skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Neointimal Hyperplasia in Low-Profile Nitinol Stents, Palmaz Stents, and Wallstents: A Comparative Experimental Study

Journal Article · · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/S002709900050· OSTI ID:21080520
; ; ;  [1];  [2];  [3];  [1]
  1. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Technology, Pauwelsstrasse 30, D-52057 Aachen (Germany)
  2. Department of Pathology, University of Technology, Pauwelsstrasse 30, D-52057 Aachen (Germany)
  3. Department of Experimental Animal Research, University of Technology, Pauwelsstrasse 30, D-52057 Aachen (Germany)

Purpose: To compare neointima formation following insertion of low-profile Nitinol stents, Palmaz stents, and Wallstents. Methods: Nitinol stents, Palmaz stents, and Wallstents similar in size were transfemorally inserted into the iliac arteries of 12 sheep. Four stents per sheep were deployed; the position of the stents was varied so that each type of stent was placed in each position (right or left, proximal or distal) with equal frequency. Stent patency was followed by angiography. Six sheep were euthanized after 1 month, and the remaining six after 6 months. Iliac arteries were removed en bloc and prepared for histological examination. Neointimal and medial thickness were measured by light microscopy, and measurements were analyzed statistically. Results: Mean neointimal thickness both over (NO) and between (NB) the stent struts was greater in Wallstents (NO = 0.341 mm, NB = 0.368 mm) than in the Nitinol (NO = 0.260 mm, NB = 0.220 mm) and Palmaz stents (NO = 0.199 mm, NB = 0.204 mm), but differences were not significant (p> 0.05). Medial atrophy in the area between the stent struts was greater in Wallstents compared with Nitinol and Palmaz stents (p < 0.007 and p < 0.02, respectively); in the area under the stent struts there was a significant difference only between Palmaz stents and Wallstents (p < 0.02). Conclusion: Under defined experimental conditions, none of the three types of stent appears to be preferable to the others regarding neointima formation in the short- to mid-term follow-up period.

OSTI ID:
21080520
Journal Information:
Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Vol. 19, Issue 4; Other Information: DOI: 10.1007/s002709900050; Copyright (c) 1996 Springer-Verlag New York Inc; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0174-1551
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Single and Tandem Stents in Sheep Iliac Arteries: Is There a Difference in Patency?
Journal Article · Tue Sep 15 00:00:00 EDT 1998 · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology · OSTI ID:21080520

Evaluation of Silicone as an Endovascular Stent Membrane: In Vivo Canine Studies
Journal Article · Sat Sep 15 00:00:00 EDT 2001 · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology · OSTI ID:21080520

Carotid Artery Stenting Using a Novel Self-Expanding Braided Nickel-Titanium Stent: Feasibility and Safety Porcine Trial
Journal Article · Tue Sep 15 00:00:00 EDT 2009 · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology · OSTI ID:21080520