alternatives will be evaluated to determine a new groundwater compliance strategy. The objectives of geochemical testing were to confirm and quantify geochemical reactions controlling uranium fate and transport. These reactions are important because they control the distribution of uranium on the solid phase; potential for release from the solid phase; mobility of uranium in the water phase; and potential for uranium redistribution onto the currently uncontaminated solid phase. A key outcome is the change in understanding of the mass of uranium in the subsurface that is potentially soluble. These results contradict the previous basis for remediation: that uranium was almost exclusively present in soluble form, within the boundaries of the contaminant plume. Testing showed that uranium sorption downgradient from the plume was measurable but relatively minimal. The movement of other mill-related constituents (nitrate, sulfate, alkalinity) results in the dissolution of naturally occurring uranium and a higher than background concentration of uranium in groundwater. These constituents are not subject to sorption, and their downgradient concentrations are reduced only by diffusion and dispersion. The geochemical testing provides conceptual and quantitative information on potential plume migration. While the testing revealed the potential availability of uranium contaminant sources, the aquifer buffering capacity, pH, and presence of oxygen in groundwater may, individually or in combination, be controlling factors for plume movement. Evaluation of evaporative treatment alternatives was undertaken to determine one or more sustainable and efficient methods capable of treating 151 liters per minute (L/min) (40 gallons per minute), the annual average flow rate. In addition to establishing the baseline capacity for evaporation using the site's existing pond, prospective methods of enhanced evaporation included preheating water before inflow to the evaporation pond, vertical circulation in the pond, dye addition, and Wind-Aided Intensified Evaporation. Consideration of a 151 L/min evaporative treatment arose from previous analysis of extraction well production rates and contaminant mass removal, which indicated that about 80% contaminant removal, relative to full-scale operation of the site's groundwater treatment plant, could be achieved with a smaller capacity system. The lower-flow evaporative option also represented a potentially more sustainable treatment system in comparison to restarting or reconfiguring the groundwater treatment plant. Aquifer pumping tests were designed to develop or improve estimates of hydraulic properties such as transmissivity, horizontal and vertical hydraulic conductivity, storativity, and storage coefficient. Testing involved pumping from one well at a constant flow rate for up to 5 days while monitoring groundwater drawdown in the pumping well and five surrounding wells and then shutting down the pumping well to observe groundwater recovery. The aquifer pumping test results provide insight regarding the hydraulics of the saturated zone. The saturated zone is in a low-conductivity formation with preferential flow in the horizontal direction. The aquifer exhibits low vertical conductance. The use of AQTESOLV software indicates that the saturated zone is a layered system due to the cross-bedded sand-grain orientation within the Navajo Sandstone. These indicators of limited vertical flow provide a potential justification for the observed depth of the contaminant plume of 15-46 meters (50-150 feet) below ground surface). Given the relatively low vertical conductance, groundwater extraction should be focused on the upper portions of the saturated zone. Aquifer response testing provided an improved understanding of aquifer characteristics. However, the primary objective, to identify optimal groundwater extraction strategies, has not been fully addressed. A list of path forward activities for hydrologic analyses was developed, with an overarching objective of providing input parameters for groundwater flow and contaminant transport modeling. Defensible predictions of contaminant transport, through modeling, are critical to the development of a new site groundwater compliance strategy. (authors)

Research Organization:
WM Symposia, Inc., PO Box 27646, 85285-7646 Tempe, AZ (United States)
OSTI ID:
23005435
Report Number(s):
INIS-US-21-WM-19581; TRN: US21V1362045769
Resource Relation:
Conference: WM2019: 45. Annual Waste Management Conference, Phoenix, AZ (United States), 3-7 Mar 2019; Other Information: Country of input: France; 7 refs.; available online at: https://www.xcdsystem.com/wmsym/2019/index.html
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English