skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Percutaneous Treatment of Central Venous Stenosis in Hemodialysis Patients: Long-Term Outcomes

Journal Article · · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology
; ; ; ;  [1];  [2];  [3]
  1. Yonsei University College of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science (Korea, Republic of)
  2. Ewha Woman's University, Department of Radiology, College of Medicine (Korea, Republic of)
  3. Ewha Woman's University, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine (Korea, Republic of)

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of endovascular treatment of central venous stenosis in patients with arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) for hemodialysis. Five hundred sixty-three patients with AVFs who were referred for a fistulogram were enrolled in this study. Among them, 44 patients showed stenosis (n = 35) or occlusions (n = 9) in the central vein. For the initial treatment, 26 patients underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and 15 patients underwent stent placements. Periods between AVF formation and first intervention ranged from 3 to 144 months. Each patient was followed for 14 to 60 months. Procedures were successful in 41 of 44 patients (93.2%). Primary patency rates for PTA at 12 and 36 months were 52.1% and 20.0%, and assisted primary patency rates were 77.8% and 33.3%, respectively. Primary patency rates for stent at 12 and 36 months were 46.7% and 6.7%, and assisted primary patency rates were 60.0% and 20.0%, respectively. Fifteen of 26 patients with PTAs underwent repeated interventions because of restenosis. Fourteen of 15 patients with a stent underwent repeated interventions because of restenosis and combined migration (n = 1) and shortening (n = 6) of the first stent. There was no significant difference in patency between PTAs and stent placement (p > 0.05). Average AVF patency duration was 61.8 months and average number of endovascular treatments was 2.12. In conclusion, endovascular treatments of central venous stenosis could lengthen the available period of AVFs. There was no significant difference in patency between PTAs and stent placement.

OSTI ID:
21450282
Journal Information:
Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Vol. 32, Issue 2; Other Information: DOI: 10.1007/s00270-009-9511-0; Copyright (c) 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC; ISSN 0174-1551
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Use of Nitinol Stents Following Recanalization of Central Venous Occlusions in Hemodialysis Patients
Journal Article · Sun Jul 15 00:00:00 EDT 2007 · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology · OSTI ID:21450282

Endovascular Treatment of Central Vein Stenoses and/or Occlusions in Hemodialysis Patients
Journal Article · Sat Feb 15 00:00:00 EST 2003 · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology · OSTI ID:21450282

Budd-Chiari Syndrome Caused by Obstruction of the Hepatic Inferior Vena Cava: Immediate and 2-Year Treatment Results of Transluminal Angioplasty and Metallic Stent Placement
Journal Article · Fri Nov 15 00:00:00 EST 1996 · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology · OSTI ID:21450282