Radiological and Clinical Pneumonitis After Stereotactic Lung Radiotherapy: A Matched Analysis of Three-Dimensional Conformal and Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy Techniques

Journal Article · Wed Jun 01 00:00:00 EDT 2011 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.02.032· OSTI ID:21491782

Senan, Suresh; Haasbeek, Cornelis J.A.; Vincent, Andrew ^[1]; Lagerwaard, Frank ^[2]

---

1. Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam (Netherlands)
2. Department of Radiation Oncology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam (Netherlands)

Purpose: Lung fibrosis is common after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung tumors, but the influence of treatment technique on rates of clinical and radiological pneumonitis is not well described. After implementing volumetric modulated arc therapy (RapidArc [RA]; Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) for SBRT, we scored the early pulmonary changes seen with arc and conventional three-dimensional SBRT (3D-CRT). Methods and Materials: Twenty-five SBRT patients treated with RA were matched 1:2 with 50 SBRT patients treated with 3D-CRT. Dose fractionations were based on a risk-adapted strategy. Clinical pneumonitis was scored using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. Acute radiological changes 3 months posttreatment were scored by three blinded observers. Relationships among treatment type, baseline factors, and outcomes were assessed using Spearman's correlation, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests, and logistic regression. Results: The RA and 3D-CRT groups were well matched. Forty-three patients (57%) had radiological pneumonitis 3 months after treatment. Twenty-eight patients (37%) had computed tomography (CT) findings of patchy or diffuse consolidation, and 15 patients (20%) had ground-glass opacities only. Clinical pneumonitis was uncommon, and no differences were seen between 3D-CRT vs. RA patients in rates of grade 2/3 clinical pneumonitis (6% vs. 4%, respectively; p = 0.99), moderate/severe radiological changes (24% vs. 36%, respectively, p = 0.28), or patterns of CT changes (p = 0.47). Radiological severity scores were associated with larger planning target volumes (p = 0.09) and extended fractionation (p = 0.03). Conclusions: Radiological changes after lung SBRT are common with both approaches, but no differences in early clinical or radiological findings were observed after RA. Longer follow-up will be required to exclude late changes.

• OSTI ID: 21491782
• Journal Information: International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics, Vol. 80, Issue 2; Other Information: DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.02.032; PII: S0360-3016(10)00324-X; Copyright (c) 2011 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.; ISSN 0360-3016
• Country of Publication: United States
• Language: English

Related Subjects

62 RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE
COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY
FRACTIONATED IRRADIATION
LUNGS
NEOPLASMS
PNEUMONITIS
RADIATION INJURIES
RADIOTHERAPY
THREE-DIMENSIONAL CALCULATIONS
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS
BIOLOGICAL RADIATION EFFECTS
BODY
DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES
DISEASES
INJURIES
IRRADIATION
MEDICINE
NUCLEAR MEDICINE
ORGANS
RADIATION EFFECTS
RADIOLOGY
RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
THERAPY
TOMOGRAPHY