skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes After Breast-Conserving Surgery and Mastectomy with Implant Breast Reconstruction

Journal Article · · Annals of Surgical Oncology (Online)
 [1];  [2]; ; ;  [1];  [3];  [1];  [4]
  1. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Breast Service, Department of Surgery (United States)
  2. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Biostatistics Service, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (United States)
  3. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgical Service, Department of Surgery (United States)
  4. Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Division (United States)

Background: Many factors influence decisions regarding choice of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) versus mastectomy with reconstruction for early invasive breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to compare patient satisfaction following BCS and mastectomy with implant reconstruction (M-iR) utilizing the BREAST-Q patient-reported outcome measure. Methods: Women with stage I or II breast cancer undergoing BCS or M-iR who completed a BREAST-Q from 2010 to 2016 were identified by retrospective review of a prospective database. Baseline characteristics were compared, and linear mixed models were used to analyze associations with BREAST-Q scores over time. Results: Our study group was composed of 3233 women; 2026 (63%) had BCS, 123 (3.8%) had nipple-sparing mastectomy, and 1084 (34%) had skin-sparing or total mastectomy. Median time from surgery to BREAST-Q was 205 days for BCS and 639 days for M-iR (p < 0.001). Regardless of type of surgery, breast satisfaction scores decreased significantly over time (p < 0.001), whereas psychosocial (p = 0.001) and sexual (p = 0.004) well-being scores increased significantly over time. BCS was associated with significantly higher scores over time compared with M-iR across all subscales (all p < 0.001). Radiation was significantly associated with decreased scores over time across all subscales (all p < 0.05). Conclusions: Breast satisfaction and quality-of-life scores were higher for BCS compared with M-iR in early-stage invasive breast cancer. These findings may help in counseling women who have a choice for surgical treatment. Breast satisfaction scores decreased over time in all women, highlighting the need for further evaluation with longer follow-up.

OSTI ID:
22927586
Journal Information:
Annals of Surgical Oncology (Online), Vol. 26, Issue 10; Other Information: Copyright (c) 2019 Society of Surgical Oncology; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 1534-4681
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

The Impact of Skin-Sparing Mastectomy With Immediate Reconstruction in Patients With Stage III Breast Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Postmastectomy Radiation
Journal Article · Thu Mar 15 00:00:00 EDT 2012 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:22927586

True Recurrence Versus New Primary: An Analysis of Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrences After Breast-Conserving Therapy
Journal Article · Sat Oct 01 00:00:00 EDT 2011 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:22927586

High Mammographic Breast Density Is Independent Predictor of Local But Not Distant Recurrence After Lumpectomy and Radiotherapy for Invasive Breast Cancer
Journal Article · Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2009 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:22927586