A Methodology for Robust Load Reduction in Wind Turbine Blades Using Flow Control Devices
Decades of wind turbine research, development and installation have demonstrated reductions in levelized cost of energy (LCOE) resulting from turbines with larger rotor diameters and increased hub heights. Further reductions in LCOE by up-scaling turbine size can be challenged by practical limitations such as the square-cube law: where the power scales with the square of the blade length and the added mass scales with the volume (the cube). Active blade load control can disrupt this trend, allowing longer blades with less mass. This paper presents the details of the development of a robust load control system to reduce blade fatigue loads. The control system, which we coined sectional lift control or SLC, uses a lift actuator model to emulate an active flow control device. The main contributions of this paper are: (1) Methodology for SLC design to reduce dynamic blade root moments in a neighborhood of the rotor angular frequency (1P). (2) Analysis and numerical evidence supporting the use of a single robust SLC for all wind speeds, without the need for scheduling on wind speed or readily available measurements such as collective pitch or generator angular speed. (3) Intuition and numerical evidence to demonstrate that the SLC and the turbine controller do not interact. (4) Evaluation of the SLC using a full suite of fatigue and turbine performance metrics.
- Research Organization:
- Arctura, Inc., South Kingstown, RI (United States)
- Sponsoring Organization:
- USDOE Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy (ARPA-E)
- Grant/Contract Number:
- AR0001011
- OSTI ID:
- 1788140
- Alternate ID(s):
- OSTI ID: 1848337
- Journal Information:
- Energies, Journal Name: Energies Vol. 14 Journal Issue: 12; ISSN 1996-1073
- Publisher:
- MDPI AGCopyright Statement
- Country of Publication:
- Switzerland
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Testing of a one-bladed 30-meter-diameter rotor on the DOE/NASA Mod-0 wind turbine
Toward control co-design of utility-scale wind turbines: Collective vs. individual blade pitch control