skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Three Confinement Systems—Spherical Tokamak, Standard Tokamak, and Stellarator: A Comparison of Key Component Cost Elements

Journal Article · · IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science
ORCiD logo [1]
  1. Princeton Plasma Physics Lab. (PPPL), Princeton, NJ (United States)
+ Show Author Affiliations

Since the 1950s “next-step” fusion devices and power plant studies have been developed for a number of magnetic confinement systems but an open question remains: can a magnetic fusion device be simplified to the point where it will be cost competitive and operate with high availability? Concept designs based on the ARIES advanced tokamak, spherical tokamak (ST), and the quasi-axisymmetric (QAS) stellarator option have progressed in recent years through a series of Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL) studies with an underlying intent to improve the engineering feasibility of each, giving special attention to concepts that simplify the device configuration and improve maintenance features. For the ST option, design details centered on a 3-m Fusion Nuclear Science Facility that evolved to incorporate vertical maintenance, high temperature superconductor magnets, a small inboard duel coolant lead lithium blanket, and a liquid metal divertor. In collaboration with the Korean fusion demonstration reactor (K-DEMO) and CFETR concept study teams the tokamak design has evolved to increase plasma component access within a vertical maintenance approach using enlarged toroidal field coils incorporating a low- and high-field Nb3Sn winding pack that provide a peak field of 16 T. A recent PPPL stellarator study focused on simplifying the stellarator winding topology to improve access to in-vessel components; combining coil optimization with winding surfaces that incorporated geometry constraints specified by engineering. This paper centered on a 1000-MW power plant design with a tokamak like vertical maintenance scheme that allows access to remove large internal blanket sectors. Results of three confinement studies (PPPL developed ST, K-DEMO, and QAS stellarator) will be presented to highlight concepts that simplify each device configuration and improved their maintenance features. Furthermore, scaling each option to a common 1000-MW net electric power plant mission allows comparisons to be made of key cost elements such as the size of major core components, sizing of the reactor hall, or external facilities needed to handle and store activated in-vessel components.

Research Organization:
Princeton Plasma Physics Lab. (PPPL), Princeton, NJ (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
Grant/Contract Number:
AC02-09CH1146
OSTI ID:
1459555
Journal Information:
IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, Vol. 46, Issue 6; ISSN 0093-3813
Publisher:
IEEECopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Figures / Tables (29)

Fig. IV-1(p. 3)figure Fig. IV-1
Fig. IV-2(p. 3)figure Fig. IV-2
Fig. V-1(p. 4)figure Fig. V-1
Fig. V-2(p. 4)figure Fig. V-2
Fig. V-3(p. 4)figure Fig. V-3
Fig. V-4(p. 5)figure Fig. V-4
Fig. V-5(p. 5)figure Fig. V-5
Fig. V-6(p. 6)figure Fig. V-6
Figure V-7a(p. 6)figure Figure V-7a
Figure V-7b(p. 6)figure Figure V-7b
Fig V-9(p. 7)figure Fig V-9
Fig. V-8(p. 7)figure Fig. V-8
Fig. V-10(p. 8)figure Fig. V-10
Fig. VI-1(p. 9)figure Fig. VI-1
Fig. VI-2(p. 9)figure Fig. VI-2
Table I(p. 10)table Table I
Table II(p. 10)table Table II
Fig. VI-3(p. 11)figure Fig. VI-3
Fig. VI-4(p. 11)figure Fig. VI-4
Fig. VI-5(p. 11)figure Fig. VI-5
Fig. VI-6(p. 11)figure Fig. VI-6
Fig VI-7(p. 12)figure Fig VI-7
Fig. VI-10(p. 12)figure Fig. VI-10
Fig. VI-8(p. 12)figure Fig. VI-8
Fig. VI-9(p. 12)figure Fig. VI-9
Fig. VI-11(p. 13)figure Fig. VI-11
Fig. VI-12(p. 13)figure Fig. VI-12
Fig. VI-13(p. 13)figure Fig. VI-13
Fig. VI-14(p. 14)figure Fig. VI-14

Similar Records

Results of availability imposed configuration details developed for K-DEMO
Journal Article · Fri Feb 05 00:00:00 EST 2016 · Fusion Engineering and Design · OSTI ID:1459555
+4 more
Design, construction, and testing of no-insulation small subscale solenoids for compact tokamaks
Journal Article · Tue Aug 31 00:00:00 EDT 2021 · Superconductor Science and Technology · OSTI ID:1459555
+1 more
PPPL ST-FNSF Engineering Design Details
Journal Article · Tue Jun 30 00:00:00 EDT 2015 · Fusion Science and Technology · OSTI ID:1459555
+1 more

Related Subjects

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY
in-vessel arrangement
maintenance approach
reduced part count
simplifying feature