skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Effect of Edema on Postimplant Dosimetry in Prostate Brachytherapy Using CT/MRI Fusion

Journal Article · · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
 [1]; ;  [1]; ;  [2];  [1];  [3];  [2];  [1]
  1. Department of Radiology, Gifu University School of Medicine, Gifu (Japan)
  2. Department of Urology, Gifu University School of Medicine, Gifu (Japan)
  3. Division of Radiation Oncology, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu City (Japan)

Purpose: To investigate the time course of prostatic edema and the effect on the dose-volume histograms of the prostate for patients treated with brachytherapy. Methods and Materials: A total of 74 patients with prostate cancer were enrolled in this prospective study. A transrectal ultrasound-based preplan was performed 4 weeks before implantation and computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging fusion-based postimplant dosimetry was performed on the day after implantation (Day 1) and 30 days after implantation (Day 30). The prostate volume, prostate volume covered by 100% of the prescription dose (V{sub 100}), and dose covering 90% of the prostate (D{sub 90}) were evaluated with prostatic edema over time. Results: Prostatic edema was greatest on Day 1, with the mean prostate volume 36% greater than the preplan transrectal ultrasound-based volume; it thereafter decreased over time. It was 9% greater than preplan volume on Day 30. The V{sub 100} increased 5.7% from Day 1 to Day 30, and the D{sub 90} increased 13.1% from Day 1 to Day 30. The edema ratio (postplan/preplan) on Day 1 of low-quality implants with a V{sub 100} of <80% was significantly greater than that of intermediate- to high-quality implants (>80% V{sub 100}; p = 0.0272). The lower V{sub 100} on Day 1 showed a greater increase from Day 1 to Day 30. A V{sub 100} on Day 1 of >92% is unlikely to increase >0% during the interval studied. Conclusion: Low-quality implants on Day 1 were highly associated with edema; however, such a low-quality implant on Day 1, with significant edema, tended to improve by Day 30. If a high-quality implant (V100 >92%) can be obtained on Day 1, a re-examination is no longer necessary.

OSTI ID:
21036267
Journal Information:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics, Vol. 69, Issue 2; Other Information: DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.05.082; PII: S0360-3016(07)01135-2; Copyright (c) 2007 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0360-3016
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Sequential evaluation of prostate edema after permanent seed prostate brachytherapy using CT-MRI fusion
Journal Article · Fri Jul 15 00:00:00 EDT 2005 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:21036267

Rectal-wall dose dependence on postplan timing after permanent-seed prostate brachytherapy
Journal Article · Thu Jun 01 00:00:00 EDT 2006 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:21036267

Evaluation of post-plan dosimetry using TRUS and CT after transperineal prostate seed implant
Journal Article · Tue Dec 31 00:00:00 EST 2002 · Medical Dosimetry · OSTI ID:21036267