skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Li 6 in a three-body model with realistic Forces: Separable versus nonseparable approach

Journal Article · · Physical Review C
 [1];  [2];  [2];  [3];  [1]
  1. Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI (United States). National Superconducting Cyclotron Lab. and Dept. of Physics and Astronomy
  2. Ohio Univ., Athens, OH (United States). Inst. of Nuclear and Particle Physics and Dept. of Physics and Astronomy
  3. Julich Research Centre, JHCP and JARA-HPC (Germany). Inst. of Plasma Physics and Nuclear Physics

Background: Deuteron induced reactions are widely used to probe nuclear structure and astrophysical information. Those (d, p) reactions may be viewed as three-body reactions and described with Faddeev techniques. Purpose: Faddeev equations in momentum space have a long tradition of utilizing separable interactions in order to arrive at sets of coupled integral equations in one variable. However, it needs to be demonstrated that their solution based on separable interactions agrees exactly with solutions based on nonseparable forces. Methods: Momentum space Faddeev equations are solved with nonseparable and separable forces as coupled integral equations. Results: The ground state of 6Li is calculated via momentum space Faddeev equations using the CD-Bonn neutron-proton force and a Woods-Saxon type neutron(proton)-4He force. For the latter the Pauli-forbidden S-wave bound state is projected out. This result is compared to a calculation in which the interactions in the two-body subsystems are represented by separable interactions derived in the Ernst-Shakin-Thaler (EST) framework. Conclusions: We find that calculations based on the separable representation of the interactions and the original interactions give results that agree to four significant figures for the binding energy, provided that energy and momentum support points of the EST expansion are chosen independently. The momentum distributions computed in both approaches also fully agree with each other.

Research Organization:
Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI (United States); Ohio Univ., Athens, OH (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA); National Science Foundation (NSF); German Research Foundation (DFG); National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)
Contributing Organization:
Julich Supercomputing Centre (JSC) (Germany); Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States). National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC)
Grant/Contract Number:
NA0002132; NSF-PHY-1520972; NSF-PHY-1520929; FG02-93ER40756; 11621131001; TRR110; AC02-05CH11231
OSTI ID:
1463321
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1414847
Journal Information:
Physical Review C, Vol. 96, Issue 6; ISSN 2469-9985
Publisher:
American Physical Society (APS)Copyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 10 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (49)

Energy levels of light nuclei A = 5−10 journal December 1988
Excluded bound state in the S 1 2 α N interaction and the three-body binding energies of He 6 and Li 6 journal June 1982
Applications of Nuclear Science for Stewardship Science journal March 2013
Erratum: Nucleon polarization in three-body models of polarized Li 6 journal July 1995
Accurate nucleon-nucleon potential with charge-independence breaking journal January 1995
Nucleon-Deuteron Scattering with $\Delta $ -Isobar Excitation, I: Test of Separable Expansion journal December 1998
Separable representation of energy-dependent optical potentials journal March 2016
Separable-potential three-body model of the A = 6 system. II. Li 6 ground state journal February 1978
Benchmark calculation of p H 3 and n He 3 scattering journal March 2017
Testing the continuum-discretized coupled channels method for deuteron-induced reactions journal May 2012
Deuteron stripping and pickup involving the halo nuclei Be 11 and C 15 journal May 2009
Angular-momentum reduction of the faddeev equations journal June 1969
Scattering and break-up of deuterons on α-particles in a realistic three-body model journal August 1983
Renormalization of one-pion exchange and power counting journal November 2005
Separable representation of the Bonn nucleon-nucleon potential journal February 1986
Construction of high-quality NN potential models journal June 1994
Iterative Methods for Sparse Linear Systems book January 2003
Neutron Single Particle Structure in Sn 131 and Direct Neutron Capture Cross Sections journal October 2012
Constraint of the Astrophysical Al 26 g ( p , γ ) Si 27 Destruction Rate at Stellar Temperatures journal May 2015
Isospin dependent global nucleon-nucleus optical model at intermediate energies journal September 2009
Three-body Faddeev-Alt-Grassberger-Sandhas approach to direct nuclear reactions journal January 2009
Accurate charge-dependent nucleon-nucleon potential at fourth order of chiral perturbation theory journal October 2003
α- d resonances and the low-lying states of Li 6 journal December 1992
Faddeev-type calculation of three-body nuclear reactions including core excitation journal July 2013
Generalized Faddeev equations in the Alt-Grassberger-Sandhas form for deuteron stripping with explicit inclusion of target excitations and Coulomb interaction journal September 2012
Separable approximations of two-body interactions journal January 1983
Benchmark test calculation of a four-nucleon bound state journal August 2001
Halo Nucleus Be 11 : A Spectroscopic Study via Neutron Transfer journal May 2012
The Formal Theory of Scattering journal July 1953
Pauli blocking in three-body models of halo nuclei journal January 2000
Toward a complete theory for predicting inclusive deuteron breakup away from stability journal September 2017
R-matrix formulation and phase shifts for n-4He and p-4He scattering for energies up to 20 MeV journal January 1972
Direct reaction measurements with a 132 Sn radioactive ion beam journal September 2011
Nucleon polarization in three-body models of polarized Li 6 journal December 1993
A realistic three-body model of 6Li with local interactions journal January 1979
Local and global nucleon optical models from 1 keV to 200 MeV journal January 2003
Adiabatic approximation versus exact Faddeev method for ( d , p ) and ( p , d ) reactions journal September 2011
Separable-potential three-body model of the A = 6 system. I. He 6 ground state journal May 1974
Separable representation of proton-nucleus optical potentials journal December 2014
Compound-nuclear reaction cross sections from surrogate measurements journal March 2012
Separable representation of phenomenological optical potentials of Woods-Saxon type journal December 2013
Quality of the three-nucleon bound-state wave function from a two-nucleon separable expansion method journal June 1991
The orthogonal projection method in scattering theory journal April 1978
High-precision, charge-dependent Bonn nucleon-nucleon potential journal January 2001
Separable Representations of Two-Body Interactions journal July 1973
A global nucleon optical model potential journal March 1991
Predictions of the Paris N - N potential for three-nucleon continuum observables: Comparison of two approaches journal June 1990
Separable representations of T matrices valid in the vicinity of off-shell points journal May 1974
Bound state properties of Borromean halo nuclei: 6He and 11Li journal August 1993

Similar Records

Deuteron-α scattering: Separable versus nonseparable Faddeev approach
Journal Article · Tue Sep 10 00:00:00 EDT 2019 · Physical Review C · OSTI ID:1463321

Effects of the three-body force in three-nucleon systems
Journal Article · Sun May 01 00:00:00 EDT 1994 · Physical Review, C (Nuclear Physics); (United States) · OSTI ID:1463321

Longitudinal Wobbling Motion in Au187
Journal Article · Wed Feb 05 00:00:00 EST 2020 · Physical Review Letters · OSTI ID:1463321