skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Big Sky Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (Phase III Final Scientific/Technical Report)

Technical Report ·
OSTI ID:1735344
ORCiD logo [1];  [2];  [1];  [3];  [2];  [1];  [2];  [4];  [1];  [2];  [5];  [1];  [6];  [2];  [7];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [2];  [5] more »;  [1];  [1];  [7];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [5];  [7];  [2];  [1];  [6];  [8];  [1];  [5];  [1];  [1];  [2];  [1];  [6];  [1];  [2] « less
  1. Montana State Univ., Bozeman, MT (United States)
  2. Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
  3. Vecta Oil and Gas, Ltd., Dallas, TX (United States)
  4. Montana State Univ., Bozeman, MT (United States); Vecta Oil and Gas, Ltd., Dallas, TX (United States)
  5. Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
  6. Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR (United States)
  7. Columbia Univ., Palisades, NY (United States). Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
  8. Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA (United States)

The Big Sky Carbon Sequestration Partnership (BSCSP) pursued a Phase III demonstration project at Kevin Dome in north central Montana. Kevin Dome covers approximately 700 square miles and is a naturally occurring CO2 reservoir that is flanked by oil and gas fields. The carbon dioxide (CO2) is in the upper Devonian Duperow (carbonate) formation and does not reach the spill point of the dome; therefore, the dome has potential as a CO2 sequestration reservoir, a CO2 supply, or as both if anthropogenic sources and enhanced oil recovery (EOR) operations are associated with the dome. Kevin Dome could potentially act as a buffer to continue accepting anthropogenic CO2 when EOR flooding operations are interrupted or completed. The project objective was to produce one million tonnes of CO2 from the gas cap of Kevin Dome, pipe it laterally, inject, and re-store it in the brine leg of the same formation to test the hub / buffer storage concept. This was to be accomplished by drilling up to five production wells, building a short pipeline and compression facilities, and drilling an injection well and several monitoring wells. BSCSP commenced outreach and site characterization activities including acquiring baseline data for near-surface insurance monitoring, acquiring 3-dimensional, 9-component surface seismic over the project area, drilling two test wells (one in the production area and one in the injection area), coring key intervals, and performing comprehensive logging. Well tests of those wells revealed two barriers to the project. The production (Danielson 33-17) well was perforated in multiple zones but failed to produce any significant CO2. This was despite being drilled in the near vicinity of a historic well that had produced 3700 MCF per day in a drill stem test. Modeling indicated that this was likely due to a phase change during production causing a temperature drop resulting in hydrate and/or water ice formation that clogged the formation. Tests of the injection zone (Wallewein 22-1) well indicated total dissolved solids (TDS) slightly below the EPA required 10,000 parts per million (ppm) for a Class VI underground injection control permit. While the project was initiated before Class VI rules were promulgated, and this was an experimental project (seemingly qualified for a Class V permit), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) indicated that injection would require a Class VI permit. The low salinity result was unexpected as contours plotted based on regional formation water quality data indicated an expected TDS above 20,000 ppm, and wells between the recharge zone and the Wallewein well tested above 10,000 ppm. Faced with the inability to obtain an injection permit, the demonstration project could not proceed. However, the project had generated valuable samples and data on a large natural analog including 32 sq. mi. of 3-D, 9-C seismic, 430 ft. of carbonate core covering seven different depositional environments taken from areas with, and without the presence of CO2, 30 ft. of core of two caprocks, a tight carbonate and an anhydrite, a full set of modern logs on both wells, and well tests. DOE decided to re-scope the project around completing studies utilizing this data. This report covers both the initial scope and the re-scope (Task / Section numbers preceded with an R). While the report covers a wide range of project activities, highlights of this work include: Development of a geostatic model using neural nets to match well logs to facies and using multi-waveform seismic to inform reservoir heterogeneity; Unique mechanical testing of permeability – stress relationship in two caprock materials; Development of full waveform inversion to generate a high resolution velocity model; Model development for dual permeability (fracture and matrix) systems to better account for matrix-matrix interactions; Joint seismic wave inversion (including the first quadr-joint inversion) exhibiting better imaging of a challenging reservoir zone in stiff rock; Core flow and core flood results on a reactive carbonate; and Innovative laboratory measurements of seismic response of fractured core as a function of fluid fill.

Research Organization:
Montana State Univ., Bozeman, MT (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
DOE Contract Number:
FC26-05NT42587
OSTI ID:
1735344
Report Number(s):
DOE-MontanaStateUniversity-2587
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (23)

Joint stratigraphic inversion of angle‐limited stacks conference March 2012
The big sky Carbon Sequestration Partnership Phase iii Kevin dome Project – site Characterization and Lessons Learned in Devonian Carbonates conference January 2017
Brittleness investigation of producing units in Three Forks and bakken formations, williston basin journal May 2016
Simultaneous inversion of PP and PS wave AVO/AVA data using simulated annealing conference March 2012
On producing CO 2 from subsurface reservoirs: simulations of liquid‐gas phase change caused by decompression journal February 2019
Determination of lithology and brittleness of rocks with a new attribute journal May 2015
Identification of thin sweet spots in the Duvernay Formation of north central Alberta conference August 2015
3D simultaneous joint PP-PS prestack seismic inversion at Schiehallion field, United Kingdom Continental Shelf: 3D simultaneous joint PP-PS prestack seismic inversion journal December 2013
Elastic parameter derivations from multi‐component data conference March 2012
Prestack 9‐C joint inversion for stratigraphic prediction in the Williston Basin conference March 2012
Water Saturation Relations and Their Diffusion-Limited Equilibration in Gas Shale: Implications for Gas Flow in Unconventional Reservoirs: WATER SATURATION RELATIONS IN GAS SHALE journal November 2017
Brittleness issues with geomechanical attributes from quadri-joint multicomponent inversion: Application to a real case, the Kevin Dome (Montana, US) conference August 2017
SVD for multioffset linearized inversion: Resolution analysis in multicomponent acquisition journal May 2001
Shear‐wave velocity and density estimation from PS -wave AVO analysis: Application to an OBS dataset from the North Sea journal September 2000
Simulation of industrial-scale CO2 storage: Multi-scale heterogeneity and its impacts on storage capacity, injectivity and leakage journal September 2012
Prospective CO2 saline resource estimation methodology: Refinement of existing US-DOE-NETL methods based on data availability journal November 2016
A method for quick assessment of CO2 storage capacity in closed and semi-closed saline formations journal October 2008
Joint PP and PS stratigraphic inversion for prestack time migrated multicomponent data conference March 2012
Useful approximations for converted‐wave AVO journal November 2001
Orientation of multicomponent receivers via semblance analysis conference September 2016
Approximate solutions for diffusive fracture-matrix transfer: Application to storage of dissolved CO 2 in fractured rocks : APPROXIMATE MASS TRANSFER SOLUTION journal February 2017
Combined interpretation of PP and PS data provides direct access to elastic rock properties journal June 2002
Warping of 9C Seismic Data and its Application to 9C Stratigraphic Pre-stack Inversion - A Real Case Study from the BIG SKY CO2 Project (Montana, US) conference June 2017