skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Impact of Insurance Status on Radiation Treatment Modality Selection Among Potential Candidates for Prostate, Breast, or Gynecologic Brachytherapy

Journal Article · · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
 [1];  [2];  [3]; ; ; ; ;  [2];  [2]
  1. Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas (United States)
  2. Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (United States)
  3. Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (United States)

Purpose: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act looks to expand both private and Medicaid insurance. To evaluate how these changes may affect the field of radiation oncology, we evaluated the association of insurance status with the use of brachytherapy in cancers for which this treatment technique is used. Methods and Materials: A total of 190,467 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 95,292 (50.0%) had breast cancer, 61,096 (32.1%) had prostate cancer, 28,194 (14.8%) had endometrial cancer, and 5885 (3.1%) had cervical cancer. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to determine the association between insurance status and receipt of brachytherapy among patients treated definitively for prostate and cervical cancer or postoperatively for breast and endometrial cancer. Results: The rates of non-Medicaid insurance were 49.9% (cervical), 85.3% (endometrial), 87.4% (breast), and 90.9% (prostate) (P<.001). In a logistic regression, patients who received radiation therapy were less likely to receive brachytherapy if they had Medicaid coverage (odds ratio [OR] 0.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.61, P<.001) or did not have insurance coverage (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.45-0.56, P<.001) compared with those with non-Medicaid insurance. On subset analysis, patients with Medicaid coverage or without insurance coverage were significantly less likely to receive brachytherapy than were those with non-Medicaid insurance for all 4 sites, except for patients with endometrial cancer. Conclusions: Despite being a cost-effective treatment modality, brachytherapy is less often used in the definitive or postoperative management of cancer in patients with Medicaid coverage or without insurance. Upcoming health policy changes resulting in the expansion of private insurance and Medicaid will likely increase access to and demand for brachytherapy.

OSTI ID:
22645024
Journal Information:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics, Vol. 93, Issue 5; Other Information: Copyright (c) 2015 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0360-3016
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Adoption of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy For Early-Stage Breast Cancer From 2004 Through 2011
Journal Article · Sun Feb 01 00:00:00 EST 2015 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:22645024

Contemporary Toxicity Profile of Breast Brachytherapy Versus External Beam Radiation After Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer
Journal Article · Tue Mar 15 00:00:00 EDT 2016 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:22645024

Brachytherapy Improves Survival in Stage III Endometrial Cancer With Cervical Involvement
Journal Article · Sat Apr 01 00:00:00 EDT 2017 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:22645024