skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Toward a better understanding of the GRB phenomenon: A new model for GRB PROMPT emission and its effects on the new L{sub i}{sup NT}– E{sub peak,i}{sup rest,NT} relation

Journal Article · · Astrophysical Journal
; ; ; ;  [1];  [2]; ;  [3];  [4];  [5];  [6];  [7];  [8]; ;  [9];  [10]
  1. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771 (United States)
  2. Office of Science and Technology, ZP12, NASA/Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL 35812 (United States)
  3. UPMC-CNRS, UMR7095, Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris, F-75014 Paris (France)
  4. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89012 (United States)
  5. Physics Department and Columbia Astrophysics Laboratory, Columbia University, 538 West 120th Street, New York, NY 10027 (United States)
  6. Instituto de Astronomia, Geofísica e Ciências Atmosféricas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP 05508-090 (Brazil)
  7. University of Alabama in Huntsville, NSSTC, 320 Sparkman Drive, Huntsville, AL 35805 (United States)
  8. Department of Physics and Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 (United States)
  9. Sabancı University, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Orhanlı-Tuzla 34956 Istanbul (Turkey)
  10. Department of Physics, Royal Institute of Technology, AlbaNova, SE-106 91 Stockholm (Sweden)

Gamma-ray burst (GRB) prompt emission spectra in the keV–MeV energy range are usually considered to be adequately fitted with the empirical Band function. Recent observations with the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope (Fermi) revealed deviations from the Band function, sometimes in the form of an additional blackbody (BB) component, while on other occasions in the form of an additional power law (PL) component extending to high energies. In this article we investigate the possibility that the three components may be present simultaneously in the prompt emission spectra of two very bright GRBs (080916C and 090926A) observed with Fermi, and how the three components may affect the overall shape of the spectra. While the two GRBs are very different when fitted to a single Band function, they look like “twins” in the three-component scenario. Through fine-time spectroscopy down to the 100 ms timescale, we follow the evolution of the various components. We succeed in reducing the number of free parameters in the three-component model, which results in a new semi-empirical model—but with physical motivations—to be competitive with the Band function in terms of number of degrees of freedom. From this analysis using multiple components, the Band function is globally the most intense component, although the additional PL can overpower the others in sharp time structures. The Band function and the BB component are the most intense at early times and globally fade across the burst duration. The additional PL is the most intense component at late time and may be correlated with the extended high-energy emission observed thousands of seconds after the burst with Fermi/Large Area Telescope. Unexpectedly, this analysis also shows that the additional PL may be present from the very beginning of the burst, where it may even overpower the other components at low energy. We investigate the effect of the three components on the new time-resolved luminosity–hardness relation in both the observer and rest frames and show that a strong correlation exists between the flux of the non-thermal Band function and its E{sub peak} only when the three components are fitted simultaneously to the data (i.e., F{sub i}{sup NT}–E{sub peak,i}{sup NT} relation). In addition, this result points toward a universal relation between those two quantities when transposed to the central engine rest frame for all GRBs (i.e., L{sub i}{sup NT}–E{sub peak,i}{sup rest,NT} relation). We discuss a possible theoretical interpretation of the three spectral components within this new empirical model. We suggest that (i) the BB component may be interpreted as the photosphere emission of a magnetized relativistic outflow, (ii) the Band component has synchrotron radiation in an optically thin region above the photosphere, either from internal shocks or magnetic field dissipation, and (iii) the extra PL component extending to high energies likely has an inverse Compton origin of some sort, even though its extension to a much lower energy remains a mystery.

OSTI ID:
22882906
Journal Information:
Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 807, Issue 2; Other Information: Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); Since 2009, the country of publication for this journal is the UK.; ISSN 0004-637X
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English

Cited By (28)

The Fermi GBM gamma-ray burst time-resolved spectral catalog: brightest bursts in the first four years journal March 2016
Correlation between peak energy and Fourier power density spectrum slope in gamma-ray bursts journal April 2016
Phase-space dynamics of runaway electrons in magnetic fields journal February 2017
Marginally fast cooling synchrotron models for prompt GRBs journal February 2018
On the α–intensity correlation in gamma-ray bursts: subphotospheric heating with varying entropy journal January 2019
Ultrahigh-energy cosmic ray production by turbulence in gamma-ray burst jets and cosmogenic neutrinos journal July 2016
Gamma-Ray Burst Prompt Correlations journal January 2018
Synchrotron Origin of the Typical grb band Function—A case Study of grb 130606b journal January 2016
A New Measurement of the Spectral Lag of Gamma-Ray Bursts and its Implications for Spectral Evolution Behaviors journal July 2017
Detection of Low-energy Breaks in Gamma-Ray Burst Prompt Emission Spectra journal September 2017
The Bright and the Slow—GRBs 100724B and 160509A with High-energy Cutoffs at ≲100 MeV journal September 2018
Multiple Components in the Broadband γ -Ray Emission of the Short GRB 160709A journal May 2019
A Connection between Spectral Width and Energetics As Well As Peak Luminosity in Fermi Gamma-Ray Bursts journal August 2019
Lorentz Factor Evolution of an Expanding Jet Shell Observed in a Gamma-Ray Burst: Case Study of GRB 160625B journal October 2019
Bayesian Time-resolved Spectroscopy of GRB Pulses journal November 2019
Spectral Analysis of Fermi -LAT Gamma-Ray Bursts with Known Redshift and their Potential Use as Cosmological Standard Candles journal December 2019
Multipulse Fermi Gamma-Ray Bursts. I. Evidence of the Transition from Fireball to Poynting-flux-dominated Outflow journal May 2019
Thermal Components in Gamma-Ray Bursts. I. How Do They Affect Nonthermal Spectral Parameters? journal November 2019
Bright Gamma-Ray Flares Observed in GRB 131108A journal November 2019
Bright Gamma-Ray Flares Observed in GRB 131108A text January 2019
Synchrotron Origin of the Typical GRB Band Function - A Case Study of GRB 130606B text January 2015
The Fermi GBM gamma-ray burst time-resolved spectral catalog: brightest bursts in the first four years text January 2016
Ultrahigh-Energy Cosmic Ray Production by Turbulence in Gamma-Ray Burst Jets and Cosmogenic Neutrinos text January 2016
Gamma Ray Burst Prompt correlations text January 2016
Marginally fast cooling synchrotron models for prompt GRBs text January 2018
MultiPulse {\it Fermi} Gamma-Ray Bursts. I. Evidence of the Transition from Fireball to Poynting-flux-dominated Outflow text January 2018
Thermal Components in Gamma-ray Bursts. I. How Do They Affect Non-Thermal Spectral Parameters? text January 2019
Spectral analysis of Fermi-LAT gamma-ray bursts with known redshift and their potential use as cosmological standard candles text January 2019