skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Kilo-Voltage Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Setup Measurements for Lung Cancer Patients; First Clinical Results and Comparison With Electronic Portal-Imaging Device

Journal Article · · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
 [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [1]
  1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam (Netherlands)

Purpose: Kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has been developed to provide accurate soft-tissue and bony setup information. We evaluated clinical CBCT setup data and compared CBCT measurements with electronic portal imaging device (EPID) images for lung cancer patients. Methods and Materials: The setup error for CBCT scans at the treatment unit relative to the planning CT was measured for 62 patients (524 scans). For 19 of these patients (172 scans) portal images were also made. The mean, systematic setup error ({sigma}), and random setup error ({sigma}) were calculated for the CBCT and the EPID. The differences between CBCT and EPID and the rotational setup error derived from the CBCT were also evaluated. An offline shrinking action level correction protocol, based on the CBCT measurements, was used to reduce systematic setup errors and the impact of this protocol was evaluated. Results: The CBCT setup errors were significantly larger than the EPID setup errors for the cranial-caudal and anterior-posterior directions (p < 0.05). The mean overall setup errors after correction measured with the CBCT were 0.2 mm ({sigma} = 1.6 mm, {sigma} 2.9 mm) in the left-right, -0.8 mm ({sigma} = 1.7 mm, {sigma} = 4.0 mm) in cranial-caudal and 0.0 mm ({sigma} = 1.5 mm, {sigma} = 2.0 mm) in the anterior-posterior direction. Using our correction protocol only 2 patients had mean setup errors larger than 5 mm, without this correction protocol 51% of the patients would have had a setup error larger than 5 mm. Conclusion: Use of CBCT scans provided more accurate information concerning the setup of lung cancer patients than did portal imaging.

OSTI ID:
20951678
Journal Information:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics, Vol. 68, Issue 2; Other Information: DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.01.014; PII: S0360-3016(07)00129-0; Copyright (c) 2007 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands, All rights reserved; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0360-3016
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Breast Patient Setup Error Assessment: Comparison of Electronic Portal Image Devices and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Matching Results
Journal Article · Mon Nov 15 00:00:00 EST 2010 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:20951678

Image-Guided Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer Patients: Surgical Clips as Surrogate for Breast Excision Cavity
Journal Article · Tue Nov 01 00:00:00 EDT 2011 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:20951678

Variability of Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography Patient Models
Journal Article · Fri Feb 01 00:00:00 EST 2008 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:20951678