Turbulence Model Study for Pressure and Velocity Distributions for Molten Salts in a Crossflow Tube Bundle
- Texas A and M University, 3133 TAMU, College Station, TX, 77843-3133 (United States)
- Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S Cass Ave, Lemont, IL (United States)
Empirical pressure drop correlations for various compositions of molten salts in crossflow across tube bundles/banks are limited due to the scarcity of experimental data for these fluids. This lack of experimental data presents a limitation when designing heat exchangers for Molten Salt Reactors (MSRs) that utilize cross-flow configurations with turbulent molten salts flowing in the shell side. In an effort to provide a starting point for future design and experimental work, a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) campaign is being conducted to estimate pressure drops over a range of Reynolds numbers, pitch to diameter ratios, and for both staggered and in-line tube banks. In an effort to continue this work, the study of various turbulence models were conducted to determine the applicability for steady RANS simulations. An in-line tube bank with FLiBe (LiF-BeF{sub 2}), a frequently selected molten salt in MSRs, was selected for these simulations. The estimated pressure drops and pressure and velocity distributions for each turbulence model was compared to determine the applicability. The k-ε turbulence model family was found to be the most appropriate model for steady Reynolds averaged Navier Stokes within this type of domain. Difference turbulence models were investigated for simulation of molten salt experiencing crossflow within an in-line tube bundle. The flow was simulated using a steady RANS formulation with different families of turbulence models. The different turbulence models provide a view of this specific flow behavior potential requirements and applicable for steady RANS. Of particular note, the k-ε models were able to converge easily within this domain. The predicted behavior for both models were observed to be mostly similar for both velocity and pressure distributions. Whereas, k-ω SST and SA models did not converge well and had observable differences for the predictions of pressure and velocity distributions. The global behaviors were generally similar, but the variations occurring suggest k-ω SST and SA turbulence models are not useful in the steady RANS formulation of this domain. When comparing to the empirical pressure drop, each turbulence model resulted in overpredictions ranging from 8.7% and 19.75% difference. The standard low-Re k-ε model having the lowest difference is likely the better model for simplified predictions for pressure drops. Further investigations will be conducted to determine the convergence issues for the k-ω SST and SA turbulence models. These might be due to the flow geometry or potentially a revision of the meshing is needed. The flow behavior may not be resolved using these models in a steady formulation due to inherent unsteadiness of the flow. (authors)
- OSTI ID:
- 22992031
- Journal Information:
- Transactions of the American Nuclear Society, Vol. 114, Issue 1; Conference: Annual Meeting of the American Nuclear Society, New Orleans, LA (United States), 12-16 Jun 2016; Other Information: Country of input: France; 11 refs.; Available from American Nuclear Society - ANS, 555 North Kensington Avenue, La Grange Park, IL 60526 United States; ISSN 0003-018X
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
CFD analysis of a solid pin-fueled small modular fluoride salt-cooled reactor
Development and Verification of MATLAB Functions for Pressure Drop Estimation in Crossflow Tube Bundles