Electrical Resistivity Tomography of the 216-U-5 and 216-U-6 WA-1 Waste Sites
The subsurface below the 216-U-5 and 216-U-6 sites needs to be characterized as part of the remedial investigation of the 200-WA-1 operable unit at the Hanford Site. Electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) was selected as a first step in this characterization effort to provide information about the three-dimensional distribution of historically disposed waste fluids in the subsurface beneath these sites. ERT does not directly image specific contaminants. However, ERT provides a three-dimensional image of subsurface zones where the bulk electrical conductivity is higher than surrounding background values. Disposed waste fluids can increase the bulk electrical conductivity in the subsurface where they are present by increasing the moisture content and because the high concentration of waste-fluid constituents such as nitrate cause the fluid to have a higher specific conductance than background pore water. Thus, zones of increased bulk electrical conductivity in the subsurface can be interpreted as zones where waste fluids are present. An ERT survey of the subsurface beneath the 216-U-5 and 216-U-6 sites was conducted to collect ERT data suitable for interpreting the bulk electrical conductivity distribution in the subsurface. Data interpretation was applied using the NQA-1 qualified E4D ERT parallel modelling and inversion code (Johnson 2014). A summary cross-section and interpretation of the 216-U-5 and 216-U-6 ERT is provided in Figure S.1. The ERT image reveals two distinct zones of anomalous bulk conductivity emanating from 216-U-5 and 216-U-6 that merge at a depth of approximately 14 m below the surface and continue to a depth of no more than 26 m below the surface, which is approximately 60 m above the current water table elevation. The image also suggests that lateral transport of waste streams disposed into 216-U-5 and 216-U-6 was limited. These results are consistent with historical groundwater monitoring, which indicated that the disposed waste had not migrated to the water table, possibly due to the relatively low volumes of waste discharge into 216-U-5 and 216-U-6. The ERT information provides a line of evidence supporting this conclusion and can be used to guide the selection of characterization borehole(s) location and depth as needed for additional characterization of the contaminant distribution and properties at these sites. Locations of bulk conductivity anomalies associated with 216-U-5 and 216-U-6 releases are offset approximately 10 m to the west of the locations of 216-U-5 and 216-U-6 as recorded in the Waste Information Data System database. There are two predominant regions of elevated bulk conductivity in addition to those associated with 216-U-5 and 216-U-6. The first is located beneath Beloit Ave. from approximately 190 to 195 m in elevation. The small region of high conductivity directly beneath Beloit Ave. is likely an artifact resulting from the failure to account for the Beloit Ave. topographic rise in the ERT modeling, as that information was unavailable. Information concerning the precise positioning of the railroad tracks shown was also unavailable, particularly in the vertical dimension. The high conductivity anomaly beneath the assumed railroad track location is likely caused by misplacement of the tracks in the ERT model.
- Research Organization:
- Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
- Sponsoring Organization:
- USDOE
- DOE Contract Number:
- AC05-76RL01830
- OSTI ID:
- 1985281
- Report Number(s):
- PNNL-29430; WA1ERT-RPT-0001-Rev0.0; TRN: US2404389
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Re-Inversion of Surface Electrical Resistivity Tomography Data from the Hanford Site B-Complex
Geophysical Characterization and Monitoring of the 200 Area Treated Effluent Disposal Facility to Support Permit Renewal; TEDF Geophysical Monitoring