The decommissioning imperative - motivating progress in us used fuel management - 15185
- Nuclear Energy Institute, 1201 F St. NW, Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20004 (United States)
- Xcel Energy, 414 Nicollet Mall - MP4, Minneapolis, MN 55401 (United States)
When the Yucca Mountain project was terminated in 2010 there was approximately 3500 metric tons of used fuel stored at Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations (ISFSIs) at which there was no operating reactor (10 shutdown plant sites and the GE Morris facility). By 2015, four additional sites with five reactors will have shut down, causing the amount of used fuel 'stranded' at sites where there is no operating reactor to nearly double to approximately 6900 metric tons which will be stored at a total of 15 sites. At each of these sites, once the reactors are decommissioned, the only thing preventing the land from being returned to communities for other uses is the remaining presence of the used fuel. The cost of maintaining 15 stand-alone ISFSIs is born by electric ratepayers and taxpayers. Going forward, the costs of maintaining stand-alone ISFSIs is certain to grow even if the number of stand-alone ISFSIs does not grow beyond the already announced shutdown of the Oyster Creek reactor in 2019 (which would increase the amount of stranded used fuel by another 10% and create a 16. stand-alone ISFSI). One reason for this cost escalation will be the need for ISFSI owners to renew storage licenses, and implement aging management programs to support these renewals, due to the continued delay in the federal program for removing the used fuel. Storage licenses at 10 of 16 stand-alone ISFSIs will expire by 2021, which is the earliest projected date at which the Department of Energy (DOE) has indicated it could have a pilot interim storage facility available - and nearly 3 decades before DOE projects a repository will be available. The burden and cost of continuing to renew storage licenses - and manage aging storage facilities - at 16 stand-alone sites instead of moving stranded used fuel to a single consolidated storage location or repository will likely be significant. Industry resources are increasingly being channeled into dry storage aging management activities as public and regulator interest in potential long-term degradation mechanism continues to grow. Whether the ultimate destination for used fuel is Yucca Mountain or some other location, the current stalemate preventing progress in the federal program to move it must be broken - and the increasing prominence of the decommissioned reactor quandary may very well be a pivotal factor in breaking that stalemate. (authors)
- Research Organization:
- WM Symposia, Inc., PO Box 27646, 85285-7646 Tempe, AZ (United States)
- OSTI ID:
- 22822729
- Report Number(s):
- INIS-US-19-WM-15185; TRN: US19V0719067644
- Resource Relation:
- Conference: WM2015: Annual Waste Management Symposium, Phoenix, AZ (United States), 15-19 Mar 2015; Other Information: Country of input: France; 18 refs.; Available online at: http://archive.wmsym.org/2015/index.html
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Managing aging effects on dry cask storage systems for extended long-term storage and transportation of used fuel - rev. 0
US Spent (Used) Fuel Status, Management and Likely Directions- 12522